WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: How Magnetic Storage Works

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio.

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Hey there, and.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:20.159
<v Speaker 1>an executive producer with iHeartRadio, and how the tech are you?

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>It is time for a tech Stuff classic episode. This

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>one is called How Magnetic Storage Works. It originally published

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>on January twenty fifth, two thousand and seventeen. So how

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>do you preserve information so that you can access it

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>again later? Cause in the old days, and I'm talking

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>like tens of thousands of years ago, verbal communication was

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>where it was at. You stored all that information up

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>in your head. Someone would tell you something important and

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>you had to remember it. Perhaps they would tell you

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>within the context of a story. And then eventually, if

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you were trying to preserve information, you would tell that

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>same information to someone else and pass it along this way.

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>This is essentially folklore. That's how knowledge was maintained for centuries.

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 2>And then way back in the day.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>Someone said, hey, what if we made up some symbols

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to represent these sounds we're making to communicate with each other,

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and then we put those symbols into some sort of

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>fixed format, like in a clay tablet, and that way,

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>we can preserve the information a lot longer. And if Bob,

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>who's really good at making fires, can explain how to

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>make fires, and we put it down in this format,

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll be able to make fires even if Bob does

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>something stupid like walks off the edge of a cliff

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>or something. And writing was born. It probably went a

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>little differently from the way I explained it, but I

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>think I got the gist of it. Not everyone, however,

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>was a fan of this development. Believe it or not,

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>there were people who were against the whole idea of

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>right stuff down. Socrates was actually a critic of writing

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff down, or at least that's what we hear, because

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Socrates didn't write anything down, his students did. He said

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that the written word is fixed, and therefore it can't

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>defend itself or any arguments it makes, so it's inherently flawed.

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>If someone writes down an argument and your access to

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the argument is in that written format, and you have

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>questions or you have attacks on that argument, it can't

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>defend itself. The person who wrote it could if they

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>were there, but if they're not there, then the argument

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>has to stand on its own, and therefore it has

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to be less effective, let's say, than an actual human being.

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>He also said that if you write stuff down, you

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have to remember it yourself, and that makes you

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>less intelligent, because if you're not actually committing something to memory,

0:02:55.560 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you're getting super dumb. This might sound a lot like

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the arguments people have made about Google and

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, and it's absolutely correct. Every single time we

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>have created a new way to permanently store data in

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>some form or another, people have brought up this idea

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:20.399
<v Speaker 1>that it's making us more dumb. Like they might say, hey,

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, you'd have to remember all your

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>phone numbers, like all the numbers of the friends and

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>family that you'd be calling on a regular basis. But

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>now it's all on your phone, so you don't remember it.

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>You may not be able to rattle off more than

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>two or three phone numbers today because of that, therefore

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you are more dumb. I don't subscribe to that particular argument.

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I think having the accessibility of information outweighs the fact

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that we are no longer able to remember it necessarily.

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>The point I would make is that comprehension is always

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>more important than being able to recall something You might

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to recall some information, but if you don't

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>truly comprehend it, it's of no use to you. So

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's necessarily a measure of intelligence. It's

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly perhaps more of a statement about our memories than

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>anything else. But I'm getting off on a tangent here,

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think the developments we've had have been phenomenal.

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 2>We wouldn't be where.

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>We are today if we were still depending upon just

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>telling each other the important stuff and hoping that they

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>would be able to then tell other people the important

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff we just told them and in a way that

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>was accurate and effective. We clearly wouldn't be where we

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>are today if we still depended upon that. And I

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have to travel all the way across the world

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>to find a specific guru to learn how to perform

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a particular skill. I can just go onto YouTube and

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>watch like thirty or forty videos until I find one

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that actually makes sense. So AD's progress take that, Socrates. Now,

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>throughout history, we saw many advances in the way we

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>store information, and as we developed more advanced technology, it

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>became clear that a compatible method of star scoring data

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 1>would be really handy. So imagine what computers would be

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>if they could not save information. They'd be practically useless.

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.679
<v Speaker 1>You need to have a way of storing data somehow,

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in magnetic storage, optical, solid state punch cards, whatever.

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>You need something that can record that information, otherwise it's

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.239
<v Speaker 1>only good for a moment. And a lot of folks

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>worked on this problem, and as is the case with

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>many technological developments, some of that work had nothing to

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>do with computers, but more with researching fundamental scientific questions

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and finding answers to questions led other people being able

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.919
<v Speaker 1>to use that information in practical ways that we didn't anticipate.

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And this is kind of another soapbox I like to

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>get up on to argue for the importance of exploratory science.

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Applied science is really interesting. Applied science is when you're

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>trying to find a particular solution that will work for

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.559
<v Speaker 1>some sort of problem. Right you might be researching whether

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>or not a specific material would be great rate to

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>use for a particular purpose, like bulletproof material something like that.

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>But exploratory science, when you're not necessarily looking for applications,

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 1>is also important because we expand our knowledge about how

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the universe works. And it can open up opportunities to

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>leverage that knowledge in ways we could not have anticipated

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>when we first started looking into the issue in the

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>first place. It's important stuff, so I argue that exploratory

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>science needs to continue to be supported. Now acknowledge all this,

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>take a deep breath, and get ready to jump into

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the strange world of magnetism. So first, magnetism, or more specifically,

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>electro magnetism, is one of four fundamental forces that govern

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the atomic behavior in our universe. So the other three,

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're keeping track, are the strong nuclear force, the

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>weak nuclear force, and gravity. And if you want to

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 1>rank those from the weakest to the strongest, you'd start

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>with gravity. Gravity is negligible at the atomic scale. It's there,

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's so faint as to be almost absent. And

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>this is largely because gravity is dependent upon mass. So

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>at the atomic scale, masses are so small there's barely

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>any gravitational attraction between particles. But gravity is kind of

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>nifty because while it's weak, it is there, and in fact,

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a gravitational pull on every bit of matter from

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>every other bit of matter in our universe. So you

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that is you listening to me, right Now you are

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>exerting a gravitational pull on the Sun, and on Alpha Centauri,

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and on the Andromeda galaxy. You are exerting a gravitational

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>pull on everything else that is matter in our universe.

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just that that gravitational pull is so weak as

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to be practically nothing, but it is there. So since

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>gravity is something we ourselves can and do experience in

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>our daily lives, we categorize it as one of the

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>familiar forces. Now, next in the rank from weakest to

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>strongest is the weak force. Now that's responsible for nuclear

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>beta decay and some other decay processes. And this one's

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty difficult to explain, and since I'm already going to

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>have to explain magnetism, I'm gonna call for a pass

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>on this one.

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Let's mulligan it.

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>But this is a force that we do not experience

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>firsthand in our daily lives, So this one actually falls

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>into the category of unfamiliar forces. Now, next in strength,

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>so second strongest, if you prefer, is the electromagnetic force,

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the one we'll be focusing on today. Now, this is

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>a force that exists between all particles that have an

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>electric charge, so electrons, for example, we'll bind to a

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>nucleus because electrons have a nextative charge, and a nucleus

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>which only contains positively charged protons and neutral neutrons is

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>net positive. And you know that opposites attract, so we

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>have the negative electrons attracted to the positive nucleus. We

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>can and do experience electromagnetic forces on a daily basis,

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 1>so this one is one of the familiar forces. And

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>then we have the strongest of them all, the strong

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>nuclear force. This is the force that holds a nucleus together.

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a dominant force in various chemical reactions, and it

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 1>has to be strong because it's.

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Doing something that's really difficult to do.

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>It's holding together similarly charged particles. Remember, a nucleus is

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of protons and neutrons. The protons all have

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a positive charge. They don't want to be and when

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I say want, I don't actually mean they have motivations,

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but they don't want to be next to each other.

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 1>Those similar charges are repelling one another. So the strong

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>nuclear force has to be stronger than the electromagnetic force

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in order to hold protons together in a nucleus with

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of neutral charge particles. It does have a

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:19.839
<v Speaker 1>very short range, however, so while it's stronger than the

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic force, the range does not reach very far outside

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of a nucleus, so we don't directly observe it in

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>our daily lives, and therefore it is an unfamiliar force.

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So gravity and electromagnetism are familiar forces. The strong and

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>weak nuclear forces are unfamiliar forces. So what makes electromagnetism

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>tick and how did we even figure out how to

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>make good use of it?

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's start.

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>By imagining a bar magnet. A lot of this is

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>going to go back to stuff that you probably learned

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in elementary school, middle school, high school, those physics courses,

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff, basic science. So you've got your

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 1>bar magnet. Let's just say it's a rectang. It's rectangular

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in shape, so you know you've got your north pole

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and your south pole on the magnet. This These represent

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the various charges magnetic charges of the magnet.

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Opposites tracked.

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>So if we were to bring this bar magnet close

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to another bar magnet, the north end of our bar

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>magnet would start to exert a pole on the south

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 1>end of the other bar magnet. Or if we were

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to try and bring the north pole of our magnet

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>close to the north pole of the second magnet, it

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>would push against each other, just like I was mentioning

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a second ago. Now, magnets produce a field around them

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that we can represent as lines of force, and those

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>lines exit from the north pole, loop around the magnet,

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>and enter the south pole. A permanent magnet is always

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>producing the sort of magnetic field. It's consistent, it doesn't waiver.

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:04.079
<v Speaker 1>You may hear about things like electromagnetism. I'll talk a

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about in a bit where you have

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>to move a coil through a varying magnetic field. Well,

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a permanent magnet creates a consistent magnetic field unless you

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>start doing things like moving it around, in which case

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you're really just moving where the magnetic field is. You're

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>not actually fluctuating the field itself. Now, inside a magnet

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a permanent magnet are microscopic regions called magnetic domains, and

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>each of these domains is essentially a tiny magnet with

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>its own north and south pole. Only by aligning the

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>poles of all of these magnetic domains in a similar direction,

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>like north south, will you get a permanent magnet.

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 2>So if you could just zoom in on.

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.359
<v Speaker 1>A permanent magnet, you would see all these tiny regions

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that are essentially magnets that are all aligned the same

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>way south. If you didn't do that, if the alignment

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>was mixed up so that you had, you know, an

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>equal mixture of north south and south north, they would

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>cancel each other out and you wouldn't have a magnet.

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>It would just be inert magnetically speaking. So that is

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>something that's interesting because you can actually do that to

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>magnets in a couple of different ways. I'll talk about

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that in a second. So all of that is changeable,

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>bomb bomb bomb. I wrote that in my notes. Actually

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I had to say it. I could show Dylan, but

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>he's working on something else. By the way, when all

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>those magnetic domains are aligned north south, what happens if

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you were to cut the magnet in half right between

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the north and south pole. So imagine you've got this

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>rectangular bar magnet.

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 2>You've got you've labeled one.

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>End the north pole, the other end of the south pole.

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 1>You cut the magnet in half horizontally across, well, you

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>would end up with two magnet. The middle of that

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>magnet would become the south pole for the north end

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and the north pole for the south end. That's because

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>those magnetic domains I was talking about, those tiny regions

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>inside the magnet themselves itself, those are all aligned north south.

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you cut the magnet across, you still have

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>those magnetic domains lined up north south, so the overall

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>magnetism is preserved. You get two magnets for the price

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of one. But don't cut into magnets. Magnets, they tend

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to be, at least the ones that we typically use

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>for things like our fridges and stuff are ceramic magnets,

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and they don't cut so well unless you have like

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a diamond saw, which some of you probably do. And

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>if you cut magnets normally, then disregard my warning. I'm

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about people who don't typically do that sort of thing.

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>If you are going to do it, where eye protection

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>because that stuff can shatter anyway. If you do that

0:14:56.320 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>with a magnet. Essentially, each magnet has approximately half the

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>magnetic domains of the old magnet, so they're not particularly

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the individual magnets aren't as strong as they

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>were when they were a single magnet. Because your yournet,

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>your overall magnet strength is dependent upon the accumulative effect

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of the magnetic domains within it, all right, So each

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of those magnetic domains are tiny magnets. There are three

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>ways to get them to line up so that the

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>overall material becomes a magnet itself. Like how you get

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>them all to line up? Like north south? So way

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>number one is to whack on it with something heavy,

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 1>which isn't a joke. If you hold the material in

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a north south direction and strike it with a hammer,

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you physically realign the magnetic domains and you can knock

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the material into a weak magnet. There's a bit more

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to it than that, but that's the basic idea, and

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that that does mean that you're not going to get

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a very strong magnet as a result, but you can

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>physically force those magnetic domains to be in the same

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>direction and create a magnet that way. Way number two

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>is that you can place the material inside a strong

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>magnetic field and make sure the material is in a

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>north south alignment and you just leave it there, and

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>if it's a strong magnetic field, it will start to

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>realign the magnetic domains within your target material so that

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>they gradually line up with the magnetic fields direction, so

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you just have to have a strong enough one to

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>affect the magnetic domains in your target material and then

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>eventually you end up with a magnet So that's kind

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of cool. And way number three is ya zap it

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>with electric current. So one hypothesis is that this is

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>how loadstone, which is a naturally magnetic material you can

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>find here on Earth, was originally formed. The idea is

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that loadstone, which is made up of the stuff called magnetite,

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>some of it was struck by lightning over the millennium

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>that Earth was forming, So you have magnetite on the surface.

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Of the planet.

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>Occasionally lightning strikes and hit some of this magnetite and

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>then magnetizes it. That's one hypothesis, but there's another one

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 1>which suggests that magnetite gained its magnetic properties during the

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>time when Earth was forming, and it was through more

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of just a physical the physical process of cooling where

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>these magnetic domains aligned in.

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 2>The proper way.

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing, we don't really know how it all

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>got started.

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 2>We don't have that information.

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>No one was around back then to write it down

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>or put it in magnetic storage. So it's still a

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 1>bit of a mystery, but we do know that those

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>are two possible ways that this could have come about.

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 2>And you can.

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Also render magnets inert by changing the alignment of the

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>magnetic domains within it. If you heat a magnet up

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>beyond its Curey point, which is different for different magnetic materials,

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>it loses its magnetism. The heat warps the material and

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 1>makes the magnetic domains fall out of alignment. So what

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>used to be magnetic will no longer be so something

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that would stick to your fringe no problem, will just

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>slide off and hit the floor, and everyone will be sad,

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>unless you just did it as a scientific experiment, in

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>which case you might be happy that you got the

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>result you expected. Now we can experience magnetism because of electrons.

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Those tiny, negatively charged sub atomic particles hold the key

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to whether material is affected by magnets or isn't. You

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>might wonder, like, why are some things magnetic and some

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.239
<v Speaker 1>things art? Why do magnets stick to some materials but

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>slide right off of other materials? And ultimately the answer

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of falls with electrons. Now, electrons orbit the nucleus right

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in atoms, You remember your basic description of an atom

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>where you have a nucleus at the center and electrons

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>orbiting at different orbital shells around the electrons. Typically electrons

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>will pair up with other electrons. You'll get pairs of electrons.

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:10.120
<v Speaker 1>They have a state that's called spin, and each electron

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in a pair has the opposite spin of its partner,

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>So we can describe spin as up or down. For example,

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>if one electron is spinning up, the other one by necessity,

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>has to be spinning down. You cannot get both electrons

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>in a pair to spin in the same direction in

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the same orbital That just that ain't cricket. It's part

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of a quantum mechanical principle we call the poly exclusion principle.

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>And until I did research for the show, I could

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>have sworn that referred to the practice of not inviting

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>poly shore to your parties. So I guess you learned

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>something new every day. That got a smirk from Dylan.

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.919
<v Speaker 1>It's maybe he'll laugh when he listens to it the

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:53.239
<v Speaker 1>second time. Some elements have an unpaired electron in an

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>orbital just because that's just how it works out. So

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>those unpaired spinning electrons generate a very tiny magnetic field,

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and we call it an orbital magnetic moment, which sounds

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>like something you'd expect in a romantic science fiction film. Iron,

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 1>for example, has four unpaired electrons that all have the

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>same spin. Those four unpaired electrons have an orbital magnetic moment.

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>So magnetic moment has a magnitude and a direction, which

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>means it is a vector. The bottom line is this

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>vector refers to the strength of the magnetic field and

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the torque it can exert. So a permanent magnets magnetic

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>moments are composed of all the moments of its atoms.

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>In other words, we've got all these atoms that represent

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>an orbital magnetic moment because of the spin of the

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>electrons of the unpaired electrons.

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 2>If you've got enough of them.

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And they're aligned the right way, that determines the permanent

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 1>magnets magnetic moments. So iron and several other magnetic elements

0:20:56.680 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 1>have a crystalline structure, right, So think of it like scaffolding.

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It makes this very ordered kind of structure as opposed

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.679
<v Speaker 1>to something that looks much more chaotic. So as iron

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>cools from a molten state, atoms line up into this

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>crystalline arrangement. And groups of atoms that have a parallel

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 1>orbital spin will line up within the crystal, and those

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>form those magnetic domains I mentioned earlier. The qualities that

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 1>make good magnets are also the same ones as the

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>qualities that make materials attracted to magnets.

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 2>So a strong.

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Magnet will attract iron and other elements that have these

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>orbital magnetic moments in alignment. Now, not all permanent magnets

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>are equal. The ceramic magnets you may have on your

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>fringe door are pretty weak all things considered. They're made

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of a mixture of iron oxide and a ceramic composite.

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.439
<v Speaker 1>These are feric magnets. That's what we call them, feric

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>for the iron that's in them. But on the other

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>end of the scale are neodymium magnets, a rare earth

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>element magnet does much much, much stronger than the feric

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>magnets we tend to use, and they typically contain a

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>mixture of neodymium, iron and boron. They could be really

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>strong too. I have played with some where if they

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>get into contact with something like a metal table, it

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>can be really hard to remove them. We had some

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>here at How Stuff Works that were potentially causing injuries.

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>One person slipped one in their pocket and then found

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>themselves stuck to a filing cabinet for a little bit.

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 2>This was way back in the day, but.

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>It was one of those things where a lot of

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>us didn't have a whole lot of experience with it

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>because at the time they were fairly uncommon. Today you

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>can order neodymium and other rare earth magnets online without

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>much trouble. But when I started, first of all, how

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff works was easy because there were only three things,

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>so it was easy to explain how stuff works. Once

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:55.959
<v Speaker 1>you wrote the three articles, you were done.

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:58.160
<v Speaker 2>But over time more stuff.

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Was made and we had more work to do, and

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 1>at that point it was more.

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 2>It was more.

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, it was easier to get hold of neodymium magnets

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>at that point. Now some materials are called temporary or

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 1>soft magnets, and those will produce a magnetic field in

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the presence of another magnetic field and retain some of

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that magnetism for a while after they leave the field itself,

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>so they're very easy to influence. So imagine that you've

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 1>got something like a paper clip and you put it

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>within the range of a magnetic field for a while

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and it starts to have its magnetic domains aligned according

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to this magnetic field. You remove it and you find

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you can pick up other paper clips with it, but

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>only for a little while, and.

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Then it stops working.

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>That's very typical with soft or temporary magnets. They very

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>quickly will change, but then they will overtime change back

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to being, let you know, not magnetic, but they're also

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>hard magnetic materials. These it's harder to change them, but

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:10.959
<v Speaker 1>then they will stay changed for longer. So stuff like iron,

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>if you're able to really realign those magnetic domains and

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>iron magnet will hold that magnetic ability much much longer.

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's how you can end up with permanent magnets

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to some that will just temporarily be magnetic.

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of interesting.

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So then you've got electromagnets and this will only produce

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the magnetic field in the presence of electricity. And I'm

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>sure everyone listening to this has done some variation on

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the experiment where you take an iron nail and you

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>coil some wire around it, usually some insulated copper wire

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>around the nail several times, and then you run an

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>electric current through the wire and you create an electromagnet.

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>The nail becomes magnetic and you can pick up all sorts.

0:24:58.760 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Of stuff with it.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>The strength of the magnetic field is dependent upon the

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>number of coils around the nail, as well as some

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>other factors, but that's the primary one. And you know,

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a cool, little basic science experiment you can run,

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's also the basis of a ton of the

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>work done in electrical fields, including general electronics, computers, storage.

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>It is an important fundamental piece of technology, and the

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>very simple applications of this you can find in stuff

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>like electric transformers or electric motors and dynamos. Like transformer,

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>you can have two different coils of wire, one that

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is got a lot more coils to it, like maybe

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:56.879
<v Speaker 1>twice as many as the second one, and when you

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 1>run a current through the larger number of coils, the

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.679
<v Speaker 1>magnetic field it generates induces electricity to flow through the

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>second set of coils, but it steps down the voltage

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>because you have half as many coils around a core

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>as you do with the first one. That's how you

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>can step down or step up voltage, and that's why

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:24.959
<v Speaker 1>alternating current ends up being much more effective for distributing

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>electricity across long distances than direct current, because.

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 2>You can't do that with direct current.

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>You need that alternating electric current in order to create

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the magnetic field that will induce electricity to flow through

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>a separate set of coils. Just like you need a

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>varying magnetic field to induce electricity, you need that varying

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>electricity to produce a varying magnetic field. It's this interesting relationship,

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental relationship in our universe, between electricity and magnetism.

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I was saying before. If you have

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>a permanent magnet and you just put it next to

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a coil of wire, it's not going to induce electricity

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to flow apart from when you first introduce the magnetic

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.719
<v Speaker 1>field to the coil, because it's not varying. You'd have

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to spin the permanent magnet, which would you know, effectively,

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>according to the coil's perspective, change the alignment of that

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:26.919
<v Speaker 1>magnetic field that would induce electricity to flow through the wire.

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>But just having a standard magnet staying perfectly still next

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to wire, you don't get the electricity to flow that way.

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>And that is a very important aspect to memory storage

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>as well. And that's our lesson on the physics of

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>magnets without diving too deeply into quantum mechanics. I think

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>we're ready to talk about our use of magnets with electronics,

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>but first let's take a quick break to thank our sponsor.

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we're back, and we just learned how magnets

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>work in general, But when did we figure out they

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 1>could be useful for storing information? So I'm going to

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>skip over all the historic uses of magnets leading up

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to data storage because I cannot spend another hour talking

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>about compasses, or ironically, i'll lose Dylan here in the studio.

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>So in the late nineteenth century we saw a boom

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in innovation that was mid to late nineteenth century was

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 1>a crazy time in the world really for inventors discovering

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.719
<v Speaker 1>not just fundamental principles of science, but how to apply

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>them in technology. I'm talking about stuff like Samuel Moore

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>successfully sending an electrical signal that could be decoded into communication,

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to Alexander Graham Bell showing that

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>electricity could also be used to carry audio signals and

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>then be converted from electricity back into audio signals. That

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>really got things moving. And over at Thomas Edison's Menlo Park,

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Oberlin Smith got a gander at a

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>cylinder phonograph and got some interesting ideas. So first let's

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about this cylinder phonograph. It would record sound by

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>transforming audio waves into electrical signals. That would then cause

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a needle to etch grooves into a wax cylinder. So

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got this wax cylinder. It would slowly spin and

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a needle would be dragged across it, and as sound

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>came in, it would cause the needle to wiggle around,

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and that caused variations in the etching on the wax

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>cylinder itself.

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Now, when you took that cylinder.

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Out and you put it in another phonograph and you

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>placed a needle on it within the groove, and he

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>started to earn the cylinder, the needle would start to

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>shake because it's following the groove that was made by

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the previous recording. Essentially, that whole process would be reversed.

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>The shaky needle would generate an electrical s which would

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:05.239
<v Speaker 1>then go to a essentially a speaker a diaphragm and

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>cause it to vibrate and that would generate the sound,

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>so you would get a replica of the sound you

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>made when you were speaking into the wax cylinder phonograph. Now,

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Oberlin Smith wondered if he might be able to do

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, only instead of using a wax cylinder,

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>he would record sound onto magnetic wire, not tape, not

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a disc, but an actual length of wire using magnetism. Now,

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>he was not successful in this attempt, but he published

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>his ideas in a journal called Electrical World in eighteen

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight, and ten years later a Dutch inventor inventor

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>named Valdemar Pulsen gave it another go. He began a

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>working magnet recorder. He started building it. He called it

0:30:56.480 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the telegraphone Pulson, and he filed the patent for this

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>invention in eighteen ninety nine. So one year after he

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>started working on it, he showed it off at the

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen hundred Paris Exhibition. So how did it work? What

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly was it doing? How was it preserving this audio

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>information in a magnetic format so that it could be

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>played back?

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, Poulson knew.

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>That he needed a magnetically hard material. If you remember

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>what I was talking about, before the break. That's a

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>material that will retain its magnetic moment indefinitely. It may

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>very gradually revert back to its original status, but it'll

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>hold it over a great deal of time. And if

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to record data for later retrieval, obviously you

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that that data remains intact. Otherwise

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a self destructing or at least a self

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>erasing message on your hands. So Paulson had to experiment

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>with various factors to make certain he could record anything

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to the medium. To begin with, if the medium has

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a coercivity factor that's very high, that means you have

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to use stronger magnetic fields.

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:05.479
<v Speaker 2>To affect it.

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll al ways talk about magnetic fields now. I'm thinking

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>about the Book of Love, this great song by a

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>group called the Magnetic Fields.

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Back to this.

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>So you have to have a really strong magnetic field

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in order to affect that material, and that can be difficult.

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>It can start to eat in on your efficiency. And

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you need the magnetic information to be distinct enough so

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that you could get a good replay signal. And you know,

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>when you're reading the material back later, you want to

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>make sure you can actually hear what was recorded and

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>not just get some sort of muffled, you know, simulation.

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Of the sounds you made.

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So to record information onto a wire, you first need

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a recording head. You need something that's going to generate

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a magnetic flux that can affect.

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 2>The medium you're using, the wire in this case.

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 1>This, by the way, is also true for other methods

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of magnetic storage, including cassette tape, VHS tapes, floppy disks,

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and some hard drives. When I say some hard drives,

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean magnetic hard drives.

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, there are.

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Solid state hard drives that are not affected in this way.

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>They don't use that technology. They are not part of

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 1>this discussion. So the recording head is a transducer, and

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>basically a transducer is something that converts some physical quantity

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>into an electrical signal, or does the reverse. So you

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>might have a transducer that can measure pressure, like air

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>pressure and change that into an electrical signal. That's a transducer.

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>But in this case we're talking about things like a

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>microphone a transducer, and a microphone converts pressure from sound

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>waves into electrical signals. With recording devices, you can use

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>one transducer to pull double duty one of them. It

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>can act as both a recording head when recording, so

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it's actually writing something to the storage medium, or it

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>could be a read head when playing a signal back

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it's reading the signal and then converting it back into

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was originally before it was stored in that format.

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Now these days, most recording devices still use that are

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>still using magnetic storage have a dedicated recording head and

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a dedicated read head so that each transducer can be

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>optimized for its respective role.

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 2>You don't see a.

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Whole lot of them where it's doing both things. Some

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 1>very cheap electronics, probably because then you don't have to

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>have as many components in it makes it less expensive

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to produce. Now, the right head's job, or the recording

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>head if you prefer, is to convert electric current into

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a magnetic field. But you remember what we said about electromagnets,

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:46.959
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty easy to do. The field it generates needs

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to be strong enough to affect the storage medium the wire,

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>but also it has to fall off quickly as you

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>move away from the recording head. In other words, you

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want the effect to be wide spread in area,

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>or else you're going to end up affecting way too

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>much wire at once, you'll end up with having to

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>use way more wire to record very short sounds in

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>this case, and not only is that inefficient, but you'd

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>also run the risk of writing over stuff you've just recorded.

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that you're writing something to wire. If the

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>magnetic field is wide enough so that it's constantly overlapping

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>what you just recorded, then all you're really doing is

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:33.800
<v Speaker 1>muddling your recording with every successive sound. So a coil

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:36.839
<v Speaker 1>of wire creates the magnetic field when electricity runs through it.

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>This wire is coiled around a soft magnetic material. Remember

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>those are the kinds of magnetic materials that are easy

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to influence, but then will go back to their natural

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>state shortly after the magnetic field they've been exposed to

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>has gone away. This creates what we call a magnetic flux,

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and it concentrates at the tip of the soft magnetic

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 1>material that's the core of this coil. A common design

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>for early recording heads was a ring that had a

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:12.720
<v Speaker 1>small gap cut into it, and then you would wrap

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the wire around the inside of this ring, like you know,

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>around the ring. So imagine just a regular ring. You

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>cut a little gap at one end. On the other end,

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you've wrapped this this coil of wire and you run

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 1>electricity through it. It turns the ring into a magnet.

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But the gap creates a difference in this magnetic field.

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>The soft material, the soft magnetic material, conducts magnetic flux

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>easily and the gap doesn't. This causes the magnetic flux

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to do something we call fringing. It fringes. A fringe

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:50.720
<v Speaker 1>field is a bit tricky to explain, but it's easier

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to understand if you imagine a horseshoe magnet. So the

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>two ends of the horseshoe are the two poles, the

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>north pole and the south pole. The fringe field is

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 1>the magnetic field that extends outside the space between the

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>two poles. That would be a fringe field. Now, that

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>fringe field is what the right head uses to actually

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>record information onto the magnetic medium. Now, with sound, we're

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:18.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about an analog approach, meaning you'd find a smooth

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>variability in the medium. You would create that by varying

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the magnetic flux in subtle ways. The recording head adjusts

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the magnetic flux by varying the current running through the

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>head and the recording medium thus has a variability in

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the magnetic flux recorded within the wire itself. The wire

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 1>represents a sort of copy of the flux if you

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>were to run the wire back. So let's say you've

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>got the red head, the transducer that acts as a redhead,

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and you run the wire next to it sequentially, so

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you're just spinning one reel pulling wire across so that

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:01.240
<v Speaker 1>this redhead is very close to it. That would create

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a varying magnetic field across the gap in the red head,

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and that then would create a varying magnetic field in

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the core of the red head, which would induce a

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>current to flow through the coil of wire, which then

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>could be sent to an amplifier. The varying electric electrical

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:20.839
<v Speaker 1>signal goes to a transducer such as speakers, and then

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it can play back the sound. Now, those old wire

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>recorders moved at a pretty good clip.

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 2>The post war.

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Wire recorders would play back wire at about twenty four

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 1>inches per second, so two feet of wire per second.

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 1>That's about sixty one centimeters per second for you folks

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>on the metric system, if you wanted to record an

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 1>hour's worth of audio, you would need seven two hundred

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 1>feet of wire or about two thy one hundred and

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>ninety five meters of wire, and you could only record

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>along one direction of the wire, so if you wanted

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to listen to it again, you'd have to wind all

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the wire back up up into a reel and then

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 1>play it out across a redhead all over again. Most

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of these early ones were hand cranked too, so you

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>would get variability on the sound quality as it was

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 1>played back, plus when you were recording, so it took

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a steady hand to create a decent recording and a

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>decent replication. And if you wanted to re record over it,

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that you've you know, you recorded an hour

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of someone catterwaulling, and then you're like, well, that wasn't

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 1>really worth it. I would love to use this wire

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:36.799
<v Speaker 1>to record something else. You would first have to run

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that wire by a strong permanent magnet, and that would

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>effectively erase the stuff that was on it before, because

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:48.399
<v Speaker 1>the strong permanent magnet would cause all those those those

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>magnetic domains inside the wire to realign to the permanent

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>magnet's magnetic field. It essentially erases all the variability, all

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the flux that was copied there before and turns it

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:06.879
<v Speaker 1>back into a uniform medium which you then could run

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>through and record stuff on again. The same thing, by

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the way, is true for lots of other magnetic storage media.

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Eventually Polson began to work with other types of magnetic media,

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 1>and a big breakthrough came with the invention of plastic.

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I say the invention of I really mean the mass

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 1>production of plastic's been around for a pretty long time,

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 1>but I'm talking about when we really started producing it

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:31.360
<v Speaker 1>on a mass scale.

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:33.760
<v Speaker 2>So you can use.

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Plastic film coated with a ferro magnetic powder. This is

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>how cassette tapes, VHS tapes, even floppy disks work. You

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>can make a cheap recording medium this way. The invention

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of the cassette tape itself was another big jump, because

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:49.320
<v Speaker 1>engineers figured out how you could double the amount of

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>material you could record on a tape if you just

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>record it on half of it at a time. Now,

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:58.439
<v Speaker 1>this is a little triggy to explain without the use

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of visual aids, but I'll try and give it a shot.

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So imagine that you've got a length of flat ribbon

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in front of you. You might think of cassette that

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 1>cassette recorders are actually putting information on both sides of

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 1>the ribbon, but that's not what is happening. All the

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>information for Side A and Side B are on one

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 1>side of that ribbon, but they are one hundred and

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>eighty degrees opposite each other, side by side. So you

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>lay out the ribbon so it's horizontal in relation to you.

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at a horizontal strip of ribbon. Imagine a

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>line going down the middle of that ribbon horizontally. The

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 1>top half of the ribbon is one side of the

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 1>cassette and the bottom half is the other side of

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the cassette. So when you put a cassette into a

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 1>cassette player, the red head is positioned over just one

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>half of that tape and it reads what's off of that.

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>When you flip the cassette over, then and the side

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of the tape that's running across the redhead is the

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 1>opposite of that. You know, it's the bottom of the

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 1>ribbon as opposed to the top of the ribbon, and

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:12.919
<v Speaker 1>that's how you're able to listen to Side B. We're

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>going to take another quick break and then we'll be

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:27.520
<v Speaker 1>back to talk more about magnetic storage. So while the

0:42:27.560 --> 0:42:31.240
<v Speaker 1>format is more or less obsolete. I'm gonna talk about

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>floppy disks for a bit, and that's because there are

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of parallels between floppy disks and cassette tapes,

0:42:37.200 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>which I talked about in the last section. Floppy discs,

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 1>by the way, used to come in several sizes. When

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I first started using computers, the standard size and the

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>US was the five and a quarter inch disc. There

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:51.879
<v Speaker 1>were larger discs that came before that, but the first

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 1>ones I ever used were five and a quarter inch.

0:42:54.320 --> 0:42:56.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people thought they were called floppy disks

0:42:56.360 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>because the outer sheath of the disc itself was flexible.

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Some people even thought you could fold them up and

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>put them in your pocket, which technically I guess you

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 1>could do, but you wouldn't be able to use them

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 1>later because you'd mangle the disk inside and it would

0:43:10.280 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 1>no longer spend properly inside a computer, So don't do that.

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Later on came the three and a half inch discs,

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and these had a hard plastic casing, but they were

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:24.760
<v Speaker 1>still floppy disks because the disk inside, the actual medium

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:29.360
<v Speaker 1>upon which information was stored, was still this flexible material.

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>A lot of folks thought that these three and a

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 1>half inch discs were actually hard disks. They said, you know,

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the floppy disks wereth the five and a quarter three

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half because the plastic is sturdy, that's a

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:43.760
<v Speaker 1>hard disk. No, that's not a hard disk. But anyway,

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that's all ancient history, and you guys probably don't even

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:48.880
<v Speaker 1>understand what I'm talking about, so get off my lawn,

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:52.840
<v Speaker 1>all right. Inside the outer covering of these disks was

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the actual disc itself.

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:56.720
<v Speaker 2>We call the floppy.

0:43:56.280 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Disks that, but they're not disc shaped. If you were

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:03.719
<v Speaker 1>to show someone a floppy disk and they had absolutely

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 1>no context for it, they knew what the word disc meant,

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 1>they'd take one look at it and.

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Say, why the heck do you call it a disc.

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:12.880
<v Speaker 2>It's because on the inside.

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:17.320
<v Speaker 1>There is a disc of material and it is essentially

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a plastic base that's coded with ferromagnetic materials. And the

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:24.759
<v Speaker 1>advantage of this is that if you apply a magnetic

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:28.360
<v Speaker 1>field to it, it would record the information permanently, or

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:30.680
<v Speaker 1>at least until you erased it and wrote over it,

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:34.160
<v Speaker 1>or if you encountered a really strong magnetic field, and

0:44:34.239 --> 0:44:36.319
<v Speaker 1>it was a really fast way to record a lot

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of information. So discs are organized into concentric rings. You

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:46.719
<v Speaker 1>can kind of think of an old vinyl album in

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:49.799
<v Speaker 1>the same way how the grooves slowly move inward on the.

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Disc.

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 1>But in this case they're actual concentric rings of information,

0:44:56.719 --> 0:45:01.400
<v Speaker 1>not just one line that slowly, you know, swirls inward

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:05.920
<v Speaker 1>towards the center. So when a computer is reading information back,

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it can it can reference some information at the at

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the front of the disc and learn exactly where a

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:14.839
<v Speaker 1>file is located, and it can then position the read

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:17.479
<v Speaker 1>right head directly over the appropriate part of the disc,

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:19.320
<v Speaker 1>rather than having to go through.

0:45:19.160 --> 0:45:20.360
<v Speaker 2>The whole thing sequentially.

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:23.399
<v Speaker 1>So with a cassette tape, if you want to listen

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to a specific song, you have to wait. I mean,

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you can use fast forward to speed things up, but

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you can't jump straight to the track you want to

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 1>hear onlike you could with say a compact disc. Well,

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 1>in this way, a floppy disk is more like a

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>compact disc in that a computer can understand exactly where

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the file is stored within those concentric rings and go

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:53.399
<v Speaker 1>straight there. In other ways, it is very different from

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:58.319
<v Speaker 1>a compact disc, but in that specific way it is similar. Now,

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 1>in other words, it's kind of lifting a record player's

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 1>needle off of one groove and skipping ahead to a

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>specific song on an album, lowering the needle and then

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:11.239
<v Speaker 1>playing it, and thank goodness, record players are coming back.

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>So that you guys know what I'm talking about when

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I say these things. This, by the way, is a

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 1>type of direct access storage, meaning the computer can get

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 1>direct access to that information in a very short amount

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of time. When writing to a disc, first the drive

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 1>will use an erase coil, and this essentially just clears

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a section of the storage medium for writing. So it's

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:39.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of like exposing that steel wired to a permanent magnet.

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>It's that same principle. You want a clean slate to

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>write upon, and typically this clean slate is a bit

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:50.560
<v Speaker 1>wider than the actual right section you're going to be

0:46:50.600 --> 0:46:55.040
<v Speaker 1>working on. You want the area that is a clean

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:57.760
<v Speaker 1>slate to be larger so that you have a buffer

0:46:57.880 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 1>zone at either end, and that way it keeps adjacent

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 1>files from interfering with each other. If you were writing

0:47:04.640 --> 0:47:06.799
<v Speaker 1>information to that part of the disc and it went

0:47:06.960 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 1>over that area, you would start writing on top of

0:47:10.360 --> 0:47:14.839
<v Speaker 1>some other file and then the storage wouldn't work at all.

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So the right head puts data on the disk drive.

0:47:19.120 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 1>By applying one of two magnetic fields to the tape,

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:28.719
<v Speaker 1>it either aligns the magnetic material as north south or

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:33.239
<v Speaker 1>south north. That means it's either a zero or a one.

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:38.719
<v Speaker 1>So imagine that north south magnetization represents as zero and

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>south north represents a one. The right head can then

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 1>go through this disc very very quickly, applying these magnetic

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>fields one after the other, maybe several north south in

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:54.399
<v Speaker 1>a row, followed by a south north or whatever, and

0:47:54.800 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it is recorded on the disc itself, and when you

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:02.880
<v Speaker 1>read it back then you know by looking at the code, oh,

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:06.759
<v Speaker 1>these are three zeros in a row and then a one.

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>It replicates those zeros and ones that were recorded to

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the storage medium. This, in a way is much more

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 1>simple than a variable magnetic flux because you only have

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:18.959
<v Speaker 1>to have two magnetic states. You just have to have

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:22.960
<v Speaker 1>something that represents a zero and something that represents a one.

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:26.719
<v Speaker 1>No other values are accepted, so you just have to

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:31.360
<v Speaker 1>have those two basic modes, and the same basic principles

0:48:31.400 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 1>apply to other computer magnetic storage. Magnetic hard drives use

0:48:35.560 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a very similar approach to the ones I describe for

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:40.919
<v Speaker 1>floppy drives. And you probably heard that it's a bad

0:48:40.960 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 1>idea to expose computers to strong magnetic fields. And the

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:47.400
<v Speaker 1>big reason for this is that magnetic storage. If you

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>bring a strong permanent magnet close enough to magnetic storage media,

0:48:52.160 --> 0:48:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you'll erase the data that's stored there. That includes data

0:48:55.480 --> 0:48:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that's on a hard drive if it's a magnetic drive, right,

0:48:59.440 --> 0:49:02.280
<v Speaker 1>If it's a solid state drive, it's a different story.

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Or if you were to take a strong permanent magnet

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and threatening someone by holding a compact disc with all

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:12.359
<v Speaker 1>their photos on it, and you're saying, if you come

0:49:12.360 --> 0:49:14.720
<v Speaker 1>any closer, I'm going to ruin your pictures by putting

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:18.440
<v Speaker 1>this magnet up to the CD, it won't work because

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the information stored on the CD is an optical format,

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 1>not magnetic, and magnets aren't going to affect it at all.

0:49:26.320 --> 0:49:29.600
<v Speaker 1>That's it for that classic episode how magnetic storage works.

0:49:29.640 --> 0:49:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I hope you enjoyed it.

0:49:32.360 --> 0:49:33.799
<v Speaker 2>Clearly still a thing.

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:37.359
<v Speaker 1>We still use magnetic storage and lots of different applications.

0:49:37.920 --> 0:49:42.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's not uncommon to find machines that only

0:49:42.080 --> 0:49:44.520
<v Speaker 1>have solid state drives these days and not a magnetic

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 1>storage drive. But yes, very important in the history of

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 1>computers and data storage. If we're being honest.

0:49:53.920 --> 0:49:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I hope you.

0:49:54.520 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Enjoyed that episode. Hope you're all well, and I'll talk

0:49:57.160 --> 0:49:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to you again.

0:49:58.239 --> 0:49:58.879
<v Speaker 2>Release It.

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:50:09.920 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.