WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2018 NFL MegaPod Week 11 Preview

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Check it down man now down Now. Thursday morning, November

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>fift is the Beating the Book podcast Kill Alexander Megapod

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>time for week eleven in the NFL. Ace hasn't said

0:00:21.079 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it yet this year, so I'll go ahead and say it.

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Where has the time gone? How are we at week eleven? Already?

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 1>The show has always brought you by the score x

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com th h E s c O r e

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>x dot com. It's that secret football stock market thing

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about for years on the show. Again

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the best, the number one, the top, Beating the Book

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>score extra. At the end of the regular season, we

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>will have you on the megapod for wild Card week

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 1>to discuss your NFL trading success and of course go

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>through the wild card games with you. So that is

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the entire goal for beating the book listeners. There's a

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>bigger five thousand dollar pot, but if you have an

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>enter jet, probably not gonna win that. But you can

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>still in the Beating the Book pool again, that's the

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>score x dot com. Just enter the promo code GIL.

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Got to do that promo code Gil with two l's.

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>That's how you get into the Beating the Book pool.

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>And again you win it all. You're on the Megapod

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>wild Card weekend. I update the stats on my Twitter

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>at beating the book from time to time, so check

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it out. Give you the top five courtesy of the

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>score X. That's the score x dot com defined all

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the download links. It is week leven, the one week

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>where all the primetime games are the best games, best matchups,

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>at least from a fan's perspective. We'll get to all

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of those Sunday daytime picks, and of course the final

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>two questions as always on the show. The staples from

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>wager Talk dot Com thirty nine years into business, Marco

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to Angelo Goo Morning Marco today. I am doing fine

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>out that the technology of the podcast is working. I

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>am ready to go feeling good. You know you should

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>get your own show because you're you're a wizard at this. Yeah,

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>technology proving to be hurdles everywhere. Let me just put

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>it that way. And all my left lads and Eelman

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>treating the Kansas City Chiefs like he treated the Seattle

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks back in still fading the chiefs, ladies and gentlemen.

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It's Ace, good morning, Ace, all right, good morning. That's all.

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>We may be wrong once for this decade, so Chief

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Fans doesn't look good. I don't think I'll be wrong twice,

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, you're right. It does move so quickly. Can't

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>believe we're already been in college basketball, man, and then

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving is next week? Does go too quickly, way too fast.

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving show up a little too early for everybody this

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 1>year I have. I couldn't believe it's next week. When

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>my wife said, you know, planning for Thanksgiving, I'm like,

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>what are you talking about? What do you get already?

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, already it's next week. I can't believe it.

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>The twenty second, that's an early Thanksgiving. And by the way,

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>let me just say this, we do not do a

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>megapod on Thanksgiving week, so everybody with the grown I

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>get it. Yeah, we could try to get the group

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>together on Wednesday, it just doesn't work out Thanksgiving week.

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>We've tried it before. People are traveling, so we just

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 1>take Thursday off Thanksgiving. We take the week off of

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.079
<v Speaker 1>the megapod. We will have guessing lines at the beginning

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of the week, but no megapod next week, so we

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>apologize in advance for that. We'll be back the following week.

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>For Week thirteen. That has always been a megapod tradition.

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>If you will returning to the show, We Love Them

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>back for the first time this season. The creator of

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the Power Rank dot Com. It's our friend Ed Faye.

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Good morning Ed, Good morning Gil. Thanks so much for

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>having me on. I appreciate it. Ed is in snowy

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>an arbor, braving the weather conditions. You think Michigan is

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>getting to the college football playoffs? By the way, I

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>believe there's a good chance. Last week I checked, I

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.839
<v Speaker 1>think it was about fifty fifty. But this Michigan team

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is on the rise. Ohio State's not quite the same program,

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>so I'm pretty optimistic about their chances. Here's the thing. If,

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>in fact, the old scenario that everybody's talking about now

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about on the Vicent Show Numbers Game

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks back, if Alabama runs the table but

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>then loses to Georgia, Let's say a field goal in

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the SEC Championship, should Alabama be in and Michigan out

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>ed um No, But obviously I'm biased, so everyone can

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>make their own judgment about this. But what I have

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>them meaning to do is figure out the probability that

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>this scenario happens because you need Notre Dame to win

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>these next two games. You need Michigan beat Ohio State,

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and I mean they're a pretty good chance to beat Northwestern.

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>The chance of that scenario happens has got to be

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>like five. So it's fun to talk about. Probably not

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. At the end of the day, Marco, I

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>went around town, as you were even witnessed to me

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>doing this last year. I went around town before the

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>playoff was elected, betting people saying Alabama will be in

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the final four, just getting a hundred dollar bills from everybody.

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It's awesome. There'll be one loss Alabama over Michigan. Absolutely,

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll be in. Yeah, they're they're Alabama is not left

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>off the ticket. You got a sad part. What do

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you do with Georgia. Georgia will be into Georgia, into

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Georgia wins the SEC I ran, So you know, then

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Michigan is gonna be the odd man out because if

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame runs the table, they're gonna they're in automatically

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>because of the name. I just you know, they're the schedule.

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Strength doesn't is not going to apply, and Michigan will

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>get to they will get to feel how Penn State

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>felt a couple of years ago, Jack, same scenario. This committee,

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>this committee has has moved conference champs that win a

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>conference championship game over idle teams. So why does the

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame the one left out? They're gonna be sitting

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>at three will soon Clemson's in. Michigan jumps Notre Dame

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>because they win a game. Georgia jump Notre Dame. Here's

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:41.119
<v Speaker 1>the answer to your question, ed because their Notre Dame,

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>because they're Michigan. That's why they're getting in right now. No,

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:51.119
<v Speaker 1>college football is not a meritocracy, right, It's just completely

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>bullshit and it's that And I'm not trying to be

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>flip about it, but Marco saw me do this last

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>year with some folks. I was so convinced Alabama we

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:01.919
<v Speaker 1>be in because I know how these people are in

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>college football. Right, it's all about the money in the end,

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's such utter bullshit in the end who they

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>put in. And so because it's not a meritocracy, there's

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously going to be a school or schools that just

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.679
<v Speaker 1>get absolutely shafted. But if it's all about the money,

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that that's in favor of Michigan, because Michigan will bring

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the eyeballs wherever they go in that semifinal game, not

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>more than Notre Dame Alabama. The only teams got their

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>own their own TV station, you know, they get their

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>own contract for all of their games with NBC. Notre

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Dame's the lock if they if they run the table,

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>there's no no way that they let Notre Dame out.

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I would be absolutely shocked. Um, if that scenario happens

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>with the George Alabama game, it's gonna be unfortunately, Michigan

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>odd man out. It's gonna be the exact same thing

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>as Penn State was. The same situation. They're gonna win

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the conference championship and all of that in and gets

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>route in the end because of somebody else being up there.

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>And I'll bet you a hundred dollars. Oh yeah, first

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of all, so so I'm happy to do that. You're

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>on gil, But but first of all, I mean, I

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>gotta check what the number is. But there's about a

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.679
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent chance, probably a little bit less, that Georgia

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>actually pulls that upside off. Yeah, we will revisited. Only

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in that scenario we obviously we got a long way

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to go. Yes, sir, that is the biggest topic of

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>conversation in ann Arbor. I'm sure it is. I'm sure

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it is. Well before the basketball game last night. We Yeah,

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of taking up the airspace this morning. I understand.

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's no disrespect, by the way, to Michigan and

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the alumni, because I grew up in d C. For

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, when I grew up in d C, and

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's still the case now, but Michigan is a

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>huge school for d C high school graduates. So I

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>have a bunch of friends who went to Michigan, and

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>let me just say this to a man, they still,

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>decades later, love everything Michigan like they hold Michigan above

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>everything else in their lives, over any pros forwards team.

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>So I respect Michigan. It's just how college football works.

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how it happens if in fact that scenario materializes.

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk NFL, gentlemen. This is one unbelievable series of

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>primetime games beginning and let's do it from reverse Monday night,

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>not only the best game, the Markee Game of the weekend,

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>but the markete game of the NFL schedule from maybe

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the outset of the NFL schedule. It's the Chiefs and

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the Rams now. The biggest story in the league this week,

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, was the fact that this was originally intended

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to be played at Estadio a Steca in Mexico City.

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>The field conditions were such that even the National Football League,

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:45.719
<v Speaker 1>led by Roger Goodell, who is hell bent on absolutely

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>proliferating this sport globally, hell bent on having the three

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>games in London and the game in Mexico City for

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>his international series, they would have done anything not to

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>move this game, but even they had to when the

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>field was such caused by concerts, caused by soccer games,

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and weather just unplayable. Players on both teams threatened that

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>not to play if in fact they kept it as Stadiosteca,

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and so they had no choice. The NFL didn't, and

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the game is now in l A. The number moves

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>from two and a half to three and a half

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>on that move to l A and favor of the

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>home standing Rams. No Cooper Cup for the Rams. He's

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>out for the season, and you have too high octane

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>offenses to even in the Rams case, two very sort

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>of beatable defenses suspect defenses. The total therefore informed by

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>that six the three and a half. It is the

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>highest total in the National Football League since as far

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>back as six at least that's as far back as

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a reliable database goes. Uh. For some who have investigated

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>this passionately sixty three and a half right now at

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>sixty three or sixty three and a half, depending on

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>where you're shopping. The total did not move once it

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>went from Mexico City to Los Angeles. That's somewhat curious.

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>We begin, as always with our guests, Mr Fang from

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the Power Rank. What you got here, Agil, You got

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that next time I'm at your house

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to build you a statue. Roger Goodell, I know how

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>much you love the guys. I'm a big fan. Are

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you always on when I go on a Goodell rant?

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Is that always you that happens to be on? Maybe?

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean I listened to you otherwise.

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate what the show. I appreciate. I know you

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:27.599
<v Speaker 1>love the man not um, yeah, you know, I I think. Uh.

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>This is obviously the super Bowl of the regular season,

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>very exciting game. Um. The thing my number has ramps

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>by five point two and that's adjusted for now they're

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>playing in their their home field. UM. Surprised the markets

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>have only moved to point with that. You know, when

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>I do home field, it's about two and a half

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>points over the last five years. Sorry two and a

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>half points, I said that, right, yeah, UM. But the

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that really strikes me about this game are the defenses.

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we know that we need that. We know

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>these offenses can score, we know that they can move

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and it's really a story of the defense.

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And when I, UH do my numbers, I have the

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 1>RAMS is about a league average UH defense and um,

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 1>for Kansas City, that's really not the case. When I

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>look at I look at defense in two different ways.

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I look at yours for past attempt adjusted for strength

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of schedule, and their twelve in that category, which makes

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you think that maybe the Chief's defense is okay. But

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>what I've been doing this year, and this is new

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>for me, is looking at success rate. So success rate

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is uh, you know, an offense that succeeds if if

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you get half of the yards on first down, on

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>second down and all the necessary yards on third and

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>fourth down. Uh. And then what I do is I

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>take that raw success rate and I adjust for strength

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of schedule in Kansas City is thirty feet out of

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty two NFL teams on defense by that metric. So

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the I mean, I see here two leade offenses, a

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Rams defense that's about the middle of the league could

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>be better. Uh kind of have you gotta have some

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>faith uh in that unit because because they've been good,

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and and then the Kansas City defense that's really going.

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>So I really I like the Rams in this game.

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I would definitely towards them on the side. And UM

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>six series a pretty high total. It wasn't didn't that

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl between Atlanta and New England get into the sixties?

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 1>Did it? I can't remember offhand. I want to say

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it was like sixty one or sixty two. And whenever

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you see a number like that in the NFL, I

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>mean you almost always want to lean the under. My

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>numbers like the under a little bit. But again that's

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that's always an effort proposition with with just such explosive offenses.

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I am efforting the Falcons Patriots super Bowl total at

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that time, New England was favored by three that much.

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I remember as far as what the total was the

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>total in that game was. I know I had an

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>under bed in that and uh saw that blow up

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>with the beltdown, Yeah exactly, and plus like you know,

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady throws a pick six in that game too,

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think it would have gone under without that play, right,

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, yeah, I'm seeing fifty eight and a half,

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.719
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know if that's where it closed. You

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>know that one and a half was the highest total, uh,

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that we've ever had in the NFL prior to this.

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And I don't remember which game it was, but I

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 1>ms the Rams. I think wasn't in a couple of

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>years when they had that Greatest Show on Turf team.

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>What about that um that Packers Falcons playoff game that

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>same year that the Falcons went to the Super Bowl.

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I remember that one being in the close to the

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>sixties as well, but not sixty three that I think

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is uh, that's the high water mark, sixty three and

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a half. As we do this on Thursday morning between

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs and the Rams, I was talking about this

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>game with the producer of my Behind the Book video

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>series that I do with j rud the Vice president

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and MGM Racing Sports every week Matt Brown is his name,

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>and Matt and I were talking about this Chiefs Rams

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>game and we were saying, Okay, well, you know both

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>coaches are going to go in with this attitude on offense.

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>At first, I think one thought for Sean McVan Andy

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Reid will be, well, look, we want to keep the

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>other offense off the field, so let's run the ball.

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's try to make a concerted effort to run the

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>ball with Kareem Hunt and Todd Gurley, respectively. But then

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the sort of second thought would would probably be Okay,

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>even if they start that way, they're going to realize

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that they can just destroy the opposing defense so much

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that why are they even bothering with that if they

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>can just matriculate quickly down the field. So I don't

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>even know if that's a strategy that even is sustainable

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>or even is something that will hold any water for

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>more than five minutes. It's interesting game to even think about,

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and I have no real feel as to how it's

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>going to go. Marco, what do you think? Well, for me, uh,

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I agree with the Rams being the side

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>in this one. And because I know Kansas City, we're

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>getting a little bit of false hope with Kansas City.

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>People are talking the last you know, four weeks. You know, look,

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>their defense is playing better all of a sudden. Now

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you know they only gave up ten and fourteen, and

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you know the Rams are given up in thirties. They

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>give up forty five to the Saints. Let's just stop

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for a second and look at what Kansas City has

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>played and the city in the last four games. They

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>played a Cincinnati team the week after they were beat

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>up by the Steelers physically, and then that last second loss.

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Then they played Denver, who has just you know, shot

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>themselves in the foot all year. They played Cleveland in Arizona,

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>two of the you know, worst teams in the league.

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, offensive not a threat. You flip that over

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and you look at the Rams and if you look, like,

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>just what points they're giving up? Yeah, the Rams are

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>given up more points per game. But look at the

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>rundown of offenses and quarterbacks that they have faced. They

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>faced Philip Rivers, they faced Kirk Cousins, Russell Wilson twice.

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>They faced Aaron Rodgers and Drew Brees. Come on, you

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>can't even compare the lineups of what the two defenses

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>have faced in this one. I'm gonna go ahead. I'm

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna take the Rams in this game. I'm also going

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to take the the over. I know it's the squarest

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>bet on the board. But guys, we're having a changing

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of the guard, and until Vegas five is with that

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>new you know high watermark is, I'm gonna go to

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the over and I know that. You know the Sharks

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>are gonna come in. They're gonna bet the under because

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that's what they do, because they don't they just don't

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>see teams scoring as many points. But guys, we've seen

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it move on the bottom end. You know, you don't

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>see thirty seven and thirty eights in the NFL anymore.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>You don't see forty ones that often anymore. They're they're

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>moving the lines up. But yet, you know, when you

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>get to the top end, there's that ceiling. Where do

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>we stop at? I don't think this is high enough.

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I I see this game both teams getting into the thirties. Um.

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I actually have the Rams getting to forty in this one.

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>And I was hoping this game was gonna stay in

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Mexico because uh, I would have liked it even more.

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I know the field conditions wouldn't have been conducive. But

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I was looking forward to seeing these two teams play

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter with both defenses gas from going up

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and down the field, watching each other trying to, you know,

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>stop each other, and then playing that fourth quarter. Uh,

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the fatigue factor, guys would just be

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>breaking and plays open left and right. But I'm still

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>going over the total, and I like the Rams not

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to mention sixty seven or sixty eight yard field goal

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>attempts down in the elevation of Mexico City. It should

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>be noted that the Rams are practicing in Colorado Springs.

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>They were practicing in the elevation of Colorado in preparation

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>for the game in Mexico City. They decided to hang

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>out there practice the rest of the week before they

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 1>head back to Los Angeles for this one murderers row

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 1>of opposing quarterbacks. Though it's an excellent point from you, Marco,

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the Rams do want to clean up the penalties though,

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that's for sure. Ten penalties last week against the Seahawks

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred and two yards, many of which were

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>just ridiculous, stupid defensive penalties that kept Seahawks drive sustained.

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So they can clean that up. That's another sort of

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>check in the Rams box. Ace. Hey, you know what's

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>really surprising with this matchup that I mean, and here's

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line with these two teams. They're both sitting

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>at nine and one. And there's a simple reason why

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 1>Kansas Cities eight and two against the spread and the

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Rams are only four and six against the spread. And

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the reason for that is because coming into the season,

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>everyone was well aware that the Rams were going to

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>be one of the elite teams in the NFL. Um,

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you looked at future ons, you looked at season win totals,

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and they were in the top three of the NFL.

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>And any time that's already established, um, they're gonna put

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>out a very difficult line, meaning you're not gonna really

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>be able to turn a profit off those top tier

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>teams when we go into the season knowing about them,

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and we touch on it on the podcast all the time.

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>The one team that's been able to do that consistently,

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>there's only been one. That's the New England Patriots, where

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>even though every year going in, you know, the market

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>concludes they will be competitive and elite, uh, they're still

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>able to outperform the betting market. UM. Usually you can't.

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>And the Rams are a perfect example of that. UM

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>nine and one straight up, four and six against the spread.

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Like I say, the spread becomes a great equalis or

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>embetting sports, we usually know whether team MAY or Team

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>B is better. In most cases. Now, Kansas City there

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 1>ain't into for the simple reason nobody saw them coming.

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Look what their season win total was coming into the season, UM,

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and they called most by surprise UM. And I think

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>that's why you're looking at such a great a t

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>S record. UM. I think there's there's value here on

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. UM. The fact that they're playing at home

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>now and getting almost no respect as far as that

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the line goes for that adjustment from Mexico City to

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>l A, that alone, I think gives you some line value.

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they adjusted enough. UM. But I also

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>liked the total here. But real quickly I wanted to

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>add what surprises me? And I wanted to know what

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys saw prior to the season. This line for

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>this game, and and granted is in Mexico City was

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>three Rams minus three UM. And and like I said,

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 1>coming in, everyone no one's surprised that the rams are

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>nine in one. But I think a lot of people

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>are surprised case's nine in one and yet the lines

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty much right where it would have been prior to

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the season. That to me is a little bit surprising. Um,

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>but I want to get to the total real quickly,

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and for me, I think it's it's again if you

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>bet the younger, you're gonna be holding your breadth. I

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>understand that these are two high profile offenses, and that's

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 1>usually the case. Um, but real quickly. I always say,

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>when you've got two great defenses, are two great offenses,

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>it usually creates the perfect storm for the opposite to happen.

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you've got two great defenses, it's the

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>perfect storm for and over because more times than not,

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the line shaded towards the bias of a low scoring game. Um,

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>so you got line value. I think you couple that

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>with two good defenses and and defense turns. It gets turnovers. Um,

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, some some three and ounce and then short

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:02.199
<v Speaker 1>drives and up and down the field could happen. It

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily mean uh, no score or low scoring game.

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's the same with with the the

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 1>high scoring, high profile offenses. I mean, I don't think

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a shootouts what you go in there wanting to happen.

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>If anything, you want to see that other team's offense

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>on the sideline, if that's the strongest part of their team. Um.

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So I got to give the Rams a little advantage

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>there on the game planning. But it's finally for the total. Listen,

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the highest we've ever seen. So for me,

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's an under or you've gotta pretty much leave

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it alone. And I agree with Marco, it's the changing

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of the guard and it's a different NFL. Um But

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they didn't adjust this total when it

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 1>moved locations from a field we already know was terrible

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>tells you that they're not really even sure where to

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>put this total. They're waiting for the market to tell them.

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And none of the betting syndicates that I provide accounts

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>for have touched the side or the total yet in

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>this game, So they're just leaving it where it is

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>and see what's gonna happen the as they expect the

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>market to bet the over. But remember when you're going

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>over sixty three, and if you look at Kansas City,

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>only four of their ten games have gone over sixty three,

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and you look at the Rams, only four their ten

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>games have gone over the sixty three. Um, I mean

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>combine their ten overs, nine unders and a push. You know,

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not like they've been flying over in their games.

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>If you bet the over for both these teams, you

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't made any money. And again, when you go over

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty three, nothing can go wrong, meaning they have to

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:33.719
<v Speaker 1>score more than two touchdowns every quarter, one eight minute drive,

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and your probability of catching that ticket just dropped significantly.

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Now again, they could score real quickly in bunches. I

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:43.719
<v Speaker 1>get it, but until I see it happen on the field,

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I just can't go over a number like sixty three.

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>It's unprecedented. So for me it's it's under. And I

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>like the Rams a little disagreement on the on the total,

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>but I get It's. Like I said my conversation with

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.479
<v Speaker 1>my buddy Mett, it's like you think they'd come in

0:22:57.640 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>wanting to keep the other offense off the field for

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>long sustained drives, and then I think they'll quickly realize

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>they can just torch the opposing defenses. But it's a

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>good point ace when you have a total that high,

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it does bear saying. At least once one long drive

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>can really put you behind the eight ball on and

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>over I I hear both sides or you know, a

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>seven minute drive, that's right, that's right. And I missed

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>field goals, I was at a field goal in this

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.719
<v Speaker 1>game with a total like that is sort of like

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a turnover, right, A missed field goal, for sure is

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a turnover, but even a field goal is sort of

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a notch against going over that number. All that said,

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not betting the under either. I'm with you, Marco,

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>your breath, man. I don't know those bets, those bets

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that are the hardest to make usually cash the easiest,

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and the ones you're most confident with a like me

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>last week you know what I uh or what was

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it two weeks ago? My most confident and you know

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>they end up losing by thirties. So yeah, such a

0:23:57.920 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>such a fun game to watch, this is gonna be

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I don't know. I like the ram side

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>as well myself. Ace one thing, so you had that

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that preseason at three. That's got to be a neutral

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>site spread, right, two and a half three, so it's

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>probably like six, you know, at the beginning of the season,

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I would have made the seven and a half of

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. So that's in l A. But prior to

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the season, we knew it was in Mexico, right, I

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>would have made it in l A seven and a

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>half in Mexico City prior to the season in in

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>l A. In l A seven and a half and

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>you make their home field what two two and a

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>half and okay, so in Mexico City it would have

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>been five. Yeah, okay, that makes sense to me, that

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. It was three day thought Kansas City was

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>league average ish. We thought Rams were a Super Bowl contender,

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and I mean it shows exactly shows you what Kansas

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>City has done. Let's move on, gentlemen. Sunday Night flexed

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Minnesota Vikings and the Chicago Bears flexed out

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Pittsburgh Jacksonville, you can credit Jacksonville for

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that credit in quotes Minnesota at Chicago, NFC North battle

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>between the six and three Bears and the five three

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and one Vikings. Interesting that when we talk about you know,

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and I've talked about it for months now, that it's

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Saints a Ram's in the NFC, it's Patriots chiefs in

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the a f C, though the Chargers and the Steelers

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>will have something to say about that, especially after seeing

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots played last week. But the team that no

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:31.919
<v Speaker 1>one sort of talks about anymore, and this was the

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>team that before the season started some people were already

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.360
<v Speaker 1>not even penciling in, but they were doing it more permanent,

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>inc putting the Minnesota Vikings, exalting the Vikings to the

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>top of the conference five three and one. They still

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>have an outstanding defense, a defense that is tops on

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>third downs. Uh, quitting new my buddies over an onside sports,

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Posing offenses are averaging eight point six yards to go

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>on third downs against the Vikings, which is the equivalent

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Vikings basically turning opposing offenses into the Buffalo

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Bill's offense, because that's exactly what the Bills average yards

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to go on third downs on offense. So the Vikings

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have been unbelievable. By the way, the opposing offense third

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>down rate as a result, it follows, is by far

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the lowest in the league, right at around twenty five percent.

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>If memory serves me correctly, it's twenty something, mid twenties.

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing, Mitch Drobiski last week three fifty

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>five yards passing, three touchdowns note picks on forty eight

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>point six passer rating out of a total of one

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight point three. Great game, and everybody's going crazy

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 1>about Drabiski all of a sudden, But I'm not buying

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 1>him for a second. He's a dinker and a dunker,

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and here now he faces the Vikings defense. Bears did

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 1>snap that division drought, their first victory over division opponents

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 1>since Halloween of ten in a row. They had lost

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>against division opponents, so that snapped. But it's the Vikings here,

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Bears are the home team giving right now

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>as we do this Thursday morning, it's two and a

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.719
<v Speaker 1>half consensus, Mark, how do you feel about this one? Well,

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I thought you were going to

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>point out is because of the flax in Chicago's uh,

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jacksonville's inepness in Chicago becoming a you know,

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a player in the playoffs. Uh, this gets moved in

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>and it is actually a huge disadvantage to Chicago. They're

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in a quandary here where they played Detroit last week.

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Guess they get to stay home two weeks in a row.

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>So that helps. But they're gonna turn around off of

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>this Sunday night game, which you know is gonna be

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>finishing late, and turn around and play on a Thursday,

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>not a Thursday night like most teams turn around, but

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 1>Thursday at noon on the road. So tough, you know,

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>problem for them after this and this is such a

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>big game. And to complicate that, Minnesota's coming off of

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 1>by so all of the advantages as far as intangibles

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>go or in Minnesota's favor um add to the scheduling problems.

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:07.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, figure Minnesota's You've talked about their defense has

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.360
<v Speaker 1>been getting better and better, and they've now had two

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>weeks to prepare their defense. Minnesota during the last five

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>games their four and one straight up, four and one

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>against the spread, and they've held four of those five

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 1>opponents to twenty one points or less. The only team

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that scored more than that on Minnesota during that recent

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>run was the Saints. Who is the team right now

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that is at the top of the heap as far

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>as flavor of the week goes, because they've aren't it,

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>They've done nothing wrong and his teams are scoring machine.

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>But if you do go back to that game, and

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:45.959
<v Speaker 1>remember it, Minnesota was up thirteen to ten and driving

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>right before the half with an opportunity to take a

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>ten lead. That would have changed the whole complexion of

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that game. But the theeling fumble consequently gave Minnesota the

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>turner excuse me, New Orleans the turnover, and they punched

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it in for a touchdown went the other directions. It

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>was a fourteen point swinging that game. I think Minnesota's

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the side here. I'm taking Minnesota. I've got to winning

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the game. But where I'm gonna be even more kill

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know thousand and eight, pull up two thousand

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>eight call and man, they're they're calling me, this is

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a low over under a forty four and a half

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>because we've got defensive teams here, I'm hitting two and

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a half. I'm taking the six on top of it,

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>going through the numbers of three, four or six and

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>seven like you're supposed to do in a traditional teaser.

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's me. And uh, if you look at the

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Bears the last two weeks, and this is what scares

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>me with the Bears, that they've won the games, they're

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>putting up big numbers, but you cannot continue to live

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL rushing the football for sixty four and

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty four yards. Drabinski needs more balance against the good defense,

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and uh, if they can't find the running game this week,

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>they'll be in big trouble. I am all about the

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota tease. I'm with you, and that is an interesting,

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>uh point. Obviously the main point of the Bears here

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>when you look at it from the Bears perspective, it

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>will be about I'm gonna say, around eighty four hours

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>between when they leave the field against the Vikings and

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>take the field early Thursday morning on Thanksgiving. So that

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>is an amazingly quick turnaround for an NFL football team.

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And in previous years, let's say they were playing some

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of patsy team here, we would talk about it

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>being a total look ahead and that if they had

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a big number, you know, you should never play the

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>favorite here because obviously they're gonna be thinking about that

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Thursday game. Maybe they rest players late and don't cover

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a big spread, but that's not the case. Here. They're

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>playing the Minnesota Vikings arguably their biggest game of the

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>year today. So tough position for the Chicago Bears to

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>be in here. Cody Parkey by the way of the

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Bears that should be mentioned hit four consecutive uprights on

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>two extra points and two field goals last week. I

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know that that means anything. In fact, I know

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean anything, but that's pretty damn incredible. The

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Bears defense sacked Matt Stafford last week six times. Khalil

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Mack had two of them. Kalil Mack back from his

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>ankle injury, of course he'll be in the lineup for

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bears as well. Yeah, thisen, this game is huge.

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you got first place implications and absolutely right.

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Minnesota is that team that nobody's really talking

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>about right now because they haven't been all that impressive.

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, remember losing that game the sixteen seventeen point

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>favorites against Buffalo, and it was kind of forget about Minnesota,

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>look elsewhere. But they're sitting at five and three and

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>coming off of buy and this is as big of

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a game for them as possible. Um. I couldn't agree

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>with you more. This would be the perfect letdown spot

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>with what Chicago has on deck, but they're not going

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to overlook um Minnesota. The problem with Chicago simple, it's

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>not a team you really want to back UM as

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a favorite. I mean they've done well this year four

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and oh against the spread, but coming into this year,

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they've covered once as a home favorite and

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>like their last seven or eight games, UM so not

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a team you really want to be given points more.

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>You want to be getting points with a team like Chicago. UM,

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and Minnesota's owned them. I mean, this is a series

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that's been one sided of late. UM So, I like

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that Minnesota side for sure, and I can tell you

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:21.719
<v Speaker 1>with certainty, UM, Minnesota plus three and on their forty

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>five is the hot sides. You know that that every

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>group that I give accounts to race to get that,

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to get the plus three even at juice, and to

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>get the under forty five, UM multiple hit it. So.

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's a legit move and I agree with it. UM.

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna see uh of of one dimension and I

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Marco nailed it. UM in today's NFL, you just can't

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>do that. You need more balance. I hope Minnesota comes

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>out and runs the football UM and slows it down

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>for us, because I think this has a good shot

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of cash in side and total. Minnesota plus the three

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>now two and a half and the Yonder for sure,

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>So I agree with both those hot signs. Alan Robinson

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>last week for the Bears six catches a hundred thirty

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>three yards, two touchdowns. Anthony Miller for the Bears five catches,

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a hundred twenty two yards and a touchdown. But the

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Bears coming off two romps for nine over Buffalo at Buffalo,

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and then they scored on their first four possessions to

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>grab a twenty six and nothing lead against the Lions

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>last week before holding on. This ain't the Bills or

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the Lions. And yeah, so Chicago's a team that I've

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>been watching all season with with Mr Drubiski and um,

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I've been kind of contrasting my adjusted yards per play

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>with my Justice success rate, and earlier in the season,

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were top eight in terms of passing

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>success rate, but in the lower half of the NFL

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of yards per times. And this is exactly

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the dink and dunk stuff that you were talking about, Gil,

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>And the game I'd like to point to is the

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a Monday night game against Seattle

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>where I mean Seattle's defense couldn't stop them. Nothing explosive,

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>but just like just grinding up first downs on then

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>when they came pretty handily, Trabiski's completion rate was up

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>near everything is kind of regress to the mean since

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>then he's down to six completion I'm looking at their

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>success rate now you know, it's still respect the ball nine.

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.399
<v Speaker 1>So like, yeah, everything you said Gil about about their

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>their offense and um, you know when I when I

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.359
<v Speaker 1>run the numbers, I think inevitably the markets are gonna

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit too far in Chicago side. Just

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 1>with the two results that you've talked about. UM, my

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 1>numbers definitely leaned towards Minnesota. Um, I don't really love

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the side, just because I just don't know what's going

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>on with this Minnesota team. Came in as a Super

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Bowl contender. They look kind of mediocre both on the

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>offensive and defense of the ball. Um by my numbers,

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>so um, and you know my number has it right

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 1>at fourty four and a half for for the total.

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So this is this is why I would lean Minnesota side.

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>But otherwise I would stay away from all Right, everybody's

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of leaning in even stronger conviction than leading onto

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the vikings. Myself included let's go to Sunday Day games. Yeah,

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I do like a lot. This week, I'm gonna go

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.240
<v Speaker 1>on something different. I have been given a total off season,

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna go with a total this week. You know,

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I have some sides jumping out. Let's go Carolina and Detroit. Um.

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 1>You can't look worse than Carolina did, uh last Thursday

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>against the Pittsburgh Steelers, at least defensively, and in fact,

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>all the quotes coming out of Carolina was just how

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 1>humbled they got UM by the Pittsburgh Steelers. UM in

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 1>that game, allowing you know, three nineteen yards, but more

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>importantly twenty three or twenty seven passing for the Steelers,

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, pretty much perfect and just ran the ball

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>down their throats as well, thirty times for a hundred

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight yards. So I think that defense is really

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>being called out this week. UM. And I think they're

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>much better than what they showed and against the Detroit

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>team that their trajectory has just been downhill. UM since

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that win against my Ammy in mid October. I mean,

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:04.919
<v Speaker 1>there's a team that's lost the Seattle Minnesota Chicago back

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to back divisional games on the road, and they have

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Chicago up next on a short week, UM, and again

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:14.760
<v Speaker 1>The problem with Detroit is they can't run the football.

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 1>And if you can't run the football and you're just

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 1>dropping back the pass, you make it really easy for defense.

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:25.240
<v Speaker 1>So I see Carolina running it down their throats, UM killing,

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 1>eating up a lot of clock, and Detroit having problems

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.760
<v Speaker 1>putting up points, kind of like against Minnesota against Seattle

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:34.280
<v Speaker 1>where they were able to put up nine and fourteen

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>respectively in both those games. UM, it's got that kind

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of matchup written all over it. But then you look

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>on the flip side quickly on Detroit team, it's the

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>defense that isn't great. But other than that Chicago thirty four,

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>they haven't given up all that many points, you know,

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 1>keeping teams belowd at thirty UM. And if they could

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 1>do that, this game will stay under that forty nine

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half fifty wherever it sits right now, we

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>bet it under fifty one UM. As soon as the

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>line came out. There is a race that had under,

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and I agree with that move immediately I got down.

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I still think there's value at under. Just get it

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>before it drops even lower under on the Carolina Detroit game.

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>That total right now, it's called forty nine and a

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 1>half right now across the board. Lions at home early

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:19.839
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. What's your game? Yeah, you know, I'm gonna

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:22.479
<v Speaker 1>go with the Thursday night game here. Um, we're looking

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>at green Bay at Seattle, and I don't really know

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>why Seattle is such a favorite. Well, I guess we

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>should start with green Bay. I know this team has

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>some issues, uh, I mean, they haven't been great on

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>defense and offense given the fact that they have Aaron

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers hasn't really impressed and everyone wants Mike McCarthy out,

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Lisa and the Packers fan base and and I kind

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of get it. It's kind of one of these relationships

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that's gone on too long and everyone could use a

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>fresh start. But on the other side of the ball,

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean I thought of Seattle as uh slightly below

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>average NFL team before the season started, and the numbers

0:37:57.239 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 1>completely confirmed that. So they're about a half a point

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>below NFL average by the numbers that I saved for

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.839
<v Speaker 1>members of my site, And um, you know, I would

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>actually make green Bay one point favorite on the road here.

0:38:09.480 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't really see any injury situation that makes me

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:13.799
<v Speaker 1>change my mind. I don't, I don't. I don't know

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>if it's Seattle just getting credit for staying close with

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the Rams last week. I mean they've lost their last

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 1>two games. Um so green Bay side. I think it's

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.320
<v Speaker 1>plus two and a half right now at at Seattle

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>as plus three. Definitely like plus three uh in this

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night game, green Bay over tease for me, Marco

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>green Bay over. By the way, all five of Seattle's

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:41.320
<v Speaker 1>losses have come by one score this year. Aaron Rodgers

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 1>seventeen touchdown passes, one pick despite playing with the spring knee,

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Packers have definitely found something in Aaron Jones.

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:51.919
<v Speaker 1>They knew it was coming. It was only a matter

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of time. But Aaron Jones hundred forty five yards rushing

0:38:54.640 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns last week against the Dolphins in the Packers

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>to twelve win. He leads the NFL with six point

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>eight yards per carry. Back to back losses to the

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Chargers in the and the Rams and the Seahawks have

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>allowed seven point three yards per carrying six point five

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry, so expect a healthy dose of Aaron

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Jones tonight. On the other hand, by the way, Seattle

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they have found their running game. They lead the NFL

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and rushing in yards per game even found Rashad Petty

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>last week. Uh they're never ending turnstyle of running backs

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>in Seattle Seahawks favored by three ed is on Green

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Bay Marco. Yeah, I agree with the old Green Bay

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota teaser, the Black and Blue Division time teaser. To

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>take it, as they would say, it's free money, printing money.

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Take it. I'm gonna go to uh team. I'm gonna

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:47.359
<v Speaker 1>go opposite a team that I've been writing for a

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>while and been you know, popping off about their wind record.

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Now all of a sudden, everybody's putting the stat up

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 1>on the Chargers that since week blah blah blah they

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>got the best record. Well, we talked about that three

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 1>weeks go here on the show, and they're now seventeen

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:07.359
<v Speaker 1>and four straight up their last games. You look at it.

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 1>But now I'm gonna go the other way. Now everybody's

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Chargers and they're the fashionable sleeper and

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:18.279
<v Speaker 1>look out for them because here they come. Well, let's

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>break them down a little bit further. I always pointed

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 1>out that that seventeen and four mark the four losses

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:28.720
<v Speaker 1>came to New England Casey last year in the Rams

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and KC this year. Four very good teams obviously, uh

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>with their four losses. So this is a team that

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, you take those four out. Man, there's seventeen

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and oh but let's look at the wins this year,

0:40:41.560 --> 0:40:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and people are just overlooking the fact that the Chargers

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:48.839
<v Speaker 1>right now, they're at a pretty soft schedule that they've

0:40:48.920 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>run through with this winning streak, they've won six in

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:55.839
<v Speaker 1>a row. In that six game streak, you have San Francisco,

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you had Oakland that I can't even call a football

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:03.720
<v Speaker 1>team right now, You had Cleenland, you beat your best

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:06.399
<v Speaker 1>winning team that you beat with Tennessee, and that way

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>was in London on a bonehead decision to go for

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 1>two when that game should have went the overtime. Tennessee

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:14.720
<v Speaker 1>at all the momentum in the second half of that game,

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and then a deep Seattle who's barely a winning team,

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and then Oakland again. I think Denver has a great

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 1>shot here. Nobody's talking about. This line is too high

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, because San next, the Rams and Sanity

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd still called San Diego. The two l A teams

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>have the least home field advantage of any of the

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>NFL teams, and right now the Chargers have the least

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:42.799
<v Speaker 1>because you go to you know, nobody's going to the games. Uh,

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Denver is coming off thereby they're the better defense. Right now,

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I gotta take the points. You give me the points

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 1>with the better defense. And given the schedule that the

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Chargers have faced, when you say that in recent weeks,

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.240
<v Speaker 1>case team is going to be the cup of quarterback

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that you've you've faced they did face Russell Wilson, I'll

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 1>retract that. That's not saying a big statement. I'm going

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>with Denver plus the points. And uh, you'll be hearing

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 1>me say Denver a second time when you ask me

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 1>another question. Denver catching seven here at Los Angeles at

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Stubub Center. It's not a stadium, it's not an arena,

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a center. Chargers though, for everybody who says, uh,

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't have home field, they tend to

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 1>win there quite often, but they tend to win everywhere.

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 1>As you point out, Marco, Uh, and the Chargers do

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 1>get the Cardinals at home next week. So the Chargers

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 1>on the CUSP, if they can get by the Broncos

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Cardinals of being nine and two, the team

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that that move from Mexico City to Los Angeles. Potentially

0:42:44.960 --> 0:42:48.359
<v Speaker 1>benefited the most is the l A Chargers, who makes

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it that much more likely the Chiefs lose that game,

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>as they have to now actually play at the Rams

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>home field. And if that's the case, if the Chiefs lose,

0:42:56.040 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>their Chargers win Chargers one game back. Eaves do have

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the tiebreaker though, having beaten the Chargers earlier this season,

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and they have the second head to head at home.

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 1>But just saying the Chargers will only be one game

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>back in the standings, it is not fated accompli that,

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>as great as the Chiefs have been that they win

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this division still in the driver's seat. But I'm just

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>saying that move from Stadi O Steca in Mexico City

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:24.919
<v Speaker 1>to Los Angeles could potentially have helped the Chargers more

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:27.279
<v Speaker 1>than anybody. All Right, gentlemen, before we get to the

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night thoughts, and Ed's already given his Thursday Night thoughts,

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 1>remember support for the show, as always comes to us

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>from bookmaker dot eu. Bookmaker dot eu a staple of

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 1>my betting arsenal. It should be for you as well.

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 1>It has been an industry leader for close to thirty years.

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Bookmaker dot eu Professional players consider them a must because

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 1>their first to post odds, they take the highest limits,

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and they pride themselves on never having kicked out a

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>winning player. Never it does not happen. That is a

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>combination of traits that is priceless in this day and age.

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Bookmakers a high volume sports book best suited for the

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.840
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated player who understand sports betting, also caters to large

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 1>recreational players and their motto is where the lines originate.

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Chances are your sports book follows their line. Again, they're

0:44:09.800 --> 0:44:13.479
<v Speaker 1>making markets and replays. Will replays be overturned? You could

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:15.959
<v Speaker 1>have bet there as to whether or not that game

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:18.319
<v Speaker 1>would have been moved from Mexico City to l A.

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:22.920
<v Speaker 1>The no was plus one. Early on Tuesday, people made

0:44:22.920 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a quick nickel doing that. It's bookmaker dot you slash gill.

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:27.719
<v Speaker 1>If you want to join right now and claim an

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>exclusive welcome bonus of up to three hundred dollars. That's

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>bookmaker dot e slash g I l l to join

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and claim your welcome bonus of up to three hundred dollars.

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I swear by it. Bookmaker dot eu check it out

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and again Bookmaker dot e slash gill to get that

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:48.240
<v Speaker 1>welcome bonus. All right, Thursday Night ed, we got your thoughts.

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:52.360
<v Speaker 1>You like the Packers, Marco, Yeah, read the Packers in

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:55.319
<v Speaker 1>the game. This is one where, uh where I really

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 1>like more though I tease the Packers, but I like

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the under in this game. Short week, I think you're

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna see both teams try to run the football a

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I'm taking under as we see these primetime

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 1>games get pumped up on the total, and I think

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 1>it's too high based on RAM Seattle. This is not

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Ram Seattle. Hey, so this is a really good Thursday

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:17.799
<v Speaker 1>night game because both teams needed the proverbial must win

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:22.799
<v Speaker 1>situation Packers four four and one and the Seahawks four

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and five. I would argue that the Packers schedule moving

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 1>forward is a little easier. Seahawks still have a gauntlet

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:30.239
<v Speaker 1>here the rest of the way. Seahawks caught a huge

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 1>break that Jimmy Garoppolo got hurt, because if he was

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>still playing for the Niners, it would be a horrific

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:38.319
<v Speaker 1>nine game stretch to close the season. Or maybe they

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:41.400
<v Speaker 1>have an easy game late, but basically a really tough schedule.

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>They had to play the Chargers in the Rams. They

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 1>got the Packers here. They got another tough game at

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Carolina next week. Huge in terms of playoff possibilities. The

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>outcome of this one, how do you see it? Yeah?

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I agree with Marco. I like the under in this game. Also,

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's one of those matchups where you're gonna

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:02.360
<v Speaker 1>see just a of running the football from both of

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 1>these teams, even though you have two great quarterbacks. I

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:07.799
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to see a lot of trying to

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>establish the run, not just come out throwing the football,

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 1>because both have had success doing that. Um. You look

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:15.880
<v Speaker 1>both of these teams, especially over the last four weeks.

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Seattle's really run the football well. Um. And you look

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 1>at I mean green Bay the last four weeks. In

0:46:22.520 --> 0:46:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Seattle the entire season pretty much, um, except for that

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:28.840
<v Speaker 1>game against Chicago where they lost by a touchdown. They

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:30.960
<v Speaker 1>they've been running the football really well. So I think

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see more of that tonight, and hopefully that

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:35.920
<v Speaker 1>clock keeps ticking and we could get a lower scoring game.

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I agree with Marco. Let's go under green Bay Seattle, alright,

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 1>totally at forty nine right now in this ball game tonight.

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, gentlemen, final two questions. I've had to uh

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:47.840
<v Speaker 1>doctor this first one because there are just not that

0:46:47.880 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 1>many candidates. The big favorite most likely to lose outright,

0:46:52.920 --> 0:46:54.759
<v Speaker 1>I gotta drop this down to five and a half

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:57.799
<v Speaker 1>as a parameter to include four games. So there's New

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Orleans ed. New Orleans eight and a half point favorites

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>at home against the defending Super Bowl champion Philadelphia Eagles.

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Marco teaser alert. Uh, the Chargers seven point

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:12.520
<v Speaker 1>favorites at home against the Broncos. Teaser alert Chargers Arizona.

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:15.719
<v Speaker 1>How bad are the Raiders that? The Arizona Cardinals are

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:19.480
<v Speaker 1>five and a half point favorites at home against Oakland

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:23.279
<v Speaker 1>and then um the game that was flexed out, Pittsburgh

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:27.440
<v Speaker 1>five and a half point favorites on the road against

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:30.720
<v Speaker 1>three and six Jacksonville and a f C Divisional playoff

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 1>rematch if you will at Jacksonville. Which are those big

0:47:33.480 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 1>favorites the biggest on the board anyway, is the most

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 1>likely to lose out right? In your opinion? Ed? Yeah,

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:41.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with New Orleans losing to Philly. Uh.

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Philly's clearly been a disappointment, a little bit of Super

0:47:43.360 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Bowl hangover, kind of look average on both sides of

0:47:46.120 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the ball. When you look at New Orleans. Yeah, so

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:52.360
<v Speaker 1>they can definitely move the ball. But after a brief

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>blip last year of having an average defense, they're back

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:58.359
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom of the league the thirtie in when

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:00.879
<v Speaker 1>I look at adjusted yards per play their twenty nine

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and adjusted success rate for the defense. Um, I don't

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 1>know what's going on. Marshall Latimer is not playing as well.

0:48:08.000 --> 0:48:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was kind of the rookie that came

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in last year at cornerback, and uh, you know, my

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:17.360
<v Speaker 1>my numbers, uh make New Orleans about a five point

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:20.319
<v Speaker 1>favorite here. So uh and I just you know, I

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:21.840
<v Speaker 1>just can just see this as a game that Philly

0:48:21.880 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>goes in and and and wins this game. Out right, Um,

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:26.960
<v Speaker 1>going with the Saints is the team most likely lose.

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Out right. Should be pointed out that the Eagles, Saints, Broncos, Chargers,

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and Raiders Cardinals three games that we just mentioned. Among

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 1>those four are the three afternoon games. So every game

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:43.840
<v Speaker 1>this weekend of the early games, every game Sunday morning

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 1>four points spreads or lower. Every single game, with the

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>exception of the game that got flexed out. The other

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:53.840
<v Speaker 1>one in this equation Pittsburgh at Jacksonville, which is now

0:48:53.920 --> 0:48:56.400
<v Speaker 1>an early game Marco, which is the favorite of the

0:48:56.440 --> 0:48:58.719
<v Speaker 1>biggest ones most likely to lose out right. Well, as

0:48:58.760 --> 0:49:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I said, I like Denver od I think they have

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a good chance to go in there and pull the

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 1>upset off of the bye week. You know, I like

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to take teams that went into the bye week ugly.

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 1>You can't go into the bye week any uglier than

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Denver did. And you know, so you know they should

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 1>be focused and prepared to give their best effort in

0:49:15.360 --> 0:49:18.680
<v Speaker 1>being a division game. And really, um, as far as

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the coach goes, I really think Evans Joseph is uh

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 1>coaching for his job here if there's no seat hotter

0:49:25.719 --> 0:49:28.960
<v Speaker 1>than his in the NFL right now, and uh, you

0:49:29.000 --> 0:49:31.640
<v Speaker 1>know they lose this one out of the break and

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know if Denver is a team that

0:49:35.000 --> 0:49:38.040
<v Speaker 1>franchise it likes to fire mid season, but this would

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:40.799
<v Speaker 1>be the candidate for it to happen. Geez, how many

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:44.000
<v Speaker 1>coaching openings are there gonna be the day after this

0:49:44.080 --> 0:49:48.719
<v Speaker 1>season ends. You might even get an offer that there

0:49:48.800 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 1>might be ten openings. Literally, they might be ten, because

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be some teams that you don't expect like

0:49:54.880 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe a Dallas or a Seattle, or a Baltimore or

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a Washington if they don't make the playoffs. More Yeah,

0:50:02.080 --> 0:50:05.879
<v Speaker 1>John Harbon rumored to be on the on the hot

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 1>seat as well. We'll see. Hey, same question, which are

0:50:09.600 --> 0:50:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the big favorites of the biggest anyway those four is

0:50:11.960 --> 0:50:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the most likely to lose that right, I'm going with

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers too. I think Denver's live in this game.

0:50:17.920 --> 0:50:21.160
<v Speaker 1>UM Charges look great obviously, excuse me, winning sixth grade

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:23.560
<v Speaker 1>games covering for their last five. But if you look

0:50:23.560 --> 0:50:26.680
<v Speaker 1>at Denver UM even in their losses, if you look

0:50:26.680 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>over the last few I mean throw out the Jets

0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:32.479
<v Speaker 1>game UM and at the road at Baltimore, but they've

0:50:32.520 --> 0:50:35.799
<v Speaker 1>lost close games, meaning against Houston that was a game

0:50:35.840 --> 0:50:38.839
<v Speaker 1>they only lost by two against the Zone, and they

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:41.400
<v Speaker 1>beat them against the Rams at home, only lost that

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:44.160
<v Speaker 1>one by three. UM even against Kansas City only by

0:50:44.200 --> 0:50:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. So they're able to hang in the games.

0:50:46.560 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And if you're able to do that, you're obviously able

0:50:49.040 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to win a game. And I think Denver is that

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:53.040
<v Speaker 1>one that could throw a wrench and ruin a lot

0:50:53.080 --> 0:50:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of teasers. On Sunday we saw last week, right out

0:50:56.640 --> 0:50:58.959
<v Speaker 1>of the gate, a couple of those favorites went down

0:50:59.160 --> 0:51:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and eliminated all the exotics for the books. Um, this

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:04.719
<v Speaker 1>one I think has the makings of of helping them

0:51:04.719 --> 0:51:06.759
<v Speaker 1>out too. I could see Denver winning this one. Let's

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:09.359
<v Speaker 1>not forget they got embarrassed last time winning the San

0:51:09.360 --> 0:51:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Diego lost that game twenty one. Nothing got shut out.

0:51:12.440 --> 0:51:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Never want that to happen. So maybe a little extra incentive,

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Denver in this one. Alright, thirteen games in

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the NFL this week, gentlemen, six teams on by of

0:51:20.960 --> 0:51:22.839
<v Speaker 1>those thirteen games, Let's say we lived in a world

0:51:22.880 --> 0:51:25.320
<v Speaker 1>now Cincinnati and Baltimore does not have a line. I

0:51:25.360 --> 0:51:27.439
<v Speaker 1>should point that out. The reason there is no line

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:29.319
<v Speaker 1>for the Cincinnati Baltimore games because we don't know if

0:51:29.360 --> 0:51:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Joe Flacco is gonna play. Joe Flacco with hip injuries,

0:51:33.000 --> 0:51:35.719
<v Speaker 1>uh so, no decision on whether he will be behind

0:51:35.800 --> 0:51:38.520
<v Speaker 1>center for the Ravens or if it will be Lamar Jackson,

0:51:38.800 --> 0:51:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens first round pick from this year, if he

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:44.400
<v Speaker 1>will be behind center, or Ladies and gentlemen party like

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it's could it gay? Could it be Robert Griffin the

0:51:50.680 --> 0:51:53.520
<v Speaker 1>third behind center for the Baltimore Ravens. And if it's

0:51:53.600 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>r G three, you know that this spread is gonna

0:51:55.600 --> 0:51:57.920
<v Speaker 1>be like minus twenty four or something in favor of

0:51:57.960 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens, something like that. I'm thinking, no, no, not

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:07.360
<v Speaker 1>minus Donny More. All right, maybe I got that part whatever.

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm on steroids from my arm by the way right now,

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so maybe maybe that was Maybe I was wrong about

0:52:15.040 --> 0:52:16.759
<v Speaker 1>that anyway, So there's no line for that. But of

0:52:16.840 --> 0:52:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the other games, the other twelve, if you had to

0:52:19.520 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>pick a side in every one of them, but you

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:25.480
<v Speaker 1>were allowed one pass, maybe maybe it is Cincinnati Baltimore,

0:52:25.520 --> 0:52:27.719
<v Speaker 1>if it was Lamar or Robert Griffin, I don't know.

0:52:27.760 --> 0:52:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we throw that into the mix. Which would it

0:52:29.440 --> 0:52:31.520
<v Speaker 1>be though, ed, Yeah, thanks for asking me that. First.

0:52:31.920 --> 0:52:37.400
<v Speaker 1>You're welcome, probably welcome. I want no part of Oakland

0:52:37.480 --> 0:52:40.440
<v Speaker 1>at Arizona. So if Rams versus Chiefs is like me

0:52:40.560 --> 0:52:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Weather versus Pacio, this game is Chloe versus Kim Kardashian.

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, seriously, Arizona is a five point favorite in

0:52:48.239 --> 0:52:51.080
<v Speaker 1>this game? Would they be a five point favorite against Alabama?

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:55.759
<v Speaker 1>Like this team is not good and but yet I

0:52:55.760 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>mean the narrative with Oakland is oh, they're tanking, and

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Gruden's in there and it's first year, and

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've just done some interesting things with getting

0:53:03.239 --> 0:53:06.520
<v Speaker 1>all these first round picks for next year and um,

0:53:06.560 --> 0:53:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, there's some underlying metrics that suggests Oakland

0:53:08.840 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 1>isn't as bad as as they appeared to be on

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the scoreboard. But I mean, I want no part of

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:17.080
<v Speaker 1>this game. We got into that conversation this week on

0:53:17.080 --> 0:53:18.640
<v Speaker 1>on a numbers game on Visa, and I think we

0:53:18.680 --> 0:53:21.880
<v Speaker 1>did throughout the whole network because Jeff Sherman at the

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:24.799
<v Speaker 1>West Gate, uh, and John Murray at the Westgate got

0:53:24.840 --> 0:53:28.239
<v Speaker 1>into this whole hypothetical and this happens about once a year.

0:53:28.600 --> 0:53:30.959
<v Speaker 1>What happens if the best team in college football played

0:53:30.960 --> 0:53:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the worst team in the pros. And before this past weekend,

0:53:33.440 --> 0:53:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo Bills were the target. Right before h you

0:53:36.800 --> 0:53:39.400
<v Speaker 1>knew that it was gonna be a route of the Jets,

0:53:39.400 --> 0:53:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So it was Alabama versus the Bills. What would be

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that line? And John Murray came out with thirty five,

0:53:46.640 --> 0:53:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to which Jeff Sherman responded, Uh no, I'd go twenty

0:53:50.480 --> 0:53:54.800
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half as as if as Chrissie Andrews

0:53:54.800 --> 0:53:56.200
<v Speaker 1>heard the twenty and a half and we're at the

0:53:56.239 --> 0:53:58.840
<v Speaker 1>south point. He goes, really a half, like you've got it,

0:53:59.080 --> 0:54:01.399
<v Speaker 1>You've got it calib rated that much that you put

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a half on it. Anyway, it's it's a ridiculous conversation

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:07.719
<v Speaker 1>as always, you know, but that, but that's kind of fun, right,

0:54:07.719 --> 0:54:11.319
<v Speaker 1>because like Alabama's got the better quarterback and not by

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Well, well, we always say, here's the

0:54:14.680 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that we always say. I always preface it by saying, listen,

0:54:17.600 --> 0:54:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a hypothetical. It's never gonna happen. So with that respect,

0:54:20.320 --> 0:54:22.839
<v Speaker 1>it's dumb. But I I am the one person who

0:54:22.880 --> 0:54:25.840
<v Speaker 1>does say after that, at least at our network, who says,

0:54:26.080 --> 0:54:29.400
<v Speaker 1>but it is a fascinating It is fascinating to note

0:54:29.400 --> 0:54:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that if that game, let's say, did happen, that the handle,

0:54:33.160 --> 0:54:37.360
<v Speaker 1>just like Mayweather McGregor, would be through the roof. People

0:54:37.400 --> 0:54:40.759
<v Speaker 1>would bet on it like crazy, And it's a reflection

0:54:40.840 --> 0:54:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of how our brains are wired, right, It's part of

0:54:42.960 --> 0:54:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the human condition. We love that conversation. We love two

0:54:47.520 --> 0:54:51.680
<v Speaker 1>things from two different disciplines pitted against each other. That

0:54:51.800 --> 0:54:53.759
<v Speaker 1>fascinates us. By the way, he went on to say,

0:54:53.760 --> 0:54:56.719
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Cavaliers versus Duke the Duke Blue Devils, who

0:54:56.760 --> 0:54:59.640
<v Speaker 1>have played at that time just one basketball game against Kentucky.

0:55:00.160 --> 0:55:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And he said, and he said, Cavaliers minus twenty two

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I love, I love, I love the

0:55:06.120 --> 0:55:09.240
<v Speaker 1>number minus twenty two and a half. I'll think plus

0:55:09.239 --> 0:55:12.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty two and a half. Will you really? Oh yeah, man,

0:55:13.040 --> 0:55:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Zion is good. R J. Barrett is great. To my goodness,

0:55:16.520 --> 0:55:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that dude Blue Devil's team. Literally, I saw one game

0:55:19.080 --> 0:55:21.640
<v Speaker 1>against Kentucky and I was like, the college basketball season

0:55:21.760 --> 0:55:23.840
<v Speaker 1>is over. I don't need to see any more. It

0:55:23.960 --> 0:55:26.640
<v Speaker 1>was really that impressive. I mean it really was. Never

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:28.640
<v Speaker 1>want to make, never want to make too much of

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:31.040
<v Speaker 1>one game, but man, they were impressive. It's all I

0:55:31.080 --> 0:55:33.920
<v Speaker 1>need to see the it's it's all an exhibition from

0:55:33.920 --> 0:55:36.600
<v Speaker 1>here on now. By the way, William Hill offering will

0:55:36.640 --> 0:55:39.919
<v Speaker 1>they go undefeated at twenty one? Not nearly high enough

0:55:39.920 --> 0:55:43.359
<v Speaker 1>for me? Not nearly high enough. Alright, Marco, same question,

0:55:43.400 --> 0:55:45.759
<v Speaker 1>which of these games you want no part of it's

0:55:46.360 --> 0:55:49.719
<v Speaker 1>it is probably gonna be a sweep. You can't play

0:55:49.760 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a game like this where you know what Oakland's intentions

0:55:53.760 --> 0:55:57.319
<v Speaker 1>aren't And that's the tank I mean, it's clear what

0:55:57.360 --> 0:56:00.400
<v Speaker 1>they're doing, But do you want to lay this number

0:56:00.440 --> 0:56:03.839
<v Speaker 1>with Arizona? You just can't with an offense. How can

0:56:03.880 --> 0:56:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you play points with the team that has scored fourteen,

0:56:07.920 --> 0:56:11.759
<v Speaker 1>eighteen seventeen the last four games and ask them to

0:56:11.800 --> 0:56:14.520
<v Speaker 1>cover a number. Well, I guess you could do it

0:56:14.560 --> 0:56:16.680
<v Speaker 1>against the team that scored six and three in their

0:56:16.760 --> 0:56:20.320
<v Speaker 1>last two games. But I can't do it if Oakland

0:56:20.320 --> 0:56:23.640
<v Speaker 1>has any pride, if I'm a player on that team,

0:56:23.680 --> 0:56:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and you know you, everybody's got to hear because it's

0:56:26.600 --> 0:56:30.040
<v Speaker 1>there's not one single talk show that has not talked about.

0:56:30.520 --> 0:56:33.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the one game Openen definitely has to lose

0:56:33.320 --> 0:56:35.680
<v Speaker 1>if they want to secure the number one. You know,

0:56:36.440 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>uh draft pick blah blah blah. It ain't hard dead stuff.

0:56:40.120 --> 0:56:41.919
<v Speaker 1>You know what's gonna end up happening. They're gonna lose.

0:56:42.280 --> 0:56:45.760
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be on a late field goal and it'll

0:56:45.760 --> 0:56:48.160
<v Speaker 1>probably sneak in under the number. I'm not I'm not

0:56:48.280 --> 0:56:50.920
<v Speaker 1>there for. I won't even watch this game. I do

0:56:51.040 --> 0:56:53.040
<v Speaker 1>not buy. First of all, I how many times will

0:56:53.120 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 1>red Zones show this game? I wonder in the course

0:56:55.600 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of the entire game. I wonder how many times they'll

0:56:57.200 --> 0:56:59.319
<v Speaker 1>flip to it. I was all over Gorden being a

0:56:59.400 --> 0:57:03.040
<v Speaker 1>clown before the season. I never bought into it. And

0:57:03.080 --> 0:57:05.920
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing where they're like, oh, this was the

0:57:06.000 --> 0:57:09.240
<v Speaker 1>plan to trade all these players and accumulate these draft picks.

0:57:09.280 --> 0:57:12.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a hunk of bullshit too, because that wasn't their plan.

0:57:12.840 --> 0:57:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Their plan was to be competitive. They traded for Jordy Nelson,

0:57:16.080 --> 0:57:18.080
<v Speaker 1>their season win total was eight and a half. And

0:57:18.080 --> 0:57:21.600
<v Speaker 1>then when they started sucking and they made the ridiculous

0:57:21.600 --> 0:57:24.800
<v Speaker 1>decision to trade Khalil mac that's when their planned quickly

0:57:24.840 --> 0:57:29.200
<v Speaker 1>became Oh my god, it's like a slippery hope to hell. Yeah,

0:57:29.200 --> 0:57:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that's been our plan all the way. Yeah, we just

0:57:31.040 --> 0:57:32.760
<v Speaker 1>want to accumulate draft picks. Here's the other thing about

0:57:32.760 --> 0:57:35.240
<v Speaker 1>accumulating draft picks. You actually have to have people who

0:57:35.280 --> 0:57:38.600
<v Speaker 1>know how to pick players by the time they By

0:57:38.600 --> 0:57:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the time they get here to Vegas, they are going

0:57:41.000 --> 0:57:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a skeleton of crap. Like it's just gonna

0:57:46.000 --> 0:57:48.440
<v Speaker 1>be miserable. Once they get to Vegas. They will not

0:57:48.480 --> 0:57:51.160
<v Speaker 1>have Derek Carr by that time either, Ace, which game

0:57:51.200 --> 0:57:53.280
<v Speaker 1>you want no part of. And that one is actually

0:57:53.280 --> 0:57:55.280
<v Speaker 1>more bettable to me than than Tampa Bay in the

0:57:55.320 --> 0:57:57.640
<v Speaker 1>New York Giants. I mean, that's a game I want

0:57:57.720 --> 0:58:00.240
<v Speaker 1>no parts of. I mean, the Giants won their Super

0:58:00.240 --> 0:58:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Bowl last Monday Night. That that's the only game that

0:58:03.120 --> 0:58:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that matters. I mean, they got Philly in Washington left

0:58:06.200 --> 0:58:08.680
<v Speaker 1>on their schedule, but they're playing for nothing. They won

0:58:08.720 --> 0:58:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Monday night football. That's a moral victory for them. Um.

0:58:12.520 --> 0:58:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And then you got Tampa Bay. There's a team that's

0:58:15.640 --> 0:58:19.680
<v Speaker 1>minus twenty one in turnovers over the last seven weeks.

0:58:20.360 --> 0:58:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Just think about that, minus twenty one in turnovers four

0:58:23.400 --> 0:58:25.919
<v Speaker 1>those last seven games, they've had turned the bowl over

0:58:26.120 --> 0:58:30.040
<v Speaker 1>at four times per game four the seven. You can't

0:58:30.040 --> 0:58:31.960
<v Speaker 1>win football games like that, you can. I mean we

0:58:32.080 --> 0:58:34.600
<v Speaker 1>know just going in if you could foresee who's gonna

0:58:34.760 --> 0:58:38.520
<v Speaker 1>win the turnover battle, you'll cash six out of tend tickets. Um.

0:58:38.680 --> 0:58:40.720
<v Speaker 1>And this team turns it over three or four times

0:58:40.720 --> 0:58:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a game. So I can't bet Tampa Bay at a

0:58:43.760 --> 0:58:45.840
<v Speaker 1>pick them pretty much. And I can't bet the Giants

0:58:45.880 --> 0:58:50.240
<v Speaker 1>either after last week getting their win and more get Finally,

0:58:50.320 --> 0:58:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the last fact last year these two teams played, Tampa

0:58:54.240 --> 0:58:56.840
<v Speaker 1>was minus two and a half. They won by two.

0:58:57.000 --> 0:58:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Landed right there on the number this is a game

0:58:59.080 --> 0:59:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I want nothing to do with. To stay away from me.

0:59:02.200 --> 0:59:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Giants on the short week after beating the Niners in

0:59:05.880 --> 0:59:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the final minute on Monday Night for their second win

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of the year, Tampa Bay. If you see that Tampa

0:59:09.360 --> 0:59:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Bay Redskins box score from last week, Tampa Bay gained

0:59:12.600 --> 0:59:17.120
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and nine nine yards of offense, scored three points.

0:59:17.480 --> 0:59:20.520
<v Speaker 1>We have not seen that in our lifetime. Turnover margin,

0:59:20.560 --> 0:59:23.520
<v Speaker 1>as you point out, Ace minus four, that's all mattered.

0:59:23.840 --> 0:59:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Six two three Redskins Paper Tiger week. They're three or

0:59:27.280 --> 0:59:31.120
<v Speaker 1>four turnovers every week from that team. Skins six three

0:59:31.120 --> 0:59:34.360
<v Speaker 1>win Paper Tiger atop the NFC East by two games.

0:59:35.560 --> 0:59:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Two games Skins. By the way, do you think the

0:59:38.520 --> 0:59:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Skins get there? I'm not so sure. I'm not so sure.

0:59:42.160 --> 0:59:44.479
<v Speaker 1>They got to play the Eagles twice. That ain't good.

0:59:45.280 --> 0:59:48.880
<v Speaker 1>We shall see. Man, what an interesting week because again,

0:59:48.920 --> 0:59:50.800
<v Speaker 1>as you look down this slate, we just we just

0:59:50.880 --> 0:59:53.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioned all the games that were above four points, Green

0:59:53.680 --> 0:59:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Bay Seattle Thursday night three points, Carolina Detroit is four,

0:59:56.920 --> 1:00:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Atlanta three with extra juice, Cincinnati both the more

1:00:00.280 --> 1:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't know, Minnesota, Chicago. We talked about two and

1:00:02.440 --> 1:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a half Tennessee, Indianapolis one and a half in favor

1:00:05.600 --> 1:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Colts Houston Washington, Houston by three on the road,

1:00:08.400 --> 1:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay and the Giants Giants by one at home,

1:00:11.440 --> 1:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>on and on and on, and then of course the

1:00:12.960 --> 1:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night or the Rams three and a half by

1:00:14.680 --> 1:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>favorites there. It's just a man, it is a field

1:00:17.520 --> 1:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>goal league. It is a game of plink Oh. I

1:00:19.760 --> 1:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>hope the plinko lands in the slot that you needed

1:00:22.560 --> 1:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to this weekend. Good luck with all your bets in

1:00:24.280 --> 1:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. And as always for Ace and Marco and Ed,

1:00:27.520 --> 1:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, man, appreciate it. Thank you so

1:00:29.800 --> 1:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>much for listening.