1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:04,200
Speaker 1: Amazon's blockbuster thirteen point seven billion dollar deal to buy

2
00:00:04,200 --> 00:00:07,040
Speaker 1: Whole Foods is a step toward dominating every part of

3
00:00:07,040 --> 00:00:10,959
Speaker 1: the consumers shopping experience. It's by far the largest acquisition

4
00:00:11,000 --> 00:00:13,399
Speaker 1: in the company's history, and some say it may cause

5
00:00:13,440 --> 00:00:16,639
Speaker 1: a seismic shift in the seven hundred billion dollar grocery

6
00:00:16,680 --> 00:00:20,720
Speaker 1: store business. Amazon already competes in a broad range of retail,

7
00:00:20,800 --> 00:00:24,439
Speaker 1: from clothing and home goods to music and comic books.

8
00:00:24,480 --> 00:00:27,720
Speaker 1: So when does Amazon become so big and stifle so

9
00:00:27,800 --> 00:00:31,000
Speaker 1: much competition in the retail sector that it is subject

10
00:00:31,040 --> 00:00:34,400
Speaker 1: to antitrust scrutiny. Here to answer that question and many

11
00:00:34,479 --> 00:00:39,280
Speaker 1: more is Bloomberg Intelligence senior litigation analyst Jennifer ree Jen.

12
00:00:39,560 --> 00:00:43,960
Speaker 1: Is there an antitrust issue with the Amazon Whole Foods merger?

13
00:00:44,440 --> 00:00:47,120
Speaker 1: You know, it doesn't seem likely June. You know, I,

14
00:00:47,120 --> 00:00:49,360
Speaker 1: I know there's always a reaction when there's a really

15
00:00:49,400 --> 00:00:52,280
Speaker 1: big deal like this in a company like Amazon that's

16
00:00:52,320 --> 00:00:55,200
Speaker 1: that's dominated a lot of industries and is now moving

17
00:00:55,200 --> 00:00:57,520
Speaker 1: into another industry. But you know, at the end of

18
00:00:57,560 --> 00:00:59,840
Speaker 1: the day that there is a framework. We have a

19
00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:03,400
Speaker 1: framework and laws that have been interpreted by the court

20
00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:06,800
Speaker 1: over time that really just don't put this merger in

21
00:01:06,840 --> 00:01:11,240
Speaker 1: a place that seems like it might concern antitrust regulators.

22
00:01:11,280 --> 00:01:14,000
Speaker 1: You know, you don't have a major horizontal overlap. They

23
00:01:14,040 --> 00:01:17,039
Speaker 1: aren't competitors with each other. And to the extent there

24
00:01:17,080 --> 00:01:19,360
Speaker 1: even are vertical issues here, which is sort of like

25
00:01:19,800 --> 00:01:23,160
Speaker 1: two companies within a supply chain, one acquiring the other,

26
00:01:23,280 --> 00:01:28,640
Speaker 1: like like a manufacturer acquiring the input supplier. Um, you don't,

27
00:01:28,640 --> 00:01:30,720
Speaker 1: you don't have some of the harm they can often

28
00:01:30,800 --> 00:01:33,920
Speaker 1: come from vertical mergers in this merger, either because Whole

29
00:01:33,920 --> 00:01:39,119
Speaker 1: Foods isn't very dominant, particularly in grocery. But there are

30
00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:45,759
Speaker 1: some congressmen already calling for a look at this. Representative Rokana,

31
00:01:45,880 --> 00:01:50,720
Speaker 1: a Democrat representing California in the House of Representatives, said

32
00:01:50,720 --> 00:01:53,800
Speaker 1: the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission must undertake

33
00:01:53,800 --> 00:01:57,320
Speaker 1: a review that considers not just the merger's impact on prices,

34
00:01:57,400 --> 00:02:02,840
Speaker 1: but also the impact on jobs and wages. So people,

35
00:02:03,120 --> 00:02:06,320
Speaker 1: even congressmen, are saying, this is so big and it's

36
00:02:06,520 --> 00:02:10,160
Speaker 1: just getting bigger and bigger. That's right, And I think

37
00:02:10,200 --> 00:02:12,400
Speaker 1: that this goes back to kind of a debate that

38
00:02:12,919 --> 00:02:15,400
Speaker 1: is going on a little bit in the anti trust world. Now,

39
00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:18,080
Speaker 1: the law has developed over the last twenty years in

40
00:02:18,080 --> 00:02:20,760
Speaker 1: a certain way, you know, such that they're very specific

41
00:02:20,840 --> 00:02:24,040
Speaker 1: kind of harms and consumer welfare that's protected by the

42
00:02:24,080 --> 00:02:27,399
Speaker 1: antitrust laws. You know, they try to make sure that

43
00:02:27,560 --> 00:02:30,880
Speaker 1: we have a healthy competitive market such that consumer prices

44
00:02:30,880 --> 00:02:34,200
Speaker 1: stay low. But there are some that believe that this

45
00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:37,440
Speaker 1: has failed the American consumer, that over time that the

46
00:02:37,480 --> 00:02:41,480
Speaker 1: way antitrust has been enforced has created too much consolidation

47
00:02:41,560 --> 00:02:45,720
Speaker 1: and too much concentration in many industries that ultimately can

48
00:02:45,840 --> 00:02:50,239
Speaker 1: have affect consumer wages, can even affect you know, political concentration.

49
00:02:50,520 --> 00:02:53,320
Speaker 1: And so there is this this debate that's ongoing, and

50
00:02:53,360 --> 00:02:57,240
Speaker 1: I think that statement by by that representative sort of

51
00:02:57,320 --> 00:02:59,239
Speaker 1: is on that side of the debate that we need

52
00:02:59,280 --> 00:03:02,919
Speaker 1: to change per HAPs our approach, our our antitrust philosophy.

53
00:03:03,080 --> 00:03:05,920
Speaker 1: And now but putting aside that debate June, you know,

54
00:03:05,960 --> 00:03:07,960
Speaker 1: and whether or not we do need to change our

55
00:03:07,960 --> 00:03:10,320
Speaker 1: philosophy here in the United States or not, or how

56
00:03:10,360 --> 00:03:12,880
Speaker 1: we approach these things. The way the law developed has

57
00:03:12,919 --> 00:03:16,320
Speaker 1: developed today, and the tools we use traditionally today to

58
00:03:16,480 --> 00:03:21,359
Speaker 1: assess a merger's potential harmful effects in the market simply

59
00:03:21,639 --> 00:03:25,720
Speaker 1: are unlikely to find that this merger is anti competitive.

60
00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:30,320
Speaker 1: During the campaign, President Trump said that Jeff Bezos has

61
00:03:30,360 --> 00:03:33,920
Speaker 1: a huge anti trust problem because he's controlling too much,

62
00:03:34,440 --> 00:03:37,160
Speaker 1: and that it that went under his watch, he would

63
00:03:37,200 --> 00:03:41,480
Speaker 1: be looking at those problems. Might that impact what goes

64
00:03:41,560 --> 00:03:45,800
Speaker 1: on in terms of review of this deal. Well, I

65
00:03:45,840 --> 00:03:47,560
Speaker 1: think we have to look at think about two different

66
00:03:47,600 --> 00:03:50,800
Speaker 1: things now. The first thing is his statement about Amazon

67
00:03:50,880 --> 00:03:53,640
Speaker 1: controlling just too much and being too big under our

68
00:03:53,680 --> 00:03:57,040
Speaker 1: antitrust laws. Even right up in the Federal Trade Commission's website,

69
00:03:57,080 --> 00:03:59,760
Speaker 1: it says it is not unlawful for a company to

70
00:03:59,800 --> 00:04:02,360
Speaker 1: be big and to be powerful, and even to charge

71
00:04:02,440 --> 00:04:05,560
Speaker 1: high prices, as long as that position was obtained in

72
00:04:05,600 --> 00:04:09,720
Speaker 1: a fair manner, not through unfair or unreasonable acts to

73
00:04:09,800 --> 00:04:12,920
Speaker 1: harm their competitors and to prevent new entry. So the

74
00:04:12,920 --> 00:04:15,200
Speaker 1: fact of the matter is, if Amazon has gotten big

75
00:04:15,240 --> 00:04:18,479
Speaker 1: and powerful, um as President Trump has pointed out, through

76
00:04:18,560 --> 00:04:21,680
Speaker 1: fair methods of competition, that is what it is, and

77
00:04:21,720 --> 00:04:24,960
Speaker 1: it doesn't violate our antitrust laws. So that's on one side.

78
00:04:25,200 --> 00:04:26,960
Speaker 1: And on the other side, you know, we do have

79
00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:29,400
Speaker 1: a Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice that are

80
00:04:29,400 --> 00:04:32,679
Speaker 1: meant to operate independently and and even if the President

81
00:04:32,720 --> 00:04:35,880
Speaker 1: tries to influence what they do here. They assess these

82
00:04:35,920 --> 00:04:39,159
Speaker 1: deals using a set a set of guidelines that they've

83
00:04:39,240 --> 00:04:42,400
Speaker 1: used that have developed over time, that are ingrained. They

84
00:04:42,520 --> 00:04:45,960
Speaker 1: use economic analysis to apply to these deals to ask

85
00:04:45,960 --> 00:04:48,279
Speaker 1: whether they have the potential to cause harm or whether

86
00:04:48,279 --> 00:04:50,840
Speaker 1: there could be an incentive to cause harm. And they're

87
00:04:50,839 --> 00:04:52,760
Speaker 1: really only going to take one of these deals to

88
00:04:52,800 --> 00:04:55,560
Speaker 1: court where they have evidence to back them up. Suppose

89
00:04:55,600 --> 00:05:00,760
Speaker 1: this deal goes through and and we find at the

90
00:05:00,800 --> 00:05:05,640
Speaker 1: grocery competitors are struggling or going out of business. Is

91
00:05:05,640 --> 00:05:09,279
Speaker 1: there anything that can be done at that point legally, Well,

92
00:05:09,320 --> 00:05:11,360
Speaker 1: it will depend on what it is that's causing them

93
00:05:11,360 --> 00:05:13,599
Speaker 1: to struggle and go out of business. If they simply

94
00:05:14,040 --> 00:05:16,960
Speaker 1: just are not as efficient and are struggling because they

95
00:05:16,960 --> 00:05:19,599
Speaker 1: can't meet lower prices, their prices are too high, they're

96
00:05:19,640 --> 00:05:23,240
Speaker 1: losing customers, they can't gain internal efficiencies that allow them

97
00:05:23,279 --> 00:05:26,839
Speaker 1: to lower those prices. They're just struggling against greater competition.

98
00:05:27,200 --> 00:05:31,680
Speaker 1: You know that perhaps there isn't recourse under the antitrust law. However,

99
00:05:32,120 --> 00:05:35,720
Speaker 1: if after the merger there is some allegation that that

100
00:05:35,839 --> 00:05:39,240
Speaker 1: Amazon and Whole Foods, it's it's subsidiary. Let's say, Whole

101
00:05:39,240 --> 00:05:43,680
Speaker 1: Foods have done engaged in unfair competition to try to

102
00:05:43,760 --> 00:05:49,000
Speaker 1: prevent new entrants in delivering delivering groceries or new entrants

103
00:05:49,000 --> 00:05:51,520
Speaker 1: in grocery. You know, there might be a legal case there,

104
00:05:51,640 --> 00:05:54,400
Speaker 1: you know, such as entering let's say exclusive deals that

105
00:05:54,400 --> 00:05:58,080
Speaker 1: that keep a source of supply from competitors. Things like that. Now,

106
00:05:58,560 --> 00:06:03,440
Speaker 1: a different deal, Draft Kings merger with fan Duel, is

107
00:06:03,520 --> 00:06:07,760
Speaker 1: facing a challenge by the US according to Federal Trade Commission.

108
00:06:07,960 --> 00:06:10,679
Speaker 1: Tell us a little bit about that. Well that Now, see,

109
00:06:10,960 --> 00:06:13,120
Speaker 1: if I had been a betting person, I think I

110
00:06:13,160 --> 00:06:16,039
Speaker 1: would have bet against this deal going through back when

111
00:06:16,040 --> 00:06:19,159
Speaker 1: it was announced in November two thousand sixteen, because you know,

112
00:06:19,240 --> 00:06:21,680
Speaker 1: we have these two companies and what they do are

113
00:06:21,720 --> 00:06:25,120
Speaker 1: they are you know, online gaming. They are daily sports

114
00:06:25,120 --> 00:06:27,560
Speaker 1: fantasy league. So people can pick go in and pick

115
00:06:27,560 --> 00:06:30,680
Speaker 1: a player and create a team, and they game by

116
00:06:30,760 --> 00:06:33,240
Speaker 1: game look at how their players do, and they can

117
00:06:33,279 --> 00:06:36,240
Speaker 1: win prizes in money on that basis. And what the

118
00:06:36,279 --> 00:06:38,960
Speaker 1: FTC said is, hey, you're the only two pretty much

119
00:06:39,640 --> 00:06:41,400
Speaker 1: of the market controlled by the two of you, and

120
00:06:41,440 --> 00:06:45,719
Speaker 1: that's really a clear case of monopolization. Um so I

121
00:06:45,760 --> 00:06:49,320
Speaker 1: think it's not a surprise that the FDC chose to

122
00:06:49,360 --> 00:06:52,000
Speaker 1: go and it was two to zero vote by the commissioners,

123
00:06:52,040 --> 00:06:54,760
Speaker 1: one Democrat and one Republican to go after this deal.

124
00:06:55,320 --> 00:06:58,240
Speaker 1: So is there any response that the two can give

125
00:06:58,320 --> 00:07:01,359
Speaker 1: to save the deal? You know, I think they probably

126
00:07:01,680 --> 00:07:04,799
Speaker 1: believe they have a good argument that the market should

127
00:07:04,800 --> 00:07:06,920
Speaker 1: have been defined the competitive market should have been defined

128
00:07:07,000 --> 00:07:10,320
Speaker 1: more broadly, because they may say, well, hey, we also

129
00:07:10,400 --> 00:07:14,240
Speaker 1: compete against online gaming entities that allow you to bet

130
00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:16,640
Speaker 1: for the season. Let's say pick a game, pick a

131
00:07:16,680 --> 00:07:18,680
Speaker 1: team with players, see how they do for the season,

132
00:07:18,880 --> 00:07:21,840
Speaker 1: and perhaps even other kinds of sports fantasy leagues and

133
00:07:21,920 --> 00:07:24,760
Speaker 1: betting and things like fantasy teams. And if you go

134
00:07:25,160 --> 00:07:27,960
Speaker 1: broader and you define that market more broadly, their combined

135
00:07:27,960 --> 00:07:30,560
Speaker 1: shares probably much lower and might not trigger this sort

136
00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:33,520
Speaker 1: of Hey, this has the harm to potential to harm competition.

137
00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:38,560
Speaker 1: But obviously the FDC didn't buy that. Jennifer, it's always

138
00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:41,120
Speaker 1: a pleasure to have you on. You break down antitrust

139
00:07:41,240 --> 00:07:45,360
Speaker 1: into the simplest, most understandable terms. Thank you, and we

140
00:07:45,440 --> 00:07:48,000
Speaker 1: appreciate it. And for more of Jennifer's analysis, go to

141
00:07:48,120 --> 00:07:51,520
Speaker 1: VI I go on the Bloomberg terminal that's Jennifer Ree.

142
00:07:51,600 --> 00:07:54,680
Speaker 1: She's a senior litigation analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence