WEBVTT - Brad Setser on the Big Surge in the Taiwanese Dollar

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Locks podcast.

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm Jill Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway. Tracy, sometimes are

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 2>old random episodes on just random things end up being

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of relevant.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean sometimes? What do you mean random?

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 3>All of our episodes, each of them are like our children.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 3>They're each special and relevant in their own way. That's

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 3>what I say.

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 2>You're right, they're all special. I would say they're all

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 2>special in their own way. Some of them probably have

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 2>more relevance to others. You know, this used to not

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 2>even be our full time job. We just found interesting things,

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>sometimes connected to the news, sometimes not. But I remember

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty nineteen, the first time I noticed people like talking

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 2>about odd Lads before the pandemic was an episode we

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 2>did on Taiwan's life insurance companies.

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 3>That's right, And I guess the reason this episode kind

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 3>of went viral or became a thing was because of

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 3>the framing. We sort of framed it as a financial

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 3>market murder mystery almost or sort of who done it?

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 3>In global of financial flows? And I guess you don't

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 3>get many of those. You still don't get many of those,

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 3>we should do more of them. But people definitely got

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 3>into this one and definitely still remember it.

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Definitely still remember it. Definitely get into it. So the

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 2>basic gist was that it was sort of well known

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 2>obviously that Taiwani's Life Insurance, which is this huge investing

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 2>savings product in Taiwan, that they were a major purchaser

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 2>of US treasuries, which of course leaves the companies potentially

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 2>at risk for currency slippage, but that the Central Bank

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 2>in Taiwan was revealed in the who done it as

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>the entity sort of providing a hedge of sorts such

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 2>that this was an economic safe trade for the life

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 2>insurance companies. And of course there's only one person we

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 2>could have ever been talking to who would have been

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 2>able to explain this whole phenomenon.

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 3>That's right, And of course we're going to be speaking

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 3>to them again because it's a new month, and in fact,

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 3>one of the things we've seen happening the big story

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 3>so far this month is the move in the Taiwanese dollars.

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 3>So we've seen this massive appreciating move in the Taiwanese

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 3>dollar against the US dollar. I think just this morning

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 3>alone we're recording on Monday, May fifth, it was up

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 3>something like five percent just in a day against the

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 3>ins dollar.

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 2>It's up two and a half percent. I think that

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 2>was the I think it's up like five percent total

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 2>in two days.

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Five percent total in two days. Sorry, but still for

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 3>a currency that like tends to be fairly stable and boring,

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 3>this is a huge deal. So there's three certainties in

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 3>financial life, right. There's death taxes and the idea that

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 3>the Taiwanese life insurers are going to be buying dollar

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 3>denominated assets because they can, because things have remained so

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 3>stable and so boring for decades now that they can

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 3>just keep on doing this trade. And then suddenly, out

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 3>of nowhere, just in the past two days, we've seen

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 3>this really violent shift in the way things have always

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 3>been happening in Taiwan, and so we got to talk

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 3>about it, and we definitely got to talk about it

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 3>with Brad.

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 4>We got to talk about it.

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Actually, I'm looking at this a three day chart. USD

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 2>TWD down six point six percent since April thirtieth, crazy move.

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 2>You're right, we got to talk to Brad Setzer. He's

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 2>the one who's been on this story longer than anyone else.

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Brad Setser, Senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations,

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for I don't know you're like

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 2>coming back for like your like fifteenth odd lot's appearance.

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 4>Not quite fifteen, but it's a lot.

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, maybe I'm just exaggerating, but not by much. I

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 2>don't think at this point. You know, it's interesting in

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 2>the post April second environment. You know, a lot of markets,

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 2>like treasuries or just the you know, treasuries and the

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 2>stock market have stabilized quite a bit. Well, the currency

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 2>does seem to be where the action is stepping back up.

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Before we get to the move that we've seen over

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 2>the last few days, just for the sake of our listeners,

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 2>give us the sort of top level description of the

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 2>flows that we see out of Taiwan and the role

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 2>of the central bank there in making that trade economical

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 2>for the lifers.

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 5>Well, Taiwan runs one of the biggest current account surpluses

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 5>in the world. It's fluctuated between ten percent of Taiwan's

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 5>GDP and fifteen percent of Taiwan's GDP is now on

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 5>the high side, it's close to fifteen percent of Taiwan's

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 5>GDP over.

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 4>One hundred billion dollars a year.

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 5>That is a big sum, and obviously a current account

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 5>surplus means that someone in the economy has to on

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 5>net be accumulating foreign assets, and over time that entity

0:04:55.960 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 5>has shifted from you know, in the fifteen or the

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 5>ten years after the Asian Financial Crisis, it was essentially

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 5>the Central Bank of China a Taiwan's central bank accumulating

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 5>foreign exchange reserves, mostly going into treasuries. At some point,

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 5>the Central Bank of China said more or less, hey,

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 5>we've got enough reserves, and maybe they were coming under

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.799
<v Speaker 5>a little bit of pressure from the US to manage

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 5>their currency a little bit less. So the central bank

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 5>and the insurance regulator in a sense worked together to

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 5>make it possible for the life insurance industry, which in

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 5>Taiwan is big, to add to the share of its

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 5>assets which were in foreign currencies, and to increase the

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 5>sales of insurance policies so that the insurance industry was

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 5>growing relative to Taiwan's economy. Combine those two things, and

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 5>the insurers basically from twenty ten to twenty twenty build

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:58.119
<v Speaker 5>up an enormous portfolio of foreign bonds. They put about

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 5>two thirds of their total ass sets in foreign bonds,

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 5>an enormous share. And as in our famous episode, there

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 5>was a secret hedgebook that offset let's say a quarter

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 5>of that exposure with a hedge with the central bank,

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 5>which wasn't disclosed until twenty twenty. So our famous episode

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 5>actually triggered a change in the central bank's policy. The

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 5>central banks started disclosing that forward book in twenty twenty.

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 5>After the pandemic, this flow has been more modest. It

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 5>hasn't gone away, but the lifers aren't buying up the

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 5>entire current account sturtplus, you're seeing a little bit more

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 5>more purchases from the banking system which is now able

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 5>to offer foreign currency policies. And then another favorite topic

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 5>of odd lots the Taiwanese semiconductor manufacturer TSMC. When it

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:55.239
<v Speaker 5>started building chip factories fabs in Japan and in the US,

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 5>that outward FDI became a big counterpart to the current

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 5>accounts plus. But the effect is that, you know, Taiwan

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 5>is just stuffed to the gills with unhedged holdings of

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 5>dollars in dollar bonds.

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Never let it be said that odd lots is not

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 3>an agent for change. So we actually affected the world

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 3>through that episode, mostly Brad, but we gave you a platform.

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 4>I guess you did very powerful one, all right.

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 3>So I would definitely encourage anyone who's really interested in

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 3>this topic to go back and listen to the whole

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 3>thing because there's a lot of nuance in there. And

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, Joe mentioned in the intro that Taiwanese life

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 3>insures buy a lot of US treasuries, but it's not

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 3>just US treasuries, it's also things like US corporate bonds.

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 3>And we're not going to rehash the whole thing here,

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 3>but why don't we just dive into what's been happening today?

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 3>So things had been changing recently, and I guess Taiwanese

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 3>life insurres hadn't been buying as many US bonds as

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 3>they once did, but they still have this huge enormous

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 3>stack of dollar assets and they're still, you know, pretty

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 3>underhedged relatively, And I think I saw some people talking

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 3>that it seems like the life insurers weren't even very

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 3>well hedged like comparatively. In recent months, they'd taken off

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 3>some of the hedges since April. Second, do we have

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 3>any indication why that was or why they wouldn't have

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 3>been particularly hedged in this particular moment in time.

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, with Josh Younger, who formerly was the interest rates

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 5>strategist at JP Morgan and one of the other people

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 5>who had a little bit of an obsession with understanding

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 5>the Taiwanese flow, we put out an estimate in January

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 5>that the unhedged book of the life insurers was about

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 5>two hundred billion, which is, you know, fifteen to twenty

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 5>percent of their assets, a very big sum. Why is

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 5>have they stayed on hedge maybe gotten a little bit

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 5>more unhedged? Yeah, simple reason hedging was expensive. Hedging is

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 5>essentially a function of the differential between Taiwanese short term

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 5>rates and US dollars short term rates. So as the

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 5>US hiked rates in twenty twenty two twenty three, they've

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 5>come down a little, but they're still absolutely high. The

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 5>cost of hedging went up, and I think what you

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 5>see across Asia, not just in Taiwan, is that as

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 5>the cost of hedging went up and as Asian currencies

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 5>were basically trading on the weak side, so there was

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 5>no financial penalty to being underhedged, institutions took advantage of

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 5>those incentives and reduced their headge ratio. On top of that,

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 5>the Taiwanese Insurance Regulator, under pressure from the life insurers,

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 5>essentially allowed the lifers to substitute a foreign exchange volatility

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 5>reserve for some hedging and let them go a little

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 5>more unhedged going into this year.

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 4>Classic kind of mistake.

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 2>So it's not just a Taiwanese dollar story. Since April second,

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 2>we've obviously seen this broad weakness in the US dollar.

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the few charts that you can find

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 2>that really has not bounced at all or very little

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 2>since that first week. The Bloomberg Dollar Index down broadly

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 2>against everyone, but the Asian currencies, the East Asian ones

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 2>have really flown. And you know what's funny is that

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people expected. They're like, oh, well, when

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 2>tariffs come in place, then the dollar is going to

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 2>strengthen and that's going to offset some of the tariffs.

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 2>We've seen the exact opposite. Before we get to Taiwan specifically,

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 2>what's the general story in your view for why the

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 2>dollar has weakened as much as it has post April second.

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 5>I think there's two general factors. The first factor is

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 5>the dollar was just exceptionally strong against most Asian currencies,

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 5>so the starting points do matter, and a yen at

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 5>one forty five now it's not one fifty five, but

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 5>one five is an incredibly weakend. Until very recently, the

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 5>Taiwan dollar was on the weak side of its long

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 5>term range. The Korean one was at fourteen fifty. Fourteen

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 5>fifty is the level it reached during the Korean financial

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 5>crisis and during the global financial crisis, and it's actually

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 5>weaker than that in a real sense because of the

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 5>inflation differentials. So I think it's the fundamental reason is

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 5>that Asian currencies were very weak, the dollar was very strong.

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.599
<v Speaker 5>And then China made a policy choice not to respond

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 5>to the draconian tariffs the one hundred and forty five

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 5>percent tariff twenty percent from the legacy Fittinel case and

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and twenty five percent on the reciprocal tariff case.

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 5>You know, like China is the only country that got

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 5>really claberd with the reciprocal tariff. In the end, China

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 5>chose not to respond by depreciating the yuan. And I

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 5>think the fact that it China didn't respond that the

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 5>yuan didn't depreciate, and that you know, in a sense,

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 5>there was newsflow that is suggestive that there's at least

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 5>some chance there'll be an agreement, or even in the

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 5>absence of an agreement, a decision to pull back some

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 5>of the US tariffs on China. All that laid the

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 5>backdrop for this recent move.

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So getting back to Taiwan specifically, I'm not going

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 3>to ask you if Taiwan's central bank when they would

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 3>have to intervene, because I think that's kind of a

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 3>boring question. But instead I'm going to ask you, what

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 3>are the limitations on Taiwan's central bank in terms of intervention.

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 4>That's a good question.

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 5>The usual intervention limits on a central bank's intervention is

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 5>in a sense that they run out of foreign exchange

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 5>and they can't borrow more. But that's what the limits

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 5>you face when you're trying to prevent your currency from falling,

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 5>from depreciating, when you're trying to prevent your currency from

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 5>appreciating arising. There's really no intrinsic limit to how much

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 5>foreign exchange a central bank can accumulate. So in that sense,

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 5>the Central Bank of China could at any point step

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 5>in and buy up a lot, a lot of dollar dollars.

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 5>The Central Bank of China has close to six hundred

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars already a little more when you count it's

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 5>off balance sheet. It's already holding close to one hundred

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 5>percent of Taiwan's GDP and foreign exchange reserves. But there's

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 5>no intrinsic limit on how high that could go. I

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 5>think the limits are in a sense twofold one is.

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 5>And you know, we don't really know what motivated the

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 5>Central Bank of China to stay relatively restrained. I mean,

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 5>I think they were in the market to smooth some

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 5>of the moves. They had more or less admitted that

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 5>both Friday and Monday and today, but they weren't trying

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 5>to stop the move. They were trying to smooth the move.

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 5>And one reason why is maybe they thought the life

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 5>insurance industry had gotten a little bit too aggressive, it

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 5>was not paying enough attention to risk, and they were

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 5>afraid that if the Central Bank of China came in

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 5>too quickly stop the move too rapidly, in a sense,

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 5>the lifers wouldn't learn a useful lesson in risk management.

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 5>So you can call that thesis one the second thesis

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.319
<v Speaker 5>is that the central bank is feeling a little bit

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 5>of heat from the United States, partially because the US

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 5>Treasury is preparing it's next for an exchange report. That

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 5>report may be out any day, Partially because Peter Navarro

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 5>has long thought that the Taiwanese dollar was undervalued, Partially

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 5>because currency has been a topic in the negotiations over

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 5>these supposed deals with most Asian countries, and so the

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 5>Central Bank of China may have been a little bit reluctant.

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 5>Central Bank of China's Taiwan Central Bank may be a

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 5>little bit reluctant to just put an absolute block on

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 5>this move and in the process draw attention to the

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 5>fact that Taiwan's currency is heavily managed, that Taiwan keeps

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 5>his currency from appreciating when necessary, at least historically through

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 5>actions of the central bank, which some people would call manipulation.

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 2>So there's a few different ways this could go. And

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 2>as you mentioned, perhaps one possibility is that Taiwan, along

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 2>with Korea, maybe along with other East Asian countries, as

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 2>part of a possible trade deal, if there is going

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 2>to be one, maybe they're going to let their currencies

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 2>strengthen and let that do some work in terms of

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 2>balancing out trade. Another possibility, and I'm curious, you know,

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 2>just sort of where this game's out. Could you see

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 2>a scenario in which these countries reinvest more of their

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 2>dollar inflows into like something that resembles consumer demand or

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 2>domestic demand and produce the sort of global demand for goods,

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 2>perhaps some from the United States or services from the

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 2>United States. That leads to, you know, some sort of

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 2>the type of desirable balance that the new administration would

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 2>like to see.

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean, I think those in a sense are

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 5>part of the discussion. They aren't mutually exclusive. You can

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 5>let your currency appreciate and then try to take steps

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 5>using your domestic fiscal capacity or the government as opposed

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 5>to the central banks balance sheet to support domestic demand.

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 5>That would be a very sensible thing, frankly for Taiwan

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 5>to do. Running a fifteen percent of GDP current accounts

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 5>for plus in perpetuity effectively has meant that Taiwan has

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 5>been overpaying for US dollar bonds for the past fifteen years,

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 5>and it's accumulating an ever bigger forward looking financial loss

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 5>from the inevitable currency move. Because the Taiwan dollar is

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 5>by any measure, incredibly weak. Some part of the Taiwanese

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 5>economy just has to overpay for US financial assets and

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 5>build up a loss. You may say that doesn't make sense.

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 5>We should be investing more in our own people, We

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 5>should be building out our social welfare system. The same

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 5>issues that China faces actually are relevant in Taiwan. The

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 5>government doesn't run a much of a fiscal deficit. The

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 5>government actually doesn't spend very much on defense either. So

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 5>for Taiwan's case, there's a pretty clear and compelling case

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 5>that they should have a more aggressive fiscal policy, more

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 5>investment in their own defense, and a bigger and more

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 5>generous social safety net. All that, though, takes time, and

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 5>you're starting from a fifteen percent of GDP current account surplus.

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 5>That surplus isn't going to go away. TSMC still has

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 5>a very dominant position in logic chips, so their export

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 5>position won't be enormously impacted by moves in the Taiwan dollar,

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 5>at least not in my judgment. So I think there

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 5>is a separate set of questions about how you manage

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 5>the risk that has already been built up in the

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 5>insurance sector, and what I would like to see the

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 5>central bank do is set up a hedging program so

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 5>that the lifers can hedge pretty much directly with the

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 5>central bank and thereby reduce the financial stability risk. If

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 5>the Taiwan dollar continues to appreciate, take away some of

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 5>the pressure on the central bank to avoid appreciation. I

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 5>think that would facilitate a broader move in Taiwan's currency.

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 5>And no doubt you're right, Taiwan, Korea, Japan all prefer

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 5>to appreciate when all their currencies are going up together,

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 5>and I think that was some of the negotiations around

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 5>China is at least potentially an opportunity to make some

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 5>progress on the rebalancing front in a healthy way.

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.479
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so I'm going to ask, I guess just the

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 3>really blunt question to this point, but is this basically

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 3>a win for Trump? You know, if I think back

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 3>US officials, perhaps even you have basically been complaining of

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 3>if you're going to be diplomatic about it, under the

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 3>radar currency intervention by Taiwan's central bank, and other people

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 3>not being diplomatic would call it outright currency manipulation in

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 3>Taiwan for years now, Suddenly the Taiwanese dollar has appreciated

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 3>by six point six percent in the space of a

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 3>few days. Is that a win?

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 5>Not yet, We're still at around thirty. We've gone from

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 5>whatever around thirty three to a round thirty. In the

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 5>past the Taiwan dollar has gotten up to around twenty eight.

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 5>I think in order for it to be a real win,

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 5>we have to see evidence that Taiwan is allowing its

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 5>currency to strengthen through the levels which the central bank

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 5>has historically defended in the sense of defended against pressure

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 5>from appreciation, not the usual sense of the word. So

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean there is a broader I guess irony, which

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 5>is I don't think the administration was hoping for a

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 5>dollar selloff. A lot of the talk around a mar

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 5>Alago accord was trying to mitigate the risks that tariffs

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 5>would lead to the dollar to appreciate and thereby undermine

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:31.120
<v Speaker 5>some of the expected benefits from the Trump administration's point.

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 4>Of view of the tariffs.

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 5>But it is certainly the case that the most effective

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 5>way to bring the US trade deficit down is just

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 5>to get the dollar weaken and so if one effect

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 5>of Trump's policies is to reduce the appeal of the

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 5>US as a destination for foreign investors, including some foreign

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 5>investors who were maybe overly eager to buy US financial assets.

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 5>That would prompt some adjustment. I think that adjustment what

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 5>is going to happen to some degree independent of Trump.

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 5>But you know, let's see. I mean, if Scott Besson

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 5>can engineer a coordinated appreciation of all Asian currencies, and

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 5>that the net result of all these trade deal negotiations,

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:16.479
<v Speaker 5>which are seeming to be a little broader than just

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 5>trade negotiations, is a meaningful change in the level of

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 5>all of the Asian foreign exchange complex against the dollar.

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 4>That would be a win in my view.

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 3>And then again, just on this point, you've set out

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 3>very brilliantly already the impact that Taiwanese life insurers and

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 3>some of the other big Taiwanese investors have on I guess,

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I guess I would say three buckets of assets slash

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 3>financial markets, so US treasuries, corporate credit, and then the

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 3>interest rates space, where we see them as big players

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 3>in rate volatility in various ways. How would you expect

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 3>those three buckets to be impacted by what we've just

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 3>seen over the past few days.

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think there's already been some important shifts. Josh

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 5>Hunger and I highlighted that the Taiwanese lifers have not

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 5>been big buyers of so called callable bonds, bonds which

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.719
<v Speaker 5>can be called by the issuer if rates fall. They

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 5>bought a lot of those before the covid as port

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 5>of a yield pickup strategy, but that particular bid has

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 5>sort of disappeared, and that had in turn had knocked

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 5>on effects on the agency market. So there's already been

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 5>some adjustments as a result of the slowdown in Taiwanese

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 5>lifers purchases over the past few years. In the fact,

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 5>they've gotten a little bit more conservative right now, where

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 5>the lifers are particularly important is for long dated US

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 5>corporate bonds twenty year plus, that kind of STAD investment

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 5>grade corporates, and then a lot of dollar bonds issued

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 5>by relatively high grade emerging markets and Asian issuers. The

0:21:55.720 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 5>lifers themselves tend not to be super heavy and treasuries.

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean, they have some, but they're not the dominant

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 5>buyer of treasuries out of Taiwan. The dominant buyer of

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 5>treasuries out of Taiwan tends to be the Central Bank

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 5>or the banking system. So what I think will happen

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 5>if the lifers are no longer willing or trying to

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 5>reduce their dollar book is they're going to see less

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 5>demand for corporate bonds, including some in some particular corners

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 5>of the market where they're very important. And then you're

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 5>going to see if the Central Bank of China comes

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 5>in and intervenes pretty either to smooth the move or

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 5>to at some point cap the move, then you'll see

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 5>a rotation and demand back towards treasuries. One of the

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 5>ironies that I don't think a lot of people kind

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 5>of have internalized is that central bank demand for treasuries

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 5>tends to be very correlated with dollar weakness. Countries that

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 5>don't want their currency to appreciate or don't want their

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 5>currency to appreciate too quickly intervene in the market they

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 5>buy dollars, and central banks tend to be the player

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 5>that is least inclined to buy corporate debt to take

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 5>credit risk, and most inclined just to plow that money

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 5>into the treasury market and typically into the shorter end

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 5>of the curve. So that's kind of the rotation that

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 5>I would expect going forward. I don't think you're going

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 5>to see big changes in the Treasury book because I

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 5>think you're going to see this central bank bid. There's

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 5>a small subtle question that comes up. If the Central

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 5>Bank of China does what I suggested, which opens up

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 5>a hedging facility with its banking system and ultimately with

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 5>its insurers, that would take dollars. But I think one

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 5>thing that the US has done over the past five

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 5>years is that it's created a repo facility for foreign

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 5>central banks, and that really is the kind of facility

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 5>that would allow a central bank like Taiwan Central Bank

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 5>that has a ton of dollar bonds to get dollar

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 5>cash without selling its bonds. So I think you could

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 5>have some sort of coordination there that could effectively help

0:23:58.280 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 5>the lifers close.

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 4>Some of the hedg you need.

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 5>So that's one of the things I'd like to see happen,

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 5>and I think that would facilitate an orderly appreciation of

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 5>the Taiwan dollar, one that doesn't break the back of

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 5>its insurance industry.

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, Brad Setzer at the Council on

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 2>Foreign Relations. Thank you so much for coming back on

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 2>odd lots. The only one who could have explained it

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 2>as clearly as you do. Really appreciate it.

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, thanks for letting me talk about one of my great.

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Passions, love talking to Brad, Love the return of the

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 2>relevance of this sort of what seemed like a niche thing.

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Joe, I'm just gonna say, you need to live your

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 3>life every day like Taiwanese life insurers are the biggest

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 3>story in the world. No, that's how to do it.

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:57.199
<v Speaker 2>You know what, all ironically that you're right that we

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 2>should never do episodes period, that you and I don't

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 2>consider the most important story of the day. Like that's

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 2>just a good editorial dictum to live by.

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Isn't it excellent? Yes, I mean this is definitely the

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 3>case at the moment. This is the story.

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 4>It is the story.

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.199
<v Speaker 2>And like, you know what's interesting is okay, here you

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 2>have this huge line on the screen and this big jump,

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 2>and it intersects with the financial markets, and you know,

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 2>looking at the stocks today, you know, it's not like

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 2>we've seen some major spill over it in fact s

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 2>and P five hundred is barely down right now. But

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 2>still it's hard not to get anxious when you see

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.959
<v Speaker 2>like big ninety degree angles in a chart. You know,

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 2>us TTWD.

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:38.199
<v Speaker 3>So I have two things to say about this. So

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 3>number one, I don't think a lot of investors are

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 3>very good at thinking about basically international financial flows. Yeah,

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 3>and I would say that of financial media organizations as well.

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 3>I have long said that every financial media organization that

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 3>takes itself seriously should have a global flows correspondent, and

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 3>to my knowledge, I don't think anyone does still. But

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 3>then secondly, the other thing I would say is I

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 3>mentioned that we're into May, and so everyone is looking

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 3>past at the month that has been April, a wild April,

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 3>and all the headlines are like, oh, it was a

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 3>crazy thirty days. But look, the S and P five

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 3>hundred is back to where it was before Liberation Day,

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 3>and so everything's fine, It's all good now. But that

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 3>doesn't really sit right if you start to look at

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 3>places like the flows data or the currency data. Right

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 3>the US dollar is still down quite a lot. You

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 3>can find little examples of risk premiums in various markets

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 3>still being higher than they were on April. Second, and

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 3>a lot of those are in the currency space or

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 3>the bond space, because this is where foreign investors are

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 3>really thinking about. I guess the existential crisis or existential

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 3>angst of investing with America. And again, like in my mind,

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 3>if you're talking about a trade war and the impacts

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 3>of a potential trade war, it would be in those

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 3>global international flows, the way big pools of capital move

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 3>around the world. And so I think it's really interesting

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 3>to me that we are seeing those kind of breakages

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 3>at least in the Taiwanese dollar and the US dollar

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 3>at the moment. Like that is indicative of the idea

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 3>that no, there is actually something really big and important

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 3>happening in the world at the moment, and it's not

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 3>just about the S and P five hundred.

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 4>Right, because NS in P.

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Five hundred is a large part about big tech stocks

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 2>and they're doing fine.

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 4>It seems fine.

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, they're still like building big AI data centers

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 2>and all that stuff. But to your point, there's other

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 2>stuff going on in the world besides tech stocks still

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 2>continuing to go up.

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, indeed, shall we leave it there for now?

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Let's leave it there.

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the add Thoughts podcast.

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 3>and I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 2>You can follow me at the Stalwart. Follow Brad Setser

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 2>He's at Brad Underscore Setser. Follow our producers Kerman, Rodriguez

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 2>at Kerman, Arman, Dashill, Ben at Dashbott and kill Brooks Kilbrooks.

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 2>More Oddlots content go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Lotshere we have a daily newsletter and all of our episodes,

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 2>and you can chat about these topics twenty four to

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 2>seven with fellow listeners in our discord Discord dot gg

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 2>slash odd Lots.

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 3>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 3>when we bring back Brad Setzer to talk about the

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 3>financial market, Who'd done it of the Taiwanese life insurers,

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 3>then please leave us a positive review on your favorite

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 3>podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber,

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 3>you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free.

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 3>All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 3>on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 3>listening

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 2>In