WEBVTT - FDA: Is there something rotten here?

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Overall, the FDA has had a number of spectacular hits

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and pretty notable failures, and it is worth asking how

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>good of a job is the agency doing and are

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>they living up to their mandate to protect the public health.

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>My boss at the time said Richard, we don't have

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to solve problems. All we have to do is appear

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to solve problems. Welcome to Calling Bullshit, the podcast about

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:38.599
<v Speaker 1>purpose washing, the gap between what an organization says they

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>stand for and what they actually do and what they

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>would need to change to practice what they preach. I'm

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>your host time onto you, and I've spent over a

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>decade helping organizations define what they stand for, their purpose

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and then help them to use that purpose to drive

0:00:54.640 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>transformation throughout their business. Unfortunately, at a lot of institution today,

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>there's still a pretty wide gap between word. Indeed, that

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 1>gap has a name, bullshit. But, and this is important,

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 1>we believe that bullshit is a treatable condition. So when

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>our bullshit detector lights up, we're going to explore everything

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the organization should do to fix it. There was a

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>time in the not too distant past when cocaine was

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>marketed to children and literal snake oil was sold as medicine,

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>a time when sawdust was put into food as filler,

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and when rats were ground up with the beef, and

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it was all perfectly legal. Food and drugs were sold

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>in a completely unregulated market until President Theodore Roosevelt signed

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>into law the Food and Drugs Act of nine six,

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>giving the executive branch the power to regulate food and

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>drugs and thus creating what we now call the f

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>d A. Today, the Food and Drug Administration has an

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>expansive jurisdiction regulating things raging from microwave ovens to cat

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>nip to ibuprofen and beyond, way beyond chew. On this

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the FDA regulates twenty cents of every dollar that you

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>spend to cover such a broad water front. They employ

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>eighteen thousand people that work across several inter agencies, including

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the Center for Drugs, Biologics, Devices, Veterinary Medicine, Food Safety

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and Nutrition, and tobacco. Their formal purposes a few paragraphs long,

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but on the homepage of their website they have a

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>phrase that nicely captures the spirit of it, and it

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 1>really Today, as in the past, the FDA strives above

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>all else to safeguard the health and well being of

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>the American people. That is a monumentally important purpose, one

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>in which the stakes for all of us are high. However,

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>if you've been listening to the news lately, it seems

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>like the f d A is falling pretty short of

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 1>living up to it. Speaking about the epidemic of youth

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>use of e cigarettes, it retrospects the FDA should have

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>acted center nationwide of baby formula stock is gone. Part

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of the blame for a lot of these shortages rest

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>at the feet of the f d A. The FDA

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>first approved OxyContin. Since then, more than five hundred thousand

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>people have died from opioid related overdoses. We've actually encountered

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the FDA twice before, first when discussing their role regulating Jewel,

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and again while researching Perdue Pharma for a potential episode.

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>The FDA was certainly a character in the first Jewel episode,

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>but when we checked in on Jewel again this season,

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>it was clear that the f d A shared a

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>lot more of the blame for the damage caused by

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Jewels unregulated product, and so we decided to aim our

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>BS detectors directly at the f d A. Starting with

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>picking up the strange case of Big Tobacco, Vaping and Jewel. Okay, folks,

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I am very excited to introduce Lauren Etter for her

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>second time on the show. Lauren, thank you for being

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>here and welcome back to calling Bullshit. Thanks for having

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>me tie great to be here. Lauren is the author

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Devil's playbook, Big Tobacco, Jewel and the Addiction

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>of a New Generation. But before we continued the conversation

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>with Lauren, let's catch you up on the escalating story

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of the regulator and the company with a b S

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>roundtable recap. Okay, So, Jewel Labs launched its Jewel E

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>cigarettes as a smoking cessation device in it was actually

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>effective and had the potential to help smokers get off cigarettes.

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>But Jewel was funded by venture capitalists with a growth

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>at all costs mindset, which led them to target kids,

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the demographic most susceptible to picking up a smoking habit,

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>thus sparking a new youth nicotine epidemic total BS. But

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>at the time the cigarettes were totally unregulated. Finally, in

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the FDA began regulating the cigarettes as tobacco products and

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>requiring manufacturers to submit applications to be on the market.

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>And guess what, Jewel Labs didn't get around to submitting

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>their application to the FDA until July, all while they

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>were still selling Jewel more bs. You would think the

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>story ends here, but it doesn't. It then took the

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>FDA two more years to review Jewels application, all the

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>while jewels are still being sold. Finally, in June of

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, the f D announcer decision to deny Jewel

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Labs application, essentially banning the e cigarette. Their reasoning Jewel

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>did not provide enough scientific data to show that their

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>products were not harmful. Not surprisingly, Jewel Labs immediately sued

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>and within a few days was granted an emergency stay,

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.160
<v Speaker 1>allowing them to keep their products on the market. And

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>now the FDA has walked back their decision and it's

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:38.359
<v Speaker 1>currently re reviewing the application, leaving Jewel. You guessed it

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>still on the market, and that you're round. I think

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>we have different internet connections and that's your round table recap.

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>The FDA website says, today, as in the past, the

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>FDA strives above all else to safeguard the health and

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>well being of the American people. So first, I just

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask you, how do you think they're doing

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.679
<v Speaker 1>at meeting their mission or achieving their purpose? I would

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>say just in general that with tobacco, for many years,

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>until the early two thousands, the agency didn't have any

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>jurisdiction over the tobacco industry. It was a completely unregulated market.

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>And it was only after the Master Settlement Agreement and

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>after the tobacco companies has gotten crushed in that whole ordeal.

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>When you know, for years Congress tried to figure out

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>how to regulate tobacco. The Supreme Court even at one

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>point said they didn't have jurisdiction. So this has been

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>an issue like where should the tobacco industry sit doesn't

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>make sense for the f d A to regulate this industry,

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>But for years there's industry was totally unregulated. So I

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a lot of questions worthy of tasking

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>about the f d A and certainly about their role

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in the regulation of tobacco. You may remember that we

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>we score organizations on their level of BS. Would you

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>be comfortable giving the f d A a score even

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to the Jewel situation of zero to

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of gaps between word indeed. So if you

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>look at what the agency is doing in the top

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>back the overall kind of tobacco space and their efforts

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to implement a harm reduction framework, they're actually making strides.

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>My issue is, I don't feel like the FDA has

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>enough resources to police the kind of illicit sale of

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the product to keep it out of the hands of

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the youth. They're just a very underfunded agency, especially the

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>tobacco products. And so if you're looking at the twin

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>problems of adult smoking and youth nicotine addiction, I feel

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>like they they are focusing quite a bit on the

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>adult smoking issue and then the youth nicotine addiction issue.

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I have enough confidence that they're

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to ultimately keep this highly addictive

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>product out of the hands of kids, which is ultimately

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the goal to stop a new generation from becoming addicted.

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>So can I give them a score? Um? I just

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I feel comfortable settling on a on

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a number, Yeah, that's okay, but it's it's definitely not

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the best number. Zero right there bumbling their way through this,

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and let's just say, with the best of intention, right,

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>they have failed to protect America's youth so far from vaping,

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>which is, at the end of the day, an extremely

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>efficient delivery system for what ought to be a controlled

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>substance in my view, right, But the FDA is constantly

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>barraged with this flood of new products, and they're constantly

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>on their heels responding to these like rapidly innovating markets.

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>That makes it very difficult for them to contain this, again,

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 1>highly addictive product that's being sold at seven elevens, and

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you know corner stores around the country that not all

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of them have the greatest I D checking abilities. So

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 1>I admit it's a very difficult task for them to do.

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it should be one of the most important

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>tasks that they undertake, and I know that they're taking

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it seriously. I'm just concerned that they might not have

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>enough resources to adequately keep these highly addictive products out

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of the hands of young people. Is the FDA's lack

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>of resources the reason they fumbled through regulating e cigarettes

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>and jewel in particular. Lauren thinks so, or at least

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>she thinks it's a significant part of it, and although

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 1>she deferred on giving them a B S score, she

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>does believe the FDA is making strides, no doubt, it

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is an incredibly challenging undertaking. But if your purpose is

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to safeguard the health of the American people and a

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>new generation gets addicted to nicotine on your watch, it's

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely a harbinger of bullshit. But maybe the Center for

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Tobacco Products is an outlier considering the FDA covers so

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>much ground, I'm going to reserve judgment and see what's

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>cooking at their second biggest interagency, the Center of Food

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Safety and Applied Nutrition. With food specific we're trying to

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>do a little more because we don't want to just

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>make food safe. We want to give consumers information that

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>helped them to choose a healthier diet. Richard Williams worked

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>at the FDA for nearly three decades, and he left

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition with a

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>bad taste in his mouth. I think the big thing

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 1>was as I approached the end of my twenty seven years,

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>it occurred to me in all those years is that

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>most of what we had done had not succeeded. And

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>so the more I thought about it, the more I thought, well,

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>what actually happened? What went wrong? And I thought maybe

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>if I could write a book about it, we can

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>start changing things and and actually solving things for consumers.

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Richard's book Fixing Food and f D A Insider Unravels

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the myth and the Solutions, is an eye opening account

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of his tenure at the organization, beginning when he was

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>hired as their very first economic analyst. You can blame

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it on President Carter. President Carter was the first one

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>who said we need some economic thinking in these particularly

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>social regulations. More and more presidents begin insisting that we

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>do these things and that we take take them into

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>account so we can make better decisions. Let's talk about

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>your job and some of the eye opening parts of

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>your book, because you, it sounds like, walked into that

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>job with the best of intention. You wanted to help

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the I achieve its mission of making people safer. One

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of the first assignments that you had was to do

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a cost benefit analysis on lead acetate in men's hair dye.

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I wondered if you would tell us that story. Sure,

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that was the first one just assigned to me. All

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I had to go by was the executive order and

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>what I knew from from being an economist. So I

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.839
<v Speaker 1>jumped into it and found out that this was basically

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 1>the thing that you put in your hair, and over

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>time it takes the great away. Richard wanted to know

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of using lead acetate could cause skin cancer, and after

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a deep dive into the toxicology, he found that the

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>risk was near zero, thus there was no benefit to

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>banning the drug. There was, however, a high cost to

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>taking it off the market. It was the only product

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>of its kind available, so without it, gray haired men

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.839
<v Speaker 1>would have no alternative, I mean, other than living with

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that their hair was great. I turned into

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>my analysis. We didn't think a thing about it until

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks later a young woman had come

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>down from the center director's office and she said, this

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>is great. Now we need you to do the other one.

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And I said, what other one? She said, well, you

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>said that benefits were lower than the cost and if

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>we decide not to do anything about let acitate that

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>will work. But we want you to do one that

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>shows the exact opposite, that the benefits succeed the costs,

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that it does costs cancer. And I'm like, well, no,

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't be honest. I'm not going to do that.

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And she said, you don't understand. This is an order,

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, from the sixth floor. And I said, no,

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to do that. I didn't hear anything

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>more about it. A few weeks later, I was in

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>our first my first training class where I was getting

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>my introduction to FDA, and the deputy Center director was

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in there, and at lunch, I went up and I said,

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, a funny thing happened to me, and I

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>explained the situation, and he said that order came from me,

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to do it or you're going to

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>be fired. And I said something really stupid. I just

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>made this up on the spot. I said, I'm not

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>an economic prostitute. And he said, then you were fired

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and you are going to be leaving this agency. And

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>so I went back to my office. I'm like, should

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I start packing up my stuff? I didn't know. And

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>then nothing ever happened. He apparently decided it would be

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a bad idea to fire over that kind of thing.

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But that was just the first time I was threatened

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>with being fired. I mean, good on you that you

0:15:34.000 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>did not gave to that pressure. But it sounds like

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that this was not an isolated occurrence. Were there other

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>instances where you were asked to essentially compromise your integrity

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>for twenty seven years. There were other instances. Was it

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>was it never stopped. That is incomprehensible to me, and

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it's terrible. And so, for the first time in my life,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>decided to become political with a small p like a

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>bureaucrat politician operator, which you have. Yeah, sadly, Well, so

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>let's let's follow that threat a little bit, because I

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>assume that, let's assume the best of people. Assume that

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>people who were feeling the pressure above you in the organization,

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we're feeling it from other entities. You know, in your book,

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you go into the FDA spending a lot of energy

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>responding to influence from just an incredible variety of stakeholders.

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>There's you know, the executive branch, there's Congress, there's courts,

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>there's press, private industry, activists, academics. Can you help us

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>understand the FDA's relationship with some of those stakeholders? Sure,

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, first of all, you have to

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>start understanding one thing. FDA has been around since nineteen

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>o six, and they have continued to accumulate literally power

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>such that one off there said that in the twentieth century,

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>there was no regulatory agency in the world that was

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>more powerful than f DA, and that's because they're very

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>good at what they do. So if you think about it,

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they work for the president, and the presidents are supposed

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to oversee them, but every president, Republican and Democrat, has

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>said it's nearly impossible to control the administrative state. That is,

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>all the agencies that they oversee. There are hundreds of

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>thousands of employees. They all have their own little agendas,

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>and it's very, very difficult for the presidents to do anything.

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Um So that's a problem. Congress they just don't oversee FDA.

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>They're afraid of f d A and um so there's

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of oversight. They're interesting, Why is Congress

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>afraid of the f d A. Well, FDA has very

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>complex issues, very hard for Congress. People are really busy,

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, with lots and lots of things, mostly getting

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>reelected and raising money. They don't have a lot of time,

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>and their stats aren't very good at overseeing these complex issues.

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I get it, but it means that FDA is kind

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of more free to do what they want, so they

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>hold Congress at bay the courts have up until recently

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and generally will give them deference to how they interpret

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>their statutes. Then they have other people, academics they generally

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 1>give grants to that kind of buys them off. And

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>then when they go into Congress to ask, you know,

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>which they do every year, for more money, they actually

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have large food firms going and testifying and saying, yeah,

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>FDA should get more money. There's a reason for that.

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Large firms usually get regulations that are easy for them

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>to comply with but hard for small firms, so it

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>puts their small competitors at a disadvantage. I want to

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>go into that issue a little bit later, the issue

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of big companies versus small companies, because that that feels

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>like an important topic. But before we go there, let's

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>talk about one other constituency, consumers and where they rank

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in that higher are key. I think consumers and small

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.959
<v Speaker 1>businesses both are at the bottom. When I first came

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>into f d A, you know, I truly believe in

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>what we're trying to do. I thought these are important issues,

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and over time I found out well, initially when I

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 1>got there, I was told this that this actually happened

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>with the let acetate rule. I said, this rule won't

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>do anything. Why are we doing it? And my boss

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>at the time said, Richard, we don't have to solve problems.

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>All we have to do is appear to solve problems.

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>We have to do something about it. And that never

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>left me, and I noticed more and more that was

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the case once we passed the regulation. No matter what

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the regulation did, it didn't matter. It looked like we

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>had addressed the problem. And that and that leaves consumers

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and public health in in in last place, if you will,

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>what a mess. Okay, So let's talk about some of

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the you know, in your view, the biggest and most

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>dangerous problems that face consumers today that the FDA is

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>responsible for. And we can live within the domain of food,

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but feel free also to talk about stuff outside of food. Yeah. Well,

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's obesity. I think that is probably

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the number one and it's going to get worse. You know,

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>there was a harvest study that projected that by the

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>end of this decade, which is only eight years away,

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.479
<v Speaker 1>half of this country will be obese. Um FDA plays

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a role in that with food labeling. Food labeling has

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>not worked, It's not going to work. It's really not

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>going to be the answer. Putting calories on foods hasn't

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>really changed anyone's behavior as far as we can tell,

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>sticking with obesity, and I don't think you you made

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>this connection overtly in the book, But one of the

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>impressions that I've gotten both from you know what we've

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 1>learned from your book and also other research that we've done,

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is that intended or not, the combination of the industrialized

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>food system where people eat a diet and combine that

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>with a for profit healthcare system that then profits from

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the multiple diseases that result from things like obesity is

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of the perfect dystopian partnership. What do you think

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>about that first? And and do you think the FDA

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>has played a role in that. I don't personally think

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that is the exact issue. I think it is an issue.

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I think certainly food companies, like every other company in

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>this country, are there to make a profit. The problem

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>is we have no idea what a healthy diet looks

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>like because nutrition science is the worst science that we have,

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and so we've got people out there hawking books, you know,

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>on diets, something say well, you gotta have a high

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>carb diet, and so you have to have a low

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>carb diet, high fat diet, low fat diet, on and

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>on and on. And the truth of the matter is

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>one we don't know, and to what we're beginning to

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>find out is that one diet probably isn't right for everyone.

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Different people with different genetic backgrounds, different underlying health conditions

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>probably need different diets. So I think, in my mind

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>a bigger problem and this is why basically companies can

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>sell whatever they want. It's because we just don't know

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>enough yet because the science is so bad. Well that

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that that's a good point. I think to pivot to

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>another aspect that you touch on in your book. You

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>believe that entrepreneurs are solving many problems that the FDA

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>can't or won't. Can you talk more about that. FDA

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>has recently announced they're going to start looking at technologies.

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:39.479
<v Speaker 1>So the first thing that they're gonna do, and this

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be tremendously helpful if we can get it done,

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is using blockchain, the same thing that you use for cryptocurrency,

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>in order to start recalling things faster. For example, this

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>technology could in theory, reduce the time it takes to

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>trace the origin of a contaminated food upbreak from two

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>weeks into two seconds. So that does several things. One,

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>if you can trace sinks back very quickly, you can

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>find out what the root caused us in others, what

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>actually went wrong that caused this problem. More importantly, it

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>gets bad products off the market more quickly. And it

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 1>also doesn't basically indict everybody right yes, which sort of

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>leads to something that you've entered at already in this interview,

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>which is that the playing field is not necessarily level

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>between small companies and big companies. Can you talk more

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 1>about that? So there's a law on the regulatary flexibility

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 1>access we have to take into account. You know what

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the impacts these things are on small producers, and if

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we can to give them some kind of relief, And

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that the benefits birth that great, I said, well,

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 1>at least let's examp some of these small firms and

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>make the requirements easier on them. We didn't do that.

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, all the large firms didn't want to give

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>small firms a break. But as they say, it's an

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>unlevel playing field. They have much more influence over FDA,

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and this is true in any regulatory agency than the

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>small firms do. So the small firms get driven out

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of business, and I think it's a shame that we

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>have two different laws that are supposed to protect small

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>firms and we're still not doing enough for them. One

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>of the other topics that you you touch on, and

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that that I've encountered in other environments is the topic

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>of conflict of interest. One of the things that I

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>just have a hard time getting over is government employees

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>leaving the FDA and going to work for the corporations

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that they're trying to regulate. And you give a very

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>poignant example of a person who wrote a regulation just

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>so that they could jump out and get a job

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>consulting on that same regulation to help corporations figure out

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>how to wend their way through it. Is that common.

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>It's hard for me to know. I don't have data

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>on how common is. I certainly saw it often enough.

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>The law allows it. What they do say is that

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it has to be a number of years before you

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>can come back and lobby the f DAY for that industry.

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>But you can go out and work for them. You

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>can tell them how to comply, and you can make money.

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I could be wrong, about this, But I think a

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of people feel, you know what, I work in

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a quote unquote low wage government job. I should be

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>allowed to go out and make money like everybody else.

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I sort of served my country in this job, and

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I have some sympathy for that. But again, like you say,

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be something wrong if you can be

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a part of writing a rule and then you know,

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>right it in such a way that you can go

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>out and profit from it. Yeah. I mean this is

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a really hard question, so I don't expect an answer, honestly,

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But how do you solve that problem? You know, it's

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>just a great question. I wish I did know, But

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure it's not the worst problem. F d A.

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>What's the worst problem? The fact that they're not solving

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>any problems, the fact that decades and decades go by,

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>uh there, their budget keeps going up, they get more people,

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>people believe in them, they believe that they're keeping us safe,

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 1>and that it just keeps going like that. And the

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that you can go to Congress every single year

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>and say we've got to do something. One out of

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>six people in this country getting sick from food poisoning

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>every year for thirty or forty years you're saying the

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Congress goes, oh my god, that's terrible, we

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>got to give you more money. Well, no, sooner or

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>later you gotta start saying, Okay, you gotta do something different. So,

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>just to be fair, are there any big winds that

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 1>you would point two times that the f d A

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>has gotten it really right? Oh? Absolutely, And first of all,

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>let me say, a lot of it is the system.

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not the people. There are a lot of great

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:48.719
<v Speaker 1>people that work for FDA. They're very smart, they're very dedicated,

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>they believe in it, but unfortunately they they they've run

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>out of ideas. But one thing I think where we

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>got it right was transfatty acids. This was a case

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>where an initially we were just going to ask firms

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>if they wanted to voluntarily label it. Trans fatty acids

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>are worse for you than than saturated fats, so that

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>was the bottom line. We really needed to do something,

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>so we kind of went round and round. There's a

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>long story about it, but we ended up with mandatory

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>labeling and companies sort of got the message and they

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>began pulling trans fatty acids because they're added to most foods,

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>so if they're added, that means you can easily take

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>them out as opposed to saturated fat, which is just

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a part of the food. So they started take them

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 1>out and then eventually adding them has become illegal. I

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's probably one of the best things that we did.

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything that I haven't asked you about that

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you think people should know about the f d A.

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I do think right now with the Commissioner saying our

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>food safety system is broken with what has been happening

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>with infant formula, which f d A incidentally played a

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>huge role in why that happened. For forty years they've

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>been telling firms who want to come and start making

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:01.360
<v Speaker 1>infant formulated, said no, they've kept it at six firms

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>new kidding. So they created essentially the monopoly that then

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>right hurt the hurt the whole countactly exactly. So when

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>you had one manufacturer drop out, of course there's a

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>huge problem. So with with these problems coming up, I

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>think the curtain has fallen down and we see what's

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>going on behind the curtain. Yeah, it couldn't have a

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>better time to start thinking about doing things in new

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 1>way and actually trying to solve problems than just appear

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to be doing that something. So I'm hoping now is

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the time. That's a nice note to wrap up on.

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's just say that you're the FDA commissioner for

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a day, or a month, or a year, for whatever

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>period of time is necessary to make real change. What

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>would you do to help the f d A achieve

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>its stated mission, which, as it says on the website,

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it says as in the past, the FDA strives above

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>all else to safeguard the health and well being of

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the American people. What's the one thing you would change

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>about the FDA to help them achieve that goal. I would,

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I would retask them. I would say, look, we're not

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>going to pass all these regulations. Let's start looking at

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>these new technologies. If we think they're not completely safe,

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that they need some sort of adjustment, let's focus on those,

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>let's promote them. I'll just give you quickly a list

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of things. Precision fermentation, genetic engineering, three D printers are

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>coming along, consumer nutrition devices. They're going to have to

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>go through the medical device basically preapproval thing. We've got

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to get those through faster. Those are gonna help consumers

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>eat better, nanopackaging, where we have smart packaging consumers when

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>their food is becoming spoiled. All of these things, I

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>would say, let's start looking there. That's the future. Those

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>are the solutions. Let's start looking at real solutions and

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>stop trying to pass these regulations. They were fine a

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred years ago, they're not fine now, so I would

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>retask them. I love that, Okay, Richard. On this show,

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we have a tool that we call the b S

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>scale that we used to measure the gap between word

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and deed. And our scale goes from zero to one,

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>zero being the best zero bs and a hundred being

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the worst total BS. So what score would you give

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the f D A Well, mostly I'm qualified to talk

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>about the food's part the FDA, so I'll just focus

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>on them on that scale, because you know, they say

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're protecting consumers. They say all these things, and

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>they're not doing it. I would give them about a

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy five. So it's of what they do in foods

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>is bullshit. Okay, room for improvement, all right, Richard, thank

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being here today. This was a

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>great conversation, and I also want to thank you for

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>writing this book and doing the work that you're doing

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>post your time at the FDA. It's incredibly important and

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we thank you for it. Well, thank you again for

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>having me on. It's been great. Well, that's interesting, if

0:30:56.600 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>not totally disconcerting. Earlier in the episode, Lauren Adder posited

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that the FDA had fallen short due to a lack

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:09.719
<v Speaker 1>of resources, but Richard, a former FDA employee, says that

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the organization floundered in spite of a consistently increasing budget.

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>If there was a harbinger of bullshit before, there now

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a flashing neon arrow. But to be fair,

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>we've yet to explore the biggest inter agency. Buckle up, folks,

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>because next we're looking into the f d a's Center

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of Drug Evaluation and Research. Right after this. Okay, folks,

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>it is my great pleasure to introduce Dr Gail Van

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Norman to the show. Gail, welcome to Calling Bullshit. Well,

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Ti, it's a pleasure to be here. Gail

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>is a clinician and professor at the University of Washington.

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>She writes and teaches about the medical research process, everything

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>from the FDA to commercialization to how animal testing works.

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>So the reason that we're doing this episode on calling

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:21.120
<v Speaker 1>BS is that the f d A has come up

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times on this show, and our research

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>left me with the impression that the f d A

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>sometimes gets things very right and sometimes it gets things

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>very wrong. Would you agree with that? I would. I

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>think the the FDA operates under constraints that are imperfect,

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and even the best of organizations tasked with such a

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>complex mission are going to have misses and hits. Over All,

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the FDA has had a number of spectacular hits and

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty notable failures. Yeah, so let's let's get into some

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of those, because I'd love to have you start out providing,

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, an example or two of times when the

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>FDA has truly lived up to their mission and really

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>gotten it right. Okay, Well, let's start with the lidamide

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>because it's a sort of a classic historical example of

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>what can go right and wrong with medical research, as

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>well as what happens at the FDA. Phillidamide was an

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>anti nausea drug introduced in Germany in the nineteen fifties,

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and it was considered one of the safest consumer drugs

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>ever to hit the market because it was so safe

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>practitioners really picked out its use in pregnancy because nausea

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>during pregnancy is not only a misery to women, it

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>can be dangerous to the health of the mother and

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the fetus in utero, and so having something that controls

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>nausea and vomiting is very important. The drug had been

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 1>tested in animals prior to human tests that had been tested,

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and I believe the number is something like fifty or

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a hundred different species of animals, including rats and mice

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and dogs and cats and armadillos and ferrets and rabbits.

0:33:58.120 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>It was considered such a safe drug that it was

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>not required that you have a prescription to use it. Uh.

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>The drug manufacturer gave it away free to its factory

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>workers pregnant factory workers to use during pregnancy. Wanting to

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>expand the market into the US, the manufacturer submitted the

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>drug for review with the f d A. The committee

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>reviewing Philidamie was headed by Francis Oldham Kelsey, who just

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 1>so happened to be the first woman to hold the position.

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 1>She later joked that they gave her what they thought

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>would be the easiest one they could possibly give and

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>whether they did that because she was a woman or

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>she was new. We'll just leave to speculation. Anyway, she

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>read the data and something about it didn't ring true

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>with her. She didn't like it, and she said, I'm

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to approve this. I'm gonna stop you, and

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to see a few more studies. And just

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a few months later, on Christmas Day, in the first

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>baby was born in Germany without years, a little baby girl.

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>And that was followed by over ten thousand cases of

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>severely deformed infants that were born and probably twenty cases

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of in utero deaths. And the US saw exactly seventeen

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>cases of thelidamid deformities, presumably in the children of mothers

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>who brought the drug in from out of country. We

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>were saved that plague because we never approved the drug

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in the United States for that use. I mean that Actually,

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I had a galvanic response to that story, like it

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>makes the hair on the back of my next stand

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>up to make me think how close we came to

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a total unmitigated disaster. You know, yeah, it really is true.

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And let's let's talk about COVID also, because that's fresh

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in everyone's mind, and that's clearly a case where you know,

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean it seemingly the normal process takes forever, and

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it just it feels like COVID vaccines just magically appeared.

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>How did that happen? It was very incredible, right. Yeah.

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking to myself two and a half years ago

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>when COVID hit and I have in my distant medical background,

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I have a background in immunology, and I remember people

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>coming and asking me, well, how long will it take

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for us to have a vaccine? And the average time

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to get a vaccine created for a new disease is

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years, So it's it was like, so right away

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>what was happening was the the government was saying We'll

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 1>have a vaccine for you in a year, and I

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>was going, not, on your life, you won't. It's just

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>not trying to happen. No chance. But of course there

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 1>was a chance due to several important factors all occurring simultaneously. First,

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:40.959
<v Speaker 1>the US government created a public private partnership offering ten

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars to pharmaceutical companies to start immediately making and

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>testing vaccines. Second, the mRNA vaccine had become available. This

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 1>new technology created a way for the body to show

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 1>effecsimile of the virus to itself, making testing on humans

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>much easier. And finally, the Century Cures Act allowed for

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>emergency authorization and the quick release of the vaccines. All

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>those things came together. It's just amazing. Yeah, it is amazing.

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So the litamide and covid vaccines y f d A truly,

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 1>and they do so many more things right as well.

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Those are just a couple of examples. But let's let's

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>pivot to where they get it wrong. For for me,

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 1>because we did the research we did, Purdue Pharma comes

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to mind and the OxyContin crisis. So the thing that

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:41.839
<v Speaker 1>that shocked me about the Purdue situation and I did

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>not I did not understand this prior to doing this research.

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>But there are people at the FDA who have to

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 1>write the language that goes on warning labels on drugs,

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and there are different kinds of warning labels. And the

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>big thing in in news world OxyContin was addictiveness. Any

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 1>opioid heretofore had been deemed to be addictive and had

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to carry a label that said it was addictive and

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 1>would be prescribed in that same way. I e very sparingly,

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and Purdue figured out a way to get the warning

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:22.439
<v Speaker 1>label written in such a way as to avoid any

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>language of addiction, so that more doctors would be inclined

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to write prescriptions for it. And my understanding of this

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:35.320
<v Speaker 1>story is that the person who wrote the language actually

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>hold up in a hotel room with the executives from

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Purdue and they all crafted that language together. And so

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>this gets to a larger issue obviously, which is sort

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of the revolving door or the I would say, fraught

0:38:54.120 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>relationship between giant for profit industries and low paid government workers.

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 1>And further, to sort of add insult entry, once the

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>language had been crafted, once OxyContin was approved and being

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:13.399
<v Speaker 1>sold across the world, that person left the f d

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>A and took a job at Purdue Pharma, you know,

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:21.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of closing the circle as it were. And you know,

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that story really disturbed me. It outraged me, honestly, and

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I would love to hear your take on that and

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>how widespread a problem like that really is. I think

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>what you're getting at is a real problem in that

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>there is a variously porous interface between the kinds of

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>researchers who work within within the f d A and

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 1>those that work in commercial industry, and so people do

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>switch teams and that's perfectly legal right now, is it not?

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh sure? I mean the current Commissioner of the FDA,

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Robert Coliff, was an executive for or I can't remember

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>the name of the research company that's a subsidiary of

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet anyway, he made two point seven million dollars a

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 1>year in salary and he used that And I'm not

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 1>criticizing him. I don't make it make it sound like

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:15.919
<v Speaker 1>it was nefarious. That was actually a selling point for

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 1>his appointment as the Commissioner to the FDA because he

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:21.960
<v Speaker 1>knew the ins and outs of commercial research companies. So

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 1>you can make an argument that it's helpful. And by

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, his salary there right now is now three dollars,

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:30.879
<v Speaker 1>which is considerably less. And he put in a lot

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of agreements to say he would not participate in owning,

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:38.359
<v Speaker 1>selling talking to you know, he self restricted to say,

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:40.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to make sure you know that who I

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 1>work for, you know who my boss is. But other

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>people have not been quite so clear about it. And

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 1>so you have somebody who works on an FDA committee

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and they have a drug presented to them, and the

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:55.799
<v Speaker 1>people who are presenting the drug whisper in their ears Wow,

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:58.879
<v Speaker 1>we really think your help has been really valuable, and

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 1>we'd like to get think about coming on as a

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>researcher or a head of marketing in our company. And

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 1>they offer you a two and a half million dollar raise,

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it can be a little hard to turn it turned down.

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 1>And so there are connections which between the FDA and

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the commercial world, which if properly aligned, are helpful because

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it can give the FDA insights as to what the

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 1>company is doing, but if they're not properly aligned, can

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>lead to conflicts of interest into the detriment of the

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 1>safety and health of the American public. Right. So, the

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 1>FDA is a government organization with a mission to protect

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 1>us all from the effects, intended or not of private

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>for profit interests. So, so let's talk a little bit

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:48.919
<v Speaker 1>about money. How does how does the FDA receive its funding? Well,

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the FDA used to be back in the nineteen twenties,

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it was all government funded. It just came out of

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the General Treasury Fund for the FDA. Now, about forty

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 1>five percent of the FDA's funds come from something called

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>user fees and application fees that are paid by the

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 1>drug companies to get their drugs reviewed. When that was

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 1>first proposed, there was a lot of concern that this

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>would create a conflict of interest for the FDA because

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of their funding would come from the very

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 1>people they're trying to regulate. But it became so popular

0:42:23.320 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>because those user fees were enacted because the FDA was

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 1>woefully short staffed. Congress enacted this as a way specifically

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>for the FDA to hire the people that needed to

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 1>do the work, and it led to a big reduction

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 1>in through put times and it accomplished exactly what was

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do. So it's still popular to this day.

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And how much do you think the f d A

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 1>is affected by lobbying, either by big drug companies lobbying

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>on the health to change laws and regulations, or patient

0:42:56.640 --> 0:43:01.359
<v Speaker 1>advocacy groups lobbying to influence the way the organization is

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:07.719
<v Speaker 1>is funded or regulated itself. Well, both affect the f

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:10.400
<v Speaker 1>d A. I mean, it's not immune to them. The

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 1>FDA acts is funded, as I mentioned, from congressional funding,

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and Congress is affected very heavily by patient advocacy. You

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:25.760
<v Speaker 1>get patient advocacy groups getting Congress to write both good

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and cockamami laws all the time. With regard to health

0:43:29.600 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and so the f d A is not immune from

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:36.239
<v Speaker 1>those effects. The other thing I would say that there's

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:39.800
<v Speaker 1>no it's hard to say that there's a direct effect,

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:43.439
<v Speaker 1>like you know, Glaxo smith Klein plays their two million

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar drug fee and that makes the FDA prove the drug.

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:51.759
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't happen. But the other kind of effect is

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:55.480
<v Speaker 1>hard to regulate against. The individual who sits in an

0:43:55.520 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>influential part of a committee who then is favorably impressed

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 1>by a drug company about their drug in various ways

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and advocates for it. Those do happen, and individuals that

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 1>sit on these committees can make big differences in what

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the FDA decides to do. One of the things that

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:21.320
<v Speaker 1>is just true is that our health care system is

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:26.560
<v Speaker 1>run largely as a for profit enterprise. And is that

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the problem here, oh sure? Or is that

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:35.319
<v Speaker 1>the whole problem here? That that might even be the

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>whole problem for all we know. I mean, I suppose

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>there are good aspects commercialization, because it does, in an

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 1>ideal world, promote competition and innovation, but it also promotes

0:44:48.920 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 1>manipulation and profit taking, and neither of those serve patients

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>at all. They serve the companies that make the drugs,

0:44:56.400 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and they're talking about well, that's right. I mean we're

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:02.839
<v Speaker 1>not just talking about the company making a profit. We're

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:07.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about unimaginable amounts of money. We're talking about a

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>drug generating a hundred billion dollars in profits, a hundred

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:18.319
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. So this is money that will buy anybody's soul, right,

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe even mine? I don't think so, but you never know. Well,

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and know, like, it's an interesting question to ask yourself, right,

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 1>is like what's my number? But in the current system,

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the consequences for breaking the law often take the form

0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:39.319
<v Speaker 1>of fines. But with profits of that size, you know,

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 1>would it be fair to say the fines are just

0:45:41.239 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a cost of doing business? Oh? Absolutely, it's it's amazing.

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what you see in the media, what the

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>American public sees is the sacklers paid what was it

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars? Well, weighed against what did they make. Even

0:45:58.160 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's a hundred over a hundred billion, it's less

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 1>than of their whole profit margin. And remember it's not

0:46:05.800 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>just the profit, it's not just the actual dollars that

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 1>go in the bank. It's how much their stock is worth. Right,

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you're making a hundred billion dollars in profits,

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 1>your stock becomes worth a huge amount more. And these

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:22.880
<v Speaker 1>companies are run by individuals who have heavy stock interests,

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 1>who may have individual conflicts of interest with doing the

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 1>right thing, and more and more, we're talking about dollar

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 1>amounts that seem insurmountable in their ability to bribe and

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 1>attract people into behaviors that we would hope we wouldn't

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 1>see in this industry. Right And and you know, just

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:45.319
<v Speaker 1>to contrast that, to make this really clear, how much

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:49.919
<v Speaker 1>money would a typical f D A employee take home,

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 1>if there is such a thing, And how much can

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:59.359
<v Speaker 1>we contrast that with an average pharma executive even just roughly? Uh? Well,

0:46:59.360 --> 0:47:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I I the farmer executives take home millions of dollars.

0:47:04.520 --> 0:47:07.720
<v Speaker 1>The average FDA salaries a hundred and ten thousand dollars

0:47:07.719 --> 0:47:11.839
<v Speaker 1>a year, and their top executive makes three dollars a year.

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's considerably less than anything the commercial environment could offer, right. Yeah,

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 1>And it just seems like there's a massive incentive for

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>these big companies to try to figure out how to

0:47:23.000 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 1>gain the system in one way or another. Well, I

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's not just there's this incentive. There's virtually no

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:33.840
<v Speaker 1>disincentive to do it, because if you're that rich, you

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:38.440
<v Speaker 1>can just pay the fine and move on, doesn't doesn't matter.

0:47:38.560 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 1>You actually factor that into the cost of developing the drug,

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the cost of putting the drug out there. Yeah, well

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that's terrifying. So, Gail, another way to look at our

0:47:47.640 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 1>show is fundamentally it's about trust, and it's just incredibly

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>important that we trust institutions like the f d A

0:47:56.239 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 1>literally lives around the line. And honestly, I can understand

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in someone who has lost trust in politicians today or

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in big pharma, or even in the f d A.

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:10.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is the same institution that approved oxy.

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So what are some things that you think the FDA

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>should do to try to rebuild trust with people. I think,

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 1>first of all, we need to start with Congress and say,

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>who do we have in Congress sitting on the committees

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:29.880
<v Speaker 1>that give the FDA it's marching orders. Frankly, I can't.

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you who those people are. I should

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to, but I can't right now, and do

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I trust them, particularly when I well know that many

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:42.839
<v Speaker 1>of our congressional representatives are, for lack of a better

0:48:42.880 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 1>word ignorance of science and how it works and don't

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:51.400
<v Speaker 1>care to learn it, and the hander to sort of

0:48:51.440 --> 0:48:54.759
<v Speaker 1>the conspiracy theorists who want to think that we're all

0:48:54.760 --> 0:48:57.560
<v Speaker 1>out to get them. So I think we need to

0:48:57.600 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 1>look at that and ask should there be special or

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 1>qualifications for people who determine how this agency works. I

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:07.880
<v Speaker 1>think overall the agency does a remarkable job given the

0:49:07.880 --> 0:49:11.160
<v Speaker 1>mission that it has and the number of opportunities for

0:49:11.239 --> 0:49:16.640
<v Speaker 1>failure that it has, how relatively few it really has experienced.

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:19.239
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to look at how we can

0:49:19.280 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>reduce conflicts of interest that we've talked about within the

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:25.280
<v Speaker 1>agency so that we don't have people who are pretending

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to serve the FDA but are really serving a commercial

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:31.360
<v Speaker 1>interest or serving themselves so that they can position themselves

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for for a well paying job with the commercial companies.

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be helpful. And I think we

0:49:37.400 --> 0:49:41.680
<v Speaker 1>need to have real penalties for pharmaceutical companies that openly

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:45.439
<v Speaker 1>commit criminal acts. This is in the criminal Code now

0:49:46.440 --> 0:49:50.880
<v Speaker 1>produted things that were criminal, and that perhaps money is

0:49:50.920 --> 0:49:53.480
<v Speaker 1>not the price those people should be paying that people

0:49:54.200 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 1>people there should be real prison time assigned when those

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:02.040
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things happen because as a CEO who knows

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that their signature on a piece of paper might put

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:07.240
<v Speaker 1>them in jail one day, may think twice before signing

0:50:07.239 --> 0:50:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it and may have better oversight. Yeah, okay, alright, Gail,

0:50:12.560 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 1>this is really my last question on this show. We

0:50:16.200 --> 0:50:20.480
<v Speaker 1>have a tool called the b S scale, and the

0:50:20.520 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 1>b S scale goes from zero to one, zero being

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the best score meaning zero bs one being the worst

0:50:29.400 --> 0:50:34.040
<v Speaker 1>total bs. So on that scale, what score would you

0:50:34.160 --> 0:50:38.280
<v Speaker 1>give the f d A in achieving its stated mission?

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:41.759
<v Speaker 1>I would give it a really good score. I think

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that to do it's the complicated job it does, to

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:48.439
<v Speaker 1>do it with the high degree of success, and it's

0:50:48.520 --> 0:50:52.680
<v Speaker 1>had in protecting the American public for nearly two hundred

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:55.920
<v Speaker 1>years now. I think that they deserve a score of

0:50:57.080 --> 0:51:01.279
<v Speaker 1>and that they've done really, really well. Gail, I want

0:51:01.280 --> 0:51:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to thank you for being with us today. Thanks for

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:07.560
<v Speaker 1>calling bullshit well, thank you for having me. It's been fun.

0:51:07.600 --> 0:51:11.359
<v Speaker 1>It really has been folks. It is time to make

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:14.799
<v Speaker 1>the call. The f d A is a complicated institution

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:19.319
<v Speaker 1>with huge responsibilities. We couldn't possibly cover the entirety of

0:51:19.360 --> 0:51:22.239
<v Speaker 1>what they do in a single episode, but with the

0:51:22.239 --> 0:51:24.560
<v Speaker 1>help of our three experts, we're still able to get

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:29.360
<v Speaker 1>enough insight to answer the fundamental question, does the f

0:51:29.480 --> 0:51:33.680
<v Speaker 1>d A strive above all else to safeguard the health

0:51:33.920 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of the American people. Although they've had some notable successes,

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we're calling bullshit on the f d A, But as always,

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:48.319
<v Speaker 1>we're not here to just curse the darkness. When we

0:51:48.440 --> 0:51:51.520
<v Speaker 1>come back, we'll speak with an expert in f d

0:51:51.680 --> 0:51:54.399
<v Speaker 1>A conflicts of interest to see if we can light

0:51:54.440 --> 0:51:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a few candles in the halls of this bureaucratic beheemoth.

0:52:14.840 --> 0:52:18.280
<v Speaker 1>My name is Genevieve Cantor. I am an assistant professor

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:22.000
<v Speaker 1>at the Proman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

0:52:22.160 --> 0:52:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm trained as an economist and I study regulation of

0:52:27.120 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 1>biomedical technologies, the f d A, and conflicts of interest.

0:52:32.040 --> 0:52:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for being here and welcome to calling bullshit.

0:52:35.520 --> 0:52:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks happy to be here. What we're here to do

0:52:39.120 --> 0:52:42.759
<v Speaker 1>is talk about ideas for helping the f d A

0:52:42.920 --> 0:52:48.360
<v Speaker 1>better live their purpose. And before we get into those ideas,

0:52:48.680 --> 0:52:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't do this in every show, but but I

0:52:50.680 --> 0:52:54.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to actually say something to our listeners because I've

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:58.160
<v Speaker 1>been feeling some of this stuff myself as I prepped

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 1>for this episode. It's really easy, and I would say

0:53:02.080 --> 0:53:06.000
<v Speaker 1>even understandable, when faced with a problem as complex as

0:53:06.040 --> 0:53:08.799
<v Speaker 1>the FDA to basically just shrug and give up. And

0:53:08.840 --> 0:53:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's easy to just declare that the problem is

0:53:12.239 --> 0:53:15.719
<v Speaker 1>impossible and to kind of move on. And I want

0:53:15.719 --> 0:53:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to ask our listeners to suspend their disbelief for this section,

0:53:18.840 --> 0:53:22.000
<v Speaker 1>because we really do want to explore actions that the

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:25.320
<v Speaker 1>FDA or the executive branch to whom the FDA reports

0:53:25.360 --> 0:53:29.560
<v Speaker 1>could actually enact to help the f d A build

0:53:29.840 --> 0:53:33.720
<v Speaker 1>better trust with people and really deliver on the promise

0:53:33.760 --> 0:53:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of keeping all of us safer. It's such an important purpose,

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and I really believe we need to take an optimistic

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:45.880
<v Speaker 1>point of view here because giving up on it is unthinkable. Sorry,

0:53:45.920 --> 0:53:48.759
<v Speaker 1>I had to get that off my chest initially. So

0:53:48.880 --> 0:53:51.960
<v Speaker 1>let's get into some ideas. Genevieve, I'm gonna ask you

0:53:52.040 --> 0:53:55.839
<v Speaker 1>to go first. In two minutes, can you tell us

0:53:55.920 --> 0:53:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the one thing that you would do to change the

0:53:59.719 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 1>f So, if I were emperor of the United States,

0:54:04.840 --> 0:54:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the one thing I would do is to replace our

0:54:08.040 --> 0:54:11.239
<v Speaker 1>current approval process with a system where the firms are

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:14.560
<v Speaker 1>given conditional approval of their products and they have to

0:54:14.600 --> 0:54:18.880
<v Speaker 1>seek renewal of approval every say, ten years. So in

0:54:18.920 --> 0:54:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the current system, a firm applies for approval of a

0:54:22.280 --> 0:54:25.759
<v Speaker 1>product and receives that approval until basically the end of

0:54:25.800 --> 0:54:28.560
<v Speaker 1>time or the sun burns itself out or something. So

0:54:29.040 --> 0:54:32.600
<v Speaker 1>with this ten year sort of renewable approval, you could

0:54:32.600 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 1>incentivize the monitoring of how well drugs are working, because

0:54:36.000 --> 0:54:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that will be required to get your renewal for the approval.

0:54:39.200 --> 0:54:42.440
<v Speaker 1>You incentivize the monitoring of how safe drugs are because

0:54:42.480 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 1>again that's part of the renewal process that will allow

0:54:46.600 --> 0:54:49.040
<v Speaker 1>us the government to pull drugs off the market that

0:54:49.160 --> 0:54:51.239
<v Speaker 1>turn out to be not effective or that turned out

0:54:51.239 --> 0:54:53.719
<v Speaker 1>to be unsafe, because sometimes you don't see a lot

0:54:53.719 --> 0:54:56.799
<v Speaker 1>of safety events in the small clinical trial populations and

0:54:56.840 --> 0:55:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you only see them in the broader population. I love

0:55:00.640 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that idea. That is an incredibly smart idea. Not surprisingly,

0:55:05.560 --> 0:55:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you are the experts, so well done. I think that's

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:12.399
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic idea. Will we will return to that, I'm

0:55:12.400 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 1>sure throughout the conversation. So here's my idea. The f

0:55:15.680 --> 0:55:19.719
<v Speaker 1>d A is much more important to all of us

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:23.240
<v Speaker 1>than is currently reflected in the salaries of the people

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:27.080
<v Speaker 1>who work there. Their job is literally to to save lives,

0:55:27.080 --> 0:55:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to protect us from harm. But there's a pretty massive

0:55:31.320 --> 0:55:33.920
<v Speaker 1>salary gap between the average f d A worker in

0:55:33.960 --> 0:55:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the average pharmat exact or food company exact, which has

0:55:38.719 --> 0:55:42.400
<v Speaker 1>resulted in this revolving door where regulators from the FDA

0:55:42.640 --> 0:55:46.680
<v Speaker 1>moved to higher paying jobs at food and drug companies.

0:55:47.520 --> 0:55:50.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the knowledge that that reward is

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:54.439
<v Speaker 1>there waiting for them if they play ball while they're

0:55:54.440 --> 0:55:56.880
<v Speaker 1>at the f d A has the effect of creating

0:55:56.920 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 1>huge conflicts of interest. And so my idea is to

0:56:00.480 --> 0:56:05.680
<v Speaker 1>change the FDA through compensation reform, pay salaries competitive with

0:56:05.719 --> 0:56:08.839
<v Speaker 1>the private sector, because right now the FDA is kind

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of a drab government bureaucracy and it attracts people who

0:56:13.120 --> 0:56:16.719
<v Speaker 1>are up for working in that kind of job. Closing

0:56:16.760 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the salary gap would begin to level the playing field.

0:56:20.160 --> 0:56:23.040
<v Speaker 1>When you know you pay people more money, you attract

0:56:23.120 --> 0:56:27.040
<v Speaker 1>better people, and their job is so incredibly important that

0:56:27.040 --> 0:56:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that would be better for all of us. So salary

0:56:31.040 --> 0:56:33.320
<v Speaker 1>reform is the idea I want to put on the table.

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:35.719
<v Speaker 1>But let's some we can we can get back to that.

0:56:35.760 --> 0:56:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to I want to talk more about your idea,

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:42.200
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's so smart because when things and

0:56:42.200 --> 0:56:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and a lot goes right at the FDA, right, but

0:56:44.520 --> 0:56:48.560
<v Speaker 1>but when things go wrong, it's not often on day

0:56:48.600 --> 0:56:51.800
<v Speaker 1>one you don't know that a problem is a problem

0:56:51.960 --> 0:56:54.520
<v Speaker 1>right out of the gate. And yet once something is approved,

0:56:54.560 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it's been released into the wild and you almost can't

0:56:57.280 --> 0:57:00.400
<v Speaker 1>get it back in the current system. And so that

0:57:00.480 --> 0:57:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that would you know, really increase people's safety.

0:57:04.719 --> 0:57:08.000
<v Speaker 1>What barriers do you think we would encounter if we

0:57:08.080 --> 0:57:11.280
<v Speaker 1>decided to try to actually enact that today? Who would

0:57:11.320 --> 0:57:14.640
<v Speaker 1>have an issue with that idea? Probably the same parties

0:57:14.680 --> 0:57:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that have blocked a lot of reforms in this space,

0:57:17.920 --> 0:57:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the pharmaceutical companies. I suspect that some of the arguments

0:57:21.560 --> 0:57:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that would be presented might be that it would be

0:57:24.880 --> 0:57:27.680
<v Speaker 1>even more costly and time consuming for firms than the

0:57:27.680 --> 0:57:33.840
<v Speaker 1>existing approval processes. Uh IN might delay access to some products,

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:38.240
<v Speaker 1>But overall, broadly speaking, it's not politically feasible because the

0:57:38.360 --> 0:57:43.720
<v Speaker 1>drug companies would intensely oppose this kind of conditional approval.

0:57:44.600 --> 0:57:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And when they oppose that kind of thing, how does

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 1>what form does that opposition take? So every five years

0:57:52.920 --> 0:57:57.080
<v Speaker 1>there is legislation related to authorizing the budget for the

0:57:57.200 --> 0:58:00.280
<v Speaker 1>f D a um. In fact, there's actually currently the

0:58:00.280 --> 0:58:03.600
<v Speaker 1>re authorization happening this year and we expect to see

0:58:03.600 --> 0:58:07.360
<v Speaker 1>it past at the end of this summer actually, And

0:58:07.440 --> 0:58:11.520
<v Speaker 1>so usually it's through you know, lobbying legislators as to

0:58:12.600 --> 0:58:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the features that might go into this reauthorization package. So if,

0:58:17.400 --> 0:58:19.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, if it were to be introduced in one

0:58:19.560 --> 0:58:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of these five year reauthorization bill's armor as well as

0:58:23.880 --> 0:58:29.840
<v Speaker 1>individual pharmaceutical lobbyists would oppose the inclusion of such a conditionality,

0:58:30.840 --> 0:58:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and the lobbyists are there to threaten by removing financial

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:38.720
<v Speaker 1>support from Congress. That's right through you know, campaign contributions.

0:58:39.880 --> 0:58:43.440
<v Speaker 1>M hmm. Yeah. That sort of leads us to a

0:58:43.520 --> 0:58:46.600
<v Speaker 1>discussion around conflict of interest in general. So so I

0:58:46.720 --> 0:58:49.000
<v Speaker 1>want to I want to go there, But before we

0:58:49.200 --> 0:58:52.720
<v Speaker 1>go there more deeply, what do you think of the

0:58:52.800 --> 0:58:55.200
<v Speaker 1>idea that I put on on the table, This idea

0:58:55.240 --> 0:58:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of like leveling the playing field from a salary standpoint,

0:58:58.160 --> 0:59:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Does that make any sense? I'd like it, And I

0:59:00.560 --> 0:59:05.040
<v Speaker 1>think you've tackled head on one of the issues with

0:59:05.240 --> 0:59:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the approval process at the FDA, which is they do

0:59:08.920 --> 0:59:13.080
<v Speaker 1>lose a lot of very good people because the pharmaceutical

0:59:13.160 --> 0:59:17.560
<v Speaker 1>companies are able to entice government workers who have a

0:59:17.640 --> 0:59:21.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of experience and knowledge. Away, I do see some

0:59:21.680 --> 0:59:24.120
<v Speaker 1>constraints while we're on the topic of you know, pluses

0:59:24.160 --> 0:59:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and minuses. One might be that these are civil servants,

0:59:29.040 --> 0:59:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and so what you describe is just a generic problem

0:59:32.640 --> 0:59:36.440
<v Speaker 1>among the civil service. So are there some rules related

0:59:36.440 --> 0:59:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to parity relating you know, GS scales and so on

0:59:40.280 --> 0:59:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that you would have to consider. I see, just the

0:59:43.120 --> 0:59:48.360
<v Speaker 1>way government workers are compensated has to be essentially universal

0:59:48.440 --> 0:59:54.040
<v Speaker 1>there or standardized. Yet in some way. A second issue

0:59:54.200 --> 0:59:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is just where that money would come from, because the

0:59:57.240 --> 1:00:01.240
<v Speaker 1>central source of conflicts actually, even with funding the f

1:00:01.400 --> 1:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>d A is user fees, so basically requiring pharmaceutical companies

1:00:07.000 --> 1:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to pony up you know, hundreds of thousands of dollars

1:00:09.840 --> 1:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to finance the review process. Now it's not earmarks, so

1:00:13.920 --> 1:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>that if visor submits a you know, drug for review,

1:00:17.720 --> 1:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that you know, people will necessarily favor the approval of

1:00:21.880 --> 1:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that drug. But financially the f d A and its

1:00:24.960 --> 1:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>operations are funded in large part by pharmaceutical companies through

1:00:29.200 --> 1:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>these user fees. I would consider that attacks in a

1:00:32.680 --> 1:00:36.439
<v Speaker 1>way of getting your product to market, and I think

1:00:36.520 --> 1:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that that makes sense. I mean, I do realize it

1:00:38.920 --> 1:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>gives them a voice in the world of money and politics,

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and so raising those fees probably would be unpopular with them.

1:00:49.440 --> 1:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to continue to talk about different conflicts of interest.

1:00:54.200 --> 1:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>You wrote a chapter in a book called Conflicts of

1:00:57.080 --> 1:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Interest in FDA Advisory Committee that was eye opening for me.

1:01:02.880 --> 1:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you first just explain what an advisory committee is

1:01:07.200 --> 1:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and how that actually works. Sure, when a drug comes

1:01:11.920 --> 1:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>up for approval, the f d A, you know, has

1:01:14.760 --> 1:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the final say, but oftentimes it doesn't have the internal

1:01:19.040 --> 1:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>expertise or perhaps even the person hours to commit to

1:01:23.440 --> 1:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>doing a full review of a particular drug, or you know,

1:01:26.760 --> 1:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the evidence is complicated and it needs external advice. So

1:01:31.560 --> 1:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>frequently it convenes these advisory committees to review the application

1:01:36.560 --> 1:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>for a particular drug. The people on these advisory committees

1:01:40.080 --> 1:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>are not formally employees or full time employees of the

1:01:44.200 --> 1:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>f d A. They are external experts. They're sitting at universities,

1:01:49.800 --> 1:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>research institutes, think tanks, and they are physicians, researchers, some statisticians.

1:01:56.480 --> 1:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>But one of the important things about this is if

1:01:58.720 --> 1:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you work for the government, there very clear ethics rules

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>regarding your financial ties to industry. Um, if you were

1:02:06.720 --> 1:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>working at a university and then you get called on

1:02:09.120 --> 1:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to be on these advisory committees, you know, these people

1:02:12.400 --> 1:02:16.920
<v Speaker 1>sitting at universities have relationships with drug companies, They are

1:02:16.960 --> 1:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>consultants for them, they have their research funded by them.

1:02:20.160 --> 1:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And so one of the things I looked at was

1:02:23.880 --> 1:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>whether the financial ties of these external experts who are

1:02:28.000 --> 1:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>called upon to advise whether a drug should be approved

1:02:31.120 --> 1:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>or not. Whether the financial ties of these experts had

1:02:34.400 --> 1:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to drug companies was associated with whether they voted for

1:02:39.560 --> 1:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>approval of the drug or not, and how open they

1:02:42.880 --> 1:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>were to approval of the drug. Right, And it sounded

1:02:45.800 --> 1:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to me like you had a specific hypothesis going into

1:02:48.680 --> 1:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the work, which actually you even you were surprised by

1:02:51.720 --> 1:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the results. Is that right? Yeah? So, I mean conventional wisdom,

1:02:55.720 --> 1:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the ethics literature on conflicts of interest, which is,

1:02:59.560 --> 1:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>if you have, you know, when tied to industry, you know,

1:03:02.680 --> 1:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not good. But if you have multiple ties, that's

1:03:05.680 --> 1:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>even more not good. That's like really really bad, yes, exactly.

1:03:10.840 --> 1:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>And then so we found two things. One was it

1:03:14.120 --> 1:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>turned out that when we compared how these experts voted,

1:03:20.120 --> 1:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and we compared people who had one financial tie to

1:03:23.840 --> 1:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>those who had no financial ties. We actually found that

1:03:28.480 --> 1:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>people with a single financial tie to a company were

1:03:32.080 --> 1:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>more likely to vote in favor of the product sponsored

1:03:35.360 --> 1:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>by that company than people who had no financial ties.

1:03:38.480 --> 1:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>So there did to seem to be some bias, but

1:03:40.760 --> 1:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it was only if you had a single financial tie

1:03:44.240 --> 1:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to a company. In contrast, people who had a lot

1:03:47.440 --> 1:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of financial ties, So people who had ties to murt

1:03:50.360 --> 1:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Fiser lots of companies did not appear to vote any

1:03:53.840 --> 1:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>differently on average than people who had no financial ties.

1:03:58.200 --> 1:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>People with a lot of ties did not appear to

1:04:00.800 --> 1:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>be biased in how they voted, and so we talk

1:04:03.600 --> 1:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about why that might be the case.

1:04:06.080 --> 1:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>One you know, hypothesis that makes sense to me is that,

1:04:10.240 --> 1:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of times when people have a

1:04:11.680 --> 1:04:14.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of financial ties, it's because they're really really good

1:04:15.240 --> 1:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>at what they do, and so a lot of companies

1:04:17.520 --> 1:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>want a piece of their brain. Um, it's not so

1:04:20.560 --> 1:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not hiring these people so they could be hired

1:04:23.400 --> 1:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>guns to say what the company wants them to say.

1:04:25.920 --> 1:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>They're hiring these people because they're just really good at

1:04:28.440 --> 1:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>advising them. Yes, some of it is just they literally

1:04:31.280 --> 1:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>want great advice from smart people. But we did find

1:04:35.680 --> 1:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>some bias. I mean, I think the other thing that

1:04:37.760 --> 1:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>came out in the paper was that, you know, the

1:04:40.160 --> 1:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>type of conflict matters. So that hypothesis that I presented earlier,

1:04:44.320 --> 1:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>one tie is bad, many ties worse. It's sort of

1:04:47.360 --> 1:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a the simplistic rule of film we had that doesn't

1:04:50.680 --> 1:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge the fact that different kinds of ties matter for influence.

1:04:55.720 --> 1:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>And so the other thing we found was that it

1:04:57.880 --> 1:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>did not seem, for example, that experts who had ties

1:05:02.560 --> 1:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>through research funding so their research was funded by the

1:05:05.200 --> 1:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>drug company, were biased. But the kind of financial ties

1:05:09.200 --> 1:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that really mattered were either you were you had an

1:05:12.720 --> 1:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>ownership stake in the company, you had some kind of

1:05:16.280 --> 1:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>stock in the company, which makes sense, and also a

1:05:19.760 --> 1:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>very strong effect came from whether you were on an

1:05:22.240 --> 1:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>advisory board for the company. Lots of times you may

1:05:25.520 --> 1:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>be on the board and you have a fiduciary responsibility

1:05:28.400 --> 1:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>for the company to act in uh interest right exactly. Yeah,

1:05:33.800 --> 1:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a clear conflict like that that seems like that

1:05:36.360 --> 1:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>should be illegal. I mean, a lot of this should

1:05:38.440 --> 1:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>be illegal. To be honest, you would think it would,

1:05:41.160 --> 1:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and if you read the rules, people who do have

1:05:43.920 --> 1:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of financial interest should not be participating in

1:05:47.960 --> 1:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the advisory committees. But there is also a process that

1:05:51.480 --> 1:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>allows the FDA to make exceptions, and many times they

1:05:55.240 --> 1:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>make exceptions. And so you have people with these kinds

1:05:58.280 --> 1:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of financial ties on these advisor committees, but things that

1:06:01.440 --> 1:06:04.959
<v Speaker 1>don't matter, consulting research, you know, other kinds of ties

1:06:05.000 --> 1:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>don't matter. So I guess the paper was really advocating

1:06:09.040 --> 1:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>for more subtle policy related to conflicts of interests. Yeah,

1:06:13.320 --> 1:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>more disclosure, right, I mean, it seems like that should

1:06:16.520 --> 1:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>be fair if the FDA is tasked with, as it

1:06:20.320 --> 1:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>says on the website, above all else, safeguarding the health

1:06:24.480 --> 1:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and well being of the American people. If that truly

1:06:27.360 --> 1:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is above all else, then you know, you should have

1:06:33.160 --> 1:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to disclose all of your financial ties. And it should

1:06:36.880 --> 1:06:40.280
<v Speaker 1>be acknowledged that there are financial ties that are okay.

1:06:40.560 --> 1:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>In other words, if you're just being paid as an

1:06:42.520 --> 1:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>advisor for a company, and that's you being paid for

1:06:45.680 --> 1:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>your professional expertise, and that's fine. If you own a

1:06:48.920 --> 1:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>piece or you're on the on the board of one

1:06:52.880 --> 1:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of the companies that's in question, that would disqualify you.

1:06:55.800 --> 1:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And I don't understand why we can't enact rules like that.

1:06:59.760 --> 1:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>What would prevent us from from closing those loopholes? That's

1:07:03.440 --> 1:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a great question. The two arguments that I've seen presented

1:07:07.240 --> 1:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>are that we would no longer be able to find

1:07:12.800 --> 1:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>people qualified enough to be on our advisory committees if

1:07:16.680 --> 1:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>we just outright banned the participation of people with financial ties,

1:07:23.280 --> 1:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>because all the all the really smart people are already

1:07:26.480 --> 1:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>on the take, essentially like or you know, whereas my

1:07:30.400 --> 1:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>study indicated, you know a lot of people want want

1:07:33.160 --> 1:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a piece of their brains, so it would be difficult.

1:07:37.120 --> 1:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>And we can kind of see this because in the

1:07:40.800 --> 1:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousands, the f d A in fact capped the

1:07:44.600 --> 1:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>exceptions that could be issued for people who had these

1:07:47.520 --> 1:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of financial ties. Um So prior to this, the

1:07:52.240 --> 1:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>f d A issued just exceptions willy nilly and just

1:07:55.600 --> 1:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>basically said a lot of the apparently disqualifying financial interests

1:07:59.720 --> 1:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>did matter. In the two thousands, with one of the authorizations,

1:08:04.040 --> 1:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the percentage of people who had these exceptions, and what

1:08:07.320 --> 1:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you saw was of course a decline and people who

1:08:10.520 --> 1:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>had these exceptions in these financial ties. But what you

1:08:13.440 --> 1:08:18.879
<v Speaker 1>also saw was more positions on the advisory committees being vacant,

1:08:19.120 --> 1:08:21.799
<v Speaker 1>a longer time it would take to convene these advisory

1:08:21.840 --> 1:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>committees because they would need to spend more time to

1:08:24.200 --> 1:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>find people who are not conflicted. Yeah right, Yeah, I

1:08:29.080 --> 1:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>want to delve a little bit more into this idea

1:08:32.439 --> 1:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of trust, because ultimately the FDA's job is to make

1:08:36.000 --> 1:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>us safe. And without guiding your answer at all, what

1:08:41.439 --> 1:08:46.599
<v Speaker 1>needs to change so that we can trust the companies

1:08:46.640 --> 1:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that are making our food and the companies that are

1:08:49.000 --> 1:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>making our drugs. What what about our system has to

1:08:53.439 --> 1:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>change to create more trust? I have to say I'm

1:08:56.320 --> 1:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a little conflicted about this. I mean, the mission of

1:08:59.360 --> 1:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the fd as pretty clear, you know, to ensure, among

1:09:03.520 --> 1:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>other things, to ensure the safety and efficacy of the

1:09:05.640 --> 1:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>drugs that are marketed in the US. The mission the

1:09:08.240 --> 1:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>drug companies is not that it is to make money

1:09:12.120 --> 1:09:15.519
<v Speaker 1>for their shareholders, and so, you know, I do wonder

1:09:15.760 --> 1:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's realistic um to expect organizations whose objective is

1:09:21.680 --> 1:09:25.839
<v Speaker 1>profitmaking to not do what they can do to make profits.

1:09:26.240 --> 1:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>But I like the way you framed it, because you

1:09:28.040 --> 1:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>framed it as a system, you know, not just the

1:09:31.720 --> 1:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>f d A. But I think the onus is on

1:09:34.240 --> 1:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>legislators policymakers to create rules that put guard rails on

1:09:39.840 --> 1:09:44.479
<v Speaker 1>drug companies that still but that's still incentivize them to

1:09:44.720 --> 1:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>do the right thing. I think, as as you you

1:09:47.960 --> 1:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>might have framed it, so things that minimize gaming, how

1:09:51.960 --> 1:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>clinical trials are run and analyze, things that incentivize the

1:09:55.600 --> 1:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>collection of data on effectiveness and safety, and start the

1:10:00.280 --> 1:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>things that we want, which is quality information on safety

1:10:03.120 --> 1:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and effectiveness with things that drug companies want, which is

1:10:06.479 --> 1:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>access to the market. Right, Okay, Genevieve, is there anything

1:10:13.280 --> 1:10:18.519
<v Speaker 1>else that you think our our listeners should know about

1:10:18.960 --> 1:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the f DA and things that either could or should change.

1:10:22.479 --> 1:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I do think, you know, the problems we have with

1:10:25.479 --> 1:10:28.479
<v Speaker 1>the f d A are structural. You know, there is

1:10:28.520 --> 1:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that structural tension there about how can we get how

1:10:31.160 --> 1:10:33.759
<v Speaker 1>can the agency have independence be based on the science,

1:10:34.320 --> 1:10:37.639
<v Speaker 1>but you know, still have a commissioner that is serving

1:10:37.680 --> 1:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>at the pledgure of the president. The other structural tension

1:10:40.600 --> 1:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and we see this, you know in our discussion as well,

1:10:43.040 --> 1:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is you know, you can have an agency that approves

1:10:46.520 --> 1:10:50.519
<v Speaker 1>drugs almost too fast, so they proved drugs that don't work,

1:10:51.120 --> 1:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>or you have safety issues, but you've increase access to

1:10:54.320 --> 1:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the drug. But that's opposed to well that you know,

1:10:57.720 --> 1:11:00.519
<v Speaker 1>the alternative is to have an agency that approves things

1:11:00.600 --> 1:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>too slowly, which is their drugs that it's preventing from

1:11:03.920 --> 1:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>being out on the market that people need to get

1:11:06.680 --> 1:11:11.799
<v Speaker 1>access to. Right, we do need to have information systems

1:11:11.840 --> 1:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that adapt an approval system that is adaptive in the

1:11:14.400 --> 1:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>same way that you know, all other systems in the

1:11:16.479 --> 1:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>world that we live in, you know, adapt to new information.

1:11:19.280 --> 1:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>And so hopefully that proposal and yours as well sort

1:11:21.880 --> 1:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>of adapts to you know, what we know and we

1:11:24.479 --> 1:11:28.599
<v Speaker 1>can make better decisions that way. Okay, So last question

1:11:29.320 --> 1:11:32.519
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast. We have a tool that we call

1:11:32.600 --> 1:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the BS index, and the BS index measures the gap

1:11:37.240 --> 1:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>between word indeed, and it goes from zero to a hundred.

1:11:41.600 --> 1:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Zero is the best score, So zero b s a

1:11:45.840 --> 1:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred is the worst score total BS. And so the

1:11:49.960 --> 1:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>f d A today says that it strives above all

1:11:54.520 --> 1:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>else to safeguard the health and well being of the

1:11:57.640 --> 1:12:02.439
<v Speaker 1>American people. What's or would you give the f d A.

1:12:04.320 --> 1:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>So I would say that my determined of the BA

1:12:09.560 --> 1:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>scores based on two main things that I think caused

1:12:14.200 --> 1:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>me to be worried about the f D A one

1:12:16.160 --> 1:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>is the degree of industry influence that leads it to

1:12:19.640 --> 1:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>diverge from its mission, as well as the degree to

1:12:23.160 --> 1:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>which it's vulnerable to political influence, you know, from the

1:12:26.400 --> 1:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>executive branch. Overall, I think the structure of the organization

1:12:31.800 --> 1:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>gives us generally reasonably high quality decisions. I would give

1:12:38.479 --> 1:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it a forty five. Okay, that was great. Thank you

1:12:44.280 --> 1:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>so much for being here today, Jenny. I really appreciate it.

1:12:47.960 --> 1:12:51.519
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for inviting me and having us think together

1:12:51.800 --> 1:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>about this issue. It was I really really had a

1:12:54.160 --> 1:12:58.479
<v Speaker 1>great time. Thank you. All Right, folks, it's time for

1:12:58.560 --> 1:13:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the FDA to get their fish'll b s score. Somehow

1:13:02.800 --> 1:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>feels appropriate that I try to get a little scientific

1:13:05.280 --> 1:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>with this one. So if I were to average our

1:13:08.280 --> 1:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>guest scores, the final score would be a forty eight. However,

1:13:13.160 --> 1:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that still feels low to me, especially given Richard's account

1:13:17.400 --> 1:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>of basically being told to deliver the results his boss

1:13:20.680 --> 1:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is wanted or risk losing his job at the agency.

1:13:24.880 --> 1:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>That's just plain scary. So I'm going to give the

1:13:28.479 --> 1:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>FDA a fifty five. I hope that acknowledges some of

1:13:32.000 --> 1:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the agency's big winds over the years, but leaves plenty

1:13:36.160 --> 1:13:40.439
<v Speaker 1>of room for some much needed improvement. And f d

1:13:40.560 --> 1:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>A Commissioner Robert Caliph, if you ever want to come

1:13:44.160 --> 1:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on the show to discuss anything we've touched on today,

1:13:47.439 --> 1:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>please know that you have an open invitation. And if

1:13:51.439 --> 1:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you're starting a purpose led business or thinking about beginning

1:13:54.320 --> 1:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the journey of transformation to become one, here are three

1:13:57.479 --> 1:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>things you can take away from today's episod D One.

1:14:05.800 --> 1:14:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Becoming purpose led is a big responsibility. It means that

1:14:09.600 --> 1:14:13.519
<v Speaker 1>you're dedicating yourself to managing better outcomes for all of

1:14:13.600 --> 1:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>your stakeholders. That includes customers, employees, the community you do

1:14:18.760 --> 1:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>business in, and the planet. If all companies did that,

1:14:23.400 --> 1:14:26.519
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't need the f d A. The FDA only

1:14:26.680 --> 1:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>exists because the motivation to manage for maximum profitability is

1:14:31.560 --> 1:14:35.639
<v Speaker 1>so powerful in our culture. The companies will knowingly sell

1:14:35.720 --> 1:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>products and services that damage people and the planet. Purpose

1:14:40.320 --> 1:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Led companies win the trust of all their stakeholders by

1:14:43.960 --> 1:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>being transparent, by taking on problems they discover, and by

1:14:48.040 --> 1:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>solving them. They tend to do the right thing, even

1:14:52.439 --> 1:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>if it costs the money. Two. Once you know your purpose,

1:14:57.400 --> 1:15:01.519
<v Speaker 1>take action against it. Since on. Fortunately, we do need

1:15:01.600 --> 1:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the FDA to protect us from companies who would do

1:15:04.240 --> 1:15:07.719
<v Speaker 1>us harm. The FDA needs to do a better job

1:15:07.840 --> 1:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of that. The action idea that Genevieve brought today sticks

1:15:12.000 --> 1:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>with me. Any approval of any product is only conditional

1:15:16.400 --> 1:15:19.519
<v Speaker 1>and time based and must be re reviewed once it's

1:15:19.560 --> 1:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>been in the market and we can all see the

1:15:21.920 --> 1:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>effects that it's actually having. That one change would help

1:15:26.520 --> 1:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the f d A better live their purpose. What are

1:15:29.280 --> 1:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the actions that you're taking to better live yours? Three?

1:15:34.280 --> 1:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Simple is better. The f d A story is enormously

1:15:38.680 --> 1:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>complex because they cover such a broad waterfront and have

1:15:42.320 --> 1:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>so many stakeholders with so many different agendas. Define a

1:15:46.560 --> 1:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>simple reason why your company exists. Choose clarity and specificity

1:15:51.840 --> 1:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>over fluff. Solve a real problem, Do the right thing

1:15:56.160 --> 1:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>by your stakeholders, and keep doing that until you win.

1:16:05.640 --> 1:16:08.919
<v Speaker 1>And if this episode made it through your approval process,

1:16:09.320 --> 1:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the Calling Bullshit podcast on the I Heart

1:16:12.400 --> 1:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Radio app Apple Podcasts, where wherever you listen to people

1:16:16.040 --> 1:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>speaking to your ears and friends. I'd like to ask

1:16:19.320 --> 1:16:22.679
<v Speaker 1>for your help. If you enjoy the Calling Bullshit podcast,

1:16:22.840 --> 1:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>please take a second to rate and review us on

1:16:25.280 --> 1:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts or on your preferred platform. Thanks to our

1:16:30.000 --> 1:16:34.679
<v Speaker 1>guests Lauren Edtter, Richard Williams, Gail Van Norman, and Genevieve Cantor.

1:16:35.320 --> 1:16:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Learn more about them and get links to their work

1:16:37.840 --> 1:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>in our show notes, and many thanks to our production

1:16:41.439 --> 1:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>team Hannah bial, Amanda Ginsburg, d s Moss, Hailey, Pascalites,

1:16:47.040 --> 1:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Parker Silzer, and Basil Soaper. Calling Bullshit was created by

1:16:52.040 --> 1:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>co Collective and it's hosted by me Ti Monting. You

1:16:55.000 --> 1:17:01.719
<v Speaker 1>thanks for listening. Four