1 00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,640 Speaker 1: Who you put your trust in matters. Investors have put 2 00:00:02,680 --> 00:00:07,000 Speaker 1: their trust and independent registered investment advisors to the two 3 00:00:07,040 --> 00:00:10,680 Speaker 1: and four trillion dollars Why Learn more at find your 4 00:00:10,760 --> 00:00:26,320 Speaker 1: Independent Advisor dot com. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. 5 00:00:26,720 --> 00:00:30,440 Speaker 1: I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we bring you 6 00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:35,520 Speaker 1: insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. 7 00:00:35,920 --> 00:00:40,519 Speaker 1: Find Bloomberg Surveillance on iTunes, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and 8 00:00:40,600 --> 00:00:48,640 Speaker 1: of course on the Bloomberg. Joining us now is Peter Hooper. 9 00:00:48,640 --> 00:00:52,400 Speaker 1: He's the chief economist at which Man Morty. Peter, I 10 00:00:52,440 --> 00:00:54,400 Speaker 1: won't ask you the question should he stay or should 11 00:00:54,400 --> 00:00:56,200 Speaker 1: he go? But to maybe we can talk about the 12 00:00:56,640 --> 00:01:00,120 Speaker 1: ramifications of this decision, the Governor Carney's waging right now. 13 00:01:00,440 --> 00:01:03,480 Speaker 1: What are there? Well, this is a this is certainly 14 00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:08,039 Speaker 1: a difficult critical time for the UK economy. UH were 15 00:01:08,240 --> 00:01:12,640 Speaker 1: as as breakfit unfolds learning how this is going to 16 00:01:12,720 --> 00:01:18,440 Speaker 1: affect the economy there and and more globally, um the 17 00:01:18,440 --> 00:01:22,360 Speaker 1: the economy right now facing the effects of substantial weakening 18 00:01:22,440 --> 00:01:27,560 Speaker 1: of sterling. UH inflation expectations up sharply at a time 19 00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:30,479 Speaker 1: when growth has not yet picked up a pace so 20 00:01:31,280 --> 00:01:35,319 Speaker 1: difficult decisions, difficult decisions ahead. I think this is an 21 00:01:35,400 --> 00:01:39,040 Speaker 1: uncertainty about Mr Carney's future that needs to be resolved 22 00:01:39,080 --> 00:01:42,800 Speaker 1: this week, and global investors are hoping that he stays on. 23 00:01:43,040 --> 00:01:48,280 Speaker 1: He's he's a known commodity and someone who is generally trusted, 24 00:01:49,200 --> 00:01:52,520 Speaker 1: but obviously personal reasons of his own for wanting to 25 00:01:52,560 --> 00:01:55,680 Speaker 1: go on. I would look through the politics here. Some 26 00:01:55,760 --> 00:01:58,000 Speaker 1: new statistics at this morning from the Euro Area about 27 00:01:58,040 --> 00:02:01,000 Speaker 1: growth in in the wake of the Brexit vone gross 28 00:02:01,040 --> 00:02:03,040 Speaker 1: domestic product for his point three percent in the three 29 00:02:03,040 --> 00:02:05,560 Speaker 1: months to September, inflation rate picking up to point five 30 00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:07,640 Speaker 1: percent in October, both of those things in line with 31 00:02:07,640 --> 00:02:09,760 Speaker 1: with expectations here. What do they tell you about the 32 00:02:10,080 --> 00:02:13,760 Speaker 1: health of the the euro economy here after that referendum vone, Well, 33 00:02:13,800 --> 00:02:18,720 Speaker 1: the the the economy is h so far, not taking 34 00:02:18,919 --> 00:02:22,160 Speaker 1: any kind of a significant hit. We weren't expecting a 35 00:02:22,200 --> 00:02:26,000 Speaker 1: major negative for the euro economy, but more in an 36 00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:30,720 Speaker 1: issue for the UK um UH at this point, it's 37 00:02:30,760 --> 00:02:34,200 Speaker 1: how how does the how do the negotiations move going forward? 38 00:02:34,600 --> 00:02:37,799 Speaker 1: The UK obviously more sensitive to this than the Euro Area. 39 00:02:38,280 --> 00:02:41,520 Speaker 1: ECPs goal here are right close to just below two percent. 40 00:02:41,639 --> 00:02:43,800 Speaker 1: That with the likelihood we get to that anytime soon. 41 00:02:45,280 --> 00:02:50,600 Speaker 1: We're a ways off. Uh. And our expectation is ECB 42 00:02:50,880 --> 00:02:55,760 Speaker 1: is going to expand its QUI at the December meeting. Um. 43 00:02:55,800 --> 00:03:00,480 Speaker 1: But certainly globally things beginning to move in a direction 44 00:03:00,520 --> 00:03:03,760 Speaker 1: that that that could be helpful. I mean, you're you're 45 00:03:03,800 --> 00:03:08,240 Speaker 1: seeing inflation slowly pick up in the US. News out 46 00:03:08,280 --> 00:03:11,919 Speaker 1: of China has been Uh. Inflation is that admit more 47 00:03:11,919 --> 00:03:16,560 Speaker 1: of the watchword these days, um so um labor markets. 48 00:03:16,680 --> 00:03:19,239 Speaker 1: Labor markets are tightening. Uh. And it's going to be 49 00:03:19,280 --> 00:03:21,640 Speaker 1: a slow process. But I'm gonna take a while, Peter, 50 00:03:21,720 --> 00:03:25,119 Speaker 1: let's do let's do a granular thing. We have two 51 00:03:25,120 --> 00:03:29,080 Speaker 1: point nine percent and we're assuming it's inventories and exports. 52 00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:33,960 Speaker 1: Helped me here with if I want to delete inventories 53 00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:37,560 Speaker 1: from my analysis of g d P, translate that jargon 54 00:03:37,720 --> 00:03:41,839 Speaker 1: forest okay. Uh. The inventory sales ratio has been has 55 00:03:41,880 --> 00:03:46,720 Speaker 1: been relatively high. Uh. It plunged. Inventory investment plunged in 56 00:03:46,720 --> 00:03:50,000 Speaker 1: the second quarter, a big negative on growth. Third quarter 57 00:03:50,480 --> 00:03:53,920 Speaker 1: looks like it's subtracted something on the order of a 58 00:03:53,920 --> 00:03:56,880 Speaker 1: half percentage point from from GDP growth going I mean, 59 00:03:56,920 --> 00:03:59,960 Speaker 1: added something like half a percent as inventory investment went 60 00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:04,600 Speaker 1: from a substantial negative to a moderate plus. Uh. That 61 00:04:04,920 --> 00:04:09,000 Speaker 1: is you know what it does going forward, is it 62 00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:10,839 Speaker 1: takes a little bit out of the fourth quarter we've 63 00:04:10,880 --> 00:04:14,240 Speaker 1: we've we were expecting to see more correction in inventories 64 00:04:14,480 --> 00:04:19,000 Speaker 1: UM over the near tournaments. Our Deutsche Bank view, UM, 65 00:04:19,360 --> 00:04:23,479 Speaker 1: we we now expect to see inventories subtract a few 66 00:04:23,480 --> 00:04:27,160 Speaker 1: tents in Q four UM. So it was a moderate 67 00:04:27,160 --> 00:04:29,440 Speaker 1: plus to us, a little bit of surprise, but more 68 00:04:29,480 --> 00:04:33,680 Speaker 1: in line with consensus expectations. UM. We still have some 69 00:04:33,680 --> 00:04:36,279 Speaker 1: correction to go going forward. Does it get you to 70 00:04:36,600 --> 00:04:40,159 Speaker 1: a sustained better g d P or as you told 71 00:04:40,240 --> 00:04:42,760 Speaker 1: us an hour ago, that it gets you to sub 72 00:04:42,839 --> 00:04:46,440 Speaker 1: two GDP. You can't have both. Okay, you have two 73 00:04:46,480 --> 00:04:51,760 Speaker 1: point nine Half of that was exports and inventories. Uh. 74 00:04:52,160 --> 00:04:56,360 Speaker 1: The underlying feeling growth trend is something in the one 75 00:04:56,440 --> 00:04:59,760 Speaker 1: and a half to two percent range. That's uh what 76 00:05:00,040 --> 00:05:05,600 Speaker 1: we're consumer and business investment. Consumer just over two. Business 77 00:05:05,640 --> 00:05:08,560 Speaker 1: investment has been very week has been a modest negative. 78 00:05:09,240 --> 00:05:11,520 Speaker 1: That's where we need to really pick up going forward. 79 00:05:12,040 --> 00:05:14,600 Speaker 1: But let me say that even if we're at just 80 00:05:14,760 --> 00:05:18,760 Speaker 1: one and a half percent GDP growth, that's enough to 81 00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:23,520 Speaker 1: give us ongoing improvement in the US labor market. Because 82 00:05:24,160 --> 00:05:28,600 Speaker 1: productivity output per hour has not grown over the last 83 00:05:28,600 --> 00:05:33,719 Speaker 1: five years. For overall GDP, labor productivity pretty flat. So 84 00:05:34,080 --> 00:05:36,359 Speaker 1: one and a half percent GDP growth means one and 85 00:05:36,320 --> 00:05:39,000 Speaker 1: a half percent labor demand growth, which gives you pretty 86 00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:46,640 Speaker 1: good growth in in employment. Uh. That's a tightening labor market. Um. 87 00:05:46,880 --> 00:05:51,640 Speaker 1: Problem here productivity is growing that slowly. Uh. Not just 88 00:05:53,600 --> 00:05:57,520 Speaker 1: it means very slow potential growth. It means uh lag 89 00:05:57,720 --> 00:06:01,719 Speaker 1: lagging improvement in the US underd of living. Uh. And 90 00:06:01,839 --> 00:06:04,719 Speaker 1: it means pressure on unit labor cards. Yeah. And David, 91 00:06:05,000 --> 00:06:07,400 Speaker 1: not that I want editor lies here, but it touches 92 00:06:07,440 --> 00:06:10,479 Speaker 1: a little bit on Mr Trump's comments in different debates 93 00:06:10,480 --> 00:06:13,799 Speaker 1: on a quote unquote one percent economy and not particularly 94 00:06:13,880 --> 00:06:17,680 Speaker 1: one point zero percent. But Dr Hooper's view is Trumpian 95 00:06:18,360 --> 00:06:22,800 Speaker 1: in the GDP sense. Squinting a correct word, I think 96 00:06:22,839 --> 00:06:25,040 Speaker 1: it is my sudden Matt Winkler's piece this work. We 97 00:06:25,040 --> 00:06:28,000 Speaker 1: can ask him about, yes, whether or not that's vaded 98 00:06:28,040 --> 00:06:31,160 Speaker 1: to the dictionary. Uh. Squinting through that headline number. Peter 99 00:06:31,240 --> 00:06:34,159 Speaker 1: looking looking at household spending, looking at the state of 100 00:06:34,200 --> 00:06:36,040 Speaker 1: the consumer, How does he or she look in light 101 00:06:36,040 --> 00:06:39,000 Speaker 1: of that two point nine percent figure, I think overall 102 00:06:39,080 --> 00:06:43,760 Speaker 1: consumer is doing okay, alright, household balance sheets of recovered 103 00:06:44,040 --> 00:06:48,400 Speaker 1: uh average households net worth income ratio back to previous 104 00:06:48,760 --> 00:06:53,720 Speaker 1: near previous highs, labor market doing well, hiring going okay, 105 00:06:53,800 --> 00:06:56,440 Speaker 1: and wage inflation beginning to rise. You you had a 106 00:06:56,440 --> 00:07:01,480 Speaker 1: four percent increase nominal income, uh two a little of 107 00:07:01,600 --> 00:07:05,359 Speaker 1: two percent real income. Uh. That's enough to sport a 108 00:07:05,920 --> 00:07:10,360 Speaker 1: you know, a moderate growth in consumer spending going forward, 109 00:07:10,760 --> 00:07:13,560 Speaker 1: and that's that's more than two thirds of the economy, 110 00:07:13,640 --> 00:07:17,280 Speaker 1: so that that's what's giving you this uh, this underlying 111 00:07:17,480 --> 00:07:20,600 Speaker 1: growth and domestic demand somewhere in the at least one 112 00:07:20,640 --> 00:07:23,000 Speaker 1: and a half two percent range in the face of 113 00:07:23,000 --> 00:07:26,040 Speaker 1: some drag on the part of business spending. As I mentioned, 114 00:07:26,040 --> 00:07:28,360 Speaker 1: we get personal income and personal spending figures this morning. 115 00:07:28,360 --> 00:07:32,120 Speaker 1: What are you looking for there? I think my expectation 116 00:07:32,200 --> 00:07:33,680 Speaker 1: is we're going to be somewhere in the four percent 117 00:07:33,800 --> 00:07:36,160 Speaker 1: range nominal. Yeah, but this is important because you get 118 00:07:36,280 --> 00:07:38,720 Speaker 1: spending an income. I get it, and then you take 119 00:07:38,760 --> 00:07:41,600 Speaker 1: it down and you guys calculate. Did the government calculate 120 00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:44,480 Speaker 1: or do you back out what the personal savings rate is? 121 00:07:44,720 --> 00:07:46,320 Speaker 1: They give it to us, they give it you. It's 122 00:07:46,320 --> 00:07:48,320 Speaker 1: all part of it. You don't have to like do incense, 123 00:07:48,600 --> 00:07:51,840 Speaker 1: you know, do a Harry Potter hell of kind of thing. 124 00:07:52,120 --> 00:07:57,160 Speaker 1: And the saving saving rate has gone from low of 125 00:07:57,360 --> 00:08:01,520 Speaker 1: three to five six. Okay, but but Peter, this is 126 00:08:01,560 --> 00:08:06,040 Speaker 1: really important here. The paradox of savings, the paradox is 127 00:08:06,120 --> 00:08:08,840 Speaker 1: upon us with with this great distortion of the fixed 128 00:08:08,840 --> 00:08:12,320 Speaker 1: income market, isn't it. Well? We we've saying, we've been 129 00:08:12,360 --> 00:08:15,040 Speaker 1: saying that the baby boom generation has not been saving 130 00:08:15,160 --> 00:08:19,080 Speaker 1: enough for retirement. Savings has picked up, but it picked 131 00:08:19,160 --> 00:08:22,120 Speaker 1: up primarily because of all the uncertainty around the Great 132 00:08:22,120 --> 00:08:26,120 Speaker 1: Financial Crisis. People. People were shocked by the by the 133 00:08:26,200 --> 00:08:29,080 Speaker 1: drop in home prices, people were shocked by the huge 134 00:08:29,160 --> 00:08:33,600 Speaker 1: drop in in asset values. Uh. All this uncertainty says 135 00:08:33,640 --> 00:08:36,960 Speaker 1: we need to save more. Of course, that is that 136 00:08:37,200 --> 00:08:40,200 Speaker 1: is one of the drags on consumer spending. More you say, 137 00:08:40,240 --> 00:08:42,880 Speaker 1: the less you spend. Uh, that was a drag. That 138 00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:45,200 Speaker 1: was a drag coming out of the out of the 139 00:08:45,880 --> 00:08:50,439 Speaker 1: out of the recession. Uh. Saving has been wiggling around, 140 00:08:50,440 --> 00:08:52,120 Speaker 1: but it's been a little more stable. I would say, 141 00:08:52,160 --> 00:08:54,280 Speaker 1: what are you doing us for Halloween? What am I 142 00:08:54,320 --> 00:08:56,480 Speaker 1: worry for Halloween? Are you going this? John Maynard? Keys 143 00:08:59,120 --> 00:09:01,600 Speaker 1: those jewel man, I've got a mask on the front, 144 00:09:01,600 --> 00:09:03,960 Speaker 1: a mask on the back. On the front, I'm going 145 00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:06,719 Speaker 1: as Irving Fisher and my mask in the back is 146 00:09:06,760 --> 00:09:10,080 Speaker 1: the vice chairman, Stanley Fisher. So I'm going as Fisher 147 00:09:10,120 --> 00:09:13,400 Speaker 1: Fisher for Hello. We think anybody will get it on 148 00:09:13,440 --> 00:09:16,120 Speaker 1: the upper east side? What do you think, David? Come 149 00:09:16,160 --> 00:09:18,800 Speaker 1: on if they get it in Brooklyn? Right? Yeah, you're 150 00:09:18,800 --> 00:09:21,319 Speaker 1: going as a kil farmer, right of course, of course 151 00:09:21,720 --> 00:09:25,080 Speaker 1: I'll have my my backpack laden with I'm afraid to 152 00:09:25,120 --> 00:09:28,559 Speaker 1: ask what the girl offspring? How you're going to embarrass them? 153 00:09:28,800 --> 00:09:32,079 Speaker 1: Halloween be safe today. Let's let's I just want to 154 00:09:32,160 --> 00:09:35,600 Speaker 1: rip up the script on Job's Day. This job's day 155 00:09:35,640 --> 00:09:38,920 Speaker 1: is a big deal. December's job days a bigger deal, 156 00:09:39,080 --> 00:09:43,480 Speaker 1: right absolutely? I mean this, This Job's Day is not 157 00:09:43,520 --> 00:09:47,280 Speaker 1: going to affect what the Fed? Uh, what what the 158 00:09:47,280 --> 00:09:52,800 Speaker 1: Fed's up to? It will raise raise the issue of 159 00:09:52,800 --> 00:09:57,679 Speaker 1: December if if there's an unusually weak number um and 160 00:09:57,720 --> 00:10:02,760 Speaker 1: followed up by another one h uh in early December. 161 00:10:03,080 --> 00:10:10,200 Speaker 1: But at this point that you know, it's uh. I 162 00:10:10,240 --> 00:10:15,000 Speaker 1: think we're looking for something in the range on payrolls. 163 00:10:15,360 --> 00:10:18,199 Speaker 1: We're looking for maybe a little bit further updrift and 164 00:10:18,280 --> 00:10:21,400 Speaker 1: average early earnings and this is right on track for 165 00:10:21,400 --> 00:10:26,280 Speaker 1: for FED moving ahead. David Girl, December two, December two ish. Yes, 166 00:10:29,200 --> 00:10:30,800 Speaker 1: we've got an ECB meeting on the heels of down 167 00:10:30,800 --> 00:10:33,439 Speaker 1: of the eighth I believe. But yep, Peter, in a 168 00:10:33,480 --> 00:10:35,079 Speaker 1: recent note, you said here we see a good chance 169 00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:38,400 Speaker 1: of substantial further step down in the unemployment rate. What 170 00:10:38,400 --> 00:10:40,760 Speaker 1: what leads you to think that could be the case. Well, 171 00:10:41,040 --> 00:10:44,160 Speaker 1: the unemployee rate has leveled off over the last year 172 00:10:44,720 --> 00:10:50,000 Speaker 1: because labor force participation has picked up pretty significantly. Uh. 173 00:10:50,200 --> 00:10:54,120 Speaker 1: The there's a secular downtrend and labor force participation because 174 00:10:54,160 --> 00:10:57,560 Speaker 1: of demographics, largely the retirement of the Baby Boom generation 175 00:10:58,040 --> 00:11:01,720 Speaker 1: taking about a quarter percentage point per year, and that 176 00:11:02,920 --> 00:11:06,320 Speaker 1: adds has a substantial impact on on the unemployer right 177 00:11:06,360 --> 00:11:08,280 Speaker 1: if it if it backs up, and it has, it's 178 00:11:08,400 --> 00:11:11,720 Speaker 1: enough to level of things out. Uh. If if it 179 00:11:11,800 --> 00:11:16,199 Speaker 1: resumes its downtrend, um the unemploint rate with with something 180 00:11:16,200 --> 00:11:19,240 Speaker 1: anything in the neighborhood of one fifty on payrolls, unemployment 181 00:11:19,280 --> 00:11:23,000 Speaker 1: rate is going to fall somewhere between three quarters of 182 00:11:23,040 --> 00:11:26,120 Speaker 1: a percentage point and one percent over the next year. 183 00:11:26,240 --> 00:11:31,160 Speaker 1: That's how powerful that downtrend is. UM. So we think 184 00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:35,199 Speaker 1: that the labor force particiation participation rate picked up over 185 00:11:35,240 --> 00:11:37,599 Speaker 1: the last year, not so much because a lot of 186 00:11:37,640 --> 00:11:41,080 Speaker 1: people are coming back in, but because the rate of 187 00:11:41,559 --> 00:11:44,920 Speaker 1: people who are unemployed long term unemployed actually leaving the 188 00:11:45,000 --> 00:11:49,400 Speaker 1: labor force has dropped off. UH. That says that sometime 189 00:11:49,440 --> 00:11:51,719 Speaker 1: in the next six months you could see a resumption 190 00:11:51,760 --> 00:11:55,120 Speaker 1: move toward a bit of a downtrend and labor force participation. 191 00:11:55,840 --> 00:12:00,559 Speaker 1: That says that unemployment UM begins to trend down. Word again, 192 00:12:00,920 --> 00:12:03,320 Speaker 1: you and your colleagues did a masterful job. You're going 193 00:12:03,320 --> 00:12:06,440 Speaker 1: through what was discussed at the Boston FEDS Economic Conference 194 00:12:06,440 --> 00:12:09,680 Speaker 1: on Octilly the fourteenth, that, of course we're fed share 195 00:12:09,760 --> 00:12:13,040 Speaker 1: Yellen suggested it might be wise to or there might 196 00:12:13,080 --> 00:12:15,440 Speaker 1: be a rationale for running the economy in a more 197 00:12:15,520 --> 00:12:18,160 Speaker 1: high pressure state. To what degree you think that's going 198 00:12:18,200 --> 00:12:21,600 Speaker 1: to be discussed tomorrow and Wednesday around that giant conference 199 00:12:21,600 --> 00:12:25,120 Speaker 1: table in the Equals Building in Washington, And and do 200 00:12:25,160 --> 00:12:28,120 Speaker 1: you think there's much agreement there among policy makers that 201 00:12:28,120 --> 00:12:29,719 Speaker 1: it's something that they you know, that they could be 202 00:12:29,760 --> 00:12:33,560 Speaker 1: heading towards Um, you know, I think when when Jane 203 00:12:33,679 --> 00:12:36,280 Speaker 1: Yellen raised the Center speech, she was sort of asking 204 00:12:36,320 --> 00:12:40,720 Speaker 1: the question, and her speech was more to raise issues 205 00:12:40,760 --> 00:12:46,880 Speaker 1: that warrant further research by macroeconomists in the years to come. Um, 206 00:12:46,920 --> 00:12:51,120 Speaker 1: I'm not expecting a theme to the central theme of 207 00:12:51,120 --> 00:12:54,480 Speaker 1: the discussion be it's time to run the economy at 208 00:12:54,480 --> 00:12:59,000 Speaker 1: a hotter level. Uh, in a serious way until until 209 00:12:59,559 --> 00:13:02,600 Speaker 1: you know, next year. If indeed the unemployed rate stage 210 00:13:02,600 --> 00:13:06,719 Speaker 1: starts declining significantly, this becomes an issue for FED discussion. 211 00:13:06,960 --> 00:13:10,560 Speaker 1: So far, however, we're not there. Dr Banky Dean Mackie 212 00:13:10,840 --> 00:13:13,079 Speaker 1: Barklay is now at point seven two with Steve Cohen 213 00:13:13,760 --> 00:13:17,440 Speaker 1: has said for quarters the migration here is to four 214 00:13:17,520 --> 00:13:21,920 Speaker 1: point zero percent unemployment. Can I make some news this morning? 215 00:13:22,240 --> 00:13:26,200 Speaker 1: Is a major house like Peter Hooper, agree with Dr Mackie. Okay, 216 00:13:26,400 --> 00:13:30,080 Speaker 1: our house call is for unemployment getting down into the 217 00:13:30,120 --> 00:13:34,760 Speaker 1: mid fours over the next year. But okay, alright, okay, 218 00:13:34,880 --> 00:13:37,400 Speaker 1: it's Halloween. You want to risk Uh, they're not my 219 00:13:37,480 --> 00:13:40,920 Speaker 1: fishure fisher there. Certainly I will tell you it's pure 220 00:13:40,960 --> 00:13:44,640 Speaker 1: arithmetic that if okay, if pure arithmetic that if a 221 00:13:44,720 --> 00:13:50,359 Speaker 1: labor force participation rate resumes its downtrend, secular downtrend. Okay, 222 00:13:50,640 --> 00:13:53,440 Speaker 1: if the economy continues to grow two percent and productivity 223 00:13:53,440 --> 00:13:57,000 Speaker 1: hasn't picked up, will be below four percent by the 224 00:13:57,080 --> 00:14:00,160 Speaker 1: end of next year. Let's leave it there, Peter, Thank 225 00:14:00,160 --> 00:14:02,360 Speaker 1: you news. This one that's shocking, folks, you heard it. 226 00:14:02,880 --> 00:14:05,199 Speaker 1: I believe folks that David Gurry. I think that's the 227 00:14:05,280 --> 00:14:09,000 Speaker 1: first I would suggest, yes for what we've heard. I 228 00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:11,120 Speaker 1: want to I wanna. I want to suggest that DARTR. 229 00:14:11,200 --> 00:14:14,120 Speaker 1: Hooper did not make a point forecast there or estimate 230 00:14:14,679 --> 00:14:17,960 Speaker 1: he are or both. He suggested those would be the 231 00:14:18,000 --> 00:14:21,600 Speaker 1: trends given this, that and the other thing. That's not 232 00:14:21,640 --> 00:14:26,200 Speaker 1: the same because an official, Mr Cry, And don't let's 233 00:14:26,200 --> 00:14:28,560 Speaker 1: be sure is badge still works? Mr Cry. That's all 234 00:14:28,600 --> 00:14:41,560 Speaker 1: we ask Peter Hooper, thank you so much. I want 235 00:14:41,560 --> 00:14:43,360 Speaker 1: to bring in Steve Whiting now. He is the chief 236 00:14:43,400 --> 00:14:46,800 Speaker 1: global strategist at City Private Bank. A real pleasure to 237 00:14:46,840 --> 00:14:48,960 Speaker 1: have him here. And I want to start with with 238 00:14:49,000 --> 00:14:52,440 Speaker 1: the bond market. Steve. I look at the FED minutes, 239 00:14:52,480 --> 00:14:54,560 Speaker 1: I look at the Fed statements. I listened to Mario 240 00:14:54,640 --> 00:14:57,520 Speaker 1: Draggy a week and a half ago, and I wonder 241 00:14:57,600 --> 00:14:59,680 Speaker 1: hear how much uncertainty remains when it comes to to 242 00:14:59,720 --> 00:15:01,760 Speaker 1: monta terry policy in light of what we have looking 243 00:15:01,760 --> 00:15:03,240 Speaker 1: at w I R P here, the probability of a 244 00:15:03,280 --> 00:15:06,000 Speaker 1: hike at you know, the heels of this FED meeting seventeen, 245 00:15:06,880 --> 00:15:10,760 Speaker 1: how much uncertainty remains when it comes to central banks. Well, 246 00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:14,440 Speaker 1: I think they're coming into a path that sort of 247 00:15:14,640 --> 00:15:19,000 Speaker 1: makes sense now for two thousand and seventeen. When you 248 00:15:19,000 --> 00:15:21,960 Speaker 1: think about the period when interest rate hikes really became 249 00:15:22,080 --> 00:15:25,480 Speaker 1: credible in two thousand and fourteen, the markets and the 250 00:15:25,520 --> 00:15:28,800 Speaker 1: said were very far apart the idea that they'll do 251 00:15:29,000 --> 00:15:31,440 Speaker 1: one step now before the end of the year and 252 00:15:31,480 --> 00:15:35,000 Speaker 1: two quarter point tightenings next year. And as Janet Yellen 253 00:15:35,120 --> 00:15:38,560 Speaker 1: said at Jackson Hole, that was the course if there 254 00:15:38,600 --> 00:15:42,320 Speaker 1: is a shop free outlook, Um, that is now sort 255 00:15:42,320 --> 00:15:44,560 Speaker 1: of a reasonable course that we could be on, particularly 256 00:15:44,600 --> 00:15:48,040 Speaker 1: with that qualification that, um, if there are no outside shocks, 257 00:15:48,200 --> 00:15:50,280 Speaker 1: you know, history is stilled with them, and there have 258 00:15:50,400 --> 00:15:53,880 Speaker 1: been FED tightenings through those periods and they couldn't control everything. 259 00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:56,160 Speaker 1: But now I think that this is a path that 260 00:15:56,200 --> 00:15:58,680 Speaker 1: we're sort of the hawks and the doves can both 261 00:15:58,680 --> 00:16:00,800 Speaker 1: take that road together and see if you're not you're 262 00:16:00,840 --> 00:16:04,280 Speaker 1: not writing off November rate rise completely, are you you know, 263 00:16:04,360 --> 00:16:07,800 Speaker 1: in my gut, I just can't completely do that. Um. 264 00:16:07,840 --> 00:16:11,800 Speaker 1: The fact that they didn't even mention the weakness in 265 00:16:11,840 --> 00:16:14,640 Speaker 1: the pervasive weakness and economic data in the month of August, 266 00:16:15,520 --> 00:16:18,160 Speaker 1: when you know they followed up in September with a 267 00:16:18,240 --> 00:16:21,560 Speaker 1: pause in three decents. You know first said that is 268 00:16:21,640 --> 00:16:25,320 Speaker 1: not political, just the absence of mentioning any of the 269 00:16:25,360 --> 00:16:28,160 Speaker 1: weak economic news, perhaps so that it doesn't fall into 270 00:16:28,200 --> 00:16:32,080 Speaker 1: a political context. It just strikes me that with um 271 00:16:32,160 --> 00:16:36,440 Speaker 1: so much information arguing for a tightening, that just deciding 272 00:16:36,480 --> 00:16:38,720 Speaker 1: to wait to December, it's just hard to say that 273 00:16:38,720 --> 00:16:42,320 Speaker 1: that it's entirely off the table. December obviously seems more likely, 274 00:16:42,360 --> 00:16:45,040 Speaker 1: and the historical proclivity is to the said not the 275 00:16:45,120 --> 00:16:48,280 Speaker 1: tighten right ahead of political events. But um, I just 276 00:16:48,320 --> 00:16:50,280 Speaker 1: note that one play this play is after me a 277 00:16:50,320 --> 00:16:52,160 Speaker 1: little bit here, because we've heard time and time again 278 00:16:52,240 --> 00:16:56,240 Speaker 1: they won't raise rates because of the election. How could 279 00:16:56,240 --> 00:16:58,440 Speaker 1: you see those two events interacting with with one another. 280 00:16:58,480 --> 00:17:00,640 Speaker 1: In other words, if they were to raise it's in November, 281 00:17:00,640 --> 00:17:02,880 Speaker 1: what what measurable effect would that have on the campaign? 282 00:17:02,920 --> 00:17:05,120 Speaker 1: On the election? As you see in Well the Strongest 283 00:17:05,200 --> 00:17:08,080 Speaker 1: argument is maybe not political, it's the sac The Federal 284 00:17:08,119 --> 00:17:11,640 Speaker 1: Reserve is not, you know, trying to impose a harsh tightening, 285 00:17:12,080 --> 00:17:15,280 Speaker 1: and markets are unprepared, have not priced in this event, 286 00:17:15,680 --> 00:17:19,800 Speaker 1: so they politely uh in. They would likely desire not 287 00:17:19,880 --> 00:17:22,320 Speaker 1: to have that outcome in the market, whereas in December, 288 00:17:22,400 --> 00:17:25,359 Speaker 1: where's entirely priced in, they're going to have less impact 289 00:17:25,359 --> 00:17:27,560 Speaker 1: in many ways that it has tried to tighten without 290 00:17:27,640 --> 00:17:30,440 Speaker 1: impact over you know, the last two years and said 291 00:17:30,480 --> 00:17:31,960 Speaker 1: only one chance and then take a look at what 292 00:17:32,040 --> 00:17:34,760 Speaker 1: happened in last December. In fact, historically the Federal Reserve 293 00:17:34,840 --> 00:17:37,720 Speaker 1: has tried to avoid. December is the period of liquidity 294 00:17:37,880 --> 00:17:40,040 Speaker 1: year and uncertainty. So they're just a little bit they 295 00:17:40,080 --> 00:17:43,080 Speaker 1: can't win situation here, but they have managed, you know, 296 00:17:43,160 --> 00:17:46,159 Speaker 1: to take down expectations so much for the course of 297 00:17:46,200 --> 00:17:49,240 Speaker 1: future tightening that they're they're okay here one way or 298 00:17:49,280 --> 00:17:54,679 Speaker 1: the other. Does inflation say next year, Steve writing, I 299 00:17:54,720 --> 00:17:58,240 Speaker 1: think inflation comes back just simply on the oil price rise. 300 00:17:59,080 --> 00:18:01,440 Speaker 1: And you know, the depending on how the American economy 301 00:18:01,480 --> 00:18:04,040 Speaker 1: forms and how willing the fit of Reserve is to 302 00:18:04,200 --> 00:18:07,320 Speaker 1: go in a different direction from other central banks and 303 00:18:07,480 --> 00:18:10,399 Speaker 1: will dictate the path of the exchange rate and you know, 304 00:18:10,600 --> 00:18:13,680 Speaker 1: a meaningful dampening effect from goods prices. You know we 305 00:18:13,760 --> 00:18:16,639 Speaker 1: were on earlier. I don't think that you're going to 306 00:18:16,720 --> 00:18:19,200 Speaker 1: see the kind of inflation with a life of its 307 00:18:19,200 --> 00:18:22,879 Speaker 1: own where demands that year after year year it's going 308 00:18:22,920 --> 00:18:26,120 Speaker 1: to be a bounce. Yeah, And I like that framework. 309 00:18:26,160 --> 00:18:28,480 Speaker 1: Stephen Winding with his folks, and Stephen Winding is an 310 00:18:28,560 --> 00:18:33,919 Speaker 1: economist and a strategist, links in earnings, revenues and the 311 00:18:34,000 --> 00:18:39,719 Speaker 1: dynamics of profitability of corporations into our greatest greater economy, Stephen, 312 00:18:39,720 --> 00:18:42,680 Speaker 1: and it will be a changed world if we get 313 00:18:42,680 --> 00:18:46,640 Speaker 1: a villain bowder economy and others that have frankly been 314 00:18:46,680 --> 00:18:51,120 Speaker 1: more optimistic than city group migrating towards the city group 315 00:18:51,280 --> 00:18:54,280 Speaker 1: level of g d P somewhere in the vicinity of 316 00:18:54,320 --> 00:18:59,399 Speaker 1: two point zero percent some south, some north. Isn't that 317 00:18:59,640 --> 00:19:03,760 Speaker 1: unex acceptable to the animal spirit of the country. Isn't 318 00:19:03,760 --> 00:19:08,480 Speaker 1: that unacceptable to develop corporate confidence? Look, I think one 319 00:19:08,520 --> 00:19:12,399 Speaker 1: of the hard questions has to be when we have 320 00:19:12,920 --> 00:19:16,560 Speaker 1: nearly two hundred thousand jobs created on average per month 321 00:19:16,640 --> 00:19:20,040 Speaker 1: for seven years, you know what in terms of headcount 322 00:19:20,640 --> 00:19:25,040 Speaker 1: looks like a you know, very significant tightening of labor markets. 323 00:19:25,040 --> 00:19:28,040 Speaker 1: But output growth is slow and so much is out 324 00:19:28,040 --> 00:19:30,880 Speaker 1: of control of policy makers. You know, we can do 325 00:19:30,960 --> 00:19:35,439 Speaker 1: things ideally to incentivize labor force participation, to get people 326 00:19:35,480 --> 00:19:38,359 Speaker 1: looking at the incentives to work and go back, um 327 00:19:38,520 --> 00:19:41,280 Speaker 1: when it comes to productivity growth. You know the technology 328 00:19:41,359 --> 00:19:44,560 Speaker 1: surprises uh that we have seen, you know, for one, 329 00:19:44,600 --> 00:19:47,320 Speaker 1: in the facting sector in oil where we had a 330 00:19:47,359 --> 00:19:51,160 Speaker 1: couple of years back a dramatic windfall and output uh, 331 00:19:51,200 --> 00:19:54,600 Speaker 1: you know, a decade earlier in I T You know, 332 00:19:54,720 --> 00:19:58,080 Speaker 1: these sorts of technology surprises are not something that I 333 00:19:58,119 --> 00:20:00,800 Speaker 1: think policymakers can plan for. But wheak you think about this, 334 00:20:00,920 --> 00:20:02,560 Speaker 1: and I think it's actually a really good argument in 335 00:20:02,600 --> 00:20:05,600 Speaker 1: favor of potential optimism. Is that when you're down, you know, 336 00:20:05,680 --> 00:20:09,359 Speaker 1: near early nineteen eighties lows on this, and you see 337 00:20:09,480 --> 00:20:12,680 Speaker 1: enough things going around in the technology front, we might 338 00:20:12,720 --> 00:20:15,200 Speaker 1: actually one of these days we're not going to get 339 00:20:15,240 --> 00:20:18,000 Speaker 1: just downside surprises and growths. To cut to the chase 340 00:20:18,600 --> 00:20:21,280 Speaker 1: and what's what's interesting to me and help me here, 341 00:20:21,280 --> 00:20:23,679 Speaker 1: Stephen Whiting and David Gura jump in here as someone 342 00:20:23,680 --> 00:20:26,840 Speaker 1: of wisdom as well. I saw an Apple commercial this 343 00:20:26,880 --> 00:20:29,560 Speaker 1: weekend which is a bunch of you know, millennials. You 344 00:20:29,600 --> 00:20:32,120 Speaker 1: want to punch there, you know the whole Apple techie 345 00:20:32,480 --> 00:20:35,320 Speaker 1: gorgeous thing. You want to punch all of them. But 346 00:20:35,400 --> 00:20:39,320 Speaker 1: the basic idea is that technology of Apple using your 347 00:20:39,359 --> 00:20:44,639 Speaker 1: iPhone to do qt C pie selfies. That's productivity, robotics, 348 00:20:44,920 --> 00:20:48,520 Speaker 1: e commerce. Um. You know the fact that the e 349 00:20:48,600 --> 00:20:52,400 Speaker 1: commerce sector is sort of displacing you know, standard commerce 350 00:20:52,480 --> 00:20:56,119 Speaker 1: with a lot less labor input, and people are a 351 00:20:56,200 --> 00:20:59,520 Speaker 1: little bit happy not having you know, massive amounts of 352 00:20:59,560 --> 00:21:02,840 Speaker 1: speculum at inventory across you know, millions of square miles 353 00:21:02,920 --> 00:21:04,960 Speaker 1: across the United States. You know where somebody might just 354 00:21:05,040 --> 00:21:07,199 Speaker 1: walk in and happen to buy it. There is a 355 00:21:07,240 --> 00:21:11,440 Speaker 1: technology like that which is in fact disruptive. Uh. You 356 00:21:11,560 --> 00:21:14,240 Speaker 1: know these sorts of things where you have some resources 357 00:21:15,000 --> 00:21:18,280 Speaker 1: again on the sidelines that you can redeploy. That's how 358 00:21:19,119 --> 00:21:22,639 Speaker 1: you know, real income rogers per person. That reminded me 359 00:21:22,840 --> 00:21:24,959 Speaker 1: of a very vivid moment from stand fisher speech at 360 00:21:25,000 --> 00:21:27,200 Speaker 1: the Economic Club of New York in which he's urged 361 00:21:27,240 --> 00:21:29,120 Speaker 1: by a colleague to take a subway ride to see 362 00:21:29,119 --> 00:21:32,280 Speaker 1: everybody using you sing there iPods. I thought that was 363 00:21:32,560 --> 00:21:34,680 Speaker 1: I thought that was just great. We were talking with 364 00:21:34,920 --> 00:21:37,680 Speaker 1: Peter Peter a few moments ago about his take on 365 00:21:37,760 --> 00:21:40,520 Speaker 1: Janet Yellen speech at the FED conference in Boston a 366 00:21:40,520 --> 00:21:42,840 Speaker 1: little while back, and so much of that conference had 367 00:21:42,880 --> 00:21:46,200 Speaker 1: to do with productivity. Alan Krueger spoke there as well. 368 00:21:46,760 --> 00:21:48,840 Speaker 1: When you look at demographics, how much do you just 369 00:21:49,680 --> 00:21:51,760 Speaker 1: raise up your hands in defeat here? How much can 370 00:21:51,800 --> 00:21:53,440 Speaker 1: the FED do? How much can anyone do about the 371 00:21:53,520 --> 00:21:57,400 Speaker 1: demographic picture we're seeing in this country right now? Well, um, 372 00:21:57,720 --> 00:22:00,560 Speaker 1: aging is not something we're going to do anything about. 373 00:22:00,600 --> 00:22:04,199 Speaker 1: It's it's the course of history and where it will go. 374 00:22:04,800 --> 00:22:10,560 Speaker 1: I think raising labor force participation for older workers is ideal. Um. 375 00:22:10,640 --> 00:22:13,080 Speaker 1: What striking is in the list seven years, with the 376 00:22:13,119 --> 00:22:16,439 Speaker 1: exception the last twelve months. Um, you know, we were 377 00:22:16,440 --> 00:22:20,600 Speaker 1: seeing labor force participation undershoot anything that demographics could explain. 378 00:22:20,960 --> 00:22:24,639 Speaker 1: People between five and fifty five were not in the 379 00:22:24,720 --> 00:22:28,040 Speaker 1: labor force US as they were predicted to be. It's 380 00:22:28,040 --> 00:22:30,520 Speaker 1: been remarkably weak on that front. And you know, for 381 00:22:30,600 --> 00:22:33,080 Speaker 1: us to see in the last twelve months three million 382 00:22:33,359 --> 00:22:37,280 Speaker 1: people come back and search for jobs is pretty striking. 383 00:22:37,320 --> 00:22:40,720 Speaker 1: That's another big forecast miss. Both the short fall and 384 00:22:40,760 --> 00:22:44,080 Speaker 1: now the improvement are other size that the forecasting is 385 00:22:44,119 --> 00:22:46,280 Speaker 1: getting better that we've We've talked a ton on this 386 00:22:46,320 --> 00:22:53,280 Speaker 1: program just about the deficits of of FED forecasting. Uh sure, 387 00:22:53,640 --> 00:22:55,800 Speaker 1: the FED and others, but you know, how do we 388 00:22:55,840 --> 00:23:03,800 Speaker 1: forecast better? Uh information, being able to take real time 389 00:23:04,720 --> 00:23:09,119 Speaker 1: digital information on sales production in the economy, These sorts 390 00:23:09,119 --> 00:23:12,480 Speaker 1: of things that we probably don't fund very well. Improving 391 00:23:12,480 --> 00:23:14,919 Speaker 1: these sorts of things can help. Um. You know, if 392 00:23:14,920 --> 00:23:17,000 Speaker 1: people are looking for the answers to like how to 393 00:23:17,040 --> 00:23:20,480 Speaker 1: make you know financial markets les volatil, that's a different story. 394 00:23:20,560 --> 00:23:22,960 Speaker 1: You know, we can people will always try harder to 395 00:23:23,119 --> 00:23:27,200 Speaker 1: get uh some better forecast, and you know, it becomes 396 00:23:27,600 --> 00:23:29,480 Speaker 1: a little bit like high frequency trade. Think it's a 397 00:23:29,680 --> 00:23:32,359 Speaker 1: it's a race for speed, but it won't necessarily improve everything. 398 00:23:32,520 --> 00:23:37,160 Speaker 1: That's an important point. What is your confidence in your 399 00:23:37,240 --> 00:23:40,960 Speaker 1: guestiments of C plus I plus G plus n x, 400 00:23:41,080 --> 00:23:44,679 Speaker 1: particularly after the first look we saw third quarter? Do 401 00:23:44,680 --> 00:23:49,359 Speaker 1: you have a belief that you can gain the adjustments 402 00:23:49,359 --> 00:23:52,160 Speaker 1: of third quarter or the reality of this fourth quarter 403 00:23:52,720 --> 00:23:56,120 Speaker 1: across consumption, investment, government, and exports. I think we can 404 00:23:56,119 --> 00:23:59,199 Speaker 1: interpret it reasonably well that the first cance of the 405 00:23:59,280 --> 00:24:03,000 Speaker 1: year had some shortfalls. We didn't believe growth would be 406 00:24:03,119 --> 00:24:07,080 Speaker 1: just one, and so what's happened in the third quarter 407 00:24:07,200 --> 00:24:09,520 Speaker 1: is a bit of a correction for that. UM. Some 408 00:24:09,600 --> 00:24:11,720 Speaker 1: of the contributions to growth are you know, not looking 409 00:24:11,800 --> 00:24:13,919 Speaker 1: so great as of course in the third quarter. But 410 00:24:14,000 --> 00:24:16,040 Speaker 1: you know, put that in the context of let's look 411 00:24:16,080 --> 00:24:18,040 Speaker 1: back at the last couple of quarters, and it balances 412 00:24:18,080 --> 00:24:21,040 Speaker 1: out roughly where we think we are, which is UM, 413 00:24:21,240 --> 00:24:23,399 Speaker 1: certainly better than one, but probably not as good as 414 00:24:23,440 --> 00:24:26,880 Speaker 1: do nine. I wanna ask you about energy. We see 415 00:24:26,920 --> 00:24:30,600 Speaker 1: oil prices here hovering below fifty dollars a barrel. We 416 00:24:30,840 --> 00:24:32,600 Speaker 1: had another OPEC meeting this weekend that came to no 417 00:24:32,720 --> 00:24:35,000 Speaker 1: result other than them just accurring they're going to continue 418 00:24:35,040 --> 00:24:39,399 Speaker 1: talking about production cuts for production freeze. How much is 419 00:24:39,440 --> 00:24:42,199 Speaker 1: oil weighing on the markets right now? UM, only a 420 00:24:42,240 --> 00:24:45,920 Speaker 1: little because sort of the absolute level of distress that 421 00:24:46,080 --> 00:24:48,639 Speaker 1: we were in around the beginning of the year, whereas 422 00:24:48,640 --> 00:24:52,560 Speaker 1: a variety of things, petro dollar portfolio holders in a 423 00:24:52,600 --> 00:24:57,440 Speaker 1: state of distress, selling assets outside of petroleum. UM solvency 424 00:24:57,600 --> 00:25:00,520 Speaker 1: becoming more of a broad question beyond ty of the 425 00:25:00,520 --> 00:25:04,040 Speaker 1: oil price itself being so high, they were contracts to 426 00:25:04,080 --> 00:25:08,160 Speaker 1: sell oil UH and fifteen dollars that were sold in January, 427 00:25:08,640 --> 00:25:11,560 Speaker 1: and so I think we can look at the last 428 00:25:11,920 --> 00:25:15,800 Speaker 1: you know two years were investment spending to seek out 429 00:25:16,400 --> 00:25:20,720 Speaker 1: new oil, to maintain the capital stock and oil that 430 00:25:20,840 --> 00:25:22,800 Speaker 1: you know, this is the path forward for oil. It's 431 00:25:22,840 --> 00:25:26,560 Speaker 1: not going to be a better agreements between different actors, 432 00:25:26,840 --> 00:25:29,520 Speaker 1: you know, gentlemen's agreements to do this through that. It's 433 00:25:29,560 --> 00:25:32,639 Speaker 1: really going to be about high cost producers simply not 434 00:25:32,720 --> 00:25:36,439 Speaker 1: being there in the future. Thank you so much, Stephen, 435 00:25:36,480 --> 00:25:48,760 Speaker 1: Winning City Private Bank as well. Who you put your 436 00:25:48,760 --> 00:25:52,679 Speaker 1: trust in matters. Investors have put their trust in independent 437 00:25:52,800 --> 00:25:56,640 Speaker 1: registered investment advisors to the tune of four trillion dollars. 438 00:25:56,840 --> 00:26:00,440 Speaker 1: Why they see their roles to serve, not sell. That's 439 00:26:00,440 --> 00:26:04,000 Speaker 1: why Charles Schwab is committed to the success over seven 440 00:26:04,040 --> 00:26:10,359 Speaker 1: thousand independent financial advisors who passionately dedicate themselves to helping 441 00:26:10,400 --> 00:26:15,200 Speaker 1: people achieve their financial goals. Learn more at find your 442 00:26:15,280 --> 00:26:25,399 Speaker 1: Independent Advisor dot com. It is a perfect time to 443 00:26:25,520 --> 00:26:29,040 Speaker 1: speak with Stephen Lawrence Ratner. I urge you to peruce 444 00:26:29,080 --> 00:26:33,320 Speaker 1: his Wikipedia over a most collected career with will of 445 00:26:33,400 --> 00:26:37,439 Speaker 1: advisors full disclosure. Managing much of the assets of the 446 00:26:37,480 --> 00:26:39,879 Speaker 1: former mayor of New York. Michael Bloomberg, of course a 447 00:26:39,920 --> 00:26:43,000 Speaker 1: majority owner of this UH station. Steve Rattner, I want 448 00:26:43,000 --> 00:26:47,080 Speaker 1: to go back to original sin. You were the leader 449 00:26:47,080 --> 00:26:50,960 Speaker 1: of the Presidential Task Force on the auto industry. You 450 00:26:51,119 --> 00:26:53,880 Speaker 1: had laptops where you had to you know, you had 451 00:26:53,920 --> 00:26:58,320 Speaker 1: sensitive stuff on it. How in God's name did this happen? 452 00:26:58,560 --> 00:27:05,199 Speaker 1: How did six hundred and fifty jillion thousand emails were 453 00:27:06,160 --> 00:27:11,320 Speaker 1: whatever we get getting on get on private computers. I 454 00:27:11,359 --> 00:27:15,960 Speaker 1: don't get it off the clarity of a senior cabinet office. Well, 455 00:27:15,960 --> 00:27:20,280 Speaker 1: first of all, the six emails were heavily Anthony we 456 00:27:20,359 --> 00:27:23,040 Speaker 1: think assume are heavily Anthony Weens emails rather than he 457 00:27:23,240 --> 00:27:27,080 Speaker 1: was right. But but look they were they they broke 458 00:27:27,119 --> 00:27:31,920 Speaker 1: the rules. They were conducting State Department business on private computers. 459 00:27:32,000 --> 00:27:35,160 Speaker 1: Whether it's Anthony and Donald Trump is not completely wrong. 460 00:27:35,560 --> 00:27:40,280 Speaker 1: Potentially Anthony Weiner had access to State Department information, whether 461 00:27:40,320 --> 00:27:42,080 Speaker 1: it was classified or not, that he should not have 462 00:27:42,119 --> 00:27:44,680 Speaker 1: had access. In the crush, You're sitting on the tarmac 463 00:27:44,720 --> 00:27:46,920 Speaker 1: at LaGuardia. You've got to get to Detroit to bail 464 00:27:46,960 --> 00:27:51,040 Speaker 1: out the auto business. At times you must have done 465 00:27:51,080 --> 00:27:53,480 Speaker 1: this original sin right, Well, let me say two things. 466 00:27:53,560 --> 00:27:55,880 Speaker 1: First of all, we had we did have in my case, 467 00:27:55,960 --> 00:27:59,199 Speaker 1: Treasury Department issued blackberries and so on, so there was 468 00:27:59,240 --> 00:28:02,960 Speaker 1: a way to commune kate through the official system. That said, 469 00:28:03,359 --> 00:28:06,120 Speaker 1: I think anyone who's worked in the government, particularly back 470 00:28:06,160 --> 00:28:08,680 Speaker 1: then when the technology was not very robust, would tell 471 00:28:08,720 --> 00:28:11,360 Speaker 1: you that a certain amount of government business does get 472 00:28:11,400 --> 00:28:14,359 Speaker 1: done on personal devices. That is just the reality, as 473 00:28:14,359 --> 00:28:18,000 Speaker 1: you say, of sitting on the tarmac at LaGuardia. But 474 00:28:18,359 --> 00:28:21,800 Speaker 1: in this case, all government business was done off of 475 00:28:21,800 --> 00:28:24,720 Speaker 1: the government server, and that's I think a different kettle 476 00:28:24,720 --> 00:28:27,000 Speaker 1: of fish. In all fairness to everybody, what I wanna 477 00:28:27,000 --> 00:28:28,959 Speaker 1: say next is by no means trying to excuse anything 478 00:28:29,000 --> 00:28:31,520 Speaker 1: that happened here. But when I was reporting in Washington, 479 00:28:31,520 --> 00:28:33,160 Speaker 1: it was not uncommon for me to talk to government 480 00:28:33,160 --> 00:28:36,840 Speaker 1: officials who complained about the updated nous the quality of 481 00:28:36,840 --> 00:28:40,560 Speaker 1: the technology they were using. Stepping aside from the politics 482 00:28:40,600 --> 00:28:43,800 Speaker 1: of this whole matter, what does it say about our 483 00:28:43,840 --> 00:28:47,560 Speaker 1: government's ability to control data, or to to have systems 484 00:28:47,560 --> 00:28:50,360 Speaker 1: in place that works seamlessly so that we can transfer 485 00:28:50,400 --> 00:28:52,640 Speaker 1: information where it's appropriate, from one person to the other. 486 00:28:53,440 --> 00:28:56,720 Speaker 1: It says that our government, not totally surprisingly is behind 487 00:28:56,720 --> 00:29:00,280 Speaker 1: the curve with respect to technology and implement at the 488 00:29:00,560 --> 00:29:02,960 Speaker 1: systems at least we had back then, as you suggest, 489 00:29:03,280 --> 00:29:07,600 Speaker 1: for operating within the total confines of the Treasury, in 490 00:29:07,960 --> 00:29:13,240 Speaker 1: my case, were incredibly difficult and incredibly ornerary. But all 491 00:29:13,280 --> 00:29:15,080 Speaker 1: that said, I would also say this is not in 492 00:29:15,200 --> 00:29:18,280 Speaker 1: any way a reference to Mrs Clinton nor Whoma Aberdeen. 493 00:29:18,600 --> 00:29:21,240 Speaker 1: There were some government officials that I'm aware of, who 494 00:29:21,280 --> 00:29:25,720 Speaker 1: would conduct some government business on personal devices, particularly to 495 00:29:25,800 --> 00:29:29,680 Speaker 1: keep it from being captured within the government email uh 496 00:29:29,800 --> 00:29:33,400 Speaker 1: complex and therefore potentially subject to FOY or other disclosure. 497 00:29:33,960 --> 00:29:36,960 Speaker 1: And so we can argue about that appropriate stuff that 498 00:29:37,080 --> 00:29:39,880 Speaker 1: did go on. What's the legacy going to be here 499 00:29:39,880 --> 00:29:42,240 Speaker 1: of the wiki leaks side of things? I think back 500 00:29:42,280 --> 00:29:44,600 Speaker 1: to just last week, a new sleu of emails came 501 00:29:44,600 --> 00:29:46,920 Speaker 1: out and Marie Slaughter Form believe the State Department's Policy 502 00:29:46,920 --> 00:29:49,560 Speaker 1: Planning Office, you know, saying that she and others did 503 00:29:49,600 --> 00:29:52,680 Speaker 1: this quite regularly. I can imagine this and still some 504 00:29:52,720 --> 00:29:54,280 Speaker 1: fear and those who have worked in Washington, who work 505 00:29:54,320 --> 00:29:56,200 Speaker 1: in Washington about what's going to happen with the emails 506 00:29:56,200 --> 00:29:59,680 Speaker 1: that they've sent. Well, I think I think there's comfort 507 00:29:59,680 --> 00:30:01,600 Speaker 1: and number verse and I think there's so many people 508 00:30:01,640 --> 00:30:04,120 Speaker 1: who did take some liberties with the system, whether it 509 00:30:04,200 --> 00:30:07,520 Speaker 1: was for convenience or privacy or whatever, that you're not 510 00:30:07,560 --> 00:30:10,760 Speaker 1: going to go and prosecute five thousand former government officials. 511 00:30:10,760 --> 00:30:13,120 Speaker 1: So I think I think they're pretty safe. I think 512 00:30:13,120 --> 00:30:15,520 Speaker 1: that I assume that starting whenever you want to date 513 00:30:15,520 --> 00:30:18,800 Speaker 1: it from when this began, was nobody anymore is now 514 00:30:18,840 --> 00:30:22,360 Speaker 1: operating off of the government, you know, anyway deviating from 515 00:30:22,360 --> 00:30:24,840 Speaker 1: the government rules, and so at least we know we've 516 00:30:24,840 --> 00:30:27,880 Speaker 1: accomplished that out of all this, what's your sense of 517 00:30:27,880 --> 00:30:30,560 Speaker 1: the politics here with you know, so a few days 518 00:30:30,640 --> 00:30:32,800 Speaker 1: until the election, the timing of this, obviously, is it 519 00:30:32,880 --> 00:30:36,760 Speaker 1: still being debated and learned about. Uh, does it smell 520 00:30:36,800 --> 00:30:41,640 Speaker 1: of something to you? No? Even in terms of no, no, no, 521 00:30:41,880 --> 00:30:45,480 Speaker 1: I okay. I I think that Comey is the FBI director. 522 00:30:45,520 --> 00:30:48,040 Speaker 1: Comy is in a very tough place. I think in 523 00:30:48,240 --> 00:30:52,760 Speaker 1: question his question, debate his decisions. But I think he's 524 00:30:52,800 --> 00:30:55,600 Speaker 1: within the fairway in terms of having UH done the 525 00:30:55,600 --> 00:30:58,120 Speaker 1: best he could under a very difficult set of sin 526 00:30:58,160 --> 00:31:01,120 Speaker 1: That is a brilliant statement that the smartest thing I've 527 00:31:01,160 --> 00:31:03,200 Speaker 1: heard on all this in the less seventy two hours. 528 00:31:03,680 --> 00:31:09,560 Speaker 1: Within the fairway captures the squishiness. It makes foolish the 529 00:31:09,760 --> 00:31:13,440 Speaker 1: certitude that we're hearing from both sides. Yeah, I think 530 00:31:13,480 --> 00:31:16,400 Speaker 1: the certitude from both sides is not correct. I think 531 00:31:16,440 --> 00:31:20,960 Speaker 1: that I I agreed with Comey's decision back in July 532 00:31:21,160 --> 00:31:24,480 Speaker 1: to explain why he wasn't prosecuting Mrs Clinton because it 533 00:31:24,600 --> 00:31:27,520 Speaker 1: was such a political situation. He then went and testified 534 00:31:27,520 --> 00:31:29,600 Speaker 1: in front of Congress and promised them that if anything 535 00:31:29,640 --> 00:31:32,600 Speaker 1: else came out, he would tell them. Then they learned 536 00:31:32,600 --> 00:31:35,640 Speaker 1: about this uh Anthony Weener laptop, and then he says 537 00:31:35,680 --> 00:31:37,920 Speaker 1: to himself, well do I tell people or do I wait? 538 00:31:38,120 --> 00:31:40,360 Speaker 1: If he waits, and after the election, it turns out 539 00:31:40,400 --> 00:31:43,800 Speaker 1: he knew eleven days before the election there were thousand 540 00:31:43,880 --> 00:31:48,760 Speaker 1: other emails. He will get crucified by the Republicans. He 541 00:31:48,840 --> 00:31:51,920 Speaker 1: brings it out. Now he's being crucified by the Democrats. 542 00:31:51,960 --> 00:31:53,440 Speaker 1: So it is kind of it is a kind of 543 00:31:53,520 --> 00:31:57,719 Speaker 1: equal opportunity, crucified crucifixion that's going on of him. And 544 00:31:57,760 --> 00:31:59,480 Speaker 1: I think he kind of did what he had to 545 00:31:59,520 --> 00:32:02,120 Speaker 1: do on of the circumstances he was faced with. Steve 546 00:32:02,160 --> 00:32:04,680 Speaker 1: I tried to do a balanced approach. I had comments 547 00:32:04,680 --> 00:32:09,040 Speaker 1: from Attorney General holder and from Attorney General Mcasey uh 548 00:32:09,080 --> 00:32:14,000 Speaker 1: this morning. Mr mckasey representing public Service with George bush 549 00:32:14,520 --> 00:32:20,880 Speaker 1: Um emphasize the need for grand juries. Does President Clinton 550 00:32:21,040 --> 00:32:26,200 Speaker 1: move beyond the grand jury if she is president? Let 551 00:32:26,200 --> 00:32:28,160 Speaker 1: me put it this way. I'm not I'm not an 552 00:32:28,160 --> 00:32:30,080 Speaker 1: expert on grand juries, but let me put it this way. 553 00:32:30,120 --> 00:32:31,960 Speaker 1: I think one thing that none of us should be 554 00:32:31,960 --> 00:32:35,200 Speaker 1: happy about, regardless of our politics, is that if she 555 00:32:35,320 --> 00:32:37,880 Speaker 1: is elected, and I think she still will be notwithstanding 556 00:32:38,160 --> 00:32:41,080 Speaker 1: recent events, she is going to be faced with a 557 00:32:41,120 --> 00:32:44,880 Speaker 1: continuing onslaught of investigation, some of them honorable in a 558 00:32:44,920 --> 00:32:47,440 Speaker 1: sense of being by the FBI or whatever, some of 559 00:32:47,440 --> 00:32:51,640 Speaker 1: them perhaps political from Republicans on Capitol Hill. And that 560 00:32:51,800 --> 00:32:54,280 Speaker 1: is a very depressing thing to me as an American, 561 00:32:54,320 --> 00:32:56,520 Speaker 1: that we're going to start a presidency with the president 562 00:32:56,600 --> 00:33:00,760 Speaker 1: under investigation. Depressing. How difficult to make it to govern? 563 00:33:00,840 --> 00:33:03,360 Speaker 1: There are many already so many hurdles to governing, and 564 00:33:03,360 --> 00:33:06,280 Speaker 1: Washington with the kind of divisions we've seen here being 565 00:33:06,360 --> 00:33:09,000 Speaker 1: under that suspicion investigation. Call it what you will, How 566 00:33:09,040 --> 00:33:11,200 Speaker 1: hard will it make it for a President Clinton should 567 00:33:11,200 --> 00:33:13,680 Speaker 1: she be elected to govern? It is one more? It 568 00:33:13,800 --> 00:33:16,960 Speaker 1: is one more log on the fire in difficultness of governing. 569 00:33:17,000 --> 00:33:19,880 Speaker 1: She's already going to be faced almost certainly with divided government. 570 00:33:20,240 --> 00:33:22,640 Speaker 1: She's going to be faced with being elected with not 571 00:33:22,440 --> 00:33:25,200 Speaker 1: the not a great approval rating from the country, and 572 00:33:25,200 --> 00:33:27,239 Speaker 1: then you add this on top of it and an 573 00:33:27,280 --> 00:33:31,440 Speaker 1: ongoing series of investigations, and as I said, as an American, 574 00:33:31,640 --> 00:33:33,960 Speaker 1: you should be depressed. I've got to ask you the 575 00:33:34,000 --> 00:33:36,520 Speaker 1: news question just to clearly or have you been asked 576 00:33:36,520 --> 00:33:40,440 Speaker 1: to provide public service to a Clinton administration? No, and 577 00:33:41,040 --> 00:33:44,560 Speaker 1: I wouldn't. I'm very happy managing all of Mayor Bloomberg's 578 00:33:44,560 --> 00:33:48,040 Speaker 1: philanthropic assets. But I don't think they've asked. I don't 579 00:33:48,040 --> 00:33:49,880 Speaker 1: think they've asked anybody at this point. Just trying to 580 00:33:49,880 --> 00:33:51,560 Speaker 1: get it out there can get it out, so you 581 00:33:51,600 --> 00:33:55,400 Speaker 1: can ask the question President vetted to be Secretary State. 582 00:33:55,520 --> 00:33:57,600 Speaker 1: Is he the energy to be a Secretary of State? 583 00:33:57,800 --> 00:33:59,480 Speaker 1: He would be a great secretary of State, but he 584 00:33:59,560 --> 00:34:01,400 Speaker 1: said that he won't take the job. So I think 585 00:34:01,440 --> 00:34:04,240 Speaker 1: that's now off the tip. That's where your name came up. Yes, exactly, 586 00:34:05,280 --> 00:34:08,319 Speaker 1: are just like two pieces in a pod from our experience. 587 00:34:08,400 --> 00:34:11,000 Speaker 1: Thank you so much. Willing advisers with perspective and we're 588 00:34:11,040 --> 00:34:14,240 Speaker 1: trying for us, We're killing ourselves trying to be balanced. Honest, 589 00:34:14,400 --> 00:34:17,680 Speaker 1: what an uproar this weekend? I shout out again, Chuck Todd. 590 00:34:18,080 --> 00:34:21,680 Speaker 1: I'm Bloomberg Radio Sunday afternoons with his wonderful Meet the 591 00:34:21,680 --> 00:34:25,319 Speaker 1: Press David Gura, Meet the Press. Killed it yesterday at 592 00:34:25,320 --> 00:34:29,640 Speaker 1: the opening yesterday, going back the secretary kissing your announcing 593 00:34:29,719 --> 00:34:33,200 Speaker 1: the war was over forty two hours or whatever before 594 00:34:33,239 --> 00:34:35,440 Speaker 1: the election, chucked out to Stephen, you want to come 595 00:34:35,440 --> 00:34:39,120 Speaker 1: in and then and then the other example of George 596 00:34:39,120 --> 00:34:40,879 Speaker 1: Bush and the d and the du I coming out 597 00:34:40,920 --> 00:34:43,360 Speaker 1: four or five days before the election in two thousands 598 00:34:43,400 --> 00:34:45,440 Speaker 1: and so we have been here before, and we will 599 00:34:45,480 --> 00:34:47,319 Speaker 1: get through it. And well, I don't know, we got 600 00:34:47,320 --> 00:34:50,040 Speaker 1: eight more chase to go. Who knows what could happen 601 00:34:50,360 --> 00:35:05,040 Speaker 1: in eight days. Steve Redner, thank you so much. This 602 00:35:05,120 --> 00:35:08,640 Speaker 1: is Bloomberg Surveillance on Bloomberg Radio. David Gurray here with 603 00:35:08,840 --> 00:35:13,680 Speaker 1: Tom Keane on Halloween. Excuse me, I'm so rattled, like 604 00:35:13,800 --> 00:35:17,120 Speaker 1: I forgot to hit the red button. The advance of J. K. 605 00:35:17,400 --> 00:35:20,960 Speaker 1: Rowling was two thousand, five hundred pounds. I've got a 606 00:35:21,000 --> 00:35:24,640 Speaker 1: working statistic of a Harry Potter thing of fifteen billion 607 00:35:24,680 --> 00:35:28,279 Speaker 1: dollars is what it's worth. I just want you to 608 00:35:28,320 --> 00:35:31,480 Speaker 1: know that for Halloween the Keen household spend about thirteen 609 00:35:31,480 --> 00:35:36,120 Speaker 1: point three billion of the fifteen billion. Like, I don't 610 00:35:36,160 --> 00:35:38,719 Speaker 1: get it. I mean, I I gotta get smarter on 611 00:35:38,840 --> 00:35:43,839 Speaker 1: Harry Potter. It's completely overtaken. You've got your neo Fisherian 612 00:35:44,640 --> 00:35:47,560 Speaker 1: devil faced masks. I am. I'm going as Irving Fisher 613 00:35:47,600 --> 00:35:50,000 Speaker 1: and then on the backside and going as vice Chairman Fisher. 614 00:35:50,320 --> 00:35:54,480 Speaker 1: It was a special custom, you know, like especially late 615 00:35:54,520 --> 00:35:59,200 Speaker 1: tex late text thing. We a what are you doing? Well? 616 00:35:59,560 --> 00:36:01,240 Speaker 1: So my daughter is going to go as a peacock. 617 00:36:01,360 --> 00:36:04,040 Speaker 1: She's she's got enough that she's you know, there's no 618 00:36:04,040 --> 00:36:07,120 Speaker 1: no Harry Potter yet on the language. But yeah, we'll 619 00:36:07,120 --> 00:36:09,439 Speaker 1: be running around park Slope. But that the mayor, the 620 00:36:09,440 --> 00:36:11,759 Speaker 1: current mayor of the city, a park Slope resident at 621 00:36:11,800 --> 00:36:14,480 Speaker 1: least part time. He often leads the parade that we'll 622 00:36:14,520 --> 00:36:17,480 Speaker 1: have down seventh, So keep an out. Doug Cass is 623 00:36:17,520 --> 00:36:21,080 Speaker 1: going as earning Banks. Yeah, with Sea Breeze partners. Doug, 624 00:36:21,120 --> 00:36:23,400 Speaker 1: I mean a little bit on baseball here. This is fun, 625 00:36:23,480 --> 00:36:25,359 Speaker 1: isn't it. Well, we while we wait for that. I've 626 00:36:25,360 --> 00:36:26,799 Speaker 1: got an email here from Doug. I opened it up. 627 00:36:26,840 --> 00:36:29,200 Speaker 1: Here has an image attached as Doug wearing a Cubs 628 00:36:29,239 --> 00:36:36,200 Speaker 1: baseball hat. Optimism continues here. Unshine fresh air, things behind us, 629 00:36:36,440 --> 00:36:39,520 Speaker 1: Let's play too. I mean, what give us your takeaway 630 00:36:39,520 --> 00:36:42,839 Speaker 1: of the excitement at Wrigley Field? I mean Bill Bill 631 00:36:43,120 --> 00:36:48,200 Speaker 1: Bill uh uh Murray almost I love. I loved his 632 00:36:48,239 --> 00:36:52,960 Speaker 1: rendition to pick me out to the ball games. One 633 00:36:52,960 --> 00:36:56,200 Speaker 1: of my closest friends, George Siegel, is in Chicago and 634 00:36:56,880 --> 00:36:59,840 Speaker 1: he went to the game. I almost went to Chicago 635 00:37:00,080 --> 00:37:03,760 Speaker 1: yesterday and I was going to go to Sluggers. But 636 00:37:03,760 --> 00:37:06,160 Speaker 1: but do you know how much the coverage charges? Yeah, 637 00:37:06,160 --> 00:37:11,439 Speaker 1: I'm afraid to ask. Yeah, just to get that, don't 638 00:37:11,600 --> 00:37:15,920 Speaker 1: Sluggers is is outside of Wrigley Field. It's a local bar. 639 00:37:16,000 --> 00:37:18,799 Speaker 1: It's a well known hamburg a joint. You know that 640 00:37:18,800 --> 00:37:21,399 Speaker 1: you're gonna at the dinner for fifteen dollars at Yeah. 641 00:37:21,520 --> 00:37:25,880 Speaker 1: Doug explained to our global audience how Wrigley Field in 642 00:37:25,920 --> 00:37:30,560 Speaker 1: the Chicago Cub's experience is different from Fenway Park, is 643 00:37:30,600 --> 00:37:35,680 Speaker 1: different from Dallas. Cowboy football is different from Manchester United. Oh, 644 00:37:35,719 --> 00:37:38,880 Speaker 1: it's so, it's so His historic with the ivy with 645 00:37:39,080 --> 00:37:43,560 Speaker 1: the vines growing on the outfield. UM. I know every 646 00:37:43,560 --> 00:37:48,560 Speaker 1: time I've gone to Wrigley Field. UM uh the uh 647 00:37:48,800 --> 00:37:52,000 Speaker 1: of course I'll never by the way, just to digressive 648 00:37:52,000 --> 00:37:55,960 Speaker 1: a second, I'll never forget. The best uh pitching duel 649 00:37:56,200 --> 00:37:59,359 Speaker 1: in the history of baseballs, as you remember, was with 650 00:37:59,400 --> 00:38:03,800 Speaker 1: my mys in Sandy and the Chicago Cubs when Sandy 651 00:38:03,840 --> 00:38:07,239 Speaker 1: threw a pitch hitter a perfect game. Excuse me in 652 00:38:07,320 --> 00:38:12,200 Speaker 1: September ninth. I think it was against Bob Henley, who 653 00:38:12,239 --> 00:38:15,600 Speaker 1: was a journeyman. Um picture for the Cubs, who just 654 00:38:15,640 --> 00:38:18,400 Speaker 1: came out of the minor leagues. But it's so beautiful. 655 00:38:18,440 --> 00:38:21,240 Speaker 1: And every time I've gone to Wrigley Field, they played 656 00:38:21,239 --> 00:38:23,480 Speaker 1: take me out to the ballgame before the first inning, 657 00:38:23,719 --> 00:38:25,800 Speaker 1: and they have a parent with a child play catch 658 00:38:25,840 --> 00:38:27,759 Speaker 1: and said to field, I mean, what is better than that? 659 00:38:28,120 --> 00:38:33,440 Speaker 1: Doug Cass, you have written often about peak sports viewership 660 00:38:33,560 --> 00:38:36,120 Speaker 1: and media companies. We have not yet had your comments 661 00:38:36,160 --> 00:38:39,160 Speaker 1: on telephone in time Warner. I love what you say 662 00:38:39,239 --> 00:38:42,719 Speaker 1: about everybody trying to copy the giant. Chris Berman over 663 00:38:42,719 --> 00:38:46,640 Speaker 1: at ESPN or arguably helped invent the modern enthusiasm. Why 664 00:38:46,680 --> 00:38:48,960 Speaker 1: are we at peak sports viewership? Yeah, I thought. I 665 00:38:48,960 --> 00:38:51,120 Speaker 1: thought for some time. I've been writing on the on 666 00:38:51,160 --> 00:38:54,800 Speaker 1: the Street dot com since June of two thousands fifteen, 667 00:38:54,840 --> 00:38:57,800 Speaker 1: and one of my largest short positions, which is a 668 00:38:57,880 --> 00:39:01,160 Speaker 1: secular short investment position, has been Disney. It's done well. 669 00:39:01,200 --> 00:39:05,160 Speaker 1: It's gone from hundred and sixteen to about ninety four. UM. 670 00:39:05,200 --> 00:39:07,080 Speaker 1: You know, if we go back to two thousand five, 671 00:39:07,120 --> 00:39:12,960 Speaker 1: when I established this peak sports viewership thesis, the n 672 00:39:13,000 --> 00:39:16,759 Speaker 1: c Double A semi final College Bowls series showed a 673 00:39:16,880 --> 00:39:20,799 Speaker 1: thirty three percent decline in ratings. Viewership at the UH, 674 00:39:21,280 --> 00:39:24,280 Speaker 1: I know you enjoyed. Hockey at the NHL's Winter Classic 675 00:39:24,360 --> 00:39:28,920 Speaker 1: dropped by twenty in two thousand fifteen versus two thousand fourteen. 676 00:39:29,000 --> 00:39:33,759 Speaker 1: Ratings for the college Football's National Championships subsequently declined by 677 00:39:33,920 --> 00:39:37,520 Speaker 1: almost We have a number of factors, I think in 678 00:39:37,640 --> 00:39:41,840 Speaker 1: terms of explaining this. Firstly, we have oversaturation of products. Secondly, 679 00:39:41,880 --> 00:39:45,920 Speaker 1: we have what you just described as these sinine commentators 680 00:39:46,000 --> 00:39:50,040 Speaker 1: who all want to be UM and mimic ESPNS. Chris 681 00:39:50,040 --> 00:39:53,600 Speaker 1: Berman's only one, Chris Berman. Uh, it's gotten annoying. Thirdly, 682 00:39:53,680 --> 00:39:59,520 Speaker 1: the quality of play UM has arguably eroded with parody UM. Fourthly, 683 00:39:59,680 --> 00:40:03,080 Speaker 1: there's or refereeing and a lack of league discipline. You 684 00:40:03,120 --> 00:40:06,640 Speaker 1: know a lot of especially in the NFL, where a 685 00:40:06,719 --> 00:40:10,960 Speaker 1: number of players are socially off the off the reservation. UM, 686 00:40:10,960 --> 00:40:14,160 Speaker 1: we have unsavory player behavior on and off the field 687 00:40:14,239 --> 00:40:17,520 Speaker 1: in other words, UM. And there are numerous viewing alternatives, 688 00:40:17,560 --> 00:40:20,920 Speaker 1: and at this market segmentation, we're in a social media 689 00:40:21,000 --> 00:40:24,560 Speaker 1: driven world. There's so much time each day for sports TV. 690 00:40:24,719 --> 00:40:27,640 Speaker 1: And I just noticed that Nielsen came out on Friday 691 00:40:27,800 --> 00:40:32,040 Speaker 1: that ESPN lost six five thousand subscribers in the month 692 00:40:32,080 --> 00:40:35,200 Speaker 1: of October, which is astonishing. David. I would suggest also 693 00:40:35,360 --> 00:40:38,080 Speaker 1: that Doug doesn't mention as people are exhausted by ads. 694 00:40:38,239 --> 00:40:41,560 Speaker 1: It's just there's a generational ship David jumping Yeah. PC here. 695 00:40:41,600 --> 00:40:43,600 Speaker 1: I noticed in Business Week a few weeks back, looking 696 00:40:43,640 --> 00:40:47,440 Speaker 1: at viewership of NFL primetime games dropping fourteen percent from 697 00:40:47,440 --> 00:40:50,040 Speaker 1: a year earlier. You say it's a secular trend here, 698 00:40:50,080 --> 00:40:51,719 Speaker 1: I know a lot of people have attributed just to 699 00:40:51,760 --> 00:40:54,279 Speaker 1: the to the news cycle and to the election. You 700 00:40:54,520 --> 00:40:57,280 Speaker 1: do think it's greater than that. It's much greater because 701 00:40:57,280 --> 00:41:01,279 Speaker 1: it began in early well actually late thousand fourteen, and 702 00:41:01,440 --> 00:41:06,080 Speaker 1: coincident with cord cutting among cable TV customers. UM. Yeah, 703 00:41:06,120 --> 00:41:08,359 Speaker 1: I think this is this is um David. This has 704 00:41:08,400 --> 00:41:10,600 Speaker 1: been in place for nearly two years now, you know. 705 00:41:10,880 --> 00:41:13,080 Speaker 1: I think it's it's a trend. You mentioned Disney, and 706 00:41:13,160 --> 00:41:15,520 Speaker 1: I got to ask you about the complimentarity there with 707 00:41:15,520 --> 00:41:17,760 Speaker 1: with Twitter. Is is Twitter something that you think Disney 708 00:41:17,800 --> 00:41:21,759 Speaker 1: should be taking a look at. It's I don't think 709 00:41:21,760 --> 00:41:26,839 Speaker 1: it's higher's um nature to buy buy a company like that, 710 00:41:27,480 --> 00:41:31,880 Speaker 1: terribly diluted. Disney has its own problems right now, David. Um, 711 00:41:31,920 --> 00:41:34,640 Speaker 1: It's earnings estimates are falling like a rock, and I 712 00:41:34,680 --> 00:41:40,319 Speaker 1: don't think they'll even meet the downgraded expectations I noted 713 00:41:40,360 --> 00:41:42,239 Speaker 1: here In your most recently you've talked about history and 714 00:41:42,239 --> 00:41:45,680 Speaker 1: talked about the difficulties of looking back. Given the environment 715 00:41:45,680 --> 00:41:48,319 Speaker 1: we're in right now with central banks and and and 716 00:41:48,400 --> 00:41:52,479 Speaker 1: quant strategies and whatnot. That'll continue, that will persist. Yeah. 717 00:41:52,520 --> 00:41:56,200 Speaker 1: I was talking this morning, UM on my blog about 718 00:41:56,960 --> 00:42:02,040 Speaker 1: the unusual investing backdrop and that we have these these 719 00:42:02,120 --> 00:42:06,359 Speaker 1: basically three influences, David. We have this this dirty water 720 00:42:06,640 --> 00:42:10,640 Speaker 1: central banking liquidity and zero or negative interest rates. We 721 00:42:10,719 --> 00:42:15,760 Speaker 1: have the dominance of quantz strategies like UM risk parity, 722 00:42:16,040 --> 00:42:20,920 Speaker 1: and vola tending volatility trending strategies who are agnostic to 723 00:42:21,080 --> 00:42:24,960 Speaker 1: private market value, income statements and balance sheets. And then 724 00:42:25,000 --> 00:42:29,600 Speaker 1: we have this proliferation of passive investing through exchange trade 725 00:42:29,640 --> 00:42:33,480 Speaker 1: of funds, and they've all up ended the benefits of 726 00:42:33,520 --> 00:42:36,440 Speaker 1: those like myself and I think Tom who are inclined 727 00:42:36,480 --> 00:42:39,080 Speaker 1: to look to the past for a picture of the future. 728 00:42:39,520 --> 00:42:41,640 Speaker 1: Douglas cast with the sea breezes. Doug, you put out 729 00:42:41,640 --> 00:42:43,919 Speaker 1: a note the other day which had in a lot 730 00:42:43,960 --> 00:42:48,520 Speaker 1: of different companies, I think the great mysteries Amazon with 731 00:42:48,520 --> 00:42:51,840 Speaker 1: with the effort in cloud. They've been on a trajectory. 732 00:42:51,960 --> 00:42:55,360 Speaker 1: Then they get hit a little bit. Whether Douglas casts 733 00:42:55,560 --> 00:43:00,279 Speaker 1: on Mr Bezos and Amazon. I took a basic what 734 00:43:00,360 --> 00:43:03,280 Speaker 1: I described as a trading short rental in the stock 735 00:43:03,480 --> 00:43:07,239 Speaker 1: the day before earnings were released, and I did so 736 00:43:08,280 --> 00:43:11,399 Speaker 1: for two basic reasons. Number one, it appeared that just 737 00:43:11,480 --> 00:43:15,520 Speaker 1: technically the stock was making a double top at eight fifty. 738 00:43:15,840 --> 00:43:19,520 Speaker 1: So had I had a tight stop in my short 739 00:43:19,560 --> 00:43:22,279 Speaker 1: position was meant to be a trade, not not the 740 00:43:22,360 --> 00:43:25,520 Speaker 1: investment short the way Disney is. The second more important 741 00:43:25,520 --> 00:43:28,879 Speaker 1: factor from a fundamental standpoint, Retail isn't disarray. I mean 742 00:43:28,880 --> 00:43:31,959 Speaker 1: the retail stock index just makes new lows day after 743 00:43:32,040 --> 00:43:35,040 Speaker 1: day after day, and I didn't believe that Amazon would 744 00:43:35,040 --> 00:43:38,279 Speaker 1: be immune to the retail carnage. As we moved into 745 00:43:38,320 --> 00:43:41,240 Speaker 1: the holiday season and improved that well, and the stock 746 00:43:41,320 --> 00:43:45,080 Speaker 1: went down um from the top by seven or five points, 747 00:43:45,080 --> 00:43:46,880 Speaker 1: at which time I covered the short and it was 748 00:43:46,920 --> 00:43:49,480 Speaker 1: one of my better shorts of the year. What is 749 00:43:49,560 --> 00:43:53,120 Speaker 1: your tone three or five years out? Is it like 750 00:43:53,239 --> 00:43:55,759 Speaker 1: Dartman where that we're going from the lower left of 751 00:43:55,800 --> 00:43:58,840 Speaker 1: the upper right, or could you be more nuance and 752 00:43:58,920 --> 00:44:04,000 Speaker 1: the gentleman? You know? Um? Back in I'm a bit 753 00:44:04,040 --> 00:44:06,319 Speaker 1: of a student of Warren Buffett, as you know. And 754 00:44:06,400 --> 00:44:12,360 Speaker 1: back in his Chairman's letter to Berkshire shareholders, he was 755 00:44:12,440 --> 00:44:16,040 Speaker 1: quoted as saying, to the extent, Charlie and I have 756 00:44:16,160 --> 00:44:21,280 Speaker 1: been successful. It's because we concentrated on identifying one ft 757 00:44:21,320 --> 00:44:24,520 Speaker 1: hurdles that we could step over, rather than because we 758 00:44:24,640 --> 00:44:29,239 Speaker 1: acquired any ability to clear seven foot hurdles. And I 759 00:44:29,280 --> 00:44:32,680 Speaker 1: think the market is now a seven ft hurdle. Um. 760 00:44:32,719 --> 00:44:38,280 Speaker 1: The SMP five index is expensive. Are nearly all valuation metrics. 761 00:44:38,320 --> 00:44:41,440 Speaker 1: I look at eight of them, Enterprise value to sales, 762 00:44:41,719 --> 00:44:45,719 Speaker 1: enterprise value to IBADA, PD growth, which is the rate 763 00:44:46,480 --> 00:44:50,840 Speaker 1: forward PE cash flow yields, cyclically adjusted PE price to 764 00:44:50,880 --> 00:44:54,520 Speaker 1: book and free cash flow yields, and the aggregate index 765 00:44:54,800 --> 00:44:58,279 Speaker 1: is at the eighty third percentile. However, Tom, if you 766 00:44:58,320 --> 00:45:01,920 Speaker 1: look at the median stock it's at nine percentile. This 767 00:45:02,080 --> 00:45:05,080 Speaker 1: to me is a seven ft hurdle and so I 768 00:45:05,080 --> 00:45:09,640 Speaker 1: want to be risk averse in a period of gross uncertainty. 769 00:45:09,840 --> 00:45:12,520 Speaker 1: You mentioned that uncertainty looking ahead here to the election 770 00:45:12,960 --> 00:45:15,720 Speaker 1: just a week away. What do you think, what effect 771 00:45:15,800 --> 00:45:17,200 Speaker 1: is that going to have in volatility to think and 772 00:45:17,239 --> 00:45:21,719 Speaker 1: how are you covering yourself there? Well, my baseline expectation, Dave, 773 00:45:22,719 --> 00:45:25,719 Speaker 1: is in looking at predict Wise and election odds dot 774 00:45:25,760 --> 00:45:30,319 Speaker 1: com and the Lunding betting parlors um. My baseline expectation 775 00:45:30,480 --> 00:45:33,920 Speaker 1: is that Clinton will win the White House, that the 776 00:45:33,960 --> 00:45:40,040 Speaker 1: Democrats will regain the Senate, and the House will be 777 00:45:40,320 --> 00:45:44,440 Speaker 1: maintained by the Republican Party. And my concern is that 778 00:45:45,440 --> 00:45:48,600 Speaker 1: my concern actually is either a Trump or a Clinton 779 00:45:48,680 --> 00:45:51,879 Speaker 1: victory will be market unfriendly. And the reason I say 780 00:45:51,920 --> 00:45:54,840 Speaker 1: that is because it's very important that we have a 781 00:45:55,000 --> 00:46:02,240 Speaker 1: successful policy. Baton pass from monetary policy which has introduced 782 00:46:02,320 --> 00:46:05,319 Speaker 1: massive amount of liquidity and zero interest rates in this 783 00:46:05,400 --> 00:46:13,000 Speaker 1: country to a thoughtful economically growth catalyzing physical policy. And 784 00:46:13,080 --> 00:46:17,239 Speaker 1: I'm afraid that not only are the parties fractured between themselves, 785 00:46:17,280 --> 00:46:20,920 Speaker 1: but within the parties they're fractured. What were the honest 786 00:46:20,960 --> 00:46:23,080 Speaker 1: that you're playing here on on a big fiscal package, 787 00:46:23,120 --> 00:46:25,520 Speaker 1: on on that fiscal policy that that you mentioned, And 788 00:46:25,520 --> 00:46:32,960 Speaker 1: I wonder what the implications of visa the senses um 789 00:46:32,960 --> 00:46:36,319 Speaker 1: you know, my basic expectation I look at my bad 790 00:46:36,360 --> 00:46:39,760 Speaker 1: case on the market, is I see UH Treasury yield 791 00:46:39,840 --> 00:46:41,880 Speaker 1: rise and the tenure rising to around two and a 792 00:46:41,920 --> 00:46:45,440 Speaker 1: half percent next year, and that the yield gap narrows 793 00:46:45,480 --> 00:46:49,080 Speaker 1: slightly to about four hundred basis points. That produces an 794 00:46:49,080 --> 00:46:52,560 Speaker 1: earnings yield of six point five or a PE of 795 00:46:52,640 --> 00:46:56,200 Speaker 1: about fifteen point five times. And you apply that pe 796 00:46:56,280 --> 00:46:58,879 Speaker 1: multiple to my estimate of around a hundred twenty three 797 00:46:58,880 --> 00:47:00,920 Speaker 1: dollars of S and P or and and I come 798 00:47:00,920 --> 00:47:03,840 Speaker 1: out with an SMP at nine, which is in a 799 00:47:03,920 --> 00:47:06,520 Speaker 1: roughly twelve percent below where it is today. A few 800 00:47:06,520 --> 00:47:08,160 Speaker 1: minutes ago, I asked Steve Whiting the degree to which 801 00:47:08,160 --> 00:47:10,960 Speaker 1: there's there's uncertainty surrounding what central banks are doing right now? 802 00:47:11,000 --> 00:47:13,439 Speaker 1: For you for somebody who who looks at technicals, looks 803 00:47:13,480 --> 00:47:16,400 Speaker 1: at history. When you look at at what the central 804 00:47:16,400 --> 00:47:18,160 Speaker 1: banks are doing, how sure are you of of the 805 00:47:18,200 --> 00:47:22,680 Speaker 1: path there on right now? Well, I think they're they're 806 00:47:22,680 --> 00:47:28,040 Speaker 1: they're trapped. They're trapped um in in what is appearing 807 00:47:28,080 --> 00:47:33,320 Speaker 1: to be a Larry Summers um secular stagnation scenario. And 808 00:47:33,680 --> 00:47:37,080 Speaker 1: the problem I have is that the effectiveness David of 809 00:47:37,160 --> 00:47:41,320 Speaker 1: monetary policy, both domestically and around the world, is losing 810 00:47:41,360 --> 00:47:46,120 Speaker 1: its effectiveness. So we're we are really super reliant on 811 00:47:46,560 --> 00:47:49,800 Speaker 1: on an effective um as I said, baton path to 812 00:47:49,880 --> 00:47:54,440 Speaker 1: physical policy, and I don't see it happening in this country. Yes, 813 00:47:54,560 --> 00:47:58,239 Speaker 1: listen one minute. How do we speed up baseball? I mean, 814 00:47:58,280 --> 00:48:01,080 Speaker 1: you know, it's an important issue. How do we speak 815 00:48:01,120 --> 00:48:04,000 Speaker 1: up the game of baseball? Are we nuts? Well, it's 816 00:48:04,040 --> 00:48:06,840 Speaker 1: the question being asked in a number of sports. You know, 817 00:48:06,920 --> 00:48:08,719 Speaker 1: I played two rounds of golf this weekend. It's the 818 00:48:08,760 --> 00:48:13,800 Speaker 1: same problem with golf. Um Uh, it's a real problem. 819 00:48:13,800 --> 00:48:16,040 Speaker 1: As I said in my in our discussion of sports 820 00:48:16,120 --> 00:48:20,160 Speaker 1: viewers peaking sports viewership, people have just so much time 821 00:48:20,160 --> 00:48:22,400 Speaker 1: in the day, and social media is taking a larger 822 00:48:22,719 --> 00:48:26,560 Speaker 1: proportion of our time. And I don't think. I don't 823 00:48:26,560 --> 00:48:28,520 Speaker 1: think the grand old game is going to be changed 824 00:48:28,840 --> 00:48:31,640 Speaker 1: in our lifetime. Tom Okay, Doug Cast, thanks so much, 825 00:48:31,840 --> 00:48:35,600 Speaker 1: brilliant inspired Doug that you're going as Dennis Gartman for Halloween. 826 00:48:35,640 --> 00:48:42,600 Speaker 1: I think that's just absolutely well. We all wish he's 827 00:48:42,640 --> 00:48:45,080 Speaker 1: on the course, like eighty hours a week here whatever 828 00:48:47,440 --> 00:48:50,360 Speaker 1: and in the county around it. Doug Cast, thank you 829 00:48:50,440 --> 00:48:59,120 Speaker 1: so much. With Cebris Partners. Thanks for listening to the 830 00:48:59,120 --> 00:49:05,080 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Surveying podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on iTunes, SoundCloud, 831 00:49:05,560 --> 00:49:09,800 Speaker 1: or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm out on Twitter 832 00:49:09,880 --> 00:49:13,680 Speaker 1: at Tom Keene. David Gura is at David Gura. Before 833 00:49:13,719 --> 00:49:18,080 Speaker 1: the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio. 834 00:49:30,520 --> 00:49:33,160 Speaker 1: Who you put your trust in? Matters? Investors have put 835 00:49:33,200 --> 00:49:37,600 Speaker 1: their trust and independent registered investment advisors to the tune 836 00:49:37,760 --> 00:49:41,840 Speaker 1: four trillion dollars. Why Learn more at find your Independent 837 00:49:41,920 --> 00:49:44,320 Speaker 1: Advisor dot com