WEBVTT - Nvidia Soars to Record as AI Boom Fuels Chips Demand

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg business Week Inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Nvidia is off and flying this year. Ian King is

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 2>US semi conductor and networking reporter at Bloomberg News. He

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 2>joins us on Zoom from San Francisco. Ian and Video

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 2>is up another twenty six percent today. It's up about

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and sixty four percent so far this year.

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 2>It's the number one perform in the S and P

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>five hundred this year. We talk about it a lot,

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 2>especially when it comes to AI. Is the euphoria over

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Nvidia and its connection to AI justified?

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 3>There are a couple of ways to look at this,

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 3>and obviously we've had conversations on this over the last

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 3>few days. And you know, the big question was is

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 3>anybody actually making money out of AI? We're talking about it,

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.919
<v Speaker 3>Is anybody making money out of it? Yesterday's announcement showed

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 3>that this company really is. Valuations that's another question, right

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 3>We're looking at what one hundred and eighty times current innings.

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:18.199
<v Speaker 3>You can decide whether that to represents value for money

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 3>or output. They are putting up numbers that justify some

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 3>of the hype. That's certainly true.

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so the forward PE is fifty four fifty five,

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 4>which you know for a normal company would still be

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 4>very rich valuation. But it's yesterday. This time it was

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 4>like sixty five, So the e has really come up

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 4>in terms of you know, what analysts expect. I heard

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 4>a great stat yesterday ian from some novas that sixty

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 4>five percent of the chips they sell for server use

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 4>are used in deep learning, are used in you know,

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 4>AI generative language models. So it's really about AI, right,

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 4>It's not just a fad. They haven't just slapped AI

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 4>on the name. It really is being used the bulk

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 4>of their product in this new technology.

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know that there are all kinds of

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 3>stats floating around at the moment that add to this,

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 3>and you know they're incredible. Another way to look at

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 3>it would be I saw another report that said in

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 3>video currently has north of eighty percent market share in

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 3>this particular segment. And guess what, during the last three months,

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent of the installs of this type of system.

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 3>We're on in video system, we're on in video equipment.

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 3>So it's got a strong market share and it's getting better.

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 3>And now this is by far the company's largest source

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.399
<v Speaker 3>of revenue. I mean, you were talking about, well, why

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 3>would you sell out the stock? Remember last year and

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 3>this year have been a terrible year for the company's

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 3>overall innings. It's in the PC business that's horrible. That's

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 3>why you sold out, not really knowing just how strong

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 3>this AI search could be. And now we're seeing it.

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, we don't know, but Kathy Woods supposed to know, right,

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 4>She's the future guru, you know, she is the one

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 4>who's making the big bets on these things they're gonna

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 4>happen later on in life.

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, look at it this way, to be fair to her, right,

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Nvidia gave a projection that was fifty three percent higher

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 3>than the average analyst estimate here. So so nobody got

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 3>embarrassed Wall Street. Right, they embarrassed Wall Street, never mind

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 3>one particular fund manager.

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 2>So I guess what I'm wondering is basically this ramp

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 2>up where Nvidia is benefiting ian is this just as

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 2>companies are exploring what they can do with AI, this

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 2>version or this higher you know, learning formula of AI,

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 2>and they're trying to figure out how they basically benefit.

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Is that what this is kind of an exploratory phase

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 2>and that we're not quite yet at the Hey, here's

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 2>what really works and is going to pay off fees.

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 3>No, I think you're picking it as something which is

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 3>really important and something which was a major topic on

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 3>the conference call that they did yesterday, and that was like, look, hey,

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 3>you're selling to Microsoft, you're selling to Google, you're selling

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 3>to AWS. That's fantastic, but guess what those guys want

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 3>to do their own chips and if they're the only

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 3>customers in town, sooner or later they're going to find

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 3>somebody else so they won't need you as much. What

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 3>are you going to do about it? And in really

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 3>was like, you really haven't been listening to us. We

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 3>believe that AI is going to be used everywhere, right,

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 3>and in order for that to happen, here are these

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 3>products that we've already put out there. They've done software

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 3>for pharmaceutical, software for all of the you know, for automotive,

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 3>for all of these different industries that wouldn't have these

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 3>genius computer scientists who can then buy some of the

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 3>service or even buy some of invidious products and use

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 3>AI for themselves. So you know, they at least had

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 3>an answer to a very very important question about where

0:04:58.400 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 3>this all goes.

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 2>They don't and Vidia doesn't need a Microsoft or Google

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 2>ultimately longer term because they can tap into all these

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 2>other areas or TVD.

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's a it's how do they put it

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 3>a frenemy relationship right now in Microsoft needs in videos chips.

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 3>In Vidia has put some of these services it's hoping

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 3>to sell to these companies in the cloud hosted by

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft as you or Amazon a WUS. But down the

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 3>road and an ideal world in video is going to

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 3>be selling directly to some of these companies if they

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 3>can acquire that kind of expertise, or if Nvidia can

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 3>make it easy enough.

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, Paul Sweeney, who in his former life was

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 4>an investment banker, his immediate thought goes to taking advantage

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 4>of this situation. Right if your stock pops like this

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.239
<v Speaker 4>and you are the it stock, I mean, right now,

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 4>you want to own Nvidia and you want to tell

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 4>your friends that you own in Vidia because you're the

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 4>smart guy who's into AI. That could last a month,

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 4>it could last three months, maybe it lasts a year,

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 4>but probably not much longer. Are they going to raise capital?

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 4>Are they going to buy something with these shares? Because

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 4>they should really take advantage of this situation.

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's I mean, knowing their CEO and

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 3>knowing the way that they look at things, that's very

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 3>much a throwback view of of Silicon Valley and of

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 3>you know, the way that the markets work. They believe

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 3>they're a technology company. They believe they have everything in

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 3>place that they need. As you remember, they did try

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.239
<v Speaker 3>to buy ARM and regulators around the world said, nope,

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 3>you're too big, we don't like this. So they've learned

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 3>that lesson. Why would they go off on something that

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 3>they're probably not going to get So that's probably the

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 3>way they're looking at it.

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 2>So who competes with them ultimately.

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean Intel, but investors don't believe them Intel.

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Just Matt and I you know, Ian going into this,

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 2>We're like, did you look at Intel's marka cap and

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 2>did you look at nd videos mark Like it's just

0:06:58.440 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 2>hard to get my head around it.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 3>No, And it's I mean AMD stock went up today,

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 3>right because they do similar things. They're nowhere near as

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 3>far and advanced into this marketers in videos and in theory.

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Intel is there as well. Intel has been the heart

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 3>of the data center for you know, twenty thirty years.

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Investors just aren't buying that they have a way forward here.

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Even though Pat Gelsinger Intel has been talking about his

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 3>new products, his accelerators, data center products and all of

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 3>these things he's going to bring to market, Investors just

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 3>just don't believe that.

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 4>Right now, Intel is worth less than an eighth an

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 4>eighth that's crazy of video right and Video's trading right

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 4>now market cap nine hundred and fifty billion. Intel is

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and fifteen million.

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 3>In Vidia added more market cap today than Intel is

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 3>worth in total.

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 4>Wow, that's a very that's a very strong point.

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 2>So thirty seconds left here, Come on, and you've been

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 2>following I know, I asked this all the time because

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 2>your perspective is really valuable because you've studied this sector

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 2>for so long. Does that make sense to you?

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you believe what Jensen Lang said, which

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 3>is there are trillion dollars of data central equipment that

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 3>needs to be replaced right now, they're in the lead

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 3>as to whether an absolute valuation makes sense in those terms.

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 2>It's just interesting world. We're eleven in Ian, Thank you.

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I know we go round and round a lot on this,

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 2>but it seems to be the topic that everybody wants

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 2>to talk about, either AI and or the chip sector,

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 2>and you really just put it in such great perspective.

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Ian King. He is US Semiconductor Networking report at Bloomberg

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 2>News on zoom from San Francisco. Check out his work

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 2>on the Bloomberg at Bloomberg dot com and also on

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Twitter at Ian M.

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>King.

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 2>Pretty amazing stuff. Huh.

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.839
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business App,

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get to it, because we want to

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 2>talk a little bit about the cannabis industry. I don't know, Matt,

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 2>if you saw there was a Bloomberg News story earlier

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 2>this month, and you know it talked about cannabis basically

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 2>facing financial and regulatory malays in the US, but it

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.959
<v Speaker 2>isn't affecting the perceptions of consumers who increasingly approve of it.

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 4>I know, and the sales numbers are very strong. State

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 4>by state, of course is where we see that. But

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 4>it's billions and billions of dollars in revenue, and that's

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 4>runs the gamut from you know, medical use, prescribe medical

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 4>use to recreational like at a dead show.

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 2>In the meantime, our next guest is in. It also

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 2>has a personal story around it. We welcome Morgan Paxia,

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 2>co founder and managing partner of Poseidon Investment Management, keeper

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:44.119
<v Speaker 2>of the advisor shares Poseidon.

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 4>Poseidon, Poseidon like king.

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 2>I know it's that coming out right, Poseidon ETFs on

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 2>zoom and here York City. Sorry it's been a rough week, Morgan.

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Good to have you here with Matt and myself. First

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 2>of all, tell us about your how you got into

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 2>all of this because it is a personal story.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 6>It is like so many of us that have gotten

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 6>into the cannabis industry. Usually starts for a lot of

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 6>us with a family event. For us, we lost our

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 6>parents to cancer at a very young age. I was

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 6>twelve with my dad passed in eighteen. When my mom

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 6>and I started the business with my sister Emily, just

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 6>about ten years ago now, but they were both believers

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 6>in ending the war on drugs. They thought it was

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, unjust and but really what was a clear

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 6>moment for us was when our dad was in hospice care,

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 6>a nurse actually offered him some cannabis, just trying to

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 6>help him find some peace in the final days or

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 6>just some comfort, you know, being on all those opioids.

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 6>Wouldn't do it because of the stigma because it was illegal.

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 6>Didn't want to have any kind of tarnished kind of

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 6>sentiment back with family or anybody around us. And obviously

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 6>we've thought that was very wrong. I was young, but

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 6>as we say, it planted the seed for our future,

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 6>and so we've been so.

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 4>You are, so you Morgan and your sister Emily. What

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 4>started this ETF? But how did you get into it?

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 4>To begin with?

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 6>Our first fund, we launched in January of twenty fourteen,

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 6>was it's actually a hedge fund. It still runs today,

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 6>but we invested in much like a hybrid strategy where

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 6>we were doing private, early stage investments because everything was

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 6>private and early back then, but it had the ability

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 6>to also invest in companies that were public or would

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 6>become public companies. So it really gave us the full gamut.

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 6>We launched our ETF in November of twenty twenty one

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 6>thinking that a lot of the bear market cycle had corrected.

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 6>We were wrong or early with that, but also waiting

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 6>patiently for the market to get a little bit more

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 6>mature before we had a product such as an ETF.

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 6>But we thought the ETF was a great addition to

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 6>the Poseidon investment universe where we could have a product

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 6>that anyone could buy, you know as a hedge fund

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 6>and our two sub subsequent venture capital funds, those are

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 6>only eligible for credited investors or institutional like investors versus

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 6>an ETF anyone can buy.

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 4>So how do you I look at the price, right,

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 4>and as you pointed out your early so you came

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 4>out at ten bucks and it's now down at a

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 4>dollar fifteen. And if I look at the holdings, you

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 4>have green thumb, cure a leaf, true, leave, cresco. I

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 4>mean basically the usual suspects for the most part, right,

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 4>and they all their stock in charts look the same

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 4>as your TF.

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 5>What that's right?

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 4>What can you do differently than another fund or ETF?

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.439
<v Speaker 4>That's investing in in marijuana in order to get a

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 4>little bit of alpha.

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 6>Yep, we're unconstrained, so we can invest globally. We can

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 6>be you know, in Canada or in Europe. Really there's

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 6>not too much in Europe yet, but it is an

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 6>unconstrained strategy from a whether or not we're investing in

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 6>US operators or technology companies. So that's one unique feature.

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 6>We're not tied to any benchmarks. It's really just at

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 6>our discretion. And then we also have a dynamic leverage capability,

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 6>so we can be anywhere from eighty percent, so we

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 6>can be unlevered, or we can be up to one

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 6>hundred and fifty percent leverage, and we can dial that

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 6>up and down. And as is a good example, for

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 6>the most part of this year, we were atzero point

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 6>nine five times, but then as some of this safe

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 6>banking initiative started to come back with regular order in

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 6>the Senate, there's some other things in the works. We

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 6>have slowly taken leverage up to one hundred and ten percent,

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 6>so we're just modestly leveraged today, but believing that there

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 6>are some potential progress. So we saw regulatory change, but

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 6>also the fundamentals of the industry have been improving over

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 6>subsequent quarters, So we like that the fundamental support is

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 6>there and any kind of regulatory progress would generate some

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 6>nice upside return. But predominantly focused on good companies. We

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 6>want to see companies that are have gross margins, have

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 6>nice evadam margins, have either the ability of generating free

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 6>cash flow or are already generating free cash flow. And

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 6>so that's what our portfolio looks like today. Really trying

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 6>to focus on quality.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Right Morgan, I feel like we've seen a lot of

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 2>cycles already when it comes to the cannabis sector, to

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 2>be fair, and is it just a case of the

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 2>industry really can't get going until the Safe Banking Act

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 2>is past. I mean, they need to be part of

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the financial system. It's been the one thing that's really

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>been holding in.

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 4>And explain to us, if you could the you know,

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 4>to the Secure and Fair Enforcement Banking Act, what is

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 4>that going to allow you to do.

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 6>The way we look at it is it's first and foremost,

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 6>it's helping small business in cannabis. It's providing safety to communities.

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 6>We are largely a cash based industry, so if you're

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 6>a retailer, you have a lot of cash in your store.

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 6>That's that's trouble, right, and we've seen a significant increase

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 6>in crime around that because there are people being advantageous.

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 2>So that's in banks, right.

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 6>You sort of CANBA is very limited, so safe WUL

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 6>help recognize that we are on the same playing field

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 6>as every other industry with the ability to deposit. Why

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 6>you're working lines of capital, so that will help. And

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 6>also if we do get capital markets included, which is

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 6>being discussed, and the minority groups are actually supporting this

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 6>understanding that if you're going to have a federal reformer

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 6>on banking, it should be all of banking, and we

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 6>think that's that's actually a really smart way to think

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 6>about it. We support that as well.

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 3>We know the.

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 6>Exchanges believe that too, and to your point that we

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 6>think that will help move money again in this space,

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 6>it's it's largely slowed down considerably. Custody is very hard,

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 6>so banking reform is needed and that's how DC functions.

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 6>You know that the industries move forehead and now we're

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 6>looking to DC to catch up with us on this.

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 4>This first up, I mean, what what is your expectation

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 4>for the safe right now, I mean, and the problem

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 4>is it doesn't function right. So what's your expectation, Morgan

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 4>for Congress to actually move on this legislation.

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 6>It's actually looking like the scent it could get this

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 6>done as long as safe stays in a pretty targeted way.

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 6>From a banking reform perspective, it sounds like we have

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 6>Democrat and Republican support and that's why it's going through

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 6>this regular order process and we think we could potentially

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 6>see a vote as early as July. Then we have

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 6>to move onto the House, which has passed seven times

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 6>in the past, but we'll have to go through that

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 6>process again. So that is helpful. But in the interim,

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 6>we are seeing structures like one of the companies, Terrace End,

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 6>is potentially listing on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Now we

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 6>might be seeing a structure that might actually be blessed

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 6>by the NASDAK waiting on SEC. So if we're able

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 6>to get access to the exchanges even without or while

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 6>we are waiting for safe banking, that's progress. And our

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 6>industry is finally done being stuck from a capital perspective

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 6>and very happy to see that action is moving again

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 6>and so capital will start to flow as a result

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 6>of that.

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 4>All right, Morgan, thanks very much for joining us. Morgan

0:16:56.160 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 4>Paxia there from Poseidon Asset Management. The ETF is the

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 4>Act Advisor Shares Posidon Dynamic Cannabis ETF and the ticker

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 4>is PSDN.

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Easter on Bloomberg Radio,

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App and YouTube. You can also listen

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News reporting earlier this year how the fitness sector

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 2>has roared back after being devastated by the pandemic. Cost

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 2>pressures though, and a possible recession could possibly pose a threat.

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 2>So we thought we'd take a look man at the industry,

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and we've got someone who's actually spent more than twenty

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 2>years managing, owning, and franchising health clubs, Chuck Runyon, his

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 2>co founder and CEO at Anytime Fitness, a franchiser of gyms,

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 2>joining us on Zoom from Woodbury, Minnesota. Check also the

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.439
<v Speaker 2>CEO and co founder of Self Esteem Brands, which is

0:17:57.440 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 2>the owner of Anytime Fitness and also the bar Method

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 2>and more so he's certainly well versed in this space. Hey, Chuck,

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 2>nice to have you here with Matt and myself. Talk

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 2>to a little bit more about Anytime Fitness, how it

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 2>all works, and the type of growth you've seen, particularly

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 2>post pandemic.

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 7>Yes, Carol, Matt, thank you for having me from this

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 7>beautiful day in Minnesota.

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 5>Excited to be here.

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 7>My partner and I started Anytime Fitness just over twenty

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 7>years ago.

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 5>We started in Minnesota.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 7>But today we serve over fifty five hundred communities in

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 7>forty countries around the world. And our goal has always

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 7>been to make fitness more affordable, more accessible, and more effective,

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 7>and we utilize technology to do that so members could

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 7>work out on their schedule, not the gym schedule. That

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 7>technology is still in place today, and when you buy

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 7>membership at your local club, to say in Minnesota, you

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 7>get to use every club in the network. So we

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 7>are still infused with technology. And now recently we've just

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 7>launched our coaching suite, which is providing people with education

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 7>motivation anytime, anywhere, whether they're in one of our gymder studios,

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 7>or wherever in the world they live. We can now

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 7>reach them right, help them be healthier, help them eat better,

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 7>coach them to a better lifestyle. And so we're very

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 7>excited and you know, tremendous growth ahead. We are on

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 7>a pathway to have ten thousand units by twenty thirty.

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 4>So do you have You know a lot of people,

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 4>myself included, have joined gyms and then like they'll go

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 4>a few times and then never go again, and every

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, a couple of years, I'll join another one

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 4>and do it again, do it all over again. But

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 4>I wish I could stick with it. How do you

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 4>motivate someone like that?

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 7>It's a great question and something that has been going

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 7>on in our industry since day one, and you know,

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 7>it comes down to a handful. Then, first of all, personalization.

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 7>You know, it really helps with understanding our members where

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 7>they're at in their life journey and where they want

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:51.239
<v Speaker 7>to get to.

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 5>And once we do that, we can now not only.

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 7>Give them the workout necessary, but give them the coaching,

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 7>give them the motivation, give them the education that matters

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:01.719
<v Speaker 7>to them, and serve them up to type of content

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 7>that they want to see. And so we're just in

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 7>this for a series of small wins, if we can

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 7>help our members just achieve some small wins, some progress

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 7>along the way. Right, when members see progress and experience it,

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 7>they stick with their membership longer and they reach their

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 7>fitness goals. When, like you said before, if they don't

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 7>get that extra help but they don't feel that level

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 7>of personalization, they start to drift away. They leave the industry,

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 7>maybe to come back a few years later.

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 5>So everything we do is.

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 7>About how do we help our members achieve progress? Right,

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 7>our members' health is at the center of everything we

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 7>build here.

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 2>You guys, though, believe that basically the government right should

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 2>be what mandating fitness give them a sh.

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 4>Let's get to that. That would be good.

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's get a little bit into how you're thinking about this.

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, let's zoom out again from our industry.

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 7>And you know, right now, globally we spend a trillion

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 7>dollars a year on healthcare, and seventy percent of us

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 7>spend is preventable based on something we call lifestyle medicine.

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 7>Lifestyle medicine is proper eating, regular exercise, and better sleep

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 7>and recovery. And so who better to deliver that than

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 7>gym's or studios located in communities around the country, and

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 7>so we were so disappointed that during COVID, health experts

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.679
<v Speaker 7>and policymakers around the world forced studios and gyms to

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 7>shut down, which is the exact opposite message we should have,

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 7>especially as as we saw that COVID attacked people with

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 7>underlying health conditions, they had it the worst.

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 2>And so now, to be fair, to be fair, we

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 2>didn't quite know how COVID was transmitted or how infectious

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 2>it was, right, so as we found our way like

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 2>it just made sense to shut it down. Initially, well, well,

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I would argue there that there is empirical evidence.

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 7>There is empirical evidence linking physical activity towards mental health

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 7>and social well being. And guess what, our industry was

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 7>working with lawmakers to say, we can social distance people

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 7>inside of our clubs and studios. We can only allow

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 7>a certain amount of people in at certain times. We

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 7>were trying to work with them to say, look, fitness

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 7>is essential, and if it's outside the club or inside

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 7>a club or studio, the message should be let's keep

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 7>people moving, let's keep them healthy during COVID, because now

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 7>what's accelerated is we have issues of mental health.

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 5>We have issues where people have been inactive.

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 7>We have, we have issues of loneliness, right, we have

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 7>issues of weight gain and right now cardiovascer disease and

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 7>type two diabetes and obesity are the number one killer globally.

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 4>We have a big country, so hold on.

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 2>None of us are disputing these numbers and no doubt

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 2>about it. But this whole idea of government mandating fitness

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 2>and wellness, I'm not saying.

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 4>I just it's not that they're mandated. He's not saying

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 4>they should mandate fitness wellness. He's saying they should consider

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 4>it essential so that they wouldn't close it down in

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 4>case of a pandemic.

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 7>And I would not use the word mandating. But think

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.479
<v Speaker 7>about this, what health health expert to be heard like

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 7>really say get behind, move more, eat better, sleep better.

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.719
<v Speaker 7>It was all about like avoiding a virus, but our

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 7>real virus is inactivity. Right at the end of the day,

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 7>we have we lose hundreds of thousands of people a

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 7>year to preventable diseases that if they were just live

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 7>healthier lifestyles, right, we could not only save money, but

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 7>save lives.

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 5>And so that should be the.

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 7>Message coming out of COVID is how do we get

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 7>people healthier, And there's no better industry to deliver that

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 7>than our gyms and studios. And so we're trying to

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 7>educate policymakers and lawmakers to help with that.

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, hopefully we'll never get back to a pandemic

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 4>where we shut down. I think I hope the government

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 4>has learned lessons about these draconian procedures. But one thing

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 4>we can do, Chuck, is encourage kids to be more active.

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 4>When I was a child, and I'm Carol, I'm sure

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 4>as well, we have exactly President Eisenhower, and it was

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 4>like a big deal when I was a kid, And

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 4>I think that kids today, for some reason in this

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 4>like snowflake generation, they're allowed to skip gym class because

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 4>it hurts their feelings. Like, don't we have to change that?

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 5>We do.

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 7>In fact, if you look at most school budgets around

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 7>the country, fy, it is being cut and so there's

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 7>less and less activity in our kids' lives. And technology

0:23:57.920 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 7>is also playing a role to have our kids be

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 7>more said, so, we absolutely, with both adults and children,

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 7>need to create awareness and incentives and policies to shape

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 7>the health of this country and the health of global.

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, don't you think technology though, ultimately with an Apple

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 2>Watch and different things that are kind of getting us

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 2>to a point where we're more aware of our fitness

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 2>or lack thereof, and just kind about twenty five seconds

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 2>real quick.

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 7>I think that the opportunity is there. We absolutely can

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 7>enable technology for more activity, but it's also like having

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 7>us be sedentary right where we're sitting and having too

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 7>much screen time, So it's both a strength.

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 2>No, but I'm saying, like if I got to watch,

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Matt's gonna watch like you count your steps, these things

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 2>are potentially good. We'll continue this conversation at another date.

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Tell with you, Chuck.

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 5>No, I'm all for wellness and fitness.

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 2>You know that co founder or CEO of Anytime Fitness

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 2>joining us from Minnesota.

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 3>This is Blueberg.

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 5>The Journal.

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Now about you?

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 7>Let me drive?

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no, no, honey, please, I'll do the gravels.

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's wat I want to try.

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 3>It's a good question.

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the clothes dot Com for me.

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Think well on Bluemberg Radio.

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, we've got about eighteen minutes eleven today's

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 2>trading session. What did you do when I was in here?

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you do this.

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I hung out with Paul Sweeney, but neither of

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 4>us knows how to run the show, so it was

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of a calamity. We're glad you're back.

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad to be back, all right, So let's get

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 2>to it. It is time for our drive to the

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Clothes and our guests on this what is it Thursday? Yeah,

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 2>Lauren San Philippo, director and senior investment strategy analyst for

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 2>the Chief Investment Office at Bank of America. She is

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:48.959
<v Speaker 2>joining us on the phone in New York City. Lauren,

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Good to have you here. There's a lot of stuff

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 2>going on. First of all, how do you guys think

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 2>about the craze in AI right now and how investible

0:25:58.680 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 2>is it?

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 8>Yeah? I think it's been pretty interesting to see this

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 8>play out, just in terms of some of our somatic ideas,

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 8>these longer term things that are playing out now in

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 8>the markets, and sort of that megacap surge. It's been

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 8>well discussed on your program, but we're still sort of

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 8>in this trading pattern of the top of the market,

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 8>those top five stocks that are accounting for the majority

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 8>of that S and P game year to date, and

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 8>obviously those valuations have obviously been running up along the way,

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 8>but those megacap names, and it's following this AI sort

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 8>of euphoric surge in the market. It's sort of what's

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 8>moving the index. And I don't think you need to

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 8>read too much into this narrowness of the market. But

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 8>we'll see how that AI story plays out as it

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 8>pertains to productivity and for you right now, we do

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 8>think it's also an up and quality story that's really

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 8>important to us here to date. So we think those

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 8>companies that are following the AI craze, it's they're still

0:26:56.920 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 8>exhibiting those tech balance sheets, are pretty healthy and they

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 8>proved their earnings power through the Q on earnings reports.

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 4>You say we shouldn't pay too much attention to the narrowness,

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 4>to the lack of breadth. Why is that?

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so I think, you know, in most cases it

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 8>could indicate that, you know, we'd prefer to see a

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 8>broader rally, of course that would be the preference. But

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 8>I think you know, some of these some of these

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 8>companies will grow into the valuations as it can be

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 8>attributed to the AI craze and other reasons why the

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:29.360
<v Speaker 8>index is moving now.

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Lauren, that sounds very similar to the kind of things

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 4>that Carol and I were hearing in nineteen ninety nine,

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 4>and that's the last time we had such narrowness in

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 4>this market. I mean, there's no breadth. If you look

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 4>at the equal weighted S and P we're down yere

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 4>to date. So it's got to be concerning at some levels.

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Or does it just mean there's more opportunity for the

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 2>rest of the market to come on in.

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think this is part of sort of that

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 8>earnings reset that's still in front of us, and then

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 8>that will include probably coming coming out the other side,

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 8>will include a broader rally, broader participation. But really until then, Yeah,

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 8>the other names are in participation purgatory.

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 4>Right, So is this part of the reason that you

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 4>well Sevida at Bank America. Your strategists have raised your target.

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 4>You're now looking at forty three hundred for the year

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.120
<v Speaker 4>end and you were only looking at four thousand previously.

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 8>I mean I think this is attributable to to the

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 8>largely better than fear first quarter earnings. I think the

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 8>path forward maybe next quarter it brings a trough in

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 8>earnings the UPco coming second quarter reporting season. I think

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 8>we're in the sick of that earnings recession though that

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 8>I was talking about, and then we see those efficiencies

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 8>for corporate America sort of reset.

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Are we in an earnings recession you're saying, or because

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 2>I know we've talked with our Gena Martin Adams a

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 2>lot about it and she said it's already happened.

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that's correct. So we did hit the second quarter

0:28:56.000 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 8>of that negative earnings report, and you know Sevida penciling

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 8>in now the second quarter also negative, the third quarter

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 8>also negative. So we're sort of in the thick of it,

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 8>that's right.

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 4>So what kind of recovery do you expect in terms

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 4>of earnings and what's going to drive that? Is it

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 4>all going to come from AI?

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 8>No, so it's not going to all come from AI.

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 8>I do think that sort of tech took it on

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 8>the chin last year, right, So they've already been working

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 8>on sort of making those efficiency cost cutting tech sort

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 8>of already been in this. I think the rest of

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 8>the market sort of gets pulled along here.

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 2>So uppy, pessimistic, optimistic? What are you in terms of

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 2>the financial markets right now?

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think I'm more positive after seeing first quarter

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 8>play out in terms of earnings. But you know, I

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 8>think if you then segment the actual economy, right, we've

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 8>seen that leading economic indicator, it's now confirmed that you know,

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 8>it drops for the thirteenth consecutive months. So the worst

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 8>of this slow down, if it materializes into a recession,

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 8>it's actually in front of us. So our economists are

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 8>calling for that recession beginning in two three of this year.

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 8>So I think, you know, somewhere in the throws here

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 8>we've gotten more positive, yes, but that growth slow down

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 8>still in front of us, and that earnings recession is

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 8>still the majority of it's still in front of us

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 8>as well.

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 4>So what do you expect the FED to do? And

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 4>how important is you know, J. Powell's decision on rates

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 4>going forward?

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, is it a pause, is it a

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 8>skipp It's almost like a weird game of Uno, And

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 8>there's a lot of terms being thrown out there, and

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 8>what they decide to do at the June meeting. I

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 8>think by the time the FED puts all the pieces together,

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 8>staying data dependent, you know, our view is the June

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 8>meeting will bring a pause. Maybe that's we already saw

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 8>the last hike to the Fed's interest rate hiking cycle.

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 8>It was in May, and market expectations so for sort

0:30:56.680 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 8>of been bouncing around here. At one point cuts were

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 8>expected for June, and those cuts are now being pushed

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 8>out to later in the year, and we're more of

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 8>the mindset that cuts aren't a story until next year.

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 8>It would be more typical anyway to see that sort

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 8>of pause, that length of pause. I think the average

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 8>is around ten months between the last rate hike and

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 8>the first cut of the cycle. So as is typical,

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 8>we expect to sort of hold that pause for some time.

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Lauren, just last question. I mean when you guys,

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 2>when you're getting together with your team and just talking

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:29.959
<v Speaker 2>about the markets and what's going on, what is the

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 2>thing you guys spend the most time talking about. Is

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 2>it valuations? Is it FED policy? Is it action now

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 2>or lack thereof out of DC?

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 3>What is it?

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think it's so actually a mixture of all

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 8>those things right now. But it's also about investment areas. Right,

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 8>how we came into the year hedging for the recession

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 8>and now we have to think about the pivot forward, right,

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:56.560
<v Speaker 8>So like where are there investible sleeves in the market,

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 8>And you know, we're we've been to defense positioned. But

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 8>you know, with so much money on the sidelines, I

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 8>caution the market is up what seventy percent for the year,

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 8>and we're just focusing on staying invested and staying diversified.

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Where's all the money in the sidelines? Money market funds?

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that's a lot of money, right, A lot of

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 8>money committed to money market funds this year. And you know, yeah,

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 8>we're just looking for opportunities to put money to work.

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting.

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 2>So what's everybody comes back in?

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 5>Huh?

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 4>Lauren?

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much. Lauren San Philippo, Director and Senior Investment

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Strategy Analyst for the Chief Investment Office every Bank of America.

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 8>On the phone.

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live weekday

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg Journal alone.