1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:03,120 Speaker 1: Welcome to Worst Year Ever, A production of I Heart 2 00:00:03,240 --> 00:00:21,680 Speaker 1: Radio Together Everything, So don't don't welcome back to the 3 00:00:21,720 --> 00:00:26,600 Speaker 1: Worst Year Ever. The President is poisoning himself, and I 4 00:00:26,640 --> 00:00:31,400 Speaker 1: think that's clever. Y is a clever ruse on his cart, 5 00:00:31,480 --> 00:00:33,599 Speaker 1: that's what I got. No, yeah, no, he's a he's 6 00:00:33,600 --> 00:00:35,920 Speaker 1: a tricky guy. He used his brain and he's like, 7 00:00:36,040 --> 00:00:39,200 Speaker 1: I'm gonna poison myself and maybe make my heart explode. 8 00:00:39,520 --> 00:00:41,800 Speaker 1: So then I plays get the virus a fourth time, 9 00:00:42,479 --> 00:00:47,160 Speaker 1: poison yourself to own the lips. Guys. Yeah, I think 10 00:00:47,280 --> 00:00:49,720 Speaker 1: I've the longer this all goes on, the more I 11 00:00:49,760 --> 00:00:52,479 Speaker 1: think that that that really is that we should just 12 00:00:52,520 --> 00:00:56,760 Speaker 1: start a counter conspiracy that convinces a lot of these 13 00:00:56,800 --> 00:00:59,480 Speaker 1: people to take as much hydroxy clark quin as they fit. Like, 14 00:00:59,520 --> 00:01:01,000 Speaker 1: if there weren't a bunch of people who needed it 15 00:01:01,040 --> 00:01:03,920 Speaker 1: for real medical purposes, I would be like, this is fine, 16 00:01:04,080 --> 00:01:07,320 Speaker 1: just let it happen. Yeah, but just you know, yeah, 17 00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:10,640 Speaker 1: it's like, oh, sure, go choke on money, but people 18 00:01:10,640 --> 00:01:14,640 Speaker 1: who need that to buy food. Yeah yeah, yeah, it's 19 00:01:14,680 --> 00:01:16,880 Speaker 1: a bummer. There's no good options because it's the worst 20 00:01:16,959 --> 00:01:21,199 Speaker 1: year ever. Um, which, yeah, it's fun when we we 21 00:01:21,200 --> 00:01:25,360 Speaker 1: we circle back around on our introductions. So how are 22 00:01:25,400 --> 00:01:28,800 Speaker 1: y'all doing this week? Everybody happy, everybody having a good time, 23 00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:35,040 Speaker 1: everybody really excited that good time. Everything's all right. Never 24 00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:39,960 Speaker 1: gonna get out of quarantine. I'm not great. I'm not either. 25 00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:44,720 Speaker 1: Um I'm okay. I thought that was great. You guys 26 00:01:44,920 --> 00:01:49,040 Speaker 1: don't sell yourself. Shut You guys are awesome. Thank you, Sophie. Um. Yeah, 27 00:01:49,080 --> 00:01:52,520 Speaker 1: today feels slow, Today feels weird and groggy. Every day 28 00:01:52,600 --> 00:01:56,640 Speaker 1: is a different adventure. But we're here doing it. We 29 00:01:56,680 --> 00:02:01,040 Speaker 1: are doing it. I got my pals, you Wales is 30 00:02:01,160 --> 00:02:08,560 Speaker 1: here doing it? What the world media is here taking 31 00:02:08,600 --> 00:02:11,720 Speaker 1: on the terror Read story. I was worried you would 32 00:02:11,800 --> 00:02:15,200 Speaker 1: say that because we planned this episode in advance. We did, 33 00:02:15,320 --> 00:02:16,959 Speaker 1: we did, we planned this episode. This is one of 34 00:02:17,040 --> 00:02:19,280 Speaker 1: the rare times when we planned an episode. We like 35 00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:21,919 Speaker 1: settled on what our topic was going to be on Friday, 36 00:02:22,040 --> 00:02:24,320 Speaker 1: and then as the weekend rolled through, this was still 37 00:02:24,360 --> 00:02:30,040 Speaker 1: the top subjective discussion. So that's fun. Um Yeah, I think, 38 00:02:30,080 --> 00:02:32,880 Speaker 1: as most people are aware, In the last week, three 39 00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:37,480 Speaker 1: big articles dropped um investigating the terror Read case and 40 00:02:37,600 --> 00:02:42,240 Speaker 1: her allegations against Vice President Joe Biden. Um and her 41 00:02:42,360 --> 00:02:45,480 Speaker 1: as a as a person and as a credible witness. Um, 42 00:02:45,560 --> 00:02:47,640 Speaker 1: and they were from There was an article in Vox 43 00:02:47,720 --> 00:02:50,520 Speaker 1: by Laura McGann. There was an article in PBS News Hour, 44 00:02:50,880 --> 00:02:55,120 Speaker 1: and there was an article article in Politico by Natasha Cocky. Um. 45 00:02:55,160 --> 00:02:58,519 Speaker 1: And I didn't write down the PBS news article person's name, 46 00:02:58,600 --> 00:03:01,080 Speaker 1: which is shitty me, but I'm gonna find it right now. 47 00:03:01,960 --> 00:03:05,760 Speaker 1: Public Radio. Yeah, it was written by the radio. Oh, 48 00:03:05,800 --> 00:03:08,080 Speaker 1: it just was written by politics. No wait, no, sorry, 49 00:03:09,120 --> 00:03:11,120 Speaker 1: I missed stook how they do their byelines. It's by 50 00:03:11,160 --> 00:03:15,280 Speaker 1: Lisa de Jardin and Daniel Bush. It's by politics. You 51 00:03:15,320 --> 00:03:19,520 Speaker 1: were right the first times. It's by Lison and it's 52 00:03:19,560 --> 00:03:24,520 Speaker 1: by those two writers, but they go as politics. Yeah yeah, 53 00:03:26,040 --> 00:03:30,320 Speaker 1: they're both the journalistic duo and a d J duo. 54 00:03:30,760 --> 00:03:34,320 Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, Well, in this economy, you've really got to 55 00:03:34,360 --> 00:03:38,440 Speaker 1: have a backup. That also is what I expect from PBS. No, 56 00:03:38,600 --> 00:03:41,480 Speaker 1: you know, actually, Okay, So it's these these articles have 57 00:03:41,560 --> 00:03:44,480 Speaker 1: been passed around quite a lot in the last few days, 58 00:03:44,520 --> 00:03:47,520 Speaker 1: and the one I'm seeing shared most is the political article, 59 00:03:47,560 --> 00:03:49,840 Speaker 1: and I am seeing it shared very frequently by like 60 00:03:50,280 --> 00:03:53,680 Speaker 1: kind of standard you know, democrats like the middle of 61 00:03:53,680 --> 00:03:56,640 Speaker 1: the road more or less centrist folks. UM, And the 62 00:03:56,680 --> 00:04:00,800 Speaker 1: overwhelming sentiment I'm seeing express with it is, uh, puts 63 00:04:00,800 --> 00:04:03,440 Speaker 1: an end to the credibility of terror read and her 64 00:04:03,480 --> 00:04:06,520 Speaker 1: allegations against Joe Biden. That's how the Politico article is 65 00:04:06,560 --> 00:04:10,280 Speaker 1: being UM is being talked about by folks on that 66 00:04:10,400 --> 00:04:12,600 Speaker 1: end of things. UM. And I want to say straight 67 00:04:12,680 --> 00:04:14,480 Speaker 1: up top so again, these are three reports that we're 68 00:04:14,480 --> 00:04:17,000 Speaker 1: gonna be digging into today. So there's there's like this 69 00:04:17,080 --> 00:04:21,679 Speaker 1: question we have right where UM, when somebody makes allegations 70 00:04:21,760 --> 00:04:26,640 Speaker 1: of this type against a presidential candidate in a race, Uh, 71 00:04:26,680 --> 00:04:29,880 Speaker 1: what is the what is the burden of proof? How 72 00:04:29,880 --> 00:04:32,479 Speaker 1: how far do we go and what acts do we 73 00:04:32,520 --> 00:04:35,480 Speaker 1: take to attempt to vet them? Um? Because it isn't 74 00:04:35,480 --> 00:04:38,360 Speaker 1: as simple as just saying, Okay, you made an allegation, 75 00:04:38,480 --> 00:04:41,160 Speaker 1: so I believe you. Um. This is national, Like, this 76 00:04:41,240 --> 00:04:43,440 Speaker 1: is the future of the entire country when an allegation 77 00:04:43,480 --> 00:04:45,800 Speaker 1: like this gets made, Like there always needs to be 78 00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:49,480 Speaker 1: an investigation if there's like criminal allegations, But this is 79 00:04:49,520 --> 00:04:51,320 Speaker 1: the kind of thing where like it's going to get 80 00:04:51,320 --> 00:04:54,000 Speaker 1: looked into, right, it has to be looked into when 81 00:04:54,040 --> 00:04:56,960 Speaker 1: you have an allegation like this, UM. And I think 82 00:04:56,960 --> 00:05:00,640 Speaker 1: The question then, is what is the appropriate it way 83 00:05:00,680 --> 00:05:04,880 Speaker 1: to do that? Um? Because there's there's a right way 84 00:05:04,880 --> 00:05:06,599 Speaker 1: and a wrong way to dig into things like this. 85 00:05:06,640 --> 00:05:09,560 Speaker 1: And I actually think all three of these articles give 86 00:05:09,680 --> 00:05:12,279 Speaker 1: us a good examples of the right and the wrong 87 00:05:12,320 --> 00:05:14,920 Speaker 1: ways to do it um. And in my opinion, the 88 00:05:14,960 --> 00:05:19,320 Speaker 1: Politico article is basically like a perfect encapsulation of the 89 00:05:19,360 --> 00:05:23,919 Speaker 1: wrong way to look out at allegations of this type 90 00:05:23,920 --> 00:05:26,240 Speaker 1: and look at the person making the allegations. So that's 91 00:05:26,320 --> 00:05:28,839 Speaker 1: kind of going into this. That's kind of how I 92 00:05:28,880 --> 00:05:34,320 Speaker 1: feel having read them all. Yeah, is this the to 93 00:05:34,440 --> 00:05:39,560 Speaker 1: hear all the people that feel uh personally like spurned 94 00:05:39,600 --> 00:05:43,599 Speaker 1: by Tara article? Yeah? Yeah, So the title of the 95 00:05:43,720 --> 00:05:48,200 Speaker 1: article by Natasha Correcki is manipulative, deceitful user terror Reid 96 00:05:48,320 --> 00:05:53,280 Speaker 1: left a trail of aggrieved acquaintances. Didn't write that. Yeah, 97 00:05:53,360 --> 00:05:57,440 Speaker 1: it's it's bad, bad title. Um. I mean it's a 98 00:05:57,480 --> 00:06:00,200 Speaker 1: good title in terms of getting the clicks, getting those 99 00:06:00,240 --> 00:06:07,520 Speaker 1: sweethet clicks. You know. I'll just say in general, as 100 00:06:07,520 --> 00:06:11,560 Speaker 1: I've been talking to people the past several days, including 101 00:06:11,600 --> 00:06:17,400 Speaker 1: people in my family about this whole thing, and and yes, 102 00:06:17,480 --> 00:06:18,960 Speaker 1: what is the burden of proof? How do you go 103 00:06:19,000 --> 00:06:22,080 Speaker 1: about proving this. I don't think that you can. I 104 00:06:22,080 --> 00:06:26,200 Speaker 1: don't think that there ultimately is approving one way or 105 00:06:26,240 --> 00:06:30,120 Speaker 1: the other. Uh. Perhaps some other piece of information is 106 00:06:30,200 --> 00:06:32,800 Speaker 1: yet to be revealed, and that changes my mind on that, 107 00:06:32,880 --> 00:06:34,840 Speaker 1: But it seems like there's no way to really find 108 00:06:34,880 --> 00:06:40,120 Speaker 1: out for sure, right, and my whole thing, and everyone's like, well, 109 00:06:40,160 --> 00:06:42,200 Speaker 1: I don't believe her, I think she's a liar. Well, 110 00:06:42,440 --> 00:06:46,800 Speaker 1: why don't you stop for a second, because if it 111 00:06:46,880 --> 00:06:50,440 Speaker 1: was reversed, which it was a few years ago, and 112 00:06:50,880 --> 00:06:55,160 Speaker 1: the other side had a candidate where there are these allegations, Uh, 113 00:06:55,400 --> 00:06:59,360 Speaker 1: what we all said was believe them, or at least 114 00:06:59,360 --> 00:07:02,680 Speaker 1: believe that there's possibility that this is true, because we 115 00:07:02,720 --> 00:07:04,919 Speaker 1: need to be able to hold our leaders to the 116 00:07:04,960 --> 00:07:08,839 Speaker 1: same kind of standard that we hold the people on 117 00:07:08,880 --> 00:07:10,720 Speaker 1: the other side. Do you know what I mean? And 118 00:07:10,800 --> 00:07:14,720 Speaker 1: it's like that doesn't Again, it doesn't mean that I'm 119 00:07:14,760 --> 00:07:18,240 Speaker 1: saying don't vote for Joe Biden because I understand what's 120 00:07:18,240 --> 00:07:21,560 Speaker 1: at stake here. But at the same time, why are 121 00:07:21,560 --> 00:07:24,240 Speaker 1: you so quick to dismiss this? Why are we so 122 00:07:24,320 --> 00:07:27,200 Speaker 1: quick to say no, absolutely didn't happen. I do not 123 00:07:27,320 --> 00:07:30,680 Speaker 1: have room in my reality for the possibility that this 124 00:07:30,720 --> 00:07:34,360 Speaker 1: could be true, and and and that's so frustrating to 125 00:07:34,400 --> 00:07:36,760 Speaker 1: me about the whole conversation. And so now we instead 126 00:07:37,040 --> 00:07:40,560 Speaker 1: turned to smear campaigns or what have you. And yes, 127 00:07:40,600 --> 00:07:44,560 Speaker 1: here are all the reasons why this woman is is 128 00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:48,120 Speaker 1: a villain, you know. Yeah, And I do want to 129 00:07:48,120 --> 00:07:50,800 Speaker 1: stay upfront. I don't think these are all bad articles. 130 00:07:50,840 --> 00:07:53,360 Speaker 1: I actually think both the PBS article and the vox 131 00:07:53,520 --> 00:07:58,440 Speaker 1: armple in particular are are pretty well done and and responsible. Um. 132 00:07:58,800 --> 00:08:02,360 Speaker 1: And I think that, like to your your initial question, Katie, 133 00:08:02,720 --> 00:08:05,440 Speaker 1: there's no way, um to get like a like you're 134 00:08:05,480 --> 00:08:07,760 Speaker 1: not going to buy reporting in a case like this, 135 00:08:07,840 --> 00:08:11,600 Speaker 1: get like a clear yes or no. Um, we can 136 00:08:11,800 --> 00:08:14,240 Speaker 1: prove that she is telling the truth, or we can 137 00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:16,160 Speaker 1: prove that she's lying. But there are some things you 138 00:08:16,160 --> 00:08:18,640 Speaker 1: can do. So like obviously, the first thing to establish, 139 00:08:18,640 --> 00:08:21,800 Speaker 1: which was established by the the the Ryan Grimm, the 140 00:08:21,840 --> 00:08:24,960 Speaker 1: Intercept reporter who broke the initial article, is that it 141 00:08:25,000 --> 00:08:27,640 Speaker 1: was possible for these for this to have happened, you know, 142 00:08:27,680 --> 00:08:30,000 Speaker 1: just like the mechanics of it work out because these 143 00:08:30,040 --> 00:08:34,240 Speaker 1: two were in the same location at the same time. UM. 144 00:08:34,280 --> 00:08:36,840 Speaker 1: Like that that is the first step, right, Like you 145 00:08:36,920 --> 00:08:39,800 Speaker 1: make sure that Okay, this person is alleged that this 146 00:08:39,840 --> 00:08:41,960 Speaker 1: other person assaulted them. Have they ever been at the 147 00:08:42,000 --> 00:08:45,360 Speaker 1: same place together at once? Like, that's okay, she actually 148 00:08:45,360 --> 00:08:48,720 Speaker 1: had this job. They actually yes, Yeah, that's the very 149 00:08:48,800 --> 00:08:51,280 Speaker 1: first most basic thing to do, and that was done 150 00:08:51,480 --> 00:08:54,000 Speaker 1: um initially and it it is it is like possible 151 00:08:54,040 --> 00:08:56,080 Speaker 1: in the sense that they were both in the same 152 00:08:56,080 --> 00:08:58,800 Speaker 1: places at the same times. And she's telling the truth 153 00:08:58,800 --> 00:09:02,000 Speaker 1: about the fact that she was employed by the campaign. UM. 154 00:09:02,080 --> 00:09:04,880 Speaker 1: And so the next things too, in terms of like 155 00:09:05,200 --> 00:09:08,920 Speaker 1: the mechanical stuff, The next things to look into would be, UM, 156 00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:12,360 Speaker 1: let's trace down the details about her that that she 157 00:09:12,440 --> 00:09:15,200 Speaker 1: claimed about, like how this happened. So, UM, can we 158 00:09:15,320 --> 00:09:17,800 Speaker 1: verify that she was anywhere close to that area at 159 00:09:17,840 --> 00:09:20,760 Speaker 1: that time? Uh? Can we verify things like, you know, 160 00:09:20,840 --> 00:09:22,960 Speaker 1: she says that she was delivering Joe Biden's jim bag 161 00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:25,280 Speaker 1: to him. Can we verify that he used that jim 162 00:09:25,400 --> 00:09:27,640 Speaker 1: um all that sort of stuff. Uh. So that that 163 00:09:27,679 --> 00:09:31,000 Speaker 1: would be the next thing or a responsible reporter would do. 164 00:09:31,559 --> 00:09:34,520 Speaker 1: Another thing that responsible reporters would do would talk to 165 00:09:34,640 --> 00:09:37,760 Speaker 1: other women who had worked in the campaign UM at 166 00:09:37,800 --> 00:09:40,760 Speaker 1: around that same time, earlier and later to get an 167 00:09:40,960 --> 00:09:45,400 Speaker 1: understanding of Joe Biden as a boss to women and 168 00:09:45,440 --> 00:09:48,360 Speaker 1: what that experience of working with him is like. Um, 169 00:09:48,480 --> 00:09:50,400 Speaker 1: And another thing to do would be to speak with 170 00:09:50,440 --> 00:09:54,040 Speaker 1: people who knew terror read at the time um or 171 00:09:54,160 --> 00:09:58,679 Speaker 1: later and prior to the allegations, UH talked to her 172 00:09:58,800 --> 00:10:01,440 Speaker 1: about what had happened. Um. So those are all things 173 00:10:01,440 --> 00:10:03,920 Speaker 1: that I would say are responsible things to look into 174 00:10:04,000 --> 00:10:08,280 Speaker 1: as a journalist. Yeah, like investigating this case. None of 175 00:10:08,320 --> 00:10:10,720 Speaker 1: those are the things that we're done in the Politico article, 176 00:10:10,880 --> 00:10:15,760 Speaker 1: And I think we should start there. Yeah, let that, Yeah, 177 00:10:15,840 --> 00:10:19,600 Speaker 1: because I I this is like the hideoust hit piece 178 00:10:19,920 --> 00:10:23,320 Speaker 1: in all of hit pieceville. Um and it it is. 179 00:10:23,440 --> 00:10:26,280 Speaker 1: It is a rough read, and I get why people 180 00:10:26,320 --> 00:10:29,000 Speaker 1: who didn't believe Tara from the start are taking this 181 00:10:29,080 --> 00:10:33,160 Speaker 1: as a damning indictment of her as a person. Um My, 182 00:10:33,160 --> 00:10:36,240 Speaker 1: my broad summary of this article would be Terra is 183 00:10:36,280 --> 00:10:38,600 Speaker 1: a bad person to rent a room too, and her 184 00:10:38,679 --> 00:10:43,200 Speaker 1: landlords don't like her. Like yeah, yeah, yeah, that's the 185 00:10:43,240 --> 00:10:44,959 Speaker 1: sense I get a lot from. I mean, it's the 186 00:10:44,960 --> 00:10:48,760 Speaker 1: same with the Krasnstine article, where it's like, yeah, money stuff, 187 00:10:49,040 --> 00:10:52,000 Speaker 1: money problems. I don't know, I can't pay rent sometimes, 188 00:10:52,200 --> 00:10:55,360 Speaker 1: I don't know, Like it's it a lot of reads 189 00:10:55,400 --> 00:11:01,280 Speaker 1: like shaming, like horror people for struggling, Yeah, and shaming 190 00:11:01,360 --> 00:11:03,480 Speaker 1: like like this is how I thought when I read 191 00:11:03,480 --> 00:11:06,840 Speaker 1: her terrible column about Russia that she posts on Medium. 192 00:11:06,840 --> 00:11:09,040 Speaker 1: It's like, yeah, she seems like a person who's got 193 00:11:09,080 --> 00:11:11,200 Speaker 1: some issues, but none of none of what's in the 194 00:11:11,240 --> 00:11:17,000 Speaker 1: political article makes me question her as a credible witness 195 00:11:17,000 --> 00:11:19,280 Speaker 1: to sexual assault because like, none of the things that 196 00:11:19,320 --> 00:11:23,280 Speaker 1: people are complaining about, like it's her needing, like asking 197 00:11:23,320 --> 00:11:26,840 Speaker 1: for help with finances, it's her being late on rent um, 198 00:11:26,880 --> 00:11:31,240 Speaker 1: it's her, yeah, and it will need these things. I mean, 199 00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:33,640 Speaker 1: I touched on this when we talked about the Crescency article, 200 00:11:33,800 --> 00:11:37,199 Speaker 1: Like none of none of the things that these articles 201 00:11:37,240 --> 00:11:41,080 Speaker 1: get into are she has a history of lying about 202 00:11:41,120 --> 00:11:43,880 Speaker 1: sexual assault. She has, like it's not specific to any 203 00:11:43,920 --> 00:11:47,200 Speaker 1: of the thing that we're dealing with. And also, none 204 00:11:47,240 --> 00:11:50,480 Speaker 1: of the ones that do this ever seemed to examine 205 00:11:50,800 --> 00:11:57,240 Speaker 1: Joe Biden's history of lying about his history specifically, like 206 00:11:57,320 --> 00:12:01,840 Speaker 1: he lies about his career constantly and public Yeah, like unabashedly, 207 00:12:02,320 --> 00:12:05,880 Speaker 1: And that's what none of these articles do. Yeah, none 208 00:12:05,920 --> 00:12:08,679 Speaker 1: of these, even the ones that I think are reasonably responsible, 209 00:12:08,720 --> 00:12:10,520 Speaker 1: none of them talk about the fact that, like Joe's 210 00:12:10,520 --> 00:12:14,720 Speaker 1: told really blatant untruths about his like very basic aspects 211 00:12:14,760 --> 00:12:17,200 Speaker 1: of his background. So if terror read lying to a 212 00:12:17,280 --> 00:12:21,680 Speaker 1: landlord is relevant, why isn't that They also, I mean, 213 00:12:23,600 --> 00:12:28,160 Speaker 1: rarely talk about the fact that he's problematic with women 214 00:12:28,600 --> 00:12:31,720 Speaker 1: in general. For we've known that for a long time. 215 00:12:31,800 --> 00:12:34,960 Speaker 1: And you can write it off as you know, creepy 216 00:12:35,040 --> 00:12:38,880 Speaker 1: Joe Biden touching women, sniffing people's necks and all that stuff, 217 00:12:38,920 --> 00:12:43,920 Speaker 1: playing with their hair, but it's not that's that's a 218 00:12:43,960 --> 00:12:46,960 Speaker 1: misuse of your position in a work situation, in any 219 00:12:47,000 --> 00:12:49,840 Speaker 1: kind of an environment that's invading people's personal space. And 220 00:12:49,880 --> 00:12:54,160 Speaker 1: that's a really, really, really important conversation and something that 221 00:12:54,880 --> 00:12:58,480 Speaker 1: undoubtedly has made people uncomfortable for the entirety of his career, 222 00:12:58,720 --> 00:13:03,080 Speaker 1: right And and that alone isn't really grappled with to me, 223 00:13:03,600 --> 00:13:06,440 Speaker 1: And I mean, it's just all part of this fabric 224 00:13:06,520 --> 00:13:09,360 Speaker 1: that that feels unfair. Also, one point I wanted to 225 00:13:09,400 --> 00:13:11,560 Speaker 1: make what we're talking about this it came to my 226 00:13:11,600 --> 00:13:15,400 Speaker 1: mind they're trying to pay this portrait of a woman 227 00:13:15,480 --> 00:13:18,840 Speaker 1: who's unreliable and all of this stuff, And Okay, I 228 00:13:18,600 --> 00:13:22,280 Speaker 1: I hear you, I see Yeah, maybe she's not a 229 00:13:22,280 --> 00:13:25,360 Speaker 1: good person to rent to all of this stuff. She 230 00:13:25,400 --> 00:13:29,199 Speaker 1: wrote that that that piece about putin Okay, it also 231 00:13:29,679 --> 00:13:31,880 Speaker 1: another way to look at it. That is the portrait 232 00:13:31,880 --> 00:13:35,280 Speaker 1: of a woman that's had kind of a rough past, 233 00:13:35,640 --> 00:13:39,520 Speaker 1: maybe has had some troubles. Also, those are the types 234 00:13:39,559 --> 00:13:42,680 Speaker 1: of women that get preyed upon and don't get praved 235 00:13:43,040 --> 00:13:46,720 Speaker 1: like like, there's a framing. It's a sexist framing of 236 00:13:46,760 --> 00:13:50,240 Speaker 1: who this this these different clues, who does this person 237 00:13:50,280 --> 00:13:52,240 Speaker 1: add up to? Well, there's a different way to look 238 00:13:52,320 --> 00:13:57,880 Speaker 1: at it, you know. Yeah, that bit from a like 239 00:13:57,920 --> 00:14:01,720 Speaker 1: a deposition from her ex husband talking about this, uh 240 00:14:01,760 --> 00:14:04,760 Speaker 1: in like like four or so years after the alleged 241 00:14:04,760 --> 00:14:10,640 Speaker 1: incident happened, talking about how like she something happened working 242 00:14:10,640 --> 00:14:15,240 Speaker 1: in Joe Biden's office that traumatized her and still affects 243 00:14:15,240 --> 00:14:17,679 Speaker 1: her to this day. Is like what he said in 244 00:14:17,720 --> 00:14:22,360 Speaker 1: the deposition, Um, and that happened that affects people for 245 00:14:22,440 --> 00:14:26,840 Speaker 1: a long time and their behavior. I don't know when 246 00:14:26,880 --> 00:14:29,160 Speaker 1: was that deposition again, Um, I want to say it 247 00:14:29,200 --> 00:14:33,120 Speaker 1: was six or nineties. Sex I have to ask you 248 00:14:33,160 --> 00:14:36,200 Speaker 1: that because that isn't something that people talk about very much, 249 00:14:36,360 --> 00:14:41,000 Speaker 1: you know, it's not and it. It's um. You know, 250 00:14:41,200 --> 00:14:42,520 Speaker 1: some of this is just coming down to this like 251 00:14:42,560 --> 00:14:46,840 Speaker 1: frustrating American puritanical thing whereby if you're a victim, in 252 00:14:46,920 --> 00:14:50,040 Speaker 1: order to be treated well, you have to be pure. 253 00:14:50,280 --> 00:14:52,240 Speaker 1: Where it's like people were willing to believe like the 254 00:14:52,240 --> 00:14:54,760 Speaker 1: the Kavanaugh accuser, at least people Democrats were willing to 255 00:14:54,760 --> 00:14:58,040 Speaker 1: believe her in part because like she she had like 256 00:14:58,160 --> 00:15:01,600 Speaker 1: as clean and like she's she was the ideal victim, 257 00:15:01,840 --> 00:15:04,520 Speaker 1: right if we're going to talk about that. But terror 258 00:15:04,560 --> 00:15:07,680 Speaker 1: read is is is messy. She's had a messy past. 259 00:15:07,880 --> 00:15:10,600 Speaker 1: She's clearly a person who has some some who's got 260 00:15:10,600 --> 00:15:12,560 Speaker 1: some ship that she needs to that she's needed to 261 00:15:12,600 --> 00:15:14,560 Speaker 1: deal with over the course of her life. And that 262 00:15:14,640 --> 00:15:17,560 Speaker 1: doesn't mean she can't be raped. I have known, I 263 00:15:18,240 --> 00:15:20,280 Speaker 1: don't want this to sound the wrong way. I've known 264 00:15:20,360 --> 00:15:23,680 Speaker 1: some terrible people, male and female, who were rape victims. 265 00:15:23,720 --> 00:15:26,200 Speaker 1: The fact that they were terrible people did not mean 266 00:15:26,200 --> 00:15:28,600 Speaker 1: that they had not also been victimized by other people, 267 00:15:28,720 --> 00:15:31,320 Speaker 1: and it didn't mean that they deserved it either. No, 268 00:15:31,520 --> 00:15:34,080 Speaker 1: it did not. It did not. Another way people tend 269 00:15:34,080 --> 00:15:37,120 Speaker 1: to look at this, well, they put themselves in that situation. Yeah, 270 00:15:37,320 --> 00:15:39,760 Speaker 1: you can be like that there were fucking rapists who 271 00:15:39,800 --> 00:15:42,280 Speaker 1: died at Auschwitz. Like, it doesn't mean that was okay either. 272 00:15:42,400 --> 00:15:45,400 Speaker 1: Like the fact that someone is flawed doesn't make them 273 00:15:45,600 --> 00:15:49,120 Speaker 1: incapable of being a victim. Um. And that is what 274 00:15:49,560 --> 00:15:53,760 Speaker 1: that's particularly the political article, because almost nothing about the 275 00:15:53,760 --> 00:15:57,359 Speaker 1: political article actually delves into things that that are relevant 276 00:15:57,440 --> 00:16:01,480 Speaker 1: to the sexual assault. Um. Uh. Stuff other than that 277 00:16:01,520 --> 00:16:05,240 Speaker 1: her landlord, her landlords think she's a liar for not 278 00:16:05,320 --> 00:16:07,200 Speaker 1: being able to pay the rent and like kind of 279 00:16:07,240 --> 00:16:09,120 Speaker 1: begging for money. She seems like the kind of person 280 00:16:09,160 --> 00:16:12,080 Speaker 1: who's like, had some ship going on and gloms onto 281 00:16:12,080 --> 00:16:14,560 Speaker 1: people that she feels like um can provide her with 282 00:16:14,600 --> 00:16:17,960 Speaker 1: a sense of support. Um. And that doesn't Yeah, it 283 00:16:18,000 --> 00:16:20,880 Speaker 1: doesn't mean she's not a victim. Um. And also it's 284 00:16:20,920 --> 00:16:23,120 Speaker 1: it's worth noting on some of this stuff at least, 285 00:16:23,160 --> 00:16:25,160 Speaker 1: like one of the allegations against her that's not from 286 00:16:25,160 --> 00:16:27,840 Speaker 1: a landlorder is from someone who ran Terry Reade has 287 00:16:27,840 --> 00:16:31,520 Speaker 1: a thing with horses. Um. Yeah, she likes. She seems 288 00:16:31,520 --> 00:16:34,920 Speaker 1: to like being living on horse farms and volunteering at 289 00:16:34,960 --> 00:16:38,160 Speaker 1: horse horse boxes whatever you call a place where they 290 00:16:38,240 --> 00:16:43,720 Speaker 1: keep horses boxes. Yeah, a horsebox. She's volunteered on horse box. Yeah. Um. 291 00:16:43,920 --> 00:16:45,800 Speaker 1: And one of the people that she lived with and 292 00:16:45,840 --> 00:16:47,920 Speaker 1: worked with in this regard says that she was a 293 00:16:47,920 --> 00:16:50,360 Speaker 1: great person and that she considered her like part of 294 00:16:50,360 --> 00:16:53,080 Speaker 1: the family. One of the people in who was just 295 00:16:53,160 --> 00:16:55,880 Speaker 1: a horse sectionary owner, not a landlord, which is I 296 00:16:55,920 --> 00:16:59,320 Speaker 1: have some issues with landlords because seventy percent of them 297 00:16:59,360 --> 00:17:04,040 Speaker 1: are outright eminals. Um. But horse sanctuary people I think aren't. 298 00:17:04,040 --> 00:17:05,760 Speaker 1: And one of the horse sanctuary people at a very 299 00:17:05,760 --> 00:17:09,320 Speaker 1: bad experience with terror read Lynn Hummer who said she 300 00:17:09,400 --> 00:17:11,960 Speaker 1: has a problem. I think she's very clever, manipulative. I 301 00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:15,119 Speaker 1: do think she's a liar um. And basically, like some 302 00:17:15,200 --> 00:17:17,600 Speaker 1: of this is based off the fact that Reid's car 303 00:17:17,680 --> 00:17:21,080 Speaker 1: was being repoed and she begged this person to let 304 00:17:21,080 --> 00:17:24,679 Speaker 1: her hide her car on her property, which again I 305 00:17:24,720 --> 00:17:26,720 Speaker 1: can say for a fact, I know people who have 306 00:17:26,760 --> 00:17:30,200 Speaker 1: been victims of variety of crimes and have also hidden 307 00:17:30,240 --> 00:17:32,040 Speaker 1: cars from ripo men, because that's just the thing that 308 00:17:32,080 --> 00:17:34,919 Speaker 1: happens when you're poor. Like, I get why maybe a person, 309 00:17:35,000 --> 00:17:37,720 Speaker 1: I get why, especially if this lady is like rich Um, 310 00:17:37,840 --> 00:17:40,800 Speaker 1: which she owns a horse sanctuary, so probably right, I 311 00:17:40,840 --> 00:17:42,920 Speaker 1: get why she might just think that Anyone who does 312 00:17:42,960 --> 00:17:45,960 Speaker 1: that is like a dangerous liar. It's pretty common poor 313 00:17:46,000 --> 00:17:49,040 Speaker 1: person behavior to have to hide a fucking car from Repo. Yeah, 314 00:17:49,040 --> 00:17:52,960 Speaker 1: it's wild, Um that that was that that kind of 315 00:17:52,960 --> 00:17:56,520 Speaker 1: stuff was included, Um like going through like this is 316 00:17:56,600 --> 00:18:00,000 Speaker 1: just the Crescentine stuff, but like yeah, a few more 317 00:18:00,000 --> 00:18:02,479 Speaker 1: of them. Yeah, it's like, oh, no, she asked you 318 00:18:02,520 --> 00:18:04,879 Speaker 1: if she could park her car on your land so 319 00:18:04,960 --> 00:18:06,800 Speaker 1: she didn't have to pay an extra five bucks to 320 00:18:06,800 --> 00:18:08,639 Speaker 1: the REPO guy when she could finally get her ship 321 00:18:08,640 --> 00:18:11,760 Speaker 1: together to pay her bill. Like like you want a 322 00:18:11,840 --> 00:18:14,199 Speaker 1: laundry list of all the times Christine Lassie Ford like 323 00:18:14,320 --> 00:18:19,159 Speaker 1: had to ask for money, Like, yeah, what should we 324 00:18:19,200 --> 00:18:22,280 Speaker 1: take a break? Guys? Yeah, you know what? Won't you 325 00:18:22,320 --> 00:18:25,040 Speaker 1: know what? Will let you park your car while it's 326 00:18:25,080 --> 00:18:28,679 Speaker 1: in danger of being repossessed on its horse sanctuary so 327 00:18:28,720 --> 00:18:34,480 Speaker 1: that you can avoid the REPO man. Yeah, well, Rayon, Katie, 328 00:18:34,520 --> 00:18:36,840 Speaker 1: I'm glad that you brought that up, because not only 329 00:18:36,840 --> 00:18:39,760 Speaker 1: will Raytheon let you hide your car in their parking lot, 330 00:18:40,240 --> 00:18:42,760 Speaker 1: Raytheon will ensure that nobody ever has a problem with 331 00:18:42,800 --> 00:18:47,959 Speaker 1: REPO men again thanks to Raytheon's new No More People program, 332 00:18:48,320 --> 00:18:51,119 Speaker 1: or they just where they just missile everybody. That's the 333 00:18:51,200 --> 00:18:55,640 Speaker 1: raytheon dream a world without Repo Man or anyone else. 334 00:19:05,800 --> 00:19:09,320 Speaker 1: We're back. Oh my god. So yeah, I don't know, 335 00:19:09,359 --> 00:19:12,400 Speaker 1: Like you know, I can't help Whenever I as I'm 336 00:19:12,440 --> 00:19:16,720 Speaker 1: going over this, think about Rodrigo du terte Um the president, 337 00:19:17,119 --> 00:19:19,480 Speaker 1: you know, quasi dictator. Now if the Philippines, because do 338 00:19:19,560 --> 00:19:22,920 Speaker 1: Tarte is um, he's a liar, he's a murderer, he's 339 00:19:22,920 --> 00:19:26,159 Speaker 1: a monster. He was also molested by a Catholic priest 340 00:19:26,400 --> 00:19:29,840 Speaker 1: um and like we don't have hard evidence of it, 341 00:19:29,920 --> 00:19:31,480 Speaker 1: like there's no video of it, but we know that 342 00:19:31,480 --> 00:19:33,280 Speaker 1: he was in that priest parish. We know that priest 343 00:19:33,520 --> 00:19:36,040 Speaker 1: molested a bunch of other kids, and there is zero 344 00:19:36,119 --> 00:19:38,960 Speaker 1: reason to believe that Rodrigo do Tarte would lie about 345 00:19:39,000 --> 00:19:41,320 Speaker 1: being the victim of that sort of thing. Doesn't mean 346 00:19:41,359 --> 00:19:43,639 Speaker 1: he's not still a monster, you like, And I'm not 347 00:19:43,640 --> 00:19:45,879 Speaker 1: saying Tara Read is a monster either. I'm just saying, 348 00:19:45,960 --> 00:19:48,840 Speaker 1: like I I don't I don't hear anybody doubting rodrid 349 00:19:48,920 --> 00:19:52,000 Speaker 1: Goo do Tarte's story. But anyway, there are other reasons, 350 00:19:52,040 --> 00:19:54,720 Speaker 1: like obviously, like she's she's expressed a partisan opinion in 351 00:19:54,720 --> 00:19:58,360 Speaker 1: an election which automatically nullifies her as a human being 352 00:19:58,400 --> 00:20:01,480 Speaker 1: to anyone who doesn't share that political agenda, because that's 353 00:20:01,480 --> 00:20:06,240 Speaker 1: the way politics works. It's gross. Uh so yeah, this 354 00:20:06,240 --> 00:20:09,960 Speaker 1: this the horse sanctuary lady who didn't like Read. Um. Yeah, 355 00:20:10,000 --> 00:20:11,399 Speaker 1: said that she would beg for money, which is a 356 00:20:11,400 --> 00:20:13,640 Speaker 1: pretty common like a common like she seemed to be 357 00:20:13,800 --> 00:20:16,000 Speaker 1: renting a lot of rooms from people who were better 358 00:20:16,040 --> 00:20:20,080 Speaker 1: off and would regularly like beg for forgiveness on rent 359 00:20:20,200 --> 00:20:22,800 Speaker 1: and would also ask for loans of money. And that's 360 00:20:22,840 --> 00:20:25,680 Speaker 1: a common thread, which again has nothing to do with 361 00:20:25,720 --> 00:20:29,160 Speaker 1: whether or not she's the victim of sexual assault. It's 362 00:20:29,160 --> 00:20:34,280 Speaker 1: also like very just like now of all times to 363 00:20:34,400 --> 00:20:39,000 Speaker 1: be like, yeah, look at these these poor landlords and 364 00:20:39,040 --> 00:20:41,600 Speaker 1: the rent that they like they needed to get. It's 365 00:20:41,640 --> 00:20:44,639 Speaker 1: just it's just wild that is happening right now. Yeah, 366 00:20:44,640 --> 00:20:50,560 Speaker 1: it's frustrating. Yeah, now this person uh Lynn Hummer also 367 00:20:50,600 --> 00:20:53,040 Speaker 1: alleges that Read called a veterinarian to the ranch to 368 00:20:53,119 --> 00:20:55,600 Speaker 1: service terror Read's own horse. I guess she had or 369 00:20:55,640 --> 00:20:58,920 Speaker 1: has a horse and left Hummer to pay the bill, um, 370 00:20:58,920 --> 00:21:01,760 Speaker 1: which would be some shady behavior. Read denies this and 371 00:21:01,760 --> 00:21:03,520 Speaker 1: his claim that her lawyer is gonna file a CISA 372 00:21:03,560 --> 00:21:05,680 Speaker 1: desist case. I don't know what's actually going to happen 373 00:21:05,680 --> 00:21:09,680 Speaker 1: with this. I don't know. So there's one two paragraph 374 00:21:09,760 --> 00:21:11,280 Speaker 1: chunk of this that I want to read that I 375 00:21:11,600 --> 00:21:13,359 Speaker 1: do think is worth talking about a little bit more 376 00:21:13,359 --> 00:21:16,560 Speaker 1: in detail. Quote five of her acquaintances have specific recollections 377 00:21:16,560 --> 00:21:19,359 Speaker 1: where Read spoken positive terms about Biden as recently. Still 378 00:21:19,400 --> 00:21:21,560 Speaker 1: has an eighteen one year before she lodged an initial 379 00:21:21,640 --> 00:21:24,520 Speaker 1: charge against Biden that he had sexually harassed her um. 380 00:21:24,640 --> 00:21:27,240 Speaker 1: According to their accounts, Read proactively brought up the former 381 00:21:27,359 --> 00:21:29,679 Speaker 1: Vice president's name, pointing to her time in his Senate 382 00:21:29,720 --> 00:21:32,240 Speaker 1: offices as a high point in her career. Those interviews 383 00:21:32,240 --> 00:21:34,080 Speaker 1: said they were into the impression that Read spent years 384 00:21:34,080 --> 00:21:35,600 Speaker 1: in his office or had played a role in helping 385 00:21:35,600 --> 00:21:38,160 Speaker 1: write landmark legislation, though she actually served in a junior 386 00:21:38,200 --> 00:21:40,439 Speaker 1: level position for less than a year. Now, this is 387 00:21:40,480 --> 00:21:43,200 Speaker 1: interesting to me because it could mean a few different things. Obviously, 388 00:21:43,240 --> 00:21:45,640 Speaker 1: the author is taking it as a c she really 389 00:21:45,640 --> 00:21:49,399 Speaker 1: loves Biden point. But it's super like it's super common 390 00:21:49,440 --> 00:21:51,400 Speaker 1: for victims to want to try to salvage something good 391 00:21:51,440 --> 00:21:54,040 Speaker 1: from a traumatic event like a rape. UM, and I 392 00:21:54,359 --> 00:21:57,680 Speaker 1: don't find it personally suspicious, especially since, and this is 393 00:21:57,720 --> 00:22:00,520 Speaker 1: again consistent against all of these articles, they find people 394 00:22:00,520 --> 00:22:02,439 Speaker 1: who are like, yeah, she would speak positively of Biden, 395 00:22:03,000 --> 00:22:05,520 Speaker 1: but more often she would speak positibively of her time 396 00:22:05,520 --> 00:22:09,200 Speaker 1: in his office and the things accomplished by that she did. 397 00:22:09,359 --> 00:22:12,240 Speaker 1: It sounds like she's had a hard life. Of course, 398 00:22:12,640 --> 00:22:16,120 Speaker 1: working for a famous senator was a highlight of her career. 399 00:22:16,280 --> 00:22:22,119 Speaker 1: Are you yeah talking about your career along those lines. 400 00:22:22,320 --> 00:22:25,080 Speaker 1: I get frustrated by a lot of the talking points. 401 00:22:25,080 --> 00:22:27,760 Speaker 1: And again, maybe something will come out and blow all 402 00:22:27,800 --> 00:22:29,760 Speaker 1: of this out of the water and we'll be completely wrong. 403 00:22:30,119 --> 00:22:33,159 Speaker 1: But all of these things are so flimsy to me 404 00:22:33,320 --> 00:22:38,400 Speaker 1: because it's common for stories of sexual assault victims to change. 405 00:22:38,720 --> 00:22:41,359 Speaker 1: You know, there's a lot of reasons why it would 406 00:22:41,400 --> 00:22:43,720 Speaker 1: be too hard to remember. It could be that they 407 00:22:43,760 --> 00:22:46,880 Speaker 1: don't think that they would be believed. Maybe they don't 408 00:22:46,880 --> 00:22:50,840 Speaker 1: want to talk about it. And again, that was clearly 409 00:22:51,359 --> 00:22:54,840 Speaker 1: a high point of her career, because you know she 410 00:22:54,920 --> 00:22:58,120 Speaker 1: struggled since then there's even Katie, there's a quote from 411 00:22:58,200 --> 00:23:01,000 Speaker 1: a one of her landladies who was also a psychologist, 412 00:23:01,240 --> 00:23:04,320 Speaker 1: UM that actually speaks to that UM where this woman 413 00:23:04,440 --> 00:23:06,439 Speaker 1: noted quote she presented it as I can get my 414 00:23:06,480 --> 00:23:08,679 Speaker 1: life together. I worked for Joe Biden, I had a 415 00:23:08,720 --> 00:23:11,679 Speaker 1: really high level job. I have that capacity, which totally 416 00:23:11,720 --> 00:23:17,080 Speaker 1: makes sense. It's really heartbreaking. Yeah, it's very sad. Um. Yeah. 417 00:23:17,320 --> 00:23:19,520 Speaker 1: And also like in some of the situation, especially with 418 00:23:19,560 --> 00:23:21,679 Speaker 1: someone like Joe Biden, like a big like you're I 419 00:23:21,680 --> 00:23:23,760 Speaker 1: don't know, you're working in this guy's office, Like you're 420 00:23:23,800 --> 00:23:27,080 Speaker 1: not necessarily going to perceive it as like a sexual 421 00:23:27,080 --> 00:23:34,760 Speaker 1: assault situation necessarily right away, right, a rationalized stuff way yeah. Um, 422 00:23:34,800 --> 00:23:37,840 Speaker 1: and just the idea that like, well she didn't tell 423 00:23:37,880 --> 00:23:42,800 Speaker 1: everybody right away that she knew kind of um about this, 424 00:23:43,000 --> 00:23:45,320 Speaker 1: Like I don't know, it's it's very frustrating to see 425 00:23:45,320 --> 00:23:49,639 Speaker 1: that uh go that way when um, if it were 426 00:23:49,640 --> 00:23:53,200 Speaker 1: anyone else or about anyone else, that wouldn't be it. Um. Also, 427 00:23:53,280 --> 00:23:58,199 Speaker 1: I just find it just one thing. It's it happens 428 00:23:58,200 --> 00:24:00,320 Speaker 1: a lot with a lot of these articles. I seeing 429 00:24:00,320 --> 00:24:03,440 Speaker 1: a lot of these people. That's kind of contradictory, where 430 00:24:03,480 --> 00:24:06,840 Speaker 1: like you were saying, how oh yeah, all these people 431 00:24:08,040 --> 00:24:10,520 Speaker 1: heard her talk about how what a great time she 432 00:24:10,520 --> 00:24:14,400 Speaker 1: hadn't Biden's office, But she also said that she had 433 00:24:14,400 --> 00:24:16,280 Speaker 1: a really high level position and she did a lot 434 00:24:16,320 --> 00:24:18,760 Speaker 1: of this stuff when she actually didn't. So like they're 435 00:24:18,800 --> 00:24:22,800 Speaker 1: presenting this situation where like, see, she's saying that she 436 00:24:22,880 --> 00:24:25,639 Speaker 1: had a great time there, which was the truth, but 437 00:24:25,720 --> 00:24:28,399 Speaker 1: she also said that she had a high level position, 438 00:24:28,440 --> 00:24:32,679 Speaker 1: which was false. So like, wait, which is she lying about? 439 00:24:32,840 --> 00:24:36,119 Speaker 1: Which one? Like? Which one? Maybe which she has a 440 00:24:36,200 --> 00:24:40,480 Speaker 1: history of needing to like of She's she's had a 441 00:24:40,520 --> 00:24:43,280 Speaker 1: fucking rough few years and she has a history of 442 00:24:44,160 --> 00:24:46,720 Speaker 1: building up this chunk of her life because it's something 443 00:24:46,760 --> 00:24:48,520 Speaker 1: that she can brag about to other people with a 444 00:24:48,560 --> 00:24:50,760 Speaker 1: guy who was very famous at the time. Come on, 445 00:24:50,840 --> 00:24:53,359 Speaker 1: do we not know people? Do we not recognize that 446 00:24:53,440 --> 00:24:56,679 Speaker 1: instinct in ourselves at some point? Yeah, it's just in 447 00:24:56,720 --> 00:24:59,679 Speaker 1: the same breath, presenting those two things as like seeing 448 00:24:59,760 --> 00:25:02,480 Speaker 1: here is both and there they oppose each other in 449 00:25:02,600 --> 00:25:04,440 Speaker 1: terms of the argument they're trying to make. One of 450 00:25:04,480 --> 00:25:07,959 Speaker 1: the things I recognize this from is just people. Trauma 451 00:25:08,000 --> 00:25:10,000 Speaker 1: sucks up your your memory. I can say that as 452 00:25:10,040 --> 00:25:11,920 Speaker 1: someone who's deck with PTSD. I can also say that 453 00:25:11,920 --> 00:25:13,240 Speaker 1: as having I have an experience that I think is 454 00:25:13,280 --> 00:25:15,479 Speaker 1: really relevant here. I have a good friend who was 455 00:25:15,880 --> 00:25:17,440 Speaker 1: who was a marine and with you know, one of 456 00:25:17,440 --> 00:25:18,920 Speaker 1: the first units. I have a couple actually, one of 457 00:25:18,920 --> 00:25:20,840 Speaker 1: the first units into Iraq, and I've gone. I went 458 00:25:20,880 --> 00:25:23,399 Speaker 1: to their their anniversary hike. They do a hike up 459 00:25:23,440 --> 00:25:26,960 Speaker 1: this mountain in San Diego, and they like it was 460 00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:29,399 Speaker 1: like them and all of their their comrades and stuff 461 00:25:29,400 --> 00:25:31,200 Speaker 1: that who had been like in really heavy combat, a 462 00:25:31,240 --> 00:25:32,840 Speaker 1: lot of them wounded together, and they were all just 463 00:25:32,880 --> 00:25:35,359 Speaker 1: talking about ship. And one of the most interesting things 464 00:25:35,400 --> 00:25:37,879 Speaker 1: was hearing someone tell a story and then going over 465 00:25:37,920 --> 00:25:40,159 Speaker 1: to my friend or both of my friends and then 466 00:25:40,160 --> 00:25:42,120 Speaker 1: being like, no, it didn't happen that way, like he's 467 00:25:42,119 --> 00:25:44,320 Speaker 1: either lying or he's misremembered. This is actually what happened. 468 00:25:44,359 --> 00:25:48,320 Speaker 1: And that happening constantly with almost everybody's stories and other 469 00:25:48,359 --> 00:25:50,240 Speaker 1: people saying like, no, that's not what happened, or this 470 00:25:50,280 --> 00:25:52,680 Speaker 1: happened like oh they've been lying about that for years, 471 00:25:52,760 --> 00:25:55,480 Speaker 1: or they just remember that. And like I remember my 472 00:25:55,520 --> 00:25:57,359 Speaker 1: friends saying to me like, I don't even think a 473 00:25:57,440 --> 00:26:00,440 Speaker 1: lot of them realize that what there's because there's stuff 474 00:26:00,520 --> 00:26:03,040 Speaker 1: stuff like people got awards for ship that other people 475 00:26:03,119 --> 00:26:05,480 Speaker 1: did and multiple members of the unit would be like, yeah, 476 00:26:05,520 --> 00:26:07,239 Speaker 1: that's what he got the award for. But it was 477 00:26:07,280 --> 00:26:10,520 Speaker 1: this person who didn't um, and it's just like it's 478 00:26:10,640 --> 00:26:12,320 Speaker 1: like and yeah again, my friend was like I don't 479 00:26:12,320 --> 00:26:14,440 Speaker 1: even know if they're lying, Like it's just what like 480 00:26:14,560 --> 00:26:17,040 Speaker 1: you you tell yourself that's what happened for so long, 481 00:26:17,119 --> 00:26:19,560 Speaker 1: Like it was such a chaotic time, like it it's 482 00:26:19,680 --> 00:26:23,399 Speaker 1: it's fucking it's traumatic and people people are bad at 483 00:26:23,440 --> 00:26:27,160 Speaker 1: remembering things period. That one of the things that Sereal 484 00:26:27,280 --> 00:26:29,800 Speaker 1: did best the original podcast, that very first episode is 485 00:26:29,800 --> 00:26:32,480 Speaker 1: pointed out like think back to something eight years ago, 486 00:26:32,640 --> 00:26:34,919 Speaker 1: how much do you really know about what happened? Then 487 00:26:35,000 --> 00:26:38,760 Speaker 1: of course her story has like like people's memories are flawed, 488 00:26:38,840 --> 00:26:41,240 Speaker 1: especially in times of trauma. So there's a couple of 489 00:26:41,240 --> 00:26:43,720 Speaker 1: things as we finish off the political article that are 490 00:26:43,760 --> 00:26:46,600 Speaker 1: interesting to me. One of the things is like, yeah, 491 00:26:46,680 --> 00:26:48,640 Speaker 1: the fact that like they go through this article which 492 00:26:48,680 --> 00:26:51,920 Speaker 1: is just all about basically landlords that she like either 493 00:26:52,040 --> 00:26:55,960 Speaker 1: screwed out of some rent or like loaned money from, um, 494 00:26:56,200 --> 00:26:59,480 Speaker 1: all that stuff. Like there's there's people who have those 495 00:26:59,520 --> 00:27:01,800 Speaker 1: bad worries that have nothing to do about sexual assault. 496 00:27:01,800 --> 00:27:04,040 Speaker 1: And then also a bunch of people like this psychologist 497 00:27:04,119 --> 00:27:06,480 Speaker 1: she rented a room from who said that she Tara 498 00:27:06,520 --> 00:27:09,080 Speaker 1: confided a lot in her and never talked about sexual assault. 499 00:27:09,280 --> 00:27:12,840 Speaker 1: And then in one paragraph, the author of this political 500 00:27:12,920 --> 00:27:15,760 Speaker 1: article notes a former neighbor, however, told Business Insider that 501 00:27:15,800 --> 00:27:17,800 Speaker 1: Reads spoke of the assault in the mid nineteen nineties. 502 00:27:17,840 --> 00:27:19,639 Speaker 1: A work colleague from around the same time told the 503 00:27:19,680 --> 00:27:22,639 Speaker 1: publication that Read complained of her sexual harassment in Biden's office. 504 00:27:22,800 --> 00:27:25,480 Speaker 1: A document filed by Read sex husband in nine also 505 00:27:25,520 --> 00:27:28,080 Speaker 1: states that Read had complained of harassment. That's basically sucking 506 00:27:28,119 --> 00:27:31,200 Speaker 1: it um, which is like, oh, so, it's not that 507 00:27:31,240 --> 00:27:34,000 Speaker 1: she was only ever saying positive things about Joe Biden. 508 00:27:34,080 --> 00:27:36,359 Speaker 1: It's that she didn't confide about the worst event in 509 00:27:36,400 --> 00:27:41,040 Speaker 1: her life to every landlord she ever had. That's the tera. 510 00:27:41,119 --> 00:27:43,119 Speaker 1: Read is a bad person to rent a room to 511 00:27:43,320 --> 00:27:46,000 Speaker 1: and doesn't tell landlords about her sexual assault. Oh no, 512 00:27:46,200 --> 00:27:49,040 Speaker 1: that makes that like that has very frustrated by the 513 00:27:49,040 --> 00:27:53,080 Speaker 1: Politico article. I think it is a bad article that specifically, 514 00:27:53,680 --> 00:27:56,960 Speaker 1: I mean outside of the fact of obviously she wouldn't 515 00:27:57,160 --> 00:28:00,960 Speaker 1: confide that to a landlord, you know, something that she 516 00:28:01,000 --> 00:28:04,720 Speaker 1: doesn't trust. But yeah, that's a landlords the person that 517 00:28:04,800 --> 00:28:07,600 Speaker 1: you would brag about having worked for Joe Biden to, 518 00:28:08,359 --> 00:28:14,320 Speaker 1: and especially at that time, Victims of sexual assault or 519 00:28:14,640 --> 00:28:19,879 Speaker 1: you know, harassment. We're not respected. That is one of 520 00:28:19,920 --> 00:28:22,879 Speaker 1: time when somebody would have said, like, well that makes sense, 521 00:28:23,280 --> 00:28:26,959 Speaker 1: you know, I bet you asked for it. Yeah, and 522 00:28:27,000 --> 00:28:30,640 Speaker 1: it's it's like, I mean, yeah, I'm just so frustrated 523 00:28:30,640 --> 00:28:33,359 Speaker 1: by the whole lying to landlords thing being a mark 524 00:28:33,400 --> 00:28:35,919 Speaker 1: against her because like, I have so many friends that 525 00:28:35,960 --> 00:28:38,240 Speaker 1: will do ship like photoshop their credit score so that 526 00:28:38,240 --> 00:28:39,720 Speaker 1: they can get because she don't want to yet you 527 00:28:39,800 --> 00:28:42,400 Speaker 1: want to get the apartment right, Like, it's not uncommon 528 00:28:42,440 --> 00:28:45,840 Speaker 1: to light to landlords. Um. And also most of my 529 00:28:45,920 --> 00:28:49,480 Speaker 1: landlords were liars. I've had to, like to tell I've 530 00:28:49,480 --> 00:28:52,960 Speaker 1: had to talk to like Los Angeles County inspectors and 531 00:28:53,040 --> 00:28:56,840 Speaker 1: like convince them not to report things about the building 532 00:28:56,840 --> 00:28:59,480 Speaker 1: that were illegal because the rent was low and even 533 00:28:59,480 --> 00:29:01,400 Speaker 1: though the place was a fire hazard, I didn't want 534 00:29:01,400 --> 00:29:05,920 Speaker 1: to get kicked out. Like that's fucking life, man. Um, 535 00:29:05,960 --> 00:29:09,160 Speaker 1: It's I hate this now. The the PBS article, which 536 00:29:09,160 --> 00:29:12,680 Speaker 1: we're gonna move on to, is a lot better, um 537 00:29:12,720 --> 00:29:15,400 Speaker 1: for one thing. So again, I think fundamentally the political 538 00:29:15,480 --> 00:29:18,240 Speaker 1: article is kind of irresponsible because you're you're you're you're 539 00:29:18,280 --> 00:29:22,280 Speaker 1: focusing on like random, unrelated bad stuff that this person 540 00:29:22,360 --> 00:29:23,880 Speaker 1: might have done that has nothing to do with their 541 00:29:23,880 --> 00:29:27,240 Speaker 1: credibility and a sexual assault allegation. The PBS article is 542 00:29:27,320 --> 00:29:30,800 Speaker 1: very different. They speak with seventy four former Biden staffers, 543 00:29:30,840 --> 00:29:34,160 Speaker 1: of whom sixty two were women, UM, to talk about 544 00:29:34,160 --> 00:29:36,160 Speaker 1: his behavior towards women over the course of his career, 545 00:29:36,200 --> 00:29:38,120 Speaker 1: how they see the allegations and if there's evidence of 546 00:29:38,120 --> 00:29:41,400 Speaker 1: a larger pattern. That is a responsible way to pursue 547 00:29:41,440 --> 00:29:44,320 Speaker 1: an article like this, Um, that is something that should 548 00:29:44,320 --> 00:29:46,680 Speaker 1: be done when allegations like this are made, especially since 549 00:29:46,680 --> 00:29:50,160 Speaker 1: there's already seven or eight women who alleged inappropriate touching 550 00:29:50,160 --> 00:29:53,000 Speaker 1: by Joe Biden. So yeah, from the start, I think 551 00:29:53,000 --> 00:29:56,040 Speaker 1: this is like a responsible thing for a news outlet 552 00:29:56,080 --> 00:29:58,160 Speaker 1: to cover, right. Um. I don't know if there's any 553 00:29:58,200 --> 00:30:00,200 Speaker 1: disagreement with that, but it seems like a reasonable set 554 00:30:00,200 --> 00:30:03,040 Speaker 1: a questions to ask, Right, Okay, Uh, he's been accused 555 00:30:03,080 --> 00:30:05,400 Speaker 1: of inappropriate behavior to women. Let's talk to every woman 556 00:30:05,400 --> 00:30:07,040 Speaker 1: who worked for him. We can find and see what 557 00:30:07,080 --> 00:30:11,719 Speaker 1: have they think? Like that that that makes sense to me, absolutely, yeah, um, 558 00:30:11,720 --> 00:30:13,400 Speaker 1: And I'm gonna quote from that now. None of the 559 00:30:13,400 --> 00:30:16,240 Speaker 1: people interviewed said that they had experienced sexual harassment assaulter 560 00:30:16,360 --> 00:30:18,640 Speaker 1: misconduct by Biden. All said that they had never heard 561 00:30:18,640 --> 00:30:21,440 Speaker 1: any rumors or allegations of Biden engaging in sexual misconduct 562 00:30:21,480 --> 00:30:23,920 Speaker 1: until the recent assault allegation made by Terror Reid. Former 563 00:30:23,920 --> 00:30:26,320 Speaker 1: staffer said they believed Reid should be heard and acknowledged 564 00:30:26,360 --> 00:30:29,600 Speaker 1: that their experiences do not disprove her accusation. Over All, 565 00:30:29,640 --> 00:30:31,880 Speaker 1: the people who spoke to The News Hour described largely 566 00:30:31,880 --> 00:30:34,760 Speaker 1: positive and gratifying experiences working for Biden, painting a portrait 567 00:30:34,800 --> 00:30:36,480 Speaker 1: of someone who was ahead of his time and empowering 568 00:30:36,480 --> 00:30:40,320 Speaker 1: women in the workplace. And I think, guys, this is 569 00:30:40,360 --> 00:30:42,640 Speaker 1: the point at which we should all talk a little 570 00:30:42,640 --> 00:30:46,360 Speaker 1: bit about a former colleague of ours. UM. A guy 571 00:30:46,400 --> 00:30:49,640 Speaker 1: who had a reputation for writing very woke articles, including 572 00:30:49,720 --> 00:30:53,200 Speaker 1: articles with survivors of sexual assault. UM. A guy who 573 00:30:53,240 --> 00:30:57,240 Speaker 1: had a really good reputation online uh, in terms of 574 00:30:57,280 --> 00:31:01,320 Speaker 1: being like a progressive and pro women advocate. A guy who, 575 00:31:01,360 --> 00:31:04,640 Speaker 1: if allegations about his own sexual misconduct had not come out, 576 00:31:04,920 --> 00:31:07,680 Speaker 1: would probably have been trying to get in on the 577 00:31:07,680 --> 00:31:10,680 Speaker 1: whole writing about me two stories thing. UM. I think 578 00:31:10,720 --> 00:31:12,280 Speaker 1: we all know who that is. I don't know that 579 00:31:12,320 --> 00:31:13,960 Speaker 1: we need to share his name, but some we worked 580 00:31:13,960 --> 00:31:16,440 Speaker 1: with it cracked, you could find it if, like his 581 00:31:16,480 --> 00:31:19,240 Speaker 1: accusers have have made their allegations public, it will not 582 00:31:19,320 --> 00:31:22,479 Speaker 1: be hard to track this down if you want. Um, 583 00:31:22,600 --> 00:31:25,920 Speaker 1: he was somebody who had a good relations with like 584 00:31:26,000 --> 00:31:28,240 Speaker 1: even after so one of the things that made this 585 00:31:28,280 --> 00:31:31,240 Speaker 1: situation stressful working with him is that like a chunk 586 00:31:31,240 --> 00:31:35,400 Speaker 1: of the office found out that he had sexually assaulted 587 00:31:35,520 --> 00:31:40,160 Speaker 1: and physically abused a couple of different UM women, UM 588 00:31:40,200 --> 00:31:43,200 Speaker 1: before the other half of the office did, and for 589 00:31:43,240 --> 00:31:47,080 Speaker 1: a variety of reasons including um there being laws about 590 00:31:47,120 --> 00:31:50,560 Speaker 1: hostile work environments and stuff. Uh, there was a period 591 00:31:50,560 --> 00:31:53,640 Speaker 1: of time where not everyone in the office knew about 592 00:31:53,680 --> 00:31:56,560 Speaker 1: what had happened, and he continued to have good relationships 593 00:31:56,560 --> 00:31:58,800 Speaker 1: with a number of women he worked with in that 594 00:31:58,880 --> 00:32:01,360 Speaker 1: office who were shocked when the obligations were made public. 595 00:32:01,560 --> 00:32:05,120 Speaker 1: That is a thing that happened, and it happens a lot, absolutely, 596 00:32:07,000 --> 00:32:10,840 Speaker 1: you guys. People weren't allowed to talk about it, you know, 597 00:32:11,000 --> 00:32:16,040 Speaker 1: it was even even uh, which is so surprising and weird, Like, 598 00:32:17,280 --> 00:32:19,640 Speaker 1: because you want to be able to protect people, you 599 00:32:19,680 --> 00:32:23,160 Speaker 1: know legally you do, and you also like you don't 600 00:32:23,200 --> 00:32:24,880 Speaker 1: want this person that you just learned about doing a 601 00:32:24,880 --> 00:32:27,960 Speaker 1: horrible thing to make, you know, a million dollars because 602 00:32:27,960 --> 00:32:30,320 Speaker 1: of a hostile work environment suits. So you you listen 603 00:32:30,400 --> 00:32:33,040 Speaker 1: to the lawyers and you you hope that that's the 604 00:32:33,160 --> 00:32:34,760 Speaker 1: right thing to do, and then you spend the rest 605 00:32:34,800 --> 00:32:36,480 Speaker 1: of your life wondering was that the right thing to do. 606 00:32:37,240 --> 00:32:40,440 Speaker 1: And that's not to say that that's necessarily what happened 607 00:32:40,440 --> 00:32:42,640 Speaker 1: to here, but it easily could have been. You know, 608 00:32:43,040 --> 00:32:46,600 Speaker 1: there's you know, it's it's more to make the point, 609 00:32:46,640 --> 00:32:48,440 Speaker 1: a lot of women will say, and I don't think 610 00:32:48,440 --> 00:32:50,640 Speaker 1: they're liars, are doing this for their career, that Joe 611 00:32:50,680 --> 00:32:53,480 Speaker 1: Biden was one of the very best people to work 612 00:32:53,480 --> 00:32:55,520 Speaker 1: with on Capitol Hill if you were a woman in 613 00:32:55,640 --> 00:32:58,680 Speaker 1: like the nineties, in eighties and stuff like, he was 614 00:32:58,720 --> 00:33:01,520 Speaker 1: ahead of his time. He did a great job of 615 00:33:02,480 --> 00:33:05,479 Speaker 1: making these women feel valued. And I don't think that 616 00:33:05,640 --> 00:33:07,760 Speaker 1: they're lying about that for the sake of their career, 617 00:33:07,800 --> 00:33:09,760 Speaker 1: because there's a lot of women who are very consistent 618 00:33:09,800 --> 00:33:13,480 Speaker 1: about that. And that is relevant because it does speak 619 00:33:13,480 --> 00:33:16,720 Speaker 1: to his character, but it's also it's also something whereby 620 00:33:16,800 --> 00:33:18,880 Speaker 1: there have been a number of people who have committed 621 00:33:18,920 --> 00:33:22,720 Speaker 1: rape and who have also had great like engaging in 622 00:33:22,800 --> 00:33:26,120 Speaker 1: positive work relationships with women that they didn't ripe and 623 00:33:27,000 --> 00:33:31,240 Speaker 1: absolutely and you know what else is relevant? Uh, that 624 00:33:31,280 --> 00:33:36,719 Speaker 1: doesn't get talked about enough, I think, Katie, because god no, 625 00:33:36,960 --> 00:33:42,120 Speaker 1: but it you know who else? Um No, it's the 626 00:33:42,200 --> 00:33:48,720 Speaker 1: way he treated and handled Anita Hill, a sexual assault 627 00:33:48,920 --> 00:33:56,280 Speaker 1: in the workplace case and this time around is not 628 00:33:56,400 --> 00:34:01,000 Speaker 1: often brought up in general, but deafly not in regards 629 00:34:01,040 --> 00:34:03,560 Speaker 1: to this again, and I can't say this is enough 630 00:34:04,200 --> 00:34:08,880 Speaker 1: around the same time, you know, yeah, and that's you know, 631 00:34:08,920 --> 00:34:11,759 Speaker 1: there's the PBS news article. News hour article is much 632 00:34:11,800 --> 00:34:14,280 Speaker 1: better than the political article, but it's also very flawed. 633 00:34:14,280 --> 00:34:15,920 Speaker 1: And then I think is one of the reasons why 634 00:34:15,960 --> 00:34:17,879 Speaker 1: it's very flawed, and others that it doesn't talk about 635 00:34:17,920 --> 00:34:21,319 Speaker 1: Joe's own history of lying about his past, although it's 636 00:34:21,320 --> 00:34:25,640 Speaker 1: not really Yeah, I think that's relevant, as I find 637 00:34:25,719 --> 00:34:28,440 Speaker 1: weird Like in the quote, and forgive me if I 638 00:34:28,680 --> 00:34:32,120 Speaker 1: didn't quite catch the exact wording, but like it said 639 00:34:32,160 --> 00:34:34,560 Speaker 1: that all the women didn't have any inkling of like 640 00:34:34,600 --> 00:34:38,120 Speaker 1: any sort of sexual harassment claims until terror read but 641 00:34:38,280 --> 00:34:43,479 Speaker 1: like sexual misconduct. But okay, but that's the year ago. 642 00:34:43,920 --> 00:34:47,440 Speaker 1: There were all these sexual misconduct allegations, well, there were 643 00:34:47,440 --> 00:34:51,320 Speaker 1: allegations of inappropriate touching. I guess they might be saying that, like, well, 644 00:34:51,360 --> 00:34:57,799 Speaker 1: that's not the same as yeah. Yeah, it's frustrating. A 645 00:34:57,800 --> 00:35:02,399 Speaker 1: lot of these articles will not even bother defining these 646 00:35:02,840 --> 00:35:06,879 Speaker 1: terms or like making distinctions work, like talking about that 647 00:35:06,960 --> 00:35:10,840 Speaker 1: in the right context from Yeah, most of them are. Yeah, 648 00:35:11,000 --> 00:35:15,319 Speaker 1: inappropriately touching should be considered sexual miscon that's sexual Yeah, 649 00:35:15,480 --> 00:35:18,520 Speaker 1: where are not? Like, Okay, we can have the argument 650 00:35:19,040 --> 00:35:24,000 Speaker 1: if you if we must. Yeah, it doesn't understand stand Oh, 651 00:35:24,040 --> 00:35:27,440 Speaker 1: I know you're not. I just mean in general. People 652 00:35:27,520 --> 00:35:30,440 Speaker 1: can say like, oh, but Joe Biden doesn't He didn't 653 00:35:30,520 --> 00:35:34,640 Speaker 1: mean it like that. Yeah, okay, the rules of change, Katie, 654 00:35:34,640 --> 00:35:39,840 Speaker 1: did you hear the rules have changed? Weird? But yeah. Yeah, 655 00:35:40,080 --> 00:35:46,240 Speaker 1: like walking up to like a colleague from behind and uh, 656 00:35:46,280 --> 00:35:48,640 Speaker 1: like putting your hands on their head and then kissing 657 00:35:48,680 --> 00:35:51,520 Speaker 1: the back of their head while sniffing their hair. That's 658 00:35:51,520 --> 00:35:55,400 Speaker 1: sexual misconduct. That's what that is. Yeah, it is, and 659 00:35:55,440 --> 00:35:57,880 Speaker 1: it's um, I don't know. We'll talk more about that 660 00:35:57,920 --> 00:36:01,280 Speaker 1: in a little bit. Um. There's allegations from Ben Savage, 661 00:36:01,280 --> 00:36:04,759 Speaker 1: who who worked next to read, that she wasn't forced 662 00:36:04,760 --> 00:36:07,080 Speaker 1: out of her job in retaliation for sexual harassment, that 663 00:36:07,120 --> 00:36:09,239 Speaker 1: she was just kind of bad at the job, um 664 00:36:09,280 --> 00:36:12,480 Speaker 1: and flaky, which totally possible. Like, and it's possible that 665 00:36:12,560 --> 00:36:16,040 Speaker 1: like again, this not isn't even necessarily an area where 666 00:36:16,040 --> 00:36:19,000 Speaker 1: there's there's lying. She may have both. She may both 667 00:36:19,120 --> 00:36:21,920 Speaker 1: honestly feel she was forced out because of her sexual 668 00:36:21,960 --> 00:36:26,400 Speaker 1: harassment claims, and also her colleagues may feel that she 669 00:36:26,520 --> 00:36:28,160 Speaker 1: just wasn't very good at her job. Both of those 670 00:36:28,200 --> 00:36:30,040 Speaker 1: things could be true. I don't know. It sounds like 671 00:36:30,120 --> 00:36:33,120 Speaker 1: maybe she was a bad worker. She might be. Yeah, 672 00:36:33,200 --> 00:36:39,160 Speaker 1: but a perspective thing too, because especially when this allegedly happened, like, yeah, 673 00:36:39,200 --> 00:36:42,640 Speaker 1: that guy's not gonna like he's not gonna aware of 674 00:36:42,680 --> 00:36:45,360 Speaker 1: sexual harassment going on, like and no one like, no 675 00:36:45,800 --> 00:36:48,120 Speaker 1: man in that air, So who's getting you know, I 676 00:36:48,160 --> 00:36:50,759 Speaker 1: don't know. It's maybe if she was, if she is 677 00:36:50,800 --> 00:36:53,280 Speaker 1: the victim of this kind of trauma, maybe she started 678 00:36:53,320 --> 00:36:55,600 Speaker 1: not doing such a great job at work because she 679 00:36:55,640 --> 00:36:58,359 Speaker 1: was traumatized, and all this guy would know is like, boy, 680 00:36:58,440 --> 00:37:00,839 Speaker 1: she's really not pulling her way, Like she's not gonna 681 00:37:00,880 --> 00:37:02,840 Speaker 1: confide in to him. He just a guy who sits 682 00:37:02,880 --> 00:37:06,080 Speaker 1: next to her, Like, yeah, that's totally possible. Now. One 683 00:37:06,120 --> 00:37:08,360 Speaker 1: of the things that I do think that's interesting is 684 00:37:08,400 --> 00:37:11,680 Speaker 1: the her claims about like being asked to um a 685 00:37:11,760 --> 00:37:14,600 Speaker 1: period of fundraiser because one of Biden's colleagues thought she 686 00:37:14,680 --> 00:37:18,279 Speaker 1: was hot um and serve drinks um. And this is 687 00:37:18,280 --> 00:37:20,719 Speaker 1: something that I think is very relevant. PBS News articles 688 00:37:20,760 --> 00:37:23,640 Speaker 1: notes quote more than fifty former staffers said they didn't 689 00:37:23,640 --> 00:37:26,400 Speaker 1: remember ever attending a fundraiser for Biden in Washington, d C. 690 00:37:26,560 --> 00:37:28,120 Speaker 1: Which is where read says this one was when they 691 00:37:28,120 --> 00:37:29,719 Speaker 1: were on his Senate staff, and some are called an 692 00:37:29,719 --> 00:37:32,319 Speaker 1: office policy banning most of Biden's Senate staff from doing 693 00:37:32,360 --> 00:37:35,560 Speaker 1: campaign work. Further, two men who worked as junior staffers 694 00:37:35,560 --> 00:37:38,320 Speaker 1: for Biden said the senator specifically did not want women 695 00:37:38,400 --> 00:37:41,880 Speaker 1: serve to serve beverages like coffee or perform other menial tasks, 696 00:37:41,880 --> 00:37:44,200 Speaker 1: and his Senate office, around the committees he chaired, men 697 00:37:44,239 --> 00:37:47,040 Speaker 1: were typically asked to perform such tasks. He didn't want 698 00:37:47,080 --> 00:37:48,960 Speaker 1: the image of a young woman's staff or serving him, 699 00:37:48,960 --> 00:37:52,520 Speaker 1: said John Earnhardt, who took over reads duties. So yeah, 700 00:37:52,560 --> 00:37:54,840 Speaker 1: I don't. I don't know that is that strikes me 701 00:37:54,840 --> 00:37:56,600 Speaker 1: as a relevant thing to talk about, like this, this 702 00:37:56,680 --> 00:37:59,120 Speaker 1: fact that like other people don't recall the same kind 703 00:37:59,120 --> 00:38:02,600 Speaker 1: of event, that she was supposedly at um and that 704 00:38:02,680 --> 00:38:04,759 Speaker 1: he didn't have a habit of asking women to serve 705 00:38:04,840 --> 00:38:07,000 Speaker 1: drinks at these I do think that's a relevant point 706 00:38:07,080 --> 00:38:09,600 Speaker 1: to bring up. It's obviously not conclusive one way or 707 00:38:09,640 --> 00:38:11,560 Speaker 1: the other, but I would call that as an example 708 00:38:11,600 --> 00:38:15,040 Speaker 1: as opposed to talking to her former landlords. I think 709 00:38:15,080 --> 00:38:18,399 Speaker 1: that's an example of a relevant relevant that's slightly more 710 00:38:18,400 --> 00:38:20,680 Speaker 1: relevant than whether or not you could make rent twenty 711 00:38:20,760 --> 00:38:24,360 Speaker 1: years ago. Yeah, I think it's time to take an 712 00:38:24,400 --> 00:38:28,520 Speaker 1: ad break. Yes, yes, you know. It's also relevant to 713 00:38:28,560 --> 00:38:34,040 Speaker 1: allegations of Nope, nope, nope, that's not that we no, no, no, Jesus, 714 00:38:34,760 --> 00:38:43,960 Speaker 1: oh boy. But products and services are good. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, 715 00:38:41,600 --> 00:38:56,760 Speaker 1: well together ere back were good. They were they were great. 716 00:38:57,640 --> 00:39:02,919 Speaker 1: I thankfully not relevant to the topic. No never. So yeah, 717 00:39:03,080 --> 00:39:04,800 Speaker 1: there's another quote in here that I find relevant that 718 00:39:04,840 --> 00:39:07,040 Speaker 1: I'm gonna read from now. Quote Victoria Nourse, who so 719 00:39:07,280 --> 00:39:09,960 Speaker 1: served as Biden's top lawyer in the Judiciary Committee in 720 00:39:09,960 --> 00:39:12,279 Speaker 1: the early nineteen ninies, were called Biden's reaction when another 721 00:39:12,320 --> 00:39:14,200 Speaker 1: official made a comment about her looks in front of 722 00:39:14,239 --> 00:39:16,880 Speaker 1: Biden during a flight in nine. The man said, O 723 00:39:17,080 --> 00:39:19,120 Speaker 1: Joe let me sit next to the pretty girl recalled 724 00:39:19,200 --> 00:39:21,279 Speaker 1: nurse who later served as Biden's chief counsel in the 725 00:39:21,280 --> 00:39:24,080 Speaker 1: White House. Biden told the man off Nor said, making 726 00:39:24,080 --> 00:39:25,799 Speaker 1: it clear that we were here for work and that 727 00:39:25,800 --> 00:39:29,440 Speaker 1: that was inappropriate in a very no nonsense way. Um. 728 00:39:29,480 --> 00:39:32,440 Speaker 1: So that's that's good. That's that's again a relevant thing 729 00:39:32,520 --> 00:39:36,080 Speaker 1: to bring up. Um. It is also, however, brought up 730 00:39:36,080 --> 00:39:38,880 Speaker 1: in this article, to its credit, that like they're interviewing 731 00:39:38,880 --> 00:39:41,439 Speaker 1: a bunch of former and like people who have worked 732 00:39:41,440 --> 00:39:43,279 Speaker 1: with Biden and who have a reason to believe they 733 00:39:43,360 --> 00:39:45,680 Speaker 1: might get hired in a Biden white House, which is 734 00:39:45,719 --> 00:39:47,759 Speaker 1: also irrelevant thing to bring up. So I'm glad they 735 00:39:47,800 --> 00:39:50,719 Speaker 1: did bring that up. That's that's a good to day, right, 736 00:39:50,760 --> 00:39:52,640 Speaker 1: That's that's what you want out of these articles, where 737 00:39:52,680 --> 00:39:56,200 Speaker 1: it's like, yeah, here's this thing, but also here's some 738 00:39:56,239 --> 00:40:00,799 Speaker 1: context for you. Um yeah. And there's there's reasons to 739 00:40:00,840 --> 00:40:03,640 Speaker 1: critique the people and which we have critique the PBS article. 740 00:40:03,640 --> 00:40:05,040 Speaker 1: But again I do want to state I don't think 741 00:40:05,080 --> 00:40:08,319 Speaker 1: it is as like an irresponsible article. Um, I just 742 00:40:08,360 --> 00:40:12,040 Speaker 1: think it's imperfect. So um yeah, and there's another I 743 00:40:12,040 --> 00:40:14,640 Speaker 1: think probably the most relevant thing this article notes is 744 00:40:14,640 --> 00:40:17,280 Speaker 1: is it talks with Liz Tanker's Lee, who was Biden's 745 00:40:17,320 --> 00:40:21,080 Speaker 1: legislative director from nine to nine nine. Um And was 746 00:40:21,160 --> 00:40:23,280 Speaker 1: also part of a group of women who put together 747 00:40:23,360 --> 00:40:26,760 Speaker 1: a list of problematic men on Capitol Hill for other women. 748 00:40:27,000 --> 00:40:28,200 Speaker 1: It was kind of like, we have one of these 749 00:40:28,200 --> 00:40:33,279 Speaker 1: circulating in Los Angeles right where it's like network. Yeah, 750 00:40:33,400 --> 00:40:35,880 Speaker 1: these are people in men in the industry that you 751 00:40:35,880 --> 00:40:38,759 Speaker 1: shouldn't be alone with, you know, um, because they have 752 00:40:39,000 --> 00:40:41,120 Speaker 1: you know, there's been allegations against him with being sketchy 753 00:40:41,120 --> 00:40:43,799 Speaker 1: as shit. Um And Liz said, quote, you got to 754 00:40:43,800 --> 00:40:45,520 Speaker 1: know which senators you didn't want to be on an 755 00:40:45,520 --> 00:40:48,319 Speaker 1: elevator alone with. No one ever said Joe Biden was 756 00:40:48,360 --> 00:40:51,000 Speaker 1: one of them. Um on that list in nineteen nine, 757 00:40:51,000 --> 00:40:54,360 Speaker 1: according to multiple staffers with Senator Bob Packwood, Republican from Oregon. 758 00:40:54,480 --> 00:40:56,600 Speaker 1: He later resigned in nineteen n five after the public 759 00:40:56,640 --> 00:40:58,840 Speaker 1: revelation that he had engaged in years of aggressive sexual 760 00:40:58,840 --> 00:41:02,320 Speaker 1: behavior towards women. Include staffers. The late Senator Strom Thurman, 761 00:41:02,640 --> 00:41:06,239 Speaker 1: Republican South Carolina, was also infamously on the avoid elevator list. 762 00:41:06,280 --> 00:41:09,800 Speaker 1: Staffers claim, so was another nats S lawmaker, Senator Ted Kennedy. 763 00:41:09,840 --> 00:41:14,400 Speaker 1: Democrat from Massachusetts. No surprises there, um, Joe, Joe Biden's 764 00:41:14,400 --> 00:41:17,600 Speaker 1: good buddy strom Thurman. Yeah, and it's it's worth noting. 765 00:41:17,680 --> 00:41:19,359 Speaker 1: So one of the things we're talking about is Joe 766 00:41:19,440 --> 00:41:22,920 Speaker 1: has this absolute and and documented. We know this to 767 00:41:23,000 --> 00:41:25,120 Speaker 1: a point of certainty that he has a history of 768 00:41:25,200 --> 00:41:28,799 Speaker 1: touching people in creepy ways, because there's there's no shortage 769 00:41:28,800 --> 00:41:31,279 Speaker 1: of pictures of him doing it, so we know that 770 00:41:31,280 --> 00:41:34,399 Speaker 1: that's a thing that occurred. But also, I think kind 771 00:41:34,400 --> 00:41:36,080 Speaker 1: of the point this makes is that, like maybe one 772 00:41:36,120 --> 00:41:38,839 Speaker 1: of the reasons why people thought so positively of him 773 00:41:39,000 --> 00:41:42,680 Speaker 1: in relation to this in this period is because he 774 00:41:42,800 --> 00:41:48,319 Speaker 1: wasn't a sexual assaulting Yeah, exactly, he was like not 775 00:41:48,400 --> 00:41:51,360 Speaker 1: in the same Like the bar was really low because 776 00:41:51,400 --> 00:41:53,680 Speaker 1: there were a ton of people who were just outright 777 00:41:53,719 --> 00:41:57,319 Speaker 1: grope on an elevator. Um. Which still leaves a lot 778 00:41:57,360 --> 00:41:59,440 Speaker 1: of room for Joe Biden to do some terrible things, 779 00:41:59,680 --> 00:42:01,480 Speaker 1: um and still be viewed as a good guy by 780 00:42:01,520 --> 00:42:02,920 Speaker 1: most of the people who worked with him because it 781 00:42:02,960 --> 00:42:05,279 Speaker 1: wasn't hard because most of the men on Capitol Hill 782 00:42:05,280 --> 00:42:09,520 Speaker 1: were fucking gross as shit, um, And just like seeming 783 00:42:09,719 --> 00:42:13,239 Speaker 1: not that gross was easy. Yeah. Now there are the 784 00:42:13,239 --> 00:42:15,279 Speaker 1: the at the end of the PBS article does get 785 00:42:15,320 --> 00:42:16,920 Speaker 1: to the fact that some of the people who worked 786 00:42:16,960 --> 00:42:19,200 Speaker 1: with Um, including Burne, one of the women who put 787 00:42:19,200 --> 00:42:21,400 Speaker 1: together his list, knew that there was a history of 788 00:42:21,400 --> 00:42:24,399 Speaker 1: Biden uh he had a habit of touching people when 789 00:42:24,440 --> 00:42:27,080 Speaker 1: interacting with them. We knew that about Biden. He was 790 00:42:27,080 --> 00:42:29,960 Speaker 1: always massaging somebody's shoulders, but never anything more than that. 791 00:42:30,040 --> 00:42:32,960 Speaker 1: There was no vibe about him. Many staffer stress that 792 00:42:32,960 --> 00:42:35,480 Speaker 1: people frequently gravitate towards Biden as a kind of comforter 793 00:42:35,560 --> 00:42:37,800 Speaker 1: in chief and look for an around the should uh, 794 00:42:37,800 --> 00:42:40,200 Speaker 1: an armor on the shoulder, or a kiss on the cheek. However, 795 00:42:40,200 --> 00:42:42,880 Speaker 1: staffords agree it was not in Biden's nature to gauge 796 00:42:42,920 --> 00:42:46,200 Speaker 1: social signals about whether someone wanted to be hugged or touched. 797 00:42:46,520 --> 00:42:49,200 Speaker 1: Many said they learned that he might do so without warning, 798 00:42:49,239 --> 00:42:51,200 Speaker 1: though most saw it as an endearing quality that wasn't 799 00:42:51,200 --> 00:42:53,800 Speaker 1: sexual in nature. A former staffers said that when Biden 800 00:42:53,840 --> 00:42:56,560 Speaker 1: does things like stroking women's hair, there's a complicated dynamic 801 00:42:56,600 --> 00:42:59,680 Speaker 1: at play. His behavior towards women can be somewhat infantilizing. 802 00:42:59,680 --> 00:43:02,040 Speaker 1: The sta Afford said that doesn't look like a quality, right, 803 00:43:02,160 --> 00:43:04,080 Speaker 1: but it was an expression of empathy is a post 804 00:43:04,120 --> 00:43:07,680 Speaker 1: of flirtation for others Biden's touching evokes and regret. There 805 00:43:07,680 --> 00:43:09,520 Speaker 1: were times I now look back that I think we 806 00:43:09,640 --> 00:43:11,799 Speaker 1: messed up. We should have said something about that. A 807 00:43:11,800 --> 00:43:14,920 Speaker 1: different former staffer said, we probably should have recognized that 808 00:43:15,000 --> 00:43:17,600 Speaker 1: made people uncomfortable. So this is kind of how the 809 00:43:17,680 --> 00:43:24,840 Speaker 1: article ends. UM. Yeah, yeah, so it's not conclusive. Um, 810 00:43:24,880 --> 00:43:28,040 Speaker 1: there's a lot that you can take out of that. UM. 811 00:43:28,040 --> 00:43:32,560 Speaker 1: Obviously flawed in some ways. UM. I think the best 812 00:43:32,640 --> 00:43:36,040 Speaker 1: of these articles that I ran across was the Vox 813 00:43:36,200 --> 00:43:39,719 Speaker 1: article UM written by Laura McGann. Um. And for a 814 00:43:39,719 --> 00:43:41,759 Speaker 1: little bit of the history of Laura McGann, you know, 815 00:43:41,840 --> 00:43:43,960 Speaker 1: because again people will look into like whether or not 816 00:43:44,000 --> 00:43:46,759 Speaker 1: these journalists have a history of like supporting Biden or 817 00:43:46,840 --> 00:43:49,640 Speaker 1: you know, being more liberal or more left to determine 818 00:43:49,640 --> 00:43:52,000 Speaker 1: whether or not they can incredibly report on this. Laura 819 00:43:52,040 --> 00:43:54,879 Speaker 1: McGan did write an article pretty recently titled Joe Biden 820 00:43:54,960 --> 00:43:56,760 Speaker 1: is the only one with a chance of getting this done. 821 00:43:57,280 --> 00:43:59,719 Speaker 1: But in April two thousand nineteen, she also wrote an 822 00:43:59,800 --> 00:44:02,480 Speaker 1: article Wold titled Lucy Flores Isn't alone. Joe Biden has 823 00:44:02,520 --> 00:44:06,040 Speaker 1: a long history of touching women inappropriately. She's also written 824 00:44:06,040 --> 00:44:08,600 Speaker 1: several articles about different reasons women don't come forward with 825 00:44:08,680 --> 00:44:12,560 Speaker 1: stories of harassment, particularly by powerful men. UM. I think 826 00:44:12,640 --> 00:44:15,200 Speaker 1: Laura is a reasonably credible journalist to be writing the story, 827 00:44:15,200 --> 00:44:17,200 Speaker 1: and she also has a personal reason to write this 828 00:44:17,239 --> 00:44:19,800 Speaker 1: story because she was one of the very first people 829 00:44:19,880 --> 00:44:23,840 Speaker 1: interviewing Terror read um before the allegations were made public, 830 00:44:24,120 --> 00:44:27,239 Speaker 1: and she was not able to publish the allegations that 831 00:44:27,280 --> 00:44:30,759 Speaker 1: she made against Terror read because, like Terror was talking 832 00:44:30,760 --> 00:44:33,040 Speaker 1: to a number of different reporters at the time, Laura 833 00:44:33,120 --> 00:44:34,880 Speaker 1: wound up not being able to like back it up 834 00:44:35,000 --> 00:44:37,560 Speaker 1: enough for her editors to actually write the story, and 835 00:44:37,640 --> 00:44:39,840 Speaker 1: someone else put the story out first, which is the 836 00:44:39,880 --> 00:44:42,880 Speaker 1: thing that happens. It happens all the time to journalists. Um. 837 00:44:42,880 --> 00:44:45,560 Speaker 1: But she continued to talk to Tara, particularly after Tara 838 00:44:45,960 --> 00:44:48,160 Speaker 1: started coming forward with stories that like Biden now had 839 00:44:48,200 --> 00:44:51,920 Speaker 1: sexually assaulted her. Her article is interesting for that reason 840 00:44:52,000 --> 00:44:55,680 Speaker 1: because she's she's clearly very sympathetic to tera Um. She's 841 00:44:55,719 --> 00:44:58,560 Speaker 1: also trying to do her due diligence as a journalist here, 842 00:44:58,960 --> 00:45:01,360 Speaker 1: and again, as with the PBS story, it ends on 843 00:45:01,400 --> 00:45:04,279 Speaker 1: a very inconclusive note, like there's not a smoking gun here, 844 00:45:04,320 --> 00:45:06,279 Speaker 1: if that's what you're looking for. But I do think 845 00:45:06,880 --> 00:45:10,640 Speaker 1: Laura's Vox article is probably the best analysis of this 846 00:45:10,719 --> 00:45:17,080 Speaker 1: that I found. Yeah, hmm, yeah, yeah, because there's not 847 00:45:17,120 --> 00:45:21,320 Speaker 1: going to be a smoking gun. No, yeah, and it 848 00:45:21,360 --> 00:45:25,040 Speaker 1: wor that's what I echoing what I said at the 849 00:45:25,120 --> 00:45:27,960 Speaker 1: beginning of the episode. It's like, yes, I think it's 850 00:45:27,960 --> 00:45:31,960 Speaker 1: important to do due diligence and and check everything that 851 00:45:31,960 --> 00:45:36,080 Speaker 1: you can, but at the end of the day, it's 852 00:45:36,080 --> 00:45:39,080 Speaker 1: hard to believe that we'll have a definitive answer on this. 853 00:45:40,080 --> 00:45:44,600 Speaker 1: And to me, I think it's really really important if 854 00:45:44,640 --> 00:45:49,320 Speaker 1: we are trying to change the culture where sniffing someone's 855 00:45:49,360 --> 00:45:52,880 Speaker 1: hair isn't there's no no longer a question as to 856 00:45:52,880 --> 00:45:57,680 Speaker 1: whether or not that's appropriate, or you know, uh, believing women, 857 00:45:57,840 --> 00:46:03,000 Speaker 1: believing that powerful men take advantage and abuse women every day. 858 00:46:03,239 --> 00:46:05,720 Speaker 1: You know, if this is a lesson that we're actually 859 00:46:05,760 --> 00:46:09,759 Speaker 1: gonna have take root as a society, it is very 860 00:46:09,800 --> 00:46:15,200 Speaker 1: important that we hold ourselves to the standard that we uh, 861 00:46:15,360 --> 00:46:18,760 Speaker 1: you know, preach about, you know what I mean, it's 862 00:46:19,000 --> 00:46:23,839 Speaker 1: very important that we say, you know what, there is 863 00:46:23,960 --> 00:46:27,000 Speaker 1: a compelling case to be made that she is telling 864 00:46:27,040 --> 00:46:30,400 Speaker 1: the truth and Yeah, she might be problematic. Yeah, all 865 00:46:30,400 --> 00:46:32,640 Speaker 1: of this stuff, you know, they're they're both of those 866 00:46:32,640 --> 00:46:36,040 Speaker 1: things can be true at the same time. And and 867 00:46:36,680 --> 00:46:39,520 Speaker 1: if I'm going to vote for Joe Biden, I need 868 00:46:39,560 --> 00:46:41,920 Speaker 1: to know who he is or I have to understood, 869 00:46:41,960 --> 00:46:44,480 Speaker 1: I have to accept that this might be something that's 870 00:46:44,480 --> 00:46:48,360 Speaker 1: a part of him. And I'm not gonna just relax 871 00:46:48,520 --> 00:46:50,400 Speaker 1: and let our leaders off the hook, do you know 872 00:46:50,400 --> 00:46:55,440 Speaker 1: what I mean? It's lesson that I hope we've metabolized 873 00:46:55,480 --> 00:46:58,560 Speaker 1: throughout the last four years. You know, especially as we 874 00:46:58,680 --> 00:47:01,120 Speaker 1: criticize Obama more, we look back and we're like, oh, 875 00:47:01,120 --> 00:47:03,160 Speaker 1: wait a minute, he wasn't exactly the person that we 876 00:47:03,200 --> 00:47:06,480 Speaker 1: said he was. We just got complacent, we were relieved 877 00:47:06,520 --> 00:47:09,680 Speaker 1: to not have Bush anymore, and we let this and 878 00:47:09,719 --> 00:47:11,640 Speaker 1: we let it. We let it skate, you know what 879 00:47:11,680 --> 00:47:15,480 Speaker 1: I mean? And if we win, I need we need 880 00:47:15,520 --> 00:47:18,880 Speaker 1: to be able to do that, is my point. Yeah, 881 00:47:19,040 --> 00:47:20,879 Speaker 1: I go back and forth, and whether or not that's 882 00:47:20,880 --> 00:47:23,880 Speaker 1: going to happen, we're capable of doing that. The discourse 883 00:47:23,880 --> 00:47:28,160 Speaker 1: around this seems to indicate that not right away. The 884 00:47:29,360 --> 00:47:32,279 Speaker 1: letter next to someone's name is what determines this kind 885 00:47:32,280 --> 00:47:35,560 Speaker 1: of thing. Yeah, I remember even talking about like back 886 00:47:35,560 --> 00:47:40,680 Speaker 1: in the cabanat days. Uh oh those days. Remember, well 887 00:47:40,680 --> 00:47:42,840 Speaker 1: this idea and like it's a lifetime appointment too, so 888 00:47:42,840 --> 00:47:44,239 Speaker 1: I think that has a little more bearing on it. 889 00:47:44,280 --> 00:47:48,439 Speaker 1: But like this idea, you know, it's not it wasn't 890 00:47:48,520 --> 00:47:51,200 Speaker 1: like a court of law about like whether or not 891 00:47:51,360 --> 00:47:55,440 Speaker 1: that happened. Yeah, it wasn't this this idea of like, 892 00:47:55,480 --> 00:47:57,319 Speaker 1: well it has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. 893 00:47:57,440 --> 00:48:01,280 Speaker 1: But in this kind of situation, especially it's a lifetime ointment. Um, 894 00:48:01,280 --> 00:48:05,920 Speaker 1: it's more about like public perception. Um, it's not about 895 00:48:05,960 --> 00:48:08,480 Speaker 1: being beyond a reasonable doubt. There was doubt. There's still 896 00:48:08,520 --> 00:48:12,160 Speaker 1: doubt in people's minds. Uh. An overwhelming number of people 897 00:48:12,440 --> 00:48:15,560 Speaker 1: still think he is guilty. It's one of those things where, 898 00:48:15,600 --> 00:48:19,840 Speaker 1: like whatever happened with the vote, the responsible thing to 899 00:48:20,000 --> 00:48:25,160 Speaker 1: happen in that situation was for Brett Kavanaugh to acknowledge 900 00:48:25,640 --> 00:48:28,200 Speaker 1: that there is a lot of doubt in the public 901 00:48:28,920 --> 00:48:32,160 Speaker 1: and his position is a lifetime appointment and it's very 902 00:48:32,239 --> 00:48:37,000 Speaker 1: important that that integrity is upheld, and the responsible thing 903 00:48:37,040 --> 00:48:39,600 Speaker 1: for him to do would be too he can still 904 00:48:39,600 --> 00:48:43,240 Speaker 1: say it didn't happen, but because of the ship show, 905 00:48:43,560 --> 00:48:46,799 Speaker 1: the responsible thing to do is to step down, not 906 00:48:46,880 --> 00:48:49,319 Speaker 1: accept the nomination and let somebody else do it. Literally, 907 00:48:49,320 --> 00:48:51,160 Speaker 1: anyone else could have done that, and it would have 908 00:48:51,280 --> 00:48:54,879 Speaker 1: upheld some sort of sense of integrity for that. Um. 909 00:48:54,920 --> 00:48:56,800 Speaker 1: And I'm not even saying necessarily this has to happen 910 00:48:56,800 --> 00:49:01,279 Speaker 1: with Joe, but like if in talking about the me 911 00:49:01,360 --> 00:49:03,279 Speaker 1: too movement and like all all the stuff we've talked 912 00:49:03,280 --> 00:49:06,480 Speaker 1: about in this episode and other episodes, Um, wouldn't it 913 00:49:06,480 --> 00:49:11,440 Speaker 1: be interesting and and uh powerful if Joe stepped aside 914 00:49:12,200 --> 00:49:16,320 Speaker 1: because of I know, but like the number of the 915 00:49:16,400 --> 00:49:20,279 Speaker 1: number of women in the party who are really struggling 916 00:49:20,320 --> 00:49:24,640 Speaker 1: with this and are really uh disgusted that they're even 917 00:49:24,680 --> 00:49:27,759 Speaker 1: in this situation where they have to choose between these 918 00:49:27,760 --> 00:49:31,280 Speaker 1: two people now and this guy. I know it won't happen, 919 00:49:31,400 --> 00:49:34,360 Speaker 1: but it's I keep going back to this that idea 920 00:49:34,760 --> 00:49:37,480 Speaker 1: of Kavanaugh, like, well, actually, here's what he should have 921 00:49:37,520 --> 00:49:42,200 Speaker 1: done that would have been great, best for everybody. Um, 922 00:49:42,320 --> 00:49:47,360 Speaker 1: I don't know, it's frustrating. Yeah, what happened doesn't matter, no, Carol, 923 00:49:48,080 --> 00:49:53,000 Speaker 1: It's it's frustrating, and it's like so one of the 924 00:49:53,040 --> 00:49:55,080 Speaker 1: things that's kind of frustrating, Like there's a lot that's 925 00:49:55,080 --> 00:49:56,880 Speaker 1: frustrating about this one of them is just sort of 926 00:49:56,920 --> 00:50:00,080 Speaker 1: the fact to which all that clearly matters now is 927 00:50:00,080 --> 00:50:02,799 Speaker 1: is what you believe politically. If you're a if you're 928 00:50:02,840 --> 00:50:06,359 Speaker 1: a Democrat and a committed Democrat, Joe's innocent. If you're 929 00:50:06,400 --> 00:50:09,400 Speaker 1: a Republican, he's guilty. And if you're um on the 930 00:50:09,440 --> 00:50:11,480 Speaker 1: left side of the party and are angry that Sanders 931 00:50:11,480 --> 00:50:15,279 Speaker 1: didn't get the nomination, he's also guilty. And you know, 932 00:50:15,560 --> 00:50:17,319 Speaker 1: there there's an amount of people in there who are 933 00:50:17,360 --> 00:50:19,640 Speaker 1: trying to make their decision based on the evidence, but 934 00:50:19,680 --> 00:50:21,480 Speaker 1: there's an awful lot of people who are just kind 935 00:50:21,480 --> 00:50:23,799 Speaker 1: of looking for like, if you want an excuse to 936 00:50:23,840 --> 00:50:27,120 Speaker 1: think that her allegations aren't credible, plenty of chum has 937 00:50:27,120 --> 00:50:29,279 Speaker 1: been put out there for that to be possible. If 938 00:50:29,280 --> 00:50:31,479 Speaker 1: you want to believe her allegations are credible, there's plenty 939 00:50:31,560 --> 00:50:34,080 Speaker 1: to latch onto. And this is kind of the nature 940 00:50:34,160 --> 00:50:38,560 Speaker 1: of truth in our society now. It's not it doesn't 941 00:50:38,560 --> 00:50:41,640 Speaker 1: exist anymore um, And like, there's a lot that's frustrating 942 00:50:41,640 --> 00:50:43,080 Speaker 1: about that. One of the things that's angry is that, 943 00:50:43,120 --> 00:50:45,520 Speaker 1: like all of the articles, all of the authors behind 944 00:50:45,560 --> 00:50:48,040 Speaker 1: the articles I read today are kind of being attacked 945 00:50:48,120 --> 00:50:49,840 Speaker 1: by folks on the left is like being part of 946 00:50:49,880 --> 00:50:52,040 Speaker 1: a smear campaign against terror read and that's very fair 947 00:50:52,080 --> 00:50:55,480 Speaker 1: for um the political article. There's some criticisms to make 948 00:50:55,560 --> 00:50:58,000 Speaker 1: the PBS article. I don't feel like Laura McGann at 949 00:50:58,040 --> 00:51:00,680 Speaker 1: vox is smearing terror read I I We'll get into 950 00:51:00,680 --> 00:51:01,960 Speaker 1: her article a little bit more. I think it's a 951 00:51:02,080 --> 00:51:05,480 Speaker 1: very responsible piece of journalism. And it's frustrating to me 952 00:51:05,560 --> 00:51:09,560 Speaker 1: that we can't because of the politicization of this. We 953 00:51:09,640 --> 00:51:13,319 Speaker 1: can't even really analyze this without being like people being 954 00:51:13,360 --> 00:51:17,040 Speaker 1: attacked all around, Like no matter what you do, you're 955 00:51:17,080 --> 00:51:19,640 Speaker 1: going to get torn up in in cases like Laura's 956 00:51:19,640 --> 00:51:21,359 Speaker 1: for just the simple act of like, all right, I'm 957 00:51:21,400 --> 00:51:23,919 Speaker 1: going to I am someone who reports on this ship. 958 00:51:23,920 --> 00:51:25,880 Speaker 1: I am somebody who believes that this is a problem. 959 00:51:25,960 --> 00:51:27,839 Speaker 1: I'm someone who is a deep understanding of the fact 960 00:51:27,920 --> 00:51:30,000 Speaker 1: of why women don't come forward in cases like this. 961 00:51:30,440 --> 00:51:32,279 Speaker 1: And I've been talking with Tara for a while. I'm 962 00:51:32,280 --> 00:51:34,080 Speaker 1: going to do my best to write an article about 963 00:51:34,080 --> 00:51:36,399 Speaker 1: everything we know and don't know. Oh now I'm being 964 00:51:36,400 --> 00:51:39,799 Speaker 1: accused of being part of a smear campaign. Um. It's 965 00:51:39,880 --> 00:51:44,480 Speaker 1: very frustrating. Um. She makes a really good point, which 966 00:51:44,520 --> 00:51:47,560 Speaker 1: is that. UM. One of the things that you have 967 00:51:47,640 --> 00:51:49,480 Speaker 1: to do, since there's not going to be an objective 968 00:51:49,560 --> 00:51:52,759 Speaker 1: yes or note of this, is you look at the 969 00:51:52,880 --> 00:51:57,880 Speaker 1: corroborating evidence, UM, and including like other allegations. And one 970 00:51:57,920 --> 00:52:00,400 Speaker 1: of the points she makes is that like when allegations 971 00:52:00,440 --> 00:52:04,040 Speaker 1: were made against Harvey Weinstein or against uh Bill Cosby, 972 00:52:04,560 --> 00:52:07,520 Speaker 1: it wasn't he said, she said it was. Here are 973 00:52:07,640 --> 00:52:10,720 Speaker 1: a ton of different people over the course of years, 974 00:52:10,760 --> 00:52:14,120 Speaker 1: in a lot of cases that whose stories we have collected, 975 00:52:14,120 --> 00:52:15,840 Speaker 1: that all line up in a variety of ways, and 976 00:52:15,840 --> 00:52:18,080 Speaker 1: that are all very consistent. And you have something similar 977 00:52:18,080 --> 00:52:21,239 Speaker 1: with Donald Trump, UM, And it is worth noting, and 978 00:52:21,280 --> 00:52:23,600 Speaker 1: it is worth pointing out that that does not exist 979 00:52:23,600 --> 00:52:26,360 Speaker 1: with Joe Biden. There's overwhelming evidence that he has touched 980 00:52:26,360 --> 00:52:29,040 Speaker 1: people in creepy ways that made them feel deeply uncomfortable, 981 00:52:29,040 --> 00:52:31,400 Speaker 1: and that that is not okay or good. UM. Terr 982 00:52:31,480 --> 00:52:34,719 Speaker 1: Read is the only person to accuse him of explicit 983 00:52:35,040 --> 00:52:37,759 Speaker 1: like something that you could qualify as rape, um, And 984 00:52:38,000 --> 00:52:41,759 Speaker 1: that that is a a a worthwhile thing to point out. 985 00:52:41,800 --> 00:52:43,440 Speaker 1: And I think I want to read an exit from 986 00:52:43,480 --> 00:52:45,560 Speaker 1: Laura's article because the way that she talks about this, 987 00:52:45,640 --> 00:52:48,520 Speaker 1: I think is very responsible so I'm going to quote 988 00:52:48,520 --> 00:52:50,520 Speaker 1: from that. Now, eight women have now said they've been 989 00:52:50,520 --> 00:52:52,840 Speaker 1: made uncomfortable by Biden in public settings. Read is the 990 00:52:52,880 --> 00:52:54,880 Speaker 1: lone woman to accuse him of sexual assault. This is 991 00:52:54,880 --> 00:52:56,799 Speaker 1: a situation out of her control. But it means that 992 00:52:56,840 --> 00:52:59,280 Speaker 1: reporters can't build a story about Biden around a pattern 993 00:52:59,320 --> 00:53:02,760 Speaker 1: of behavior where multiple accusers boost one another story. Instead, 994 00:53:02,760 --> 00:53:05,319 Speaker 1: reporters are looking at Read's account in isolation, and that 995 00:53:05,400 --> 00:53:08,160 Speaker 1: account has changed. Um. And then she notes, you know, 996 00:53:08,160 --> 00:53:09,840 Speaker 1: there are a number of ways that accounts changed. And 997 00:53:09,920 --> 00:53:12,360 Speaker 1: she also note that that's not uncommon with stories like this, 998 00:53:12,480 --> 00:53:14,959 Speaker 1: that people's memories are flawed and perfect, and like, yeah, 999 00:53:14,960 --> 00:53:19,200 Speaker 1: that that is that is a thing that happens. That's noteworthy, Um, 1000 00:53:19,360 --> 00:53:22,160 Speaker 1: And it's noteworthy that like Since then, a former neighbor 1001 00:53:22,160 --> 00:53:24,680 Speaker 1: of Reads, linnar Lacasse, has come forward. In an every 1002 00:53:24,760 --> 00:53:26,680 Speaker 1: with Business Insider, she said that Reid spoke about the 1003 00:53:26,680 --> 00:53:29,440 Speaker 1: harassment and assault claims in I asked Read why she 1004 00:53:29,440 --> 00:53:31,520 Speaker 1: hadn't mentioned the cast to me a year ago, or 1005 00:53:31,600 --> 00:53:33,239 Speaker 1: to help her, or to the first few reporters she 1006 00:53:33,280 --> 00:53:35,640 Speaker 1: told about her assault allegation, including The New York Times, 1007 00:53:35,760 --> 00:53:37,520 Speaker 1: which is working in a deep dive into her story. 1008 00:53:37,520 --> 00:53:39,800 Speaker 1: At the same time, she said La Cass hadn't seemed 1009 00:53:39,800 --> 00:53:41,680 Speaker 1: like a relevant source because she talked to her two 1010 00:53:41,719 --> 00:53:44,480 Speaker 1: years after the alleged incident took place. Read added that 1011 00:53:44,520 --> 00:53:46,880 Speaker 1: she told reporters about two other anonymous friends later who 1012 00:53:46,920 --> 00:53:49,360 Speaker 1: hadn't seemed relevant to her either. When asked a similar 1013 00:53:49,440 --> 00:53:51,239 Speaker 1: question by the Associated Press, who had been working on 1014 00:53:51,280 --> 00:53:53,719 Speaker 1: the story, to Read didn't respond. And this is like 1015 00:53:56,040 --> 00:53:58,840 Speaker 1: number one, Like, I get why people are are poking 1016 00:53:58,880 --> 00:54:02,120 Speaker 1: at this because again, as as Laura points out, you 1017 00:54:02,239 --> 00:54:03,960 Speaker 1: have to do like all you have is this one 1018 00:54:04,000 --> 00:54:06,960 Speaker 1: story to poke into. But also I get that this 1019 00:54:07,000 --> 00:54:09,439 Speaker 1: traumatic thing you probably talked to a number of people 1020 00:54:09,480 --> 00:54:15,960 Speaker 1: about and you don't think of all of them immediately. Yeah, yeah, 1021 00:54:16,200 --> 00:54:18,200 Speaker 1: but then you get to this frustrating thing where like, 1022 00:54:18,520 --> 00:54:21,960 Speaker 1: um so, when Helper asks Read why she didn't mention 1023 00:54:22,000 --> 00:54:25,399 Speaker 1: the assault allegation originally, she responds by blaming the media. Quote, 1024 00:54:25,400 --> 00:54:26,719 Speaker 1: while I was going to tell the whole thing, the 1025 00:54:26,719 --> 00:54:28,200 Speaker 1: whole history with Biden, but the way I was being 1026 00:54:28,280 --> 00:54:30,520 Speaker 1: questioned it made me so uncomfortable that I didn't trust it. 1027 00:54:30,520 --> 00:54:32,120 Speaker 1: And no offense to the reporters out there. But it's 1028 00:54:32,160 --> 00:54:33,799 Speaker 1: maybe just something that can't be learned how to talk 1029 00:54:33,800 --> 00:54:36,000 Speaker 1: to somebody who got because I really just got shut down. 1030 00:54:36,320 --> 00:54:38,520 Speaker 1: And the narrative they really wanted to it to be 1031 00:54:38,680 --> 00:54:40,399 Speaker 1: was that it wasn't a sexual thing, like I don't 1032 00:54:40,440 --> 00:54:42,400 Speaker 1: say it's sexual, and so I was like, Okay, I 1033 00:54:42,400 --> 00:54:46,160 Speaker 1: guess I can't really say the whole story. Um. And again, Laura, 1034 00:54:46,200 --> 00:54:48,320 Speaker 1: the person writing this article is one of the women 1035 00:54:48,520 --> 00:54:50,560 Speaker 1: that Read was talking to at this time, and Laura 1036 00:54:50,640 --> 00:54:53,000 Speaker 1: notes quote, but that wasn't the narrative I wanted. I 1037 00:54:53,040 --> 00:54:55,319 Speaker 1: wanted the truth, and I certainly had no qualms about 1038 00:54:55,360 --> 00:54:58,920 Speaker 1: the accusations being of sexual misconduct. Reporters that many outlets, 1039 00:54:58,920 --> 00:55:01,399 Speaker 1: including the reporters reads folk to have not shied away 1040 00:55:01,400 --> 00:55:06,319 Speaker 1: from reporting on detailed sexual assault allegations. Um. And that's 1041 00:55:06,360 --> 00:55:09,000 Speaker 1: a good point for one thing. Just looking at Laura's history, 1042 00:55:09,000 --> 00:55:11,080 Speaker 1: I have no doubt that she would have been perfectly 1043 00:55:11,120 --> 00:55:14,040 Speaker 1: happy to have been the one to break this story. Um. 1044 00:55:14,120 --> 00:55:16,720 Speaker 1: And Laura also notes quote in the interview with Helper, 1045 00:55:17,080 --> 00:55:19,520 Speaker 1: Read said that she contacted someone at the Washington Post 1046 00:55:19,520 --> 00:55:22,000 Speaker 1: and then they never really followed up. The Washington Post 1047 00:55:22,040 --> 00:55:24,440 Speaker 1: said that it interviewed Read on multiple occasions, both this 1048 00:55:24,480 --> 00:55:26,200 Speaker 1: year and last, as well as people she said she 1049 00:55:26,280 --> 00:55:28,040 Speaker 1: told of the assault, claiming more than half a dozen 1050 00:55:28,040 --> 00:55:31,320 Speaker 1: former staffers of Biden's Senate office, a fact Read conceded 1051 00:55:31,320 --> 00:55:33,560 Speaker 1: to me in an interview. In a recent conversation, I 1052 00:55:33,600 --> 00:55:35,360 Speaker 1: asked Read why she would say the media was shutting 1053 00:55:35,360 --> 00:55:37,120 Speaker 1: her down when she was initially so adamant with me 1054 00:55:37,160 --> 00:55:39,759 Speaker 1: and other outlets this wasn't a misconduct story. The only 1055 00:55:39,760 --> 00:55:41,440 Speaker 1: answer she gave is that she was speaking about the 1056 00:55:41,480 --> 00:55:44,160 Speaker 1: response to her claims collectively, and in her opinion, the 1057 00:55:44,160 --> 00:55:46,440 Speaker 1: added detail still fit her construct that this is not 1058 00:55:46,480 --> 00:55:49,320 Speaker 1: a story about sexual misconduct, because she told me sexual 1059 00:55:49,320 --> 00:55:54,040 Speaker 1: assault itself is about power. So I don't know, like again, 1060 00:55:54,239 --> 00:55:59,120 Speaker 1: this is this is it's complicated as hell, um that 1061 00:56:00,200 --> 00:56:03,880 Speaker 1: you know, this is conjecture. I just listened to that, 1062 00:56:03,920 --> 00:56:08,360 Speaker 1: and I think about myself in that situation or her, 1063 00:56:08,480 --> 00:56:11,600 Speaker 1: you know, you know, like what could be motivations for 1064 00:56:13,840 --> 00:56:17,960 Speaker 1: with holding some of that information at that point, and 1065 00:56:19,040 --> 00:56:23,719 Speaker 1: you know, this is somebody that is being lauded as 1066 00:56:24,440 --> 00:56:26,480 Speaker 1: especial at that time too, people were pushing for a 1067 00:56:26,520 --> 00:56:29,600 Speaker 1: lot of people wanted Biden to be then not you know, 1068 00:56:29,719 --> 00:56:33,680 Speaker 1: to to to be running for president and that's a 1069 00:56:33,719 --> 00:56:36,239 Speaker 1: scary thing to go up against, you know what I mean, 1070 00:56:36,840 --> 00:56:40,240 Speaker 1: even and and me too was happening, but we hadn't 1071 00:56:40,280 --> 00:56:45,640 Speaker 1: really seen that much progress with it. Weinstein only recently 1072 00:56:45,800 --> 00:56:49,640 Speaker 1: got convicted, you know what I mean, Like, I think 1073 00:56:49,640 --> 00:56:54,960 Speaker 1: that there I can understand a world where even at 1074 00:56:55,000 --> 00:57:00,359 Speaker 1: that point, not being comfortable sharing the whole story, I can't. Um, 1075 00:57:01,680 --> 00:57:05,600 Speaker 1: I'm not saying that it isn't also concerned a problematic 1076 00:57:05,960 --> 00:57:07,920 Speaker 1: element of it. I'm not saying that that isn't an 1077 00:57:07,960 --> 00:57:12,880 Speaker 1: important point. I'm nearly you know, hypothesizing and trying to 1078 00:57:12,880 --> 00:57:16,400 Speaker 1: put myself in that position, you know, and be empathetic 1079 00:57:17,000 --> 00:57:19,240 Speaker 1: and if we're if we're trying to actually look at 1080 00:57:19,280 --> 00:57:23,080 Speaker 1: this accurately, like there is there are things to be 1081 00:57:23,560 --> 00:57:25,680 Speaker 1: concerned about in her Like one of the things that's 1082 00:57:25,680 --> 00:57:27,840 Speaker 1: been brought up believing the PBS article is that the 1083 00:57:27,840 --> 00:57:30,440 Speaker 1: specific place where she alleges the assault took place is 1084 00:57:30,480 --> 00:57:33,640 Speaker 1: incredibly crowded, um and has been forever and always has 1085 00:57:33,640 --> 00:57:36,560 Speaker 1: a heavy amount of tourist and foot traffic. And that 1086 00:57:36,600 --> 00:57:40,960 Speaker 1: doesn't mean it didn't happen because also like details get 1087 00:57:41,000 --> 00:57:44,960 Speaker 1: muddled up, especially of location over time. Um. But like 1088 00:57:45,080 --> 00:57:48,400 Speaker 1: it's it's that's a worthwhile thing to point out, UM. 1089 00:57:48,440 --> 00:57:52,680 Speaker 1: And Laura McGann points out that UM quote. A few 1090 00:57:52,720 --> 00:57:54,600 Speaker 1: weeks before Reid spoke to Helper, she applied to a 1091 00:57:54,600 --> 00:57:56,680 Speaker 1: tweet from grim the guy who wrote the Intercept article 1092 00:57:56,720 --> 00:57:59,240 Speaker 1: about this, semi to tease that a story was coming out. UM, 1093 00:57:59,240 --> 00:58:01,920 Speaker 1: and the tweet was Ryan said, Um tweeted I had 1094 00:58:01,960 --> 00:58:04,200 Speaker 1: to had Biden v Sanders contest were forced voters to 1095 00:58:04,200 --> 00:58:06,400 Speaker 1: take a close look at Biden again that went very 1096 00:58:06,440 --> 00:58:11,400 Speaker 1: badly for him last time. And Tara responded to this, UM, yep, 1097 00:58:11,400 --> 00:58:14,760 Speaker 1: timing wait for it, tick talk uh. And this was 1098 00:58:14,800 --> 00:58:18,280 Speaker 1: posted on March three, and Grimm says that he didn't 1099 00:58:18,320 --> 00:58:20,520 Speaker 1: speak with her for the first time until until March eighth, 1100 00:58:20,600 --> 00:58:23,640 Speaker 1: a week later. That's a thing to note, like it 1101 00:58:23,760 --> 00:58:27,080 Speaker 1: and it doesn't. That doesn't look great for her, So like, yeah, 1102 00:58:27,080 --> 00:58:30,160 Speaker 1: that's that's worth noting. It's also possible, like I don't know, 1103 00:58:30,280 --> 00:58:33,280 Speaker 1: people have said that. That's like, yeah, I don't know, 1104 00:58:33,760 --> 00:58:36,880 Speaker 1: it's a thing worth noting. Yeahs noting. I guess it's 1105 00:58:36,920 --> 00:58:41,320 Speaker 1: just like if she she's trying to get this story out, 1106 00:58:42,000 --> 00:58:46,280 Speaker 1: I don't know. Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's but see that's 1107 00:58:46,280 --> 00:58:50,360 Speaker 1: a that is a fair approach to this, and I 1108 00:58:50,400 --> 00:58:53,000 Speaker 1: think that for me is what I want to take 1109 00:58:53,040 --> 00:58:55,240 Speaker 1: away to be because again we're not I don't know 1110 00:58:55,280 --> 00:58:57,520 Speaker 1: that we're going to have an answer, but I'm talking 1111 00:58:57,560 --> 00:59:01,080 Speaker 1: about how we have this conversation, how we treat people 1112 00:59:01,120 --> 00:59:05,640 Speaker 1: that come forward. There's this whole believe women articles circulating, 1113 00:59:05,640 --> 00:59:09,520 Speaker 1: and it's just so frustrating how we approach believe women 1114 00:59:09,680 --> 00:59:15,440 Speaker 1: and you know, the character assassinations feel irrelevant, something like 1115 00:59:15,480 --> 00:59:18,640 Speaker 1: that a discerpancy that is something to fuck that political 1116 00:59:18,760 --> 00:59:22,640 Speaker 1: article and funk the person who wrote it. It's difficult, 1117 00:59:22,680 --> 00:59:27,680 Speaker 1: and like I don't want to just be blanket saying 1118 00:59:28,080 --> 00:59:31,760 Speaker 1: you know, she's not lying because we don't have the answer. 1119 00:59:31,880 --> 00:59:34,760 Speaker 1: But I don't want to be somebody that sees the 1120 00:59:34,800 --> 00:59:38,920 Speaker 1: worst in people and uses that as a weapon either, 1121 00:59:39,400 --> 00:59:45,560 Speaker 1: And you know anyway, end of sentence. I mean, yeah, 1122 00:59:45,680 --> 00:59:49,800 Speaker 1: like it's it's you, uh, take these allegations seriously and 1123 00:59:50,120 --> 00:59:54,959 Speaker 1: don't like just try to rip the woman apart. Yes, 1124 00:59:55,440 --> 00:59:57,640 Speaker 1: which is I do think if you are if you 1125 00:59:57,680 --> 01:00:02,360 Speaker 1: are interested in journalism and like what what good journalism 1126 01:00:02,440 --> 01:00:05,760 Speaker 1: versus bad journalism is? These three articles are a really 1127 01:00:05,840 --> 01:00:09,640 Speaker 1: good illustration because they run the gamut of On the 1128 01:00:09,720 --> 01:00:13,760 Speaker 1: On the irresponsible journalism side, you have the political article, 1129 01:00:13,880 --> 01:00:17,360 Speaker 1: which is a hit piece, um and very gross for 1130 01:00:17,440 --> 01:00:21,280 Speaker 1: that and I I think provides almost no information that 1131 01:00:21,360 --> 01:00:25,600 Speaker 1: is relevant and evaluating um uh this case. Then you 1132 01:00:25,640 --> 01:00:30,480 Speaker 1: have a want to hear the repossessed car story A yeah, yeah, yeah, 1133 01:00:30,480 --> 01:00:34,880 Speaker 1: I don't care. Yeah. In the middle, you have the 1134 01:00:34,880 --> 01:00:38,160 Speaker 1: PBS article, which starts from a very good position, has 1135 01:00:38,200 --> 01:00:40,560 Speaker 1: some serious flaws because it doesn't take some things into 1136 01:00:40,600 --> 01:00:42,840 Speaker 1: account that it really ought to have, including Anita Hill, 1137 01:00:42,840 --> 01:00:45,000 Speaker 1: and including you know, the fact that if you're going 1138 01:00:45,000 --> 01:00:47,439 Speaker 1: to talk about um, Terry read being in consistent, let's 1139 01:00:47,440 --> 01:00:50,640 Speaker 1: talk about Joe Biden's own inconsistencies. And then at the 1140 01:00:50,680 --> 01:00:52,680 Speaker 1: other end of it, I think, and this is, you know, 1141 01:00:52,680 --> 01:00:54,760 Speaker 1: the Vox article is almost more of a column because 1142 01:00:54,760 --> 01:00:56,760 Speaker 1: it is written in this author's voice, and it is 1143 01:00:56,800 --> 01:00:59,439 Speaker 1: based in part on her personal experience talking to Tara 1144 01:00:59,560 --> 01:01:02,520 Speaker 1: for a very long time, and her experience in general 1145 01:01:02,560 --> 01:01:05,520 Speaker 1: covering stories like this and very much caring about telling 1146 01:01:05,560 --> 01:01:07,360 Speaker 1: these kinds of stories. And I think it is a 1147 01:01:07,440 --> 01:01:11,520 Speaker 1: very responsible article. And it's worth noting that the most 1148 01:01:11,600 --> 01:01:15,480 Speaker 1: responsible article in the bunch doesn't lead you to really 1149 01:01:15,520 --> 01:01:17,680 Speaker 1: feel one way or the other about the truth of 1150 01:01:17,680 --> 01:01:20,760 Speaker 1: the case. It's just it's it's this is like it 1151 01:01:20,800 --> 01:01:23,560 Speaker 1: which is frustrating, and I know is like not the 1152 01:01:23,600 --> 01:01:27,480 Speaker 1: place anyone wants to end this on, UM because you 1153 01:01:27,520 --> 01:01:31,680 Speaker 1: want to, you want to know, but we won't. And 1154 01:01:32,040 --> 01:01:35,120 Speaker 1: acknowledging how frustrating it is and that we won't is 1155 01:01:35,440 --> 01:01:39,200 Speaker 1: I think part of what needs to uh yeah be 1156 01:01:39,320 --> 01:01:45,720 Speaker 1: mentioned when you're reporting on this kind of thing. Yeah, absolutely, Yeah, 1157 01:01:45,840 --> 01:01:48,240 Speaker 1: A point of certainty will never be like for example 1158 01:01:48,240 --> 01:01:50,200 Speaker 1: of how hard it is to get certainty. There is 1159 01:01:50,240 --> 01:01:54,360 Speaker 1: still a debate among scholars about the extent to which 1160 01:01:54,400 --> 01:01:58,440 Speaker 1: Hitler was aware of the Holocaust, because Adolf Hitler was 1161 01:01:58,440 --> 01:02:02,760 Speaker 1: was was very um committed to not putting certain shipped 1162 01:02:02,760 --> 01:02:06,560 Speaker 1: down on paper like the annihilation of multiple in ethnic 1163 01:02:06,600 --> 01:02:09,440 Speaker 1: groups UM. And so his name is not on a 1164 01:02:09,440 --> 01:02:12,680 Speaker 1: whole lot of documents tied to the Holocaust. UM. Now, 1165 01:02:13,000 --> 01:02:17,400 Speaker 1: I I think of credible historians at this point agree 1166 01:02:17,440 --> 01:02:20,480 Speaker 1: that he knew and was very involved and understood exactly 1167 01:02:20,520 --> 01:02:23,120 Speaker 1: what was happening and was in fact a major advocate 1168 01:02:23,120 --> 01:02:27,560 Speaker 1: for it and devoted military resources to um uh to 1169 01:02:27,960 --> 01:02:31,080 Speaker 1: allowing the Holocaust to continue, even when those resources were 1170 01:02:31,120 --> 01:02:33,520 Speaker 1: needed up at the Eastern Front. There's very little debate 1171 01:02:33,520 --> 01:02:36,480 Speaker 1: about that now, but there were decades of debate, and 1172 01:02:36,520 --> 01:02:39,640 Speaker 1: it was decades of people trolling through archives and building 1173 01:02:39,680 --> 01:02:43,040 Speaker 1: the case because he had just been kind of careful 1174 01:02:43,040 --> 01:02:45,400 Speaker 1: about not sticking his name on documents, building the case 1175 01:02:45,440 --> 01:02:47,680 Speaker 1: that he knew exactly what was going on. That was 1176 01:02:47,760 --> 01:02:53,200 Speaker 1: the work of lifetimes. Um, and that's you know, it's 1177 01:02:54,480 --> 01:02:57,520 Speaker 1: the truth is a shitty business to be in. It's 1178 01:02:57,560 --> 01:03:03,040 Speaker 1: the only place I can end this on these days. Yeah. 1179 01:03:03,400 --> 01:03:06,800 Speaker 1: I finally popped up on Facebook and gotten to a 1180 01:03:06,840 --> 01:03:10,240 Speaker 1: conversation so don't do that person, and it really turned 1181 01:03:10,280 --> 01:03:13,280 Speaker 1: into Q and on stuff really quickly. Oh great, Yeah, 1182 01:03:13,360 --> 01:03:18,400 Speaker 1: that's a problem. You did this to yourself, Cody. I well, 1183 01:03:18,920 --> 01:03:23,200 Speaker 1: and that's what really hurts. A friend of mine was like, hey, 1184 01:03:23,200 --> 01:03:25,120 Speaker 1: sold for from my school is talking about this stuff. 1185 01:03:25,160 --> 01:03:28,040 Speaker 1: Do you want to have some fun? I was like, no, 1186 01:03:28,680 --> 01:03:34,919 Speaker 1: I was right, it wasn't fun. No Ah, good job guys, 1187 01:03:35,280 --> 01:03:39,480 Speaker 1: we made it the episode. Good job. Everybody clear on 1188 01:03:41,080 --> 01:03:44,960 Speaker 1: what to do now? No crystal clear everything everything is 1189 01:03:44,960 --> 01:03:50,000 Speaker 1: in order. Yeah, well, you guys can check us out online. 1190 01:03:50,360 --> 01:03:52,160 Speaker 1: It can give you that. That's kind of fun and 1191 01:03:52,240 --> 01:03:57,640 Speaker 1: positive way to end it online at worst, your pot 1192 01:03:57,720 --> 01:04:02,240 Speaker 1: and the inctant that the Twitter and this stuff like that. Um, 1193 01:04:03,440 --> 01:04:07,440 Speaker 1: yeah you can believe that for sure. Yeah I am. 1194 01:04:07,520 --> 01:04:11,960 Speaker 1: I am excited, um because I I think there are 1195 01:04:12,000 --> 01:04:14,080 Speaker 1: things in here that are going to piss off everybody, 1196 01:04:14,120 --> 01:04:15,920 Speaker 1: which is never my goal. Actually, I'm not one of 1197 01:04:15,960 --> 01:04:18,280 Speaker 1: those things that people who's like, if you're if everyone's 1198 01:04:18,320 --> 01:04:21,040 Speaker 1: angry at you, you're telling the truth. Yeah, but this 1199 01:04:21,240 --> 01:04:23,600 Speaker 1: is one of those things where I don't know how 1200 01:04:23,640 --> 01:04:26,160 Speaker 1: to actually tell how I feel having analyzed all these 1201 01:04:26,200 --> 01:04:28,720 Speaker 1: stories and not have there be something in there that 1202 01:04:28,800 --> 01:04:32,400 Speaker 1: pisces off everybody, um, which I don't like. I wish 1203 01:04:32,440 --> 01:04:34,240 Speaker 1: that wasn't the case, but this is how I feel 1204 01:04:34,240 --> 01:04:37,640 Speaker 1: about these articles. Well, we live in a very complicated 1205 01:04:37,720 --> 01:04:42,200 Speaker 1: time where there are where it's too complicated. It's it's 1206 01:04:42,240 --> 01:04:46,320 Speaker 1: sometimes too complicated to have a definitive opinion on something. 1207 01:04:46,480 --> 01:04:49,080 Speaker 1: But you can do your very best and you can 1208 01:04:49,160 --> 01:04:53,479 Speaker 1: sort through what you're presented and be critical of it. Yeah, 1209 01:04:53,600 --> 01:04:56,800 Speaker 1: and it's okay to say I don't know. Yeah, I 1210 01:04:56,800 --> 01:05:00,440 Speaker 1: don't know. It's okay to say I don't know. I 1211 01:05:00,560 --> 01:05:05,240 Speaker 1: sure wish we had a candidate who was selfless enough 1212 01:05:05,320 --> 01:05:07,800 Speaker 1: to be like, but also like, yeah, I don't know. 1213 01:05:07,880 --> 01:05:10,040 Speaker 1: Fuck it funk all of this ship. I hate everything. 1214 01:05:12,640 --> 01:05:19,800 Speaker 1: You know. We got a big Trump, Yeah, Roxy clor Quinn. Yeah, 1215 01:05:19,840 --> 01:05:23,200 Speaker 1: I feel like that drug maybe yeahs might be the 1216 01:05:23,240 --> 01:05:26,040 Speaker 1: answer to our question. Hi, Droxy Clark quin becomes the 1217 01:05:26,080 --> 01:05:29,600 Speaker 1: big hero of the year. We build a statue to it. Yeah, 1218 01:05:29,880 --> 01:05:33,160 Speaker 1: cover a Time magazine. He might not be the hero 1219 01:05:33,400 --> 01:05:35,880 Speaker 1: we need, but it's the hero we got. Yeah, the 1220 01:05:35,960 --> 01:05:39,400 Speaker 1: drug that made Trump's heart explode. Thank you, comrade Hydroxy 1221 01:05:39,440 --> 01:05:43,720 Speaker 1: Clark Quinny. You live long enough, become the villain or 1222 01:05:43,760 --> 01:05:48,520 Speaker 1: you die. Then this just all becomes the Democrats long 1223 01:05:48,600 --> 01:05:52,160 Speaker 1: game to trick him into having his heart explode. Yeah, 1224 01:05:52,320 --> 01:05:57,560 Speaker 1: boy got him? Yea God. I wish the Democrats were 1225 01:05:57,640 --> 01:06:01,720 Speaker 1: capable of a long game. Yeah, I don't. I wish 1226 01:06:01,760 --> 01:06:06,040 Speaker 1: they were any game. Yeah right, even as I don't think. 1227 01:06:06,640 --> 01:06:08,439 Speaker 1: I don't think I would like the goals of their 1228 01:06:08,480 --> 01:06:13,240 Speaker 1: long game, don't yeh. Didn't we end this episode like 1229 01:06:13,360 --> 01:06:17,200 Speaker 1: five minutes ago? We did, but we're all still frustrated 1230 01:06:18,320 --> 01:06:28,160 Speaker 1: by the year. Yeah, alright, bye later, everything everything so 1231 01:06:28,520 --> 01:06:36,080 Speaker 1: dull again. I tried Worst Year Ever is a production 1232 01:06:36,120 --> 01:06:38,959 Speaker 1: of I Heart Radio For more podcasts from my heart Radio, 1233 01:06:39,080 --> 01:06:42,000 Speaker 1: visit the i heart Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever 1234 01:06:42,080 --> 01:06:43,400 Speaker 1: you listen to your favorite shows.