WEBVTT - How Long Will the Commodities Boom Last?

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome the trillions. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric Valcunas. Eric. Uh,

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the world is in a very different place than the

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>last time we had trillions, and we felt like we

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>needed to bring everyone up to speed on on sort

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of the big macro implications of this war in Ukraine

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and the role of commodities and what what's happening in

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the commodities market, because there's a lot of turmoil and

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and uh, commodities are basically part of the thing that

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody's watching. Yeah, you know, we planned to do this

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>episode really because commodities are the new shiny objects. I mean,

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the commodities category, which has been

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>really bad for like a decade, it's now the hot spot. Really,

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it's green all over no matter what commodity you pick,

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty much. And we were going to do it because

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>commodities are up because of inflation fears where they were

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Now you have geopolitics. So we've got two major catalysts

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>here that are creating potentially a really attractive category and

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:12.919
<v Speaker 1>investors are starting to put in money. And the commodities

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>e t f s have grown by about fift over

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the past fourteen months. In organic growth. So there's a

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of trapdoors, a lot of um rated our products

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in here places. To you know that you don't know

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing, it can be tricky. So we really

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>need to be careful when we go over a category

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>like this. So to help us make sense of everything,

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Mike mccloan commodity strategist with Bloomberg Intelligence, is gonna help

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>us understand the field, this time on trying in the

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>boom in commodities. Last, Mike, welcome to trillions. Thanks for

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>having so. Mike, before you were at Bloomberg, you actually

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>were in the E T F world, So let's just

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>start there. What what would you do before you're a

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>commodity strategist? But I did, I like to say it

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>just took me thirty years to get to Bloomberg. But

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Eric and I met on a panel. I was the

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>head of research at et S Courtage, which is not

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Wisdom Train, and I remember discussing precious medals and stuff

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>like that, and um so we've been it's been how long?

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Has that there? About eight nine years now? It was

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>probably about ten years ago. Can I just explain what

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Mike did on this panel? I think we were in Austin,

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Texas at or Dallas in this like cool art bar.

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>We were using these unique venues to do presentations on

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>e t s and panel discussions. Anyway, Mike actually brought

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>like physical gold coins or silver coins and he held

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>them up and I was like, I told him after

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>him like props. I like that. That's good. I gotta

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I gotta use some props in my thing too, because

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>these panels can be so boring, So anything that you

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>can do to spice them up, I like as a presenter,

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and I was. That's how I first met Mike. And

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>then that night or later that day, I saw him

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in the line at the airport waiting for bags, and

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>that's how we started talking, and um we met. That's

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>how we became friends. And man, I remember I had

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>a silver one of those silver dollars. If I had

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>just given you the equivalent, had the equivalent mont of bitcoin,

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it would have been much better off. So so much

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>for the physical like mindys anymore. I guess they're coming

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>back a little. Also worth mentioning that you you cover

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies for bluemrinkin Intelligence, which I'm sure we'll talk about.

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>But Mike, Mike has gone full crypto. You know, we

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>talk half crypto, Mike's I think he's probably so, Mike,

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>let's start in a non crypto space. Let's talk about Ukraine.

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>UM commodities has been just on this terror there's you know,

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the word supercycle was dropped many times last year. So

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>where where are we at in that supercycle? And sort

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of bring us up to speed on on inflation and

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing in Ukraine. Well, I think the most

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>important thing for investors to realize here is allocating or

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>some partial allocations to commodities has worked really well as

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a diversifier. And that's been the investors who did that

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>early on UM reaping the benefits at least having that

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>hedge says, you know, the boomer commodity in decks up

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>almost on the year, crew up on as of the

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>beginning of March, and stock market down, you NASTAC down.

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>They're doing what they're supposed to do. UM. But the

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>key thing that's happened is the market's price for a

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>significant amount of demand about a supply shock out of

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the Russia invasion of Ukraine. And I still think it's

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be the opposite. I think it's gonna be

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>more of a demand destruction event like happen in two

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight. I'll bring those parallels in there. But

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing we need to point out is this will

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>be a absolute boom for North American commodity producers. Now

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we can get in that later and a lot of

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>our our audience will be interested in some of those

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>producers because right now Crudels is the first time w

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>h I really sustained above a hundred dollars of bail.

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>The first time I did that was in two thousand eight,

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>right about this time of year. Will dig into that.

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>The parallels are uncanny, very scary, but we're basically almost

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>triple the cost of US production shale, where if producers

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>can head you out two to three years based on

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the curve, and you can roll down that curve when

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you're investing in those commodities and they can double their

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>cost of production in terms of a price in the screen.

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>It's happening in all the grains and everything. So this

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>is an absolute boom for those producers. It's the question

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>is sustainability. My fears this war will trigger a global

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>recession which was overdue, and the whole thing will tumble

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>down like two eight. Well, okay, let's that's a lot

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>of like in the no macro talk rate. Let's just

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.559
<v Speaker 1>take a big step back and talk oil. Okay. Xcel

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>e is a is a popular ETF people use. I

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>believe Lestimer looked AT's in the past year. This wasn't

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>supposed to happen. I remember some people were like, oil

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is over, this is a green revolution, this will never happen.

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Just explain to us why oil in particular is up

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>so much in the past twelve months. If we're supposed

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to be like over oil, well, the first of all,

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line, the foundation for oil going up to

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Hunter down the barrel was it went down the negative

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>forty back in April. That shut off a lot of production,

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and from that we came out with this almost unprecedent

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>discipline from OPEC. Now we're returning to a demand environment

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and the supply is not they're OPEC discipline. But if

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the lessons of oil is a good example, the higher

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>price cure should kick in and we should go back

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to where we were before. So it's point out right

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>now the price of oil is about fifty below the peak,

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe below the peak in two thousand and eight. There's

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a reason for that because the US back in two

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight was a net importer, one of the largest

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and we had a financial we had

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a real estate crisis. Now the world's largest import is

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>China and they're having a real estate crisis. But the

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>key thing about oil was it's on the back of

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that major demand shock. Now we're getting supply to kick in,

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and the rule in commandities I'll leave you with this

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is a higher price cure should kick in right now.

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>We have the war and there's fears of how that

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>will happen, and we'll have a cut off of rush

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and supply, but Russia's supply is probably gonna goes directly

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to China and then I don't think there'll be a

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>major disruption supply in the planet. But key thing to

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>think about what's happening right now is this is a

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>major shock to inflations, major shock to the FED for consumers,

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's basically repeated what it did in two thousand eight.

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm worried that this is going to revert lower.

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's what Karel has been doing since the peak

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eight. I'll end with this three times

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand has dropped, So that's what investors have

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to be worried about, and that would be more of

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a lower tide for everything. Okay, you mentioned the North

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>American producers, which is an interesting component here because OPEC

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>seems like it's gonna probably just do its own thing,

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>maintain status quo. But what could happen over here in

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>North America now that there's this that that opportunity, that

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>margin that you know, if you're a shale producer, you're

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at hundred dollar oil that you could spool up

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>real quick and start pumping again. I mentioned I focus

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>on North America, Joel, because that North America's supply has

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>been major paradigm pressure shift in crude oil since the

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>peak in two thousand and eight. Back then, North America

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>was in that import of about ten million barrels of

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>liquid fuels a day as of this year, Department of

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Energy Estiment, So we'll probably be North America will probably

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>have a surplus about four of production of liquid fuels

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>versus consumption. Now I say liquid fuels because I'm from

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a farm background. In this country, towel percent of our

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>unletted gas comes from ethanol, and that bio fuel kick

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>self is kicking in so UM and I have to

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>include Canada UM. But that's that's spend the paradise m

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>this pressured oil. That's what's changed from just a decade ago.

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>And what does that mean for the future. That supply

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>is not gone forever, it's just coming back, it's revisiting,

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>it's resetting. The key thing is that peak has been

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in consumption. I just remember being in the business line

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:50.839
<v Speaker 1>met eric All. It was all about the peak crude

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>oil supply and it turned out to be Creek Keep

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>peak consumption in North America. So US total liquid fuel

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>consumption the US peaked around twenty four in barrels in

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eighteen. Maybe we get to twenty three million

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 1>barrels a day. But the major, the most significant returning

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>ever in the history of automotive manufacturers, is towards EVS.

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I own an e V and that's has probably peaked

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>forever and it's gonna head lower. And also versus GDP,

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's insignificant. Now. The demand side is on China.

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>But what's China facing major property crisis like you US

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>had had. Now if the world has some recession, all

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that demand pulled for China, and of course it's gonna

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>be a problem. Of course, this effect of China of

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the automobile sales last year where vs. First time? Ever,

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 1>where's that going well? I I would add that to

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>make evs you need fossil fuels. I mean, there's a

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of fossil fuel behind the scenes of clean energy.

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>But let's move to oil. You mentioned something in your

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>first answer, which was the curve, And just to deconstruct this,

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I have two categories of commodity ets. Those that are

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>physically backed like gold, where it really does track the

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>price very well, but then ones that you can't store,

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>like oil, natural gas, corn. They are different than the

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>price because they own futures and they have to constantly

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>roll them from one month to the next as the

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>one becomes closer to expiry because no one wants to

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>get oil delivered to their house. So can you explain

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to me, if we have USO or an oil et

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>F like that, what the annual roll costs look like

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>right now versus what it looked like before, And what

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>should investors be looking for when it comes to those

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>roll costs or is it just worth it? So the

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>key thing there, Eric is it's it's probably questions does

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it get much better for commodity and energy investors right now?

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Because of backwardation. What backwardation means you have to roll

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that future and every time you roll it periodically roll

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to a higher to a lower price. The front end

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>this bid. The back isn't Why is the front end bid?

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Because typically what happens in you but a short term

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>issue with the UM excess demand and lack of slacks supply,

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and then it's always expected to where can say it

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>does that it's a higher price cure. The question is

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>how much better is it yet? So right now crewe

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>went in backgardation on a one year basis. I always

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>look at the annual most of the futures positions roll

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>each contract. That depends on how they work. But you

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>meant there's that's the key thing I want to point.

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:20.079
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned natural gas. You've got to point a natural gas.

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the world's worst commodity investment history and mankind probably

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>because if you look at the price right now, it's

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 1>four to five dollars at the same price as twenty

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>years ago, yet's the most expensive to store and always

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>cost a fortune. UM and it's the key thing to

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>remember about investing commodities. When you invest in commodities, sometimes

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it's better to be more tactical. And if you're thinking

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>longer term, bye, hold stick with the metals gold. You

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 1>mentioned precious metals because it will hold the physical you

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have the role as much. But the way I

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 1>look at nowadays, you cannot be invested in any commands

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>most noted goal without having some Bitcoin in that space

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's the fact that bitcoin is taking flows from

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 1>gold and investment portfolio. So looking forward to what it's

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>what's the actual roll yields? It really is dependent hipally.

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:06.719
<v Speaker 1>It costs on average five to seven percent annualized to

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>hold crude oil in a normal contango environment. Right now

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you're probably making that in positive um positive returns in

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>addition to this spot price. That's just the role. Okay,

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>So we just went over oil, a little bit of

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>natural gas. I would put all of those as big

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>chunks of what's called broad commodity E T F S

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>H and the biggest one on the market right now

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that's taking in the most flows and it's up this year,

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the best performers of the year's

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:43.199
<v Speaker 1>p DBC So this is going to hold a whole

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>bunch of future commodity futures. You talked about tactical and

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I know that's what you do. You write for people

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>who are trading, But what about a long term investor.

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Is this the kind of fund that is better to

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>hold long term or should you never hold anything that

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.719
<v Speaker 1>holds commodity futures long term? Well, the lessons of commodities

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is more the latter. Unfortunately, just look at performance p

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>dbc um from two thousand fifteen is you know, it

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>is around twenty four or so right now it's sixteen.

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>The problem is because there's a negative role in commodity.

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not like equities. You can buy and put them

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>away and they're donny. You're you're in coupons, you use

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 1>that buybacks. You have to worry about in this type

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 1>of product. There's always have to rule that futures and

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the rule commodities is normal contangle. You're always in the

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>long term half gonna have to pay some form of

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>cost of storage. Natural gas is the most expensive. His

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>historic commodity goal is the cheapest the store, and bitcoin

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>is actually the cheapest now, So that's why I wrote

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that in there, So that's gonna come out through the

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.719
<v Speaker 1>future's role. Now there's periods when you have like now,

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.599
<v Speaker 1>you get some great performance um, and it's just a

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>question of how long that lasts. But the bottom line

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is always remember is the cure for higher prices and

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>commodities is higher prices. So why is the price of

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>crudal right now? The same price is two thousand and

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>eight wheat the same prices, two thousand and eight corn,

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the same price, and then let's looking even even um copper,

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the same price as two thousand and eleven. That's

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a problem. It has been a problem. You mentioned the

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>performance the last ten years, but looking forward, when prices

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.599
<v Speaker 1>go up, I mentioned there's so much profits in the

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>space that supply will come back. That's the difference withholding

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>equities or commodity based equities, which I've understand a lot

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of institution investors like to focus on if they want

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the commodity exposure, because you don't have that always working

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>against that contangle work in the long term working against you.

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>So you you mentioned some specific areas there, the wet,

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the copper, corn, What other et F do you watch

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and and from you know, from a an investors standpoint,

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>if we're back to a certain level and we have

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a potential for for this to be an area where

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>we could see increased flows. Which which ETFs are you watching? Uh?

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Usually watched the man. I don't watch commodity t F

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly much anymore. Having been done, been there, done that.

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I managed many of um an SMP because I know

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>what happens with those over time. They're melting ice cubes.

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just the fact that comminded except from the metal.

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>It's the key ones. I watched our g l D

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and GBTC, and Eric knows which that is, because I

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>think what's going to happen is GBTC will convert to

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a ETS. It's gonna whip take out that discount, and

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it probably end up being one of the best ways

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to get exposure the bitcoin, which is becoming the global

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>digital reserve asset and going the world going that way. Okay, Mike, woa, Okay,

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So you just went over a lot quickly. I just

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>want to can we just put bitcoin aside for a minute.

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna we'll get there when we When we look

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>at at gold in particular, just it seems as though

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess we can bring bitcoin rebeck in g BTC

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is a is a trust which doesn't have new share creations,

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>so it's trading in a discount. That's a that's a

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>really unique trade that people are looking at. Let's let's

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>put that aside. Let's look at golden bitcoin. It seems

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>as though gold is a better store of value right now.

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't move around as much bitcoin. It seems to

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>be trading like a high beta tech stock. So what

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>isn't the bid on gold right now make make more

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>sense if you're worried about inflation and the world, you know,

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>having geopolitical situations. It just seems like gold is actually

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>showing why. It's more uh true zero correl correlation. It's

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a more better diversifier slash hedge, whereas bitcoin is really

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>more like a shiny object. I have to push back

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>on that a little bit. Gold has been a horrible

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>performer last couple of years, despite the highest inflation in

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>forty years, and bitcoin has done very well. Serium has

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>done a lot better. So I look at it this way.

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't speak about gold anymore without bitcoin in the

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>same bucket. Because the world is going digital and bitcoins

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the digital reserve asset, and I see it and sense

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it every day that the old guard that held and

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>allocated the gold, I'll know they have to have some

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin in that bucket. The key thing about goal is

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I fully expect it's going to perform a lot better

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in a deflation environment UM, and it has. And that

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is a good indication for that would be when the

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>long bond yields starts dropping, which I expect UM long

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>bond yield right now it's peaked last year two point

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>five percent and now it's like two point one. That's

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a recessionary trade. And gold had some major competition competition

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>for a stock market last three years in a row

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of stock markets up SMP five average. Who needs goal

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>in that environment? That to me is what should be changing.

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>But the key thing fact is Eric and that's why

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>what I mentioned earlier E T S. I watch gotta

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>watch something that tracks bitcoin um because those two belong together.

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And I say gold is naked without bitcoin in the

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>same bucket. That's just the facts of where things are

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>going and have been going in the last few years.

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>So now that Ukraine and this war is underway, a

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of interest in what bitcoin will do what's your tick.

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's showing divergent strength versus stock market. Certainly

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is Bitcoin is down a few percent, but it has

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>it basically trades that three to four x volatily, meaning

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the risk two D sixty day valta is that much higher.

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So Bitcoin at this stage versus the stock market should

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>be done a lot more. So. What I think has

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>happened is Bitcoin is transition from a risk on asset

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to a risk off asset. And what's happened in this

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>war might have just set that tone, kicked the inflection

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>point and bend the trigger point. People in Ukraine and

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Russia who can't get a penny from a t m

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>s have have access to crypto dollars via their phones

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and cryptocurrencies and bitcoin is the biggest one. So to me,

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 1>this is the transition. And the key fact is ask

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 1>a millennial about gold. What do they say, Yeah, sorry,

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going from bitcoin. The world is going that way,

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>and I look at it, it it is why take the

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>risk of not being allocated to one of the best

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>performing assets in the world. In the world is going digital,

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, I'm bullish gold. I think at

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>some point what's gonna happen is golds is gonna pop

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>above two thousand dollars and ounce and stay there. But

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I fully expect bitcoint about performing. The key thing is

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>how will we perform if when we get the next

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>down leg in the stock market, which I expect bitcoin

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>is still risk. Gasket will probably gravitate lower. But it's

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:01.719
<v Speaker 1>been only very good support around thirty and I think

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll end with this. I think it's just a matter

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of time that this global digital collateral goes to under grant.

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just a matter of time that's just based on

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>supplied demand and increasing adoption. Let me ask you this question,

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>which is something that I've been seeing debated on Twitter

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of days, and it's a really

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>good one, which is this idea of crypto trying to

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>have it both ways like and this question really strikes

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>at the core of that. Should crypto exchanges comply and

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>do what the US government wanted to do in terms

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of freezing Russian accounts or should it say, no, Biden administration,

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that's not what we are. We are defy And that's

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole point is that we're not run by the governments.

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>What should they do? And this is this is this

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:49.239
<v Speaker 1>is a war, and in war, the government can make

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>them do it, and they should be smart enough to say, Okay,

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do help the cause here because we have

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a very oppressive dictator um taking over and and taking

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>over a free country. That's got to stop right away

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>or it won't stop. And so any other financial institution

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>has to do. Why shouldn't crypto exchanges to be different? Also,

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>licensed will be revoked. That's just the fact of war.

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Get used to it, and get used to pay taxes

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>when you make money. It's just that's life. The thing is,

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a revolution in digital assets. Now anybody in

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>those they can run their own nodes. You don't have

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>to go through an exchange to do things um, and

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>they can figure it out away from these exchanges. But

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>when you're have k y C and a m L

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>rules and to be licensed in the U S, you

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>gotta do what the government tells since the fact. But

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 1>that's what's gonna happen this year. I fully expect we're

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:44.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna have more clarified regulation from the US eventually. I know,

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Eric is your space side. To me, it's just a

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>matter of time we get properly. UM tracking physical ETPs

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>attract an index of cryptos um just catching up to

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Europe and Canada. You know what's happening. Funds are leaving

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the world, and but bitcoin is becoming global digital reserve asset,

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's war is defining that. But the exchanges have

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>to comply to what's happening the world. I expect a

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 1>year from now we're gonna see Russia completely isolated on

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a global economic stage. And if we don't do that,

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>we are risking this tyranny spreading. We have to. So

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>it's just like, yes, she's investing when you're when you

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 1>when your grandmother in Ohio who used the former teacher

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 1>finds out that some of her pension fund money is

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>invested in Russia, there's gonna be an uproar. It's got

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 1>to be complete. Pull the plug. Yeah, I agree, Bitcoin

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>is here to stay, cryptos here to stay. I just

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of you know, the performance and

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the use cases are are definitely gonna be debatable for

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>a while in my opinion. But let's cook. Let's just

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>take a big step back and just talk to me

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>about I just told at the beginning of the UM

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>podcast we talked about commodity e T s up a

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>good amount over the past year as as because inflation

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>fears are here, is now a good time to add

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to that? Uh? And we're you know, what, which, what

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>practically should people do with a portfolio in terms of commodities? Uh?

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, should they use like a broad commodity and

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>then add it with a little G l D and crypto?

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And I know we can't give investment advice, but what

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>generally should people think about in terms of how to

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>put this into a portfolio. I think think about commodities

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>is a hedge. It's worked great as a hedge. But

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>if you want to just be overweight or underweight, the

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>rule of commodities in most markets you should be buying

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>when they're crying, someone when they're yelling and the market

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is extremely high levels and don't ever underestimate the higher

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>price cure. So I fully expect Rudell can easily drop

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>fifties six seventy this year. UM. And that's just what

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>it's done three times since two thousand and eight, So

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>be prepared for that. And I fully expect if you

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>are worried about inflation, which is what you should have

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>been worried about a year ago. I mean, it's just

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it's this is not the time to worry about inflation.

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>It is time to worry about the base effect UM

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and FED tightening and most assets going back down UM,

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>which has always happened, and it's gonna happen, I think,

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly because we have a risk of this recession UM.

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>But that's the key thing now. And overweighting commodities here,

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I just learned this lesson. Been in the business for

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a long time. You just never want to get two

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>bullish commodities when they when producers can make so much

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>money at such good levels. And you know, that's the

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>old days when the US was a net importer of

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>liquid fuels and now that you as as a net exporter.

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is UM and the world's changed. And and

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I view commodities as naked if there's not some digital

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>assets in that space, because that's what's changing. The adoption

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoining the theorem is happening rapidly. And I'll leave

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you with this. The most widely traded cryptos and the

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:40.159
<v Speaker 1>planet are digital crypto dollars. People call them stable coins,

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>but the really crypto dollars because the vast majority track

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the dollar. They're all based on stereum tokens. It's just

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a better way to do business. Um, just like you

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't learn an ets, it's just a better way to invest.

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Crypto dollars a better way to do business and um

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 1>instant settlements four seven trading costs nothing. You're an interest.

0:23:58.200 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>What more do you need to know? And the essential

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I you don't need a bank in between. Um, So

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be regulated. But they're based on the storium tokens.

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 1>That's part of when the sterium is doing its revolutionaries

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in the space. And then there's bitcoint the digital version

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:19.199
<v Speaker 1>of goal in the world going digital. You mentioned, uh,

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the potential for recession a couple of times. How do

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you see that playing out? And is the commodity market

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and does that provide indicators for what may transpire? Oh?

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Sure right now. Spiking energy, the most severe energy crisis

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in Europe in my lifetime, is a very good sign

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of what will happen to consumer spending. It's going to

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>get crushed. I mean, just simple facts of inflation. Um.

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is not profound, this is almost exactly what

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>happened two thousand and eight. But it was not. It

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>was It's gonna be worse. I think this time UM,

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's global, it's being centered in Europe and China

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and US should come out very well. So spiking energy

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 1>is really bad. So let's look at the fact that

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five is the trolls drop fift this year,

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>yet the Fed funds are still priced for six tightenings

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>pointings in the next year and in the next year.

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:10.959
<v Speaker 1>I used the one year measure. The last time we

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>had correction in the stock market was two thousand eighteen.

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>In September two th eighteen, markets price for four hikes

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>high titans in the next year. By the time we

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 1>got December, they're they're talking about easy. We're still priced

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>for hikes. So the headwinds are increasing for asset revisions.

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>We have this war, which I think is a significant

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 1>trigger trigger for UM negative consumer sentiment. And and I'll

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>end on this. At the beginning of the year, versus

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>their sixty month moving average, the SMP five, Bloomberg Comandity

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in next were both about fifty above those levels. That's

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>never happened in the last six years where they're both

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that stretched. So simple mean reversion is what I'm worried,

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and now we have pretty significant triggers for that. Alright,

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 1>stuff to watch, you know, Mike. One et F we

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked about is wheat w A t you crane

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>being such a big producer of wheat, obviously the war

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to jeopardize that production. What do you think

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>would happen to that ETF? By low cell hi the

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 1>higher price cure, there's gonna be massive supply coming on

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>in the US wheat tracks. The US wheat future has

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to roll and contango. Historically, whea it's expensive to store um.

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna invest in anything commodities in that space,

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 1>look at soybeans. You know it was virtually it's one

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of the best roll yields of all commodities UM soy

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and um corn across you maybe six seven percent the

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>year costs just to hold it. And wheat is great.

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But the time to buy wheat was two years ago.

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>And if you know, if you've been long, you're supposed

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to be lightning up. I would not suggest overwaiting here.

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is the problem. You have to be careful

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>about people chasing markets and that's the last thing you

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>ever want to do in commodities. If you miss it,

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 1>you miss it um And if you want to get

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in that space, look at soybeans because they're not gonna

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>cost you historically, they're easy to store, typically don't have

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that contangle to roll in we um you have cantangled

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>role and I typically cost you six percent annually just

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to hold it. Last question for you, what is your

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>favorite e t F ticker? G BTC. Come on, I

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>was hoping to Eric, I listen, listen. This is why

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Mike's gone full bitcoin because the old Mike,

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>he would have picked g L t R Glitter, which

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>is this cool basket of the physically backed gold, palladium, platinum,

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and silver. We we we that we kind of like

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>this e t F on the team. We feel like

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a kind of a cool like diversified metals e

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>t F that has no weird role cost in it.

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>And that was from Mike's old company. And but the

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that he didn't pick it shows Mike has he's

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:49.959
<v Speaker 1>gone Bitcoin. He's gone. I gotta give it two reasons

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 1>why that it was five years binehole accumulate, never trade

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>five years bine hole accumulate, never tried. I think the

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>upside is many exes and GBTC and glitter might be

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>a but to me and and your risk obviously is

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>appropriate and you might lose more too. But I see

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the upside is, like I said, it's unlikely. Um it's

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>like say, many exes and and for the trends to continue.

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>G BTC, Yeah, I love it, I've I've exposed it

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>in the past. I liked it, but it's already had

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good run. And I think those together paired

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:25.360
<v Speaker 1>would be good too also. But again, when you're looking

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>at your portfolio, wouldn't glitter or goal g l D

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>be better to put in the commodities section and g

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>BTC or bitcoin should be you should replaced maybe some

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.479
<v Speaker 1>tech stocks with that. Well, you could do that, but

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>we're getting that divergence now. Eric I would say theium's

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>more associated with tex stox, maybe a Bloomberg Galaxy crypto

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>index or an index and EATF. Eventually we're gonna be

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about someday that attracts, you know, an index of cryptos.

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>But um bitcoin has become a global digital claddals, so

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I think what's transition this year. It's already showing up

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in the tape is bitcoins transition again from that risk

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>on to a risk off asset, and UM it's we're

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing that with I see bids coming in below on

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>all dips, and it's going institutional. And here's a good

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>fact about it. It's still less than one percent of

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>most institutional portfolios. And I think most you know Fiducier

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>has realized there great risk is UM not being allocated

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to this space. They might as well have some rather

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>than being able to tell their grandkids, why did you

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>miss the best performing acid in history versus who lose one?

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not important, and I'm sensing that everywhere. Okay, Mike,

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much, Thanks for having Thanks for listening to trillions.

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Until next time. You can find us on the Bloomberg Terminal,

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Wearber else you'd

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>like to listen. We'd love to hear from you. We're

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. I'm at Joel Webber Show. He's at Agriculturists.

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Trillians was produced by Magnus Hendrickson. Francesca

0:29:52.880 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Leady is the head of Bloomberg podcast fe and the

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Sister Ter. The sister