1
00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:08,480
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News.

2
00:00:08,920 --> 00:00:11,880
Speaker 2: I want to welcome everyone here, and this is a

3
00:00:11,920 --> 00:00:15,160
Speaker 2: forum to talk about investment ideas and a frame of reference.

4
00:00:15,680 --> 00:00:19,439
Speaker 2: And we have the task of explaining how to navigate

5
00:00:19,480 --> 00:00:22,520
Speaker 2: the current business climate, and these two gentlemen we'll explain

6
00:00:22,600 --> 00:00:24,959
Speaker 2: to us how we can frame the current events that

7
00:00:25,000 --> 00:00:27,159
Speaker 2: we're facing off with and how companies are grappling with

8
00:00:27,240 --> 00:00:30,560
Speaker 2: them at a time where the business climate changes in

9
00:00:30,600 --> 00:00:34,400
Speaker 2: thirty minute increments. Joining us here is Ray MacGuire, president

10
00:00:34,440 --> 00:00:37,839
Speaker 2: of Lazard, as well as the seventieth US Secretary of

11
00:00:37,920 --> 00:00:40,760
Speaker 2: the Treasury, Robert Rubin. They have both told me that

12
00:00:40,800 --> 00:00:43,400
Speaker 2: I can call them Bob and Ray or your honor.

13
00:00:43,720 --> 00:00:46,599
Speaker 2: I want to start with this question of where are

14
00:00:46,640 --> 00:00:51,120
Speaker 2: your honor If you want.

15
00:00:51,200 --> 00:00:53,440
Speaker 3: Your honor, your people in Congress who called me things

16
00:00:53,479 --> 00:00:56,680
Speaker 3: far south of Bob, I'll tell you, well.

17
00:00:56,560 --> 00:00:58,640
Speaker 2: Hopefully we don't go there, but I do want to

18
00:00:58,640 --> 00:01:01,960
Speaker 2: start with just where we are in the day's news,

19
00:01:02,000 --> 00:01:04,080
Speaker 2: which is the tariffs and this idea that we got

20
00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:08,400
Speaker 2: twenty five percent tariffs actually put on Mexico on Canada,

21
00:01:08,480 --> 00:01:12,600
Speaker 2: an additional ten percent tariffs put on China. I want

22
00:01:12,600 --> 00:01:14,600
Speaker 2: to start with you, Ray, how are companies making sense

23
00:01:14,640 --> 00:01:14,880
Speaker 2: of this?

24
00:01:15,959 --> 00:01:16,520
Speaker 1: You know it.

25
00:01:18,000 --> 00:01:23,960
Speaker 4: We're in the early stages of this tariff diplomacy, if

26
00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:29,960
Speaker 4: you will, geopolitical diplomacy, and boards and senior managements are

27
00:01:30,200 --> 00:01:34,360
Speaker 4: now trying to assess the implications. It's been advertised for

28
00:01:34,400 --> 00:01:38,680
Speaker 4: a while and today it's begun to be implemented. Having

29
00:01:38,760 --> 00:01:44,080
Speaker 4: said that, there's also the suggestion that in April there's

30
00:01:44,120 --> 00:01:45,920
Speaker 4: going to be a reset, so there'll be a review,

31
00:01:47,160 --> 00:01:52,440
Speaker 4: and most investors, most companies do take a long term view,

32
00:01:53,080 --> 00:01:55,960
Speaker 4: and so we'll see how this early move on the

33
00:01:56,040 --> 00:01:59,760
Speaker 4: chess board plays out. People are assessing, companies are assessing

34
00:01:59,760 --> 00:02:04,120
Speaker 4: them implications, But for the most part, there's a long

35
00:02:04,200 --> 00:02:07,600
Speaker 4: term view that is now being contemplated. We've not seen

36
00:02:07,720 --> 00:02:12,000
Speaker 4: this level of terrorist at least in modern times. We've

37
00:02:12,040 --> 00:02:15,560
Speaker 4: seen it historically, the implications of which historically have been

38
00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:18,720
Speaker 4: pretty dramatic, and we'll see today whether or not the

39
00:02:18,720 --> 00:02:20,480
Speaker 4: implications are going to be equally as dramatic.

40
00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:22,880
Speaker 2: Bob, how do you take a long term view when

41
00:02:22,880 --> 00:02:24,400
Speaker 2: it's unclear what the destination is?

42
00:02:26,440 --> 00:02:27,560
Speaker 1: Well, I have the following deal.

43
00:02:27,760 --> 00:02:29,440
Speaker 3: I think these are going to adverse the effect us

44
00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:33,320
Speaker 3: with respect inflation. The adverse effects us respect the growth,

45
00:02:34,240 --> 00:02:37,040
Speaker 3: adversity effect productivity, but I think is an even bigger

46
00:02:37,080 --> 00:02:39,960
Speaker 3: point in some respects Lisa, we have treaty obligations with

47
00:02:40,040 --> 00:02:44,480
Speaker 3: Canada and Mexico and we have now violated congressionally approved treaties.

48
00:02:44,720 --> 00:02:46,519
Speaker 3: What does that do to our credibility around the world

49
00:02:46,600 --> 00:02:49,640
Speaker 3: aspect to our commitments? And that can adversity affect us

50
00:02:49,720 --> 00:02:52,880
Speaker 3: geo politically and adversity effect us economically. We have spent

51
00:02:53,400 --> 00:02:56,040
Speaker 3: all these years since World War Two developing alliances and

52
00:02:56,080 --> 00:02:59,840
Speaker 3: allies excuse me, supported by all sorts of commitments in

53
00:02:59,840 --> 00:03:02,520
Speaker 3: our our partner has been enormously in our economic self interest,

54
00:03:02,960 --> 00:03:05,799
Speaker 3: well in our economic self interest, in our geopolitical self interest,

55
00:03:05,880 --> 00:03:06,920
Speaker 3: and I think we're putting.

56
00:03:06,639 --> 00:03:07,280
Speaker 1: All that at risk.

57
00:03:08,520 --> 00:03:08,640
Speaker 4: Right.

58
00:03:08,680 --> 00:03:11,080
Speaker 2: Do you see companies thinking about it that way or

59
00:03:11,120 --> 00:03:15,240
Speaker 2: dealing with international partners who are calling into question some

60
00:03:15,360 --> 00:03:19,040
Speaker 2: of the framework of being able to come through the.

61
00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:20,760
Speaker 1: Answers that and I agree with Bob.

62
00:03:21,040 --> 00:03:25,960
Speaker 4: Companies are being forced to now contemplate variables that historically

63
00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:29,000
Speaker 4: we haven't contemplated. Remember the peak of US manufacturing happened

64
00:03:29,040 --> 00:03:32,960
Speaker 4: in nineteen seventy nine. Between nineteen seventy nine and today,

65
00:03:33,120 --> 00:03:36,680
Speaker 4: we have relied on a supply chain that has been

66
00:03:36,800 --> 00:03:41,560
Speaker 4: so dependent upon our international partners, especially our closest one

67
00:03:41,640 --> 00:03:45,760
Speaker 4: being Canada in Mexico, and so as that begins to

68
00:03:45,800 --> 00:03:49,440
Speaker 4: be challenged, how we onshore or at some point we

69
00:03:49,480 --> 00:03:52,040
Speaker 4: talked about nearshoring and near sharing was canadon in Mexico.

70
00:03:52,680 --> 00:03:57,080
Speaker 4: Since we've now applied tariffs to those countries, it's unclear

71
00:03:57,160 --> 00:03:59,240
Speaker 4: how US manufacturers will navigate.

72
00:03:59,280 --> 00:04:00,000
Speaker 1: So we're exposed.

73
00:04:01,160 --> 00:04:05,360
Speaker 4: The corporate America is exposed, especially those in the industrial

74
00:04:05,720 --> 00:04:08,800
Speaker 4: in the industrial arena's technology, perhaps a little less soil

75
00:04:08,880 --> 00:04:11,280
Speaker 4: that we have exposure to what's taking place on the

76
00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:16,160
Speaker 4: chip front, But the implications here on the market we've

77
00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:18,640
Speaker 4: seen today you've seen a sell off of two to

78
00:04:18,680 --> 00:04:22,320
Speaker 4: three trillion dollars. Risk is off today. Before today you

79
00:04:22,360 --> 00:04:24,760
Speaker 4: had a little bit more risk on. You look at

80
00:04:24,800 --> 00:04:28,080
Speaker 4: the volatility index, which is a VIX. Historically it's average twenty.

81
00:04:28,120 --> 00:04:30,440
Speaker 4: Now you're at twenty five or so. If you look

82
00:04:30,480 --> 00:04:32,840
Speaker 4: at the options on VIX fifty, which gets to the

83
00:04:32,920 --> 00:04:35,880
Speaker 4: high end of risk, we see more activity in those

84
00:04:35,920 --> 00:04:38,520
Speaker 4: options in what we've seen in quite some time. So

85
00:04:38,760 --> 00:04:44,240
Speaker 4: you now are in a relatively complex environment with interdependency,

86
00:04:44,600 --> 00:04:46,800
Speaker 4: having to do with the supply chain for all the

87
00:04:46,839 --> 00:04:49,560
Speaker 4: goods and all the products that we consume.

88
00:04:49,920 --> 00:04:51,400
Speaker 1: We're gonna have to be able to manage through that.

89
00:04:51,960 --> 00:04:55,560
Speaker 2: Bobby mentioned that this is going to cause inflation, and

90
00:04:55,600 --> 00:04:59,400
Speaker 2: it's also going to cause some sort of deceleration and growth.

91
00:05:00,160 --> 00:05:03,680
Speaker 2: People argue that tariffs in the long run are disinflationary.

92
00:05:03,720 --> 00:05:06,240
Speaker 2: It's a one time price shock and then it gets

93
00:05:06,279 --> 00:05:09,400
Speaker 2: absorbed and it's sort of part of the mess to

94
00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:12,960
Speaker 2: get to a final goal of bringing more domestic production,

95
00:05:13,960 --> 00:05:18,479
Speaker 2: reviving domestic production. What's your outlook. Do you think that

96
00:05:18,520 --> 00:05:20,160
Speaker 2: it's going to look a bit different than.

97
00:05:20,040 --> 00:05:23,479
Speaker 3: That, Well, a little bit technical for the moment at least,

98
00:05:23,600 --> 00:05:26,240
Speaker 3: you're right, it's a one time supply shock, so that

99
00:05:26,360 --> 00:05:28,600
Speaker 3: increases costs, and then it can level off. So the

100
00:05:28,680 --> 00:05:30,760
Speaker 3: rate of inflation may not have gone up, but costs

101
00:05:30,760 --> 00:05:35,120
Speaker 3: will be higher to consumers, to our producers, the producers

102
00:05:35,120 --> 00:05:37,840
Speaker 3: who compete with imported goods can now raise their prices,

103
00:05:39,160 --> 00:05:42,800
Speaker 3: and I think in terms of the long run for US,

104
00:05:43,360 --> 00:05:46,120
Speaker 3: I think it means less productivity because the whole theory

105
00:05:46,160 --> 00:05:50,400
Speaker 3: of trade is comparative advantage, so that every country gets

106
00:05:50,400 --> 00:05:52,760
Speaker 3: the benefit of getting the most it possibly can for

107
00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:55,600
Speaker 3: that which it is best suited to produce, and now

108
00:05:55,600 --> 00:05:56,640
Speaker 3: we're interfering.

109
00:05:56,200 --> 00:05:56,840
Speaker 1: With that process.

110
00:05:56,880 --> 00:05:58,840
Speaker 3: It will cost us in terms of productivity and growth.

111
00:05:59,720 --> 00:06:02,200
Speaker 3: I think I think this is about ideology and the desiions.

112
00:06:02,360 --> 00:06:04,719
Speaker 3: I think you're it's about ideology and I think of

113
00:06:04,839 --> 00:06:06,359
Speaker 3: not factor analysis grounded.

114
00:06:07,960 --> 00:06:11,600
Speaker 2: It raises this question about a time when heading into

115
00:06:11,640 --> 00:06:17,120
Speaker 2: this year, companies, we're talking about incredible dynamism, incredible expansionism,

116
00:06:17,200 --> 00:06:19,919
Speaker 2: the idea of American exceptionalism. You're going to see a

117
00:06:19,960 --> 00:06:24,240
Speaker 2: boom in deal making. Ray, do you think that that's

118
00:06:24,360 --> 00:06:27,080
Speaker 2: just on hold, that that can come back, or do

119
00:06:27,120 --> 00:06:32,479
Speaker 2: you think that people are rethinking that in corporate executive offices.

120
00:06:33,000 --> 00:06:37,159
Speaker 4: Well, let's be clear about productivity and how does it

121
00:06:37,200 --> 00:06:44,680
Speaker 4: we transition. In order to rebuild the industrial infrastructure of

122
00:06:44,680 --> 00:06:46,600
Speaker 4: this country, it will take five to ten years. So

123
00:06:46,839 --> 00:06:50,599
Speaker 4: while we think about being able to remove ourselves from

124
00:06:50,640 --> 00:06:53,440
Speaker 4: that supply chain dynamic, the reality is it will take

125
00:06:53,480 --> 00:06:56,560
Speaker 4: a while before we do that. Having said that, is

126
00:06:56,640 --> 00:06:59,239
Speaker 4: I think about some of the tailwinds in this environment.

127
00:07:00,240 --> 00:07:03,400
Speaker 4: You have I don't know ten trillion dollars sitting on

128
00:07:03,400 --> 00:07:05,719
Speaker 4: the sideline, seven and a half trillion on corporate balance

129
00:07:05,720 --> 00:07:09,400
Speaker 4: sheets two and a half trillion. With the asset managers,

130
00:07:10,280 --> 00:07:13,440
Speaker 4: you have fourteen trillion dollars or so of debt available

131
00:07:13,520 --> 00:07:17,440
Speaker 4: to trillion and with the asset managers twelve trillion traditional banks.

132
00:07:18,080 --> 00:07:22,160
Speaker 4: Will we need to somehow deploy that capital to continue

133
00:07:22,200 --> 00:07:23,040
Speaker 4: to grow the entries?

134
00:07:23,120 --> 00:07:23,840
Speaker 1: Yes, we will.

135
00:07:24,680 --> 00:07:26,440
Speaker 4: So I have, on the one hand, a lot of

136
00:07:26,440 --> 00:07:30,160
Speaker 4: capital that is pent up. On the other hand, notwithstanding

137
00:07:30,160 --> 00:07:32,160
Speaker 4: the sell off that we're seeing in the market today

138
00:07:32,200 --> 00:07:34,960
Speaker 4: which brings it back down to still it is a

139
00:07:34,960 --> 00:07:38,520
Speaker 4: pretty historical high. We're trading at twenty semi times next

140
00:07:38,600 --> 00:07:41,800
Speaker 4: year's earning forward earnings. So I look at the dynamics

141
00:07:41,840 --> 00:07:44,440
Speaker 4: of the resources that we have and how we deploy

142
00:07:44,520 --> 00:07:47,160
Speaker 4: those resources, and the pent up demand for growth.

143
00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:51,640
Speaker 1: So we will pause for a while as we.

144
00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:56,960
Speaker 4: Understand and interpret the implications of the tariff dynamics, and

145
00:07:57,080 --> 00:07:59,600
Speaker 4: once we get to a new normal, then at some

146
00:07:59,680 --> 00:08:01,920
Speaker 4: point we will re engage. Will it be at the

147
00:08:01,920 --> 00:08:05,080
Speaker 4: same levels that we've engaged re engaged historically unclear?

148
00:08:05,520 --> 00:08:06,840
Speaker 2: Yeah, But do you think that we're going to have

149
00:08:06,880 --> 00:08:09,200
Speaker 2: that boom and m and a, that boom and deals

150
00:08:09,200 --> 00:08:12,680
Speaker 2: that everyone was expecting that's been propelling financial stocks higher.

151
00:08:13,120 --> 00:08:18,280
Speaker 4: Well, we had the prospect of that, didn't We When

152
00:08:18,280 --> 00:08:20,960
Speaker 4: we came in, we thought that there was going to

153
00:08:21,000 --> 00:08:23,920
Speaker 4: be because of the factors of the availability of capital

154
00:08:24,240 --> 00:08:26,360
Speaker 4: where the market was going. And we also thought there's

155
00:08:26,400 --> 00:08:28,360
Speaker 4: going to be a relaxation in some of the regulatory

156
00:08:28,440 --> 00:08:30,920
Speaker 4: environments having to do with what took place in the

157
00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:34,200
Speaker 4: many environment last year, where regulators came in and upset

158
00:08:34,200 --> 00:08:36,480
Speaker 4: a few of those transactions, said note or a few

159
00:08:36,520 --> 00:08:39,280
Speaker 4: implications which are pretty severe on a few of those

160
00:08:39,320 --> 00:08:43,040
Speaker 4: companies that were not able to e merge, and given

161
00:08:43,080 --> 00:08:45,960
Speaker 4: the pent up demand and demand for growth for these companies,

162
00:08:45,960 --> 00:08:48,520
Speaker 4: and so I think you will see some once this

163
00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:53,400
Speaker 4: the first move in the tariff environment, once that move

164
00:08:53,440 --> 00:08:55,960
Speaker 4: gets digested, the implications of which are still going to

165
00:08:55,960 --> 00:08:58,319
Speaker 4: be long term is Bob reference.

166
00:08:58,520 --> 00:09:01,480
Speaker 2: Well, and Bob, something that you talked about is that

167
00:09:01,559 --> 00:09:04,600
Speaker 2: one of the foundations to the business climate in the

168
00:09:04,679 --> 00:09:08,240
Speaker 2: United States has been some level of predictability. Is what

169
00:09:08,480 --> 00:09:09,960
Speaker 2: some level of predictability?

170
00:09:10,080 --> 00:09:13,520
Speaker 3: Oh boy, Yeah. And I think what we're doing absolutely is.

171
00:09:14,240 --> 00:09:16,560
Speaker 3: And I think that that goes even beyond that. The

172
00:09:16,640 --> 00:09:21,679
Speaker 3: rule of law underlies our economy, and I think we're

173
00:09:21,400 --> 00:09:25,120
Speaker 3: and that gives you a certainty and predictability, and I

174
00:09:25,160 --> 00:09:28,439
Speaker 3: think a lot of what's going on is adversely affecting confidence.

175
00:09:29,720 --> 00:09:31,200
Speaker 3: It is now, and I think we'll more so in

176
00:09:31,200 --> 00:09:34,160
Speaker 3: the future. Confidence in the rule of law. This whole

177
00:09:34,160 --> 00:09:37,640
Speaker 3: discussion about retribution and the use of the law enforcement

178
00:09:37,679 --> 00:09:40,679
Speaker 3: agency in the United States to attack our components or

179
00:09:40,679 --> 00:09:42,960
Speaker 3: opponents throughout the administrations is a good example.

180
00:09:43,120 --> 00:09:44,319
Speaker 1: I think, just as I said.

181
00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:46,199
Speaker 3: A moment ago, I think the violation of our treaty

182
00:09:46,280 --> 00:09:49,520
Speaker 3: obligations to Mexico and to Canada.

183
00:09:50,440 --> 00:09:51,559
Speaker 1: So yeah, I think that.

184
00:09:52,920 --> 00:09:57,560
Speaker 3: I think predictability and confidence are essential and undermined underlie

185
00:09:57,679 --> 00:10:00,600
Speaker 3: rather our economy. And I think I think of another

186
00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:02,240
Speaker 3: good example, if I may, if something I think is

187
00:10:02,280 --> 00:10:05,880
Speaker 3: doing tremendous damage, which is Doge. I've spent my entire

188
00:10:05,920 --> 00:10:08,959
Speaker 3: career focused on fiscal discipline. We bounced the budget in

189
00:10:09,040 --> 00:10:11,720
Speaker 3: nineteen ninety eight, first time in thirty years. I think

190
00:10:11,720 --> 00:10:13,240
Speaker 3: we knew what the heck we were doing. I don't

191
00:10:13,280 --> 00:10:15,319
Speaker 3: think these people the foggiest notion what they're doing. And

192
00:10:15,360 --> 00:10:19,000
Speaker 3: I think DOSE is doing tremendous damage to government and

193
00:10:19,080 --> 00:10:24,000
Speaker 3: to the recipients of government services and government activities. Now,

194
00:10:24,320 --> 00:10:27,280
Speaker 3: are there excess expended? Are there inefficiencies and is there

195
00:10:27,280 --> 00:10:29,959
Speaker 3: excess regulation, Yes, but you approach it with the cost

196
00:10:30,080 --> 00:10:34,079
Speaker 3: of a rational cost benefit analysis, not a burn and

197
00:10:34,880 --> 00:10:37,160
Speaker 3: the burning down of what exists, and then the thought

198
00:10:37,200 --> 00:10:38,520
Speaker 3: that you rebuild it. And I think, I think we

199
00:10:38,559 --> 00:10:41,520
Speaker 3: really are doing tremendous damage to government and to our economy.

200
00:10:41,880 --> 00:10:43,240
Speaker 2: Right, you're nodding, do you want to add.

201
00:10:43,040 --> 00:10:44,880
Speaker 1: In a little?

202
00:10:45,360 --> 00:10:51,040
Speaker 4: The answer is the response is, as you think about

203
00:10:51,280 --> 00:10:55,560
Speaker 4: the world geoeconomically and geopolitically, the anchor, the sacro sa

204
00:10:55,800 --> 00:10:58,560
Speaker 4: anchor that the US has is a rule of law.

205
00:11:00,559 --> 00:11:03,520
Speaker 4: It has never been a factor in any conversations that

206
00:11:03,559 --> 00:11:05,520
Speaker 4: we've had up.

207
00:11:05,360 --> 00:11:05,920
Speaker 1: To this point.

208
00:11:06,720 --> 00:11:07,680
Speaker 2: Is it a factor now?

209
00:11:08,600 --> 00:11:08,839
Speaker 1: It is.

210
00:11:09,720 --> 00:11:12,080
Speaker 4: It is moving into the conversation in the ways that

211
00:11:12,080 --> 00:11:17,199
Speaker 4: we haven't we haven't visited historically. So we need to

212
00:11:16,160 --> 00:11:20,520
Speaker 4: be very mindful of conversations that today. It is not

213
00:11:20,720 --> 00:11:23,800
Speaker 4: central to the conversations, but it has now become part

214
00:11:23,800 --> 00:11:25,840
Speaker 4: of the conversation where historically it hasn't been.

215
00:11:26,559 --> 00:11:30,000
Speaker 2: One thing that some people would argue, the Trump administration

216
00:11:30,200 --> 00:11:34,839
Speaker 2: argues is that this is an effort to rearrange a

217
00:11:34,880 --> 00:11:39,520
Speaker 2: system that has been structurally disadvantaging the United States, especially

218
00:11:39,559 --> 00:11:42,040
Speaker 2: when it comes to China. And they make the argument

219
00:11:42,080 --> 00:11:45,920
Speaker 2: that you need to play tough and do different things

220
00:11:45,960 --> 00:11:50,960
Speaker 2: to try to shake up the status quo. Are companies

221
00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:53,240
Speaker 2: still talking like that? Do they expect this to just

222
00:11:53,280 --> 00:11:57,440
Speaker 2: be a negotiation that they're to raise point Bob that

223
00:11:57,640 --> 00:12:00,240
Speaker 2: there will be a new normal that will emerge and

224
00:12:00,240 --> 00:12:02,600
Speaker 2: that the second half of this year we'll have a

225
00:12:02,600 --> 00:12:06,160
Speaker 2: more stable kind of foundation that's more visible for corporations.

226
00:12:06,320 --> 00:12:08,240
Speaker 3: What kind of a new normal do you want to have, Lisa,

227
00:12:09,120 --> 00:12:10,120
Speaker 3: I think that the normal.

228
00:12:10,440 --> 00:12:10,920
Speaker 1: No, I'm sure.

229
00:12:11,040 --> 00:12:13,920
Speaker 3: I think there's a new normal of irrationality, and I

230
00:12:13,920 --> 00:12:15,920
Speaker 3: don't think that's going to be helpful to our economy.

231
00:12:16,600 --> 00:12:18,920
Speaker 3: I think our new normal to be to return to

232
00:12:19,080 --> 00:12:23,280
Speaker 3: sensible cost benefit judgments about everything that we do in

233
00:12:23,320 --> 00:12:25,080
Speaker 3: terms of public policy, and I don't think and I

234
00:12:25,080 --> 00:12:26,800
Speaker 3: think we're doing exactly opposite right now.

235
00:12:27,880 --> 00:12:30,800
Speaker 2: What we're hearing from companies Ray is that there could

236
00:12:30,880 --> 00:12:34,439
Speaker 2: be some reasons behind some of the tariffs, and some

237
00:12:34,559 --> 00:12:36,920
Speaker 2: investors have come out and said that tariffs are attacks,

238
00:12:37,000 --> 00:12:37,920
Speaker 2: but some have said.

239
00:12:37,679 --> 00:12:39,040
Speaker 1: You know, both our attacks.

240
00:12:40,120 --> 00:12:43,120
Speaker 2: Some have come out and said that you know that

241
00:12:43,160 --> 00:12:45,520
Speaker 2: they can manage through this. The US economy is strong

242
00:12:45,559 --> 00:12:48,440
Speaker 2: and resilient and once we're past this negotiation tip for

243
00:12:48,520 --> 00:12:52,480
Speaker 2: TAT they can continue with the growth plans, and they

244
00:12:52,480 --> 00:12:55,600
Speaker 2: still are optimistic about the consumer. Ray have you heard

245
00:12:55,600 --> 00:12:56,640
Speaker 2: anything different than that?

246
00:12:57,600 --> 00:13:02,680
Speaker 4: I think there is optimism still, but optimism maybe without

247
00:13:02,720 --> 00:13:09,199
Speaker 4: the same level of conviction. Right, So the the randomness

248
00:13:09,400 --> 00:13:13,400
Speaker 4: that appears to be at play here is not one

249
00:13:13,440 --> 00:13:15,640
Speaker 4: that gives boards. And see there's a lot of confidence.

250
00:13:15,720 --> 00:13:18,400
Speaker 4: So whatever the new normal is, will they react? Is

251
00:13:18,440 --> 00:13:20,880
Speaker 4: they will react whatever whenever we get there. If it's

252
00:13:20,920 --> 00:13:24,160
Speaker 4: a new normal of continued unpredictability, there's quite quite certain

253
00:13:24,559 --> 00:13:25,960
Speaker 4: how aggressive people are going to act.

254
00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:26,960
Speaker 1: So I would.

255
00:13:26,960 --> 00:13:30,400
Speaker 4: Continue to pay pay it, pay attention to the volatility index.

256
00:13:31,000 --> 00:13:33,760
Speaker 4: I would continue to pay attention to the tenure treasure,

257
00:13:33,800 --> 00:13:36,600
Speaker 4: which I think what the administration is currently looking.

258
00:13:36,400 --> 00:13:37,800
Speaker 1: To as guidance.

259
00:13:38,160 --> 00:13:40,240
Speaker 4: And see if we get to a new normal, what

260
00:13:40,280 --> 00:13:41,320
Speaker 4: that new normal looks like.

261
00:13:41,440 --> 00:13:42,360
Speaker 1: It's not clear yet.

262
00:13:43,200 --> 00:13:45,959
Speaker 3: Fun Yeah, And if a new normal, Lisa, is new

263
00:13:45,960 --> 00:13:49,000
Speaker 3: normal which the world has tariff walls, we haven't because

264
00:13:49,000 --> 00:13:51,360
Speaker 3: they have to have retali We're having retaliation already. We'll

265
00:13:51,360 --> 00:13:54,120
Speaker 3: continue to have retaliation. And if the new war, if

266
00:13:54,120 --> 00:13:57,200
Speaker 3: the new normal is a world of tariff walls, then

267
00:13:57,240 --> 00:14:00,880
Speaker 3: will all just be less productive, less efficient, and less

268
00:14:00,880 --> 00:14:03,439
Speaker 3: effective as economies, and our people will as a result,

269
00:14:03,520 --> 00:14:05,160
Speaker 3: do less well and they would otherwise have done.

270
00:14:05,679 --> 00:14:08,720
Speaker 2: You mentioned the ten year treasure yields and Scott Bessett

271
00:14:08,760 --> 00:14:11,280
Speaker 2: has made it. The treasure secretary under Donald Trump has

272
00:14:11,320 --> 00:14:13,320
Speaker 2: made it very clear that the ten year treasure yield

273
00:14:13,360 --> 00:14:16,160
Speaker 2: is his north star in some ways, that he wants

274
00:14:16,200 --> 00:14:20,760
Speaker 2: to bring yields lower. That is a requirement to deal

275
00:14:20,800 --> 00:14:25,520
Speaker 2: with the deficit that we have. Is that how companies

276
00:14:25,520 --> 00:14:28,200
Speaker 2: are thinking about it as well? Is this how people?

277
00:14:28,200 --> 00:14:30,120
Speaker 2: I think that actually ten year treasure yields?

278
00:14:30,360 --> 00:14:31,880
Speaker 3: Now, pray Tell does he plan to do that?

279
00:14:34,440 --> 00:14:36,560
Speaker 1: Seriously? Yeah, this is something I know a little bit about.

280
00:14:36,760 --> 00:14:38,040
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, how pray Tell does he?

281
00:14:38,560 --> 00:14:38,640
Speaker 2: No?

282
00:14:39,320 --> 00:14:39,920
Speaker 1: I'm serious.

283
00:14:40,160 --> 00:14:41,960
Speaker 3: I would have gone into Act twenty six years. This

284
00:14:42,040 --> 00:14:43,160
Speaker 3: is what I did for a living and I was

285
00:14:43,160 --> 00:14:44,640
Speaker 3: a treasury for one of it. How does he want

286
00:14:44,640 --> 00:14:45,760
Speaker 3: to bring ten year yields down?

287
00:14:46,480 --> 00:14:46,720
Speaker 1: Well?

288
00:14:46,960 --> 00:14:50,720
Speaker 2: He says that according to his plans that there will

289
00:14:50,760 --> 00:14:54,080
Speaker 2: be greater efficiencies through doche but also through cost cuts.

290
00:14:54,120 --> 00:14:55,600
Speaker 1: Those an't going to create data efficiencies.

291
00:14:55,640 --> 00:14:57,560
Speaker 3: What those is going to do is tear apart our government.

292
00:14:58,160 --> 00:14:59,480
Speaker 2: But that he you need.

293
00:14:59,360 --> 00:14:59,960
Speaker 1: A greater efficial.

294
00:15:00,040 --> 00:15:01,800
Speaker 3: In the way you do that is you look at

295
00:15:01,800 --> 00:15:04,800
Speaker 3: the excesses in both regulation and government and then you're

296
00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:07,200
Speaker 3: approach them with a course of reasoned course benefit.

297
00:15:07,280 --> 00:15:08,680
Speaker 1: Now not slash and burn.

298
00:15:10,320 --> 00:15:12,480
Speaker 2: Well, the ten your treasure yield has been down every

299
00:15:12,520 --> 00:15:15,320
Speaker 2: single week, Donald Trump, the ten your treasure yield has

300
00:15:15,360 --> 00:15:16,080
Speaker 2: been down every since.

301
00:15:16,240 --> 00:15:18,000
Speaker 3: But there's people starting to worry about the economy.

302
00:15:19,120 --> 00:15:21,560
Speaker 2: So then I would ask you ray at a certain point.

303
00:15:21,840 --> 00:15:22,800
Speaker 4: No, I will.

304
00:15:25,200 --> 00:15:27,000
Speaker 3: I'm now being excluded from the conversation.

305
00:15:28,720 --> 00:15:30,880
Speaker 1: All right, I'll send you totally quiet.

306
00:15:31,560 --> 00:15:34,920
Speaker 2: No, I actually I would love to have to further

307
00:15:34,920 --> 00:15:35,200
Speaker 2: the cover.

308
00:15:35,560 --> 00:15:39,160
Speaker 4: That's what I'm yeelding to the secondary and I'm looking

309
00:15:39,200 --> 00:15:41,640
Speaker 4: at the chart here and unfortunately, if it happens to

310
00:15:41,680 --> 00:15:44,400
Speaker 4: be right, well, no.

311
00:15:44,400 --> 00:15:46,680
Speaker 2: This is this is really the key question. And actually

312
00:15:46,720 --> 00:15:49,480
Speaker 2: to your point, there has been this theory that if

313
00:15:49,520 --> 00:15:53,280
Speaker 2: yields go down, you end up with more economic dynamism

314
00:15:53,280 --> 00:15:55,480
Speaker 2: because companies will invest more. And that has been the

315
00:15:55,520 --> 00:15:57,920
Speaker 2: FED put right, this idea that if they lower rates

316
00:15:58,160 --> 00:16:00,400
Speaker 2: that will encourage people to spend more. That is not

317
00:16:00,440 --> 00:16:02,680
Speaker 2: what we're seeing in markets. That is the opposite. What

318
00:16:02,720 --> 00:16:07,400
Speaker 2: we're seeing is yields lower risk off people scared exactly

319
00:16:07,440 --> 00:16:11,240
Speaker 2: to your point and right to your point from your perspective,

320
00:16:11,640 --> 00:16:15,880
Speaker 2: do companies see yields lower as a positive shift before

321
00:16:15,920 --> 00:16:17,920
Speaker 2: when we were talking about the potential for rate hikes

322
00:16:18,280 --> 00:16:21,880
Speaker 2: or are they growing increasingly concerned to Bob's point that

323
00:16:21,960 --> 00:16:26,000
Speaker 2: this really represents a pretty massive, massive and seismic shift

324
00:16:26,360 --> 00:16:27,080
Speaker 2: in the economy.

325
00:16:27,160 --> 00:16:31,240
Speaker 4: Remember this is we're responding real time, right. I got

326
00:16:31,240 --> 00:16:34,440
Speaker 4: a pretty low tenure, and I got a stock market

327
00:16:34,440 --> 00:16:37,920
Speaker 4: to Soloft treat two to three trillion dollars today and

328
00:16:37,960 --> 00:16:41,960
Speaker 4: a VIC that's gone up by twenty percent. So the

329
00:16:42,080 --> 00:16:44,960
Speaker 4: data is and I got a conference call that's taking

330
00:16:45,000 --> 00:16:47,880
Speaker 4: place now up north, and I got one that's going

331
00:16:47,920 --> 00:16:50,240
Speaker 4: to take place to night leave. I got one that's

332
00:16:50,280 --> 00:16:52,400
Speaker 4: taking place tonight that we're all going to witness. So

333
00:16:52,440 --> 00:16:55,640
Speaker 4: the question is is CEOs are waiting to digest as

334
00:16:55,720 --> 00:16:57,360
Speaker 4: much and boards are waiting to do just as much

335
00:16:57,360 --> 00:17:01,360
Speaker 4: of this information as they can and then somehow position

336
00:17:01,520 --> 00:17:03,960
Speaker 4: themselves for what the world is going to look like

337
00:17:04,359 --> 00:17:06,040
Speaker 4: after the next two days or so.

338
00:17:06,520 --> 00:17:09,440
Speaker 1: But it won't be just that. They have to look

339
00:17:09,480 --> 00:17:10,560
Speaker 1: at the entire.

340
00:17:11,920 --> 00:17:15,240
Speaker 4: Supply chain infrastructure and how it impacts what they do

341
00:17:15,320 --> 00:17:19,160
Speaker 4: as will the US consumer. And if you go through

342
00:17:19,200 --> 00:17:22,359
Speaker 4: and look at the implications on the large retailers out there,

343
00:17:23,080 --> 00:17:29,360
Speaker 4: both electronic retailers and food retailers look at consumer staples.

344
00:17:29,400 --> 00:17:31,800
Speaker 4: For some reason, consumer staples are up. I'm looking at

345
00:17:31,800 --> 00:17:34,960
Speaker 4: some of the companies with which are in we interact

346
00:17:34,960 --> 00:17:36,520
Speaker 4: every day, and their stock scens have been moving in

347
00:17:36,520 --> 00:17:39,320
Speaker 4: the right direction. Well, right direction means the stocks are

348
00:17:39,320 --> 00:17:41,360
Speaker 4: moving up. And I'm looking at this and you're looking

349
00:17:41,359 --> 00:17:42,840
Speaker 4: at what you're looking at the vics here.

350
00:17:45,000 --> 00:17:47,520
Speaker 2: It's easier sometimes to talk about what the market's.

351
00:17:47,200 --> 00:17:51,040
Speaker 1: Doing, bought working here. So it's something that we suggest

352
00:17:51,200 --> 00:17:52,120
Speaker 1: you put a slide up.

353
00:17:52,760 --> 00:17:54,560
Speaker 2: You can just keep talking on this, Bob, I want

354
00:17:54,600 --> 00:17:56,399
Speaker 2: to come back to you about this idea.

355
00:17:56,640 --> 00:17:57,639
Speaker 1: So you're excluding me.

356
00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:01,639
Speaker 3: You want to come back to me, I may not,

357
00:18:01,840 --> 00:18:03,119
Speaker 3: I may not engage.

358
00:18:04,119 --> 00:18:09,359
Speaker 2: I think you'll engage a little bit. You're talking about

359
00:18:09,359 --> 00:18:11,240
Speaker 2: how you have quite a bit of experience as being

360
00:18:11,240 --> 00:18:12,680
Speaker 2: the Treasury secretary.

361
00:18:12,359 --> 00:18:13,720
Speaker 1: Of experience, but good idea.

362
00:18:13,800 --> 00:18:16,480
Speaker 2: And you said, how is he going to bring down

363
00:18:16,480 --> 00:18:17,600
Speaker 2: ten year treasure yields?

364
00:18:18,280 --> 00:18:20,240
Speaker 1: And right now we see them dropping.

365
00:18:20,440 --> 00:18:22,719
Speaker 3: The best way to bring down treasuries is to have

366
00:18:22,760 --> 00:18:26,919
Speaker 3: a sound economy and then have, in response to that,

367
00:18:26,960 --> 00:18:31,480
Speaker 3: have sound monetary policy, and then have treasury yiels adjust accordingly.

368
00:18:31,680 --> 00:18:34,359
Speaker 3: You don't want to have eels go down because people

369
00:18:34,560 --> 00:18:36,440
Speaker 3: are concerned that we're going to have a weak economy

370
00:18:36,520 --> 00:18:38,720
Speaker 3: or that we may run into growth problems.

371
00:18:39,160 --> 00:18:42,280
Speaker 2: It raises this question, even if these teriffs come off,

372
00:18:42,359 --> 00:18:43,680
Speaker 2: even if they rolled back.

373
00:18:44,000 --> 00:18:45,960
Speaker 1: If what rolls back the terriffs, Oh, I'm sorry.

374
00:18:45,840 --> 00:18:48,159
Speaker 2: If they are being used as a cudgel of sorts,

375
00:18:50,280 --> 00:18:54,960
Speaker 2: how long can this uncertainty remain before just the idea

376
00:18:54,960 --> 00:18:59,560
Speaker 2: of having uncertainty is really pernicious for growth.

377
00:19:02,960 --> 00:19:10,320
Speaker 3: Cain famously said that confidence underlies economic activity, and confidence

378
00:19:10,359 --> 00:19:13,439
Speaker 3: is predictability. And I think that the actions we're taking,

379
00:19:14,520 --> 00:19:18,040
Speaker 3: the tariffs, the immigration actions that we're taking, we're doing

380
00:19:18,040 --> 00:19:19,880
Speaker 3: with dough which, as I said, I think doing tremendous

381
00:19:19,920 --> 00:19:23,600
Speaker 3: damage to government and ineffectively addressing what is a real

382
00:19:23,640 --> 00:19:26,640
Speaker 3: problem with your inefficiencies and excess regulation. I think all

383
00:19:26,680 --> 00:19:29,840
Speaker 3: of that have not only substant effects, but adverse effects

384
00:19:29,840 --> 00:19:32,159
Speaker 3: on confidence and unpredictability. And I think all this talk

385
00:19:32,200 --> 00:19:34,560
Speaker 3: about retribution, of which there's been a lot of talk,

386
00:19:35,119 --> 00:19:38,000
Speaker 3: I think feeds that that lack of confidence and unpredictability.

387
00:19:39,160 --> 00:19:42,240
Speaker 2: Right from your perspective, how long can this go on

388
00:19:43,040 --> 00:19:46,160
Speaker 2: before companies that are delaying some of their investment plans

389
00:19:46,920 --> 00:19:49,200
Speaker 2: just take them off the table, you know.

390
00:19:49,200 --> 00:19:51,119
Speaker 1: I think it's early days again.

391
00:19:51,280 --> 00:19:54,560
Speaker 4: I think you're in the early innings of this tariff diplomacy,

392
00:19:55,520 --> 00:20:00,160
Speaker 4: and companies are pretty wise and thoughtful about how they engage.

393
00:20:00,359 --> 00:20:05,200
Speaker 4: This still remains the largest, used to be faster grow

394
00:20:05,200 --> 00:20:07,680
Speaker 4: an economy that exists on the planet. So there's still

395
00:20:07,720 --> 00:20:10,920
Speaker 4: confidence in what's taking place in the uas US notwithstanding

396
00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:13,520
Speaker 4: the lack of predictability. A lot of reserves, a lot

397
00:20:13,560 --> 00:20:16,199
Speaker 4: of capital reserves, a lot of pent up capital that

398
00:20:16,280 --> 00:20:19,040
Speaker 4: needs to be allocated. So I don't think there's going

399
00:20:19,080 --> 00:20:21,879
Speaker 4: to be a rush to judgment. Having said that, the

400
00:20:21,920 --> 00:20:25,960
Speaker 4: more the actions are unpredictable, then that goes to the

401
00:20:26,080 --> 00:20:29,800
Speaker 4: level of confidence that exist with senior managers and boards.

402
00:20:30,320 --> 00:20:33,040
Speaker 4: They will wait, they will wait out, wait this out

403
00:20:33,119 --> 00:20:35,240
Speaker 4: to see what the implications are in the house of

404
00:20:35,280 --> 00:20:38,040
Speaker 4: the Earth, the implications, and then take a decision on

405
00:20:38,040 --> 00:20:39,040
Speaker 4: how they're going to move forward.

406
00:20:39,840 --> 00:20:42,560
Speaker 2: Is the United States still the best place in the

407
00:20:42,560 --> 00:20:43,440
Speaker 2: world to invest?

408
00:20:43,680 --> 00:20:43,880
Speaker 1: Ah?

409
00:20:45,080 --> 00:20:48,240
Speaker 3: I would rather that's a good question, Lisa. I would

410
00:20:48,280 --> 00:20:50,560
Speaker 3: rather invest here than any other economy. But of course

411
00:20:50,560 --> 00:20:53,400
Speaker 3: that a little bit reflects on what's going elsewhere China, Europe, etc.

412
00:20:53,640 --> 00:20:55,800
Speaker 3: I mean, those are all places with tons of problems.

413
00:20:55,920 --> 00:20:57,680
Speaker 3: But having said that, we also I think it's the

414
00:20:57,720 --> 00:21:01,120
Speaker 3: greatest uncertainty. Having said that, think it's the greatest uncertainty

415
00:21:01,119 --> 00:21:03,680
Speaker 3: in the twenty six years that I've been involved, or

416
00:21:03,760 --> 00:21:07,640
Speaker 3: rather sixty years roughly that I've been involved in decision

417
00:21:07,640 --> 00:21:10,119
Speaker 3: making it one sort or another respective markets and economies,

418
00:21:10,720 --> 00:21:13,280
Speaker 3: and I think those risks have been substantially increased, as

419
00:21:13,280 --> 00:21:16,480
Speaker 3: we discussed briefly, by the action of the administration or

420
00:21:16,480 --> 00:21:18,679
Speaker 3: the perspective actions of administration, and then one other things,

421
00:21:18,680 --> 00:21:21,840
Speaker 3: if I made Lisa, I think we have an unsustainable

422
00:21:21,880 --> 00:21:26,159
Speaker 3: fiscal trajectory, and I think that as and there that

423
00:21:26,280 --> 00:21:28,160
Speaker 3: is what the administration says. The problem is, I don't

424
00:21:28,200 --> 00:21:30,040
Speaker 3: think they go at the right way. I think you

425
00:21:30,080 --> 00:21:32,000
Speaker 3: can be rational about trying to save some money, and

426
00:21:32,000 --> 00:21:33,840
Speaker 3: I think we can save some but I think it's

427
00:21:33,880 --> 00:21:37,680
Speaker 3: a practical matter that is a very limited an opportunity,

428
00:21:37,720 --> 00:21:40,359
Speaker 3: but a very limited opportunity, and fundamentally we need more revenues.

429
00:21:40,560 --> 00:21:43,000
Speaker 3: And if you look to tar and tarifs for revenues,

430
00:21:43,160 --> 00:21:45,840
Speaker 3: You'll get more revenues, but you ms be adversely affecting growth.

431
00:21:46,000 --> 00:21:46,800
Speaker 1: And the offset of.

432
00:21:46,720 --> 00:21:48,760
Speaker 3: That is probably and I've had this model for me.

433
00:21:48,800 --> 00:21:51,320
Speaker 3: Actually the offset of that is a very small, if any,

434
00:21:51,359 --> 00:21:52,480
Speaker 3: net increase in revenues.

435
00:21:53,200 --> 00:21:53,399
Speaker 1: But the.

436
00:21:55,080 --> 00:21:57,440
Speaker 3: Answer lies prodominantly on the revenue side.

437
00:21:58,119 --> 00:22:00,800
Speaker 2: Right your thought about what the United's States is still

438
00:22:01,200 --> 00:22:05,040
Speaker 2: the place that everybody wants to invest, you know.

439
00:22:05,960 --> 00:22:10,080
Speaker 4: Without reservation longer term. Yes, I look at the advantags

440
00:22:10,080 --> 00:22:15,400
Speaker 4: that have been made in technology Max seven been examples.

441
00:22:15,440 --> 00:22:18,760
Speaker 4: If I look at all the advantages that we're making

442
00:22:18,800 --> 00:22:22,280
Speaker 4: across the landscape, notwithstanding our dependence on supply chain in

443
00:22:22,320 --> 00:22:27,920
Speaker 4: many ways, this still is the most attractive, the greatest

444
00:22:27,960 --> 00:22:28,880
Speaker 4: country that exists.

445
00:22:29,080 --> 00:22:30,520
Speaker 2: What about next six months.

446
00:22:31,000 --> 00:22:33,240
Speaker 4: We're going to go through some challenges over the next

447
00:22:33,280 --> 00:22:35,480
Speaker 4: six months, We'll be challenged.

448
00:22:36,240 --> 00:22:39,160
Speaker 1: Will we get through them? The answer is yes, presumably. Now.

449
00:22:39,280 --> 00:22:41,840
Speaker 4: The challenge I have is that it's a historical mindset.

450
00:22:41,880 --> 00:22:46,600
Speaker 4: We've not seen factors come in to play historically the

451
00:22:46,640 --> 00:22:49,760
Speaker 4: way we see today. And so and I say that

452
00:22:49,800 --> 00:22:52,520
Speaker 4: with a bitter conviction, not necessarily the hope, but a

453
00:22:52,960 --> 00:22:55,800
Speaker 4: bitter conviction. I hope will always be there, but conviction

454
00:22:55,880 --> 00:22:56,639
Speaker 4: that we'll get through this.