WEBVTT - Barstool Sports CEO Erika Nardini Learns From Digital Media's Past Mistakes

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of the Strictly Business podcast, where

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we talked with some of the brightest minds working in

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the media today. I'm Andrew Wallenstein with Variety. Well, the

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>struggles of companies like Vice and BuzzFeed seem to be

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.799
<v Speaker 1>well documented these days, not everyone in the digital content

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>publishing world is suffering. Bar Stool Sports, for one, is

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>attracting a growing audience at some controversy with a business

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that spans everything from podcast to get this pink lemonade vodka.

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Here to discuss all things bar Stool is. It's CEO

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Eric and Ardini. Erica, thanks for coming in, Thanks for

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>having me. I'm hoping you're going to tell me the

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>secret formula. It's not. It's a little more complicated. Lemonade

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and is slightly more complicated, and it's the rest of

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.279
<v Speaker 1>your business is very complicated as well. Well, we'll get

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to the beverages in time. But what I want to

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>do first is, I know there aren't many audiences for

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>media brands out there that are devoted as the so

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>called stew Leys as they're known, But I want to

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>explain Barstool first to the uninitiated. I know there's a

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of brands out in the sports world, from ESPN

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to bleacher Report. So how would you say bar stools

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>voice differentiates from those typical players in the space. Yeah.

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Barstool Sports is infinitely an Internet company. We

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>were born of the Internet. Dave Portnoy founded Barstool in

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand four. He developed a very distinct point of

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>view and voice which really resonated with what he would

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>have called at the time the common man. So what

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>really sets barstool apart tonally is that we are on

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the same level as our fans. Were not purporting to

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>be journalists, were not purporting to be authorities. What we

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>really want to do is to make people laugh. It's

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a company that does not have an agenda be on that.

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>We do satire, we have humor, We cover entertainment, we

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly cover sports. But what makes Barstool very different is

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>really the Internet of it all. That we are focused

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and born out of the Internet. There are plenty of

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>digital native content companies that are suffering right now and

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>being digital native didn't really help them. Yeah, what what

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>did you guys figure out that others didn't? I think

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>the what the challenge with Internet brands right now is

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that they forgot about the consumer. There they point of

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>view and voice became commoditized. And when you have a

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>commoditized point of view or the content is on original

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and you don't have a deep relationship with your audience,

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and those two things go together, it is hard to

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>create a brand that can break through and resonate. And

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've seen it. I worked and I've worked

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in the internet for twenty years. So if you look

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>at you know, why does someone go to Yahoo versus

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they go to a O Well versus you go to

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Huffington Post, versus go to Vox. When you're publishing, you know,

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>a slightly different version of the same news story, you

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 1>become completely undifferentiated. It's commoditized, right, So I think there

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>were two. There are two main challenges in the media business,

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's an Internet business or traditional business. One is

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the attrition in the digital space of advertising. Right the

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>advent of the social platforms, they sucked a lot of

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the air out of the room in terms of traffic

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and engagement and time spent. They took a lot of

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the value. You know, if you were to ask someone

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>at a major magazine publisher, you know, things that used

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to be valued at for a dollar are now valued

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>at since and then the third piece of it is

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that their businesses didn't diversify because the brands didn't grow.

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>If you can't find someone who wants to wear your

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>T shirt, your brand is going to struggle to have

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a different business model than an ad driven business model.

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's really been very key to our success, which

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is we have a very diverse business because we have

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>brands that people want to identify with, that they do

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>identify with what they want to badge themselves with, and

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>are relatable and ongoing and differentiated and not commoditized. But

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>for all that relatability, as I was saying earlier, you

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>guys have had some controversy. There's been a lot of

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>criticism about everything from uh, sexism or harassment that has

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>either been part of the content or the conduct of

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>those following along on on social media. You know, is

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>this a problem for your company or is it really

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>actually just kind of part of the DNA of the

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>brand at this point. Yeah, it's a it's a good

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>question of whether it's a feature or above each right, um,

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>controversy isn't the intention of barstool sports. I think when

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you think about the controversy or people look to examples

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of the controversy, those are mostly things that have happened

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>in the past and are said by people who aren't

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>active listeners or participants or readers or viewers of Barstool Sports. Um,

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>so I would say the perception of controversy can be

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>grossly exaggerated. That said, I don't think it hurts The

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.559
<v Speaker 1>controversy doesn't hurt us because it helps identify our base

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and it also, you know, there's often a lot of

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>hypocrisy in that controversy and in the criticism of Barstool,

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So that a great example. We are a sexist, misogynistic company.

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>We're the only company in media with nearly an entire

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>female c suite, So there's one. Two. We have more

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>women on the radio, more women starring in content than

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you would find any sports media company proportionately to our size.

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's things like that where actually this is a

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>very fascinating company. We are unafraid, we are unfiltered, which

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>often puts us in the headlines for a variety of reasons.

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>But it's that level of authenticity again, you know, to

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>use that word that that makes us breakthrough and res Nate,

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:04.799
<v Speaker 1>We're not playing it's safe. We're not covering hockey or football,

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>or entertainment or relationships or the headlines coming out of

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the Internet the way everybody else is, and we don't

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>want to. But isn't that a double edged sword? Because

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, frankly, controversy has earned media. You

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>get publicity from that, and I think it also plays

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>well with your brand. On the other hand, are you

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.799
<v Speaker 1>guys a controversy or two away from an advertiser backlash?

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.239
<v Speaker 1>That's always been the issue with all sorts of media

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>operations I think of like from Perez Hilton to w

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>w E. The bad boy image works to an extent

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and then it doesn't. Yeah, I mean I think it's

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>working like we're not. We're not a controversy away from

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>an advertiser backlash. Our brand. Advertiser business has grown, I

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>think in the last two years, so the world is changing.

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 1>How people perceive what what people perceive as valuable, what

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>they perceive as real, what they perceive as resonating has

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>changed dramatically. We live in a world where attention is

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the most scarce and finite research resource, or or it's

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>just it's precious and your and our ability to capture

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>headlines and interest and to maintain engagement from our audience

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>is what ultimately is going to make us an incredibly

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>powerful vehicle for brands and an incredibly powerful vehicle for ourselves.

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And the brands are there, there's no question. And podcast

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>seem to be a big part of that right now,

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>several dozen podcasts in play that are giving you about

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a third of the company's revenue. That's right. Yeah, so

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we love podcasting in a barstol Sports started as a newspaper, uh.

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It then evolved into a blog. From the blog, we

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>moved into podcasting and really live video. And when you

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>think about podcasts, right, podcasting is really a natural extension

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of blogging. It's one person or a few people's point

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of you. It's a conversation. It's first person thought. It's

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>on it's not linear. It can be long, it can

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>be sure, it can look and sound like anything. We

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>like that as a medium. I get how having the

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of voices you have works well for podcasting. I'm

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>curious about how you approach it as a business. You

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter recently went on a large rant, interesting rant

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>where you kind of acknowledged the growth opportunity that podcasts

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>represent right now, but also sort of the perils of

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>over programmatic. Yeah, I look like I've been in the

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Internet since you were at a O L that I

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>was at it. I started my career fidelity investments, buying

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the Internet advertising, and then you know, I went to Microsoft,

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I worked at Yahoo, I worked at A well as

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>part of the demand media I p O like I

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have seen. I've seen the big people, big players in

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the business overlap twenty years, and we screwed up a

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of things about digital media. It was a medium

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know if you remember, but where

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>there was whizz bang pop ups, you know, unreadable content right,

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>unreadable content. You felt like you were going to get

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a virus from going to a website. So you know,

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we over monetized, right, We over monetized. We became too

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>smart and cute with programmatic and with s c O

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and s c M. And the glory of podcasting is

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that it's actually a very intimate medium. There is a

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>there is a true you're in somebody's ears, and there

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 1>is a very intimate relationship. And you know this from

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>having a podcast between what you have to say the

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>people you interview, the conversations you're having and your audience.

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>When you put an AD that's prerecorded, it's dynamically inserted,

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it's targeted to me as a consumer. When you slap

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that in the middle of it zero context, the probability

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that that ad is going to get skipped is extremely high.

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what happened with banner ads, right they

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>became wallpaper. Who looks at a banner ad anymore? Um So,

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>how do we, at this stage of the game prevent

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>podcast from falling down? That? I think the biggest thing

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, we've made a statement we are

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>sticking to host read, so we are going to integrate

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>brands into our content and into our conversations. Right, you

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>started this conversation by mentioning Pink Whitneys, which is, you know,

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>our flavored vodka that we have with New Amsterdam Vodka

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that came out of an ad read. And it came

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>out of an ad read because it was a story

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>by one of our hosts about how he drinks his vodka.

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And when you make an ad part of a content

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>experience and a brand part of a content experience, you know,

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's almost evolving the very definition of advertising

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to make it content that's what will perform. And so,

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think the risk of podcasting is a

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. One is from a content creator perspective

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and a content create a content perspective. You're going to

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>see publishers treat this like video, whereby people will say, hey,

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>we have a slate of new, built of sold podcasts

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that are about to launch. It's not going to work

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>because podcasting is really still at this stage of performance medium.

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>So anyone can have a brilliant idea for a podcast.

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>There's seven thousand podcasts right now in the world, so

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge long tail. There's a huge glut of

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>content in podcasting. No one really cares if you have

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of built of sold concepts, and there's no

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>assurance that it's going to work for an advertiser. So

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>so I see that as something that is going to

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>fail and not work in podcasting. The second piece is

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that in order to harness a long tail, just like

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, the ad tech folks and the kind of

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:58.719
<v Speaker 1>performance driven scale marketing people of the Internet will try

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to create uniformity and they'll try to insert you know,

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>pre produced highly scaled, scalable, dynamic ads that don't require humans.

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And I understand that I've been in those businesses. I've

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>helped build those businesses. I think that's counter to the

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>type of medium that podcasting is right now. But isn't

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it possible though, that if you don't play that game,

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you're not able to scale your business because you're doing

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>all this customized stuff. No, because I don't think it's

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>actually that custom and you'll maintain premium. See what will

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 1>happen is as the ad performance decreases, as the ad

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>skip rate increases, it's going to actually put price pressure downward,

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>price pressure pressure on the advertising, not upward price pressure.

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Right when you look, if you asked anyone in the

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>music industry, or really any performance advertiser what the single

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>most important thing is, they'll tell you it's radio play

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>because the host listener relationship is so important. And when

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a compelling host endorse a compelling product, the

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>r O I on that will beat any Internet product

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and the time, and I think the same is true

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in podcasting. So I get why you're bullish there. Here's

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>what I don't get. Um we go back a few years,

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.959
<v Speaker 1>you guys had sort of a notorious flirtation with ESPN. Yes,

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>we had a one night stand. One night stand literally

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a one episode show. Um, but why

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>aren't okay? That was two years ago. If your brand

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 1>is as hot as it is now, where's the big

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>video play? Where is the the O T T brand?

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Where is producing for other brands that don't necessarily give

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you a show, but hey, you create a documentary from them?

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>What's the story there? We have our own O T

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>platforms and that is so Apple TV, Roku, Amazon YouTube.

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>We are on Snapchat. We have two of the top

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>five shows on Snapchat, where the number one streaming channel

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>on Serious x M. We are the fastest growing sports

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>brand on TikTok. So we are building our our own

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>real estate on all different types of platforms audio platforms,

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>social platforms, video platforms. What I believe is it's that

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>organic real estate that we can build ourselves, which is

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the best place for our content. We have done an

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>incredible documentary on the history of Barstool Sports, really centered

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>around tap Portnoy, the founder. We put that into our

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>subscription product called Gold. So you know what I learned

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>from the ESPN experience and really linear television experiences. You know, one,

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's very appealing to get the validation to be on

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>someone else's network. That was exhilarating for us when we

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>did the rundown on Comedy Central, which was in at

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl in that was an incredible experience. We

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>had trucks and big production and it was with bright lights,

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and we learned the television format. But what you saw

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>was that an entire company dedicated all of its time

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to one twenty eight minute production versus spending all of

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>its time building a hundred productions and running those productions

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>on its own channels. And so, you know, we will

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>do documentaries. We have a documentary, we have O T

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>T platforms. We are very deeply invested in video. That's

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>been our single biggest pivot, i would say, in the

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>last twenty four months. But you're not going to see

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>us give those to other people to build audiences on

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>their network. You're going to see them where you're going

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to see us put it on our own platforms, build audiences,

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>monetize those directly, which is kind of a departure from

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of companies are doing at their work. Yeah,

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it's like everybody becomes when you can't bring people to

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>your own network and you need a more lucrative way

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to make content, you sell content to someone else. Right,

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>So look at you know, Go ninety, you know, remember

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the Go ninety deals or GO ninety doled out you know,

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>very very very lucrative checks to publishers, and then those

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>publishers spent all of their time making content for Go

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>nine d that, as it turns out, nobody saw. And

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the question is doesn't really matter. Did the check from

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Go ninety is that more important to the business or

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is it the eyeballs on the content that was created?

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And at Barstool Sports, it's the eyes on the content

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that was created, not the check. So that's why I'm

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>building a business that's very diverse from a monetization perspective

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and not does not have dependency on a single form

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of revenue, so that I can keep our eyes on

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>what's most important, which is our content and our fans.

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>And of course, as you mentioned, you are active across

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different platforms. But when I was interested

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to read recently was one of these platforms, and now

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is Telegram, which to my you know, a little background,

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>And if I'm getting this wrong, explain it differently. But

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the content issues you were running into on platforms like Instagram,

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps there was some sort of violence in particular footage. Um,

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>now if you're able to go on Telegram where there's

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>no kind of regulation of the content, But is there monetization?

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>They're like, what is? What is? Yeah? I believe that

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>we want to be in every place where our audiences

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and if you look at the broadest sense, we have

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>people from twelve years of age who are following us

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram, They're watching our pizza reviews religiously. They follow

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:28.959
<v Speaker 1>us on Twitter or on TikTok up to you know,

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>sixty year old guys reading the blog who are from

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Boston and lived you know, lived in Boston when Da've

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>created the paper. We're really platform agnostic. We ultimately want

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to connect with our fans in a medium that lets

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>us express ourselves in a way that we can be

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>as funny as possible, or we can bring our satire

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>to life and our humor and our point of view

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to bear. But can you monetize there? But I'm not

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>worried about the monetization. So I'll give you an example

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram, since you brings that up. Instagram and Facebook

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>are continually defining and tweaking their quote unquote community guidelines,

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>which is their prerogative, and I have total and utmost

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>respect for that. It's been long said that it's very

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:15.880
<v Speaker 1>difficult to understand what those guidelines are, how and when

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they change, because they change often, and to mitigate and

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>manage that as a publisher. So what what's Facebook prioritizing

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in its feed? That's been a topic for ten years, right,

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>what's Instagram value in its feed? What's happening is Facebook

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram or are becoming closer together. Two is that

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>they are also continually evolving and I think tightening those

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>community guidelines. We had a video of a girl riding

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>a bike and the bike hit a stairs and the

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>girl tumbled off the bike, and Instagram ultimately didn't like

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that video because the girl could have gotten hurt. She

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't get hurt, she was fine, she lived, she wasn't

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>substantially harm, but they don't like that there's a risk

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that she could have gotten hurt. A video like that

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>will get millions and millions and millions of views because

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that video is you know, it's like America's home videos, right,

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the allure of God. What happened in this video

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is what makes it ultimately compelling. We want to respect

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 1>what's happening on Instagram, so we won't put that video

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram. But ultimately, if you look at our eighteen

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to twenty four year old audience, they love videos like that.

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 1>So those are the type of videos that we will

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>put on Telegram because our audience is there. They're looking

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 1>for content that's entertaining, and we want to deliver that

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>to them. Got it um. What was also interesting is

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you guys have been experimenting recently with NASCAR, a presence

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>there that perhaps you weren't covering racing all. Yeah, we

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't know anything about racing, right, and now all of

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, let's be clear, it's a sponsored deal. They're

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>pain No, well they are and they aren't. So we

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>what started as a sponsorship from NASCAR and Dave Portnoy,

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the founder of Barstool Sports. Dave Portnoy went down to Daytona,

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>had never been to a NASCAR race, didn't follow NASCAR race,

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 1>didn't follow NASCAR, probably had some of the misperceptions of

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>NASCAR fans that are very common for people who don't

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>watch NASCAR. We had I think ten personalities down there.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>We did a live show, We set up in the

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>fan zone and had an awesome experience. The NASCAR people

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>could not have been more open, more welcoming. We got

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 1>so much access and we're able to, you know, not

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>only engage with the drivers, but the racing teams and

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:44.719
<v Speaker 1>the track and the you know, the pace car and everything. Uh.

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>We had an incredible experience. We carried that through several races,

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and the last two races, which were Talladega and Las Vegas,

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>we sponsored a driver. So not out of our sponsorship

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>with NASCAR, but from bar Stool Sports, we decided that

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to sponsor a racer, Matt Di benedetto car

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>number five. We branded one is Barstool Sports with all

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 1>of our podcasts, and then that was in Las Vegas,

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and then in Talladega we created a car around one

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Byte pizza we sold merch. Was a very deep, integrated

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>partnership with the driving team. NASCAR loves it. The Talladega

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 1>race was the single largest streamed race in history, mostly

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>because we streamed it live on nearly We talked about

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>watched it streaming live and talked about it on every

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>single channel that we have. So it's a good example

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>of sports that are looking to bring new audience and

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>new eyeballs to that sport are coming to Barstool Sports

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to help them do that because we have such a

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>plug into young audiences and our engagement with those audiences

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>is off the charts. The second thing you're seeing happening

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>with Barstool, which is different than you would find with

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a Turner or Fox or an ESPN, is that we

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>are a young, nimble company. So when we get behind

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>something we didn't have on a strategy deck that we

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>were going to sponsor a race, team literally came up,

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, came up. We decided in a week. In

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, we have the car wrapped, in two and

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a half weeks, we had the merch designed, and three

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>weeks later we were on the track. So we tend

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to get behind the things that we find passion around,

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it's football, whether it's hockey, whether it's golf, whether

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it's entertainment, or whether it's Nascar, uh and we get

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 1>behind those things in a big way in a way

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that's creative and ultimately in a way that's a creative

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to the experience we're trying to create for our fans.

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So in this case, being able to see you know,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a bar stool car on Fox Racing in a NASCAR

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>racer on NBC in the case of Talladega was incredible.

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>So we're very three sixty to use a marketing word

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>around that, But ultimately it's just very organic whereby when

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>we get behind things and find them interesting and compelling,

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 1>our fans tend to follow and we tend to go

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>all in. Is that a sign of things to come

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of your relationships with various leagues that you definitely, Yeah, definitely,

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe look at we have an incredible partnership with the

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 1>U s g A. So we've done You've had a

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>similar experience in golf around US Open. Uh We two

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:20.479
<v Speaker 1>years ago Um Dave and a host our our golf

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 1>podcast which is called four Play. They went and they

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>had a Mulligan challenge, which was Dave's hypothesis was that

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>he could win the win the US Open if he

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>had unlimited Mulligan's. It was very funny. We captured a

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of content. It sucked all the air out

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of Media Day because what everyone was watching was barstool Sports,

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and if we could be the you know, the Mulligan

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>challenge would work or not so? Um, the us G

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>has been incredibly open to us same spirit of partnership.

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Right want young audiences, want new audiences. They want to

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote grow the game. Anyone looking to grow the

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>game tends to be open to Barstool Sports to help

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>them do that. If there's a recurrent theme though in

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>this Converse station, it is that Dave Portnoy is quite

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a character. Maybe that's an understatement, and I'm just curious

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you're managing this incredible business. Is it also your job

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>though to manage him? Does he? Is he someone who

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>needs to be like reined in? Watching and I have

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>an awesome partnership. So we've met in We hit it

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>off immediately. Single best partner I've ever had professionally. I

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 1>think he's brilliant. I think his understanding of content and

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 1>chemistry is just electric. Um. But he does he know

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>where the line is? The line? No, I'm not the line.

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>He understands the line. And we're very fortunate we've grown

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>from twelve people to now people. We had maybe ten

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>personalities when I started. We now have almost seventy and

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>we have a great system for them knowing the line.

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So we want to find people who you know, have

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a point of view, are fine, me, are captivating, are

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>hard working, who understand the Internet. And we have a

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>very strong creative culture whereby almost through osmosis, the way

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that Dave and Dan Katz and Kevin Clancy and Keith Markovic,

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>like the early Barstool guys, are now replicating how they

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.640
<v Speaker 1>thought about content, what their work ethic was around creating content,

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and also where the line is around around that content.

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Those are all things that we manage within. You know,

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in a normal company you called a writer's room. In Barstool,

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we just call it barstool. Okay, Well, here's the two

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>part questions about the future of the brand. Number one,

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering, you know again, I was talking earlier about

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 1>W W E and Perez Hilton. It seems for some

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>brands there's like the bad boy period and then eventually

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>they clean up their act because that's what it takes

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the scale to the next level. Is that what you

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>guys were about. And part two of this is it's

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>called Barstool Sports. But you're right, you know, you're talking

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>about pizza and about everything but sports. Yeah, is there

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a future where sports actually isn't so central to what

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>bar Stool is. So I'll answer the second part first,

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 1>which is that you know, Dave couldn't get the U

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>r L barstool dot Com and called it Barstool Sports.

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think we're so much bigger than sports. We

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly are sports, and we have guys and girls who

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>love sports. We also have people who know nothing about

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:36.719
<v Speaker 1>sports and care about you know, entertainment, military news, you

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>name it, lifestyle, food. Um, so I would say we're

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>far bigger. You know, a lot of people dropped the

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>sports in our name, But I think really what the

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>most important thing is when you see or touch any

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>of our brands, which gets to the first part of

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>your question. You know it when you feel it feels

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>like Barstool, feels uniquely Barstool. The second piece of what

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>makes us very different from a pre as Hilton or

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>WW or The Ringer or any other you know, any

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of these brands, is that we have worked incredibly hard

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>over the last three years to grow almost sixty brands

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in our portfolio. So when you say Barstool Sports, Barstool

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Sports is a brand in and of itself. It's also

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Viacom right, we're sitting over a port. It's Disney right.

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>We're an i P company, whereby we are building hockey brands,

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>golf brands, lifestyle brands, entertainment brands, vodka brands, merch brands.

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 1>We have a tremendous amount of i P in this company.

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>We grow each of those pieces of i P. We

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>do it on different platforms, we do it in different mediums,

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we do it in different ways with different personalities. There's

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount of crossover in the network, in the network, um,

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 1>but Barstool is bigger than just one monolithic thing. We

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 1>have the Barstool brand, we have every brand that we've

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 1>created in the last three years. And then we have

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>incredible personalities who are in and of themselves celebrities and brands.

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>And that's what makes this company so different is that

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it's incredibly layered, it's incredibly nuanced, and from a content

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and brand perspective, it's quite diverse. It's not one thing,

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not one personality, it's not one point of view.

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>We have guys and women who disagree constantly. You know,

0:28:27.520 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>we've got the Yankee fans versus the Red Sox fans.

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>We've got one point of view versus another point of view.

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 1>It's a reality show, you know. It's as though you

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>had Disney or Marvel with a reality show built over

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it and built on the Internet. Well, when you make

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the Disney comparison the Viacom comparison, I wonder, are the

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>ambitions to be that big? And is it possible that

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to get that big you need to be acquired by

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the Disney's or Viacoms of the world. Is that the endgame?

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you know? Even I always laugh

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>about this, which is people say, you know, what's your

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>five year plan, what's the seven year plan? And we

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>always say, we don't know. Um. And that's not to

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:11.719
<v Speaker 1>say we're not strategic, nor to say that we're not

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful about where we want to go or what we

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>want to do. But what I think we are at

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>our core is really passionate and opportunistic. So you know, yes,

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>would we like guns money and steal from a big

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>media company to be in and around our business. Definitely.

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>The things we could do to drive linear the things

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>we can do to grow personality, the things we can

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>do to create brands. I think is unparalleled. Um. That said,

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're profitable company now, we're growing incredibly quickly.

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>We are at the top of our game in the

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>fields that we are in. I also see a path

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>where we grow independently pretty successfully. So you know, I

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:56.479
<v Speaker 1>think it's a long way of saying we don't know

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>what the future holds. We're incredibly open to what that future.

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like, Well, that's the last question. Where else are

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you guys going to go that we need to pay

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>attention to going into you need to pay attention to

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>sports betting. So I think that we will be a

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>force in sports betting, in the type of content we create,

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:17.239
<v Speaker 1>in the way we create it, in the level of

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>passion and originality, and in what we do. So sports

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>betting is a place you should definitely look out for

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>us too. I think you'll see us in more consumer

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>products in the same way. We partnered with New Amsterdam

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Vodka to launch Pink Whitneys, which is you know now

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the third biggest flavored vodka in the world, and under

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>two months, you'll see us do more of that. Um.

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>And then I think you'll see us do more in podcasting,

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's more to do. There's more to do? Yes,

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>more to do? I mean, you know, isn't there though

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>a saturation point with the podcast? There's a saturation point

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:55.479
<v Speaker 1>if your podcasters and your podcasts all appeal to the

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>same audience. Right when you look at Barstool Sports, Caller Daddy,

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>which is the number one mail podcast in the world,

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>has a completely rabid, completely loyal, massive fan base. The

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>women and men who listen to call her Daddy probably

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't listening to zero Blog thirty, which is our military podcast.

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>They may or may not be listening to Pardon My

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Take or Spitting Chicklets or KFC Radio. So as we

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>grow new brands. Were very mindful to growing brands that

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 1>can bring new audience and can extend into new spaces

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and who we feel that we can you know, pour

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>gasoline on to make bigger. Got it? Well, it sounds

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>like you've got a big agenda. We'll be watching and

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing how it all plank. You. Thanks for the time.

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. This has been another episode of Strictly Business.

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Tune in next week for another helping a scintillating conversation

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>with media movers and shakers, and please make sure you

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the podcast. To hear future episodes. Also leave

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a review in Apple Podcast let us know how we're doing.