WEBVTT - How the Five Day Weekend Works

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you welcome to stuff you should know

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>from house Stuff Works dot com? Hey, and welcome to

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>stuff you should know. It's Josh and Chuck. You're waiting

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>on me. I was, I was. I was staring right

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>at you, Chuck. I didn't notice. I should have given

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you a yeah. Yeah. Um, you know, Chuck, I don't

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>know if you've checked out the editorial department calendar recently

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>of our editorial calendar. Sure, yeah, yeah, sure, not not

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the not the the articles slated, but our actual calendar calendar.

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no, I know you haven't. Well, you

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>will be pleasantly surprised to find that if you go

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>into the week of Christmas this coming December, we work

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>two days. That's not and you know I'm not working

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>any Are you taking those days off? Oh yeah, I'm

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>taking off a couple of weeks. Wow, you know, I

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>used up almost all my big catient time. I'm very

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>grateful for this, But do you realize what that gives us? Uh? Less,

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>what it gives me? Well, it sounds like a two

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 1>day work week. It sounds also like a five day weekend. Right,

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>one man's two day work week is another man's five

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>day week. Yeah, it definitely depends on how you look

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 1>at if your workaholic two day work week, if you're

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a slacker five day weekend, right, that sounds great?

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>It does. And actually, um our HR department is isn't

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the first to ever come up with this concept. It

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>is so there's actually a movement of foot chuck called

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the Friends of the Five Day Weekend. There's actually a

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>constitutional amendment, a proposal for one, which last time I

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>counted had about signatures on it. I wasn't too impressed

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>with that number. By the way, it could be better, um,

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>basically petitioning Congress to say, all right, you know, we're

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have a two day work week from

0:01:56.760 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>now on and the rest is the weekend. Legally, you

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>if you work more than this, you have to pay.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>You have to be paid over time. Right. I love

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that this group really went for it there. They didn't

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>go with a three day weekend or even a fourth

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>They just said, screw it, five days off, two days

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a week will work. Yeah, And we should probably give

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>a little background on this group. I gotta tell you,

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>um it sounds very tongue in cheek. It sounds um,

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>almost satirical and a joke, and it almost completely is.

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>It's um. The group behind it is the Asheville Convention

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and Visitors Bureau, I Brave Asheville, North North Carolina, and um,

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>this is uh an ad campaign of marketing campaign to

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>get people to Asheville to you know, create this five

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>day weekends so everybody could come to Asheville and spend

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>their five day weekends there. Now, Gina, how it was

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the idea just to get press, I think so. I

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>think that was part of it, but I think it

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>was kind of like a whole campaign, and then the

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>press aspect wrote itself, especially once they floated a constitutional amendment,

0:02:57.720 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So it was kind of a tongue in cheek thing.

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>But actually, um, people reacted to it. They responded to it.

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, Hey, that sounds great kind of thing. Especially

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I imagine when there's like you know, they they had

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>they held rallies at festivals and stuff like that, and

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 1>I imagine the more beer there was there, the more

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>of a response there was. You know, yeah, were five

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>day weekend kind of thing. So, um, well, we found

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>out about it here at how stuff works, and of course,

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>as is our way, um, we took a tongue in

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>cheek idea to the nth degree. It's extreme conclusion, and

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to find out. I mean, like, what what the

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>deal is? Could this even work? What would happen if

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>it did? So it's like you'd be careful making a

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>joke around us, because we'll we'll we'll investigate it and

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>publish it and if if it's a stupid idea, we'll

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll say so. But frankly, these people, I think they

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>have a good idea. I think the friends of the

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Five Day Weekend they have a a good idea. And

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>they're they're actually pointing something out. What's that they're pointing

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>out that Americans work way too hard and have become far,

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>far too serious. Well, Donald Trump doesn't agree with you, No,

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't. But that's the Donald. You know. He said

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>he said the idea was ridiculous. He did he actually

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>he said it in his blog, right. I got to

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>him in the first place. I'm impressed that he knows

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>how to blog. So, um, yeah, he he didn't. He

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't like that. But there's plenty of people who agree

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>with the concept um and actually this this this idea

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>that Americans are overworked is We've got yards of figures here, Chuck, Chuck,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>how about some figures. I'm the statmn UH in two

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven survey was performed by the Conference Board, and

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they found that a fewer than fifty percent of Americans

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>were happy with their jobs, which is, yeah, that's pretty sad.

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Though UH in seven had job satisfaction. That's a sharp decline.

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And you will know note that I think in nineteen

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>eight seven, that was the year that the Michael Keaton

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>pro America movie Gung Ho came out and really kicked

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the American worker into overdrive. We're not gonna get beaten

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>by the Japanese. Let's get to work, you know, be

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>the lovable Michael Keaton led the charge. Well, I think

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that's it centered exclusively around the movie Gung Ho. Yeah,

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>pre batman, Michael Keaton. Uh. And then there was another

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>study in two thousand four that um, one third of

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>all Americans feel overworked, which I thought it might be

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>a little higher than that. To be honest, I would too,

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think we we've also developed an endurance over time,

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Tom and fat lazy pre gung Ho days to like,

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of a lean, trim workforce. Yeah, and

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>we have now that's slightly evidenced by and I know

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>something else. You mentioned the article that, uh, a lot

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of Americans don't use all their vacation days No. Ten

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of fourteen. Yeah, that's just that was in three thousand

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and six. That added to five hundred and seventy four

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>million unused vacation days. Yeah, that is one thing you

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>will never catch me with unused vacation That's great. Hats

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>off to you, buddy. I just I don't I don't

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>get it. Time off is good. I'm not lazy. No,

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you definitely aren't lazy, but you know, you know how

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to live, you know how to take care of yourself,

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and the value of time off, it's a value at

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:12.119
<v Speaker 1>treasure it. But I think there's a lot of people.

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you could even say a majority of American

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>workers don't know. They don't know how to do that.

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of the point of this five day weekend.

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>It's like, wake up, man, settle down, let's all just

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of chill out here there, learn to live like

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>chuck that kind of right. Well, I think I don't

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>have any stats for this but I bet a lot

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of these types are the men and women that are

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>after the dollar and that you know, they figure if

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>they're snoozing, they're losing on money. And um, you know

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>people use acidine rhymes to describe their motivations, right, and

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we're not really like that. We're meager livers and uh yeah,

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>we we know how to be happy and content. Yeah

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>without you know, making three hundred thousand dollars a year,

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not making three Maybe I should renegotiation. So, um,

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>if you'll notice, chuck the end of the five day weekend,

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, they proposed a constitutional amendment. Now, if Congress,

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>for some weird reason took this up, championed it, and

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>passed it, it actually wouldn't be the first time that

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>they've done this. Did you know that there wasn't any

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>such thing as a weekend in the United States until

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>nine that's weird. And the weekend was actually created by

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a congressional act. That's so cool. Yeah, I bet no

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>one that that's that's the your takeaway today, folks. If

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to amaze around the water cooler, that's a

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>good fact. The weekend was created by Congress, right, and

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it was called the Fair Labor Standards Act. Yeah, we

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about, um, we talked about the the Labor Department

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in Free Market Regulation podcast if we'll remember um, and

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, they shouldn't exist in this free market. But really,

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the Fair Labor and Standards Act is one of these

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>shining acts that really protects people. You know. It established

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a forty four hour work week, you know, Monday through Friday,

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>about eight hours a day. Um. It also established a

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>minimum wage, I got rid of child labor across the board.

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>It was a good act and it's still the test

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of time, clearly because the forty hour work week is

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>still kind of between forty and still the standard exactly. Okay,

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>So so what would happen if we did go to

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a two day a week work week? Um? Well, you

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>tell me, you know, you tell me, Well, it depends

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>on are you talking about economically speaking? Yeah, I know,

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>people be a lot happier. Well supposedly, it depends. I mean,

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>can you can you really say that? Well, that's just

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>my feeling. Okay, let me let me tell you about

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 1>an unnatural law that you might be interested in. Right,

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>here's the first problem with with the two day work week.

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>How are you going to do five days worth of

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>work in two days? Is it possible? Well, stay off

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Facebook exactly a good start. There's this guy named I

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>believe Alan Parkinson. No, that's Alan Parsons project. I think

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh see Northcote Parkinson. He created Parkinson's law.

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like Murphy's law. Um, it's an unnatural law, right,

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of a Rye observation um. And Parkinson's law says

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that UM work expands so as to fill the time

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>available for its completion. So if you have, you know,

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a one day job to you know, to do, but

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you're given a week to do it, it's gonna take

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you pretty much all week to do that job, no

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>matter how hard you try. So I guess if you

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>put Parkinson's law up to the you know, five day weekend,

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you could you could probably trim several days off of

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>your work week if you just went all out for

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>those two days. Probably not going to be able to

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>finish everything in two days, but it is possible, right,

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I would agree? Okay, So, um, So that's that's number one, UM,

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and then number two as far as the five the

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>friends of the five day weekend see it basically, Um,

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>we're not taking any time for ourselves as it is

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>even on the weekends, because there's a lot of times,

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>so much time spent working that the weekends are often

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>spent doing chores, housework, that kind of thing. And in

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 1>a strict economic sense and as strict economic definition, actually, UM,

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>leisure time is activities that give direct enjoyment. So just

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>because you have time off doesn't mean you're engaging in

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>leisure time, which is the whole point behind the five

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>day weekend thing. We need more time to have leisure

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>time because, like you said, we're vacuuming, we're running errands,

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. That's not leisure time. That's working

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>but not being paid for it, you know. UM, So

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that's another aspect of the whole thing, and there's also

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a physical aspect to it. Our health could actually improve,

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.839
<v Speaker 1>UM if we adopted a five day weekend case. In

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 1>point a two thousand study UM from the University of

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh and the State University of New York Oswego, they

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>found that there was a there is a direct correlation

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>between middle aged men who are at risk for heart disease,

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>suffering heart attacks, and a lack of vacation time. Right

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I did a lot of articles recently on the heart

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and stress, as you know, and it's there. It's not

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>supposed you know, it's those are direct links. Yeah, there's

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely a mind body link, and it appears to be

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 1>stresses is the most clear um example of it, right right,

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>So okay, so we would technically be able to to

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>do most of our work in two days that we're

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>now taking five days to do. Um, we would uh,

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>we would be able to actually engage in actual leisure time.

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Our health would benefit. And even more, there's a model

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>already in place for lots of time off and that's

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. Correct. I went, I went to Malta. Remember

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>this summer. There's this guy who's a diplomat over in

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>crow Geatia. He's an English diplomat and he had like

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>eighties six paid days off per year. You're kidding. No,

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not kidding at all. He hardly knew what to

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>do with all the time off that he had, and

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it was fairly fairly common, fairly standard, and I'm like, wow,

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I get two weeks off, you know. So yeah, it

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>was kind of um, it was a rough thing to

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>come you know, face to face with, right I'm jealous

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of your We often talk about our weekend activities and

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm all, you really do do it right at your house. Yeah,

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>but you you you have very you have a very

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>improved house. Well, I'm renovating a house. Some of you

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>may know this, some of you may not. So there's

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work to be done on the weekends. Um.

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I do get pleasure out of that, though, So I

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>guess technically that still counsels leisure time as long as

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>you're driving. Pleasure is a direct pleasure. So, Chuck, let's

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>look at it from an economic aspect. Now we know

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>what the friends of the five day weekend. You're saying

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that it could be beneficial to us, but you know,

0:12:57.679 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>would it be beneficial of the economy. Well, this is

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:01.959
<v Speaker 1>where you need to school meet, because I know economics

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>is your your one true love in life. I love economics.

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Actually it's so weird and nerdy, but I've become fascinated

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 1>by it as I've grown older. And there's this guy

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>who pertains to what we're talking about, um named John

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Maynard Keynes, and uh he appropriately enough came up with

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Keensian economics, and um, he wrote a paper basically Keensie

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and economics is a form of macro economics. So before

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>people would say, okay, um, there's this much much wealth

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in the world, or you know, people sold this many

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>goods and um, you know there was this gross profit

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, minus expenditures, and now you have

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 1>net profit. And there's economics. And keens is like, well, well, whoa,

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>we're missing like a lot of aspects here, so like

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>our are really um, I guess granular uh view of economics.

0:13:55.720 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Now we're we're keeping track of office supply indexes or indicaes. Um,

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 1>that's all KINSI. And he said we need to take

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>into account debt and taxes and all this other stuff. Right,

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. So by the time he writes this paper,

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>UM called um economic go Ahead, go ahead, Economic possibilities

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>for our grandchildren. Right, And he writes that in ninety

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and he'd already established himself as like the the economic

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>genius of his age. So he writes this thing. Everybody's listening, right,

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and in it he says, okay, he took a very

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>conservative growth rate of um of the economy and wealth,

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>which he called capital um equipment. Yeah, thank you, um.

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>He said two percent growth per year and seven and

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a half percent growth of the capital equipment, which is,

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I believe all the money available in the world, um,

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and within a hundred years we're going to basically be

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>living in this leisure society. The friends of the Five

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Day Weekend came up with, Yeah, I love this theory

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. He actually took a his estimates were pretty

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>much spot on, and they were actually slightly more concerned.

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>We've grown more than that, and I believe like our

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>capital equipment has grown much more than seven and a half.

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like a hundred or two hundred times

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>or some some really enormous amount, and yet we're still

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>not in this leisure society that Keene's envision within a

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred years. Even though we far exceeded his his predictions

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>for growth, he was off the mark there for sure.

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>He was though, why well, I think you actually didn't

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>interview him, correct, I did two interviews, Uh, And I've

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>always kind of had this idea that if you want

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to know a question, go to Harvard. It's they They

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>have some really really good interview subjects. And actually I

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>also called a guy from Cornell too, and both of

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>them just turned out to be spot on and um, yeah,

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>from Cornell Robert Frank, and from Harvard Richard Freeman. And

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the thing is is I call both of them out

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of the blue. Neither one of them had ever heard

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of the five day weekend before, and both of them

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>just right off the cuff talked just perfectly, gave me

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>all the information I needed. And as if that weren't enough,

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>both of them had just submitted chapters for a book

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>called Revisiting kens On the very question I called them about,

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and I had no idea that book was even coming out,

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>So it was all just kind of going, like, you know,

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>we're operating on all cylinders here. I'm kind of I

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>can't sit down while I'm interviewing. I'm very excited. It's

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>economics and all that. Um So Robert Frank from Cornell.

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>His his theory was that we haven't reached this Keynsian

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>leisure society because Keenes grossly underestimated relative needs. So you've

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>got basic needs, right, which are like food and water

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and say clothing, right, and then there's relative needs as well,

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>which can also be basic needs, like, for example, clothing

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>but instead of you know, tattered rags that keep you warm,

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>relative need would be a nice suit. And what Frank

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>was saying was that, um, in our modern society, it's

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>not enough to just have tattered rags that keep you warm.

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>If you want to have a better life, if you

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>want to provide for your children, you have to throw

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>more into relative needs. So your suit has to be

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>nicer so you can get a better job at an

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>interview and then pay for your children. And it's become

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 1>much more important. You can't walk into a place in

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>an interview and in rags, this basic need that's been

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>recovered and expect to advance in life. So he it

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>was his opinion that that's why Kenes missed the Mark

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Freeman and now you interviewed and this was from Harvard, correct,

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 1>and uh, he just kind of flatly said that Keenes

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>overestimated our desire for leisure and that it's a five

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 1>day work week is pretty optimal. Yeah, he said that that, Um,

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that labor and management came to a perfect agreement pretty

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 1>much to the five day, five day work week, eight

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>hour day. What do you think? I gotta tell you, you

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I I had sent before that that's I

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>don't like too much time off. It's weird. I feel weird.

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I have to do something, I have

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to produce something, and um yeah, too much time off

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>actually makes me a little edgy. I think a four

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>day work week would be just about right for me.

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it'd be good to pepper it here there.

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it has to be standard every time,

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 1>but maybe like twice a month you get a day

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>or two off or something like that. And we're not

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>talking about telecommuting. It's a different deal. It totally is.

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>It's actually a day off, right, yeah, a day off

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>where you're just not expected to do any work. Um. Okay,

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.360
<v Speaker 1>So so now we we the friends of the five

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>day week, they five day weekend. They don't, um they

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not the first to come up with it. Keynes did. Um.

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>But I asked Freeman and Frank uh, you know what, really,

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>what would happen to the economy? Epogetically? What would happen? Yeah,

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>but you got well, I know the first thing that, um,

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 1>you would have to do is to convince your employers

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to pay you a full wage for two day his work,

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>so paying on production rather than time, right, which makes sense.

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think either of them assume that employers

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>would be willing to do that. So right there, you

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got two fifths of the wages we have now,

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>which is fine for domestic products. Right, so anything that's

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>produced domestically, Um, it's going to fall down and step

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>eventually to reflect these two fifths of wages that Americans

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>are making. In theory es okay, But also houses would

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>get substantially smaller, cars would get substantially smaller, but we'd

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>be able to survive. Basically, America would take a gigantic

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>step backward out of the rat race as one collective whole.

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>But then it would all kind of catch up with

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>itself and adjust itself. It would, and and everything would

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>be fine. I would be much like it is now,

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>except two fifths is valuable. But for and produced goods

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in comparison to our lowered wages, the prices of those

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>would skyrocket. Right, So so long Sony plasma TV, because

0:19:57.960 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>if you would be so, it be is out of

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.360
<v Speaker 1>out of bounds. Is as you know, a five million

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar home is to the average person. Um, so you'd

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>have that, but again we'd still be fine. Our our

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>relative needs would with lower to to reflect that two

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>fifth wage. But I think it was a Freeman, who

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>predicted sadly that we would still compete with one another, like,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>we'd still want to get the best TV we could

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>for two fifths of the wages we were getting, and

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it we'd want it to be better than someone else. Yeah,

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of sad that, you know, even after

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.239
<v Speaker 1>taking a gigantic step backward, we would still compete with

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>one another. There's an interesting article. It'll clearly never happen,

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 1>but it's interesting to kind of think about what the

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>what if? I think so too. So there's actually quite

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit more to this article, right, Uh, you tell

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>me you wrote it. Well, let's let's let's just advise

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>people to go on to our handy site, look into

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>our handy search bar. Just type five day weekend into

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the search bar, how stuff works dot com and stick

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>around because it is uh. Listener mail time right, listener

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>mail time, listener mail time? Okay, so, Chuck, who is

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>our listener? Mail from? Our listener is David and we

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>have the last name. We don't know where David's from.

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>But David did not take kindly to our Delta Force podcast,

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but he was very constructive in his criticism. Didn't just

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 1>slam us David says, Hi, Chuck and Josh, I usually

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>enjoy your podcast quite a bit, but your recent podcast

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>on Delta Force was way over the line. While I

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the bone you threw human human rights activists at

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the end before suggesting that they may be killed for

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a policy disagreement, you're over the top adulation for all

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>things military was disturbing. You seem to suggest that any

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>action they took was justifiable, saying how happy you were

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that they were taking care of business, not every policy

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>decision made by our government, particularly when using shadowy military

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>groups for the best. I'm not going to read it

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>because it's too long, but basically he thinks our opinion

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of special forces might change if some European Arabian country

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>special forces two tapped their way through the White House

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to arrest our president. So he was kind of just

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.239
<v Speaker 1>disagreeing with a little bit. And at the end there

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>David's referring to the colonel of Delta Force back with

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>two tap methods, with two shots to the head of

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>every terror, which I have to say, can we play

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a clip because we actually warned David and all the

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>other listeners that it could evolve into something like this right, Sure,

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>let's listen. Okay it is Yeah, there's We should probably

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>warn the listeners right now, Chuck and I will most

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>likely devolve into some sort of weird boyhood admiration of

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>all the sick, sick stuff Delta Forces done over the years.

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So just before warn if we start tittering or really

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 1>excited or one of us takes our shirt off, don't

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>be offended. Okay, so David actually shamed us a debt.

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>We did feel bad after this one, if I wereall correctly,

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>because we're not big workouts. No we're not. It's just

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 1>this weird power the Delts Force has over us. Yes

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we are odd, Yes we got a little a little juvenile,

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, David, generally we we would agree with you.

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>We believe in in human rights and UM, diplomacy not

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>military direction is as much. But I think one point

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that we tried to make it. I don't know if

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>he made it clear enough, is that if there is

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:22.719
<v Speaker 1>action to be taken, we would much prefer a small

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>operation UM, rather than some day and thirty thousand troops.

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, and just quickly before we go, we gotta

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a message from another Dave about the same podcast. Hi,

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I listened to your podcast from the UK and really

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>like the one about Delta Force. Would it be possible

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>for you to do one on European special forces like

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in Germany and France. Cheers yes and sears to you Dave. Um.

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>We were not aware that France had a special forefront.

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>So some guys like that, some guys didn't. That's great.

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh and don't forget our girlfriend in Sudan who started

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>listening to it through her speakers and and it's an

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>email saying that she felt uncomfortable doing so, so press pause,

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>but she hit was happy with it as well. Great.

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>So thank you to all three of you guys for

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>sending email. Um and David, thank you very much for

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>letting us know how you feel. We appreciate it. If

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 1>you guys want to send us an email, let us

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>know what's on your mind, whether you like what we said,

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>whether you didn't. Either way, we're cool with it. Uh.

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Send it to stuff podcast at how stuff works dot

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>com for more on this and thousands of other topics.

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Does it how stuff works dot com brought to you

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready, are

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you