WEBVTT - China Tech Stocks Surge, US Chips Get Boost

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:02.160
<v Speaker 1>From Mahart.

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 2>We're Innovation of Money and Power co line in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Love Love.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Live from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Technology coming up. China Tech stocks on a tear after

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 3>Beijing's push to boost growth.

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 4>And the CHIPSAC gets a boost too with a bill

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 4>headed to Biden's desk that cuts red tape.

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 3>And we discuss all things MNA, the City Group's head

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 3>of Tech Deals. But first let's check in on these markets,

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 3>and we start with the move of the day. Ed,

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 3>it is China Stocks, it is China Tech Stocks, and

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 3>we shine a light on the Golden Dragon Index. Here

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 3>we are up more than six percent. What does that mean?

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 3>It is the biggest move in more than a year,

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 3>and we're up training at the highest level in more

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 3>than three months. Stimulus to the Chinese economy. It helps

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 3>some of the key names that you're watching.

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and understandably those two key names at Ali BARBERANJD

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 4>dot com e commerce focus names, but also multifaceted tech companies.

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 4>Actually two of the names on the index in positive territory.

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Year to date, many of them are not. We will

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 4>go to our reporter later in the hour to talk

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 4>about the impact of stimulus on China tech. I'm also

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 4>looking at chip stocks at the index level. The socks

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 4>is up for a second day so far this week.

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Intel what might happen to it is dominating headlines. But

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 4>there's also some newscare about progress i'd say about onshoring

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.279
<v Speaker 4>the industry here in the United States. Bring us that story.

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, let's dive in.

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Because the US House approved legislation that would exempt some

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 3>chip manufacturing projects from federal permitting requirements. It's a bid

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 3>to speed up the buildout of the US semiconductor industry

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 3>from moos. Mackenzie Hawkins joins us. Now, so what they

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 3>don't have to take certain environmental.

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 6>Boxes, right, So, whenever our projects get money from the

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 6>federal government in excess of two thousand dollars, which every

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 6>chip company that's getting money from the Biden administration is

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 6>getting well north of that, they have to go through

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 6>the National Environmental Policy Act permitting process, which basically requires

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 6>all federal agencies to review the environmental impact of their

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 6>major actions and also opens up projects to significant litigation.

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 6>There's been concern in the chip industry from companies like

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 6>Intel and Samsung and Taiwan Sumi connecting manufacturing company, that

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 6>this could produce months or even years of delays on

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.839
<v Speaker 6>projects that the companies and the Biden administration have said

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 6>are critical to national security. So the bill that the

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 6>House passed yesterday, it's passed the Senate last year, so

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 6>it's going to Biden's desk, would exempt some of those

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 6>projects from federal environmental review. They'd still have to go

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 6>through state local permitting processes, which companies say can be

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 6>a headache. Environmental groups say are bedrock climate law. But

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 6>this is a significant red tape cuttake at the federal level.

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 5>Mac.

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 4>What you do so well for our audience around the

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 4>world is that there's billions of dollars coming from the

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 4>Chips Act, and lots of names on paper sound to benefit.

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 4>But building a fab takes a long time and it

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 4>takes all that money. Is there any evidence that actually

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 4>something is started in America, that there's some infrastructure popping

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 4>up around the place.

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 6>So we've seen more money put into chip factory construction

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 6>in the past four years, kind of leading up to

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 6>the package of.

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:23.119
<v Speaker 2>The chip stack.

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 6>When folks thought Hey, this subs package might be coming,

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 6>and of course after its enactment and during its implementation

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 6>then we saw in the two decades before that. So

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 6>companies are absolutely committing real money to these construction projects,

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 6>but they also need to wait and see market conditions

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 6>before they decide when and how and at what level

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 6>to fully build out their projects. You see, companies make

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 6>commitments to one fab or two fabs, but they have

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 6>sites that could accommodate eight and that of course depends

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 6>on customer demand. But in terms of the construction process,

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 6>that's where the permitting stuff really comes into play. And

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 6>so for companies that have been waiting to secure environmental

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 6>permits or have been going through that process alongside actually

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 6>putting shovels in the ground, this could be a really

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 6>big deal in giving them confidence of their construction timelines

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 6>for projects of that in many cases are already well underway.

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Mackenzie Hawkins with the latest and the flow of

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 4>dollars from the CHIPSAC Thank you very much now, As

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 4>misquite McKenzie discussed, Intel is one of the chip companies

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 4>that's pledged to invest billions into US chip capacity. But

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 4>the top story for this industry right now is reports

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 4>that rival Qualcomm has approached Intel over a friendly takeover,

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 4>and Bloomberg reporting that money manager Apollos offered billions of

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 4>dollars to Intel in an equity like investment.

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 7>The stage is set.

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 5>What happens next?

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Let's discuss with Phil Dury, head of Technology and Communications

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 4>Investment Banking at City Group. When I woke up on

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 4>Monday morning, I was still recovering from the weekend where

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 4>I was recovering from Friday. In a headline where one

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 4>of the biggest chip makers, Qualcomm, it's reported we're going

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 4>for Intel. Well, in this environment, does that deal happen? Well,

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 4>you probably won't be surprised that. I'm not going to

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 4>comment specifically on the deal. What I would say Intel

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 4>has a storied history dating back to nineteen sixty eight.

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 7>They've got a.

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:19.679
<v Speaker 8>Collection of phenomenal assets. The company is clearly going through

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.679
<v Speaker 8>a transformation. Pat and his team have been pretty clear

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 8>in the plans that they have outlined, including some significant

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 8>CAPEX reduction. Well I would say is I'm not surprised

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 8>that there's speculation around a number of interested parties, whether

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 8>that be strategic or whether that be private equity who

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 8>is looking to invest quite meaningfully across a whole artificial

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 8>intelligence ecosystem, which we've already seen, and we've already seen

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 8>Apollo obviously work with Intel.

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 2>As well.

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Island that neither Intel nor qualcom commented on that reporting.

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 4>And the other piece of reporting was Apollo, which has

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 4>an existing relationship with Intel and against Strategic in the

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 4>sense that they had co invested in a specific project.

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 4>Why is an Intel attractive to a name like Apollo.

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 4>It is a duration bet. It's infrastructure, you know, in

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 4>the world of AI, it's building something physical and waiting

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 4>for the payoff later.

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 8>Look, I think this is long term generational investment. Funds

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 8>like Apollo take and extremely long term view beyond the frankly,

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 8>the more of a short term nature of the public market.

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 8>And when we look at M and A and the

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 8>trends that we've seen over the last year, and MNA

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 8>activity is up quite meaningfully off two very low years

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 8>in twenty twenty two and twenty twenty three, and we're

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.799
<v Speaker 8>seeing strategics much more active. Right City advised on AMD

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 8>and ZT Systems. We advised on IBM and Hashi Corp.

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 8>So not as transformational necessarily as intel as we're talking about,

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 8>but we're definitely seeing strategic be more proactive as it

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 8>relates to growth vertical adjacencies. Where we've seen public equity,

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 8>most private equity, most activia today is on dislocated public

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 8>market valuations. What we haven't seen so far is the

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 8>huge number of private companies with high watermark valuations in

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty one starting to come to market. But time

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 8>results in valuation compounding, and that's where we do have

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 8>high expectations for twenty twenty five and twenty twenty six,

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 8>and it's already happening.

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Phil Today news of one of the biggest take privates

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 3>in the software area.

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.119
<v Speaker 5>We've got Blackstone.

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Vista Equity making an eight billion dollar take private offer

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 3>to a company called Smartsheet. Is that the sort of

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 3>software long term revenue that they want to be digging into.

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Where do you see other opportunities in the take private field?

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 8>I think, Caroin, that's exactly spot on. We anticipate that

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 8>we'll see more of this, you know, I think that

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 8>artificial intelligence embedded on two years of data points in

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 8>enterprise software is going to start to become really, really interesting.

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 8>When we think about the first quarter of this year,

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 8>the AI investment boom, if you will, focused on hardware,

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 8>focused on chips where and actually we saw weakness in software.

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 8>That weakness driven by a diversion of enterprise funds towards AI.

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 8>But now we're starting to look forward. We've got more

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 8>data points and we're starting to see a pickup an

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 8>activity for enterprise software with embedded AI and how that

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 8>can really be a catalyst for enterprise. So I think

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:50.839
<v Speaker 8>you're spot on. I think we'll see a lot more

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 8>of this in twenty twenty five and twenty six, and

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 8>we'll start to see that private supply come to market

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 8>as well, which is held off for now because companies

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 8>were very well capitalized. Private equity hasn't had to do anything.

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 8>But now there is some pressure around DPI, and I

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 8>think we'll see a more vibrant cell side as well

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 8>as an active byside that.

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Sort of pigeonholes the positive side of making deals and

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 3>taking private there's the negative side of stressed assets.

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean almost Intel might be that story.

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 3>But we're looking today at Liberty Broadband. Of course, key

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Billion m Malone trying to place together some of his

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 3>stressed streaming and cable assets.

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 5>I'm looking at Liberty Broadband.

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 3>And Charter Communications seemingly getting towards some sort of merger deal.

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Here.

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to see more of that mergers because they

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 3>have to to survive because of industry pressure.

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 8>I think you'll see combinations for sure. I also think

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 8>you'll see you'll see companies looking to carve and split

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 8>and break out very valuable assets as well.

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 5>There's no doubt we're in.

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 8>A moment of time driven by AI, which is causing

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 8>corporations to look and reflect about how they're going to

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.559
<v Speaker 8>crystallize and maximize the valuation for their companies. That can

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 8>result in adjacent combinations, but it can also result in

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 8>illumination of value through carve outs through split offs. You know,

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 8>we've not talked about activism, but you know, we think

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 8>this will be a theme that activists will focus on

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 8>over the next couple of years as well. We're definitely

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 8>going to go through change, and we're going to go

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 8>through change through a greater sense of certainty. On the

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 8>geopolitical this year has been a year of transition, more

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 8>elections than we've ever seen in the past. Obviously, we've

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 8>got a big one coming up. We will have a

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 8>lot greater certainty on both the macro and the geopolitical

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 8>when we get into twenty five and twenty six. So yeah,

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 8>I believe we're going to see more activity for a

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 8>host of reasons.

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned AMD and ZT. What was the other one

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 4>that you mentioned that you advised on.

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 5>IBM and Hashiko?

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 4>What is unique to both of those as they got done?

0:10:57.800 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 4>And so I know you won't comment on Intel and

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 4>Quilcom the idea of but in the context of what

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 4>happens in November antitrust, you know, in this environment, do

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 4>deals of that scale on paper, Intel ONQUO proceed.

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 8>Well, the data is going to show a mixed bag

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 8>of results, right. We also advised on the Broadcom VMware

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 8>deal which went through. Obviously Microsoft Activision went through, but

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 8>there are examples of deals that haven't gone through. What

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 8>it means is just look, there's a lot of focus,

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 8>a lot of preparedness that's going on early on with

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 8>advisors and corporations in terms of how certain can we

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 8>be with regard to global antitrust decisions, cities role positioned there,

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 8>we're operating one hundred and sixty countries.

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 5>It gives us a good.

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 8>Global spotlight on how regulatory bodies are going to react.

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 2>But you're right.

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 8>All you can do is building contingencies early on in

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 8>case deals break. But it can be a distraction when

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 8>you know MNA is announced and it takes twelve, eighteen,

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 8>twenty four months to complete.

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes the lawyers for is when Phil Drury, thank you

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 3>had a Technologogy Communications investment banking City Group coming up.

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Roku remains loyal to the hardware that put the company

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 3>on the map when the company's streaming ambitions then, and.

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 4>I actually want to go back to Liberty Broadband. We

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 4>mentioned it in that conversation, but the specifics are that

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 4>Liberty went back to Charter with a counter offer, and

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 4>that's kind of what's pushing up the shares twenty seven percent.

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 5>I'd also point out.

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 4>Like it's a big move, but Liberty is a company

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 4>the carry that you also pointed out has been under

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 4>a brid of pressure, the stockdown significantly over a period

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 4>of time. This deal pretty dry one actually in truth,

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 4>but it's one the market's paying attention this morning. This

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 4>is Bloomberg Technology. Roku says the company remains quote very

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 4>committed to its set top boxes as it veils a

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 4>new faster version of Roku Ultra streaming box. This even

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 4>is the electronics industry shifts to smart TVs with built

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 4>in streaming tech For more Bloomberg Smart German joins us. Now,

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 4>I find this story so interesting for two reasons. I

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 4>have a Roku TV still believe it or not, alongside

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 4>the Samsung Smart TV. But that sort of set top

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 4>box is such a small part of their business, like

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 4>they're keeping it going.

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 9>Why, Yeah, the set top box is a very interesting

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 9>thing for Roku. Right, that is their namesake, that is

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 9>how they made their money, that is how they developed

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 9>into a brand. Now for them, it's two things. One,

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 9>it's all about content, that's their platform business. Two it's

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 9>all about integration of the Roku operating system into TVs

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 9>you buy off the shelf at Target, at best Spy,

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 9>at Amazon, you name it.

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 7>But the set top box is still interesting for them, right.

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 9>They don't make a ton of money off these things.

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 9>They cap out at one hundred dollars per piece and

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 9>their money losers, but they believe it brings content which

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 9>they're making a lot of money off of, including from advertising,

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 9>into more people's homes. And it's a lot cheaper for

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 9>consumers to get into the Roku experience, to get into

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 9>the smart TV experience if they have an older TV

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 9>by buying one of these hunred dollar boxes versus going

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 9>out and buying a new several hundred dollars TV. Right,

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 9>there's a lot of overlap between the experience you get

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 9>from a set top box and a smart TV. One

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 9>just requires you to buy the whole TV, the other

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 9>requires you to just plug a box into your hdmiport.

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 3>We're looking at one year chart of Roku. We now

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 3>moved to an interday, but it has been under pressure.

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 3>The earnings haven't been pleasing investors.

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 5>Is this part of drumming up support from the investor.

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 7>Base they've been suffering.

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 9>I don't think the investor base is entirely happy or

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 9>fixated on the set top box business. I think if

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 9>you're investing in Roku at this point, it's because of

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 9>the content business, the advertising, the platform, the integration into

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 9>smart TVs and other products. This is a bit of

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 9>moving away from that focus that I think investors are

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 9>wanting to see. But at the same time, this is

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 9>a cheap way to bring more people into the ecosystem

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 9>and gather more support for its platform and more users there. Right,

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 9>the majority of sales at this point are via first

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 9>party and third partiesmar our TVs. But adding more people

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 9>to the user base, more people that can be exposed

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 9>to Roku content, is not necessarily a bad thing. Just

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 9>to hope for investors is this doesn't take away from

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 9>the core competency that is the thing actually making the

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 9>company money.

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 5>Marc German, We thank you. That's about Google now.

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 3>It says it has seen faster progress in artificial intelligence

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 3>as a result of a closer collaboration between its cloud

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 3>computing unit and its AI research lab. Google Cloud struct

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 3>deals to weave its latest AI models into popular consumer products,

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 3>sharing more than seventy five customer stories, one of which

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 3>was the social app Snapchat, which we'll start using Google's

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 3>generative AI model to help power Snapchat's AI chat Thot

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 3>New Mags Asia accounts joins us for more to deal

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 3>with open AI, but they started leaning more into Gemini.

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 10>It seems like yeah, so snap originally released their chatbot

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 10>just last year and it started off using models from

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 10>open Ai. As you mentioned, the reason they also started

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 10>testing and using Gemini is because when you go on Snapchat,

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 10>a lot of the time you're communicating through videos or images,

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 10>and they felt like Gemini's models were really good at

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 10>doing that and being able to do images, videos and

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 10>texts or at the same time.

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 7>So that's why they started using Gemini as well.

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 5>Heicha.

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm right and saying, you were at Snap

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 4>the other day and you've kind of seen the latest

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 4>gen of hardware from them, and this is heating up,

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 4>Like meta, it was a surprise story that at least

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 4>the ray bands and your interaction using a voice based

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 4>AI assistant would take off. You know, I've had experience

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 4>with it.

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 5>How real is this for Snap?

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 4>Like, do they really think this is going to be

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 4>the future for them?

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 7>I think they do.

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 10>I mean they're spending a lot of money, right They

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 10>are supposed to spend up to one point five billion

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 10>dollars I believe this year, which is about half of

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 10>their expenses on things like infrastructure.

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 7>To support all of these new tools.

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 10>If we're thinking about artificial intelligence, augmented reality through glasses,

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 10>machine learning, all those sorts.

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 7>Of things, they're really doubling down on this.

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 10>So if you think about AI, it's not just a chatbot,

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 10>but it's AI and the glasses as you mentioned, and

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 10>it's AI obviously to rank and recommend content to create

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 10>new experiences.

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 7>So they're really betting.

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 10>On this is a key part of the company and

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 10>a key part of their future.

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.719
<v Speaker 4>Bloombergsats accounts all across the Snap story.

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Thank you very much, time now for talking tech.

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 3>First, up writing assistant software maker Grammarly is announced it's

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 3>adding a new CFO and CTO bolstering the AI startups

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 3>management now. According to Grammarly, both new executives actually assisted

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 3>their previous.

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 5>Companies in the igo process.

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Family is currently valued at thirteen billion dollars plus. Boeing

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 3>when it bumps up its pay proposal to striking workers

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 3>to thirty percent now that's sweetened from the twenty five

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 3>percent rejected earlier this month, still less than the forty

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 3>percent sought by the workers' union. Boeing said the terms

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 3>of the pay proposal are final and valid till the

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 3>end of the day of September the twenty seventh, and

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 3>TikTok will be shuttering its music service in November, ending

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 3>an experiment to compete with Spotify and Apple that started

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 3>back in twenty nineteen in a statement released TikTok Music

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 3>will be shutting down on November the twenty eighth, and

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 3>customer data will be deleted.

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 5>And what have you got?

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 4>Another news story, Elon Musk and his social platform X

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 4>lost a legal fight over unpaid severance to a former

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 4>Twitter employee who was laid off when Musk took over

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty two. Now remember back in July, X

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 4>defeated a lawsuit alleging that at least five hundred million

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 4>dollars in severance pay was owed to about six thousand

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 4>laid off employees. Let's discuss with Bloomberg's multi Nayak In

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 4>long story short about two thousand employees said that they

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 4>were short changed when they were let go. We spoke

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 4>to some of them, like over the last couple of years.

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 4>What are the specifics of this case.

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 11>So this is happening separate from the court proceeding, in

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 11>that this is happening in arbitration behind closed doors. So

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 11>this was a private arbitration proceeding. And as you said,

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 11>there are more than two thousand employees who have brought

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 11>complaints against the company, but they have proceeded in arbitration

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 11>and are fighting against the company. So now we received

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:36.719
<v Speaker 11>actually last week, the first ruling in one of these

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 11>arputuation proceedings and looks like it was a win for

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 11>the worker. And there are you know, thousands more of

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 11>these complaints that will still be arbituated. But fifteen cases

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 11>we know so far have been arbituated, and we're waiting

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 11>for rulings in other cases as well.

0:19:55.440 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 3>How seismic is this one off ruling? Will it forceultimately

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 3>for X to settle in a broader number?

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 11>Of course, it definitely is a good sign for the

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 11>employees because you know, one win could lead to more wins,

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 11>and that potentially allows their attorneys to you know, sit

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 11>across the table with Twitter and Mask and say, hey, listen,

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 11>we're winning all these cases. Maybe it's just easier if

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 11>we just settle this and you know, get done with

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 11>this dispute once and for all. So it's definitely a

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 11>good positive sign. And you know, this is the first

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 11>of many cases. And now that you know we are

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:37.479
<v Speaker 11>seeing the first ruling being a positive one, it is

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 11>possible that this sort of trend will continue for the

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 11>other arbituation proceedings as well.

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 4>Multi if it's the first of many, would you take

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 4>us into the sort of mystery world of technology severance disputes.

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 4>There are many people interested in this, right the lawyers

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 4>are incentivized to get their clients some pay. You know,

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 4>I remember the early days. It must take over in

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:03.719
<v Speaker 4>just the chaos in some of the chat forums of

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 4>what was happening.

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 7>What's it like covering these Well.

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so you know, this particular arbitation proceeding is happening

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 11>closed doors. So unfortunately, I wish I could be a

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 11>fly on the wall, but I can't. I'm not allowed to,

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.719
<v Speaker 11>you know, enter. But but just in talking to attorneys,

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.640
<v Speaker 11>these are very very sort of different from port proceedings

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 11>in that, you know, the rules together, evidence, all of

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 11>that tends to be a little different. But you know,

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 11>it's just very very private. We don't get to and

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 11>even this memo that we got, you know, Kurt Wagner,

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 11>our tech reporter who reported this story with me our sources,

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 11>sheared memo and that's how we got to know about

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 11>this ruling. So we were no unless the attorney sort

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 11>of went to port to enforce the ruling. So yeah,

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 11>so all of this happens closed doors. But in court,

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 11>you know, when we do have these disants. Of course,

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 11>there's a lot of drama, and you know, if they

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 11>go to trial, you get to see a lot of

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 11>you know, inside information about what happened behind the scenes

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 11>in terms of, you know, the chaos that happens behind

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 11>the scenes at these companies and all the different players

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 11>that sort of maybe need decisions that potentially you have

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 11>heard the employees names the employees, could you know all

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 11>to share how they feel about how they were.

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 4>Shortchy Multi, gotta go, Bloomberg's Multi, Nayak, Thank you. This

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 4>is Bloomberg.

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Caroline Hyde in New.

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 4>York and I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco. If you're

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 4>just joining us. One of the big stories in technology

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 4>today is the US listed shares of Chinese technology companies.

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 4>The news is the Chinese government coming with a big

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 4>stimulus package to kickstart the economy. So you see e

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 4>commerce names like JD dot Com, Ali Barber doing really well,

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 4>but at the index level, then aw's that Golden Dragon

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 4>index now on track for its best day since January

0:22:57.560 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 4>of twenty twenty three. Let's set out to Bloomberg News

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 4>reporter Henry Wren, who's in London and covers China tech stocks,

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 4>and some of these names have underperformed year to day. Recently, Henry,

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 4>they've rebounded. But a big stimulus package that helps the

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 4>Chinese economy will help some of China's tech sector as well.

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 12>Indeed, what we see today is Chinese authorities really made

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 12>a concerted push to help boost the economy as well

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 12>as stock markets. These stimulus measures can be seen in

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 12>three buckets. One is providing more liquidity to the economy

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 12>in terms of cutting rates, lowering banks reserve requirement racials.

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 12>Second is about helping the housing market, including lowering the

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 12>mortgage rates for existing mortgages. And the third part, which

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 12>is probably the most eye catching part, is about providing

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 12>direct to liquidity support to the stock market. The Central

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 12>Bank has pledged eight hundred billion remen bee of initial

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 12>liquidity and it has said that it's con letering in

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 12>terms of providing a stock stabilization fund. So all those

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 12>measures putting together really help boost investor sentiment in terms

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 12>of Chinese internet stocks that we've been seeing today.

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Ed, why e commerce? Why those names j D

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 4>and Ali Barba doing so well?

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:25.360
<v Speaker 12>Henry, Yeah, because as we as we know that all

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 12>those Chinese internet companies as well as those e commerce

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 12>companies have been highly related to Chinese consumer spending, and

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 12>we've been seeing them under quite heavy pressure recently given

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 12>the Chinese economic slowdown.

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 5>We've been hearing.

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 12>Those companies executive talking about China's necro pressure being PDD,

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 12>being JD, being Ali Baba for example. Ali Baba's e

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 12>commerce business just screwed by single digit in the past quarter,

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 12>as well as the Value Champion PDD for example, it

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 12>was a stock market Darling, but in August it's issued

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 12>a warning and said that growth has been slowing and

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 12>need to be investing more. Competition has become more intense,

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 12>so we see the stocks really under pressure, and those

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 12>Miles's pressure measures could be seen as the first step

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 12>if the authority is getting more serious in terms of

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 12>boosting the economy.

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Henry, we know these companies so well here in the

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 3>United States too. They have global pushes taming for example,

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 3>how much are their revenues still so focused on China

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:27.920
<v Speaker 3>or how global is it becoming?

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it really depends on companies, right, So when we

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 12>are talking about PDD for example, like it has a

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 12>big global push in terms of expanding to US market

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 12>European markets for its team will brand. However, for that

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 12>international business, it's under pressure as well because the US

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 12>government is having its new rules in terms of curbing

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 12>those cross borders small packaged shipping as well. So the

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 12>domestic market, the local market is really key for those companies.

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 12>Even though Ali Baba has its you know, international push

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 12>as well, the local market is still key because the

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 12>timo and talbail business for Alibaba for example, is still

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:10.959
<v Speaker 12>about two thirds of its revenue generation. So the local

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 12>really matters. And what we've been seeing today in terms

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 12>of the stimulus pressure, stimulus measures really helps the investor sentiment.

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 3>What's the next catalyst then, Henry, how much are people

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 3>saying you can continue to buy?

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 12>On the fiscal side, I would say so, we've been

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 12>seeing lots of measures on monetary side, for example, in

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 12>terms of cutting rates, in terms of you know, lowering

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 12>down payment ratios or cutting rates for existing mortgages.

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 5>But on the fiscal.

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 12>Side, it's people what really cares about because the problem

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 12>with China's economy is not just about lack of liquidity

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 12>in the economy. It's about you know, lack of consumer

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 12>demand it's about a weak consumption among Chinese consumers. We

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 12>have the national holidays coming up, and it's really about,

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 12>you know, how to help Chinese consumers to buy more,

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 12>to shop more. So the focus for investor in next

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 12>it's really about on the fiscal side, whether the fiscal

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 12>more fiscal policies for or will come through us.

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, Henry Wren, thank you very much. Indeed. Meanwhile, in the.

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Political sphere, former President Donald Trump has been.

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 5>Discussing China, accusing the nation.

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Of failing to honor a deal to buy fifty billion

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 3>dollars worth in.

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 5>US agricultural experts.

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump vowed to raise the matter with the Chinese president's Usinping.

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 3>If the Republican nominee returns to the White House. Both

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Trump and Kamala harris A vowed to take a tough

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 3>stance against.

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 4>Beijing ed Meanwhile, the UN General Assembly is in full

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 4>swing in Manhattan, and China a key discussion for President

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 4>Biden in his address that's going to read on where

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 4>things stand with Bloomberg's National security reporter Nick Waddens and Nick.

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 4>President Biden was speaking just ahead of this program starting.

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 4>What did he say, particularly in the context of the

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 4>things that we care about here, technology, AI and anything

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 4>relating to national security.

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 13>Well, I mean, what you saw really was this sort

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.880
<v Speaker 13>of a valedictory address for President and Biden. A big

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 13>thing he said was listen, don't cling to power. Sometimes

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 13>you have to do what's right for your country, and

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 13>remember that you serve the people, not yourself. So a

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 13>bit of a shot across the bow there. It was interesting.

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 13>He did feature AI pretty prominently in his speech. It

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 13>was mostly a look back, but really one of the

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 13>few places where he actually looked forward was saying AI

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 13>has a lot of promise, but they're in inherent dangers

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 13>to it and essentially seeking a cautious approach. But you know,

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 13>the big thing here, the message that he may not

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 13>want to send but that is sort of inescapable, is

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 13>the fact that he's going to be off the stage

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 13>literally and metaphorically in just a couple months. So there's

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 13>not a lot he can say to look forward given

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 13>the uncertainty around who's going to succeed him as president.

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 5>Let's talk about what therefore.

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Kamala Harris has been saying in recent days it fundraises

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 3>here in Manhattan as well about AI, I wanting to

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 3>foster it around crypto And it's interesting it's not just

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 3>world leaders in town. You know, Musk is in town,

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 3>he says, getting an award from the Italians. There's also

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Sam Altman at an event with him last night, and

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 3>he's speaking with Sextrey Blinkn about regulating AI.

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 5>So while are we hearing much more about.

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 3>The discourse of governance of artificial intelligence?

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 13>That's a really big theme this week, in part because

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 13>what you've seen is Secretary General Guterris is basically saying, listen.

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 5>We are not able to make any progress.

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 13>And any of the issues that the UN was founded

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 13>to help with, so peace and security. So what we're

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 13>going to do is try to stake a claim on

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 13>issues that matter for the future, AI and climate. But

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 13>of course the big challenge there is the UN can

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 13>say what it wants. It has no enforcement mechanisms. This

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 13>will all have to come through national laws. In fact,

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 13>it was one of the big things he did last

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 13>week Guterres said, listen, we got to not use AI

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 13>in military targeting.

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 2>This is just crucial.

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 13>But all the evidence we're getting is that countries with

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 13>the ability to use AI in that way are doing

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 13>so already. You're seeing a situation where the US and

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 13>other countries is you, for example, are essentially disregarding these

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 13>UN warnings and it is still just very early days.

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 4>Nick, you've been at this a long time, respectfully in

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 4>China first and then DC. In your experience, what tangibly

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 4>comes out of these weeks? I know a lot of

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 4>tech CEOs, the meeting with world leaders, So what explains

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 4>our audience the substance of it?

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 13>Right, So, I mean, the big thing on ANGA is

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 13>you really should not focus on what's actually happening at

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 13>the UN. There are speeches, you can get a sense

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 13>of the mood, prevailing trends, things like that, But where

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 13>you really see the action is on the sidelines, the

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 13>bilateral meetings, the backroom deals, the hotel conversations. As Caroline mentioned,

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 13>Musk is here, Sam Altman is here. World leaders are

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 13>going to swing states in the US after they're at

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 13>the UN trying to sort of figure out get a

0:30:58.120 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 13>sense for the horse race of what's going to happen

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 13>in the future. So you may see some backroom conversation

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 13>around a potential Ukraine peace plan that Zelenski's putting forward,

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 13>conversations with Iran, stuff like that, But it's really not

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 13>focusing on the un but looking at the networks that

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 13>these leaders are trying to build out with tech titans

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 13>like Elon Musk and Sam Moltman. That's really where the

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 13>action is.

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 5>Remax's National Security bringing us tech. We thank you. It's

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 5>Nick Wadams coming up.

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 3>We dive into the world of AI investments with Kafaao

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Safar Adventures partner And what are you looking at?

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 4>So kind of break well, what you share is at

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 4>Bank of New York Melon moving close. It's rolling out

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 4>custody services for the bitcoin ether held by ETF clients.

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 4>This after a review enabled the company to avoid treating

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 4>the assets as a balance sheet liability.

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 2>This has been by technology.

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Fractal Analytics is said to be considering filing for an

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 3>IPO and as soon as November to raise five hundred

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 3>million dollars. That's, according to sources. Known as India's first

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 3>AI unicorn, The company is seeking evaluation with some three

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 3>and a half billion dollars in a share sale. Discussions

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 3>are going on at the moment and the size of

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 3>the IPO and it's timing could change.

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 4>With ed there's certainly one to track. Okay, it's time

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 4>for VC Spotlight and we will talk about investing in AI.

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 4>Sapphire Adventures announced last summer their commitment to AI by

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 4>investing more than one billion dollars in AI focused enterprise startups.

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 4>Kathy Gaoer Safire Adventures joins US. Now one billion is

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 4>a commitment. I guess the easiest place to start is

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 4>how did that go and how did you go about

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 4>deploying the capitol?

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Absolutely, First of all, great to be here.

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 4>Ed.

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Sapphire Adventurers were focused on investing in B to B

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>companies at the mid to late stage, so we're really

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>looking for companies product market fit, are generating revenue and

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that are proven businesses with AI. There has been so

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>much innovation and there's been waves of adoption.

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 2>So what we saw.

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Really was in twenty twenty three it was a year

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of experimentation. This year twenty twenty four was a year

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of ROI validation and people actually starting to play with

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>these tools and getting use out of it. And we

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>believe that next year twenty twenty five will be the

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>year of widespread enterprise adoption. Now that being said, we've

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>been very active in twenty twenty four and have made

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>several AI investments already.

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 4>I sent some sort of tension out there maybe between

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 4>the bench capitalist and large tech companies that are making

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 4>very similar investments or they're developing technology themselves. And one

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 4>of your historic portfolio companies is MuleSoft. Bear with me,

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 4>but I picked that casely because ultimately Salesforce went on

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 4>to acquire mule Soft. It was an interesting exit, right,

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 4>how do you find that next kind of mule Soft

0:33:57.720 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 4>type company?

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 2>But in the AI context, I think.

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 1>This conversation is so interesting when we're talking about GENAI companies. Right,

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>In many ways, the incumbents, whether Salesforce, Microsoft, Amazon, you

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 1>name it, they are all actively investing in young AI

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:20.399
<v Speaker 1>startups because you're trying to ensure that their future will

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>have AI in it. As an investor, what we look

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 1>for closely are companies stand alone that we think are

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 1>amazing businesses and can go all the way to IPO.

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>But we also consider other exit paths, including to M

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and A. So we pay a lot of attention to

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.360
<v Speaker 1>companies that we believe hold strategic real estate.

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:44.800
<v Speaker 2>For many of the large tech players.

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Kathy, what are the valuations like in this space that

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 3>you're trying to put money to what you say, You've

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 3>done a company of deals in twenty twenty four already,

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 3>they hih.

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question, Caroline. The short answer is yes.

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 1>The reality is that AI is so consensus right now,

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 1>which arguably means it's a really difficult time to invest

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>because evaluations are so high. So if a perfect deal

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 1>that means a perfect valuation. I think our approach and

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>my approach at Sapphire is you have to take a

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 1>differentiate approach to investing. And because AI it's still in

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the early stages of manifestation into different types of companies,

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to take a leap of faith on some dimension.

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 1>So for me, for example, the leap of faith that

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking, which is based again on data and research,

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>is that industries that have historically been technology laggards in

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of adoption are now going to adopt technology in mass.

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So two examples are a lot of different verticals right

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>so manufacturing, construction, healthcare, legal. These are companies and industries

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that are still operating on pen and paper and on

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 1>mainframe computers. And the second one is really small businesses,

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the backbone of the US. Over eighty percent of US

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 1>businesses are companies under ten people that have historically not

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>been able to research the latest and greatest when it

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>comes to technology.

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 3>I love what you said before about the validation with

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Carney at the point where you have to validate the

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 3>return on investment. I don't feel like we've had that yet,

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 3>and I'm wondering whether you're seeing it in the startups

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 3>you've backed and how you're measuring it.

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Kathy, that's such an on point question, Caroline, I think

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we've already started that phase. I'll give you an example.

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Sapphire recently backed a lease AI. I know Mino was

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>on the show a couple of weeks ago. That was

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a Series D company. What elise AI does is owns

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the entire conversation, end to end between a prospective tenant

0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:52.319
<v Speaker 1>or tenant and a residential building. A lot of their

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>customers are sophisticated residential real estate companies. They do a

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of internal benchmarking. They don't just trust the lease

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to show their own benchmarks, They actually do it in house,

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:09.879
<v Speaker 1>and the data shows significant improvements in accuracy, significant improvements

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and actual results, including customer satisfaction.

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 4>Some of the news of late has been open AI's

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 4>big primary at a very high valuation. Then reports about

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 4>and fropic getting itself organized, and one report I spotted

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 4>was that the minimum check for the open AI round

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 4>is an examples, two hundred and fifty million dollars. What's

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 4>the trickle down effect of that for you?

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Can you explain that question a little bit?

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so everyone's clamoring to get into very small concentration

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 4>of names, including through SPVs. Does that kind of open

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 4>up the field for you to sort of have access

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 4>to more startups where people aren't paying attention or is

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 4>it just that you kind of have to say, oh,

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 4>do I need to be involved in this round even

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 4>if it's a stretch for me at growth stage?

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Great question, And look, at the end of the day,

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:05.399
<v Speaker 1>as investors, it's our jobs to allocate capital in our

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>fund construction, and that means thematically what we invest in.

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 1>There's always going to be great deals out there, but

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we have to find the best use of our capital

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 1>based on our strategy. So I think it's a great

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>thing for companies like Sapphire right other investors are busy

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 1>chasing these mega deals in these ultra late stage companies,

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>or they're going super super early HIGHPAI companies that may

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:32.879
<v Speaker 1>not have a lot of revenue. That leaves more greenfield

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>for companies like Sapphire that again are focused on that

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:38.240
<v Speaker 1>mid to late stage company proven.

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, it's not just Ai.

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty of amazing companies out there that aren't Genai

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 1>native companies.

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:47.719
<v Speaker 2>And if more investors are looking only at Ai, I say,

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 2>that's great for us.

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 5>Okay, name one that isn't to do.

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 3>With generat ai that has been exciting to be able

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 3>to get into at least analyze, you know.

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I think one interesting way to play the broader Genai

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>strategy is to think about companies that are leveraging Genai

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 1>for themselves.

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:08.320
<v Speaker 2>So I'll give you an example.

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Metabol which is a Sapphire portfolio company, is a software

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>platform that allows clinical trials to be performed in a

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 1>decentralized manner. It's not a gen ai native company, but

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:29.839
<v Speaker 1>they're actually actively using genai technology to vastly improve implementation time.

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>So Medical is working with the largest life sciences companies

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and implementations can take a long time

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>because of the complexity. But now converting a thousand page

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>trial document in a way that is automated and someone

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:46.879
<v Speaker 1>without technical expertise can set it up.

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Is a game changer.

0:39:48.719 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Kathy go aefave Inches, thanks so much for joining so much. Meanwhile,

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 3>that AI is here to say, we know that and

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.400
<v Speaker 3>it can't happen without nuclear Apparently it's according to the

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 3>Constellation Energy Ceoes Dominguez, these comments coming off to the

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 3>company decided to reopen that nuclear reactor in Pennsylvania, with

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft agreeing to purchase the energy for two decades in

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 3>order to.

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 5>Power the AI boom.

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:13.879
<v Speaker 3>The Constellation CEO sat down living no Miskati Greefel yesterday's

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 3>talk about the deal.

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 5>Just take a listen.

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 14>Earlier this year we started talking to Microsoft about it.

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:24.359
<v Speaker 14>We had partnered with Microsoft on different products before, so

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 14>they made sense as a client. Of course they have

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 14>the need, so.

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 15>The relationship was there, and of course we see the

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:31.880
<v Speaker 15>culmination of that now.

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm curious.

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 15>I mean, when it comes to the nuclear industry, you

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:39.439
<v Speaker 15>have bipartisan support, you read a lot of academics and

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:43.160
<v Speaker 15>other thought pieces that nuclear just makes so much sense,

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 15>But there's still that reputation cloud, if you want to call.

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:47.319
<v Speaker 5>It, hanging over it.

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 15>I'm curious when you think about the industry now versus

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 15>when you were spun out of Exelon in twenty twenty two.

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 2>How has it changed.

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 14>Oh god, it feels like ten years, right, it's really

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 14>thirty one months that we've been And back then the

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 14>thought was, you know, there wasn't going to be a catalyst.

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 14>It's always one of these things where in retrospect you

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 14>think the pieces are coming together. Electrification of the transportation sector,

0:41:15.239 --> 0:41:19.240
<v Speaker 14>home heating industry. We're on shoring a lot of industry

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 14>now to deal with supply chain issues. But AI was

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 14>the thing that just really drove the load projections to

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:28.759
<v Speaker 14>a point where you said, without nuclear it's not going

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 14>to happen.

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Let us head to the Bloomberg philad the piece Earthshot Prize,

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 3>which is happening right now on the sidelines of.

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 5>The United Nations General Assembly.

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Alex Steel, David SASAA join us and it is

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:42.799
<v Speaker 3>all going on at the Plaza Hotel today.

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 5>Alex, I have to.

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 16>Say, this is quite a set up here at the

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:50.839
<v Speaker 16>Earthshot Summit at the Plaza Hotel. This is sponsored, as

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 16>you mentioned, a co hosted by Bloomberg Philanthropy's, but the

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 16>whole goal is about trailbasing solutions and innovators to help

0:41:57.200 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 16>our planet. And later on today there's also going to

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 16>be the Goal Business Forum, where you have Bloomberg Philanthropy's

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:04.800
<v Speaker 16>teaming up with the World Bank and the IMF to

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 16>kind of go through some of the big topics of

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 16>our time, and in that is most definitely.

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 5>Going to be AI and how to globally regulate that.

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 16>We heard from President Biden earlier at the UN talking

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:18.359
<v Speaker 16>about the AI security and how to help that conversation

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 16>on a global level and rupport. We'll be speaking with

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 16>Eric Shaftsper later on today, the President and CIO over

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 16>at Google, and Damien just kind of got stuck in here, yeah, radio,

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:29.239
<v Speaker 16>but he kind of dug it.

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 5>He was into it.

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 17>Central Bank's ambassadors, heads of state. I mean, it's all

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 17>happening here. And what's interesting is we're talking to people

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 17>like the European Investment Bank, We're talking to the Monetary

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 17>Authority of Singapore. We're getting a sense of how they're

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:45.239
<v Speaker 17>financing sustainable development, how they're financing climate change solutions. And

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 17>it's really an unbelievable vibe here. Alex I'm just happy

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 17>to be here.

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:50.400
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, and everyone's really positive. Obviously, Guys in terms of

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 16>the financing and the technology, but the real information kind

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:55.359
<v Speaker 16>of comes down on the ground, like can companies really

0:42:55.360 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 16>make a return when they go green? And where and

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:00.160
<v Speaker 16>how did they do it? And what that long her

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 16>from outlook w ends up being guys.

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Money Talks, Bloomberg Z, Alex Steele, Damien Sasa loving the

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:09.319
<v Speaker 3>energy down there, Thank you so much. Meanwhile, that does

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 3>it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. Clearly some key

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 3>conversations still coming up later today.

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:13.840
<v Speaker 7>Ed.

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:16.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, don't forget to recap on the podcast. You can

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:19.480
<v Speaker 4>find it on the terminal as well as online on Apples, Spotify,

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 4>and iHeart. This is Bloomberg Technology.