WEBVTT - Tesla Sales Drop, TikTok Bid 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio, Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple Coarclay, and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.240
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get to one stock in the move.

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 2>A's Tesla shares down by about two percent. They're off

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 2>the lows of the session. It reported first quarter deliveries

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>that went below analyst estimates, touching the lowest level since

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 2>the second quarter of twenty twenty two. I want to

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 2>talk to Steve Mann, Bloomberg Intelligence Global Audios and Research

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 2>analyst joining us. Hey, Steve, what would behind the drop

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 2>in sales? That may seem like an obvious question, but

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 2>it feels like there are lots of layers here to this.

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Admittedly, the thirty percent decline was a little bit

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 3>more than what we were expecting. We were expecting around

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 3>three hundred and fifty thousand, came in at around three

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty six. But you know, it's if you

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 3>look below the headline, it's actually operating as we expected.

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 3>It's unfolding as we expected. China sales. Retail sales is

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 3>actually up despite production down year on year. US is

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 3>kind of flatish. Really, the dent to the quarterly sales

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 3>was in Europe. It seems like March. March is a

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 3>little bit worse than February and January. But our thesis

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 3>has not changed. You know, we still think the inflection

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 3>point is in second quarter. We believe China sales improvement

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 3>will extend into the second quarter, and then, you know,

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 3>the Model Y has already launched in the US and

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 3>we expect, you know, some improvement in sales in the

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 3>US as well in the second quarter.

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Talk to us about the model. Why I know Matt

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 4>Miller has yet to take me in a model. Why

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 4>so I don't know anything about it. Tell me about

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 4>the model. Why is it a game changer? Is it

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 4>just a slight move. Talk about this new model what

0:01:58.600 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 4>it might mean.

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Yeah, there's some cosmetic changes in the front end

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 3>and the rear end. The lighting in the rear end

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 3>is is pretty cool if you haven't seen it yet.

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 3>But I think the most biggest, some of the biggest

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 3>changes are inside the user experience. There's a monitor at

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 3>the back, there's a nice little cooler up in the

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 3>front end. So you know, there's people who have held

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 3>off buying the model, why anticipation of the new one.

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 2>But how much of this is reputational damage? It might

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 2>be too early to say, right because it's still through March.

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 2>But I hear you that on principle, you're bullish on

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 2>the car and sales in essence. But I mean, we

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 2>can't ignore the reputational damage. I mean, I know that

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm in Brooklyn, but I see like get rid of

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 2>your Tesla signs everywhere at this point, that's right, I don't.

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we can ignore that what we're seeing

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 3>in the media and what happening to test the cars

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 3>and in showrooms, it is having an impact. It definitely

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 3>is having some impact in Europe. But at the end

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 3>of the day, you know, we feel that a lot

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 3>of it is being priced in. The stock has come

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 3>off from its highs since the election. You know, the

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 3>P four pe ratio is around eighty five times twenty

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty five earnings. That's just about ten percent above where

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 3>it traded before the presidential election. So I think, you know,

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 3>I think the stock has pretty much factored that in,

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 3>and you know, we're looking ahead and we think business

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 3>fundamental should improve in the second quarter. You deliver, it

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 3>should improve in the second quarter.

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 4>Does the company does the stock need Elon Musk to

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 4>come back to the company?

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I personally, I think so because he's he's an industrialist.

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 3>He's an avid cost cutter, and that's really what you

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 3>really need in the auto industry given the price competition

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 3>that we're seeing around the world. And uh uh you know,

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 3>hopefully later in the year, when you know, when he

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 3>gets thosee up and running in a steady pace and

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 3>uh you know, he can maybe step off and refocus

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 3>on on his businesses.

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 2>What does Tesla need to refocus on? Like what company

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 2>does Tesla now need to be?

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, they need to continue to be an innovator. I

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.719
<v Speaker 3>think there's a lot of debate out there why Tesla

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 3>deserves a higher valuation than like GM and Ford. Look,

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 3>you know they have they they're doing something that you know,

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 3>we I couldn't imagine anyone can do in the auto industry,

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 3>which is to start a new automaker in this day

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 3>and age, it's high barriers of entry, and they're doing

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 3>it in a way that it's profitable. Right. Uh, you know,

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 3>there's there's a lot of debate, but you know they are,

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 3>they are booking profits on EV sales and uh, you

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 3>know it's it's hard to find, you know, an automaker

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 3>that can still do this and do it do it

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 3>in a consistent manner.

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 4>Steve, I just bought a vehicle. I mean, I'll have

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 4>you know. It is a hybrid, so I'm getting there slowly.

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 2>He's not actually driving it, but it's a fair point.

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 4>So Steve is b y D and the Chinese automakers.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 4>Are they going to take over the e V world?

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it looks like it.

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 3>Time will tell. They're very aggressive. You know, they've you know,

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 3>they've cornered the market in China, right, they've basically, through

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 3>price they have pushed out a lot of the foreign

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 3>automakers out of China.

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 3>And then you know they're actually branching out into the

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 3>rest of the world. Not not in the US. They're

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 3>making headways in Europe despite the tariffs there. But they're

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 3>really aggressive in emerging markets, which is competing a lot

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:01.359
<v Speaker 3>with the likes of Toyota and the Koreated South Korean Handay.

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 3>So you know they're if you can think of you know,

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 3>they're kind of encircling the US at the moment, North

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 3>America at the moment. So, uh, they don't have to

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 3>be in the US. But if you know they're in there,

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 3>if they're strong in China and there's strong in other

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 3>emerging markets, uh, you know they will they will eventually dominate.

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but thirty seconds or so, lepstive. But speaking of

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 2>when Paul bought the car, it was a Honda and

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 2>it was you made in the US. So, like, why

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 2>have foreign automakers been able to move manufacturing here in

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 2>a way that US automakers haven't.

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, I think I think a lot of

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 3>automakers over time has been very focused on driving profitability.

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 3>And there's nothing wrong with that, right, There's nothing wrong

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 3>with that, and that's that's the only reason why we

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 3>people go into business is to make money. But I think, uh,

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 3>you know that that you know, there has to be

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 3>a balance. I think, and you know, driving costs is great,

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 3>but can we drive costs with innovation? And I think

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 3>that's what Trump is trying to do based on his rhetoric,

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 3>is to bring back manufacturing. So like, how can The

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 3>question is how can automakers actually build a low cost

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 3>car in the US through innovation.

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 2>It's Steve Man, a Bloomberg Intelligence at Global Autos and

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Industry at the Analysts. Thank you very much for joining us.

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 4>That Musk news is really interesting. It's great for the

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 4>stock stocks. Up four percent is Genosis reporting, So I'm

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 4>sure the investors there are happy. Let's get right down

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 4>to DC and get it from the a source, our source.

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Then in DC. Nathan Dean, senior policy analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 4>Nathan in the Beltway, what was the feeler and what

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 4>is the feeling about Elon Musk? His role, his proximity

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 4>to the president is so so close, and it's been

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 4>that way since the inauguration here, But is anybody surprised

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 4>that he may be leaving maybe leading soon?

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 5>So I don't think I was surprised. I think this

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 5>makes sense. And obviously if you're in Tesla investor, you're

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 5>going to like the idea that Elon Musk returns to

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 5>the company. But if you think about it, you know,

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 5>the Doge Committee, the Doge Group, if you will, they've

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 5>been expanding. Bloomberg News just reported a few minutes ago

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 5>that Kelshi's chief regulatory officer is going to Doge. What

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk essentially has done is he's created a group

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 5>and they're going agency by agency, but they can only

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 5>cut so much. You know, if they cut too much,

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 5>then eventually it's going to be a political blowback. And

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk doesn't have the power to go after the

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 5>mandatory spending, which is where the big ticket items in

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 5>terms of reducing the deficit is. So I think this

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 5>makes sense. He's going to return to the Tesla. Assuming

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 5>Political is reporting is correct, he'll return to Tesla, but

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 5>nothing prevents him from coming back. Nothing prevents them from

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 5>going into the White House. And I think if you're

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 5>a Republican on Capitol Hill, you'll love the idea that

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 5>maybe you're not going to have the White House calling

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 5>for deep cuts to Social Security, the mandatory spending. If

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 5>you will, they'll be left to Congress. So I think

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 5>they may be pleased with this as well.

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 2>So this is not the end of DOGE. If this

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 2>is indeed true, this is just sort of an evolution

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 2>of DOGE, So we can still expect that to come

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 2>and bring hammers to everyone's payrolier.

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely well, at least in terms of your first question

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 5>in terms of this is not the end of DOGE.

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 5>Dog is going to continue. But what Elon must did

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 5>is essentially created a group of advisors and individuals that

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 5>are going in agency by agency and they're looking at

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 5>identifying areas to cut. But for Elon's mangal of deficit reduction,

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 5>he's not going to be able to do that with DOGE.

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 5>They just do not have the power to do that.

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 5>It requires an Act of Congress. So you are going

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 5>to see DOGE continue probably for the next year, if

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 5>not a little bit longer, until they really get to

0:09:57.880 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 5>the point where they are streamlined and they feel that

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 5>they've adequately right sized those agencies. But for the big

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 5>ticket items, we're going to see that in the upcoming

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 5>tax debate in terms of things like MEDICAIDS, snap benefits.

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 5>You know obviously that was a mandatory, but social Security,

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 5>the really key things that are really important to the deficit.

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 5>DOJ and Elon Musk just don't have the ability to control.

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 5>He's going to need Congress to do that. And I

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 5>think Congress is going to be happy. They're now going

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 5>to be in the back in the driver's seat, assuming

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 5>that Elon Musk does leave.

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 4>And Nathan, I wonder if the last night's race in Wisconsin,

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 4>with the addictional race where Elon Musk candidate did not win,

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 4>do you think that had anything to do with his

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 4>decision making.

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 5>I don't think so. But I think what last night

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 5>didd was the indication of what Republicans fear may happen

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 5>eighteen months from now. I mean, if you look at

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 5>midterm elections, they always swing back the other way. I

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 5>mean the joke is, think of US politics as like

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 5>a car out of control going down the street. It

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 5>hits guardrails left and right, left and right, it never

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 5>goes straight. And so you know, the tendency here is

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 5>is that the House of rep is going to be

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 5>in play for Democrats. And I think yesterday just told

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 5>a lot of those Republicans on Capitol Hill that a

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 5>year from now this may be something that hurts them politically.

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 5>And so I don't think anybody's going to vote off

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 5>of what happens right now eighteen months from now. But

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 5>I do think that this decision for Elon Musk to

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 5>maybe step away from Washington and go back to Texas

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 5>and Florida and so forth like that will make a

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 5>little bit of the Republicans and capitall breathe a little

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 5>bit easier, just because they can get a little bit

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 5>more control of the narrative.

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 2>You know what this did do We didn't talk about

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 2>tariffs for four minutes. Yes, I'm just saying that newsful

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 2>definitely just changed. Nathan. Okay, So four o'clock today, I'm

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 2>going to be sitting on set on TV, gonna have

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 2>my terminal NI heads for all the pros out there.

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 2>What are the headlines that you the literal headline that

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 2>crosses that you're going to be most interested in.

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 5>So obviously the biggest question is is this going to

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 5>be a country tax or a tariff? Or is this

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 5>going to be a tariff tariff? Sorry, tiered tariff. But

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 5>you know, one of the big questions we're getting from

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 5>clients this morning is they're focusing on Secretary I'm sorry,

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 5>Treasury Secretary of Scott Beston is saying in terms these

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 5>are a cap is essentially floating the idea that these

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 5>are a cap, with the idea here that potentially President

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 5>Trump will be willing to negotiate going forward and bringing

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 5>this down from like a cap down to a reciprocal tariff.

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 5>And so the question for me is, in this statement

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 5>tonight at the White House or sorry, at the Rose Garden,

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 5>is President Trump going to give any indication that he'll

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 5>be willing to pick up a phone tomorrow. Because if

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 5>that's the case, you know, he can come out and

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 5>say twenty fifteen, twenty percent universal tariff, whatever it may be,

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 5>but tomorrow it may be different. And so you're not

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 5>going to get that clarity of this is what the

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 5>tariff policy for the United States will be. I don't

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 5>think the markets will like that, just because I don't

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 5>think that clarity is coming.

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 4>So do you expect any pushback feedback once we do

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:54.319
<v Speaker 4>know what the policy is from either obviously the Democrats

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 4>or maybe even some in the Republican Party.

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, absolutely, I mean I think we're going to see,

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 5>you know, obviously the sometime today pick up their resolution

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 5>to try and you know, overturn these tariffs that were

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.599
<v Speaker 5>up with Canada, and you know, my vote count, I

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:09.719
<v Speaker 5>at least I had. You know, the Democrats need four

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 5>Republican senators to go along with them, and I think.

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>They have it.

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 5>So you are going to begin to see a public

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 5>rebuke of some of these tariffs. I would just caution though,

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 5>and say that, you know, tariffs are the power of

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 5>the presidency. Congress delegated its authority a long time ago,

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 5>so there's only so much Congress can do to actually

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 5>advise the presidents say maybe you should scale this back.

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 5>So it's ultimately President Trump's decision. And I think that

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 5>for him to be able to walk back this tariff,

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 5>and this is just my own personal belief, you're going

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 5>to you're going to need to see consumer confidence or

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 5>sticker shock amongst things that you know, Americans just buying

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 5>a daily basis for him to actually walk back a

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 5>lot of their tarff threat.

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 2>And of course, though the goal is to shipt the

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 2>economy though away from physical spending to private led investments,

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 2>is that a possible thing.

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 4>Not in the short term.

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean, this has been the White House plan all along,

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 5>is that you're going to have short term pain for

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 5>long term gain. But you know, some of these pains

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 5>are going to be very, very, very permanent. I mean,

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 5>if you think of just the farmer argument in particular

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 5>that you know, if the United States does move forward

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 5>and use the USDA to implement subsidies for farmers, farmers

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 5>aren't going to like that because essentially what it means

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 5>is that you're going to be thrown out of the

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 5>supply chain and in the future, maybe instead of buying

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 5>goods from the United States, they're going to buy it

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 5>from Brazil. That's not something that you're going to be

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 5>able to easily reverse. So yes, you are going to

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 5>get this shift. And we've heard from clients saying, look,

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 5>I want to potentially buy a factory in the United States.

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 5>I just can't do it in twenty twenty five, probably

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 5>can't even do it by twenty twenty seven. So you know,

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 5>again it's really how long how long can the White

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 5>House really keep with this strategy to try and transform

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 5>that economy.

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 4>All right, Nathan, thank you so much. We appreciate it,

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 4>and you're going to have a long afternoon and into

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 4>the evening analyzing what we will hear from the President

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 4>this scepter and Nathan Deane, Senior policy analyst Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 4>He's based down there and wash it in DC. He

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 4>does a wonderful job explaining all the mechanizations of what

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 4>happens down there in Washington and Congress and Capitol Hill

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 4>and in the White House as well.

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarcklay and Android Auto

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube in DC.

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not just about musk, It's not just about tariffs.

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 2>It's also about TikTok. Potentially. President Trump is weighing plans

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 2>for TikTok sale today at a meeting. We want to

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 2>get more on this. And Matt you St and Hell

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 2>media litigation analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, he joins us now

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 2>from DC. All right, remind us of where we are

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 2>in the law and what Congress did and where we're

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 2>at here.

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So we are at the point where Congress adopted

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 6>this law last year that effectively bans TikTok in the

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 6>United States. As of January nineteenth. The Supreme Court upheld

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 6>that law after TikTok Talk brought a constitutional challenge, and

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 6>then President Trump adopted an executive order just before the

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 6>law was going to take effect in mid January to

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 6>say that, look, companies that are at risk under this law,

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 6>don't worry about it. Right now, we're not going to

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 6>enforce that law. So app stores like Google and Apple

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 6>and Oracle, companies that host TikTok, potentially faced billions of

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 6>dollars of liability under the law. Trump's Attorney general sent

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 6>a letter saying, don't worry about it. We don't think

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 6>you're in violation of the law, so you can continue

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 6>to host TikTok. That executive order from President Trump ran

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 6>for seventy five days. That takes you to Saturday, April fifth.

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 6>So we're at the point where there's likely to be

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 6>some action. And as you said, there's a meeting in

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 6>the White House today.

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 4>It's a good time for this discussion. Matthew had read

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 4>headline crossing the Bloomberg terminals we speak, Amazon puts in

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 4>a last minute bid to acquire all of TikTok. What

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 4>do you make of that?

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 6>That's that's that's fascinating. I mean to me, that underscores

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 6>how far we are away from a resolution here and

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 6>you're talking about, you know, you know, some indication that

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 6>they that a deal could be in place by by Saturday.

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 6>I don't think so. There there are so many moving

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 6>pieces here and new bids coming in that the idea

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 6>that all of this is going to be resolved in

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 6>three days seems pretty fantastic. So I think what you're

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 6>likely to see is sort of some indication of movement

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 6>towards a deal and President Trump again kicking the can

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 6>down the road. And the only question is is anyone

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 6>going to stand up to that. There was a lot

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 6>of political courage to to, you know, advocate for a

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 6>ban of TikTok last year. There were some votes in

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 6>Congress that were fifty to zero for it. But now

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 6>President Trump has a warm spot in his heart for TikTok,

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 6>as he says, and suddenly some of that courage is

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 6>falling away. So that's going to be the interesting dynamic

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 6>is how much lawmakers or maybe TikTok's competitors stand up

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 6>and say, hey, we have a law on the books

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 6>here that that that bands TikTok. Are we going to

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 6>enforce it or not?

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 2>So to that point, I guess I wonder what part

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 2>of TikTok is still left to be bought in that

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 2>is it just going to be the US stuff, which

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 2>may not be as valuable, or is it going to

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 2>also be the technology that kind of sits in China.

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 2>And if that's the case, how do we get.

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 6>That That's that's sort of the million dollar question here,

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 6>because there was a lot of pushback in Congress for

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 6>the idea that a company tied to China would still

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 6>have control over the algorithm, and and a lot of

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 6>the solutions you're seeing floated around look a lot like

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 6>what TikTok was pitching as Project Texas last year, where

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 6>the US opperations what would work here maybe under Oracle

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 6>or someone else, but the algorithm would still ultimately be

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 6>controlled by by byte Dance. And the question is is

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 6>that the sort of solution that we're talking about here,

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 6>because ultimately China and byte Dance need to agree to this,

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 6>and and with with Trump kicking the can down the

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 6>road on this van, I'm not sure they have a

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 6>lot of concern. I don't know that the US has

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 6>a lot of leverage to force them to sell the algorithm,

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 6>So it seems very likely that we're looking at some

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 6>sort of solution that that keeps that algorithm tied to China,

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 6>tied to byte Dance, And the question is is Congress

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 6>going to be okay with that now in a way

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 6>they weren't last year?

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, silly question, but there's no indication that byte

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Dance wants to sell here. So I mean an Amazon

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 4>bid is impressive, but I don't think I've got a

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 4>seller there, do I.

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 6>That's exactly that's been the problem, you know through this

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 6>whole process, is is bike Dance really willing to sell

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 6>and especially the algorithm component here with with China needing

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 6>to to bless that. So yeah, a lot of offers,

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 6>a lot of talk, but but I think we're far

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 6>from from any sort of final resolution here.

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 2>So to that point, this goes back to the earlier

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 2>headline that Paul just broke that Amazon's putting in that

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 2>last minute bid to acquire all of TikTok this according

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 2>to the New York Times, who else quickly is on

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 2>the docket to potentially buy?

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so I mean you keep seeing Oracle mentioned as

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 6>a potential bidder. You saw Frank McCourt was on Bloomberg

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 6>Television earlier, and you know a number of other names,

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, floating around. I don't have great visibility into

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 6>all those offers. I've heard four offers you know, talked about.

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 6>But just I think we'll learn more this afternoon after

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 6>this meeting, as as President Trump considers next steps here.

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 6>But again a lot of open questions on the law

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 6>and big questions politically of whether whether people are going

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 6>to advocate for the law that was adopted last year.

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.719
<v Speaker 4>All right, so you know, Alex that Matt does all

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 4>the litigation around the media communications, which means he's going

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 4>to be going out to the NAP conference out in Vegas,

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 4>National Association of Broadcasters. So I asked him offline, where

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 4>are you staying in Vegas? Because that tells me a

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 4>lot about a person, you know. His response, he didn't know.

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:26.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Al did not like this.

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 6>By the way, Matt, I booked someplace. I got to

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:29.679
<v Speaker 6>look it up.

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 4>All thank goodness, because I mean, you know, when I

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 4>was out there, first it was the mirage, then Bolagio

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 4>nounce the win. But it's it says a lot about it.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 2>But if you don't know where you're staying, that just

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 2>means that you got you've got nothing going noew lots

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 2>of shade, Lots of shade. Met Schettenhelm of Boomberg Intelligence

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Litigation Analysts, thank you so very much.

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>ten am to new n Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal