WEBVTT - The Blockchain Built for Good

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>clus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Over the summer, the blockchain

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem Topple raising fifteen million dollars in a series a

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>funding round that's on top of a five million dollar

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>seed round which happened back in so we want to

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>talk a little about the business and what they're up to.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Chris Georgia and the founder and managing director of Topple,

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>joining us from Houston, Texas. Chris, how are you? You're great?

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>It's happy to be on today. Yeah, thanks so much

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. I I coinker a show called Crypto

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I r L and I still think there's so much

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>confusion over what exactly the blockchain is is and what

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it can do. And in a recent episode actually talked

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>about this. I said that, you know, we've been hearing

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 1>about the promises the blockchain for over a decade at

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>this point, and consumers have yet to see a point

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in their lives it has actually gotten better as a

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>result of this technology. Uh would you disagree with that

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>or would you agree with that? Well, I would definitely

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>agree with that. Um, you know, for a lot of people,

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't become apparent yet. You know, we're starting to

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>have some small use cases, you know, supply chain traceability,

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>carbon credits, you know, starting to be tracked this way.

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think we all need to remember that blockchain

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>came onto the scene from a retail perspective very early

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>in its lifespan. You know, a I got started in

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the sixties, but I think none of us really heard

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>about it until fifteen years ago. So blockchain is kind

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of had its coming out party in a very public way.

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>So remind our world, Chris, what you are doing specifically,

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and what kind of companies are you working with, and

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe who are your biggest partners or customers. Is at

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>this point absolutely. So the way that we think about

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>TOPPLE is we think of it as blockchain for sustainability,

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>for positive impact or you know, to use an acronym

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>for for e s G. And what that means is

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>we're doing everything from tracking and tracing conflict free diamonds

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.679
<v Speaker 1>moving around the world or fair wage agriculture. We work

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>with energy companies and you know, big project developers to issue, track,

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>buy and sell carbon credits. So we do a lot

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>with powering the energy transition, and we do a lot

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to help clean up supply chains, you know, making sure

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're properly environmentally sustainable and also you know, following

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>good labor practices as well. So dig a little bit deeper.

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>How do you do that? Because the big part, you know,

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you say es G and kind of the hairs in

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>my neck perk up because I think we keep saying,

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>or I certainly keep saying that E s G feels

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>like it's going through a reckoning after years and years

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of good performance in an upbeat market, a bullush market. Um,

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it's going through a reckoning where people want visibility, transparency

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and at our understanding, uh, and so tell us, how

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>what are you what's your proprietary technology that helps customers

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they are complying by real E s

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>G means if you will, absolutely, And the way that

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>we think about how blockchain fits into this is blockchain

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>can be open, blockchain can be decentralized. And really one

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest problems with a lot of E s

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>G claims is they're being assembled after the fact that

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>a main corporate office months after something supposedly or hopefully

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>happened somewhere out in a plant or out in the field. Well,

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>blockchain technology and what we're able to do is get

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>data directly from when it's happening. So maybe that's taking

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>inputs directly from SMS information from that what's SMS text

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>messages for everyone, um, so you know, maybe farmers are

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>text interacting with the system, or there's IoT or satellite

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>information that's being fed directly into technology. So you don't

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>have kind of like an after the fact report being assembled,

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>but you've got data being sourced directly from on the

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>ground or where that impact is supposed to be happening,

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's being able to you know, relay direct to

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 1>investors get more transparent access to it, or consumers get

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>more transparent access to it. Chris, this conversation reminds me

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>of the way that we've seen Google Glass develop and

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the technology and heads up displays develop over the last

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>well only in the sense of, you know, when this

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>came out that Google had this video of you know,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>everyday people wearing these glasses and you know, a heads

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>up display saying, you know, walking down a subway into

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a into a subway station underground and it's like, oh,

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you know something pops up, subways closed, better go use

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>another one, that sort of thing. But what ended up

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>happening was, you know, consumers didn't want that type of technology,

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't like the way that they interacted with it. The

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>technology was then used in warehouses and it's like caught

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>up on the industrial side of things. Do you see

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>that happening with with blockchain, Like, you know, something was

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 1>promised to consumers, but it's actually more applica bull in

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>an industrial in an industrial space. I think the earliest

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>use cases absolutely, you know, will fall into that pattern.

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know that's really the pattern that we're following

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>as well. You know, it's it's right now, it's behind

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the scenes technology, it's powering applications and platforms that are

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>all being built on top of it. UM. There's still

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>probably a long way that innovation that can go. And

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>so you know, just like we might see Google lots

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>or you know, a competitor make a reemergence once the

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>technology is you know, ready to come back out of industry.

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, i'd say in the next two to four years,

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll see that on the consumer side or the blockchain

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>as well. Hey listen, just get about forty five seconds

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>left here, R Bloomberg. We care about this kind of stuff.

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>You guys are raising money from investors, So what's been

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the growth in your business top line? And I'm assuming

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 1>you're not profitable yet, but you can clarify so some

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of this is kind of uh, you know still you know,

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>private information. But you know, over the last year, we've

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 1>on boarded about thirty different projects UM all across the

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>world onto the platform. I think we're active with projects

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>across five continents right now. Team is growing healthily. I

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.679
<v Speaker 1>think we've just on boarded our thirty five person UM.

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>So it's also a great time to be hiring in

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>the tech space. So I've been really enjoying that as well.

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, no slowdown? So that is it like

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>double did you grass? Yeah? I didn't hear it? Pretty

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>close that okay, well listen, good to know and uh,

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely a world that we're interested. Tim is all

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>over it on his shoe. Watch our new show Crypto

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I r L Tonight eight thirty Bloomberg TV. Little Little Love.

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I like that. That's the that's the like fifth of

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>more plugs. Okay, I love it. Um our. Thanks to

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Chris of Course, founder imaging director of Topple here on Bloomberg.

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Do you want

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to get back to something we just talked about with

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>our Mike mckeean. We're talking about this morning's jobs report.

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Just a reminder the US labor markets staying strong. In September,

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate unexpectedly returned to an historic low, leaving

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the Fed on course to deliver yet another aggressive interest

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>rate hike. Non Farm payrolls increased two hundred sixty three

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand in September after three gain in August. Unemployment rate

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>dropped to three and a half percent. That matched a

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>five decade low average. Really earnings rising firmly. Tim Well,

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>we like to turn to on days like this. Becky

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>frank Witz, chief commercial Officer, President North America for Manpower Group.

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Becky joining us this afternoon on the phone from Chicago.

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Manpower Group, of course, a placement firm that works around

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the globe and has a really good understanding of what

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly is happening when it comes to jobs in this

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>economy and more. Becky, good, good to have you back

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>with us. How are you hi, Tim Well? Thank you good? Good? So. Um,

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>any surprises in the jobs report that we got, we

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>know for the equity market, it's another good news is

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>bad news scenario. Yes, I'd say, you know, first, we

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>saw some softening, gradual softening month over month, which is

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>actually good for employers. Tim. I know it sounds cow

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>are intuitive, but a little bit of release of pressure

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>in this really tight labor market is actually encouraging because

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>employers are hoping they can actually you know, fill some roles. Now. Um,

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>A surprise earlier in the week is it quit rates.

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Quit rates prove that your job openings, you know, haven't

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>dissuaded people from resigning. Um, even if we go into

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>this holiday. So I would say that was a surprise

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>at bit earlier in the week, and I think that

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the no news is the news around wages.

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>UM also was clear in the reports this morning. So

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>what are you guys seeing at Manpower Group when it

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>comes to what companies need? Are they finding their need?

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Give us some color behind these numbers that we got

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>from the government and what you guys are seeing in

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>real time. Yeah, Carol, I'm so glad you asked that,

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the job's report is is a backward

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>looking view. And so if you say, hey, what's going

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>on today, Banky, what's going on the labor market today?

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I would say two big headlines. One is hybrid holiday.

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>So we are seeing retailers start to hire for what

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I call hybrid and my kids make fun of me

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>because I said, it's it's I R L, you know,

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in real life. So we're seeing people want to shop

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in store, and therefore we're seeing roles associated store managers,

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 1>service people in the inside retail. We're starting to see

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>some some pick up there as well as continuing growth

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>around you know, logistics, delivery drivers, etcetera, which really didn't

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>show up in the report today, and so it's a

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit more delayed. Um, so that would be

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>one big thing that we're seeing. And the second thing

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that it wasn't the report today is tech hiring.

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Carroll continues to robust, aggressive and apparently slow down proof.

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Really that's so weird because okay, because we get so

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>much anecdotal evidence, whether that's you know, Meta platforms, the

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>parent company of Facebook, or you know, you just go

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and type in what ni job cuts in the Bloomberg

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>terminal and there's headline after headlines, so much of them

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>based in Silicon Valley. Are are you just using the

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>term tech differently? Is more a more encompassing term. Well,

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it's about tech skills, it's not about tech companies. And

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>so you're absolutely right. The headlines are front of the

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies. Yet every company today is in some

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>part of tech company, and so anything anyone who might

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>have been impacted by Silicon Valley layoffs was rapidly picked

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>up in either another industry or in a smaller company.

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And tchech Unemployment is still under one percent in our country,

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>under one percent. You know, it's interesting. What was the

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>thing of labor hoarding. We were talking about where companies

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>are afraid to let go of workers even if they're

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a little nervous about the outlook, because they just maybe

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't think they if we get a recession, it

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>won't be deep. And so they don't want to let

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:30.839
<v Speaker 1>go of workers because they know how tight the labor

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>market is and they don't want to have to scramble

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of it. What what can you

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>tell us about what you are seeing when it comes

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to companies and doing labor labor hoarding. Yeah, so, so

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd say that we're still in a post pandemic labor recovery.

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And I know, you know, we like to think the

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>pandemic is roll over. Just now, supply chains are normalizing.

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>You've seen the headlines around freight costs going down, containers

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, now being readily available, lumber going down, and

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>so we're still in this post pandemic recovery. And in employers,

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>memories are long and they remember for the last eighteen

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>months they've not been able to find talent. And so, yes, Carrol,

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing I love that term, by the way,

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>labor hoarding. Um, we are seeing labor hoarding in some

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>places because you know, employers are afraid if I let

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>these people go, I may not be able to get

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>them back in a few months when we all hope

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the economy rebounds. Uh, can you give us some indication

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>on I don't know how you're looking forward a little

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>bit becky to understand what comes during the fourth quarter

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of the year and in Q one, because the excuse

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>me him getting a little ahead of myself. The FED

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is certainly trying to figure out what happens there, and

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>investors are as well. Yes, so I would say, you know,

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>holiday hiring is the weather vane. It's going to tell

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>us what we're going to see for the rest of

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least the rest of this year, and

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>also into the very first part of three. So that

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>would be one, you know, one thing. So if we

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>see so okay, so let me just make sure I

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>understand this. If we see softness when it comes to

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>holiday hiring, that could be a bad sign. It could

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>be a concern. You know, so far we're seeing I

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>know you saw Amazon just announcer hiring a hundred and

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty people for the holl Day and so you know

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we'd see early signs of promise. But it's still early

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in the season, but that that is the weather vein

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that we should all keep our our eyes on. Um.

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the other is, you know, just the FED

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>take action again and what impact does that have on

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the job market? And that's well outside of you know,

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>my control. Are you concerned the Fed over does it.

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>They've talked about where the unemployment rate needs to be

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>potentially in order to bring down inflationary pressures. Are you

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>concerned that we will see maybe it's six months from now,

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's twelve months, maybe it's three months that we

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>will see those unemployment claims to hire and a significant

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>amount of people might be out of work. And just

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>got about thirty seconds, Becky, Yeah, so I would say, Carol,

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope it's not significant. The labor market traditionally lags

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 1>the economy. It's lagging it a bit more. So I'm

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>hoping the economy rebounds and the labor market has a

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>short and shallow decline. Okay, I'm gonna leave it there. Hey, listen, Becky,

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>have a great weekend. Good to check in with you,

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Becky Frankoments. She's Chief commercial Officer, President of Manpower Group

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>North America and of Chris johan Elsa, she typically does

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.599
<v Speaker 1>on these monthly jobs data days, joining us on the

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>phone from Chicago. You know it's funny. I just I

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>was looking at an eye job cuts and there's just

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>so many stories. It's like, wait a minute, I don't understand. Um,

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the job market is so good. Why does so many

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>people talk about layoffs? But the distinction that Becky made

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>is so important? Right, tech jobs versus tech companies? Yes, yes,

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>really important. Yeah. I think that could be a quick

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>take video. Sounds good, you want to do it. You're

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.239
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Let's get to

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Julia Pollock, chief economists for Zipp recruiter. She joins us

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>once again on the phone from Los Angeles. We like

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>checking in with her at least once a month when

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it comes to what she's seeing on her platform. Julia,

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>how are you very well? Thanks? And how are you

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>We're doing okay. It's good to have you with us

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>once again this afternoon. So when you saw these numbers

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>this morning, wasn't any surprise to you? After all, you

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>see what recruiters are looking for, and you see what

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>job seekers are looking for on ZIP recruiters, so you

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>have a good, you know, good idea of what's how

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>opening in the economy. Was this a surprise to you?

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Not at all. This is right in line with what

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>economists we're expecting, and vice line with what we've been

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing on our website. While employers are becoming a little

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>bit concerned about the future, outlook a bit more cautious,

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit more conservative, and they're hirings while they're reducing

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>job openings somewhat, they are still hiring when push comes

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to shove because business conditions are still good and the

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>consumer is still spending. So how do you cross this

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>with um all of the talk about recession. Obviously, the

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>financial markets tell a very different story. Uh. And we

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>did have a market guest who joined us earlier about

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I think what's going on in terms of corporate earnings

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that we've already had a corporate earnings recession, but we

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>haven't had necessarily, yes, an economic recession. So companies who

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>have had to maybe cost because of inflationary pressures are

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>shown and so forth. You're saying they're reducing job openings,

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>but they're not letting folks go. Bottom line, that's that's

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>what it's going to be, UM, and we'll continue to

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>be that way. Yes, because though companies are reducing headcount

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>growth but not reducing headcount, and that is sort of

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly I think what the said would like to see.

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>They want to see that gap between job openings, the

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>number of unemployed people seeking them close. It was more

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>than five million a month ago. It's uh, it's shrank

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to four million in the most recent ULTS report earlier

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>this this week. Uh. And if that gap narrows, you

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>will see people becoming a bit more reluctant to quit

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>their jobs, a little bit less confident in the availability

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of alternatives, and that will reduce wage growth pressure a

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit and also with its equation. UM. Want to

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>ask you, though, do we get to a point where

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not just about reducing headcount growth but actually you

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>say they're not reducing headcount now, but do we get

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to a point where companies are reducing headcount in your conversations,

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>do we start to see that? Well? We I mean,

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing the lave market split into two groups now,

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>one group that's still adding jobs very rapidly and another

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>group set of industries that are disproportionately affected by high

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. Uh. Those are industries like finance and insurance

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that lost thirteen thousand jobs in this report. UM building,

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>material and garden supply stores lost six thousand jobs. Car

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>dealerships lost almost two thousand jobs. You know, the US

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>consumers are not able to tap into their houses and

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>use them as tiggy banks anymore the way they were

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>last year. They can't just refinance their house to buy

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a new car or do some renovations on their home

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>because they're they're two thirds of US mortgages are now

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>below four percent, and two percent of mortgages only two

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>percent are adjustable rate mortgages. No one wants to jump

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>out of that into a much much much higher mortgage rate,

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>which we're a and we're seeing that play out in

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the housing market, Like you don't want to leave that

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that mortgage rate that sub four percent to buy something new.

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's essentially at a standstill right now. Hey, Julia,

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>help us understand what this looks like in Q one

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>three and what it looks like for the year the

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>new year. You know, and typically in situations like this,

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>like how should we expect things to start looking when

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the layment front. Sure, so this job

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>gain that we just saw two sixty three thousand is

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 1>about five times what we would need to keep pace

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>with population growth right now. So we uh could see

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>job gains slow gradually and continue to slow a little

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>bit while the economy continues to add jobs across a

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>broad set of industries and not just you know, low

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>wage jobs, not just minimum wage jobs, but good jobs

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. Um, we will see some sexual pain. I

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>mean there there are parts of the economies that are

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>hard hit by rising interest rates and low stock prices

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and a very strong dollar. Big tech, major enterprise companies, UM,

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 1>many of them earn the majority of their revenue abroad,

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:46.639
<v Speaker 1>and so uh those non dollar denominated sales are hurting

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 1>their margins. UM. But you know, the typical like main

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>street business that buys inputs from abroad cheaply now and

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>is getting all of its revenue here at home. Those

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>companies are still, by and large doing quite well. So, Julie,

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>if I go to your website, I have the option

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of saying, there's a question what brings you here today?

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for a job right now, I'm looking for

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>a job, but no, Rush, I'm just browsing. Next. What

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>do most people hit? Do you know? Yes? So, Um,

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, about half of people are looking for a

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>job right away and they know exactly what they want

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>to look for. But there is a huge set of

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>people who come to the website and don't know what

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for. They're they're just looking for a job,

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's why they come to us, because we can

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 1>help match them two jobs that match their skills and

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>experience levels. Um. Many people have no idea. Um. Uh,

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the most common search on our website is

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a blank search and that that is exactly I think.

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Why mean a blank search where they just hit search

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>but they don't fill anything in. They don't they don't

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 1>know what job titles they're looking for. Um, they're looking

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>for a job, but they don't even know what's out there.

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>They don't know the possibilities. Uh. You know, no one

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>trains you to to search for a job. It's something

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't learn school. Many people also leave learning about

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>looking at the lave market until it's kind of too

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>late to match to get the skills that they would

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>actually need to get a great job. Julia, When we

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>have twenty seconds left here. But what about employers are

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>they are not looking for jobs to the same extent

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that they were, you know, just six months ago. Employers

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>are are worried about the future outlooks. But business is

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.719
<v Speaker 1>still good and so they're still hiring and uh and

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>that means they're great opportunity still. This is where we

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>scratched our heads. It's just a crazy environment. Hey, Julia,

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much, Julia Pollock. She's chief economists ZIP recruiter

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>with us on the phone from Los Angeles. You get

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a job, you get a job, You get a job.

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:46.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what it feels like. I'm row a journal. Yeah,

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 1>I bet you let me drive. Oh no, no, no no, no, please,

0:19:51.520 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive. It's a good question. Drive. This

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>is good. Drive to the clothes on blue Bird Radio.

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, everybody, just about eleven minutes left in today's

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>trading session, getting ready to wrap up what has been

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a wild, vaulatile week here in the trade. Having said that,

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I do want to point out, as we see stock

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>selling off in a big way today, we're off our

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>worst levels of the session, and we are still up

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>nearly two percent on the Dow Jones Industrial average this week,

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>up about one point three percent for the SNP for

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the week overall, and just holding onto about a six

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 1>tenths of one percent gain in the past five days,

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>but again seeing some significant selling in today's session, and

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I will say that one reduced volume I think in

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 1>particular for the SNP. Let's get into it with Brian Jacobson,

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>senior investment strategies at all Spring Global Investments. They've got

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit shy of five billion dollars in assets

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>under management. Brian joins us once again on the phone

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>from Milwaukee. Brian, how you doing? I have ye better

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>than the markets. Okay, that's good that we don't tie

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you know how you're doing to markets, because that can be,

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>as we all know, a fool's errand um. But but

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 1>how do you weigh in on what's going on here?

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Because at the start of the week we saw the

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>two day rally that you know, it was the biggest

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 1>two day rally that we've seen in two years, leading

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>many to say, wait a second, Perhaps there was some

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>short covering there, but also echoes of maybe a FED pivot.

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>We can throw that out the window now, right, Yeah,

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the FED pivot that's not going to happen

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>until they take the blinders off, right, and I don't

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>think that they really want to even contemplate changing their

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>tune until they get the four and a half percent

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>with the FED funds rate. So here at all spring

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>my Systematic Edge multi asset team. We had our one

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>of our many tactical calls this morning discussing kind of

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>doing a little debrief about what was going on. And

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, Ned Davis was famous for

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his wisdom, the trend is your friend,

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>and don't fight the Fed. But now you can kind

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>of paraphrase that by saying, don't fight the trend because

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>the Fed isn't your friend and the trend, unfortunately, is

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>towards weakness. Okay, in terms of the meeting you talked

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>about having with your team, how much did coming how

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>much did finding a bottom kind of come up in

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that discussion or nearing a bottom because the market was very,

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>very oversold prior to the rally earlier this week. Yeah,

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>and we agree that there was generally over sold in

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>we're expecting some bear market bounces. One of the challenges

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>is just looking back at history and recognizing that most

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:36.959
<v Speaker 1>bear markets don't really end until recessions begin, right, And

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you know that's just been the history going back to

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>the eleven bearer markets that we've had around recessions, and

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>they typically and within a month or two of the

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>recession starting now, I think you could look at earning

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>season and quarterly earnings. We've actually had two sequential quarters

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in a row of declines in SMP as reported an

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>opera the in earnings. So maybe we already have a

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.679
<v Speaker 1>profit recession in the books. But the problem is is

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that we probably don't have the economic recession but broader

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 1>one until some time in two thousand twenty three. So

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you're saying probably already an earnings recession, but not necessarily

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>an economic recession yet exactly. And we think that maybe

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>this that's kind of what makes this time somewhat unique,

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is that the earnings recession maybe happened before the economic recession.

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>And so then the question for us becomes one of

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>how do you build a portfolio that's most resilient to

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>an economic recession. And that's where there's all sorts of

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 1>wonderful divergences within the market, small cat and value Emerging

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>markets from a valuation perspective look like they've already experienced

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>those recessionary conditions, whereas other parts maybe not so much.

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>And let me ask you, so, if it's an earnings

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>recession already, why aren't companies letting go of more workers

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately would show up in the labor numbers. Yeah,

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think the guys of how challenging it

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>was to fill those vacancies, they might be a little

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>hesitant to let them out exactly. So it's kind of

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the economic theory of labor hoarding, where it's one of

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why the labor market is a lagging economic indicator.

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>You don't you really look at it for an indicator

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>about where the economy is going, because you know it's

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 1>costly to find someone trained them, and companies, you know,

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't necessarily just want to let those people go. Um.

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's one of the reasons why it's a little

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:35.959
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable to hear the FED talks so much about wanting

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.959
<v Speaker 1>to see more labor market weakness, because you're not going

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to see the labor market weakness until it's too late

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the economy. That just means that

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 1>you're already in the midst of the draw down of

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>broader economic activity. What kind of scenario Brian is priced

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>into equity markets right now? You know, the way that

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at it is that the market is pricing

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in a fairly mile recession, one where maybe you know,

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit more downside. Uh, We're expecting to

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 1>see some more bear market rallies, some choppy trading, probably

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>until the FED actually does begin to pivot, which isn't

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>likely going to be until maybe third quarter of two

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty three. So perhaps for the full next year

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we can expect to have this type of choppy trading

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 1>ahead of US. UH. And so we think that the

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>market is well choppy all year. It's been tabu a year.

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>But how much chopping this happens though? As again you

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>try to find a bottom. And I guess I keep

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>pushing this a little bit because if I look at

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're still on track for the best weekend stocks.

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>If I look at the spire in the past month,

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is that a significant trade? Essentially? Yeah? Isn't that interesting

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's one of the best weeks but also one

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>of the worst days? And yeah, And and that is

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the characteristics of the finding a bottom,

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't Just because you find a bottom doesn't

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>mean that you have to rise from that bottom. And

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the position that we're in right now. Okay,

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting towards that bottom, and it's just going to

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>be that choppy trading until we do get a whiff

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>of a FED pivot, which isn't likely going to happen

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>until you know, they get up to four and a

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>half percent and hold it for a while, in which

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you know is good for active traders and active managers

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>like on my team, we do a lot of tactical

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>traits and so it's a fun way to try to

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>add value, but it's not necessarily the most comfortable ride

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>for strategic one term investors. So when do we start

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to see uh? I mean, it's it's interesting because it's

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>if you say that, you know, if the FED pivot

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>could be unlikely until we get up to four point

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 1>five percent, when do we get there? Because as Mike

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>McKie has talked about on our air a lot, it's

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, as important as how long it stays at

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the terminal rate true exactly, it's the entire

0:26:56.160 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>contour of the path of rate Hypes and I think

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that's why the market maybe got a little excited on

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.959
<v Speaker 1>Monday and Tuesday, the idea that oh maybe we can

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>only have to go up to four and a quarter

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and maybe they can begin to pivot mid two thousand

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. But looking at FED funds futures today, now

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it's pricing in well, then maybe they want to get

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:19.439
<v Speaker 1>up to an upper end of about four point seven five, right,

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and hold it until towards the end of two thousand

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, And that seems reasonable. And it's that change

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in the expectation which you might see that as far

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>as some more descents from some of the more devish

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 1>members of the FED that maybe they've pushed things too far,

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 1>too fast and they really need to take a little breather.

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Just got about forty seconds left here, so you we

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>can talk all the macro that we want, but ultimately

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, right, you've got to do

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>something for your investors, and they don't always love to

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>just throw things in cash, although in this environment we

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>know cash has been more interesting than as of late.

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So what do we do with money right now? Brian? Yeah, well,

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>cash is a wonderful investments as far as what the

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>yield that you can get on it, and so our

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 1>short duration strategies are doing quite well as a result

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of this increase in yields. But we're finding some really

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 1>good opportunities longer term consumer staples, small camp value, emerging markets,

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>especially those on the emerging market side with the focus

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>on equity income. Uh and even just adding some of them.

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Are worried about the strong dollar on the emerging markets

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>just quickly, Uh, not really all that worried about it,

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 1>because maybe we might be closer to the peak of

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>the dollar as opposed to the trough for the dollars.

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the pain is hopefully mostly behind us.

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we gotta run. Hey, listen, have a great weekend.

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Brian Jacobson, he's senior investment Strategies at all Spring Global Investments,

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>four seventies six billion dollars in assets under management, on

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Milwaukee. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com,

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and you can also listen to our radio show at

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Sarah to Bloomberg Global News