WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week: Murphy, Rieder and Summers

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. What's the state of

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>corporate governance? The deficit is a real issue. The US

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>economy continues to send mixed signals to the financial stories

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that cheap our world fed action to con concerns over

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>dollar liquidity and encouraging China data. The five hundred wealthiest

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>people in the world. Through the eyes of the most

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>influential voices Larry Summers, the former Treasury Secretary, star Ward CEO,

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Johnson sec Chairman j Clayton. Bloomberg wool Street Week

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. Markets get their hopes

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>up investors look past fears of a cold war with

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>China and a possible second wave of COVID. This is

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston. It was a

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>week of hope, but is it hope triumphing over experience.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Equities continue to climb higher, but lurking in the background

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>are those growing tensions between Beijing and Washington, and as

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>well a fear that there might be a second wave

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of a pandemic that as of this week, has claimed

0:00:56.240 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand American lives. The economic numbers are stunning

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to be sure. This week, jobless claims fell for the

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>first time in two and a half months, but during

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that period of time, over forty million Americans have become unemployed.

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Fiscal and monetary authorities continue to look for more solutions.

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>That's after they've already thrown trillions of dollars into the

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>stew of government support. So which story isn't we should

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>believe the hopeful one of the equity markets back almost

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to the level they were pre COVID, or the one

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that tells us that we are not yet out of

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the woods. Rick Reader of Black Rock, really knows rates

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>like no one else in this new world, and he

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>sees the effect of FED action on yields right across

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve. But the FED has done has been

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty powerful. But you know, there is something that I

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>think people underestimate when you when you think about what

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the FED does with central banks can do. When they

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>before they wheel out the bazooka and say this is

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>what we will do if we need to, the markets

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>tend to take them at their word. Particularly is FED

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that has a lot of credibility to day. So the

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>FED actually hasn't done a lot in the credit markets

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>at all. But what's happening is there's a sense that

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the FED will be there for emergency reasons or to

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>provide for markets to actually function effectively. So what's happening

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>now is you're seeing a manifestation of what the FED

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>has done. Let's take interest rates to zero. They're gonna

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>keep them at zero for an extended period of time.

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 1>And what it's as long as the economy is reasonably

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>stable than this demand for income and we've talked about

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of times, the demand for income in the

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>world because of the aging, demographic, etcetera, is so profound.

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>And as long as people feel like, gosh, I need

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to that the economy is gonna be stable, I can

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>start to go and get that income. And then when

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you think about the size of the high yield market,

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:42.679
<v Speaker 1>it's only a trillion dollar market. Do you think about

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the market cap of Amazon, it's more it's been uh

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>And you think about it's a bigger Amazon is bigger

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>than the entire high you horning there's not enough income

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in the world, And so what you're seeing is this

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is Gosh, I gotta get income. Economies doing fatter. I'm

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.519
<v Speaker 1>anticipating will continue to do better, and so the surge

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of money that's commenced been restive to say the least.

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>So as a result, yields are really suppressed, I would say,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's reasonably cheap still to borrow money despite everything

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that's happened. Does that sort of give government to blank

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:14.119
<v Speaker 1>check for stimulus? We had to former central bankers Carston's

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and Vabor come out and say this is really dangerous

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>because we're basically gonna have the central banks funding the

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:24.839
<v Speaker 1>government debt. So you know that it has a long

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>complicated discussion, and I would say a couple of things

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.399
<v Speaker 1>that are really important. One is there is something that's

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>really profound about the ability for the governments to actually

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>borrow today. I'm not saying there's an unlimited amount of

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the governments can borrow. They have to be conscious of.

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>You can put too much doubt on the system. You

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>create a crowding out effect for the corporate sector, household financials, etcetera.

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>But today, because of the demograph, we can talk about

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the system is actually set up to be a lender.

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Insurance companies, pension funds actually need the assets and actually

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>need to lend. And what's happened when you drop rates

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to so low, um, it's causing people to say, gosh,

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>where do I go to actually be a lender? And

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>so into day's environment, you can actually, you can actually

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>create some more debt on the system as long as

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you're creating nominal GDP, which I would argue in the

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>US we will have some some improvements, significant improvement and

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>nominal GDP to pay down the debt over time. But

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say we shouldn't go too far,

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>but to put a bit more down on the system,

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>given the circumstances, is actually not as scary as it's

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>been historically. Think about it. When we were back in

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>oh six, oh seven, the households were indebted because the

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>housing market, the financials were indebted. We're in a better

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>position today, happening side. You've always got to be pragmatic

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>about you can't just keep doing it. And but we

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>can afford to do a little more debt, certainly to

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>get to the other side of what is a shock

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to the economic system. So with that, that's the fixed

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>income side of your book. Let's go to the equity side,

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of people saying, boy, the equities look

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>like they're pretty high considering what we're really seeing in

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the economy, the equities telling us something meaningful about the recovery.

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>But the first as we can't leave the fixed thing

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in side, because as part of why the equities are doing,

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>uh doing a they're doing. When you move interest rates

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to to to zero, then you're basically telling people you

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>need to find something else to do. And and when

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't create income in other ways, you need to

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>find something else to do, and you create this transmission

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>effect that gets into the discount rate on equities, that

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>gets into the alternative assets that equities are. And listen,

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the equity market is too high on a

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>short term basis given what the economy is telling you.

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>But part of what I think people have been maybe

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe a bit short sighted about is you don't buy

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>equities for the next quarter, and people talk a lot

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>about next quarter and p ratio offer this year. If

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you go over the intermediate term and think about guess

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you've got we don't have interest low interest rates for

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a long time, and you think about where earnings are

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be over a long period of time. These

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>equities are a long duration the longest duration asset there

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>is equity valuations when you take equity risk premium and

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>think about where we are versus on a low interest rate,

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>on a low level where companies can borrow and actually

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>buy back their stock if they want to. Equities are

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>not high. I mean, I think they can go higher

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in the near terms. I think they should pull back

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit probably, But you know, if you're building

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>balance in your portfolio and you're a long term investor

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and medium term investor, to hold equities in the portfolio,

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, versus owning you're not gonna make any money

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>owning the ten year Treasury note at sixty eight basis

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>points sixty nine basis points. So I do think that

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that equities makes sense as long as you're an investor

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and can be thoughtful about. Gosh, I'm not gonna look

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>at you know, could I go down in the next

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>week or so. You could go down a bit, But

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I think people are under estimating equities for the for

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the intermediate to long haul are actually still okay value here.

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>That was Rick Reader of black Rock coming up. We

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>talked with the governor of one of the states hit

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 1>hardest by the coronavirus as it moves cautiously to open

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>back up, Governor Phil Murphy of New Jersey. That's next

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Will

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg. Ready, New Jersey

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>has been one of the state's hardest hit by the coronavirus,

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and Governor Phil Murphy has been on the front lines

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>organizing efforts to bend the curve, comforting those afflicted, and,

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>as he says, playing moneyball by sticking to the science.

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I hope what we can offer, folks um is that

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you know some basic sort of themes, which is number one,

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>public health creates economic health. Inasmuch as we're all chopping

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>at the bit to get everything opened again. If we

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>if we transpose those steps or we jumped the gun,

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we throw gasoline on the fire. And I

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>think we've been very deliberate. And the second handed glove

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>with that is we say all the time that data

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>determines dates. So inasmuch as we don't ever want this

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to be abstracted. In fact, we eulogize a handful of

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>people every day. I call families every day to make

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>sure it always stays personal. Having said that this is moneyball,

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.559
<v Speaker 1>this is what's the day to telling us and what's

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it allowed that data allow us to do? And I

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>hope that that we get that right. So far, so good,

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and just about every one of those briefings that I've seen,

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>at least. You also give credit to people in New

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Jersey for complying with the restrictions that are not easy

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to comply with. You mentioned chomping in the bit. People

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>are chomping to put in New Jersey and elsewhere as well.

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>As you start to back off, and it's not just

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>an on off switch, it's by measures. How do you

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>ensure compliance? It's going to get harder and harder. Yeah,

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it probably is. But I have to say both individuals, David,

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of staying at home and staying away from

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>each other and wearing face coverings, as well as businesses

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>both big and small, the compliance has been overwhelming relative

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to any expectation. Now, clearly as the weather has gotten warmer,

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>as the clock has continued to tick, as folks see

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>other states that have been less hard hit than New

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 1>Jersey and New York, as they you know, that's all

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>human nature, and I I get that. Are there more

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 1>folks today than there were a month ago? Uh, saying

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm gonna open on June something. Yeah, there

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>are some more, but I will say this, and by

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the way, I think the other point I would make

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is that we have we've done, We've started to open up.

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>We've not this is not uh, you know, we we

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>recognize that we need to take steps. For the most part,

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>folks have done the right thing. What about the politics

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of it within New Jersey? We've seen, at least in

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>some other places some of the states, a fair amount

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of politics involved where some people are really not just

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>clamoring to get back, but really demonstrating pretty active in it.

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>What's been the politics New Jersey? Do you have the

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>legislature with you? Do you have the politicians back in

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you here? Yeah, for the most part, we do. There's

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>been some demonstrations, There's no question about it. Nothing at

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the scale that we've seen in a place like Michigan,

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>for instance, But they have been pretty regular demonstrations. And

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't begrudge that we never have. I would prefer

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>folks to them virtually that they don't congregate, But that

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>bothers me more than the demonstrations. Uh, you know, there's

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>always exceptions with any legislature. But we we've had a

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>very good across the aisle, give and take, generally strong support,

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and we've needed them. You know, we need laws to

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>get past. We need to for instance, we need an

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>ability to borrow money to fill up the enormous budget

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 1>hole that we have as an example. But so far,

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 1>so good. Again, there are some folks who, naturally, in

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>any democratic reality, are gonna go off and say and

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>do their own things. But for the most part, we're

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>we've been in a good place. One of the tricky

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>things everyone is confronting is reopening at the schools, and unfortunately,

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>with the summer most people are not going to school anyway.

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>But you've got the fall coming up. It's a lot

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of uncertainty about how that's gonna work. As you approach

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that question, what are the criteria're gonna use, What are

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the things you're considering about how and when to open

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>your schools? You know, we've promised folks by sort of

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>mid June, we're gonna give them guidance, uh at least

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>on pre K through twelve, And we're clearly talking to

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the universities and higher in community constantly as well. Um,

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's my bias, David strongly is that we

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 1>get back to school. Uh. We've done the virtual stuff

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>as well as any American state, but there's for a

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>whole host of reasons, including mental health, the richness of

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the experience. I'd like, I want to see us back

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in school, but it's got to be a new normal

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>if you ask me a different question. But relatedly, what's

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>my biggest what what's the hardest nut to crack? I

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna it's going to be the young, healthy, asymmetric, asymptomatic,

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>unwitting student who could pass this virus to an older educator, administrator,

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>someone with underlying health challenges. That's got to be the

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>one piece of this that we've got to get right.

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we can with social distancing, face coverings, maybe

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>virtual instruction, even within the in the bricks and mortar reality,

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>but we've got to make sure we get that right.

0:11:58.480 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>One of the things you said is a particular chan

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>elenge of New Jersey is long term care facilities. It

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>is not unique j New Jersey, but you've had a

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>big issue with that. What are you doing about that?

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>How can you really going forward sort of protect some

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>of our elderly, some of the people with some of

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the underlying conditions. Yeah, we've been clabbored in long term care.

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.559
<v Speaker 1>We're not alone for sure. But uh. Of the eleven thousand,

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>four one deaths, almost five thousand of them are from

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>long term care facilities. Uh. And by the way, early on,

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>when I just mentioned about schools early on, that was

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of the the spark that created the fire, the

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>symptomatic unwitting heroic by I might add, healthcare employee or

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>love one visiting and unwittingly passing it on. So we've

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>thrown the kitchen sink at this, including at the uneven

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>operator performance. The Attorney General has got an investigation outstanding.

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>The National Guard, I'm very happy to say the President

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is just re up the funding to extend the National Guard.

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.599
<v Speaker 1>They're in a lot of our long term care facilities.

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>The Federal Veterans Administration has come in and helped us out,

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>not just in our veterans homes which have been hit,

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>but also in other homes. We hired a nationally renowned firm.

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>We're now we're now in the process of universal testing

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and re testing, cohorting, separating patients positive from non positive.

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>We've learned a lot of lessons. The in that industry

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.239
<v Speaker 1>has learned a lot. We all have the hard way unfortunately.

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>But it's also an economic issue. Without adat, we are

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>getting increasing numbers of unemployed and the inclusion New Jersey,

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I think is that one in nine. Now you're up to.

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>At what point do you still expect this is going

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to bottom out? Do you see a bottom to this unemployment?

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's starting to turn back around? Please God sooner

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>than later. Uh. I think it's correlated with a couple

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of things. David number one, the responsible continued responsible reopening

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that we get that right that we don't have. You know,

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going down on one way street. I don't want

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to turn the car around and go back the other way. Uh.

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And secondly, I'll give you a big game changer, and

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that is direct federal cash assistance to states and municipalities. Uh.

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>It's talked about. There are a couple of bills, including

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Bob Menendez, one of our great senators co sponsor with

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a Republican colleague, Bill Cassidy in Louisiana. UH is a

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>good example, Speaker Pelosi with the Heroes Act. UH. We

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>need that, Uh, not just a blue state, not just

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, all American states need that. And and frankly,

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the biggest potential accelerant that's available to us right

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>now to reboot our economy and get as close to

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that that long uh long sought after V shaped recovery.

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>That's to me the biggest game changer available. That was

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Governor Phil Murphy of New Jersey. Coming up. Europe finally

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>gets its act together for a fiscal stimulus package. That's

0:14:54.720 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. We

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>wrap up the week with our very special contributor Larry Summers.

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>As always so Larry, welcome, Good to have you here.

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Af Throughout the entire week, markets were sort of a

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>little nervous about China, and then at the very end

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of the week, President Trump had a big news conference

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>at the White House and he said, boy, there are

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>bad things coming from China. He did withdraw from the

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>w h oh, so there's gonna be sanctions, but the

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>markets could have shriped it off. Is this real or

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is it saber rattling some of both uh our withdrawal

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>from the W HO is probably not as consequential as

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>when the United States decided not to join the League

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of Nations after the First World War, but it may

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>be the most important withdrawal from internationalism that the United

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>States has engaged in since the Second World War. It's

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a completely irresponsible act that will set back the effort

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to combat disease in the world and will ultimately hurt

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>our security. God knows the w h O is deeply flawed,

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>but the United States should be fixing it, not abandoning it,

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and future generations will regret this decision and the lack

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of trust uh that comes from it. It's not something

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that affects the profits of companies over the next several years,

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't affect the stock market. But that's the

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>really consequential thing. The sparring on Hong Kong doesn't involve

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>something that is going to concretely hurt corporate profits. That's

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>why the market didn't react, and the market has been

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>pricing in the fact that the United States and China

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>are at deep blogger heads in a way they haven't

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>been since Nixon opened to China fifty years ago, and

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what's continuing to play out. But think that the

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that there's no market response shouldn't make people complacent,

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>not about the United States abandoning the world's health organization,

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>and not about the state of the US China relationship,

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>which I believe if history goes wrong, goes off track

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>in this decade, the far and away the most likely

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>way in which that will happen is fissures between the

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>United States and China. So, Larry, if the goal is

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to modify China's behavior in some way, shape or form,

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>is there a way to do that? As a practic man,

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>it looks like President she has decided what he wants

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to do, whether it's in Hong Kong and other places.

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look like anything we're doing is changing his

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 1>mind any Look. I think one of a lessons of

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>human life, and it's also a lesson of global life,

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is that it's harder to change people and it's harder

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to change nations then we often hope it would be,

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 1>and that threats and scolding are not all that effective

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>as UH tactics, And so I'm not surprised that this

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>isn't working very well with respect to China, And of

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>course it creates all the wrong incentives over the medium

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>and UH long term. It strengthens the people who say

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in China that any kind of inter relationship with the

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>United States is a mistake against those who want to

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>be more intertwined UH with UH the United States. It

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>teaches China that they need to avoid any kind of

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>vulnerability to US, which means they will put more emphasis

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>on splintering UH their technologies and their economic approach from

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>anything that's global and is involved U with US. But

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in fairness, UH, these are really hard problems, and it's

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>much easier to object to particular means that are being

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>pursued UH than it is UH to propose ways that

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>will be effective. I think over time, we're gonna have

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to reduce our aspirations for how much we're going to

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>change China and concentrate on the set of issues that

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>most directly UH impact on our security. And we're gonna

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>have to think about aspects of our own behavior UH

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 1>that at times are provocative and recognized that in a

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>bargain UH you have to demand, you get to demand things,

0:19:55.080 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>but you also have to respond to uh the other

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>side's concerns, and that our concept can't be that we

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 1>run the world and China gets to decide how exactly

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it wants to fit into the world we run. That's

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>probably not gonna work given China's current strength and UH

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>broad economic power. The one other thing, one other that's

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>one other thing if I could, Uh, David, I think

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>probably the single most serious farm policy error that the

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration has made is the more you think that

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>China is, in various ways a serious threat, the more

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>important it is that we have strong global alliances with

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>all the other countries in the world. And so what

0:20:56.000 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>is odd is a strategy of UH elevating the Chinese

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 1>China threat and at the same time not aggressively trying

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to get close to all the other countries and instead,

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 1>in many ways abrogating commitments UH to them and lashing

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>out at them UH in various ways. In a world

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>where we want to put trade sanctions on China, what

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 1>could be dumber than threatening trade sanctions on Canada and

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Europe and all the other countries who we need to

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>cooperate with us if we're to have a realistic chance

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of influencing China's behavior. Larry, I want to come back

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to the unit statis just for a couple of minutes

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>here because you've expressed concern about how quickly we're coming back,

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>at least in some parts of the country, whether we're ready,

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>whether we have the testing, the contact tracing, things like that.

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>We are starting to open back up, even here in

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>New York. Now we're hearing New York City maybe open

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>with the next couple of weeks. How will it be

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>different these cities now, these big cities are a lot

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of talk now, But what are these cities like New

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>York City, like Boston, the places, whether they'll ever be

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the same again. Look, I think to two separate questions there,

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 1>uh David. Several weeks ago um a set of criteria

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>were laid out. There seemed to be a consensus around

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>those criteria. In fact, the Trump administration laid them out

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>for how much progress we had to make with respect

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to health, how much death counts had to come down,

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>how much testing had to be in place. None of

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>those criteria have been matched, and we're still moving ahead.

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think those were probably reasonable criteria when we

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>laid them out, and I think it's therefore quite risky

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to be moving ahead. I can understand why the decision

0:22:55.680 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is being made, but I'm very concerned that I think

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we are taking substantial risks of a second wave of

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a re emergence UH. Everything the world knows about pandemic

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>disease suggests that it doesn't grow. It's not an inverted V.

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't grow and then revert back to zero. It's

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>more like upside down. W It goes up and then

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 1>it comes down, and then it goes up again. And

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we're taking a substantial risk of that, and people, UH, markets,

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>UH need to be aware that that's very much a

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>risk we're taking. We could be doing much more to

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 1>minimize that risk. We could have a much more organized

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>national effort to make to massively increase the level of

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>testing UH in the United States, for example, but we don't.

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>We could be engaged in a major effort when there

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>are tens of millions of people who are unemployed, to

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>hire people to do contact tracing so as to reduce

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>UH the spread. We could recognize, as is increasingly being

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>recognized by the scientists, the problem of super spreaders and

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>be trying to pursue targeted strategies directed at making sure

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that any superspreaders are separated from the rest of the population.

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>As rapidly as possible. But we're not doing any of that,

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and so I think we are taking substantial, uh needless

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>risks of more trouble down the road. We may look out,

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:54.719
<v Speaker 1>it may be okay, nobody can predict uh pandemics, but

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 1>uh sometimes people don't buy insurance and they don't get

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 1>sick and it work shout. Okay not to have what insurance,

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't make it the right thing to do.

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So I'm alarmed our strategy. I think it's extremely odd

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>that as a country we are debating, and this is

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a bipartisan issue, we're debating a three trillion dollar bill,

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and not two percent of it is devoted to uh

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>finding vaccines and therapies and increasing testing. And so I

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 1>would suggest as a minimum threshold of responsibility that of

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>any legislation we devote to addressing these economic problems be

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>devoted to the health aspect. Okay, there you have it,

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Larry some re Seon, a special

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>contributor of Courstion is former Secretary Treasury. That's it for

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>this edition of Walstert Week. I'm David Weston. See you

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>next week. This is Bloomberg