WEBVTT - FRC's Trading Halt and Upcoming Tech Earnings

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>From Bahard where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and ed Love Love.

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I met Lovelow in San Francisco. Caroline Hyde is off today.

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up full coverage of the

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 2>second biggest bank collapse in US history. We'll discuss the

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 2>outlook for funding with Jojao a Millennia Capital. Plus another

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 2>big week for tech earnings ahead with AMD, Quilcom and

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Apple all reporting. We'll get a preview of what's to come.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 2>And soft banks chip design firm ARM filing confidentially for

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 2>an IPO in the US over the weekend. More in

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 2>the offering later this app There is just one story

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 2>that we're talking about, and that is JP Morgan stepping

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 2>in to acquire First Republic, taking on portions of its

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 2>loan book and deposit base in a deal negotiated with regulators.

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 2>You see JP Morgan high by two point seven percent.

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Some kind of feel good at bank, the biggest bank

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.479
<v Speaker 2>that's got even bigger. Let's get more details on First

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Republic bringing Bloomberg Shnali Bassack, who's out in Los Angeles

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 2>at the Milking Conference. And I imagine this is the

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 2>topic of the day, Shinali. But bring us the details

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 2>of this JP Morgan deal to acquire First Republic.

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 3>It certainly is because, as you say, we are watching

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 3>the biggest US bank get bigger. As we know that

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 3>there were other bidders behind the scenes. We had reported

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 3>that Apollo and black Rock had supported, for example, PNC's

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 3>efforts to buy the company as well. Yet the reason

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 3>JP Morgan had emerged as the biggest bidder here and

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the most successful is because, as we know it that

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 3>the cost of the deposed insurance fund for the fdiit

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 3>was the least under a JP Morgan acquisition.

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Now, any other.

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Politics that come out beyond this is up for debate.

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 3>But the question here is does this stem the banking crisis.

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 3>We have seen a lot of California lenders now go

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 3>through a series of struggles as we have been talking about,

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:13.239
<v Speaker 3>have failed. This one now is another major deal and

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 3>it certainly gives JP Morgan and even more attract it

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 3>the base of customers high net worth individuals. Remember, when

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 3>we look at First Republic, there has been a lot

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 3>of bleeding already for the last couple of weeks and

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 3>months but this deal and an iconic franchise is certainly

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 3>a co for JP Morgan.

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 2>You go back to when SBB collapse in one of

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 2>the beneficiaries was JP Morgan right snapping up some of

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the venture capital and startup customers or depositors.

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 4>You pose a.

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Question there sheanali about whether this fixes the sort of

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 2>systemic risk? Are there any answers to that on the

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:54.679
<v Speaker 2>ground yet? In milkn conference in LA.

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you can kind of put it in their two buckets.

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Here you have a lot of banking titans that believe

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 3>that there could be some pain among a couple of

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 3>more regional lenders. We just talked to Julian Salisbury, for example,

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 3>the CIO over at Coleman, who believes it's almost death

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 3>by a million cuts, where you see sustained pressure on

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 3>the industry but not wholesale failures or systemic wrist. On

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 3>the other hand, you talk to the likes of a

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Mark Rowan, the CEO of Apollo, which was behind that

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 3>P and C bid, and there are les there's a

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 3>second wave. Really, there's a lot of problems under the

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 3>surface when you look at other asset classes like commercial

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 3>real estate, so to where the pain will be felt

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 3>further is a huge open question ed and the fact

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 3>is is that there could still be more pain among

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 3>this industry as well as other parts of the market,

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 3>as we continue to see the pressure high interest rates

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 3>on the systems.

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, Bloomboagtion, Ali Bassack out at Milking, go work

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 2>the corridors.

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 4>We'll see you later in the week.

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's stick with his story and for more, let's bring

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 2>in Lenny a cap to investor Joe Chow. Joe, I

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 2>would frame you as an avench capitalist with a knowledge

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 2>base in fintech the banking sector, but you also have

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 2>your own exposure to First Republic. Can you just tell

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 2>our audience what that exposure is?

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So, as a VC fund, we have profolio companies

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 5>and our operations which run on both our Socing Value

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 5>Bank and for Republic.

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 2>So, Joe, this outcome, what do you make of it?

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, JP Morgan becomes much bigger, but they've stepped

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 2>in and saved First Republic essentially.

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I would say this Republic incident is a little

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 5>bit different than the Local Value Bank incident in a

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 5>few ways. CD was largely unanticipated, but in the case

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 5>of b FC, most vcs and founders have already made

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 5>content continuous planted in the last few weeks. So in fact,

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 5>most founders, entrepreneurs vcs now have several bank accounts with

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 5>different banks and so you know, so you know, we're

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 5>not unprepared for sort of the transition here. Now our

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 5>you know, accounts at efforts will roll over to a

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 5>new acquirers hipping workings account, so that would ensure continuity.

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 5>But I think on a broader sense, the different between

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 5>First C and slolicon value bank was FIRC has also

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 5>a larger non tech consumer base, and I think this

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 5>outcome helping shore the continuity of that. But for businesses

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 5>and tech tech business in the VCS, we've already been

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 5>largely prepared for this outcome.

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 4>Prepared.

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 2>How are you talking about diversification of banking.

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, since, like you know, a few weeks ago, most

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 5>vcs and most founders that leads in our portfolio and

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 5>the ones we've we've connected with and the ones we're

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 5>seeing in the market have opened several new accounts at

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 5>different banks, even instant banks multiple accounts. And there's also

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 5>fintech players which are offering a higher deplit insurance than

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 5>to fifty because they're parking their opening accounts with multiple banks,

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 5>so that ensure you can actually, lets say, add four

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 5>to fifty case to give to a million. So that's

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 5>been underway for you know, since the SVB fallout, and

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 5>so when you know, this incident kind of occurred with FC,

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 5>vcs and founders have already kind of been making continuous

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 5>a plant plus even if the ones that happened, you know,

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 5>I guess they're the positive for being short by the

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 5>large bank in the US. So I think, you know,

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 5>founders and vcs feel much safer this time and securely on.

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:12.679
<v Speaker 4>The last time, Joe.

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Even for private market participants in vcs. There are some

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 2>big picture questions, one of which is what does the

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Fed do this Wednesday?

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know, financial stability was always sort of a

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 5>third objective by the Fed after the inflation and unemployment rate.

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 5>You know, if you if you look at sort of

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 5>effas of terms from Marks, you know, I think he

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 5>did to say in the pressure that we expect to

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 5>inflict some pains, and I think, you know, what was

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 5>happening here within the broader financial system is not inconsistent

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 5>with what they would anticipate. I think the real question

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 5>in my mind is to what extent will the banking

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 5>crisis and followouts sort of deter the FED from from

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 5>raising rates. In my view, you know, they're probably gonna

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 5>raise race another twenty five pips at this meeting.

0:06:58.480 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 6>But but you know, in my own.

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 5>View, holding rates at you know, five and a half,

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 5>five hun quarts five and a half is also very

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 5>very restrictive and so and so financials abilities, you know,

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 5>become a large concern for the FED and might actually

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 5>deser the FED from raising riks further. But by keeping

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 5>race at parent levels, there's still being very restrictive on

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 5>financial conditions and that could really kind of temper and

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 5>non inflation over time.

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 2>What what is the environment like right now, Joe? For

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 2>vcs that yourself considering writing checks for startups trying to

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 2>raise money, you.

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 6>Know, there's two schools of thought.

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 5>You know, my own school of thought is this is

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 5>actually the best comething best because you know, because values

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 5>start down and we believe this is a help you

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 5>reset for valuations and companies. And but there's another school

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 5>of thought, which is many found many vcs are actually

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 5>uh kind of holding back from investing, and so you know,

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 5>but within the broader system. You know, there's you know,

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 5>amongst kind of this period of weakness, I would I

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 5>would call uh, the whole AI kind of a genet

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 5>AI sort of a uh you know, innovation has been

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 5>introducing some new life back into the ecosystem.

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 6>So I think broader quality speaking, most.

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 5>Vcs are slowing down not only on investing, but lpis

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 5>are slowing down on investing in funds well, when bright

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 5>Spot is general AI, which seems to offer a lot.

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 6>Of new blood and excitement back into this ecosystem.

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Joe, there was a guest on Bluemoll television earlier

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 2>saying that banks and markets don't have crystal balls, they

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 2>don't have clairvoyance. But as you look into the future,

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 2>does the JP Morgan intervention kind of settle things a.

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Bit for now?

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 5>I think in the short term yes, because kaping Morgan

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 5>and I looked at the assets. They're fifteen to twenty

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 5>some larger than evarsas assets, and that should really contain

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 5>sort of the spread of the of the of the

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 5>bad assets.

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 6>But also I think you know, having.

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 5>And there's you know, debates on whether it's politically viable

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 5>or not, but I think having the largest band to

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 5>kind of step in and contain sort of this this

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.079
<v Speaker 5>usual kind of health restore system and not very much

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 5>like an eight and nine. But you know, I guess

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 5>the question is, are we are we fully through the banking.

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 6>Fallouts?

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 5>I think for large banks which have regularly, uh you know,

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 5>regularly passed the first card test, the stress testing, I think,

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 5>personally think they will be fun. I think mis sized

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 5>banks management who haven't been on top of it would

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 5>be on top of it now. My actually natural concern

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 5>would be with the smaller banks, which you know, maybe

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:31.719
<v Speaker 5>I would expect to be to see a little more

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 5>stress in the bankings on the smaller side. I think

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 5>from this larger banks, I think the crisis that uh

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 5>in the first term content.

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, Joe Chow, Millennia Capital Goods, catch up, Thank

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 2>you for your time. Now, another busy week ahead for

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 2>earnings with Apple, a m D and qualcom Or reporting numbers.

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's get a preview of what to expect from the

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 2>iPhone maker with our own Mark German. Good morning to you, Mark.

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 2>What's on deck for Apple?

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, good morning, thank you for having me. So this

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>quarter is likely to play out a bit similarly the

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>last quarter. Right, Bloomberg consensus at this point anticipates about

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a five percent annual decline. Last year for the second quarter,

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple reported revenue of about ninety seven billion. For this

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>year twenty twenty three, the second quarter will come in

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>at around ninety two billion. That's according to a summary

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of analyst estimates. Now, within that ninety two billion, it appears,

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>according to these estimates, that all of the Apple major

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>product categories aside from services, will see a bit of

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a decline. That includes the iPhone, the iPad, the Mac,

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>as well as wearables. The iPhone decline is likely to

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>be less significant than in the previous quarter because in

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the previous quarter we had the supply chain challenges that

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>have now been essentially fully resolved. But you'll still see

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the iPad and the math go down quite significantly compared

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 1>to the year ago quarter.

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Services, however, are.

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>The estimates indicate that should be up a little bit,

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>which obviously is news and positive growth somewhere for Apple

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>on this quarter.

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:05.839
<v Speaker 2>All right, Bluemos, Mark Gurhman, We're all waiting for Apple

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 2>later in the week. And by the way, Mark's power

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 2>On column was out over the weekend. If you don't subscribe,

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>do so. He's focused on Apple watching software. Thank you

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 2>to Mark. Now sticking with earnings. Another stock we're watching

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 2>is Checkpoint Software, out with earnings that frankly disappointed to

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the downside as revenue missed expectation. Shares at one point

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 2>in the session down by the most since February of

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one. Now, coming up, how the AI startup

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 2>pine Cone managed to get a seven hundred and fifty

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 2>million dollars valuation in a one hundred dollars million dollar

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 2>funding round.

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 4>We'll talk to the CEO Ido Liberty. That's next.

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Meantime, here's what Wing Venture partner Jake Flomenberg, who took

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 2>part in that round, had to say about.

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 4>It last week.

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 7>And so, if you're building a generative AI startup or

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 7>a generative AI application and you want to marry that

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 7>with your own company's data, or if you want to

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 7>remember things from one question to the next, you need

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 7>a vector database like Han Kong.

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 2>The White House is probing how companies use AI to

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 2>monitor and manage workers. The Biden administration says such practices

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 2>are on the rise and can inflict significant harm. Just

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 2>last week, the Minnesota Statehouse actually passed a bill to

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 2>require companies like Amazon to provide warehouse workers with copies

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 2>of data they collected on their pace of work. California

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 2>and New York had passed similar legislation in the past

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 2>couple of years. Let's keep talking about AI with pine Cone,

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 2>an AI powered platform. We've just raised one hundred million

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 2>dollars in a funding round last week, valuing the company

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 2>at seven hundred and fifty million dollars. Founder and CEO

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Eedo Liberty joins us. Now, we would describe pine Cone

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Edo as the long term memory for AI models, right,

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Explain what pine Cone.

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 8>Does provides exactly that. I mean when.

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 9>We think about AI models as being smart, they might

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 9>not be very knowledgeable.

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:15.119
<v Speaker 8>And if you see.

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 9>All the issues that people have had with what's called illucinations,

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 9>basically AI models giving very smart sounding answers but with

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 9>wrong information. That is solved by equipping them with long

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 9>term memory, which is provided by fine.

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Con interesting timing one hundred million dollar round a seven

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty million dollar valuation. You did a much

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 2>smaller round a sort of a year ago. How difficult

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 2>was it to raise those funds? And why did you

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:46.199
<v Speaker 2>raise the fund.

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 8>It wasn't difficult at all.

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:54.079
<v Speaker 9>In fact, the fact that sector databases really asserted themselves

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 9>as a critical piece of generative AI and the ability

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 9>to do that escale correctly and pine Cone being the

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 9>leader in that space and made that a no brainer

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 9>to be honest, And so it was. Yeah, it was

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 9>needed for us to really fuel the future research and

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 9>development and future investment in the field.

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're covering AI more than a daily basis

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 2>here on the show, right and we're talking to those

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 2>that are working on foundational models vcs that are investing

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 2>in the technology. We kind of break it down to

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 2>data prep, deep learning, and then inference. Where does pine

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Cone sit within that development cycle.

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's sort of a different component altogether. This is

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 9>about search and retrieval and access to your long term memories.

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 9>If you are trying to build a generative AI on

0:14:56.520 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 9>your own company data and you want your then you

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 9>want your application to not hallucinate or make gross mistakes,

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 9>then you have to equip it with that capability and

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 9>that's what prime Cone provides. That could be either on

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 9>training side or data cleaning, or in production at real

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 9>time or customer facing.

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 8>This happens everywhere up and down the stack. It's just

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 8>a whole different component.

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 9>And in some sense, doubling down on what I said before,

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 9>this is the realization that this is a critical piece

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 9>and that it's here to stay was exactly what catalyzed that,

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.119
<v Speaker 9>both the round and evaluation.

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 2>You have customers like Shopify, HubSpot, ZAPR, and Gong interesting

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 2>names in Layman's terms, What is it you're doing for them?

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 8>When when large language models.

0:15:54.240 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 9>Processed texts, they don't save it or represent then in

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 9>the same way. And when you want to search for data,

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 9>when a large language model search is for data, they

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 9>don't search through it with a regular search engine like

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 9>you would and I would like search on Google, but

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 9>in a very different pattern. And that pattern is support

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 9>supported by pine Cone. And so if you know, if

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 9>you're on Gong and you want to see what the

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 9>some salesperson you know offered some discount for some customer, uh,

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 9>that's much easier to do with the large language model

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 9>searching through the data with with pine Cone.

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 8>Than with keyword search for example. Right.

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 9>The same goes for Shopify, who built a shopping assist

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 9>app very quickly with those capabilities, surfacing the actual information

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 9>about their products and so on.

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 8>Uh, the customer's products.

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's it's really retrieval and search in the

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 9>way that AI models expect them to happen.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 8>And the daily power.

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 9>It's very power, very new kinds of applications, especially where

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 9>hallucinations is.

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 8>Something that you really try very strong to avoid.

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, is there a risk that the pool of

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 2>data is finite that it just runs out for training

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 2>foundational models?

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 8>I'm not sure what you mean by that, to be honest.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 8>There's a debate we are enable, Okay.

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's debit from industry participants. Right, there are lots

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 2>of data inputs that go into training generative AI tools. Right,

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 2>if you take for example, Google and Bard, they clearly

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 2>have an advantage in the data that they are able

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 2>to draw on to train that model. Others have less access,

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 2>especially those of the training models where there are far

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 2>fewer parameters and inputs. I guess my question is, you know,

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 2>how are you helping and make data available and what

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 2>the risk is that there is not sufficient access to

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 2>data to train future models.

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 9>So, first of all, I don't think that that is

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 9>that is a serious risk for training better models, because

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 9>I think we have scarcely tapped the.

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 8>Single percents of what's available out there.

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 9>But what pinekone allows you to do is actually make

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 9>your AI models a lot more accurate and a lot

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 9>more actionable without retraining them, which is I think why

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.239
<v Speaker 9>it has been so successful and why we're ramped up

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 9>thousands of customers even just in Q one, because you know,

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 9>with the large language model, even without being retrained, if

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 9>it's given the right context and the right information from

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 9>which to construct the answer, then you don't have to

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 9>bake into the model all the data in your company.

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 8>You just have to present it to the model at

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 8>the query time say hey, you know, I want.

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 9>To see what this customers are for a discount, and

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 9>here are you know, twenty snippets of texts that I

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 9>think contained the answer. Can you just steal that from

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 9>that and give it to me in a reasonable way.

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 9>That's a much easier problem and a much more manageable

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 9>sort problem to sort.

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.199
<v Speaker 2>All right, pine Cone founder and Cooedo Liberty, thank you

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 2>so much for joining the show. Time for Talking Tech

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 2>India's most valuable startup by you look into reinsure employees

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.719
<v Speaker 2>and partners. After a weekend raid of the company's offices

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 2>by the agency that investigates money laundering in the country.

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 2>The investigations come at a time when the education company,

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 2>valued the twenty two billion dollars, is in talks with

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 2>investors to raise funds to address a liquidity crunch, and

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Ali Barba co founder Jack Maher is joining the University

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 2>of Tokyo as a visiting professor. Mar is set to

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 2>assume the new position to day and will provide advice

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 2>on research topics and conduct his own research. Will also

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 2>give seminars about entrepreneurship and innovation. Plus, Twitter co founder

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Jack Dorsey is offering sharp criticism of the social media's

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 2>new owner, Elon Musk and his handling of the deal,

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 2>after previously being publicly in favor of the sale. When

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 2>asked if Musk has proven himself to be the best

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 2>possible steward for the platform, Dorsey said, quote not no,

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 2>nor do I think he acted right after realizing his

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 2>timing was bad, Nor do I think the board should

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 2>enforce the sale. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm ed

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Lovelow in San Francisco. We've got to talk a little

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 2>bit about AI. Now here's what some of our guests

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 2>have had to say about what they think of generative

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 2>AI's applications and where it's best suited.

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 4>Have a listen.

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 7>This technology really takes personalization to the next level when

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 7>it comes to any type of education, but specifically financial literacy,

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 7>which is so complicated.

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 10>Certain categories are more exciting than others right now. Obviously,

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 10>generative AI is a category that is very exciting to

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 10>startup founders, customers, and venture capitalists as well.

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 7>There'll be hundreds, if not thousands of opportunities to build

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 7>interesting applications powered by AI.

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 10>Technology makes it easier to create. Generative AI is accelerating

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 10>that trend by decades, maybe centuries.

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 11>To me, brainstorming is actually a perfect use case for

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 11>these tools.

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 8>I don't really care whether you're using AI or some

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 8>other technology. I care what are you delivering to, what

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 8>set are customers and how delighted are they going to be?

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 2>So I show you these two names Starbucks and Young

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Brands reporting earnings Tuesday Wednesday. AI Artificial intelligence is absolutely

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 2>dominated earning statements and calls over the last ten days

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 2>or so, particularly for the technology sector. Do we see

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 2>that happen again this week when it comes to qsr's

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Qui restaurants and some of the more consumer facing companies.

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 2>It's really big question if that carries on throughout this

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 2>earning season. For more, let's bring in Presto Automation Chairman

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 2>and Interim CEO Krishna Gupta. Presto one of the largest

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 2>providers of AI power tech for restaurants like McDonald Zapplebee's,

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Chili's and much more. Krishna, what do you think is

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 2>AI going to dominate the earnings narrative for this sector

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 2>this week?

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 4>And great to be on.

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 11>Well, let me start by saying I completely agree with

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 11>Keith Ruboy, which is that I don't care whether it's

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 11>AI or not. All that matters is are you creating

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 11>something that's immediately actionable and valuable for customers today? And

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 11>we believe that there are a lot of opportunities to

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 11>do that using AI in the hospitality and the restaurant sectors.

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 11>So yes, I expect every QSR, frankly every corporation in

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 11>the world to be thinking about what are the most

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 11>immediately actionable opportunities to leverage AI today.

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Press Automation Chairman and Interim CEO Christiana Guttu is with

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 2>me in New York we were talking about the role

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 2>of art official intelligence in the restaurant industry, the quick

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 2>serve restaurant industry, and I was about to ask you

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 2>why you're so focused on drive through. How is something

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 2>so manual complemented by artificial intelligence.

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's not necessarily complemented. I think it actually ends

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 11>up being one of the most immediately actionable applications of

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 11>generative AI in the enterprise. Because you have labor costs

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 11>which are rising, you have a relatively confined problem set

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 11>in the drive through, and I don't think in three

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 11>years is going to be a single drive through having

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 11>a human take your orders. I think, you know, voice spots,

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 11>whether that's ours or someone else's, will be pervasive. They

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 11>will never get tired of delivering perfect service, upselling the customer,

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 11>and ultimately delivering a lower cost, higher revenue experience to customers.

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Like many of your industry pays, you have looked to

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 2>open AI and GPT tools to complement the work you're

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 2>already doing.

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 4>How does that relationship work?

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well, look, I think LM technology and generative AI

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 11>broadly does enable better personalization, faster speed of service, etc.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 11>For us, we have a little bit of a unique

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 11>entry into the relationship in the sense that the CEO

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 11>of Open Ai, Sam Altman, is a longtime investor in

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 11>our company, a longtime friend of our founders. So we

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 11>are very actively in discussions with them and incorporating some

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 11>of that technology into what we're doing.

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 2>What's it been like in the first four or five

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 2>months of this year. Are their QSR CEO's phony every

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 2>day saying get in here now and give us some

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 2>AI capability? Literally, what is demand for you?

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 11>Yeah? Look, I mean I think we're at a really

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 11>unique moment in time where the customer's business needs, which

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 11>is low margins and rising labor costs, are met with

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 11>the progress on the technology side. And yes, because of

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 11>how pervasive this term AI is and everything you're reading

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 11>or seeing or hearing, it no longer feels like science fiction.

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 11>I would say in twenty twenty two, some of what

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 11>we were doing felt like futuristic. Maybe it's a twenty

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 11>five initiative. Well, a lot of CEOs and a lot

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 11>of sea level people at our customers in general are

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 11>now thinking, well, maybe we can actually deploy this now,

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 11>Maybe we should, Maybe we need to for the benefit

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 11>of our shareholders deploy these kinds of technologies now, because

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 11>if we don't do so, we're going to be left

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 11>behind relative to our competitors. We're not going to be

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 11>able to have that margin benefit that others are enjoying. So, yes,

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 11>the tone of conversations across the board has changed pretty

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 11>dramatically over the last six months.

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Does AI displace or eliminate jobs in this industry?

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 11>Krishna, I believe, well, it's hard for me to apply

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.679
<v Speaker 11>on this industry specifically, but I do believe that the

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 11>adoption of AI overall will actually be relatively neutral on jobs.

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 11>I believe that's the case historically with any large technology revolution,

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 11>is that new jobs come up, and we're already seeing

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 11>that you need humans, not necessarily incredibly skilled humans, but

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 11>you need humans to be able to train the AIS

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 11>to help them make sure that specific edge cases are

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 11>not run into and so at the end of the day,

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 11>I think there's a lot of opportunity for us to

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 11>help find new jobs for people in the restaurant industry specifically. However,

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 11>you have a unique challenge which is labor availability. A

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:15.880
<v Speaker 11>lot of people still haven't been able to find laborer

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 11>and we are helping them do that using Automation.

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Press, their automation chairman an interim CEO, christ Na Gutta

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 2>bringing AI to a drive through near you, sing thank

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 2>you Now coming up, bridging the gap in venture capital

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 2>funding for women of color founders. We'll talk about that

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 2>and more with Fearless Fun CEO arian Simone. That's next.

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 2>So we had to bring a second look at shares

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 2>of Ribbean under pressure again, down another two and a

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 2>half percent. Well so, as investors have little faith left

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 2>in the ability of the company to compete in a

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 2>crowded EV market. At least six analists have cut price

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 2>targets since April, a lot of people pointing to its

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 2>market cap being exactly the same as the.

0:26:54.160 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 4>Cache that's on its balance sheet. This is Bloomberg feelers.

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Fun, the Benure Capital Fund built by women of Color

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 2>for women of color, has recently announced a new industry

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 2>specific cohort of the Get Venture Ready program in partnership

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 2>with JP Morgan Chase. The program is designed exclusively for

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 2>black women business owners in fintech all the workforce development industry.

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 2>To tell us more about what this program entails, that's

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 2>bring in the fun CEO Arianne Simone. Arianna actually just

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 2>want to start on JP Morgan because you have announced

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 2>this partnership with the EN they have acquired First Republic,

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 2>both of them with significant VC relationships and startups that

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 2>adventure backed. What is your reaction to the news that

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgan has stepped in to acquire First Republic.

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 12>I'm not surprised. JP Morgan has definitely been a leader

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 12>in the space as far as venture capital is concerned

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 12>with emerging fund managers as well as the startup ecosystem

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 12>as a whole, So I'm not surprised when it came

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 12>to even the whole SBB scare and everything.

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 8>That was going on.

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 12>They were as investors in our fund, they were one

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.360
<v Speaker 12>of the first LPs to reach out to see how

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 12>they could be supportive in taking over any type of

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 12>losses we may have incurred or anything that may have

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 12>taken place. Luckily, of course, we didn't. We had very

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 12>low exposure to the issue, but we saw early on

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 12>that they were definitely being a leader in the space

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 12>and wanting to get more into the startup ecosystem.

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 4>Let's get to your relationship with them.

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I find this really interesting making CAPTO available to women

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 2>of color, but specifically in fintech. Why fintech.

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 12>Well, at the Fearless Fund, we actually invest in CpG

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 12>as well as technology, and CpG were heavy beauty and wellness,

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 12>heavy food and beverage, and in technology were heavy fintech,

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 12>SaaS marketplace and in the fintech sector. We also had

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 12>have investors LPs such as JP, Morgan, Chase and a

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 12>few others that are in the fintech business. For us,

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 12>this makes a very good strategic relationship. Anytime we invest

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 12>in a fintech company, we know that we have potential

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 12>acquirers that are invested in our fund that may acquire

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 12>them later on down the line.

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 8>So it just makes.

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 12>Good for business overall, and it sets up a very good,

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 12>strong pipeline.

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 2>For women of color in all of the industries that

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 2>you're investing in. What has the environment been like so

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 2>far in twenty twenty three are on. We've talked a

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 2>lot about tighter financial conditions on this program, but also

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 2>inequality frankly in how founders and startups are able to

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 2>navigate that those type of financial conditions.

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 12>That is very true. Women of color are the most

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 12>founded entrepreneur demographic, they are just the least funded, so

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 12>in any condition, whether there's a market correction or not,

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 12>they have the biggest gaps of disparity. We exist because

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 12>we do hope to change what the narrative is in

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 12>this landscape. As of right now, the profile of a

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 12>woman of color entrepreneur is somebody who you definitely want

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 12>to bet on if their cash burn rates are low.

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 12>They're not used to large sums of access to capital,

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 12>so they're very good stewards over their investment. Our portfolio

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 12>actually is even quite healthy at a time like this

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 12>because we chose to invest in women of color who

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 12>are very mindful of their investments.

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 2>You're coming to us from Atlanta, Georgia. On this program,

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 2>we talk a lot about San Francisco, Silicon Valley, Miami,

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 2>New York, sometimes ostin less about Atlanta, Georgia. What's the

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 2>environment like for raising venture funds founding a business in

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 2>that city and in that state.

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 12>One thing I can say that the whole VC tech

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 12>ecosystem in Atlanta, Georgia is definitely growing. It's definitely growing.

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 12>I would like to add, even just for transparency, that

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 12>is it easy. No, it's not easy to raise capital

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 12>in any environment, especially when you're an emerging fund manager.

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 12>And especially when your thesis is for women of color.

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 12>But we have been blessed by a very amazing LPs

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 12>such as you saw even on screen with JP Morrigan,

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 12>Bank of America, Allibank, Casco, MasterCard, and many others. So

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 12>for us, even though we are based in Atlanta, yes,

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 12>we have raised capital from many other areas including San Francisco,

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 12>New York, and all the other major areas that you

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 12>see a lot of financial institutions based.

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 2>We had a founder on the show earlier who just

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 2>closed one hundred million dollar round at seven hundred and

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 2>fifty million dollar valuation, but a year ago. You know,

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 2>even at their last stage there are about one hundred

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 2>and twenty eight million dollar valuation. I give you that

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 2>as an example because I want to know what kind

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 2>of activity you're seeing. You know, there is there a

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 2>desperation to go out and get rounds done. From the

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 2>startups perspective, is their willingness to deploy capital.

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 4>From the VC's perspective.

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 8>You are correct.

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 12>With this current market and vitce, you're seeing a lot

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 12>of tech founders raise what we call bridge rounds, which

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 12>is like an in between round before you get to

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 12>your next round. That's just pretty much what the market

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 12>has dictated in this current space. You are also correct

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 12>that a couple of years ago you could see a

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 12>company that was precede with the valuation of nine figures

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 12>and it was just like nothing. It was just something

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 12>that you could see. So valuations have gone down. Some

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 12>investors would like to say they're probably more realistic now

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 12>as far as valuations. So you have seen a drop

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 12>in those, and from a standpoint of the founder, their

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 12>approach to this environment is pretty much just been to

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 12>raise a bridge round to stay afloat while they continue

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 12>to build their technology.

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Hey area, and the last question I want to go

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 2>to is CpG fintech. Where's the most activity right now?

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Are there any specific areas thematically that you're looking at

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 2>going WHOA, there's a lot of activity.

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 12>Here for us, as I was sitting before, we're heavies.

0:32:58.240 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 12>We're fifty percent CpG FI technology and the sectors that

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 12>we are in, Yes, there's definitely heavy activity. One thing

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 12>I can say even on the tech space of course,

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 12>right now we all know that AI is like the

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 12>new hot thing. We've been investing in AI now for

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 12>about I think about a couple of years. We invested

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 12>in a company by the name of Clever Aria Moore

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 12>is the founder on the AI space, but you'll see

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 12>a lot of activity there. One thing I can say,

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 12>even back to fintech is that a lot of the

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 12>febal founders that are of color, they are very hot

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 12>for acquisition in the area of fintech.

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Bilis fun Ceo Arion Smoan. We'll get you back on.

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for your time. Soft Banks Semiconductor

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Design Unit ARM filed confidentially over the weekend for an

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 2>initial public offering. Joining us now is Bloomberg Semiconductor correspondent

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Ian King. Valuation is really interesting here. We've been covering

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 2>this saga story for quite a long time. Where do

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 2>we settle out on that.

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 13>Well, if you remember in video, was trying to buy

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 13>them for forty billion dollars based upon where their revenue

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 13>is roughly a billion a quarter. That's a massive valuation.

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 13>If you were to compare that revenue level to publicly

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.720
<v Speaker 13>traded companies, they'd be worth sort of ten billion, probably

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 13>well less than twenty So really hard to put a

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 13>valuation on it. Obviously, a lot of people really like

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 13>their technology and really like their prospects.

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 4>What does ARM do You say they like their technology?

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what is ARM?

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean it's a very good question. It's hard

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:35.760
<v Speaker 13>to understand the licensing of an instruction set.

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 4>I realize, yes, Niche.

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 13>The way to understand it is they produce a layer

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 13>of technology that is in every smartphone, increasingly in computers

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 13>and also into data centers as well, and they're moving

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 13>up the food chain. They're doing more of the design,

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 13>they're doing more of the kind of thing that Pollcom

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 13>broad Com would do, and that's a very high margin business.

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Is this going to be a really really big payday

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:00.839
<v Speaker 2>for soft Bank?

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 13>Initially No, in terms of the cash. They've said, look,

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.439
<v Speaker 13>we're not going to dump our entire holdings into the market.

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 13>We're going to put an element of our holdings into

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 13>the market. But what it will do is let people

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 13>know what ARM is worth. They paid thirty two billion

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 13>dollars for this in twenty sixteen. People will be looking

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 13>for this as a kind of a cornerstone of soft

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:26.839
<v Speaker 13>Banks holdings to kind of restore some faith and confidence

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 13>in that company's investing and try and get evaluation as well.

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 13>Above at thirty.

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Two there's also a jurisdiction or territorial angle to this story,

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 2>which is ARM is a UK based firm, it's a

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 2>US listing soft banks in Japan.

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 4>That's quite complicated, it is.

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 13>I mean, the UK, as we've written, has really really

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:48.280
<v Speaker 13>wanted them to come back to the LS and really,

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 13>as far as we understand, have failed to do that.

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.439
<v Speaker 13>So it's going to be a US listing a lot

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 13>of ARMS operations. It's CEO here these days, headquarters is

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 13>still Cambridge and obviously the ownership and Japans whole a

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 13>lot of regulatory issues that needed to.

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Be navigated there also give us the boiler plate.

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot that we don't know, like timing, there

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 2>are lots of factors that need to happen before we

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:11.280
<v Speaker 2>move forward with this listing.

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean the big thing is to focus on

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 13>this is going to be the biggest tech IPO this

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 13>year when you look at it from a valuation perspective.

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:22.400
<v Speaker 13>They've said all along sort of second half of the

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 13>year typically. You know, we've got the filing now, so

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 13>that's say it's probably autumn.

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 2>Right, bloomberg Z and King on all things ARM. We're

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 2>rating that listing. That does it for this edition of

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:39.919
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Technology come back tomorrow for a jam packed show.

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 4>Guests just for example, Uber.

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:46.399
<v Speaker 2>CEO, Dara Kostra Shahi, Apple co founder Steve Wasne act

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 2>and so Fi CEO and Sinota. You don't want to

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 2>miss that one. And okay, look, we're just a day

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:54.280
<v Speaker 2>into the week. We have earnings, we have a FED meeting.

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 2>But there's a lot to recap. Check out the podcast

0:36:56.600 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts, Apple, Spotify, iHeart and of

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 2>course on all of your Bloomberg platforms. Apple comes later

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 2>in the week. That is where a big portion of

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 2>our attention is. But don't forget the discussion we've had

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 2>in the show, which is the QSRs are reporting, Will

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 2>they talk about AI? AI has been the buzzword of

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 2>this earning season, not just the technology sector, but more broadly.

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 2>Go and check out that Bank of America data or

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 2>we will track it here on Bloomberg Technology.

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:26.280
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg