WEBVTT - MLB Rule Change Suggestions

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>For the people.

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 2>Perfect way to label this one, and he often does

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 2>articles that are for the people because the people get involved.

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Nesbitt with us right now from the Athletic put

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 2>out an article to the people saying what rule changes

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 2>should MLB make and it was a mailbag to analyze

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 2>the suggestions. Stephen, great to chat with you, and I

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>want to go right to the one that it listed,

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 2>like the most response, the most fire. There's always that

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 2>one right from your article. So what was the one

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 2>that we should lead this conversation with.

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's like the realistic one and then there's

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the unrealistic one. Do you have a favorite?

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh, aj, what do you want?

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's just the realistic one first, because the unrealistic

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 3>ones something so crazy, like a pitch cla yeah.

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The realistic ones had to do with the pictures,

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and that always gets a lot of people going because

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it does feel like sixty feet six inches in some

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of gospel, but in reality it was just a distance.

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>They moved the pictures mound two in nineteen eighty sorry,

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>eighteen ninety three or something like that. They lowered the

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>mound in nineteen sixty eight, as we know, after the

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>year of the picture, and there was evidence that that

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>worked right eras went up, batting averages went up, And

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the problem with that is that it wasn't really a

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:33.759
<v Speaker 1>clean body of evidence, I guess because they also changed

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 1>the strike zone at the same time the walks went up.

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>It was a more friendly environment for hitters in many

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>different ways. So lowering the mound I think would help

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>hitters certainly, but I don't think it is like really

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the one sort of end all, be all rule change

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that would fix the hitting environment completely. The other thing

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that sort of the other side of that coin is

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to move the mountain back, which was discussed at length

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago. It was tested in the

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic League moved it back one foot in the Atlantic League.

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>There have been talks about having it two feet back.

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>A little bit further back you'd be at the true

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of geometric center of the infield diamond, but they

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>really didn't see positive improvement in the Atlantic League experiment. Now,

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the problem there also is that guys can't throw strikes,

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 1>and so this just made it worse. You had more

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>movement from that far back, So if you couldn't already

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>already couln't land your sinker or your slider or you're

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>sweeper in the strike zone, then you have even tougher

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>time from a couple feet back. So they've tested a

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>number of different things, and it does feel like you

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>guys can attest to this too, Like if you're going

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to make one change to the game that isn't going

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to radically change how the game looks, then moving the

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.959
<v Speaker 1>mound down further or moving it back farther certainly seems

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>like a relatively minor fix from a just an aesthetic standpoint,

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>and it could have a positive effect on the game.

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>It also will make movement harder, and I'm just gonna

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>keep guessing that pictures will continue throwing hard and harder

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>no matter how far back you asked them to throw from.

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that problem is going away, that

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the average velocity continues to climb. As far as more

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of an absurd thing that drew some attention, There is

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>so much focus still on the extra innings rule to

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>add a runner at second base, that one was probably

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>two to one comments versus any other topic when I

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>ask for people's favorite rule changes. Now, if you ask

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>baseball fans, what's one rule do you want to change.

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Almost every single response is undoing a rule change that

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>already happened. That's just sort of the way we are.

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>We can't sort of getting our creative hats on and

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>come up with something super zany. Like one person did

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>on here, which I enjoyed, was why not make the

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>infield dirt smaller to prevent them from backing up? Okay,

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting, that's new to me. But extra innings rule

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is not particularly popular. That Rob Manford has added a

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>runner at second base, the Manford Runner or the ghost runner.

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Some people say incorrectly, that's a wuffle ball thing, that's

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>really not a person on second base. But it's not

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>popular to have that there. And yet it's successfully getting

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>games over quickly. It's saving arms, it's saving bullpens, And

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>so I understand the desire to have it look more

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>like baseball. And for all the changes baseball has made,

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 1>the League Office has made to try to make baseball

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 1>look like baseball, right, don't let third basement lineup in

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>shallow right field, ban the shift, A lot of things

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>they want to make baseball look like baseball used to be.

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.359
<v Speaker 1>And yet that's one thing with the extra endings, like no, No,

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we just got to get the games over with. If

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to restrict how many pitchers can be on

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a roster, then we want to not be burning guys

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in the extra innings. We don't want anymore's position players pitching,

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>which is another rule change we can discuss, and so

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>extra innings the one I went with. People had all

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>sorts of you know, their version of their favorite extra

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>inning plan. One of them, the simple one is play

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the tenth inning normally. Maybe you start a run around

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>first in the eleventh, run around second in the twelfth.

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of different ways you could do it.

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>This person had it sort of invented a showdown where

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the home team, I believe it was just gets to

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 1>pick if they hit or if they pitch. There are

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>three outs to end the whole thing. You put your

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>picture out there, you put your five hitters with run

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.159
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a run around first was the idea.

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>And if the pitcher gets three outs before a run scores,

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>then his team win. If he gives up a run,

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>his team was as simple as that, so it would

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>get the game over quickly. Do I think it is

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>going to happen? No? Do I think it's like as

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Mickey Mouse is, what's happening now? Pretty close.

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 4>We love our dog Bella, who splays out in the

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 4>open sun on our floor like she's an underwear model,

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 4>and that's why we love her so much.

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 5>To scratch her belly. She's a cutie, that Bella.

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 2>And a quick message from today's sponsor, the ASPCA Pet

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Health Insurance Program. If you're frantically looking for what to

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 2>do with your pup when they have an issue, the

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 2>program offers customizable accident and illness plans, making it easier

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 2>to get your pet the care they need. When you

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 2>enroll in an ASPC Pet Health Insurance plan, you could

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:03.840
<v Speaker 2>get a twenty five dollars Amazon gift card. It's a

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 2>little treat for you while you're doing something great for

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 2>your pet. To explore coverage, visit ASPCA Pet Insurance dot

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 2>com slash foul that's ASPCA Pet Insurance dot com slash foul.

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Eligibility restrictions apply. Visit ASPCA Pet Insurance dot com slash

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Amazon terms for more info. This is a paid advertisement.

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Insurance is underwritten by either Independence American Insurance Company or

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 2>United States Fire Insurance Company and produced by PTZ Insurance

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Agency Limited. The ASPCA is not an insurance and is

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 2>not engaged in the business of insurance.

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Steven a couple of things. First of all, lower the

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 3>mound all you want. Places like Toronto and other places,

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 3>they'll figure out a way to make the mound still

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 3>higher than it should. Because if you've ever sit on

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 3>the rogersoner Round mound, it's like you're on top of

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Mount Everest and you're looking down.

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 5>I mean, hoseell.

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 3>I remember you go up there and you stand up

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 3>there next to your picture, and I always had to

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 3>make sure I was at the top because otherwise I

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 3>was like three feet shorter than the picture. And I'm like,

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 3>this guy's not that tall. Why am I hurting my

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 3>neck looking up at him? So there will still be

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 3>people that skirt the rules. Also moving the picture, the

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 3>mound back or whatever. How about we just learned to

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 3>make strikeouts matter. If you want to cut down strikeouts,

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 3>make the matter when guys get paid. That'll cut that down.

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 3>And then the last one, I actually liked the Manford

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't a big Manford runner Manford man guy until

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 3>now that I broadcast. I think it's great because it

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 3>gets games over and we don't have these eighteen inning

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 3>slog fests for I'm fine for it going back to

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 3>the regular way in the postseason. And then the last

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 3>thing you said was one of the dumbest things I've

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 3>ever heard in my life. Because let's say your best

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 3>picture is your closer and use them in the ninth inning. Well,

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 3>guess what teams aren't gonna want to risk bringing in

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 3>a starter or another guy to pitch that.

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 5>So that that was a terrible idea.

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Now, if you want to say, do the home run

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 3>derby or something like that, okay, I could deal with

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 3>that a little more. But the pictures and the injuries.

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 3>We already have too many injuries to pitchers.

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 5>So I don't know. Just my two cents.

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, first of I definitely did not grade these

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>on realisticness, and I'm not necessarily condoning many of the suggestions.

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I want a creativity more than anything. But if aj,

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>if I give you this, we ended the all start

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the game last year with the swing off, and it

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>was fun, it was interesting. Would it make you mounts

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to borrow that phrase again? Totally? Would you if you're

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>going to go to a sort of non baseball version

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of extra innings. If we say you could play the

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>extra rings regularly, or you can have this middle tier,

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>which is what they're doing now, of putting a runner

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>on base in scaring position, or if you're going to

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>go sort of zany to make it an entertainment thing

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to make people really want to stick around almost root

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>for extra innings. Would you ever go there where you

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>want to swing off, where you want a quasi version

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of baseball, where it's three outs to end the whole thing.

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 3>I'd rather have the swing off what It'd be more exciting.

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 3>It'd be over quicker than the three out thing. I

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 3>think a swing off. The problem with the swing off

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 3>is teams aren't built the same, so your three best

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 3>hitters for the swing off might not be equal on

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 3>every team. Now on the All Star Game, they were

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be. But it would have been so much

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 3>cooler if it was Judge and Otani and the rest

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 3>of the starters that had already jumped on their private

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 3>planes and flown home. Yeah, but I think it'd be cool.

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 3>It won't happen. I actually, I think the best umpermise

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 3>of what you have in order to keep the game

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 3>shorter and to keep him from going twenty innings is

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 3>what we have now most games. I mean, I mean, heck,

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 3>we I don't think we've had a game go to

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 3>the was it past the fourteenth inning since this rule

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 3>came into play, So I mean, I think that's all right.

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 3>I'mbout one hundred percent sure, But I think that's the

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 3>longest one I've seen. I mean, I remember going eighteen

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 3>nineteen innings, not regularly, but every once in a while

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 3>it would jump up on You can't have that in

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 3>today's game. There's too many injuries already, and we're trying

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 3>to keep people's attention. So let's keep people's attention, all right.

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 4>So the runner at second is called the zombie runner

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 4>because he died and came back to life, the resurrected runner,

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 4>whatever it is. It's not a ghost runner. Definitely not

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 4>the Manford Runner. That sounds weird because Manford never played,

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 4>so that's not going to happen to me.

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 5>Why are all the rules Why are all.

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 4>The rules to increase offense when the or that not?

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Why are the rules that are like gimmicked about to

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 4>increase offense?

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 5>Why is that?

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 4>Because is that more fun than watching a pitcher dominate?

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 4>Is that more fun than or is it because of

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 4>the fact that some of your rules that you came

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 4>up with here, could we have, you know, more injuries

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 4>to pitchers. If we have less injuries to pitchers, then

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 4>maybe we can have just a better product completely out

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 4>on the field.

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 1>Pretty hard to reinvent the product though, And so what

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the league is left with interesting here, if you guys agree,

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>is if the league is going to force something, it

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 1>can only force certain things. It can't force contact, it

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 1>can't necessarily force the strike out right down. It can

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 1>really encourage it. But who's to say that they make

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>any of these changes that are recommended by fans here

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that are intended to bring strikeout rates down and intended

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to put the ball and play more, bring like stuff

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and velocities down. I guess PEG and how dominant they

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 1>are in today's game, the game would continue to evolve

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in the way that incentivizes the players. Then the clubs,

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>like teams won't be like you know what, the league

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>really feels like. It feels like they're really trying to

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>get some more runs across the board. Interest fans, they

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>don't like three true outcomes, but TIEF are still going

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:21.719
<v Speaker 1>to operate the way they always do. We have a

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>set amount of money to score the most amount of

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>runs and allow the fewest amount of runs possible to

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>win the most games, and so they're going to play

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the most efficient brand of baseball in the league doesn't

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>necessarily want that. So our rule change. Is that intended

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to fix something that's broken in the game from a

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>competitive standpoint, or are they intended to fix something that's

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of broken from a fan perspective? Was the shift

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>moved out of the game because it was ruining gameplay? No,

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the shift that moved out of the game because it

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:50.719
<v Speaker 1>looked bad and people didn't like the way that it

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>looked compared to the game they're used to. And so

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you walk through each rule change, and I would challenge

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>most people to think through the rule change and think

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>who was this or actually endings rule was not for fans.

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Fans kind of dug the game that won on eighteen innings.

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Even as a beat writer when I was missing like

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a date night with my wife, it was kind of

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>fun to sit through those and see I remember like

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a pitcher playing left field randomly and pictures having to

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>hit the in extra innings in the National League game

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that zany stuff was cool. It's like awesome to write

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>about afterward too. And so this was done for fans

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>because fans they wanted to sorry. This was done for

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>teams because they wanted predictability. And when is the game

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>getting over? And do I need to make four roster

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>moves before tomorrow's game? And it's rare. I think that

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball is going to make rule changes for

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>teams and for players. I think most of the rule

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>changers are going to be what does the fan want,

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>which the league has said is the driving force of

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>what the league wants to do.

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 4>How does baseball compare to other leagues changing their rules?

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 4>I followed Baseball way more, but the other major leagues,

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, obviously, big rule change in hockey was the

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 4>blue line. You know, they don't have the center line anymore,

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 4>so you couldn't go. So there was changes in there

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 4>to aid more open offense. Football has changed a ton,

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 4>but mostly around safety. How is Major League Baseball done

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 4>compared to the other four leagues?

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 1>It was interesting. We wrote a story a couple of

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>weeks back with Mike Borkanov, who is our one of

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>our basketball writers, and it was sort of the story

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>was like all the juice that baseball has right now

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>compared to basketball, and it was the premise was like

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>his baseball sort of reovertaking basketball as the numbers two

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>sport in the US, and that it's interesting. It's fascinating

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>for me, as someone who's covered baseball for a long time,

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>for like the prevailing narrative to be that baseball is

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>doing things right. For a long time, that was not it.

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>That was not the conversation that was being had around baseball.

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>And yet the conversation and now is, Hey, these rule

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>changes came in and they've really interested a lot of people.

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>There are some stars at the top of the game.

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>There are some interesting teams. You may not like the Dodgers,

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>but I think they're certainly interesting, and so compared to basketball,

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I think basketball people look in like this is a

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>game that needs some innovation. This is a game that

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>is running to little defense, happening way too much scoring,

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>way too much three point like efficiency. Same conversation, and

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>they haven't yet made big sweeping rule changes to fix

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that. Hockey has done a lot of

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>messing around that. You mentioned the blue line of too

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I pass all that sort of stuff, but they've been

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I think most of their messing around has been in

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>like overtime and extra extra any the shootout at the

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>end of it. Football field like changes a bunch of

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>things every year, but is it so consequential that it

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>truly changes the nature of the competition.

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 5>Not really.

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>It's like tickoffs and things like that that you mentioned

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>as far as safety. So Baseball, I think these rule

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>changes were pretty radical once you consider the landscape of

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>like these leagues. How often do they change something as

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>big as the pace of play? You know, we've talked

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>about the shot clock or the play clock. That's a

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>long time ago that these were implemented, And so baseball,

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it does feel like, is the sort of most recent

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>sport to make big changes like that. And so I

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know that the premise. I think of our previous story,

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>which was about the infield shift and sort of the

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>lack of impact that has had on truly bringing back

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>base hits, which is pretty predictable. But I think fans

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>so other way. Other ways they thought that the game

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>was sort of some parts of the game we're fixed

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in some ways by these rule changes. That conversation around

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the game still is that they've they're going in the

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>right track. So I don't think that necessarily the league

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>is open to these massive, sweeping, real changes that we're

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that we're suggesting in this story.

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 3>But by the way, you mentioned that the player, the

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 3>rule changes aren't made for the players. Tommy has his

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 3>own rule. They made him rule change for him, right,

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Should we.

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 5>Take that.

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 3>A little bit to allow other guys to get to

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 3>that possibility?

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the rule change in the scheme of But no,

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not.

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 5>No, I disagree. That's a huge rule.

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Hold on, that's a advantage for the Dodgers.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>It isn't. It is an advantage, but it's not a

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>thing that fans care about one iota. Right, there is

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a roster construction rule. That's that's all it is, right,

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's not something like you would never you would

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>never ask fans like, hey, how do you guys feel

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>about this roster construction rule? Or when this guy can

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>come on? Whatever. They don't care enough for that to

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>be a consequential le chain, is what I was trying

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to say.

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, OK, that's.

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Fair, it's pretty conch it's pretty qut consequential when it

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 3>comes to.

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 4>Sure fans gripe. Fans gripe about their payroll. They're not

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 4>going to be like, oh they got an extra pitcher.

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 4>No actual like players and other teams complain about it.

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 5>More.

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Thans are pretty smart. Yeah, fans are pretty smart. I mean,

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 2>I remember since I was a kid hating September call

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>ups because I'd be like, why are the games all

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden? I have all these extra players and

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 2>they take an extra.

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't say that. You don't say that September callups

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 4>made some people's careers.

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Scott, it was hurting my fan experience.

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 5>Eric, it was hurting your fantasy team, That's what it

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 5>was doing.

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Soine, I'm fine with an extra catcher, nine more pitchers. No,

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm good. Okay, we can bring up an extra catcher compromise, Steven,

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 2>great article, though, thanks for joining us to go over

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 2>all of it. I encourage everyone to check it out

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 2>in the Athletic. It's posted. There's a lot more in there.

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Appreciate you man, good catching up.

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks guys.

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Some wireless plans can get a little bit crazy, a

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit off the charts. Expensive Mint Mobile can get

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 2>you started with three months of premium wireless for fifteen

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 2>bucks a month.

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 5>Pretty good.

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 3>I like that the way gas prices are going up, Scott,

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 3>We've got to keep more mobile plan down and mint

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 3>mobile is your location to keep your mobile plan down,

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 3>can add family members. You can do all that for

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 3>just fifteen bucks a month.

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 2>That's less than a drink in many cities these days

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 2>if you like bougie drinks. All plans come with high

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 2>speed data and unlimited talk and text delivered on the

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 2>nation's largest five G network. If you like your money,

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 2>mint mobile is for you. Shot plans at mobile dot

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 2>com slash territory. That's mintmobile dot com slash territory. Upfront

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 2>payment of forty five dollars for three month five gigabyte

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 2>plan required equivalent to fifteen bucks a month. New customer

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 2>offer for first three months only, then full price plan

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 2>options available. Taxes and fees extra. See mint mobile for details.

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 6>The best nickname in the minor leagues is now the

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 6>best nickname in the Major League. Just Nixon Garcia. The

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 6>password is up with the Pirates. He came up because

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 6>Ryan O'Hearn has gone on the injured list and this

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 6>is a newfound thing for the Pirates. Hey, a back

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 6>goes down and you have the depth to replace with

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 6>someone who should give you a capable fill in. Garcia

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 6>was acquired in the off season four situations like this.

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 6>He is triple a depth who should in the long

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 6>run be potentially an everyday regular in a corner outflot spot.

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 6>I would not expect him right now to provide the

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 6>same thump that Ryan O'Hearn was before his injury, but

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 6>at the same time, he's also going to be significantly

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 6>better defensively in right field, so there's gonna be a

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 6>little bit of a trade off here. Garcia had an

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 6>injury of his own back tightness that kind of sidelined

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 6>him a little bit. In April. He's back and full speed.

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 6>Now there's I would say solid power here, but he

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 6>does a really good job of getting to it and

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 6>there's not a ton of swing a miss for a

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 6>guy who does have the ability to kind of go

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 6>on a home run bingch solid replacement. I don't expect

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 6>him to be, all of a sudden a game changer

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.959
<v Speaker 6>for the Pirates, but hey, the Pirates have for years

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 6>struggle to fill in when they have an injury. This

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 6>is an example of a guy who should be able

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 6>to come up and if not miss a beat, he

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 6>should be able to provide a very capable replacement for

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 6>Ryan Hurr.

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 2>That's Baseball America's JJ Cooper on the pass word. I

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 2>think that was the key for me. Aj. Yeah, he's

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily going to be the star spark right from

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 2>the jump for a Pirates team that actually needs a

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 2>little jump start. Again, but they used to replace their

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 2>injuries with guys that you know would be instantly to

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 2>the bottom of the lineup and maybe not ready for

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 2>the big leagues. This is helpful depth.

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but that's not Losing a Hearn is a big

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 3>deal for the Pirates. I mean he was better hitters,

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 3>so that that's a big deal. We just need to

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 3>be replacement level. This is where I love War because

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 3>War is like Ryan O'Hearn, Well, who's replacing Ryan o'harn.

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 3>It was like when Mike Trout, who's replacing Mike Trout.

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, yeah, of course he's not going to be

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 3>as good well the pass word, I'm not even trying

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 3>to say his name, but yeah, you can be somewhat

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 3>serviceable until Hearn comes back. That would be a big

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 3>win for the Pirates. And yes, this is something nice

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 3>that the Pirates now have the ability to do is

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 3>have major League ready people in the minor leagues that

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 3>can come up and actually help them.

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 2>Red Sox Yeah, Jose Tinson, Okay, you'll handle it from.

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 5>The Red Sox. And this is where the Pirates have

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 5>to he has to step up.

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 4>He has to be able to be somebody that not

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 4>only contributes offensively, because then they're just going backwards when

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 4>they have injuries. They have injuries like that's that's the

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 4>reality of it. And they played some tough games this

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 4>weekend against the Phillies team that was hot.

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 2>Hey, we asked the Knights and simple question on Twitter

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 2>over the weekend, and let's do rapid fire reactions to

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 2>responses from fans. We said, how would you critique your

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 2>favorite team up to this point in the season. We

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 2>used a photo of a Mets fan with a brown

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 2>paper bag over their head, but probably about a third

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 2>of the league has fans with brown paper bags over

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 2>their head at games sometimes throughout the year. So let's

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 2>roll it. Let's just read and react here for the

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 2>next few minutes and see what we have. And I've

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 2>been told we're going to start with a photo. That

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 2>photo is somebody happy and sad? Eric replied, the Reds

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 2>so far? What was the wind streak for them? Does

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 2>anyone remember? Was it nine? It is at least eight?

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 4>They were rolling, Yeah, they weren't. Then they hit the

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 4>Then they hit the Cubs. Chicago's a place right now.

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 4>Up and down, up and down, op and down.

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm. Next up, Tigers. Dana lifelong Tigers fan, not

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 2>gonna lie this year is making me crazy. Lots of injuries,

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 2>no excuse to the poor play, too many nights.

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 5>There you go. That sums it up right there. That's perfect.

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Poor play, bad, bad fundamentals, whatever it is. They've they've

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 3>had everything, injuries, everything, they've they've bad hitting, bad pitching.

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 5>They've kind of seen it all in and motown this

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 5>year since the second half of last year. Like let's

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 5>this could be a scary trend for this team.

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Next up, William bleeping destroyed any hope or belief in

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 2>this team with letting Pete and Edwin walk without giving

0:22:56.480 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 2>all out max offers to keep them. Oh he was

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 2>talking about Stearns. A Mets fan here not happy with

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 2>the decisions made by the team this offseason. A lot

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 2>of people were questioning it and now they're questioning it

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 2>even more. Actually to play to that. We didn't cover

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 2>this earlier, but Jorge Polanco seems to have one of

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 2>those issues that's not going to go away this year.

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 2>They just keep getting the news that spills out as

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 2>guys are hurt that it's going to be worse. So

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 2>it's up to the Baby Mets. Maybe the Baby Mets

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 2>have it. Got to see the prospect shine.

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 5>I'll see a tough division though, with two solid teams.

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Braves are great. Phillies look really freaking good right

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 2>now too. Next up, Oh, another photo. It's Mark contributing

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 2>a dumpster fire and writing red Sox. That would be

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 2>their offense.

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 5>Ajay, Yeah, did you see? I was on Twitter today

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 5>and I saw Veritec's wife wrote something. It was interesting.

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 5>If you guys haven't seen it, go will or go

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 5>on Twitter. It was something like.

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Something about Jason, why Jason wasn't instill in the organization

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 3>and she wrote something along the lines of smartest guy

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 3>in the room in quote, smartest guy in the world

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 3>or smartest guy in the game in quotes, knows what

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 3>he's doing or something like that. I forget exactly what

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 3>she how she worded it, but it was it was interesting.

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, they've already fired their manager, and yeah it's

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:26.640
<v Speaker 3>been interesting in Boston. Dumpster fire would be a mild

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 3>way to put it.

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm. Well played, and I will go look for

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 2>that tweet after this one. More raise? Yes, let's finish

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 2>on a fun note. Raise thirty and fifteen, and they're

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 2>showing wedding crashers partying, So what.

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 5>Does that mean?

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Is that?

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Is that more what that fan truly thinks? It is

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 4>like wedding crashers, like just oh, we're gonna enjoy it

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 4>whileunteer because I don't know if it's gonna continue, or

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.360
<v Speaker 4>does that mean like, hey, we celebrate it because we're

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 4>celebrating everything.

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 2>You go to something bougie and you crash it with

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 2>something that is rugged, and that is the raise.

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 5>Do they keep it? Do they keep it going?

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 4>That's whether their pitching as healthy.

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, they're not gonna win one hundred twenty games,

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 2>but can they win ninety two games?

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 5>Sure?

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 4>But where did this pitching? Where does pitching come from?

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 4>They find pitching everywhere, so why couldn't they just keep

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 4>finding pitching?

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 5>Hurt them? Send the next one in