Speaker 1: Thanks to all of you for being with us.
Speaker 2: Right down our toll free telephone number if you want
Speaker 2: to be a part of the program, it's eight hundred
Speaker 2: and nine to four one Sean if you want to
Speaker 2: join us. Uh wow. We're learning a lot about the
Speaker 2: Epstein files. We're learning a lot about why Joe Biden
Speaker 2: didn't release him for the four years, and we're also
Speaker 2: learning why a bunch of so called conservatives have been
Speaker 2: so you know, in a frenzy. You know, why were
Speaker 2: they so quiet for four years? Why didn't they demand
Speaker 2: the release of all this when Biden was president? Because
Speaker 2: now it's impacting Hakeem Jeffries one congressman take a congresswoman
Speaker 2: taking questions directly during a hearing with Michael Khne, apparently,
Speaker 2: according to reports and information in the in the documents, verbatim,
Speaker 2: asking the questions of Jeffrey Epstein at that time, a
Speaker 2: convicted a felon for what was it, soliciting prostitution from
Speaker 2: a minor? By the way, you know, the Bible is
Speaker 2: very clear you don't hurt the look, don't hurt children.
Speaker 2: I mean, I just I shudder to think what level
Speaker 2: of Dante's inferno people like that will end up in
Speaker 2: but it's it's just horrible. I mean, now they're talking
Speaker 2: about thousands of victims, and even with the release of it,
Speaker 2: the only you know, with all the talk about this,
Speaker 2: thank god they put in their provision to leave people
Speaker 2: that have been victimized, that probably live with this for
Speaker 2: the rest of their lives, that alone, if they want to,
Speaker 2: you know, deal with it privately and not expose them.
Speaker 2: I can't imagine the pain, the tragedy, you know, and
Speaker 2: the horror of such evil of young children. It is
Speaker 2: disgusting on every level. A new Republican bill in the House,
Speaker 2: by the way, will expedite deportations for criminal illegals. Will
Speaker 2: hit that one illegal immigrant who was caught and released
Speaker 2: by the Biden administration charged in a brutal hammer attack
Speaker 2: on a Texas woman seventeen year old and arrested and
Speaker 2: released by the federal immigration authorities during the Biden years,
Speaker 2: charged with a brutal hammer attack on a woman jogging
Speaker 2: in a Texas park.
Speaker 1: Unbelievable.
Speaker 2: By the way, did you see Nicki Minaj praising President
Speaker 2: Trump for prioritizing the issue of the persecution and slaughter
Speaker 2: of Christians in Nigeria. Thanking him for his leadership on
Speaker 2: the global stage. I mean, I can only imagine the
Speaker 2: attacks have probably begun, you know, with the Hollywood lunatics
Speaker 2: out there, Linda, Am I wrong about that? Or am
Speaker 2: I right about not at all? Starting a very real thing.
Speaker 2: She's being attacked for standing up for people. And President
Speaker 2: Trump said, if they don't stop this, radical islamis apparently
Speaker 2: attacking and killing innocent Christians. And you know, Donald Trump
Speaker 2: has a moral compass, he has moral clarity. And this
Speaker 2: is why I really don't understand even some people that
Speaker 2: claim to be MAGA, what part of the Trump doctrine
Speaker 2: some of these people have trouble understanding, and why some
Speaker 2: people haven't interpreted this and misinterpreted this to mean isolationism,
Speaker 2: because some have and they seem at times to be
Speaker 2: the louder voice in the MAGA movement. I'm all for
Speaker 2: no forever warse. You know, many years now I've been
Speaker 2: saying on this program, we can never ever allow what
Speaker 2: happened in Baghdad and elsewhere to ever happen again. And
Speaker 2: that is you know, going door to door, stepping over
Speaker 2: IEDs without up armored hum v's, and you know, our
Speaker 2: brave men and women, our soldiers, our heroes, getting their
Speaker 2: legs and their arms and blown off and their faces disfigured.
Speaker 2: That's not how modern warfare is going to be fought.
Speaker 2: I mean, you see the beginning stages of it.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: You saw it with the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.
Speaker 2: You see it the way. You know, even Israel is
Speaker 2: now being attacked with you know, bombardments of ballistic missiles,
Speaker 2: and thank god, they have missile defense systems that are
Speaker 2: able to shoot those things out of the sky. Back
Speaker 2: in the day they mocked Ronald Regan, they called it
Speaker 2: star Wars if it was called strategic defense. Now President
Speaker 2: Trump wants to modernize it and protect our entire country.
Speaker 2: It's called the Golden Dome. Because of my sources, I
Speaker 2: could tell you we are progressing at a level that
Speaker 2: would really impress most of you. However, I keep some
Speaker 2: sources private. It's not that I want to not tease
Speaker 2: you and tell you that I know something you don't know.
Speaker 2: It's just that it's not in our best national defense interests,
Speaker 2: you know. I'm just I'm just getting little bits and
Speaker 2: pieces and putting it all together, and I'm really feeling
Speaker 2: very confident that we will achieve that goal of being
Speaker 2: able to stop any type of attack on our country
Speaker 2: with that technology that is advancing and that we're discovering,
Speaker 2: all of which I think is very, very needed and necessary.
Speaker 2: All of you should be angry about what I am
Speaker 2: about to play for you. We have Senators Mark Kelly,
Speaker 2: Ali Slotkin and and others, all these Democrats. They're actually
Speaker 2: on tape and they are telling people in the intelligence community.
Speaker 2: They are telling people that are in our military not
Speaker 2: to obey unlawful orders, illegal orders of the president. The
Speaker 2: problem is they don't identify what the hell they're talking about,
Speaker 2: because I don't think they can, and I don't think
Speaker 2: they have any intention to do so. But there's such
Speaker 2: great damage and danger in what it is that they
Speaker 2: are saying in this tape. And there's danger, you know,
Speaker 2: it's almost like a subversion. It's almost like they're calling
Speaker 2: for insurrection among our intelligence community and people in are
Speaker 2: armed forces. What is President Trump ordered that caused them
Speaker 2: to tell them they have a duty to disobey orders
Speaker 2: of the commander in chief. I mean, the constitution is clear,
Speaker 2: not a Leise Slacke and not Mark Kelly, not any
Speaker 2: of the people in this video. They're not the commander
Speaker 2: in chief of the United States of America. The President
Speaker 2: is the commander in chief of our armed services. He
Speaker 2: is the guy he makes the decisions. That's not Congress,
Speaker 2: that's not a senator. That's not a former CIA officer,
Speaker 2: not a former astronaut, not Alis Slocket.
Speaker 1: But here's what they say. We want to speak directly
Speaker 1: to members of the military.
Speaker 2: And the intelligence community to take risks each day to
Speaker 2: keep Americans safe.
Speaker 1: We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now.
Speaker 2: Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk.
Speaker 2: This administration is pitting our uniform military and intelligence community
Speaker 2: professionals against American citizens like us.
Speaker 1: You all swore an oath to protect any then this constitution.
Speaker 2: Right now, the threats to our constitution aren't just coming
Speaker 2: from a broad but from right here at home.
Speaker 1: Our laws are clear. You can refuse the legal orders,
Speaker 1: you can refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 2: You must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry
Speaker 2: out orders that violate the law or our constitution. We
Speaker 2: know this is hard and that it's a difficult time
Speaker 2: to be a public servant.
Speaker 1: But whether you're serving in the CIA, the Army, or Navy,
Speaker 1: the Air Force. Your vigilance is critical, and know that
Speaker 1: we have your.
Speaker 2: Back, O that we have your back. I'll think about this.
Speaker 2: How scary is that tape? This is TDS Trump derangement
Speaker 2: syndrome on steroids and human growth hormone. It is not
Speaker 2: just it is so morally repugnant and inappropriate, but it's
Speaker 2: downright dangerous what they are saying there is Again, if
Speaker 2: they had a specific issue where they identified that the
Speaker 2: very examples where people must refuse illegal orders, they have
Speaker 2: a duty and obligation to spell it out.
Speaker 1: They didn't do that.
Speaker 2: No, it is just, you know, as far as I'm concerned, constitutionally,
Speaker 2: they are undermining the authority of the president and his
Speaker 2: constitutional authority as commander in chief. I mean, if that
Speaker 2: it's it's if that's not subversion, tell me what it is.
Speaker 2: If that's not a call for some type of insurrection,
Speaker 2: then please tell me what it is.
Speaker 1: I'll give you a number. It's eight hundred and nine
Speaker 1: point one. Shawn.
Speaker 2: I'm open to any any points you want to make
Speaker 2: on this, but you know, they might as well just
Speaker 2: breach the walls of the White House and you know,
Speaker 2: sending their radical supporters because remember it was a five
Speaker 2: hundred and seventy four official riots in the summer of
Speaker 2: twenty twenty their radical base, and they never lifted a
Speaker 2: finger to stop them.
Speaker 1: They never criticized them.
Speaker 2: No, they just flat out either their silence was deafening,
Speaker 2: or they went out there and just flat out lied
Speaker 2: and said they're mostly peaceful, or they went out like
Speaker 2: you know, their vice presidential candidate at the time later
Speaker 2: Vice President Kamala Harris and you know, said those rioters
Speaker 2: aren't going to stop.
Speaker 1: They shouldn't stop, and.
Speaker 2: We're not going to stop supporting them, okay, And then
Speaker 2: they claimed only care they ignored those five hundred and
Speaker 2: seventy four rights. They rationalized something that wasn't true. Dozens
Speaker 2: of Americans that Summer of Love lost their lives. Thousands
Speaker 2: of cops were injured during the Summer of Love. You know,
Speaker 2: they were pelted with bricks, rocks, bottles, molotov cocktails, things
Speaker 2: like that. Billions of dollars in property damage took place.
Speaker 2: You know, where was Benny Thompson and or whatever his
Speaker 2: name is and Liz Cheney at the time, they cared
Speaker 2: so much about one riot where the president actually said
Speaker 2: many of you will peacefully and patriotically, you know, march
Speaker 2: to the Capitol so your voices will be heard.
Speaker 1: That's what he said at the time. But they didn't.
Speaker 2: Of course, that never came up, and then all the
Speaker 2: records magically just disappeared. They're just gone, you know, in
Speaker 2: thin air, you know. And if we're going to talk
Speaker 2: about moments where maybe just maybe, you know, members of
Speaker 2: our intelligence community for example, and high ranking people and
Speaker 2: law enforcement for example, maybe they should have stood up
Speaker 2: against the Russia hoax that they knew was a hoax.
Speaker 2: We now know they knew it was a hoax. We
Speaker 2: now learned from the classified materials of Tulca Gabbard that
Speaker 2: in fact, they had information it was a hoax. They
Speaker 2: had a meeting about Hillary Clinton's plan to unveil this
Speaker 2: hoax against Donald Trump. And then when career years senior
Speaker 2: intelligence officials did their job after the twenty sixteen election
Speaker 2: and came to the determination that in fact, there was
Speaker 2: no Russia Trump collusion, well then it was presented to
Speaker 2: Barack Obama, and according to these declassified documents and Tulsea Gabbard,
Speaker 2: Barack Obama didn't like the conclusion, so he got his
Speaker 2: political operatives involved, and they decided to redo the intelligence
Speaker 2: assessment come up with a new one that had a
Speaker 2: completely different conclusion, and again based on the Dirty Russian
Speaker 2: Disinformation NOSSI, which they also were warned about that it
Speaker 2: was political in August of twenty sixteen. They apparently were
Speaker 2: worn multiple times and again statute of limitations run out
Speaker 2: unless they come up with a grand conspiracy investigation. But
Speaker 2: you know, you think about that, the Russia hoax, the
Speaker 2: Mueller investigation, that witch hunt, two bogus impeachments to Donald
Speaker 2: trum and then of course, you know, we've got three
Speaker 2: phases of the grand conspiracy. One includes no reasonable prosecutor
Speaker 2: would prosecute Hillary Clinton's you know, servers with top secret
Speaker 2: classified information on them. They didn't raider her home or office,
Speaker 2: just like later they wouldn't raid Joe Biden's homes or
Speaker 2: offices the four locations where he had top secret classified information.
Speaker 2: Presidential Record Zact actually gave Donald Trump a lot more
Speaker 2: leeway than any of them, but they rated mar a lago.
Speaker 2: That sounds like a dual justice system to me. Using
Speaker 2: the dirty Russian disinformation dossier that not only was not corroborated,
Speaker 2: but it was completely bogus, And even after they knew
Speaker 2: it was completely bogus and Christopher Steele was long gone,
Speaker 2: they used it three more times for three separate PISA
Speaker 2: warrants lied to a phis A court. Law requires that
Speaker 2: once you know it's false, that you're supposed to go
Speaker 2: to the PHISA court. You know, with the fact that
Speaker 2: intelligence now we were finding out we don't know how
Speaker 2: many Americans, including senators and congressmen and other people and
Speaker 2: groups like Turning Point and so many other conservative organizations
Speaker 2: were targeted by our government to be spied on without
Speaker 2: without any indication that a proper warrant was sought or granted.
Speaker 2: Whatever happened, unreasonable search and seizure. I'm sure there was
Speaker 2: great need to rip through Milania Trump's closet and Baron
Speaker 2: Trump's bedroom, you know. And then four years of weaponization
Speaker 2: because well they couldn't stop them. Remember, Originally the dirty
Speaker 2: dossier was designed to prevent Trump from getting elected. Then
Speaker 2: after the election it was used to sabotage the incoming president,
Speaker 2: which it did effectively. Then, of course, the suppression of
Speaker 2: the very real laptop from Hell that they've had verified
Speaker 2: as authentic. In March at twenty twenty, and then they
Speaker 2: prebunked it, meeting weekly with big tech companies in twenty
Speaker 2: twenty because they didn't want the truth about that laptop
Speaker 2: coming out. And then of course big tech asked, well
Speaker 2: is this information in the New York Post reel? They
Speaker 2: knew the answer, but they wouldn't tell them and they
Speaker 2: didn't want the American people to know them. When that
Speaker 2: didn't work, Let's just, you know, take a case where
Speaker 2: the statute of limitations had run out. That's only a
Speaker 2: minor misdemeanor in New York, and let's turn it into
Speaker 2: thirty four felon accounts. And let's value Maro Lago at
Speaker 2: eighteen million dollars, not one point five trillion, and let
Speaker 2: everybody not say a word about any of it because
Speaker 2: we're okay, Because it's just to prevent Trump from becoming president.
Speaker 2: This is sick stuff. These are sick people. This is
Speaker 2: a sick time that we're living.
Speaker 1: In, all right.
Speaker 2: So I may lose Linda here a little bit. Linda
Speaker 2: doesn't love technology the way I do in this sense. Now,
Speaker 2: I've never been the most technologically savvy person in the world,
Speaker 2: but I am obsessed with artificial intelligence because I can
Speaker 2: learn so much from it. Friend of mine who pretty
Speaker 2: high ranking with Elon Musk and smart as a whip.
Speaker 2: I mean, this guy is is so out there smart.
Speaker 2: It's he's spectacularly smart. You know who I'm talking about, right,
Speaker 2: And he's also the nicest guy you'd ever want to
Speaker 2: meet in your life. He works so hard. I mean,
Speaker 2: when you work for Elon, you don't stop working. By
Speaker 2: the way, you think I'm tough as a boss, I'm
Speaker 2: really not. I'm actually, you know, a pussy cat compared
Speaker 2: to Elon Musk. But anyway, and they are driving and
Speaker 2: driving and driving.
Speaker 1: I mean this Elon.
Speaker 2: Will sleep on his office floor for like an hour
Speaker 2: and a half, we can get up and start working again.
Speaker 2: He just doesn't stop. I mean, it's pretty fascinating to
Speaker 2: watch it.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: Do I think he was he was designed for the
Speaker 2: DC Washington swamp or bureaucracy. Absolutely not. It just goes
Speaker 2: against his very nature. He is a genius CEO at
Speaker 2: the highest level and an innovator and creator. And there's
Speaker 2: a great series on the History Channel The Men That
Speaker 2: Built America, and it talks about you know, the Rockefellers
Speaker 2: and the Conegies and the Melons, and you know, the
Speaker 2: Morgans and all these people. By the way, they're all ruthless,
Speaker 2: ruthless business people. There's the side of them is rough.
Speaker 2: But I think with genius, I think, you know, when
Speaker 2: people have really spectacular gifts, I think, and I've been
Speaker 2: blessed in my life to meet a lot of brilliant people,
Speaker 2: and it's a very common trait that with their gift
Speaker 2: comes a little bit of a curse and it manifests
Speaker 2: itself in different forms.
Speaker 1: Linda, that makes sense. You're with me so far, right.
Speaker 2: Sure, and okay, but the work ethic that Elon has
Speaker 2: coupled with the genius that he has is is it's
Speaker 2: just undeniable that he is the brightest guy in the
Speaker 2: world that I can think of right now. If there's
Speaker 2: anybody smarter, you can tell me, But I don't think
Speaker 2: there is. Having spent time with him and spoken with him,
Speaker 2: actually at dinner with him one night and it was outside,
Speaker 2: and you know, he was looking up at the stars
Speaker 2: and he's pointing out that that's Venus, that's Mars, that's this,
Speaker 2: that's this, that's this, and he's like pointing all this
Speaker 2: stuff out to me, and the difference is the way
Speaker 2: my mind works, which is, you know, rather on hip
Speaker 2: base compared to his level.
Speaker 1: Very simple and basic.
Speaker 2: I don't look at Venus and Mars and think that
Speaker 2: I want to figure out a way to travel there
Speaker 2: and maybe establish life there and send people there and
Speaker 2: bring them home. But that's how he thinks. It's just
Speaker 2: a whole different dimension of thinking. I've met people that
Speaker 2: are so insightful in terms of politics.
Speaker 1: You know, one of the geniuses of RUSSI.
Speaker 2: I always felt Rush had a take that nobody else
Speaker 2: would have, and I think that was part of his
Speaker 2: great creativity and genius, and he was a great entertainer
Speaker 2: on top of it. It's just great at everything that
Speaker 2: he did, and which is why when he passed, God
Speaker 2: rest his soul, we miss him dearly. You know, I said,
Speaker 2: nobody can replace this guy. He's irreplaceable, and we all
Speaker 2: he would want all of us to do our very
Speaker 2: best because he believed so much in the in the
Speaker 2: in the in the individual, in the concept of liberty
Speaker 2: and freedom and talent that God gave every individual, and
Speaker 2: that the only way that that those talents can be
Speaker 2: brought brought to fruition is if you live in freedom
Speaker 2: and liberty and which is the antithesis of top down
Speaker 2: government run everything in our lives. So you know we've
Speaker 2: gone through many different revolutions, if you will. I mean
Speaker 2: when the train was first created, that was a big deal.
Speaker 2: You know, going shopping with Linda to buy a little
Speaker 2: toy train for her son at the time was the
Speaker 2: biggest deal I've ever seen in my life. And after
Speaker 2: an hour of picking up every single solitary train and
Speaker 2: turning it over and playing with the wheels and looking
Speaker 2: at the price and comparative shopping, I couldn't take it anymore.
Speaker 2: I went and got a shopping cart and I just
Speaker 2: filled it up full of a bunch of trains. And
Speaker 2: I figured, let our son pick it out on his own,
Speaker 2: and they'll be happy with more trains rather than a
Speaker 2: few trains. And I don't think he's going to miss
Speaker 2: out on whether or not Linda picked out the perfect train.
Speaker 2: And Linda doesn't like when I tell that story, but
Speaker 2: it's true. So why am I bringing all of this up?
Speaker 2: So there's an article of Business Insider and it says
Speaker 2: Elon Musk says optimists will eliminate poverty, and a speech
Speaker 2: after his one trillion dollar pay package was approved. This
Speaker 2: is with Tesla if he meets certain goals and certain
Speaker 2: benchmarks that they have set out for him. And what
Speaker 2: I've been trying to communicate to people is the we
Speaker 2: are living through an age that is going to be
Speaker 2: so impactful. Nobody is going to everybody's going to be
Speaker 2: impacted by it. And it's a matter of are you
Speaker 2: ready for it, are you ready to adapt to it?
Speaker 2: Are you going to get ahead of the curve or
Speaker 2: you're going to be behind the curve. And my hope
Speaker 2: is as we discuss this periodically to make sure that
Speaker 2: you are ready for it, it doesn't take you by surprise,
Speaker 2: it doesn't overwhelm you, and that you actually take advantage
Speaker 2: of it by having more knowledge than other people and
Speaker 2: are fully aware of the magnitude of what's about to happen.
Speaker 2: It would be the equivalent of okay, well, communications changed
Speaker 2: when we had telephones. It would be the equivalent of
Speaker 2: electricity versus you know, having you know, a gas lamp
Speaker 2: in your house. It is that dramatic an innovation with
Speaker 2: artifice intelligence, so you know, the Tesla's optimist robot, which
Speaker 2: is what he was talking about on this call, he
Speaker 2: actually believes ultimately will eliminate much of the need for
Speaker 2: human labor. Now that that is a little bit shocking,
Speaker 2: earth shattering, but something I think I want all of
Speaker 2: you to be aware of so that you're prepared for it.
Speaker 2: And he's talking about humanoid robots are going to be
Speaker 2: a production challenge and it's not launching anytime soon. But again,
Speaker 2: I want you to be thinking in the future and
Speaker 2: not be sure, shocked or surprised by it. As I
Speaker 2: have spoken to people that are involved in this industry,
Speaker 2: what they're telling me is middle class families. This is
Speaker 2: sort of like the creation of the Model t and
Speaker 2: you know Henry Ford and the fact that he made
Speaker 2: it in a way that was affordable so the average
Speaker 2: person can own one, And the way they're designing these
Speaker 2: robots that would take care of mundane tasks for middle
Speaker 2: class Americans.
Speaker 1: We're talking about robots that will clean.
Speaker 2: Your house, cut your lawn, cook your dinner, you know,
Speaker 2: do all of these mundane tasks that you take for granted,
Speaker 2: put the sheets on your bed, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 2: It may sound crazy, but I'm telling you this is
Speaker 2: what they're telling me. And he has a bigger vision
Speaker 2: for robots. He wants them to transform the economy. That
Speaker 2: should be scary to everybody. He says, you know, people
Speaker 2: often talk about eliminating poverty, giving everyone amazing medical care.
Speaker 2: And this goes to my conversation with Gary Brecker, who's
Speaker 2: in the health, wellness, fitness, nutrition space. And Gary Breker says,
Speaker 2: if you live the next five years, the odds of
Speaker 2: you living to one hundred will go up exponentially.
Speaker 1: I agree with him.
Speaker 2: And I talk to a friend of mine that's in
Speaker 2: radiology and they are already using artificial intelligence, and what
Speaker 2: he has discovered is the ability of artificial intelligence to
Speaker 2: pick up spots on an MRI that no human eye
Speaker 2: would be able to detect. In other words, early detection
Speaker 2: is the key to longevity, especially on issues like cancer.
Speaker 2: And I believe probably we're going to look back on
Speaker 2: how we treat cancer today and one day we'll say
Speaker 2: we were living in the dinosaur era, and they are
Speaker 2: going to be far more sophisticated ways of detecting and
Speaker 2: treating cancers long before they get bad. Anyway, so Musk
Speaker 2: double down. He said optimists will actually eliminate poverty minutes earlier.
Speaker 2: The crowd cheered and broke out in chance of Elani
Speaker 2: Lan and the shareholders approved a trillion dollar pay package
Speaker 2: and he's the world's richest person. It will unlock up
Speaker 2: to a trillion dollars in shares if Tesla achieves the
Speaker 2: lofty targets, including selling a million Optimists robots in the
Speaker 2: next decade, I believe that will happen. Musk said that
Speaker 2: Optimists would change life for incarcerated people. He said, for
Speaker 2: instead of physically jailing prisoners, he said, you know, optimists
Speaker 2: will follow you around and stop you from doing crime
Speaker 2: and things like that. I don't know how, but just
Speaker 2: follow me here that these are his remarks, not mine.
Speaker 2: He said the robots would increase global economy by a
Speaker 2: factor of ten or even possibly one hundred, and I
Speaker 2: would argue even maybe greater than that. He did this
Speaker 2: on the Tesla third quarter earnings call. He imagines a
Speaker 2: world of sustainable abundance, a goal outlined by the Tesla
Speaker 2: master Plan Part four, with Optimists leading the way. An
Speaker 2: Optimist robot would have five times the productivity of any
Speaker 2: human being per year, he predicted, because it would be
Speaker 2: able to operate twenty four to seven. Let me stop here.
Speaker 2: There's a company in our Australia. A friend of mine
Speaker 2: sent me this video and sure enough, in less than
Speaker 2: a week, a massive, big warehouse is being built perfectly,
Speaker 2: no flaws at all, where it would take a construction
Speaker 2: company six months to a year. And you can see it.
Speaker 2: And maybe I should post it online, Linda, because it's
Speaker 2: worth posting it and eliminates waste and they work twenty
Speaker 2: four hours a day and the job gets done. He said,
Speaker 2: there's no limit how much AI can do in terms
Speaker 2: of enhancing the productivity of humans, and is not really
Speaker 2: a limit to AI that is embodied, he said. He
Speaker 2: said described how sustainable abundance and a robotic future. He
Speaker 2: told Joe Rogan, this will transform the economy. He said,
Speaker 2: I came to the conclusion that the only way to
Speaker 2: get us out of the debt crisis and to prevent
Speaker 2: America from going bankrupt is artificial intelligence and robotics. And
Speaker 2: he said that robots like Optimists will make working optional
Speaker 2: in the future. I don't like that part of it,
Speaker 2: as long as I think people need to be of
Speaker 2: service to other people.
Speaker 1: Really that's spiritual for me. But put that aside.
Speaker 2: It's not my thoughts here we'll have a benign scenario
Speaker 2: universal income. He's saying that the wealth that will be
Speaker 2: created and generated and food production generated, that there won't
Speaker 2: be something like poverty that exists. If you can build
Speaker 2: a home at one hundred and fifty dollars a square foot,
Speaker 2: everybody's going to have their own home. And that's how
Speaker 2: once the robotics are up and running and building homes
Speaker 2: or building out seventy or seventy five percent of them,
Speaker 2: that's what you're going to have. Is that anyone can
Speaker 2: have any product or service they want, but there'll be
Speaker 2: a lot of trauma disruption along the way. This is
Speaker 2: why I'm warning all of you. And he's not the
Speaker 2: only business leader that is touting the prospects of universal
Speaker 2: basic income. Saying that the money is not coming from
Speaker 2: the government, he's not suggesting that. I don't interpret it
Speaker 2: that way anyway. And Rogan, you know, said there's an
Speaker 2: economic irony here the capitalist implementation of AI and robotics,
Speaker 2: assuming he goes down the good path, and there's always
Speaker 2: a danger with technology that it can be used for
Speaker 2: something horrible, you know, could result in this utopia that
Speaker 2: we as conservatives launchly disagree with. I do believe that
Speaker 2: human beings are designed with talent and gifts from God,
Speaker 2: and you've got to bring him to fruition, and you
Speaker 2: can't be all about being served all day. But he said,
Speaker 2: AI robots will replace a lot of jobs. Working for
Speaker 2: some will be optional, like growing your own vegetables instead
Speaker 2: of buying them is optional. That's a pretty ambitious prediction.
Speaker 2: I'm not saying all of this is going to be true,
Speaker 2: but what I am saying is the economy's changing. And
Speaker 2: what I want to tie this into is Donald Trump's
Speaker 2: securing an other trillion trillion dollars. You know, the Saudi's
Speaker 2: committed up to a trillion of manufacturing in this country
Speaker 2: the next four years. Okay, that's going to be You know,
Speaker 2: we're gonna need workers for these jobs, and I want
Speaker 2: you to be ready to get those jobs. We're gonna
Speaker 2: have the energy sector building out like never before, high
Speaker 2: paying career jobs, and if you're interested, I want you
Speaker 2: to be ready for those jobs. I want you to
Speaker 2: be ready for the semiconductor manufacturing facilities, the pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities,
Speaker 2: the AI and robotic manufacturing facilities that they're going to
Speaker 2: need workers and they're also going to need a very
Speaker 2: well educated population to get in on this and be
Speaker 2: productive members of this new technology. And I would add
Speaker 2: to that, the tax cuts automatically are going to kick in,
Speaker 2: and when that does, that's going to be economic growth, prosperity, hopefully,
Speaker 2: the golden era that Donald Trump talks about. To me,
Speaker 2: it's just fascinating. Did that interest you at all? Into
Speaker 2: I wonder if I can hire about to replace you?
Speaker 1: Yeah, why don't you? Same sass.
Speaker 2: Will teach him to be sassy, sarcastic, you know, to
Speaker 2: try and get me angry every day before the fool
Speaker 2: of vinegar.
Speaker 1: It'll be great.