1 00:00:01,280 --> 00:00:16,560 Speaker 1: The Volume. All right, welcome to Hoops to night here 2 00:00:16,560 --> 00:00:20,000 Speaker 1: at the Volume. Happy Wednesday, everybody. Our Finals coverage wrap 3 00:00:20,079 --> 00:00:22,720 Speaker 1: up is brought to you by Chase Freedom Unlimited. How 4 00:00:22,720 --> 00:00:25,200 Speaker 1: do you cash back? Well? Our off season started an 5 00:00:25,200 --> 00:00:29,600 Speaker 1: interesting fashion this morning as Sean Sharani and Adrian Morganowski 6 00:00:29,680 --> 00:00:31,800 Speaker 1: reported that Bradley Beal and his representatives are going to 7 00:00:31,840 --> 00:00:34,199 Speaker 1: be working with the Washington Wizards in the event that 8 00:00:34,240 --> 00:00:37,360 Speaker 1: they decide to rebuild, which the full point of this 9 00:00:37,400 --> 00:00:39,440 Speaker 1: report kind of seems like it's leaning in that direction. 10 00:00:39,840 --> 00:00:42,000 Speaker 1: But they're gonna be working together to find Bradley Beal 11 00:00:42,479 --> 00:00:46,720 Speaker 1: a new trade destination, which is super interesting because of 12 00:00:46,760 --> 00:00:48,239 Speaker 1: the fact that he is a no trade clause so 13 00:00:48,280 --> 00:00:51,360 Speaker 1: he has a lot more control over that situation than 14 00:00:51,400 --> 00:00:54,319 Speaker 1: players usually do. So what we're gonna do today, I'm 15 00:00:54,320 --> 00:00:56,800 Speaker 1: gonna do a deep dive into what Bradley Beal can 16 00:00:56,800 --> 00:01:00,280 Speaker 1: bring to a basketball team, full of some film that 17 00:01:00,320 --> 00:01:02,040 Speaker 1: I went over as well as a bunch of data, 18 00:01:02,320 --> 00:01:03,760 Speaker 1: and then at the end, I'm going to go over 19 00:01:03,800 --> 00:01:07,160 Speaker 1: a bunch of potential destinations that I think makes sense 20 00:01:07,640 --> 00:01:09,040 Speaker 1: for brad Do you guys know the drip? Before we 21 00:01:09,080 --> 00:01:10,960 Speaker 1: get started to subscribe to the Volumes YouTube channel. So 22 00:01:10,959 --> 00:01:12,680 Speaker 1: you don't miss any more of our videos. Follow me 23 00:01:12,760 --> 00:01:14,959 Speaker 1: on Twitter at underscore Jason lts you guys don't miss 24 00:01:14,959 --> 00:01:16,960 Speaker 1: anyhow announcements in it. For whatever reason, you miss one 25 00:01:16,959 --> 00:01:18,480 Speaker 1: of these videos and you can't get back over to 26 00:01:18,480 --> 00:01:21,040 Speaker 1: YouTube to finish, don't forget. You can find them wherever 27 00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:24,319 Speaker 1: you get your podcasts under Hoops Tonight, and last but not least, 28 00:01:24,360 --> 00:01:25,760 Speaker 1: you guys have heard me talk about game Time, the 29 00:01:25,760 --> 00:01:28,039 Speaker 1: fastest growing ticketing app in the United States. If you're 30 00:01:28,080 --> 00:01:30,959 Speaker 1: looking to get out to a baseball game this summer, 31 00:01:30,959 --> 00:01:33,360 Speaker 1: if you're looking to get out to a concert or 32 00:01:33,360 --> 00:01:35,839 Speaker 1: a comedy show, game Time has amazing last minute deals 33 00:01:35,840 --> 00:01:38,800 Speaker 1: on tickets to all of these. I used them earlier 34 00:01:38,840 --> 00:01:41,000 Speaker 1: this year to go to a basketball game at McHale 35 00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:44,520 Speaker 1: Center to watch the University of Arizona men's basketball team, 36 00:01:44,880 --> 00:01:47,319 Speaker 1: and I had an incredible experience. I got a great seat, 37 00:01:47,319 --> 00:01:50,480 Speaker 1: I got a great deal, The user experience was super smooth. 38 00:01:50,880 --> 00:01:52,760 Speaker 1: I highly recommend you guys give it a shot. So 39 00:01:52,840 --> 00:01:54,720 Speaker 1: no matter where you live, get out and have some 40 00:01:54,760 --> 00:01:56,720 Speaker 1: fun this week. Download the game Time ap and to 41 00:01:56,720 --> 00:02:00,320 Speaker 1: your email and redeem code Hoops for twenty dollars off 42 00:02:00,320 --> 00:02:03,440 Speaker 1: your first purchase terms apply again, enter email and code hoops. 43 00:02:03,440 --> 00:02:08,080 Speaker 1: That's Hops for twenty dollars off. Download game time today, 44 00:02:08,400 --> 00:02:12,280 Speaker 1: last minute tickets, lowest price guaranteed. All right, let's talk 45 00:02:12,320 --> 00:02:16,400 Speaker 1: some basketball. So, like I said, Bradley Bealaner's representatives apparently 46 00:02:16,440 --> 00:02:18,840 Speaker 1: are working with the Wizards to potentially facilitate a trade. 47 00:02:19,560 --> 00:02:22,960 Speaker 1: The two teams that Sham's specifically mentioned in his reports, 48 00:02:22,960 --> 00:02:25,280 Speaker 1: for the Miami Heat and Milwaukee Bucks that could be interested. 49 00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:28,280 Speaker 1: We'll talk about those particular teams, but I have three 50 00:02:28,360 --> 00:02:31,000 Speaker 1: others that I find interesting, including a Western Conference team 51 00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:33,600 Speaker 1: that you guys might not be expecting. Again, there's no 52 00:02:33,680 --> 00:02:37,320 Speaker 1: trade clause, which means now again the teams always have 53 00:02:37,360 --> 00:02:39,680 Speaker 1: a no trade clause, meaning like the teams can nullify 54 00:02:39,720 --> 00:02:41,400 Speaker 1: anything they don't want to do, So it's not like 55 00:02:41,680 --> 00:02:45,600 Speaker 1: Brad can force them to trade him somewhere. However, the 56 00:02:45,760 --> 00:02:48,440 Speaker 1: no trade clause gives Brad the leeway to at least 57 00:02:48,480 --> 00:02:50,920 Speaker 1: stop a trade that's going to a team that he 58 00:02:50,919 --> 00:02:53,320 Speaker 1: doesn't want to go to or that has to give 59 00:02:53,440 --> 00:02:55,480 Speaker 1: up too much talent, to the point where he'd be 60 00:02:55,480 --> 00:02:57,639 Speaker 1: in a similar predicament that he was in in Washington 61 00:02:57,639 --> 00:02:59,079 Speaker 1: to begin with, so there is going to be a 62 00:02:59,120 --> 00:03:01,720 Speaker 1: little bit more control there. I do want to start 63 00:03:01,720 --> 00:03:03,760 Speaker 1: with the basketball side of things, though, because Bradley Beal 64 00:03:03,840 --> 00:03:06,840 Speaker 1: is still an insanely good basketball player, and this kind 65 00:03:06,880 --> 00:03:09,160 Speaker 1: of thing happens a lot in the NBA, where a 66 00:03:09,200 --> 00:03:11,920 Speaker 1: player is kind of floundering in a bad situation, and 67 00:03:11,960 --> 00:03:14,600 Speaker 1: then we start to dramatically undervalue what they bring to 68 00:03:14,639 --> 00:03:16,520 Speaker 1: the table, and then we get to see what it 69 00:03:16,520 --> 00:03:19,760 Speaker 1: looks like when they play with a better set of 70 00:03:19,760 --> 00:03:22,440 Speaker 1: supporting players, and then they suddenly reveal that they are 71 00:03:22,440 --> 00:03:24,160 Speaker 1: a lot better than we thought they were. And I 72 00:03:24,160 --> 00:03:26,919 Speaker 1: think Bradley Beal could be that type of guy. First 73 00:03:26,919 --> 00:03:28,800 Speaker 1: of all, he was one of only ten players in 74 00:03:28,840 --> 00:03:31,000 Speaker 1: the league this year to play at least fifty games, 75 00:03:31,160 --> 00:03:33,640 Speaker 1: average at least twenty three points per game, and shoot 76 00:03:33,639 --> 00:03:36,640 Speaker 1: at least fifty percent of the field. Ten guys hit 77 00:03:36,680 --> 00:03:38,880 Speaker 1: those markers. Bradley Bual was one of them. He was 78 00:03:38,920 --> 00:03:41,480 Speaker 1: one of only twenty eight players in the league this 79 00:03:41,560 --> 00:03:44,080 Speaker 1: year to run at least six hundred and fifty pick 80 00:03:44,120 --> 00:03:48,320 Speaker 1: and rolls and average over a point per possession. And 81 00:03:48,360 --> 00:03:50,480 Speaker 1: when you really factor in the type of talent that 82 00:03:50,520 --> 00:03:55,080 Speaker 1: he's playing, with in that Washington system. That's incredibly impressive, 83 00:03:55,160 --> 00:03:57,920 Speaker 1: especially when you think of pick and roles as not 84 00:03:58,000 --> 00:04:00,960 Speaker 1: a play finishing type of thing. Pick rolls are attacking 85 00:04:01,000 --> 00:04:04,200 Speaker 1: a set defense on every single given possession. That's usually 86 00:04:04,280 --> 00:04:07,760 Speaker 1: how teams begin their assault on a set defense. It's 87 00:04:08,120 --> 00:04:11,280 Speaker 1: typically a lower point per possession than a post up 88 00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:13,560 Speaker 1: or an ISO for a lot of these stars, because 89 00:04:13,560 --> 00:04:15,440 Speaker 1: in those situations it's more of a play finish, like 90 00:04:15,440 --> 00:04:16,920 Speaker 1: we got him to a spot on the floor, We've 91 00:04:16,920 --> 00:04:19,240 Speaker 1: spread things out for him, he's going. Pick and roll 92 00:04:19,320 --> 00:04:22,040 Speaker 1: is a beginning attack of a defense, and points per 93 00:04:22,040 --> 00:04:24,160 Speaker 1: possession is typically pretty low. Like I said, only twenty 94 00:04:24,160 --> 00:04:26,480 Speaker 1: eight players in the league ran as many as Brad 95 00:04:26,480 --> 00:04:28,919 Speaker 1: Beild did and averaged over a point per possession. He 96 00:04:28,960 --> 00:04:30,880 Speaker 1: was one of those guys, and a big part of 97 00:04:30,880 --> 00:04:33,040 Speaker 1: it is he's just efficient with all the shots that 98 00:04:33,080 --> 00:04:35,280 Speaker 1: you need to hit to be successful in pick and 99 00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:37,280 Speaker 1: roll pull up jump shooting. He was one of only 100 00:04:37,800 --> 00:04:40,000 Speaker 1: out of forty seven players who attempted at least three 101 00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:43,360 Speaker 1: hundred pull up jumpers this year. Bill ranked eighteenth inefficiency, 102 00:04:43,440 --> 00:04:45,279 Speaker 1: so he's in that upper third in that group. He 103 00:04:45,320 --> 00:04:47,039 Speaker 1: was up over a point per possession on pull up 104 00:04:47,080 --> 00:04:50,200 Speaker 1: jump shots. He shot fifty four percent on floaters, which 105 00:04:50,240 --> 00:04:52,720 Speaker 1: is awesome. That was tenth out of one hundred and 106 00:04:52,800 --> 00:04:55,279 Speaker 1: ten players who attempted at least fifty floaters this year. 107 00:04:56,080 --> 00:04:58,680 Speaker 1: But rim finishing is the big one. He made three 108 00:04:58,720 --> 00:05:01,520 Speaker 1: and a half shots per game restricted area at seventy 109 00:05:01,560 --> 00:05:06,000 Speaker 1: one point six percent. He was fourth in the NBA 110 00:05:06,040 --> 00:05:08,359 Speaker 1: among players that are six y five or shorter, so 111 00:05:08,440 --> 00:05:12,480 Speaker 1: among smaller guards, he was fourth in the league at 112 00:05:12,600 --> 00:05:16,120 Speaker 1: finishing finishing in the restricted area and makes per game. 113 00:05:16,160 --> 00:05:18,320 Speaker 1: The only guys that were ahead of him were John Morant, 114 00:05:18,480 --> 00:05:21,880 Speaker 1: Anthony Edwards, and little trivia for you guys, who do 115 00:05:21,920 --> 00:05:25,680 Speaker 1: you think was third behind Ant and Jaw and ahead 116 00:05:25,720 --> 00:05:28,800 Speaker 1: of Bradley Beal. Spurs fans will know the answer was 117 00:05:28,880 --> 00:05:32,880 Speaker 1: Kelden Johnson, who was at six foot five. But all 118 00:05:32,920 --> 00:05:35,919 Speaker 1: those guys were below sixty five percent in their ability 119 00:05:35,960 --> 00:05:38,720 Speaker 1: to finish in the restricted area, and Bradley bial was 120 00:05:38,720 --> 00:05:42,040 Speaker 1: at seventy one point six percent, which is miles better 121 00:05:42,080 --> 00:05:44,640 Speaker 1: than those guys. So I would argue, when you combine 122 00:05:44,760 --> 00:05:48,920 Speaker 1: volume and efficiency, he's arguably the best guard in the 123 00:05:49,000 --> 00:05:52,640 Speaker 1: league at getting to the basket. So that's a super 124 00:05:52,640 --> 00:05:54,920 Speaker 1: interesting stat there. That I don't think people knew about 125 00:05:54,920 --> 00:05:57,320 Speaker 1: Bradley Beal, And that was honestly the big thing that 126 00:05:57,360 --> 00:05:59,480 Speaker 1: stood out to me on tape this morning. Over my coffee, 127 00:05:59,520 --> 00:06:02,960 Speaker 1: I just bought to hundreds of Bradley Beal picking rolls 128 00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:05,839 Speaker 1: in ISOs and post ups, and he, you know, he 129 00:06:05,920 --> 00:06:07,960 Speaker 1: does a really good job of bridging everything out of 130 00:06:07,960 --> 00:06:11,160 Speaker 1: a high hesitation. And in addition to that, he's got 131 00:06:11,279 --> 00:06:14,640 Speaker 1: really good variety. Like he goes right and left almost 132 00:06:14,680 --> 00:06:16,800 Speaker 1: the same amount of times, and when he goes right 133 00:06:16,839 --> 00:06:19,240 Speaker 1: and left, he takes about the same number of pull 134 00:06:19,279 --> 00:06:20,840 Speaker 1: up jump shots as he does driving to the room, 135 00:06:20,839 --> 00:06:23,679 Speaker 1: at least relative to most players. Most right handed players 136 00:06:24,120 --> 00:06:27,279 Speaker 1: are far more likely to drive right and pull up 137 00:06:27,360 --> 00:06:30,200 Speaker 1: jump shoot to their left, and more frequently they're going 138 00:06:30,279 --> 00:06:31,880 Speaker 1: to try to get to the right hand as much 139 00:06:31,920 --> 00:06:34,599 Speaker 1: as possible, same thing in reverse for left handed players. 140 00:06:34,680 --> 00:06:37,520 Speaker 1: Right like, to give you an example, Jason Tatum drove 141 00:06:37,640 --> 00:06:40,920 Speaker 1: right fifty five fewer times than he drove left this season, 142 00:06:41,240 --> 00:06:43,839 Speaker 1: and when he drove right, he took just twenty six 143 00:06:43,880 --> 00:06:47,320 Speaker 1: pull up jump shots in one hundred and forty nine drives. So, 144 00:06:47,400 --> 00:06:50,720 Speaker 1: like Jason Tatum always wanted to get to that right 145 00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:52,560 Speaker 1: hand and if you could funnel him to his left, 146 00:06:52,600 --> 00:06:54,679 Speaker 1: he was probably gonna take a pull up jump shot. 147 00:06:54,880 --> 00:06:56,320 Speaker 1: That's a big thing that you saw a lot of 148 00:06:56,360 --> 00:06:59,159 Speaker 1: defenders talk about, like Kayleb Martin was talking about it 149 00:06:59,200 --> 00:07:01,320 Speaker 1: after the Eastern Cop finals. There's a lot of players 150 00:07:01,320 --> 00:07:03,279 Speaker 1: that have talked about that. When you have kind of 151 00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:06,159 Speaker 1: a one dimensional approach to the way that you attack 152 00:07:06,200 --> 00:07:07,720 Speaker 1: and there's not a ton of variety, it makes you 153 00:07:07,800 --> 00:07:10,840 Speaker 1: easier to guard a lot more balance. For Bradley Beal, 154 00:07:10,920 --> 00:07:13,360 Speaker 1: so he had one hundred and two drives to the 155 00:07:13,400 --> 00:07:15,280 Speaker 1: left this year and eighty eight drives to the right, 156 00:07:15,320 --> 00:07:17,119 Speaker 1: so a little bit of a difference there, but nothing 157 00:07:17,120 --> 00:07:20,760 Speaker 1: too crazy. When he went left, fifty six pull up jumpers, 158 00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:23,000 Speaker 1: thirty seven drives to the rim, So he's more likely 159 00:07:23,040 --> 00:07:25,720 Speaker 1: to shoot a pull up jumper, but he's it's still 160 00:07:25,760 --> 00:07:27,720 Speaker 1: like about a forty percent chance it'll go all the 161 00:07:27,720 --> 00:07:29,600 Speaker 1: way to the rim, which is pretty good. When he 162 00:07:29,640 --> 00:07:32,280 Speaker 1: goes right, thirty three pull up jumpers, forty drives to 163 00:07:32,280 --> 00:07:35,040 Speaker 1: the rim, same thing. Good balance when he's going both ways. 164 00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:37,720 Speaker 1: So when he's in that high hesitation, which is that 165 00:07:37,800 --> 00:07:40,360 Speaker 1: bridge move. When I work with my high school kids 166 00:07:40,680 --> 00:07:44,240 Speaker 1: in the mornings on skill development. Everything is built out 167 00:07:44,240 --> 00:07:46,360 Speaker 1: of a high hesitation. If you do it between the 168 00:07:46,400 --> 00:07:48,120 Speaker 1: legs dribble and you have the ball kind of sitting 169 00:07:48,120 --> 00:07:50,800 Speaker 1: in your hand on the left side. From there you 170 00:07:50,800 --> 00:07:53,200 Speaker 1: can cross back over to the right, you can rise 171 00:07:53,240 --> 00:07:55,679 Speaker 1: into a jump shot, you can push the ball further 172 00:07:55,760 --> 00:07:57,440 Speaker 1: to the left. As you drive to the left, you 173 00:07:57,440 --> 00:08:00,360 Speaker 1: can hit another move. It's the ultimate bridge move. Everything 174 00:08:00,400 --> 00:08:03,440 Speaker 1: is connected out of that high hesitation. And when Bradley 175 00:08:03,520 --> 00:08:06,240 Speaker 1: Beal is sitting up in that high hesitation, you don't 176 00:08:06,280 --> 00:08:08,000 Speaker 1: know which way he's gonna go. He might go right, 177 00:08:08,080 --> 00:08:10,000 Speaker 1: he might go left. If he goes left or right, 178 00:08:10,040 --> 00:08:11,280 Speaker 1: he might shoot a pull up, he might go all 179 00:08:11,280 --> 00:08:13,120 Speaker 1: the way to the rim. He's got really good variety, 180 00:08:13,120 --> 00:08:14,760 Speaker 1: and I think that's a big part of why he's 181 00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:17,480 Speaker 1: been so damn efficient and a big part of why 182 00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:19,800 Speaker 1: he gets to the rim so frequently. And from an 183 00:08:19,800 --> 00:08:23,400 Speaker 1: athleticism standpoint, that was literally the most impressive thing that 184 00:08:23,400 --> 00:08:26,440 Speaker 1: stood out to me on film. He is incredibly gifted 185 00:08:26,480 --> 00:08:29,200 Speaker 1: at turning the corner. So you'll see him even against 186 00:08:29,280 --> 00:08:32,520 Speaker 1: good defensive players, he'll get into that high hesitation and 187 00:08:32,559 --> 00:08:34,839 Speaker 1: he'll see the defender relax a little bit or lean 188 00:08:34,880 --> 00:08:36,959 Speaker 1: a little bit the wrong way, and he'll hit the 189 00:08:37,080 --> 00:08:39,280 Speaker 1: jets to try to turn the corner, and he gets 190 00:08:39,360 --> 00:08:41,560 Speaker 1: the corner. You know what I'm talking about when those 191 00:08:41,600 --> 00:08:43,920 Speaker 1: shoulder battles that I've talked about a lot over the 192 00:08:43,920 --> 00:08:47,080 Speaker 1: course of the season, where it's like you're trying to 193 00:08:47,080 --> 00:08:48,680 Speaker 1: turn the corner on a guy, but like if he 194 00:08:48,800 --> 00:08:50,280 Speaker 1: just gets a little bit of an angle on you, 195 00:08:50,360 --> 00:08:52,439 Speaker 1: he can cut you off and flatten out your drive, 196 00:08:52,880 --> 00:08:54,640 Speaker 1: Whereas if you kind of get the corner, you can 197 00:08:54,679 --> 00:08:56,720 Speaker 1: blow through his shoulder and get more of a straight 198 00:08:56,760 --> 00:09:00,720 Speaker 1: line drive. Bradley Beal wins a ton of those confrontations 199 00:09:00,760 --> 00:09:03,720 Speaker 1: and we'll get the corner and get downhill. That's why 200 00:09:03,760 --> 00:09:06,080 Speaker 1: he finishes in the restricted area so much compared to 201 00:09:06,120 --> 00:09:09,320 Speaker 1: his peers. That's why he's so efficient compared to most 202 00:09:09,320 --> 00:09:11,880 Speaker 1: of his peers. So I did think that was super interesting. 203 00:09:12,000 --> 00:09:14,760 Speaker 1: On tape, playmaking is a bit of a mixed bag. 204 00:09:15,120 --> 00:09:17,640 Speaker 1: He makes extremely high level reads. You'll see him make 205 00:09:17,679 --> 00:09:19,800 Speaker 1: skip passes and feeds into the high posts that a 206 00:09:19,800 --> 00:09:22,319 Speaker 1: lot of players don't see. But then he'll also force 207 00:09:22,400 --> 00:09:26,040 Speaker 1: things into traffic and he'll missreads. Like a lot of 208 00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:29,360 Speaker 1: scoring guards. He seems to go through like different attack styles. 209 00:09:29,400 --> 00:09:32,200 Speaker 1: So he'll have phases where like a dozen possessions in 210 00:09:32,240 --> 00:09:34,640 Speaker 1: a row, he's really looking to make the right read 211 00:09:34,679 --> 00:09:37,040 Speaker 1: and he's surgical and offense has a really good flow. 212 00:09:37,320 --> 00:09:39,040 Speaker 1: But then he'll kind of click into this other mode 213 00:09:39,040 --> 00:09:40,680 Speaker 1: where he's just hunting his own shot and he gets 214 00:09:40,679 --> 00:09:44,040 Speaker 1: a little tunnel vision. That is a super common trait 215 00:09:44,200 --> 00:09:46,880 Speaker 1: in high volume ball handlers. In fact, I would argue 216 00:09:46,880 --> 00:09:49,960 Speaker 1: that the vast majority of primary ball handlers in the 217 00:09:50,000 --> 00:09:52,560 Speaker 1: NBA have that exact same trait. They have phases where 218 00:09:52,600 --> 00:09:55,000 Speaker 1: they playmake phases where they don't. We literally just saw 219 00:09:55,000 --> 00:09:57,719 Speaker 1: this with Jamal Murray in this particular playoff run. I 220 00:09:57,720 --> 00:09:59,800 Speaker 1: would actually argue that there's only like a dozen guys 221 00:09:59,800 --> 00:10:02,880 Speaker 1: in the entire league that are like, really really good playmakers. 222 00:10:02,880 --> 00:10:05,880 Speaker 1: It's one of the most rare skills in basketball. But 223 00:10:06,040 --> 00:10:08,079 Speaker 1: I would say that Bradley bial is definitely a bit 224 00:10:08,160 --> 00:10:10,920 Speaker 1: above average as a playmaker based on what I saw 225 00:10:10,960 --> 00:10:12,880 Speaker 1: on tape and in the numbers. He was one of 226 00:10:12,920 --> 00:10:14,559 Speaker 1: only thirty two players in the league this year to 227 00:10:14,559 --> 00:10:17,120 Speaker 1: play at least fifty games, average over five assists, and 228 00:10:17,280 --> 00:10:21,360 Speaker 1: fewer than three turnovers per game. On the defensive end 229 00:10:21,400 --> 00:10:23,680 Speaker 1: of the floor. Like a ton of players at his position, 230 00:10:24,120 --> 00:10:26,040 Speaker 1: he was the best player on a bad team, so 231 00:10:26,120 --> 00:10:29,480 Speaker 1: he didn't devote a ton of energy or resources to 232 00:10:29,520 --> 00:10:32,760 Speaker 1: the defensive end. That's kind of common. But he's a 233 00:10:32,800 --> 00:10:35,520 Speaker 1: good athlete with a low center of gravity, like I said, 234 00:10:35,520 --> 00:10:37,640 Speaker 1: a good first step which helps him cut guys off, 235 00:10:38,240 --> 00:10:39,960 Speaker 1: and he's also got a good amount of strength. So 236 00:10:40,000 --> 00:10:43,080 Speaker 1: it's completely plausible that in the right system, with a 237 00:10:43,080 --> 00:10:45,640 Speaker 1: good training camp or a coaching staff, and a good 238 00:10:45,640 --> 00:10:48,160 Speaker 1: group of players with good buy in and a true 239 00:10:48,200 --> 00:10:52,440 Speaker 1: pursuit of a championship goal, could get Bradley Beal to 240 00:10:52,480 --> 00:10:55,800 Speaker 1: buy into a specific defensive role and do it reasonably well. 241 00:10:55,840 --> 00:10:58,040 Speaker 1: I've also just seen this too many times. It's like JR. 242 00:10:58,080 --> 00:11:01,560 Speaker 1: Smith on the twenty sixteen Calves or even Nikola Jokic 243 00:11:01,640 --> 00:11:04,040 Speaker 1: on the twenty twenty three Denver Nuggets. When you get 244 00:11:04,080 --> 00:11:06,280 Speaker 1: a guy that has some defensive limitations or that has 245 00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:09,480 Speaker 1: a lot of offensive responsibilities, there's no reason why in 246 00:11:09,600 --> 00:11:12,439 Speaker 1: a in a the right type of system that they 247 00:11:12,480 --> 00:11:14,640 Speaker 1: can't buy in and do something. It's one of the 248 00:11:14,640 --> 00:11:16,640 Speaker 1: big reasons why I like the Miami Heat example, as 249 00:11:16,640 --> 00:11:18,760 Speaker 1: a place for him to go. Eric Spolstra is one 250 00:11:18,760 --> 00:11:21,760 Speaker 1: of the best coaches in the league at crafting these 251 00:11:21,800 --> 00:11:25,480 Speaker 1: like achievable defensive roles for limited defensive players and so 252 00:11:26,080 --> 00:11:29,160 Speaker 1: and then even with Jamal Murray, for instance, like I 253 00:11:29,200 --> 00:11:32,360 Speaker 1: thought he was mostly bad defensively in this playoff run 254 00:11:32,400 --> 00:11:34,080 Speaker 1: and it just didn't matter as they won the trophy. 255 00:11:34,120 --> 00:11:36,239 Speaker 1: As long as you bring enough to the table offensively, 256 00:11:36,280 --> 00:11:38,520 Speaker 1: you're gonna be a net positive. And again, you can 257 00:11:38,520 --> 00:11:41,280 Speaker 1: scheme around it to a certain extent, just like Denver 258 00:11:41,360 --> 00:11:44,800 Speaker 1: would hide Jamal Murray on shooters that can't move right, 259 00:11:44,920 --> 00:11:46,880 Speaker 1: like shooters that aren't movement shooters, so that you could 260 00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:49,800 Speaker 1: run got screens or they would just help as much 261 00:11:49,800 --> 00:11:51,760 Speaker 1: as they could in his post up situations. And Jamal 262 00:11:51,840 --> 00:11:53,880 Speaker 1: Murray's big and strong, so at least he could fight 263 00:11:54,240 --> 00:11:57,040 Speaker 1: in some post mismatches, right, So, like you're gonna find 264 00:11:57,040 --> 00:12:00,080 Speaker 1: a way to turn that into a positive player. And 265 00:12:00,080 --> 00:12:03,760 Speaker 1: the injury concerns are real. He's played just ninety total 266 00:12:03,800 --> 00:12:06,640 Speaker 1: games in the last two years, so that's definitely something 267 00:12:06,640 --> 00:12:09,640 Speaker 1: to factor in. But there was like a three year 268 00:12:09,679 --> 00:12:12,520 Speaker 1: stretch from twenty seventeen to twenty nineteen where Bradley Beal 269 00:12:12,679 --> 00:12:15,720 Speaker 1: only missed five games total, and that was also back 270 00:12:15,720 --> 00:12:18,120 Speaker 1: when the Wizards were relevant. So I do wonder if 271 00:12:18,120 --> 00:12:20,800 Speaker 1: it's possible he's been a little bit more deliberate with 272 00:12:20,840 --> 00:12:23,880 Speaker 1: his recovery just simply because Washington didn't have anything to 273 00:12:23,920 --> 00:12:27,000 Speaker 1: play for. But it's certainly a risk that you have 274 00:12:27,080 --> 00:12:29,880 Speaker 1: to factor in. He is only twenty nine years old 275 00:12:30,080 --> 00:12:33,320 Speaker 1: as of today, although he turns thirty very soon. I 276 00:12:33,360 --> 00:12:35,439 Speaker 1: wanted to stay before we go to some teams. I 277 00:12:35,440 --> 00:12:37,840 Speaker 1: wanted to stay on the Jamal Murray example for a minute, 278 00:12:37,880 --> 00:12:40,560 Speaker 1: because I talked a lot about with Jamal Murray the 279 00:12:40,600 --> 00:12:43,280 Speaker 1: difference between your contributions as a basketball player in a 280 00:12:43,360 --> 00:12:47,440 Speaker 1: vacuum versus your contributions in a five man context. In 281 00:12:47,520 --> 00:12:50,560 Speaker 1: a vacuum. Yeah, Jamal Murray's, you know, probably not going 282 00:12:50,600 --> 00:12:52,000 Speaker 1: to be the guy like if you threw him on 283 00:12:52,040 --> 00:12:55,120 Speaker 1: the Washington Wizards and said lead that team all next year, like, 284 00:12:55,720 --> 00:12:58,120 Speaker 1: he may not do very well, but that doesn't matter 285 00:12:58,160 --> 00:13:00,800 Speaker 1: because within the context of what Denver needed him to do, 286 00:13:01,480 --> 00:13:04,319 Speaker 1: they focused his strengths and he played like a star 287 00:13:04,640 --> 00:13:08,120 Speaker 1: right and actually flashed some really high level playmaking to 288 00:13:08,160 --> 00:13:10,920 Speaker 1: a higher level even than what Bradley Beal can do. Right. 289 00:13:11,280 --> 00:13:13,920 Speaker 1: But the point is is that, like, there's no reason 290 00:13:13,960 --> 00:13:18,080 Speaker 1: in the world why Bradley Beal can't in the right system, 291 00:13:18,120 --> 00:13:21,040 Speaker 1: surrounded by the right types of players, where he's not 292 00:13:21,160 --> 00:13:23,920 Speaker 1: the best player on the team, why they can't craft 293 00:13:23,960 --> 00:13:26,280 Speaker 1: for him a similar role where he can excel in 294 00:13:26,320 --> 00:13:30,040 Speaker 1: that role and produce like a legitimate star. And this 295 00:13:30,080 --> 00:13:32,360 Speaker 1: is a story we see way too much in the NBA, 296 00:13:32,440 --> 00:13:35,679 Speaker 1: where we all just decide a guy sucks for one 297 00:13:35,760 --> 00:13:37,959 Speaker 1: reason or another. We saw this with Kyrie forever. It's like, oh, 298 00:13:37,960 --> 00:13:40,560 Speaker 1: they missed the playoffs. It's like Kyrie's awesome. That was 299 00:13:40,559 --> 00:13:44,240 Speaker 1: a roster limitation. Bradley Beal has been floundering in a 300 00:13:44,520 --> 00:13:49,040 Speaker 1: bad organization around bad players for a long time and 301 00:13:49,360 --> 00:13:52,120 Speaker 1: hasn't really had an opportunity to demonstrate what his skill 302 00:13:52,160 --> 00:13:55,320 Speaker 1: set can contribute to a great basketball team. So don't 303 00:13:55,320 --> 00:13:58,160 Speaker 1: be the least bit surprised if he gets moved to 304 00:13:58,240 --> 00:14:00,679 Speaker 1: the right type of team and im meetiate kind of 305 00:14:01,040 --> 00:14:03,560 Speaker 1: succeeds in a role similar to what Jamal Murray did 306 00:14:03,880 --> 00:14:06,719 Speaker 1: for the Denver Nuggets. Jamal Murray, for instance, is from 307 00:14:06,760 --> 00:14:09,640 Speaker 1: a health standpoint, we talked about how Bradley Beal only 308 00:14:09,640 --> 00:14:11,640 Speaker 1: played ninety games in the last few years. Jamal Murray 309 00:14:11,640 --> 00:14:13,400 Speaker 1: only played one hundred and thirteen games in the last 310 00:14:13,400 --> 00:14:16,480 Speaker 1: three seasons, but he got healthy in time for a 311 00:14:16,520 --> 00:14:18,640 Speaker 1: playoff run, and in that playoff run was the second 312 00:14:18,640 --> 00:14:20,520 Speaker 1: best player on a team that hoisted the trophy. So 313 00:14:20,800 --> 00:14:23,320 Speaker 1: I have absolutely no doubt in my mind whatsoever that 314 00:14:23,320 --> 00:14:27,480 Speaker 1: Bradley Beal can have a similar contribution to the right team. 315 00:14:27,960 --> 00:14:31,000 Speaker 1: So from there, let's talk about some options. I think 316 00:14:31,040 --> 00:14:34,240 Speaker 1: Miami's literally perfect. They have good salaries to match without 317 00:14:34,280 --> 00:14:37,320 Speaker 1: giving up a pivotal rotation piece to probably be Tyler 318 00:14:37,360 --> 00:14:41,520 Speaker 1: Harrow and Duncan Robinson. Ideally try to jam Kyle Lowry 319 00:14:41,520 --> 00:14:44,560 Speaker 1: in there, but I just am not sure why Washington 320 00:14:44,560 --> 00:14:47,640 Speaker 1: would want that. But it's important because Bradley Beal is 321 00:14:47,680 --> 00:14:49,200 Speaker 1: in no trade clause, so he can at least kind 322 00:14:49,200 --> 00:14:50,760 Speaker 1: of try to finagle or force his way to a 323 00:14:50,800 --> 00:14:53,080 Speaker 1: specific situation. And if he wants to go to Miami, 324 00:14:53,120 --> 00:14:55,200 Speaker 1: I think Miami has the assets to get it done, 325 00:14:55,480 --> 00:14:57,440 Speaker 1: and I think it'd be a great basketball situation for 326 00:14:57,480 --> 00:15:00,160 Speaker 1: Bradley where he could actually help that team get to 327 00:15:00,160 --> 00:15:03,040 Speaker 1: the next level. It's a very specific roster need, Like 328 00:15:03,080 --> 00:15:05,200 Speaker 1: I said, they needed somebody that can lighten the load 329 00:15:05,200 --> 00:15:08,560 Speaker 1: on Jimmy Butler as a reliable secondary shot creator because 330 00:15:08,600 --> 00:15:11,320 Speaker 1: BAM's not that guy, and the do it by committee 331 00:15:11,320 --> 00:15:14,720 Speaker 1: with undrafted guys in late career vets thing wasn't working either. 332 00:15:15,600 --> 00:15:18,960 Speaker 1: I also think with the whole heat culture conditioning body 333 00:15:19,000 --> 00:15:22,280 Speaker 1: fat thing that they could probably get a better stretch 334 00:15:22,320 --> 00:15:24,840 Speaker 1: of health out of Bradley Beal and Spolstra, like I 335 00:15:24,840 --> 00:15:28,120 Speaker 1: mentioned earlier, has a gift for creating achievable defensive roles 336 00:15:28,120 --> 00:15:31,680 Speaker 1: for limited defenders, So I think overnight it would allow 337 00:15:31,720 --> 00:15:35,040 Speaker 1: Miami from a talent perspective to hang better with teams 338 00:15:35,080 --> 00:15:37,520 Speaker 1: like Boston and Milwaukee so that you don't need other 339 00:15:37,600 --> 00:15:41,320 Speaker 1: worldly performances from Jimmy Butler and coaching performances from Eric 340 00:15:41,360 --> 00:15:44,240 Speaker 1: Spolstra to overcome a talent disadvantage. It would be the 341 00:15:44,280 --> 00:15:47,960 Speaker 1: type of talent influx that they need. Milwaukee's probably that 342 00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:50,560 Speaker 1: was the other team that Sham's mentioned, probably the least 343 00:15:50,680 --> 00:15:53,600 Speaker 1: likely because if you look at their salary matching, it 344 00:15:53,640 --> 00:15:56,120 Speaker 1: would have to be something like Drew Holliday and Bobby Portis. 345 00:15:56,160 --> 00:15:59,600 Speaker 1: And again, why would Washington do that, Like, if you're 346 00:15:59,600 --> 00:16:02,680 Speaker 1: gonna go to Miami you're gonna get a legitimate young 347 00:16:02,720 --> 00:16:04,840 Speaker 1: prospect in Tyler Harrow. If you go to Boston, it'd 348 00:16:04,880 --> 00:16:06,680 Speaker 1: be somebody like Jyalen Brown. If you go to Golden State, 349 00:16:06,680 --> 00:16:08,240 Speaker 1: you might get Jordan Poole. If you go to Philly, 350 00:16:08,280 --> 00:16:10,880 Speaker 1: it might be someone like Tyrese MAXI right, that's not 351 00:16:10,960 --> 00:16:13,760 Speaker 1: the case with this Golden or this Milwaukee package. But 352 00:16:13,800 --> 00:16:15,640 Speaker 1: I do think it's a great fit, especially with their 353 00:16:15,680 --> 00:16:20,040 Speaker 1: half court shot creation limitations Boston. So Brian Winhorst did 354 00:16:20,080 --> 00:16:23,240 Speaker 1: report earlier that Boston is not interested in Bradley bial 355 00:16:23,240 --> 00:16:25,720 Speaker 1: and is more interested in resigning Jalen Brown. That could 356 00:16:25,760 --> 00:16:28,960 Speaker 1: also just be a negotiation piece. However, I actually do 357 00:16:29,080 --> 00:16:31,320 Speaker 1: kind of like that idea. It would be a really 358 00:16:31,360 --> 00:16:35,280 Speaker 1: tough pill to swallow because Jalen Brown's a better player 359 00:16:35,320 --> 00:16:39,280 Speaker 1: than Bradley Beal. But in terms of the timeline, with 360 00:16:39,480 --> 00:16:42,680 Speaker 1: how much talent Boston has right now, in the fact 361 00:16:42,680 --> 00:16:44,760 Speaker 1: that two or three years from now, just through the 362 00:16:44,840 --> 00:16:48,320 Speaker 1: expensive nature of retaining these players under the curtain CBA, 363 00:16:48,520 --> 00:16:50,640 Speaker 1: you're gonna lose a bunch of these guys. You kind 364 00:16:50,640 --> 00:16:53,320 Speaker 1: of need to capitalize on this window right now. Tatum's 365 00:16:53,360 --> 00:16:56,680 Speaker 1: not quite good enough Bradley Beial's a higher level shot creator, 366 00:16:56,960 --> 00:16:59,080 Speaker 1: a better half court shot creator in my opinion than 367 00:16:59,160 --> 00:17:01,520 Speaker 1: Jalen Brown. So it's kind of one of those things 368 00:17:01,560 --> 00:17:04,040 Speaker 1: where you're giving up a long term ceiling in favor 369 00:17:04,080 --> 00:17:07,320 Speaker 1: of capitalizing on a short term window. I think Washington 370 00:17:07,320 --> 00:17:09,119 Speaker 1: would do it in a heartbeat because they'd be like, oh, 371 00:17:09,160 --> 00:17:12,040 Speaker 1: hell yeah, we're getting Jalen Brown. So again, don't think 372 00:17:12,080 --> 00:17:14,679 Speaker 1: it's gonna happen. Windhors reported it's not gonna happen. I 373 00:17:14,760 --> 00:17:17,280 Speaker 1: understand why Boston fans would be like, hell no, But 374 00:17:17,320 --> 00:17:20,000 Speaker 1: if you wanted to capitalize on this particular talent window, 375 00:17:20,240 --> 00:17:21,960 Speaker 1: that would be an example of something that would work, 376 00:17:22,040 --> 00:17:25,560 Speaker 1: or something similar for Damian Lillard. Golden State was the 377 00:17:25,600 --> 00:17:27,440 Speaker 1: only team in the Western Conference that I threw out 378 00:17:29,000 --> 00:17:31,200 Speaker 1: it would look like something like Klay Thompson and Jordan 379 00:17:31,280 --> 00:17:34,000 Speaker 1: Poole for Bradley Beal. I think Washington would do the 380 00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:36,760 Speaker 1: deal because they're getting a legitimate young prospect in Jordan Pool, 381 00:17:36,760 --> 00:17:39,280 Speaker 1: who I think could be really good in with the 382 00:17:39,359 --> 00:17:42,520 Speaker 1: keys to an offense as he gets older. Clay I 383 00:17:42,520 --> 00:17:44,200 Speaker 1: think would have to be in the deal mainly because 384 00:17:44,200 --> 00:17:46,199 Speaker 1: the salary matching. Otherwise you have to start throwing in 385 00:17:46,200 --> 00:17:48,399 Speaker 1: a bunch of smaller contracts, which could probably cost you 386 00:17:48,480 --> 00:17:51,800 Speaker 1: Jonathan Kaminga. I also don't like the idea of starting 387 00:17:51,840 --> 00:17:54,280 Speaker 1: Klay Thompson at small forward this season. I'd rather do 388 00:17:54,400 --> 00:17:58,679 Speaker 1: something like Steph Curry, Bradley Beal, Andrew Wiggins, Jonathan Kaminga 389 00:17:58,840 --> 00:18:01,080 Speaker 1: and Draymond Green. That gives you a ton of athleticism 390 00:18:01,119 --> 00:18:03,440 Speaker 1: on the front line and maybe for a whole season 391 00:18:03,480 --> 00:18:06,280 Speaker 1: you can see I Jonathan ming is capable of contributing, 392 00:18:06,640 --> 00:18:09,479 Speaker 1: But going back to that Lakers series when they lost, 393 00:18:10,040 --> 00:18:12,119 Speaker 1: it was just too much to ask Steph Curry to 394 00:18:12,119 --> 00:18:13,840 Speaker 1: create every single shot out of high pick and roll. 395 00:18:13,880 --> 00:18:17,119 Speaker 1: They need a legitimate second shot creator. If Jordan Poole's 396 00:18:17,160 --> 00:18:19,560 Speaker 1: not ready, Klay Thompson can't do it anymore because he's 397 00:18:19,560 --> 00:18:22,240 Speaker 1: all aging, Like you need somebody like that Bradley Beals. 398 00:18:22,240 --> 00:18:25,000 Speaker 1: An example. Last team I had on my list was Philly. 399 00:18:25,200 --> 00:18:27,600 Speaker 1: If Harden goes to Houston, it would look like Tobias 400 00:18:27,640 --> 00:18:31,560 Speaker 1: Harris and Tyros Maxey, who Washington would immediately extend similar 401 00:18:31,560 --> 00:18:33,520 Speaker 1: type of dealer. You're getting a young prospect in Tyris 402 00:18:33,520 --> 00:18:35,920 Speaker 1: Maxy that I really like, and it's that secondary shot 403 00:18:35,960 --> 00:18:38,800 Speaker 1: creator to have next to Joellen beat So I'm really 404 00:18:38,840 --> 00:18:40,840 Speaker 1: curious to see which way it ends up going. A 405 00:18:40,880 --> 00:18:43,800 Speaker 1: lot of teams could use him, but Bradley Bil's a 406 00:18:43,800 --> 00:18:45,959 Speaker 1: really good player, and I hope that he ends up 407 00:18:45,960 --> 00:18:47,879 Speaker 1: on a great team and we have an opportunity to 408 00:18:47,920 --> 00:18:51,880 Speaker 1: see what he's capable of on the playoff stage next year. 409 00:18:52,040 --> 00:18:53,480 Speaker 1: All right, guys, it's all we have for today. We'll 410 00:18:53,480 --> 00:18:55,600 Speaker 1: have one more video later this week going over the 411 00:18:55,680 --> 00:18:57,399 Speaker 1: lessons I learned this seasons. Keep an eye on the 412 00:18:57,400 --> 00:18:59,320 Speaker 1: feeds that I'm hanging out of town for a week. 413 00:18:59,400 --> 00:19:01,000 Speaker 1: Like I said, I've went over all of our off 414 00:19:01,000 --> 00:19:03,639 Speaker 1: season stuff and kind of a postseason recap in our 415 00:19:03,720 --> 00:19:06,080 Speaker 1: last video at the end, so you guys can check 416 00:19:06,119 --> 00:19:07,560 Speaker 1: that out there. As always, I appreciate you guys, and 417 00:19:07,560 --> 00:19:33,720 Speaker 1: I'll see you later this week. The volume