WEBVTT - Why We Don't Build More Apartments for Families

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wis Tracy. You know, we did a recent

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>episode on rent and whether the price of rent is

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>ever going to go down? And I asked the question, like,

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>why don't they ever build new apartment buildings for families?

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Totally un self interested questions from now from here on out,

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Now that our years of just doing supply chain episodes

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to come to an end, let's just do

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>episodes about our own personal ground, our own personal frustration

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. All right, where are all the dog

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>amenities for apartments? That's my question. That's the thing. Like,

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of buildings with dog amentities. And as a

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I have two kids, and sometimes we look

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>at like new apartments and they're like, I want like

0:00:56.200 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a building with dog amentities and billiard rooms in gyms

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and dorman and all that stuff. But they don't make

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>those buildings for like the actual units. And my kids

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>don't play pool. Well, you got to teach them, no.

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think you're right. It seems like a lot

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of apartment buildings are geared towards young professionals. For the

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>most part. It's studios, it's one bedrooms. Here in New York,

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it tends to be larger apartments that have been cut

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>up at one point in time, and you end up

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>with these really weird floor plans where like the bathroom

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is right next to the kitchen. Yeah, and it's it's

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>not a very pleasant experience for anyone. But I think

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>there is there is this overarching question of why are

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>these decisions being made in the way that they're being made, right, Like,

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>there must be some reason, And the people who are

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>building these buildings, you know, obviously they have, you know,

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>presumably some good business reasons, but I don't know what

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>they are, and I find it frustrating, And I guess

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd like it to change, but I don't know, like

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>if any like developers are going to like change their

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>business models. For me, I think the expectation is, like,

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I just got to move out to the suburbs. My

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>kids are really tired of sharing a punk bit. Okay.

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>What I will say also is I think this is

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a peculiarly American problem because having lived in many other places,

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>apartments are well designed, even in Hong Kong, where the

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>average size of apartments tends to be incredibly small. They

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>are designed for that tiny square footage, and so they

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>tend to be quite functional even for families, and certainly

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in Europe there's much more of a culture of renting

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>versus ownership, so that you do have families who spend

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>decades in the same apartment building. I think you're totally

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>right here. The basic idea is that if you live

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in the city in an apartment, you're young, you're single,

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and then if you have kids at some point, then

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you move out to the suburbs, and the housing stock

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is not made for people who would say like to

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>stay in the city and maybe be a renter in

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>one unit or one building for twenty years. Yeah. I

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>think that's exactly right. All right, So what explains the

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>state of affairs? Is there any reason to change it?

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be speaking to two guests I think

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>they were both heard our last episode and then spend

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days sort of debating it on Twitter,

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and so it's like, well, why debate on Twitter when

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you can come in. So we're going to come talk

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to us. Yeah, just come talk talk to us. Rather

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>than wasting get all in tweets. We are going to

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>be speaking with Stephen Smith. He is the executive director

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>at the Center for Building in North America, I think

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>tank around construction policy. And we're also going to be

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Bobby Fian. He is a real estate developer

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and he there's all about apartment floor plans and the

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking behind the business reasons behind these decisions. So, Bobby

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and Stephen, thank you so much for joining us. Very

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>glad to be here. Yeah, thanks for having me so, Steven,

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll start with you, but really, are we right? Like,

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>let's start with is the premise that we're talking about

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of these new developments really aren't geared

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>towards families? Is that correct? Yeah? I mean the typical

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>new apartment building in the United States, the developer will

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>try to cram in as many studios in one bedrooms

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>as they can. You know, I think it's mostly driven

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>by policy. You have a lot of there's a lot

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 1>of planning policy that tries to encourage more family sized units,

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>but they're really pushing against some more fundamental regulations that

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>make it quite difficult to build family sized apartments in

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>any sort of affordable way in not just the US,

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>but also Canada, North America. Stephen can I ask you

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>a quick follow up before we bring in Bobby, But

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>why does it matter? Do we need to have families

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in apartments? Why can't everyone just move out to the suburbs.

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that, you know, that's the that's the safety valve.

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>As you know in America, you can just move out

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to the suburbs, and we make it quite easy to

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>build family sized houses. So I mean, you know, does

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>it matter? I guess you know, if you want our

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>cities to thrive, if you want, you know, people to

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to raise families in them, you know, for

0:04:55.839 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>environmental reasons or you know, even for some social reasons. Yeah,

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say it matters. I don't want to live

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in I don't want to live in the suburbs. I

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't either. I like living in Manhette. I don't want

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe to have to live in suburbs. Point. Thank you,

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you for recognizing that. All right, Bobby, all right,

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 1>let's bring you in. So you come from it from

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>the business perspective, What is like the sort of like

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 1>big picture math in your view of someone builds a

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>new apartment, they have an opportunity, they get the approvals

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to put down apartments on a plot of land. Why

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is it better to target young professionals and the types

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that don't need that space for children. Well, it is

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>simple math in that smaller units generate higher rent per

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>square foot, and that is the primary driver of returns

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>for ground up apartments in the way that we finance

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>them here in the United States, which is, you know,

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>through private market capitalism, unlike other parts of the world.

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>So in those places, someone will look at the building

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in their spreadsheet and they'll look at or comps from

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.119
<v Speaker 1>the market, and the primary way that they compare units

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to other units that they say, here's the rent, here's

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the size, here's the number of bedrooms. I want to

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>try and make it slightly smaller. So like it's like

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the power of diminishing marginal turns like in reverse, right,

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a five hundred ninety nine square foot one bedroom will

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>get basically the same right in a six hundred square

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>feet So that dynamic ends up pushing all units to

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>being smaller. That's the basic math for why realistic developers

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>are incentivized to try and put as many of those

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>types of units they can into the building as possible.

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>There's a host of other things that I'd say have

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:41.559
<v Speaker 1>to do with the different timeline of incentives, but that's

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the largest driver. So walk us through as a real

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>estate developer. You know, when you are considering a potential

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>investment or a potential new project, what are the things

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>on your spreadsheet that you're looking at? How are you

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>making those calculations? While I like to think that I

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>make them a little bit differ than other people, but

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I would say in general, what I and other people

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>are looking at is the trends in the market to

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>see which unit types are getting the highest rents. Those

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously are going to be within the class a new

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>construction sub market, so you're not going to compare yourself

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to a pre war building unless it's been heavily upgraded.

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>And well, i'd say it really is ends up being

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that simple. If there's a large problem that we have

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>within real estate, which I hope to like advance in

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the future, and I hope like our industry advances, it's

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that the real estate data is very simplistic. Rents are

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>extremely opaque, and things get i'd say reduced down to

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>different unit types. There's a lot of different i'd say,

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>like data on new housing inventory that gets added individual

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>markets and that's almost never broken down into type, and

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>even when it's broken down into type, it's definitely never

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>broken down into is this three bedroom, four family or

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is it essentially three one bedroom suites? Those kinds of

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>nuances are always lost in data. Yeah, that's something that

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>came up in our kind of in our last episode

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>on rent, which is that you know, we talk about

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>like multifamily, et cetera, but like it's kind of meaningless.

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>What city are they in, how many you know whatever?

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>It is like that sort of drill down is like,

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, desert. It's not all fungible, it's not all

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the same. I just realized we should probably talk about

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>what we mean by apartments meant for families, Like what

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly is it that families would like to see here?

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would say fundamentally, what families want is

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bedrooms. And you know, Joe, like when

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you think about like what would you like, you'd probably like,

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>most of all, you'd like just one extra bedroom. You

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>don't need an extra walking closet, you probably don't need

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>an extra bathroom. You just want one extra bedroom. So fundamentally,

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, a family sized apartment might be

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a three bedroom, one and a half bath, maybe a

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>three bedroom, two bath, but the second and third bedrooms

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't need walking clos that they don't need on

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>suite bathrooms. And that's what you get in the US.

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's maybe it's not by design, but it is

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in some sense mandatory based on the building and zoning codes.

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we should have this. It should really just

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>be Tracy hosting this and I should just be like

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the third guest. That's I have all these complaints. But clearly, Stephen,

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>like you must view this question somewhat differently than Bobby,

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to identify zoning and codes as being a driver rather

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>than this simple unit math. Yeah, I mean I would

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>say in the United States to add an X. You know,

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>let's say, let's imagine your typical new construction apartment. There's

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a long hallway in the middle of the building, and

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>then perpendicularly a rate off of it, there's apartments, and

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you enter one of the apartments, and if it's a

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.079
<v Speaker 1>two bedroom apartment, it's designed in what someone wants called

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a bowling alley configuration. So you enter it, you enter

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in the kitchen, you're about I don't know, thirty feet

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>from the window, probably, and there's not actually a whole

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of window space in the apartment, and it's you know,

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty feet away from you. So on the left you

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>have a bedroom, so you know, you enter in the

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>kitchen and then you go then you go forward and

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>then you see like a living area, and then on

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the left you have a bedroom. On the right you

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>have a bedroom and those are by the window. But

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>what do you fill all that other space with. There's

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a ton of this space that would not exist in

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Europe or in Asia, mostly because the building is much

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>much thicker than it would be in another country. So

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we think about what a family wants,

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>they want another bedroom. In a bedroom typically you know,

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>by codes and customs has to have a window, so

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, you want to capture that extra window space.

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>But then you need to fill all this space, at

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>least in the United States, and you know, this is

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>square footage. It costs money to build, it cost money

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to maintain. You have to fill it with something you're

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>probably going to fill it with, you know, bathrooms, which,

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>as you know if anyone's ever done at home renovation,

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>they're the most expensive part. So in the United States,

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>when you add an extra bedroom to a two betterom

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>apartment or a one bedroom apartment, you typically have to build,

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, just within the apartment about three hundred square

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>feet of extra space. The bedroom itself is only about

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten by ten, one hundred square feet, but

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>then you need to you know, fill all that space

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in the middle, whereas in other countries in Europe, Latin America,

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>or Asia, to add the extra bedroom you might need

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>an extra I mean, in some cases you can just

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>add an extra hundred square feet, but maybe you'll add

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>another one fifty two hundred, but you're adding much less

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>space to add that bedroom. So, you know, buildings cost

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>money based on the rent per square foot. When you

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>rent an apartment or buy an apartment, you're probably not

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at it based on a you know, you're not

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>looking for a number of square foot if you're looking

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:57.839
<v Speaker 1>for a number of bedrooms. Bobby, you mentioned the lack

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of floor planned data. What do you mean by that exactly?

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>Because when I think of floor plans, I think that's

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>like the one thing that is potentially available and kind

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of standardized across every apartment building in America. Certainly, Oh Tracy,

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 1>where to begin answering that, Yes, so I'd say this

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is the that question has been driving me in my career,

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd say for the last like seven years and bothering me.

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd say in looking at my own Excel models, like

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>when I've built ground up apartments, it always intensely bothered

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>me that in Excel there was no differentiation between square footage.

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>It's always a multiplier, like a base rent per sure

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>multiplier depending on type, right at just like a little

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>pivot table. If if one bedroom multiply by four square

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>four dollars to square foot if two bedroom multiply by

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 1>usually less three fifty, right, and there's no differentiation between

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>those two. So I'd say that is something that has

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>bothered me for a while, given that anyone who walks

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>into a unit knows that there are seven hundred squarefret

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>one bedrooms that are great and seven hundred squarefret one

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>bedrooms that are a piece of junk. Right, But it

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>has to be captured like in data somehow or else.

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like the qualitative difference. I would say, yes, qualitative,

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>but like you have to use some sort of data

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>analytics or some sort of data columns just to say, well,

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>how large is I get similar things like we all

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>know that height matters, height should increase rent. But what

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 1>would be the only way to prove that, Well, you

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>would have to go through and measure the height of

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>every place, then equalize for all other like real estate

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>type attributes, and then say, aha, now we know that

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.559
<v Speaker 1>height matters by this much, when in fact every person

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>knows that to be true, we just don't know exactly hownswer.

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So I would say that the difficulty on that has

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>been driving me and my career for a while. It's

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>why I left a real estate development for a little

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>while to start two different sort of technology ventures and

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.479
<v Speaker 1>now am in, like i'd say, the software data business

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>around floor plan data. I was just about to ask,

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 1>could you create an algorithm that takes in like data

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>inputs and then tries to spit out I don't know,

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like a livability score. Well, I was just gonna say,

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Bobby, in your Twitter bio, you have quote

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who made this quote, maybe you even

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>made it up Bill James of Apartments, Bill James, of course,

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>being the moneyball guy who famously took baseball and tried

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to get it out of pure sort of like subjective

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, that guy, that guy is good hustle and

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>tried to put nu miracle, you know, really quantify the

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>speed that someone could go, or how all these other things.

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So how do you go about sort of like taking

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>these things that seems subjective, Yeah, that seems like good,

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that's nice an area, it's roomy, and try to put

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>some like hard math behind it. So that is a

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>self that is a self chosen moniker, and it is

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it is an homage too, I think like the mathematical approach,

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and it is also meant to me to be a

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>reminder of how long it takes you that for those

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>people who remember the story of Bill James, he was

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>doing this by manually calculating things from box scores that

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>he got in newspapers thirty forty years ago, and it

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>took at least twenty five years for the general approach

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to move forward. And the other thing that I also

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>greatly admire about that approach is that none of his

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>particular algorithms or that meaningfloor that that good anymore. But

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it was the approach of saying, we're going to go

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>through and turn the sweet science into something slightly analytical.

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>So for me, how that works in floor plans is.

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>As you mentioned, Tracy, there are a tremendous number of

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>floor plans. Every apartment has one. The dimensions on them

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>are nearly always useless because it's not always clear whether

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it's putting into a wall or whether it ends in

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the room. Sometimes the dimensions just incorrect.

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes they've taken room names and change them from something

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 1>useful to something useless, like from bedroom to dream and

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>some other some of the ridiculous things which so which

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>confuses people. But my basic approach has been to build

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>some software tools to take essentially these low resolution image

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>files and turn them into a lot more usable pieces

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of data. So instead of a room or a unit

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>being described as a seven hundred and seventy five score

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>foot one bedroom, it would be described as there is

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a room that has dimensions X and y. It may

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>or may not have a living room, it may or

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>may not have direct access to a bathroom, and it

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>has a closet with linear feet hanging of Z. And

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>by breaking things down into some more pieces, then you

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>can do some of the fairly straightforward statistical analysis on

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>apartments to say, in an area, do people want like

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a kitchen that's fourteen feet or are they okay with eleven?

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Does someone prefer that extra foot in their bedroom or

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>in their living room given like a fixed space. So

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd say that's where it initially started. The family oriented

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>aspect of those apartments kind of came out of the

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>data and saying they're all lot of apartments and many

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of them are not being built to these sorts of specifications.

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Stephen touched on some of them, which is that the

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>size of closets in the United States is at least

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>two to three times what is in Europe, and I'm

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>not they're huge in Europe. We still use wardrobe, yes,

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>like a piece of furniture that acts like, yeah, Joe's

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>looking at no OA, I had a studio or I

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>had a loft in the financial district. Right, So you

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>have a rail that we're just like, we just bought

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 1>this like huge sort of yeah wardrobe from Ikea that's

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>dood like next to our TV. Basically, Stephen is absolutely

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>right that our building form does drive a lot of

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. Right. So the general process for real estate

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>development is that a developer is going to go identify

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>piece of land and then first say go to the

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>city and say I would like to build this approximate

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>footprint with this many units, this money, parking spaces, this

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>amount of like mixed use. It isn't until after the

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>building is approved that then they'll go through and configure units,

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>because you're not going to spend money on full architecture

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 1>when you don't know the general layout. So once the

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>building footprint is defined, then it's a matter of how

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>do you shift around walls? How do you chop up

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that space into a unit mix and type that maximizes

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.479
<v Speaker 1>your returns. And that's why almost always small ends up

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>like driving small, and deep ends up like really pushing

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>them forward. And once the building is set at being

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>like sixty five feet wide in the long direction, well,

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>now we know the simple math, like your units are

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be about thirty feet deep. Well, then that

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>means your smallest studio can be four hundred and fifty

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 1>feet a two bedroom. You need to be what what

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>does deep mean? Deep? So the difference the distance between

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>one window to the other window on the other side

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Oh, so you're looking at it from the street,

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:55.199
<v Speaker 1>how far back does the whole apartment go? And it

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>goes In the United States, it typically starts at about

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty five feet. I would say, right, well, yeah, well

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 1>it depends, it depends on what market, but that is

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that is quite typical. That is quite typical, I would say.

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean when when we talk about you know, Bobby

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:10.439
<v Speaker 1>was talking about the built form of the building, we

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>don't typically think about real estate as a field like

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>education or healthcare where there's like a lot of government

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>intervention because you know, it is all owned and developed privately.

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think we probably should. I mean, the regulatory

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>burden is quite high in modern day society, even even

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>outside the United States. The architect isn't really designing the building,

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the codes are designing the building. So this

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this form is sort of set from the start, so

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>there's not a ton of flexibility from the architect. And

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cities they put out these little diagrams

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of how the building should look and it's it's very

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>very close to how it actually works. And the architect

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>can do the finishes, they can do the interior layout

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 1>of the building, but the fundamental form that is pushing you.

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, Bobby mentioned a seven hundred square foot one bedroom.

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's a concept that just doesn't exist in

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>other countries another countries, a seven hundred square foot apartment

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>would be a two bedroom apartment. And it's not just

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>because you know, our bedrooms are a little wider. They're

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a little wider. It's not just because we have a

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of more closets. We do have a lot more closets.

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>It's because that's really the only way that you can

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 1>design the building. If you want a window in the bedroom,

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>at least that's exactly right. Right, So once the building,

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>once the unit is thirty feet deep, having a window

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in the bedroom means the unit is going to meet

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>at least be like twenty three twenty four feet wide. Right,

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So then basic geometry just tells you how your different

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>units step up in size as you had bedrooms. Just

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to play Devil's advocate, and I know Joe says he

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like the suburbs. But setting Joe aside, what evidence

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>do we have that families, you know, assuming that there

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>were good sized apartments designed for families, what evidence do

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>we have that families would want to stay in that

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of presumably more urban environment. Are there other factors

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>at play where maybe people want to buy a house

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and build up equity. May be they want different schools,

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they want a garden for their kids to play in.

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>What evidence do we have that families actually want this?

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Just to add on today, and I agree with I,

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, even though Tracy started at Devil's advocate question,

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder like, do people go to the suburbs

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>because the houses are ye or do they go to this,

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, or do they go to the suburbs because

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>they want the suburban lives? I mean, the rent shows

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>you that there's the demand for it. The rent and

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the prices, you know, like a typical you know, family

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>family housing unit in New York might be a townhouse,

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and I mean the prices are extraordinary, so you know,

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I would say the demand. The evidence of the demand

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is there is the very low vacancy rate in our

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 1>cities and the high price. And you know, you look

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.199
<v Speaker 1>at other countries that simply allow this kind of family

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.679
<v Speaker 1>this you know, family oriented apartments, and you have a

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>lot more of a culture of families, you know, living downtown.

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Just on that note, can you give us some examples

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of how other countries handle this, because I often think

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 1>with the US housing market, it's really helpful to look

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>at how other places do it because there's often such

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a big contrast. Yeah, So the design of a North

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>American apartment building is very globally unique and it is

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>what in other countries they might think of as a hotel.

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>So you enter the building, um, you might remember it

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>from the movie The Shining. There's a big law hallway

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 1>and there's you know, there's there's apartment. Great description of

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>American apartments. It's like The Shining. Yeah, and I mean

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>they all look like this, and maybe the hallway will

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>twist and turn a little, but it's going to be

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a long hallway. There's going to be units a rate

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to the left, rate to the right. On the end

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of the building, there might be some you know, three bedrooms,

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of reasonably sized departments because they're on the corner.

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>In the rest of the world, let's use Europe, because

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the people have a lot of familiarity with it. Typically

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>there will not be as much of this hallway space,

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>if at all. So typically what it'll be is it'll

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>be you'll enter the building, there'll be a single staircase

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>till you know, if there's an elevator, it'll probably be

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a little smaller. It'll definitely be a little smaller and

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it'll go you know, you'll so you'll have this vertical

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 1>core of the stair case in the elevator and then

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>a raid off of it. There will be likely between

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>one and four, but probably two apartments on either side,

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>left and right. So each building, or at least little

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>core of a larger building, will you know, let's say

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a six story building, pretty typical height, there will

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 1>be you know, twelve apartments in the building. There will

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>not you know, it's not going to be a you know,

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>one hundred unit building. There's not going to be a

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>long hallway and these units If if you're an American

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>or if you're familiar with New York, I'm really describing

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a tenement, so you know, these units still go from

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the front of the building to the back of the building.

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 1>In the rest of the world, the building will typically

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>be maybe forty five feet deep and the apartment will

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>go from front to back. So in general, there will

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>be a much higher ratio of surface area to volume,

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>which is to say, you're going to have more windows.

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 1>So in seven hundred square feet you're going to have

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>two bedrooms. In nine hundred square feet you're going to

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>have three bedrooms, whereas in the US those are one

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and two better apartments. In the rest of the world,

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you're much more likely to have windows in the kitchen,

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>windows in the bathroom. You just have more windows generally,

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and much more flexibility with laying out the laying out

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the plan. It's funny because if someone asked me what

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the differences between a European and apartment building in the US,

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>apartment building is like, I don't know what I would

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>have said, But then the moment you said, like, oh,

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>those tiny elevators and that single central core staircase, I

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh yeah, and I haven't spent that much

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 1>time traveling in Europe, but I like immediately got that.

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like random Arabians have stayed in like Italy or Paris.

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.199
<v Speaker 1>It's not just Europe, it's every you know from you know,

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Daka to Switzerland, you know, from Bladesha, Switzerland. This is

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:45.959
<v Speaker 1>this is how an apartment building is built. And this

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 1>was how an apartment building was built in America too.

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 1>If you think about like a Chicago three flat, or

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in New York City tenement, or you know one of

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>those little two story four unit buildings in Los Angeles,

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.160
<v Speaker 1>this is how apartment buildings by humans are designed. It's

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>just in North America we've taken it a different direction. Well,

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>can I ask why has that happened? It's a combination

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 1>of I would say two things. It's a combination of

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>our very very unique approach to fire safety rules, which

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>are in turn driven by our obsession with building buildings

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>out of lightwood frame. And then it's also, I would say,

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>our obsession with the way our society looks down on

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>apartments and confines them to very small pieces of the city.

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>So let's take the second one. First. To have an

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>apartment that has a lot of windows, you tend to

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>need a little bit more land. And in America, you know,

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 1>we have these competing planners, have these competing mandates. On

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, there's clearly a housing crisis, and you know,

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 1>especially in our cities, we need to allow more apartments.

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you know, the local politics are

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>such that nobody wants to live near an apartment. Nobody

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>wants it near them, so we confine them to these loud,

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>polluted arterial streets. So if you think about a new

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>apartment building, it's probably not being built on a leafy

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>side street. With a lot of land. So all you know,

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>most of our land is locked up in single family

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>houses and it would be pretty trivial to demolish them

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and build something new, but that's not really allowed. So

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in this attempt to try to fit so many apartments

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>on such a small piece of land, the buildings just

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 1>get like really thick, really deep. And this is a

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>good way of cramming in a lot of square footage.

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not a great way of cramming in a lot

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 1>of bedrooms. Then, on the other side of things, the

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>United States has a very unique approach to construction. Something

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>that foreigners are very surprised about when they watch American

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>TV series. Is you punch through the wall and I

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>mean yeah, drywall. Yeah, you punch through the wall and

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing there. It's built out of wood and drywall.

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So we've traditionally allowed people to build out of lightwood frame,

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>whereas in the rest of the world, again from Bangladesh

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to Switzerland, you build the building out of concrete. So

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>as a result, the buildings traditionally have been quite flammable.

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>America has a very high rate of fire deaths. You're

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>much more likely in America than in any other advanced

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 1>country in a lot of far less advanced countries to

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>die in a building than in other countries. So we

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.479
<v Speaker 1>have all these mitigations. One of the mitigations, probably the

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 1>most important one in driving apartment design is two interior staircases.

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>There has to be two ways to get out of

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the building by staircase. This is very unique globally in

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>other countries. This is really reserved for skyscrapers. So if

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 1>you need two entrances and since nine to eleven, in

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.159
<v Speaker 1>most of the country, except ironically New York, they have

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.239
<v Speaker 1>to be the term is remote from each other. They

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>have to be at a distance. So if every apartment

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>needs to get out two ways and they need to

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 1>be a distance from each other, well, the most logical

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>thing to do is have this long haul hotel light

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>corridor in the middle. So that's the simple version of

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 1>what's driving all of this. So, Bobby, as a developer

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and as a floor plan expert floor plan knower, you know,

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>how much does that resonate And when you're thinking about

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a new building, how much do you feel constrained ultimately

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 1>in design by some of the rules that Stephen's been

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Oh completely, but I would say in sports

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the way that I sort of approach it as these

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>are the stricters, like I want to try and make

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.719
<v Speaker 1>things as good as possible within within the bounds of that,

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>within the bounds of those limitations. So Steven's absolutely right

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that those are the design limitations. I'd say that there

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>were some other ones too that have to do with capital.

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>It is much more efficient to build a two hundred

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and fifty unit apartment building double loaded, very quickly and

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>inexpensive out of wood. And that is one thing that

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>especially across the United States, we have done very well,

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>very very very quickly in Texas in the suburbs, and

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>those projects are the ones that institutional investors want to

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:42.239
<v Speaker 1>put their money and their tip. A large developer is

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>typically not going to waste their time doing any project

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that's under two hundred two hundred and fifty apartments, both

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>from the equity side and just it is just as

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>complicated to build ten as it is to build two

0:28:55.920 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty. So I think you mentioned before we

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>started recording this, but that you yourself are investing in

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>more projects that are explicitly designed for families. How is

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that process like, how is it in terms of identifying

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>those projects, how common is it that they're being proposed?

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And then secondly, what are the different calculations that you

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>would make for a family oriented project versus something you know,

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess more normal for an apartment building. Well, I

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:47.719
<v Speaker 1>think about it from a product perspective, which is another

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>area where I believe that real estate is lacking. The

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>product philosophy. Your most apartments, certainly in the United States,

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is to offend as few people as possible. That's why

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>there's three different color or palettes of cabinet Country, and

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right, right, everyone uses the same light. There's

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>there's so that's a problem in general. So I would

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>say the way that I start by approaching and is saying,

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to build something that is a product that

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>will actually delight families, which to me means it's going

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to need to be a smaller project. A two hundred

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and fifty unite project with kids would be unpleasant for everybody.

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'd also say that I think there's a lot

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of diversity within family and family oriented, which is why

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I sort of use that phrase. I think that I

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>think that it needs to be a product that is

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>appealing to someone who doesn't not just people who have kids.

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>If there was a problem that Another problem that I'd

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>say within US apartments is that it's fairly monolithic. In turn,

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>who goes after right? Like I like billiard rooms, but

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>every building has, every rooming has a billiard room, Like

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone has like a rock climbing wall here in New York,

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>they all have these. They all fit these same things.

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>So what I want to do is build something different.

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>How does that different differentiate from a typical building. It's

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be smaller, it's going to be about six

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>two one hundred units. That is good for me, and

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that I am not competing with, say the Trammel Crow

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and Avalon Bays of the world, who would eat my

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>lunch operationally? And the difference in the type again fitting

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>within the double loaded quarter or means. One of the

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>metrics that I track in floor plants is something that's

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>called like bedroom ratio, which is the amount of square

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>footage that is behind bedroom doors, and the other one

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is the ratio of the size of bedroom one to

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>bedroom two or bedroom one to bedroom three. So for

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a family, the main thing that I look at is

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>reducing the size of those second and third bedrooms. Yeah, right,

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>because if it's like two roommates, then presumably they want

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>like the same size, whereas like, well, if it's kids,

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>they can have a small they don't need a masterom bedroom,

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and they don't need an on sweet bath. Yeah that

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>might be nice, but when you're talking about like an

0:31:55.880 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>urban or expensive suburban markets bases at a premium, and

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>so it's all about making the best change you can.

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>So this might be one for either Bobby or Stephen.

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Stephen talked a little bit about the

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>regulations in the US and how that impacts building designs,

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>specifically around fire safety. Are there additional regulations that kick

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in if you know you're going to be having small

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>children living in a space. And the reason I ask

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that is because I know in New York if you

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>live in an apartment, every once in a while you

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>get a form from the city asking you to fill

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it out. If you have small children in that apartment,

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>they need to put like bars on the windows so

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't fall out and other safety measures. Is that

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a consideration or a thing that comes into play generally,

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>not with a new construction. Okay, so there are regulations

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>for children around things like lead. For older buildings, owners

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 1>have to continually certify. I don't have to have a

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>higher level of certification if there are people under certain

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>age living there. But for new construction those safety things,

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not aware of any building regulations or construction regulations

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that are different for who occupies it. In fact, regulations

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>like the FHA require that anyone be allowed to rent

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>any unit that is there. Now, design will practically discriminate, right,

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Like if you were design a three hundred and seventy

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>five square foot studio, a family I suppose could rent it,

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>but they're not going to, right Yeah, I mean even

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>for these big apartments. I mean the reason they don't

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>build them is if they did build them, you couldn't

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>afford it. Yeah, Like Joe, you know you're looking for

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a bitter apartment. I'm sure you're seeing them. They're just

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>out of your price, right, Yeah, that's what we see

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is like, Okay, there would be the one bedroom, the studio,

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the one bedroom, maybe the two bedroom. And if you

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't even need three bedrooms, I just

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>need too But if you like go to that next level,

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>then a balloon so like the unit to do theoretically

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>exist they're just like so much more expensive. Well, you know,

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>again this gets to some of these questions about families,

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>like really want to live in cities, etc. But if

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>there's one sort of like policy change or prescription that

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>could really prove the family orientedness of the new housing

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>stock in New York, what would it be. I'm gonna

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>cheat and give you two. Okay, so well, actually in

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>New York, I can just give you one. We need

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to zone more land for apartments. And I think when

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 1>people think of land, they think of big corn fields.

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>But most urban land is tied up in single family houses,

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>so you know, a single family you know, including in

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>New York City. So you know, we think about New

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>York City as you know Brownstone, Brooklyn and Manhattan. But

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the truth is a lot of New York

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>is Staten Island out of Queens, out out of Brooklyn.

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 1>So more of that land, more of those lots need

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to be zoned for you know, low and mid rise apartments.

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:39.799
<v Speaker 1>And then some things that need to be changed a

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 1>little in New York in a lot in other cities

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:44.919
<v Speaker 1>is we need to change our building code so that

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you can build a building with a single staircase. New

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:51.280
<v Speaker 1>York you can in other places you can so maybe

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>make the construction material more resistant to fire, and then

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 1>if you do that you can achieve similar out with

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>points of egress. You could do that. Although you know,

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a generation or so ago the United States started requiring

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 1>sprinklers in all buildings, which is globally extremely unique. You

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.600
<v Speaker 1>won't find a sprinkler outside of a high rise skyscraper

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in Switzerland, so, you know, at least in theory, and

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I think in practice, a sprinkler should provide the same

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:21.839
<v Speaker 1>fire protection that you know, just building the whole thing

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>out of concrete does. So I think, frankly, the buildings

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>are already I mean, the real fire traps in America

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 1>are the single family homes. You can still build a

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:31.439
<v Speaker 1>single family home pretty much everywhere out of lightwood frame

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and in most places, especially the places that actually build

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>them without a sprinkler system. So in America we you know,

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 1>we we we treat apartments as these you know, dangerous things,

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know single family houses you know this, you know,

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>just a right and normal thing. But the truth is

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>our single family houses are quite dangerous. So I think

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>if we if we applied similar standards, either brought the

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 1>standards of the single family homes up or I wouldn't

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 1>do this, but you know, bring this the standards of

0:35:57.320 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the apartments down, then I think would make a lot

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:03.479
<v Speaker 1>more sense to build apartments. Like right now, it makes

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot more sense for families to live in single

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>family houses, partly because they're you know, they're built as firetops,

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>so they're a lot cheaper. Bobby, what would you like

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to see when it comes to maybe encouraging more family

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>oriented apartments in the US. I think developers have the

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 1>tools to do it. Currently. It is going to require

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 1>creative partnerships with the right tent, with the right kind

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of capital. Short term private equity is going to be

0:36:28.719 --> 0:36:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot more difficult in financing these kinds of projects,

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 1>but they work, they pencil. Mainly, it requires, i'd say,

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>developers being willing to do the chicken in the egg.

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I fundamentally believe that families do want to live in cities,

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:47.800
<v Speaker 1>taking too sort of like product oriented approach to thinking

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 1>about real estate and demand for like normal consumer goods,

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:54.280
<v Speaker 1>like it goes through fads and changes all the time.

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Is there do you perceive a fundamental change in demand?

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Are there more families like mine? That want to stay

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in the urban core, and is this something that's different

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in near twenty twenty three than might have been in

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the year, say, nineteen ninety three. It's not something that

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>I can show yet, It's only something I can know

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>as being someone who's lived in the city and knowing

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the number of people who are meeting people in the city,

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>falling in love with the city, like they have kids here.

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.879
<v Speaker 1>They move after those things occur, So I would say,

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, the option isn't there for them to stay.

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I believe and I'm willing to bet on,

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think other developers should too, that that will work.

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 1>People in the United States are delaying having families or

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 1>there are having fewer kids, but they most people still

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 1>eventually make that decision, and that product is not being

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>built at all, which to me is even just as

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 1>an investor, is a compelling thesis. If even just a

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>small percentage of people staying, then at the moment they

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>have no new choices. Bobby and Stephen, I feel like

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 1>we could get there's so many sort of branches of

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this conversation that we could take super fascinating. I'd love

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to have you both back on sometime. Got to leave

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>it there. But seriously, like there's so many interesting like

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>aspects of the housing conversation we could take this. So

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you both coming on the podcast. Thank you

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>for having me. Thank you. Yeah, that was great, guys,

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. So Tracy, I mean, I know

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you really want me to move to the suburbisode that

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you can have more space in New York, etc. But

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:43.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's an option, maybe it could have it that

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>we could both stay here. I just want more dog

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>amenage department building. Maybe we could have both. No, you

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:52.720
<v Speaker 1>mentioned branches from that episode. And one thing that has

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 1>always sort of confused me is why in the US

0:38:56.760 --> 0:39:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the standard like building material is that yeah, that really

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 1>thin like would framing. I've never understood that. And sometimes

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>when you see especially single family houses going up to

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Steven's point and you see the framing for those, it

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>really looks like nothing, and it does look like they

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>could a either go up in flames very quickly or

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:20.320
<v Speaker 1>be just fall over with like one good gust of wind. Yeah.

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, another aspect of this that we didn't get into.

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just like you know, homeownership culture or rental culture

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and whether the perception that you don't need to build

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:33.399
<v Speaker 1>as well for rental. Maybe the problem is really just

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 1>like you know, capitalism and this need for everyone to

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:42.240
<v Speaker 1>own a home, or the distortionary impacts of this idea

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 1>that everyone needs to own a home. Yeah, there's that,

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>But to me, the big like, yeah, the thing that

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>resonates is this idea that choice of building materials leads

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to the need for additional regulation, which leads to design

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>choices that are not necessarily optimal. Well, and then you know,

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know, I think we talked about

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>this and I haven't found it. There's like this famous

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>like post that someone put on medium about why like

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 1>all cars will look this same Yeah, and I think

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just because they all have to design for the

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 1>same safety and fuel standards rags, and so there really

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is like sort of one optimal design. And it kind

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of sounds like, you know, to some extent, that's the

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>same thing that's happened with homes, which is that if

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 1>mainly you're sort of like feeling like you're optimizing for

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>one sort of set of regulations, then you do just

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 1>get these endless gray buildings, and then the only places

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>where you can exercise. Some creativity is in the rock

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>climbing wall, and I want there too. I want to,

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:39.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, I also want to rock climbing ball. I'm

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 1>not against these things. How regulation ruined design? That's a

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 1>good topic. Okay, shall we leave it there. Let's leave

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it there. This has been another episode of the Odd

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Allaway. You can follow me on

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Tracy Alloway, and I'm Joe Wisenthal. You could

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow our guests

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Fiance He's at Bobby Yon. Stephen tweets under the

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>handle at market Urbanism. Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Carmen Rman and Dash Bennett at dashbot. And check out

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>all of our podcasts in Bloomberg under the handle at podcasts.

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And for more odd Lots content, go to Bloomberg dot

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 1>com slash odd Lots, where we have blog posts, transcripts,

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and a news limb that comes out every Friday. Go

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:26.320
<v Speaker 1>there and side up. Thanks for listening.