WEBVTT - Geoff Collins Fired + Lucky Teams

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal hell that for me. I'm

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm for it.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 2>I've heard so many players say, well, I want to

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 2>be happy. You want to be happy for a day

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>at the steak?

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Is that woo woof? And Dan and tie welcome back

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to the solid verbol, boys and girls. My name is

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Ti Hildebrand. That fine gentleman over there in a quasi

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>matching quarter zip is Dan Rubenstein. We did not do

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>this on purpose if you're watching the video, but alast

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>we are not changing because we're comfortable. Frankly, Dan, how

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 1>are you? I'm good.

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 2>I am a company man because Roeback sponsor can continue

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 2>to be I think we're both a weaaring Roeback. So

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, shout out to these quarter zips. They're very

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 2>comfortable as the is it. The weather's turned a little bit.

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 2>I know you're on the East coast and you got

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 2>some storms along the seaboard. You're not on the seaboard,

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 2>but uh weather's turning. It's fall correct that that is correct.

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 2>The house is getting a little chillier at night. The

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.919
<v Speaker 2>snow dog that is downstairs that you may hear barking

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 2>at some point during this broadcast is enjoying it much

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 2>more than anybody else. But alas it is the end

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 2>of September, it has been a September to remember in

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 2>many respects. On today's show, we're going to talk through

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 2>what it looks like moving forward for some teams. We've

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 2>got this term called LOR luck running out.

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>You just said lor What did I say LR?

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 2>You just said l R, which is how I screwed

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 2>it up because I'm dumb on our previous show.

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, yeah, LRO luck running out teams We're going

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk through. We're going to try to figure out

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>is it a luck thing, is it not a luck thing,

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Who's good luck, who's bad? Luck? Is set to run

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>out the ro or not or not correct? I was

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>going to talk through some of the news of the

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>past couple of days, most notably Jeff Collins getting fired

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>at Georgia Tech. Todd Stansbury, the director, also out go

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>through some of those candidates. This episode, all of our

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>episodes driven by our good friends over at Geico. Don't

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>forget You've only got about what nine ten days now? Yeah,

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Solid Verbolive dot Com, Smell tieshair dot Com. We started

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>posting graphics. You and I had a long internal production

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>call yesterday. Yeah, it's called work tie, It's called work

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>cald work, cald work. We started figuring this thing out.

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 1>It's got a high degree of difficulty, but I think

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the upside, the upside is there for this concept that

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>we are going to do the Solid Verbal Presents College

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Football Call in the Game Show, Live, New York City,

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>eight pm, Chelsea Music Hall, October the seventh, Not this Friday,

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>next Friday.

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 2>It's like it's mere feet away from the best tacos

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 2>in New York as well, mere feet if that's a

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 2>one to two that you're interested in college football fun

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 2>on a Friday night, Friday, October seventh, and delicious handmade

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 2>ts flour corn tortillas, all all made to order.

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>It's the best. Let's talk us number one not a

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>sponsor could be. Shall we get to news? Let's let's

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>but I saved my voice these days for the true

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>breaking news. It's hard to do in an on demand

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem such as podcasting, so we'll save it, use it

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>when we need to the news. I mentioned it at

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the top. Jeff Collins fired at Georgia Tech. It is

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>now the third consecutive week that we've had a coach

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>get fired after dismal results. Jeff Collins, of course was

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>rumored to be fired for a while. We kind of

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>knew this was coming. It does catch me off guard

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>every time it happens after like week four or week

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>three or week two. That's just where we are now

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>as a sport. Todd Stansbury, the athletic director, also out

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it is of note that Jeff Collins was his first

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>big hire, so did not go swimmingly for either of

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>those two gentlemen. Per our friend Bruce Felman, here are

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the names. Dan, we can talk through which

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>ones we like, which ones we don't like. But Deon

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Sanders getting some love here. Yeah, Deon Sanders a name

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that Bruce lists first in his coaching candidates to watch.

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Also Jeff Monkin as well as Todd Monkin, the Monkin brothers.

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Jeff of course, the head coach at Army, Todd the

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator at Georgia, Charles Huff from Marshall, Sean Lewis

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>from Kent Right, Caine Wollmack from South Alabama, Bill O'Brien,

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the current offensive coordinator for the Alabama Crimson Tide, and

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Alex Atkins, currently the offensive coordinator at Florida State. Dan.

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Another name that I didn't list here in that initial

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>batch was Jamie Chadwell because if only based on the

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>feedback we have gotten, the early feedback we've gotten on

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>our discord server, which you could find overballards dot com.

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Chadwell, current coach at to Carolina. I'm also a

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>name I think very much going to be pursued here

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>in this next batch of coach hires. Jamie Chadwell another

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>name that could be very interesting given his proximity to

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 1>the job, given what he's done at Coastal, given the

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that he's young and innovative, got a hybrid offensive system,

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>fun to watch. There's a lot to like about Jamie Chadwell.

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.239
<v Speaker 1>So if I were to say to you, your option

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is Jamie Chadwell or one of the other names on

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>this list, oh man phrasing with option continue, Jamie Chadwell

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>or one of these other what eight names that I listed? Yeah?

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Which direction would you go? I would go a different direction? Okay? Why?

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 2>I think Jamie Chadwell will succeed on the Power five level.

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 2>But I think Georgia Tech is so specific in that

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 2>it is not a football powerhouse. Right when Georgia Tech

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 2>succeeds in football, which they do and have had stretches

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 2>of doing, it almost seems like it's right before Clemson pops,

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 2>right right before, like they're filling a vacuum, right when

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 2>the ACC was crazy down and Georgia Tech found itself

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 2>in the AEC championship game against I believe wake Forest

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe a Riley Skinner Reggie Ball situation. It's that they're

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 2>an opportunity truck program, that they'll run a system, or

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 2>that they will be pretty good in a year when

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 2>other teams that are traditionally better are not as much.

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 2>And so you factor in the academics, you factor in

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 2>do kids want to play college football in a major

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 2>American city as opposed to a college town? Right, if

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 2>you're good enough in Atlanta to play for a major

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 2>power five program, how many do you have within a

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 2>four hour drive, five hour drive, five hour flight, right

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 2>that everybody that Atlanta metro area has become an increasing hotbed.

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 2>And so do you want to play for a power

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 2>in a traditional college town or do you want to

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 2>stay home? And that's that challenge I think, and I

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 2>think Jeff Collins did an admirable job in terms of

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 2>trying to transition this program away from the baggage fair

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 2>or not, of the triple of the triple auction, the flexbone, whatever.

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 2>And it was always going to be a struggle on

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 2>a certain level with how deeply entrenched that recruiting was

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 2>and that system was within the roster to move to

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 2>a different system, to move to a more modern slash

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 2>traditional power pro style not option. So it's just going

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 2>to be a challenge for whoever. And now you look

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 2>at some of the other schools that are more academically rigorous,

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:34.119
<v Speaker 2>they're all like in when they succeed Stanford, Northwestern, Duke

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 2>and Duke maybe is not the best example, but like

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Stanford and Northwestern, Vanderbilt did with James Franklin, but he

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 2>was expert recruiter, and you can find quarterbacks to run

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 2>a system like James Franklin wants to run. But Stanford

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 2>leans on the offensive lineman thing. Northwestern leaned on three

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 2>stars academics defense right that the offense was never there,

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 2>but they hit with some really strong defensive coaching hires,

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 2>namely my Hankuets. And so the question for Georgia Tech

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 2>is not how do we become a program that competes

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 2>to win nine or ten games a season, it's how

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 2>do we become a program that wins eight games in

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 2>a very specific way. Does it have to be the

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 2>triple option? You mentioned Jeff Monkin's name, and they succeeded

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 2>under Paul Johnson, But then people got sick of what

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 2>appeared to be a ceiling. And yes, we'll be a

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 2>ball team, Yes we'll beat a good team here and there.

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes we will run for a kajillion yards, but we

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 2>can't really develop defenses running the triple and recruit to

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 2>a good defense running the triple. And we want to

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 2>appear to be more modern and attractive to quarterbacks who

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 2>could potentially fit in with Georgia Tech. And so Jeff

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Collins did a good job also of marketing Atlanta as

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 2>like the team of Atlanta, as you know, fraught and futile,

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 2>as that may be at times with Georgia owning that

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 2>territory to the degree that it does. So, Yeah, Todd

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Munkin's an interesting name. I saw what Dell McGee I

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 2>think is the Rams running coach. I saw Richard Johnson

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 2>wrote a longer piece that's worth your time at si

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.599
<v Speaker 2>dot com about the Georgia Tech opening, Charles Huff you

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 2>mentioned is interesting because of his experience recruiting in the

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 2>South and the success he had at Alabama and recruiting there.

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 2>It's it's ultimately going to be somebody who embraces what

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Georgia Tech is instead of what it isn't. And that's

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 2>true of a lot of jobs, and which is why

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 2>I think Paul Johnson succeeded. You're like, this is a

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 2>place where you need to be very specific. His brand

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 2>of specificity was that offense, that option offense, and you

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 2>own a Georgia Tech Orange Bowl Champion's hat, do you not?

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I do? It's it's yeah, it's somewhere around here.

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 2>So it's leaning into that specificity. And if it's the option,

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 2>if it's you know, defense and blitzing and just going

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 2>all in on defense and having an offense that serves

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 2>the defense, fine, whatever, I just think it's going. It's

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 2>basically impossible to say we're gonna do what Tennessee did

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 2>right a long down, dormant program. But it's in a

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 2>college town. There's a history there. I just don't think

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 2>you can if you really want to make Georgia Tech

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 2>a nine win ACC, a ten win ACC type program.

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna take twenty years, right, a twenty years of

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 2>it doing it correctly. So let me ask you about

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Deon Sanders them. Okay, the Deon Sanders angle is.

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting because there's an obvious connection with it Atlanta,

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>their legend icon. Yeah. Given his professional career, he has

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 1>clearly burst onto the college football scene with what he's

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>done at Jackson State, notably what he did with Travis Hunter,

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>recruiting Travis Hunter away from Florida State last second, big deal,

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>big deal in our parts here earlier this year. So

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>let's talk through Deon Sanders and what that looks like.

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>Because if Dion comes to Georgia Tech, you would imagine

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>there would be something of a boon with recruiting. You'd

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.199
<v Speaker 1>imagine that the folks who are willing to give money

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to that program would be energized and perhaps want to

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>give more money. Georgia Tech has shown, at least on

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>some level, an ongoing commitment to the football program. They

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>want to make this thing better, They want to make

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>facilities better. There was a like a nine figure renovation

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>project that I had read about. So this is not

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a program that is I think, content to just collect dust.

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>They clearly want to move things forward. In the fact

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that Dion is out there, given his connection to Atlanta

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting. I also think there will be other

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>jobs that will want to try and court Deon Sanders.

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about week five now, there's a chance that

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Auburn is next. I'm not rooting for that for Brian Harson,

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>but there's a chance that depending on how things go

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>against LSU this week in Harson could be the next

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>man up. Auburn you would think would also be interested

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in a guy like Dion, So any thoughts on Dion

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Sanders and where he might go next.

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 2>So you have to separate Dion Sanders from the big,

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 2>outsize personality who has recruited really well and won a

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 2>ton of games by the way, at Jackson State. Not

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 2>eligible I don't believe for the FCS playoffs, but won

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 2>a ton of games and has done a crazy impressive

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 2>job that I think has surprised a lot of people

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 2>given his lack of college football coaching background. So if

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 2>you remove Dion and you're just saying very successful Jackson

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 2>State coach, that leap is unprecedented to go from an

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 2>FCS school to a Power five program, especially one in

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 2>a big city with the history that Georgia Tech football

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of does. Anyway, that even I remember when at

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.599
<v Speaker 2>a certain point when the Oregon job opened. Maybe it

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 2>was when Willie Taggart took the job, when PJ. Fleck

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 2>was floated by some people in the Oregon universe or

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 2>like Oregon fan universe, and what I had heard in

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>coaching circles and hiring circles, and it's too big a

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 2>leap to go from Western Michigan to Oregon is too big,

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 2>that Oregon's too major a program, and that when he

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 2>made that move to Minnesota it probably made more sense.

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.959
<v Speaker 2>Georgia Tech is not where Oregon is. But to go

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 2>from FCS too well, not the not just ACS, HBCU, right, HBCU.

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 2>It's an inn jump, that's, like you said, unprecedented that

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 2>I think would be a great story. It'd be a

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 2>great story. And if there were anybody equipped to handle

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 2>the increase in pressure and attention and shaking hands and

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 2>being that sort of major figurehead for a Power five program,

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 2>it does seem like it would be Deon. Sandyon could

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 2>handle that. Yeah, Now, Dion Sanders. If we're going to

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 2>talk about his presence, his personality, he's already in commercials

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 2>and he was on the NFL network, and he's primetime.

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, primetime coach Prime. There's not a.

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Lot that's cool about Georgia Tech. There's not as much

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 2>college football cultural cachet that surrounds Georgia Tech in the

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 2>way that it surrounds schools in Texas, schools in the SEC,

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 2>schools elsewhere in the ACC, schools in the Big Ten,

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 2>some schools in the PAC twelve, right, that there is

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 2>a certain fit of like this major personality is now

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 2>fitting in with this place that he can fully be

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 2>himself and recruit to sensically, sensibly, sensically sense whatever. That Again,

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I think you have to lean into what Georgia Tech

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 2>is rather than what they're not.

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, look, let's put it this way. The

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>first thing that they need to figure out is what

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is the administrative structure. Yeah, there's no idea in place

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of that, but is the administrative structure, who's making the

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>higher what does that look like? What is the landing spot,

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the true administrative landing spot for whichever coach they decide

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to go out after But I think Georgia Tech, even

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>by virtue of getting Paul Johnson when they did, they

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>prove that they are willing to zag a little bit.

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>The institution is willing to take a risk to zag

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. They didn't do that as much with

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Collins, who were trying to get away from that

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>very specific system. But this could be another opportunity where

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>they decide to just fully steer into a personality driven

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>program with the Deion Sanders, someone who, by the way,

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to your point, has done really well. He's done really well,

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>he's recruited well, he's obviously won games. It's a huge

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>jump to go from Jackson State to Georgia Tech. But

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's an interesting example. I really think

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting example, and I would love to see

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it for Georgia Tech. I'd loved I don't know if

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it would work, but I'd much rather see a guy

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like a Dion Sanders try to take coach Prime and

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>all the swagger that comes with to Atlanta place he's

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>very familiar with, to a program that is desperate to

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>have a better football program than a place like Auburn.

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>No disrespect to Auburn, but It's just more interesting to

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>me to have a guy like that go to Georgia

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Tech and see what he can do with the program.

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So we'll seems certainly more to come on this.

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 2>I might go Huff depending on what his season looks

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 2>like and how general how different parts of Marshall's program improves,

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 2>obviously as they navigate a new conference. But he's I

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 2>think he's a morehead guy, right, isn't he a joemo

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 2>guy like he was Penn State's running backs coach that

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 2>I think he went to Mississippi State. He was obviously

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 2>at Alabama. I think he had a year or two

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL. Bruce Felman did write I think a

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 2>feature on Charles Huff and so now having that head

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 2>coaching experience, I think that's interesting. None as a good

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 2>recruiter known as somebody who inspired, like he has a

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 2>really strong seeming reputation, and yeah, that's going to get

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 2>a game.

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Resident, He's going to get a game before long, and

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you should. You should. Totally very interesting. It's only going

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to continue to get more interesting as we go through

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>here Week five. Who knows what Week five will bring

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>on the coaching front. Two other very quick notes A

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Naias Smith done for the rest of the year at

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Texas A reportedly a leg fracture. They did not come

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 1>out and say it. They just said it was a

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>lower Well we're body injury, but leg fracture. Out for

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the season. Not cool, not cool. Feel

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>bad for him, Definitely feel bad for the Texas A

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and m offense. He was a key component of that,

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>especially when it goes to when it comes to downfield

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff going downfield. So Nya Smith done the rest of

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the year. Bummer for him. Hank Bachmeyer on a different note,

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>for Boise State, it has not been a good run

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>for him in the early going so far this season

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>for the Broncos. He has decided the transfer out of

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Boise State. Have not seen where he might go next.

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>He's got a year of eligibility left and presumably somebody

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>will want Hank Bachmeyer. He's had a pretty good run

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>at Boise but not in the early going. Here and

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Andy and Alos. Yeah, he's got to figure out something

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.479
<v Speaker 1>on offense because ten points against UTEP is not going

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>to cut it.

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 2>No, I think he's got to figure out something in

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 2>terms of Monster dot Com because I just when you

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 2>look at trends, and when you look at offense careening

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 2>off a cliff quarterback highest profile. I don't know if

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 2>he's the highest profile or the highest rated. I know

0:17:52.600 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 2>he was a four star quarterback YE two. Boise State,

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>of which they do not have a history of finding

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 2>four star developed a ton of good quarterbacks, but attracting

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 2>a top level recruits to Boise State was a great

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 2>job done by I think it was harsonaire, of course,

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 2>but things seem acrimonious on the offensive side of the ball.

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 2>They bring in dirt Cutter and I don't know, man,

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 2>this type of momentum with how Oregon State season started

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 2>against Oregon State with all the turnovers in the first

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 2>half and the offense just looking like a mess, and

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Andy Ablos, you know, obviously fires his offensive coordinator. But

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to reverse course, not impossible, but tough to

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 2>reverse course because as we know, and as we're all

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 2>aware this, the bar is pretty high in Boise for

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 2>college football. Like we can talk about the expectations at

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 2>certain places and coaches being let go in Nebraska and

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Tennessee wherever over these past few years, Boise State is

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 2>not an eight win expectation job it just isn't, and

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 2>so Boise expects rightfully so given the resources and the

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 2>growth of that program, Boise expects to be in the

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 2>mix more often than not for that New Year's six

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Bowl game.

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that's totally fair. And by the way, if

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>it does go south at Auburn for Brian Harrison, if

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it does continue to go south for Andy Avelos at Boyse,

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.959
<v Speaker 1>perhaps Brian Harson ends up back at Boise next season.

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>That is not so possible. That is that is not

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>out of the realm of possibility.

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's uh yeah, I didn't mind the higher obviously

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 2>quite familiar with Andy Avlos from his time at Oregon.

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 2>It made sense given he played there and coached there

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 2>and has the West Coast ties. I think he's from California.

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 2>But this is it's that weird crossover of Boise both

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 2>seen being seen forever and ever as cute little Boyse.

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 2>It's cute that they win all these games, and the

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 2>fun crispy they expect to win a lot of games

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 2>in that treasure Valley.

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:55.239
<v Speaker 2>By the way, a couple other news items I just

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 2>scan across, and then we'll get into our lucky game.

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Brandt Keithy the tight end for you, like all American

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 2>caliber tight end. He's out for the season, which is

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 2>a major blow to cam Rising in that passing attack.

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 2>But they recruited tight end pretty well and it's they

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 2>run a lot of two tight ends. That's the other

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 2>thing is South Carolina moved their game to Thursday because

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 2>of the incomings and Hurricane Ians, So you might see

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 2>more either precautionary cancelations, postponements, or hey let's play Friday,

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Hey let's play Thursday. That's somebody keep your eye on.

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's South Carolina. South Carolina State, I believe,

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 2>is who they're playing this week. That's correct, not a major,

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 2>major matchup, but something that they felt was worth doing.

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>So keep an eye peel. Okay, play then play the game.

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Little Brittany here to alcow you to the college Football podcast.

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So sphere Dan, what is this game?

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 2>So we've been talking about luck and a team, but

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 2>not the only team that I think in the early

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 2>going that's been associated with some degree of luck has

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 2>been because of the turnover different wrencheal USC.

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Now, let me be clear as somebody who has doubted

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 2>a USC at least in the short term their defense.

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that hype machine continue.

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Lucky does not mean bad. You can be lucky and good.

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 2>They can be occurring at the same time. And you're

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 2>not only good because of luck, but sometimes you might

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 2>be three and one instead of four and oh because

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 2>of some luck. And so luck can take its form

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 2>in a number of ways. It's not just turnover march.

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 2>And this is what I have here that I think

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 2>in some ways can be considered lucky. So we have

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 2>what tip balls on passes right, that it's a skill

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 2>to tip a ball, but you're not necessarily You're not

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Wilt Chamberlain or Bill Russell tipping it and getting it

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 2>to a teammate all in the same motion. It's a

0:21:55.320 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 2>little different with a rifled pass of doinks right can

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 2>be involved with luck? We have I have brutally bad

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 2>game changing referee calls yes like a and that's it's

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 2>a moment. And so a lot of these games don't

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 2>necessarily come down to a moment. There are opportunities in

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 2>both directions. But yeah, that you can be just flat

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 2>unlucky that your star edg rusher is called for targeting

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 2>and it upon replay, it wasn't or flat unlucky that

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 2>a pass interference was missed or something like that. That

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 2>is unlucky. Sure, you can be lucky, especially in the

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 2>early going, that teams on your schedule are way worse

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 2>than anticipated or way better on unluckiness, like, oh my god,

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I didn't see all these.

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Teams being this good. Damn it.

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 2>You can be I mean, you got the fumble recovery.

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Go either way.

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 2>You can be lucky with fumble recoveries and unlucky with

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 2>fumble recoveries that the ball just bounces the wrong way.

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 2>You be unlucky with weather. They're like, we should be

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 2>way better, but this team, you know, was hosting us

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 2>in a monsoon situation. That is flat unlucky. That is

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 2>act of God that you have nothing to do with.

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 2>And then of course injury luck either way, some teams

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 2>get fantastic injury luck, and some teams are just snake bitten,

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 2>sometimes literally, and somebody's kept out of a game because

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.959
<v Speaker 2>of venom in there in their body venom.

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, there's all sorts of.

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Ways, especially a few weeks in where you're like, man,

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I am just flat lucky as a SO and SO fan,

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 2>or I am flat unlucky as a SO and SO fan. Sure,

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 2>So that's where I come down with luck and the sport.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>You can be.

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Bad and lucky. You can be good and lucky, you

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 2>be bad and unlucky, you can be bad, you can

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 2>be good and unlucky. It all happens, It all fits

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 2>in the spectrum. So what we want to do is

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 2>evaluate the luck. We want to evaluate the luck thus

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 2>far through four weeks of the college football season. When

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 2>things kick off in week five, if you can believe.

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>It will be October oh Man September football effectively over,

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>though there will be a couple games before we get

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the Saturday. But for all intents and purposes, we've made

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it through excuse me, one month of the season, and

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>so we have a pretty good set of data that

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>we can go on with respect to law. Give me

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple teams here. I know you mentioned USC, but

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>let's let's let's pick a different team. We can come

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>back to USC later.

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I have some teams that you could consider to be

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 2>both lucky and unlucky. Okay, I think Notre Dame could

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 2>be both lucky and unlucky. Unlucky because of the status

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 2>of their starting quarterback shoulder, just an unlucky literal break

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 2>right that they with their schedule, getting Ohio State as

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 2>early as they did. And even though Tyler Buckner was

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 2>not an immediate All American, let's phrase it, he probably

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 2>very kind of you, thank you. He probably has a

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 2>better and would have had a better chance of developing

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 2>into something more dangerous than Notre Dame's backups, because I

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 2>think the raw talent he's perceived to have.

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Does that make sense, It makes sense. I will say that,

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Drew Pine against North Carolina completed pretty much

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>any pass he wanted to thus far. His completion percentage

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>is sixty nine percent. Hey, nice, something like that. So

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>he's done a good job against a team like in

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina, did enough to win against Cal. You know,

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame is in a weird spot with that quarterback position.

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 1>And I can't tell if it's a matter of Buckner

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>playing against two really good teams in Ohio State and

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Marshall back to back weeks one and two, or if

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:49.719
<v Speaker 1>it is just a Buckner problem. Because you know, as

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>well as I, we talked to plenty of people here

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in the off season that were like, maybe think again

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>about Tyler Buckner. Maybe maybe like don't don't go all

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in on Tyler Buckner as the answer at quarterback at

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame. So what I'm dancing around here is I'm

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>just not sure Buckner's that good. That's okay, And it

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is still unlucky that Notre Dame would have this circumstance

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 1>where they got to start Drew Pine, a ninety five

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>pound quarterback the rest of the way against the schedule

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>that is not particularly like super easy. So definitely a

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>stroke of bad luck for Notre Dame. Quarterback depth is

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 1>going to be an issue moving forward, at least for

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the entirety of this season. Who knows what it looks

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>like next season. And you know, looking ahead at some

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of these other teams in the schedule, they've got a

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>bye week now, but then they've got BYU right a

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks after that, they go on the road

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 1>to Syracuse, they got Clemson, They've got usc Like, they

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>got to get their their offense squared away here with

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>their quarterback situation before long, otherwise we could be looking

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>at a few more l's in the schedule.

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 2>I should point out all legit programs worth rooting for

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 2>BT BYU that's all.

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Now, that's all. I'm fair enough.

0:26:57.400 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 2>The reason I said Notre Dame both that they are

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 2>all so lucky is that col game featured a postgame

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 2>referee apology about an offsides call that extended a Notre

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Dame drive got them a touchdown and they win by

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown. That game also featured I believe by their

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 2>skin of the teeth hail Mary drop that is right

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 2>at the end.

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:18.959
<v Speaker 1>That is correct.

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Again, you can be good and lucky, but Notre Dame

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 2>walking away from that game, I think now that we

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 2>have all of the facts, a bit lucky, that's okay.

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 2>I have Minnesota lucky and also good. But you look

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 2>at their schedule, it's been pretty good through the first

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.479
<v Speaker 2>few weeks of the season. I didn't see the Michigan

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 2>State thing coming. I was I was in on Minnesota.

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 2>I bet Minnesota with.

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Hard earned dollars, hardered Americans. I was in on Minnesota

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>minus two and a half. I did not feel that

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>confident about it. But to win thirty four to seven,

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe was the final, and to look as good

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>as they did against a team in Michigan State that again,

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't sure they were going to be as good

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:03.640
<v Speaker 1>as they were a year ago. But I didn't think

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>it's bad. It was really bad against Minnesota. That is

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a result they did not expect. So I do believe

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that Minnesota is good, though I do have scar tissue

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>from last year and even the year before going in

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>on Minnesota and having them burn.

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 2>Me corolary slash a dendum. I should probably learn what

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 2>either of those words mean. Any team who has played

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Colorado or Nebraska is extremely lucky to have them on

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the schedule this season, if not seasons moving forward. Who's

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 2>to say, but yeah, that Minnesota has Colorado is it's a.

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Nice, little, nice little fluff.

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I suppose in a number of ways, I didn't mean

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 2>fluff the way that some people might be understanding that

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>term to me.

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>But here we are. It's too late. I think.

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's necessarily the worst thing in the

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 2>world if you're a program like Minnesota with expectations of

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 2>being good but not necessarily excellent in playoff caliber, to

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 2>have the preseason schedule or the non conference schedule that

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 2>they do. But it is it is lucky that they

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 2>have this year's iteration of what Michigan State's looking like

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 2>and what Colorado's is looking like not their fault, and

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm sure their turnover margin is out of

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 2>this world it is it's well, no it's not, it's

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 2>plus three. It's fine, But that they had those games

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 2>and also that I guess Kirk Sharaka became available.

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Kirk the sound is back on the board now forevermore continue.

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I think their number one most efficient defense

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 2>in the nation number is probably based on a little

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 2>bit more than just an incredible defense.

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, they're definitely lucky to some extent because

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of the schedule. But we said it at the very

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>like the very beginning of the season, we said this

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>about Minnesota that because of the schedule, because of just

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>what they had coming back, it seems somewhat probably that

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>they're undefeated going into their game what mid October, second

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to last week of October at Penn State. And that's

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a game for Penn State that's really really tender because

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that's like a very let down, look aheady situation for

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Penn State in between Michigan and Ohio State. Yeah, so

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>plus there's history there at Minnesota. Yeah, I don't know,

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>do not be surprised if Minnesota goes to Penn State

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and knocks them off. Right now, looking at projections, that's

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>about to pick them. Okay, Vegas has that as about

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to pick them. Maybe Penn State favored by a few,

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>but Vegas views these teams very very similarly. I like that.

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I like that, you know what, And I know Minnesota

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 2>has a rival of course in Wisconsin, but Penn State

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 2>to me still without that obvious rival, the personalities of

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 2>both James Franklin and PJ. Fleck would make for like

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 2>a fun let's look forward to this game a little

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 2>bit more. We had the game where Minnesota upsets and

0:30:57.600 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 2>they hang on to upset Penn State. I think in

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty nineteen, like I'd say, budding rivalry.

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Not necessarily, they're kind of the same, dude. There's a

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>lot a lot of overlap there. Yeah, yeah, okay, Okay.

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 2>By the way, imagine if in like nineteen ninety three,

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 2>we were like fast forward twenty years, thirty years, whatever

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 2>it is since then, Jesus World teams are going to

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 2>feel so incredible about seeing Nebraska and Colorado on their schedule.

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Be unfathomable. But wo yeah, that's it's a crazy conversation

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 2>for another day. How about Ohio State a little bit lucky?

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 2>You think Ohio State is a little bit lucky, And

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 2>this isn't because of what they've done thus far, but

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit lucky in that when you look at

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 2>the rest of Ohio State's schedule and the Big Ten

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 2>that it's sort of an opposite whatever the opposite is

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 2>of Hurricane Ian. The skies are opening up. It's Hurricane

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Ryan day, because it's Rutgers, it's whatever Michigan State is,

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 2>It's Iowa without an offense. Penn State on the road

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 2>is going to be challenging. Northwestern seems to have fully collapse.

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Not that a good Northwestern was going to beat Ohio State,

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 2>but it could have been a challenge like it was

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty. Indiana looks like they're not going to

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 2>be a lot. Maryland looks decent but have a pretty

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 2>low ceiling, and Michigan was maryland Ish this past weekend.

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm just speaking. In this moment, Ohio State appears to

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 2>be full on excellent and fortunate that the rest of

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 2>their schedule, which at one point seemed pretty rough, now

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 2>is seeming pretty great. See, I thought you were going

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 2>to stay lucky because of their receiver depth. No, no,

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 2>they amassed that with skill.

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 1>To me, I mean they are just so loaded at

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the skill positions that it is increasingly difficult to figure

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>out who can go toe to toe with this team. Honestly,

0:32:57.320 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be Bama, It's going to be Georgia,

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>one of those teams. That's the only team. I stand

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>by it. I said at the top, Michigan fans can

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>can yell at me if you want, but I still

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>believe it. Nobody's beating this team. Nobody's beating this team,

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>at least on their schedule in the regular season. With

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the offense that they have a mass because you know, CJ.

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Stroud is awesome at quarterback, still underrated in my view,

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>perpetually underrated. Somehow. They've got a great running two great

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>running backs led by Trey Henderson. Even when you're not

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>starting Jackson Smith and Jigba still got a mechag Buca,

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>still got Marvin Harrison Junior. You still got Julian Fleming,

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>all these guys that can just plug and play out wide.

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Put that behind a good line like there really are

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>no weak spots on that offense, and with a defense

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that's going to continue to get better under Jim Knowles, Like,

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see it. So yeah, I mean, I

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>guess they're lucky to some extent with the schedule they've

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>gotten in front of them. But for me, this feels

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot less lucky and more just raw skill and

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>coach and development over the years now with Ryan Day,

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, it's they're so good.

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 2>It's luck in the way that Ana, maybe you're this

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 2>kid that in fifth grade you're like lucky you have

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:17.399
<v Speaker 2>a super Nintendo and a second Genesis. Lucky in fact,

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 2>you were just an only child who loved video games

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 2>and got lots of presents. I think Ohio State and

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 2>again one if you want to offline about what it's

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 2>like to root for a program that can beat CJ. Stroud,

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Garrett Wilson, Chris o'lave and Jackson Smith and Jig but

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:35.280
<v Speaker 2>we can offline about it and I can walk.

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>You through that experience. Yeah, things are looking great for

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State.

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Next next, I just have Kansas that Jalen Daniels was

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 2>slept on as a recruit.

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Man, He's he's an impressive kid. I don't know if

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you've had a chance to listen to any of his

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>postgame stuff. But I mean, he's got a confidence about him.

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>He believes that they're going to go out there, they're

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>going to compete, they're going to win again, and whoever

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>their competition is. From week to week, the offense has

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>been objectively one of the best in the country so far. Yeah,

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it continues, that might be a

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>lot to ask, but it's getting to the point now

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>where you look at Kansas and you're like, you know,

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty good they can score forty against these teams on

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>their schedule. Yeah, there's not a lot on that schedule

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that that worries me about being able to hold Kansas down.

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>So Jalen Daniels, with what he's done with the with

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>the way that Lance Liphold has kind of built that

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>offense around him, it doesn't what strikes me the most

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>about it. And I was trying to put my finger

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 1>on it when we went through and looked at the

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Duke Kansas game from a week ago. We've seen teams

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 1>before that rise from the ashes and they get a

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 1>couple wins and everybody feels good about it, and it

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>feels like it's duct tape and chicken wire. Yeah, this

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel like that. This feels like legitimately they're a

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>very good offense, and that in and of itself is

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:57.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the best stories in college football.

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it turns out when you hire an apt athletic

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 2>director and a head coach who are legit it makes

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 2>a difference. And you're not hiring less miles right sorry,

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 2>like they're just when when as a university you're making

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 2>decisions that's continually set the program back, and then you

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 2>hire actual professionals and jobs that demand it, it makes

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 2>a difference. Who could have seen that coming? And by

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:24.959
<v Speaker 2>the way, not unlucky in their results. Not that Duke

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 2>is a team with a pronounced heartbeat, but West Virginia

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 2>and Houston those are teams. Those are squads. Those guys

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 2>have players. Those teams have players. So I'm I'm just

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 2>thoroughly impressed. But yes, lucky that Jalen Daniels was not

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 2>like in the last second, Oh my gosh, Texas Tech

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 2>offered him, Oh my gosh, Cal offered him. Like didn't

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:51.919
<v Speaker 2>to my knowledge, receive other last minute, bigger Power five

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 2>program offers because they whiffed on another quarterback target.

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:57.879
<v Speaker 1>No, Well, and so here's the question. Then if we're

0:36:57.880 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>truly playing a game with this. A question is done

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the luck run out? Does the luck run out for Kansas?

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Because I mean, thus far see, I'm inclined to say no.

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm inclined to say no because it feels like a

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 1>legitimately good offense. We also have decent data at this

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>point on Kansas. We're getting better data on most of

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>these other teams. But Kansas in particular played West Virginia

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and Houston on the road. In addition, they played Duke

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>last week. Those are actually teams that have played, you know,

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 1>decently well in some capacities so far this season. Sure,

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and you look at what they've done from an offensive standpoint,

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>they've been very good. They've been very good. Now Still,

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel like the numbers have caught up to

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Kansas yet. So if you look at projections moving forward,

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Kansas is projected to lose every game it plays. The

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 1>schedule does get harder, so it still is on the

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>table that they could lose every game that they play

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and finish four and eight. I don't think that's likely.

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 1>When you've got an offense like this, you'll catch teams.

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>So Kansas potentially on the drive to six here. You

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>know their luck might run out from the standpoint of

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>being undefeated, but in terms of qualifying for a ball

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:01.240
<v Speaker 1>at some point between now in the end of the season.

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>To me, with this offense, that feels totally feels likely.

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>The first step to doing to becoming a good team

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 1>is to do something well. To do something well, and

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:14.280
<v Speaker 1>what Kansas is doing through the air on offense, obviously

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:16.839
<v Speaker 1>led by Jalen Daniels. Look, if they are scoring on

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 1>average and they're not going to be scoring how many

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:21.760
<v Speaker 1>points are they averaging right now? Forty some odd forty

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:25.280
<v Speaker 1>five points or something. If they're scoring thirty three points

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven points the rest of the way on average,

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 1>which of these teams do you feel confident? Do you

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 1>think Iowa State is going to be scoring well enough

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>with Kansas again, Iowa State has a defense that's going

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to limit Kansas. But Texas Tech, We'll see what happens

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>with their quarterback situation Texas. I mean, Kansas kind of

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 1>owns Texas and that's not when Jalen Daniels was peaking

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>like he seems to be doing this season. Kansas State

0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:52.879
<v Speaker 1>is scoring a number of points. Good defense once again,

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:57.800
<v Speaker 1>But can you get to six wins with a pretty

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>electric offense. I think I think he can. I think

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 1>he can. All right, give me another team.

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 2>All right, I have In terms of luck, I have

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:12.359
<v Speaker 2>Florida State in here now. Florida State's luck is that

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 2>one LSU did not have its act together in Week

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 2>one at all to do very basic things correctly i e.

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Catch punts, I e. Block kick kick balls without them getting.

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Block people trying to block the punts.

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:28.879
<v Speaker 2>Yes, right, And so it was fortunate in that they

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 2>let jen Jaden Daniels excuse me an LSU back into

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 2>that game and were able to win the game the

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 2>man or that they did. And then also Florida State

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:42.360
<v Speaker 2>lucky in that Jordan Travis's injury wasn't worse against Louisville,

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 2>that they were able to pull out that game with

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Tate Roamaker roda maker, Yes, and then have Jordan Travis

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 2>return against a pretty woeful Boston College and the rest

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:56.839
<v Speaker 2>of their schedule. In terms of what Florida State's doing, uh,

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 2>pretty decent in terms of defenses. I'm not going to

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 2>say it's lucky because there are some challenges ahead, but

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 2>lucky both in terms of the LSU game and the

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 2>stroke of injury fortune here.

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know here is why, and I don't think

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>this is so much luck, but this is definitely, at best,

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 1>at worst fortuitous. Let's say, yeah, okay, kind of the

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 1>same thing. But the schedule before the season, when we

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>previewed Florida State, the schedule before the season, We've looked

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:29.359
<v Speaker 1>at this and we said, we think Florida State's gonna

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 1>better than they were a year ago. The schedule looks tough.

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Schedule looks tough for a team that was inconsistent and

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:38.759
<v Speaker 1>still growing and still almost transitioning into the Mike Norvel Era.

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Looks like a tough schedule where you can see four

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>or five losses. Right. I don't think that was out

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of the ordinary. Things have changed very quickly. Not only

0:40:46.760 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 1>did they beat LSU in week one, not only did

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.280
<v Speaker 1>they show a lot of fight in knocking off Louisville

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in the manner that they did on the road backup quarterback,

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but now look at the teams that they've got in

0:40:57.360 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>front of it, particularly over the next three weeks, which

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>is really going to be the make or break time

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 1>for Florida State. Wake Forest this week, I don't know

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 1>what the weather situation is going to be.

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Like and a letdown spot wake Forest ot lost to Clemson. Yeah,

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if weather's going to factor in.

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 1>It looks like the Southeast is going to be a

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>mess over the next few days. But Wake Forest at

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 1>home letdown spot potentially a weird weather game that's going

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to be dictated on the ground. I like Florida State's

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 1>chances there. I will up there. At NC State, we

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>could talk about NC State. NC State has has I

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 1>think been generally unimpressive this year compared to where we

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>thought they might be at this point in time. NC

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 1>State what a top ten team now great, by the way,

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.800
<v Speaker 1>after that ECU game. A lucky record right now, I

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>mean huge, hugely lucky based in the ECU result. Yeah,

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 1>but you can go to n c State win. That

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel as difficult. It's still a good team, doesn't

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>feel as difficult Clemson. You could score on Clemson, you

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.320
<v Speaker 1>can move the you can move the ball on Clemson

0:41:57.680 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in a way that we did not expect.

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I have Clemson as lucky, lucky to get out of

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Winston Salem with a win with how that defense was

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 2>absolutely torched. You look at Clemson you're like, all right,

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:13.319
<v Speaker 2>this is a team that is far more fallible than

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 2>we expected. They've got Georgia Tech, they've got Miami on here,

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 2>they've got Syracuse on here, They've got Florida on here.

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 2>I can't even tell if you're saying that's a lucky

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 2>thing and an unlucky thing.

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, I feel like this is much more advantageous

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:30.759
<v Speaker 1>to Florida State than we initially thought. So I don't

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>know if luck is the word. Luck feels almost like

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>as a pejorative if I use it in conjunction with

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Florida State and their schedules, since they have no control

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 1>over it. But things have turned in such a manner

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:44.760
<v Speaker 1>here with the schedule that it feels a lot more gettable,

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and I like that for Florida State. I'm feeling actually

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>quite good about saying ten and two Florida State, Okay,

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>fair enough.

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a stretch still, but yeah, for the

0:42:58.239 --> 0:43:00.920
<v Speaker 2>LSU and Jordan Travis reasons, I'm in Florida State being

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 2>having a stroke of luck. Also good stroke of luck Clemson.

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned why just getting out of Winston Salem with

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 2>a win. Any other teams I'm trying to I have

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 2>a list here.

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's sort of it for me. Beyond the

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:19.279
<v Speaker 1>USC very quickly. On Clemson, I do think the luck

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:21.879
<v Speaker 1>will run out. I do think the luck will run

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:25.399
<v Speaker 1>out for Clemson before long. The fact that Clemson gave

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>up points the way they did the wake Forest wake

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Forest to get a good team, legitimate capitol g good team,

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 1>good offense. At least, I do think that the luck

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 1>runs out for him. And I still harken back to

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>what I've been saying the last couple of weeks. If

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 1>receivers cannot get open, that's a problem. Against better defenses,

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a problem, and especially if defenses aren't going to

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 1>create havoc. The way that if the Clemson defense, excuse me,

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is not going to create havoc, play is the way

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>we expected, especially in that front seven. You give teams

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>time to pick you apart against the better squads on

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you on your schedule, and somebody's gonna get you. Somebody

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to get you. Wake Forest came close. Wake

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Forest could have been that team. But there are plenty

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of other opportunities here on this Clemson slate where somebody

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:15.120
<v Speaker 1>could take him down. And it doesn't seem like a

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 1>stretch to me, like I think, I think, really that

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 1>will happen. If I had a bet on one team's

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 1>luck running out, it's Clemson, because it's just you know,

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I like Will Shipley, I like a lot of the

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 1>pieces on this team, and I'm not rooting for it openly.

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:29.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate Clemson. I kind of like this team.

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I really like Will Shipley, But I just think of

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 1>receivers aren't getting open, and if the defense is not

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 1>creating the kind of pressure that we had expected, that's

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a problem.

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it might fit more under you take the good,

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:45.319
<v Speaker 2>you take the bad with Dabbo, but the Dabbo experience

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 2>might be fraught with some luck and Unluckiness. That lucky

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:52.000
<v Speaker 2>that a position coach turned out to be a dominant

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:55.760
<v Speaker 2>all time modern head coach for Clemson once Tommy Bowden

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:58.440
<v Speaker 2>and that era didn't clearly weren't working out and they

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 2>needed to make a change. Lucky that he was the

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 2>type of coach who could make pretty great hires that

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:09.840
<v Speaker 2>both within the Clemson loop and outside of it, like

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 2>Brent Vennables, and a little bit unlucky that man he's

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 2>going to be loyal forever. Cool that he's loyal forever

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 2>because guys want to stay there for a longer period

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 2>of time. Quality assistance, and it's very attractive to recruits

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:26.760
<v Speaker 2>unlucky in that Oh another internal higher, Oh, another internal

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 2>another internal higher, and so that sort of you take

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 2>the good in the bat. But that's not really anything

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:34.040
<v Speaker 2>to do with this season unless it doesn't work on

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 2>either side of the ball with those internal hires. You

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about USC and the luck factor. Explain

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the luck factor to me. With USC so number one

0:45:43.080 --> 0:45:46.040
<v Speaker 2>in the country in terms of turnover margin, they're plus

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 2>fourteen at the moment, which is well ahead of basically

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:52.880
<v Speaker 2>everybody as far as I could tell. A lot of

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 2>that comes from the interceptions that have bailed out less

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:58.799
<v Speaker 2>than stellar defensive drives, especially in the red zone. They

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:01.319
<v Speaker 2>had four picks I believe against Oregon State this pack

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 2>past weekend. And I also want to be quick to

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 2>say interceptions are not all luck. Like, yes, it's lucky

0:46:10.040 --> 0:46:11.920
<v Speaker 2>if a quarterback throws a bad pass and you're there

0:46:12.040 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 2>to catch it. But also, I'm a big believer in

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 2>right place, right time, and so if you are able

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:19.360
<v Speaker 2>to find yourself as a defensive back or a linebacker

0:46:19.400 --> 0:46:22.680
<v Speaker 2>or whatever doing your job in the lane you're supposed

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:24.239
<v Speaker 2>to be in in the passing lane, and you pick

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 2>off a quarterback that's not fully luck that it is

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:31.880
<v Speaker 2>a skill to be have situational awareness. And so USC

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:34.440
<v Speaker 2>though the manner in which that they in the manner

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 2>in which they've won, they've had to rely on those turnovers.

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 2>And if those are dropped passes or overthrown passes or

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 2>tipped balls that fall innocently to the grass, and a

0:46:44.560 --> 0:46:48.000
<v Speaker 2>team lives to play another down, we might be talking

0:46:48.000 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 2>about a three on one USC or a two and

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:53.040
<v Speaker 2>two USC. Fresno State was able to move the ball

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:57.240
<v Speaker 2>against USC. Oregon State was able to fully stop basically

0:46:57.400 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 2>USC's offense. And so you say Oregon State has basically

0:47:01.200 --> 0:47:03.719
<v Speaker 2>the same game on offense but only throws one pick,

0:47:04.480 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 2>we're probably talking about a Beaver win. But once again,

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:11.319
<v Speaker 2>USC is drafting off of the opportunity truck. I think

0:47:11.360 --> 0:47:14.799
<v Speaker 2>they are a good team who is probably the seventeenth

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 2>best team in the country, not the sixth best team

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 2>in the country, And I think that jump has to

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 2>do with luck.

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree?

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you like?

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 2>The other thing, though, is we're now talking about a

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 2>schedule that features Utah and maybe UCLA on a great

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:36.880
<v Speaker 2>day like what is on this regular season schedule for

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 2>USC that they just can't get by with maybe not

0:47:40.680 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 2>as much luck, but some luck.

0:47:42.680 --> 0:47:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, man, I see plus fourteen. Yeah yeah, I mean

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:53.600
<v Speaker 1>they've definitely been bullied by by by some of the turnovers, right,

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean I tend to think that teams with new

0:47:57.760 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 1>coaches off and see this right there, there are these

0:48:02.760 --> 0:48:06.920
<v Speaker 1>areas in the margins where you just you have some

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 1>oddities that occur early on, and it's how a new

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 1>coach either harnesses it or or doesn't harness it that

0:48:14.440 --> 0:48:16.640
<v Speaker 1>can teach you a lot about how how their coaching

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>style is, how the team feels about the coach. Like,

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:21.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, we saw some unlucky stuff with Brian Kelly

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:23.440
<v Speaker 1>at LSU, like it. I feel like you see this

0:48:23.560 --> 0:48:25.840
<v Speaker 1>type of thing all the time with new coaches, and

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:30.360
<v Speaker 1>USC has been able to use this type of stuff

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to its advantage. I believe that as the season goes on,

0:48:35.560 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>we will be talking less about luck with USC. I

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 1>think as this team settles into what it will eventually

0:48:41.640 --> 0:48:43.239
<v Speaker 1>become by the time we get to like the Notre

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Dame game Thanksgiving weekend, there will less, there will less

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:53.040
<v Speaker 1>be a luck component involved here. The question is they've

0:48:53.080 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 1>got Utah in a couple of weeks on the road,

0:48:56.400 --> 0:48:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and if there is any luck that is buoying USC

0:49:00.400 --> 0:49:03.359
<v Speaker 1>come out, then yeah, it's gonna come out then, because

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Utah does not need luck to win. Utah will beat

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 1>your brains in They didn't do it effectively against Florida,

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:10.759
<v Speaker 1>but they will beat your brains and they will run

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you to death. And they will hear brains and running

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you to death. That's what you talk, That's what Utah does.

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:21.759
<v Speaker 1>So what I think I'm saying here is we'll find

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>out soon enough. If you're right. It may even be

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:26.839
<v Speaker 1>a game like a Washington State potential look ahead game

0:49:26.880 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the week before Utah game is in USC. But at

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the same time, that's a team of the good defense

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 1>you saw last week, right, or at least can play

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:40.439
<v Speaker 1>good defense. So I'm I'm I'm mixed on the USC

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:44.840
<v Speaker 1>luck thing. They just have such good players that not

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:48.359
<v Speaker 1>to say that they are immune from the whole luck thing,

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:49.799
<v Speaker 1>but gosh, I.

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Situated Williams and Jordan Addison. It's I don't know, No,

0:49:56.880 --> 0:49:59.279
<v Speaker 2>there's no luck involved with those talents. The problem is

0:50:00.400 --> 0:50:03.319
<v Speaker 2>if we're talking about a top eight five type team

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:05.719
<v Speaker 2>for USC, which is where they're ranking, I think they're

0:50:05.760 --> 0:50:07.880
<v Speaker 2>six in the eight. People don't have I don't memorize

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:11.040
<v Speaker 2>these things. I'm old and washed up. USC has one

0:50:11.080 --> 0:50:13.480
<v Speaker 2>of the absolute worst rush defenses in the country, and

0:50:13.480 --> 0:50:19.560
<v Speaker 2>they've played Fresno, Oregon State like Rice, and they haven't

0:50:19.600 --> 0:50:22.120
<v Speaker 2>been protecting Caleb Williams. So we're saying, do you believe

0:50:22.160 --> 0:50:24.320
<v Speaker 2>in USC as a top ten team with an abysmal

0:50:24.440 --> 0:50:28.640
<v Speaker 2>rush defense and an offensive line, but pf an offensive

0:50:28.680 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 2>line who in practice has not protected Caleb Williams all

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 2>that effectively. They are one of the worst tackling teams

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:40.759
<v Speaker 2>in the country. Again, USC good team, not excellent team,

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:43.320
<v Speaker 2>not excellent team. And I don't know if it's Washington

0:50:43.360 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 2>State because they absolutely did get gashed by Oregon. I mean,

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:47.840
<v Speaker 2>bon Nicks through for an all time high, the running

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 2>backs running for seven yards of carry.

0:50:49.239 --> 0:50:50.799
<v Speaker 1>They stood up in the red zone impressively.

0:50:52.080 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Washington State could beat USC if that game were

0:50:55.120 --> 0:50:57.880
<v Speaker 2>in Pullman, I'd feel better about that potential. But no,

0:50:58.120 --> 0:51:00.960
<v Speaker 2>USC still feels like a nine or ten win program,

0:51:01.600 --> 0:51:05.279
<v Speaker 2>if not more. But if they have to put up

0:51:05.680 --> 0:51:11.120
<v Speaker 2>against a playoff team, Like, what is Trey Henderson going

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:13.800
<v Speaker 2>to do on the ground against USC? What is Jamiir

0:51:13.840 --> 0:51:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Gibbs gonna do? What is Kendall Milton gonna do? Like

0:51:17.760 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 2>I've seen it up close, it's not pretty. Again, we

0:51:20.840 --> 0:51:22.839
<v Speaker 2>can offline about what it's like to beat Ohio State,

0:51:23.160 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 2>but I just think they are prime LRO. I just

0:51:29.640 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 2>don't know when the l is going to ro. That's

0:51:33.200 --> 0:51:36.760
<v Speaker 2>the question, all right, Well right in, let us know your.

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Thoughts and any other luck teams we missed out on.

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Do you want me to go through unlucky? Real quick,

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:44.799
<v Speaker 1>very quickly? Here we're coming on the edge of our time.

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:49.879
<v Speaker 2>Arkansas is the weirdest fumble and touchdown return away from

0:51:49.920 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 2>A and M. I don't think they're fully unlucky because

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:55.279
<v Speaker 2>that is a play and they had opportunities. It's a play,

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:57.680
<v Speaker 2>and they had opportunities to make up for it against

0:51:57.719 --> 0:51:59.759
<v Speaker 2>A and M from being you know, number seven, number

0:51:59.800 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 2>six in the country. I mentioned cal with Notre Dame

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:05.600
<v Speaker 2>with the off sides call, Florida might be a little

0:52:05.600 --> 0:52:08.359
<v Speaker 2>bit of both. Yeah, Florida might be a little bit

0:52:08.440 --> 0:52:10.600
<v Speaker 2>lucky and unlucky lucky to get out of that Utah

0:52:10.680 --> 0:52:13.719
<v Speaker 2>game with a win. Unlucky that you know, expectations were

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:17.040
<v Speaker 2>hoisted on them, and to have Tennessee and Kentucky be

0:52:17.120 --> 0:52:18.959
<v Speaker 2>good in the same year doesn't happen often.

0:52:19.239 --> 0:52:20.919
<v Speaker 1>No, doesn't happen often.

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:24.320
<v Speaker 2>That good LSU a little bit of both with the

0:52:24.360 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 2>guys that they were able to pick up in the

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 2>portal and what their SEC schedule looks like moving forward, which,

0:52:29.200 --> 0:52:31.800
<v Speaker 2>by the way, a lot of SEC teams on LSU's

0:52:32.040 --> 0:52:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Brian Kelly Year one slate do not look as dangerous

0:52:34.760 --> 0:52:38.240
<v Speaker 2>as they did over the summer. No, I have Houston,

0:52:39.280 --> 0:52:42.360
<v Speaker 2>what the hell we were supposed to expect Kansas to

0:52:42.480 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 2>be lightning on offense, Texas Tech to come through with

0:52:46.239 --> 0:52:49.480
<v Speaker 2>a backup quarterback like just unlucky the way that Houston

0:52:49.520 --> 0:52:51.920
<v Speaker 2>has had to open up their season with. Still I

0:52:52.080 --> 0:52:53.160
<v Speaker 2>believe to be a good team.

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:54.880
<v Speaker 1>A very good to you. We were talking about Houston

0:52:54.920 --> 0:52:58.040
<v Speaker 1>as potentially one of those group of five teams. It

0:52:58.080 --> 0:53:02.040
<v Speaker 1>sneaks into the playoff before the year, uh, Northwestern fans.

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:07.520
<v Speaker 1>The unluckiness of opening the season with, hey, maybe we're

0:53:07.560 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent kind of and then to lose to Miami

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:14.279
<v Speaker 1>of Ohio in southern Illinois, that is a bad beat

0:53:14.760 --> 0:53:19.719
<v Speaker 1>in terms of fandom to be suddenly assured that you're

0:53:19.760 --> 0:53:21.480
<v Speaker 1>going to have a pretty good team.

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:29.520
<v Speaker 2>And immediately immediately have the universe say no, well yes,

0:53:29.840 --> 0:53:32.000
<v Speaker 2>are you gonna mention Miszoo and the way they lost

0:53:32.040 --> 0:53:32.480
<v Speaker 2>to Auburn?

0:53:34.160 --> 0:53:34.640
<v Speaker 1>That's bad?

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:37.680
<v Speaker 2>That that is a bad That is an unlucky way

0:53:37.800 --> 0:53:41.279
<v Speaker 2>to lose a game. Opportunities to win elsewhere, but to

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:44.799
<v Speaker 2>miss the field goal and have Nathaniel Pete fumble millimeters

0:53:45.000 --> 0:53:47.239
<v Speaker 2>it was the right call millimeters from the goal line.

0:53:47.480 --> 0:53:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is an.

0:53:49.120 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Unluck But like I also don't think Missou is a

0:53:53.200 --> 0:53:57.080
<v Speaker 2>program who would otherwise be seen as good if they

0:53:57.120 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 2>beat Auburn. But better sure, I think that all right,

0:54:02.280 --> 0:54:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I would add my team as being unlucky because when

0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Oregon scheduled Georgia, which I presume was in like two

0:54:06.560 --> 0:54:09.200
<v Speaker 2>thousand and eight, I joked with all my friends, let's.

0:54:09.040 --> 0:54:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Take our kids. We're gonna be old.

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to Atlanta. And then to have Georgia go

0:54:14.840 --> 0:54:20.280
<v Speaker 2>from being talented but disappointing to death star, that is unlucky.

0:54:20.600 --> 0:54:23.040
<v Speaker 1>That is not fun. There's nothing unlucky about Georgia.

0:54:23.080 --> 0:54:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Georgia is full un skilled but unlucky to have that

0:54:26.440 --> 0:54:27.560
<v Speaker 2>in game one of a new coach.

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:31.320
<v Speaker 1>That's all We've had some folks watching a long courtesy

0:54:31.400 --> 0:54:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of verballers dot com. That is our Patreon. If you

0:54:35.200 --> 0:54:36.839
<v Speaker 1>like the show, if you like our vibe, going out

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:39.879
<v Speaker 1>to verballers dot com check it out. It's the best

0:54:39.920 --> 0:54:42.520
<v Speaker 1>way you can support the show outside of downloading and

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:48.239
<v Speaker 1>subscribing and telling your friends, your college football buddies about Cliverbal.

0:54:48.640 --> 0:54:52.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll be here all your long three episodes per week publicly.

0:54:52.239 --> 0:54:56.160
<v Speaker 1>We also offer a bonus episode every Thursday morning, which

0:54:56.200 --> 0:54:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you can watch live. We call it the Bruined A.

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:01.600
<v Speaker 1>We also have a Spot five live show tomorrow evening

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:05.279
<v Speaker 1>college football Thursdays. People jump up on stage with us.

0:55:05.320 --> 0:55:08.239
<v Speaker 1>They talk all things college football. They pick against me

0:55:08.520 --> 0:55:10.279
<v Speaker 1>last week did a little bit better than they had

0:55:10.320 --> 0:55:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the previous week, So awesome for you. Rough It was

0:55:16.160 --> 0:55:16.719
<v Speaker 1>a rough week.

0:55:17.840 --> 0:55:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we came tie dissipated before coming ashore.

0:55:21.600 --> 0:55:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Hurricane Tie definitely took a different track last week.

0:55:25.640 --> 0:55:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah to say the lead downgraded to tropical storm. Now

0:55:29.440 --> 0:55:34.160
<v Speaker 2>we joke about this. We hope Hurricanean is a complete

0:55:34.280 --> 0:55:38.520
<v Speaker 2>disappointment for all weatherheads and it's just rainy and windy.

0:55:38.280 --> 0:55:41.239
<v Speaker 1>And everybody's fine. That's all. That's what we hope. Absolutely

0:55:41.960 --> 0:55:44.560
<v Speaker 1>more to come on that more to come for sure

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:46.800
<v Speaker 1>as we progress through the course of the week. Tomorrow

0:55:47.120 --> 0:55:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is our week five previous show. We're into our picks,

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:54.879
<v Speaker 1>going to give our predictions, obviously going to give as

0:55:54.960 --> 0:55:57.239
<v Speaker 1>much personality as we can here in the soul Uble.

0:55:57.280 --> 0:56:00.239
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, tune back in, don't forget to tell your ends,

0:56:00.280 --> 0:56:02.799
<v Speaker 1>make sure you subscribe to the show. And last would

0:56:02.800 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly not least if you made it this far. Solid

0:56:04.680 --> 0:56:07.239
<v Speaker 1>giveaway dot com. You've got about two weeks left before

0:56:07.239 --> 0:56:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we give out the c J. Stroud Mini Mini helmet.

0:56:12.920 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we could get and the answer is

0:56:15.120 --> 0:56:15.839
<v Speaker 1>definitely yes.

0:56:16.880 --> 0:56:19.239
<v Speaker 2>What was the Fordums receiver's name? Do we think we

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:23.279
<v Speaker 2>can get a Photus signed Fordam Photus Coco. I'm gonna

0:56:23.280 --> 0:56:24.399
<v Speaker 2>get it wrong. I don't want to get it wrong

0:56:24.440 --> 0:56:28.120
<v Speaker 2>because he was obviously excellent against Ohio. We have it

0:56:28.239 --> 0:56:28.839
<v Speaker 2>somewhere in our.

0:56:28.840 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Chat Cocosciolas Cocoa, Ciolas coco sulis.

0:56:33.239 --> 0:56:37.480
<v Speaker 2>I think Motus cocosulus I would put that right here.

0:56:37.800 --> 0:56:39.799
<v Speaker 2>You see, if you're watching this live on Forballers dot

0:56:39.840 --> 0:56:42.120
<v Speaker 2>com I would put a mini helmet right I got

0:56:42.160 --> 0:56:44.839
<v Speaker 2>the little d'ad de loos Morito skulls from Trader Joe's.

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:48.200
<v Speaker 2>I'd put it right there. Prominently featured assigned for a

0:56:48.280 --> 0:56:51.040
<v Speaker 2>mini helmet from Focus. Coco soulis happy to pay.

0:56:51.840 --> 0:56:53.239
<v Speaker 1>I'll see how I can find it. I'll see if

0:56:53.280 --> 0:56:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I can find it. I don't see it yet, I

0:56:55.080 --> 0:56:57.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll look. Yeah. Fun show. Thank you to one and

0:56:57.600 --> 0:56:59.680
<v Speaker 1>all for downloading, for listening, for playing along at home.

0:56:59.719 --> 0:57:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Will be back again tomorrow talk about all things week five.

0:57:04.160 --> 0:57:05.920
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime for that guy over there, Dan Rubinstein

0:57:06.000 --> 0:57:09.800
<v Speaker 1>from myself, Tie Hildon Brandt. As per usual, Stay solid, Peace,