WEBVTT - Look at Value Compared to growth says Bent Hunt

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Fox along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>We have a big meeting coming up or at least

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>announcement tomorrow. Today the Fed begins it's two day monthly

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>meeting or I guess not monthly ten times a year UM.

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in Ira Jersey. He's chief US

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>interest rate strategist for Bloomberg in chaligence, and before we

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>look ahead to what we're expecting from the Federal Reserve tomorrow,

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about this inflation data that we

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>got out this morning. UH inflation accelerating to its highest

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in six years, and yet not a wholesale cheer necessarily

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>from markets. Why Yeah, high A couple of things, Lisa.

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I think one is that the UH UM the market

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 1>was expecting the numbers that we received. And I think

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.399
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why you have UM, certainly interest

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>rates near where they are you know, tenure yield right

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>close to three percent, yet again after the big risk

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>off we had two weeks ago. Is because we are

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>expecting inflation to kind of hover with co inflation at

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>just over two percent. So um, you know, you have

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that plus a risk premium on top of that, and

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that gets you too close to three percent and that's

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>where um, we're we're likely to hover for for a

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>little while. Um. It does have big implications for the

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>economy though, because when one of the things that that

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we calculate based on this inflation data is what are

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>real wages? So what are wages minus inflation? And those

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>have been coming down from from a from a high

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>last month. So um, so that's something we have to

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>keep track of. Is is you know, will spending be

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>able to be kept up if inflation can and used

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to rise? So how will the FED view this? Yeah,

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>so I think the FED is going to say, Okay,

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>this is evidence that what we're doing is the right

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>policy path because we've been hiking you know, irregularly, but

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly consistently, and as such, we you know, we were

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to get inflation under control. We don't want inflation

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>to be significantly above where it is today. UM. But

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it says that their gradual path hasn't really

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>disrupted the economy, but it also hasn't yet brought inflation

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and inflation expectations down very much. So until it does that,

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that they're going to continue to be reasonably hawkish.

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>So right now I'm looking at the expectations that are

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>being priced into the futures market for a FED rate

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>hike tomorrow. It is pretty much chance of a rate

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 1>hike tomorrow. UM. I think the more interesting thing that

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>we can hear from the Fed is guidance for the

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>rest of the year for next year, and there's been

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>some speculation that the Fed might hint that it would

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>be willing to slow or cretail it's balance sheet normalization

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>if the economy didn't accelerate more. Have you heard about that?

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of that? Yeah? So, so certainly

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>one or two UM, what one or two economists have

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>suggested that maybe the UM the FED might consider slowing

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the pace of adjustment. I think part of the reason

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>for that is that you've seen the FED funds market

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>start to creep up toward the interest that the FED

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>pays on access reserves and because of that, they're thinking, oh, well,

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that means that money markets are very tight, and because

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>money markets are tight, we should maybe not reduce the

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet as much. I'm not convinced that it's really

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it's port folio runoff that's doing this. There's a lot

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of other factors that are involved in the pricing of

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Fed funds and and other short end um short end

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>rate So, for example, right now, there's a lot of

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>treasury bills in the market because of the fiscal stimulus.

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>The Treasury departments issued a lot of them, so that's

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>caused almost every single front end interest rate to move

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit higher than it had been prior to this year.

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's not that the Fed can really do much

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>about it except maybe lower um and not hike interests

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that paid on reserves by as much as they do

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>their UH, their range of where they want to keep

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the Fed funds right. You know, I'm glad that you

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>mentioned bills. We've been talking a lot about the treasury

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>auctions this week. They're nearly two hundred billion dollars of

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>debt auctions. Most of them are bills. UH. The ten

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>year auction of a coupon debt yesterday went really well.

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Today we have more bill sales. How are the bill

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>sales going? And who is buying? Yeah? So the so

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the bill sales have really been, uh been up and down,

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and in particular, what's been really good is actually six

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>months bills, which which a little bit surprises me because

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>when we don't know if the Federal Reserve is going

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to hike perhaps two times over the next couple of

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.119
<v Speaker 1>months or one time over the next couple of months,

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, why lock in for six months when you

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>can just do a four week bill or three months

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>bill and be able to capture and additional FED hike

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>if if the Fed happens the hike in both June

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and September. Um so so demands good. Who's buying it's

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly it's mostly end users. So when you look

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>at at who's purchasing those longer term securities, it's UM,

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it's UH investment funds and the like. The front end

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>bills of four week bills tend to go to dealers,

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and then the dealers then UM then sell them on

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to other other investors such as money market funds and

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>and UH and just cash equivalent investors. Um I do

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>want to just bring you some headlines just crossing. The

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Senate panel voted twenty four and five against rich Clorida

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>for his nomination is FED vice chair? Excuse me. The

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Senate panel also voted eighteen four seven against for Bowman

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>for his FED nomination. And do you think that any

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>of these sort of changes to the composition of the

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Federals or of will affect sort of the direction of policy?

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I think Richard Clarenda, in particular

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is is a pretty mainstream, um mainstream economists. I think

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>that he'll look at the economy where it's going, and

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>how policy might might impact both markets and importantly the economy,

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and as such he'll you know, he's not going to

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>really rock the boat as much as some other people

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>that we may be thought, um that that President Trump

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>might might actually pick um. You know, he's not a

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly hawkish or dovist person. Um. You know, when you

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>know you've spoken to him, I've spoken to him. He's

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>really a reasonable, a reasonable person when it comes in

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>and a real monetary policy expert. So I think when

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to things like changes in the Balancie composition,

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.600
<v Speaker 1>he'll be one person that they'll definitely lean on for

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>his opinion as to you know, what size the balance

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.679
<v Speaker 1>should be or the pace of reduction there I Jersey,

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us our Jersey

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>chief US interest rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. Great insight

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the announcement to borrow from the Federal Reserve

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>as well as all of the Treasury auctions the first

0:06:55.360 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>two days of this week. This is a confusing US economy.

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>While it is very strong now, certainly a growing number

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of traders are saying, perhaps this is as good as

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it gets, and how do you maneuver given the fact

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that the hangover from the really incredible expansion that we've

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>seen could be potentially dramatic. Joining us now, Ben Hunt,

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>He has chief investment strategist at Salient, which manages about

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>thirteen billion dollars and is focused on real assets. Ben

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Hunt is also the author of Epsilon Theory dot com

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 1>um and it has a hundred thousand professional investors as

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>regular readers. Ben, thank you so much for joining me. Um.

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with how you're viewing the economy

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, because on one hand, you're seeing US inflation

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>at six years six year highs. You're seeing wages that

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>are not being up to the degree that people would

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>like to see, a federal reserve that's hiking. Where where

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking as far as the sort of risk

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>appetite that you're willing to make. Well, it's great to

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>be on again, Lisa, Thank thanks for having me. And

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you put your finger on what is the

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>real I'll use a ten dollar word dichotomy. You know,

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it's this, it's this real uh fracture that we're seeing

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>between the real economy and what i'll call the market economy.

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, what's happening in the in the in the

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>stock market. And look, you know, for the last nine years,

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we've had a stock market that is really rocked uh

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and A and a real economy, particularly here in the US,

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been mich right. And and what what I think

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing today is that that's really been turned on

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>his head, right, that you've got a real economy that

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is starting to to really pick up here. And we

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>can talk about signs off of that and what's driving that.

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, you're you're seeing the markets

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you here kind of looking mech right, and and what

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to say, is that's not an accident. Right.

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>We've had this split in this this this dichotomy between

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 1>the real world, the real economy and markets for about

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>nine years now, and now it's truly flipping on his head. Well,

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want to just push back a little

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>bit because I think that when you talk about the

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>real economy, what are you looking at? Because you know,

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>there are signs that you know, there still is a

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>large swath of people that have been left behind in

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the recovery because there has been so much focus on

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the stock market and you know, assets that only the

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>wealthiest people are really heavily invested in. And so I'm

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 1>just wondering, you know, what's where are you getting the

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>sense it's going to accelerate? Yeah? Yeah, No, what I

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>mean by the real economy, I'm really focusing on small

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and medium businesses here in the United States. You know,

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we got some some some new data out today. You know,

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the I'll call it the confidence, the intention to grow,

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the intention to spend, the intention to higher from small businesses,

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>which still are the economic backbone of this country, of

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>our real economy. You know, that confidence at least for

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>intention to grow, it's never been higher since they've been

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>taking this survey, and they've been taking it for a

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>long time. Now. Look, I totally agree with you that

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>there are so many people that have been left behind

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in what i'll call the inflation we have had over

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the last nine years, which is an inflation in asset prices.

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing wealth inequality return to levels we haven't

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>seen since the nineteen thirties, and that has enormous consequences,

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly in politics. But what I'm talking about with the

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>real economy, I'm talking about small the medium businesses year

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and their perception, their intention has

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>never been more growth oriented. Uh, new hiring, new expansion,

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>all of that. That's what I'm talking about with the

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>real economy. How are you capitalizing on that? How are

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you investing around that? Well, look, it's it's it. It

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>really means, you know, thinking about how to invest your

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>money away from the public markets that have been the

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 1>beneficiary of what I'll call is the monetary stimulus, you know,

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>central banks buying everything inside for the last nine years.

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And now how do you think about, well, what if

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that gets turned on his head with the SAD now

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>shrinking its balance sheet, with the tide going out on

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the monetary stimulus. But at the same same time, you've

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>got fiscal stimulus in the form of tax cuts. You've

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>got and I know this sounds weird, but as the

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Fed normalizes interest rates from this very low base, I

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's actually stimulative again to these small and medium businesses.

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>And third, I don't think you can overestimate I really don't.

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>What I'll call is the Donald Trump narrative that you know,

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever the reality is, there is a reception that there's

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>enormous change of foot particularly informs of deregulation, all of

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>those things benefiting the mindset, let's call it the expectations

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of small to medium businesses. So what do you do

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for that for investing? Well, look, you can certainly look

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>at private markets as opposed to public markets, but you

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>can also look at value of compared to growth. And

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 1>you can look at you know, the Russell two thousand,

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>which tends to doesn't tend it's comprised of those smaller

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>cap stocks which tend to match or mimic those smaller

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to medium businesses in the real economy. But one thing

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that I'm struck by is that the Russell two thousand

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is actually outperformed dramatically this year. I mean, it's almost

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking about. Yeah, I mean, I'm just wondering

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>how much is left. Look, I think there's a lot left, frankly,

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>right because I I think there's been such a tent

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>up I'll call it demand, but it's it's there's there's

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>such a tent up energy in the small and medium

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>businesses in this country that I think this can go

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>on for quite a long time. Now. Look, ultimately, mistakes

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>will be made, right, the said will hike rates too

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, an an interest rate hike too far. Ultimately

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>we will get really inflation starting to kick in, which

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 1>hits the margins not just of you know, big companies,

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>but also small and medium companies. That that that's all

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. But right now we're at this phase

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>where these small and medium businesses are really picking their

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>heads up and are intending to spend expand and that

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>can do well for stocks to represent that. Then, what

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>do you think is the biggest thing that investors are

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>getting wrong right now? You know, the biggest thing they're

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>getting wrong had in my view, is that we are

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>still trapped in this perception that we live in a

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>deflationary world forever and ever. I'm in just as far

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>as the eye can see. And you know, frankly, this

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>has been the right bet for forty years, right that

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that we have been in this deflationary rates are always

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>going down type of world. What I'm trying to suggest

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is is that when these big picture items like are

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>we in an inflationary world or deflationary world? When these

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>ideas change is at moments just like this, because it's

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>driven by change in politics, is driven by a change

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>in the mindset, the expectations, particularly of small to medium businesses.

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's a you know, I'll use another

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>ten dollar phrase, a non trivial chance that where at

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the cusp of a big shift here in the investment environment,

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>our business environment, and that's moving from a world where

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it's deflation all the time to where we really have

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to start flexing those How do you invest in an

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>inflationary market all over again? And Hunt, thank you so

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>much for joining me, really really interesting. Ben Hunt, chief

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>investment strategist at Salient. Salient Managers about thirteen billion dollars.

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>It's focused on real assets. Been also is the author

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of a blog epsilon theory. Dot com markets have been

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>struggling to figure out the real world impact from the

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>increasing trade tensions between the US and other major economies.

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>One place so where perhaps we'll be able to see

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that is with tourism. And the question is has tourism

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to the United States declined? Joining US now Chris Thompson, President,

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer of Brand USA. It is a federal

0:15:55.400 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>agency that focuses on trying to attract international dull travelers

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to the U as Chris, thank you so much for

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>being with me, so good morning, my pleasure. So I'd

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>love to get your sense of exactly this, whether or

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>not fewer tourists are coming to the US as a

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>response of to the growing tension that has frankly erupted

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>during President Trump and some of these longstanding allies. You know,

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>we have seen some softness in international visitation to the

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>United States. That was after record visitation for six or

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>eight years, But the majority of that actually happened prior

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to the elect of the majority of the reasons for

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that happened prior to the election and have really been

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>influencing since then, the main thing being the strength of

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the dollar. You know, you look at market flag Canada,

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Mexico and others. You know, when the dollars strong and

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously makes it a little more challenging for folks looking

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to travel to the United States. So that has been

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the case for uh an extended period of time at

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>at levels that have been higher than normal. So I

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>think that's contributed significantly some of our uh you know,

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the things that affect people's intent to travel

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and their willingness to travel or what's affecting them back home.

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of economic, political, social tensions back home

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>also influence intent to travel. So I'm not sure you

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>can really pay it on, uh, the things that are

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>happening at the moment um. You know, the beautiful thing

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.959
<v Speaker 1>about travel is it really has the ability to transcend politics.

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>It's you know about destinations, experiences and US as Americans.

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we know once people travel to the

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>United States and they can immerse themselves and our destinations

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and and they get to feel from US as Americans, uh,

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>as far as as being some of the most welcoming

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>people in the world, that that has ability to kind

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 1>of rise above all that. Did you notice an uptick

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in visitors international visitors to the US earlier this year

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>when the dollar weakened. Yeah, you know, there was some

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>some moderation in the dollar, so it was hard to tell.

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>The numbers that we get are lagging numbers from the

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>Department of Commerce, so I'm not sure we'll really know

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the true impact on what our final numbers as a

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>result of that. But we did see some some increases

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:17.879
<v Speaker 1>in numbers going into seen which was encouraging. And a

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of that, as you pointed out, had to do

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that the dollar was weakening a bit.

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>But I think now it's maybe heading back in the

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 1>other direction, and and so it just depends on where

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>that all ends. Can you give us some perspective on

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>how important tourism is to the U. S economy? So

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>most people don't realize that travel is actually an export.

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>The product is the experienced people have, the memories they

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>take home. As an export, it's a service export. So

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of everything the United States exports that's a service is

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>tried to tie to people coming here, having the experiences

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and leaving their money. Eleven percent of everything the largest

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>economy in the world exports is tied to people traveling

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to the United States enjoying them els and leaving their

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>money behind. You know, you look at balance of trade.

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Trade is obviously a big topic right now. In the

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.880
<v Speaker 1>last time we had annual numbers, we had seventy six

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>million people spend two billion dollars and that was an

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>eighty four billion dollar positive contribution to the balance of trade.

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 1>So when you look at it as an economic engine,

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly a huge contributor. And then on the soft

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>diplomacy side, we know that, as I said earlier, once

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>people have a chance to come and experience the United States,

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>they always walk away with a more positive opinion of it,

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever their opinion was coming in Chris. Last year, there

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 1>were a number of stories that came out saying that

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's budget eliminated funding for Brand USA and would

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>effectively kill the organization. Have you heard more about that?

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>What was your response? You know, anytime a president comes

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in the way for them to make a statement of

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>priorities through budget. Uh And so obviously there were a

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of priorities. There's never enough money in Washington to

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>do everything that everybody wants to do. Uh. So the

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>good news is that the people that actually appropriate or

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Congress Congress we have a tremendous bipartisan, strong majority relationship.

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>As far as support in Congress, UH, when Congress actually

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>got to the business of appropriations are funding state impact

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>as as budgets were moved forward. So UH, though we

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>would have liked it, liked it to have been a

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>different situation. As far as the President's budget, we understand

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that it is a statement of priorities and it's a

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>way to navigate a situation where there's really never enough funding.

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Just a real quick what is how exactly do you

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>market the US to international investors? So our job is

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>to reach out to all the markets around the world.

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>We're we're headquartered here at Washington, d C. We're actually

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a private company that had that's in partnership with the

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>federal government. We have fifteen offices around the world. We

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>take UH messages direct to consumers, and in this year,

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>our theme is music. Before there were destination marketing organizations

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>like Brand USA, the way people found out about US

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>was through movies and music. And we just released a

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Imax film called America's Musical Journey, which documents the heritage

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of American music and the cities that it was founded

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in and tells a story about how UH that is

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>is a great way to talk about the United States,

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>America and what there is to see and do through music.

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>So our job is to be storytellers, to inspire travel

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>uh from our friends and visitors from around the world,

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and in the end to really remind them why they

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 1>want to come to the United States, why it is

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.959
<v Speaker 1>the most aspirational destination in the world. Chris Thompson, thank

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with me, President and Chief

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>executive Officer of Brand USA, coming to us from Washington,

0:21:47.440 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>d C. One notable thing about this week, which some

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>have dubbed the most important week of the year, is

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that markets just don't care. They have not cared about

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the Trump Kim Jung summit. UH. They haven't necessarily cared

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 1>about the inflammatory rhetoric out of the G seven meetings.

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Here we had inflation data that came out pretty much

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>in line with expectations. No one cared. The Fed's going

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to raise rates tomorrow, and then the ECB meets. Evan

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Brown joins us now to see what'll make him care

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and change potentially his views on the market. Right now,

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Evan Brown is Director of Asset Allocation as part of

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the Investment Solutions team for UBS Asset Management and he

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>joins us here in our eleven three oh studios. So, Evan,

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>what will make people care sort of change their strategies

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that that's coming out potentially this week? Yes, So I think,

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if anything is gonna gonna make us care,

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it should be the tomb important central banks, arguably

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>at least in the development in developed markets to fend

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the e CB this week. So um, I think for

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the FED, we are going to get hike. We're finally

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>going to get to a priced in at its priced in.

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>But of course right after that you'll get the summary

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of economic projections. Everyone will be wanting to looking at

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>at the forecast. What the people still care about the dots?

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>People still care about the dots? Uh, And people will say, oh,

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the FED is moving to four hikes or or in

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eighteen, maybe they're moving their their forecast for

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen as well, and share Powell is going

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to do everything he can to de emphasize those dots.

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.360
<v Speaker 1>That's something that he wants to do is is move

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the FED away from forward guidance and more towards data dependence,

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>which I think is is healthy. It gets us focused

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on the economy and and look, I think one of

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why the markets haven't been so focused on

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the other geopolitical risk right now is that

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the economic news is is is pretty good. So let's

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>focus on that. The FED will want to focus on

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that and uh, and and that really is what should

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>be guiding markets broadly. You know, there has been some

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>speculation as people try to spice up this week's meetings

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps the FED and signal that they're willing to

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 1>curtail their balance sheet normalization. Uh, if they got a

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit concerned about lack of acceleration economic data. Is

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that pie in the sky or do you think that

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a real discussion. I don't think that's a real discussion.

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>That set is all right, that the FED is on autopie.

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 1>I know that the Reserve Bank of India governor was

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>was calling on FED to to slow down its pace

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of normalization, but there is a very very high bar

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>for doing that. The FED is on autopilot with the

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. They'll use rates as there as their main

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>policy lever. All right, So how are you positioning right now?

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 1>And when was the last time you changed your positioning. Yeah. So, um,

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>so look, we're we're broughty broadly constructive on on risk appetite,

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>on on risk asset. So we we uh, you know,

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 1>like global equities. I think, you know, more recently we

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>pivoted a little bit more towards the US and away

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>from Europe and Japan. Uh. Clearly we had the Italian

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 1>risks rise over the over the last few weeks, and

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and those are non neglig non negligible. I know that

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>they've kind of disappeared a little bit from the headlines.

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, I think in September, you're gonna

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>get this Italian the budget from from the new Italian government,

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and if that is in any way in line with

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>what the new government has promised in terms of fiscal

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>stimulus rising by five to seven percent of GDP, that's

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna put them on a real collision course with with

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the EU. So I know we all say that, look,

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Italy ultimately will stay in the EU. Um, there will

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>be market pressure growing in September as this collision course, uh,

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it starts to starts to build. Here, You're

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>not alone in favoring the US over Japan and Europe.

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Bank of American Mary Lynch put out a

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>fund manager survey today that showed that sixty four of

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>people who responded to the survey I think the US

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>has the most favorable outlook for profits. That is a

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>seventeen year high. So does that Does that give you

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of banks the fact that this has

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>become a consensus trade at a time, especially with the

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>UH fanmag FAM, the big tech stocks in the US

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>being at such high high levels right now. Yeah, No,

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean we always, we always want to be focused

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>on what's consensus, and uh that obviously raises questions. You

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 1>don't you don't want to be positioned the same way

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that that everyone else is, and you have to be

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>hyper focused on the risks or catalyst that could lead

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to an unwind of that UM. At the same time,

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>you cannot ignore what is an extraordinarily strong economy, what

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>are extraordinarily strong earnings. Uh So, yeah, it's hard and ultimately,

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 1>if we do get a downturn in the end, uh,

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be those those foreign markets that that

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>get hit hardest. Europe and Japan. Emerging markets a higher

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>beta than the US. The US is a relative safe haven.

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that some of the distress that we've

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.400
<v Speaker 1>seen in emerging markets is just the beginning. I don't.

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I think we're we're coming to the end.

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>You will have uh, specific countries, specific spots kind of

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>blow up at any given moment um, But broadly in

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, I think what you're seeing is, uh, some

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>of these central bankers in these economies, they increasingly realize

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that they need to shore up their system. So you're

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing Brazil central bank intervening and foreign exchange markets, you're

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 1>seeing Turkey, you're seeing India. These central banks are are hiking.

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>They get it. They realize that as the fetest tightening

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that they need to protect themselves. At the same time,

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>one way in which you know this e M quote

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:53.959
<v Speaker 1>unquote crisis or or or sell off is different from

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>previous ones is that you know, China is doing pretty

0:27:56.720 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. China's growth is is quite strong. Uh So

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that keeps us from getting too bearish on e M. Here,

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>so when was the last time that you changed your

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>recommendations for acid allocation. We've tilted a little bit here

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and there, But in terms of having a broadly constructive

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 1>outlook on risk and on equities and and a short

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>duration view globally. Um, it's been a while well, I mean,

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and and as far as the little tankers is, it's

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of more cash here, feed LUs duration here. Is

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it that type of idea? Yeah, I think so. I mean,

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>one one thing that I think is becoming increasingly important

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 1>for US and and uh global acid allocators is that

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>as the FED is hiking rates, the short end of

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the yeol curve or cash is increasingly in attractive option. So, um,

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we think about ways in which you want

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to move to the shorter end of the yeol curve.

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a there's a decent argument. Why do

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you want to be earning, say two ninety on the

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>tenure and be taking all that volatility, inflation restoration risk

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>when you can park your funds in the two year

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>yield that at about to fifty, is it is it

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>worth it to be out there? So I think if

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>there's if there's any shift, which I think will continue

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to see, it's it's just moving shorter duration across you

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>know most of our US investments. Is anyone leveraging up

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.479
<v Speaker 1>to your treasure yields right now? Not that I know,

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>because I'm really I was having a conversation with the

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Trigger yesterday and and we were asking this question. You

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>at a certain point, if you're getting you know, four

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent on junk bonds, you're getting you know,

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the triple C a version of the of the spectrum

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>outperforming dramatically, why not just left her up to your No,

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there's there's something to be said for that.

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>The risk there is that if you do get inflation

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>accelerating in the FED hiking a lot more aggressively than

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is currently priced, then that leads you vulnerable. You have

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a problem. Evan Brown, thank you so much for being here.

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Really great. Evan Brown, director of Asset Allocation, is part

0:29:55.160 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of the investment solutions team of EUBS Asset Management. Thanks

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.