WEBVTT - Big Oil vs. Divestment

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Drilled listeners.

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 2>We are still on a production hiatus working on our

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 2>next season, but there's a little sneak peek of that

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 2>season at the end of this episode, so make sure

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 2>you listen to the end for that. The reason we're

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>coming at you today is because I had the opportunity

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 2>to speak with David Serrata about a recent piece that

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 2>he did in his newsletter TMI too much Information. You

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 2>might recognize David's name from his previous gig at The

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Guardian or as a speechwriter for Bernie Sanders. I wanted

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 2>to talk to him because I get his newsletter and

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 2>I saw an item in there that we had actually

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 2>missed on our policy trackers, so I added it. But

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>I also wanted to get the backstory on it.

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>It was a.

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Sort of obscure, little proposed rule that basically makes it

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 2>harder to to invest retirement funds in environmentally sustainable funds.

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>It's been pushed mostly by the fossil fuel industry, no surprise,

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 2>and we're going to pick up this conversation with David

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 2>explaining more about it in a minute after this message

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 2>from today's sponsor. I'm a Westervelt and this is Drilled.

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 3>So I was I was hoping that you could start

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 3>by sort of saying, you know, what is this rule

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 3>change and what brought it to your attention initially?

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 4>Sure, So ESG investing is basically the technical term for environmental,

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 4>social and governance based investing, And what that's a lot

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 4>of jargon for is investing in a way that takes

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 4>into account what the companies you're investing in are actually

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 4>doing in the world and how their corporate behavior affects

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 4>the environment and the like. And to be clear, it's

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 4>not just to make you as an investor feel good,

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 4>but there's also a financial reason that proponents argue that

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 4>you want to engage in this kind of investing. For instance,

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 4>you don't necessarily want to be investing your retirement money

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 4>in investments that are at risk of being destroyed by

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 4>climate change. Or you don't want to be investing your

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 4>money in investments that are based on destroying the climate

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 4>and could be financially imperiled at the point, hopefully soon

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 4>that we actually take action to not use those products anymore.

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 4>So you don't necessarily want your retirement savings in oil

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 4>companies if you think that at some point we're going

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 4>to basically say, you know what, we have to use

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 4>less oil to not destroy the entire planet. So that's

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 4>what ESG investing is. And the Trump administration has put

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 4>forward a rule that aims to make it harder for

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 4>financial managers to help you move your money and help

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 4>worker retirement systems move that money into ESG investments. Now,

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 4>what the Trump administration says is that the current existing

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 4>Labor Department rules about how financial managers have to invest

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 4>other people's money, that those long standing rules say that

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 4>the financial manager must prioritize above everything else, they have

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 4>a fiduciary responsibility to maximize returns regardless of what kind

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 4>of investments the money is going into. Now, there's a

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 4>good reason for that basic idea of fiduciary responsibility that

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 4>you don't want financial managers to be able to self deal.

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 4>You don't want people who are managing your money to

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 4>be able to just throw their friends your money for

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 4>reasons that have nothing to do with whether they're generating

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 4>good returns. But what the Trump administration is doing, and

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 4>which is so insidious, is that they are taking that

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 4>understandably good concept of fiduciary responsibility and then saying, in effect,

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 4>that that means it should be harder to invest in

0:04:56.160 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 4>ESG investments, and the underlying insinuation is ESG investments environmental investments,

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.799
<v Speaker 4>investments that take into account climate risk, that those must

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 4>be inherently worse performing as investments. That's actually not the

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 4>way the markets are working. But that concept has been

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 4>out there forever. Hey, you know, if you want to

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 4>go invest in some in some feel good investments, you know,

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 4>you want to feel like you're really socially responsible, fine,

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 4>do it on your own time. If you want to

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 4>do that individually with your own individual investments, fine, And

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 4>of course, not surprisingly, the fossil fuel industry is cheering

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 4>on this new rule, and the fossil fuel industry is

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 4>saying in one letter, they said, the push to divest

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 4>money from the fossil fuel industry has become a serious

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 4>problem for the industry because because large institutional investors are

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 4>increasingly moving their money out of fossil fuel investments, and

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 4>that's depriving us of capital, which of course is the

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 4>point of the devestment movement.

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.599
<v Speaker 3>That's so interesting because I want to say, maybe four

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 3>or five years ago now, one of the early lawsuits

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 3>against Exon was about exactly this kind of thing, except

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 3>they were making the opposite argument, and it was like

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 3>a worker retirement fund that was suing Exon for an

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 3>abdication of fiduciary responsibility because they had, you know, put

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 3>off writing down assets forever, and they were doing various

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 3>things that they were you know, the workers were arguing

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 3>would sort of reduce their returns from their retirement fund.

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 4>If you're a worker, any of you work for Exon,

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there's a good case to be made that,

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.559
<v Speaker 4>especially in the era of climate change, you don't want

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 4>your money or lots of your money in your own

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 4>company just as a matter of future returns for your

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 4>retirement sattings, I mean putting money, and especially now at

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 4>a time when the the fossil fuel industry is reporting

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean just big earnings losses, right, big losses, and

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 4>you see, you know, I think it was there was

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 4>a story in the Financial Times about how ESG investments

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 4>are actually performing or in some cases outperforming the market.

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 4>So the whole idea that ESG investments are you know,

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 4>automatically bad for your own portfolio is just increasingly proven wrong.

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 4>But again that's why the proverbial smoking gun here is

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 4>is that when the letter from the one of the

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 4>oil industry's lobby groups is saying, we really want this

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 4>rule because the devestment movement is draining us of capital,

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 4>then you see the real motive. At the same time

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 4>this has been going on, essentially, the SEC has stalled

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 4>the effort to require more disclosure by companies about their

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 4>own climate risks, and these two things are linked. Basically,

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 4>the upshot of the new Trump proposed ESG rule is

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 4>to just make it that much harder. There's all sorts

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 4>of new kind of due diligence requirements and kind of

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 4>paperwork requirements to justify when financial managers want to want

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 4>to shift money into ESG, just to kind of bog

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 4>it down.

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 5>Do you know if.

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>There's any.

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Any way that this might impact the role out of

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 3>all of the ESG stuff that's happening in Europe?

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, ultimately, the global pool of money is one

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 4>giant pool of money, and so certainly it and the

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 4>United States has an outsized role in that, and so

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 4>certainly it can deprive the move into those investments. And

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 4>here's what's really interesting is that if you read the

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 4>comment letters on the rule, the big opponents of the rule,

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 4>not exactly, not necessarily. You know, the most altruistic people

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 4>in the world. I mean, yes, you've got some great

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 4>environmental groups on there. But but there's a lot of

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 4>Wall Street firms, right, Like Wall Street firms that that

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 4>that don't they don't they don't really have an ideology, right,

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 4>They're just looking for customers, and they know that customers

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 4>and you know, the people who's money they're managing. They

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 4>know that there's a demand for I don't want to

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 4>invest in oil companies. I'm more interested investing in green investments, right,

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 4>And so a lot of these sort of you know,

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 4>Wall Street firms that aren't do gooders have put in

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 4>letters saying, you know, we don't like this rule. This

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 4>rule is not good because we want to have as

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 4>much freedom as possible to meet the consumer demand for

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 4>more sustainable investments.

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's super interesting and also kind of flies in

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 3>the face of the whole we're just worried about returns

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 3>thing exactly exactly.

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I mean those firms want returns also. So

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 4>it's a weird situation where in some senses, it's like

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 4>the Trump administration is so devoted to going to bat

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 4>for the fossil fuel industry that it's willing to piss

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 4>off the financials.

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's it for this time.

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening. I also want to thank all of

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 2>our Patreon members. You guys are really helping us to

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 2>get more work done. We appreciate it. And I want

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 2>to share a little preview of what's coming up in

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 2>the next season of Drilled. If you're curious and you

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 2>want to get the scoop on these episodes, please consider

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 2>becoming a Patreon subscriber. We have all different levels of

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 2>membership and you will get early access to episodes for

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 2>the next season. You can also get ad free episodes,

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 2>and I've gotten some questions from folks about how to

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 2>access AD free episodes. Those actually come into a special

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 2>Patreon feed, but then you're able to kind of connect

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 2>that to whatever podcast app you use. If you're having

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 2>trouble doing that, let me know and we can try

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 2>to help sort that out for you. Thanks again, and

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 2>here's the season five preview. This season on Drilled, then.

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 4>They went after Kandi asked they come truly to believe

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 4>that Donager is a criminal.

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 6>There's a lot in the film that they could have

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 6>used to go on a more narrow request, but they've

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 6>not done that. They've simply asked for the entire footage

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.839
<v Speaker 6>to be turned over to go on a fishing expedition.

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 5>I think if I had it to do over, I

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 5>would advise my client to completely protest the trial. And

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 5>unfortunately Stephen didn't have that option because Stephen lives in

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 5>New York and he's subject to the jurisdiction of the

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 5>court and he has to defend the case. But my

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 5>clients did have that option, and that was not a

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 5>card we chose to play. In retrospect, that may not

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 5>have been the best decision. Hindsight is twenty twenty.

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 7>It was cold, so we would be all bundled up.

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 7>We would be in this long line to get through

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 7>security to get into the courthouse, and then you would

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 7>see a row of five black suburbans arrive with tinted windows,

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 7>and out of it would come senior management of Chevron,

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 7>their head of litigation, their entire legal team, and they

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 7>were ushered in through a separate entrance as VIPs, so

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 7>they didn't have to stand in the line with all

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 7>the rest of us. I am now tired of rating

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 7>about Stephen and the ankle.

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Enough with Stephen and the.

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 7>Ankle I want the attention to go back on the

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 7>Ecuadorians and what they had said.

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 5>A state cannot contract human rights away.

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Human rights are inalienable. They belong to humans, They belong

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to the people.