WEBVTT - Free Picks for EVERY Week 17 NFL Game (Ep. 414)

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in, everybody to betting pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>your bets. It is me, Joey Pa joe Pisapia and

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>it's week seventeen. Can you believe it? Fantasy championships will

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>be won or lost this week, but neither matters here

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>because this is just about us making money on football.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>This is about us having fun, and we're still having fun.

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>So fantasy might be over if a betting never stops.

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>And of course neither of these two guys, because it's

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the morning after Christmas and here we are opening a

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>present of a show for you. Sam Hoppin right here,

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>fresh off of too many Christmas cookies, and Pat fitz Morris,

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>fresh off of, you know, just the entire Christmas season.

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Just the eggnog continues to flow through Pat fitz Morris

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in a very strong way. But regardless, we're here. I've

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>got more lasagna to feed people. Because Christmases never end.

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>When you're Italian, you just have every cousin that you

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>ever had in your entire life come over your house.

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's what's happening for the rest of the week.

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't matter. We're still here talking football. We

0:00:57.840 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>got a great time for you today, So if you

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't already subscribe to the YouTube channel, drop your comments

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>below because we're still giving away premium upgrades of betting

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>pros want you to win all of those that are

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>possibly left here as the season comes to a close.

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>What a wacky weekend of football. We had incredible performances

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>from Amari Cooper last week, some upsets on those Christmas

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Day games as well. You know, guys, I thought something

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:22.839
<v Speaker 1>was gonna go sideways. If you look at these games,

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you're like, wow, these are three heavy home favorites. Something's

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna go sideways. I thought one. I didn't think two

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>were gonna go sideways, and the one that went sideways,

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>they didn't go sideways, is the only one that I

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>thought was going to So at the end of the day,

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a hot mess, but we're gonna sort it out.

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're gonna do. And let's jump right in

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>feed first to some of the games we've got going

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>on here today, and again, don't forget to subscribe because

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we've also got the NBA Action here on the program

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>as well, which is a great time. Every Wednesday and Friday,

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we've got best NBA bets going on there on Fast

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Break Bets with Matt Mody eleven AM Eastern right here

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>on the channel live, so you can ask questions, you

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>can get involved with the NBA action. So, gentlemen, let's

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>kick things off with the first game another Thursday night.

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Or the New York Jets coming off an incredible performance

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.399
<v Speaker 1>at home when they've got eliminated for the playoffs, going

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>against the Cleveland Browns. Cleveland's ten and five, they are

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>seven point home favorites, an incredible game for Joe Flacco.

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Thirty six and a half is a consensus number on

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>betting pros right now, plus two sixty for the Jets. Upset. Sam,

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with you on this one here the Cleveland

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Browns a very convincing victory and incredible performance. Joe Flacco

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>continues to just throw a three hundred yard game after

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>three hundred yard game. So any feelings about this line

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and the early value and could this one possibly even

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>continue to grow as the week drags on.

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I am about forty minutes outside of Cleveland for

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>the holidays, and let me tell you it is buzzin'

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 2>here with with how good this offense looks. I mean,

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 2>this offense looks probably the best it has in the

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 2>last two years. It's I know. I mentioned last week

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 2>that def Flacco isn't really playing as well as the

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 2>results have shown, and I think that's still the case

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 2>to a degree, but Kevin Stefanski is dialing up some

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 2>incredible play calls using play action at a slightly higher

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 2>rate with Joe Flacco under center. They just had their

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 2>third positive EPA performance on the year this past week,

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 2>and even in the event that Flacco does turn it over,

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 2>this defense is still good enough to hold opposing offenses down,

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 2>so it doesn't really cost them that much. Seven is

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of points, though, against this Jets defense that

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 2>continues to play well despite the second half blunder they

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 2>had against Washington this past week. So I don't have

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 2>a lean on the side for this game right now.

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 2>I think I would lean Cleveland. I believe it's about

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 2>minus seven right now. I made it minus six for Cleveland,

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 2>but again, not confident enough to want to back.

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>The Jets, understandably so, and boy, you got to be

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>loving that Cleveland to win the AFC that you had there,

0:03:58.200 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>because that one from thirty to one to twenty to

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>one over the last couple weeks, So Sam's loving that investment.

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>FITZI a performance from the Jets and Breeze all that

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody really saw coming necessarily, and that

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>throws a wrinkle into this just slightly. But this one

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is in Cleveland, so I'm kind of where Sam is,

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 1>which is it feels about right your thoughts on this

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>one here as Cleveland continues to put together good performance

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>after good performance lately.

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's funny, Joe, when you talked about things going

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 3>sideways for a couple of the home favorites at the

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 3>top of the show, I bet you weren't even talking

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 3>about the Jets. And I took them last weekend and

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 3>was counting my money about an hour into that game

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 3>and things started to get away from them. So this

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 3>does seem like a lot of points. But the Jets

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 3>have been really bad on the road this year, and

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 3>they've been especially bad as big road dogs. They're one

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 3>in five against the spread on the road, zero and

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 3>three against the spread on the road when underdogs by

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 3>seven or more points. So they have played down to

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 3>expectations in some of these games where they been big

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 3>road dogs. But this is a really tough matchup for

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Joe Flacco. I mean, the Jets have been tough on

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 3>opposing passing games. You have to tip your hat to

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 3>him for making this Cleveland passing game go. But he

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 3>also has five interceptions in his last two games, and

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 3>that's what scares me about possibly taking the Browns here.

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't really want to bet the Browns. I'm not

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 3>betting the Jets on the road here, so you can

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 3>interest me in the under though. Like I mean, the

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 3>Browns have an excellent defense, the Jets have a very

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 3>good defense, and like I could see this one turning

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 3>into a total rock fight. So I'm inclined to bet

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 3>the under here more so than either side.

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to the next one here, Detroit

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>at Dallas. Dallas again dropping another big game on the

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>road as Dallas is wont to do. The Detroit Lions

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>have wrapped up the North. They are Kings of the

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>North for the first time in a very long time.

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>They are six point underdogs though going into Dallas, which

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>is where Dallas does their best work, so this is understandable.

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Fifty three and a half is the number here on

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>betting pros plus two twenty four. The Lions now, Pat,

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I imagine you know it's week seventeen. I

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think you can start sitting guys necessarily here if

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you're Dan Campbell, I think guys are gonna get out

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>there and continue to work. And Jared Goff does play

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>good and controlled environments. We know this. I'm on the

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Detroit side of this game, and I actually kind of

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>think that plus two twenty the money line is the

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>most intriguing part. I think Dallas is reeling a little bit.

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I know they've been brilliant at home, but you know what,

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lions right now, at least the six. To me,

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a good temptation. I want to go there.

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, first, Blatch, this does seem like it's too many points, Joe, and.

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 4>Like the reason.

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 3>The only thing that gives me pause, and you said

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 3>it is how good Dallas has been at home seven

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 3>and zero straight up, six and one against the spread

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 3>this year for the Cowboys when they're at home. So

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure if I'm gonna pull the trigger on

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 3>the Lions or not. Like it's it's really close, but

0:06:57.880 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 3>I like, if I'm going to bet this, that's who

0:06:59.480 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to bet.

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 4>So I agree with you like that is where the

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 4>lean is, and I've.

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 3>Already bet the under like such a tall number that

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 3>you really need both teams to go up and down

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 3>the field on this one to get an over. And

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 3>the Cowboys ranked sixth in defensive DVOA and the Lions

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 3>ranked thirteenth, So these are two pretty good defenses and

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 3>not a case where you're getting a gross mismatch where

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 3>a couple of really good offenses picking on bad defenses.

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 4>The defenses here.

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Are legits, so I don't think we're likely to get

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 3>a point total in the upper fifties here.

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Sam Pott makes a great case for the under in

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>this game with the high total of fifty three and

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a half.

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Do you concur Yeah, I mean I think that's the side. Again,

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 2>with the total of this big, you'd need everything to

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 2>go right. You can't have those long drives that in

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 2>in a field goal or a red zone turnover, things

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 2>like that. Those will absolutely kill the chance of this

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 2>going over. But I'm with both of you. I think

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 2>the Lions are clearly the side here. Last four games

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Dallas has played Seattle, Philadelphia, Buffalo in Miami, so four

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 2>pretty good offenses. But they are struggling on defense to

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 2>hold these offenses. Over the last four weeks, they are

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 2>thirty second in early down EPA per play and early

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 2>down success rate, and Detroit still is one of the

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 2>better offenses. They're playing with one of the best offensive

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 2>coordinators in Ben Johnson. So I think Detroit has a

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 2>chance to take this win in Dallas. I mean, there's

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 2>no way that Detroit is sitting anyone over the next

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 2>two weeks, so they still have a chance to the

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 2>number one seed with everyone at eleven and four at

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 2>the top of the NFC. So I really like Detroit

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 2>in this spot and think they could come away with

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 2>the win.

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>How crazy would that be if the Lions were not

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>only just the Kings of the North, but the number

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>one seed. I talked to a buddy of mine who

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>has been a long time suffering Lions fan, and he

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>was so excited Yesterdong Christmas, which is so funny because

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>he was so miserable on thanks Giving. He was miserable

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>on Thanksgiving. I know you two were not. You guys

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>were very happy with that day. All right, let's get

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>to the next one. Much to my chagrin, the Newingland

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Patriots won again last week, jerks. All right, let's get

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to this game that they've got coming up in Buffalo.

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo has trounced them these last few times. Around twelve

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 1>points is a lot, though, Sam, forty one is the

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>number plus five hundred four New England to win this game.

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I know New England found a way to squeak out

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of victory thanks to Sean Payton over in Denver, But

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:28.839
<v Speaker 1>what are your take on this one? I know twelve

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.959
<v Speaker 1>is a large number. Buffalo should have smashed the Chargers

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>last week. Instead, they kind of just squeaked by. I

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know, maybe the road travel, something about that, the holidays,

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>all that crunch, But this one's at home. Is twelve

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>too much? Or is it just right for you? Sam?

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Joe? I have been on the Patriots each of the

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 2>last two weeks, and I have won those each of

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 2>the last week, so I guess pushed against the Chiefs,

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 2>but I will not be on the Patriots for a

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 2>third time. But I'm not on the Bills either. I

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 2>think since Joe Brady took over, the Bills have been

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 2>much more run heavy. They are wanting to run the

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>ball as much as they can. They're sort of I

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 2>don't know if they're hiding Josh Allen, but it doesn't

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 2>seem like he trusts him that much. And the way

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 2>to beat the Patriots is through the air. Their run

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 2>defense continues to be exceptional, and I think if Buffalo

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 2>runs as much as they want to and have over

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 2>the past couple of weeks, that they're going to struggle

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 2>to move the ball. James Cook has been great, especially

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 2>from a fantasy perspective, but you know, he hasn't been

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 2>the most elite rusher. He's been great in the passing game.

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 2>But I think honestly that the best play here might

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 2>be like parlaying the under with the Patriots, because if

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>the Bills lean into the run, I don't think they

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 2>have as much success, and that keeps the total a

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 2>little bit lower as well.

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>That was my thinking as well. As you have seen

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>this shift here to Jack. I don't know if it's

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>hiding Josh Allen so much as maybe it's trying to

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 1>balance the offense for once and trying not to ask

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen to do everything all the time and make

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>every single play, because I think that's asking a lot

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 1>of any quarterback, no matter how talented, but to Sam's point,

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it is that rush defense of the Patriots, that one

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that does seem to be the only thing going

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Patriots this year. So that being said, is

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>this another underfitsy for you?

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm not petting either the side or the total

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 3>on this one. And like, I don't have the numbers

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 3>in front of me, Joe, but I would love to

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 3>see what the underdog is this year. In games where

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 3>the underdog is catching double digit points and the total

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 3>on a game is relatively low, like forty two points

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 3>or less, it seems like the underdog in those matchups

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 3>has been doing really well this year.

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 4>So that's it.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Like you see a total this low in a double

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 3>digit spread, and I do not want to bet the favorite,

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 3>so I just, yeah, I can't get behind the bells.

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 3>And as you said, like the one thing the Patriots

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 3>do Joe really well has stop the run. And with

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Joe Brady and the Bills leading so hard on the

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 3>running game, like I don't know how that's gonna work out,

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, and Joe condolences on that victory for the Patriots,

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 3>and like that probably is going to cost them the

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 3>quarterback they so desperately need in the draft. But you know,

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 3>nice to see them show their pride.

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess in Denver U pride cometh before the fall,

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>my friend, it was miserable. Look, I can only hope

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>that there's gonna be more trading and things going on.

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>There's also two weeks for other teams to lose two,

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>so I can only assume these next two games the

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Patriots can lose to the Bills. I'm hoping, let's go Buffalo.

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>The Baltimore Ravens twelve and three are gonna host the

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins eleven and four, who finally beat a big

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>time opponent. That's great and Baltimore Ravens shout out to them. Look,

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>last week, I was on my high horse. You know,

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought the fort Nits were unbeatable. I thought they

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>were gonna smash. I took the five and a half,

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and boyle boy, was I wrong. Purdy laid an absolute egg.

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Interceptions galore, four of them. Now two of them, maybe

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>we gets air question all. We talked about this before

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the show. But still there was two that he got

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 1>away with two that could have been interceptions. So I'll

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>take that four or give them a three and a half,

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. But regardless get Baltimore credit. Lamar and

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>company played a great game. The defense played very well.

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So here you go. Ravens twelve and three, Miami eleven

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and four. Ravens are just three point favorites. This is

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting line. I thought they might get a

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more maybe the hook or possibly even more

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Fitsy after that performance last night, But this morning, that's

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>all your gang. Forty seven is the number Miami plus

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>one thirty five, so fits This is a huge AFC

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>game here. That's basically going to tell you how the

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>next two weeks go for both these teams. Do you

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>think that Miami is up to the task to go

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>into Baltimore and win this football game? Or is this

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>another spot for the Ravens to assert their dominance and

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>not let their guard down, which is something the Ravens

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>seem to do in some other games, Like they get

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>up for some games and other games they look more human.

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Which Ravens club do we see this week?

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Ravens were clearly up for that game against

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 3>the forty nine ers, and I can't imagine they have

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 3>a letdown game in a game of this magnitude and

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 3>coming home. But at the same time, I think we

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 3>finally got what we wanted to see from the Dolphins,

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 3>and that's a win against a quality opponents. You know,

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 3>like every time we wanted to crown them, they would

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 3>play some strong team like the Bills or whoever, and

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 3>they would lose and we'd have to question whether the

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Dolphins belonged in the elite tier of the NFL. So

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 3>now I think they've showed that they do belong. Another

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 3>case where I'm not really interested in the side, Joe,

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 3>but you can talk me into the under here, because

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 3>both of these defenses again too good for the total

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 3>to be this high. The Ravens are number two in

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 3>defensive DVOA, and I think people realize what a good

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 3>defense this is. Although maybe they're going to be without

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Hamilton, who injured his new on Sunday night. That

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 3>was kind of a bummer for the Ravens. But I'm

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 3>not sure the public has a really good grasp on

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 3>how good this Miami defense has been over the last

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 3>two months. The only teams to score more than twenty

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 3>one points against the Dolphins over their last eight games

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 3>were the Titans, oddly enough, but so I think this

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 3>total is just too tall. I think the under is

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 3>the best bet in this game, and there's really no

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 3>value on either side in my opinion.

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, your thoughts on Baltimore Miami and by the way,

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Sam too, Lamar Jackson's now gone ahead of everybody for

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>MVP is minus one seventy on the board, Christian McCaffrey

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a plus four fifty, and where's Brock Purdy. He's all

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the way plus thirteen hundred. Now, all it took was

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of picks. Maybe that's all it took. Your

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>thoughts here on Ravens Dolphins.

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the Ravens. I still can't get a full grasp

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 2>on like they is scoring well, like they've scored thirty

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 2>plus points in some of their last nine games, but

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 2>it just doesn't it looks like a challenge at certain points.

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 2>And I understand Lamar is the MVP, and I think

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 2>that's mostly based off of vibes and like who else

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 2>are you gonna give it to? And he had to

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 2>win in prime time against this great forty nine ers defense. Again,

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 2>not trying to take anything away from Lamar, because I

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 2>think he has been fantastic this year, but we're giving

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of credit to this Baltimore Ravens defense that just,

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, not a couple of weeks ago got sort

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 2>of gashed by this the Rams for thirty one points.

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 2>So they're just sort of like all over the place

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 2>for me. So I originally was going to lean Miami

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 2>in this game because to your point, I think their

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 2>defense is still underrated. What they've been able to do

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 2>with Jalen Ramsey and even with the loss of Jalen

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Phillips has been incredibly impressive. Vic Vangieau is calling a

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 2>great defense there. So I don't have a leen on

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 2>this game right now.

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this, I'm pretty sure we get the forty

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>nine er game. We're all gonna agree the fort Niners

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to win if Baltimore has another hiccup here

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>this Christian McCaffrey a plus four fifty for MVP. That's

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the bet of the week, that's the better of the week.

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know how you don't do that

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>because he is the MVP. We're trying to give it

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to anybody here. But if you think about this year,

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>who's been the most valuable asset in the National Football League?

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any doubt that at this juncture

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in the season, it's McCaffrey. No quarterback has really stepped

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>up consistently. They've all had moments, but everybody's kind of

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>drifted backwards. At the end of the day. I think

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>it's McCaffrey right now. I know we don't like to

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>give I know it's Peterson and we got to go

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>back to like Sean Alexander for God's sakes. But I

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Sam, you look like you have feelings about

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>this as I'm saying, yeah, I.

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Mean, we could do a whole nother podcast on this.

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 2>But the reactionary nature of this, the awards market for

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 2>the MVP specifically, I mean, at the end of the day,

0:17:57.240 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 2>these voters, I think are going to go back and

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 2>look at the full landscape and product of their season

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.959
<v Speaker 2>and not just react to the most recent Monday night

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 2>football game. And hell yeah turned out so again, if

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 2>there was any year that a running back or someone

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 2>like Christian McCaffrey was going to win it, certainly this

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 2>is the year. But I do think that players like

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Lamar Jackson, I mean, if the Dolphins win this game,

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 2>to us probably going to be the MVP favorite after

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 2>the after the game yeah, but you know.

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 1>What, he ate the MVP either, And I think when

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you look totality of everything, I don't think that's gonna

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>be I don't think Look, Rock Party was on by

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a thread and then this game happened, and this is

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you can recover from this one

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>not in this race. I really don't think that. Pat,

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what your thoughts are here. But to

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Sam's point, like we could just juggle back and forth,

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>but the one guy every single week is getting done

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>who is putting up magical stats as Christian McCaffrey. You

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 1>got twenty something touchdowns. What are we doing here?

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 4>It's funny.

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 3>At Christmas a Christmas Day gathering yesterday, my cousin's fiance

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 3>has Christian McCaffrey at plus thirty eight. He has a

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 3>bet on Christian McCaffrey plus thirty eight hundred, and he

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.239
<v Speaker 3>like laid out the possibilities, like, well, the forty nine

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 3>ers would probably have to lay an egg in this

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 3>game against the Ravens and Purty is a really bad game.

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Then Lamar has to lose at Miami.

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 3>And you know, McCaffrey like bounces back with some massive

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 3>game against Washington, which could very easily happen.

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 4>I could pree it, Like, yeah, I don't. I don't

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 4>hate those odds on McCaffrey right now.

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:29.719
<v Speaker 3>We know it's traditionally been a quarterbacks award, but like

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.199
<v Speaker 3>this is setting up for those rare years where a

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 3>running back could sneak through Pat.

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>There's been one quarterback pillar to post that's really bit

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it this year. All right, we spent a little time

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>on that. Let's let's fly through these games here. Vegas Indianapolis,

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis three point favorites at home. Vegas huge upset, Sam.

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 1>This number is forty four and a half plus one

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty five on the Vegas side. Look, the Colts have

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>been an enigma all year in terms of betting. But

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you got to give credit to Antonio Pearson, the Raiders man.

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>He has had this team from minute one of taking

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>over that job, prepared to play and ready to play.

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>That makes it very dangerous. Are they dangerous in this one?

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I think they are. I mean, I think I was

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 2>actually surprised that the market wasn't more in favor of

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 2>Las Vegas after their win against Kansas City. But I

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 2>think there's two things. I mean, the people sort of

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 2>realized that the win was fluky. They scored two defensive touchdowns,

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 2>barely had over two hundred yards of offense, and we

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 2>know that this Chief's offense is not what it used

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 2>to be, so shutting them down is not the great

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 2>feat that it once was. That said Antonio Pierce wants

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 2>to establish the hell out of the run. I mean,

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 2>if they get a lead, they are going to run

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 2>as much as possible. Fortunately, that is not a strong

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 2>spot for Indianapolis. It helps that the Raiders are fourth

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 2>in EPA per rush over the last four weeks. They're

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 2>doing it without Josh Jacobs as well, who seems like

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 2>he might be back this next week. It sounded like

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 2>he was close to playing in this game against Kansas

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 2>City as well well. So I like the Raiders in

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 2>this spot to pull off the upset even on a

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 2>short week.

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Look, O'Connell is not impressive. I'm sorry. I watched

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 1>that game, and you know he is not the Goods

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't think it was the Goods when you

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>were in college either. So whatever that pivot is, it

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>makes you ponder like if Garoppolo was healthy enough to

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>really play, like maybe this could be a really dangerous,

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>A very dangerous team potentially fits. I don't have a

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of faith in O'Connell, but there's something about Antonio Pierce.

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>It just gets this defense fired up. To get this

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>team very focused, they find ways to win and be competitive.

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And Indy is, as I said before, a bit of

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>an enigma. I know for you especially, you've mentioned it

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 1>several times this year. What do you think of this

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>game here with the early kind of here you go

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>choose your own adventure that Vegas is laying out for us.

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Raiders have been really plucky under Antonio Pierce,

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 3>but I am not the Shane stike In disciple that

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Sam is. But I do think there's a little bit

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 3>of value on the calls here. And Sam mentioned like

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 3>he's surprised this line is not pointing more in the

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Raiders direction. But think of what this line probably would

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 3>have been before last weekend's results, with the Chiefs getting

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 3>upset by the Raiders and the Colts laying this egg,

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 3>probably playing their worst game of the season against the Falcons,

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 3>like I think had Week sixteen never happened, I think

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 3>you've probably seeing Colts minus five, minus five and a

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 3>half in this one, so you know you you talked

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 3>about it, Joe, like the Chiefs offense or maybe it

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 3>was you, Sam, Sorry, the Chiefs offense really struggling. They

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 3>gift wrapped the Raiders a couple of presents with those

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 3>back to back defensive scores on consecutive plays. I believe

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 3>that was the Raiders just don't have much of a

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 3>passing game. And well their explosion against the Chargers two

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 3>weeks ago, notwithstanding, but I.

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Think like sixty dropped two, but that was the Chargers.

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, And like, I think we could see the

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Colts come out breathing fire after playing such a poor

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 3>game against the Falcons last week. Like think, I think

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 3>they're going to come back hard in this one. And

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 3>I am leaning towards betting the Colts here. Have not

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 3>done it yet, but I think I am going to

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 3>bet the Coults.

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of the Falcons, they are going to travel to

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Chicago to take on the Bears. They are three point

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>underdogs in Chicago. Thirty eight is the number plus one

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty for the Falcons fits. Again, confidence is a tricky

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>word this time of the year in certain teams. Do

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you have confidence that Chicago can handle their business? And

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta will continue their road woes. Or do you think

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta somehow finds a way to pull out a victory here.

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 4>Nope. I bet the Bears. They've won three of the

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 4>last four.

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 3>They've held opponents to an average of fourteen point eight

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 3>points per game over that stretch, and the Chicago defense

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 3>is just playing really well lately, and Justin Fields is

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 3>generating offense. The Falcons need this game, but are we

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 3>going to trust Arthur Smith in a must win game.

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 4>I don't know about you, guys, but I am not.

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 3>And last week's Massy Peabody rankings suggested that the Bears

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 3>are about two points better than the Falcons on a

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 3>neutral field. This is not going to be a new

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 3>neutral field. It's a dome team from the Deep South

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.719
<v Speaker 3>coming up to Chicago to play an outdoor game, and

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 3>temperatures that are probably going to be in the thirties

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 3>next Sunday.

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 4>So I like the Bears here. I'll lay the field goal.

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, Sam, your thoughts on this contest here between

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bears and the Falcons? Any value here on this line?

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't see anything on the sides, but I think

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 2>the under is in play here. The Atlanta defense is

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 2>legit and they have been all year. And for how

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 2>good the Bears defense has played recently, their offense has

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 2>continued to struggle. They rank thirty second in passing success

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 2>rate over the last four weeks. And again the free

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 2>agency additions that Atlanta brought in on defense, and Mcleus

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Campbell is playing very well for I think thirty eight

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 2>years old. So I think both of these teams, again

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 2>with strong defenses, less than ideal offenses. Give me down

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 2>right here.

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Falcons are a quarterback and a co away. That's all

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>they are. Quarterback of the coach get those two things

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>in the off season. I think they get right in

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:09.199
<v Speaker 1>the things I know, I know, but you never know.

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, crazy things happen sometimes coaches show up with quarterbacks.

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes we've seen that happen when guys leave together. All right, Carolina,

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville's the next one here. Carolina is two and thirteen,

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville's eight and seven. SAM minus six and a half

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is the number for this one. The Jags are favorite

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>at home, as one would imagine Carolina being as poor

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>as they are. Thirty seven and a half is the

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>total for this game, plus two to thirty for Carolina

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking at this one too. I know Jacksonville

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>has had its struggles, but is this one where they

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>can handle their business and cover the six and a half?

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Sam?

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 2>I think so? I think I want to buy the

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 2>Jags here. Carolina just had its best offensive output, but

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 2>it was against the Packers and Jill Berry's defense that

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 2>had previously allowed back to back NFC Player of the

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Week awards. So I think this is a get right

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:58.159
<v Speaker 2>game for Jacksonville. I'm not sure the status of Trevor

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence at this point. I think he injured his throwing arm.

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 2>But even if it is CJ. Brethlord, I think Jacksonville

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 2>they wanted to run the ball a lot and have struggled,

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 2>but I think Carolina gives them an opportunity to run

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 2>the ball as effectively as they want. So I think,

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 2>regardless of quarterback, I want the Jags here.

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 1>All right, Pat, your thoughts on this game here? The

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Jags obviously a lot of injuries, a lot of issues

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks. Is this the get right game

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>for them?

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure it is, Joe. Four straight losses and

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 3>they have been stomped by the Ravens and the Buccaneers

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 3>the last two weeks, and like, I don't want to

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 3>bet the Panthers either, I'm just going to pass on

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:37.919
<v Speaker 3>this one.

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, fair enough, Let's get to the next one

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 1>then Tampa at excuse me, Tampa hosting New Orleans. The

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay Buccaneers are eight and seven, Saints are seven

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and eight. The Bucks, as they should be, three point

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>favorites at home. Forty two is the consensus number plus

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>one thirty five here on the New Orleans Saints money

0:26:55.840 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>line fits. Tampa Bay just kind of feels like, ironically,

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>at this juncture in the season, the best team in

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>this division, and this is the chance for them to

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>really go out there improve it. Will they do that

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>this weekend?

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean the Buccaneers have really found their footing. They've

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 3>won four straight, as you mentioned, and over the last

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 3>two weeks they've beaten the Packers and the Jaguars, two

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 3>respectable teams, by a combined thirty two points. Meanwhile, the

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Saints have lost for their last six, and the two

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 3>wins came against the Panthers and the Giants. And back

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 3>in Week four, the Buccaneers handled the Saints really easily

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 3>twenty six to nine, and that was before the Bucks

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 3>did find their footing. So I think they're going to

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 3>take care of business and I'm happy to lay the points.

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 3>The only thing that gives me slight pause is that

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 3>the Saints have that extra three days of rest in

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 3>prep time after playing the Thursday night game last week.

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Sam the Bucks were convincing thirty to twelve on Christmas

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Eve here against the Jags. I mean, it just kind

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of feels like things are going their way. They found

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>their quarterback in Baker Mayfield. That reclamation project has worked

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>for them the Saints. As Fitz said, it does have

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>some extra time, but does that even matter with the

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Saints team at this point.

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it does. But I do like the

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 2>over in this game. I think both offenses, the Bucks

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 2>offense again, Baker Mayfield playing really great football right now.

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 2>It's cool to see him sort of rejuvenate his career there.

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like they want to keep him past this

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 2>year as well. And the Saints' offense is great at

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 2>padding stats at the end of games and when they're

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 2>down big, they throw the balls on and can get

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 2>back into these games. And Tampa Bayed secondary is one

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 2>that is going to allow you to be able to

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 2>do that, So I think over forty two here is

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 2>my leaning.

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now, All right, next game on the slate, the

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia Eagles at home will take on the Arizona Cardinals.

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Philly's favored by nine and a half on this one.

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually surprised it's not a little larger. I'm worried

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>this one is going to grow as the week rolls on.

0:28:57.640 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Forty seven and a half is the total plus four

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty on the Arizona money line. Sam, where did you

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>have this game just out of curiosity in your projections,

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>because it feels like this one would have been at

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>double digits but it hasn't quite hit there yet.

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So this one was at minus twelve in favor

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 2>of the Eagles before the game yesterday and now is

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 2>down to minus nine and a half. And the game

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 2>between the Eagles and the Giants, it felt like different

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 2>parts of the Eagles team clicked at different times, Like

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 2>the defense played well for a little bit and then

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 2>the offense played well, but it just never all happened

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 2>at once. That said, the Cardinals are not even with

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Kyler Murray, They're just not that great. I think Philadelphia

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 2>is going to be able to take care of business here.

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm not laying either side in just this could be

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 2>a just a weird game.

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I kind of understand that, all right. The Rams are

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>going to travel to New York next week for Week seventeen.

0:29:58.480 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>They are going to be six and a half point

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>favorite when they do to face the Giants forty two

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>with the consensus number plus two thirty five on the

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Giants money line, the Giants are five and ten the

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Rams are eight and seven. It feels like two teams,

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you know that have obviously gone in a different direction

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>this season. So Sam, that being said, you've seen the

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>early value in this line.

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, give me the Rams. They are one of the

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 2>hottest teams on offense right now. Matthew Stafford is playing

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 2>quarterback is as well as any other in the league

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 2>right now. They'll get the extra rest having played on

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Thursday night, and the Giants are on a short week

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 2>as well, having played on Monday afternoons. So I think

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Stafford's going to be able to take care of business

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 2>against the Giants again. Kyron Williams playing extremely well, so

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't see how the Giants are able to stop

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 2>this Rams offense.

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>The two greatest waiver wire pickups of twenty twenty three,

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Kyron Williams and Pookin Takua on the same team. Patty,

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>It's been quite a season for the Rams here and

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>they are getting hot at the right time. So do

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you think fits that you have that same confidence that

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Sam does here that they can go on the road

0:30:57.720 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>here with the six and a half and take care

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of business against the Giants?

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Not quite as much. If I were going to bet

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 3>this one, that is who I would bet. But it's

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 3>just a little too tall for me to do that,

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 3>especially after the Giants were able to and we talked

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 3>about the Eagles, like, the Giants just hung around in

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 3>that game and refused to be extinguished and wound up

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 3>getting the covers a double digit underdog. So like, I

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of think they can keep this one close. I

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 3>just don't want to touch it. I mean, I think

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 3>the offense better.

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Than the Eagles offense right now, because I think it

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is yes, yeah, okay.

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 4>No question.

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 3>The Eagles passing game has struggled for a couple of

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 3>months now.

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a funny thing to ask that question, but like,

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it needed to be rhetorically asked, because I

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>think all three of us agree that's the case. So

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>if they kind of, you know, just kind of backdoored

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>last week that we're only talking about six and a

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>half here, that feels like a long day at the

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>office maybe for the New York Giants, but I think

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>we're all pretty confident with the Rams have done recently.

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>What about Houston and Tennessee situation here? Always a tough

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>one here Houston at home. We don't know the CJ.

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Stroud status minus three and a half their favorite against

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee forty two and a half is the number plus

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>one fifty five on the money line? Fits Is this

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a stay away until you have clarity when it comes

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Houston Texans QB situation this week?

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if anything, Joe, I think, like maybe you

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 3>want to get this now before we get word on

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 3>C Like I have to imagine Stroud is back this week,

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 3>but they.

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Have said it's a very it's one of the more

0:32:29.800 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>serious quarterback concussions, is what I read that they've had

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>all year. But to your point too, it's been a

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>few weeks now.

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, very tricky situation, that's the thing.

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 3>But I guess even if Stroud is back, like, I

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 3>don't have the same warm and fuzzy feeling about the

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Texans that I had a month ago.

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 4>You know what I mean?

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 3>So maybe just laying off this one is the right move,

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 3>because if we don't get Stroud, then all of a

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 3>sudden three and a half points does not look like

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 3>a bargain by any means.

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Are you where fits as Sam on this one where

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to take it now before you get clarity

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>about this laming changing if Stroud does play in this

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>one getting a little tighter, I don't.

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Want to touch it all because I don't even think

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 2>we know who's going to be playing quarterback on the

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 2>other side of the ball for three points. And while

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think Tannehill to Levis changes the line that much,

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 2>the variability in Levis's play is much wider than it

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 2>is for Ryan Tannehill. So I think again, if Levis plays,

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 2>then I'd want to again try to maybe target some

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 2>all spreads for the Titans in favor of Tennessee. But

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not touching this game until we know more about

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the quarterbacks, all.

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, San fran Washington Boy. If ever, there was a

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>perfect opponent for a team that just came off a

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>bad loss on a prime time holiday game, it's the

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Washington Commanders. That's what you want to see if you're

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the forty nine ers. I mean, the Commander's just got

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>their buck kicked by the Jets. I can't imagine what

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of pain they're going to be involved in. What

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think the team total is going to be

0:33:57.560 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>for this game? Here? Sam? Forty nine ers a third

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>even a half points favorites forty eight and a half

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>is the number plus six hundred for the Washington Commander upset.

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>I know Washington sometimes shows up in weird games they

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>have this year at certain junctures, just as the Eagles.

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>But that being said, San fran is a lot to

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>handle for Washington. They struggled with Breeze Hall. I can't

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 1>imagine all the overs on Christian McCaffrey. Is that just

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the approach for this one? Sam?

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think Kyle Shanahan's just going to

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 2>get all of his frustration out on against his former team.

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 2>I kind of want to know who's going to be

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 2>starting for Washington in this game. I think if if

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 2>they do go with Jacoby Bressett. I think there could

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 2>be a little bit of value on the Commanders because

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 2>he has not played terribly. I mean, I think he

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 2>raises the floor for Washington a little bit. And again

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 2>we've seen San Francisco's defense against some competent teams can

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 2>can have some success and potentially keep it close. So

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I yeah, just look at Christian McCaffrey overs.

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Christian McAffrey overs. Do you think if Jacoby Brissett

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>was the quarterback of the Jets or the Falcons all

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>year they'd be playoff teams? Because I do with those defenses,

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 1>and that just goes to you know, they sat on

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Brissett and they are a four win team at the

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 1>trade deadline, and I didn't understand why that wasn't the

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>piece that everybody was going for. Why maybe the Commanders

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to give him up. It's just so strange

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.399
<v Speaker 1>to me because I think those teams would have really

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 1>benefited from Brissett, who is a good leader, a likable

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 1>guy in the clubhouse. Everybody seems to like him in

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the locker room. And again another Stefanski quarterback last year

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that somehow found a way to win games and keep

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>them relevant for longer than maybe the Brown should have been.

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Stefanski's a great coach. I don't think he gets just

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the thing.

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 2>If Washington plays Pressett all year, they're probably a playoff team.

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 2>Are They're at least in contentient for a wild car.

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>So maybe at this point maybe it's not impossible. Fits

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on this potential ugly situation here for the

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:56.479
<v Speaker 1>Commanders and forty nine.

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:58.959
<v Speaker 4>Ers, I think we do see Brissett this week.

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they can run on Sam Howell, who

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 3>over his last three games, I'm not sure Sam Howell

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:06.879
<v Speaker 3>has completed even forty percent of his passes the last

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 3>three games, he has been.

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 4>A hot mess.

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 3>And I don't like touching games where the road favorite

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 3>is favored by like two touchdowns. It's just way too

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 3>many points. As Sam said, if it is Brissett, maybe

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 3>there's a little bit of value on the Commanders here,

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 3>but like I just think, like, I'm not sure what's

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 3>going on with brock party. I don't think we're going

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 3>to get two terrible games in a row. And heaven knows,

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 3>this forty nine Ers offense could just shred this paper

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 3>mache Commander's defense to ribbons.

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I just don't want to bet.

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not laying the points here, and I'm not really

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 3>anxious to bet the Commanders either. But by the way, Joe,

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 3>like the Commanders really weren't thumped by the Jets. It

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 3>took a last second field goal basically, and then they

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:00.040
<v Speaker 3>hung pretty.

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Tough the week. The first part of that game was

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>just wacky, all right, Oh they were getting crushed. They

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:07.840
<v Speaker 1>were like that. There was just so much energy in

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that building too, which just it was so bizarre, like

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Roberts fall there, just poor guy.

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 3>But like Washington is not laying down this season, Like

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 3>they played the Rams top two weeks ago and they

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 3>came back against the Jets when they could have just

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 3>wave the white flag in that game. So yeah, I

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 3>think a lot of people think the forty nine ers

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:28.479
<v Speaker 3>are going to be really steamed after losing this big

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 3>game and everything, and they're just going to crush this

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 3>overmatched opponent.

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:33.320
<v Speaker 4>But like, this is just too many points.

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I agree, it's to It's a lot of points. So

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it does make me scared. That's why I keep saying,

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:41.239
<v Speaker 1>give me the all purpose Christian McCaffrey yards and two touchdowns.

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>What can I get at the two touchdowns for Christian McCaffrey.

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll take that those twos I want.

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm really excited about going against him in a championship

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 3>game in fantasy next week.

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, get it that way.

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 1>At least you're still alive. All my teams are dead now,

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, Let's go to Pittsburgh and Seattle. Seas eight

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and seven, And so the Pittsburgh Steelers talk about looking good.

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers coming out strong with some energy over the

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Christmas holiday. They are going to go to Seattle. They're

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be three and a half point underdogs there. Over

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>on the consensus betting pros line, forty one and a

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 1>half is the total for this game, plus one fifty

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for the Steelers. So Mason Rudolph has come to town.

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>FITZI your thoughts on this Steeler Seattle contest for Week seventeen.

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, the Steelers have been one of the most

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 3>unpredictable teams in the league all season, and I feel

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 3>very vindicated that I finally was on the right side

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 3>of them this past week.

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Taking the money line against the Bengals.

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.320
<v Speaker 3>I just felt like they weren't going to lose that game.

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, I just had this feeling. But now

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:40.360
<v Speaker 3>we get a game between two of the most unpredictable

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 3>teams in the league. So I'm not touching this one, no, thanks.

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 3>Like Steelers versus Seahawks, two teams you never know what

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna get from game to game, like wide wide

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 3>range of outcomes. For this one, I'm not betting it.

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 1>It does feel like four outcome game. It's interesting too,

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>because you look at Mason Rudolph, he had a two

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 1>touchdown game. You know, the big play to Pickens early

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>on certainly kind of set the tone of this one.

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 1>But it's funny because it's as many two touchdown games

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>as Kenny Picketts had the entire season, which is also

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I think sad and depressing. So four outcome games certainly

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>exists here. But Sam, does the data point to one

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of these outcomes be more likely for you?

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:25.919
<v Speaker 2>No? Because to Fits's point, these are two teams that

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I can't get a rena on them. I mean, they're

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 2>just all over the place and putting up stinkers against

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 2>bad teams, putting out great performances against good teams. I mean,

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 2>I think for me, this means to bet the under,

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 2>because again, you don't really know what you're going to

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:43.720
<v Speaker 2>get out of these offenses. The Pittsburgh defense, I think

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 2>still has some juice, and the Seahawks offense, to what

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I was saying, has struggled at points. The Seahawks defense

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 2>has played pretty decently the last couple of weeks as well,

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 2>held again what we think is an underwhelming Philadelphia offense

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 2>to just twenty point. So I like to underhear I

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 2>think these are two teams that just can't both figure

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:07.319
<v Speaker 2>it out. At the same time.

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of not being able to figure it out, I

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>give you the Kansas City Chiefs. We are now nine

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 1>and six. They're going to be under that win total,

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 1>I believe for the year now right, I'm pretty sure

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:19.399
<v Speaker 1>or at least push so nine and six for them

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:22.359
<v Speaker 1>taking on Cincinnati, who maybe the Cinderella has lost their

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 1>slipper here. Kansas City's seven and a half point favorites

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:27.919
<v Speaker 1>at home forty five and a half is the number

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>plus two eighty five on the Cincinnati side of the

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>money line. Sam, I mean, we keep sitting here every

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>week and we think, Okay, this can't last. It can't last,

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it can't last. But this offense just cannot seem to work,

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 1>and there were times where it was starting to look good.

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey had some big plays in that first half

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of that game, you know, and then the Pacheco injury

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:46.840
<v Speaker 1>happened and he came out. I don't know, It's just

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City might just be having one of those years,

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and it happens, It's happened. I mean even in the

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Patriot dynasty. I remember one year that that happened to

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:56.839
<v Speaker 1>It was a year after they they lost the Super

0:40:56.880 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Bowl and they just could not get back on track.

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>And it kind of feels like that's where Kansas City is.

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>No matter what they do, they can't get out of

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>their own way. But what do you think you're seven

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Is that too many points for the

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City Chiefs to be favored in a game, even

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 1>at home?

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I mean this weirdest this year is so weird. Man.

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 2>This Cincinnati defense is terrible, but the Chiefs offense just

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 2>lacks explosiveness and consistency. But man, this Chiefs defense is legit.

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean they've a lot of success rate over forty

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:30.360
<v Speaker 2>percent just once in the last six weeks to Jordan

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Love have my Dad. I don't like either side here.

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 2>I think the under again forty five points is a lot.

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I think the Chiefs will be able to hold down

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 2>this Bengals offense, especially if they don't have Jamar Chase again.

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:47.879
<v Speaker 2>And the Chiefs offense, to me, I want to look

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 2>at the Travis Kelcey receiving props because the Bengals have

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 2>been terrible against tight ends all season. But man, I

0:41:56.480 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 2>can't trust this Chief's offense right now. It's crazy because

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 2>if this chief Chiefs offense looks like even the worst

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 2>version of itself from the last five years, this team

0:42:08.760 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 2>is just a gauntlet because of how well their defense

0:42:11.560 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 2>is playing. But that's not the case, So give me

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 2>the under in this game.

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Chase is probably unlikely for this We heard he was

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be as multiple weeks, so I don't anticipate having Chase.

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Is that just the difference maker in the seven and

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a half here?

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 4>Not necessarily?

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't think the Chiefs should be favored

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 3>by more than a touchdown against anyone other than the

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 3>dregs of the league right now. The Bengals are not

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 3>the dregs of the league by any stretch of the imagination. Like, yeah,

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 3>they've got problems on defense, and I think we saw

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:42.839
<v Speaker 3>that Jake Browning is not going to be, you know,

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 3>someone's quarterback of the future.

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:47.840
<v Speaker 4>But I still like the.

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Bengals and the points here because we have seen this

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 3>chief passing game struggled to such an extent, like since

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 3>coming out of there by Patrick Mahomes is averaging six

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 3>point four yards per pass attempt. That is Mac Jones.

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 3>That is a mac Jones number. Like, this passing game

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:07.719
<v Speaker 3>is not working right now. So I'm inclined to take

0:43:07.760 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals, But I do agree with Sam the best

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:12.399
<v Speaker 3>bet in this game is the under far and away.

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, the under far and away? All right? What about

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Denver hosting the Chargers? Denver's five and a half point

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:20.719
<v Speaker 1>favorites at home against the Chargers thirty eight and a

0:43:20.760 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>half is number for this one plus two hundred fits.

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Is there any value on the Chargers here with considering

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the way Denver's looking in the last couple of weeks.

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh, maybe this game is just such a weird thing

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 3>to say, but I just right, like, are the Chargers

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 3>the team that got stuffed into a locker by the

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 3>Raiders two weeks ago?

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 4>Or are they the team that.

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 3>Was surprisingly Plucky in Week sixteen, Like I don't know,

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:44.759
<v Speaker 3>and I don't know where the Broncos are.

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:46.319
<v Speaker 4>I just don't want to touch this game at all.

0:43:46.600 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 1>These are two tough teams to invest in.

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:48.279
<v Speaker 2>Sam.

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 1>That being said, is that a walk away for you?

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 2>I think I slightly lean the Chargers here if this

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 2>crosses six, because again to what you guys are saying,

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers played pretty decent against Buffalo, and Denver played

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 2>about as poor as you could against New England. I

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:07.919
<v Speaker 2>know they made the game look close at the end there,

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:09.959
<v Speaker 2>but they had a negative two point one percent pass

0:44:10.040 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 2>right over expectation against a Patriots defense that we know

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 2>is strong against the run. Denver wants to run the ball,

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 2>but they're not really good at it. They're negative point

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 2>nine to eight EP per rush is sixteenth in the

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:27.960
<v Speaker 2>league this year. So I think if Denver runs the ball,

0:44:28.440 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, keeps this total lower, Chargers have enough to

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 2>keep it close. So if this crosses six, then give

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:37.839
<v Speaker 2>me the Chargers, all.

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, last one here, your Green Bay Packers, gentlemen are

0:44:41.000 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>going to travel to Minnesota. Minnesota, another heartbreaking loss for them.

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:47.320
<v Speaker 1>It's nothing but heartbreak for the seven and eight Vikings.

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>They are two point home favorite. Sam Forty five and

0:44:49.960 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a half is the total on this game, plus one

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:53.480
<v Speaker 1>oh five on the green Bay Packers side. So the

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 1>question is it's practically a pick, and what side do

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to be picking.

0:44:58.560 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I want to be picking the pack Hers

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 2>because how much, he said. But the biggest concern here

0:45:03.840 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 2>is the injuries on offense on both sides. It looks

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:10.920
<v Speaker 2>like Minnesota could be without both Jordan Addison and TJ. Hockinson.

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:13.879
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay is also dealing with injuries on offense. There

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:16.719
<v Speaker 2>might be without Christian Watson and Jayden Reid missed the

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:20.480
<v Speaker 2>game this past week. Jordan Love has been okay against

0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 2>the Blitz this year, which Brian Flores loves to do.

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 2>He's ninth in PFF passing grade against the Blitz. I

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 2>made this Minnesota by two, So I'm running the line

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:32.879
<v Speaker 2>and don't see any value right now?

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, FITZI any value in this practical pick him

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:37.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Monday Night contest?

0:45:38.520 --> 0:45:41.399
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't think so. And part of the reason why, like.

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I Mars Sunday Night contest no Monday this week because

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of college football, pardon me.

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:49.240
<v Speaker 3>So my inclination would probably be to take the Vikings

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:52.160
<v Speaker 3>just because of how badly the Packers defense has been playing.

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:55.319
<v Speaker 3>But then again, Nick Mullins is such a wild card.

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:57.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is a man who truly does not

0:45:57.520 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 3>have a conscience when it comes to throwing down field.

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Like he he threw four interceptions in that game this

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:08.080
<v Speaker 3>past weekend. He probably could have thrown eight interceptions in

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:10.240
<v Speaker 3>that game. Like I don't know how many turnover worthy

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:12.799
<v Speaker 3>plays he was great at as having by PFF. I

0:46:12.840 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 3>can't wait to see what that number is because I

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 3>guarantee you it's higher than four. But that makes me

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 3>not want to bet either side. But I kind of

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:26.280
<v Speaker 3>like the over here despite the injuries on offense. Sam

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 3>was talking about, Yes, Jordan Addison's hurt, but I think

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 3>kJ Osborne can step in and torch this Packers defense

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:37.279
<v Speaker 3>just as well as Jordan Addison probably, And like with

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 3>the Packers, I don't think Love has really missed a

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 3>beat missing his wide receiver like he just spreads it

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:45.240
<v Speaker 3>around no matter what. So if it's not Christian Watson

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 3>and Jayden Reied, it's gonna be Romeo Dobbs, Dontavian Wis,

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Malik Eith, whoever he needs to get it to Tucker Kraft,

0:46:51.920 --> 0:46:54.120
<v Speaker 3>so give me the over here.

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm not interested in either side.

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:58.799
<v Speaker 1>There you go, and make sure you're interested, obviously in

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>continuing to follow along here with all this line movement.

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Make sure that you download the Betting Pros app, that

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:07.319
<v Speaker 1>you are checking out the game notifications. You can stay

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:08.920
<v Speaker 1>on top with all the line alerts so you know

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:11.799
<v Speaker 1>exactly where the movement is happening with these games. And

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:14.320
<v Speaker 1>remember if you haven't already downloaded the app now because

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you get three free days of premium on iOS. Great

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:19.400
<v Speaker 1>weekend to do it. You've got all the college football

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>bowl stuff happening, the college playoffs, NFL Action. Great time

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to utilize the tools of Betting Pros. And don't forget

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:27.279
<v Speaker 1>if you're watching here on the YouTube, subscribe drop the

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 1>comments below and you just might win a one year

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:33.000
<v Speaker 1>free premium upgrade to the best betting tools on the planet.

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of the best betting tools on the planet, I

0:47:35.160 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 1>love these two guys, I kid, I love you, Sam Hoppin,

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Papitz Morris. Great stuff as always, gentlemen, enjoy the rest

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of your week. That'll do it for us. But the

0:47:42.560 --> 0:47:45.360
<v Speaker 1>story of the game goes on for Sam and fits.

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids, Happy

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:48.680
<v Speaker 1>New Year.

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:51.960
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:54.360
<v Speaker 5>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 5>by leaving a positive review on.

0:47:56.160 --> 0:47:57.799
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:00.759
<v Speaker 5>Follow us on x and TikTok at thattting Pros and

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 5>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 5>channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros.