WEBVTT - Merck’s Progress Toward a Coronavirus Vaccine

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly. We're right here every day bringing you the

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>latest news from the world's of business and finance, plus technology, politics, economics,

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>all harnessing the power of Business Week reporters and editors.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>And of course Carol that's part of a team of

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven hundred journalists and analysts more than a hundred

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and twenty countries and Jason. You can download Bloomberg Business

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, bl Bloomberg dot com. You can

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio every weekday, or watch us on YouTube

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>by searching Bloomberg Global News. Checking out some of the headlines.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to the virus, we saw infections among

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 1>US children grow in the last half of July, and

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that's according to a recent report. Uh and this as

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Alex and I were just talking for a New York

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>audience about there really is a debate about whether school

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>should reopen in the fall. We're gonna reopen here in

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>New York City, but if you look across the country,

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that debate is certainly raging. Let's talk about the latest

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>on the virus and the headlines he is watching back

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>with us is Dr Sandra Golia. He's dean and professor

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>at Boston University School of Public Health, author of Pained

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Uncomfortable Conversations about the public's health, and he joins us

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>once again on the phone from Boston. Dr Gala, great

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to have you here with Alex and myself. This rise

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 1>in cases of the virus among children, what should we

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>know about that? Well, thanks for having me, Carrol and Alex. Well,

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing cases among all ages and uh and

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a rise in cases in many parts of

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the country, which has resulted in the highest numbers of

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>cases that we've had any time in the pandemic. Now

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>we are our overall numbers are actually starting to go

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>down slowly. The fact that we're seeing some more cases

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>among children is not altogether surprising, given that we are

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>slowly reopening schools and there has been a relaxing of

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>many of the social distancing norms. To my mind, the

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>question we should be asking ourselves at the moment is

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>how do we balance making sure that we keep people

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>as safe as possible, managing risk as much as possible,

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and also meet social and ecomic functions that we need

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to meet the schools, and school reopening is really important.

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>We know that children do not learn as well if

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>they're strictly in a digital environment. We know that children

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>who are disadvantaged already fall further behind if they're not

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in school. Now, that does not mean that we should

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>be reopening schools at all costs. It simply means that

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.839
<v Speaker 1>we should be thinking carefully about how we can get

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>as close to as possible to giving the best possible

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>education while also managing risk. So there was this survey

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that went out to all the teachers and said, you know,

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>do you want to return to school? How safe do

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you feel? And then it was sent back to me

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>as a parent for where the public school that my

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>daughter goes to. And then the teacher of our kindergarten

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>class followed it up and and said that she didn't

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to school, And I asked her,

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.119
<v Speaker 1>I was like, so, what really is the problem, like specifically,

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 1>And I guess what really comes up for all these

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>teachers is the air quality in the classrooms, especially because

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the majority of these public schools are not well ventilated

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and there are super old buildings. They have those bars

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>on them, so it's hard to even get like an

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>air conditioner in there. What can be done to fix

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that in a realistic kind of way. Yeah, I know,

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it's an excellent question, and I think there have been

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a number of teachers and the organizations who have had concerns.

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>And these questions are very school by school and district

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>by district specific, because certainly there are any number of

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>districts that have the capacity to upgrade the schools or

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>or or have newer buildings, and other ones that do not.

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, the the answer really depends on the school.

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>But there's nothing magical that can be done. But each

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>school needs to have its ventilation inspected, it's air flow inspected,

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the physical layout inspected. And to my mind, it's not

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>unreasonable to say that any number of schools are reasonable

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and safe to open, and some may not be. But

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to um Dr Galia that I do wonder

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly many are saying we're going to have more viruses

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>akin to what we're dealing with now in the future.

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>So do we all need to look at all of

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the air our systems in schools, in office buildings. Do

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we kind of need to rework them? Rethink them. I

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>think in the long term, we have learned in this

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>moment that we definitely need to do that, and it

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly seems to be one of the greatest strategies of

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>this moment will be if we do not learn from it.

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>We certainly have learned that we need to make sure

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that we have proper airflow and ventilation in all buildings

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to anticipate events like this. In the short term, I

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>think we do need to look at building by building,

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>case by case basis. And what what always troubles me

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in the public conversation is the reductionist yes or no argument,

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>with one one side saying well, we must open all

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>schools everywhere, another side saying we cannot open any school anywhere,

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and neither of those sides are correct. Ultimately, the answer

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is one of careful, thoughtful approach, looking at the region,

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at the at the case positivity rate of the

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>virus in the region, looking at the nature of the schools,

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>looking at what the schools can put in place in

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of social distancing, in terms of ventilation, and and

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 1>allowing thoughtful decisions to be made locally responsive to local needs.

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>So um, there's only one right answer for me right

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>here on this question. Do those U V air purifier

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>things work? And you have to say yes, Well, well,

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>given that you know what the answer should be, I

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like no, seriously, is that what's in your schools?

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that that's what I want to put in a

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>school classrooms? That's emailing the principle about it. Anyway, I

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>am not aware that the evidence of such that most

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of those work in isolation. Now, no, I'm sorry, I'm sorry.

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So what kind of system do you need? Well, you

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you would need environmental engineers to talk about specifications for that.

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>The my understanding is that fundamentally what you need is

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>reasonable airflow, and different schools and different for example, subways

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and planes, they're designed with different capacities for the fundamentally

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you want is that aerosols are not hanging around, They're

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>not lingering. Right. We now know that the virus is

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>transmitted via aerosols. So essentially, if somebody coughs somebody's nieces,

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the virus is going to stay around for many seconds,

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>many minutes, many hours. And what you want is you

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>want to have airflow so that the virus then moves

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>on and and that is very much building by building

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>structure by structure dependent right, right, which is why people

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>say opening up windows. And they all also have talked

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>about airplanes that the kind of the airflow that comes

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>from down kind of helps to the air quay, um course,

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>and that's and that's why we haven't seen we haven't

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>seen any large number of outbreaks from airplanes, even though

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>airplanes are obviously complied spaces. It's because they have good airflow.

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's also why we've seen relatively few cases that

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 1>are transmitted in the outside, because when you're in the outside,

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>there is good So we'll get to what you're gonna

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>do with your school into a second. But I did

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>want to start about the inequality because Bill Gates was

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>on CNN over the weekend and he called it catastrophic

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>and mind blowing how bad testing here is in the US,

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and specifically talked about the inequities of it, like, if

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you're rich, you can get a fast test, and no,

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you're okay. If you're not, then you don't. What do

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you think? Well, I think Bill Gates is right. The

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal just run a long piece today about

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>inequities and testing, which I'm quoted in a few times,

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and the bottom line is that we have been terrible

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>at keeping equity at front and center throughout this entire

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>COVID pandemic. We we there is no way we can

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>say that we have done anything but poorly when we

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>have such enormous racial disparities in risk of getting coronavirus

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and risk of death from COVID, And fundamentally what's been

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>going on is it's a reflection of underlying racial inequities

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in the country. You are seeing underlying inequities in core morbidity,

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>ease and prior diseases, in jobs which allow one to

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>social distance or not, and all of that is manifesting

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>in COVID. Now the testing, which of course is an

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>entirely problem of our own making, adds a layer on

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to it that it has become very easy to get

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a test if you are well connected or wealthy. It's

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>become quite difficult to get a test if you're if

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you're none of those things, and of course if you're

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>none of those things is when you are more likely

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to need a test. So we have great a situation

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>where our underlying conditions has put marginalized people a greater risk.

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>It has taken people who are health left behind and

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>made their health worse. And now compounding that, we are

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>not making testing available to try to restore health to

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the group that needs it most. So what's preventing that

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>from happening, um Dr Galleia. Is it just the physical

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>test not being available? Is it not enough testing sites?

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>What's holding it all back? You know, fundamentally, you do

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>not you do not fix inequities without paying attention to them.

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>The in order to fix something that has been structurally

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong for a long time, you have to say I

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>want to fix this, and I'm going to make an

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>effort so to come to testing. If you have a

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred tests and you say, well, I'm just going to

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>distribute them evenly, what ends up happening is eighty of

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>them end up in the hands of people who have

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 1>resources already. In order to get eighty of them in

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the hands of people who don't have resources, you have

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to distribute the tests in such a way such that

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>people who are disadvantaged have are at the front of

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the line and getting those tests. And we just have

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>not done that. We we have not made the effort

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to say where are the communities of color, where the

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>poor communities, Where are the communities with the highest prevalence,

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>with the highest density of COVID, those are the ones

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>who need the test the most, and let's make sure

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that the tests are available in those communities. Center. Who

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>do you mean we? Like? Who needs to be the folks?

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's do this right. You know, I like it.

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 1>I like the word we because I don't want to

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 1>absolve us. I don't want to absolve me. I don't

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>want absolve you because I think fundamentally, fundamentally, the decision

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>comes centrally right. Fundamentally, these decisions are federal. They come

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in the f d A, and they come from the

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>distribution of tests to the state and from the states

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 1>to their counties and their communities. But the reason I

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>think we is a better term is because we collectively

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>are allowing this to happen, and we should not be

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>allowing this to happen. And I'm very grateful to you

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>for actually voicing this on your show. On the flip side, though,

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of talk about poorer and minority

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>populations getting the vaccine, for example, for is because that

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.239
<v Speaker 1>they've been harder hit. But there's a lot of controversy

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>around that also, particularly if they're wound wind up being

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>some side effects. Yeah, I know it's that that is

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be a difficult issue. I think it's almost

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>premature to even have this conversation, to be frank, just

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>because we do not know what the vaccines are going

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to be, like, we do not know what their side

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>effect profiles are going to be, what their effectacy are

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 1>going to be. But whatever we end up with, if

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>we have an applications vaccine, we should make sure that

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the people who need it most are the ones who

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>get it first. And people who needed most are those

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>who are most at risk of coronavirus. And that means

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>people who are in contact with coronavirus. That includes first responders,

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>That includes people in minority communities, That includes people who

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>are working in jobs where they cannot social distance. I

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>think any other way of distributing vaccine would be unfair.

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I was going to ask you about school's reopening, but

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Alex went a really great place. Um

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and we've only got about a minute left, But I

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>do wonder are we rushing this vaccine too quickly? The

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>magazine this week is going to be all about the vaccine,

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine and a hunt for a vaccine, but I

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 1>do wonder we don't oh, really the consequences and just

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>have about forty five seconds here, Yeah, we did not there.

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>There are two large trials going on, each with thirty

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>patients in them. They are I'm not involved in design

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of these trials, but my senses that they are designed

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to the state of the science. And as long as

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>we are getting our vaccines, testing them appropriately in large trials,

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>making sure they have a good safety profile and good

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>efficacy profile, I think we should embrace the fact that

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>science has moved forward and we can have vaccines faster

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 1>than we ever have been able to end the past.

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>All Right, We're gonna leave it on that note. Um, Sandra,

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.839
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Dr Sandra Glea, dean at the

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Boston University School of Public Health, author have pained uncomfortable

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>conversations about the public's health. Back with us on the

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>phone from Boston. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Masser and Jason Kelly on Bloomberg Radio. This week, the

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>magazine is taking a deep dive into a vaccine for

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the virus that includes a story a drug giant Mark

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>taking a slow and steady approach as we know many

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of its rivals have really been racing for a vaccine.

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into this. Joining us right now is Bloomberg

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>News US healthcare reporter Riley Griffin joining us on the

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>phone in New York City, and Bloomberg Business Week nitor

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Joe Webber on the phone in Massachusetts and jil This week,

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned, UM, the issue looking at everyone working

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>on a vaccine was so much going on globally. How

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.599
<v Speaker 1>did you guys approach the coverage here? So one of

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the things that we realized is that there's got no

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 1>bigger story in the world right now, and that's sayings

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>have been considering. You know, we've seen social unrest, we're

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>about to see in an election, but uh that that

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>clearly a lot of hinges on. But you know, I

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>think we're we've all been fixated on UM, on everything

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>around the vaccine to the point that you know, we're

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>we're all becoming sort of better scientists and understanding um,

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>how even approaches to vaccines can work, let alone you know,

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the trials that all of them entail. So we figured,

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>let's like look at this on the biggest level that

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>we can, but not just look at it in terms

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of like the companies and the horse races, so much

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.319
<v Speaker 1>as all the other things that have to happen around

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine. It's like getting a vaccine is ultimately getting

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a formula, right, but you have to get production distribution,

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>there's politics, there's a whole bunch of other stuff. So

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>we've really devoted a lot of this issue to looking

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>at all these facets. But let's not forget the foot

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>race either, right. I think that Um was really captivating

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>about Mark in this context is a lot of the

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>big vaccines that have come to civilization in the past

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>decades have actually come from Murk. And while other approaches

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>are racing, like you said, Carol, to get this thing

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>done quickly. Murcusan. You know, we're not gonna be the

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>first out of the gate, but we're we know what

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>we're doing when it comes to vaccines. And that's what

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Riley was able to write about Um and Riley talk

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to us more about what Mark, Why Mark sets the

0:13:56.160 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>bar where it sets it when it comes to vaccine development. Yeah. Absolutely, Well,

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to take you back a few months actually

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to the final weeks of May and Mark first announced

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>they would be pursuing two coronavirus vaccines and an anti

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>viral treatment. To be frank the news came rather late

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>at the time. The coronavirus had already swept the US,

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and within days of that announcement we marked more than

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand deaths in this country. UM at the

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>time though we were thinking through Mark, which has more

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>than a hundred years dominating the vaccine space, it had

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to have something brewing. In fact, I had UM. It's

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>spoken with the director of the National Institutes of Health

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>at the time, Francis Collins, who has said to me,

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>don't count Mark out quite yet. And I think you'll

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>find that those who know the vaccine world well always

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>hold that opinion. Don't count Mark out because though they

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>might take a more conservative approach to vaccine development, they

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>have quite the track record, as you mentioned. And to

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about that track record briefly, I mean Mark is

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>responsible for the first U s and oculations for the chickenpox,

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Mabella measles and months. In fact, that Month's vaccine is

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the quickest to go through the development to market in

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a matter of four years. Nobody has since beaten that record.

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Most American kids now get Mark produced vaccines for all

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>four of those things. And to top it off, the

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>company of pioneered Vaccines for HPV and Justice has December

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>bibola and that was the first vaccine ever approved for

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that virus. So they have scheme in the game. They

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>know how to do this work. And even though there

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>are more than a hundred and sixty vaccines in various

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>stages of development for the coronavirus, twenty six of those

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>which have entered human trials. Murk is coming later, but

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got to watch work closely because they know what

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. So when we talk about like a slow

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>roll of slow rolling vaccines, like, what what does that mean?

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Do they just like do more testing? Is it more trials? Yeah.

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So we've spoken with top researchers and executives at the

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>company and their goal right now is to have global impact.

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So they started there to avelopment process later, but they're

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>taking a threefold approach. They want to have a shot

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that's effective in a single dose. That's notable because some

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of the front runners that we see today they take

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a two dose approach, a vaccine plus a booster. They

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>also want to make sure it can be easily distributed

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>around the world. And last, they want to rely on

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>triad in true technology. So they're employing this kind of

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>old school approach that they have for decades um now

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>augmented with genetic engineering to add COVID specific proteins are arena.

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>They've settled on these two candidates, once based on their

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>epola vaccine and the other based on an existing measles vaccine.

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>So to put that in perspective in terms of timeline,

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the measles vaccine is going to launch into human trials

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>later this month. The ebola trial, meanwhile, will kick start

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in the fall. And again the fall is when we're

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>hearing some companies say they're gonna gonna seek an emergency

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>use authorization. The market is just starting some of their

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>human trial at that point in time. One executive, speaking

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 1>in a congressional hearing said, we shouldn't expect them to

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>come to market with a vaccine until at the earliest.

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>But their goal here isn't to be first, it's to

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>be best. So so talk to us more about what

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that that best might might look like, Riley, because if

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>they're taking this tread and true, slow and steady sort

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of approach, we could see other vaccines using different technology

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>come out first and maybe be something that you could see,

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, embraced by first responders for instance. So where

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>does Mark feel like the their their role in this

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>marketplace is exactly Yeah. Their goal is really to bring

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 1>a single dose shot that generates immunity very quickly. And

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that's an important point to make because the reality is,

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>even though there are a hundred and sixty vaccines in

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>various stages of development, we really don't have a silver

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>bullet thus far. There are so many lingering unknown how

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>many doses are going to be needed to grant suficient immunity,

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>how long will that immunity laugh, well, we need a

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>vaccine every six months, once a year, every two years,

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>and what populations will it work within? You know, I

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>cover this vaccine race. I speak with CEO's of Feiser

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and other frontrunners, and they they're starting to be a

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit more open, a little more candid about the

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that we might end up with a coronavirus vaccine

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 1>that operates more like a seasonal flu shot that you

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>need frequently, and we don't know who it's really going

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to work within or what level of efficacy it will reach.

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Mark is watching this all unfold in real time, and

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, yes, there are these unknowns, Yes, these these vaccines.

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>It's important to get them out first, but they might

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>be sub subpar in some ways. And rather than the

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>first market, they want that one dose shot that provides

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>sufficient immunity for a very durable period of time. And

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>so they're not gonna hedge their bets on new technology

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.959
<v Speaker 1>like Maderna, like Feiser and bio en texts. They're going

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to turn to this old school technology that actually is

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 1>quite interesting. In a question I get often from readers

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and healthcare folks is why isn't Mark pursuing m R

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and A like Maderna. Here's a little history. Wait, you know, Riley,

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we're running out of time, but this is a great

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>teaser for everyone to kind of check out the story

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com and I'll put it out on Twitter,

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and of course it will be in the magazine because

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to cut you short in terms of

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>your explanation, but I highly recommend that this is a

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>must read for everyone wanting to understand about the race

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>for a vaccine. Riley Griffin, thank you so much. Bloomberg

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>News US healthcare reporter on the phone in New York,

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>and of course our thanks to Bloomberg Business we get

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>our Jill Weber on the phone in Massachusetts. This is

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Jason Kelly on

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Let's continue a conversation that we've had often

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 1>with Andy Brown, editorial director at Bloomberg New Economy. He's

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>on the phone in New York. Um, Andy, I do

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like you know, this is something we have talked about,

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Jason and I certainly a lot with with you, and

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I know um Alex has been covering it. I mean,

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.199
<v Speaker 1>in terms of TikTok, how do we see it at

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>this point? And the banning of TikTok, it just doesn't

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>seem to make sense. It doesn't make a huge amount

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of sense. I mean, the White House are trying to

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:28.360
<v Speaker 1>present TikTok and and we chat as being these unique

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Chinese threats to US national security with the with the

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>capability of potentially of undermining US democracy. And you know

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it in one way, it has a point, right that

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that TikTok. Actually it's not just this this platform that

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>plays out goroo free videos. I mean, it is an

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>enormous data collection surveillance machine. It's collecting all kinds of

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>information on use a hundred million of them in the

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, drawing up you know, detailed profiles

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of all these people. It once it is dated to

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>push videos at them. But of course, you know it

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>could if the Chinese government wanted If the government wanted it,

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it would have to probably hand this data

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>over to the Chinese government. And then there's also the

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>fear that it could use this data, um, you know,

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 1>for political purposes, potentially to influence the next election. But

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you know that the fourceful analysts are saying that this

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>is this is not necessarily a China problem. You know,

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a privacy issue, the data privacy issue, and

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and Reach are behaving just like their peers in

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States, which are also these you know, surveillance

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>machines big Brother in your pocket. And the smart neutral

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>way of handling this would be to better regulate these

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>all of these social media companies, not just the Chinese

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Chinese ones, in a way that you know is acceptable

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to broadly to the US society. Well, I was going

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to ask that because I'm really trying to understand what

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the national security issue is with TikTok privacy in terms

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of say nine year old using it and then having

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>porn images there. That's one thing. But is it that

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>China is going to so disinformation in the US or

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>try and disrupt commonly held views in the US, or

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is it literally stealing data and then using it somehow

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>against them? So, so the Chinese security law basically demands

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:33.919
<v Speaker 1>that um, you know, if if if they're social media

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>companies are asked for data, if any company is asked

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 1>for data, they're going to have to turn it over

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to the government. And I think that's pretty much what

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>would have to happen. You don't say no if you're

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese business or any business, you don't say no

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Chinese government. So that's that's one level of concern.

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>But the other level of concern is that TikTok actually

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>is inside the hots and minds um of a hundred

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>million Americans, um, you know, and many of them you know, uh, millennials,

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and um. There is a genuine fear that if it

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to, it could weaponize this data for political purposes.

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>But again, this isn't just the TikTok problem. I mean

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>they are all playing this game, right, I mean, Facebook

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram and Twitter. This is the this is the

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>industry standard. And so you know people are saying, well, well,

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>if that's a problem, then then regulated, right, But don't

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>just pick on the Chinese companies, right, And it makes

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>me wonder andy to um the rest of Silicon Valley.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, as we know, we did see the big

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>tech CEOs a lot of them you know, hauled before

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Congress once again. But I do wonder you know, if

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we're worried about privacy, then we, as you said, you

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 1>need to make it a regulatory thing. And look at

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 1>all big tech right, right, I mean you know, and

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that's just one of the issues. And the other

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>thing is it's it's just a really terrible look for

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a democracy, um that purports to you know, uphold values

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.959
<v Speaker 1>of the free market, to be seen knocking out the

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>biggest competitive threat to Silicon Valley, that is that is

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>ever out of China. This isn't just a little a

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 1>little app. You know that this is like the smash

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>hit app of the decade. Maybe maybe you know, make

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:18.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe of this of this century. And um, you know,

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in China, people are rightfully outraged the same you know,

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>they're pulling down, they're pulling down a competitor um or

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>forcing its sale, you know, with a with a gun

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to its head at a at a at a knockdown price.

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean even even Bill Gates, I mean of Microsoft

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>is in is in talks to pick it up. And

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates over the weekend was quoted as saying, this

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 1>is really weird. You know, yeah, exactly, And you do

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>wonder what will be ultimately the consequences when you know

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>we've already seen China start to fight back about different things,

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and you do wonder what it means then ultimately for

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>US tech in a in a market like China. Um, Andy,

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Always appreciate getting some time with you.

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 1>Andy Brown, Editorial director of bloom a New Economy, on

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the phone from New York City. This is Bloomberg Business

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Jason Kelly on Bloomberg Radio.

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>McDonald's stock going nowhere today, but the headlines came fast

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 1>and furious in really an unbelievable story. And joining us

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>now to talk more about that is Anne Raley Moffatt,

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News US Consumer Editor. She joins us on the phone.

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 1>And this is like the gift that keeps on giving.

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can you just break down what we learned

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>today about the former CEO, Mr Easterbrook and multiple affairs

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and what it means for McDonald's. Sure, and this certainly

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>feels like a story of if anything ever was so.

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Steve Easterbrook had been McDonald's CEO and he was fired

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>last November. That was public at the time we reported it. Um,

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.719
<v Speaker 1>he came out and admitted to having a contensual affair

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>with an employee, and so it's the me too era.

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>He was ousted. The company said it stands by its values, um,

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>because when we just seen your jack for a second,

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't not okay for in the company for him

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to do that, like we've seen, not allowed to have

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>any sort of relationships with anyone in the company, just

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to be told yeah, well they you know, they never

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>have revealed who it was. But considering he's the CEO,

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that means he's at the top, so everyone is technically

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>under him. And and at the time the company was

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>really cracking down on misconduct within its franchise level. You know,

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>people who are flipping burgers, um, you know, the whole

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>meat too. Era. So I think they decided a zero

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 1>tolerance policy. So at the time they let him walk

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>away with we calculated about seventy three million dollars in severalth.

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>It was a consensual relationship. They were all adults. Fast

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>forward to now, the company received an anonymous tip in

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>July from an employee, um, which resulted in them reopening

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the investigation. And it turned out Easterbrook had affairs with

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 1>at least three other employees. Yeah and um, not only

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that it looks like he lied about it, the company

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is saying that he tried to delete evidence, delete in

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>some naked photos off of his computer. Um. And so

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the company now wants to change it to firing him,

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, with cause instead of without a cause, so

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>that they can get that severance back. So that's the

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>losses they filed today, which is a crazy story. So

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:10.159
<v Speaker 1>how likely and is that? And I know, you know, UM,

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious what you're hearing from lawyers from the

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>legal world about how likely it is that they can

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 1>do this. Yeah. Well, you know, companies and uh former executives,

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they often settle these clawback matters privately because they want

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep it out of the press. Uh. In this case,

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I think McDonald's decided the board really wanted to distance

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.360
<v Speaker 1>itself from this inappropriate behavior, so they brought it out

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in the open. You know, that happens every now and

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>then rental car company hurts. For example, it suited's former

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>CEO to recoup compensation after that federal investigation. Um, you

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>prompted the company to restate several years of financial results.

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 1>So every now and then this does happen publicly. But

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I think McDonald's is really taking a stand and trying

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to distance themselves by putting this out there for everyone

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>to see today. So let's just let's just backcheck a

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>second here, okay, because you're gonna glossed over all the

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. So it wasn't that he had multiple It

0:27:59.880 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>was just that he had multiple affairs. It wasn't just

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that they found some stuff in his files. It was

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that they were naked suggestive pictures and videos that he

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>sent from his his account at McDonald's to his personal

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>email account that they didn't find because he deleted them.

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>But then once they went back and looked at the server,

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>they were able to find them. I mean, first of all,

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>can that guy be really well, don't do that your

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>naked pictures. Just use a different phone exactly, CEO one

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>oh one oh one. Don't send naked photos of your

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>employees from your you know, from your public account to

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 1>your private account. Um, but that's absolutely right. And um,

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the company did do an investigation last fall

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>when this first relationship came out. UM, but it said

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it didn't sign the photographs because Easterbrook apparently has had

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>deleted them off of his work issued phone. But I

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>think what he didn't realize, at least what the company

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:51.719
<v Speaker 1>says he didn't realize, was that that didn't take them

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>off of the server where things are stored long term.

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Now we should mention that Easterbrook has not replied yet

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to this complaint. Um. We reached out to his attorneys

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and haven't heard anything back. So as of now, it's

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the company's allegations, but they are certainly quite juicy

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>for Boomberg News. I would say, yeah, it's amazing though

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that right that he was able to do it right.

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>It stayed quiet and then all of a sudden somebody

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>has come out with this information and I guess we'll

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>find out more details as to potentially who this person

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>was a good job with that investigation, you guys. Um,

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think some of it also has to

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>do with, you know, the me too movement that you know,

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a big thing we were hearing about last year.

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly still continuing even though the COVID story has

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly taken over you know, the press, but there's still

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is way less forgiveness for badly behaving CEOs and so. Yes,

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it took until July for this anonymous tip to come out,

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I just think workers aren't willing to

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>put up with this kind of behavior anymore, and so

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody decided to step up. Does McDonald's like get any

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>money from this? I mean in that like they don't

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have to pay extra stuff Like could this actually be

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>financially material for them at the end of the day

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>if they win? You know, I think it's really getting

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>back these these stock awards UM, which is thirty seven

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. You know, that's certainly uh not chump change,

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and at any damage is uh you know, but it's

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>not about the money. I think it's much more about reputation. Um.

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>And I mean if it's interesting because you know, stocks

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't move much on this today. But back in November

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>when Easterbrook was oustid share his this fault. I mean,

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 1>he was very popular with Wall streets. UM. He had

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>done a lot of good things for the company, moved

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it into a technological digital age. He'd acquired stakes in

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>several AI companies that did cool things like when you

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>drove through the drive through, it would uh it can

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>read your license late and know that you usually order

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a opera, so maybe a will to start getting wopper ready.

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he had been seen as very uh forward

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking for a fast food ceo. UM, So I think

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>there's really surprised people when you stepped down in November.

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>It probably surprises people even more right now. Alright, we're

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave it on that note. In the stock right

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>now is kind of little changed for the day. Despital

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of this news trading at two o four sixty two.

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh share um, and thank you so much. And Raley

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Moffatt Bloomberg News report. She covers the US consumer space.

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm roc journal now, but you let me drive no no,

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>no home, honey, please, I'll do the righting drivel Lets

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>me I want to drive, just drive by the question

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>trying this is the Drive to the Globe. Give me thanks.

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll drying us down on Bloomberg Radio. All right, everybody,

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>time for the Drive to the close and with us

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>as Katerina Semonetti. She's senior VP at EBS Private Wealth Management,

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and she joins us on the phone from Philadelphia. Katerina,

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>good to have you here with Alex and myself. The

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>last time I think we talked with you, or at

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>least I remember, back in February you talked with us

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>about the virus concerns on the economy eacuity market. She

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>thought that they would be short lived. Here we are

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>in August and we're still kind of grappling with them,

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>although Wall Street seems to be in a pretty good place.

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>How do you kind of reconcile what's going on in

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the economy versus what's going on in the financial markets. Well,

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Tierra and Alex, thank you for having me on the show.

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>And I can't agree with you more. There's nothing normal

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>about this year, and you know it certainly is absolutely unpredictable.

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>And um the one thing we have to remind ourselves

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>about is that you know, we're in this um, you

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>know situation. What's happening in the market right now is

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>not primarily economically driven. It is this external factor is

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the virus that you know, we we can we always

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>have to keep keep track on. And you know what

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is interesting is despite of the fact that we had

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>this very substantial first wave and now we're dealing with

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the second wave, they would we see is this very

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>gradual and mesodic reopening up the economy. And what's certainly

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is helping is the fact that they they are you

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>know economy and actually you know, globally, the markets are

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>flushed with cash, you know, through this unprecedented support by

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve and central banks, uh, you know around

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the world. You know, so with the the strong monetary policy,

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, coupled with the essentially you know, important fiscal

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>stimulus that you know, we're hoping for, you know, the

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>second part of it that is going to be you know,

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>coming through soon here. You know. That's why markets feel

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>so supported. And also certain sectors of the markets, of course,

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>they are benefited tremendously from the state home narrative. Uh.

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we're seeing, that's why we're seeing this rally,

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, that is happening right now as not a bubble,

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.959
<v Speaker 1>but something that is quite sustainable actual, So how low

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>can really yields go? And I single out really yields

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like that is truly what's driving asset

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>allocation right now. I agree, Uh, they they can go.

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>It's quite low. And you know, when we when we

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>look at the yields right now, Um, you know, the

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the question is, you know, investors need yield, they need income,

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, and where do we truly find it? And

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>more and more, in addition to the the areas of

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>six income, which by the way, we still believe that

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>there's certain attractive evaluations in the sixth income in areas

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>like tips, like corporate credit, like you know, high yield,

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>but more and more investors are really evaluating the risk

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>pull files and looking at the dividend things stops at equities,

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, as the the higher yielding alternatives because it

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is just so unbelievably hard to you know, to find yield.

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 1>And we are you know, basically the bed um rate

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>is that zero right now? Can it go negative? We

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>hope not? But is it a possibility? Absolutely? Is the

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 1>possibility with you know, in Europe, what's the scenario planning

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>though that you're doing because of that, I mean, what

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:55.320
<v Speaker 1>are the assumptions that I mean, you guys have to

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 1>make some decisions in terms of investment strategy. What are

0:34:58.239 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the assumptions you're making when it comes the yield environment?

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>We are we're looking at every aspect of the of

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the aspidillocation and specifically at the UH there is the

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>involvement of the risk asset, you know, and the question is,

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, of course here is is are we properly

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>utilizing every piece of the allocation and you know, just

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>just as usual assallocation will involve it will involve a

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, verry significant cash balance, and there's the cash

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is not earning anything at all practically, you know, so

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 1>we have to evaluate that. We have to come back

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and say we only should keep as much in cash

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.839
<v Speaker 1>as we absolutely need to pour the you know, six

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:42.320
<v Speaker 1>months to possibly twelve months or of living expenses for

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 1>uh your individual clients and then you know, specifically within

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>sixth income. We have to be extremely strictlyatur you know,

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>again evaluating the spectors. You know, maybe uh, the the

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.720
<v Speaker 1>acid allocation there you know, should definitely involve investment, credit

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and tips and um. You know, as they mentioned high yield.

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not as simple as just um, you know,

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the the treasuries or you know, just just more basic

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>portfolio and both you know, the strategic planning and uh

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:13.240
<v Speaker 1>A diversification you know, within within fixed income, both by credit,

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 1>both by quality of the holding cludent the portfolio, but

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>also the duration and the finding yield is not just

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a problem now, this is something that we will have

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to be facing for years to come. The strategic planning

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 1>right now will have to be not just for the

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>short term, it has to be long term based. So

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>where does gold fit into that? Then? The gold is

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic hedge against volatile markets, and we have to

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>remind ourselves that we're not really out of the woods.

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, what's affecting this market right now is the

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that there's no vaccine yet, even though we're really

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 1>positive and enthusiastic about developments in that space, but there

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is no vaccine, and then we have less than hundreds

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>days left until the election, and there's a lot of

0:36:57.200 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>volatility that comes with that. Um So gold there, you know,

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just just offering this wonderful hedge for the post

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>folios and usually negative side of gold. Why would we

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:10.280
<v Speaker 1>advocate against world is because it's a non yielding asset, Claud.

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:13.800
<v Speaker 1>But to your point, in the environment where real yields

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:16.840
<v Speaker 1>are so low, that's where gold fits in great And

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>we also in the future, we actually you know, are

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>anticipating they that eventual depreciation in the value of you

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>as dollar, and gold will benefit in that scenario. So

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>we think that the longer term positioning of gold is

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.800
<v Speaker 1>actually quite strong, not just as a hedge against volatile markets,

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>which we expect heightened level of volatility with upcoming election,

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, but also longer term benefiting from some of

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the economic trends. Hey, Katerina, just got about forty seconds

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, where don't you want to be in this

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>market environment, we are cautioning investors against sectors like consumer staples,

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 1>real estate, and utilities. We think the longer term there

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to be time for them, but not right now.

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Right now, this is probably our nest favorite sectors of

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the market. Alright, We're gonna leave it on that note.

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Katerita Semonetti, she's senior vice president at EUBS Private Wealth Management,

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from Philadelphia. Thanks so much

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, Southcloud,

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Blomberg dot com, or wherever you get your podcasts. And

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 1>of course you can always listen to our radio show

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:27.359
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News