WEBVTT - Rates, SocGen, Markets, and COP27 (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. The narrative here as

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>it relates to rates here in the US is pretty clear.

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>The Federal Reserve is job number one is fighting inflation,

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:31.159
<v Speaker 1>aben raising rates to do that. The question is, you know,

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of when will they stop? Where will they stop?

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of folks are saying, let's talk about

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the European markets, in the UK markets, what's going on there?

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>We touch base with Hugh Worthington. He's a European rate

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence based in in London. Hugh, thanks

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us here. Give us your sense

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of kind of what you're seeing there in the UK

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and Europe in terms of the rate environment. What are

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you seeing over there? Well, I think I think the

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>situation in the UK he's putty more and not like

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>sports going on in the US. The UK has been

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>hiking rates for some time. It's been you know, it's

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it's got its self fairly well down the curve in

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of of of kind of negative of exiting the

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>negative interestrate policy. But the ECB does seem to be

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>lagging still a little bit, and I think there's there's

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>concerns that you know, they they they're they're still behind

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the curve and their their focus is a primary focus

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on inflation. They don't have a dual man they like

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the said just for example, and I think that there's

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a definite sign of the changing attitude there. There's,

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>if you like, the Germans seems to be much more

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in control of the ECB and the focus very much

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>remains on fighting inflation and it's going to continue that way,

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, and I think they're they're basically the latest

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>things they've been saying is that they are going to

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>be hiking in December and they're going to keep going

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to keep hiking into restrictive policy. And

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it may well be that they're they're still doing that

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>whilst people like the FED in the Bank of England

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>may well be starting to ease off a little bit Well,

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting to me because on the one hand, you

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>have these odds of recession, the US specifically going to

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>three really ramping up, but those arts have been quite strong,

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, for at least a year now

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. Why would they keep hiking. Isn't just to

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>perhaps close the divergence between the ECB and the FED

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and other central banks, or is there a real fundamental

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>reason behind it? Well, I think I think they're they're

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.839
<v Speaker 1>very concerned that they know they forget the e CV

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is still printing cash to buy bonds back in as

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>early as as late as June, so they were still

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>being very accommodatated when things were being being much more

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>strictive elsewhere. Also, you've definitely got some things that are

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 1>happening in Europe which happened happened for many, many years.

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>There's later stage on wages out from the funny enough

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in Central Bank of Ireland, on wage growth in places

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>like Germany, wage's running at something like seven percent, and

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>those sort of thing as you haven't seen for fifty years.

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>And it's very hard to know that they think that

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the ECB is going to get their inflasi and target

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>back down to two percent when German wages are running

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a nomenal wage worth's running at that sort of level.

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>So they are basically saying that they are going to

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>be having to be hiking into a restrict into restrictive territory.

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:08.959
<v Speaker 1>And obviously they look sort of worryingly behind the curve

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and a rate bill look low in Europe compared to

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>what they are in the English tax and sphere. Also,

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, definitely QT is definitely going to

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>be on the agenda there as well, and that's going

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to be something which is gonna be probably restrictive for

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the yields and maybe something which means it can keep

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>yields curves pretty steep. In the UK and Europe. There's

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of issues that needs to be done to

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>meet in particular things like the energy subsidies that are

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>being put in place to help the economies in the

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>wake of you know, Cuton's illegal actions in Ukraine. Yeah,

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of where I want to go here. I mean,

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the US are our recession discussion is generally

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>if it happens in twenty three, you know, how short

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>will it be, how shallow will it be? That tends

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to be the discussion narrative talk to us about kind

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of as European banks continue to tighten, what's the recession

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>discussion over there? Well, I think I think the UK

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>probably is already in recession um and we're expecting a

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty long, if if relatively shallow procession, not to not

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>such a hard recession like I was in two thousd

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and eight. But it looks the Bank of England and

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the and and the Office of the Responsibility in the

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>last week's statement in in in the UK Parliament was

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>expecting pretty much a recession to last all next year

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>as well. So it's going to be pretty long and

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty painful, but it maybe not as as as sharp

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>as it was in two thousand and eight. And it's

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a very much going to be a similar situation. I

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 1>suspect um in in Europe and in particular in Europe

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>this time around Germany is going to be leading their

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>work the way down and obviously in the past prices

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in Europe it hasn't been Germany's. It's been hits it hard.

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>But it looks like Germany is going to be the

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, the main the main impact will be in

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Germany probably next year. I suspect we have about literally

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds here. When does QT start for the e

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>c B. I think they're lands it in in December.

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure they'll they'll and in terms of active sales,

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>but it'll just be basically not letting, not reinvesting bonds

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>as they roll off, and that's obviously gonna matter. An

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>aflot was already very very high issuance needs and that's

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be keeping pressure on nels and spreads high

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. All right, you great stuff, As always, always

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>appreciate getting your perspective the UK European rates outlook. Uh

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>there Hugh Worthington European rates strategies for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>based in our London office, Queen Victoria Street, extraordinary building

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in the city of London, just spectacular. Our brand new

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>headquarters over there opened up a few years ago. Good stuff.

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Looking at the markets here, uh the pound one spot

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>one eight on your sterling and Europe above parody here.

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Remember we were below parody several weeks ago. One spot

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>zero two seven eight on US euro ten year treasuries.

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Talking about rates ten years up thirteen thirty seconds, pushing

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that yield down to three point seven seven percent on

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>your ten year treasury. It's not a little education now

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>shout we Stephen Kramer, he's the CEO of Bright Horizons.

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a New York Stock Exchange traded company the symbols

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>b F, A M. You put that into your Bloomberg

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>terminal Education services company. The company also offers a child

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and other dependent care solutions as part of their employee benefits.

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>We work with them, you do, Bloomberg Bloomberg works, We do.

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what I mean. Yeah, if you, you know, have

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>an emergency and you need childcare, an unexpected emergency, or

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>if you just um, you know, have if you're sick

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and you need childcare, fail step into help. Oh cool, excellent? Uh, Stephen,

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. Talk to us

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>about Bright Horizons. What are you guys up to these days.

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>What's your strategy over the next several years to drive

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>your growth. It's a pleasure to be here. Thank you

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>for including me, and thank you obviously to Bloomberg for

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 1>being a great client over many years. Our strategy remains

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>the same as it always has been. We are very

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 1>focused on working with our employer clients to support UH

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>their employees. UH to integrate their work in their life.

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>We do that through the provision of on site chold

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>care centers. We provide backup child care as you just outlined,

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and elder care, and then in addition to that, we

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>support organizations and their employees with workforce education. And so

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly we continue to see great demand across our services

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and continue to focus on being across those services and

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>also continuing to operate in multiple geographies across the globe.

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So what kind of growth are you looking at? I

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>can imagine that employers now as they do things like

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>expand um UH parental leave policies and look to offer

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>more solutions for for daycare and elder care, UM, they

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>can attract better candidates UM if they have you know,

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>bright horizons working with them. So what kind of growth

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>are you looking at? Yeah, so we we continue to

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>focus our growth with our employer clients, and you're right,

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>as they continue to recognize all the challenges that their

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>employees are facing with childcare and other dependent care needs

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>as well as in workforce education. UM, we continue to

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>expand our client base, we continue to expand the utilization

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>of our services, and ultimately that propels our growth forward. UH.

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Each and every year. Is it quantifiable? Yeah, So in

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>typical times we were growing at sort of call it

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>eight to ten per um. We had a major dislocation

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously in COVID UH. And so back in March and

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>April we closed eight percent of our centers. Obviously saw

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a significant degradation UM in UH, in our revenue as

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>well as the services that we deliver UM. We are

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>at this point continuing to grow at a much faster

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>clip against the comps of the prior two years. But

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>we expect in the long term that our growth algorithm

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>will come back into UH that more normalized place UH

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and continue on on that starting in the next year

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>or two. So, Steve and I gotta imagine, like many

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>many many businesses and industries, you were dramatically impacted by

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. How have you your discussions with your clients

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of evolved over the last several years as we

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>come out on the other send, the other end of

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic. Yeah, So there has been a great awakening

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>among employers. I call it a great renaissance among employers

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 1>recognizing that they need to lean in more heavily than

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>they ever have. And so in the current situation where

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a war for talent, or even in a scenario

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>where employers are just simply looking for UM, you know,

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>supports that allow for productivity of their employees. UM. There

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>has been great receptivity towards the services we offer. UM.

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's well understood that through the pandemic UM

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, somewhere between ten and of child care centers

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>across the US permanently closed, and so there is an

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>expectation among employers that there will continue to be a

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>great imbalance between supply and demand, and so employers are

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>looking to lean in and support their employees to provide

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>better access, higher quality, and more affordable care. UH. And

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>then on the backup side, we've seen really significant growth

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>because again, UH, employees have really needed those extra supports

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>as some of the supports that were generally available to

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>them in their community have really dried up. Well. What

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>are the kind of challenges that you face in terms

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of childcare and elder care? I imagine it's a business

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that is rife with regulation. UM. Compliance must be difficult,

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and UM, you know, you've got to have a certain

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>amount of sensitivity as well for both of those UM,

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>but for both both those demographics. Yeah, so I certainly think, um,

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you know that there is a strong regulation. I think

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>there are um you know, a maniacal focused on health

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>and safety and other things that we do, and over

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty five years have really perfected in terms of making

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>sure that what we're delivering every day is high quality

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and meeting the needs of those who we serve. I

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>would say the biggest challenge is around workforce. So there

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>is a significant shortage of teachers, and we see that

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>across all the geographies in which we operate, but specifically

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 1>acute here in the US, where their pre COVID was

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a shrinking pool of talented people going into early childhood

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>education that was exacerbated in the pandemic. And so I

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>would say our biggest challenge is really on the workforce

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>side in terms of attracting um, you know, talent into

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the field and then ultimately to bright horizons. So how

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>difficult is it then to uphold margins because I can imagine,

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, teachers are going to be wanting substantial

0:11:55.840 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 1>hourly salaries and parents are going to want to pay

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>less than what dollars a month, But that that puts

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you in a tight spot. Yeah, no, for sure, I

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>mean certainly. We have always looked to be at the

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>top of the market in terms of the pay that

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 1>we provide to the heroes in our classrooms are teachers, uh,

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:22.559
<v Speaker 1>and so over the last several years, we have accelerated

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>wage increases pretty significantly. Um to quantify it, it's been

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>more than to our teachers over the last several years

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and so um. Obviously, working families struggle to afford the

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>investment in early childhood education, but the reality is is

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.839
<v Speaker 1>expensive to deliver, and so we have always relied upon

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>our employer clients to help their employees to offset some

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of the costs of childcare. And that's really what makes

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 1>our model unique, right, which is our employer clients lean

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in and provide subsidy so that their employees are not

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 1>responsible for the full cost of childcare and the full

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>cost of delivering that childcare, and ultimately that becomes an

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>important benefit to them for working at companies like Bloomberg.

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, good stuff, I really appreciate you taking a time.

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Kramer, CEO of Bright Horizons again in New York

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>stock has changed listed company b f A M is

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a symbol to type into your Bloomberg terminal there. So, uh,

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you're a user, Yeah, well we can. It's a great

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 1>service that Bloomberg um offers. You know, the interesting thing

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the comparison I make is between what the system in

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Germany and here, right, because I just moved back. I

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>pay more in taxes here than I did in Germany, really,

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 1>but childcare was free there, so they had doublic daycarees

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>with organic food and musicians and farm field trips over there,

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>and here it's like two or three grand a month

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>for the basics, right, parent contrast, not saying which one

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>is better, but just comparing tressed all right, sp of

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>eight tens of one percent. We'll take that on a

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>holiday Tuesday. This this bood bern get a little bit

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of a deal here, and it really got my attention.

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>So chen Or Society General is doing a deal with

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Alliance Bernstein. Alliance Bernstein is one of the combination of

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>two of the best names I think in the US

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>global finance. Jonathan Tyson's his senior analyst European banks for

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. He's based in London. He joins us, Hey, John,

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you know the story that we've heard over and over

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and over again over the years is kind of the

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>European banks retrenching, pulling back. I'm thinking credits Swiss Deutsche Bank.

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>But what does suck Gen doing well? I mean, you're

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>completely right, and sockd In has only just finished about

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>three years of a lot of disposals there in mind,

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they sold their stake in the Monday to UM Credittal,

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>they sold lix Source creditcal next to the number of businesses,

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>but um they are pretty strong in equities and prime services,

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of which castext is probably not the strongest part of it.

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think they're trying to do what BMP did

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>with x mat UM and they've picked a very good franchise.

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you at Alliance UM and Bernstein Research.

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>So what does this mean? Are they going to be

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>moving pushing to move market share higher? UM is chen

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>making a play here? Are they an aggressive dealmaker? Now?

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh no. But basically the outgoing CEO who who leaves

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>may have next. He has been there for fifteen years,

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ups and downs. The new guy coming

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in is ex corporate investment banking and clearly a lot

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of the restruction has been done. But if you look

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>at say their equities division, they've beaten for the last

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>six quarters and I don't think any bank's done that,

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>so they would have pretty good franchise there. He's making

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>his mark. He's confirming that sock Jan as the European

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>player and a global equities player wants to play. And

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>as I say, I think they've looked at BEMP did

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>with nex Han over a few years, eventually buying in

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a year or so ago, and the strength of their

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>franchise there, and they're trying to do the same thing.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>They have said. We don't think there'll be that many

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>job cuts. There's not that much of an overlap, probably

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred staff in total across the two businesses. Um

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it's suspensible move. And in terms of how they're paying

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>for it, I mean banks are actually profitable again, so

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that they're paying for it by using up some of

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the capital they're generating. You know what I thought was interesting.

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Um So soft Gen takes fift Alliance Bernstein gets the

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>CEO position, um and they're going to be headquartered in London.

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Why headquartered in London? Five years ago we thought maybe

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that was going to shift as a as a financial hub,

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, to the continent, or maybe more business would

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>come back here to New York. But is it still

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>just so attractive that when you're there you can get

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the best talent. Well, I think it's time zones. Um.

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>It is also language, as you say, the Bernstein research

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>quite US heavy, very English speaking, and also the uk

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:06.959
<v Speaker 1>IS is doing everything you can with the kind of

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>watering down post Brexit, etcetera, to make this as a

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>nicer place to be a bank as possible. We were

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>even looking at things like tweaking Bank Aponus as we've

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 1>removed the cap so there's no reason to rush anything.

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>And I mean this is they've got five years to

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.919
<v Speaker 1>buy the remaining four nine. This is a a thing that

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>we've done in a hurry. But I think at a

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>starting point it makes sense to me in London given

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the the US An American English speaking component of Burnstein. So, Jonathan,

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you've covered all the European banks here, this seems a

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit of, you know, out of step with some

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of the other ones. Does this suggest that maybe some

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>others European banks may be looking to maybe increase through

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>your U S exposure. Um, maybe thinking that twenty three

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>will be a better year for the financial markets. Not

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>at all. No, I think well, this is though, this

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is a bank that's come to the end of a

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>very long and painful restructuring okay, torture bank, and it's

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at the businesses is doing well in it is profitable,

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 1>it's generating capital, it's got more capital than it needs.

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's sort of building out in the franchises. Another

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>franchise has got a l d S. You've probably never

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>heard of it, but it's pretty much the biggest leasing

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>company in Europe um and it's going great guns. That's

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>another business that they are building out via acquisition. The

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>ext franchise. They used to be very very strong and derivatives,

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>remember the French blew up massively in one Q twenty.

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>They've got through that. They've got revenues right back again.

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>This unit is supposed to make about three billion next year,

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 1>so that they're just sort of moving on to the

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>next CEO and consolidating in the businesses that they're good at.

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>When when you talk to your institutional investor clients these days,

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>what is there kind of outlook for kind of European

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and UK banks? Well, I mean the thing is we've

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:53.959
<v Speaker 1>been waiting for ten years for revenue to start going up.

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>They started going up. Rates went up that interesting and

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>went up. Then Ukraine invason happened. It's has begun to

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>look through it. But the fact is we can see

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the peak of the rate cycle now. So they're now

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>worrying about the downturn and quite how badly bad debt

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>is going to impact the banks. And we have an

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>accounting standard that's reasonably new and pretty untried and untested.

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>So they're a little bit skeptical, world more bullish, were

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>comfortable that the banks will weather this and actually report

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>double digit r o e s, which if you've looked

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>at European banks for the last ten of fifteen years,

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't even remember the last time you saw that

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and did thirty seconds Jonathan. Brexit Did it kill the

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 1>city of London? Do you think? Or it's just a

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>minor blip. It hasn't helped um And hopefully the new

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>government is going to stop kind of the UK and

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the ECB being at war about things like euroclearing and derivatives,

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>so hopefully the hospitalities will cease or the least softened.

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>But no, it didn't, it didn't help all right, good stuff,

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Tyce. He covers all the European and UK banks

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's been doing it for decades. One

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of the best in the city of London, so he's

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>seen it all. But I mean he gets some masters

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in classics, literature and linguistics from I don't Oxford Cambridge

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those super duper banker major and then you

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>got classics and then you go to financial services. I

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>just don't get it. But he is a really really

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>good banks I would get some massive I would guess

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a double digit percentage of successful bankers majored in classics classics.

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'll take your word for they love it.

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>That's why I always hedge funds have like Greek god names.

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk energy here. Yesterday, as John was just mentioning

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>today we got w t I crude oil eight cents.

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>We had a seven handle yesterday which got my attention.

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Got gasoline prices unleaded regular. Yeah that I'm going to

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>tell you that's not good for your engine. Yeah that's

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>your car was engineered to tank ninety one octane. Alright,

0:20:55.680 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>so it's cheaper. Yeah, I know the long run, it's

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>not Do you love your car question? Yes you do?

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And will you be able to replace it. No, MW

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>does not make those anymore. Right, I'll take better care

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>of it. But diesel is the issue here, and I

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>want to talk to much more important fuel for the

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>global economy. Exactly right, Scott Levin, senior Energy and industrial

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence Joints us Hey. Scott talked to

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 1>us about diesel. I mean, I don't put it in

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>my car. I don't like the sound diesel engines make.

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's big, it's great, it's a great sound. Talk

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to us about diesel UH fuel Scott House concerns should

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>we be Yeah, you have kind of a unique phenomenon

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>going on with right now. And if you look at

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>your local gas station, you'll see a gap of close

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>to two dollars gallon in some places between diesel and gasoline.

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.959
<v Speaker 1>And that's abnormally large, obviously, and the primary reason for that,

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I think is unusually low inventories of diesel weren't less

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>than half of or we typically are this time of year.

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>UH for diesel fuel, and diesel fuel is much more

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>commonly used to fuel trucks and the industrial economy at large.

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Is also used in the Northeast as a source of

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>heating oil. And so it's that uh, that phenomenon with

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>inventories and getting additional supply to the Northeast in particular

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>that is coming up the works and driving a spike

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>in diesel prices and causing some concern uh coming into

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the winter months where you know, you could have harshal

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>weather and some very uncomfortable people unless we get some

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>additional supply cooking well. And in other countries, diesel is

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>very common as personal transport fuel. You know, UM, a

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of people drive diesel engine cars in Europe. That's

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>not really the case in the US. UM. And I

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>guess it doesn't matter as much because Europe has public transportation.

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>But how how hardcore is the knock on effect going

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>to be in terms of shipping costs? You know, we

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we see shipping costs coming down broadly, but if diesel

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 1>is short, I can imagine UM truckers and you know,

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>UM boat vessel operators are gonna have to raise prices. Yeah.

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna definitely provide an underlying support, uh for for

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>the transportation industry at large. Uh, more so in Europe,

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>as you point out, than in the US. But in

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>both places, uh, And there's a somewhat regional phenomenon here

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>in that Europe is going through its own um energy

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>supply crunches, you know, uh, knock on effect of the

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Russian invasion in Ukraine, and so they've been trying to

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>resolve their own uh crunch uh in terms of diesel

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>natural gas, which can also be used as sources of

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>heating fuel over there. So whereas that's potentially or in

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the past has been a source of supply and could

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>be used to alleviate some of the pressure that we're

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.959
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the US northeast this year, that is not

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the case clearly this year as uh. You know, the

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>European countries in general have been building up inventories uh

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in advance of a supply crunch for this winter, so

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, a knock on effect there. But yes, this

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly underpins higher pricing for the transportation sector in general

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and maybe helps them overcome some of the cost pressure

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're seeing on the labor side. Hey, Scott, you know,

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>whenever I hear about energy shortages, whether it's diesel or not,

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>gas or gasoline, my first response is just crank up

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the refineries. What's the big deal? Go down to Texas

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and Louisiana and get those things going. But that's not

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the case. Is it tells what the refining situation is

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in this country. Yeah, you know, unfortunately, in this instance,

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>with diesel being the issue, us refining is much more

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>geared toward gasoline than diesel. I think you get to

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>uh gallons out of every barrel for every gallon of

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>diesel that you produce here, So the uh, the cracks

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>are are skewed more towards gasoline than diesel inherently in

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>this country. And from a gasoline standpoint, yeah, we're higher,

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 1>certainly higher than then we'd like to see, you know,

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 1>at four dollars a gallon or there about, but uh,

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>not abnormally high, certainly nothing like we're seeing in the

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>diesel market right now. And uh, you know that's kind

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of consistent with eighty dollar crude or thereabouts. And so

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>we have not seen much of a push to increase

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>refining capacity within the country. If anything, what we need

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to do is make it easier to get from one

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>place to another from the existing refineries that we have,

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's typically the Gulf coast that serves the majority

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Eastern seaboard, So make it easier. How do

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>you mean, like more pipelines or more ships? How do

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you make it these year to transport? Yeah, so we'll

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>start with the pipelines. Pipelines is an obvious way, and

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:11.120
<v Speaker 1>we have an administration obviously that is ah against pipeline construction, uh,

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly as it relates to hydrocarbons, and so Mountain Valley

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Pipeline is still on hold. That's one of the big

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>conduits along the Eastern Seaboard that has been on hold

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>pending resolution of environmental permits. And then you know, if

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>we were to look at shipping, uh, it's the Jones Act.

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>The Jones Act requires uh, you know, the ships that

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 1>carry crewed uh with the area to be h on

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>US flag ships and there are a significant limitations there.

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>So you have transportation bottlenecks that are really making the

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>situation more Yeah. I think we need somebody needs to

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>look at that Jones Act. I keep hearing about that

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>all the time. And when we think about not having

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>fuel in the Northeast, what's up with that? So anyway,

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>Scott Levine, senior Energy and Industrial analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Markets moving higher today, lower volant, but move on. Higer

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>we'll take the green on the screen. Let's check in

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>on what we should be doing in these markets. Tom Mantion,

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>he is a managing director at UBS Private Wealth Management. Hey, Tom,

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're thanks so much for joining us here.

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>We're you know, we're ten percent or so off the

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>bottom here in s What are you telling your clients

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 1>these days? You know what I think the next three

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to six months do you have to still understand that

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>we're going to remain volatible. We're gonna watch every fat

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>governor speak. We're gonna listen to what they say. We're

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna parse every single word and look for clues as

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to win. The set is going to stop. But at

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the you know, I think the heavy lifting is behind us, right,

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think next three to six months be defensive.

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Look for value. I think Staples, healthcare, energy, defense, infrastructure,

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>income plays. But but somewhere in you've got to think inflection. Right,

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>things are going to change. By the way, as on

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the side, don't you wish fewer of them would speak?

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've been in this industry, You've been at

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 1>UBS for like twenty years. You were Mother Meryl before

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that for ten um. It didn't always used to be

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>like this, Every single FED speaker offers a different opinion,

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 1>moving the markets each time. Yeah, it can't be good,

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't don't forget. We used to watch

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the briefcase. Remember Alan Greenspan had his briefcase and whether

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>it was thick or sin you know, So a little

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of this has been almost my entire thirty year career.

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>It never ceases to amaze me, how how one word

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>can move a market, you know, three in either direction.

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the longer term investors here can find opportunities

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in those moments. So do you have do you have

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>clients who say, like Tom, enough of this macro crap, like,

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>give me some of them up research. It seems like

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>no one cares about companies. Well, you know, and I

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>think this is definitely two has completely shown you that

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>earnings matter, right, And I think we've seen that in

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the last few weeks where stocks that didn't have a

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>good things to say, didn't do a good job, have

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>been punished severely by this market. And then stocks that

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.719
<v Speaker 1>that have done well and have navigated what has been

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult year from an interest rate and inflation perspective,

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly with supply chains those companies that have done well

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>have been rewarded. So there are there are names on

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the board that are up this year and up significantly.

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think being positioned the right way has helped.

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:46.479
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you're not going to get it right

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>every single time. But I do agree with you. I

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>think I think thinking macro is helpful, but you need

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to bring it back down a reality every once in

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a while. And Tom, you mentioned financials is a sector

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you like. I mean, do I want to own kind

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of the big money center global banks, the JP Morgans cities,

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>or do I want to go maybe regional banks who

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>may benefit more from a you know, you know, an

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>economic kind of reopening as we get through whatever recession

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have in twenty three. Yeah, I love that,

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, whatever recession we're gonna have in three I

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>think people have been talking about recession now for it

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 1>seems like a year and a half um and it

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>hasn't it hasn't yet occurred. I think you need to

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>own both. I think the I think the big money

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>centers have have hail winds here. I think the regionals

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>also have tail winds. Obviously, I think that there's some

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>some regional risk to certain industries UH that that that

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>may or may not do well in a in a

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>recession in three given the type of recession that we're

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>having UH or or may have. You know, nothing is

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a fed up complete But I like I like both

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>sectors here. I also think staples in healthcare and and

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously we've seen some some positive and negative earnings reports

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in the healthcare sector. So you need to be really

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>smart about what you want to own UH and why.

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>But I do think there are some at least for

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the next three to six or nine months, some some

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>some places I hate to use the word hide, but

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>some places to be defensive. If people want to be

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>If investors want to put more risk on the table,

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about going outside of the US?

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm assuming most of your clients are here

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in America. UM, but with the dollar it had climbed

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to such amazing heights. I mean, what an opportunity to

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you to invest elsewhere. Certainly you can look to a pack,

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you can look to Europe. But if you're worried about

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the US being in a recession in three, I think

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be much more concerned about what's happening

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. I think the geopolitics on the in the

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>European continent or are significantly more dangerous than that than

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>they are domestically here in the U. S. So, uh,

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they obviously have a significant energy crisis that's going to

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>take some take a while to work out, and and

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that is that is uh, you know, if we can

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>control inflation here with the said to be much more

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>difficult for the ECB to control inflation with with energy

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 1>costs not being impacted by the economic situation, but but

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>outside factors. Alright, Tom, good stuff, appreciate you're checking in

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>with us. Tom Menteon, he's managing director UBS, a Wealth

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of Management. He's up in Stanford, Connecticut. I think about

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a huge operation up there in Stanford, huge trading floor there. Yeah,

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not en sure if they still use it. Also,

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>our second Fairfield grad in the same number of days,

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>is that right? Alright? But then he went to Wharton

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>instead of Duke. Yeah, Well, what what are you gonna do?

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you call it? The Fuqua School, the Fuqua

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>School of Business, Fuqua, Yeah, JB. Fuqua, one of the

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>first um kind of like consolidator kind of guys. He

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>was a. You think some of those big companies back

0:32:57.560 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in the sixth seas and seventies that owned multiple businesses.

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like off the tongue a little bit easier.

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>It does, it does so, but we'll see. Well, the

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>United Nations COP seven conference just finished up a few

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>days ago. It was a two week conference where leaders

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>small over the world got together to talk about climate

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and sustainability and all that good stuff. And Bloomberg Intelligence

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>send our expert over their Shaheen contractor. She has an

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>E S G research analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. She joins

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>us live in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio because she

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't phone it in. She comes to the office, which

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>she gets a gold star for UM. So she's triple

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 1>triple mint, as Tom Keane would say. So Sheen, what

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>are some of the takeaways that you had from the

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>COPY seven conference. So, first, full thank you for the

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. But the COP conference was it was, at

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>least being my first time that it was amazing. I

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's two weeks. You know, when people descended about

0:33:56.560 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>one thing. Mikey bakeaways were first, you know. On the ground,

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the most divided topic was around carbon markets. The companies

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>using offsets to basically offset their own emissions. That was

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the most divided topic. The other frustration was this gap

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we had and I mentioned this before, around companies carbon

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>reduction goals and no real plan to do that on

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the ground. As we progressed towards the end, many many

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 1>people called it a disappointing cop mainly because of the

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 1>mitigation aspect. We didn't build on emission reductions that we

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:34.439
<v Speaker 1>already established last year in Glasgow. Why what what? Why

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't we get there? And are we sticking at least

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to the commitments we made in Glasgow? Apparently there was

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a fight to stick to that. A lot of the

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>things were debated that we had already established in Glasgow,

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was interesting. This year, what's being said

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is there was a lot of sort of roadblocking from

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the oil rich countries like Saudi Arabia

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to actually push things of the finish line. That was

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>the main roadblock this year. So but in the end

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>there was some kind of communic a right, So in

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the end were we able to save CAP twenty six

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>at cap we were able to maintain it, I believe,

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean the way we went beyond that is the

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is the establishment of this loss and Damage Fund, which

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:25.320
<v Speaker 1>was really groundbreaking. It's basically the more developed countries creating

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a fund and paying some of the more less developing

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>countries for the for the adaptation of climate and mitigation.

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:34.839
<v Speaker 1>That was the main thing that came out. That's more.

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:38.280
<v Speaker 1>That's less on the emission reductions, right, it's about money. China.

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Is China involved in CUP twenty seven? Are they? Are

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.399
<v Speaker 1>they constructive? Are they supportive? What are they? They sort

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 1>of I think they sort of laid low this one

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and Cup compared to last year, where they came out

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 1>with a little more fanfare. This year was a lot

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>more about the Middle East. Okay, so what's the Where

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 1>do we go next year? By the way, it next

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>year is Dubai Dubai Okay. They don't come to Detroit

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>or Cleveland, do they? I don't. I don't know, but

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that would be great. Columbus could host. Columbus could but Detroit.

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>As you know, I am an avowed fan of the

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State University, but I love Detroit. It's such a

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:22.399
<v Speaker 1>great city gearhead um and for conferences as well. It's

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>really ideal UM in terms of the big cops. I

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like Glasgow got a lot of attention and charmel

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>shake not so much. Why is that? I think a

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:38.240
<v Speaker 1>lot more was achieved in Glasgow in terms of actual

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 1>mitigation of emissions. Paris was obviously the biggest. I think

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 1>that's when you know the country has decided to put

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>nationally determined contributions, ago is it around their emissions um

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>This one sort of built off that, but the biggest

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 1>one was this loss, this loss and damage fund for sure.

0:36:56.800 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>So what is the role of the United States in

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>these efforts year to year to year? So it's it's

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 1>an effort of all the countries right to the Conference

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of parties. They come in and they negotiate basically, and

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the end goal every country has to agree on it.

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's really the big challenge. You come in knowing

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 1>what your country wants, but you don't know what the

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>other one wants. That's really a negotiation between everyone. So

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the idea this year, the groundbreaking move is that the

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>rich countries who have benefited from, you know, destroying the

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>environment are going to pay the developing nations who have

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>been hurt. Is that the idea, Yes, they established a

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>fund which is and this is the first time that

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>agenda came on too. Sort of discussions. They established a fund.

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Now the workings of the fund, how much food bay

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>is all that will be established over the next hill

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 1>before we head into the by That's that's what I

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>understand so far. Okay, So what what was some of

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>the more optimistic expectations going in to top twenty seven

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that maybe we're not fulfilled? Well, the biggest expectation is,

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, continued emission reductions. We all see these reports

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:10.320
<v Speaker 1>about us being you know, far off what we really

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 1>need to be in terms of temperature alignment. The expectation

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>as we build more of those goals, more countries update

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>their goals to meet sort of the baddest baras aligned

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:25.479
<v Speaker 1>um sort of temperature benchmark. And that didn't happen. So

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>what are the takeaways for investors? What do you bring

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>back to Bloomberg intelligence that's actionable. So the biggest takeaway

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:36.760
<v Speaker 1>from me is primarily around these again these companies carbon

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>reduction goes. What do they actually mean for a company's investment?

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>So what the UK did is actually interesting. During cop

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>they announced that they have this new plan. If a

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>company has a goal, they actually have to have a

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 1>plan to meet it, and there's a lot we can

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>do with that. We can establish, you know, is it

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and PB positive, Is it and P be negative given

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 1>different carbon prices, given different scenarios. And I think that's

0:38:57.280 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the biggest question we have today. And that kind of

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>discourages greenwashing because that means the company can't just come

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>out and say, hey, we're gonna be carbon and but

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>they have no idea how exactly. And we need that

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to domin financial impact, like we've done this great example

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 1>of S S A B where we find that the

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 1>carbon goal is MPV positive only in a high steel price,

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>high carbon price environment and otherwise it's not. So we

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 1>need insights like that that's actionable. What are the incentives

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:32.240
<v Speaker 1>for US companies to go green? So well? The Inflation

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Reduction Act that we we saw recently puts a lot

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of subsidies, puts a lot of tax breaks onto you know,

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 1>clean energy, onto renewable fuels. Um that would be the

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest sort of incentive. I think over the long term,

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>if you imagine some kind of carbon price and regulation

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that comes in, it is cost positive. It is efficient

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 1>to have these things in place for your bottom line.

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Mr I don't. I don't know if investors are buying it.

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's still a lot of skepticism out there,

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:02.479
<v Speaker 1>that is in the US and YopE. I think where

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you have a more study regulator mechanism by the EU

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>emission training scheme, you do see a cost. It's a

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>very substantial cost to company. We're skeptical. The thing is,

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Paul and I are skeptically. I know, I know that before,

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 1>but we love having you on the show exactly. So

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that's why we're like, hey, Shaheen, convince us, but we're

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>neither one to do it. All right, she can contracted

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 1>great stuff E s G. Research channels for Bloomberg Intelligence

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>back from Egypt, the Top twenties seven conference there and

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>again they're always needs pretty cool locales. Thanks for listening

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three.

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Pet On Ball Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio