WEBVTT - April Q&A (4/5/2017)

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Solid Verbal. I'm that for me. I'm

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for day Edith State?

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Is that?

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Woo whoo and no, Dan.

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 2>And Tye, welcome back to the Solid Verbal, boys and girls.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>My name is ty Hildon Brandt.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 2>I am joined as always by my good friend and

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 2>colleague and co host. Man here's way over there. He

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 2>is in sunny New York City. His name is Dan Rubistinezer.

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>How are you? Is it sunny?

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 3>I'm all right, it's been on and off. Life has

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 3>been all right. I had a lovely walk to brunch

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday with our pal Bill Barnwell and our pal

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 3>who I don't think has been on the show, Seth Rosenthal.

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 3>So that's nice to get outside some football people, sports people,

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 3>but otherwise on and all. I am running again. Ty

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 3>are you running? Are you taking advantage when it's sunny?

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I haven't yet, No, No, but I will. I absolutely will.

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 3>It's been it's been a while since I've been able

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 3>to run because of my foot, my dumb foot injury.

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 3>But I'm back out hitting the pavement and I'm gonna

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 3>tell you something right now, completely unrelated, please, well, sort

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 3>of related, because I always like to tinker with what

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 3>I listened to. Sometimes I'll start with music and I'll

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 3>just ease into a podcast to just sort of keep

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 3>the pace. But lately I've just been doing sprints sort

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 3>of more circuit stuff, so it doesn't really matter to

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 3>zone out or not to zone out to music or podcasts,

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 3>so I haven't really cared as much. But underrated song

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 3>not to get you hyped, because I don't like being

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 3>hyped while running, but to just sort of get energy

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 3>up before you do something like a podcast. I just

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 3>listened to insyncts It's Gonna be Me four times before

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 3>hitting records tonight, and it is a wonderful jam. It

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 3>will be a wonderful jam. And the Backstreet Boys did

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 3>nothing to even come close to It's gonna be Me.

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:53.559
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna be Me, It's gonna come about that, gonna

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 3>be my.

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be May May He says that, yeah, it's

0:01:58.720 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be my.

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, it is getting nice out. The calendar has turned

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 2>to April, and with April comes a lot of spring

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 2>football chatter, which I'm sure we'll get into in due time.

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 2>But one of the things we've been trying to do

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 2>now in the off season because we really truly do

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 2>get an unclimbable everest as you once refer to it,

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 2>of questions that we read and can't answer all the time.

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 2>So we've been trying to do more regular Q and

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 2>A type shows, and we've got one in front of

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 2>us this evening. We didn't put out a call earlier

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 2>today to get questions, and the everest got a little

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 2>bit taller. I don't know if I've ever seen so

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 2>many questions come in in such a short period of time.

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>So we've got football, we've got non football, a lot

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of life tonight, a lot of life.

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're just going to try and run the gamut here, yes,

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 2>and see if we can't help her for ballers out, Dan, absolutely, is.

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 3>There anything news wise that you want to get into

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 3>anything with the NFL Draft that has been standing out

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 3>to you. We had Brian Kelly call out to Sean

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Kaiser as not being particular ready. I think he said

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 3>it in a concern not criticism kind of way. I know,

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, we don't we shouldn't talk about Notre Dame

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 3>unless we absolutely have to at this point. But it's

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 3>a fair in general because this is something we saw

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 3>with Pete Carroll and Mark Sanchez, we saw it with Jimora,

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 3>and I believe Brett Hunley to different degrees. Brett Hunley

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 3>and I want to say Miles Jack last year that

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 3>they sort of should have come back for different reasons.

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Do you think a college coach should be should be

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 3>backing his prospect one percent? Or do you think that

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 3>there is a bit of integrity involved in being as

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 3>forthright as possible, so when you do say this guy

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 3>is amazing, it holds more weight.

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 2>I think they should be honest. I'm not sure if

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 2>they should do it out. I'm not sure if they

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 2>should do it publicly.

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 3>It seems strange, especially when recruiting, evaluating quarterbacks is already

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 3>so difficult, and to send a message and to have

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, Notre Dame competes against everybody because they recruit nationally,

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 3>and so you could have a coach at Stanford, you

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 3>could have coach at Texas, you could have a coach

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 3>at Alabama, you could have a coach at Florida, at

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Florida State wherever. They can all say Brian Kelly's not

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 3>gonna have your back, and that's pretty rough.

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 3>I still think Brian Kelly should be able to recruit quarterbacks.

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 3>He's had some success with them, but yeah, not the

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 3>best of looks. But I understand sometimes why the honesty

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 3>is necessary. Well do you think do you think Deshaun

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Kai do you think that was a fair statement?

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely? Absolutely a fair statement. I'm also not going to

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 2>say he made the wrong decision going because it looks

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 2>like he'll probably be a borderline first round He's going

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 2>to go fairly high in the draft. He's not at

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 2>all at risk of going undrafted. He'll find a team

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 2>next year.

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Correct.

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 2>The other thing that I should point out about Brian Kelly,

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 2>it's a more interesting high wire act for him because

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 2>there have been plenty of rumors about Brian Kelly potentially

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:00.679
<v Speaker 2>jumping to the NFL at some point.

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Right now, this is true, and maybe he is looking

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 3>at this as his last year at Notre Dame, and

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 3>so he's trying to seem so honest and forthright about

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 3>quarterback evaluations to seem like an NFL coach in waiting,

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 3>who knows.

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 2>We are going way down the rabbit hole here? Is

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 2>there anything else in the news.

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't believe that, if I'm reading this correctly, I

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 3>don't believe MAC teams will be playing on Saturdays in November.

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Did you see this? I saw what's that about.

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Basically, they're going all out to get as much attention

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 3>as possible. And while it's true that a lot of people,

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 3>especially on social media, turned to action as a sort

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 3>of fixed midweek, I know the ACC likes playing on

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 3>Thursday nights and that certainly gets that conference attention, but

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 3>I it hurts me a little bit. It hurts me

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 3>a little that there is a conference that year after

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 3>year generates interesting players, interesting games, sometimes without defense, which

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 3>is fine, everybody needs an identity. But the fact that

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 3>TV is instructing college football to this degree and affecting it,

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 3>I think we've sort of accepted, but it still hurts

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 3>to sort of see it reflected on the schedule to

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 3>this degree. Saturdays are for football. Saturdays are for you.

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 3>You're off work, you get to go to even though

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 3>it's probably cold in the Midwest and November, there's something

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 3>about tailgating in the morning, and right you know, there's

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 3>the communal thing that's sort of lost.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I think on Thursday night games.

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 2>So Jason Kirk, in the oft mentioned read option newslatyer

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 2>that goes out every day talks about college football.

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>If you're not subscribing, you should. He does a great job.

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 2>He has college Football Game Day power rankings, Saturday being

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 2>number one, obviously. He then goes Sunday, Monday, Thursday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday. Right,

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 2>do you agree with that? Does that feel right to you? Saturday, Sunday, Monday, Thursday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday.

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 2>The early week games to me really throw me off schedule,

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 2>So I would probably put those way.

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>At the bottom.

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 3>I think I agree with his rankings, maybe exactly. The

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 3>defensive Tuesday games is this. It's general if you're into

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 3>the NFL, you have Sunday, Monday, and now Thursday, and

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 3>it's nice to get some time off if you're an

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 3>NFL fan and whatever. But there's no football on Sunday's

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 3>college wise. There's no football on Monday's college wise other

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 3>than Week one, and Tuesday sort of doesn't happen until

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 3>later in the season, right, doesn't happen until November, Okay,

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 3>So that sort of feels like you're at a restaurant

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 3>and your server takes a particular liking to you and

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 3>slips you some extra biscuits or it's like, oh wow,

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 3>I didn't I didn't order it, but this is here

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 3>they are. And there's just that the bonus quality of

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Tuesday football that I mean, TV, at least network TV

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 3>is sort of worse, and that there's so much to

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 3>choose from now with Netflix and whatever and whatever, and

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 3>sometimes you just want to instead of watching those shows

0:07:57.800 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 3>that you have to focus on to a huge degree,

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 3>just kind of want to like sit on your couch

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 3>with your laptop maybe browse stuff with having football in

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 3>the background as sort of a screen saver. I think

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 3>that's the beauty of Tuesday night football. You don't have

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 3>to pay attention to it. I'm not a fin Okay,

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a fan. I might put bonus biscuits is

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 3>number seven. You're not wrong, but I'm just saying I'm

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 3>not a fan.

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, anything else that caught your eye, Dan, No, not really.

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we could just get into the action.

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk about NFL draft stuff as that sneaks up

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 3>a little bit closer. When is the NFL Draft, I believe,

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 3>as we're recording this on Wednesday, April fifth, it will

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 3>be three weeks from tomorrow, will be the first round.

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, we got to figure out figure out a

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 2>show then, and yes we'll get we'll get an NFL

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 2>show together.

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 3>Well, don't phrase it like that. We will get a

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 3>recently departed college football player.

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Shake you going, thank you.

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 2>We'll get a college prospects moving to the NFL show,

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 2>thank you, relatively soon.

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So stay tuned.

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, your questions, Yes, congratulations, Skippy, you've got mail,

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 2>You've got mail with solid rubal Dan. We've been doing

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 2>it once a month, but as often as we can.

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 2>We do our best to pay homage for those of

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 2>you who write into Twitter, Facebook, fan cred, Instagram, Snapchat, email, Messenger, pigeon,

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 2>you name it.

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Have we ever received an Instagram DM question like somebody

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 3>sliding into our DMS?

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were going to say something else.

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 2>No, we've not gotten any questions nor anything else via

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Instagram DM.

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Did we get a picture of a Johnson a somebody's

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 3>junk texted to us at our old Google phone address?

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>We absolutely did, Yeah, we absolutely, yes, we did. We did.

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, send us, you know, send us as often

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 3>as you'd like. We do, get to as many as

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 3>we possibly can, but and we do read all the email.

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>We do read.

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 3>We read every email. Even if we don't respond. That's

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 3>because we're bad people. We will try to be better.

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 2>I love when people write in like, oh you probably

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 2>won't read this actually.

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Bam No.

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 3>I live for them. I honestly. If you I just

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 3>want to get someone off your chest. If you ever

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 3>want to just say, like ty, I love what you do,

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:04.719
<v Speaker 3>send us an out.

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Soliverbo at gmail dot Co's got a vent. You need

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a friend?

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, dum, We've got a long laundry list here

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 2>of the items that people have sought to discuss with

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 2>us or sought to have us discuss amongst ourselves.

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Dan, where do you want to start?

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 3>Uh, let's skip around, but we're going to go some football,

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 3>some life, some other topics whatever. Let's start with josh

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 3>at the top of this list. It was pretty recent,

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 3>but he asked if the Gators are Joshua is how

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 3>he's listed. If the Gators go ten and four every

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 3>year but get demolished by Florida State whoever the SEC

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 3>West champ is and their bowl opponent, will they ever

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 3>fire mech I feel like they have a mark Rick

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 3>situation brewing in Gainesville. By that, I assume he means

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 3>a perennial good team, but not great team, which a

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 3>number of programs would take.

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Not getting over the hump syndrome correct.

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Not getting past you know that that out back Bowl

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 3>ceiling or that lower tier former BC New Year's Day

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 3>that is not watched by many people. I will say,

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 3>I think it's harder and harder, given how national the

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 3>sport has become to just sort of have a beloved coach.

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Mark Richt was in Athens forever and became beloved, and

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 3>even when he was let go, it seemed like people

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 3>really liked him even as he left, which is very

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 3>rarely the case, and I think Mack is fairly likable.

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if people have been huge fans of

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 3>his recruiting and quarterback play early on. It's not entirely

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 3>his faults, but I think with the expectations at Florida

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 3>being a recent multiple time national champion, the hump will

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 3>need to be cleared within the next two or three

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 3>years or he.

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Will be gone. I just think that's the level.

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 2>They've also got some recent tradition of performing in the

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 2>postseason with Urban Meyer true That's what I'm saying, right,

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 2>So I feel like that makes it a little bit

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 2>more difficult for a guy like a Jim mckawain. It's

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 2>a long painful death in most cases when you've got

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 2>this inability to get over the hump. And not to

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 2>say that things went totally off the rails, although Mark

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Rick did lose control wink, we touched nudgeways. It's sort

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 2>of a long painful process when you see this happening.

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 2>What I am most curious about is if he can

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 2>find a quarterback, because he came in on this assumption

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 2>that he would instantly breathe new life into the Florida offense,

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 2>and he has not done that yet. He's now had

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 2>some time to get his guys in there, and he's

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 2>going to have an opportunity now to start anew with

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 2>a young quarterback. So we'll see if he's able to

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 2>move things a little bit more forward. It helps that

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 2>he's got the defense. The defense is going to keep

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 2>me in a lot of games. I don't see that

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 2>changing anytime soon because defensive talent at Florida has pretty

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 2>much been a mainstay of the last I don't know

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 2>what five to eight years. It's just always been pretty

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 2>rock solid. If they that's absolutely If they can get

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 2>an offense in place, I think the risk of not

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 2>getting over the hump syndrome will be drastically reduced. But

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 2>to your point, there is definitely not as much allegiance

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 2>to a guy like a mcawaine as I think there

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 2>was to a guy like a Mark Rick.

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 3>I think that's fair and urban. Meyer, you know, gave

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 3>himself such a long road by winning like he did

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 3>early on in his career. And granted, I don't think

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 3>a number of those players recruited by Meyer and his staff.

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 3>But at the same time, this is a it's it's

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 3>weird to say it, but twenty seventeen is different from

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 3>like two thousand and eight. Oh yes, just it feels

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 3>like such a different world college football and outside. So

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 3>I think it'll be tough. Next question is from our

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 3>friend Brian, a longtime UCLA fan, and he wants to

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 3>know about ty What school do you think he wants

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 3>to know about?

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>UCLA?

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Is Jim Mora's seat actually hot or just the warmest

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 3>in the Pac twelve? Seems rich Rod is getting there,

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 3>but expectations aren't as high in Arizona. I thought, I

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 3>think it's hot, don't you. I think it's warming up.

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't think it's that he's on fire. I

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 3>think it's on he's heating up. I think it's in

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 3>that place because you go three and nine in a

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 3>place with a good amount of talent and have a

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 3>team that not only wins the Rose Bowl, but now

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 3>everybody's saying, oh, the presumptive twenty eighteen number one overall

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 3>pick is the USC quarterback, whereas it was a few

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 3>months ago the UCLA quarterback. And you play in a

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 3>big stadium, and you have a basketball team that is

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 3>going deep into the tournament, and it is high profile

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 3>as UCLA basketball is that there is this sort of

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 3>tradition at UCLA or expectation of at UCLA to perform

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 3>on a Rose Bowl challenging stage, and it's I guess

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 3>it also depends on who can you get, Like if

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 3>they can get Chip Kelly or something like that, if

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Chip Kelly's doing TV and he's in La anyway and

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of likes it out west as we know, maybe,

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 3>But at the same time, is the UCLA job as

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 3>attractive as it may look from where we sit three

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 3>thousand miles away that like, oh, it's a beautiful school,

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, a great athletic program, but you're also number

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 3>two in your city and it's a decidedly basketball school

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 3>in a stadium that you don't fill up because it's

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 3>obviously enormous, that's far away from campus. There's some challenges.

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's a matter of who does UCL I.

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Think they can get. I think that will determine the

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>temperature of his seat.

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I think it's actually hot. I agree with you that

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 2>it's not scalding hot. You mentioned USC. There's obviously always

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>going to be this need to keep up with the

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Joneses across town in USC and US. He's about to

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 2>load up. They've got Sam Darnold coming back, a ton

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 2>of talent on both sides of the football. US He's

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 2>coming off that Rose Bowl win. As you mentioned, They're

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 2>going to be pretty solid in twenty seventeen, no doubt

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 2>about it. Not only that, but you've also got a

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 2>ton of coaching talent in the PAC twelve North. The

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 2>playoff team from the PAC twelve came from the PAC

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 2>twelve North Washington.

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 3>There is yet to be a PAC twelve South Conference

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 3>champion absolutely, so the PAC twelve North has loaded up

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 3>on coaching talent. I feel like the PAC twelve is

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 3>probably in the conversation for the best conference in college

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 3>football in twenty seventeen. The profiles has definitely been raised

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 3>a bit given what Washington did, and with Josh Rosen

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 3>now coming back from injury, there is an expectation that

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 3>he will take the next step in his development. Only

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 3>played half the season last year. But if he comes

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 3>back healthy and doesn't deliver the goods, if UCLA just

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 3>sort of sputters around the five hundred marks, seven and five,

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 3>even eight and four, I think there will be a

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 3>real push to go a different direction at UCLA.

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're right fair.

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Next question comes to us from I believe his name

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 3>is Quinn the Day, so he's an Ole Miss fan

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 3>because they're also win the Day. He wants to know up,

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 3>I lost my Google doc. We think will be the

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 3>leading rusher in the Pac twelve, so we'll stay on

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 3>that topic.

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it's either Miles Gaskin or Royce Freeman, right,

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 3>It's probably coming out of the North. It could be

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Bryce Love. We know that Stanford offensive line has paved

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 3>the way for some large chunks these past few years.

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 3>I would feel better about USC considering how talented Ronald

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Jones is, but they're replacing a good chunk of their

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 3>offensive line. Also, not to say that the new guys

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 3>won't be as good, but it's a little bit worrisome.

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 3>I think they're going to want to show off Sam

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Darnold and his ability, and we'll be throwing the ball

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 3>pretty often. So I'm going to take the Homer pick

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 3>and go Royce Freeman because even though that is a

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 3>deep core of running back, still they return a number

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 3>of big offensive linemen and I think five starting offensive

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 3>lineman if you can include Tyrol Crosby who's out for

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 3>most of last year. So I'm going to go with

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 3>that retooled offense and Royce Freeman succeeding as a senior.

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I will just for the hell of it, go Miles Gaskin.

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 2>That's a good tick to take an opposing side. But

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 2>Royce Freeman is a very compelling pick. He's a bigger

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 2>running back, He's got top end speed. I think I

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 2>saw over the span of his career he's averaged something

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 2>like six yards per carry. He is very much a

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 2>big game kind of running back. But Miles Gaskin also

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 2>plays in a very friendly system if you are a

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 2>running back. He's got a good quarterback, and we know

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 2>that Chris Peterson's building something. He had a great year

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 2>last year, so Sa'll go with him.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Here's the problem with the Miles Gaskin thing.

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Even though he's as talented as a lot of these guys,

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 3>most of the time he's sharing carries with Lavon Coleman,

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 3>who a lot of would argue is the better running

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 3>back in that backfield.

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>That's true.

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I'm only going Gaskin because you pick Freeman.

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 3>That's fair. I listen, I understand the hate. Stay petty, Yes,

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 3>let's go. Oh, this is interesting because we're talking about

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 3>the draft, next year's draft. Who are the big names

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 3>that are standing out to you defensively for next year's

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 3>draft that will be the first defensive player off the board.

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 3>He submits arden Key, the very good defensive end for Lsu,

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Deron Payne Alabama, DeShawn hand Alabama, MIKEA. Fitzpatrick Alabama. I

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 3>think there's a good, little, good little trend going on

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 3>with his picks. But the defensive lineman for Ohio State

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 3>are really good. Sam Hubbard and Taekwon Lewis I believe

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 3>will be I mean Taekwon Lewis is a senior, so

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 3>he will be very good. We'll see how Derwin James.

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I was gonna say, what about big Bet that's your bag, James. Yeah,

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 3>somebody that versatile. I think is a real nice pick.

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Kind of a little off the radar because he was hurt.

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 2>He had the knee injury, and perhaps that's why he's

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 2>not one of the suggested names in this conversation. But

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 2>arden Key was unstoppable at LSU. Good.

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 1>He's versatile, he can play in almost any system.

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Mika Fitzpatrick I think is a good, reliable defensive back.

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 2>He will clearly find work at the next level. I

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:00.160
<v Speaker 2>mentioned Irwin James, my boy Malik Jefferson, Uh huh, he's

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 2>gonna be in the mix.

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Moving to the outside. Yeah.

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 3>In Todd Orlando's system. I'm going to give you a

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 3>wild card name. Yeah, the defensive end from Kansas. I

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 3>believe led the Big twelve, which is not a huge

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 3>accomplishment defensively in any category. I apologize his name is

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 3>it's Durance Armstrong. I want to say yeah, but he's

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 3>he started receiving attention because David Beatty was the guy

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 3>who recruited Miles Garrett, tex A and m and has

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 3>said he sees a lot of the same qualities, but

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 3>he had like twenty tackles for a loss last year

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 3>and has become I mean, he's not huge. I think

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 3>he's only about two fifty two sixty, but has become

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 3>pretty unblockable.

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think we'll start shooting up draft boards.

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Whenever you have that dominant player on the not great team,

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 3>right that that pop size it helps.

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Okay, where are we going next? Which Pac five

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Pack five?

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Which power five school with new head coaches the best

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 3>chance of going to their conference championship?

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Tie? Wow?

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so the Pac twelve, it's just believe Willy Taggart

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 3>and Oregon, oh and Justin Wilcox.

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 2>And Cal Not a bad chance for Willy Taggart. I'm

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 2>riding down Oregon.

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 3>In the Big twelve, there is no conference? Is there

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 3>a conference championship this year?

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Is it not? There is?

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 3>It's okay, there is? Yeah, new coaches in the Big twelve.

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Tom Herman, Mmm, interesting, I believe that's I mean, Matt Rule,

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 3>I know that's not going to believe.

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>That's not going to be the pick. So Oregon in

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Texas right now?

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 3>ACC wise, who's new in the ACC, Tye. I don't

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 3>see any that are new in the ACC, so it's

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.959
<v Speaker 3>not gonna be anybody in the ACC. We did Big twelve,

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Big ten. You have Tom Allen in Indiana. No, I

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 3>don't see that happening. Early would love if it did.

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>PJ.

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:49.719
<v Speaker 2>Fleck att Minnesota, I don't see it.

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't see it, Tye. But that is the Big ten.

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 3>West Wisconsin has a lot of changes, lost their defensive coordinator,

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Justin Wilcox. Iowa sort of a new look offense this

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 3>year with CJ.

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Bethar gone. Nebraska.

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 3>I've heard from a few different people that if there

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 3>is a team that goes from eight nine wins to

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 3>like five six, it might be Nebraska. Okay, that's that's

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 3>the scuttle. As our friend what's his name, Ted Miller

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 3>in the Pac twelve likes to say the scuttle and

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Jeff Brohm at Purdue. I don't see that little Early

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 3>for that, But what the PJ. Fleck thing is interesting

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 3>to me. That's a nine and four team. I just

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 3>in terms of comparing against the other options. Yeah, it's interesting.

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I would say if I'm picking between Oregon and Texas,

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Texas is probably a safer play because the PAC twelve

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 2>North is going to be absolutely loaded, true, so by

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 2>default we'll go Texas there.

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, fair enough.

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:54.199
<v Speaker 3>Next question, let's go to or starting with all the

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 3>football ones. Actually, let's stay on that subject mentioned Justin

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 3>Wilcox thoughts on the new coaching staf at Cal. So

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 3>obviously this all happens sort of after the initial hiring Binge. Yeah,

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 3>because Cal did not let go of Sonny Dykes until

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 3>later on in the process. Justin Wilcox has hired a

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 3>couple of former Oregon slash Ship Kelly coaches, Steve Graywood

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 3>on the offensive line, Jerry Aznaro on the d line,

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 3>so he'd be interested in our thoughts. Do you feel

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 3>confident in Cal improving to beyond just consistently Bowl eligible,

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 3>in being a reason why the PAC twelve is deep? No,

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 3>like sort of a Colorado of the future.

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't.

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 3>I really like the the offensive coordinator higher Bob Baldwin,

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 3>the head coach Eastern Washington. So Justin Wilcox has been

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 3>a good defensive mind recently.

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing.

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like that they've moved away from like the

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 2>air raid that Sonny Dikes had. I feel like it's

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna take some time for will Cox. If he is

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the guy to bill cal up into that program, it's

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 2>going to take him a while to recruit personnel, to

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 2>get his system in place, and to get that wheel

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 2>turn in. So if it does happen, it's not going

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:13.439
<v Speaker 2>to happen overnight. There's a lot of work to do

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 2>at cal especially on the defensive side of the ball. Yeah,

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 2>they've got some offensive talent, they're okay, But defensively that's

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 2>an area where I think he can bring a lot

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 2>to the table. For me, it's a question of how

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:30.360
<v Speaker 2>quickly can he implement his defensive schemes to maybe turn

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 2>that ship around a little bit. So it's tough for

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 2>me to view cal As like any kind of alpha

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 2>dog who's going to steal or poach top recruits from

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 2>so many of the other schools out in California or

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 2>in the Pac twelve North, because there's just so much

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 2>AMO out there now, what with Oregon and Stanford down south,

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 2>with UCLA and USC there are so many other options

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 2>if you're looking in that part of the world to

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 2>go and play your football, that it feels like it's

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 2>going to take CAL a little bit longer to build

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 2>up its reputation enough to attract that top echelon of talent.

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Here's one of the weird things and our pals that

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 3>shutdown Fullcast discussed this a few weeks ago. Cal has

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 3>put a crap ton of players into the NFL. Now,

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 3>what's his name, Justin Wilcox cannot claim any of them, obviously,

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:23.400
<v Speaker 3>but there is something about Cal and the talent they

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 3>do attract that has, for whatever reason, played well into

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 3>getting drafteding to getting onto NFL teams. Right now, you

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 3>have Tyson Alualu, Keenan Allen, c J Anderson, Aaron Aaron

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Rodgers is not bad at football. Jared Goff was number

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 3>one overall pick, even if he's not good. That is

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 3>a very public thing. Alex mac Mitchell Schwartz, all these

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 3>guys are really good and making a ton of money

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 3>and products of CAL. So I think you can succeed

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 3>through Cal. You can get attention through Cal. And there's

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 3>talent in the East Bay, there's talent in Central California.

0:25:57.920 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 3>You do have the academic standards which make it a

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 3>little more difficult, But Stanford is able to do it.

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 3>Cal campus is beautiful if you like living in a city,

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Berkeley is weird and cool. It's just it's a tough pull.

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 3>It is a tough pull with your If you're in

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 3>the North and you have offers from powers in the

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 3>PAC twelve North, you have offers from Washington, Stanford, and Oregon,

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Cal's a tough sell. Now, these coaches are very good,

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 3>and I think they can get a lot out of

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 3>like high level three star guys, but they are going

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 3>to need to build a ton of depth and they're

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 3>going to need to hit on so many of those

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 3>high three star guys if they're going to start challenging

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 3>for eight or nine winsy, it's.

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna take a couple of years of getting blood

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 2>from a stone before before they can build up reputation

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 2>enough to maybe win some of those recruiting battles.

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>You'll win a couple here and there.

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 2>But but would I rather coach Cal or would I

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 2>rather coach like Minnesota Purdue?

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Now the answer can I'd rather coach Cal than Kansas State,

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 3>even though Kansas State's in that eight nine category Right now,

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 3>it's just so much tricky. I'd rather coach Cal than

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Boston College. Yeah, coach Cal then maybe even like NC State,

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 3>I think they're in a similar position except for maybe

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 3>the academics. It's tough, but I like Cal's very lean

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 3>advantages over a number of schools in similar places.

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's a bad job at all. I

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 2>think it's a very attractive job.

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, timing's not great though.

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Timing's not great, and it does come with a unique

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 2>set of challenges of obviously being in a very deep

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 2>conference and having some you know, academic stuff as well

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.120
<v Speaker 2>that needs to be considered. So yeah, I like the job.

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 2>I think it's going to take him some time. I

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 2>am not confident in him being that guy to take

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 2>them to the next level, but I think there is

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 2>potential there.

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 3>All right, final football question then if if you want

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 3>less football, if you want more football, whatever, you can

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 3>go elsewhere, and that's cool. If you want some life stuff,

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.400
<v Speaker 3>we're going to do that. Final question from Joe. If

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.120
<v Speaker 3>South Florida's offense is similar to last year and considering

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 3>their strength of schedule, which by the way, choice, Yeah,

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 3>all things point to the balls being favored in pass

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 3>all twelve games next year outside of maybe Bama, what

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 3>other teams can you say that about? So look, I

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 3>am not going to go through everybody's schedule. Here, here's

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:12.360
<v Speaker 3>the deal. Yeah, there's only one member of the broadcasting

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 3>duo who surveyed the landscape of college football last year

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 3>pointed to one team way out on the West coast,

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 3>particularly in the Pac twelve North.

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 2>And said that team way over their tie. I don't

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:27.880
<v Speaker 2>see a loss in that schedule.

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't see a loss on that schedule. Only one

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>member I'm holding up one finger.

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Only one member of the broadcasting duo had the audacity

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 2>to go there.

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Very early on. It was you.

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 2>So if anyone's going to answer this question, it's certainly

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 2>not me and my TCU playoff picks.

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe it would be you. So give us your prediction.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Is there anyone else other than USF that might fall

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 2>into this category?

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to get do you have the hype

0:28:55.960 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 3>train sound ready for me? More of a hype machine

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 3>than a tripe machine.

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll get on that. Yeah. Yeah, it's very industrial USC.

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Right now.

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 3>USC's road schedule is as follows. They're at Cal they're

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 3>at Washington State, They're at Notre Dame, they're at Arizona State,

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 3>they're at Colorado. As it appears right now, the US

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 3>seed is in a better position than all of those teams.

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Is that not unfair?

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Fair? Very fair?

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And they have Stamford and Texas at home in

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 3>consecutive weeks early on in the season. But it's at USC,

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 3>it's in the coliseum, and I.

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Believe they in looking at.

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Their schedule, they don't play Washington and they don't play Oregon.

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 3>So those were the two places that if they were.

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>On the road.

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Obviously they wouldn't be on the road against Washington this

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 3>year after going up to Seattle last year, that you

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 3>could see, okay, they'll be like zero point and a

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 3>half dogs. But as of right now, I mean, the

0:29:55.640 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 3>best possibility would be Notre Dame's completely retool offense and

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 3>defense looking really good, and then Notre Dame will probably

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 3>be you know, six and one, seven and zero at

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 3>that point and they would be Docs going to the

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 3>South Bend. But other than that, tie, yeah, USC should

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 3>be favored in all their games.

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I like that.

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I like that, and it's bold too to go right

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 2>into the teeth of what is certain to be a

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 2>pretty formidable hype train, hype machine, if you will. As

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 2>we enter twenty seventeen, US He's always in that discussion

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 2>to begin with. This year might be second to none,

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 2>given the fact that Sam Darnold is coming back and

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 2>they had a really strong finish to their twenty sixteen season.

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Actually, you know what, I will say, Washington at this

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 3>point too. They're at Stanford late in the year. I'm

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 3>not saying they're going to be favored. I'm not saying

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 3>they're going undefeated. But non conference is Rutgers, Montana, Fresno State,

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 3>road schedule, Colorado, Oregon State, Arizona State. Until they get

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 3>to that Stanford game in middle of in the middle

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 3>of November, They've Oregon at home, They've UCLA at home.

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 3>That's that's a pretty sweet sketch, Ty. I don't think

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 3>any one's as clear cut as us F. They're obviously

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 3>not playing in the Pac twelve, but there are some

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 3>picks out there on the West coast. Yeah, sure, all right, Ty,

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 3>you have lots of thoughts about this, even though you're

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 3>not the most well traveled person in the world. Which

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 3>is the best regional Fried chicken Chain, Raisin Caines, Zaxby's, Bojangles,

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 3>or I guess other you lead the Chick fil A

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 3>is I guess Chick fil A is not regional anymore,

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 3>and Popeye's is national. So of those three, I've not

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 3>had any of these. Oh okay, I have not had Zaxby's.

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 3>Everybody that I've spoken to personally says Zaxby's is pretty good.

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It's fuck. It's like an eight and four team year

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>over year, an eight and fourteen, that's fine.

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 3>I think this depends on what you go for fried

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 3>chicken wise, So like Raisin Canes is a tender place

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 3>through and through, if you love tenders, if you like sauces,

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 3>the answer is probably Raising can Bojangles. I like that

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 3>they have Cajun fries. I like their tenders as well,

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 3>but I think their fried chicken is better. So I'm

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 3>going Bojangles here. Bojangles is largely in the Southeast. There

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 3>is one in DC's train station. Uh, I think I'm

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 3>going Bojangles.

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna have to take your word for it. I

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 2>have no idea. The only monkey wrench I was gonna

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 2>throw in here was that. You know, I've only ever

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 2>been a Chick fil A as it relates to chicken places,

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 2>so I don't know.

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I'd be curious. Have you never been to Popeyes? I've

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>not been to a Popeies either.

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 2>What swear to God, there are no Popeyes around here.

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 2>The only Popeyes around here in Eastern PA closed down.

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 3>That's as much of an indictment on your region of

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 3>the country.

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I I know. I'm not arguing. I'm just saying I

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 2>do not have easy access to a Popeyes.

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I like the caje and fries of Bojangles.

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 3>I like the the more the bigger spread of chicken

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 3>options at Bojangles than Canes. But I love Canes too,

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Don't do not get me wrong. I will happily go

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 3>to Canes for a giant bag or box or whatever

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 3>of Tendo's.

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>A giant bag, Okay, giant bag.

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Jason wants to know is there ever an acceptable public

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 3>place where birkenstocks? I say that's a hard no, but

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 3>my friends disagree. Thoughts, do you know what birkenstocks are?

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Are?

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Are those of sandals?

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 3>They are like the Jesus sandals. They're often leather buckle

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 3>like two buckles. Yeah, slip in, slip out, kind of thing. Yeah,

0:33:27.680 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 3>they're not the coolest looking thing, ty, but what do

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 3>you think.

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think.

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I have a strong opinion on Birkenstocks. We've made the

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 2>case on this program time and time again that you know,

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 2>as it relates to socks, right, you want to make

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 2>sure that your feet are comfortable. Right, So if you

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 2>achieve the this is burkin stocks, not burkin socks. No, No,

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 2>But what I'm saying is, as it relates to feet, Dan,

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 2>comfort is everything.

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Feeling as comfortable as your feet? Yep.

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if the Birkenstocks give you the level of comfort

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 2>that you require and you don't care about being fashioned forward,

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.239
<v Speaker 2>different strokes for different folks, Man, I'm okay with that.

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't personally own them. I don't know if I

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 2>ever will. I just don't have a hot take on it.

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:15.959
<v Speaker 2>Here is my official take.

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 3>My take is tie as correct, and I would add this,

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 3>in the last year, when my foot has started giving

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 3>me a lot of pain, I'm way more open to

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 3>foot comfort and whatever that looks like than I was before.

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 3>But with Birkenstock specifically, if you're on the fence, maybe

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 3>wait until you're in a very serious relationship before you

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 3>wear them a bunch, or you're married, or you're in

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 3>some sort of committed situation, and that won't play a

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.399
<v Speaker 3>role in somebody determining, well he looks he's just too

0:34:45.480 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 3>much of a dork. That's my official stance.

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 2>I will say this on a different note, but quasi related,

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 2>while we're talking about foot comfort, I'm willing to submit,

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:04.760
<v Speaker 2>along with easy path and wireless internet and smartphones among

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 2>the truly great trends and inventions of our generation, this

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 2>whole thing now where people are comfortable wearing sneakers to

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 2>just about any occasion, that to me is in the

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:15.399
<v Speaker 2>equation right there.

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I mean, and there have been nicer sneakers made,

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 3>like the formal sneaker thing.

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Whatever Marty Smith wears all the time. When you see

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 2>him conducting interviews out at the National Championship.

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 3>I interviewed I interviewed Florida's basketball coach Mike White at

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 3>MSGMS Square Garden during the tournament. He was rocking the

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 3>same thing. He's a younger guy, looked great, looked totally good.

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>That movement.

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 2>For me, I'm not saying in all occasions I'm for it.

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 2>I will not be doing it at my wedding, right,

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 2>But and there are people who have done it at

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 2>their wedding and it don't begrudge them. If you're able

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 2>to get away with it in comfort and everyone's cool

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 2>with it, then you bu But I'm just saying as

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 2>a whole this trend towards wearing sneakers where we wouldn't

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 2>traditionally wear sneakers. I am very okay with that, very

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 2>okay with that.

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Jeremy wants to know what are your feelings. I'm bringing

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 3>a flask to a wedding? Is it okay if.

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:07.399
<v Speaker 1>I bring one?

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 3>If I assume they will have a bad selection, Do

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:11.439
<v Speaker 3>I go ahead and bring a whole bottle? If that's

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 3>the case? Is it? Is it okay if I bring

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 3>a flask? If the reception will be dry? So this

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 3>was maybe the easiest question that we received in you

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 3>you are not much of a drinker, I'm not okay.

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 3>So I feel like I already know what your answer

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 3>is going to be here. I feel if it's a

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 3>dry wedding and it's going to be particularly torturous and

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 3>you'll become a very popular table, I can sort of

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 3>get behind that. But I mean, how much do you

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 3>love drinking. If just standard booze and beer and wine isn't.

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Good enough, well that was going to be my point.

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 3>That's the problem where just like if I went to

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 3>wedding and it was hot outside and they were serving

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 3>you know whatever, there's some barbecue or tacos or whatever

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 3>it is that like would really pair well with a

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 3>cold beer, but they only had like bud light or something.

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 1>I'd have the bud light, but light's fine. You're right.

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna say, you're not gonna put beer in

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 2>a flask, are you?

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:17.359
<v Speaker 3>No, You're not putting beer in a flak? So like, okay,

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 3>they only have like Jack Daniels, and like great, I

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I don't even know what nice vot is.

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 3>But if they only have like Jack Daniels or you know,

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 3>like lower end stuff, that's fine. Just make it with

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 3>some ginger ale and get on the dance floor. Come on,

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 3>we don't we don't need the high end stuff constantly,

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 3>do we tie?

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you do you own a flask? By the way,

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not.

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 2>I was gifted a flask for being in someone's wedding.

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what kind of gift ideas you have

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 2>for anyone.

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't have groomsmen.

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean you give gifts to parents sometimes. Maybe

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 2>maybe you're a new father in law with like a

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 2>flask for his day job.

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Who knows, definitely not, but okay.

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm sort of uncomfortable taking that with me to places

0:37:57.640 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 2>I know a lot.

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Maybe like camping, can being something like.

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 2>But my whole thing is that if you've got a flask,

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 2>the reason it exists at all is so you can

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 2>take alcohol to a place where you're not supposed to

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 2>be taking alcohol. Right, And I'm not much a rule

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 2>breaker all the time.

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Dan, you know this about like.

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 3>A dry like torturous religious Thanksgiving or holiday, you might

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 3>have a situation you might have aboard there that seems

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.839
<v Speaker 3>more defensible. I don't know, just drink what's there. All

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:27.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying is drinking.

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 2>If it's an open bar and you take a flask,

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 2>you're kind of just being a dick.

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>That's true.

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 2>If it's a dry wedding, then it's kind of a

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 2>different debate. You can do it, but just don't get bombed, right,

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:42.320
<v Speaker 2>don't make a fool out of yourself, because if it's dry,

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 2>there's probably a very good reason why it's dry. So

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:47.240
<v Speaker 2>don't be that guy. That would be my only advice.

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.799
<v Speaker 3>Tell you know, when you're watching an overnight like Pack

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:52.919
<v Speaker 3>twelve after Dark game and you're like, I just got

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:55.439
<v Speaker 3>to go to sleep. I'm sorry this. I will see

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 3>what happens in the morning. And then you check the

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:59.879
<v Speaker 3>box score and it turns out Connor Halliday has thrown

0:38:59.920 --> 0:39:03.879
<v Speaker 3>the ball eighty three times. He threw for seven hundred Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 3>you know he finished the game fifty of eighty three.

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 3>That's what I feel like. Our pal Matt Morris did

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:10.720
<v Speaker 3>to our Facebook feed. He was a volume shooter.

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 2>This Matt Morris throwing a lot of pitches at us

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:13.760
<v Speaker 2>here Dan.

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, and a lot of good questions I will add,

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 3>but I'll get to a couple of them. Will we

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 3>have another EMO episode? Don't know, maybe, but we will

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:24.320
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent definitely welcome Bill Barnwell back for another

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:26.280
<v Speaker 3>themed non college football episode.

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say that. I gotta say so.

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I tried my best, and I got some comments about this,

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:33.879
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I tried my best to go toe

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:34.760
<v Speaker 2>to toe with you guys.

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 1>When it came to EMO, I know pretty much.

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know nearly as much about the genre as

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 2>you guys did.

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I helped my own I did.

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you guys were clearly the superstars of that podcast.

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine with that. I'll accept that.

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 2>We talked about doing another themed show that all three

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 2>of us know a lot about, and I'm very excited

0:39:57.680 --> 0:39:58.319
<v Speaker 2>about that show.

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:01.919
<v Speaker 3>So also, Matt wants to know I'm juiced for that one.

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Dan seems to be eating healthier. What is his quote

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 3>secret cheat food? So I normally eat pretty healthy, but

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:11.879
<v Speaker 3>I generally tend to eat healthier because I work out

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:14.320
<v Speaker 3>more as the sun comes out in New York and

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:16.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm running a little bit more and now I'm gotta

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 3>look sleek in a wedding suit coming up here.

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 1>Ty.

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:22.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I don't need a ton of sugar. So

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:25.759
<v Speaker 3>I guess if I am quote cheating, it will be

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 3>eating something sweet and the other day at the office. Ty,

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:30.280
<v Speaker 3>do you like girls Scout cookies?

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Sure? Do you have a favorite line? I'm a fan

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of the thin Mints? Okay, you like the thin Mints? Yeah?

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 3>We have the tagalongs here are just those are for me.

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 3>I am here for tagalongs. I am here on this

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:48.280
<v Speaker 3>earth for those peanut butter chocolate just beauties.

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Not a huge peanut butter fin. But okay, oh my god,

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I love the tagalongs.

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 3>I ate four or five of them. I looked at

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:56.720
<v Speaker 3>the box. It was an open container of tag alongs.

0:40:56.760 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Looked at the box and said, nope, not today, girls

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 3>outs and immediately ate four or five. I immediately just

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 3>went for it. And here's my question to you, ty,

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:10.240
<v Speaker 3>how long? And we talked about this in the office.

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 3>If thin mints are a genuine weakness for you, yes.

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say a weakness. I like them. What is

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a sweet weakness? A sweetness? Chocolate covered almonds?

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>We have them in the office now. Yeah, yeah, I.

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Can't control myself around chocolate covered almonds. The two things

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 2>that I am utterly unable to control myself around are

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 2>the chocolate covered almonds and the wise food white cheddar popcorn.

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 2>But that's not really sweet.

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>No, not a sweet.

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 3>But let's say at your desk at work, there was

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 3>a bowl of just just to the brim tie you

0:41:48.520 --> 0:41:51.880
<v Speaker 3>like dark chocolate or milk chocolate milk, gotta go milk, milk,

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 3>chocolate almonds, just a heaping bowl.

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 1>If you were given.

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 3>One dollar an hour, which is not a lot of money.

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:01.839
<v Speaker 3>How long could you just stare at those almonds on

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 3>your desk without eating one?

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Wow? I could probably. That's a very weird question.

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I have pretty good willpower. I could hold

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 2>off for a What could you do five dollars worth?

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, definitely, I've been I've been doing it for

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 2>a month. I gave up chocolate covered almonds this month.

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>But they're not on your desk.

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 2>They're not on my desk now, but there is a

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 2>steady supply of them at the Mysterious day job, and

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:30.399
<v Speaker 2>I walk by them on the way to my desk

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:30.839
<v Speaker 2>every day.

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:35.240
<v Speaker 3>I could get one Crisp Washington out of this deal.

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 3>I could not if an open box of tag alongs

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:38.919
<v Speaker 3>on my desk.

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>That's it's my weakness.

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:40.879
<v Speaker 2>Tie.

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 3>All right, I'm not doing so well. This is the

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 3>question that is perhaps the most tie question I could

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:50.240
<v Speaker 3>possibly imagine.

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm excited.

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Which current college football quarterback or quarterbacks do you guys

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 3>put at the top of your quote? Most likely to

0:42:57.120 --> 0:43:00.480
<v Speaker 3>end up on the Bachelor end Quotes Big board for

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 3>this year. That comes to us from John Haggard, which

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 3>is everything Tied dreams of in.

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:07.760
<v Speaker 1>A question when he falls asleep at night. Yes, wow,

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>who is it? Ty who?

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 3>So okay, let's establish this what makes for a good

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:15.720
<v Speaker 3>ex player bachelor. So we've had Jordan Rodgers.

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I've had Jordan Rodgers, Jesse Palmer.

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 3>Jesse Palmer. We've had the Aaron Murray connection. And he

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 3>was an athlete of baseball Josh Murray. Yeah, Josh Murray

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 3>was on was Sean?

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Was that his name? Sean? Yeah? Sean?

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:33.720
<v Speaker 2>He didn't he played football football at Case State? Yeah, yeah, Okay.

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 2>It has to be somebody that maybe is good enough

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 2>to play at the next level, but not in like

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:44.919
<v Speaker 2>a starting capacity, Jesse Palmer being being the obvious there.

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 2>It has to be somebody who I think has a

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 2>personality that translates well to television because first and foremost

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:54.840
<v Speaker 2>are trying to make a TV show With the Bachelor,

0:43:54.960 --> 0:43:59.399
<v Speaker 2>it's not about love. And I also think in today's era,

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:04.239
<v Speaker 2>because they're trying to drive ratings, it needs to be

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 2>someone who has some sort of well publicized girlfriend and

0:44:08.920 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 2>or crush situation, something someone that people knew about because

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 2>of a previous relationship or.

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Did people know about Jordan Rodgers previous relationships.

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Where I'm going with this is I feel like Trevor

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Knight would have been the correct answer last year. And he,

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:34.399
<v Speaker 2>for example, is someone who was dating someone from Duck

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 2>dynasty or a daughter of someone from Duck dynasty. I

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:40.160
<v Speaker 2>feel like that sort of helps to have that in

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 2>the quiver. Sure, so for me, the obvious answer is

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Baker Mayfield.

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's what Ryan said as well represented this.

0:44:49.600 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Baker Mayfield has the personality, he's too small, too unconventional

0:44:56.120 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 2>to make it in the NFL. And he also you'll remember,

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 2>like two years ago he was in the running for

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 2>our factoi that malely interested Tom Hammond because he had

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:09.319
<v Speaker 2>a girlfriend who went to Oklahoma State. Sure, so, right

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 2>out of the choot, my my one A is probably

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Baker Mayfield.

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:17.839
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So I did a little bit of research, ty,

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:20.760
<v Speaker 3>not knowing what makes a good bachelor, and just looking

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 3>at what quarterbacks actually look like, and it seemed the

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 3>look that they go for, it seems like you'd have

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 3>to be below the Mason Dixon line, so Oklahoma would count.

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:33.320
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't seem like a Minnesota quarterback or a Michigan

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 3>State quarterback as dreami as Kirk Cousin's eyes were, Penn

0:45:36.719 --> 0:45:40.839
<v Speaker 3>State quarterback. It just doesn't feel like they're drawing from

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:43.880
<v Speaker 3>that area. I looked at Ryan.

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Finley at North Carolina Carolina. They said he looks like

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:49.720
<v Speaker 1>he is Bachelor material. Okay.

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Bryce Ramsey has the name and has the pedigree Georgia,

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 3>but didn't seem to have the bachelor look to me.

0:45:56.760 --> 0:45:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Lamar Jackson looked very nice at that heisman.

0:45:59.800 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 2>Sarahremony, you can make a really good case for Josh

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 2>Rosen too, could make a great case for Josh Rosen.

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 1>The UCLA is very all American.

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Josh Rosen's an interesting case. If he doesn't turn things around,

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and there's no guaranteed though I would think that he would,

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 2>and I'm rooting for him too. But if he doesn't,

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 2>he certainly got the personality.

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:24.280
<v Speaker 1>At that point.

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 2>He probably wouldn't have a whole lot of longevity in

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 2>the NFL.

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And we know.

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:32.600
<v Speaker 2>That he's willing to be a little riskue didn't he

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 2>invite a fan back to.

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>His dorm, true an Arizona fan to go on to

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>hot tubs?

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:39.760
<v Speaker 2>So he clearly have no issues with going on national

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 2>television in a well publicized situation like that.

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:46.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna throw another name at you, Shane Michelle Okay,

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 3>go on Shane Michelle. I don't know that he doesn't know,

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:51.800
<v Speaker 3>don't know that he has an NFL future at this point.

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 3>Open competition at Texas for the quarterback job. High profile

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 3>at Texas Dad, notable baseball player. Yep, didn't he put

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:03.120
<v Speaker 3>out videos in the off season like throwing to friends

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:06.799
<v Speaker 3>that were driving. Oh what was it on the lake?

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Stuff and boats or something like that. So there is

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 3>that sort of very not very public but public persona.

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a sleeper right there. This comes to

0:47:16.600 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 3>us from Mike, and I did some research into this

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 3>one as well.

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Tie. Similar note, is Randy Edzel sexy? Wow? Is Randy

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Ways to go with that? Yeah?

0:47:28.640 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 3>So it could be asking is Randy Edzel a sexy?

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Higher at Yukon coming back? Hires Rhet Lashley to run

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:37.880
<v Speaker 3>the offense. You know, he's the only real Yukon football

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:40.080
<v Speaker 3>coach recently to have a good amount of success, got

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:42.239
<v Speaker 3>them to the Fiesta well before taking his dream job.

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:48.320
<v Speaker 3>But I went at it from a more analytical approach.

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:52.319
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, really what makes a fifty eight year

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:53.280
<v Speaker 3>old man sexy?

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't, but I did some research. Tie.

0:47:56.480 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 3>These are the famous fifty eight year olds we have

0:47:59.440 --> 0:48:01.839
<v Speaker 3>before us. According to one website, that was the first

0:48:01.880 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 3>one I googled.

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Or we're not playing hot or not now? Or what

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 1>are we? How are we doing this here?

0:48:05.960 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Sexier than Randy Edsel? Do you want to bring up

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 3>a picture of Randy Edzel? I know what Randy Etzel

0:48:10.520 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 3>looks like, but I'll pull him. Know what he looks like,

0:48:12.200 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 3>pull it up just so you have the visual reference. Okay, Rand,

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 3>go ahead, I got him, all right. Vigo Mortensen sexier

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 3>than Randy Edzel. Not sexier, We'll go Vigo on that one. Okay,

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 3>you have to go. He was he was in Lord

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:29.240
<v Speaker 3>of the Rings.

0:48:29.440 --> 0:48:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, okay, let's see where did my keep there?

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, next up? Sexier than Randy Edzel. Not sexier than

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Randy Etzel, Neil de grass Tyson, No, No, Randy Acknowledge

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:40.080
<v Speaker 3>is sexy?

0:48:40.120 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Tie I do. I'm a big NDT fan, But now

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go Randy.

0:48:44.719 --> 0:48:48.320
<v Speaker 3>The Prices Rights, Drew Carrey, Randy Edzel, a bit of

0:48:48.360 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 3>a womanizer. Yeah, Randy Edzel over Drew carry Mark Cuban,

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Randy Edzel, Gary Oldman, Commissioner Gordon.

0:48:57.280 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 1>From the Batman series. Randy Edzel, Randy Edseell, Okay, Kevin Bacon,

0:49:04.120 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 1>mister footloose.

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Probably Kevin Bacon probably, Yeah, Kevin Bacon is way better

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:13.080
<v Speaker 2>looking at Randio. Okay, this is a very weird conversation,

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:18.799
<v Speaker 2>but I like it. Tim Burton, Randy Etzel, that's very clear. Yes,

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Alec Baldwin current, Alec Baldwin, got to go. I'm talking still,

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:25.319
<v Speaker 2>Alec Baldwin. Yeah, Alec Baldwin, all right.

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 3>And these are the deceased Prince, Michael Jackson, and Billy

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Mays obviously all are sexier than Randy Edseell.

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:35.520
<v Speaker 1>All right. Here is the only other big name.

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:38.479
<v Speaker 3>College football coach that is fifty eight years old, which

0:49:38.520 --> 0:49:40.160
<v Speaker 3>is strange. You would think that they'll be more given

0:49:40.200 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 3>the like popular in sixty, right, But the only one

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:48.760
<v Speaker 3>I could find in my pretty extensive search through Lovey

0:49:48.800 --> 0:49:50.279
<v Speaker 3>Smith is fifty eight years old.

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Wow, who is the sexier man in your eyes? Lovey Smith?

0:49:54.200 --> 0:49:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Randy ets I think I go, love you Smith.

0:49:57.040 --> 0:50:00.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that's right. Yeah, I think that's right. But

0:50:00.560 --> 0:50:02.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad we got to the bottom of this and this.

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Never accuse us of not taking your questions very seriously.

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:12.359
<v Speaker 3>Mike Reardan very seriously. All right, Next we have uh,

0:50:13.000 --> 0:50:14.600
<v Speaker 3>this is a quick one. Sushi is sashimi?

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Ti? Do you have a preference. I'm gonna go sushi

0:50:17.200 --> 0:50:19.359
<v Speaker 1>because I've never had sushimi.

0:50:19.719 --> 0:50:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Sashimi. Do you know what sashimi is? No idea, sashimi

0:50:24.080 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 3>is sushi or it's sushi fish without the rice. So

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:30.560
<v Speaker 3>you're just having a piece of fish, a piece of

0:50:30.600 --> 0:50:33.040
<v Speaker 3>raw fish, no dip, a little bit of in soy sauce,

0:50:33.080 --> 0:50:36.560
<v Speaker 3>and some with sabi, but no rice. No, No, I'm

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 3>gonna go sushi myself because I think great sushi rice

0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:40.160
<v Speaker 3>really makes the meal.

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Can we get to the.

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Question about about the animals like the real life train.

0:50:46.640 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 3>This comes to us from Chris. If all the animal

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:53.040
<v Speaker 3>named teams were their nicknames trained to play football, who

0:50:53.080 --> 0:50:54.280
<v Speaker 3>would be the national champion?

0:50:54.360 --> 0:50:56.399
<v Speaker 2>This is my This is one of my top ten

0:50:56.480 --> 0:50:57.680
<v Speaker 2>favorite questions of all time.

0:50:57.920 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Eleven on eleven.

0:50:59.200 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, who which mascot or not specific mask, but which

0:51:02.800 --> 0:51:06.000
<v Speaker 3>nickname do you think has the best chance at winning

0:51:06.040 --> 0:51:09.359
<v Speaker 3>the national championship? So I think we're gonna call it

0:51:09.400 --> 0:51:11.040
<v Speaker 3>on land because football's played on land.

0:51:11.080 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was gonna say that's where we have to

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 2>figure out what we're gonna do because I have to

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:20.680
<v Speaker 2>believe like the Southern miss Golden Eagles would have a

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:24.320
<v Speaker 2>distinct air raid offense that the Penn State Nitney Lions

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:27.160
<v Speaker 2>could not contend with. Right right, His thing here does

0:51:27.200 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 2>not specify land creatures, So I'm going to specify ground

0:51:32.560 --> 0:51:36.640
<v Speaker 2>creatures on land. That's what That's the line I'm going

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 2>to draw.

0:51:38.200 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:51:40.280 --> 0:51:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Because of their ability to both stand and run on

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:51.279
<v Speaker 3>all fours and hold a football, I think I'm going

0:51:51.320 --> 0:51:56.839
<v Speaker 3>with cal UCLA bruin. I think is a baby bear.

0:51:56.880 --> 0:51:59.720
<v Speaker 3>A bruins a baby bear, which is a more difficult task.

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:02.320
<v Speaker 3>They're more athletic, I mean they at a younger.

0:52:02.160 --> 0:52:05.319
<v Speaker 1>Age, they'd be undersized. Dan, do we have human mascots?

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:08.160
<v Speaker 2>If you're talking about like a cougar or a puma

0:52:08.320 --> 0:52:12.360
<v Speaker 2>in the wildcat category, then I think you've got a

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:16.439
<v Speaker 2>potential there. I'm inclined to say that Nitney Lions also

0:52:16.520 --> 0:52:22.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of fall into that same category. Nitney Lions a cougar, sure,

0:52:23.200 --> 0:52:28.560
<v Speaker 2>so I have seen what those creatures can do. And

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:31.640
<v Speaker 2>a puma can do something like jump twenty feet straight

0:52:31.680 --> 0:52:35.160
<v Speaker 2>up in the air, right that level of agility and

0:52:35.239 --> 0:52:39.799
<v Speaker 2>speed and really just I think intelligence is something that

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:41.240
<v Speaker 2>translates to the football field.

0:52:41.320 --> 0:52:44.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm leaning bears still just because of I think they're

0:52:44.400 --> 0:52:47.640
<v Speaker 3>more athletic than a lot of the other four legged

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:51.240
<v Speaker 3>armed you know, running and moving on all fours animals.

0:52:52.239 --> 0:52:55.960
<v Speaker 3>I think they offer more versatility, more size, ferocity, but

0:52:56.040 --> 0:53:00.680
<v Speaker 3>still agility. But if we're talking about, you know, running,

0:53:00.680 --> 0:53:04.960
<v Speaker 3>some sort of just like single wing, really basic and

0:53:05.120 --> 0:53:07.080
<v Speaker 3>we sort of accept the fact that a ball can

0:53:07.120 --> 0:53:10.040
<v Speaker 3>be attached to this animal in some way. I think

0:53:10.080 --> 0:53:13.080
<v Speaker 3>the most unstoppable force would be eleven buffaloes.

0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:14.239
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:53:14.719 --> 0:53:17.560
<v Speaker 3>That to me is buffaloes can run it up. They

0:53:17.560 --> 0:53:19.680
<v Speaker 3>can stampede it up to thirty five miles an hour.

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 3>So we're talking faster than football players at their top speed. Right,

0:53:24.600 --> 0:53:27.759
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about they're relatively light on their feet, sort

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:31.239
<v Speaker 3>of thinner legs, but still a ton of mass, and

0:53:31.400 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 3>they lead with their head, which is problematic referee wise.

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:38.360
<v Speaker 3>But I'm going I'm staying in the Pac twelve and

0:53:38.400 --> 0:53:39.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm either're going Bears or buffalo.

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:42.719
<v Speaker 2>Do they call targeting in a game like that? I

0:53:42.760 --> 0:53:44.840
<v Speaker 2>feel like they don't. I feel like they'd all be

0:53:45.239 --> 0:53:47.640
<v Speaker 2>with their head. That's true, But you bring up a

0:53:47.719 --> 0:53:50.000
<v Speaker 2>very interesting point with Buffaloes, it'd be like a team

0:53:50.040 --> 0:53:51.200
<v Speaker 2>of Craig Hayward out there.

0:53:51.320 --> 0:53:53.560
<v Speaker 3>You're running the wedge, I mean you're running the return

0:53:53.640 --> 0:53:56.680
<v Speaker 3>wedge offense. And we've seen Ralphie run. Ralphie can run

0:53:56.960 --> 0:53:58.240
<v Speaker 3>once he gets ahead of Steam.

0:53:58.719 --> 0:53:58.959
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:02.439
<v Speaker 2>The question is get ahead of steam knowing that you've

0:54:02.440 --> 0:54:04.480
<v Speaker 2>got something like a puma who could just jump over

0:54:05.840 --> 0:54:06.279
<v Speaker 2>jump over.

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the agility factor is what scares me.

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Huh, this is interesting. Here's another one that I that

0:54:11.560 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 2>I enjoyed, kind of along the same lines. This is

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:18.240
<v Speaker 2>from Dan. Which conference has your favorite nicknames? He votes

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:21.200
<v Speaker 2>for the Big Ten, he says, because they have twelve

0:54:21.360 --> 0:54:24.799
<v Speaker 2>unique names like boiler Makers and Nitney Lyons, really only

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:27.960
<v Speaker 2>two generic ones. He says, the SEC is the worst,

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:30.840
<v Speaker 2>with three tigers, two bulldogs in a wildcat.

0:54:31.239 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:54:31.640 --> 0:54:35.320
<v Speaker 2>I put an inordinate amount of thought into this, Dan, Okay,

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:39.920
<v Speaker 2>I have settled on Conference USA. Okay, I was, I

0:54:39.920 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 2>mean part of me was AAC. But can continue. Let

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:46.840
<v Speaker 2>me read off the names of the Mascotskay, in Conference USA,

0:54:47.480 --> 0:54:50.000
<v Speaker 2>I challenge you to come up with a better slate

0:54:50.080 --> 0:54:50.600
<v Speaker 2>of names.

0:54:50.840 --> 0:54:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready.

0:54:52.120 --> 0:54:56.880
<v Speaker 2>The forty nine Ers, the Panthers, Owls, Bulldogs, Thundering Herd,

0:54:57.200 --> 0:55:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Blue Raiders, mean Green Monarchs, Owls, owl Golden Eagles, Miners,

0:55:04.400 --> 0:55:05.839
<v Speaker 2>road Runners in Hilltoppers.

0:55:06.400 --> 0:55:08.920
<v Speaker 3>It's very good. That is as a strong list. I mean,

0:55:08.920 --> 0:55:11.080
<v Speaker 3>he may have been referencing Power five conferences, but I

0:55:11.120 --> 0:55:11.600
<v Speaker 3>don't care.

0:55:11.800 --> 0:55:18.040
<v Speaker 1>No Mountain West is decent. PAC twelve is fine. Nothing.

0:55:18.040 --> 0:55:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Cardinal is kind of cool.

0:55:19.800 --> 0:55:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Buffalo's is obviously relatively unique. AAC, We've got owls, Bowls, Knights,

0:55:27.320 --> 0:55:31.560
<v Speaker 3>bear Cats, We've got East Carolina is the Pirates, which

0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:33.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that's pretty dope. The Huskies is pretty normal.

0:55:34.040 --> 0:55:37.759
<v Speaker 3>The Midshipman, like the midshipman. Yeah, like the midship not

0:55:37.800 --> 0:55:42.480
<v Speaker 3>just a hurricane tie a golden hurricane in Tulsa, not

0:55:42.600 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 3>just a wave, but a green wave with that helmet,

0:55:46.280 --> 0:55:49.000
<v Speaker 3>that sort of throwback helmet. Got the Mustangs, not just

0:55:49.000 --> 0:55:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Broncos or anything like that. Mustangs. You've got your Cougars

0:55:53.239 --> 0:55:55.680
<v Speaker 3>and you've got your Tigers. I think that spans enough.

0:55:55.960 --> 0:55:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I like the weather factor. I'm going with the AAC.

0:55:58.800 --> 0:56:00.719
<v Speaker 2>Another one here he mentioned a big ten and he's

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:03.440
<v Speaker 2>not wrong. But one other one I'll throw in here.

0:56:04.120 --> 0:56:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Acc not bad, m Okay. He got some common ones Eagles, Tigers, sure,

0:56:11.400 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 2>but Blue Devils, Seminoles, yellow Jackets, tar Heels, the Orange Cavaliers, Hokies,

0:56:20.840 --> 0:56:22.880
<v Speaker 2>and to round it out, the Demon Deacons.

0:56:22.920 --> 0:56:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Not bad, not bad.

0:56:24.840 --> 0:56:26.840
<v Speaker 3>We got time for one or two more, one or

0:56:26.840 --> 0:56:29.520
<v Speaker 3>two more. These will be relatively quick. I'm going to

0:56:29.600 --> 0:56:32.120
<v Speaker 3>save a couple of these for when we have Doctor

0:56:32.200 --> 0:56:35.319
<v Speaker 3>Jane on because got very personal and I like that.

0:56:36.960 --> 0:56:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Walker wants to know he has to plan a bachelor

0:56:38.640 --> 0:56:40.359
<v Speaker 3>party for the late summer. Looking for a good spot

0:56:40.400 --> 0:56:43.200
<v Speaker 3>in the continental the United States, Vegas not an actual

0:56:43.320 --> 0:56:47.240
<v Speaker 3>option because it's going to be very hot in late summer,

0:56:47.280 --> 0:56:50.840
<v Speaker 3>which also sort of takes away Austin, Nashville, Charleston, some

0:56:50.880 --> 0:56:54.839
<v Speaker 3>popular spots. New Orleans is gonna be pretty gross late summer.

0:56:54.920 --> 0:56:56.840
<v Speaker 3>But New Orleans is great. Can you guys give me

0:56:56.880 --> 0:57:04.080
<v Speaker 3>a recommendation. Cogo's interesting to me, Dan, Chicago's you can get.

0:57:04.200 --> 0:57:06.839
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it gets humid, but you summer can also

0:57:06.880 --> 0:57:08.080
<v Speaker 3>it's a great summer city.

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:57:08.760 --> 0:57:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, you can go to a Cubs game, you go

0:57:10.480 --> 0:57:12.960
<v Speaker 3>to Wrigley, easy to get to. I don't know where

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Walker is from, so, but Chicago's pretty central to everybody. Yeah,

0:57:18.760 --> 0:57:22.040
<v Speaker 3>go to Chicago for one night and you know, have

0:57:22.120 --> 0:57:24.520
<v Speaker 3>a great meal, you know, walk around, you know, maybe

0:57:24.520 --> 0:57:26.800
<v Speaker 3>do something on the lake. I would then go to

0:57:27.000 --> 0:57:29.280
<v Speaker 3>either Michigan or Wisconsin and try to get a lake

0:57:29.320 --> 0:57:32.960
<v Speaker 3>house there. The summers are pretty mild up there. You

0:57:32.960 --> 0:57:34.880
<v Speaker 3>can have a great you can grill, you could just

0:57:34.920 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 3>do your own thing. You can be secluded, rent a lakehouse.

0:57:37.560 --> 0:57:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Sort of upper Midwest Michigan, Wisconsin totally beautiful over the summers,

0:57:42.640 --> 0:57:46.680
<v Speaker 3>and I would say more affordable, especially if you have

0:57:46.720 --> 0:57:48.840
<v Speaker 3>a bigger group to do the beach house thing or

0:57:48.880 --> 0:57:51.480
<v Speaker 3>the lakehouse thing. Go to the supermarket and get a

0:57:51.520 --> 0:57:54.280
<v Speaker 3>bunch of burgers and dogs and beer, and you know,

0:57:54.440 --> 0:57:57.800
<v Speaker 3>maybe we can get a flask from our friends. Go

0:57:58.480 --> 0:58:02.360
<v Speaker 3>you get a flask from Jerrem. But I would do

0:58:02.720 --> 0:58:04.960
<v Speaker 3>It's beautiful up there during the summer. That's what I

0:58:04.960 --> 0:58:07.200
<v Speaker 3>would do. I would do the sort of chill lake

0:58:07.240 --> 0:58:08.439
<v Speaker 3>house thing every down.

0:58:08.480 --> 0:58:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Again, I have a decent idea doesn't happen often. But

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:13.680
<v Speaker 2>where are we going? Final question here?

0:58:13.800 --> 0:58:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Final question? This is going to say a lot about

0:58:16.120 --> 0:58:19.120
<v Speaker 3>you as a human. Okay, man, it's about somebody living

0:58:19.120 --> 0:58:20.080
<v Speaker 3>in twenty seventeen.

0:58:20.240 --> 0:58:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Taylor has a cold.

0:58:23.680 --> 0:58:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh, he's sick in bed? What's your best cold remedy?

0:58:28.240 --> 0:58:32.440
<v Speaker 2>I am a big fan of the old adage. Feet

0:58:32.480 --> 0:58:35.479
<v Speaker 2>a cold, starve a fever, they starve a flu.

0:58:36.400 --> 0:58:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I've heard star of a.

0:58:37.200 --> 0:58:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Fever, but I suppose you could starve the flu as well.

0:58:40.880 --> 0:58:43.760
<v Speaker 2>When I have a cold, if it is just chills,

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:45.840
<v Speaker 2>I do my best.

0:58:45.920 --> 0:58:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Stuff my face.

0:58:48.280 --> 0:58:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I eat as much as I can without making myself uncomfortable.

0:58:51.520 --> 0:58:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Does it need to be what do you eat? A

0:58:53.720 --> 0:58:57.560
<v Speaker 2>giant cheese steak, can just be. Soup, can be comfort, food,

0:58:57.600 --> 0:58:59.480
<v Speaker 2>can be almost anything. When you got a cold, I

0:58:59.520 --> 0:59:01.479
<v Speaker 2>think every everything's fair game.

0:59:01.800 --> 0:59:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Sleep your ass off, Sleep like it's your job. Sleep

0:59:05.120 --> 0:59:09.240
<v Speaker 3>like crazy. Just keep rebooting your body. Drink a ton

0:59:09.280 --> 0:59:12.080
<v Speaker 3>of water. I generally, even though I love tea, I

0:59:12.120 --> 0:59:14.480
<v Speaker 3>will avoid tea when I have a cold because tea

0:59:14.520 --> 0:59:17.960
<v Speaker 3>actually lowers your body temperature. Yeah so that's not even

0:59:17.960 --> 0:59:20.800
<v Speaker 3>though it's warm going down at that moment, it lowers

0:59:20.800 --> 0:59:22.400
<v Speaker 3>your body temperature. Which is why they say when you

0:59:22.480 --> 0:59:24.440
<v Speaker 3>have a fever, to drink tea because it actually lowers it.

0:59:25.480 --> 0:59:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Eat a ton of Relatively, you have a turkey sandwich

0:59:30.160 --> 0:59:31.760
<v Speaker 3>on wheat bread. You know something that's not going to

0:59:31.840 --> 0:59:35.400
<v Speaker 3>upset your stomach all that much. Drink just a crap

0:59:35.440 --> 0:59:37.520
<v Speaker 3>ton of water. I will drink like hot water with

0:59:37.600 --> 0:59:40.200
<v Speaker 3>honey if I have a cold, just because it'll warm

0:59:40.200 --> 0:59:40.520
<v Speaker 3>me up.

0:59:40.800 --> 0:59:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Follow up question sleep like it's your job. Final question

0:59:44.920 --> 0:59:48.560
<v Speaker 2>follow up HM to what end do you believe in

0:59:49.000 --> 0:59:51.440
<v Speaker 2>something like emergency?

0:59:51.520 --> 0:59:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I'll have it occasionally if I start to feel myself

0:59:54.280 --> 0:59:58.320
<v Speaker 3>getting sick, But I don't believe in it in any

0:59:58.360 --> 1:00:01.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of significant way. Just because the vitamin C is

1:00:01.440 --> 1:00:04.720
<v Speaker 3>good for you. Thing was sort of a hoax from

1:00:04.760 --> 1:00:08.200
<v Speaker 3>like the seventies by like some just random doctor. Vitamin

1:00:08.240 --> 1:00:10.040
<v Speaker 3>C is fine for you, but it's not going to

1:00:10.160 --> 1:00:14.320
<v Speaker 3>cure your sickness. So you know, putting vitamins into your

1:00:14.320 --> 1:00:16.720
<v Speaker 3>body is fine generally, when you have them in unnatural

1:00:16.760 --> 1:00:19.800
<v Speaker 3>forms like airborne or emergency, you're just going to pee

1:00:19.800 --> 1:00:22.760
<v Speaker 3>it out pretty quickly. I can too agree with you.

1:00:23.320 --> 1:00:25.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it does much. Eat healthy, and you're

1:00:25.200 --> 1:00:26.480
<v Speaker 3>gonna get all the vitamins you need.

1:00:26.960 --> 1:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>There you go.

1:00:28.400 --> 1:00:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Sage life advice here from Dan Rubinstein, maybe a little

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:32.480
<v Speaker 2>from me too.

1:00:32.560 --> 1:00:33.840
<v Speaker 3>We got a bunch of We got a bunch of

1:00:33.960 --> 1:00:38.560
<v Speaker 3>questions involving like relationships and personal matters. And wedding stuff.

1:00:39.080 --> 1:00:41.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to do my best to book the always

1:00:41.160 --> 1:00:44.120
<v Speaker 3>difficult to book Doctor Jane for a return appearance this spring,

1:00:44.160 --> 1:00:46.000
<v Speaker 3>so we will get more questions. You have any questions

1:00:46.040 --> 1:00:51.760
<v Speaker 3>about life, relationships, inner working, politics kind of stuff. I know, Ti,

1:00:51.840 --> 1:00:54.800
<v Speaker 3>you've been dying to do a bathroom medic hit show, So.

1:00:56.480 --> 1:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>This is not made up, correct. I could probably go

1:00:59.840 --> 1:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>for about an hour on Bathroom Medica.

1:01:02.320 --> 1:01:03.800
<v Speaker 3>But no, we're going to have a life talk with

1:01:03.880 --> 1:01:05.840
<v Speaker 3>doctor Jane. Maybe we'll bring Ryan in as well at

1:01:05.840 --> 1:01:07.800
<v Speaker 3>some point, so we'll get to some of those questions.

1:01:07.840 --> 1:01:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Then I am pretty much all talked out now, Ty.

1:01:10.720 --> 1:01:11.600
<v Speaker 3>No sponsor tonight.

1:01:11.840 --> 1:01:15.280
<v Speaker 2>No sponsor tonight, oh man, so you know whatever you

1:01:15.320 --> 1:01:17.000
<v Speaker 2>want for dinner. They must have heard the last show.

1:01:17.040 --> 1:01:19.880
<v Speaker 2>No sponsor tonight. Sponsors will be back next week.

1:01:20.480 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>All right.

1:01:20.880 --> 1:01:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe at iTunes dot com, slash Solid Verbal, don't forget.

1:01:24.720 --> 1:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>You can email us whenever your heart desires. As Dan mentioned,

1:01:28.480 --> 1:01:31.240
<v Speaker 2>as I mentioned, we read them all. We love getting them,

1:01:31.680 --> 1:01:34.520
<v Speaker 2>so hit us up. Soliverbal at gmail dot com. If

1:01:34.560 --> 1:01:38.640
<v Speaker 2>not there, look to Twitter, look to Facebook. We're always

1:01:38.720 --> 1:01:41.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of surveying the landscape, seeing what people have to say.

1:01:43.040 --> 1:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>So don't hesitate.

1:01:44.080 --> 1:01:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Please do reach out and we will be broadcasting all

1:01:47.000 --> 1:01:50.320
<v Speaker 2>off season here on the podcast feed, YEP, our website

1:01:50.400 --> 1:01:53.320
<v Speaker 2>soliverbal dot com. Send it to your friends, share it

1:01:53.400 --> 1:01:56.240
<v Speaker 2>on social, do what you got to do to get

1:01:56.240 --> 1:01:59.320
<v Speaker 2>the word out. We'll be here all off season long,

1:02:00.120 --> 1:02:02.840
<v Speaker 2>preparing for the long dol drums of the college football

1:02:02.840 --> 1:02:05.520
<v Speaker 2>off season and getting you all geared up for the

1:02:05.560 --> 1:02:10.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty seventeen season, like what five six months from now?

1:02:10.360 --> 1:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a while from now, ty, Yeah, Okay.

1:02:13.480 --> 1:02:17.280
<v Speaker 2>On that note, Dan, I know you are headed for

1:02:17.320 --> 1:02:21.400
<v Speaker 2>parts unknown here shortly after the show, so safe travels.

1:02:21.640 --> 1:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Well, I talk to you next week. Yes,

1:02:25.440 --> 1:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll be here. I'll be ready, all right.

1:02:27.000 --> 1:02:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Very good for that guy over there, my good friend

1:02:29.200 --> 1:02:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Dan rubenst for myself, Tie Hildebrand, thanks again for joining

1:02:32.080 --> 1:02:33.160
<v Speaker 2>us on the show.

1:02:33.600 --> 1:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>We will catch you next Week's say solid peace.