WEBVTT - Distressed Companies Dumping Assets; SBB Sinks

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Credit Edge, a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>My name is James Crumbie. I'm a senior editor at Bloomberg.

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>This week, we're very pleased to welcome it enly Garthia Pees,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>who covers distressed debt and also football for Bloomberg News

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in London. How are you, Renie?

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 2>All good?

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Thank you? James.

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Ru also delighted to have Tolu Alamutu, who covers real

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 1>estate and banks for Bloomberg Intelligence based in London. We'll

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>be coming back to Tollu later in the show to

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>talk about the crisis at SBB, the poster child for

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Sweden's property meltdown. But first it Garcia Pees with Bloomberg

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>News traveled companies distress debt. Why are we seeing so

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>much drama right now?

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's been a long time coming because a lot

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 3>of companies accumulated a lot of debt during COVID times.

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:07.199
<v Speaker 3>Also some of them that had you know, big, big

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 3>leverage because they were leveraged buyouts when that was cheap.

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Those kind of structures worked well while that was very cheap,

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 3>not so much anymore, in particular when they face refinancings.

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 3>So we are now starting to see the cracks showing

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 3>up more often and higher interest rates is already hurting

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 3>those that have floating dead, but also the ones that

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 3>are trying to refinance. They know that it's going to

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 3>be more expensive and in some cases just prohibitedly. So

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 3>that's one and then the other thing is inflation, which

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 3>of course it's also hurting. Not all the companies have

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 3>the same pricing powers, so some have been able to

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 3>pass through to consumers at least for most of last year,

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 3>and others haven't. So we are also starting to see

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 3>this disparity between borrowers of the ones that have this

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 3>power and the ones that don't.

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>So in basic terms, rates are going up. That means

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that debt service, you know, the cost of your debt increases. Also,

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the economy's slowing, so your earnings are going down. Consumption

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>is probably suffering because of inflation across the world. But

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>where are we in the cycle any Is it going

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>to get worse from here?

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 3>It does look like it's definitely going to get worse

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 3>before it gets better. Part of the reason is because

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 3>we're still seeing high levels of inflation, so central banks

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 3>are not likely to lower rates anytime soon. And the

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 3>other part of The reason is that we are coming

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 3>from from an era where lenders or creditors in general,

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 3>where keen on amending and extending the dead and wave covenance,

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, because they understood with COVID, they understood that

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 3>most of the companies were in that situation for reasons

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 3>that were outside of their control or had reasons that

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 3>had little to do with their performance. Now that they

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 3>are a lot of them are running out of passions

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 3>in some cases, when you know, you've seen a lot

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 3>of of the restructurings that we're seeing now actually are

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 3>second time structurings. In some cases even third time companies

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 3>that restructure during COVID, and that hasn't been enough because

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 3>the business hasn't rebounded as strongly as expected. So they

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 3>are coming back for a second or third round.

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So what kind of companies at most risks do you think?

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in the US, we've seen a lot of

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>stress in retail and healthcare, and commercial real estate is

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>under a lot of pressure as well. But what about

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in Europe? Is it the same kind of cast of characters,

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the same same same sectors that are in trouble.

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it does look like it's it's very similar retail

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 3>has been distressed for ages because of the change in

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 3>in online shopping. It was a change of partying people

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 3>not going to to shopping malls as often that that

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 3>kind of of trend that was already the case before COVID,

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 3>and of course with COVID things accelerated even further. And

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 3>then for real estate it is now it's a sector

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 3>that accumulated a lot of debt again when when it

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 3>was cheap to do so. But now a lot of

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 3>these structures are suffering because of property value going down

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 3>also with the pandemic. In the case of the of

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 3>the businesses that have offices, a lot of those are

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 3>suffering because depending on the on the geographies, people are

0:04:55.960 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 3>not going back to the office as often as for

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 3>so not a lot of companies don't need the same

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 3>office space that they used to. They need less, So

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 3>landlords in that part of the market are are struggling.

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 3>Depending on the on the countries, you do see more

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 3>higher back vacancy rates in that part of the of

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 3>the real estate market than in others. But but yeah,

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 3>real estate companies are are suffering a lot with this

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 3>combo of lower lower value of the properties plus higher rates.

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>So the borrowers that are out there that are really

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 1>struggling right now, but we think that they've got a future.

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>They're not going to file for bankruptcy. What are they

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>doing to relieve the pressure here?

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 3>So we are seeing more and more companies that are

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 3>trying to sell assets as a way to pay down debt,

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 3>or they are that are announcing that they are doing

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 3>reviews to sell assets to pay down that and for

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 3>now it's non core assets. They're not selling the duels

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 3>of the crowns or to speak, but they are starting

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 3>to look into it, if not doing it already. One

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 3>reason why there haven't been even more asset sales so

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 3>far is because the mismatch in valuation in terms of

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 3>what the sellers were hoping they would get for their

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 3>assets and what the buyers want to pay for them.

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 3>So the sellers that can hold to the asset are

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 3>waiting for a better moment to sell it. But that's

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 3>not the case for everyone.

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 1>And you say they're not giving away the crown jewels,

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but are there any sort of being forced to sell

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>assets or units that they really do need to keep

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in order to generate the cash that they'll need to

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>stay alive over the long term.

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 3>I think more than I mean perhaps Friends supermarket Casino

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 3>is the best example. It's still holding to its its

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 3>main business, which is Friends, but it did have a

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 3>bigger stake in SAE, which is I think the third

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 3>largest retailer in Brazil. That was a pretty good asset,

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 3>but it had to sell part of those shares in

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 3>order to raise money to to pay down debt. Again,

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 3>it's holding to its core business, which is Friends, but

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 3>it's also it also had to sell some of the

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 3>businesses that were actually pretty good for its you know,

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 3>existence so to speak. I guess what we are seeing

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 3>more when it comes to that core part of the business.

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 3>What we are seeing more is debt for equity swaps,

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 3>so creditors to taking over the business because a private

0:07:56.000 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 3>equity owner doesn't doesn't see a way forward for that

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 3>for that company, so it's just giving up on it altogether.

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And on Casino, I mean, you've been all over that one.

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a really fascinating story. It's the biggest supermarket, one

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest supmarket chains in France, and so why

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is that one getting so much attention? What's the drama there?

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 3>So it's a very interesting situation. It has been cooking

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 3>for a long time.

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.239
<v Speaker 1>It was already.

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 3>Short sellers had it on the radar many years ago.

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 3>It started in twenty fifteen, and then in twenty eighteen

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 3>the main accuisition of short sellers was that the company

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 3>actually had more debt that it was reporting because of

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 3>the way it was consolidating different assets in its portfolio

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 3>in the group. And then from twenty eighteen the company

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 3>compromised medias announcement that it was going to sell assets

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 3>to reduce the debt because it was overlabored and it

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 3>was doing so. But definitely COVID didn't help in terms

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 3>of valuations and in terms of the calendar to some extent.

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 3>And also now it's got to a point where even

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 3>after selling a lot of assets just in time to

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 3>pay the next the dead that was the next maturity,

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 3>it not has come to a point where it has

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 3>to restructure and it has started talks with creditors and

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 3>other stakeholders to decide how it's best to restructure the

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 3>company for the business. It's also very interesting. It's also

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 3>a very interesting case because it's for the French government.

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 3>It's a very important asset because it employs over fifty

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 3>thousand people in France, and it's also critical for feit

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 3>security in some of the French regions. It's very important

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 3>in Paris, for instance, in the Paris region, it's important

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 3>in the Lyon region as well, and in the south

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 3>of France. So of course for the French government it's

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 3>a very it's a very important asset and also it's

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 3>interesting and it has a massive capital structure. It's about

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 3>seven billion of debt, so a lot of creditors involved,

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 3>a lot of suppliers involved, and it also has very

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 3>interesting characters involved in terms of well the chairman of

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 3>the company is a very interesting character, but also Jean,

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 3>but also different parties that have made offers for the

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 3>company to inject equity. If you know, the company managed

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 3>to cut debt to sustainable levels. We have a check

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 3>billionaire called Daniel Kratinsky that has made such an offer,

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 3>teaming up with an existing shareholder of the company. And

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 3>we also have a tree of French businessmen that have

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 3>done a separate bit for it. And Lastie is interesting

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 3>because of the implications he may have in the French

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 3>food retail industry in general. Because O'shan, for instance, has

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 3>already approached Kratinski to team up if he's bid wins

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 3>after the restructuring, and Carfu has expressed interest in the

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 3>past for some of the assets. The company has already

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 3>agreed to sell some some of the some of its

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 3>sites to Antarache. It's another French retailer, so there is

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot of interest for the assets in France, so

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 3>it will be it will be interesting to see how

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 3>it plays out after the restructuring.

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like a fascinating story with It's like a Shakespeare

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in drama. What what scene? What actor we in the drama?

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it act three? Scene one? Or are we getting

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of the two? No more?

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, we're nowhere near the end. Because they just

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 3>entered conciliation laid may May twenty fifth, so they have

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 3>until October twenty fifth to negotiate the restructuring. Ideally they

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 3>would like to have it earlier, of course, because it's

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 3>also listed companies, so the earlier the better. And also

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:30.800
<v Speaker 3>summer is typically a very bad quarter for supermarkets in

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 3>terms of liquidity because they need to do all the

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:38.959
<v Speaker 3>purchases for them for the Christmas season, so they need

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 3>to stock basically, so Yeah, we were starting the talks

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 3>of the restructuring and after that they will have to

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 3>go to accord to validate the agreement, vote on etc.

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, we're starting.

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Interesting. So just going back to the asset sales generally,

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're talking about European asset sales to support

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>companies through difficult times. Is it confined to Europe orre

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you seeing it in other parts of the world.

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 3>We are seeing it in other parts of the world

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 3>as well. In the in the US, we've seen different

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 3>cases and there was also a poll by EY that

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 3>mentioned that in the US there were about forty four

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 3>percent of chief executive officers that are planning to the

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 3>investments this year. And we have already seen in Chapter eleven,

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 3>although of course you can say Chapter eleven is the

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 3>place you want to avoid if you can. But we

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 3>are seeing examples of companies that Genesis Care, for instance,

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 3>is an example. It's in the healthcare space. It has

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 3>businesses in Australia, in Europe and in the US, but

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 3>the US one is the one that wasn't working and

0:13:54.160 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 3>that was dragging performance in general. So eventually they put

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 3>the police a company in they file for Chapter eleven

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 3>and they are announced that they are planning to sell

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 3>the US business. But again that one's as part of

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 3>the chapter eleven situation.

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, got it. So basically, these companies that are trying

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to sell assets they think are worth more than the

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>market is willing to pay. At the same time rates

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>are going up and the economy is slowing. It all

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a recipe for disaster. It seems going to

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>get worse.

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is complicated because, for instance, or Pea, which

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 3>is a French care home operator, it had to restructure

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 3>twice last year. And part of the reason for that

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 3>was that in the first restructuring it made a deal

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 3>with the French banks, but it also was planning to

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 3>sell a lot of assets to cut down that. But

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 3>then because of the valuations, it realized, well, if we

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 3>do this now, it's we're going to get paid less

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 3>than we think they're worth. So it's better if we

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 3>do a broader structuring and then we sell the assets

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 3>as we see fit. The other thing is that when

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 3>everyone in the market knows or thinks you have problems,

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 3>of course the price that they're willing to pay for

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 3>those assets are not necessarily the best or fair value

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 3>or what you could get if they thought your situation

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 3>was more stable. And that's something that SBB, for instance,

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 3>is facing. That they announced they were planning to do

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 3>asset sales, but then the new management was very clear.

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Now it remains a question on whether they will be

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 3>able to stick to the plan, but that they don't

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 3>want to do fire sales, so that they will try

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 3>to sell them, that there are a lot of parties

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 3>interested in their assets, and so that they will do

0:15:56.520 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 3>them as they see fit, slowly but surely. Slowly will

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 3>depend I guess on the offers that they get, but

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.479
<v Speaker 3>they don't. They're not planning to sell at deep discounts.

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>So just to be clear, you're talking about SBB there

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>from Sweden, right correct? Yeah, okay, great, we all get

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to catch up with Tolu al Mutu in the moment

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg intalience about that, but before we do, only

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>what's the next big story to watch on your beat?

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Are there any big football scoops out there coming? That's

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>soccer for our US listeners.

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 3>It is. It is getting busy. That's busy. It's definitely

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 3>getting busy. I guess in that front, we're all watching

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 3>what happens with the Italian League if they're going to

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 3>sell their broadcasting rights the same well revenue from their

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 3>broadcasting rights the same way that the Spanish and the

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 3>French league did. And also any any clubs that are

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 3>potentially for sale, that's something we're always looking for. And

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:58.359
<v Speaker 3>then in the stress, Yeah, it's it's a matter to see,

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 3>well what what the owners of the companies are going

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 3>to do, if they're willing to inject more money in

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.959
<v Speaker 3>their companies, or if they will give up and just

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 3>hand the cues to creators, and to what extent we

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 3>will see like real fights or it will be you know,

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 3>less less aggressive.

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Great stuff. Gartha Perez with Bloomberg News, thanks so much

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Thank you for having me read all

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>of it and is great scoops on the Bloomberg terminal

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and of course at Bloomberg dot com. So, as I

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, we're very pleased to have with us. Tolu Alamutu,

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>who looks at real estate and banks for Bloomberg Intelligence

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>based in London. What's going on in real estate toler

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>It seems like nothing but bad news when it comes

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to offices with not enough people going back to work.

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>After the pandemic.

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, it definitely seems like that from where we're sitting

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 2>in London. Not only are you seeing some of the

0:17:56.160 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 2>real estate issuers report negative valuation adjustments, but you're seeing

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 2>that result in losses at some of the companies. You're

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 2>also seeing negative actions from the rating agencies, and you're

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.199
<v Speaker 2>not seeing the supply that you would have expected in

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 2>the bond markets from these issues. So there's concerned about

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 2>financing as well. So a lot going on and the

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 2>concerns are not going away. It seems I think, you know,

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 2>looking forward to the second half of the many of

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the issues that people had earlier in the year are

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 2>going to carry through to that period unfortunately.

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about SBB. It's the landlord at the

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.679
<v Speaker 1>center of Sweden's property crisis, which is wearying a lot

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of people, especially in Europe. They loaded up on cheap

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>debt to snap up schools and healthcare centers that local

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>governments were looking to offload. Now they're facing off against

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>local councils who want the properties back. That sorry. They

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>recently postponed dividend payment for at least a year to

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>try and ease a funding crunch caused by sharply higher

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. And we know that SPB has about eight

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in debt, So what is the situation TOALU,

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>how bad is it going to get? Do you think?

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 2>Okay? Well, SPB is being seen as I guess you know,

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 2>the canary and the coal mine in some ways in

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 2>some ways, and there are a number of reasons for that. First,

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 2>they've been under pressure since at least the early part

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 2>of i'd say last year because there was a short

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Sellar report that targeted them. And since then, SBB has

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 2>done a number of things, including a spin off, including

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 2>changing some of its reporting to include some alternative reporting measures.

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 2>They've also carried out some asset sales, but none of

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 2>this has really worked. And most recently they got downgraded

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:03.360
<v Speaker 2>by Pitch, SM and Scope, so they lost their investment

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 2>grade ratings at S and P and Fitch and a Scope.

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 2>There is a possibility of a further downgrade and as

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 2>a result of the S and P downgrade, as you mentioned,

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 2>they decided to skip the dividend. They also postponed a

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 2>rights issue with SBB. It's basically at a point where

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 2>we're getting at least one headline or one story a day.

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:35.719
<v Speaker 2>So yesterday we had a story about them converting a

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 2>mandatory convertible of about I think two billion krona or

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 2>so into shares, which I think would have been expected.

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 2>And today we had the pleasure of a headline saying

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 2>that the Swedish FSA will be probing SBB's accounting, primarily

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 2>focused on the twenty twenty one reporting, but also potentially

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty and SBB has has responded to that sorry,

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 2>saying that in their view the valuations and other metrics

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 2>that they reported are correct and they're looking forward to

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 2>having a constructive dialogue with the Swedish FSA. The problem

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 2>from a bondholder perspective is clearly the headline risk is

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 2>extremely elevated at this point on SBB, and every day

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 2>the headlines that we're getting and not particularly encouraging. In

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 2>the meantime, we are waiting for the outcome of what

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 2>SBB is calling a broad broader strategic review, which is

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 2>supposed to look at whether they should sell all or

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 2>some of their assets and so on, and I think

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 2>what this probe from the FSA does is increase the

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 2>urgency of them completing that review.

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And as you say, they were cut to junk in May,

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and since then the share price has dropped very deeply.

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Now hedge funds and rival landlords are circling the trebled

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>company's holdings. You mentioned, you know, we're kind of getting

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>this bad headline to day. What exactly we're looking for next?

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Is there a deadline on the horizon that we're trying

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>to you know, focus on and what could happen next?

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 2>So there are to me every day it seems like

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 2>a deadline at the at the moment because of the

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 2>level of headlines that we're getting, all the amount of

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 2>headlines that we're getting. But there is one date that

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 2>people are focusing on at the moment, and that is

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 2>towards the end of this month, I think around twenty

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 2>ninth of this month. The reason for that is that

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 2>according to a report, there are bondholders that have written

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 2>a letter to SBB stating that they have reached an

0:22:55.960 --> 0:23:02.959
<v Speaker 2>interest coverage ratio covenant and SBB has i think ninety

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 2>days to respond to that or to remedy that. SBB

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 2>has already publicly said that they meet the covenants or

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the covenants under their Euroborn documentation. At least that's what

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 2>we know in terms of what they said publicly. We

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know whether there's been any bilateral negotiations between them

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 2>and this bondholder group, but if the report of the

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 2>bondholder action is correct, then I guess the bondholders will

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 2>expect some action from SBB before the end of this month.

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 2>Having said that, there is another bondholder group that's on

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 2>the other side of that argument that's stating that SBB

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 2>actually has not reached that covenant, and I think one

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 2>can understand why there would be players on that side

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 2>as well. That's because if SBB were forced to in

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 2>default at this point, that would obviously potentially mean that

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 2>they'd have to pay off all the debt that they

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.959
<v Speaker 2>have or the senior debt that they have, and they

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.479
<v Speaker 2>don't necessarily have the cash on hand to do that.

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 2>So the outcome for the bondholders may not be positive

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 2>if they were to precipitate a default at this point.

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 1>And is that the base case right now, that they

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 1>will default on the debt and there will be a restructuring.

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't say so. I think that there is still hope.

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess that some kind of resolution can be reached

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 2>and that there will be progress with the broader strategic

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 2>review and that there will be some way to appease

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 2>these bondholders that have raised concerns. I should say that

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 2>the issue is all around definitions and so on, and

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 2>it's the definitions of the interest coverageeration that of its

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 2>obviously have come into focus in this instance. The problem

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 2>is there are many ways that one, I guess, can

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 2>calculate that, and I guess SBB is justifying its own calculation.

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 2>The bondholders will be justifying their own. The issue with

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 2>SBB is that they restated their Q one results, and

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:32.120
<v Speaker 2>restatements are never could right, and the restatement didn't contain

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 2>as much information as the initial reporting, and I think

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 2>that's also added to the worry basically, and is one

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 2>of the reasons I guess why you're seeing this bondholder action.

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 1>But in a worst case scenario, which we have to

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>be kind of always looking out for, what do we

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>think recoveries might look like.

0:25:54.040 --> 0:26:00.479
<v Speaker 2>That's a tricky fun because what normally well, these are

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 2>never normal circumstances. What can happen in these disorderly situations

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 2>is that the amount of secured that the people that

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 2>maybe was reported was last reported might be higher, the

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 2>valuations that they get for the properties might be lower

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:24.959
<v Speaker 2>than was last reported, and so as an unsecured bondholder,

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 2>which all these people would be, you end up in

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 2>a worse position than maybe you were bargaining for based

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 2>on the last reported figures. And that is the primary concern,

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 2>right that you know, all those that rank ahead of

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 2>you might do much better, or might be there might

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 2>be greater amounts ahead of you, and there might be

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 2>less security left for you to claim.

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>That was a fascinating story for Sweden, and you know,

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>there's tons of really interesting things going on that we'll

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>be watching very closely. But when you sort of zoom

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>out a bit, how much is this a Sweden and

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 1>or credit specific SBB story and to what extent could

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it become a bigger issue for credit markets.

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that you really hit on what the concern is,

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:25.360
<v Speaker 2>which is that this may not be SBB specific and

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 2>that when or if the SBB situation is resolved, there

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 2>might be concerns about whoever the next weekest link is.

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if we look at how some of the

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 2>other issuers have performed year today, not just in Sweden,

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 2>and I'm talking about the performance of their bonds. It

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 2>tells you that the concerns are definitely not restricted to

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 2>just that Nordic country. I was looking at some of

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 2>the year to day performance figures today and looking at

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 2>the likes of time Staden, the around town perps and

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 2>so on. They haven't done very well year to date.

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 2>So I think what the market is telling us is

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 2>that they are concerned about real estate more broadly than

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 2>just SBB. Of course SPB is it seems to be

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 2>in the eye of the storm at the moment, but

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 2>there are definitely broader concerns.

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>So there could be some contagion if SPP goes down.

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 2>In a sense. Yes. The other thing I guess I

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 2>should say is in the last few weeks we have

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 2>had statements from the Swedish FSAs stating that leverage is

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 2>too high in the commercial real estate sector, which I

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 2>guess will make lenders more cautious towards that sector, which

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 2>is not positive for the other entities in Sweden that

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 2>are operating in real estate. So the regulators already sounding

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 2>out their concerns, or was already sounding out their concerns

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 2>even before the probe was launched against SBB today that.

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:11.959
<v Speaker 1>It is something also that resonates beyond just Sweden, of course. Yes, okay,

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>so I'm the one on this podcast that I saw

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.719
<v Speaker 1>the dumb questions and I have one, just very simple

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>one about real estate generally. You've got all these companies

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that have, for example, office buildings that you know, no

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>one wants to use anymore because they're not going back

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to work. Why can't they just be repurposed? Because you know,

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>cities have a lack of housing, they have a lack

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of schools, they have a lack of all sorts of

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>other infrastructure. Why can't they just be repurposed.

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 2>The simple answer is that it's not that easy, and

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 2>it's all it's never that straightforward. So first let's just

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 2>consider what's going on in parts of the office space.

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 2>It is true, of course, many people prefer working from

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 2>home for at least a portion of the week now,

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 2>and so the demand for offices is not as strong

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 2>as it was maybe prior to the pandemic. But when

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 2>you have people still coming in for part of the week,

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 2>you still do need to maintain some office space, but

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 2>you need to be flexible around it. And in some

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 2>cases the issuers are not organized in a way that

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 2>allows for such flexible working, so it's almost like an

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 2>all or nothing approach. The second issue for the issuers

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 2>is the quality of the building. So we're finding that

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 2>if the doings are basically greener, and we are privileged

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 2>here to have a building that has like one of

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 2>the highest green ratings if you like. But with greener

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 2>buildings there is great demand, but it takes a lot

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 2>of time and finances to meet those standards, and it's

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 2>not always easy for the issuers to make those investments.

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 2>And in terms of repurposing them into flats or whatever else,

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 2>the location of the offices may not be ideal. You

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 2>need permissions to do that, you need funding to repurpose

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 2>them as well, So it's not as straightforward as I

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 2>guess it might seem, and it can take a lot

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 2>of time to do as well, and that time that

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe some of the lead issuers probably don't have in abundance.

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, Tollu al Mutu of Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Read all of her great analysis on the Bloomberg Terminal.

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Do check it out and hope to see back on

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the show soon.

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Tollu, thank you so much. James, hope to be back

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 2>on the show soon.

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks and thanks again to Erni Gartier Perez from Bloomberg News.

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Get all her great distressed debt and football scoops on

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal and at Bloomberg dot Com. I'm James Crombie.

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>It's been a pleasure having you join us again next

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>week on the Credit Edge