Speaker 1: Well we have come in to your city. Way I
Speaker 1: get sing you a con.
Speaker 2: Will be desire.
Speaker 1: And if you want a little banging a yuni.
Speaker 3: And come along.
Speaker 1: We're going to make official the greatest victory yet when
Speaker 1: I signed the one Big Beautiful Bill.
Speaker 4: It will kill over ten years one hundred thousand people.
Speaker 1: That is two thousand days of death like we've seen
Speaker 1: in Texas this weekend, This big beautiful Bill. Well, if
Speaker 1: beauty is in the eye of the beholder, then you gop.
Speaker 1: You have a very blurred vision.
Speaker 3: Freedom is back in style. Welcome to the revolution we
Speaker 3: have coming to your city.
Speaker 1: On the way, I get Salzan saying you a consist.
Speaker 2: Sean Hennity Show More.
Speaker 3: I'm to see his information on freaking news.
Speaker 1: And more bold inspired solutions for America. Welcome back to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hennity Show. I'm Greg Jarrett filling in for Sean.
Speaker 1: This is our last hour today. If you want to
Speaker 1: join the program, please give us a call. We'll be
Speaker 1: taking a lot of your calls in this hour. The
Speaker 1: number is one eight hundred nine four one seventy three
Speaker 1: twenty six. That's one eight hundred and nine for one Sean.
Speaker 1: If you have a question, or a comment. Happy to
Speaker 1: have you on the program, so give us a ring
Speaker 1: one eight hundred and nine for one sean. In a
Speaker 1: few minutes, I'll be joined by Peter Schweitzer, who is
Speaker 1: one of the best authors when it comes to political corruption.
Speaker 1: He's the author of the book Blood Money, Red Handed,
Speaker 1: Throw Them Out Profiles, and Corruption Secret Empires. My favorite
Speaker 1: is actually Clinton Cash, which was an eye opening book
Speaker 1: into what I think is you know, Clinton, Hillary Clinton corruption,
Speaker 1: and in fact so much so that I quoted it
Speaker 1: pretty extensively in the first three or four chapters of
Speaker 1: my book of the Russia Hoax that came out in
Speaker 1: two thousand and eighteen. Speaking of the Russia Hoax, so
Speaker 1: there obviously. A couple of days ago the news broke.
Speaker 1: Fox News exclusively had it that the Department of Justice
Speaker 1: and the FBI have launched a criminal investigation into James
Speaker 1: Commy and John Brennan, and it arises out of the
Speaker 1: pernicious lie that Donald Trump colluded with Russia to the
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen presidential election in his favor. And the principal
Speaker 1: piece of so called evidence was a document infamously known
Speaker 1: as the Dossier. It was secretly financed by Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: In fact, she invented the hoax. And then you know
Speaker 1: it was the dossier was written by Christopher Steele, this
Speaker 1: foreign agent, ex British spy with a checkered pasted in espionage.
Speaker 1: As I said, either yesterday today, maybe both. You know,
Speaker 1: this is a guy who thought he was James Bond,
Speaker 1: but he was Inspector Clouseau. And then of course Comey
Speaker 1: and Brennan and Clapper and the whole gang brokeered it
Speaker 1: to collaborators all over the place, the Fbiica, Department of Justice,
Speaker 1: of course, the Trump hating media, and the dossier was
Speaker 1: complete garbage. The FBI debunked it almost from the outset.
Speaker 1: They fired Christopher Steele, who was a human source for
Speaker 1: the FBI. Why did they fire him? Because he was lying?
Speaker 1: And you know, but the Bureau and Comey concealed those
Speaker 1: inconvenient facts and exploited the document as a pretext to
Speaker 1: go after Trump with a vengeance, first to prevent him
Speaker 1: from getting elected. When that failed, they doubled down to
Speaker 1: drive him from office. And a guy who knows a
Speaker 1: lot about this is Peter Schweitzer. As I mentioned, he's
Speaker 1: president of the Government Accountability Project, host of the Drill
Speaker 1: Down podcast, New York Times best selling author. I mentioned
Speaker 1: five or six of his books just a moment ago.
Speaker 1: They're all must reads, and Peter joins us now live
Speaker 1: on the Sean Hannity Show. Peter, thanks so much for
Speaker 1: being with us. So what is your general reaction to
Speaker 1: the news that Comy and Clapper are under investigation? Excuse me,
Speaker 1: Comy and Brennan are under investigation.
Speaker 2: It's great to be with you as always. Greg. Yeah,
Speaker 2: you were on the on the you know, the front
Speaker 2: of this story. Really. I remember when you and I
Speaker 2: talked about this in twenty seventeen, when the initial news
Speaker 2: was breaking about these allegations about Trump, and you know,
Speaker 2: there was a moment when I thought, man, these are
Speaker 2: such serious charges. They seem to have detail, and you
Speaker 2: know you told me, you said, look, there's another shoe
Speaker 2: that's going to drop about you know how this is
Speaker 2: all fake and made up. And look at what it
Speaker 2: put our country through, you know, in twenty sixteen, really
Speaker 2: up until the present time. And the question is should
Speaker 2: there be a price or consequence paid for that by
Speaker 2: senior intelligence officials. And the fact of the matter is,
Speaker 2: if you break the law, doesn't matter what your role is.
Speaker 2: And I think that just on the issue of lying
Speaker 2: to Congress, the evidence seems overwhelming. I always defer to
Speaker 2: you on the on the legal part of this, but
Speaker 2: you know, lying to Congress is actually supposed to be
Speaker 2: a serious crime, and not just if you or I
Speaker 2: were to do it, if the head of the CIA
Speaker 2: or the head of National Intelligence has done it. And
Speaker 2: I think that is where it's going to begin, but
Speaker 2: I think the investigation is going to expand beyond that
Speaker 2: because you had a misbuse of misuse or a abuse
Speaker 2: of power by both of these individuals. And the thing
Speaker 2: we know about Washington, Greg is if you allow things
Speaker 2: to fester, if you allow people to get away with
Speaker 2: this kind of conduct, it will be imitated. And it
Speaker 2: has in fact been imitated. So you have to if
Speaker 2: they've broken a law, which I think they clearly have,
Speaker 2: to make an example and demonstrate to people this is
Speaker 2: not the sort of behavior that will can allow are
Speaker 2: elected our officials to do to put our country through.
Speaker 1: You know, Democrats and and Brennan himself is a classic projection.
Speaker 1: Oh this is vengeance, retribution. It's politically driven, and of
Speaker 1: course he's accusing Republicans are doing exactly what democrats did. So,
Speaker 1: as I say, it's classic, you know, psychological projection. But
Speaker 1: you know, I talked to new Gingrish about this yesterday, Peter,
Speaker 1: and he said, well, if you find out that somebody
Speaker 1: has broken the law, what are he's supposed to do? Say, oh, well,
Speaker 1: you know you're a Democrat, so have a nice stay,
Speaker 1: no problem, will look the other way. No, you can't
Speaker 1: do that. You have to enforce the law, and it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter whether you're a Republican or a Democrat. I
Speaker 1: mean that's the way I see it. I suspect you
Speaker 1: see it that.
Speaker 2: Way too, absolutely. And look, here's the thing, especially these
Speaker 2: guys that are in the intelligence world. Look, we need
Speaker 2: people in the intelligence world. Everybody acknowledges that we need
Speaker 2: people keeping track of our enemies. We need to be
Speaker 2: able to engage in COVID actions. But what you really
Speaker 2: had here was a COVID action carried out against the
Speaker 2: United States in the United States, and that's not something
Speaker 2: that these intelligence agencies are supposed to be doing. And
Speaker 2: I think in your introduction you laid it out really well,
Speaker 2: which is they knew that the dossier was fake. They
Speaker 2: use it as a predicate to expand the investigation. There
Speaker 2: was all this garbage that was put out, Remember the
Speaker 2: whole thing about Alpha Bank, that somehow Trump had some
Speaker 2: back channel to Alpha Bank, which was totally ridiculous. The
Speaker 2: New York Times covered that story based on quote unquote
Speaker 2: intelligence leaks. This was a dirty op that was carried
Speaker 2: out on the American people, and it was targeted, as
Speaker 2: you said, it was targeted against a particular individual, Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: And it's the classic example of corrupt behavior. You know,
Speaker 2: they used. The definition was the definition of a dirty cop.
Speaker 2: A dirty cop says I've found the man. Now I'm
Speaker 2: going to find the crime. In other words, I don't
Speaker 2: like this guy. I want this guy gone, So I'm
Speaker 2: going to figure out some way to concoct something to
Speaker 2: put him away. And that's what they did to Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: So the question becomes, what do you do in that
Speaker 2: kind of scenario. Does anybody want to live in a
Speaker 2: country where both sides or up to this point has
Speaker 2: been one side, but both sides are doing this to
Speaker 2: each other. No, that's why you have to bring clarity
Speaker 2: to this, and you have to again demonstrate that intelligence
Speaker 2: operatives cannot, under any guys be carrying out these kinds
Speaker 2: of COVID operations within our borders, to try to manipulate
Speaker 2: an election, to try to overturn an election by you know,
Speaker 2: getting a president compeached, and that was their goal, I
Speaker 2: think along First it was to defeat him in the
Speaker 2: ballot box. That didn't happen in twenty sixteen. Then it
Speaker 2: became we've got to get this guy out of power
Speaker 2: by any means necessary.
Speaker 1: And you know, they were so clever and conniving about it.
Speaker 1: When I wrote my first two books, particularly the second book,
Speaker 1: I laid out what I thought was Hillary Clinton's role,
Speaker 1: that she was behind it all, And of course I
Speaker 1: knew then that she had financed it her campaign and
Speaker 1: the Democratic National Committee had paid for the dossier. And
Speaker 1: you know, Christopher Steele was triple dipping money from the
Speaker 1: Hillary campaign, money from the Democratic National Committee, money from
Speaker 1: James Comey's FBI. But what I didn't know is that,
Speaker 1: and it came out the year after witch Hunt was published,
Speaker 1: there was a secret meeting in the Oval Office with
Speaker 1: President Barack Obama and Loretta Lynch, the Attorney General, was there.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden was there Vice President at the time, and
Speaker 1: James Clapper, who was the DNI and Brennan shows up
Speaker 1: and he tells them that we have found out that
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton has approved a plan pitched to her by
Speaker 1: her accolytes to smear Donald Trump as a Russian agent
Speaker 1: to rig the twenty sixteen election. Now was totally made up,
Speaker 1: and her motivation was to distract from her own email scandal,
Speaker 1: which was damaging her campaign. And somebody came up with
Speaker 1: the idea and again she approved it that we can
Speaker 1: shift the attention away to a greater scandal involving Donald Trump's.
Speaker 1: So Obama knew about it, Biden knew about it, obviously,
Speaker 1: Brennan Comy knew about it, and almost simultaneously, the you know,
Speaker 1: dossier began to appear. The dossier was actually handed over
Speaker 1: on July fifth, so before the July twenty eighth Oval
Speaker 1: Office meeting, was handed over the FBI in London. And
Speaker 1: you know, I didn't know then, but we now know
Speaker 1: now that Hillary Clinton was behind it. And I bring
Speaker 1: it up because you wrote the book Clinton Cash, and
Speaker 1: it just dovetails with the schemes of the Clintons, doesn't it.
Speaker 2: It does, Greg right, And by the way, which Hunt
Speaker 2: was just superb in sort of laying out the ins
Speaker 2: and outs of the evolution of this. There's also interesting
Speaker 2: confirmation from another source, Greg, and that is a guy
Speaker 2: that you to write for The New York Times named
Speaker 2: Jeff Girth. He wrote a piece in Pro Publica, which is,
Speaker 2: you know, left wing funded in part by Soros, at
Speaker 2: least it used to be, and he wrote a long
Speaker 2: essay in the origins of the Steele dossier, and he
Speaker 2: came to the same conclusion. And in fact, what he
Speaker 2: points out is that the Clinton campaign after Clinton Cash
Speaker 2: came out, and you and I talked a lot about that,
Speaker 2: and you really helpful and spreading the word about the
Speaker 2: uranium one story, the fact that you know, the Clinton
Speaker 2: Foundation had taken money from investors who were involved in
Speaker 2: helping Russia Rosatom to acquire these US uranium minds. Girth
Speaker 2: found that the Clinton campaign had actually done polling and
Speaker 2: found that one of the most damaging things to her
Speaker 2: with voters was uranium one. And Girth in his article
Speaker 2: says that one of the reasons they wanted to finger
Speaker 2: Trump as a Russian acta said, was to flip the narrative.
Speaker 2: As you said earlier, the things that they accuse Republicans
Speaker 2: of doing oftentimes they themselves are actually literally doing and
Speaker 2: that is the case here. And so it was a
Speaker 2: a you know, clever, slick manipulation and what they were
Speaker 2: counting on and what they got was this lovely response
Speaker 2: of the mainstream media. Think about this, Greg, I mean,
Speaker 2: you and I have been doing this for a long time.
Speaker 2: If somebody came to you and said, hey, I've got
Speaker 2: this thing on Joe Biden and it has all these
Speaker 2: things on Joe Biden that you want to believe, but
Speaker 2: it's completely unsourced and some of it is just ridiculous,
Speaker 2: totally out of character, you would just say, well, first
Speaker 2: of all, what is the sourcing. Second of all, you know,
Speaker 2: are there you know, multiple sources. You would ask questions.
Speaker 2: The media didn't do any of that with the Steel dossi.
Speaker 2: The Steele dossier was anonymously sourced, It had ridiculous stories
Speaker 2: in and the media ran with it hook line and sinker,
Speaker 2: just like the Clintons expected them to do. And then
Speaker 2: they used the mainstream media buy into reporting on these
Speaker 2: lies to justify further investigations of Donald Trump, his family,
Speaker 2: people in his circle. So it's just like revolving door,
Speaker 2: this reinforcing structure that operates all based on pedled lies,
Speaker 2: and again, do we want to go through that again?
Speaker 2: Do we want people to be able to manipulate that way? Again?
Speaker 2: I don't think so. So that's why I think these
Speaker 2: legal investigations are very very important, and I give the
Speaker 2: Trump administration a lot of credit for doing it. Takes
Speaker 2: a lot of courage because this sort of thing hasn't
Speaker 2: been done before, and by the way, it hasn't been
Speaker 2: done before because I think it's harder to find something
Speaker 2: more outrageous as a smear than the Steele dossier. So
Speaker 2: it is well up to side.
Speaker 1: The great Peter Schweizer, Thank you so much for taking
Speaker 1: the time.
Speaker 5: Again.
Speaker 1: Peter has written so many great books. My favorite Clinton Cash,
Speaker 1: but also Blood Money, Red Handed, throw them all out,
Speaker 1: Secret Empires, Profiles, and Corruption. The guy is all over it,
Speaker 1: all bestsellers. You got to read him. Peter Schwitzer, Thanks
Speaker 1: very much. We'll be right back. Give us a call,
Speaker 1: join the program, whether your question or comments one eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine four to one, Sean, We'll be right
Speaker 1: back and we're back with the Haunt Sean Hannity Shaw.
Speaker 1: I'm Greag Jared filling in for Sean time for your calls.
Speaker 1: We've mostly been talking about how John Ratcliffe, the current
Speaker 1: CI director, has declassified and released an internal agency review
Speaker 1: of all the machinations that helped fuel the Russia hoax,
Speaker 1: and then he issued a statement all world can now
Speaker 1: see the truth. Brennan, Clapper, and Comy manipulated intelligence and
Speaker 1: silenced career professionals all to get Trump, And in an
Speaker 1: interview with a New York Post, he said this, this
Speaker 1: was Obama, Comy, Clapper, and Brennan deciding we're going to
Speaker 1: screw Trump, and that's what they did. And of course
Speaker 1: it all turned out to be a hoax, which means
Speaker 1: now the FBI in the Department of Justice is investigating
Speaker 1: two of the people, James Comy and John Brennan, false statements, perjury,
Speaker 1: Maybe how about defrauding the government, deprivation of rights under
Speaker 1: color of law, conspiracy. I think all of that is
Speaker 1: in play. It should be whether or not a grand
Speaker 1: jury will issue indictments. Only time will tell. Time for
Speaker 1: your I want to thank you for waiting patiently. Let's
Speaker 1: go to our first caller, Eric's been standing by from Texas,
Speaker 1: and by the way, our hearts and prayers go out
Speaker 1: to the people of Texas for their horrible losses. But Eric,
Speaker 1: do you have a question or a comment?
Speaker 6: Two part question, Greg, You're doing great. Unfortunately I do
Speaker 6: have a buddy of mine who's got a daughter missing
Speaker 6: is horrible. So given the payment, the parties involved, and
Speaker 6: the and the continued acts of a mission, at what
Speaker 6: point does this is there enough there for it to
Speaker 6: be considered treason? And then the second part is what
Speaker 6: are the statues and limitations on such a crime against
Speaker 6: the United States?
Speaker 1: Well, treason is you know, efforts to overthrow the government.
Speaker 1: This looks like efforts to overthrow an election, to rig
Speaker 1: an election in favor of you know, Hillary Clinton and
Speaker 1: against Donald try tromp back in twenty and sixteen. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: what was the second part of your questionnaire?
Speaker 6: What are the statue limitations on where to be considered treason?
Speaker 6: And if we and then I guess maybe that fall
Speaker 6: up to that would be is there something else that
Speaker 6: they would likely be charged with?
Speaker 7: Yeah, or to get.
Speaker 6: Something on any of these parties.
Speaker 1: So the ones I just mentioned, you know, defrauding the
Speaker 1: government seven year statue limitations, deprivation of rights five years,
Speaker 1: the you know, false statements is five years perjury, five years.
Speaker 1: Here's the thing. Brennan last testified falsely I think, with
Speaker 1: just my opinion two years ago in twenty twenty three.
Speaker 1: So there's no statue of limitation problems there. As for
Speaker 1: the other ones. The seven year doesn't pose a problem.
Speaker 1: The five year would. But the law says you suspend
Speaker 1: the statut limitations if there's incriminating evidence, deliberately held or
Speaker 1: fraudulent concealment. Well, because we've just now found out this
Speaker 1: new information that was clearly concealed over at the Central
Speaker 1: Intelligence Agency, and I'm guessing more at the FBI, that
Speaker 1: would toll the statute of limitations, and it doesn't start
Speaker 1: running until the discovery of the concealed incriminating information. So
Speaker 1: you know, there's there are ways of getting around the
Speaker 1: statutal limitations for the crimes that I think they're looking
Speaker 1: at treason. I doubt very much if they'd be looking
Speaker 1: at that. But good question, Eric, and thanks so much
Speaker 1: for joining us. Let me turn to Blake now from Florida. Hi, Blake,
Speaker 1: how are you, Hi?
Speaker 5: I Greg I'm on WKV here in Jacksonville. Great job
Speaker 5: you're doing today. You saw to a lot of your
Speaker 5: comments with Hillary Clinton being involved in the creation of this,
Speaker 5: and we need to go back to the remember the
Speaker 5: fact that Hillary Clinton was an understudy of Salolensky and
Speaker 5: he wrote the book Rules for Radicals, and one of
Speaker 5: the things that they deposited in that book was that
Speaker 5: you attack where you blame your adversary for the bad
Speaker 5: work that you're doing. And that's exactly what's happened, and
Speaker 5: all the way through this, from the very beginning, I
Speaker 5: think we need to keep in mind just exactly where
Speaker 5: this has come from, because this is their playbook that
Speaker 5: the Democrats have been playing, have been using.
Speaker 1: Yeah, dirty tricks. I mean, you know, it's right out
Speaker 1: of the Dick Nixon dirty Tricks playbook as well. And
Speaker 1: you know that's no coincidence the Nixon thing, because it
Speaker 1: was Hillary who was a junior staffer on the Watergate
Speaker 1: investigation when she was right out of college and law school.
Speaker 1: And uh, you know, I think she learned a thing
Speaker 1: or two about the effectiveness of dirty tricks and how
Speaker 1: to avoid the precipice that Nixon fell over and getting caught,
Speaker 1: in other words, how to do a dirty trick without
Speaker 1: getting caught and for the longest period of time you know,
Speaker 1: she she didn't get caught. And the only reason we
Speaker 1: really know about you know, her scheme, her plan inventing
Speaker 1: the Russia hopes approving it that was pitched to her
Speaker 1: by her her confederates in her campaign, is because Brennan
Speaker 1: made the mistake, I guess of putting it in writing.
Speaker 1: And John Radcliffe has discovered Brennan's hand written notes memorializing
Speaker 1: that Oval Office meeting with Obama and Biden and Comey
Speaker 1: was there, and Clapper was there, and Loretta Lynch, who
Speaker 1: was then the Attorney General, in which you know, Brennan
Speaker 1: disclosed that, you know, Hillary's come up with the Russia hoax,
Speaker 1: this smear of Donald Trump, and they knew that it
Speaker 1: was completely phony. Did Obama's President of the United States
Speaker 1: come forward and say, look, we've discovered this. It's wrong,
Speaker 1: it's unethical. You know, it may be illegal. Now he
Speaker 1: kept quiet about it and quiet to this day. Same
Speaker 1: thing with Joe Biden. He never disclosed it and they knew.
Speaker 1: And you know, Hillary Clinton became very adept at things
Speaker 1: like that, and her track record is demonstrative of it.
Speaker 1: Let's go to our next call. Greg joins us from
Speaker 1: West Virginia Hi, Greg, how are you?
Speaker 7: Hey? Greg? It's Greg.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 7: Hey. So with Tomy Clapper, Brennan and the Clinton campaign
Speaker 7: and I'm sure a lot of others, these people weren't
Speaker 7: working separately.
Speaker 1: Correct, that's correct. They seem to be working together in
Speaker 1: a conspiracy, if you will.
Speaker 7: Right, So, where does the RICO charge comn.
Speaker 1: Well, it's interesting you bring that up.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 1: RICO is basically, it's a federal crime. It usually targets
Speaker 1: organized criminal activity, and you have to prove a pattern
Speaker 1: of racketeering activity and enterprise under the federal statute. And
Speaker 1: you know, normally it's used to go after things like
Speaker 1: you know, murder, kid napping, gambling, arson, blackmail, bribery, drug trafficking.
Speaker 1: You know, look what we learned in the p Diddy
Speaker 1: Sean Combe's case, in which Comey's daughter, by the way,
Speaker 1: was one of the lead prosecutors, and they failed n RICO.
Speaker 1: Why did they fail because it's exceedingly difficult to prove
Speaker 1: a racketeering case in sort of non mafia organized crime cases.
Speaker 1: It's so complex. You have to prove all these predicate
Speaker 1: crimes and then you have to prove that it was
Speaker 1: an ongoing criminal enterprise and sures really struggle wrapping their
Speaker 1: heads around it. You know, if it's John Gotti or
Speaker 1: something like that, yeah, they get it. But when it's
Speaker 1: not you know, mafia figures and organis crime, Yeah, they
Speaker 1: have a tendency now to really comprehend or understand the
Speaker 1: complexities of racketeering. So while it technically would qualify, and
Speaker 1: it's been used in political corruption cases in the past,
Speaker 1: normally those cases dealt with things like, you know, politicians
Speaker 1: on the take, bribery and so forth. So you know,
Speaker 1: I suppose it's an option, It's not one that I
Speaker 1: would recommend just by virtue if it's poor historical record.
Speaker 1: Let's go to our next caller. Will joins Us from Florida. Hey, well,
Speaker 1: do you have a question or a comment?
Speaker 3: Yeah, and thank you for taking the call. And I
Speaker 3: was thrilled to hear that you're filling up for Sean.
Speaker 3: I get to hear you for three hours, get into
Speaker 3: your legal mind. But I hear everybody talking about call
Speaker 3: me Clapper, Brennan and Hillary? Why can and they indict Hillary?
Speaker 3: I mean there's no pardons on her?
Speaker 7: Yeah?
Speaker 3: Is there a statue on her?
Speaker 1: Well, so you're you're going well past the normal statute
Speaker 1: limitations because her role in it was back in twenty
Speaker 1: and sixteen when she came up with a plan and
Speaker 1: you know, her campaign financed it along with Democrats and
Speaker 1: so forth. Her role was key. Obviously, she you know,
Speaker 1: was the instigator of the Russia hoax. I agree that
Speaker 1: she should be interviewed, and you know that puts her
Speaker 1: in jeopardy.
Speaker 3: Why, okay, why wouldn't they Why wouldn't they Why.
Speaker 1: Wouldn't they interview No, I think they should interview her.
Speaker 1: And here's the problem.
Speaker 5: Do you think that they would?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think they would.
Speaker 3: Do you think they will?
Speaker 1: Yeah? I do?
Speaker 2: Really?
Speaker 1: Yeah, He's here's the thing. If she lies in the
Speaker 1: interview about what she did, especially in the face of
Speaker 1: Brennan's now newly discovered handwritten notes, that it was all
Speaker 1: her idea to smear Trump, and if she lies about that,
Speaker 1: she'd be charged with false statements in perjury. So she
Speaker 1: that would therefore put her in legal jeopardy on that
Speaker 1: basis alone. I would interview her if I were the FBI,
Speaker 1: and I'd want to know who, among the people involved
Speaker 1: in your campaign was involved in providing the phony information
Speaker 1: to the Igor Denchenko, who gave it to Christopher Steele
Speaker 1: and who put it in the DOSSI and did you
Speaker 1: know about that? And did you approve the payments that
Speaker 1: were funneled through a law firm by the name of
Speaker 1: Perkins Cooeye that then paid Christopher Steele for the phony
Speaker 1: anti Trump dossier? What did you know about it? And
Speaker 1: obviously I would ask her did you approve the plan
Speaker 1: pitched by your team on the campaign to frame Donald Trump?
Speaker 1: And you know, again, if she lies about any of
Speaker 1: those things, she's in legal jeopardy. So I absolutely would
Speaker 1: sit her down for an interview. Now, she would go
Speaker 1: to court and fight tooth and nail against an interviewer
Speaker 1: a deposition, But I don't, frankly, think she has a
Speaker 1: leg to stand on to prevent an interview pursuant to
Speaker 1: a subpoena or whatever it takes. We're gonna pause and
Speaker 1: take a break. We have more callers standing by. Our
Speaker 1: number is one eight hundred and nine four one seventy
Speaker 1: three twenty six. Give us a call again. The number
Speaker 1: is one eight hundred and nine four one. Sean. We'll
Speaker 1: be right back and welcome back to the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: Just a minute left. I'm Greg Jared joining us now
Speaker 1: from Louisiana. Is Rick. Hey, Rick, do you have a
Speaker 1: question or a comment?
Speaker 6: Yeah, sure do, Greg. I was really wanting to go
Speaker 6: back to the lawyer that live about the carter Page
Speaker 6: situation that actually got.
Speaker 4: Them in to the Trump campaign from the beginning. From
Speaker 4: my knowledge, as far as I know, he only got
Speaker 4: a slap on the wrist. Yeah, just barred for such
Speaker 4: a series. But they could re review that any kind
Speaker 4: of weave.
Speaker 1: Yeah. His name is Kevin klein Smith. The case has
Speaker 1: been resolved. He got probation. James bos the judge gave
Speaker 1: him a Freebieklinesmith altered a document that said carter Page
Speaker 1: was not a source for another US intelligence agency, when
Speaker 1: in fact he was. He added the word not so
Speaker 1: basically falsified documents, and he got off pretty easy. I
Speaker 1: doubt it could be revisited. Great question though, And that's
Speaker 1: it for the Sean Hannity Shawn. Greg jareded it's been
Speaker 1: a pleasure to be here yesterday and today. I hope
Speaker 1: you have a great Thursday. Bye bye.