WEBVTT - Deciphering Elon Musk's Politics

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, Elon Musk gives now the richest person on the planet.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.040
<v Speaker 2>More than half the satellites in space are owned and

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 2>controlled by one man.

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Starting his own artificial intelligence company.

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, he's a legitimate, super genius.

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Legitimate, he says.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 3>He's always voted for Democrats, but this year it will

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 3>be different.

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 2>He'll vote Republican.

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 3>There is a reason the US government is so reliant

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 3>on him.

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is a scam artist and he's done nothing.

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Anything he does is fascinating.

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>People. Welcome to Elon Ink, where we discuss Elon Musk's

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 2>vast corporate empire, his latest gambits and antics, and how

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>to make sense of it all. I'm your host, David Papadopolis.

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 2>This week, we'll discuss some of the fallout from Musk's

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 2>dramatic appearance at the New York Times deal Book Conference.

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 2>One of many noteworthy moment, which is when Elon began

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 2>talking politics.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 4>I let's say I'll vote for Trump, but I mean,

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 4>this is definitely a difficult choice here.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 2>It's not news that Elon has been moving to the

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 2>right in the past few years, but it's been a

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 2>complicated turn. It doesn't fit neatly with his leadership on

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 2>electrifying vehicles to address climate change. But on the other hand,

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 2>he's taken an anti woke stance in his post on

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 2>X among other moves like moving some of his manufacturing

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 2>to Texas. Oh, and he also told advertisers to go

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 2>fuck themselves. We'll come back to that to figure out

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 2>what Elon's role could be in American politics as we

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 2>enter a presidential election year. We have Sarah Fryar, who

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.559
<v Speaker 2>leads our big tech team here at Bloomberg. Hello, Sarah, Hello,

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Dana Hull, who covers Tesla among other musk projects, Dana

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Hey Hey, and Max Chafkin, senior reporter at Bloomberg BusinessWeek.

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Hello.

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So a moment ago, we played a bit of

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 2>musk discussing that we would vote for next year with

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Aaron Ross Sorkin at the New York Times Deal Book Conference.

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Here's that full exchange.

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Could you see yourself voting for President Biden if it's

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 3>IF's a Biden Trump election, for example.

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 4>I think I would not vote for Biden.

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 3>You'd vote for Trump.

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying I'd vote for Trump, but I mean

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 4>this is definitely a difficult choice. Yeah, you know, would

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 4>you vote.

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 3>For Nicki Haley. Nicki Haley, by the way, wants all

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 3>social media names to be exposed.

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 4>As you know, No, I think that's outrageous. Yeah, no,

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to vote for some pros and censorship candidate.

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Dan, So let's start with just a primer on

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Elon's political leanings.

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean, I think, as we've all said, they're complicated.

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 5>He does not neatly fit into a box. And I

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.679
<v Speaker 5>think he's really a political chameleon who kind of waxes

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 5>and waynes depending on how it impacts his businesses and

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 5>personal all fortune. So, when Tesla was a young company

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 5>that was really struggling for survival and President Obama was

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 5>elected and the Recovery Act poured millions of dollars into

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 5>Silicon Valley companies that were investing into clean tech, Tesla

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 5>was a big beneficiary of that, and you know, Musk

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 5>was widely viewed as kind of like a left leaning

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 5>climate change champion. And then we you know, fast forward,

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 5>Trump is elected in twenty sixteen, we have the pandemic,

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 5>and Musk kind of more publicly moved towards the right.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 5>I think the clip that you just heard really speaks

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 5>to this long standing beef that Musk has had with

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 5>President Biden that goes way back to like August of

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty one, when Biden invited Detroit automakers to the

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 5>White House to kind of celebrate electric vehicles and Tesla

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 5>was notably not invited. And that is like this snub

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 5>that still eats away at him.

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it still sticks in his cross And we're gonna

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna dive in depth into that. And second, but

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 2>before we do, Max, chameleon is a term I've heard

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 2>you also use a lot for Musk and his political

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 2>and he's politics.

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely yeah, And and I mean Dana didn't mention, but

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 6>of course George W. Bush was president, you know, during

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 6>the early days of SpaceX and during Musk's early engagement

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 6>with Tesla, and and there was sort of an even

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 6>earlier era of Musk talking about Tesla and his old

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 6>his whole empire and kind of vaguely libertarian terms. I mean,

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 6>people think of him as this environmentalist, but early on,

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 6>the whole pitch from Tesla was that it was a

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 6>better sports car than a Porsche. Elon was a Porsche driver,

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 6>and he was like, I'm gonna make I'm gonna make

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 6>a car that's even better than this. And and I

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:44.239
<v Speaker 6>think that was kind of, you know, pitch to appeal

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 6>to the kind of George W. Bush, you know, compassionate conservatism.

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 6>So he's he's moved over the years. And and I

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:54.119
<v Speaker 6>think what's what's sort of notable about the Biden beef

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 6>that that Dan is bringing up here is sort of

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 6>just how wrong footed Elon Musk has been.

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>He he is.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 6>This is like the first time since the Bush administration

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 6>where he hasn't been able to find a way to

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 6>get on good terms with the person who's in the

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 6>White House.

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Everyone wants to talk about the snubs, so let's go

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 2>into it. Elon at deal Book spoke at length about

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 2>it and sort of spoke about it in kind of

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 2>somewhat raw terms. It's clearly still very personal to him.

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, without any doing nothing to provoke the wide administration.

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 4>They held an electric vehicle summit at the White House

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 4>and specifically refused to let Tesla attend. This is in

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 4>the first six months of the administration, and we inquired, like,

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 4>we literally make more electric cars than everyone else combined.

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 4>Why are we not allowed? Why are you only letting

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 4>you for GM, Chrysler and UAW and you're specifically just

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 4>allowing us from the EV summit at the White House.

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 4>We've done nothing to provoke them. Then Biden went on

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 4>to add insult injury and publicly said that GM was

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 4>leading the electric car revolution. This was in the same

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 4>quarter that Tesla made three hundred thousand electric cars and

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 4>GM made twenty six. Does that seem fair to you?

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 2>So, Dana, can you indeed can hear in his voice

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 2>how it still really bothers him. I mean, the truth

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 2>of the matter is he's got something of a point here.

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 2>It would be a little bit like talking about the

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Professional Football League in commaning a conference with it and

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 2>not inviting the NFL.

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 5>Right, Well, I think it's beyond that. I mean, it's

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 5>not just the emission of Tesla. It's that Biden went

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 5>sort of above and beyond to heap praise onto General

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 5>Motors and Mary Bara and you know, I mean, Biden

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 5>visited this GM factory in Detroit, and he took a

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 5>spin in an electric comer and he said, Detroit's leading

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 5>the leading the world in electric vehicles, and he sort of,

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 5>you know, praised Mary barras like leading the revolution. I mean,

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 5>that is really not fair. Any history of the ev

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 5>industry knows that GM really fought tooth and nail against

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 5>Tesla's ability to sell to consumers directly. They had the

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 5>EV one pro that they shuddered. So it's not just

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 5>that Tesla is like omitted from all these like pomp

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 5>and circumstance shows at the White House lawn. It's that

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 5>like Biden is like keeping praise on GM and and

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 5>like barely mentioned Tesla at all until we called him

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 5>out on it. And that's what feels very personal form Musk.

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 5>And that's why going into the selection cycle, like he

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 5>is not inclined to vote for a man who he

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.239
<v Speaker 5>has publicly called a damp sock puppet.

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 7>He's extrapolating beyond Biden to in the last midterm he said,

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 7>don't vote for Democrats.

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, he has indeed gone from Biden to the

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 2>whole Democratic Party.

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>It might not be fair, but it's it's politics.

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 6>It's not surprising that Joe Biden, a kind of Democrat

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 6>who ran on on pro union, you know, bring the

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 6>jobs back to Detroit type credentials, would go around celebrating

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 6>union auto shops, especially given you know, Elon Musk's history

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 6>with unions, which we've talked about on.

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>The show all the time.

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 6>And and of course Elon Musk is not used to this,

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 6>He's not used to to dealing with this kind of

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 6>politician in Joe Biden, and and it again, it's it's

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 6>surprising to me that he hasn't tried to find a

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 6>way to embrace Bidenomics or whatever you want to call

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 6>Joe Biden's politics.

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Because of course he could. He has a very.

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 6>Compelling pitch to offer Democrats if he wanted to.

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, So you're you're basically saying that the chameleonic Musk

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 2>of years past would have gotten over the hurt feelings

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, and we just rolled with this.

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>That's what I would have expected.

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 6>What may be going on here is just that Elon

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 6>Musk is a lot bigger than he was earlier. So

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 6>in the old days, you know, any president is going

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 6>to sing single out a uh, you know, American job creator,

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 6>startup from Silicon Valley that's doing pretty well. Suddenly we

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 6>have this guy who is the world's richest man, who

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 6>is you know, has a political has spoken out against

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 6>unions in the past, and that makes him harder perhaps

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 6>for somebody like Biden, or really any presidential candidate to

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 6>just fully embrace.

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 7>Especially with the backdrop of income inequality, inflation, people not

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 7>being able to you know, afford basic things in their minds,

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 7>even if it's improved. I think he really wants to

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 7>speak to the working class in America and being really

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 7>close with the world's richest man is not a good look.

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 5>And let's be honest, Michigan is critically important to Biden's

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 5>re election campaign. The Detroit Automakers are based in Michigan.

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 5>There is no real value add to coosing up to

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 5>a billionaire who has moved to Texas.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah so he' right, he's got plants in California, foregone

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 2>conclusion in elections and Texas foregone conclusions in election. Michigan. Yeah,

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 2>always you know, up for grabs, which again comes back

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 2>to Max's point about chameleonic Musk in the past would

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 2>have just sort of seen it for what it is.

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 2>But let me throw this at you, Dan, I mean,

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 2>is it also possible that his ability to roll with

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Biden and find a way to become sympathical with him

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 2>also just perhaps reflects how the pandemic actually really affected

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 2>him and sort of by him meaning Elon and just

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of drove him ideologically further to the right.

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 7>That's part of it.

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 5>I think what's weird about this is that Biden's Inflation

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 5>Reduction Act keeps billions of dollars onto climate change efforts

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 5>through everything from like a manufacturing text credit, which Tesla

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 5>really benefits from, to funding for electric vehicle chargers all

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 5>over the United States, to like, you know, a ten

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 5>percent credit for refining raw minerals in the US, which

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 5>is why Tesla now has this lithium refinery in Corpus Christy. So,

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, Musk, as much as he likes to sort

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 5>of portray himself as being a self made man, really

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 5>does benefit from government programs, government programs designed to combat

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 5>climate change. Would think that there would be some kind

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 5>of detente where they could put the personal grudge aside

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 5>and just sort of, you know, move forward and talk

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 5>about the benefits of the IRA. But that's that's not happening.

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 5>And I think what's so so wild about this these

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 5>clips that we just heard from Deal Book is Musk

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 5>is saying he's not inclined to vote for Biden, but

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 5>he's not. He hasn't yet endorsed a Republican candidate either,

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 5>and that Republican field is really narrowing, and it's like,

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 5>what is his game here? Like he sort of, you know,

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.839
<v Speaker 5>did the speak show of coming out with DeSantis, then

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 5>he sort of was flirting with Vivek, and but now

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 5>he's saying he won't he's not inclined to vote for

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 5>Nicki Haley. So like, who's left? Like, is Musk gonna

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 5>get behind Chris Christie?

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, Max, you describe it like he's basically getting

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 2>behind a handful of Rump candidates.

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 6>I mean that's the thing in that clip that to

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 6>me is most surprising his refusal or hesitancy to say

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 6>that he would vote for Donald Trump, who is, you know,

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 6>way way ahead in the in the Republican primaries, is

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 6>the presumptive nominee.

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>And and to me.

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 6>It just shows how politically marooned Musk is. So in

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 6>certain ways, right, Okay, he's got he's got some beef

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 6>with the Democrats. Fine, that kind of makes sense, but

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 6>he also has beef with Donald Trump.

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump has responded, how has he responded?

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 6>Trump has responded by insulting him back, you know, on

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 6>the campaign trail, and it's it's not that surprising because Trump,

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 6>like Biden, also wants to win over these autoworkers, right,

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 6>they're they're they're.

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 7>But I don't think that Musk really works in alliances.

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 7>I think he works in enemies, and I think that

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 7>the you know, deciding that Biden the Democrats are enemies

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 7>is more important to him than deciding which Republican he

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 7>wants to align with and support, because he needs all

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 7>of them right now, like he needs the state based

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 7>politicians for launching, launching his rockets, selling his cars. You know,

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 7>all of those regulations around car sales are very state oriented.

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 7>So what's what's the benefit to him of making any

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 7>any like choices.

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 2>He's got a lot of to Sarah's point, business interest

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 2>in Florida, Right, I mean, let's start back at the beginning, right.

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Didn't this whole this election cycle start for him with

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 2>the with the Ron DeSantis X launch that went oddly? Max?

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, he Uh, Ron DeSantis launched his presidential candidacy

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 6>on X. Elon had actually praised DeSantis before. I think

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 6>I believe he in fact said he was, you know,

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 6>inclined to support DeSantis in twenty twenty four. Then Elon

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 6>sort of shifted to the vek Ramaswami as as Dana

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 6>is saying, and he's at times expressed, uh, you know,

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 6>a little maybe a little curiosity about RFK, who's you know,

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 6>was running as a Democrat. He hosted him on a

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 6>yeah yeah, now running as he yes, he hosted him

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 6>on x uh and and RFK of course now running

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 6>as an independent.

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think in all these.

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 6>Candidates you can see why there's appeal to for somebody

0:13:58.240 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 6>like Elon Musk.

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Now, Dana tell us how historically involved has he been

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.599
<v Speaker 2>as a donor and activist. Does he punk down a

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of money in these elections?

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 5>Traditional?

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Not at all.

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 5>I mean that's the big thing. Musk is a loud voice,

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 5>but he is not a big donor. He doesn't have

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 5>a pack that we know of. He's always like donated

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 5>very small to both sides of the aisle, but never

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 5>been a big player in presidential campaigns. He's not like

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 5>a budler. I mean, there are a lot of big

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 5>money donors on both sides, you know, who typically give

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 5>a lot to presidential campaigns, and Musk has never been

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 5>that way. So That's what's sort of curious to me

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 5>as we head into twenty twenty four. What does an

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 5>endorsement from Musk even mean? Does he give you money

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 5>or does he just sort of like platform you on

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 5>his platt Well.

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, but Sarah, so he that is a pretty big platform, right.

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 7>Well, this will be this will be the first election

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 7>where he owns X. There was obviously the midterms where

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 7>he put his finger on the scale saying, don't vote

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 7>for Democrats, vote for Republicans. And this presidential election is

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 7>going to have obviously much bigger consequences, and he can

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 7>really shape the narrative however he wants. He's shown us

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 7>that that he will promote his own tweets. He will,

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 7>you know, decide what content stays and goes, decide when

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 7>to ban people and how to ban them if at all,

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 7>and keep them keep them posting. So, even though X

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 7>has declined in advertiser revenue in some of its cloud,

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 7>it still has this this outsized impact on the political

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 7>conversation because it is the real time network. And so

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 7>if he if he is open about who he's supporting,

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 7>you can imagine that we'd want to know a little

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 7>bit more about how X is treating that decision, if

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 7>at all, in its algorithm, in its moderation choices, in

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 7>its advertising choices, it could have a big impact.

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 6>I just to push back a little bit on what

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 6>Sarah was saying, Like, I think there's always been real

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 6>questions about how influential Twitter is actually has actually been

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 6>on the political pop process it had. It definitely gets

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 6>things in front of journalists. So insofar as there are

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 6>journalists still on X, which they are to some extent

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 6>but not as much as they used to be, there's

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 6>potential for influence there. But just you know, counterpoint is

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 6>the vik Ramaswami did really well on X. He was

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 6>embraced by Musk, platform by Musks, and he has gone

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 6>absolutely nowhere in the Republican president Like he's you know,

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 6>he's at like something like five percent in you know,

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 6>polls in Ohio, Iowa, and New Hampshire. So I don't

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 6>know how big the impact really is going to be.

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 7>You don't just have to think about what he does,

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 7>but what he chooses to not do. I think about

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 7>like what Twitter did after the January sixth insurrection. They

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 7>banned Trump, they started fact checking people, They sort of

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 7>tamped down the radicalization that was happening, not entirely, but

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 7>enough alongside Meta there was like this united front by

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 7>the platforms that they that they needed to do. You know, frankly,

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 7>too little, too late, but I think as a lot

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 7>of people thought of it that way. But I think

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 7>that that shows, you know, if you have a platform

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 7>with fewer rules around political speech. As Musk says, he

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 7>cares deeply about how quickly are people going to radicalize

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 7>in a situation where they disagree with the outcome?

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, we do indeed need to talk sports, so

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 2>we'll we'll segue to there. Okay, welcome back. So, as

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 2>we've talked about in the past, advertisers have been fleeing

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 2>X in drobes. This topic came up in the deal

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Book interview and it was the most explosive moment by far.

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 4>If somebody's going to try to blackmail me with advertising,

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 4>blackmailing with money, go for yourself, but go fuck yourself.

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 4>Is that clear? I hope it is? Hey, Bob sharing

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 4>the audience.

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Sarah. So that's the landscape out there right now.

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 2>That's the tone right now between Elon Musk and X

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 2>versus or Visa VI its corporate clients, but one, curiously

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 2>one remains and remains pretty close to X and that

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 2>is the National Football League the NFL.

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 7>Why there's a lot of history there. Twitter had a

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 7>CFO who was the former CFO of the NFL, Anthony Noto,

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 7>and back around the twenty sixteen twenty seventeen era, he

0:18:56.440 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 7>created a lot of deals, including a deal Forday Night

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 7>football to be streamed on X Sorry Twitter, which is

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 7>what it was called back then.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>And it trained you too well, Sarah, you know it's

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 2>actually I know, I.

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 7>Just spent too much time covering this company, But that

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 7>was that was a big deal because Twitter has a

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 7>much smaller audience, but at the time it was considered

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 7>the only place where those kind of real time conversations occur.

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 7>If somebody has an amazing touchdown or if somebody gets injured,

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 7>you are going to see people just posting about it,

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 7>even you know, out of context, assuming that everyone else

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 7>on Twitter that they follow or that there is in

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 7>their community is also watching the game. And that made

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 7>sports more fun, and it made it something that was like,

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, the shared experience. Even if you weren't watching

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 7>the game with friends, you could feel like that that

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 7>you know, excitement.

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 2>And that community remains that community.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 7>It doesn't have anywhere to go. I mean, I think

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 7>it's kind of a default. You're on Twitter because like

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 7>that's where your people are. I will say I've seen

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 7>the NFL start to embrace other platforms more they are

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 7>they're you know, not really finding It doesn't seem like

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 7>they're finding an alternative either. They have to be on

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 7>X and there's not many brands that that can say

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 7>that they have to be there.

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 5>Still.

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 2>Now, the NFL is the most dominant sports league in

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 2>this country, and frankly, in terms of all entertainment, it

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 2>pretty much dominates the US landscape. You look at the

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 2>top eight most watch shows all of last year, one

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 2>through eight are all NFL football games. You look at

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 2>the top twenty most valuable sports franchises in the US

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 2>fifteen of the twenty. Does this relationship with the NFL

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 2>at a time when so much is going wrong for

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 2>X Sarah? Is it actually a road to financial viability?

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Is it something is it a model that can work

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 2>off of or is it ultimately still just too small

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 2>and in scale to add up?

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think it's a legacy thing. I don't think

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 7>it's something that they're building. That's just the default behavior

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 7>from the years of work that Twitter did before. And

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 7>in fact, what we are seeing is the algorithm is

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 7>changing on Twitter to be more about entertainment less about

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 7>real time, and we've seen Musk embrace memes and posts

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 7>that are maybe a little older, posts from people you

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 7>may not be following. And so it doesn't seem to

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 7>me like Twitter being the place where you go to

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 7>see what's happening in the moment is really the thing anymore.

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 7>You know, see what he has done with news links,

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 7>He's down ranked them. I think that is that used

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 7>to be the soul and heartbeat of Twitter. If it's

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 7>still got that, it's because nobody else has figured it out.

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 2>So that point that tweak to the to the algo

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 2>seems very important. Right if in the past, you know, indeed,

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 2>you wanted to know which wide receiver to start in

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 2>your fantasy league, and so tweets on who was injured

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 2>and who was going to play were enormously important. You

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 2>needed that information immediately. If that's being downplayed to as

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 2>as the app becomes more of an entertainment, so that

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 2>does indeed seem like a problem, especially Max at a

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 2>time when gambling is exploding the US And I was

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 2>at a game earlier this year and the guys behind

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 2>me had made we're making all these in game bets, right,

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 2>and so like you need that real time information, right.

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, absolutely, I'm like what Sarah is saying is is right.

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it's the platform. It's not as useful for

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 6>sports as it used to be. Like I use it

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 6>all the time to like look, no, not to gamble,

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 6>but to look at, you know, who's starting in the NFL,

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.719
<v Speaker 6>to look at soccer transfer news to figure out if

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 6>the Mets, which scrub you know, Pitcher, the Mets.

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Are going to sign bring next that's up here. And

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to kind of work at it, you know,

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>because because.

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 2>Like because of the tweaks to the algo.

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because of the tweaks the algo. But you can

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>do it.

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 6>And and the sports influencers, as Sarah's saying, they haven't left,

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 6>They're still there. And the thing about sports that is

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 6>really good for Twitter.

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Sports is just.

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 6>Like an avalanche of developments of ups and downs and

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 6>funny stuff you want to react to.

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's sort of perfect for that. And and I.

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 6>Think the gambling thing actually is a huge gift to

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk because of course they're having huge problems with

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 6>all these brand advertisers. We've seen some announcements about efforts

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 6>to you know, go after small businesses. I mean sports,

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 6>gambling websites. There's a lot of money there. Those are

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 6>companies like he wants X to be the everything app. Right,

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 6>He's gonna ask for your credit card information and he

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 6>wants you to do payments. So if you can gamble

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:48.719
<v Speaker 6>on X, that would be perfect for you.

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, totally.

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 6>And so it definitely seems like this is something they

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 6>can work, they can build on. I also don't think

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:57.880
<v Speaker 6>it's something that's gonna go away anytime soon for all

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 6>the reasons Sarah is saying, like there isn't another REDS

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 6>isn't better for this.

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 5>I have a question about advertising on X. What's the

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 5>NBA doing Because the NBA is so player driven versus

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 5>owner driven. You have really big names like Lebron James

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 5>who used to have huge followings, like is he still

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 5>on X? And is the NBA doing anything around their

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 5>advertising or are they still on it as well? Because

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 5>if we're talking about sort of cultural war politics, the

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 5>NFL and the NBA are just very different, and I'm

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 5>just sort of curious about that.

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 7>I haven't seen any recent statements from them, but I

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 7>will say that I thought it was really funny when

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 7>Musk started this kind of premium verification product that you

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 7>wanted people to buy that actually didn't have anything to

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 7>do with whether you were who you say you are.

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:51.719
<v Speaker 7>He doled it out to some celebrities who were kind

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 7>of surprised by it and confused about why they got

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 7>blue checks without paying, sort of to create the impression

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 7>that theseelebrities, we're paying, and that it was a cool

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 7>hit product that you needed to buy.

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Sarah last thing before we move on here, Ex's CEO

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Linda Yakarino. She keeps xing about tweeting, xing posting. I

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 2>guess musk stead post is the word he wants us

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:19.360
<v Speaker 2>to use. Keeps posting about the NFL football, But she

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 2>she's doing so in a sort of odd way. She'll

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 2>just post right like football heart right, Like what what

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 2>do we make of the Linda Yakarino football tweets posts?

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 2>I should say, oh, to.

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.199
<v Speaker 7>Get inside her head. I mean, I think that that

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 7>she is in a tough position, right now because she

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 7>needs to create the impression that Twitter is a place

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 7>where advertisers want to put their money and the are

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 7>excited about hanging out and building their communities. And at

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 7>the same time, she is dealing with an owner and

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:04.719
<v Speaker 7>CTO who is doing everything in his power to alienate

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 7>some advertisers, including telling some of them at the deal

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 7>Book conference to go f themselves, and you know, specifically

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 7>calling out Bob Eiger, who is the CEO of Disney,

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 7>which was a very major advertiser for Twitter for a

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 7>long time. So yeah, she's got to take what she

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 7>can get.

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 2>We've got to talk cyber Truck again. The launch was

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 2>last week. We spent the fair amount of time talking

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 2>about it last weekend and they launched two days later.

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go around the room here and i want

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 2>everyone to hit me with one thought they had. We'll

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 2>start with our Tesla expert Dana Hall.

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 5>Why was Elon standing in the dark on stage? It

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 5>was a very very weird, underwhelming short presentation.

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and do we have a theory Dan as to

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 2>why he was standing in the dark on stage?

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 5>To be fair, I have not been invited to a

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 5>Tesla event in a while. But I have been to

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 5>them in the past and they were like showstoppers. They

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 5>were like these very highly orchestrated LA high production value,

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 5>incredible events like the Model three launch, the semi truck launch.

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>They were awesome.

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 5>And then watching this on the live stream, I'm like, Okay,

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 5>this is very underwhelming. The big thing people want to

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 5>know are price and range. Elon must did not talk

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 5>about either during his twenty minute presentation. It was all

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.920
<v Speaker 5>it was like showing video clips of performance, but nothing

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 5>about the key.

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Maybe because the price is maybe because the price is

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 2>higher than they had indicated would be and the.

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 5>Range is louder.

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 2>There were yeah, right, so those are probably too all right,

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Sarah Fryar.

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean, this thing just doesn't seem that safe, Like

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 7>maybe for the driver, but if you're on the road

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 7>and the cyber truck's coming at you, I just wouldn't

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 7>want to be.

0:27:58.440 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 2>So I'm like, as I look at that thing, the

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 2>epiphany I had over the weekend. This thing is all

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 2>stainless steel and it's built like a missile. Now, I mean,

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be it's gonna be pretty dangerous.

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean, our former colleague Sean Okaine had a great point,

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 5>this is like ev for Doomers. I mean, they made

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 5>this kind of feeling during the whole presentation that this

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:21.679
<v Speaker 5>is a vehicle that you can drive on Mars or

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 5>other planets. This is the vehicle for escaping the apocalypse.

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 5>It's like, you know, when when everything goes to hell

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 5>in a hand basket, this is the vehicle that you

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 5>want to be in.

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 7>But what in your car turns into the weapon that

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 7>will smash the zombies out of your way?

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that was definitely the vibe.

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 7>That's but that's like not good for reality. That's there

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 7>are you know, kids playing on the street and stuff.

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 2>So I'm Sarah, you and I are aligned here, so Max,

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 2>that leaves you.

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 6>So I was just gonna say, like, I am very

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 6>conflicted on this because like I'm a cyclist and a

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 6>runner and on the other hand, like a truck that

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 6>smashes zombies like it doesn't I see the appeal. And

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 6>but anyway, the thing that the thing that I was

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 6>surprised by, which is actually related to this, is that

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 6>this truck is not going to be legal street legal

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 6>in Europe because European regulators, for safety reasons require trucks

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 6>to have rounded.

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Edges like totally and so like they can't.

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 6>You can't even sell this thing in Europe, which I

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 6>hate to say, it kind of increases the appeal for me.

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Uh you know.

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing that I find just head scratching

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is the steering.

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 6>Thing Like a rede a review top there's a top

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 6>Gear review of the of the truck. It's largely positive,

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 6>but it really doesn't like the steering. This drive by

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 6>wire system where you can't turn the wheel. You know,

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 6>you're you're turning the wheel sort of very small distances

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 6>to get it to to to turn and which is

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 6>a feature in high end sports cars, but which the

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 6>top Gear testers said.

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Was weird, especially at slow speeds.

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 2>So they're out there, people are driving them, are dan

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Is that correct? Yeah?

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean Tesla turned over what like twelve of them

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 5>to the first customers last Thursday night. You know, we'll

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 5>see in January how many they actually deliver in December.

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, people have them. You know, some automotive journalists

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 5>got early access to them, some influencers were able to

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 5>drive them. The other thing that's really interesting is there's

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 5>this whole product called the Range Extender which you can

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 5>buy for sixteen thousand dollars that will add vehicle range

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 5>to the battery, But they didn't talk about that during

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 5>the presentation either. And that's like a big thing for

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 5>a company that's kind of known for making the best

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 5>range batteries in the business to come out with a

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 5>product that, you know, if you really want the range

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 5>that was promised four years ago, you've got to buy

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 5>this sixteen thousand dollars like thing that gets it gets

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 5>embedded into the back of your cab. People are bummed

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 5>out about that.

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 2>It seems on Tesla like so all right, well, we'll see,

0:30:56.360 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 2>we'll see how this cyber truck dot. Thanks for listening

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 2>to Elon, Inc. And thanks to our panel Sarah Dana Max.

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Great to be here, see you next week.

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 7>Thanks for having us.

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 2>This episode was produced by Stacey Wong. Naomi Shaven and

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Rayhan Harmanci are our senior editors. The idea for this

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 2>very show also came from Rayhan Blake Maple's Handles Engineering,

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 2>and we get special editing assistants from Jeff Grocott. Our

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 2>supervising producers Magnus Henrickson. Thanks a bunch of BusinessWeek editor

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Joel Weber. The Elon Inc. Theme is written and performed

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 2>by Taka Yasuzawa and Alex Sugijira. Sage Bauman is the

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 2>head of Bloomberg Podcast and our executive producer. I am

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 2>David Papadopolis. If you have a minute, wait and review

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 2>our show, it'll help other listeners find us.

0:31:59.000 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>See you next week.

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 4>The Stop staff