Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. What is the great
Speaker 1: COVID reset that's being planned? Twenty six hundred new votes
Speaker 1: just turned up in Georgia. Joe Biden founded a fake
Speaker 1: cancer charity, and California's plan to determine the election in Georgia.
Speaker 1: This is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or
Speaker 1: mission is to decode what really matters with passionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake, you're a great American. Again the buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show begins. He's a great guy. No, welcome, friends
Speaker 1: to the buck Sexton Show. Thank you so much for
Speaker 1: being here. Another busy day on the front lines freedom,
Speaker 1: another day in which we must hold the line. I
Speaker 1: think we're all starting to pick up on something the
Speaker 1: warnings that people like me have been giving you for
Speaker 1: many months now about how even after a vaccine, they're
Speaker 1: not giving up all this emergency health authority. No, no,
Speaker 1: quite the opposite that's now becoming apparent, even to skeptics
Speaker 1: of those earlier warnings. We now have doctor Fauci, who
Speaker 1: is honestly a disastrous, a disastrous statist bureaucrat, and an
Speaker 1: imbecile on policy. I don't care how much he knows
Speaker 1: about medicine. He's a moron when it comes to national
Speaker 1: public health policy. He's now saying that we're probably heading
Speaker 1: for the most severe restrictions stay at home orders, the
Speaker 1: government telling you you cannot leave the place where you
Speaker 1: live except under very narrowly defined circumstances. You cannot gather
Speaker 1: with other people, you cannot go to business is other
Speaker 1: than those necessary to feed yourself and perhaps to get
Speaker 1: medical attention or supplies. That's what we're heading for. And
Speaker 1: I have so many questions, like, why are we heading
Speaker 1: for that when we've been masking up for months and
Speaker 1: months now? Why are we heading for that with all
Speaker 1: of our social distancing in mitigation. Oh, that's right, because
Speaker 1: we didn't do it well enough, they tell us. It's
Speaker 1: not that that stuff does not work. It does not
Speaker 1: change the trajectory of the virus once it infects a community,
Speaker 1: not over the long term. No, it can't be that.
Speaker 1: It has to be that we aren't listening enough, you see,
Speaker 1: that's the problem. This is a mindset that you do
Speaker 1: often come across in countries where there is no voice
Speaker 1: of the people in government. This is a mindset that
Speaker 1: you will you will hear in places where the answer
Speaker 1: from the government to why should we do that is
Speaker 1: just a version of because I said so, that's where
Speaker 1: we are now, because I said so, you can't open
Speaker 1: your business. If you do, we'll find you if you're
Speaker 1: a restaurant, will take your liquor license, or will just
Speaker 1: shut you down entirely, will ruin you based on what
Speaker 1: you're a health risk. Ah, Yes, a health risk, say
Speaker 1: the people who keep breaking the very quarantine rules they
Speaker 1: want to inflict upon the rest of us. Hypocrisy increasingly
Speaker 1: as you are seeing, is the point. But ultimately this
Speaker 1: is about showing everybody now that we've all been sufficiently
Speaker 1: terrified by the media, now that they may have managed
Speaker 1: to use this to take what should have been an
Speaker 1: easy reelection for Donald Trump away from him. I know
Speaker 1: the fight is still ongoing, friends, but let's be honest,
Speaker 1: this is not looking great. They used COVID for that purpose,
Speaker 1: but there's a much bigger purpose behind it too, the
Speaker 1: policies around it, the mentality here, and you're starting to
Speaker 1: see how it all comes together. Joe Biden talks about
Speaker 1: build back better. That's the slogan, that's the phrase. Why
Speaker 1: isn't it just returned to normal life? Isn't that what
Speaker 1: we all want? We just want our freedoms back. We
Speaker 1: just want the world that was taken away from us
Speaker 1: under the guise of bureaucrats saving all of our lives.
Speaker 1: What lives did they save here? What did they actually do?
Speaker 1: What did they accomplish? There's no accounting for that. And
Speaker 1: if you point out the horrific mistakes in the early
Speaker 1: days from the public health experts, they say, everybody makes mistakes,
Speaker 1: but listen to us now or else. They don't see
Speaker 1: the problem with that. They don't see how that doesn't
Speaker 1: sit well with a whole lot of us. And then
Speaker 1: that brings me to build back better. Plan. A crisis
Speaker 1: is an opportunity. We all know this. The Obama administration
Speaker 1: made that clear. But in general, people who believe in
Speaker 1: the plan, meaning that really smart folks will gather together
Speaker 1: and make decisions for everybody else, also known as central planning,
Speaker 1: also known as the beating heart of Marxism and socialism.
Speaker 1: People that really believe in the plan know that the
Speaker 1: best time to implement it is when everyone is scared,
Speaker 1: when things have gone poorly for other reasons, or things
Speaker 1: that are even out of the state's control. As we
Speaker 1: see in this case, although we've made it worse with
Speaker 1: these lockdowns. I think that's apparent at this space. Notice
Speaker 1: that they don't even try to explain why we're having
Speaker 1: more cases than ever before. It's spreading all over the country,
Speaker 1: and mass compliance is that it's all time high. They
Speaker 1: see no dissonance here, they see no problem whatsoever. They've
Speaker 1: created a perception. Smart people wear masks. That's what they've done, right,
Speaker 1: Like the sheep in George Orwell's animal farm. Four legs good,
Speaker 1: two legs bad. Remember you've all read it, Wear a mask.
Speaker 1: Cuomo yells at you. All the politicians yells, wear a mask.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, where's your mask? I'm wearing a mask. I
Speaker 1: wear two masks now, Joe Biden says. And I'm not kidding.
Speaker 1: He said it yesterday. Now, and it's not enough. The
Speaker 1: virtue signaling thrill is not enough from a single cloth
Speaker 1: placed across your face. You gotta double up on that
Speaker 1: cloth to that, I say, oh yeah, Joe Biden, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna start wearing three masks. Triple mask is where it's at.
Speaker 1: These people are buffoons, but they're dangerous. They don't think
Speaker 1: for themselves, but they still want to make you do
Speaker 1: their bidding. It's all about the collective and it's all
Speaker 1: about that plan that I was telling you about before,
Speaker 1: and you're seeing this on a broader scale Otherwise, how
Speaker 1: can you explain that? Now? When Boris Johnson gives a
Speaker 1: speech the Prime Minister of the UK, build Back Better
Speaker 1: is behind him in Canada at the Institute. This was
Speaker 1: all all shared by Professor Weinstein on his Twitter account
Speaker 1: Build Back Better in Canada, the Institute for European Environmental Policy,
Speaker 1: the OECD tackling coronavirus, contributing to a global effort building
Speaker 1: back better. Prime Minister Imron Khan having a spokesperson in
Speaker 1: Pakistan stand in front of a sign that says build
Speaker 1: back Better. Starting to see this UK, Canada, International Organizations OECD.
Speaker 1: I mean, we're talking folks Grade A one globalists here.
Speaker 1: There's a term we're gonna have to start using more.
Speaker 1: We've used it in the past, but now we're seeing,
Speaker 1: with the possibility of a Trump exit from the world stage,
Speaker 1: the globalists want to come rushing back in. Why do
Speaker 1: we not like what the globalists want for us? What's
Speaker 1: the problem with it? Central planning for nation states results
Speaker 1: in failure results in the destruction of freedom of individual
Speaker 1: choice and therefore of a degree of individual individual identity autonomy.
Speaker 1: They start to chip away at your very soul. We're
Speaker 1: not machines. We don't exist to do what other people
Speaker 1: in far off offices tell us to do. There should
Speaker 1: only be the most universally applicable standards and guidelines, set, contracts, enforced,
Speaker 1: and that's it. We're supposed to be able to make
Speaker 1: other choices for ourselves. And as we know, and the
Speaker 1: founders certainly understood this, which is why we have federal, state,
Speaker 1: and local levels, which is why we have the House
Speaker 1: of Representatives, which is why we have a Senate, which
Speaker 1: is why we have a separate judiciary. That you don't
Speaker 1: want the consolidation of power and very few hands because
Speaker 1: it results in tyranny as well as bad decision making.
Speaker 1: There is no one person, there's no one entity unless
Speaker 1: all of a sudden we have a return of the Messiah,
Speaker 1: that is in a position to tell everybody what to do,
Speaker 1: what's best and what's right without catastrophically bad outcomes. So,
Speaker 1: if you look at central planning, if you look at
Speaker 1: collectivism as it plays out in a nation, state, now
Speaker 1: imagine you're magnifying that out all over the world. One
Speaker 1: world policy. You could have one world principles, but what
Speaker 1: does a one world policy look like? Right? And they
Speaker 1: always start with the one and then try to move
Speaker 1: to the other. And we see that it's a failure.
Speaker 1: They're unable to do it, but that never stops them.
Speaker 1: They keep wanting to assert their will. They keep wanting
Speaker 1: to tell you what to do, whether it's about energy,
Speaker 1: whether it's about our own elections, international monitors looking at
Speaker 1: what we're doing, any number of issues where the UN,
Speaker 1: international consensus, global opinion are supposed to influence us. I
Speaker 1: always think it's hilarious when journalists will show what the
Speaker 1: opinion is of some European country or European countries about
Speaker 1: our election. I'm pretty sure we won a revolution starting
Speaker 1: in seventeen seventy six, so we could not give a
Speaker 1: crap what the Brits or the French, or the Germans
Speaker 1: or anybody else. And we had to win a few
Speaker 1: wars against the Germans for that right too, or anybody
Speaker 1: else thinks about our politicians. In fact, I'm quite certain
Speaker 1: of it. I think my history is sound here. I
Speaker 1: don't care at all but build back better as a
Speaker 1: global rallying cry with COVID should make you very illidease.
Speaker 1: We just want them to stop what they are doing
Speaker 1: because they are not helping. And what they are telling
Speaker 1: you is, Oh, you're gonna get more of this, and
Speaker 1: you're gonna get a whole lot more of other stuff
Speaker 1: that we're planning a lot of it doesn't even have
Speaker 1: to do with COVID. This is out of the Slalinsky
Speaker 1: playbook and rules for radicals as well. Just get a group,
Speaker 1: get a population, Get people mobilized around one issue, and
Speaker 1: then you have a mobilized group that you can use
Speaker 1: for any other issue. Get people fearful and obedient, get
Speaker 1: them to bend the knee on COVID nineteen lockdowns, which
Speaker 1: is what they're about to do again, And then it
Speaker 1: becomes so much easier to tell them we're also going
Speaker 1: to do the following for your benefit. You listen to
Speaker 1: us on COVID and we kept you safe, even though
Speaker 1: they didn't and they made things worse. This is the
Speaker 1: plan described accurately. They would tell you that the plan,
Speaker 1: the centrally planned effort of a would be incoming Biden
Speaker 1: administration and all of the international institutions in globalists that
Speaker 1: it will lean on in order to erode your rights
Speaker 1: and your autonomy. They will tell you that this is
Speaker 1: going to make everything so so much better. They're going
Speaker 1: to improve everything in your life. They're telling you that
Speaker 1: as they're making your life more miserable and more difficult,
Speaker 1: So why should you listen to them? Ultimately, this rests
Speaker 1: on coercion. That's the problem with the leftist approach, with
Speaker 1: the collectivist approach. These are arguments that should be settled
Speaker 1: through an established process of people voting and also taking
Speaker 1: actions that are within the scope of a constitution that
Speaker 1: is written in plan language that we can all understand.
Speaker 1: But they seek to subvert all of that. They either
Speaker 1: say the constitution doesn't matter. It's an old document written
Speaker 1: by people that we shouldn't listen to anymore. Or they
Speaker 1: say that elections only count when they win, or they
Speaker 1: say that our election doesn't even really matter all that much.
Speaker 1: As long as we have people in charge who will
Speaker 1: take orders and be a part of this globalist collective,
Speaker 1: then everything is going to get so much better for us.
Speaker 1: Here we are heading into a miserable, cold winter of
Speaker 1: moronic democrat policies with COVID, where they're just going to
Speaker 1: become even more unhinged and enraged. They will continue. I
Speaker 1: can assure you to blame Trump and Trump supporters all
Speaker 1: the way through January, all the way through the no
Speaker 1: matter who's in charge in this country, through the end
Speaker 1: of the winter, because otherwise they'd have to turn around
Speaker 1: and realize that they're just not that smart and they've
Speaker 1: been swindle They've been fooled. And no one likes that
Speaker 1: feeling that Fauci isn't some saint that we should all
Speaker 1: we should all elevate as the great hero of the
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen pandemic. No, this guy should be thought of
Speaker 1: as somebody deserving of scorn. I mean, he's truly failed
Speaker 1: in his charge here. At a minimum, he should have
Speaker 1: the humility to say, I've been wrong on key stuff.
Speaker 1: I don't really know what to do anymore. Somebody else
Speaker 1: should step up and be advising you guys. My policy
Speaker 1: declarations are absurd, They're idiotic. We're going to have people
Speaker 1: masking up after the vaccine. We're going to have people
Speaker 1: continue to do this once there's no real epidemiological basis
Speaker 1: for them to be worried about the risks, long since
Speaker 1: passed the time when he should have stepped aside. But
Speaker 1: now you're seeing it. Of course he's not going to
Speaker 1: step aside. Of course, the people that have been screaming
Speaker 1: at you to wear a cloth mask loosely fitted around
Speaker 1: your face, sometimes usually in public, so you can show
Speaker 1: what a great democrat you are, or because you don't
Speaker 1: want people to spit at you and yell at you
Speaker 1: and scream at you because you're one of the bad people.
Speaker 1: That's even though there's a ninety nine percent chance you're
Speaker 1: just a healthy person walking around living your life. You're
Speaker 1: treated like some kind of zector of the plague. It's
Speaker 1: really not about this, in the end. It's about the
Speaker 1: massive shift in our mentality, the way that we have
Speaker 1: let our liberties slip through our fingers with barely a
Speaker 1: peep of protest, and they see an opening here. It's
Speaker 1: not just about the great reset. It's a remaking of society.
Speaker 1: We've been conditioned now to do whatever the government tells
Speaker 1: us about some of the most personal, intimate aspects of
Speaker 1: our lives. Who you spend the holidays with the government,
Speaker 1: and it's bureaucrats thinks that it has that mandate. Now,
Speaker 1: this is a power that the Obama socialists of a
Speaker 1: few years ago could have barely dreamed of, and now
Speaker 1: the Biden acolytes are all getting ready to implement this.
Speaker 1: The Build Back Better Plan also known as the eradicate
Speaker 1: your freedom, your liberty and the constitutional protections that have
Speaker 1: been around for a couple of hundred years plan. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Do a risk benefit discussion with your family about what
Speaker 1: you're going to want to do with the holidays. In
Speaker 1: other words, you might say, you know, I have vulnerable
Speaker 1: people in the family, I have elderly people, I have
Speaker 1: people with underlying conditions. Do I want to get ten, fifteen,
Speaker 1: twenty people flying in from different parts of the country.
Speaker 1: That's a wonderful, beautiful tradition that we have, Jim. But
Speaker 1: maybe the time now is to take an assessment of
Speaker 1: that risk benefit ratio and maybe modify what you're gonna
Speaker 1: do from now. And the scientific thing is that there
Speaker 1: is light at the end of the tunnel, help is
Speaker 1: on the way, So a vaccine should not have You
Speaker 1: then make a decision, well, we're going to have a vaccine,
Speaker 1: so we don't have to do anything else. No, the
Speaker 1: fact that we have a vaccine coming means we should
Speaker 1: double down and hang in there because help is on
Speaker 1: the way. Oh wait, now we can have risk discussions
Speaker 1: among ourselves because because Governor Cuomo in New York and
Speaker 1: Governor Newsom in California, among others, have said limits on
Speaker 1: how many people who can gather in your home, they've
Speaker 1: decided this is a matter of law, this is a
Speaker 1: matter of state coercion. Now the doctor Fauci, you know,
Speaker 1: help is on the way, and the cavalry's come in.
Speaker 1: And oh but notice that I think they've shown us
Speaker 1: a little too much of who they are, especially with
Speaker 1: this talk of mask up after the vaccine. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: what was that? The moron just said all aspects of
Speaker 1: this should be left up to individuals, private businesses, private establishments.
Speaker 1: What are we willing to do and what decisions are
Speaker 1: we going to make? But it has not been that way.
Speaker 1: Businesses require masks overwhelmingly because state mandates tell them to
Speaker 1: require masks. Business is shut down because people are told
Speaker 1: they have to. This has not been about choice or freedom.
Speaker 1: Web and how they say we can start to talk
Speaker 1: about risks huh. Thanks for listening to the buses and
Speaker 1: show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. What the hell are
Speaker 1: you doing here? Yeah? It could be their last Thanksgiving
Speaker 1: if you expose them to people who aren't wearing masks,
Speaker 1: who aren't socially distancing and haven't been doing so and
Speaker 1: haven't gotten tested because they somehow think they don't want
Speaker 1: to get in the con of COVID. You know you
Speaker 1: want to hide on state news, you do it. But
Speaker 1: someday you're gonna have to deal with real questions and
Speaker 1: either you're gonna come on a show or you're gonna
Speaker 1: do it. But you know what, we may go back
Speaker 1: to old school, and maybe the questions will come find you.
Speaker 1: Maybe when you're living your life nice and easy because
Speaker 1: you don't have the concerns that these same people that
Speaker 1: you're telling the rise up that they have, Maybe the
Speaker 1: questions will come and find you because you have to
Speaker 1: answer to that kind of guidance. Let alone. It's a doctor,
Speaker 1: do no harm. Invite Grandma. This could be her last Thanksgiving. Yeah,
Speaker 1: if you invite her to a place where you can
Speaker 1: get sick and die almost like Bro Cuomo over at
Speaker 1: CNN is threatening? Is threatening? Doctor Scott Atlas here with
Speaker 1: at least ambush questions outside of his home or something
Speaker 1: right because he says, enjoy your Thanksgiving. Doctor Fauci said,
Speaker 1: have a talk about the risks. Doctor Atlas says, see
Speaker 1: your grandparents, don't don't be crazy like thing is perfect
Speaker 1: and you could end up. You know, does Cuomo ever
Speaker 1: look at the at the data that shows that a
Speaker 1: vast majority of the people who are dying from COVID
Speaker 1: are at high risk of dying from any number of
Speaker 1: other natural causes imminently over people in their eighties. Almost
Speaker 1: half of the people who have died of COVID in
Speaker 1: the last month or so are people who are in
Speaker 1: or above their eighties. Now that's not to say that
Speaker 1: I know, I hate that we would have said this.
Speaker 1: Every life is precious, you know. I still remember, I
Speaker 1: still get very sad when I think about the loss
Speaker 1: of all four of my grandparents. But I wouldn't have
Speaker 1: told them stay in your nursing home, for which they
Speaker 1: weren't in nursing homes. But regardless, I wouldn't have said,
Speaker 1: you know, stay alone in your home don't see anyone.
Speaker 1: You're eighty four. We can't let you see anyone for
Speaker 1: the next eighteen months, maybe the next two years. Sorry,
Speaker 1: it's not safe. Stay home alone. How about that? Is
Speaker 1: that the life that Governor Cuomo and his idiot brother
Speaker 1: over at seeing and want for everybody, because that's the
Speaker 1: life that they're insisting that we all have. Can't see
Speaker 1: your grandparents, can't actually take any of these risks. Trump
Speaker 1: had COVID was fine in three days. Life's not perfect.
Speaker 1: Some people get this and they die very few as
Speaker 1: a percentage, And yet we have all of society being
Speaker 1: told to be in this panic over this. Don't have Thanksgiving,
Speaker 1: don't have Christmas, don't see people, don't live your lives. Yeah,
Speaker 1: if you're sick. If I had the flu five years ago, okay,
Speaker 1: I would not have gone to my family Thanksgiving. If
Speaker 1: you're sick, clearly stay away from people. But what they're
Speaker 1: talking about are the risks of asymptomatic transmission among people
Speaker 1: in a family, and then the risk of somebody in
Speaker 1: the family getting it and actually dying from it as
Speaker 1: a result. There are a lot of folks out there
Speaker 1: who are going to look at that and if they
Speaker 1: understand the real numbers, the real data, and say, Okay,
Speaker 1: we're just gonna we're gonna live our lives. We're going
Speaker 1: to do this, We're going to see each other. We're
Speaker 1: willing to do that anyway, knowing in any given year,
Speaker 1: you could have showed up at Thanksgiving and given Grandma
Speaker 1: the flu and she could have died from that. That
Speaker 1: has been true. And people say, oh, you would know
Speaker 1: that's not true because the flu is at least twenty
Speaker 1: four hours before you show symptoms. You can spread it,
Speaker 1: which is one of the reasons why the flu does
Speaker 1: spread widely. So that could have happened in any given year.
Speaker 1: But do you live your life based on that fear?
Speaker 1: And let's also remember that COVID treatment has gotten substantially better,
Speaker 1: which means the risk now is considerably less even for
Speaker 1: those at high risk than it was back in April
Speaker 1: and May and March of this past year. And there
Speaker 1: are vaccines coming on the horizon, which I know doesn't
Speaker 1: change your risk calculation for right now, but it does
Speaker 1: mean that we are making real scientific progress against this
Speaker 1: actual science. But I thought, I thought where a mask
Speaker 1: was all you had to do, wearing a mask was
Speaker 1: going to stop this thing cold in its tracks. That's
Speaker 1: what we were told for months and months and months.
Speaker 1: You mean that didn't work. Oh we didn't wear masks enough.
Speaker 1: They'll tell us that's bull that's nonsense. But they're not
Speaker 1: going to change because there's so much behind this. Isn't
Speaker 1: it fun for them to be able to go around
Speaker 1: and lecture everybody. Don't they get some joy out of
Speaker 1: being the heroes here that stand up for science. We
Speaker 1: believe the science Where a mask, Cuomo says, right, okay,
Speaker 1: we've been doing that. Have they been doing that? Have
Speaker 1: they been social distancing? Have some of the very people
Speaker 1: who are making decisions about using the force of the
Speaker 1: state to make you do things right now because of
Speaker 1: COVID risk? Have they I'm just I'm wondering. I'm really asked.
Speaker 1: I'm really asking have they been setting a good example?
Speaker 1: The mayor of Chicago, remember Lorie Lightfoot, somebody who is
Speaker 1: deeply unimpressive. That's fair to say true of many mayors, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, she's probably a better mayor than de Blasio
Speaker 1: because she at least got upset when there was widespread
Speaker 1: looting of the downtown high end shopping district in Chicago.
Speaker 1: She realized that's a bad look for her city, and
Speaker 1: she was actually kind of upset about it. So I
Speaker 1: guess she's not completely insane. Where's de Blasio views it
Speaker 1: a little bit of you know, settling the score for
Speaker 1: social justice. Got to have some looting and ryding sometimes,
Speaker 1: you know, it's just the price the hard working people
Speaker 1: in New York City have to pay for the left
Speaker 1: wing lunatics in their midst. But Lorie Lightfoot is she
Speaker 1: got the haircut when we couldn't get haircuts, remember that,
Speaker 1: And then when asked about it, because she has to
Speaker 1: look good for her city, that was her answer. Lorie
Speaker 1: Lightfoot was out there with the big Biden protests on
Speaker 1: the streets. We have this big we have the surge
Speaker 1: of cases this week, and we're being told to change
Speaker 1: all of these aspects of our lives. You know, no thanks.
Speaker 1: They just canceled Thanksgiving parade. Thanksgiving parade in Houston, first
Speaker 1: time that's happening over seventy years, ever since they've been
Speaker 1: doing the parade. So they're canceling pride. And I'll look,
Speaker 1: I don't like I'm not a parade person, but I
Speaker 1: think people should. I think parades could can They could
Speaker 1: certainly do the parade and just help people, you know,
Speaker 1: don't gather in large numbers on They could still have
Speaker 1: the parade and people could watch from a distance or not.
Speaker 1: You know, there are ways they could do this, but no,
Speaker 1: I mean, in general, I'm just an anti parade guy.
Speaker 1: Unless it's a military veterans parade, and especially if there's
Speaker 1: drums and or bagpipes involved, then it's cool. Other parades,
Speaker 1: I'm just not into. I just don't care. But here's
Speaker 1: Lorie Lightfoot talking about how the Biden celebration going on
Speaker 1: there on the streets when they call the immedia called
Speaker 1: the victory for Joe Biden. Oh yeah, she was out
Speaker 1: there without a mask, and she was in crowds and
Speaker 1: there are a lot of people gathered and yelling and
Speaker 1: everything else. But you know, no big deal. Sixteen. We've
Speaker 1: been saying all along, everybody has to take care, everybody
Speaker 1: has to take precaution. I will tell you in that
Speaker 1: big crowd a week ago, we had everybody was wearing masks. Look,
Speaker 1: you can see the shot here. Mask compliance in our
Speaker 1: city is actually up very, very high. But yes, there
Speaker 1: are times when we actually do need to have a
Speaker 1: relief and come together. And I felt like that was
Speaker 1: one of those times that crowd was gathered, whether I
Speaker 1: was there or not. But this has been a super
Speaker 1: hard year on everyone. Everyone feels traumatize, they feel threatened
Speaker 1: their safety, and they don't know what tomorrow is going
Speaker 1: to bring. And with this new surge in cases, we
Speaker 1: have just got to step up and do the right thing.
Speaker 1: And I think people understand that. Back in the spring,
Speaker 1: when we issue these blankets stay at home orders, it
Speaker 1: was because we really didn't understand where the risk was,
Speaker 1: so we were trying to mitigate it everywhere. We now
Speaker 1: have a lot more data and we can use a
Speaker 1: surgent's knife and not just a blunt instrument to try
Speaker 1: to really go at where we're seeing the biggest risk
Speaker 1: and help mitigate them. And for us right now, the
Speaker 1: biggest risk that we're seeing in our city is in
Speaker 1: these private spaces and gatherings or Trump rallies. Of course,
Speaker 1: that's where the real risk is, right because this is
Speaker 1: what Democrats have We're telling us for months leading up
Speaker 1: the election. The Trump rallies are the real risks, not
Speaker 1: BLM rallies and protests and looting and rioting. That's not
Speaker 1: a risk. This has this has been politicized beyond recognition.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is now a straight up political issue.
Speaker 1: But I do want to be very clear here that
Speaker 1: she is basically making some absurd justification as she goes along.
Speaker 1: You know, people need relief sometimes, but don't gather for Thanksgiving.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, so you need relief for a Joe Biden
Speaker 1: victory dance like literally dancing in the streets. But people
Speaker 1: shouldn't have the relief of seeing their family members over
Speaker 1: the holidays, including family members who have been particularly isolated
Speaker 1: during COVID, who have been cut off from their loved
Speaker 1: ones and friends and just human contact. Now that that
Speaker 1: doesn't that doesn't count. Joe Biden's victory is important. Your
Speaker 1: Thanksgiving with your family is not. That's what Lori Lyford
Speaker 1: wants you to know. Before I move on to another
Speaker 1: case of this, I just wanted to point out she says,
Speaker 1: we're in Chicago, just just to take an example, They're
Speaker 1: doing great with masks in Chicago. They're doing great with
Speaker 1: masks in Chicago. Okay, I'm so happy to hear that
Speaker 1: in August you had you know, you had fifteen hundred
Speaker 1: Let's say to two thousand ks a day in Chicago.
Speaker 1: Yesterday you had eleven I'm sorry, fifteen thousand, fifteen thousand
Speaker 1: as of November thirteenth, so a few days ago. It's
Speaker 1: the data that just popped up here. Twelve thousand. I
Speaker 1: think November sixteenth was twelve thousand every that's the closest one.
Speaker 1: So we've gone from call it fifteen hundred and twelve thousand,
Speaker 1: fifteen thousand a couple of days ago, new cases. And
Speaker 1: but we're doing great with masks. Gee, how great would
Speaker 1: we be doing without mask mandates? I asked that question
Speaker 1: in all honesty. She says, and she's the mayor and
Speaker 1: she's watching it very closely, and she's a Democrat. She says,
Speaker 1: we're doing great, guys, great masking. Okay, cool cases are
Speaker 1: up seven x in two months. Well what are we
Speaker 1: what are we to believe that without our amazing cloth
Speaker 1: mask policy they'd be up seventy? Is that really what
Speaker 1: we're going to think? In New York City, we didn't
Speaker 1: wear masks in February when the virus was spreading all
Speaker 1: over the city, and it didn't get up to those
Speaker 1: kinds of numbers, right going up to one hundred thousand
Speaker 1: cases a day, let's say something like that. But in Chicago,
Speaker 1: a city with two million instead of eight million people,
Speaker 1: they're they're up to fifteen thousand cases a day, and
Speaker 1: they're a great example of mask wearing. But like I said,
Speaker 1: that's all, and if you don't wear them, you're a
Speaker 1: bad person. In fact, it is your patriotic duty. Play
Speaker 1: clip five. Ask a rhetorical question. Do you guys understand this?
Speaker 1: Does anybody understand why a governor would turn this into
Speaker 1: a political statement. It's about patriotism, It's about being patriotic,
Speaker 1: it's about saving life. For real, I'm not it's not hyperbole.
Speaker 1: It's about being patriotic. And I think you're seeing more
Speaker 1: and more this gun awful virus continues to spread almost unabated,
Speaker 1: that that governors are stepping up, he says, it spreads.
Speaker 1: I'm using his words now, I'm using the Democrat talking
Speaker 1: points here, and I just want explanations. He's using words
Speaker 1: like unabated. Meanwhile, we have masking going on. Meanwhile, we
Speaker 1: have masking going on in numbers that they're praising. Unobated
Speaker 1: means effectively without any stopping of it, right with it.
Speaker 1: It's just free reign to spread. But our masking has
Speaker 1: been great. Good job at the masking, but Biden saying
Speaker 1: it's spreading unabated. Nobody wants to see these two things
Speaker 1: in conflict, though, right, because a whole lot of people
Speaker 1: will look like a bunch of dumb asses if we
Speaker 1: actually dig into what's happening here. You're in. This is
Speaker 1: the Bucks Sexton Show podcast and another one, another one
Speaker 1: here telling us that we all have to mask up,
Speaker 1: that we have to listen to the mandates, we have
Speaker 1: to obey all these different rules and regulations around COVID.
Speaker 1: But he doesn't have to obey the rules. He's important.
Speaker 1: He's an important, powerful person who's doing the bidding of
Speaker 1: the left, so he gets to live by a different
Speaker 1: set of rules. That's the explanation we get. That's the
Speaker 1: reality of this. So let's just hear from himself because
Speaker 1: he's got to do a little fake apology thing. Here
Speaker 1: we got Gavin noosm everybody play thirteen. I was asked
Speaker 1: to go to a friend's fiftieth birthday. My wife and
Speaker 1: I a friend that I've known for almost twenty years
Speaker 1: and a friend that had well put a lot of
Speaker 1: time and energy into his fiftieth birthday. It was in Napa,
Speaker 1: which was in the Orange status, relatively loose compared to
Speaker 1: some other counties. It was to be an outdoor restaurant
Speaker 1: and we started the well the program start at four o'clock.
Speaker 1: It was one of those early reservations. I got there
Speaker 1: a little bit late at four thirty, and as soon
Speaker 1: as I sat down at the larger table, I realized
Speaker 1: it was a little larger group than I had anticipated,
Speaker 1: and I made a bad mistake. Instead of sitting down,
Speaker 1: I should have stood up and walked back on my
Speaker 1: car and drove back to my house. Instead, I chose
Speaker 1: to sit there with my wife and a number of
Speaker 1: other couples that were outside the household. You can quibble
Speaker 1: about the guidelines, et cetera, et cetera, but the spirit
Speaker 1: of what I'm preaching all the time was contradicted and
Speaker 1: I got to own that. And so I want to
Speaker 1: apologize to you because I need to preach and practice,
Speaker 1: not just preach and not actus. And I've done my
Speaker 1: best to do that. We're all human, we all fall short.
Speaker 1: Sometimes He's much more slick, I'll give him that than
Speaker 1: say Governor Cuomo is, who is just a deluded sociopath,
Speaker 1: the governor of California. Yeah, he's a smooth operator. He is.
Speaker 1: You know, you say, oh, okay, we're all fallible, we
Speaker 1: all and you want to sympathize with him. Except you
Speaker 1: if you were running a restaurant and we ran a
Speaker 1: foul of one of Newsome's mandates, you don't get to say, well,
Speaker 1: we made a mistake when we had that reservation for
Speaker 1: twelve people, and no, you get a fine, you get
Speaker 1: shut down, you get punished. He just gets to say, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, we're all human. But I'd also note that
Speaker 1: even his takeaway here is wrong. I don't have a
Speaker 1: problem with Gavin Newsom going to French Laundry, by the way,
Speaker 1: considered by some the fanciest and finest restaurant in America.
Speaker 1: Actually it's Thomas Keller's flagship place up in Napa. I
Speaker 1: remember I tried to go there over ten years ago,
Speaker 1: and I think they told me there was a reservation
Speaker 1: list stretching back six months or something like that, and
Speaker 1: basically no chance. Kid. You know, I'd saved up all
Speaker 1: my pennies from my government work. I just wanted to
Speaker 1: go there as a culinary you know, a culinary special treat.
Speaker 1: Couldn't do it. But French Laundry is a great restaurant, true,
Speaker 1: very very expensive. Is it worth the enormous fee? I
Speaker 1: don't know, but that's for you to decide. Point here being,
Speaker 1: I got no problem with Gavin Newsom going to a
Speaker 1: friend's fiftieth birthday party. Good for him. I got a
Speaker 1: problem with Gavin Newsom walking around telling everybody else you
Speaker 1: can't go to your friend or dad or you know,
Speaker 1: mom or co workers fiftieth birthday party. Can't do that, sorry,
Speaker 1: not allowed, government mandate. Too dangerous, too dangerous. That's what
Speaker 1: they tell us, that's what they say. Well, do as
Speaker 1: I do, do as I say, not as I do.
Speaker 1: Is really now a mantra for democrats empower during COVID,
Speaker 1: isn't it? Just like they enjoy the authority but they
Speaker 1: don't want their responsibility. Thanks for listening to the bus
Speaker 1: and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Que all
Speaker 1: the hysteria out there now over how if Trump doesn't
Speaker 1: just hand over the keys to the White House tomorrow,
Speaker 1: we're all gonna die of COVID? Because of the delay.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, right, I mean, what they've used COVID
Speaker 1: for so many things. Why not have this be this
Speaker 1: secret to convincing everybody that Trump's delay is costing lives
Speaker 1: his delay and conceding that's really what this is all about.
Speaker 1: You're hearing a lot of this of this now. Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's out there, He's giving his team's talking points, and
Speaker 1: then the media will reflect those talking points back to
Speaker 1: him with questions that are effectively given everything that you've
Speaker 1: said is true, how awful is Trump really? And what
Speaker 1: should we do to continue to talk about his awfulness
Speaker 1: in the press. But first, let's start with what Joe's
Speaker 1: contention is. Here. Here's Joe Biden, no joke, no joke
Speaker 1: period period. I mean, I'm just here saying stuff that
Speaker 1: people tell me to say, and I've been doing it
Speaker 1: for forty years. Play clip one. It's great news that
Speaker 1: Maderna and Fiser each come up with vaccines that are
Speaker 1: in excessive ninety percent effectiveness and getting the vaccine and
Speaker 1: a vaccination, though, are two different things. Everyone on our
Speaker 1: Call today, in our Zoom Today, agreed that the sooner
Speaker 1: we have access to the administration's distribution plan the sooner
Speaker 1: this transition would be smoothly move forward. And you know,
Speaker 1: as we battle COVID well else to make sure the
Speaker 1: business and workers have the tools, the resources, the national
Speaker 1: guidance and health and safety standards to operate safely. And
Speaker 1: we can do that. We can bring Democrats from republic
Speaker 1: Is together, work with business and labor to deliver those
Speaker 1: necessary resources. And for millions of Americans who've lost hours
Speaker 1: and wages or have lost their jobs, we all agreed
Speaker 1: on our call that we can deliver immediate relief. You know,
Speaker 1: it would help in delivering immediate relief if Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: stopped holding relief hostage to her outlandish demands to bail
Speaker 1: out cities that were running up huge debts even before
Speaker 1: the COVID crisis. But he's not going to talk about that, No. Instead,
Speaker 1: what you get from Joe Biden is, we just want
Speaker 1: to know what their vaccine rollout plan is, man. We
Speaker 1: just want to know what's going on with that one
Speaker 1: issue with it. We all understand what that would turn into. Right,
Speaker 1: They're saying they want to know the vaccine rollout plan
Speaker 1: so that there can be a smoother transition and keep
Speaker 1: in mind that Trump hasn't even accepted that there is
Speaker 1: necessarily there could be, but a transition coming. And that's
Speaker 1: the part of this that they're not going to that's
Speaker 1: not going to shift, that's not going to change. But
Speaker 1: what we all know they would do the moment that
Speaker 1: the Trump team told them what the transition plan and
Speaker 1: what the vaccine plans are, they would start criticizing it
Speaker 1: publicly trashing it. Oh my gosh, Trump is just putting
Speaker 1: forward this vaccine distribution plan that privileges you know, white cisgender,
Speaker 1: patriarchy or something. You know, there would be some oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, you know, oh it's only the vaccines only
Speaker 1: for the rich. What it's going to nursing homes and
Speaker 1: healthcare providers? Oh, you know, whatever. It may be, right,
Speaker 1: that's that's what they're gonna tell us. So it just
Speaker 1: opens up all kinds of criticism. They got plenty of time. Remember,
Speaker 1: they're gonna be handed a plan if there is a
Speaker 1: transition of what vaccine is supposed to be. But really
Speaker 1: this is all them saying, this is all the storyline
Speaker 1: of we would do a better job, and any problems
Speaker 1: in the vaccine distribution that do come up if there's
Speaker 1: a Biden presidency will immediately be blamed upon Trump and
Speaker 1: his unwillingness to pass the plans to them now so
Speaker 1: they can come up with their fixes to the plan,
Speaker 1: even though there's zero reason to believe that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: and the clowns that he is filling in and slots
Speaker 1: around him already would be better at this no reason
Speaker 1: to believe it whatsoever. Who just created the public private
Speaker 1: partnership to get us to this stage? Who created that?
Speaker 1: That's right, it was the Trump administration. Right, it was
Speaker 1: President Trump that came up with this Operation warp Speed
Speaker 1: with his advisors. I understand marshaling the experience and the
Speaker 1: knowledge of experts around him, but they were able to
Speaker 1: do that, and you'll notice they get no benefit as
Speaker 1: a result. They have there's no willingness to say, wow,
Speaker 1: good job Trump and team. You guys probably know what
Speaker 1: you're doing. Let us know about this vaccine plan when
Speaker 1: you can, because we want to make sure we do
Speaker 1: a great job of implementing it when Joe Biden takes over.
Speaker 1: I'm talking about from the perspective of the Biden team,
Speaker 1: that's that would be a reasonable position. No, their position is, oh,
Speaker 1: this is an outrage. He's not conceding, he's not giving
Speaker 1: us what we need, he's not doing what we tell
Speaker 1: him to do. It's terrible, it's awful, and the media is,
Speaker 1: of course playing along with the whole thing. Here's a
Speaker 1: NBC News reporter that I mean, this is a this
Speaker 1: is a great question, because this is a reminder you
Speaker 1: could call this, you know, the Obama's the Obama administration
Speaker 1: era of journalism questions, right, this is the kind of
Speaker 1: stuff you'd see when they'd ask Obama, sir. I know
Speaker 1: this is going to be a tough one, but what's
Speaker 1: it like to have to deal with the evil and
Speaker 1: stupid Republicans when you, yourself are a super genius that
Speaker 1: everybody should bow down to and beg forgiveness from for
Speaker 1: just not being as awesome as you. That was ninety
Speaker 1: five percent of mainstream journals for eight years. It was
Speaker 1: it was embarrassing, It was debasing. I mean, just as
Speaker 1: a human being to be so so just to be
Speaker 1: always supplicating, you know, to be so just toady's all
Speaker 1: the time. But anyway, you're going to see a lot
Speaker 1: of that if there if there is a Biden administration
Speaker 1: and here's NBC NBC reporter who's doing a great example
Speaker 1: of what you could expect for Biden, same kind of
Speaker 1: treatment plate. Too good to see you. I'm gonna start
Speaker 1: with a question about your pandemic planning and then a
Speaker 1: question about your economic plan. You spoke about the need
Speaker 1: to access the outgoing administration's COVID vaccine distribution plans. What
Speaker 1: do you see as the biggest threat to your transition
Speaker 1: right now? Given President Trump's unprecedented attempt to obstruct and
Speaker 1: delay a smooth transfer of power, more people may die.
Speaker 1: Isn't that amazing? Think about all the ways that he showed,
Speaker 1: the editorial line that he's taking in that question, the
Speaker 1: unprecedented obstruction that's going on. What are the threats to
Speaker 1: you saving so many lives? Joe Biden is an imbecile.
Speaker 1: He is not a smart person. He does not have
Speaker 1: good judgment. He is not knowledgeable about anything that helps
Speaker 1: the public with the policies that he implements. I just
Speaker 1: want to scream, no one thinks this guy's impressive, but
Speaker 1: now they're all going to pretend like he is. Democrats,
Speaker 1: until five minutes ago, knew that he was a buffoon,
Speaker 1: but he'd been around forever, and you know, he was
Speaker 1: there to hold Obama's coat for eight years, and now
Speaker 1: all of a sudden we are supposed to think that
Speaker 1: he's the dear leader. Oh, he's amazing, He's going to
Speaker 1: save us. It wasn't my question. That question was perfect
Speaker 1: given how awful and horrible Trump is. What are you
Speaker 1: gonna do to save more lives in the face of
Speaker 1: his efforts to kill more people? Because he's awful. Journos, baby,
Speaker 1: that's how they do it, that's how they get down.
Speaker 1: And Biden's really know better. I mean Biden, of course
Speaker 1: I love he goes. People will die. Yeah, sure, that's right.
Speaker 1: Everyone's gonna die because Trump. I'm just gonna tell you this.
Speaker 1: You know how the anti war movement disappeared under Obama?
Speaker 1: I mean there were a couple of and hey, at
Speaker 1: least they're consistent. There were a couple of code pin
Speaker 1: crazy ladies running around occasionally during the Obama administration. They
Speaker 1: had no institutional support. The editorial page of the New
Speaker 1: York Times CNA nothing. People don't even know that Obama
Speaker 1: just to look like he wasn't some whimp on national security,
Speaker 1: he didn't know anything. Surged over one hundred thousand troops
Speaker 1: in Afghanistan and announced or withdrawal at the same time
Speaker 1: of the surge. So the Taliban got to sit there
Speaker 1: and basically look at the calendars and look at the
Speaker 1: clocks and like, Okay, well we fight this thing out
Speaker 1: for a while, but we keep some in reserve. We
Speaker 1: go across the border to Pakistan, and we just waited out.
Speaker 1: That's exactly what they did. But we lost a lot
Speaker 1: of particularly a lot of brave marines during that period fighting.
Speaker 1: Childhood friend of mine was there in Hellman Province and
Speaker 1: I remember, you know, we came back talking about this stuff.
Speaker 1: It was nasty fighting going on there. We lost a
Speaker 1: lot of marines. Media didn't even talk about it. I
Speaker 1: mean they had covered a little oh there's a little
Speaker 1: bit of a troop thing going on in Afghanistan. But
Speaker 1: we lost more soldiers in Afghanistan under Obama than we
Speaker 1: did under Bush. Does anyone even know that? Does anyone
Speaker 1: even understand that? No? Of course not, because the anti
Speaker 1: war movement disappeared, Because the anti war left is disingenuous,
Speaker 1: right there, really just a bunch of marx Is trying
Speaker 1: to undermine US foreign policy abroad. If they had been consistent.
Speaker 1: I'd say, well, good for them, because I do think
Speaker 1: the Bush administration pushed for too much conflict in too
Speaker 1: many places. But for them, it's really just a tool
Speaker 1: for the anti war left. It's a tool of politics.
Speaker 1: The pretense that they care so much about our soldiers,
Speaker 1: what they care about humanitarian losses in these countries. They
Speaker 1: really don't. It's about what works as a political instrument
Speaker 1: of bludgeoning the other side. And then when Obama is
Speaker 1: in office, Oh no, we gotta back off this and
Speaker 1: now war now Libyan war is fine. Now you know,
Speaker 1: whatever we gotta do is fine. You're gonna see the
Speaker 1: same thing with COVID. Be prepared for that. It's going
Speaker 1: to be disgusting. Do you think CNN is gonna have
Speaker 1: a COVID death tracker up if Biden takes office? Every day?
Speaker 1: How many deaths, how many deaths? How many deaths do
Speaker 1: you think that's going to happen? Oh, I want to
Speaker 1: make a prediction right now, all of a sudden, the
Speaker 1: deaths from COVID will just be a thing that happens.
Speaker 1: It's sad, but no, it's not any one person's fault,
Speaker 1: which is true, by the way, but that mentality has
Speaker 1: been completely in reverse. Now it's all Trump's fault. Every
Speaker 1: death is Trump's fault, and they even go so far
Speaker 1: as to lie to you about the vaccines mistrust in society.
Speaker 1: Here's Joe Biden self saying in play clip seven, it's
Speaker 1: important that people who are in the greatest need get it.
Speaker 1: I wouldn't hesitate to get the vaccine, but I also
Speaker 1: want to set an example. But I wouldn't hesitate to
Speaker 1: get the vaccine. And if in fact doctor doctor Fauci
Speaker 1: and these two organizations, whether it's Maderna or Feiser, who
Speaker 1: have been extremely responsible, conclude that it is safe and
Speaker 1: able to be done. Look, the only reason people questioned
Speaker 1: the vaccine now is because of Donald Trump. That's the
Speaker 1: reason why people are questioning the vaccine because all the
Speaker 1: things he says and doesn't say. It's a truthfulness and
Speaker 1: not truthful to the exaggerations. I think we're on a
Speaker 1: clear path now, we're in a clear path or the
Speaker 1: international community and national leaders in the scientific community have
Speaker 1: focused on these two vaccines. They appear to be ready
Speaker 1: for prime time, ready to be used. And if that
Speaker 1: continues on those roads, I would take the vaccine. The
Speaker 1: only reason that people distrust the vaccine is Donald Trump
Speaker 1: leaves out that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and other
Speaker 1: Democrats and the media became temporary and situational anti vaxers
Speaker 1: for months leading up to the election because they wanted
Speaker 1: people terrified and anything, any lie, any tool, any artifice
Speaker 1: that they had to use to defeat Trump was okay,
Speaker 1: including spreading anti vax nonsense as if the Trump FDA
Speaker 1: would also be able to collude with Fizer and Moderna
Speaker 1: to put out an unsafe or ineffective vaccine. You want
Speaker 1: to talking about a conspiracy, You want to talk about
Speaker 1: no evidence for something. But Kamala Harris and Joe Biden
Speaker 1: were the one spreading that poison for months, and now
Speaker 1: they blame Trump for the poison that they spread. They
Speaker 1: created a perception among their followers who it's, you know,
Speaker 1: and we're going to see again, who's the real cult?
Speaker 1: Is it the Democrats or Republicans? Trust me, it's Democrats.
Speaker 1: Remember the Obama era, they worshiped the guy was absurd,
Speaker 1: but they created the Democrats created the perception that you
Speaker 1: couldn't trust the Trump FDA, and now they're going to
Speaker 1: turn around and say, oh gosh, look at this. People
Speaker 1: don't trust Trump among our supporters in particular, We're going
Speaker 1: to have to clean up this mess. I mean, they're
Speaker 1: like the people that light a fire. That they're the
Speaker 1: ones that commit arson, and then they complain when the
Speaker 1: firefighters arrive. Oh you guys haven't put out that fire yet.
Speaker 1: Oh gosh, you know, really not doing a good enough
Speaker 1: job here. They're the ones that started this. It's because
Speaker 1: of them. Do you think they'll ever admit that. No. Never,
Speaker 1: of course that's completely absurd. They won't admit that. No.
Speaker 1: So much easier to just continue to play this game
Speaker 1: and lie to people. And one of the big lines
Speaker 1: is that Joe Biden represents some kind of new era
Speaker 1: of honor in our politics. Joe Biden is a slimy, feckless, reckless,
Speaker 1: self interested DC swamp creature. That's just the truth. You're
Speaker 1: in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. It's a quick note on these Georgia Senate runoffs.
Speaker 1: Who are Warnock and us Off the two Democrat candidates here?
Speaker 1: What should we know about them? There's this plan that
Speaker 1: we're seeing underway right now where Californians are saying they're
Speaker 1: gonna move to Georgia. I guess they're going to establish
Speaker 1: some form of residency there. They've got some way they
Speaker 1: think they're going to be able to do this. They're
Speaker 1: looking to change their residences, moved to Georgia and vote
Speaker 1: in order to get these two Democrats elected. Let me
Speaker 1: say right now, friends, I've been advocating for this for
Speaker 1: a while. I want conservatives to pick a city. We
Speaker 1: should create a nationwide movement. Pick a city that we
Speaker 1: are going to take over politically. So whether it's Dallas
Speaker 1: or Tampa, or you name it, we show up. It
Speaker 1: has to be in a red Ish state. We show
Speaker 1: up and we say, all right, I want, you know,
Speaker 1: three hundred four hundred thousand Republicans to all converge in
Speaker 1: this one place, and we're going to flip this city
Speaker 1: red and we're going to run it like a conservative city.
Speaker 1: I don't know what we call this project, but we
Speaker 1: need to do it. It needs to happen because right
Speaker 1: now we don't have any cities of any real size,
Speaker 1: which is unacceptable, but because also think about the example.
Speaker 1: We could set a city where police are supported, where
Speaker 1: public services are efficient, but also taxes are minimal. I mean,
Speaker 1: think about what we could do anyway. Here's John ass Off,
Speaker 1: supposed to be smister, mister nice guy. He does remind
Speaker 1: me of that Obama era Obamacare pajama boy meme. But
Speaker 1: here's John Assoff, who the the mattaw watching Chris Hayes
Speaker 1: loving MSNBC squad. They think this guy's fantastic. If you're
Speaker 1: a leftist, they love us Off. Is he a nice guy?
Speaker 1: Running in Georgia for the senatecy play a team. We
Speaker 1: need to send the message this year. We need to
Speaker 1: send the message that if you indulge this kind of politics,
Speaker 1: you're not just getna get beat You're gonna get beaten
Speaker 1: so bad in public. Because we have had enough, absolutely enough,
Speaker 1: And what we are getting from Donald Trump and his
Speaker 1: fellow travelers right now, never show your face in public
Speaker 1: again for the crime of supporting Donald Trump. That's what
Speaker 1: they're telling us. They want to never show your face
Speaker 1: in public again. Oh yeah, I can feel all the
Speaker 1: unity and the healing, can't you. And here's Democrat candidate
Speaker 1: Raphael Warnock play seventeen. I don't no matter what happens
Speaker 1: next month, more than a third of the nation that
Speaker 1: would go along with this is reason to be afraid.
Speaker 1: America needs to repent for its worship of whiteness on
Speaker 1: full display. Repent America for your worship of whiteness. These
Speaker 1: are the Democrat candidates here, Ausoffen Warnock. These are the
Speaker 1: things that they say, and they are the ones that
Speaker 1: the entire Democrat apparatus is going to go through, go
Speaker 1: to extreme measures to do everything in their power to
Speaker 1: make sure that they win, so that there can be
Speaker 1: a Democrat majority in the House, the Senate, and perhaps yes,
Speaker 1: even the presidency in the hands of Joe Biden. That
Speaker 1: is a recipe for a twenty twenty one that could
Speaker 1: be even worse, believe it or not than twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, at the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. The fight is still on.
Speaker 1: This election is not yet over, despite what you're hearing
Speaker 1: in so many different places in the media. Let's hear
Speaker 1: from the campaign right now. An advisor to the campaign,
Speaker 1: senior strategic advisor, that is our friend Steve Cortez back
Speaker 1: in the mix. Steve, thanks for making the time for
Speaker 1: us I appreciate a bucket. You are very right when
Speaker 1: I talk about this election, we must speak in the
Speaker 1: present tense, because it is ongoing. Let's not be vold
Speaker 1: in speaking of the past tense as though it is over.
Speaker 1: Now you've got a roughly fifteen thousand I think it's
Speaker 1: little less than that roughly fifteen thousand vote mar Rgin
Speaker 1: of victory thus far, we call it a margin of separation,
Speaker 1: perhaps for Joe Biden in in Georgia. We just found
Speaker 1: twenty six hundred new votes just well, look, twenty six
Speaker 1: hundred votes two for one going for Trump. Does this
Speaker 1: begin to chip away at the Let's just move past
Speaker 1: this and not audit and not recheck and not recount anything, Steve,
Speaker 1: But it certainly does. You know, obviously, this is very
Speaker 1: troubling that these votes are just happened to be missing
Speaker 1: and suddenly got found, and that they overwhelmingly favored the president,
Speaker 1: you know, forgiving you if I'm not shocked, right, sort
Speaker 1: of like the police showing up in Casablanca and find
Speaker 1: out while there's gambling going on at Ricks. And by
Speaker 1: the way, the statistical case also backs up this anecdotal case.
Speaker 1: When I mean the statistical case I'm staying. For example,
Speaker 1: look at the state of Georgia and the rate of
Speaker 1: rejection of mailed in ballots four years ago, when they
Speaker 1: had about two hundred thousand mailed in ballots. In twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: which is a more normal rate before the pandemic, they
Speaker 1: rejected three percent of all ballots that were mailed in.
Speaker 1: They were even not registered voters, there was something in
Speaker 1: valid about the ballot itself, it wasn't signed. Whatever the reason,
Speaker 1: three percent were rejected. Now this time, one point three
Speaker 1: million ballots in Georgia were mailed in, more than six
Speaker 1: times the twenty sixteen told. That's not surprising given the pandemic. However,
Speaker 1: here's what is surprising and more than surprising, I think
Speaker 1: damning really of the vote totals and the validity of
Speaker 1: vote tobles. That rate of rejection went down from three
Speaker 1: percent all the way to point two four percent of
Speaker 1: ballots were rejected. In other words, one twelfth the level
Speaker 1: the percentage of ballants that we're rejected in twenty sixteen
Speaker 1: were rejected this time, even though with such a mammoth increase,
Speaker 1: over a million point one point one million more ballots
Speaker 1: coming in. If anything, if there were a serious vetting
Speaker 1: of the voting going on, we would expect, if anything,
Speaker 1: that percentage to actually rise a book because you have
Speaker 1: so many people doing it for the first time. The
Speaker 1: fact is the percentage fell dramatically, and I believe the
Speaker 1: complete void of vetting of votes and it wasn't contained
Speaker 1: of Georgia. Similar thing happened in Pennsylvania. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, the numbers are actually even more in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: This indicates that a large share of these votes are
Speaker 1: simply not valid, and the only way for us to
Speaker 1: determine if they are is a serious audit, not just
Speaker 1: a recount, not just sending them back to the machine,
Speaker 1: but an actual hand audit of these results. And in
Speaker 1: the case of Georgia, if we were to have the
Speaker 1: same rejection rate as twenty sixteen, thirty nine thousand votes
Speaker 1: would be rejected instead of the only three thousand that were.
Speaker 1: Now where are we with the recount? And George of
Speaker 1: the President has been tweeting about this. We know there
Speaker 1: was some kind of recount, but he's not happy with
Speaker 1: what's going on. Can you just tell us what is
Speaker 1: the status of Georgia as of today? Right? Well, listen,
Speaker 1: are the campaign is not happy with it, obviously, and
Speaker 1: neither is the president because we're not having an honest
Speaker 1: recount there. And this is particularly disappointed because we have
Speaker 1: a supposedly Republican Secretary of State. Georgia, while it is
Speaker 1: a swing state statewide, has been electing Republicans lately, so
Speaker 1: we would expect better than this. But the unfortunate reality
Speaker 1: is we know that the recounts had not been that
Speaker 1: it has been a recount rather than an auditing. And
Speaker 1: then that's again a crucial difference here. We're not saying
Speaker 1: just put the numbers through the machine again. You know,
Speaker 1: we realize that you're going to come up with a
Speaker 1: very similar number there. You're gonna have a very tiny
Speaker 1: sampling of just honest human error. You know, you'll change
Speaker 1: a few hundred votes. That's normal for a just quote recount.
Speaker 1: But we're talking about is an audit. And again, I
Speaker 1: think an audit for very legitimate means. I think these
Speaker 1: statistical case for the improbability of Joe Biden's win is
Speaker 1: really compelling and one of the reasons, by the way,
Speaker 1: let me give you another stat related to Georgia's Let's
Speaker 1: give you start of the numbers these Biden only ballots nationwide,
Speaker 1: and what I mean by Biden only, these people who
Speaker 1: supposedly voted for Joe Biden and then for no one
Speaker 1: else down ticket. Now that's a rare phenomenon. It certainly
Speaker 1: is rare. Even in twenty twenty outside of the swing states. However,
Speaker 1: there are a total of four hundred and fifty thousand
Speaker 1: at least of these Biden only ballots in America. They
Speaker 1: are predominantly in these swing states, which seems far too convenient.
Speaker 1: And to get specific on Georgia, where we have very
Speaker 1: contentious center rais is obviously ball races are heading into runoff,
Speaker 1: but where you had highly contentious set of races with
Speaker 1: a lot of interest in races plural because there's two
Speaker 1: of them, it's really telling that if you look at
Speaker 1: the Biden only votes, there were ninety five thousand Biden
Speaker 1: only ballots in the state of Georgia where somebody voted
Speaker 1: for Biden and then not downballot allegedly. If we compare
Speaker 1: that to Trump, no such phenomenon. Out of the two
Speaker 1: point four million votes that Donald Trump got, of those,
Speaker 1: only eight hundred and eighteen people voted for Trump only,
Speaker 1: and then nobody down ballots. So if you think about
Speaker 1: that disparity, fewer than a thousand people voted for Trump,
Speaker 1: only ninety five thousand supposedly voted for Biden. Only. Look
Speaker 1: that just it reeks. Let's just be honest about it.
Speaker 1: And again, in and of itself, I want to be fair,
Speaker 1: that is not conclusive. In and of itself, it does
Speaker 1: not prove fraud, but it sure does smell bad, and
Speaker 1: it sure does point to a phenomenon that's pretty hard
Speaker 1: for any reasonable person to explain in the state of Georgia.
Speaker 1: Now we're speaking of Steve Quartet, senior strategic advisor to
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign. Steve, tell me this, why haven't we
Speaker 1: You know, we have all these stories, all this sort
Speaker 1: of you know, the affidavits and all this about fraud,
Speaker 1: but I have not yet seen the Aha. Here is
Speaker 1: proof of a fraud. We've seen proof of irregularity, no
Speaker 1: question about that. Right when you're finding ballots, when they're
Speaker 1: you know, there's no there. And by the way, anyone
Speaker 1: who says there, we're not going to be at least
Speaker 1: irregularities in an election with one hundred and fifty million
Speaker 1: give or take ballots cast. I mean they're living in
Speaker 1: a fantasy world, right, So we know there are regularities
Speaker 1: and that those those should be corrected, and that means
Speaker 1: ballots are going to go alongside either Okay, fine, but
Speaker 1: intentional fraud? Are we just you know, we have all
Speaker 1: these people saying I saw this, I saw that. Are
Speaker 1: we really going to be able to prove any of this?
Speaker 1: You know? But I believe you will. Here's what I
Speaker 1: would tell you. Those those cases of what I would
Speaker 1: call micro fraud are importance. You know, a dead person voting,
Speaker 1: an illegal immigrant voting. But I'll be the first to
Speaker 1: can see that that will not change the election. Now,
Speaker 1: we should clean that up and people should be punished.
Speaker 1: That people should end up in handcuffs when they have
Speaker 1: broken election laws. That's serious. But I will agree with
Speaker 1: you that that is not the smoking gun of macrol fraud, right,
Speaker 1: the macro fraud that we're talking about. I think there
Speaker 1: are two instances here, both of which are still to
Speaker 1: be argued in federal courts. So I would tell folks
Speaker 1: out there to hold tight because these arguments had not
Speaker 1: even started yet, and there are really two elements to them.
Speaker 1: One is we're hundreds of thousands of ballots illegally counted,
Speaker 1: meaning that there were no Republican observers, but there was
Speaker 1: no vetting, as I talked about in terms of the
Speaker 1: percentages insanely lower percentages of rejection raids and route. Giuliani
Speaker 1: primarily in terms of the public face of the campaign
Speaker 1: has been making this case that in Pennsylvania there are
Speaker 1: as many as six hundred thousand plus ballots that are
Speaker 1: simply not valid, not according to our opinion of the
Speaker 1: Trunk campaign, according to Pennsylvania law. So that's the macro case.
Speaker 1: And then perhaps even more damning one, and City Powell
Speaker 1: has really been the tip of the sphere on this
Speaker 1: one is the voting saw where now she has said
Speaker 1: and I think she has enormous credibility. She's one of
Speaker 1: the best lawyers in America. She certainly has a track
Speaker 1: record of meaning what she says publicly and eventually backing
Speaker 1: it with evidence. And I only say eventually because she
Speaker 1: simply does not want to make that evidence public yet,
Speaker 1: because it's about to be argued in court. But Sidney
Speaker 1: Poll has been very very clear in her intermedia appearances
Speaker 1: that she has an absolute proof of cheating going on
Speaker 1: in a systemic way. Regarding Dominion Software and perhaps other
Speaker 1: vote vote vendor companies that are out there, but primarily Dominion.
Speaker 1: And it really does when I talk about the statistical
Speaker 1: improbability of the case, that alone does not prove that
Speaker 1: there was fraud, but it points us toward fraud, right,
Speaker 1: And I think a reasonable person says, we're going to
Speaker 1: take the compelling, circumstantial case and then take a more
Speaker 1: serious look at things that can actually be proven as fraud.
Speaker 1: Lin So I am, like everybody else, awaiting those arguments
Speaker 1: to be made in court, but I'm very, very confident
Speaker 1: that Sidney Poll and others on the Trump legal team
Speaker 1: are going to make a compelling case that there wasn't
Speaker 1: just circumstantial fraud evidence of fraud, but actual approvable evidence.
Speaker 1: And I encourage everybody out there, encourage your audience to
Speaker 1: be patient in that regard. I mean, yes, we do
Speaker 1: have to move quickly, but we also can't build cases
Speaker 1: that are rock solid in a matter of hours. And
Speaker 1: so you know, we realize the clock is ticking. We
Speaker 1: realize December eighth and December fourteenth that are critical deadlines
Speaker 1: for the Electoral College. And I can assure you everyone
Speaker 1: of the Trump campaign is working around the clock, but
Speaker 1: I can also assure you that the case has to
Speaker 1: be rock solid, the constitutional case. I believe eventually that
Speaker 1: several of these states, Pennsylvania included, will not be able
Speaker 1: to certify electors, and I believe we're going to be
Speaker 1: in for a contingent election, which is not the optimal choice,
Speaker 1: but but it's also hardly without historical precedent, and it
Speaker 1: is something that is constitutionally and legally mandated in certain cases.
Speaker 1: I believe that's where we're going to end up, and
Speaker 1: I really believe that's how the president is going to
Speaker 1: end up with reelection. So let's just for everyone listening,
Speaker 1: and we're speaking of Steve Cortez, who's a senior strategic
Speaker 1: advisor to the Trump twenty twenty campaign. Steve, you're saying
Speaker 1: that this these legal challenges may result in a situation
Speaker 1: where it comes down to not the electoral College votes
Speaker 1: cast in the end, but it will be the House
Speaker 1: of Representatives. Is that what you think may happen? I
Speaker 1: believe so not Again that look that that's not official
Speaker 1: I speak right, that's an analysis and projection. So everyone's
Speaker 1: clear this is your assessment. But go ahead and of course,
Speaker 1: none of us know, right, but I in my view
Speaker 1: that is the most likely scenario. Is that, unfortunately, and
Speaker 1: it's the fault of the governors of some of these states,
Speaker 1: for example, Governor Wolf of Pennsylvania, who took it upon
Speaker 1: himself to unilaterally change the election procedures of his states,
Speaker 1: something he is not allowed to do by law nor
Speaker 1: by the US Constitution, but he did it anyway. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: his state Supreme Court backed him in that. But because
Speaker 1: of that unlawful act, he created a system where I
Speaker 1: believe it's going to be nearly impossible to certify the
Speaker 1: votes and to send proper electors to the United States Congress. Now, again,
Speaker 1: this has happened before historically, and we we have procedures
Speaker 1: that trust the process. You mean, this has happened in America.
Speaker 1: It may happen again. We'll see. But that is my projection,
Speaker 1: but I think it's an educated one. Is that it
Speaker 1: will be difficult for either side to reach two hundred
Speaker 1: and seventy in terms of electoral votes. And if that happens,
Speaker 1: the vote then goes to the House of Representatives, where
Speaker 1: each state gets an equal vote. So Wyoming, our smallest
Speaker 1: state by population, gets one vote, as does California are
Speaker 1: most populous. In that case, there are twenty six delegations
Speaker 1: controlled by Republicans. If party lines hold, the president would
Speaker 1: then be elected reelected president of United States. Again, look,
Speaker 1: it's not optimal, but it's not unprecedented, and it's not
Speaker 1: a crisis. It doesn't mean that we can't go that
Speaker 1: route if we need to. But there's a lot of
Speaker 1: stop steps between here and there, And all I'm saying
Speaker 1: too is that there is there are enough of regularities
Speaker 1: on an anecdotal basis, there is enough statistical evidence out
Speaker 1: there making a circumstantial case that we should doubt these returns.
Speaker 1: And then we're going to see about the legal case,
Speaker 1: the full legal case regarding wholesale macro fraud that the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign can make. And by way, I'm not privy
Speaker 1: to that. Nobody is outside of that legal team, but
Speaker 1: we all will soon be priving to it in the country,
Speaker 1: and we will assess it as a country, as a people,
Speaker 1: and as will a Most importantly, the court's very likely
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court, and from there I think we find
Speaker 1: out who's truly going to be president the United States.
Speaker 1: But I would caution to anybody who believed that there
Speaker 1: is a president elect right now, there is not a
Speaker 1: president elect. Steve, can we hold you for one second?
Speaker 1: So I just want to give everybody a quick moment
Speaker 1: to catch their breath. I want to come back and
Speaker 1: ask you just a few questions about the Trump win
Speaker 1: among Latino's relative to where the gops. Can you give
Speaker 1: us a sect for that? All right? We got Steve Cortez.
Speaker 1: He is a senior strategic advisor to the Trump campaign.
Speaker 1: We'll be back with him in just a moment. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Back with my friend Steve Cortez, senior strategic advisor to
Speaker 1: the Trump twenty twenty campaign. He's walked us through where
Speaker 1: we are now on these legal fights. Also made his
Speaker 1: own analytic assessment in the future, a prediction that this
Speaker 1: could in fact, emphasis on could, but could in fact
Speaker 1: go to the House of Representatives to determine who the
Speaker 1: next president will be. But Steve, I just want to
Speaker 1: ask you about the broader trent here of the incredible
Speaker 1: surge in Latino support relative to what the polls were
Speaker 1: saying and GOP expectations Latino support for President Trump. Tell
Speaker 1: us about this. Yes, the President did incredibly well. This
Speaker 1: is super important to me as an Hispanic and the
Speaker 1: whole team of the Trump campaign has been working for years,
Speaker 1: actually since the President won in twenty sixteen, to build support,
Speaker 1: to reach out in respectful and intentional ways to the
Speaker 1: Hispanic community. To contrast that, by the way, with our
Speaker 1: opponent Joe Biden, his idea of Hispanic outreach was going
Speaker 1: to Florida and playing Desposito on his cell phone. I
Speaker 1: call that hispanderine and it certainly didn't work, particularly in Florida.
Speaker 1: We won forty seven percent of the Hispanic vote in Florida,
Speaker 1: and that's according to exit polling. I think we might
Speaker 1: have done it even better than that, but regardless, I'll
Speaker 1: take forty seven percent. It's part of why the president
Speaker 1: just robbed in the state of Florida. Actually wasn't even
Speaker 1: close to find all the skeptics and certainly all the
Speaker 1: fake news polling that was out there on a national level.
Speaker 1: Though it's not just a Florida story, it's not just
Speaker 1: a Cuban and Venezuelan story. A lot of the media's
Speaker 1: trying to put it in a box and say, wow,
Speaker 1: he just didn't really one Q if that's not the case.
Speaker 1: For example, if we look at Texas, where there's very
Speaker 1: few quban, it's almost entirely a Mexican American Hispanic population.
Speaker 1: Of course, in border state of Texas, if we look
Speaker 1: at those border counties, it's really incredible the gains the
Speaker 1: president saw in those counties which are overwhelmingly Hispanic. And
Speaker 1: I'll give you some of the numbers. Zapata County is
Speaker 1: eighty five percent Hispanic, right on the US Mexico border.
Speaker 1: President Trump won it, and his margin versus his own
Speaker 1: margin in twenty sixteen increased thirty eight percent. Right next
Speaker 1: to Zapata County is Star County, ninety six percent a Spanicus,
Speaker 1: the most Hispanic county in America. The President didn't quite
Speaker 1: win it, but he only lost it by five points
Speaker 1: after losing it by sixty points in twenty sixteen. And
Speaker 1: you know, is such an a student of politics. Those
Speaker 1: kinds of swings just don't happen in four years, a
Speaker 1: fifty five percent swing for the same candidate. But why
Speaker 1: did this happen? And I think this is really important,
Speaker 1: particularly when it comes to Texas, and I call it
Speaker 1: the three genes. I think it was gas, guns, and God.
Speaker 1: That brought Hispanics over to President Trump's side of what
Speaker 1: I mean by that as gas is the energy industry.
Speaker 1: It's critical for all Americans, of course, but particularly for
Speaker 1: the state of Texas and a lot of spanks very
Speaker 1: directly involved in the energy industry. I think a spanks
Speaker 1: rightly knew that Joe Biden would be an existential threat
Speaker 1: to America's energy dominance. That's terrible for the country, for
Speaker 1: Texas and for a lot of spanks who work in
Speaker 1: those industries. When it comes to guns, the whole state
Speaker 1: of Texas has a great culture of the Second Amendment
Speaker 1: of self reliance and self protection. And there's a lot
Speaker 1: of good own raised in Texas with names like Cortez
Speaker 1: and Gomez who are not going to let a think
Speaker 1: Mexican bet to Rourke be empowered by Joe Biden to
Speaker 1: take away their firearms. And then I think the last
Speaker 1: gene that matters is God. Catholics are overwhelmingly church people,
Speaker 1: whether Evangelical or Catholic. We do not want Joe Biden
Speaker 1: to be in the White House food he can once
Speaker 1: again target religious groups like the Wonderful Women, the nuns
Speaker 1: of the Little sisters of the poor matters a lot
Speaker 1: to Spacks, and so we saw a surge of Hispanic
Speaker 1: support for the America First agenda and for President Trump.
Speaker 1: It's one of the reasons, by the way, that I
Speaker 1: so doubt the election results as told to us by
Speaker 1: the corporate media. This president got the highest minority share
Speaker 1: overall in sixty years for any Republican candidate. I believe
Speaker 1: if you combine that with a net game of ten
Speaker 1: million votes over twenty sixteen, to me, is the idea
Speaker 1: that we lost, frankly is at least in a clean
Speaker 1: count of the legal votes. To me, that's a dubious case.
Speaker 1: But we made great inroads with a spact something to
Speaker 1: really build on from here. Amazing as well, Steve, especially
Speaker 1: considering that one of the main lines of attack against
Speaker 1: this president was anti Hispanic bias, right, that he was
Speaker 1: racist against Hispanics. This was apparently news, or I should say,
Speaker 1: fake news. Two millions of Hispanics across the country, who,
Speaker 1: as you said, are are traditional and a lot of
Speaker 1: their values or entrepreneurs, are businesspeople and want a better,
Speaker 1: brighter future. They love this country, their patriots, and they
Speaker 1: came out of they voted for Donald Trump. Thanks so much, Steve.
Speaker 1: Steve Cortez advised with the Trump campaign. Always great to
Speaker 1: have you on, buddy. Thanks for giving us your time today.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bus and Show podcast. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Let's talk about the Joe Biden
Speaker 1: cancer charity scam. Oh wait, you haven't heard of this one.
Speaker 1: You've somehow not seen this being blasted all across social media.
Speaker 1: You're not You're not seeing the constant headlines about this one.
Speaker 1: What a shock. Friends. Let me explain to you a
Speaker 1: little bit about what we're actually seeing here. Let's talk
Speaker 1: about this for a moment, shall we. Joe Biden, it
Speaker 1: turns out, had a few years ago founded a charity
Speaker 1: for cancer research. Now this is something that's very near
Speaker 1: and dear to the Biden family, of course, because Joe
Speaker 1: Biden lost a son to cancer, so understandably people would
Speaker 1: want to support this. Everybody hates cancer. We're all united
Speaker 1: in our fight against against cancer. But if you're going
Speaker 1: to raise money for a charity in the name of
Speaker 1: that fight, shouldn't the money actually go to charitable purposes?
Speaker 1: Is that fair? To say. Right, in twenty seventeen, Biden
Speaker 1: founded the Biden Cancer Initiative. In two years, it took
Speaker 1: in four point eight million dollars in contribution. That's a
Speaker 1: lot of money for a charity. I know people who
Speaker 1: have started charities. In fact, I know someone who's father
Speaker 1: died of heart disease and she started a heart foundation,
Speaker 1: charitable foundation. The Biden Cancer Initiative, which remember was started
Speaker 1: right after he was no longer Vice president, just put
Speaker 1: that out there. So I was looking for stuff, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, this is right around the same period when
Speaker 1: the Hunter Biden reaching out to China and the Barisma
Speaker 1: stuff would really be kicking in more. You know, this
Speaker 1: is what we would expect. Biden's trying to get some
Speaker 1: good stuff going for himself. So the Biden Cancer Initiatives
Speaker 1: spent three million dollars three million, seventy thousand and change
Speaker 1: on salaries, so about three million dollars on salaries and
Speaker 1: about a million dollars on travel and conferences. Zero dollars
Speaker 1: on grants for research and for treatment. And this is
Speaker 1: all from the New York Post. Wait a second, you
Speaker 1: have a cancer charity that you get four million dollars
Speaker 1: of donations. And remember those donations are tax deduct so
Speaker 1: you get people that get to write a Biden Cancer
Speaker 1: Charity Initiative check and then deduct that from their taxes.
Speaker 1: So there's a big incentive. It's people and that's a
Speaker 1: good thing, right. We want people giving to charity, but
Speaker 1: we want the charity to do something. And now you
Speaker 1: have the usual hyenas in the mainstream media all coming
Speaker 1: together trying to defend this practice with Joe Biden. They're
Speaker 1: trying to say, well, they never claim that this charity
Speaker 1: would fund research or initiatives or anything. No, this is
Speaker 1: what Snopes and these other fact check organizations are trying
Speaker 1: to do. Now they're saying, well, it was really about
Speaker 1: and I want to give you the specifics here. It's
Speaker 1: not a grant giving organization. Its mission was quote to
Speaker 1: convene and connect partners. Oh okay, So they raise a
Speaker 1: bunch of money. They pay salaries to people, millions of
Speaker 1: dollars in two years, friends, three million dollars of salaries,
Speaker 1: a million dollars of gathering together for let's be honest
Speaker 1: parties conferences where I'm sure they had amazing food, fantastic lodging,
Speaker 1: you know, they're paying for these. This is the taxpayers
Speaker 1: subsidizing private jet travel and five star meals for Joe
Speaker 1: Biden and his cronies. Oh and paying them salaries to
Speaker 1: arrange the travel and the five star meals. That's what
Speaker 1: this is. This is a small scale version of the
Speaker 1: Clinton Foundation, which raised two billion dollars over many years
Speaker 1: spend tens of millions on private jet travel. Right, work
Speaker 1: for a charity, You really got to fly private all
Speaker 1: the time? Interesting, you know, you're traveling on the charity's dime.
Speaker 1: You gotta fly in a private jet. Well, if your
Speaker 1: Bill or Hillary or Chelsea or any of their cronies, yeah,
Speaker 1: of course you're not gonna fly you're not a pleb.
Speaker 1: You're not gonna fly commercial. The charity is going to
Speaker 1: pay for you to fly in a private jet, because
Speaker 1: that's what charities do. That was the Clinton Foundation and
Speaker 1: the lib media of course, all went along with this, said,
Speaker 1: oh no, the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation does
Speaker 1: great stuff all over the world. You look into this
Speaker 1: and there are a lot of people that are donating
Speaker 1: to it that have interest before the US government, including
Speaker 1: foreign entities, foreign governments that generally don't care very much
Speaker 1: about charity, but they're willing to write a big check,
Speaker 1: and they're willing to pay big dollars which go directly
Speaker 1: into Clinton pockets for speeches. Right, we know that the
Speaker 1: Clintons made tens of millions of dollars personally off of
Speaker 1: their influence, peddling schemes, giving speeches to big companies and corporations,
Speaker 1: all because Hillary Clinton was supposed to run again and
Speaker 1: supposed to be president. So that's what was happening there.
Speaker 1: People like me during that whole period were making noises
Speaker 1: about this. We were saying, hold on a second, this
Speaker 1: isn't really they're polluting the idea of charity. The Clinton
Speaker 1: Foundation was at best a pass through. It would give
Speaker 1: some portion of the money that it wasn't using on
Speaker 1: conferences and private jet travel and salaries to other charities
Speaker 1: that would actually do some stuff that might be good
Speaker 1: with the chair. But there was no there were no metrics.
Speaker 1: The Clinton Foundation wasn't doing anything as an entity that
Speaker 1: was benefiting the world. The whole thing was a scam basically,
Speaker 1: with a little bit of you know, it was like
Speaker 1: running a company that's a front. Right, you can have
Speaker 1: a luggage store somewhere, but if you're really not selling
Speaker 1: any luggage, just a few pieces here and there, but
Speaker 1: you are selling a lot of drugs out the back
Speaker 1: of it. You know, that's what we call a money
Speaker 1: laundering operation. But you got to have a front. The
Speaker 1: Clinton Foundation was effectively a money laundering operation for influence
Speaker 1: peddling by Bill and Hillary Clinton. We know this because
Speaker 1: they shut it down. Largely, they shut down the entire
Speaker 1: Clinton Global Initiative right after Hillary lost all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: donations dried up, all of a sudden, there was no
Speaker 1: more money, there was no more interest in this. Gee,
Speaker 1: what what happened? I thought? I thought that Saudi Arabia
Speaker 1: and Russia and these countries that were writing these these
Speaker 1: checks to Bill and Hillary Clinton in their foundation. I
Speaker 1: thought they all cared so much about women's empowerment and
Speaker 1: combating climate change. Oh no, only idiots believe that, right.
Speaker 1: That's why they had to shut it down though, because
Speaker 1: the influence peddling was no longer so valuable, So the
Speaker 1: charity front couldn't sustain itself anymore. That's what happened with
Speaker 1: the CGI. So what about the Biden Cancer Initiative? Isn't
Speaker 1: it amazing? The Biden Cancer Initiative even borrowings some of
Speaker 1: the terminology. You have the Clinton Global Initiative the CGI,
Speaker 1: and you've got the Biden Cancer Initiative the BCI. He
Speaker 1: probably saw what Hillary had been up to and figured
Speaker 1: that's a great scam. I gotta get in on some
Speaker 1: of that. You know what happened After a couple of years,
Speaker 1: they had to shut it down. You know why, because
Speaker 1: it didn't do anything, didn't actually help anyone. The charity
Speaker 1: suspended its operations in twenty nineteen. Gee gosh, I wonder
Speaker 1: what were they paying people salaries for millions of dollars
Speaker 1: tax pay or subsidize. Right, you donate to this charity
Speaker 1: and then the charity directs money to people. I would
Speaker 1: love to see who is getting paid off by this thing.
Speaker 1: Three million dollars in salary, a million dollars in operating expense,
Speaker 1: meaning conferences, which is renting out the ballroom at the
Speaker 1: Four Seasons and flying people who are officers of the
Speaker 1: company in privately and paying for them to have open
Speaker 1: bar and a live band, and who knows what else.
Speaker 1: That's what the Biden Cancer Initiative was doing. This is
Speaker 1: the guy that the Democrats now want in charge of
Speaker 1: your healthcare. This is the guy who's supposed to be
Speaker 1: a return to honor in our politics. I'm sorry, that's
Speaker 1: just too much for any of us to believe. We're
Speaker 1: not going to swallow that nonsense no matter how hard
Speaker 1: they try. Biden is a swamp creature. He's corrupt and
Speaker 1: we all know it. You're in the Freedom This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Who's to blame for
Speaker 1: the Democrats actually losing House seats in a pandemic year
Speaker 1: when the Republican Party has the presidency On the Senate,
Speaker 1: You'd think that there would be such a big opening
Speaker 1: for the Democrats to run the table here, but it
Speaker 1: didn't happen. Why is that. Well, let's hear from one
Speaker 1: of the left wing media's favorite members of Congress, Ilhan Omar,
Speaker 1: who did win reelection. And oh, Minneapolis, Minnesota, such nice people, Minneapolis,
Speaker 1: your politics. Gosh, here's Johano more play nine. I mean,
Speaker 1: there are so many lies and sneers that the Republicans
Speaker 1: engage in that have had impact on races, and you know,
Speaker 1: to to blame a movement that has shown up for
Speaker 1: us in the most aggressive way to deliver a decisive
Speaker 1: victory for president for President elect Biden is really shameful
Speaker 1: and something that I can't even believe my Democratic colleagues
Speaker 1: are doing. Yeah, I mean, who would have ever thought
Speaker 1: that defund the police and socialism now would be unpopular
Speaker 1: in places where people are swing voters or in places
Speaker 1: where there are districts that are not completely left wing
Speaker 1: echo chambers. Gosh, I don't know, but the left is
Speaker 1: upset because there was no No matter what these legal
Speaker 1: challenges show us, there was no repudiation of Trump. There
Speaker 1: was no there was no shattering of the Trump movement
Speaker 1: and the coalition, And if anything, we now have lots
Speaker 1: of data to suggest that all the left and the
Speaker 1: media's claims of Trump being racist are absurd given how
Speaker 1: he did with black and Hispanic voters relative to traditional
Speaker 1: GOP numbers, big improvement on those two fronts. And also
Speaker 1: the Democrats couldn't even win net house seats this time around.
Speaker 1: That's just what bigger indicator could you have of the
Speaker 1: left word drift of the party and how that's not
Speaker 1: popular Americans. Yeah, they might have been able to convince
Speaker 1: people with their constant Orange man bad the world is
Speaker 1: going to end because of Trump. They might have been
Speaker 1: able to fool enough people into thinking that that was
Speaker 1: true to be Trump. We shall see. But the left
Speaker 1: is a problem for Democrats. The left is a drag
Speaker 1: on the rest of the party, pulls down their poll numbers,
Speaker 1: and that's why they're so upset with this. Now. I
Speaker 1: think they realize. I think the aoc to squad that
Speaker 1: wing of the House Democrats knows that the power structure,
Speaker 1: they may be able to push the conversation and get
Speaker 1: all the media attention, but the powers that be for now,
Speaker 1: at least Pelosi and the rest recognize that this is
Speaker 1: a problem. The Democrat Party's strategy for a long time now,
Speaker 1: a long time now, has been to rile up the
Speaker 1: base and then moderate towards the center just before election
Speaker 1: time and hope the American people don't remember come the
Speaker 1: next election that they were full the last time around.
Speaker 1: And that's really a central Democrats strategy. Ilhan Omar of course,
Speaker 1: is a problem for that makes it too obvious, and
Speaker 1: also for the healing and unity message that Democrats want
Speaker 1: to pretend they're going and they don't really go with it,
Speaker 1: but that they want to pretend they're going with. Here's
Speaker 1: what you get from people like ilhan Omar on the
Speaker 1: left Democrats of the socialist wing of the Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: how they refer to Trump rallies play ten two is
Speaker 1: speak about me at every single rally, didn't really matter
Speaker 1: where he was, sometimes multiple times in the day as
Speaker 1: he held his clan rallies throughout the country, clan rallies.
Speaker 1: There's a sitting member of Congress. This is referring to
Speaker 1: any of you who went to a Trump rally as
Speaker 1: having attended a KKK rally. And she won't even get
Speaker 1: called out for this. I mean, that's disgusting. Even Christian
Speaker 1: Almumpo with a fanciest accent to have ever been on television,
Speaker 1: Even Christian Almumpoor had to apologize for a crystal knock
Speaker 1: Trump is a Nazi and his supporters or brown Shirts comparison.
Speaker 1: Last week, she did have to come out and say, Okay,
Speaker 1: I shouldn't have done that. Now. I don't think she's
Speaker 1: sorry for it, but it hurts the game that she's
Speaker 1: trying to play, which is oh but time. I'm just
Speaker 1: a journalist. I'm just presenting the facts as they need
Speaker 1: to be sure. But elan Omar can call Trump supporters,
Speaker 1: clan members or clan supporters just as bad. And there's
Speaker 1: no blowback to this at all. And that's what the
Speaker 1: Democrats are going to have to control as a narrative
Speaker 1: going forward. That's going to be the problem that they face.
Speaker 1: I'll also say this, well, I know they're all out
Speaker 1: there calling for Trump to concede. Here's one reason I
Speaker 1: haven't gotten to in a little while. And I'll use
Speaker 1: Anderson Cooper as a case in point here. Who is
Speaker 1: who is really one of the ultimate smug elite journos
Speaker 1: out there. This guy was very lucky. CNN just built
Speaker 1: him into a household name over a long period of time.
Speaker 1: They decided that he would be the one. He would
Speaker 1: be the franchise, so to speak, at CNN and the
Speaker 1: more around it, this is just just an unimpressive guy.
Speaker 1: I don't know, it's just a guy like any He's
Speaker 1: got a certain look, but he's a trust fund baby
Speaker 1: and they've just decided that he was the anointed at CNN.
Speaker 1: That's the way that it happened here he is though.
Speaker 1: I'll use some of his commentary here to make my
Speaker 1: point talking about the Trump team and where we are
Speaker 1: in the transition. Play twelve next week, the CDC starts
Speaker 1: the process of determining which of us, which Americans, will
Speaker 1: be the first to get the vaccine. That is an
Speaker 1: incredibly important decision. Not everyone can be at the front
Speaker 1: of the line, and people will have to wait. So
Speaker 1: it should be obvious why you would want to give
Speaker 1: an incoming him in his access to the people who
Speaker 1: are making these decisions right now, because in about sixty
Speaker 1: five days it becomes their decisions too, and they have
Speaker 1: to make it work. In our democracy, the people speak,
Speaker 1: and the people changed the course of history. That's what
Speaker 1: they did, and that is what has already happened. And
Speaker 1: the president is free to fight this in court all
Speaker 1: the way to inauguration day. He's been laughed out of courts.
Speaker 1: His lawyers are dropping left and right. His time is over.
Speaker 1: Let the new administration have a transition and let's help
Speaker 1: americans true this crisis. Oh yeah, Now, CNN really cares
Speaker 1: so much about the crisis and the vaccine and the plan.
Speaker 1: All of a sudden, it's all about that. Did they
Speaker 1: call out Biden and Harris for convincing people not to
Speaker 1: take to vaccine effectively for months before the election. No, No,
Speaker 1: they did not, No, they didn't matter. Then, just like
Speaker 1: they didn't call out the BLM mobs in the streets
Speaker 1: for the summer, that was fine, that was necessary, that
Speaker 1: was saving lives. Actually, they told us these people are
Speaker 1: intellectually and morally decrepit at CNN, but this is where
Speaker 1: they are. But there's another reason why I like that
Speaker 1: Trump is continuing this fight. And it's one of the
Speaker 1: best things about Trump and Trump is hm. He drives
Speaker 1: these smug, elitist, self indulgent, vain journos completely insane, and
Speaker 1: I love it. He drives them up the wall. I mean,
Speaker 1: they just can't handle it. He makes them lose their minds.
Speaker 1: And every moment where that's the case, we should just
Speaker 1: savor at every moment we have, whether it's a couple
Speaker 1: more months or four more years, his ability to really
Speaker 1: get under the skin of some of the worst people
Speaker 1: in professional life in America. The modern American journalist is
Speaker 1: a tremendous talent and it's a gift. And because he's
Speaker 1: forced them, or he's made them show us who they
Speaker 1: really are, and that's never going to change again. We're
Speaker 1: not going to forget that whoever ends up winning this election,
Speaker 1: and we'll remember that. CNN is a disaster and a
Speaker 1: joke and a fraud. The entire entity of the organization
Speaker 1: now is a disgrace. Are there some good people who
Speaker 1: work there Shore, you know? But there are also good
Speaker 1: people who work in the Kremlin, right. There are good
Speaker 1: people in a lot of places. Doesn't mean the institution,
Speaker 1: the entity should not be condemned. CNN is one of them.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the bus Sex and Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts like Soft Butter on Warm Toast.
Speaker 1: Time to spread some freedom coast to coast. It's time
Speaker 1: for roll Call. Roll Call everybody, Facebook dot com, slash
Speaker 1: buck Sexton team Buck at iyeheart media dot com if
Speaker 1: you want to email us and producer Mark. Have you
Speaker 1: yet figured out a way that we could have pigeons,
Speaker 1: you know that that bring the message like they do
Speaker 1: in Game of Thrones, because that would be cool. Maybe
Speaker 1: like owls like they do at Hogwarts in the Magical World. Yeah,
Speaker 1: or I guess actually in Game of Thrones it's a
Speaker 1: raven but it comes from using messenger pigeons from back
Speaker 1: in the day, which is pretty ingenious when you think
Speaker 1: about it, right, Pigeons move fast, Yeah, but how do
Speaker 1: you trust the pigeon to find the right place? Well,
Speaker 1: you got to train them beforehand. You know. You can't
Speaker 1: just let pigeons run around willie nilly. We're you know,
Speaker 1: we're civilized. I don't think I would give an important
Speaker 1: document to a pigeon. So true story. I was walking
Speaker 1: down the street with the snow Princess a few weeks ago.
Speaker 1: I don't think I told you this and a bird,
Speaker 1: and I actually have photos of this. A bird like
Speaker 1: fell like it fell out of a nest almost, but
Speaker 1: I don't know. It fell right in front of us,
Speaker 1: and it was beautiful, full, and it was it was
Speaker 1: very many different colors, and I think we ended up
Speaker 1: believing that it was At first I thought it was
Speaker 1: a pet, and then it had fallen. And this was
Speaker 1: not a bird that you would normally see on a
Speaker 1: street in New York City. Okay, I've lived through my
Speaker 1: whole life, so I didn't like pick up a dirty
Speaker 1: sparrow that you know, looked like it had just come
Speaker 1: out of some uh you know, mutant experiment with toxic
Speaker 1: waste in our subway system, right, Like I this was
Speaker 1: a beautiful bird, different kind of green and yellow colors.
Speaker 1: It looked like it looked like a parakeet kind of right.
Speaker 1: It looked like something that would be a pet. So
Speaker 1: it and the snow Princess being who she is, um,
Speaker 1: because like I don't know what else to say, small children, dogs, animals,
Speaker 1: they all like love her, you know, like when she
Speaker 1: when she sees to Lula, to Lulah and her spend
Speaker 1: like twenty minutes of just you know, snuggle time because
Speaker 1: she gets so excited. So so anyway, so she holds
Speaker 1: out her hand and the bird just hops into her hands.
Speaker 1: So now I'm thinking, I'm thinking that this has got
Speaker 1: to be you know, pet. I think I think I
Speaker 1: got a pet bird, right, I mean, I'm sort of thinking.
Speaker 1: I'm thinking that this may be a m a thing
Speaker 1: that's gonna be a And so we walk around to
Speaker 1: the building in New York City was kind of a
Speaker 1: large apartment building where I went to the and I
Speaker 1: felt so weird. I walked to the front desk and
Speaker 1: I said, hey, um, I don't want to be weird,
Speaker 1: but I mean she had the bird in her hand still,
Speaker 1: she was carrying around in her hand. It was just
Speaker 1: hanging out, just chilling, like not flying away or anything.
Speaker 1: And we'd go to the front desk we say, hey,
Speaker 1: do you guys, I know this is weird, but do
Speaker 1: you guys know if if any of your tenants have
Speaker 1: like a pet bird, because we think and it couldn't
Speaker 1: really it tried to fly a little bit, it looked
Speaker 1: like one of its wings might have been hurt. So
Speaker 1: we didn't know what really to do, and um, we
Speaker 1: went in and we talked. The guy said, no, I
Speaker 1: don't I don't know, and he says it is very pretty.
Speaker 1: He's like and the guy says, I think you've got
Speaker 1: a new pet. And I'm looking at her like, look,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't know about just breaking a bird.
Speaker 1: And she, of course is like, I think we're breaking
Speaker 1: this bird home, and I'm like, no, I don't know
Speaker 1: if we're really bringing this bird hug. So we did
Speaker 1: a little bit of searching. Actually asked my dad, who
Speaker 1: is an avid birdwatcher, and my dad loves birdwatching, which
Speaker 1: is I think a surprise to folks because there's this
Speaker 1: guy who is big into sailing and golf and fishing
Speaker 1: and gave up hunting, grew up a big hunter, and
Speaker 1: I actually used to go hunting with him when I
Speaker 1: was a kid, and he loves birdwatching and knows all
Speaker 1: about birds. And I sent him a photo and he says, oh,
Speaker 1: that's a scarlet tanager and it is an American songbird.
Speaker 1: And it was a female scarlet tanager. I believe that
Speaker 1: we had. And they are rare in New York City,
Speaker 1: but you do come across them. And he said that,
Speaker 1: and then as he says, it's the bird actually did
Speaker 1: just sort of fly away and looked like it was okay.
Speaker 1: But I was a fun, little good story buck. I
Speaker 1: just thought i'd tell everybody. So I had a little
Speaker 1: we had a little wild Kingdom experiment here in New
Speaker 1: York City. He was very fun. I totally thought at
Speaker 1: the beginning of that story that you were going to say,
Speaker 1: a bird defecated on you. That happens all the time.
Speaker 1: I've had no I'm sure you would like that. I've
Speaker 1: had pigeons poop on me so many times. And what
Speaker 1: I hate is somebody always goes, oh, it's good luck.
Speaker 1: It is not good luck for a page in the
Speaker 1: poop on you. There's no good luck, you know. I've
Speaker 1: had so many people I well, I've walked into my
Speaker 1: office before. What I was I think what I what?
Speaker 1: I worked at the the YPD. I was like, oh crap,
Speaker 1: I got a pigeon. The craped on me. Oh good luck.
Speaker 1: Someone was saying, no, it is not, it's not good luck.
Speaker 1: It's so gross. You sit there. It reminds me a
Speaker 1: little bit of when you're walking in the summertime in
Speaker 1: New York and and there's you know, the the air
Speaker 1: condition There's all these external air conditioning units that'll stick
Speaker 1: out from window and water will drip off of them.
Speaker 1: And sometimes I don't know how this happens, but I'm
Speaker 1: sure it's happened to you market definitely, I remember it
Speaker 1: happening to me. You'll get one of those big drops
Speaker 1: off of like a rusty old air condition that goes
Speaker 1: right in your eye and then you just like, what, what
Speaker 1: what weird? You know, free on and bacteria and like
Speaker 1: viruses and mold just planted itself right in my eyeball. Yeah,
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen is nothing compared to some of the liquids
Speaker 1: experience in New York, sting compared to some of this stuff,
Speaker 1: did you deal? I'll never remember I used to I
Speaker 1: used to be a kid. You know, I thought it
Speaker 1: was cool. This was kind of cool. When I was
Speaker 1: in college. People would walk around wearing like flip flops
Speaker 1: with like jeans or whatever. You step in a couple
Speaker 1: of New York City street puddles, and the kind of
Speaker 1: puddles where there's a weird, viscous rainbow ee thing above
Speaker 1: the murky brown sort of you know, toxic waste looking sludge.
Speaker 1: You step in one or two of those puddles with
Speaker 1: a flip flop on, You're done. You're never doing that again.
Speaker 1: I don't know how any human being walks around any
Speaker 1: city in flip flops, the disgusting stuff that's all around. Yeah,
Speaker 1: flip flops are for showers and the beach and you
Speaker 1: know places like that. That's what flip flop ups are for.
Speaker 1: You know, maybe walking down to your lobby to get
Speaker 1: the morning paper or something. But it's not for outdoor
Speaker 1: outdoor I see people do this. Southern fraternity kids love
Speaker 1: to do this thing where they wear the flip flops
Speaker 1: with like dress pants or a sear sucker even maybe
Speaker 1: out in your beautiful beaucolic college campus on the grass
Speaker 1: or whatever. That's that's one thing but you step into
Speaker 1: an urban environment, Ringworm friends, I'm just telling you, it's
Speaker 1: all over the place. Gotta keep those gotta keep your
Speaker 1: feet clean. One thing, you know, I was talking about
Speaker 1: comfortable shoes. Gotta take care of your feet. Two things
Speaker 1: if you learn nothing else team from this show. Two
Speaker 1: things that the older I get, the more I realize,
Speaker 1: and older people have been telling me this for a
Speaker 1: long time. Two things. Take care of your feet. Take
Speaker 1: care of your teeth enormously important down the line. You
Speaker 1: want to take the best care of your teeth you can,
Speaker 1: and take the best care of your feet you can.
Speaker 1: And step one on feet is comfortable shoes. I'm just saying,
Speaker 1: comfortable shoes, whatever they are. I don't care if you
Speaker 1: look like you're walking around with clown shoes on. They
Speaker 1: make your feet feel good. Wear your clown shoes. See
Speaker 1: producer Mark, I'm a utilitarian. I'll have to get a
Speaker 1: pair of clown shoes. Yeah, just don't get a clown nose,
Speaker 1: because then people think we're doing a different kind of show.
Speaker 1: All right, I've I have not given enough time to
Speaker 1: our friends and roll call to We'll make sure we
Speaker 1: get deeper into it tomorrow. And so with that, I
Speaker 1: do want to get to it, and remember buck sexton
Speaker 1: dot com. I'll have an editorial up there tomorrow, in
Speaker 1: fact is the plan, and you will also post podcast
Speaker 1: off social media stuff. Your one stop shop for all
Speaker 1: things buck Sexton is buck sexton dot com. So we
Speaker 1: want to make that happen. And now we get to
Speaker 1: the roll call Brandy, right, San Hey, Buck and Mark
Speaker 1: king Insley has declared we cannot have people at our
Speaker 1: homes who don't live with us. I can't believe these
Speaker 1: new regulations. My husband wants to move out of the state.
Speaker 1: I'm worried it wouldn't be much better than anywhere else.
Speaker 1: I know your family is still planning on celebrating Thanksgiving
Speaker 1: together Christmas as well. Oh. I appreciate you and your views.
Speaker 1: It helps give me clarity, Brandy. Like I said, if
Speaker 1: somebody feels like they might be a little bit sick
Speaker 1: or something, you know, we're not going to risk somebody
Speaker 1: who's symptomatic with COVID being near my parents and or
Speaker 1: anyone in my family we got I got a new nephew,
Speaker 1: little baby, and you know, but that's where we draw
Speaker 1: the line, right, I mean, if everyone feels healthy We're
Speaker 1: not going to live our lives in a closet and
Speaker 1: not see each other until there's a vaccine that who
Speaker 1: even knows how long the distribution's going to take on
Speaker 1: this thing. So yeah, I'm sorry. I know about the
Speaker 1: totalitarian impulse of Insley. It's not not a surprise to
Speaker 1: me at all. And I just I just wish these
Speaker 1: crazy libs would back off. But they're not going to
Speaker 1: that much. That much. I think we know for sure
Speaker 1: they are going to double down, as I've been telling you,
Speaker 1: Remember I started saying, and I think right around late
Speaker 1: July into a guest, I said, you know, I've realized
Speaker 1: here they're not going to open things up after if
Speaker 1: Biden wins. And I know, let's just assume that it's
Speaker 1: a win for now. I know we're still fighting this out,
Speaker 1: but you know what I mean, they think it's a
Speaker 1: win for sure. They're not opening things up. No, they're
Speaker 1: locking you down even more. They like this power. You
Speaker 1: think they want to give up all this authority, all
Speaker 1: this delicious, wondrous ability to dictate to you. You think
Speaker 1: they want to let that go? Oh? I don't think so. Friends,
Speaker 1: They're liking it. Matthew, Oh, but that said, Brandy, keep
Speaker 1: the faith, and at least if you're in Washington State,
Speaker 1: you have the beautiful coast there. I think the Pacific
Speaker 1: Northwest is one of the one of the underappreciated gems
Speaker 1: in terms of geography and the landscape. There's something really
Speaker 1: beautiful about the coast line up there, all right, Matthew,
Speaker 1: Hey Buck, I find your argument for conservatives building unsingable
Speaker 1: aircraft carriers or free speech to be highly thought provoking.
Speaker 1: Recently in the news, I saw the CNN will be
Speaker 1: up for sale. If Trump doesn't win reelection, he should
Speaker 1: buy CNN and completely reform it. Imagine if in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty four he campaigns on his stellar presidential record and
Speaker 1: the fact that he reformed fake news. I find the
Speaker 1: thought of Trump buying CNN highly satisfying. What are your thoughts?
Speaker 1: PS love the Dracula podcast. Keep up the good work,
Speaker 1: Shields High, Matthew, that would be fun. I don't think
Speaker 1: Trump is going to buy CNN. I think that there
Speaker 1: would be people who would block a sale even if
Speaker 1: Trump wanted to do that of CNN. Imagine if they
Speaker 1: bought it and we started calling it the conservative news network.
Speaker 1: Wouldn't that be amazing. Wouldn't it be great just do
Speaker 1: a total house cleaning, get rid of all those journeys.
Speaker 1: They'd all find jobs at PBS and ABC and NBC,
Speaker 1: and they'd all be fine. All that'll you know, maybe
Speaker 1: they wouldn't be making the absurd salaries that some of
Speaker 1: them do, because it's really about creating the It's like
Speaker 1: a patronage network for connected liberals. Right. You go there,
Speaker 1: whether you're a contributor or a host, they pay you
Speaker 1: whatever the legacy media institution bosses say you should get
Speaker 1: you know, say that you should get paid. That's your
Speaker 1: salary there. It's really not linked to any specific because
Speaker 1: the entity itself is what's bringing in the money. The
Speaker 1: CNN brand. Everyone there is entirely replaceable, right, So it's
Speaker 1: just what does Zucker think of you, which is why
Speaker 1: he has so much sway over what people there say
Speaker 1: in their career. You know, if you're if you're a
Speaker 1: CNN employee, whatever Jeff Zucker decides about you and your
Speaker 1: future and your income, that is what it is, at
Speaker 1: least while you're at CNN. And I'm glad you like
Speaker 1: the Dracula podcast, Matthew. We got some really good response
Speaker 1: on that, so there will be now more shield Tie podcasts.
Speaker 1: We're actually working on getting some advertisers lined up for them,
Speaker 1: because we're going to do at least a series of six,
Speaker 1: if not eight, and we're gonna hopefully release them by
Speaker 1: the end of this year or early in twenty twenty one,
Speaker 1: in January. That's the schedule for it right now. Charlie, Hey,
Speaker 1: buck love the show. You've got a great perspective. I
Speaker 1: just have to question your thoughts about the election. You
Speaker 1: seem to think that we'll accept election results if in
Speaker 1: fact they showed Joe Biden winning. Do you truly believe
Speaker 1: that all the weird anomalies that happen November four to
Speaker 1: show anything other than fraud? The statistical data is literally
Speaker 1: not adding up to a Biden win in many ways.
Speaker 1: How will we ever accept this win? And what is
Speaker 1: you're taking the conservative people's response to it? Shields High, Charlie.
Speaker 1: When I say accept it, that's not to say that
Speaker 1: I agree with it or that I don't think that
Speaker 1: there may still have been fraud and irregularities based on
Speaker 1: exactly what you're talking about, But I would ask you
Speaker 1: what really is the alternative? I mean, if we go
Speaker 1: through the process, and the process, imperfect as it may be,
Speaker 1: does end up spitting out at the end that Joe
Speaker 1: Biden is a head in the electoral College and has
Speaker 1: the two seventy required right right, we respect law and order,
Speaker 1: we respect the system. He's then the president, and we
Speaker 1: move forward. That's how it happens. I don't see an alternative.
Speaker 1: I don't see any other way. And when you start
Speaker 1: thinking about what the alternatives are, I think you go
Speaker 1: down a very dangerous path very quickly. So no, we
Speaker 1: we will. We will accept the outcome of the process.
Speaker 1: That's not to say we will agree with it or
Speaker 1: refrain from believing that the process may have been tainted.
Speaker 1: But that's all we have for This is the process.
Speaker 1: There's no way around it. So I think that's the
Speaker 1: best way I can answer your question. Charlie, And thank
Speaker 1: you so much for writing in You're in the Freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right, we
Speaker 1: got more roll call, Danielle writes in, Hey, bucking producer
Speaker 1: Mark love the show. I listened on Radio kf ab
Speaker 1: Omaha podcast and lately I've been watching the first as well. Well.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much, folks. You can always watch me on
Speaker 1: demand on the first Just download the first TV app
Speaker 1: look for the Buck Sexton show. We put not a
Speaker 1: show every day if you want to watch the TV
Speaker 1: show of Buck Sexton, which I hope you do. And
Speaker 1: as for k kf aby Omaha, great heritage radio station
Speaker 1: that I'm so appreciative. You know, they put me on
Speaker 1: early in my radio career and have stayed with me,
Speaker 1: and we've built such a fantastic, loyal and large audience there.
Speaker 1: So big thanks to the folks of k f ab
Speaker 1: Omaha for keeping us, keeping us early on and straight
Speaker 1: through on their on their list there on their rundown.
Speaker 1: He writes. Also, I've been wanting to tell you for
Speaker 1: a while now how impressed I am with your call
Speaker 1: to wartime conservatism. It reminds me of William Wallace and
Speaker 1: Braveheart when he tells Robert the Bruce, if we join,
Speaker 1: we can win, and if we win, we'll have something
Speaker 1: we've never had before, a country of our own. Keep
Speaker 1: up the great work, Shields High Well, Daniels. You know
Speaker 1: Braveheart is my favorite movie. So any comparison of any
Speaker 1: kind between the work that I do and some of
Speaker 1: the great lines in the movie Braveheart makes me smile
Speaker 1: ear to ear, so thank you so much for that.
Speaker 1: And yeah, for anyone who has not seen Braveheart, I mean,
Speaker 1: come on, you've seen it. Reproducer are of course sure.
Speaker 1: I've asked you that a long time ago. But yeah, yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: I'm just you just don't have to see it once.
Speaker 1: I'm not you know, I'm not not that crazy, but
Speaker 1: you gotta see it. Rick writes Buck, you have me
Speaker 1: laughing with your Obama impersonation today. Good stuff. Keep up
Speaker 1: the good work and shields hie. Thank you, Rick. I
Speaker 1: don't even remember doing the Obama impersonation. I think it
Speaker 1: just sort of comes out of me sometimes we do
Speaker 1: a lot back in the day when he was president.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna have to really work on a little bit
Speaker 1: more of a Joe Biden impersonation. I think I kind
Speaker 1: of got it. It's like a you know, it's an
Speaker 1: old guy who kind of yells, has some fall back
Speaker 1: slogans and phrases that he uses, so we'll get there.
Speaker 1: You need a Kamala. Kamala's not easy. There's no I
Speaker 1: don't see an impersonation of her. I don't know. I've
Speaker 1: I agree with you that that would be good, but
Speaker 1: I don't you know, I don't know. I'd have to
Speaker 1: really work on I'll tell you this. I've never heard
Speaker 1: a good impersonation of Kamala Harris, so that makes me
Speaker 1: think it'd be a difficult one to do, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean. I mean, I know you hate SNL,
Speaker 1: but Maya Rudolph, just because she looks a lot like Kamala,
Speaker 1: does do a pretty good one. There are some talented
Speaker 1: people on SNL. I mean, I do give credit where
Speaker 1: it's due. But she was part of the pre woke
Speaker 1: SNL and now she's back to play Kamala. I love
Speaker 1: SNL in the and they were all libs then too,
Speaker 1: but they weren't annoying about it. SNL and the Mike Myers,
Speaker 1: Dana Carvey, Chris Farley era with you know, Phil Hartman
Speaker 1: rip and you know, a whole bunch. I mean, that
Speaker 1: was great, it was. It was great even when it
Speaker 1: wasn't that funny. It was all in a spirit of
Speaker 1: fun and comedy and it was worth watching, you know.
Speaker 1: I in those years, the early two thousands, SNL in
Speaker 1: late nineties, early two thousands, I thought it was really fantastic,
Speaker 1: all right, that's gonna be able to get to more
Speaker 1: roll call tomorrow. Friends, be sure to check out bucksxon
Speaker 1: dot com, shields high