WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Fed Meeting, Eurozone Data, BOJ Decision

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 2>top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak anchors

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 2>all around the world, and straight ahead on the program,

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 2>a look ahead to this week's FED meeting, what it

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 2>means for monetary policy. I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Head in London, where we're looking ahead to

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the Eurozones Big economic data job.

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm Brian Curtis in Hong Kong. We look ahead to

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 3>the machinations of one key central bank, and then what's

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 3>next for a key industry that would hope to curb

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 3>the power of central banks.

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 4>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 4>Eyleod on Free Own, New York, Bloombergen ninety nine to one, Washington,

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 4>d C, Bloomberg ninety two to nine, Boston, Bloomberg nine sixty,

0:00:55.760 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 4>San Francisco, DAB Digital Radio, London, Sirius XM one twenty one,

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 4>and around the world on Bloomberg Radio dot Com and

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 4>via the Bloomberg Business APPA.

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby. We begin the

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 2>program with a look ahead to this week's Federal Preserve

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Policy Meeting, a decision on rates expected on Wednesday. Twenty

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 2>meetings in a row with either a rate increase or

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 2>no change at all, will the Fed finally vote to

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 2>cut rates for more. We're joined by Michael McKee, Bloomberg

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 2>International Economics and Policy correspondent. Michael, I think the handwriting

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 2>is on the wall. What are you expecting to see

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 2>though this week from the Fed?

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 5>The handwritings on the wall? And for the first time,

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 5>as you mentioned, in a very long time, we're actually

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 5>going into this saying it matters what they do for

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 5>so long. We've been saying they're stuck higher for longer,

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 5>and it doesn't matter what they do at their meeting.

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 6>It's going to be what they.

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 5>Say about the future. Well, that one's going to be

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 5>both because there is a slight chance of a fifty

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 5>basis point move because they didn't fit rule it out

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 5>before the quiet period began. Nobody really thinks that's going

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 5>to happen, but it's out there, so it'll be the

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 5>first thing people will look at is how much did

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 5>they cut? And so that will be important. Then we

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 5>get the summary of economic projections new forecasts for the

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 5>economy and the dot plot, and that'll capture some attention

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 5>as well.

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Now, the Fed has always said we are data dependent.

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Any move we make is all depends on the data.

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the data we saw this past week

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.399
<v Speaker 2>consumer and producer price inflation. How will that factor into

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 2>this decision?

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 6>Kind of a downside surprise.

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.679
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well that's what cemented. I think the view that

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 5>we do twenty five instead of fifty and really took

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 5>away the hope of the fifties folks, because while we

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 5>got a very small increase in core CPI over what

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 5>was anticipated and the same in PPI, it doesn't suggest

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 5>that the inflation is going to be going the other

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 5>way or there's a huge danger of inflation accelerating. It

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 5>just shows that the battle is not won yet and

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 5>the FED can't rest on its laurels. And so that's

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 5>why people are saying they shouldn't go fifty because that

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 5>might send the wrong message. They want to send the

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 5>message that we are still vigilant against inflation.

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 6>And we're going to keep an eye on it.

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 5>And as last week, Christopher Waller from the Federal Reserve said,

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 5>if data from this point on show that fifty is

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 5>worth doing They can easily do that, but right now

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 5>they're not ready to.

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Now some of the people who are calling for a

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 2>fifty basis point cut, I think the Fed waited too

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 2>long to initiate this cut, that they kind of missed

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 2>the boat at the end of July and we saw

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 2>some very troubling data about jobs. We saw a little

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 2>uptick in inflation growth. Do you think they missed the boat,

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.839
<v Speaker 2>do you think? Or is it steady as she goes

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 2>and they're on the right path.

0:03:55.920 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's impossible to say, except in hindsight that they

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 5>were behind the curve. The argument is that, as you noted,

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 5>the labor market has slowed a lot. We haven't seen

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 5>consumers spending really slow yet, except that the people's savings

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 5>are kind of dwindling, and so there's a feeling that's

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 5>going to happen at some point. The thing about in

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 5>recessions is they're based on confidence, and all of a sudden,

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 5>people lose confidence, both consumers and businesses lose confidence in

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 5>their ability to pay for new what economics would call investments,

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 5>all the stuff you buy, and so they pull back

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 5>on their spending. And right now it doesn't seem to

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 5>be the case, businesses have slowed down. We don't really

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 5>know whether that's because they are waiting, and it does

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 5>seem logical they are waiting to see the results of

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 5>the presidential election and what the tax and regulatory regime

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 5>will be like going into the new year. Consumers through

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 5>the back to school have been spending. We'll see if

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 5>that continues, but the latest indications from the high frequency

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 5>indications from retailers are that people are still spending. So

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't look like there has been a seizure of

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 5>lack of confidence seizure among people yet. So it's hard

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 5>to say with any certainty that they may or may

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 5>not have missed the boat. The only thing that you

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.919
<v Speaker 5>do know is that it takes a long time for

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 5>monetary policy to hit the economy. You're going to hear

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 5>after Wednesday, especially Donald Trump, who's already said this, the

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 5>Fed shouldn't be cutting rates and it's going to be unfair,

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.799
<v Speaker 5>and it's going to be a boost to Biden and Harris.

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 5>But it's not because you won't really see any impact

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 5>on the economy until next year from even a twenty

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 5>five basis point cut. So if things deteriorate between now

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 5>and the end of next year, you could say they

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 5>got behind the curve, but we don't know yet.

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, we have a big decision this Wednesday from the

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Federal Reserve. Our thanks to Michael McKee, Bloomberg International Economics

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 2>and Policy correspondent for full FED coverage, be sure to

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 2>tune in Wednesday one thirty pm Wall Street Time for

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 2>a Bloomberg surveillance special, The Fed Decides, joined Tom Kaine,

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 2>John Ferrell, and Lisa Abramowitz as they break down the

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 2>decision with the biggest names in finance, economics, and business.

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 2>That's one thirty Wednesday on Bloomberg Radio and Television. We

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 2>move now to the logistics and services delivery giant FedEx,

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 2>and with its busiest time of year nearly here, FedEx

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 2>reports first quarter earnings this Thursday. So how will an

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 2>organizational restructuring impact its earnings ahead of the holiday season. Well,

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 2>for more, we're joined by Lee Clascow. He's Bloomberg Intelligence

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Senior Transport, Logistics and Shipping analyst.

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 6>Will Lee.

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with what you expect to see in FedEx's

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 2>earnings report this week, coming off a very strong Q

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 2>four in June.

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Well, thanks for having me. You know, I think

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 7>that FedEx's should report another solid earnings report. You know,

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 7>they were show me story for so many quarters, and

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 7>they've really shown the market, if you will, that they

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 7>can't execute on their strategy. They have a bunch of

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 7>restructuring plans that are underway that are expected to save

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 7>a significant money, over two billion dollars in physical twenty

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 7>twenty five on top of the one point eight billion

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 7>that they saved in twenty twenty four. So you know,

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 7>they're really doing all the right things. They're restructuring their

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 7>businesses into one main reporting business. They are changing the

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 7>way they operate their air fleet, and they're really taking

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 7>costs out, something that that company didn't do for a

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 7>long time. It really became an old fat company, and

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 7>they're really taking a good look inside and making it

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 7>a much more productive organization.

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, they also laid off tens of thousands of workers

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>in the last year or so.

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean they you know, that's always an unfortunate event,

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 7>but you know, they, like I said, there was a

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 7>lot of fat, if you will, that needed to be them.

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 7>And with the you know, advent of technology advancements and

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 7>productivity tools that they're able to use you just simply

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 7>don't need as many people as you once did, whether

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 7>you know that's on the dock or you know in accounting.

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 6>Does robotics play a lot into that?

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 7>Not so much robotics for FedEx. I mean, you know,

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 7>they have really state of the art sorting facilities across

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 7>the country and the world. You know that does a

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 7>lot of that automation, and that's able to save not

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 7>only time but money for the company. So that is

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 7>definitely in net positive, but that's not really what's driving

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 7>I would say the head cuts a lot of that.

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 7>The head count reduction is really on the corporate side.

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Now, in addition to those job cuts, there's also capital expenditure.

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 6>They've really pulled back or are they just you know, really.

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 7>FedEx was famous for buying a lot of planes, maybe

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 7>even if they didn't need them. What they have done

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 7>is they've refreshed their fleet into a much more fuel

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 7>efficient fleet, getting rid of some of the older, less

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 7>efficient planes, and they're also parking a lot more equipment.

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 7>So you know the reality is they don't need as

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 7>many planes as they once did. And not only does

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 7>it need as many, but you know, not just because

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 7>from a restructuring of their air freight network. They also

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 7>don't need as many because a lot of the planes

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 7>either can can do more with less, if you will.

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Now, speaking of freight, you have reported that there's a

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>possibility of them spinning off that freight unit.

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 6>Is that still in play?

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so they're freight unit is or less than truckload business.

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 7>That's it's a very good business, but it's currently under

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 7>a strategic review. You know, we expect that could generate

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 7>an enterprise value of between thirty and thirty three billion

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 7>dollars for the company. You know, right now, the less

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 7>than truckload market is having a little issues with demand.

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 6>Demand is down for a.

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 7>Lot of the carriers that are in the market, and

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 7>the reason for that is we're really coming up against

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 7>tough comparisons. One of their large competitors went out of

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 7>business last year and we're kind of past that anniversary. Also,

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, the ism has been in contraction territory for

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 7>something like twenty one over the last twenty two months.

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 7>So that's not great for LTL demand because it tends

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 7>to be a leading indicator.

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Now a lot of businesses and consumers pulling back on

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 2>spending times are tight, especially as we're coming into the holidays.

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Do you think there's going to be a lot fewer

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 2>packages people choosing ground instead of air. I mean is

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 2>how will this affect FedEx in the coming months.

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So the consumer is obviously an important constituent for

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 7>not only FedEx ups, Deutsche Posts, but really all modes

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 7>of transportation that I cover. We're relatively bullish on the consumer.

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 7>You know, we think that a couple of things are

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 7>going to happen a you know, we are transitioning back

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 7>from buying services to now going back to buying stuff.

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 7>We all so believe that we are going to have

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 7>a real peak season this year pecause of that, and

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 7>seasonality is continuing is coming back into the market because

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 7>we've gone so many years from the pandemic of these

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 7>crazy dislocations that made comparisons next to them possible. So

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 7>you know, we're getting back to seasonality. We think there's

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 7>going to be a peak, which I think could surprise

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 7>demand on the upside. And we're really gonna be paying

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 7>close attention during the earnings call on Thursday on when

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 7>management talks about you know, what they are expecting from

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 7>peak from their conversations with their shippers.

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Well FedEx fiscal first quarter earnings out after Wall Street's

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.119
<v Speaker 2>closing bell this Thursday, and our thanks to Lee Classical

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence senior transport, logistics and shipping analysts. Coming up

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg day Break weekend to look ahead to the

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 2>eurozones big economic data drop. I'm Tom Busby and this

0:11:51.160 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day Break weekend, our global

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 2>look ahead at the top stories for investors in the

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 2>coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York. Up later

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 2>in our program, we look ahead to a meeting from

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the key central banks in Asia, the Bank

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 2>of Japan. But first, as expected, the European Central Bank

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 2>cut rates again at its most recent policy meeting, three

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 2>months after its first cut in five years. Will lower

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 2>borrowing costs lead to economic prosperity for the block for more,

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to London and bring in Bloomberg day Break

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 2>europbanker Caroline hepgar.

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Tom in Europe, it seems that rake huts are like buses.

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>You wait five years for one, and then two arrive

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in quick succession. When the EU became one of the

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>first major central banks to cut its lending rate, this summer,

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it hearted progress made on tackling inflation. This time around,

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the bank delivered another twenty five basis point cut, citing

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>further progress against their economic goals. But European Central Bank

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>President Christine Lagarde says that you per area growth risks

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>are now tilted to the downside. Speaking at a news

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>conference in Frankfurt following the committee's decision to once again

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>lower boring costs, she emphasized the importance of economic data

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:15.239
<v Speaker 1>going forwards.

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 8>So the President, the Vice President and I welcome you

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 8>today to our press conference. The Governing Council today decided

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 8>to lower the deposit facility rate, the rate through which

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 8>we steer the monetary policy stance, by twenty five basis points.

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 8>Based on our updated assessment of the inflation outlook, the

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 8>dynamics of underlying inflation, and the strength of monetary policy transmission,

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:49.599
<v Speaker 8>it is now appropriate to take another step in moderating

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 8>the degree of monetary policy restriction. Recent inflation data have

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 8>come in broadly as expected, and the latest ECB staff

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 8>projections confirm the previous inflation outlook. Fiscal and structural policies

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 8>should be aimed at making the economy more productive and

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 8>competitive which would help to raise the potential growth and

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 8>reduce price pressures in the medium term. Mario Draggy's report

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 8>on the Future of European Competitiveness and then recall it

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 8>as report on empowering the Single Market stress the urgent

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 8>need for reform and provide concrete proposals to make this happen.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 8>The risks to economic growth remain tilted to the downside.

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 8>Lower demand for your area exports, owing for instance, to

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 8>a weaker world economy or an escalation in trade tensions

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 8>between major economies, would weigh on your area growth. We

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 8>have consistently said, and we repeat again that we shall

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 8>remain data dependent, and that is particularly justified in view

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 8>of the uncertainty that abounds.

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>That was the European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde speaking there.

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Despite the upbeat sentiment of Eurozone policy makers, growth is

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>faltering across the region's largest economies and consumer confidence remains

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>below pre pandemic levels. The ECB's latest projections downgraded output

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>over the next three years, whilst the outlook for underlying

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>inflation nudged higher for this year and twenty twenty five.

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>In the coming days, markets will receive more European inflation

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>data alongside the Bloomberg September Eurozone Economic Survey, which may

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>help to guide the two remaining ECB policy meetings that

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>are left this year. All of this is something I've

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>been discussing with Bloomberg's senior Euro Area economist David Powell.

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 9>The most important data point will beginning this upcoming week

0:15:58.040 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 9>to you.

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 10>Is that the finallying on CPI for the month of August,

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 10>and that will allow us and others to look at

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 10>as a more grammar look at underlying measures of inflation.

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 10>But basically, broadly speaking, those measures are coming down. The

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 10>headline number isn't very far from the ECB's target right

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 10>now and all moving in the right direction. A real

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 10>number that's is concerned to the ECB's services inflation that

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 10>has remained uncomfortably high at over four percent, and that's

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 10>what the ECB is focused on. This is the second reading,

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 10>so it's unlike it moved that much from the from

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 10>the first reading, so it'll be more important for the

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 10>ECV on terms of inflation. We get the reading for

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 10>September and that's out on the first in October.

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Is there a danger that the ECB has been overconfident

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>on tackling inflation. They haven't ruled out a further cut

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>in October.

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 10>Well, these policy rates, deposit rate is in very restrictive territory.

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 10>We think that kind of a neutral level would be

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 10>about two percent. So monetary policy has been very tight.

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 10>We have seen that in the economy, with the economy

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 10>having flatlines for a long time in your area, and

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 10>they have made significant progress on inflation. Like I said,

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:32.479
<v Speaker 10>the headline number now is now very close to the target.

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.199
<v Speaker 10>And when we look at measures of cost pressure, so

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 10>wage growth and negotiated wages, things like that, they're all

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 10>moving in the right direction. And an ECV can't wait

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 10>until they're actually there to cut because voluntary policy operates

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 10>with the long leag They've got to be more forward

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 10>looking and they see everything going in the direction they

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 10>want it to be going, and I think monetary policy

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 10>can be less restrictive.

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 9>Now.

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Expect, though, is for the economy in Europe to remain

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>under significant pressure. You saw it in the ECB's forecasts

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>from this week's bank meeting. How will markets react if

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the incoming economic data isn't positive? Will there be concerns

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that the ECB has left it too late.

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think generally speaking in the your area as

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 10>well as in the US, so around the world, there

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 10>are concerned that that tight monetary policy is really taking

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 10>it all on the economy, and of course the markets

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 10>are react negatively when.

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 9>We get the bad data.

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 10>We're seeing that not only in Europe, in the US

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 10>as well, and.

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>So in terms of what that means for others who

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>are affected by interest rates, particularly for the European banking space,

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>what do you expect from that.

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, A lot of banks, of course are benefit from

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 9>the rise in interest rate because their interest rate income

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 9>has gone up, and then they will have a negative

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 9>impact as that comes down, although it won't be immediate

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 9>because for many of these institutions they have longer term

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 9>they have longer term assets and liabilities. They will be

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 9>benefitting for a while from higher interest rates, and we

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 9>have we've we've seen that in the government bond space

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 9>where Italy has.

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 10>Had a very high demand for its bond in recent

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 10>in recent options in order for investors to take advantage

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 10>of these higher interest rates before they come down.

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Will be the effect on the European Central Bank If

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>the FED cuts by fifty basis points in the days ahead.

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 10>Well, the the the e c D has been moving

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 10>on its own at its own pace. The e c

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 10>B cut before the FED, and so it really at

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 10>a monetary policy based on what's happening in Europe. Having

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 10>said that, of course, not ignoring what the SAID does.

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 10>What the FED does is an impact on the exchange rate,

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 10>and they'll be watching it closely if the if the

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 10>FED were to have an aggressive move, it would probably

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 10>increase the probability of the ECB moving more aggressively as well,

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 10>meaning it would increase the probability of a move in October,

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 10>although at this stage we don't think that Planckly, what

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 10>do you make.

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Of the idea of higher for longer? Is that really

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>true for Europe?

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 10>Well, we have we moved away from that now. The

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 10>CD had its first cut in June and then we

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 10>had to cut yet announced and we think the CB

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 10>will cut again in December, so they have the higher

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 10>the longer idea of this idea of kind of reaching

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 10>a plateau is the chief Aponos the Maank of England

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 10>referred to as a table mountain approach. You kind of

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 10>get up and it's very flat for a long time.

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 10>But this isn't looking like table mountain. It's certainly more

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 10>like a like a a peak that we've come down

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 10>and we think will continue to come down after December.

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 10>In the next year, you'll probably be having cut at

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 10>a quarterly pace.

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 1>How much concern is that within the ECB around the

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>growth prospects of Europe? I mean, the US also is

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.719
<v Speaker 1>perhaps cooling, but only a little, and the underlying strength

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of the economy has been evident for months. China has

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>seen kind of a lot of big disinflationary pressures. How

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>much concern and Europe is exposed to that, How much

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>concern is there within the ECB about the slowing pace

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of the economy.

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 10>Well, the ECB has a single mandate just inflation reserved,

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 10>a dual mandate focusing on inflation and employment, so the

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 10>ACB doesn't have to pay as much attention to employment

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 10>as epent. But of course in order to meet this

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 10>sensation objective, it has to look at what's going on

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 10>the economy, because an economy it's too week will produce

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 10>inflation that's below target, and we saw that.

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 9>For many years preceding the pandemic.

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 10>But at this stage they really focused on the inflation

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 10>numbers as a whole, although there are voices that are

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 10>becoming increasingly concerned about the slowdown the economy and the

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 10>potential for that to lead to an undershooting inflation eventually,

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 10>and that's probably why we've seen some more of support

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 10>for a back to back cut at the ECB, needing

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 10>another move in October. As it's reported by Bloomberg.

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>News David, there's always a concern amongst the different members

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of the European Union and the Eurozone indeed about the

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>differing performance of certain countries and whether or not interest

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>rates happen to suit them at the particular business cycle

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>that they are in. Who is most worried now?

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 10>Well, when we look around Europe, there are the various

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 10>economies that performed differently. The President of ECV, Christiane Regard,

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 10>highlighted it for press conference with this month that Spain

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 10>and Netherlands.

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 9>Are doing very well, others are not.

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 10>If there's one country that had stopped doing well right now,

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 10>it's Germany. Germany's industrial sector who has had a number

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 10>of hits in recent years from high energy prices as

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 10>result of the war in Ukraine and softening demand in China,

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 10>which is one of its largest export markets, and it

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 10>really does continue to kind of be in thedulgence right now,

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 10>and it's looking like a sick man of Europe as

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 10>it was called for many years before before labor market

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 10>reforms were introduced.

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>My thanks, sir to Bloomberg's David Power for taking us

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>through the data to watch when it comes to the

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>European Central Bank. I'm Caroline Hetger here in London. You

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>can catch us every weekday morning for Bloomberg day Break Europe.

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Began at six am in London. That's one am on

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street.

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 6>Tom, Thank you, Caroline.

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 2>And coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend, we look

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 2>ahead to a monetary policy decision from the Bank of Japan.

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 2>day Break Weekend, our global look ahead at the top

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 2>stories for investors in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 2>in New York. We turn now to Asia and what

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 2>could be a big decision from the Bank of Japan,

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 2>which is weighing just how far to adjust its policy

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 2>easing settings. We get more from Bloomberg Daybreak Asia co

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:44.719
<v Speaker 2>hosts Brian Curtis and Doug Krisner.

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Tom the Bank of Japan meets in the coming week,

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 3>and this smart money is suggesting no major surprise is expected.

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 3>But what are BOJ officials thinking. Well, a Bank of

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Japan board member says the BOJ will adjust policy provided

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 3>the economy performs in line with projections. We welcome Paul

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Jackson to the air waves Bloomberg Economy Editor to take

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 3>a closer look at what we might expect. Paul bog

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 3>official seem a little nervous here about the volatility that

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 3>was caused by the rate hike in July. So let

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 3>me go out on a limb and say, not likely

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 3>they will make a move this month.

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think you're right there. I think it's a

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 11>time to wait and watch given the extreme volatility we

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 11>saw after that July rate hike. Remember this is only

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 11>the second time the Bank of Japan has raised rates

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 11>in the last seventeen years, so we saw in very

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 11>sharp volatility afterwards the nick K stock index and its

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 11>biggest drop on record following the rate hike. Of course,

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 11>one of the key factors was also US data, which

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 11>fed into the narrative for the Federal Reserve rate cuts.

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 11>So it wasn't just the BOJ rate hike that caused

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 11>that volatility, But still I think there's enough reason there

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 11>for the central Bank in Japan to want to just

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 11>wait and see look at market stability and also to

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 11>look at the impact of that second rate hike in July.

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 11>So I think the widely held consensus for next week

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 11>is there's going to be no move from the Bank

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 11>of Japan, but that does not mean rate hikes aren't

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 11>in the pipeline coming ahead.

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 12>The enormous volatility with the unwinding of that yen carry

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 12>trade as well, which then brings to my mind the

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 12>concern that the BOJ may have when it watches the

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 12>currency perform in markets. Is there a kind of a

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 12>comfort zone that the BOJ has, do you think for

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 12>the en visa e. The dollar?

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 11>Ah, well, that's that's a very interesting question. Of course,

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 11>the BOJ would argue that it is not targeting any

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 11>currency levels. But let's face it. You know, the yen

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 11>has been extremely weak against the dollar, and while that

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 11>really helps its global companies, its companies with a lot

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 11>of exports, it inflates the earnings for those companies. For

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 11>domestic operations, it's the opposite. It raises all the costs

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 11>puts pressure on them, and it also makes the power

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 11>of the end for the average Japanese consumer, especially for

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 11>thinking of going abroad, much weaker. So in terms of levels,

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 11>i'd say one sixty is definitely two weak. We see

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 11>a lot of talk about the end getting too strong

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 11>when it's you know, between one hundred, one hundred and ten,

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 11>So we're a long way off that, but for sure

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 11>that the narrative is going to change towards. Is the

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 11>end strengthening too much we get past one twenty, I

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:00.120
<v Speaker 11>would say.

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to argue with the math. At the moment,

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 3>it looks like US rates are heading down, that Japanese

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 3>rates are heading up, and when you put that all together,

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 3>it would seem to argue for a stronger yen. The

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 3>pace is what matters, I suppose the most. The pace

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 3>was just too abrupt when we had the July rate hike,

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 3>so some modulation there. But the end will get stronger

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 3>from here, right.

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 11>I think the end is going to get stronger, But

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 11>I think we should be wary of thinking that the

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 11>Bank of Japan has seen that volatility and is now

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 11>scared off hiking again. I think they've been very consistent

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 11>in the messaging that no, no, If forecasts are met

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 11>as we hope, then we are going to continue hiking. Now,

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 11>is it going to be every quarter? No, I don't

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 11>think so, but I think the consensus is that December

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 11>or January is probably the timing for the next rate hike.

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 11>And don't forget we had a story with people familiar

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 11>and their views that BOG officials see this idea that

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 11>a nominal interest rate about one percent is probably around

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 11>the minimum level for the neutral rate. So if you

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 11>think of it in those terms, that's three quarter percentage

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 11>rate hikes that could be in the pipeline.

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 12>Paul, take a step back. Help us understand the macro

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 12>view of the Japanese economy right now, economic growth and inflation,

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 12>how are they performing well?

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 11>The economy has been sputtering. We've been lacking a consumption

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 11>in real terms, and that's really down to inflation. Don't forget,

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 11>Japan has not been used to inflation. It's had decades

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 11>of deflation. The goal in Japan has been to create inflation,

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 11>not crush it, so the optics are very different in Japan.

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 11>Inflation at the moment overall is at two point eight

0:29:55.360 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 11>percent and that's been really weighing on consumer spending. Really,

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 11>we're looking to see if the economy is kind of

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 11>engaging gears and is now moving towards growth of the

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 11>positive inflation cycle that allows more right hikes.

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Paul, Thank you, Paul Jackson, Bloomberg Economy Editor. Next up,

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 3>we segue from the world of central banks to the

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 3>world of limiting the power of central banks. Cryptos. Coming

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:26.959
<v Speaker 3>up later this month a very big conference Token twenty

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 3>forty nine. It's going to take place in Singapore. A

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 3>lot of very interesting topics coming up, such as the metaverse, DeFi, NFTs, Gold, Macro,

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 3>of course, Web three dios, and a whole lot more.

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 3>In Joining us now on the program to discuss what

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 3>might be said is Suver shri Ghosh, Bloomberg Crypto Currency

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Reporter with us in our Singapore studio, Suva. I know

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 3>the US elections is a big issue with regard to crypto.

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 3>When we get to this Token twenty forty nine Singapore agenda,

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 3>what will the biggest issue p.

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:02.959
<v Speaker 13>Firstly, I would like to kind of just give a

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 13>quick summary about this Token twenty forty nine because why

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 13>we care is important. You know, this is the most popular,

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 13>most well represented crypto conference globally that Singapore hosts every year,

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 13>and this time there will be twenty thousand people attending

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 13>globally from across the world, which is double that of

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 13>last year. Coming to your question over here, the main

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 13>themes as we go into the US elections is, of

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 13>course what will be the outcome of the US elections

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 13>results on crypto, especially given that there are two candidates,

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 13>one has very clearly talked about pro crypto, you know, stance,

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 13>and then there is Kamala Harris who hasn't yet given

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 13>a very clear indication of stance on crypto. So that

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 13>will be a very big theme that I expect to

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 13>play out in this conference in Token twenty forty nine

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 13>which starts next week. So we will clearly and very

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 13>openly speak to a lot of venture capital funds and

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 13>are there are big ones coming from US, from Europe,

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 13>from all across the world for four to twenty forty

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 13>nine in Singapore, and we are going to speak to

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 13>them to understand where will they put their money in.

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 13>Because in the back of the theme of US elections,

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 13>there are a lot of projects as well. We saw

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 13>in the last two years, there are projects which had

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 13>and companies which is moved, which were moving out of

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 13>US for a not so favorable climate towards crypto. Then

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 13>these are very crucial stuff that you're looking to cover

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 13>from the crypto.

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 12>Cryptocurrencies I think we can agree. I mean rose in

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 12>popularity pretty dramatically during the pandemic, and then twenty twenty

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 12>two happened in November, the cryptocurrency crash. There was a

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 12>lot of conversation before that about venture capitalist interested not

0:32:55.680 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 12>only in crypto but in blockchain technology more broadly. Is

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 12>now the notion of artificial intelligence really providing a lot

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 12>of very tough competition for new money that would have

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 12>otherwise maybe flown or flowed into the crypto space or

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 12>the blockchain space.

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 13>I mean, the thing is that you know, the money

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 13>is of course a part of money is limited, and

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 13>venture capital obviously would like to optimize the returns for

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 13>their LPs when it comes to choosing between AI and crypto.

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 13>Of course, in the last year or so, AI was

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 13>a fat but we have been seeing that that fat

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 13>is slightly fading and people are looking more for projects

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 13>which are detailed use case rather than just pure play infrastructure,

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 13>be it in AI or in crypto. So to answer

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 13>your question in a short wait, it's basically venture capital

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 13>funds are looking to invest where the use case is

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 13>more prominent than just going by the tag, which is

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 13>either AI and crypto. And I think personally speaking that

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 13>this will merge in this conference as well, where AI

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 13>and crypto will come together, they will intersect, and we

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 13>will see a lot of investors looking for those kinds

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 13>of projects.

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.240
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of technical aspects to this. For instance,

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 3>we've seen mining difficulty increase for bitcoin, and you'd have

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 3>thought that that would lead to higher prices, and perhaps

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 3>to a certain degree that happened, but bitcoin has actually

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 3>dropped about ten percent since you have this software code adjustment,

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 3>So you're seeing quite a lot of whipping around volatility

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:35.240
<v Speaker 3>in cryptos. Will that continue?

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:40.399
<v Speaker 13>Interesting question, and yes, crypto is a volatile asset and

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 13>it is likely to go ahead in that way, meaning

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 13>that the volatility is likely to continue. Of course, the

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 13>initial support was from the exchange traded funds that were

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 13>there in the US that piled up a lot of bitcoins.

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 13>But then after that the initial demand fizzled out and

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 13>we again saw macroeconomic conditions paramitter like inflation growth, all

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 13>this taking over, and Bitcoin was reflecting that as well.

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 13>In terms of volatility going ahead. You bring a very

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 13>interesting point about mining. Yes, the mining ban in China

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 13>had an impact, but we are seeing you know, spurts

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 13>of mining growth in different parts of the world, and

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 13>that is giving rise to some kind of support on

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:27.320
<v Speaker 13>the bitcoin prices. At the back end of it, however, yes,

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 13>bitcoin is a volatile asset and no one can say

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 13>what would be the future of the price is going ahead,

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 13>whether the demand and supply will continue to match to

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 13>push prices higher or not. But this token twenty forty

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 13>nine will clearly show the trend of investor demand as

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 13>well as what miners are saying over here, because that's

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 13>going to be crucial for the you know, the aspect

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:55.800
<v Speaker 13>of what will happen to bitcoin price is going ahead.

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 3>Suva, thanks so much for joining us, Suva. Shrik Ghosh there,

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Crypto Current see reporter. We'll have Dan moorehead, the

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 3>founder and CEO at Pantera Capital speaking there. Mike Novograt's

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 3>a big name as well, CEO at Galaxy Digital. That's

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 3>all coming up in this conference. I'm Brian Curtis in

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Hong Kong along with Doug Crisner. You can catch us

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 3>every weekday here for Bloomberg day Break Asia, beginning at

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 3>eight am in Hong Kong and eight pm on Wall Street.

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Tom, Thank you Brian, and thank you Doug. And that

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 2>does it for this edition of Bloomberg day Break Weekend.

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Join us again Monday morning at five am Wall Street

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 2>time for the latest on markets overseas and the news

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 2>you need to start your day. I'm Tom Buzzby. Stay

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:39.959
<v Speaker 2>with us. Top stories and global business headlines are coming

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 2>up right now