WEBVTT - Let's Make a List

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:04.359
<v Speaker 1>And now, o muses dwellers in the mansions of Olympus,

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>tell me for your goddesses and are in all places,

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>so that you see all things, while we know nothing

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>but by report? Who were the chiefs and princes of

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the Danaans. As for the common soldiers, they were so

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that I could not name every single one of them,

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>though I had ten tongues, and though my voice failed,

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>not and my heart were of bronze within me, unless you,

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>o Olympian muses, daughters of Egists bearing Jove, were to

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>recount them to me. Nevertheless, I will tell the captains

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of the ships and all the fleet together, Welcome to

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow your mind from How Stuffworks dot Com. Hey,

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>welcome to stuff to Blow your mind. My name is

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb, and I'm Joe McCormick, and today we're going

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to be taught talking about lists. So that opening was

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>from the Samuel Butler translation of the Iliad, and it

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>proceeds a section of the Iliad that's often known as

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the Catalog of Ships. If you remember, Iliot has a

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of sections where it kind of lists things. This

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is like the most famous list in it um. It's

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>this long list of the ships and the leaders of

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the Achaean expeditionary force called the Denayans in that passage,

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>and so to get a sense of the many items

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of the lists that follows, I think maybe we should

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we should read a couple more of them. They've got

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of tricky Greek names, but we'll do our

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>best for them. I'll take the first one. Okay, Escalaphus

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and Almana, sons of Mars, led by people that dwelt

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in Asplodon and or common Us, the realm of Minnius.

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>A Styachy, a noble maiden, bore them in the house

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of act Or, son of Asius, for she had gone

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>with Mars secretly into an upper chamber, and he had

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>lain with her. With these there came thirty ships. It

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>sounds a big gossip, he doesn't. I thought, you're just

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>naming ships, and now you're you're having to tell me

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>who's sleeping with who as well. Well, they're naming like

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the captains and the numbers of people and where they

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>came from. But they also got to slip in a

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit of like a divine rumor. Yeah, all right,

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 1>it continues. The fierce Abantes held Via with its cities Calcus,

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Rita Historia, rich in vines, Corinthus upon the sea, and

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the rock pushed town of Beam. With them were also

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the men of Caristus and Steira. Elephin Or of the

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>race of Mars, was in command of these. He was

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>son of Calcodon and chief over all the Abantes. With

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>him they came fleet afoot and wearing their long hair, behind,

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>brave warriors who had ever strived to tear open the

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>corsets of their foes with their long ash and spears.

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Of these there came fifty ships, and they that held

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the strong city of Athens, the people of great Erecttheus,

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>who was born of the soil itself. But Jove's daughter

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Minerva fostered them and established him at Athens in her

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>own rich sanctuary. There year by year the Athenian youths

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 1>worship him with sacrifices of bulls and rams. These were

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>commanded by Menestheus, son of Peteus. No man living could

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>equal him in the marshaling of chariots and foot soldiers.

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Nestor could alone rival him, for he was older. With him,

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>there came fifty ships, but there are a lot of

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>these in the poem. Uh. This passage in the Iliad

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is interesting because there's a lot of debate about its

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>origin and authorship, like is it part of the original poem?

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it a later insertion? Is it maybe a gradual

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>accretion as audiences of the epic song in every locale

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to hear their own local tribe and legendary hero

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>incorporated into the story. But it's also something that calls

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>attention to itself simply be cause it is a list.

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a list of so it's a list and accounting

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of things, a list of numbers of ships, of their commanders,

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of the numbers of soldiers they brought. And it is

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle of a poem. Uh. And we

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>might not often think of like a list of forces

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>as having a very like literary or poetic quality, but

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess they're They're also scholars who would disagree with that.

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>For example, Umberto Echo, the medievalist and Simiatitian and author

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>including of the Name of the Rose, which I just

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>read for the first time this year, and I loved. Yeah,

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:36.679
<v Speaker 1>but Echo loved lists. He was pretty much obsessed with lists,

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and he clearly considered them not like a deviation from

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>poetic form, but a really valuable form of art and

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>object of study, So much so that in two thousand nine,

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>when Echo was invited to curate an exhibition at the Louver,

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the subject of the exhibition he put together was the list.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could have seen that, and umberto Echo

0:04:56.200 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>curated exhibit on lists. But he was interviewed that year

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>by Der Spiegel and ended up talking a lot about

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>his fascination with the power of lists. In the interview,

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the central examples he talks about is the

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.279
<v Speaker 1>catalog of ships from the Iliad. So Echo says in

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the interview, quote take Homer for example. In the Iliad,

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>he tries to convey an impression of the size of

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the Greek army. At first, he uses similes, and he

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>quotes as when some great forest fire is raging upon

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a mountaintop and its light is seen afar. Even so

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>as they marched, the gleam of their armor flashed up

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>onto the firmament of heaven. But Echo continues, but he

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't satisfied. He can't find the right metaphor, and so

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>he begs the muses to help him. Then he hits

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>on the idea of naming many many generals and their ships.

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>And then later in the interview, he says, quote Homer's

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>work hits again and again on the tow posts of

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the inexpressible. People will always do that. We have always

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>been fascinated by infinite space, by endless stars, and by galaxies.

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Upon alexis, how does a person feel when looking at

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the sky, He thinks that he doesn't have enough tongues

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.239
<v Speaker 1>to describe what he sees. Nevertheless, people have never stopped

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.679
<v Speaker 1>describing the sky, simply listing what they see. Lovers are

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in the same position. They experience a deficiency of language,

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>a lack of words to express their feelings. But do

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>lovers ever stop trying to do so? They create lists.

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Your eyes are so beautiful, and so is your mouth

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and your collarbone. One could go into great detail. And

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there's something interesting in what Echo says there.

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>What he says makes me think of other poems like

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>the Song of Solomon and the Hebrew Bible and uh

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>like you know, Elizabeth Barrett Browning, how do I love

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>thee Let me count the ways I love you in

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the morning and in the afternoon. I'll love you in

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the evening underneath the moon. Oh yeah, I will not

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>eat it with a goat them, eat it on a boat,

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Well, even in Sam I Am and the

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Green Eggs and Ham, I think there's something going on

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>there with the use of a list to try to

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>convey what cannot be expressed in in simple language. The

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>idea that, like one's discussed, is without bounds. You know,

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you have infinite disgust for the idea of green eggs

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.559
<v Speaker 1>and ham, and so all you can do is start

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>listing all the ways you would not eat it, right,

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But then ultimately, like each one is, is each argument

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>against trying the green eggs and ham is just as

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous is the last, because the whole argument is we'll

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>try it, give it a try, and eventually he does.

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, there's it's it's there's a lot of listing

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in that particular, But there's a lot of listing, I guess,

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and kind of lyrical um fiction, lyrical children's books especially.

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Another example that came up they will probably bring up

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>again is the is the night before Christmas the naming

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of the reindeer, Like all the reindeer must be named

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and listed as part of this. There's there's almost kind

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of a magical spell quality to it. Yeah, absolutely, Yeah,

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the recitation of figures of qualities. Another one I think

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of a great list in in poetic form that sort

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of conjures a magical environment of inexpressible quality is The

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Goblin Market by Christina Rossetti. Yeah, that's a fun one.

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>We actually helped record a reading of the Goblin Market

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for movie. It was then food Stuff, now known as

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a Saver the podcast hosted by a Lauren Vogel bomb

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>In any Reese Well have to include a link to

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that on the landing page for this episode. That was

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a really fun episode. But it what what? What is?

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>What happens in that poem? So the basic plot of

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the poem is it's about some a pair of sisters

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>who are corrupted by these goblins who are selling sort

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of supernatural fruits at a market. But there there are

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>these long sections where the goblins are just listing all

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of the fruits, and it goes on and on and

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>on more and more fruits, and it eventually has this

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 1>cumulative quality where it suggests that the fruits are infinite. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:55.839
<v Speaker 1>there are there are a lot of encind of this,

0:08:55.920 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot in uh, you know, rich descriptions of places

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>and settings, um where where the author will just just

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>dive in head first and just describing one thing after

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the other, just really really list the sights and sounds

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of a particular uh scene. Yeah, exactly. And so it's

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting that there's uh the use of lists and in

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the literary sense, I feel like has completely opposite usages

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in which it works both ways. One way is an

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 1>author can use a list to sort of suggest infinity

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and inexpressibility, like qualities that are beyond measure and beyond

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>counting can be suggested by listing. But at the same time,

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you can use a list to start to make understandable

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and make manageable something that otherwise is is completely chaotic

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't make sense to you. Like another quote of

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Umberto Echoes in that interview is he says, quote, the

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>list is the origin of culture. It's part of the

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>history of art and literature. What does culture want to

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>make infinity comprehensible? It wants to create order, not always

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 1>but often. And how is a human being does one

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>face infinity? How does one attempt to grasp the incomprehensible

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>through lists, through catalogs, through collections and museums and through

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>encyclopedias and dictionaries. Well, certainly if you begin to list

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>something and it gives you the ability to then break

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>up that list into consumable parts. Like, for instance, the

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>list of all organisms on the planet is an ongoing

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>list that has not yet been finished. Uh, we continually

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>add new species to it, and yet by subdividing that list,

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>we have a really good idea of of what the

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>basic shape of life on planet Earth consists of. Yeah. Yeah,

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you can construct an evolutionary tree by making lists of

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>organisms and then listing their characteristics and then comparing your lists.

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think of making a list is often

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>similar to um, there's a process at the beginning of

0:10:55.679 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>cleaning a messy room, you know, where at first a

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>mass is sort of a singular quality. It's just like

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a thing that you are faced with, and it has

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>this unified evil, magic and aura that cannot be penetrated.

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>And the best way to deal with it is start

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like making a catalog of Okay, what's

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>actually here, and sometimes you'll make piles of things and stuff.

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Essentially you're sort of physically making a list out of

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>individual elements. From what was originally just a mess. Oh absolutely,

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>with a with a proper list of a task that

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>would otherwise seem insurmountable can seem beatable. Be it something

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that does have a definite end to it, say, like

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a like a long legal process, like say an adoption process.

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 1>That was my experience. It was a very very long

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>process to reach the endpoint. But you know, you divided

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it up, and indeed the first step is just like, well,

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>let's look at the list. Likewise, though, we also take

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>this same thing and we apply it to such situations

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.599
<v Speaker 1>as say, human mortality. And if you take just the

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>bucket list, well, not just that, but say Aubrey De

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Gray's approach to actual mortality, like, you know, how can

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>we beat death? Well we can, Well, let's start by

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 1>just dividing it up into winnable avenues, like winnable battles. Yeah,

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and even though so Aubrey de Gray, if you're not familiar,

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>he's like a gerontologist and general a smart guy, I think,

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>but he he's tried to address the problem of aging

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and said, hey, let's not treat this as an inevitability.

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we can scientifically beat aging and stop you know,

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>death from Old Age, from Happening Um and the way

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>he approached it. I think, though a lot of people

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>disagree with his confidence in his you know, prediction that

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we can beat the problem. The way he approached it is,

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>let's break death and aging down into a list of

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>all of the things that go wrong. And that's a

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a brilliant way of looking at it. Even if

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>he's wrong about what we can do. Just seeing the

0:12:55.800 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>like actual number of problems in aging in new a

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>rated and named it gives you suddenly this feeling of

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>power over the problem that you didn't have before. Yeah said,

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you start thinking, well, maybe this wizardy looking guy does

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>have a point. Maybe we can beat death death It

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't isn't that big of a deal. He does have

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a magnificent beard, he's like he's like a resputant of life.

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And so I think maybe this should lead us to

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>make a distinction. That's an important distinction when it comes

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to lists. I was thinking about, like finite versus infinite games.

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>There's also a big difference in in the way lists

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>play roles in our lives depending on whether they're finite

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>or infinite. Lists. Like we make finite lists of things.

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I think in order to better understand something, so like

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a list of organs in the human body. And then meanwhile,

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you make an infinite list in order to try to

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 1>begin to address an infinite problem, like, you know, how

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>do you express an unbounded feeling of love for somebody?

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>You start listing the ways or how do you live

0:13:57.840 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>your life? Well, one way to do that is to

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>try to make it to do list. Ideally, a to

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>do list is not something where you're like, Okay, I'm

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>done with all my tasks and I can just stop

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>living now. It's just something that you're trying to prioritize

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole future you have in front of you. I

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>have to admit that the the idea of infinite lists

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>here is is maybe a little confusing to me, because

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking, like, is there really an infinite number of

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>reasons that once they loves their spouse? I mean, there's

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>there's probably a finite list of things. I mean, the

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the human experience is only so varied, right, Well, I

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>mean you could keep breaking down reasons into smaller and

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>smaller sub reasons. I guess, so, yeah, that's right. You

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>could sort of of what you know, a foot race

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>with Achilles. Yeah, you can pull that number off. I mean, likewise,

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you could say the stars in the sky, to a

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>certain extent, the human experience, there's sort of a small

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>eye infinity there, though of course there is there is

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>there is a definite, finite number out there. So I mean,

0:14:58.320 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>in the same way you could say there is no

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>such thing is an infinite game, because eventually we'll have

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the heat death of the universe and nothing can go

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>on forever. But I mean things that are things that

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>are for your purposes infinite, like you never to do

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>list is something you might cross all of the items

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>off of, but that doesn't mean you've run out of

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>things to do, all right, fair enough, fair enough. But

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>then on on the other side of lists, one of

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the things that I often think about is how how

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>funny it often is to me, just how funny listicals

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>are to me. We've both worked in web publishing, and

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>oh man, there was a period. I mean, I guess

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>listicles are actually still popular, like they do well on

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and end on, you know, on social media and

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>all that. But but back in the day, I remember,

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>especially like for Google Search and like homepage optimization, trying

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to make trying to make the house Stuff Works homepage clicky.

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It was. It was listicals all the way down. Oh yes, yes,

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and some of them are were quite good. I remember

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>even when we're putting out a bunch of towing articles

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>at the time, there was one top ten that they

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>spun out of that effort to a top ten Heaviest

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Things Moved by Man, which is a fun little article. Yeah,

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, yeah, I mean I can enjoy good listical.

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I know, Robert. I think even the past expressed your

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>love for for a good cracked listical, right, Yeah, I

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>have enjoyed some of some of those cracked listicals in

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the past. I also really like some of the um

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the ClickHole listicles. Those are amazing. Like I think it's

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>like five or ten signs that your therapist is about

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to go to six flags after your session, you know,

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that I'm always on board for. Well, that's

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>what ClickHole is great for, is like just highlighting the

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>bear absurdity that lies underneath the Internet content strategies. But yeah,

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I remember back in the day, like around two thousand

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and ten, some of the listicles going up on Discovery

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and TLC were so funny to me. It was like

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it would be things, you know, like ten backyard games

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>your Golden Retriever will love. Yeah, I think so. So

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>there are a few different appealing aspects of the top ten, right,

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I Mean A big one is that it's easily absorbed,

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the ideas that I'm I'm not I'm in a hurry.

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I don't even really want to read this article,

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's a top ten. So at the very least

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>I could scan the ten items and I kind of

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>instantly want to know what made the list and what didn't.

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's very Yeah, I think that's exactly right.

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Scannability is a big part of it, right, especially with

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>things that are because so there are different types of

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>top ten's obviously or ten or list based things. Sometimes

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 1>there are a process. For instance, the so many wiki

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>how articles that are a list of ten steps to

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 1>do something including there there. I found one the other

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>day for faking your own death, so it's everything from

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>fixing a toilet to faking your own death. My favorite

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>eh how article of all time that I ever found,

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I checked recently. It's not still up, but

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it was how to pray for money. Um, yeah, so

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that so there's that area, and then there's the ranking

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of things like the ten best superhero movies, um or,

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and so you want to click on that because you

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>just want to Maybe you're just you're comagined and you

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>just want to notice what they didn't include and and

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>shame them for what they did include. Well, the top

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>ten ranking thing is I think popular for multiple reasons.

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Number one, I mean, humans, even though we don't like

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to admit this, we clearly look to other people to

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>form our own tastes, right, you know, we we start

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to think, I should have my own ideas of what's

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 1>the top ten movies in next category, and then like

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at other people's ideas gives you something to react to,

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>either to base yours on theirs, or to react against

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>it or whatever. But it's also popular, I think for

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the same reason that like You're doing it wrong articles

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 1>are popular. It feels like an aggressive, opinionated statement that

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>is highly tempting to argue with. Right, yeah, and and

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly sharing like five five films that shaped you or whatever,

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, whatever the current version of it that's going

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>around on social media is a great statement of self.

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's say it's it's a way of sort

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of summing up your character in a selection of films

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>or books or albums or what have you. Yes, at

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the same time that it's easy to share by it's

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>easy for audience members to share because you know, it's

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>fun to say, I disagree. How could they leave off

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you forgot X? Yeah? We we could. I mean, we

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>even we don't do top ten episodes, but one of

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 1>the most common types of emails we get is I

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>can't believe you forgot to mention X when we're like

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you know, giving a selection of examples of something.

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Whenever we do a list. Yeah, yeah, I mean, and

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we do really forget to mention things, or we

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have them in the notes and we

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>don't mention. The other times we just don't know about them. Yeah,

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the the other problem about trying to make any

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of fully inclusive list. Yeah. So, I think for

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the rest of this episode, we we should try to

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>think about what what is the role of the list

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:54.479
<v Speaker 1>in human culture? And for a couple of things we're

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>going to focus on. I think one should be the

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to do list and the psychological power of the to

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>do list. The other one would be the idea of

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 1>a list as a type of literature media. Why is

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it so popular? Why why does it work? Yeah, I

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>think it's interesting to think of lis even just purely

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>in an entertainment um and and even outside of the

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>necessity their necessity and things like crafting, mixology, cooking, building

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a Lego kid. I mean, those are the things where

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>you you need a series of steps to follow in

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>order to get it right. Oh man, what is the

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Is there like a visual version of a s MR?

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what when you just get like goose bumps,

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>like seeing an image of a toy from your childhood.

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>For me, it would be Lego instructions and they've only

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 1>gotten better, Joe. That's the thing when when I read

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>let current Lego kit instructions versus older Lego instructions, that

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>they're just they's they're so clear and precise, that can

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>follow them so easily. Um, they should do instructions for everything.

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>You're just mocking me, like I should leave the studio

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and go buy some Legos to play with right now.

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>You should go buy yourself Hogwarts and and have at it.

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>That one. That one has a lot of steps to it.

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I keep saying I think one of the best things

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>about having kids has got to be that you get

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to play with legos again. Yeah, and then step on

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 1>legos again. The Harry Potter sorting hat, by the way,

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>specially painful to step on. That's probably the most painful

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 1>lego I've ever stepped up anyway. Outside of children's play things,

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>you also find a lot of lists in um you know,

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 1>in in in and say video games for all ages. Well,

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of video games are highly acquisitive in nature,

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, you accumulate stuff in them. Oh yeah, Like

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the main example, UM I I have right now is

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Fallout seventy six because that's that's a game I'm currently playing.

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And uh I stopped though to think the other day

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is as we were talking about doing this episode, that

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>there's man man. There sure are a lot of lists

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 1>in this game because you open your inventory and what

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>is it a series of lists like there's a great

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a big list, and then you can break down

0:21:56.560 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>your list into sub lists of the various weapons are humors,

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>bits of scrap, junk notes, uh, hollow tapes, etcetera. So

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just one big list. And then when you when

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:08.959
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the things you're trying to do

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in the game. There are a whole there's a whole

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>other like wide array of to do lists. You get

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>your like your main quest items, your side quests, your

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>daily quest. Uh, it's just a game full of lists.

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:25.959
<v Speaker 1>The story is a list of mission objectives and what well,

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I haven't played seventy six. I assume it's

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>like the other followut games. Oh yeah, basically the same concept. Yeah,

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's just a list of things you have

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to have to get done, which is kind of weird

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that we we sometimes retreat from our real life of

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to do lists and then we go into a fantasy

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>world where we have, you know, another list that we

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>have to do, and it's not necessarily this just simple

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>equation of well, your your your real life list is

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>harder to do and you have it's it's you know,

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the video game is a world in which everything is simplified. No,

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the to do list is impossible in the video

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>game world as well, Yeah, for for varying reasons. But

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>but yet we we go to it and we expect

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it to be there now here. Here's another question though,

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.439
<v Speaker 1>aside from like internet content type listicles, I mean, like

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>lists within broader works of fiction or or something. What

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>What is it that makes a list inherently entertaining? Some

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 1>lists are boring and other lists are really engrossing. I

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>remember looking at lists of things in my like Star

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Wars Illustrated Encyclopedia when I was a little kid, and

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I was like, this is a good list. Oh yeah.

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>When it when it comes to the lore and the

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>glossary of any kind of created world, and I'm instantly

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>on board for any of that, Like things like, uh,

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the appendix to The Lord of the Rings

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>or Dune. The Dune Glossary is almost as good as

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the novel itself. Absolutely, The Dune Encyclopedia, even though it's

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>not technically Cannon was one of my favorites when I

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>was younger. Um, yeah, pretty much any book that I

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>really get into, the Second Apocalypse saga or the Game

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 1>of Thrones books, you know, like give me, give me

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>an alphabetized list of all the names, places, and things

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>in a given universe, and I'll just I'll read through it.

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm currently reading the Harry Potter Monster Book to my son.

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Or it's an alphabetical listing of various magical beasts from

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the setting. He does he get down with lists two

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>um I will. I don't know if he's as down

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>with lists as I am, but he's really into Harry Potter,

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>so that works. But but yeah, outside of that though,

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>like like, for instance, Lord of the Rings, Okay, like

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of built around a whole list, isn't it.

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean you kick off the whole novel with this

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 1>list of rings and who has them, and it's vital

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to the the basic setup of the entire saga, even

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>better than it's a rhymed list though. Yeah, yeah, the

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>whole three rings for Elphin King's under the sky, seven

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>for dwarf lords in their Halls of Stone. It's usually

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>read with some degree of drama, but I often wondered, like,

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>what if it what if it was just this was

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>just written on a like a cocktail napkin, and Sauron

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>just had it on hand. He's like, all right, what

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 1>am I making today? Okay? I gotta make three rings

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>for Alvin kings under the sky, seven for dwarflords in

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>their Hall of nine geez, nine for mortal men doom

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 1>to die. That's a lot. I don't know why I

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>said nine, okay, with the one for me on my

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>dark throne right here in more door, etcetera. But then,

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>of course, because he's the lord of mort Or, the

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to do list just ends up gloating right and in

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the darkness behind them. Yeah, I've never thought about it

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>that way. I like that it's it's Saron's to do

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>list from before the rings were made. So I think

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that should steer us into talking about the power and

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.239
<v Speaker 1>nature of to do list. But first we should take

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>a break and we come back. We'll discuss some of

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the psychology of to do lists. Than all right, we're back, Robert.

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you find to do lists useful? Yeah, to a

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>certain extent. I mean, so sometimes it's a matter of

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>just having a reminder, right, Like on my hand, I

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>have the remnants of it to do list for today

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>that include picking up two items from from various stores,

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise I might forget them if I didn't have them

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>written on my hand. And likewise, if I have more

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>than two items to pick up at a given store,

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I need a list of those otherwise I'll forget them.

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean a LISTA lists are necessary for

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>tackling various larger projects. And especially if you're approaching something

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>from a project management standpoint, uh, something like say launching

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a podcast. That's the kind of checklist we see a

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 1>lot around here when there's a new podcast that rolls out.

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>When we roll that invention for existing for for instance,

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 1>there was a standardized list of things that needed to

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>be done, that needed to be figured out, that needed

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to be started or assigned to somebody else, and you

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you would not have a finished product until you've finish

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 1>that list. So, I mean, I have to like to

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>do list because they are one way that things get done. Well,

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you're clear right, I think that there is clearly a

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>difference between good lists and bad lists. When you're trying

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to come up with a to do list and it's

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:11.479
<v Speaker 1>sort of like you know it once you're in it.

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>To like, you like, this isn't a good list, it's

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>not working for me. But I was trying to think,

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 1>what are the actual characteristics that make it to do

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>list helpful rather than something that just hangs over you

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>like a wraith that's making you feel anxious and depressed. Well,

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>they need to be things that you can easily check off.

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it seems like a no brainer, but they

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>need to be things that are achievable in the short term.

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>So like, you can't have a checklist that says like

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>sarrance checklist wasn't enslave Middle Earth and check it off. No,

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:45.360
<v Speaker 1>he started small, building various magical rings to work up

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to this. In fact, maybe he should have started even smaller.

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh he should maybe should have been thinking about the

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>individual materials he needed for the ring, and like making

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the mold and all that. Uh So we'll get into

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this in a minute. I was wondering, like, obviously there's

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a million self help books and productivity seminars and all

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that about about like how to have better to do

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>lists and and be more productive. But I was wondering,

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>is there anything that draws on actual psychology research. Um.

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>One thing I came across was a chapter about to

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>do lists in a book about willpower by one of

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the authors was the psychologist Roy Baumeister. Uh So it

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>was by Baumeister and Tyranny, and I thought some of

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>their points were were kind of interesting, some of them

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>were kind of obvious, others I was interested in the

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>reasoning behind them. So one of the things that they

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>point out in this book is that studies show that

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>often when we get asked to like list out our

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>goals and priorities, a lot of our goals are in

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>conflict with one another. And this this is something that

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know should be kind of obvious to us,

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's clear that we just don't really think about

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it this way until we like list things out and

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>realize things are in conflict. A common example is like

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>when you have two different goals that are both competing

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>for time you don't have. So like, you're already busy

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're asked to make a list of your goals.

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>And your goals include things like, you know, spend more

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>time on ex personal project and also spend more time

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>with family, and so like, those goals are obviously in

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>competition with each other for an already scarce resource. Or

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>things can be like that with money. You know, they're

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>competing for a limited pool of finite resources that you have.

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I can't help me. Be reminded of of

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a ClickHole headline I saw recently, uh titled the only

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty one thing standing between you and your dreams. I'm

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>scrolling through it now, Uh, it's gout entries like your

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>dog crippling doubt your past. See that's that's a wonderful,

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>terrible list because you're including some things that are reasonably

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>specific but just also huge and vague and totally not actionable. Yeah.

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>So so in this book a great example of of

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>like when you know, how our goals can come into

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>conflict with each other. So the authors talk about, you know,

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin Franklin was obsessed with maximizing his life. He was

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a maximize er, sort of a life hacker type dude,

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and he tried to do this by making to do

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>lists about everything, like huge to do list for daily

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>virtues to fulfill, so like one every day you'd have

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to fulfill, like like a frugality and industry. But he found,

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of course these things came into conflict because he's trying

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to be frugal, so he ends up having to spend

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time like doing things for himself instead

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of paying somebody else to do them. But then that

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>prevents him from doing work, so he finds he's less industrious.

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So you know, these things are large in general, and

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the goals are actually fighting each other. And so the

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>authors point out that like psychology and neuroscience, research does

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>not always show that thinking about lists of goals is helpful.

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>It's only helpful in some cases given certain kinds of

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>lists and goals. Like the psychologist Robert Emmons and Laura

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>King demonstrated in a series of study, is that that

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>quote the result of conflicting goals is unhappiness instead of action. Again,

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that might seem kind of obvious, but how many obvious

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>things do we get stuck in a rud over all

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the time? Uh So, First of all, they found when

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>people when people make a list of goals and and

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>think about them, if the goals are in conflict, First

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:21.719
<v Speaker 1>of all, people end up worrying a lot. They end

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>up The psychological term for this is rumination. And that's

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the word that just means like repetitive negative thought patterns,

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>worrying cycles. The second thing is they actually get less

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>done when they think about these lists of goals. People ruminate,

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>not only ruminate, but they ruminate instead of acting to

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>get things done. And productivity on reaching goals decreases. And

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>then finally, physical and mental health suffers. People report more

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>negative emotions, more depression and anxiety, and more physical sickness.

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>So thinking about lists of your goals listing out the

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>things you want itself is not enough to make you

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>become happier, more active, and all that. It really matters

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>what those goals are and how they're formulated, and when

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>they're in the wrong format, it could leave you worse

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>off than before. Who reminds me of a bit of

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>wisdom that I've seen numerous times about New Year's resolutions,

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, about how you set too lofty and new

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Year's resolution and you're just you're you're kicking your own

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>self in the pants, like there's that's not going to

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>do you any good. You've just you've just gone ahead

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and made this formalized version of your own impending failure.

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Well when really you should you should scale it back

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>more and make something that's again more actionable and more

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>achievable and fits in with the the other commitments in

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>your life. You know, I wonder if sometimes we set

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>really ambitious goals for New Year's resolutions because subconsciously we

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that we will have an excuse

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to quit trying sooner. I tell you one I always

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>hate is I forget what it's called, but it's like

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a challenge to write an entire novel manuscript during the

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>month of no November nano remo. Yeah, which is the

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>with the I can't scarcely think of a worse month

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to try and commit to a daily writing project. The

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>November that you're getting right into the holidays, there's Thanksgiving,

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>You're trying to to get a lot of work done,

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>like they should do it. More like I'm thinking it's

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>like in April. Maybe it's a challenge to go swimming

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 1>outdoors every day of January or something. I mean, everyone

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>smile is just gonna vary. But that is always my

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>my realization is like I say, oh, that that thing

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>going on, and I'm like, oh, it's no, it's November.

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>This is this is a complete waste of my time.

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just remembering what our November last year was, like, Yeah,

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>somehow I didn't have time to fit in writing a

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>novel while we were also launching an extra podcast. Right,

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>uh so, But anyway, so if sometimes goals are in conflict, right,

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes this just happens, and thinking about those goals can

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 1>paralyze you make you unhappy. How do you resolve this?

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you would think one way would be to

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>reformulate your list of goals in order to remove conflicts.

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 1>So one way to do this is think about the

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.240
<v Speaker 1>time horizon of your top goals. I think it's probably

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 1>easier for things on your list to remain in conflict

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>when they're more general and when they're more long term time.

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Thinking about time helps you think about like, Okay, what

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>do I really care about this month? What do I

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 1>really care about this week? For instance? Come up with

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.359
<v Speaker 1>an idea for a novel in November? You go and

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and that time horizon thing really does matter in multiple ways,

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 1>like Some studies show that short term goals are more

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>effective at at causing action and improvement than long term goals,

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.919
<v Speaker 1>can sometimes be better than no goals at all. One

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>example side it is this research conducted by the psychologist

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Albert Bandura and Dave Schunk on kids from seven to

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 1>ten who are taking this self directed math course. So

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the kids are trying to learn how to do certain

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>kinds of math problems, and they're separated into four groups.

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:01.439
<v Speaker 1>One group gets this set short term goals. Their goal

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>is to do six pages of math problems in every

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:07.879
<v Speaker 1>one of seven sessions. And then a second group has

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a second has a different goal. It's to complete forty

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:14.240
<v Speaker 1>two pages of math problems at the end of seven sessions.

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>So these two goals, if both completed, should give you

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the same level of progress. And then there was a

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>third group that didn't have any particular goals, in a

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 1>fourth group that didn't do math exercises, and the results

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 1>were the kids in the short term group did a

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>lot better. They completed more problems, they were better at

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>solving problems at the end of the course. Kids in

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the long term group who were just like, Okay, get

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it all done at the end of the course did

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>no better than kids who had no goals at all.

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 1>And if you think back to your own childhood or

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe your own adulthood, you can you can probably see

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:47.359
<v Speaker 1>that that really rings true. At least it does to me,

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>like if I didn't have work broken into smaller chunks,

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:53.879
<v Speaker 1>I would never get it done now. On the other hand,

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, there's research that's found that particularly

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>an older students around high school age, thinking about long

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 1>long term goals is associated with better outcomes like academic

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.839
<v Speaker 1>performance overall. And a common explanation here that that might

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>be going on is that once you're older, it's easier

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:12.959
<v Speaker 1>for you to see a connection between your long term

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>goals and your short term work, like short term tasks

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.359
<v Speaker 1>are sort of they're given a motivation boost when you

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>think about what your long term goals are. So you

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>could maybe think about these two results sort of in conflict,

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think they're necessarily in conflict, because the

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:31.280
<v Speaker 1>possible takeaway is it's good to keep long term goals

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:33.439
<v Speaker 1>in mind to help motivate you as long as they're

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 1>not conflicting. But you also, in order to get stuff done,

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you need to chunk things down. You've got to put

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:41.720
<v Speaker 1>your you've got to formulate your to do list items

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in small, discrete chunks of work with clear goals. And

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're talking about with sour On earlier. You know,

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.959
<v Speaker 1>if it's just conquer all of the lands, that that's

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to work as well. You've got to separate,

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>break it into smaller tasks. Right. But likewise, having having

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>that overall goal of subjugating Middle Earth probably helped him

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>put even more effort into making that one ring really dope,

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think so. Yeah, So it's like visualize

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the end, but focus on what you have to do

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 1>right now. The very next thing. Another important insight that

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>they side is just it's important to be flexible. Like

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:19.880
<v Speaker 1>if you try to over rigidly plan out to do

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>lists of things, uh that can that can actually get

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you bogged down. In one example they side is research

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.959
<v Speaker 1>that found that people who made monthly plans for goal

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>attainment did better than people who made rigid daily plans

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.439
<v Speaker 1>for goal attainment, just because the day to day things

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>come up, you get you get sidetracked. You need to

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:40.800
<v Speaker 1>have a plan that has has some some wiggle in

0:37:40.920 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it if something comes up today and you can't do

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:46.360
<v Speaker 1>your thing today. Yeah, yeah, I guess I can definitely

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>see that with bigger projects. I'm if I'm trying to

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>think on a day to day basis, something's going to

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.760
<v Speaker 1>wreck that plan. But if I'm thinking more weekly and monthly,

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>like by the end of this month, I will have

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>reached this point more or less, then that's it. That's

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:06.239
<v Speaker 1>it that tends to work. Yeah, totally, though, I would say,

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>like each day within a monthly goal setting thing, it's

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 1>good to like plan out more minute parts of the

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>day as you get You shouldn't wait till right then

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 1>you get into like do your forty two pages by

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the end kind of thing. You just never do it. Okay.

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.280
<v Speaker 1>The next big thing that these authors bring up about

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to do lists is going back to something we've talked

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>about on the podcast before, which is the Zigarnic effect. Oh, yes,

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed this, We've discussed in our Tetris episode. And uh,

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>there was another one too. I'm trying to remember the

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the incomplete unfinished one. Yes, yes, about various bits of artwork,

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>etcetera literature in which there is some incomplete aspect to

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Right, Well, it certainly applies to that, because

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the Zigarnic effect is the brains tendency to be brought

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>back to incomplete tasks and to remember them better than

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>complete tasks asks. So it was. It was a concept

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>originally expressed and studied in the nineteen twenties, I think

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seven by a Russian psychologist by the name

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of bloom O Wolfovna Zigarnik who lived nineteen hundred to

0:39:12.320 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight, and supposedly this came about after she and

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:19.839
<v Speaker 1>a colleague were discussing watching waiters in a restaurant and

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 1>how the waiters could remember all of the details of

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the order one of their tables until the check was cleared,

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and then once the check at that table was cleared.

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 1>It was like their brains were just wiped. They forgot everything.

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>The task is complete, and therefore the the information, Uh,

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:41.479
<v Speaker 1>the various road signs to completion are no longer necessary. Yeah,

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly so uh to to sum it up in a

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:48.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight social psychology textbook by Roy Bauminster

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and Brad Bushman, uh the author's right quote, the Zigarnic

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 1>effect is a tendency to experience automatic intrusive thoughts about

0:39:57.360 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a goal that one has pursued but the suit of

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 1>which has been interrupted. That is, if you start working

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:07.760
<v Speaker 1>toward a goal and fail to get there, thoughts about

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the goal will keep popping into your mind while you're

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>doing other things, as if to remind you to get

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:17.840
<v Speaker 1>back on track to finish reaching that goal. So, given this, like,

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the Zigernic effect is often cited as an explanation of

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 1>what we talked about earlier, rumination, you know, unproductive patterns

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of recurring negative thoughts. Uh. The Zigernic effect can kind

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 1>of like just pull you out of whatever you're doing

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 1>right now and make you start thinking about that thing

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you're worrying about the goal. You haven't attained the task

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you haven't finished, but it's also used to describe more

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>mundane stuff like earworms and music, like, if you hear

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 1>part of a song play, your brain may try to

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:52.760
<v Speaker 1>keep completing the task of the song until you actually

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 1>are able to listen to the whole thing. And as

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:58.239
<v Speaker 1>personal anecdotal evidence of this, you ever notice how, at

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>least if you're like me, you're more likely to get

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a song stuck in your head if you hear it

0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>in an unfocused way, like playing in a grocery store

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 1>or on the radio in a car, as opposed to

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a song that you like, sit down and listen to. Yeah, yeah,

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:15.320
<v Speaker 1>for sure. It certainly it makes for more more of

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:19.839
<v Speaker 1>a chance encounter. Yeah, um, not a deliberate encounter, but yeah,

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>those will be the times where I leave the grocery

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>store and then there's this song stuck in my head.

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, literally, at least seventy percent of the

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 1>time that somebody says to me, why are you singing

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:34.799
<v Speaker 1>that song? I don't even realize I was singing it.

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>And then what I realized is it was playing in

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the store. But that seems perfect because like in the store,

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you walk in and out, you're not really paying attention

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to the music. You hear a bit of it and

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it just gets lodged in there, and then your brain

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 1>is like trying to play it back and and and

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 1>complete it um. But we should note that it appears

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that the Sigartic effect has a sort of mixed replication history,

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:59.840
<v Speaker 1>like some studies replicate the effect, others fail to. So

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>if we assume that it is real and based on experience,

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it does at least somewhat seem to be real.

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>There may be conditional qualities to it that we don't

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>fully understand yet, and one complication to the effect, for instance,

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 1>seems to be related to creating to do lists. So

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I just want to mention one study by Roy Baumeister

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and E. J. Massa Campo called consider It Done. Plan

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 1>making can eliminate the cognitive effects of unfulfilled goals, and

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 1>this was in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eleven. So this paper, they they recount

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a number of studies that the authors did to test

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the persistence and intrusiveness of thoughts about an upcoming finished

0:42:41.680 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 1>task like an exam in school, and a few examples

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of how to test things would be like testing how

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:52.240
<v Speaker 1>often people became distracted while trying to read something after

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 1>being made to think about that upcoming task, or testing

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>how primed this. The subjects were to complete a partial

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>word puzzle with a task related solution word, so like,

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:05.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're given like e x blank, do you complete

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that as exam or as something else? So they found

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>evidence of the Zigaric effect that people who had been

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:15.839
<v Speaker 1>made to think about an upcoming task and it wasn't

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 1>something they had finished yet, it did become an intrusive,

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>repetitive thought for them. But they found that you didn't

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>actually have to go complete the task in order to

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>find it less intrusively occupying your thoughts, less likely to

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 1>cause rumination and distraction. You just had to come up

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:37.400
<v Speaker 1>with a concrete plan basically a to do list of

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 1>concrete steps about how you would solve the problem. Uh So,

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to quote from their abstract quote. Allowing participants to formulate

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>specific plans for their unfulfilled goals eliminated the various activation

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:53.839
<v Speaker 1>and interference effects. Reduction of the effects was mediated by

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the earnestness of participants plans. Those who ultimately executed their

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>plans were those who also exhibited no more intrusions. So

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:06.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not just that the people who made the concrete

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>steps uh did better with eliminating the zigonic effect intrusions,

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>also the ones who actually ended up being successful in

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:18.400
<v Speaker 1>their plans that was correlated with it. So it's like

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like your brain can tell whether you're taking

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 1>your own plan seriously. And to quote more from their

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 1>abstract quote, committing to a specific plan for a goal

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>may therefore not only facilitate attainment of the goal, but

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>may also free cognitive resources for other pursuits. Once the

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 1>plan is made, the drive to attain a goal is suspended,

0:44:38.280 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 1>allowing goal related cognitive activity to cease, and is resumed

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 1>at the specified later time. Well, this makes a lot

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of sense of certainly when when compared to experience, because

0:44:50.760 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I can think of definite times in my life where

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>there's been like some big thing I've got to start,

0:44:57.320 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and just by starting it, just by safe, for instance,

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:03.239
<v Speaker 1>looking at the list of things to do and then

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 1>calling it a day, you know, which ultimately doesn't really

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really get that much done on the task,

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 1>but you began the process, and just by doing that,

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:14.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can feel better. You can feel like

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you have more control of the situation. Oh well, thinking

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 1>about or or making a list of things to do.

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say that is really getting something done. That's

0:45:22.200 --> 0:45:25.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe the most important part of what you've got. But

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 1>but in another way, you didn't actually do anything. It's

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of like cleaning cleaning the room. An essential step

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is formulating a game plan and deciding what you're gonna

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 1>tackle first so that you can act. But you haven't

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:41.279
<v Speaker 1>actually cleaned anything yet. Yes, but but it's it's a

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:44.719
<v Speaker 1>crucial part. And in fact it's good enough to not

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 1>only help make you more likely to get the project

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:50.720
<v Speaker 1>done in the end, but also to make you worry

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:54.320
<v Speaker 1>less about it until you get there. It's a twofold benefit,

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 1>more actual success at goals and less rumination in the meantime.

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think this also makes sense from a sort

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of imagining, like a cognitive neuroscience point of view, because

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, so like the Zigaric effect

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 1>is sometimes interpreted as like, uh, the unconscious mind sort

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of pinging the conscious mind with like an outstanding problem.

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:17.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like, hey, remember this, you need to get on that.

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey remember this, And but what it really is asking

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:23.960
<v Speaker 1>for is the help of the conscious mind, and the

0:46:23.960 --> 0:46:27.319
<v Speaker 1>conscious mind, we tend to think, is linked to the

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:30.800
<v Speaker 1>part of the mind that has executive control. Executive control

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is good for what planning, Like, the conscious mind is

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>good at coming up with a list of steps of

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 1>things you need to do to solve a problem, something

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that the unconscious mind is not very good at. And

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>this is where executive time comes in, right, the amount

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of time we spend each day in executive time. No,

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the exact opposite. That's like period time. So you

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:55.840
<v Speaker 1>rope in the conscious mind for for executive action. Yeah,

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think it appears that across this stuff like

0:46:59.000 --> 0:47:04.239
<v Speaker 1>that that very specific concrete plans are more useful and

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 1>more psychologically satisfying. Uh So. One of the things that

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, productivity experts often observe is that say, like,

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to, like, you know, fix some stuff

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 1>around your house, don't have a step in the plan

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that's like fix the shower. The step in your plan

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:25.399
<v Speaker 1>should be the very specific first concrete step you need

0:47:25.400 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to do to fix the shower, like go to Lows

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and buy this part that I need and have the

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 1>name of the part, or you know, and if you

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're not at that stage. Yet the thing should

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 1>be find out what part I need on the shower

0:47:39.520 --> 0:47:42.280
<v Speaker 1>by going to by looking it up on the internet.

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I do think that's a useful insight. Like if you're

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:47.319
<v Speaker 1>finding if you've got to to do list, but you're

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>stuck and you're not getting through it, probably one way

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that you can get unstuck is take the items in

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the list and try to break them up into smaller

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 1>parts figure out how they can be subdivided. All right,

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:00.160
<v Speaker 1>on that note, we're going to take a quick right,

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:03.399
<v Speaker 1>and when we come back more on lists and why

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:07.239
<v Speaker 1>we love them. Thank you, thank you. All right, we're back.

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>So clearly, as we mentioned earlier on lists are huge

0:48:11.560 --> 0:48:14.719
<v Speaker 1>in web content, right, we know the power of list uh,

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:18.040
<v Speaker 1>this is something that web traffic analysis clearly shows. Enumerated

0:48:18.080 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>list type articles have an extremely powerful appeal. They're clicky.

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Why Well, like I said earlier, I think a lot

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of it is ease of absorption and or action. So

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:30.799
<v Speaker 1>it's like ten images or names, uh, you know, and

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you probably don't even have to read the rest of

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the text. You can just scan it. But then also

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:37.840
<v Speaker 1>like ten steps being a big thing, like ten steps

0:48:37.880 --> 0:48:40.959
<v Speaker 1>that sounds doable. I can do ten steps. What you know, what,

0:48:40.960 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 1>what's the offering? Is it ten steps to a better life,

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:47.799
<v Speaker 1>ten steps to a cleaner house? Uh, ten steps to

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:50.279
<v Speaker 1>a better marriage? I mean these are all uh you

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>put it the phrase it like that. I'm like, well,

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:54.880
<v Speaker 1>let's let's try it. Well, I mean yeah, ten steps

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I think are very popular. They're popular maybe for a

0:48:57.480 --> 0:49:01.320
<v Speaker 1>different reason than a lot of other kinds of enumerated articles.

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Are useful because the steps thing is like a to

0:49:03.880 --> 0:49:07.400
<v Speaker 1>do list. It says, this is not an infinitely complex,

0:49:07.440 --> 0:49:10.319
<v Speaker 1>impossible problem. This is a problem with ten parts, and

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:12.839
<v Speaker 1>you can do one part at a time. It makes

0:49:12.880 --> 0:49:15.359
<v Speaker 1>it seem like, oh, yeah, I could actually begin this

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 1>right and like that alone can be empowering, even if

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you have no intention of following entities just no, even

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:25.759
<v Speaker 1>just not even reading the list, just knowing that that

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 1>process could be broken down into ten steps can feel

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:33.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of liberating. Yeah. So nine rings for men doomed

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to die. Okay, so that's one step, or maybe that's

0:49:36.200 --> 0:49:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the third step. I don't remember what order they come in,

0:49:38.160 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>but Elvin King's our first joke. First, the elves are

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 1>picky if you don't take care of them first, they

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:46.839
<v Speaker 1>asked to see your manager. But but to come back

0:49:46.840 --> 0:49:49.319
<v Speaker 1>to the scannable nature of list, I think that's big too,

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 1>because it's really important. Yeah, because there there have been

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 1>recent studies. In fact, there was the most recent one

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:55.439
<v Speaker 1>just came out in the last few weeks. I think

0:49:55.880 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at how we easily overestimate our understanding of a

0:49:59.160 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 1>topic based on say a headline of an article or

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 1>an article preview and Facebook, Um well yeah, I mean

0:50:05.680 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>there's like you remember the the illusion of explanatory depth episodes,

0:50:09.600 --> 0:50:12.879
<v Speaker 1>where that's somewhat different, But it's that you know, there

0:50:12.880 --> 0:50:16.160
<v Speaker 1>can be a thing that we're familiar with because we

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 1>are exposed to the concept of it a lot, and

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:21.719
<v Speaker 1>it gives us the false impression that we understand how

0:50:21.719 --> 0:50:25.279
<v Speaker 1>it works. Like you know, you're you're around bicycles all

0:50:25.320 --> 0:50:27.239
<v Speaker 1>the time, so surely you can draw one with all

0:50:27.280 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the parts accurately placed, right or can you? It seems

0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:33.680
<v Speaker 1>so simple, But it turns out a lot of people

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 1>can and it's just like, yeah, you see them enough

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that you just think, well, I must understand this. And

0:50:38.239 --> 0:50:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the same is true for more abstract conceptual topics,

0:50:41.760 --> 0:50:44.920
<v Speaker 1>like you know, issues in politics. You think you understand

0:50:44.960 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 1>how it works because you've seen the name referenced in

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:50.800
<v Speaker 1>headlines right or you've or maybe you've seen something broken

0:50:50.840 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>down on a list of talking points, etcetera. Uh Now,

0:50:53.920 --> 0:50:55.920
<v Speaker 1>speaking of social media, it's also worth pointing out that

0:50:56.040 --> 0:50:58.640
<v Speaker 1>something like your Facebook or your Twitter feed is it's

0:50:58.640 --> 0:51:01.200
<v Speaker 1>not enumerated, but it is essentially a list. Yes, it

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:04.440
<v Speaker 1>is also not a fineite list because they're designed to

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:08.880
<v Speaker 1>be infinite, infinitely scrollable. But but these are lists, and

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:12.239
<v Speaker 1>many times a day we're probably checking in to see

0:51:12.280 --> 0:51:14.360
<v Speaker 1>what the list is offering us this time. Well, I

0:51:14.400 --> 0:51:17.880
<v Speaker 1>think that also goes to the fact that lists are appealing.

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:20.839
<v Speaker 1>Listical type articles are appealing on the Internet because they're

0:51:20.840 --> 0:51:23.799
<v Speaker 1>easily scannable for content, in the same way that your

0:51:23.840 --> 0:51:26.239
<v Speaker 1>news feed is easily scannable for content. You know, like

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:29.000
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, if you're just sitting there scrolling and letting

0:51:29.040 --> 0:51:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Facebook ravage your brain, you are not You're not reading

0:51:33.800 --> 0:51:37.440
<v Speaker 1>everything you're scrolling past. You know, You're just like scrolling

0:51:37.520 --> 0:51:39.839
<v Speaker 1>until your eye hits something and you look at that

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:41.719
<v Speaker 1>for a second and you're like, oh, there's that, and

0:51:41.760 --> 0:51:44.439
<v Speaker 1>then you keep going. So I think maybe it's not

0:51:44.560 --> 0:51:47.920
<v Speaker 1>always the numbered and nature of a listical that's important.

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Like in many cases, I think the numbers don't matter.

0:51:50.200 --> 0:51:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe what's important is that we know to expect a

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:58.040
<v Speaker 1>listical to have headers. Actually, header is very important because

0:51:58.080 --> 0:52:01.040
<v Speaker 1>they help you quickly identify the meat of the content

0:52:01.120 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to know what the things on the list are. You

0:52:03.640 --> 0:52:06.759
<v Speaker 1>don't really have to read the paragraphs if there are any.

0:52:06.880 --> 0:52:08.839
<v Speaker 1>You can just like look at the headers and say,

0:52:08.880 --> 0:52:11.319
<v Speaker 1>do I want to go deeper on this one? Knowing

0:52:11.440 --> 0:52:13.640
<v Speaker 1>just scroll past right and you know exactly. You know

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:15.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty much how long the article is going to be.

0:52:15.440 --> 0:52:17.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like ten items, that's it. Maybe there'll be some

0:52:17.960 --> 0:52:20.239
<v Speaker 1>honorable mentions at the bottom, but for the most part,

0:52:20.560 --> 0:52:22.799
<v Speaker 1>I have a general length in mind. Yeah, And so

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:26.680
<v Speaker 1>your relationship with the listical type thing is usually pretty mercenary, right,

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:29.759
<v Speaker 1>It's less dedicated than a relationship you might have with

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:33.240
<v Speaker 1>other types of written texts. I think it's also appealing

0:52:33.239 --> 0:52:36.960
<v Speaker 1>because a list promises discrete chunks of information that are

0:52:37.040 --> 0:52:41.920
<v Speaker 1>desired for some understood reason, like they're either practically useful

0:52:42.200 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>useful like steps and how to or um practically useful because,

0:52:46.400 --> 0:52:49.880
<v Speaker 1>like say ranked products, you know that these are good

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:52.400
<v Speaker 1>versions of this product that you might want to remember

0:52:52.400 --> 0:52:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and look for when you're shopping, or because they're interesting

0:52:56.680 --> 0:52:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and you want to have bits of interesting information to remember,

0:52:59.520 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 1>like the the eleven craziest Baffamet statues, or there's something

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:06.040
<v Speaker 1>else that you feel compelled to know, like those best

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of lists that people sort of used to help form

0:53:08.080 --> 0:53:10.400
<v Speaker 1>their taste. I was reading an article in The New

0:53:10.480 --> 0:53:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Yorker by Maria Knakova, science writer who I like is

0:53:13.960 --> 0:53:16.000
<v Speaker 1>she She wrote a good book called The Confidence Game.

0:53:16.040 --> 0:53:18.279
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed that one a lot. One of the things

0:53:18.360 --> 0:53:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned is the idea of that the lists basically

0:53:22.600 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 1>benefit from processing fluency. And we've talked about processing fluency

0:53:26.640 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 1>on the show before, but processing fluency is a really

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:34.400
<v Speaker 1>underrated influence on our mental lives. Like we spend a

0:53:34.440 --> 0:53:39.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of energy trying to spend less mental energy on

0:53:39.280 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 1>things like a lot of energy trying to optimize our

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:47.719
<v Speaker 1>information environments for processing fluency, which means we're trying to

0:53:47.800 --> 0:53:51.400
<v Speaker 1>make sure the information coming into our brain is not

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:55.160
<v Speaker 1>too challenging and it's easy to process. And there are

0:53:55.160 --> 0:53:56.959
<v Speaker 1>a ton of ways you can look at the world

0:53:57.000 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 1>around you and understand that we're trying to shape our

0:53:59.280 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 1>environments to favor processing fluency by having these biases for

0:54:03.719 --> 0:54:07.239
<v Speaker 1>processing fluency fluency, like remember the example of the the

0:54:07.280 --> 0:54:11.200
<v Speaker 1>illusory truth effect. Oh yes, absolutely, Yeah, we're more likely

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to what recall something if we've heard it before, and

0:54:14.440 --> 0:54:16.440
<v Speaker 1>even more if it's not true, even if it's an

0:54:16.440 --> 0:54:19.479
<v Speaker 1>outright lie. Exactly, I've heard it before, and therefore we

0:54:19.480 --> 0:54:22.600
<v Speaker 1>we echo it. Yeah, we're so we're primed to understand it.

0:54:22.600 --> 0:54:26.200
<v Speaker 1>It's easier to process because we've heard it before. And

0:54:26.280 --> 0:54:28.960
<v Speaker 1>so there's scientific backing for the idea for the notion

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that if you hear something often enough, you start to

0:54:31.040 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 1>believe it's true. And one possible explanation for this is

0:54:34.719 --> 0:54:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that it's caused by a bias favoring processing fluency. You

0:54:37.960 --> 0:54:41.279
<v Speaker 1>hear something for the hundredth time, it's just way easier

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to process than when you hear something for the first

0:54:44.040 --> 0:54:47.520
<v Speaker 1>time and it's new and unfamiliar. Another example I randomly

0:54:47.560 --> 0:54:52.280
<v Speaker 1>came across as a study uh by a Grifhenator at All,

0:54:52.280 --> 0:54:56.160
<v Speaker 1>which is a great name in social psychological and personality science.

0:54:56.200 --> 0:54:58.720
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand ten, there was a series of studies

0:54:58.760 --> 0:55:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that just revealed, um, when people are grading handwritten essays,

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:06.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a strong bias in favor of the ones that

0:55:06.440 --> 0:55:09.160
<v Speaker 1>are easy to read and against the ones that are

0:55:09.200 --> 0:55:11.319
<v Speaker 1>that are more difficult to read. That might not be

0:55:11.360 --> 0:55:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that surprising, but even people who don't think they're biased,

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in fact are You're biased by the fact that something

0:55:17.480 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that is easier to read and it's easier to take

0:55:20.200 --> 0:55:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in just feels better to you. And so I think

0:55:22.960 --> 0:55:27.400
<v Speaker 1>this is clearly work with like list type content because you, uh,

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 1>number one, lists are pre categorized, you know, like so

0:55:32.239 --> 0:55:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to wonder, like what what box am

0:55:34.960 --> 0:55:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I going to put this in? In my mind? Like

0:55:37.000 --> 0:55:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you already you know based on the title of the

0:55:39.200 --> 0:55:41.160
<v Speaker 1>list what you're going to be getting out of it.

0:55:41.280 --> 0:55:44.040
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to be categorically surprised. You've you've already

0:55:44.040 --> 0:55:47.360
<v Speaker 1>got a schemata going in for where to put everything.

0:55:48.760 --> 0:55:51.480
<v Speaker 1>And then also there's just simple stuff like kna Covid

0:55:51.480 --> 0:55:56.640
<v Speaker 1>points out that lists naturally naturally lend themselves to spatial categorization,

0:55:57.239 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 1>like there's vertical placement on a page, and there's ters

0:56:00.320 --> 0:56:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to denote placement of information um there in like large

0:56:04.640 --> 0:56:08.080
<v Speaker 1>blocks of normal text aren't as clearly spatialized, but that

0:56:08.160 --> 0:56:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we remember things better when it's spatially formatted in a

0:56:11.520 --> 0:56:14.799
<v Speaker 1>way that's clear. Like think about the memory palace. Uh.

0:56:14.840 --> 0:56:17.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, people can remember things better if what they

0:56:17.200 --> 0:56:21.360
<v Speaker 1>like imagine a physical space. Yeah, using these yes, spatial

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:24.279
<v Speaker 1>um of processing to understand something that may just be

0:56:24.320 --> 0:56:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a list of numbers even Yeah, like a top ten

0:56:27.840 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 1>list is basically taking a concept and putting it in

0:56:31.600 --> 0:56:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the format of a Mortal Kombat challenge tower, you know,

0:56:35.440 --> 0:56:37.480
<v Speaker 1>where you have a list of opponents and at the

0:56:37.520 --> 0:56:40.960
<v Speaker 1>top you've got you know, you've got Shaalcan or whoever,

0:56:41.320 --> 0:56:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's the main boss, that's the number one ranking

0:56:43.600 --> 0:56:45.000
<v Speaker 1>goes all the way down to the who are the

0:56:45.040 --> 0:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>easiest person to beat? Is So if you can take

0:56:48.000 --> 0:56:52.640
<v Speaker 1>anything be it you know, global politics or environmental concerns,

0:56:52.840 --> 0:56:55.520
<v Speaker 1>break it down into a Mortal Kombat challenge tower, and

0:56:55.520 --> 0:56:58.560
<v Speaker 1>then just about anybody can can at least get like

0:56:58.640 --> 0:57:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the surface level unders standing of what you're trying to relate.

0:57:01.840 --> 0:57:04.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point. I mean another way of putting

0:57:04.040 --> 0:57:07.919
<v Speaker 1>it is that like, uh, lists tell you the tell

0:57:08.000 --> 0:57:10.680
<v Speaker 1>they explicitly tell you what's the important part of what

0:57:10.760 --> 0:57:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you're reading. You know, like this is a thing that's

0:57:13.520 --> 0:57:17.120
<v Speaker 1>like difficult for younger readers often is like to like

0:57:17.400 --> 0:57:21.240
<v Speaker 1>read a passage and then identify what's the thesis sentence

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:24.600
<v Speaker 1>or the most important sentence in this paragraph or in

0:57:24.680 --> 0:57:26.920
<v Speaker 1>this page. And like a lot of times it's it's

0:57:26.960 --> 0:57:29.280
<v Speaker 1>harder for younger readers to do that. To figure out

0:57:29.320 --> 0:57:32.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the point a list, you don't have to wonder.

0:57:32.120 --> 0:57:35.040
<v Speaker 1>It tells you here's the point. And that's another big

0:57:35.080 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 1>thing about about lists and ranking is we're often going

0:57:38.080 --> 0:57:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to skip to the end. Like Pitch for It comes

0:57:40.040 --> 0:57:42.400
<v Speaker 1>out with like top one albums of the year, I'm

0:57:42.440 --> 0:57:45.920
<v Speaker 1>going to look at the top ten. Maybe they intentionally

0:57:46.040 --> 0:57:49.880
<v Speaker 1>stagger the page nation to make that harder to do. Yeah, yeah,

0:57:49.880 --> 0:57:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to. Like, of course, you have to click

0:57:51.120 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 1>through a bunch of pages rights part of the game.

0:57:53.600 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 1>You like can't click to the last page from the

0:57:56.040 --> 0:57:58.520
<v Speaker 1>first page. You can only click to the like third

0:57:58.560 --> 0:58:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to last page from the first page age, and then

0:58:00.520 --> 0:58:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to click down from there. It's nonsense. People

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:06.720
<v Speaker 1>people get mad about that. But anyway, bringing back to

0:58:06.840 --> 0:58:09.400
<v Speaker 1>umberto echo, like, I think there are some some clear

0:58:10.000 --> 0:58:13.760
<v Speaker 1>easy reasons to see why, Like, you know, listical type

0:58:13.800 --> 0:58:17.120
<v Speaker 1>content on the internet is highly popular, But what about

0:58:17.240 --> 0:58:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the appeal of the list to somebody like Umberto Echo

0:58:20.160 --> 0:58:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and or in in something like the Iliad. One of

0:58:23.440 --> 0:58:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the things that Echo mentions is he just says that

0:58:26.000 --> 0:58:30.120
<v Speaker 1>lists are sort of a suggestion of immortality, because he says,

0:58:30.200 --> 0:58:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have this discouraging limit on our lives.

0:58:32.840 --> 0:58:35.200
<v Speaker 1>We know we're going to die, and that we like

0:58:35.320 --> 0:58:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to assume that things go on without end, and so

0:58:38.480 --> 0:58:41.280
<v Speaker 1>a list of creating these big lists, like the catalog

0:58:41.360 --> 0:58:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of Ships, it's kind of a way of escaping thoughts

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:46.480
<v Speaker 1>about death because we like to make He says, we

0:58:46.560 --> 0:58:49.680
<v Speaker 1>make lists because we don't want to die. Interesting. Yeah,

0:58:49.800 --> 0:58:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean it comes back, you know, probably one of

0:58:52.200 --> 0:58:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the most direct things. We can think of it as

0:58:53.880 --> 0:58:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a bucket list or a reading list of viewing list. Uh,

0:58:58.280 --> 0:59:00.000
<v Speaker 1>these are all the things we're going to a common

0:59:00.000 --> 0:59:02.760
<v Speaker 1>plush in our lifetime. Yeah, which, of course I have

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to sadly admit that I still have a couple of

0:59:04.600 --> 0:59:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Umberto Eco novels on my two to read list, a

0:59:08.960 --> 0:59:11.400
<v Speaker 1>couple that I haven't haven't gotten around to just yet.

0:59:11.480 --> 0:59:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Well I've only read one now. Oh yeah, they're uh.

0:59:14.600 --> 0:59:18.240
<v Speaker 1>He has some other great ones of Co's Pendulum, Island

0:59:18.280 --> 0:59:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of the day before Bartolino. Those are the those are

0:59:21.880 --> 0:59:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the ones I enjoyed the most. I've got to check

0:59:24.280 --> 0:59:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that out. Name of the Rose was awesome. It's oh yeah,

0:59:27.440 --> 0:59:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like a easily now a top ten book for me,

0:59:31.560 --> 0:59:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, really really awesome. And by the way, speaking

0:59:34.840 --> 0:59:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of the name of the route, Name of the Rose,

0:59:37.040 --> 0:59:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, it's said in the medieval period with like

0:59:39.120 --> 0:59:40.960
<v Speaker 1>monks who are you know, a lot of times dealing

0:59:40.960 --> 0:59:44.640
<v Speaker 1>with these philosophical debates about the nature of things and

0:59:44.720 --> 0:59:48.280
<v Speaker 1>dealing with these in cycling medieval encyclopedias, which is just

0:59:48.360 --> 0:59:50.600
<v Speaker 1>like the best things that were, you know, the bestiaries

0:59:50.640 --> 0:59:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and all that um. And that one of the things

0:59:53.240 --> 0:59:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Echo talks about in this interview is sort of the

0:59:55.440 --> 1:00:00.920
<v Speaker 1>difference between understanding something by defining it versus understanding something

1:00:00.960 --> 1:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>by way of list uh, and that these are different

1:00:04.080 --> 1:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>ways of approaching knowledge and of seeing the world. When

1:00:06.560 --> 1:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you define something, you try to like put into a

1:00:08.920 --> 1:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>sentence the essence of what the concept or the thing is,

1:00:13.360 --> 1:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>whereas the other way, I guess is the more like

1:00:15.600 --> 1:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>inductive way of understanding a concept, which is making lists

1:00:20.120 --> 1:00:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of examples of it or making lists of its characteristics.

1:00:25.120 --> 1:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, This reminds me of the TV Tropes website

1:00:28.760 --> 1:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that I enjoy using from time to time, especially especially

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>if we have an episode coming out and there's like

1:00:33.680 --> 1:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a concept in the show and I would like to

1:00:36.000 --> 1:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge or remind myself of either know either sci fi

1:00:40.000 --> 1:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that I've I've read before or I'm familiar with, or

1:00:43.280 --> 1:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>something I am not familiar with it someow ties into

1:00:45.400 --> 1:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the concept. You can go to TV tropes and you

1:00:46.800 --> 1:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>can look at the various tropes and a given property,

1:00:49.480 --> 1:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>um so, and on one level, it's it's it's fulfilling,

1:00:53.000 --> 1:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, it feels very very much

1:00:55.760 --> 1:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>like a reduction of these things, you know, like let's

1:00:58.560 --> 1:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>just Adam is a film or a novel or a

1:01:02.360 --> 1:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>comic book down to familiar tropes that have appeared elsewhere. Well,

1:01:07.440 --> 1:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, I would say they kind of

1:01:09.480 --> 1:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>TV tropes that site kind of um I don't know,

1:01:13.320 --> 1:01:18.320
<v Speaker 1>validates or immortalizes strange cliches and conventions by showing you

1:01:18.360 --> 1:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>just how many examples of it there are. When you

1:01:21.160 --> 1:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>thought you you see something in like one movie and

1:01:24.680 --> 1:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you're like, that's kind of odd, But it feels bigger

1:01:26.920 --> 1:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>than that to me. It feels like a cliche. And

1:01:28.920 --> 1:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you look it up on TV tropes and you

1:01:31.520 --> 1:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>find out, oh, yeah, this is in thirty things. You know,

1:01:34.000 --> 1:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it's in a bunch of anime, and you have it.

1:01:36.080 --> 1:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes that thing that has appeared thirty Other times

1:01:39.160 --> 1:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's so well executed, or it's executed in a

1:01:42.560 --> 1:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>way that feels unique, or or or when other elements

1:01:46.240 --> 1:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>are creative sufficiently creative that it it doesn't feel like

1:01:51.160 --> 1:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>one of thirty things, it feels like the thing. Well.

1:01:53.480 --> 1:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the great talents of a writer,

1:01:55.520 --> 1:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>especially comedy writers more than anybody else. But but one

1:02:00.160 --> 1:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of the great talents of a writer who has a

1:02:01.720 --> 1:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>good sense of irony is the talent for picking out

1:02:06.280 --> 1:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>one example of a thing that communicates that thing well,

1:02:10.240 --> 1:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>whereas somebody else would have to write a complex definition

1:02:14.040 --> 1:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>or give a list of many examples. You know what

1:02:16.880 --> 1:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about, Like the great talent for picking out

1:02:20.480 --> 1:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the one example that perfectly encapsulates the spirit of something

1:02:25.120 --> 1:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like if you were to say, and I'm not even

1:02:26.560 --> 1:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>sure exactly what this would mean, but if you were

1:02:28.360 --> 1:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to say so, and so is the Highlander two of

1:02:30.600 --> 1:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>people exactly Yes, I'm not sure what I would. I'm

1:02:34.200 --> 1:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>saying if I were to pass that judgment on someone,

1:02:36.880 --> 1:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>part of it would depend on obvious aspects of that individual.

1:02:42.560 --> 1:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>But it that I'm still saying something that seems pretty specific.

1:02:46.640 --> 1:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it works for H two, but

1:02:48.560 --> 1:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it's but but yes, you're on the right track, that

1:02:51.120 --> 1:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is what I mean. Now, another way of thinking about

1:02:53.120 --> 1:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>lists is just the nature of list making and list using,

1:02:57.680 --> 1:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>as it's comparable to just how we use language, especially

1:03:02.360 --> 1:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>written language. UM So, if we go back far enough

1:03:06.440 --> 1:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in time, we get back to the roots of cuneiform writing,

1:03:10.160 --> 1:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>which developed around the eighth millennium BC. So this featured

1:03:13.800 --> 1:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a system of clay tokens to represent individual units of

1:03:17.320 --> 1:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>various commodities. So like one uh, you know, sheep, One

1:03:21.040 --> 1:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>sheep would be one sheep token because it was that

1:03:24.000 --> 1:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>simple and uh, these were pretty useful for keeping track

1:03:27.760 --> 1:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of of of these commodities as we're dealing now with, uh,

1:03:32.520 --> 1:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, with with cultures that that had a surplus

1:03:35.240 --> 1:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of things in there there was trade going on. Um.

1:03:39.040 --> 1:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>These tokens remained in useful around umt BC, when more

1:03:43.840 --> 1:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>complex tokens came into play, and you would have clay

1:03:48.160 --> 1:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>envelopes which were eventually developed to hold these tokens, and

1:03:51.920 --> 1:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>then you would stamp those envelopes to indicate the contents,

1:03:55.120 --> 1:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and this stamping would eventually lead to solid clay tablet

1:03:58.440 --> 1:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>writing and pictograph writing, logo grams or word signs, and

1:04:03.320 --> 1:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in sequential writing systems. But written language in this emerges

1:04:08.680 --> 1:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>from counting technology, from the systems of making lists. Yeah,

1:04:12.920 --> 1:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I've read this theory before, I uh, and this is

1:04:15.640 --> 1:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. The idea that like the first written language

1:04:18.280 --> 1:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>emerged from trade and originally was more pictographic, but but

1:04:23.560 --> 1:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>became more symbolic as time goes on, and this led

1:04:27.160 --> 1:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to phonetic alphabets. Right now, a great deal of what

1:04:30.640 --> 1:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>we do with written language is highly sequential. Even in

1:04:33.560 --> 1:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the case of say, nonlinear narratives and fiction, there is

1:04:37.200 --> 1:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>still is an order to what you're being presented with,

1:04:39.840 --> 1:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>even if that order is is altered, you know, it's

1:04:43.280 --> 1:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it's maybe not chronological anymore, but there is still an order,

1:04:48.360 --> 1:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Like there is a sequence that you're presented with, and

1:04:51.360 --> 1:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that sequence presumably means something, whether you're presenting something in

1:04:56.280 --> 1:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in reverse chronological order or you're skipping around in time,

1:05:00.280 --> 1:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. And of course we also ultimately experience, remember,

1:05:04.280 --> 1:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and anticipate the universe as a series of sequential events.

1:05:08.560 --> 1:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So this is one of those areas where it begins

1:05:11.160 --> 1:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to sort of you know, hurt the brain a little bit,

1:05:13.200 --> 1:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>but like you know what comes first, right, Like to

1:05:18.320 --> 1:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>what extent is the Is this sequential experience the linear

1:05:23.120 --> 1:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>existence of of life? Is it dictated by our language writing,

1:05:30.320 --> 1:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>list making nature or is it the other way around? Well,

1:05:33.480 --> 1:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that is a great question. I mean, the physics of

1:05:35.800 --> 1:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>time is no different for other animals, right, I mean

1:05:39.160 --> 1:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>their experience of time might be different than ours, but

1:05:41.880 --> 1:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like it's not the case that like, uh, chimpanzees live

1:05:47.440 --> 1:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>their lives out of order, they also experience an order

1:05:50.920 --> 1:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of events. They might not perceive it like we do.

1:05:54.320 --> 1:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I do wonder about that. With language, are

1:05:56.720 --> 1:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>we like, are we homo album us or whatever? The

1:06:00.040 --> 1:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>list the list making ape? Is that what we are? Well,

1:06:02.800 --> 1:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you this, Uh, list making apes have have

1:06:05.960 --> 1:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>achieved an awful lot when it comes to making lists.

1:06:09.120 --> 1:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And one of the one of the hallmarks of this

1:06:12.240 --> 1:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that I think we we both found kind of independently

1:06:15.160 --> 1:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in our our searching, is that there is an actual

1:06:18.120 --> 1:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia article out there that is a list of lists

1:06:20.920 --> 1:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of lists. It is so good. The intro to this

1:06:23.160 --> 1:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>page reads as follows. This is a list of articles

1:06:25.880 --> 1:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that are lists of list articles on the English Wikipedia.

1:06:29.600 --> 1:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>In other words, each of the articles linked here is

1:06:32.040 --> 1:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>an index up to multiple lists on a topic. Some

1:06:35.080 --> 1:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of the linked articles are themselves lists of lists of lists.

1:06:38.680 --> 1:06:41.160
<v Speaker 1>This article is also a list of lists. You know,

1:06:41.240 --> 1:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not surprising that Wikipedia is where you would encounter

1:06:44.240 --> 1:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a list of lists of lists, because Wikipedia is an

1:06:47.000 --> 1:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>example of encyclopedic thinking, which is an attempt, however feeble

1:06:51.120 --> 1:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>on our part, to impose order and understanding on a world,

1:06:55.840 --> 1:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>on a world where you know, things do exist in

1:06:58.120 --> 1:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>relation to each other, but order is sort of it's

1:07:01.360 --> 1:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it's our attempt to master the chaos of reality to say, like, okay,

1:07:05.880 --> 1:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>here's how we can put things into categories. It's also

1:07:08.440 --> 1:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of the project of Aristotle, right, I mean Aristotle

1:07:11.360 --> 1:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>like to divide things and put them in categories and

1:07:14.480 --> 1:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>make lists of lists of things. You could say that

1:07:17.480 --> 1:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>list making is in one way sort of deep at

1:07:20.480 --> 1:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the core of the scholastic impulse. It's, you know, when

1:07:23.280 --> 1:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about what it means to be a scholar

1:07:25.440 --> 1:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to study the world. It's to like put things in

1:07:28.760 --> 1:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>boxes where they conceptually go and organize the boxes, or

1:07:32.960 --> 1:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to wander out in the into the garden and name

1:07:34.920 --> 1:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>all the animals. Right. Yeah, Well another funny thing mentioning

1:07:39.280 --> 1:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the garden is um the authors of that book I

1:07:41.920 --> 1:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>was talking about earlier. They point out that Genesis one

1:07:44.760 --> 1:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>is essentially a list. On the first day, it is

1:07:47.480 --> 1:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a to do list. It's just like, seriously, it is

1:07:51.240 --> 1:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a divine to do list, and then it gives way

1:07:54.400 --> 1:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to like listing animals and stuff and says that the

1:07:58.920 --> 1:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>first task give to man when he was created is

1:08:02.280 --> 1:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to name all the animals, which is to create a

1:08:04.440 --> 1:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>list make more lists. Now I have somebody to make

1:08:08.560 --> 1:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>lists with me. That was the major accomplishment there. Well,

1:08:12.160 --> 1:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that is until that somebody broke the only commandment on

1:08:14.600 --> 1:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the list of thou shalt not so yes. Yeah, but

1:08:17.720 --> 1:08:20.559
<v Speaker 1>oh goodness. Getting into rules and laws though, that's a whole.

1:08:20.760 --> 1:08:23.479
<v Speaker 1>That's a whole another area of list making that we

1:08:23.479 --> 1:08:26.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't really get into here, just the the the essential

1:08:26.520 --> 1:08:29.519
<v Speaker 1>nature of of law, like and really that's that's part

1:08:29.560 --> 1:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of the same process going on. Like it's one thing

1:08:31.920 --> 1:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to say you there subject, uh do right, or you know,

1:08:37.080 --> 1:08:40.719
<v Speaker 1>behave yourself. That's this one thing. But if you say, actually,

1:08:40.960 --> 1:08:43.519
<v Speaker 1>here's a here are the ten steps to not be

1:08:43.640 --> 1:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>executed by my high guard. Here are ten steps to

1:08:46.720 --> 1:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>not be cast outside the city gates and consumed by

1:08:50.160 --> 1:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the jackals and h and then you're like, okay, I

1:08:52.760 --> 1:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>can probably do these things. Well, it's a way of

1:08:55.320 --> 1:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>making like virtue or righteousness. You can divide it in

1:08:59.040 --> 1:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the same way Echo does us with He's like, okay,

1:09:01.160 --> 1:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you can give a definition of something, or you can

1:09:03.360 --> 1:09:05.680
<v Speaker 1>give a list of examples of it. You can do

1:09:05.720 --> 1:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the same thing with like righteousness or the law. You

1:09:08.320 --> 1:09:10.599
<v Speaker 1>could say you give somebody a principle like do unto

1:09:10.680 --> 1:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>others as they would do unto you or something, or

1:09:13.240 --> 1:09:15.519
<v Speaker 1>you can give them just a long list of rules

1:09:15.520 --> 1:09:18.519
<v Speaker 1>like don't do this, don't do that, do this. Both

1:09:18.520 --> 1:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>our approaches humans have used, and I guess they both

1:09:21.160 --> 1:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>have their advantages, right, because like the the more like

1:09:24.680 --> 1:09:29.479
<v Speaker 1>single principle based system feels more flexible and takes into

1:09:29.520 --> 1:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>account more of the you know, the diversity of human

1:09:33.040 --> 1:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>life and the different things you'll experience. Is less legalistic

1:09:35.840 --> 1:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and intolerant, and on the other hand, the list of

1:09:38.280 --> 1:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>rules is less ambiguous. You're like, like, if you just

1:09:40.840 --> 1:09:43.559
<v Speaker 1>follow a gigantic list of rules, you're less likely to

1:09:43.600 --> 1:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>accidentally get into trouble, right, Like, you're more likely to

1:09:47.200 --> 1:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>give a list of commandments to say a robot or two,

1:09:51.800 --> 1:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>or to robocopp er whoever, as opposed to a principle,

1:09:54.960 --> 1:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>or at least you give them rules alongside the principle.

1:09:57.479 --> 1:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, So there you have it, the world of lists.

1:10:00.200 --> 1:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>I would say, bekase, Sorry, we just ended up like

1:10:03.840 --> 1:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to list all the different ways that you can

1:10:06.360 --> 1:10:08.519
<v Speaker 1>use a list or think about a list. I think

1:10:08.560 --> 1:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what this turned into. This episode, by the way,

1:10:11.080 --> 1:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the top ten episodes we put out this month.

1:10:13.960 --> 1:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I would, I would say, just to pat ourselves on

1:10:17.000 --> 1:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the back. Um, obviously, this is gonna be a topic

1:10:19.720 --> 1:10:22.639
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people have thoughts about out there.

1:10:22.640 --> 1:10:26.519
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have varying degrees of success with with to

1:10:26.680 --> 1:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>do lists, You're gonna have varying thoughts on top ten lists,

1:10:30.439 --> 1:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Just sort of the list obsessed nature of

1:10:32.800 --> 1:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>our culture, and we would love to hear from you

1:10:34.920 --> 1:10:37.519
<v Speaker 1>about it. What are your top thirty seven reactions to

1:10:37.600 --> 1:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>this episode. Yes, lists them, rank them, share them with us.

1:10:41.000 --> 1:10:42.679
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, if you want to check out more

1:10:42.720 --> 1:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Stuff to Blow your Mind, head on over

1:10:45.040 --> 1:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. That's the mothership.

1:10:48.080 --> 1:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>That's where you'll find all the podcast episodes. You'll find

1:10:51.400 --> 1:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>blog posts. You'll find some lists on there from back

1:10:53.800 --> 1:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>when we were doing more text based content. You also

1:10:56.880 --> 1:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>find links out to our various social media accounts. If

1:11:00.000 --> 1:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to support the show, there are a few

1:11:01.400 --> 1:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>different things you can do. UH. You can buy some merchandise.

1:11:03.880 --> 1:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>We have a t public store with some cool logos

1:11:06.280 --> 1:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and designs. But the best thing you can do is,

1:11:09.360 --> 1:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>first of all, spread the word. Let other people know

1:11:11.360 --> 1:11:13.679
<v Speaker 1>about Stuff to Blow your Mind. You know, post about

1:11:13.760 --> 1:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>us uh in your online discussions, mentioned us to people

1:11:17.200 --> 1:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>on the street. UH. Likewise, you need to subscribe to

1:11:21.880 --> 1:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>this show as well as Invention, and rate and review

1:11:24.320 --> 1:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>us wherever you have the power to do so. Give

1:11:26.120 --> 1:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>us some stars, give us a nice review. It helps

1:11:28.400 --> 1:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>out the almighty algorithms that govern our world. Hey have

1:11:32.680 --> 1:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you not subscribed to Invention yet? Are you seriously not subscribed?

1:11:36.320 --> 1:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>If you're not, go check out Inventions subscribe it's our

1:11:39.400 --> 1:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>other podcast, It's about inventions. If you like this one,

1:11:42.280 --> 1:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty sure you'll like that one too, go subscribe.

1:11:45.479 --> 1:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, big thanks to our excellent audio producers, Alex

1:11:49.040 --> 1:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Williams and try Harrison. If you would like to get

1:11:51.680 --> 1:11:54.479
<v Speaker 1>in touch with us directly with feedback about this episode

1:11:54.520 --> 1:11:57.599
<v Speaker 1>or any other, with suggestions for the future, or just

1:11:57.680 --> 1:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to say hello, let us know how you found out

1:11:59.760 --> 1:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>about show where you listen from. What your top ten

1:12:02.479 --> 1:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>list of lists of lists are? Uh? List, I think

1:12:05.840 --> 1:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd screwed up the plural there. Anyway, you can email

1:12:08.200 --> 1:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>us at blow the Mind at how stuff works dot

1:12:10.880 --> 1:12:22.879
<v Speaker 1>com for more on this and thousands of other topics.

1:12:23.120 --> 1:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it how stuff works dot com