WEBVTT - 2020 Fantasy Baseball: 5 Interesting Pitchers, 5 Interesting Catchers 

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Beth for

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences. Yeah,

0:00:55.480 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, now, welcome your host by Roman God, Rob

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Sat Francis practice stand ball ladies and gentlemen. Your pictures

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and catchers are reporting the Red Sox might have a

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>new manager and we perhaps could have a new MLB

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>playoff format. Welcome to the Fantasy BFS live on the

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>Sports Grade TV Network. I am Frank Stanfeld, joined as

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>always by gregs Bank. Gregory, what's going on over in

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the FANDUL Sports Book? How's it going? Greg pray Age, Dude,

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing fantastically, man. I'm happy to be here, happy

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to be inside the FanDuel Sports Book. I didn't want

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to be next to you, of course. In success I'm not.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>That's okay, I'm good, all right. Right, you're looking a

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>little short in that chair, so we might have to

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>raise you up a little bit, or you might have

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to grow up a little bit. I don't know if

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>we can make that happen, but maybe window Wilkins kind

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>of the same size. Frank, Yeah, but I didn't look

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that small. I don't know. You might have sunk the

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>chair down a little bit. Here's saying a fat. No,

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I would never say that. Come on, Greg, Come on, man,

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it feels like it feels like you're saying a fat

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I would never say anything like that. Greg. We have

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of interesting pictures and catchers. You're taged. I

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't even prompt him to do that either. He just

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>did it on his own. He just went out there. Fantastic. Yeah, great,

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>not much, man. I just sleep last night, buddy, you

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>know what. I stlefed all right, I had some James.

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I was up early. This might not really having to

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>be up early. My phone was buzzing. I just I

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I have Okay, I did you sleep, man?

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I slept all right, not bad, of course. I stayed

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>up too late as usual, But I'll try and rectify

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that tonight pitcherton catchers coming up after this news update

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that you will hear from alex Fasana Sports Grade News upda,

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I am alex Fasana with your sports grid news update

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>here on the fantasy b f f's in Major League Baseball.

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>The Boston Red Sox will name Ron Rennicky interim general

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>manager a day before the first scheduled workout for pitchers

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and catchers, sources tell ESPN. Boston entered spring training without

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a skipper following the abrupt and shocking departure in January

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of Alex Cora following Major League Baseball's investigation into the

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>astro's sign stealing scandal, leaving new Chief Baseball Officer hium

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloom to conduct an abbreviated job search a month before

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>spring training. Boston is expected to hold a press conference

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>tonight to announce Rennicky as interim manager. The move was

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>first reported by The Boston Globe the sixty three World.

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Rennicky arrived in Boston with alex Cora before the two

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen season, serving as bench coach. Sticking with Major

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>League Baseball, officials are mulling significant changes to its postseason,

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>including increasing number of teams from ten to fourteen, and

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>adding a reality TV type format to determine which teams

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>play each other in an an expanded wild card round.

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball it's considering a move in which each

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>league would have three division winners and four wild card teams.

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Here's how it would work. Once the team's clinched the

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 1>regular season ends, the division winner with the second best

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>record would select its wild card opponent from three winners.

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>The division winner with the worst record would then choose

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>its opponent from the remaining two teams, and the final

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>matchup would be the wild card winner with the best

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>record taking on the wild card team not yet chosen.

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>All of the selection source, it said, would be unveiled

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>live on television the Sunday night of the final regular

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>season games. You have a full slate of NBA, NHL,

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and college basketball. Some you may want to consider. The

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Bulls take on the Washington Wizards. Wizards are your

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 1>three point favorites. The total is two thirty. The Los

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Clippers visit the Philadelphia seventy six Clippers are your

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>point and a half favorites. Total is two five and

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a half, and the San Antonio Spurs visit the Oklahoma

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>City Thunder. Thunder are your eight and a half point favorites?

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>The total is to eight. I'm sorry, what's that? Oh?

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>We have some breaking news ladies and gentlemen and your

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>bffsh it. Apparently seems that Greg Sussman turns fifty three today.

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 1>Happy birthday, Greg Sussman from your BF Frankie Stamfull alright,

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna send it back to the BFFs. What do you

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>have to say about this? Greg Sussman is turning fifty three? Greg,

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>how does it feel to be running around at that age? Well,

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>frank when I saw you earlier said now, I'm game

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>ten more years in the two hours since I last

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>saw you. Uh so, it does not feel great to

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>be three years old. It does feel better to be

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>slightly younger. Happy birthday, of course to Greg Sousman. Fun fact,

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>he has never invited me to his birthday party, and

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 1>because of that, I had our producer downstairs, Sandro, create

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>this fantastic video montage highlighting the life of Greg Susman

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>here now on the BFS. That's a great one. That

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>was Halloween. Greg didn't fight me there either, You were

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>inviting you in your own party didn't come. That's the

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>last time Greg Sustman did push ups. He likes pizza,

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he likes there's no doubt about that. Oh, how can

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 1>we forget the Sun Games last year? That was That

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>was last year. Greck Susman was left home alone once

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and there you go, the Grand Final. That's my wedding.

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>There you go. That's right, celebrating the life of Greg

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Susten here on the Fantasy BFS. But no, honestly, heppy birthday, buddy?

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Are you doing? Can we say how it is? Frank?

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Can we can we say it how it is? What?

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>What's what's really happening here? Because last Saturday you were

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>next door to my apartment. He said, Hey, I'm coming by,

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, cool, let me know when you're around.

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>You did it. I also would like to note yesterday

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>on this very show, you mentioned the fact that Hey,

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow's dands be Swanson's birthday, not realizing, knowing, noticing that

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it's your bf's burthday. What the hell? Man? Well, to

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>be fair, on Saturday, I was very inebriated, so I

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>apologize for that. I definitely should have hit you up

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>when I got to the city. So that is my

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>bad um. And then look, I can give you a

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit of not just in the city, not just

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in the city next door to my apartment, Greg, I

0:07:58.400 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>thought I would give you a taste of your own

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>us in by shouting out Dan's by Swanson, but not

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>shouting out your birthday considering I've never been invited to

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>your birthday party. Uh. You I threw you a massive

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>birthday party on your birthday on November nine this year,

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>did I not? And that's why I'm throwing you a

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>massive birthday party right now. Did you see that video montage?

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>That was amazing? It was a fantastic video montage, There's

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about it. I will say, however, Frankie uh

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that this morning, when you realized it was my birthday,

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you felt bad and that was good enough for me.

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what you're talking about. Time to

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>move over to the new MLB playoff for Matt Greg

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh tell us when you think about this. Obviously, We're

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>not gonna spend too much time talking about this today.

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I really do want to get into some of the

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>pictures and catchers that are very interesting and fantasy baseball

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>for the season, But I think we would be remissed

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>not to at least mentioned talk about this at the

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>top of the show. Here, Greg, expanding the playoff format

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to potentially fourteen teams with four with four wild card

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>team is potentially making it uh. And then they would

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>have a reality TV show, which I'm sure you would love,

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>where they get to choose their opponents in the wild

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>card round. It would be a two out of three

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>game playoff in the wild card round as well, and

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>if you finish as the number one seed, you get

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a first round wild card by into the divisional round.

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So let us know what you think about this proposed

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>MLB playoff format, because Trevor Bauer is somebody who frankly

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>hates it. Craig, you have to at least like the

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>reality show part of it, right, So what do you

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you think I think of this? That's my question.

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that you are somebody who's usually up for change. Uh.

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>If we if we can find ways to innovate the

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>game and make the things better. I don't know if

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>this necessarily makes it better. Um, but the reality show

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>thing actually sounds kind of interesting to me. I think

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>all along the wild card round should be two out

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of three games. Anyway, I don't think that one game

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 1>should control whether or not you make it to the playoffs.

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>After playing one sixty two games of baseball, I think

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that you would. I think there are parts of it

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 1>that you would like and then there are other parts

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that you wouldn't like. Does that sound accurate? It does, Frank, However,

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>I got me honest with you. I kept seeing all

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>these these tweets and whatnot about us just killing the

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>game of baseball, that half the teams are gonna make it,

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>no one's gonna try. My initial reaction was to be

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>against change. I like it, man. I think it's super,

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>super fun. I think the reality show aspects was choosing

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>your opponent, and then nobody who believes in this theory

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>like I think there's something to be said for that.

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fun, and I'm all about fun. I

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>am in I'll tell you what, these rules are better

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>than the NBA All Star rules. I can assure you that, Yeah,

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what I brought up on FFC earlier today

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>with Craig mish uh. The I understand trying to honor Kobe,

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>which is great, but the way that they went about

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 1>it is so like convoluted and random and not really necessary.

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Um there are you know, there are things that I

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>do like about this at and I like the wild

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 1>Card round being two out of three games. I don't

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:04.959
<v Speaker 1>think that it should just come down to a one

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>game playoff. I understand why they do that is because

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>they want to drive up ratings for that one specific game,

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>so they're trying to help baseball in that regard. But

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, like they do that in the NFL,

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and they only play a sixteen game season, you can't

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>have a one game playoff for a one hundred and

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>sixty two game MLB season. As for all the other stuff,

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty wacky. I don't know that we should have

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>fourteen teams. I don't know that we should have a

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>reality show either, But I do like the three game

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 1>playoff in the wild Card round. All right, we come

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>back five pitchers and five catchers that are interesting in

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>fantasy Baseball. In twenty Greg Sussman takes over his rightful

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.439
<v Speaker 1>role as the host of BFS once again. We come

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>back here on the Sportscrede TV network. I want to

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>be the next Daily Fantasy millionaire. Dunk on your NBA

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>DFS competition with Daily Rotal dot Com and Dominated and

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings this season, compete with the pros with Daily dot

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Com Optimizer and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS,

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support and

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>much more safe ten on winning NBA DFS advice with

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>promo code Dunk. Visit Daily road dot Com backslash Dunk

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to learn more. Welcome back. It's a VVFS my birthday

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>edition of the program. Frank stamfle gregg saucemen hanging out

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>with you. I am in Jersey at the Vanduel Sports

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Book wasting my birthday presents away and gambling. Uh. Frank

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Stample is not, but he wishes he was. Frankie has

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a hanging I'm doing very well, Greggy. Kind of wish

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you were here in studios so that we can have

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a little fun here birthday celebration. Blow up some balloons

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>or something, but you know what you were in here,

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>so I wasn't gonna blow up the balloons for myself,

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, just didn't make sense. It didn't feel I

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 1>knew there was no way you would go out of

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:03.839
<v Speaker 1>your right in low balloons for a studio without me

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>in it. You'd think that window Will or Brian would

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>do it, but they haven't. That's okay, no big deal.

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>They're new, they're they're still being trained on the party

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>aspects over the job. But today, other than my birthday

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and other than Dance by Swanson's birthday, today is pictures

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and Catchers. So here on the BFFs, we thought, well,

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>what should we talk about? We decided on on Pictures

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and Catchers because they thought it made sense. We're not

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>just any pictures. We talked a lot about Garrett Cole,

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Justin very Lander, Max Scherzer, and Jacob de Graham. But

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>today here on the program, we wanted to get into

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the I don't know, the the hotter names, right,

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>some of these guys that you're getting a little bit later,

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>but people are really interested in talking about and we

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 1>haven't exactly gotten that opportunity to talk about that quite yet.

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 1>So we wanted to start with some of these bigger names,

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and Franks like, oh, I like this guy, like this guy,

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 1>like this guy, like this guy. Well, I want to

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 1>know which which guy I'm supposed to like? And until

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 1>Frank tells me, I simply don't know. So let me

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>start with I would to call him a hype guy necessarily,

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>but he came out last year a little bit of

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>aura around him. It was Griffin Canning all of the

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim up and down. Hear he

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>was a fine streamer in most locations this year. While

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit more hype in general, What do you,

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>sir think, Frank Standfeld, I mean boy Griffin Door Canning.

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I like Griffin Canning, Greg and I think a lot

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of these pictures have something in common where they have

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>some prospect pedigree. They didn't necessarily pan out the first

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>time they came up to the MLB, but we have

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>seen some flashes, and I think that is the case

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>from Griffin Canning. He has the pedigree, as I mentioned,

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>a former second round pick for the Los Angeles Angels

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of Anaheim. And he has a four pitch mix right

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these A lot of times we'll see

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>these prospects come up and they'll only have two pitches

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that they've really, you know, mastered, and they're still working

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>on a third pitch. He has four pitches that he

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>uses a decent amount of the time. He has a fastball,

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a curve, a slider, and a change. All four of

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>those pitches he uses at least twelve percent of the time,

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>or at least that was the case last year. We

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>saw some warning signs in the second half, Greg, but

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that he can, you know, kind of rectify

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that this upcoming season, and he's a name to watch

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>throughout spring training and kind of see if he's worked

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>on some of these issues. He had some struggles with

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>walks in the second half. We saw the string swinging

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>strike create come back a little bit. It dropped about

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>two percent in the second half here, Greg, but overall

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>still finishes the season his first rookie campaign ninety innings

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>pitched with over a strikeout per ending with a nearly

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>fourteen percent strikeout right. So the swinging misses there, it's exciting,

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think the strikeouts could be there as well.

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>He's got to work on some of that command, as

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, but that's something that you should be paying

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>attention to throughout spring training. I like Griffin Canning and

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>where he's going right now in in the month of

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>February to twenty three and NFPC drafts. He's you know,

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you can get him as your back end of your

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>rotation guy SP five, s P six, And I think

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>there's some upside there with Griffin from Canning. You know,

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>what have you seen so far when looking into him?

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Have I said anything that entices you when it comes

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to rim Canning in Greg, I think the strike guts

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>are nice, frank Um, as you mentioned, but you look

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>at the walks, you know about three walks per nine mediocre.

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the X fit right around where he was,

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>uh just a few just last year, right, four point

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>five eight e r a four point seven to five

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>X fit, so kind of kind of right around the

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>same number of the homeboard in the football ratio wasn't

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>all that different for it wasn't all that below average

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>or above average. It was, you know, lee average. I

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>think grimmy cannon kind of is what it is. I

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I see the potential for him to

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>explode all of a sudden. It's the swing and miss stuff, right.

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So you see that rate that he had thirteen point

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>eight percent, and again I do worry about it's dropping

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>about two percent in the second half, so he does

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>have to kind of get that swinging miss back up.

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>The fact that he has four pitches that he can

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>use at least twelve percent of the time is very

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me because he has that repertoire. He has

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a pitch mix that he can you know, kind of

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>keep hitters off balance here, uh, and go to four

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>different pitches this upcoming season. Remember when he first came up,

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>we were all excited about him because you know, you

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>could see it when he was on the mound. He

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>has the stuff, Greg. He kind of just has to

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>learn how to put it all together and pitch at

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the major league level. But I think when you see

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that near fourteen percent swinging strike rate, that kind of,

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, raises some light bulbs and gets your attention here.

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think that, you know, again, if he can

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 1>just kind of bring those walks back a little bit,

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>swinging strikes bounce back, uh, someone to pay attention to

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>throughout spring training again. But I I like the pitch

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>mix here. And you know, he's not the player that

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm most excited about that we're going to talk about today,

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>but he is somebody that is on my radar. I'll

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>probably have ten teams this year, Greg, I'm probably gonna

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>want him on let's say two or three of them.

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>That's too many teams in general. Frank, You're right, But nevertheless,

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>here I think that Griffin Canning. Yeah, the repertoires fair.

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>I think he does star with four pitches, which is great.

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.719
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder how it will translateually as respective will

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>strike more guys out, we'll have more success. I don't know,

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 1>but I'm kind of mediocre right now when it comes

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to Griffin Canning like that last year started off this

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>season really really well. Was your boy Caleb Smith bring

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Yankee prospect Caleb Smith? And I know you were upset

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>last year. Uh, they didn't have more of Caleb Smith,

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, at the time you ended up more

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Marlin's rotation who were all pitching pretty well.

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Smith didn't drop off in the second half, but

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Smith someone that's at least we're talking about that

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>strikeout rates awesome, Yeah, absolutely, Greg, and the first eleven starts,

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's what that's what really catches your attention.

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Three point one oh e r A and a whip

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>under one a zero point nine seven whip his first

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 1>eleven starts of the season, thirty four percent strike out rate,

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>fueled by a fifteen percent swinging strike rate. So we

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that Griffin Canny is someone that gets swinging strikes

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that in your fourteen percent clip and league averages right

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>around UH ten ten and a half percent. To put

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that in perspective for you, Caleb Smith was even better

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>than that. UH and he had a you know, a

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>thirty five percent chase rate, which is higher than the

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>league average average right around thirty. So he gets opposing

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>batters to swing and miss, he gets him to chase

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>pitches outside of the zone. He's got a solid fastball,

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>he's got a slider uh and he's got a change.

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>He's he's got a three pitch mix, not like Griffin

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Canny has a four pitch mix, but his three pitches

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>are really really solid. Reminds me a lot of Patrick Corbyn,

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>right Like, if he can just continue to use that

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>slider even more this upcoming season, I think that we

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>can really see Caleb Smith kind of take off. Second

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>half was was a disaster. Once he got hurt, he

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>dealt with like a hip injury, everything really went downhill

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>for him. But I mentioned this to you, Greg, if

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>he ended the season with that eleven star stretch that

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>we saw in in the first half of the season,

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>then he would be going about fifty six, fifty or

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 1>sixty picks earlier than where he is going right now.

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>So people kind of forgot what he did in that

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:51.919
<v Speaker 1>first half and they get scared off by what he

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>did in the second half. But I really do believe

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>he was pitching through injury. Caleb Smith is somebody who

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely going to be in on that I want

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>shares of the season, even more so than Griffin Canning.

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>In you sold Cayles smiths really really well. But the

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>problem for me, Frank, is when you look at the

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>numbers and you have to include the second half here,

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Like the photos, first level starts were awesome, but when

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:16.479
<v Speaker 1>it was all said and done, that x fit was

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>over five, right the strikeouts for nine right around with

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Griffin Canning. Was he watched for nine or more than

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Griffin Canning was at When you look at these numbers overall, yeah,

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>pitched more innings over a hundred fifty innings last year

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>for Caleb Smith. Yes, sween strike rate is excellent, but

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 1>those overall numbers are just not what you need. And

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you do wonder if the second half Caleb Smith is

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>the real Caleb Smith. Yeah, I guess that's fair to

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>worry to wonder for sure. And he really struggled with

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>home runs last year one point nine four home runs

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>per nine That is a massive amount, so he's gonna

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>have to bring that back as well. Reminds me a

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of Matt Boyd. Right, Matt Boyd gets a lot

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>of strikeouts but struggles with home runs. Same thing with

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>someone like Robbie Ray. I think Caleb Smith is in

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that mold. The problem. You know, what good about him

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is you're getting him much later than pictures like that. Yes,

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Ray is more proven. Uh And I guess you

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.479
<v Speaker 1>could say the same thing about Matt Boyd, but you know,

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>they were going at a level like Caleb Smith is

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>going at right now at some point in the past

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. So I think Caleb Smith can get to

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>that point. I really like what I saw in the

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>first eleven starts, and you know, look, there's a reason

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>why he's going as late as he is right like

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>he was bad in the second half. I'm not gonna

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>make excuses for him, but I'm gonna make an excuse

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>for him Greg he was pitching through a hip injury.

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that he was healthy last year. I

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>think the player that we saw in those first eleven

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>starts was closer to the player that he could be

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>went healthy. So that is pretty much what I'm trusting.

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And you're getting him super late in drafts again in

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>the month of February is n abc A DP is

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>two eight point eight. He's basically free at that point, Craig.

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>That fifty two and a half percent fly ball percentage, Frankie,

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what scares me. Man, he's a fly ball pitcher.

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I know Marlins Park, he's a big park, but that's

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a really big number. The groundball percent basically half that.

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm in on Caleb Smith either. Again,

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>these guys are late run guys. Maybe I should have

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 1>more faith. I don't when it comes to Caleb Smith

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>and when it comes to Griffin Canny. So let me

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>try it again. Let me go with the third player

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and we gotta get the break in a few moments.

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>But let me get to a guy that a lot

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 1>of people are high on this season, including you, and

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that's Mitch Keller, forward top prospect for the Pittsburgh Pirates,

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and somebody that came up and stunt class year. Why

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>do you have hope that he won't sink again. Yeah,

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>he was got off the last year. He had a

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>seven point one three e r A. But again, the

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>underlying numbers tell a different story. He had a three

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 1>four seven x FIT. His left on base percentage was

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 1>under sixty percent, so you know runners are getting on

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>base and they're scoring nearly forty percent of the time.

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 1>League average left on base rate is around seventy. He

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>also had a four seventy five batting average on balls

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and play league average is three hundred. He was incredibly

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>unlucky last year. There's just no way around it. And

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 1>like we've said with these other guys, he does have

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>swinging miss stuff. A mid nineties fastball has, the curveball

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>has the slider, has two breaking pitches there that he

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>can rely on. Comes with the pedigree of being a

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>second round pick from the Pittsburgh Pirates organization. Uh, and

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>look at what he did in the minors as well.

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Thirty nine and the third endings pitched a three one

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>two year A in a one one six whip. Greg.

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully I could talk to you into one of these players,

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's gonna be Mitch Keller. I am

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a feeling Miss Keller is gonna be the guy that

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you talked me into, because that prospect pedigree is gonna

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>get me man. So we'll see if I can buy

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 1>into Miss Keller will come back a whole lot. More

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 1>pictures and and he just talking about pictures of catchers

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>are here. We'll break it down for you next. I

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>your NBA DFS competition with Daily rodal dot com and

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>pros with Daily rod docom optimizer and the most accurate

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news,

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>lake swap support and much more. Safe ten on winning

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily rodo

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com backslash dunk to learn more. Al Right back

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>here from the Fat Nule Sports Book, Greg Sausman, Frank Stamford,

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 1>it's you be a fast pictures and catchers today, So

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>let's continue to talk about pictures and catchers. Frank. We

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>left off on Mitch Hella, a top prospect for the

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Pirates, came out last year and stunk. You're in

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the midst of trying to explain to me why it's

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna be different. Yeah, So I spoke about this a

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit before the break. It reminds me a lot

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of someone like Blake Snell, right, Greg who comes up,

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>gets his first taste of the MLB uh and does

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>not pitch well, gets she lacked, comes back the next

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>year and starts to put it together. And we've seen

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this before with all different types of prospects, not just

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>pitching prospects. Let's talk about Mike Trout right. Mike Trout

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>came up and was not Mike Trout right away. He

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>actually struggled quite a bit in his first season. So

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what we're looking at here. With Mitch Keller.

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>There were underlying signs that were uh, you know, encouraging.

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>The swingey strike create again was higher than league average

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>for Mitch Keller, the average over twelve case per nine.

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And when he came back to the Major's last year,

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>if you remember, he came up like late May, made

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>like three starts into June, uh, and then got sent

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>back down because that's how bad he was. And and

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.199
<v Speaker 1>then when he came back in August, his final eight starts,

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>we saw the walks really go down to about two

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and a half walks per nine. The case per nine,

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we're still over twelve per game, So you know, you'd

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>like to see those things. A bounce back there from

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Keller and the swinging strike create, the chase rate,

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the first pitch strike percentage, all of those numbers went

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>up when he came back his second time around. Those

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>final eight starts for Mitch Keller last year, and I

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's something that he could build on heading into

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>this year. The Pirates are not going anywhere this upcoming season, Greg,

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>so I think that they're gonna give Mitch Keller every

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to stay in that rotation and try and figure

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>things out at the major league level. Reminds me a

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:20.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit about Blake's now when he first got sent

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>down and then came back and pitched better after that.

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that miss Keller has Blake Snell type upside,

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>but I think based on where he's going uh and

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the prospect pedigree that he has, he's someone that I'm

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>going to have on a lot of my teams as well. Yeah,

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Mitch Keller the more I look at him,

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 1>he looked at the top prosper pedigree. And I think

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Blake Snell there and and Snell was very similar.

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>It was he couldn't get deep into games, he didn't

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>have an opportunity to grow, and then all of a sudden,

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>as Mike Florio called it, he did. And Mitch Keller

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 1>he's going later then he would have had to draft

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Blake Snell two years ago. He doesn't. He doesn't cost

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you all that much in draft. I think the upside

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is simply higher than it is for a Groof and

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Canning or at Caleb Smith go around the same spot.

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot to like with Mitch Keller.

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm most intrigued by Keller than the other two players

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned thus far. Yeah, I think that's fair. And

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>again he's going in a similar rain show. You want

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to pick and choose who you want out of these prospects,

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.679
<v Speaker 1>these players who have upside. Mitch Keller again going around

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the same range as these guys, like the two twenty

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to forty range right now in NFBC A d P.

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll have a few of all of these players, but

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Keller is probably the one that I like most

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>that we've talked about thus far. And you have ten teams, Frank, Yeah,

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I have ten teams, so I can kind of diversify.

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>I could get all the prospects I want. Greg, it

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>is worth mentioning that the draft campions that I'm doing

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>right now, Mitch Keller is on that team. Yeah. And

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>also it's worth mentioning you look at the r A

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>over seven, the X fit just three and a half, right.

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>You look at the case per nine over twelve. That's

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>way more than Kayleb Smith and Griffin Canning. The walks

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:53.360
<v Speaker 1>right around the same number. I like Mitch Keller heck

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and a lot more than like Kayleb Smith and Griffin Kenny.

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>All Right, a couple more pitchers. I want to get to,

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Frank before we move on to the Casher Porsche in

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the program. And it's player that we want to make

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.360
<v Speaker 1>sure fantasy owners do not forget about as a head

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>toward their draft. It's Michael kopeck O, the Chicago White Sox,

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>first on the scene two seasons ago. Then that time

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>he John missed all of last year, but he should

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>be close to ready to rock come March and April.

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Michael Kopeck how to do what he did when he

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>came up the first time of the White Sox. I

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>think it can right it. Look, this is a flamethrower,

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy that throws mid too high, upper nineties. He

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>has the strikeout potential, and he was absolutely ridiculous at

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the minor league level. To like, throughout all the numbers

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned when it comes to like Mitch Keller and

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Griffin Canning and all these guys, Copeck was even better

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>than that when he was in the minor leagues. So

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>he pitched, you know, right around four hundred innings in

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>his minor league career, a three oh five e r, A,

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a one to one whip, five hundred and fourteen strikeouts

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in three hundred and ninety five innings pitched. He might

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>not have a role in the rotation right out of

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the gate for the Chicago Whites box. Again, he's working

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>his way back from Tommy John. But it is worth

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>reminding people that the Tommy John surgery he had was

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>back in September of eighteen. So everything that I've read

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>is that he's going to have no restrictions in uh

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>spring training. He's gonna have an opportunity to make the rotation.

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>They did sign Geo Gonzalez, and they have Dylan Seized

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>penciled penciled in as their uh fifth starter in their rotation.

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>He does come with some prospect pedigree as well. We

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>saw a little bit of him last year and he

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>really really struggled in the Major So all it takes

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>his Geo Gonzalez to basically be Geo Gonzalez or Dylan

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Cease to struggle early on in the season, and then

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we see Michael Kopeck back in the rotation. Honestly, Greg,

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>his upside might be the highest of all of the

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>pictures we're going to talk about today. Uh. And he's

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>actually going later than these names, about forty fifty picks

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>later than some of these guys that we're talking about.

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And the only reason I think so is because he

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a solidified spot in the rotation right out

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of the gate here in it's Michael Kopeck the top

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>pitching prospect that you're drafting this year. I think he

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is in the mix, him and Forest Whitley. We spoke

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>about this yesterday off air. I think people are, you know,

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of going way too far the other way when

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Forest Whitley right now, and he could

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>have an opportunity in that Astro's rotation as well. They

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>do like Jose or Kety, They're gonna give him a spot.

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>He's the fourth starter there. And then Brad Peacock, who

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>we've kind of seen as like a swingman in his career.

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes he's in the bullpen, sometimes he's in the rotation.

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't really go deep into games either. I think

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that if Forest Whitley is pitching well early on this

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>season in the minor leagues, then he's gonna get a

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>shot to be that fourth or fifth starter in the

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Astros organization. He struggled mightily last year. There's no defending

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Forest Whitley, but I still think the upside is there,

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and he was someone who pitched incredibly, incredibly well in

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>at the Arizona Fall League as well. Greg. So it's

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Michael Colpeck and Forest Whitley are the two pitching prospects

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that I'm really looking at here in that can make

0:30:55.840 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>an impact. Where does Brendan McKay fall in that conversation? Obviously,

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>he is both a hitter and a picture for the Rays.

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Where we talked yesterday that they never are very sure

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing where just Brenda McKay fall in that conversation.

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So I would rank him behind both of those guys,

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>both Forest Whitley and Michael Kopeck, even though Brendan McKay

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>has a spot in the rotation from day one, or

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>at least that's what we assume as of now heading

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:24.479
<v Speaker 1>into spring training with the Tampa Bay Rays. I think

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that he got rushed last year. Greg. If you remember,

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>he really climbed through every level of the miners really quickly.

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Where he started off in double A, he tore it

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>up there with a one point three zero e ar A.

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Then they promoted him to Triple A. He made about

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>six seven starts there and he had a zero point

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>eight four e r A. And I guess at that

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>point the Rays organization is looking at him and saying, look,

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>how can we defend keeping him down? He's just dominating

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>at every level. But I think he almost got rushed

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too much to the major league too

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>quickly here last year. And he doesn't have the same

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>type of swinging miss stuff as some of these other

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>starting pitch as we spoke about so far today, I

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 1>don't even think he has the same type of upside.

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he kind of pens out somewhere as like

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>an SP three or an SP four from a major

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>league level, from a major league standpoint, like real life baseball.

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think he has as much upside. He

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>might be a little bit safer in the long term,

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>but even heading into the season, I think some of

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>these other names on this list, in fact, every other

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>name on this list probably has more upside than someone

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>like Brendan McKay, and where you're taking him, you kind

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of want some of that upside. Obviously, Kellery Man, he's

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:34.479
<v Speaker 1>my number one guy. I think Brenda McKay is fun, right,

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you want that switch pitcher, hitter type of player I

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>like Rennie. I might have McKay honestly second after Um

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>because I think the upside might be a little bit

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>higher than for Brenda McKay, who is still twenty four

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>years old, than Caleb Smith, who was approaching thirty UM,

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>So I might Brendan McKay above Caleb Smith kind of

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>closer to to Griffin Canning. There's a go about it.

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Keller is my guy here this year. Yeah, that's fair.

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I like Mitch Keller the most out of

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>this group as well. If I were ranking it right now,

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I would go Mitch Keller at the top. I would

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>go Caleb Smith, then Griffin Canning UH, and then I

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>would probably have both Michael Copeck and Forest Whitley ahead

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of Brendan McKay as well, just because I think that

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the upside UH is higher this upcoming season. But I

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>could definitely be proved wrong Brendan McKay pitches anywhere close

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to how he did in the minor leagues last season. Greg, alright,

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>there you go, Brendan McKay. Let's see him explode in

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the full major league season that he's going to have.

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Frank, are there any pictures you want to

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about? It? Just pictures and catcher's day. We're gonna

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>be want to the catchers, But there any other picture

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to make sure we mentioned now. I think

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>we've got to a lot there, even through a little

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>curb ball with Forest Whitley in there as well, I

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's worth mentioning both him and Michael Kopeck as

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the prospects starting pitchers that you want to target late

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in your draft this upcoming season or even in keeper

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>leagues right where you want to take a shot on

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>these guys, maybe in the middle to later rounds. I

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>think Forest Whitley is a name to pay attended to

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. But we've got about twenty minutes left here

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:58.479
<v Speaker 1>on the show, Greg, so I would like to get

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to some catchers. It is pictures and catchers week here

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy BFS. I would say week week week,

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>stretching pictures and catchers day long. You know, Greg, sure

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that that that's fair. But it's not my birthday all

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>week long. It's a dual celebration. I make sure we

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 1>have time to celebrate me to the catchers. Yeah, I

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>actually the video the guy I was. I was proud

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>of that video, Frank, I'm sure Sandro is downstairs as well.

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he should be. Scandro working his ass off on that.

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And it was a beautiful video. See Sean, Like Sean

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is proud, Sandro is proud, Alex is doing a great job.

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's doing a great job today. I'm in a great mood,

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>fantastic mood. So I will stop just speaking randomly on

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the Catcher's NOWT like that one minute to go. It

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>wasted all this time, Frank, I have two catches on

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>my fantasy team right now that I could keep. One

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is Wilson Contraires in the eleventh round. The other is

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Will Smith and tenth round. What do I do? I

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>would go with Wilson Contraires personally, just be called Is.

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>We've seen him do it for longer, Greg, and we're

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about Will Smith when we come back after

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the break. I like him. I think that he showed

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uh interesting talent from last year based

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on what he did in the Majors and the Miners

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:16.240
<v Speaker 1>combined thirty five home runs from the catcher position between

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 1>the Miners and the major leagues last season here, Greg,

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:20.839
<v Speaker 1>but we will stick Trais is someone that we've seen

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:24.279
<v Speaker 1>do it for much longer, Greg, and he's been so

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.280
<v Speaker 1>consistent at the catcher position. So if you are deciding

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>between one of these two guys, I would lean with

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Wilson Trais we come back, I'll tell you why you

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>actually should like Will smithy as well, because he's awesome.

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 1>That's that was easy. He's getting jiggy with it. Also

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a great answer, But Frank will have better ask here

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>is in a moment, we'll talk more catchers here in

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the BFS. I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire.

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rotal dot

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 1>with the pros with Daily dot Com Optimizer and the

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:05.720
<v Speaker 1>most accurate projections in NBA DFS plus line of alerts,

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support and much more safe ten

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 1>percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk.

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily road dot Com backslash Dunk to learn more

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>by DMB. For my birthday, Frank, this is fantastic. This

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>is the show should be Who I know how to

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>throw a birthday party? Or one? Greg? Let's go? You

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>really do? Man? Do you want? Do you know what

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing for my birthday? I told Sonder this um

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a few months ago. I know he doesn't remember because

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 1>it's not important, but you know what I'm doing tonight? Uh,

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna go out to dinner with my Cardono obviously

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 1>for your birthday. I am not. I had lunch with

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 1>my Cardano, so I don't have to go out to

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>dinner with him now for um. So for Judy's birthday

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 1>back in November. I bought her tickets to see Hamilton's

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 1>the Broadway Show for her birthday. But I bought those

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>tickets to see the show on my birthday, so we're set.

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton's tonight. Is that a good thing? Are you excited

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 1>about that? Yeah? How old? This is awesome, man, it

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>would be great Boozy Gray going to see Hamilton's on

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 1>his birthday. No surprises there. It was a present for

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Judy's birthday. Man. They would come on like it was

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a president for her birthday. It was a nice thing

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to do. The only thing I screwed up on was

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't check the Maryland schedule. They play at home

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>against Nebraska tonight, and Sean, I'll trow this to you, man,

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>because because you're in touch with this, seventeen and a

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 1>half points is way too many points for Maryland to

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>ever be favorite. That is correct, But Nebraska stinks. They

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>lost by eleven at home to Michigan without their point guards,

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 1>so it's possible. I don't think Maryland has been anybody

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 1>by seventeen points. Maybe Marquette in in Orlando. Great, great, dude.

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I love the braw especially the rask in the first half.

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying, all right, we want to catch yours

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>because no many cares anymore. Alright, Franks just like staring off,

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 1>be like, I move on now, all right, let's get

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 1>back to will Smith. You like Will Smith, but you're

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:16.760
<v Speaker 1>telling me yesterday you don't like him at this value?

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Why is that? Because Wilsmith was great? Way he came

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>up last year about I believe why don't you like

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Will Smith where he's going? But you do like him

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>as the player? Yeah? I like the player Will Smith.

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 1>The problem is he's going ahead of Salvador Perez right now, Greg,

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that that should be the case.

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And we're gonna talk about Salvador Perez uh in just

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I like what I saw from Will

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Smith last year. Again, he had thirty five home runs

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>combined between the miners and the major leagues. He actually

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>struggled against left handed pitching. Is weird because he's a

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>right handed batter and he actually crushed left handed pitching

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in the minor leagues last season. He had two eighty

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 1>one with an ops over a thousand against left handed

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 1>pitching in the miners last year, so I would expect

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>him to improve against left handed pitching in the majors

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:04.359
<v Speaker 1>in two in One of the problems we see here

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Greg is he hit to fifty three. His expected batting

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>average was twenty five, and the reason for that is

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.400
<v Speaker 1>his launch angle was actually just way too high. Like

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we want people to hit fly balls, we want them

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to hit line drives and raise their launch angle, especially

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>if they've you know, hit too many groundballs in the past.

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:24.879
<v Speaker 1>The problem is his average launch angle was twenty three

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 1>point seven degrees and he had a a flyball percentage

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 1>over fifty three per cent, So he was basically going

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>up there swinging for the fences every single time uh

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>he was at the disc. So I think he has

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to bring that down a little bit this season. He

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:41.800
<v Speaker 1>actually has good plate discipline. He had right around a

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 1>ten percent walk great Greig twenty six and a half

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 1>percent strikeout rate. You don't like that. I think that

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>could actually come down a little bit. Based on his

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 1>swinging strike rate. He actually didn't swing and miss all

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that much, so I think his strikeout rate is gonna

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 1>come back a little bit. And overall, the player that

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm expecting this upcoming season around a two forty batting

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>average twenty two, twenty five home runs. Uh, you know,

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 1>seventy seventy five r B. I s. I think that

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a good player, but I think that Salvador Perez

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>can actually be better than that. So I just don't

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>agree with Will Smith going ahead of Salvador Perez right now, Greg,

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you brought it up. That's exactly the question

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna ask you, would you rather have Will

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:20.919
<v Speaker 1>Smith or Salvador Perez? Of course, Perez obvious the entire

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>season last year with an injury. Uh, this year, he'll

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>come back and not just play casher, which is something

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that as you excited. Yeah, he's gonna play a little

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>d H. He's gonna play a little first base as well. Greg,

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and I was reading an article on The Athletic last

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>night about the Royals projected opening day roster, and I

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:42.879
<v Speaker 1>came across this quote from Salvador Perez to miss a year,

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I know it's bad for the first time, but it

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:48.240
<v Speaker 1>helped me a lot healing. It helped me heal my body.

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 1>So this is someone who played so much. If you remember,

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was like indestructible. He's basically playing every

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>single day. He had four hundred and seventy one or

0:40:57.239 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>more at bats in sixth straight seasons, so you know

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 1>that takes its toll on your body. He's coming off

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John surgery. We've seen a lot of hitters actually

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>come back from Tommy John and it hasn't affected them

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 1>all that much, like Labor Torres for example, has been

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:11.919
<v Speaker 1>perfectly fine. And I think that could be the case

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>for Salvador Perez this upcoming season. I think the year

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>off is actually gonna do him a ton of help, Greg,

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:20.800
<v Speaker 1>because again, this is someone that was beat up catching

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>every single day for the Royals. You'll get some extra

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 1>at bats at d h at first base as well.

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 1>He has twenty one plus home runs in four straight

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 1>seasons a career to sixty five hitter as well. I

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>think he personally that he's just gonna be better than

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Will Smith. So I don't really agree with Will Smith

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 1>going ahead of him right now. Salvador Perez is actually

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>one of my main catcher targets his upcoming season. Greg. Yeah,

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Perez healthier now rested, as you said, and always pretty good,

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that he plays every freaking day at catcher.

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 1>He's so much um, so much more than so many

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 1>other catchers give you and it just kills you. You

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 1>get that too forty batting average, not enough home runs,

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 1>too many couch and then you don't get the guy

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 1>to play every day. At least Prez will be out there.

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's at catcher first phase, we don't care. He's

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>catcher eligible, which is the most important thing. Let's move

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>all do some of these. I guess not top five, six,

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 1>seven guys, the catchers that you're getting a little bit later,

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:16.799
<v Speaker 1>but maybe you're considering as second catchers in two catcher leagues.

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe just somebody that you have a good feeling on.

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 1>And last year for many fantasy owners, Frank, that guy

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was Omar Nevayez for the Seattle Managers. But he's not

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Seattle anymore. He's in Milwaukee. We know what Yasmani Grandal

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 1>did yet last season four at the Milwaukee burs Why

0:42:32.080 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 1>can't Navarre's study yet. So I was looking into Omar

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Nurvayas and I already owned him on one of my

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Draft Champions leagues. I kind of will regret the pick

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:42.320
<v Speaker 1>right now and I want to go back and change it.

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 1>And here's why. Right So I looked into Omar Narvayez.

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 1>As a left handed batter, he really struggled against lefties

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 1>last year, a two seven batting average at six o

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:53.839
<v Speaker 1>p s. Against right handed pitching, he was a two

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine hitter with an eight thirty six o p s.

0:42:56.960 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So there's a chance that we could see him a

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 1>platoon from the catcher position as well. He wound up

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 1>hitting two seventy eight last year with an expected batting

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:10.399
<v Speaker 1>average GREG of just two fifty four. His average eggit

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:13.319
<v Speaker 1>velocity was not very exciting, and he wounded up hitting

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty two home runs. He had a great season. You

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>know that I was on Revilla's last year. I had

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:20.359
<v Speaker 1>him basically everywhere. He hit twenty two on runs last year,

0:43:20.680 --> 0:43:23.279
<v Speaker 1>and the year before that he hit nine home runs.

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>The year before that he hit two home runs. He

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of strikes me as someone that was helped out

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:31.360
<v Speaker 1>by the juiced ball last year, which is something you know,

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna try and have to figure out how to

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>quantify this upcoming season. Greg but Omar revised his profile.

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Strikes me as somebody who was helped by the juice

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 1>ball last season. I think he could still have a

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:45.439
<v Speaker 1>fine year, maybe like a two sixty two seventy hitter

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>fifteen sixteen home runs, which is fine from a catcher too,

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you're expecting him to come close to what

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:53.880
<v Speaker 1>he did last year, I don't think that that's going

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Are we so sure you're going to have

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the juice ball? How it affected over to bas Omar

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Devias his game? Are you so sure that the juice

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>ball is going anywhere? No, we're not sure. I mean

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that's something to pay attention to throughout spring training. You

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people Greg say, uh, spring training

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is meaningless. I think this is actually one of the

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:17.280
<v Speaker 1>storylines we have to pay attention to throughout spring training.

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 1>If you remember during the playoffs last year, I went

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to a few Yankee postseason games and there were a

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>few balls that died on the warning track, where in

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the regular season those balls would have been way out

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in Yankee Stadium. So I think we saw them already

0:44:30.040 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>go back to the regular ball that they were using

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in your year's past in the postseason last year. So

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that the assumption is they're probably gonna use

0:44:38.280 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that same ball heading into But you're right, there's no

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 1>way for us to know exactly I like everybody. Honest, man,

0:44:45.880 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a guy that you you don't really

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:49.479
<v Speaker 1>have to spend anything on. And I think you're getting

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>him cheap enough. Those home runs maybe if they were

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 1>inflated the average man two seventy eight for a catcher.

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>You have to like that that that bit wasn't crazy

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:59.160
<v Speaker 1>at three oh six. I think the hard hit percentage

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to be hired. It's a big bugaboo for me.

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Under thirty for hard hit percentage. For Devaiyaz, I assume

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a home run, a fly ball ratio is high. Sixty

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 1>percent wasn't crazy. So I like Devas. I think he

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:10.919
<v Speaker 1>doesn't costume about and I think you should be happy

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that you owned on the few teams that you do already. Frankie, Yeah,

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:16.120
<v Speaker 1>like he's fine as a catcher too. I don't know

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:17.879
<v Speaker 1>that I would want him to be in the catcher one.

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, here's what I will say, touching on

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what you said, I think it's okay. I

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's okay. It's a catcher one. And what you

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:26.759
<v Speaker 1>said about the batting average and the babbit, he is

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 1>someone who always hits a lot of line drives a

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:31.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven and a half percent line drive right for

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 1>his career, and last year that was a scent. Again,

0:45:35.480 --> 0:45:37.839
<v Speaker 1>he is someone that year in and year out makes

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:40.359
<v Speaker 1>hits a ton of line drive. So obviously that's gonna

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 1>help with the babbit, that's going to help with the

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:44.279
<v Speaker 1>batting average. I just want to see him play better

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:46.959
<v Speaker 1>against left handed pitching this upcoming season. If that's the case,

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:49.799
<v Speaker 1>then he probably can maintain this to seventy five maybe

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a two eighty batting average. The catcher that I pushed

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 1>on us as our second catcher and all the leaves

0:45:57.280 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 1>we were together is Frank was Francisco but Here, and

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:02.759
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do very very well in his first season

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:05.640
<v Speaker 1>San Diego to play enough this year he is projected

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to be the starting catcher. Is that enough for you

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to invest? Yeah, I'm interested in Francisco ma Here, especially

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:14.120
<v Speaker 1>in these two catcher leagues and in these fifteen team

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:16.400
<v Speaker 1>rotal leagues where you know you're gonna be deep diving,

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 1>scraping the bottom of the barrel. Anyway, when it comes

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to the catcher position, assuming you spend up, assuming you

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 1>don't spend up on someone like a JT. Real Muto

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:27.440
<v Speaker 1>or a Gary Stinchez. But you're looking at upside for

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:31.319
<v Speaker 1>at the position, and he's still just twenty four years old.

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't turn twenty five until October, so in his

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>age twenty four season, and he's someone that I still

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:40.960
<v Speaker 1>believe does have upside. Greg last year in seventy nine games,

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:43.800
<v Speaker 1>he hit two sixty five and we saw what he

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 1>did at the minor league level as well. He was

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:48.160
<v Speaker 1>someone who hit at every single level. Of the miners

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 1>was Francisco Mahe had eight home runs, is twenty seven

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 1>runs scored, twenty two r b I s. But it

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:55.560
<v Speaker 1>was hard for him to get into a flow last

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:58.760
<v Speaker 1>year because he was constantly splitting time with Austin Hedges,

0:46:58.800 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and Hedges is still there. He's probably going to just

0:47:01.000 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>be mainly the backup catcher this upcoming season. But I

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 1>think this is the year that the Padres kind of

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:10.080
<v Speaker 1>unleash Francisco Mihia and everyone wants a piece of the

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Padre's lineup right now, Manny Machado and you know, with

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Fernando Tatis Jr. And all the other names in that lineup,

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone wants a piece of the Padre's lineup. It seems

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>like we almost have like prospect fatigue when it comes

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to Francisco Mihia, and I think because of that, you're

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:26.800
<v Speaker 1>getting him at a discount. I believe this is the

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 1>first year that he is going to start and play

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:31.840
<v Speaker 1>full time regularly for the Padres. It wouldn't surprise me

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:35.240
<v Speaker 1>if he hits like two seventy with close to twenty

0:47:35.320 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>home runs this upcoming season, which might actually working work

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:44.240
<v Speaker 1>out to be better than Omar Nervaiez in ten second

0:47:46.440 --> 0:47:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Carson Kelly. The power potential is real. He comes with

0:47:49.600 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 1>prospect pedigree as well. Just please, Diamondbacks give him the

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to play every day. Get Steven vote out of here. Greg,

0:47:59.400 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 1>He's Franks NFL. My name is Greg sas Thank you

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 1>so much for watching, listening to be f f sin

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Se Shawan and Alex in our control room for Real

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Coast the Coast comes your way. Next, You're fris to

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:10.680
<v Speaker 1>have Greg Sousman. We'll do it all again tomorrow. We hope,

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:20.400
<v Speaker 1>we hope that I want to be the next Daily

0:48:20.520 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with Daily

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Rodal dot Com and dominate on FANDEL and DraftKings this season.

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Compete with the pros with Daily rodal dot com optimizer

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:37.640
<v Speaker 1>up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support, and much more.

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Save ten percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 1>code dunk. Visit Daily Rodo dot com backslash dunk to

0:48:44.760 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>learn more.