WEBVTT - Court Blocks Trump Global Tariffs as Nvidia Lift Markets

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 2>No one better than Anastasia Amroso, chief investment strategist at ICAP,

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>who was trumpeting large cap growth participate when it was

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 2>a very lonely call. Let's recapitulate right now, I'm hearing

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 2>people come over to the Amoroso side. Is it still

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 2>large cap growth in tech? Look?

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 3>I think so. I think back in March we were

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 3>talking about the sell off being temporary, and of course

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 3>you know you were now in late May and here

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 3>we are. The SAP is up, and actually we talked

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 3>about software, and software is up. AI software in particular

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 3>is up about twelve percent for the year. So yes,

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 3>I think the reasons are still plentiful to continue to

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 3>stick with stocks. And you know, Tom, one of the

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 3>things you have to do is you'll have to look

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 3>at the economy. And while the sentiment around the economy

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 3>fell apart, the hard economic data never did so. As

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 3>a result, we're still looking at two point three percent

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 3>GDP growth this quarter when everybody was worried about the

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 3>tariff impact. So that's the first thing. The second thing

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 3>is the determination you just heard from Peter Navarro to

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 3>cut those deals and continue to negotiate is absolutely there.

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 3>So as long as that's the drum beat, then I

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 3>think we have to discard any sort of data that

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 3>goes against that. And then the last thing I would say,

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 3>tom you know, tomorrow we get the core PC inflation report,

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 3>which is projected to be about two and a half percent,

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 3>and whether it's oil prices that are lower, whether it's

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 3>wages that are lower, all of that is supportive. So

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 3>I still think investors are not tapped out. It's not

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 3>max bullish by any means. So I think we add here.

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I have been brought up the three point ex trillion

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 2>of cash Paul out there.

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 4>Yep, Yes, it's always been out there. I mean earlier

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 4>this year it was out of the US, out of cyclicals,

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 4>out of tech. Now it seems to be if I

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 4>look at the S and P five hundred, if I

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.519
<v Speaker 4>look at nastacy, it seems to be that that trade's

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 4>getting reverse ship hereople coming investments, coming back to the US,

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 4>back into cyclicals, back into tech. Was it just a

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 4>what was that?

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh, there's a lot of discussion around that. And first

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 3>of all, the month of May has all been about

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 3>these star reversals back into the US tech and back

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 3>into the US and back into cyclicals. But if you

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 3>actually look at the performance here to date, it's the

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 3>defensive sectors like utilities, for example, that lead the SMP.

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 3>They're up about five or six percent. The semiconductors, for example,

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 3>are down about five to six percent. So I don't

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 3>think it's actually too late for this rotation trade. And look,

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 3>we were never in the camp of the US exceptionalism

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 3>being over, because what's not over, for example, is the

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 3>fact that we have one of the most constructive tax

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 3>policies relative to our developed market peers. The fact that

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 3>the corporate tax rate in the US is twenty one

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 3>percent and with some write offs, maybe is the effective

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 3>one is even eighteen percent. That is a very constructive

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 3>environment to do business in the United States, and obviously

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 3>that's what the administration is trying to foster through terror

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 3>policy as well.

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Do we have to bring the evaluation discussion back on

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 4>the table because boy, when the market's sold off, a

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 4>lot of folks are saying, wait, eighteen times earnings, I'm

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 4>going to go in and buy this thing. But now

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 4>we're back, you know above twenty times, How do you

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 4>think about earnings? Because there still may be some earnings risk.

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 3>In this market, right, So a few weeks ago we

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 3>sort of had when we didn't know what is likely

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 3>to happen with terrorists, we sort of had this binary risk.

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 3>We either have to price in a recession and therefore

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 3>recession or earnings, which could have taken us well, it

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 3>has taken us as low as five thousand, but could

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 3>have taken us lower if we also had to assign

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 3>a recession in multiple. Now we don't have to assign

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 3>a recession in multiple, and we actually have to focus

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 3>on the earnings not only this year but next year,

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 3>which are expected to be around three hundred and seven dollars.

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 3>So if you apply the existing multiple to that, you

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 3>actually do get north of six thousand on the S

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 3>and P five hundred. And that's why to Tom's point,

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 3>I say, large cap stocks are certainly worth staying with.

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 2>What does free cash flow look like? In use of cash?

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean back when you were lonely and correct. The

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 2>answer is the free cash flow came in and I'm

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 2>hearing a lot of fancy Well, it's not going to

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 2>be this first second derivative, Da da da da da.

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you see sustained free cash flow by the market leaders?

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, I do, and the use of free

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 3>cash flow I think certainly would benefit the share repurchases

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 3>and buybacks, and Tom, that's what we're seeing in the market.

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 3>We actually have some of the record authorizations for corporate

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 3>buybacks and that is such a strong presence in the

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 3>market as well, which is why I say market participants

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 3>are not tapped out. It's individual investors, it's hedge funds,

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 3>it's CTAs, but it's also corporate is buying back those shares. Look,

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 3>the beauty of the setup, Tom, is a corporate margins

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 3>are in your highs and so there's a lot of

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 3>room to absorb the potential negative impact of tariffs.

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 2>Just quickly here, how lonely do you feel now? Is

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 2>everybody in the AMRO support I think it's sort of

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 2>a pretty lonely call. There's a lot of fear out there, right,

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 2>you know.

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 3>I still think there's a degree of fear out there.

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 3>But I'll just quote these stats you know that you know,

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 3>back in April you had about sixty six percent of

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 3>investors that were bearish. That is not the number today.

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 3>It's probably closer to thirty percent now, couple. It's a

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 3>big reversal. A couple of weeks ago you probably had

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 3>only twenty percent of investors that were bullish. Today that's

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 3>about thirty seven percent, But it's not fifty It's not

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 3>half of the investors that we're in the bullish camp

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 3>to start the year. So I think we need a

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 3>few more to join the party.

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Don't be a stranger. Come back again to sure of

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 2>visits today. Anastasia am Aroso with that capital, She's been

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 2>courageous about long in the market for years.

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 2>Now joining US d ives in videos not Cisco right.

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 5>It's almost an insult to in video when you say

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 5>look because the reality is that it's a fourth Industrial

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 5>revolution and it's being led by godfather of AI, Jensen

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.039
<v Speaker 5>and video. There's only one chip in the world, few

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 5>on this and that's why I believe four trillion and

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 5>eventually five trillion is where we're going to see for in.

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, in the ives perspectives on this page forty two

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 2>risk factors. What's the risk factor for the certitude this

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 2>thing's going to work out?

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 5>Look, I mean when you think about China, and obviously

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 5>that's all factored in here. I mean, anything that gets

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 5>a little positive in terms of moves on trade and

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 5>tariffs between US and China is ultimately that that to

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 5>me right now, the biggest risk is just trying to

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 5>and I think Jensen called it out shout across about

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 5>Trump administration. You're essentially giving away the China business because

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 5>of the AH twenty to Huawei, and that's the biggest risk.

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 5>But tom it just comes down to, like it is

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 5>Jensen and Nvidia's world. Everyone else is paying rent when

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 5>it comes to AI.

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 4>So what was the biggest takeaway from the earnings?

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 5>Last night?

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 4>It stocks up five six percent this morning, what's the

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 4>street taken away from it?

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 5>Was a staggering quarter in a bullish way relative to

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 5>the demand. I believe right now, demands that Truman supply

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 5>eight to one.

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 4>You got SOPs supplying supply eight to one.

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 6>Eight to one.

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Wow, So what where does this company go? What does

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 4>Nvidia do now to kind of take advantage of that

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 4>demand out there?

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 5>It's when you think about autonomous robotics physical AI. Eventually

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 5>keen with a robot, you know, in his in his palace.

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 2>You've been talking to Mikey.

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 5>Look, this is the only way it's fueled is by Nvidia.

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 5>So to me, now, the AI revolution coming to Middle

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 5>East sovereigns they want to be online.

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 2>It's on a unit basis. They're selling these things, right,

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 2>do you have a linear I mean, I got seventy

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 2>seven percent up free cash flow, but these numbers we've

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 2>never seen this. How do you extrapolate the unit growth

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 2>into the future. Forget about price, forget about tech boys

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 2>with their fancy shoes and you going out to all

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 2>the conferences you go to on a unit basis? Is

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 2>it a linear extrapolation?

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 5>Look, it's it's unprecedent in terms of what we've seen.

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 5>But to give granted, but if you look, it's almost

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 5>it's linear. But to the point that right now you

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 5>only have three percent of enterprises in the US that

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 5>have actually even gone down the AI path. So when

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 5>you think about the demand trajectory and where we ultimately

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 5>see this playing out, I mean you will be on

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 5>a trajector to ten dollars today.

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Paul knows it. Cold pract and gamble. What in God's

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 2>name is shamp vellow ballsom shampoo. What are they gonna

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 2>do with AI?

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 5>They're gonna look at marketing penetration and customers. They're gonna

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 5>look at all their data, probably seventy percent of it

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 5>that they basically they have not analyzed, and they're gonna

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 5>come up with eight, ten, fifteen use cases for how

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 5>AI agents could be deployed. Which is bullish from Microsoft,

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 5>bullish from MESSI of AI pound tier, bullish ultimately for

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 5>the rest of the food chain.

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, I looked at the chart yesterday. I mean the

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 2>quiet story at Q two is the moonshot in Microsoft

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe record highs this morning, yep, yep.

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 4>So Nvidia expec's revenue about forty five million in forty

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 4>five billion in the second fiscal quarter despite new export

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 4>restrictions costing about eight billion. That's a headwind.

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 5>Okay, let's just talk Apple, And there's why the stocks

0:09:56.400 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 5>up Apples to Apples Street, which is say April second,

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 5>you know libration, they didn't happen streets at forty eight billion, yep, okay,

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 5>Apples Apples, it would have been fifty three a five

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 5>billion piece. So Paul, that to me, it's when but

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 5>that speaks apples to apples, and everyone recognizes, I mean

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 5>you are you're looking at something that's really been unpressed

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 5>and I had relative to what we're seeing with them.

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Can I on it?

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 4>Can my chip guys do a workaround whatever the US

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 4>restrictions are?

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's that the market's basically reading through this saying

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 5>at one point you're gonna have to come to the table.

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 5>Part of negotiations. When you get chips on the table,

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 5>it's in video, it's Apple. When you think about trum administration,

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 5>come to the table. And and that's something where there

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 5>could be some work around eight billion that they've given away,

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 5>maybe half of that they get back.

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Apple. Unfortunately the chart doesn't look like Microsoft. I

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 2>got Apple right now down twenty two percent from the peak.

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 2>We don't have time for the Why how does Tim

0:10:57.800 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Cook turn it around?

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean he this is continues to be a hall

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 5>of fame moment in terms of how he's now the

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 5>get moment.

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Come on, Paul told me to buy this thing at

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of the year. I'm down twenty, but not

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 2>a hall of fame moment.

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 5>It's a hall of fame moment relative to the China

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 5>tariffs and getting around in ultimately India being the life raft.

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 5>You're gonna have sixty five seventy percent of assembly coming

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 5>out of India. And I think, look, no company is

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 5>more caught in the storm when it comes tariffs than

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 5>Cook and Cooper. Tina will be at WWDC. It's the

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 5>start of that broader AI strategy. I first said that

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 5>last year, No and Tom. If you take out tariffs,

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 5>this is a stock that's forty to fifty dollars higher.

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 5>So my view is that Cook is ten percent politician,

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 5>nineteen percent CEO. He'll navigate around this. And I think

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 5>we city are six months from now. The name that

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 5>I think is way miss priced is Apple.

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 4>Elon's going back to work. It seems like, what do

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 4>you expect it in the next six six months until.

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 5>I mean the dark chapter is over right, and and

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 5>I think it's bullet because now the autonomous and robotics

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 5>feature is here. And ultimately, look this, it was a

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.839
<v Speaker 5>fork in the road moment he bet on Tasla, And

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 5>now I think, even though there is still some brand

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 5>damage that remains, we weave the path through to a

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 5>two trillion dollar mark out for Tasla is now on

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 5>the table.

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Lisa, if your daughter in her prom, if her date

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 2>shows up in a tuxedo, that's that pink.

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 7>That's the trend.

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 4>Now that's what the kids are doing.

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 2>The kids are doing. The kids going to show up

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 2>in tuxedo with.

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 7>Like no everything like bananas, pineapples, like whatever on this ser.

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Toxedo.

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 5>Because I keep thinking, I keep waiting for the keen

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 5>pink boats tie. We know, I think it's I think

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 5>with AI it could be coming with.

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Today they said ives was here and I went with pink.

0:12:58.040 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 2>But I think you look I did.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 5>It's phenomenal in the pink bow tie. I'm just I'm

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 5>just saying.

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:09.719
<v Speaker 4>You know, I just give my charity yesterday you did

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 4>what Yeah my tux seedo that had I had worn.

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 7>In twenty years.

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 6>Okay, that's why.

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the difference, Paul, Paul, you would still get into

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 2>the tex exactly my tuxedo from twenty years ago.

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 5>It happened single best buy Apple, single best buye Here

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 5>to me, it's Tesla, given the given the autonomous path,

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 5>and must recommitted that continues to be front and center.

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 2>You're pro. I'm an amateur. I don't buy it. I

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 2>just can't get there, Paul, can you get there?

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 6>I can't bet against Elon in this stock.

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 4>It's just been.

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 2>It's just been.

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 4>It's been amazing story. And if he's back, if he's

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 4>really back, that's good for that He's back.

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 2>That's the way we rolled. Dan's Thank you so much.

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.479
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Corplay.

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 8>And Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 2>It is the most important interview of the day, folks,

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Riveting America is with Andrew Gilbert joining us. Now he's

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 2>with ECP, but forget about that, far far more. Andrew

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Gilbert has a massive cred out of stern On Data Centers. Yep,

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 2>you need to be neuutilities. I have seen the collective's

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 2>amount of hot air from people that didn't take thermodynamics

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 2>now is off the chart. Cut to the chase. Is

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 2>retail Electric America going to pay for Microsoft or in

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Video's data center electric bill?

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, first, thanks for having me on.

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 9>Happy to be here in really exciting time in our

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 9>industry for nuts for twenty five years, no growth, and

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 9>all of a sudden, we're on TV here after Nvidia earnings.

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 2>It's better than me, so it works. Are we going

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 2>to pay for nvidious data center?

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 6>So across across it's a great question.

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 9>Across the country, regulators are trying to figure out how

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 9>to make those companies pay for it, How to make Microsoft,

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 9>Amazon pay for it.

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Confidence they will, they will, and.

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 9>I think they're already finding a better way to do

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 9>that in competitive markets. So regulated utilities want you and

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 9>I to pay it on our content bill, But competitive

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 9>markets it's different. Companies like ours invest in competitive generation

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 9>and we take the risk. And I think that's the

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 9>big difference between regulated areas like the southeast of the

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 9>country and competitive markets like the Northeast and Texas.

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 4>So how do we power all these data centers. What's

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 4>the what's the path forward? Because I keep seeing Nvidia

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 4>and other companies from Microsoft and that we're building, We're building,

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 4>we're building, we're building. You've got to power this stuff.

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I watch landman, I know how the oil

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 4>and gams industry works.

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh, here we go.

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 5>Talk to us.

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 6>How we're going to power this stuff with everything?

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 9>This this is an industry that really again hasn't had

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 9>much demand growth, all of a sudden has an explosion

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 9>of it, and so we're going to need electricity from

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 9>all sources. Gas is going to have to be a

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 9>big component of it. Renewables as well, and that stuff

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 9>faces challenges with with tariffs and protectionist policies, with tax

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 9>credit risk on the renewable side. On the gas side,

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 9>it's just industry that for a while was sort of

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 9>adapting to almost no growth. So companies like ge Vernova

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 9>and Siemens are ramping up production capacity, but it's not

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 9>there yet, so it's going to take time.

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 4>Is it a public private partnership here? What's the regulatory

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 4>environment that you guys in on the financial side.

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 5>Need to see?

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 9>Uncertainty has been I think used a lot in the

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 9>show and many shows recently. We need policy certainty. The

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 9>industry is ready to make investment the investments needed the industry.

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 4>What is the industry? Is it just the power industry?

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Is it old?

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 4>Is it exceon Mobile?

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Is electric?

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 9>It's competitive generators like Constellation, Vistra Energy Talent companies like

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 9>that are the companies that going to move more quickly

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 9>than regulated utilities. But regular utilities, the dominions, the southerns,

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 9>they will be part of this too.

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Ge Vernova GV, I really don't know what it is.

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 2>All I know is mister Colp's genius. I got a

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 2>moonshot one fifty to four eighty five. Is that the

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 2>future of your business, whether it's private you know, like

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 2>your shop like ECP or public utilities boring Grammar, stock dominion.

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 2>I need to divo it an increase. Is this total

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 2>return of ge Fornova the future?

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 9>It's all about the shortage of gas turbines. That's what's

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 9>driving gev's performance and that's what we're seeing.

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but guess turbines aren't spinning windmules going around. Don't

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 2>give me this renewable energy. Song and dance is traditional energy.

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Dare I say coal going to power Microsoft's need for

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 2>the fourteenth data center.

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 9>Colon not Cole will survive a bit longer, but it's

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 9>declining and that's not going to change. Gas has really changed.

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 9>Gas has been the biggest kind of placement of coal,

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 9>and that's going to accelerate because data centers need twenty

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 9>four to seven electricity. Wind in solar don't provide that,

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 9>but wind in solar are cheap and that they can

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 9>be constructed quickly. So we need all of it to

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 9>meet this challenge. You can't do it with one feel source.

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 2>See that.

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 4>That's what I've understood.

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>You got to have it all.

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 4>Talk to us about nuclear I like the modular nuclear things.

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 4>Pop that baby right next to a data center. Let

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 4>it power it is that realistic?

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 9>Well, if you're willing to pay I don't know, seven

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 9>times the price of gas, maybe really and we think

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 9>it will be a factor that cost will come down

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 9>over time, but it's not ready two years from now.

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 9>It's probably ten years from now.

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Man, I thought that was a cool, Well, this is fascining.

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna be with us for the next four hours.

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Gilbert with us. He's partner at ECP. We've been

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 2>dying to do this. Palls in the meeting at three am.

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 2>When are we going to do data centers? We're doing

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 2>it right now. Are the tech companies open or are

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 2>they opaque about their plan? It's like they're like, you know,

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 2>we have to keep our image jump. If you know,

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Cooper Tino, they're out there wearing sneakers and you know,

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 2>you know they're Lulu Lemon and all that. Are they

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Are they transparent about their electrical demand needs?

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 6>Well, what's we mentioned uncertainty.

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 9>What's certain is the top five or six companies are

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 9>going to spend four hundred million dollars a year on

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 9>this stuff. And that's good and that's going to drive

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 9>electricity demand growth.

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 6>Yes, per year.

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 9>On the on the opacity, sure, it's hard to get

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 9>projects connected. So if you're a meta and you have

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 9>a two gigawatt need, you're going to apply for projects

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 9>in different parts of each market and hope that one

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 9>of them kind of gets service, gets connected. So you've

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 9>got to make sure. You've got to have contingency plans.

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 9>So I think they're doing some of that. I think

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 9>they're becoming more transparent.

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 4>You're thirty eight years old, dude, how did you You

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 4>guys are doing some serious stuff at ECPs. What's the

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 4>focus of what you guys are doing. You're investing equity

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 4>credit for power generation? Where's the where's the next five years?

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 9>As I mentioned before, this industry was even the electricity

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 9>I think is the most exciting commodity in the world.

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 6>Nobody cared about it three years ago.

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I've seen you at a bar. The whole bar goes

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 2>to sleep when you start talking gigawatts.

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 6>But that is our focus, and it's an industry all

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 6>of a sudden is growing.

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 4>Is this an administration that wants to support smart energy development,

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 4>whether it's fossil fuels or green I hope.

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 2>So. Okay, how'd you react when Spain went dark? To

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 2>me the heart of the matter. You know, I did

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of the act. Yes, I survived thermodynamics, folks,

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 2>not quantum mechanics. But that's a different story. Okay, great

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Spain goes dark because of the grid and the rap is.

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm speaking out of turn, folks, a bunch of touchy

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 2>feely theory. How does America avoid apearch black Spain for

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 2>two days?

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 9>I think it's about paying and compensating generators for reliability.

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 9>A big challenge in the electricity market is the capacity

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 9>that's not needed most of the time, but is needed

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 9>in that five percent scenario. And you've got to make

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 9>sure those those units are compensated, and they're starting.

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 2>To be and honor Dan Fuss, Boston, Looma's sales. Can

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Quebec Hydro come to the rescue. Can the Canadians be

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 2>a data center conduit to keep us in or is

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 2>it just too far to get it to some data

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 2>center in French Hills, Arkansas?

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 9>They need they need it up there too, need it

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 9>up there up there, especially during the winter. So it's

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 9>it's not twenty four to seven reliable type type generation,

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 9>which is what we need now.

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Lisa emails in, should I put solar panels on my

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 2>garage roof?

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 9>Maybe maybe losing that tax credit soon to do that

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 9>so it could get a little bit more expensive.

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Should we have the text credit? Yes, it's radio. You

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 2>got to talk.

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 4>What's the I mean, just real quickly, what's the what's

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 4>the next investment you guys want to make? Where do

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 4>you want to put capital for your Where do you

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 4>want to put your client's capital?

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 6>Today it's it's powering data centers.

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 9>So it's partnering with the biggest companies in the world

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 9>to supply these needs and to make sure that rate

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 9>payers aren't paying for it so it doesn't show up

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 9>on our electricity bills.

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Unfair question. Final question, Andrew Gilbert, which traditional utility has

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 2>best practices for the future.

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 6>I think what.

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 9>Some of the western utilities are doing in terms of

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 9>hardening and the efforts they're making around wildfire prevention is excellent.

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 9>It's a huge challenge they face to keep that, to

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 9>keep the wire safe, to keep people safe, and I

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.120
<v Speaker 9>think they're doing a fantastic job turning those businesses around.

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Don't be strange.

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I would love to come back.

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you pay the congestion tax? Or who figure out

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 2>get around that? It's tough. It's tough, absolutely superb But folks,

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I hope you love this. Somebody said, Lisa or Paul

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 2>came to the rescue and so get some geek on

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 2>all the data center elector stuff. Andrew Gilbert, did you

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 2>do take thermodynamics?

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 10>And I did not.

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 6>I'm not bright enough for that stuff.

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 2>That's all.

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 4>He's a banker.

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Gilbert, thank you so much. With ECP, we'll do

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 2>This again is the story, huge story.

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Corplay.

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 8>And Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 2>We are honored to bring you the nation's expert in

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>civics or textbooks are absolutely foundational. Wendy Schiller is professor

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 2>at Brown University, the Tubyne Center and such. Wendy, so

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 2>honored to have you here. The document is incredibly detailed

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 2>for a hack like me. Halfway through on page twenty

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 2>five discussion, they go right to the Shiller matter. They

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 2>go right back to seventeen eighty eight, James Madison, Federalists

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 2>number forty eight. Where's the legislature? Whatever you believe in, folks,

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 2>whatever the issue is, pro Trump, anti Trump, etc. Wendy Schiller,

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 2>where is the legislature in this tariff battle?

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 10>Well, it's fascinating that the court, this sort of structure

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 10>for tariff courts, has now intervened and said these are illegal.

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 10>You would have thought the Congress with you know, tariffs

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 10>are import taxes. Congress, particularly the House of Representatives have

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 10>a constitutional authority to generate revenue and to authorize spending.

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 10>Only the House can initiate that, and so they do

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 10>have jurisdiction over tariffs. And the president can suspend the rules,

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 10>you know, indefinitely if he so chooses. But the idea

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 10>was that this is just for an emergency and that

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 10>the power really rests with Congress. But the Republican dominated

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 10>House and Senate has chos and to let the president

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 10>extend this authority literally.

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 8>Chosen to do that.

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 10>They could have repriked it earlier this year, but they didn't.

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 10>So this is really fascinating that now the court that

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 10>is part of the trade, international trade and domestic trade

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 10>system has said no, these are illegal. Where is Congress?

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 2>What will the appeal process looked like? Peter Navarro with

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:22.640
<v Speaker 2>this year in an hour and a half from sixteen

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 2>hundred Pennsylvania Avenue Professor Schuler, Navarro's going to be apoplectic

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 2>over this. Who does the Trump administration appeal to? Who

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 2>are those guys?

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 10>Well, that's the big question mark, I mean everything. This

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 10>is sort of an embedded government structure. So you know,

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 10>when you think about the final word, who has the

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 10>final word? And the Trump administration is not that interested

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 10>in any other structure in the American piblical system having

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 10>of power over them.

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, does everything go to.

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 10>The Supreme Court? And the Supreme Court is interesting to watch.

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 10>We have a lot of decisions coming down in June

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 10>that we can expect, and you know, where do they

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 10>reign in executive power? And the important thing with the

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 10>Supreme Court is to make sure this isn't about Donald Trump.

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 10>This is about the balance of power in the system itself.

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 10>So that's where the education on tariffs lie. In immigration,

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 10>and we've seen the Court say to the President and Congress.

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 10>Congress has authority to make the laws on immigration, make

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 10>the laws. The president cannot just create immigration law. So

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 10>is that the same thing that will be applied to tariffs.

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 10>We're probably about to find out.

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 4>So, Wendy, what happens in the interim here? I mean,

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 4>I feel like the United States negotiating with dozens of

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 4>countries over tariffs. What do I do if I'm I

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 4>don't know, China, Canada, Mexico, What do I do now

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 4>with this ruling?

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, when you think.

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 10>About the other countries, she also think about small businesses.

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 10>Rhode Island is to state with a disproportionate amount of

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 10>small business owners.

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 8>How do they plan? You know, are you paying the tax?

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 10>Are you're not paying the attacks? And I call it

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 10>attacks because it is a tax, a tariff.

0:26:58.840 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 6>You know, what do you do?

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 10>Do you reach your prices?

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Now? You know? How much do you order?

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 10>What do we think about the economy? It creates and

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 10>generates of course uncertainty. We saw the markets react badly

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 10>to major tariffs, then they come down. Now the market

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 10>is settled, and now there's continued uncertainty. So if you're

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 10>Navarro and you want to make the argument that government

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 10>that businesses should invest in the United States, they need

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 10>a stable, consistent business environment. And right now the trumpinstration

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 10>is not providing a stable and consistent business environment.

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 4>How how hard do you think the Trump administration will

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 4>fight this court ruling and fight for its tariff mandates.

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 10>The instinct to fight comes straight from the top.

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 10>Trump is a fighter and he doesn't like limits on

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 10>his power. You know, he could be talked into lowering them,

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 10>and he has been talked into lowering them. And so

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 10>when you think about this, the president will fight for

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 10>the sake of retaining executive power, and Congress has to

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 10>send him a signal eventually, but they aren't acting on that. Again,

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 10>when we look at this tax bill, once it's out

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 10>of the way, what does Conger doud reserve itself. I

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 10>don't have great expectations for Congress to reserve itself once

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 10>this tax bill is done. I think the Republicans realize

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 10>that's not the only thing they're gonna get done this year.

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 2>And your commute across the nation. A hugely eventful Thursday

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 2>with legal opinions which will brief you on a number

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 2>of times. Yere across the morning. Good Morning on YouTube

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 2>worldwide as well. Wendy Schiller of Brown University is with

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 2>us today. Wendy, I'm just going to cherry pick here.

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 2>And a gentleman from New Jersey, Samuel Alito, is on

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court. Let's assume if it's a decision of

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 2>eight to one, seven to two, nine to one, whatever,

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 2>ninety two, three four, Alito's leading a certain charge to

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 2>support the executive branch. Describe the thinking of the people

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 2>like Judge Alito, who says, wait, you three judge, Court,

0:28:53.760 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 2>you can't do that. Describe Alito's federalists and Madisonian vial me.

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 10>When you look at Alito and Thomas, they're different, I

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 10>think in the way they vote a lot similarly a

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 10>lot of the time. But Alito truly believes that the

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.959
<v Speaker 10>entire apparatus of the federal government is far too large

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 10>and is completely inconsistent with the constitutional structure and the

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 10>intent of the federal government as it was created, which

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 10>was basically to protect the national defenses and allow an

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 10>economy to flourish, but basically let the original thirteen colonies

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 10>live the way they were. They were very different from

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 10>each other when they entered into the Union. And so

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 10>his argument is, nobody ever built, nobody ever intended for

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 10>this to be so big, nobody wanted it to bill

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 10>out this large. So I'm going to take every opportunity

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 10>to basically reduce the scope of the government. And what

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 10>he believes is that Congress drives the size of the

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 10>federal government, and not the President, that the President executes,

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 10>but that the president can in fact reduce the size

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 10>of the government.

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 2>This is so important, I got to squeeze it in,

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Professor Schuller, I look at a three judge court, Reagan, Trump,

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 2>what was it? Obama? Reagan Trump Obama judges. Nobody's talking

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 2>a regionalist theory here. They're just talking nuts and bolts

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 2>of a nineteen seventy seven agreement. And the huge detail

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 2>in their professionalism is this going to just go back

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 2>to originalist theory a la Thomas and Alito and what

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 2>President Trump supports.

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 10>The problem for Thomas and Aldo to do that is

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 10>that original theory literally in not only the Federalist papers,

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 10>but the Constitution itself, is that the House controls tariff policy.

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 10>That you can't just wake up in the morning and

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 10>say I'm going to impost one hundred and thirty percent

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 10>or forty five percent on an individual country if you're

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 10>the president of the United States, only under extraordinary circumstances.

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 10>And the Constitution and the founders are very clear that

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 10>when you execute these powers as president in extraordinary circumstances,

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 10>those circumstances have to be extraordinary. So this is the

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 10>problem for Ledo on Thomason. Goes completely against their theory

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 10>of originalism to put all this power and opportunity in

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 10>the president's hands, and the Constitution that's quite explicit that

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 10>it should rest with the Congress, particularly the House represent.

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 2>I can't Imagine your day, Wendy Show, Thank you so

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 2>much for being with us this morning with Brown University.

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay.

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 8>And Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty Lisa Matteo.

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Now with the newspapers, what do you happen?

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 7>All right, I'm starting with this Wall Street Journal exclusive.

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 7>This is about Paramount Global. They're offering reportedly offering President

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 7>Trump fifteen million dollars to settle that lawsuit he had

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 7>against Paramount CBS News, But sources are telling the journal

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 7>that the President feels it's not enough. He wants more

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 7>than twenty five million. He also reportedly wants an apology

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 7>from CBS. If you remember that lawsuit, it was it

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 7>all surrounds how the network supposedly edited a sixty minutes

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 7>interview with Kamala Harris to make her sound better. CBS

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 7>says that's not true, but they're all also saying that

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 7>the President's team has dreatened another lawsuit against CBS related

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 7>to bias on its news coverage. But there's supposed to

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.959
<v Speaker 7>be a session today like where this is unprecedented.

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, isn't CBS supposed to fight back? Is the news?

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 4>The reason they're not fighting back is they have a

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 4>planned merger with Skydance Media and they want.

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 2>That to go through.

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 4>They need the FCC approval and presumably there's some concerns

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 4>that the government will use this suit as a reason

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 4>not to approve the deal. Sherry Redstone needs the merger

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 4>to go through so she can get paid out. It's

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 4>as simple as that. So it's uh, you know, they'll

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 4>come to something.

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 2>We've seen some just point out separate from this news.

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 2>We've seen resignations at CBS.

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, yep.

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot, a lot going on.

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 4>There, a lot going on there, and it's all because

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 4>they need to get this deal approved and get it through.

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 4>So it's all about money as it just as it

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 4>always is.

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 7>Neclas Okay, all right, we'll take you to luxury okay,

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 7>lvmh Okay. They said they could increase the price bits

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 7>goods by about three percent to office at tariffs. But

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 7>there are two things that they say they cannot raise

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 7>a price on and that is cognac and lower priced

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 7>beauty products, the lower priced end.

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 7>They say things like jewelry, those high end jewelry they

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 7>can withstand the price increases because their buyers can take

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 7>on the price increases.

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 8>But they've had a.

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 7>Tough time with the alcohol sales. Apparently the Konnak Spirits

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 7>division they've dipped in the past year. They're selling fewer

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 7>champagne bottles on top of it too, so they're saying

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 7>those are the things they can't.

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't think I've ever had.

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 4>Cognac is a variety of brandy named after the Commune

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 4>of Cognac, France.

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 6>All right, it's not bad, Yeah, yes, Cognac.

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 7>I did a little Hennessy sometimes.

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 6>In the desk.

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 4>It's the Hennessy Cognac, all.

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 7>Right, it has and Champagne.

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember the name of the company now, but

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 2>it's a small, secure French thing, and like one third

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 2>of their business is Cognac or whatever. And it ain't happening.

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's not just LV, it's overall. So they're

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 2>not lowering the price of all the merch that sundry Keenes.

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 7>Look at of the cognac and the spirits of the

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:20.959
<v Speaker 7>other high end jewelry and that kind of stuff.

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Lewis Viewton shoes too much for the prom.

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 7>Yes, definitely, that was a discussions. You can't even see

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 7>the feet with the dress, so don't even think about it. Next,

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 7>we've been talking a lot about AI and will they

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 7>replace jobs, right, so this story about salesforce kind of

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 7>puts that into perspective a little bit. They said they're

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:44.240
<v Speaker 7>reducing the hiring for some roles because of its AI tools.

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 7>So its CFO gave this example and she said five

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 7>hundred customer service workers will be moved to different positions

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 7>within the company and that'll save them about fifty million dollars.

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 7>Also said they're hiring fewer engineers on top of it.

0:34:57.880 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 7>They say they hope it's going to make their staff

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 7>more productive. But at the same time, where they're increasing

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 7>are the ranks of its salesforce. So that's where they're

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 7>starting to see the difference. But we've seen it, you know,

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 7>different companies like Microsoft told.

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 4>Offspring number three, get to a business where you have

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 4>a revenue number next to your.

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Name, that's it.

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 4>That's my strategy, that's my advice. You know, get to

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 4>a business, and so salesforce?

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Do you do you believe equipment? We don't have the

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 2>time here, but like all these jobs are going to

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:26.320
<v Speaker 2>go away, I just don't buy it.

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think a lot of them are. I mean,

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 4>I just think of my investment banking business. I mean,

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 4>do I need three analysts staffed on a deal to

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 4>draft inspect models. I don't think so.

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:37.840
<v Speaker 6>I don't think so.

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 4>So I think there's gonna be an issue there.

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 2>The newspaper SAIDY Lisa Matteo, thank you so much.

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Easter and on Bloomberg dot com,

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal