WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - March 10th, 2023

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news as it happen. Sloomberg

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebec on Bloomberg Radio. Hi, everyone,

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week. Call

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>at the Wall Street Churn. This past week, as FED

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Chair J. Powell spent two days up on Capitol Hill

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 1>taking questions on the economy and monetary policy, reiterating that

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>officials are likely to take rates higher than previously anticipated

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and could move at a faster pace if needed. Based

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>on Friday's Mix Jobs report, investors now move their focus

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to this week's CPI report, and that's not the only

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>risk for investors. More in a moment. Also, I have

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>this CEO of Hpe, Antonio Nari on tech spending, Claire

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Hughes Johnson, former CEO at Stripe on a company's most

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>important asset, and Priceline CEO Brett Keller with a global

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>travel post. All of that to come. We begin with

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>a story in this week's Finance section of the magazine.

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>It was also a Bloomberg Big Take It details a

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>looming risk that investors simply don't want to consider. We're

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about the US debt ceiling and what a default

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>on federal debt would actually mean for markets. Bloomberg's Liz McCormick,

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Eric Wasson, Josh Wingrove, and Mike Dorning joined forces to

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>bring us both the Wall Street and Washington perspectives. Liz

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg News chief correspondent for Global macro markets. She

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Business Week editor Joe Webber join us with more.

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>We in January hit that debt ceiling in which they

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.559
<v Speaker 1>had set a bit ago. Now the Treasury departments, using

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.119
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary measures kind of a special accounting moves to stay

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>under it because they can't go above it. This is

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>only going to get worse because there is, of course

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a limit to how long Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>her team can do these maneuvers and stay under the

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>debt limits, So they really need Congress to raise it

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>or resuspend it, which they do many times. I feel

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>like part of the problem, though, is that, you know,

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>we come up against the seas ceiling and then we

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>always figure something out. What's different this time around. Potentially, Well,

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I think this time around, and you know the gentleman

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>on the story with me are the you know, Washington

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>politics experts, but that you know, Eric Wason will tell

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you that we have a very contentious situation here where

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>both sides you know, are jockeying. You know, the Republicans

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want a clean death sailing rays, which means that

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we just raise it. They want to kind of jockey

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>for some future spending cuts, and President Biden and his

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>team is saying, no, we don't want to do that,

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know, they seem pretty entrenched, and it kind

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of hearkens to twenty eleven where we had a very

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>contentions death sailing episode that they eventually did come to

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>something in the final hour, but it was such a

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>messy process that the US for the first time ever

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>by SMP got there rating downgraded from triple A, and

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you know that had a sting, even though we didn't

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>see rates jump up sharply. Then you know, the stock

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>market went down and it was a tumultuous time. So

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what people think this time it's going

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to go down to the wire. So that that story

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:10.519
<v Speaker 1>that Eric wasn't did about Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania Representative,

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>top democrat on the budget community. When I read our

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>story and then I read that story, I was like,

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>oh boy, this is scary. This got scarier all of

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, right because he's basically saying like, we're not

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>going to back down. You know. It's funny, Joel, because

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone thinks, which we came to in our story, that

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of course they'll come to something. We've seen this movie before.

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a headache, we hate it, but well they'll do it.

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>But when you know, you look at some of this

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff like Eric's laying out, it's really troublesome, and you know,

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like we hope, you know, cooler heads will prevail. No

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>one would jeopardize the US treasuries as the world's safe

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>haven security, which some people say. People may not realize

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>if there's a default, be it short, you know, because

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>they'll say, oh, well it'll be short, you know, but

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't matter. You know, the US doesn't default on

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>their debt, and if they do, it could have repercussions

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>for years and years. Okay, so x date, we don't

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>know when that is what's our best sense of not

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a new dating app is it's not well. Janet Yellen

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>says they have at least until like June. It seems

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>like most of Wall Street is saying it probably goes

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>until August. But it's very unclear because you know, it's

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of coming at the worst time. We're in tax season,

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>right and the government doesn't know exactly how tax flows

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>are going. I know I want a refund. They're trying

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to figure out of a we didn't get our refunds.

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know, I mean, that will happen, but

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't know how the flows are going to be,

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 1>how much you know, the cash flows are going to go,

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>how much refunds they're gonna have to pay out, how

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>much inflows people paying their taxes. So it's very hard

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>for the Treasury to kind of have a good timing of,

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we'll run out of these maneuvers didn't

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>help if I was getting a refund and I said,

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>why don't you guys just sit on it until August,

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and like it's like Social Security a little bit and

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe I get a little bonus. Wow, you're the man,

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just thinking he's got of I don't think

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll give mine whatever fund I'm giving nowhere near what

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>we need want, Yeah, exactly exactly. So that's made it harder.

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>That's why, you know, we know in past times, what

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the traders do is say, hey, listen,

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not buying any Treasury bills or bonds that have

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>coupon payments, which is this semi annual interest that's coming

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>around that crazy X day time. But now this X

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>date range is so wide that it's kind of murky

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in the market. Right. People are like, I don't know

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>yet what debt to avoid, right, So maybe maybe that

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>will become more clear as a troublesome when we get

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:41.239
<v Speaker 1>a better date. You know, maybe we'll get an update

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>from the Treasury of when that X date is going

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to be. If the wheels start coming off this car

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.559
<v Speaker 1>ahead of that X date, do we have any sense

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>what's going to break? Well, you know, after twenty eleven,

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the called parties that be that oversee

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the treasury market did a lot They were like, we

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>don't want to go through this again with having no idea,

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So they did a lot of backup plans like if

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>like maybe Treasury says, well, we'll delay the maturities a day.

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:05.359
<v Speaker 1>You know they can deal with that because you have

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to remember there's the repurchase agreement market that uses treasuries

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>as collateral. So there's a lot of things that you know,

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>what if it couldn't even function. So there's been some

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>backup plans, but even those officials say, but we're not sure.

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, we haven't been through this before. You hope

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the treasury market will function. But Chairman Palell has also said,

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>don't expect that the FED can swoop in and make

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a cure all evils. That it would be repercussions on

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>the economy for a long time. It may sting borrowing

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>costs for years and years or slaying that to me

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 1>that if indeed we get that default, I mean, if

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 1>somehow then there's a fix, quick fix after it, list

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>would we still have that long term impact well the economy.

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what a lot of people say. Of course, we

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know till it happens. But you know, some very

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 1>smart people have said in various stories we've done that

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>it could be cured very fast. But you have to think.

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Some big investors say, I might add that I need

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a little cushion because you know, the US has defaulted, right,

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, so you would say there might be some

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 1>premium added to yields, not just for a day or

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>two maybe maybe small, but as a baseline for a

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>long time, because it's totally different dynamic. You know, Yeah,

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>what do we think on the Republican side, are they

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Is there any cracks anywhere in the in the in

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the wall that may be exposed here that may lead

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, a small group of people to say, you

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>know what, we're not standing with McCarthy anymore. Well, not yet.

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.679
<v Speaker 1>There's a few strongholds. Remember McCarthy took so many votes

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to get him in as speaker, and he had to

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>cut some deals, and you know that's made it harder

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>because they also can kind of, let's just say, in

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>light terms, spike him as the speaker. They have that option,

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>So he has a lot to kind of payback to,

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>do you know. Eric was saying that maybe you know,

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy in the end, you know, will do the best

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>for the country and say, you know, I'll followed by

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>sword and you know, we'll make a bipartisan deal. You know,

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>so that it may go that way. But again, I

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>think it comes down to markets getting ginned. Up stock

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>selling off, and that being in the front of the

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>local papers and things that policymakers may realize, oh this

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>is bad, and you know, we'll come up with a deal.

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's just hard for me to believe that they won't.

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>But like you know, one investor said to me, I

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know, never say never, you know, don't know. You know, Okay,

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>So why throughout all of this and whatever may come

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>yet Mark has been kind of singling like everything seems

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>like it's not quite registered that this could go awry. Well,

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a few things. One is, like we said,

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.079
<v Speaker 1>they can't kind of know yet exactly when we'll hit

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that wall. Number two, there's a lot of other problems, right,

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, inflation is going to be sticky, you know,

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 1>not to minimize traders, but there's only so many things

0:08:57.720 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 1>they can worry about at once, right, So the deaths

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of you have far away a little bit.

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>We have seen US credit default swaps, which is insurance

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>against a default in the US. They're not a huge

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>product here and they're not that liquid, but those you know,

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>rates have gone up, so there is a few people

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>buying some hedges against a default, right so I guess

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a little concern, but I think we need to

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>get some more clarity. And you know, when this we

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>could hit this wall from Marcus to really kind of

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 1>like sell treasuries at that point in etc. Have we

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>heard anything from the biggest holders of US treasuries at

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>this point? And I think about whether it's to Japan.

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>We always think about China when you talk about maybe

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>ultimately in the future if we do get a default,

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>they a lot more in terms of holding them. But

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>have we heard anything from global investors on that front, well,

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>sovereign nation, Yeah, no, they haven't. I think they don't

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>want to get in the middle of this fight. I'm

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>sure if it gets down to the wire, you know,

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>we've gone through this before. You know, China's a little

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 1>bit and they still hold a lot, but they're a

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 1>little bit less of a player. US has a lot

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>more domestic investors than they ever had, so we're not

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>getting into that political jockeying. And I don't think they

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>would speak beforehand. But you do have private investors saying like,

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried, Like I think I had some story saying, oh,

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>there's not gonna be too much volatility ahead, and one

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>investor emailed me, Liz, the debt ceiling. You know, so

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of the private investors that are

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>concerned that this could be you know, a lot of havoc.

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>And even if we don't get a default, if it

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>goes down to the wire and there's real concern, you

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>might see just see more selling of treasures. Again, we

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>have a backdrop of rates rising, inflation being sticky. There's

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of concern out there. Anyway, That was Bloomberg

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 1>News Chief correspondent for Global macro Markets Liz McCormick, along

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>with the editor of Bloomberg Business Week, Joel Webber. Joe

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>will be back a little bit later on coming up

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Hewlett Packard Enterprise CEO Antonio Nary on his company's strong quarter.

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg. Please

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>sees Bloomberg Business Week with Harold Messer and Tim Stenebec

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. So one way we've been trying to

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>figure out what happens next in the global economy and

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>financial markets is by listening to what CEOs are saying

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>as they report earnings. With this quarter winding down, among

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the last major companies reporting was HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise,

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>which last week gave a strong forecast for the current

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>quarter and boosted its annual outlook. The company's results of

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>jest corporations are still upgrading their technology infrastructures, even in

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>an uncertain economy. Antonio'nery is president CEO of HPE. He

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.719
<v Speaker 1>joined me and Bloomberg News Deputy team leader for US

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Equities Jess Benten to dig into the company's numbers. That

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the it spent is resilient, that it spent obviously shifting

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in different areas, but overall, I will say, continue to

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>be a top priority for any enterprise of any size.

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And last week I actually I was in Europe talking

0:11:56.600 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to customers in France and Northern Europe, and they all

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>very clear with me it will continue to be a

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>top priority for them, whether it's to improve the resiliency

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of the company, or whether it's to mind data through

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 1>the analytics portion of the investment, or whether it is

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to also digitize their business. So overall, I will say

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>is good. There is some unevenness in some aspects, but overall,

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I think about r Q one performance,

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>which was recro setting for the company on every metric

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, revenue, operating profit, and EPs. And

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we have a very solid order book,

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you give us the confidence to raise the outlook for

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>both revenue and EPs, I will say, and I had

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with our Bloomberg intelligence analyst Wu Jenhoe, who said,

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were still a result and you did

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>raise your outlook. You know, we also went through Dells

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>report last night and your outlook was very different in

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>contrast to Dells, which was much more dour. Why do

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you think there is that disparity that we're seeing in

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the industry because it's tough for us as we see

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys over port and talk about it. We listen

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to the c suite similar companies having so different outcomes.

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's because people just look names and that

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>they kind of put all together in the same back end.

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>But the fact of the matter is we have a

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>complete different portfolio. Obviously, Hewlett Packer Enterprise does a now

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>participate in the PC business. That's our former pattern company

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>in them now is independent HP Inc. But we have

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a unique diversified portfolio which makes us very different than Dell.

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>We have an intelligence connected business which Dell doesn't not have.

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>We have an AI business a scale that Dell doesn't

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>not have, So you have to look at the portfolio

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's why it makes us very different. But also

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>we have a different strategy because our strategy is to

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>offer everything that we develop inside the company. Where is

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>edge cloud NAI in a platform oriented approach, not swelling

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>systems or commodity hardwork. And that's where it is so different.

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>That's why customers and investors need to learn more about that,

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we are a little bit more polish

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>than they are. We certainly have seen a fundamental trade

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of specific stories just right, And I'm glad you brought

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>up Antonio when it comes to the cloud. You did

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>announce how you do have that definitive agreement to acquire

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>access security and that could help push you deeper into

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that space. What are you expecting to come out of

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that and are you expecting to have any more potential

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>acquisitions on the horizon. Well, over the last eight weeks,

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we acquire four different assets always in this three domains

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>edge cloud NAI. The first one was a company called

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>packing There that allows us to do data pipeline automation

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>for deploying AIA scale. So we have a unique asset

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>with supercomputing that now becomes a kind of the old

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>tech becomes the new tech in many ways because you

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>need supercomputing power to trend these very large models and

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the challenge the customers have is to train

0:14:56.560 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>those models in a very large scale data pipeline. The

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>second answer we bought was a company that does software

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>defined compute for in memory wordloads. Think about those workloads

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>like database that needs a law of memory. We can

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>now do that a cloud scale. The third one was

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Private five G. So when we think about the edge,

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the ability to provide a ubiquitous connectivity layer from Wi

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Fi to land to software define what they're a network.

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Now we are bolted into the same architecture the Private

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>five G because Wi Fi and priv five G are

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>very complementary. And that's a company called Athonet. And last

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>one unless the one you mentioned, which is access security,

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>because you need to wrap all that connectivity layer with

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a secure access secure edge, and we will have the

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>most complete portfolio on the connecting intelligent edge. And that's

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to continue to growth in the adjustance market.

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>But ultimate customer want and integrated secure solution. You've also

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>been tied to new Tanics. Is something likely to happen there?

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>We always we don't comment on speculation. I will say

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>we always look for assets that accelerates our journey into

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the three domains. You know, for us, it's all about

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>accelerate accelerated momentum with hp green Lake. Hpeagreen Lake is

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a flagship product and one of the metrics are quoted

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>yesterday is that with the HPI green Lake and the

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>total as a service business in two twenty one Q

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>one twenty twenty one, our total control value was five

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. At the end of Q one twenty twenty three,

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a total contra value in the balance sheet is ten

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, so we double the business. And obviously we

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>look at all these assets that accelerate the strategy, particularly

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>in the software the findes kind of a layer as

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>well as automation. What about a larger strategic deal. Is

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that something that could happen? You know, we look at

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>all a type of assets. But one of the things

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I might CEFO and I hold ourselves accountable to is

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>a discipline, return based investment. And you know, with the

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>last four acquisitions. I have now done more than three

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 1>acquisitions in the last six years or so, and all

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 1>of them fits in that consistent framework where we bring

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>unique ip and talent that we can scale to our

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>go to market. And obviously, as valuation come down from

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>their highs and multiples that were in some cases not justifiable,

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we look at all of them, but again we stay

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>strict to that framework. Yeah, one of the criticisms came

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to the guidance and your momentum moving forward and how

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 1>that momentum could actually slow in the second half of

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the year. Is that something that's more of a potentially

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>conservative estimate and something that might be we could see

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>some revisions. They're happening depending on how obviously the business

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>outlook changes in the macro outlook as well. You know,

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I have to tell you sometimes I'll understand some of

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:57.239
<v Speaker 1>these questions because when you think about it, you know,

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>at the end of QUE four twenty twenty two, which

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>we at an outstanding quarterer, we guided for the full

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>year two to four percent year over year revenue growth

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>for twenty twenty three. With the new guidance, we are

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>doubling that revenue from the midpoint three to now five

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to seven million, midpoint six. So Alont call that conservative.

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you double the revenue guidance. Alont called

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that conservative. And in addition to that, let's remind ourselves,

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>we're also raising the earnest per share guidance by another sixpennies.

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Now we stand that we have a massive headwind on currency.

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>You know our eighteen percent year over year revenue growth

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that we just posted. Yeah, the five hundred and fifty

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 1>basis points head winds. So we are prudent, you know.

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And this is why, which is early in the year.

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>That was Antonio Nary, president CEO of HPE. You joined

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>me and Bloomberg News Deputy team leader for US Equities,

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Jess Metton. Jess will be back in the next hour.

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Still ahead on Bloomberg Business Week, a decorated tech executive

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>explains the most important building block of a successful company.

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>If you're not investing in yourself as a leader and manager,

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.400
<v Speaker 1>or in your talent, you're gonna have a problem because

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you need more out of them, and you can't let

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>growth paper over challenges. I mean, I do think the

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>pandemic cause more disconnection. So if you're not reconnecting, it's

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 1>going to get worse. There seems to be something soft

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in saying people investment or people matter, when in fact,

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>I think the best places, the best managers and leaders

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>have very high standards but also deep devotion. Right. It's

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the marriage of the caring and the expectations. And I

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>worry people were like, well, we've got to just take

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>our foot off the gas, because yeah, there was a pandemic.

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Terrible things have happened in this country and around the world,

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and it is very hard and people are tired. But

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we want to be inspired. We want

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to be inspired by where we work and the people

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>we work with. And if you don't have a high

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>standard coupled with that empathy and that devotion and that investment,

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not doing your job and you're not going to

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>get the results. Stripe executive and Silicon Valley veteran Claire

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Hughes Johnson provides her playbook, Look for Better Business Practices

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in Any Industry. This is Bloomberg Broadcasting from the Financial

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Capital of the World Bloomberg eleven Frio in New York

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to Washington, d C. Bloomberg ninety nine one to Boston,

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg one O six one to San Francisco, Bloomberg nine

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>sixty to the country, Sirius XM Chado one nineteen and

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>around the globe, the Bloomberg Business app and Bloomberg Radio

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 1>and Tim Stenebec from Bloomberg Radio. Okay, so you know,

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 1>we've had lots of conversations with heads of companies and

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>organizations of all sizes. One common denominator the fight for

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>workers in today's tight labor market. We got another read,

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>as you know, on the US employment picture with the

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>monthly data released on Friday. Well, our next guest knows

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot about people management and building a company thanks

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to its people. Claire Hughes Johnson spent ten years at

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Google oversaw some key projects. She is a corporate officer

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and advisor to Stripe. Was COO It's Stripe. She's got

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a new book out, Scaling People, Tactics for Management and

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Company Building. She explained some common pitfalls of today's business leaders.

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>What we've probably done is thought that just people management

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>will come naturally to us. But I do think it's learnable.

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think a lot about scaling people is

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>just like, let's break down some of the stuff that

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>happens in private, the one on ones, the performance conversations.

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's expose what happens, but actually do the work. If

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not investing in yourself as a leader and manager,

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>or in your talent, you're gonna have a problem because

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you need more out of them, and you can't let

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>growth paper over challenges. I mean, I do think the

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>pandemic caused more disconnection, so if you're not reconnecting, it's

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>going to get worse. And that doesn't change when we

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>get into a softer labor market. I think the best

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>companies make this investment no matter what. Okay, I do

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>think though in a softer labor market, sure people start

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>taking some things for granted. One of the things that

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.200
<v Speaker 1>bothers me often is companies Obviously they're obsessed with their business,

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>with their product, with their growth, but your people, for

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies are what's producing all of that.

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>And the whole hypothesis of scaling people is you want

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>great results, this is the investment you make because in

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the long term, that's what's going to produce them. What

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>are use though, The biggest mistake that people kind of make.

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>There are two things that I think often happen. One

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is thinking you need everyone to like you and you're

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>not your team's best friend. I'm sorry. And the other

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is not you need to manage different people differently. And

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people take the Golden rule. Well,

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to manage people the way I like to

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>be managed. But guess what, they're different than you. It's

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>like the opposite of the Golden rule. What motivates them,

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>what kind of challenge? How do they take feedback? You

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>need to be studying your team and yourself to understand

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>how to adapt and adjust. And I actually think it's

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>very doable. But maybe the third mistake is not taking

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the time to do it well. It's interesting too, And

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I think about as you were helping Stripe, as you

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>were working at Google, right, building out these incredible companies, right,

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>but at some point it's probably crazy. You're running after

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>a million different things. The last thing you're like, all right,

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>what is Joe need or what is Jay need? In

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of an employee? But it's really important, it is.

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>It is at the end of I think the longest

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>chapter in the book is about hiring. Yeah, and at

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of the chapter, I found myself because it's true.

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I've been in very high growth environments. I've been part

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of building to you know, arguably pretty definitional companies Google

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly and Stripe we hope to be. And at the

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>end of the chapter, I found myself writing, if you've

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>gotten to this point, you probably think I'm insane for

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>recommending all of these things that you need to build

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and want to build into your hiring and your onboarding process.

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 1>And it's very tactical. They're they're like specific steps, right,

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>and how to interview and teach interviewing. I said, but

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you believe talent is everything you know,

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 1>or that hiring is everything, then talent is everything and

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you're hiring has to reflect that. Well. It's interesting because

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 1>I do feel like in part of the narrative, the

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>corporate narratives, certainly coming off the pandemic right, certainly coming

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>off of George Floyd and everything, it's people, you all matter,

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>and so on and so forth, and you know, the

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>working from home, do what you need to do. But

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I do feel like I wonder if the narrative, maybe

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the narratives there, but the actions aren't. And what are

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you seeing or what do you think does it just

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 1>does something change? Here's what I worry about in that,

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>which is there seems to be something soft in saying

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>people investment or people matter, when in fact, I think

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the best places, the best managers and leaders have very

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>high standards but also deep devotion. Right, It's the marriage

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of the caring and the expectations. And I worry people

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>were like, well, we've got to just take our foot

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:48.719
<v Speaker 1>off the gas, because yeah, there was a pandemic. Terrible

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>things have happened in this country and around the world,

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and it is very hard and people are tired. But

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we want to be inspired. We want

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to be inspired by where we work and the people

0:24:58.080 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>we work with. And if you don't have a high

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>standard coupled with that empathy and that devotion and that investment,

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you're not doing your job and you're not going to

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>get the results. All right, So, because you're here and

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you have this incredible background, I only have a couple

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of minutes left, So you have to promise you if

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you're going to come back, because I would talk to you,

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But tell me about some of the interesting trends that

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>are going on. We're talking so much about aim what

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is it that you find it you're at Google, I

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>mean the Moon's like, you know, there's just so much stuff.

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 1>What is it that you find interesting? I love working

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>with founders, and I love all of the new things

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that are happening. You're absolutely right, it's you just turn

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>around and there's an exciting project happening in any lots

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of companies of all sizes. I think AI is real.

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>It is incredibly innovative. But what's really interesting about it

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to me is it's less of a technology that is

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>like there's one or two winners, Yeah, kind of a thing, right,

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>like an Android and an Apple. Right. This is much

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>more fragmented and dispersed, and it's very accessible to a

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of different companies. It'll be very interesting to see

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>how pele how companies sort of innovate around AI as

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 1>part of their core business. And I think a lot

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>of the best companies will Is it a conversation you

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>guys are having about I think every company. I'm on

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 1>bunch of boards too. I'm on the board of HubSpot,

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 1>every company is having that conversation. Really really fascinating. I

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>have a million more questions working from home, is it

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>here going to go away. I think some version of

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>it is here, but it means you have to be

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in person on some regular basis. In my opinion, that's

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Claire Hugh's Johnson Corporate Officer and Adviser to stripe. Her

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>new book just out. It's called Scaling People, Tactics for

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Management and Company Building. So Claire is scaling people, while

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>our next guest is helping to scale up The Everyday Feminist.

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>As we marked International Women's Day this past Wednesday, Latania

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>map Fret is the President CEO of Global Fund for Women.

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>She's a former executive director of Planned Parenthood Global and

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 1>UNICEF Human Rights officer who also spent a decade with

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the United States Agency for International Development. Patania's new book,

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 1>entitled The Everyday Feminist, The Key to Sustainable Social Impact,

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>driving movements we need now more than ever. It came

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>out on International Women's Day, which he joined me and

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Market Senior editor Mike Reagan to talk about her

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>organization's work. Global Fund for Women has been around for

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>about thirty five years, and it started with the concept

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that we should just fund women period. That's, you know,

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 1>because because because there's so many different reasons why we

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>need it to do that. And back then, honestly, thirty

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>five years ago, it seemed a little bit groundbreaking that

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>you should fund a woman to do the business of

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>supporting the community. We're so we're talking about the mid eighties, right, yeah, yeah,

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>about eighty seven, So it was very difficult to get

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>funds to women, particularly in the international setting. I mean,

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>but Stevens still, you know, we're struggling with so much

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of this. But it is just women who don't fit

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a scenario. And we have some real biases in our

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 1>cultures and our communities around women who are doing just

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>everything but yet are undervalued, overlooked, and when it comes

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to getting them resources, people just feel uncomfortable just giving

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>them money to do these things that are quite entrepreneurial, innovative. Okay,

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>so let me just start with some of the you know,

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 1>then one of the first grants from Global Fund for

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Women went to Lima Goobowie and Lima Goobowie, as many

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of you know, Pray the Devil back from the Disney documentary,

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>actually just was a woman who wanted to want it

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>peace in her country after three civil wars. She was

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>tired of the actual table of peacemakers being all men,

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>she thought, and she felt seriously about the fact that

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should have some women at that table and

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>women that are living these real experiences that are going

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>on in Liberia. So Global Fund for Womber gave her

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>ten million dollars I'm sorry, ten thousand. Ratchet that back

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand, very different. Probably felt like it's a business show.

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So ten thousand dollars, I mean, of course they did.

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And she didn't have an organization, she wasn't registered, you know,

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>she didn't have a bank account. We gave her ten

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand to get buses to take women from Liberia to

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a cross to Ghana, to chain themselves around a building

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>where they were holding peace talks with all these men,

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>both the opposition and the government and other actors, international actors,

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and they would not let them come out until they

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>had a peace accord signed. And that's what they did.

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's the kind of money we're talking about. The

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Global Fund for Women does. And this is this long

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>term social change that we keep talking about that is

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>so valuable, but yet that we don't get behind, you know.

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>And so that's because we talk too much and we

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>don't actually put the money to what a rhetoric. It's

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sort of cultural understanding of what women

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>should do and what they should ask for when they

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>do it, and maybe they should just be able to

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>do it without asking, you know. So it's this kind

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of thinking that really is the emphasis behind The Everyday Feminist.

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>That's Latonia map Fret, Presidency of Global Fund for Women.

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>More from her conversation is coming up, including her response

0:29:56.560 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to the backlash against critical gender equality initiatives. You're listening

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg. You're listening to

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Tim Stenevec from

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. All right, so let's get back to our

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Latania map Fret. She's the Presidency of Global

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Fund for Women, which provides feminist funding for grassroots organizations

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Her new book, The Everyday Feminist, The

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Key to Sustainable Social Impact, driving movements we need now

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>more than ever. Latani joined Bloomberg Market Senior editor Mike

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Reagan and me and shared that almost anyone can contribute

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to the cause. These are ordinary women. I mean, of course,

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we love the jscentas and the Kamalas of the world.

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Who are you stepping up in amazing ways and breaking

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the glass ceiling. But don't forget about the women who

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:54.080
<v Speaker 1>are the headed at bta's, the nurses who are taking

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>care of your elderly parents and pushing back. What's different

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>about feminism outside the US versus like a developed country.

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So well, let me just say, I think that the

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>word has gotten to be so um taken out of context.

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, I mean feminist. You know, these are

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>people who believe that many women are equal and should

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to proceed likewise in our culture. But there

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is um, you know, there's a sort of background to feminism,

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>especially in the North, the global North. I mean, my

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>grandmother when I was a little told me she is

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>no feminist. That's white, rich women who have time to

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>think about gender all day. But yet in the book

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll see she's probably one of the biggest feminist I

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>know who stand out when women are you know, need

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to be stood up for um. And so I think

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the you know, there's this new renaissance among feminisms. So

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the word can now be used and business, It can

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>be used in sports, it can be used in our homes,

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in ways that I think we're just now getting again

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.479
<v Speaker 1>to get acquainted with the word. So I'm happy about that.

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So do we let the guy speak or Okay, go ahead, Mike,

0:31:55.880 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry with you. I was gonna say, I have

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>three daughters, so I'm very familiar with funding women. I

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>guess we'll give them. But let's tell you, you know

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't help, but worry about this backlash that's going

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>on politically to UH inclusion diversity programs among some of

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the far right politicians out there, is that affecting the

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Global Fund at all or is actually invigorating donations and

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of the enthusiasm for it. Well, let me just

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>start with I do get a little worried. I just

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>saw OECD data. You know, so this is the money

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that's coming from mainly Global North countries and the assistance

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that they give into UM Global South spaces. UM week

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>track that every year there's a report that comes out

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>on gender equality UM. In twenty twenty one, we started

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing a backlash. So the report has not come out

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>for twenty twenty two, of course, but we saw the

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>numbers actually decline when in other spaces of grant making,

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 1>charity and other um, you know, things had gone up.

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>It was the COVID area, of course, and it was

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>also a time when women were experiencing more violence at

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>home than they did it anytime. So yet the money

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:11.479
<v Speaker 1>going directly to grassroots groups women's groups was actually lower.

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>So I am a little bit worried about those numbers.

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'll start there, but I'll say for Global Fund

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>for Women, we are constantly in conversation with and building

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>new ways of getting money to local organizations around the world,

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and in particularly these women's groups that are doing this work.

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>So we start partnering with where at the Resilience Fund,

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>which is a group of fashion industry. It's the guccies,

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the Amazons, the gaps, h and ms and so

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>forth and starting, and I shouldn't be naming them, I'm sure.

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, too late, it's too late, right, it's out there.

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:48.160
<v Speaker 1>But they're actually they're working with women's funds to fund women,

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>trust women, to let them do work in the factories

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>where they work, to make sure that their rights are met.

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a new way of thinking about it, and I'm

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>excited about that piece of it. So even if the

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>total money is going downs, we're getting money to let

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 1>women do what they do best in their countries, in

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 1>their sectors, in the way that makes sense. That's Latanya

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 1>map Fret, President CEO of Global Fund for Women, her

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.720
<v Speaker 1>new book, The Everyday Feminist, The Key to sustainable social

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 1>impact driving movements we need now more than ever. Bloomberg's

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>micree Can sticking around for a next segment that reps

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>up the first hour of the weekend edition of Bloomberg

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. Ahead. In our next hour,

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we take look the global travel business with the CEO

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of Priceline, Brett Keller. Plus Ferrari's first ever suv, although

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>they kind of refuse to call it that. You'll hear

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>more on that in a moment. And we've got to

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>look at Google scramble to catch up on AI. We're

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>talking a code red kind of scramble. They are just

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>so terrified of being leap fraud in a field that

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>they really helped to lay the foundation for when it

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.359
<v Speaker 1>comes to generative AI. This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser. Stay with us. Today's top stories and global

0:34:55.440 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>business headlines are coming up right now. This is Bloomberg

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Business Week inside from the reporters and editors who bring

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you America's most trusted business magazine, plus global business, finance

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 1>and tech news as it happened Sloomberg Business Week with

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Tim Stenebec on Bloomberg Radio plenty head

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in our second hour of the weekend edition of Bloomberg

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Business Week, including Priceline CEO on travelers running off to

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:28.240
<v Speaker 1>catch planes and travel deals, We're jumping on the Pony

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Express aka Ferrari's suv, the first they've ever made, and

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>who is in the market for those global multimillion dollar homes.

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>First up this hour, though Google's plan to chat GPT

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the open AI chatbot is all the rage, And with

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that we turned to the technology section of the new

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:49.240
<v Speaker 1>issue of Bloomberg Business Week and a story that opens

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>up with the following line. Artificial intelligence was supposed to

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>be Google's thing, and yet we have spent a lot

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of the last few weeks talking about Microsoft's narrative changing

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and ipop ten billion dollar investment into chat GPT. So

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>why does a tech titan that's been involved in AI

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 1>for years now appear to be behind the curve. With

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>more on that, Bloomberg Market Senior Editor Mike Reagan, and

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I turned to Julia Love, Bloomberg News tech reporter, who

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 1>co wrote the piece with Davy Alba. Julia joins us

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>along with the editor of the magazine, Joel Weber and

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>BusinessWeek Technology editor Joshua Brustin. AI has been a long

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>running theme of Silicon Valley coverage for quite some time,

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>and throughout the newsroom. You know, we saw Google as

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the companies that was pretty far ahead. It

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>had a reputation for building you know, products like the

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 1>like the Auto Complete and emails, just building it kind

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of into everything. But I think everyone was a little

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:53.320
<v Speaker 1>bit stunned by just the reaction to chat GPT sort

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 1>of how much it showed a glimpse at what could

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>be the future and how much it seems to change everything.

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>And so we set out to see, like, well Google,

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.839
<v Speaker 1>who did not get who suddenly doesn't seem like they're

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>far out ahead? Like how were they reacting? And Julia

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and Davey found that they were reacting pretty pretty significantly.

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>On the stands. Julia, come on in give us some

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>color about what was going on at Google. Sure, so

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>it's really a fascinating moment at Google because they are

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>just so terrified of being leap fraud in a field

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>that they really helped to lay the foundation for when

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes to generative AI. And so we learned through

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>sources that the company's senior leadership has issued a directive

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that all the company's most important products must incorporate generative

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 1>AI in the coming months. We have also heard that

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>CEO assumed our Pachai is getting his hands dirty and

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>diving into minute details of product development. That's the type

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of work that normally would be handled three or four

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>layers below him in the organization. And you know, in general,

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>employees feel like working on generative AI is something that

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 1>can you know, raise their profile within the organization. But

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>there's also a lot of anxiety in the company right now.

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:12.799
<v Speaker 1>They just really don't want to fall behind what I

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 1>was interested in among other things. Here is just the

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>tension within the company. So, Julie, what'd you learn as

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you reported? You know, what, what are people comparing this too?

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:28.399
<v Speaker 1>People outside of the company are worried that this experience,

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the declaration of the code read risks repeating doodal,

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>plus the ill fated social networks that some of you

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>we do circles. Oh, I forgot about that, you know.

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>It's it's the parallel that people see is that normally

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>doodle is a pretty um, you know, bottom up place.

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Employees and different teams have a lot of freedom to

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of chart their own course. But goodal

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 1>plus was one of the last time so that Panie

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>said every product must have a social component, and it

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't turn out well. So some faults now that seeing

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the company do something similar with this generative AI code

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 1>read are worried about seeing history repeat itself. What was

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing that you learned while you were working

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 1>on this, Julia. I think for me, you know, we

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>had been hearing a lot about the code read, but

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we had imagined we'd envisioned into something that was really

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 1>impacting the artificial intelligence researchers, the search team. What are

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 1>reporting over the past few weeks showed me was that

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>this is something that is on every single doodler's mind

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 1>and that for many people, more and more people is

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>starting to influence their workflow. Joshua, come on back in here.

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Google not alone to be fair me. Meta has also

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:51.319
<v Speaker 1>been scrambling salesforce VC. They're putting some money. I mean,

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody is kind of figuring out where they need to

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>be in this. Is that a fair assessment? Oh yeah,

0:39:57.160 --> 0:40:00.239
<v Speaker 1>we're in like full on Silicon Valley hypes. I goal

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>right now. I feel like overnight all of our inboxes,

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 1>which had been filled with pitches for blockchain companies, just

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 1>seamlessly switched to chatbot companies. Everyone's trying to figure out,

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>like where you know, where there space is in it.

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>One little tidbit in this piece, which I think will

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>hopefully be grispher for further reporting down the road, is

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 1>that the company formerly known as Facebook, which you might

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 1>remember changed its name because the metaverse was everything, is

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>apparently now focused increasingly on this kind of AI and

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:34.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe like eyes wandering away from the metaverse a bit.

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's definitely a thing that you know, everyone is

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking is existential now AI verse get ready? I mean

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to be real here, like that what Google has already

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is an incredible product that has dominated for decades metaverse definitely,

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you know nascent. Let's say everybody uses Google, not everybody

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:59.359
<v Speaker 1>uses meta for Google. Here, I think that the risk

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 1>becomes like could do they mess it up along the way?

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And what kind of reality? Uh? And what kind of

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:09.479
<v Speaker 1>conversations are happening within the company about about that tension. Yeah,

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, Doodal executives have said over and over again

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that they take very response, very seriously the responsibility that

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 1>they have as the world's tea provider of information. You know,

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:26.280
<v Speaker 1>these large language models frequently hallucinate, meaning they will deliver

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>incorrect information with conviction. And while chat GPT might be

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 1>able to get away with that and sort of a

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>new final final product that we're all playing around with

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the states, they're much higher when it's Toodal and also

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:47.799
<v Speaker 1>not even just hallucinate. You know, their stories when being

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>introduced a beta version of its new chat bot. You know,

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:54.879
<v Speaker 1>there's a New York Times reporter who had a very

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 1>alarming exchange with the chat bot where the chatbot tried

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:02.399
<v Speaker 1>to convince him to leave us, fall in love, fall

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>in love, and leave his wife. So it seems to

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>me like we're almost and you know, the backlash stage

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to the new technologies is hitting before it's even off

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the ground. You know, there is there a risk there,

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 1>do you think, I mean, is there any concern at

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>least about a risk that everyone's moving too fast with

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 1>this technology? Yes? You know it's funny. I did speak

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>with one former Doodler who told me that he was

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit surprised that Doodle sort of put its

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 1>foot to the gas after this um announcement of chat

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 1>gpt UM. He said that he felt like if the

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:38.799
<v Speaker 1>company had just waited a few weeks around months that

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, being Church would have self emolated in his words,

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think that, yeah, Goodle had been acting cautiously

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and Natasha's approach me maybe the wise one in the

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:56.720
<v Speaker 1>long run. Josh I thought the way that the story

0:42:56.960 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 1>ends was also really poignant though, because bringing the Xerox reference. Yeah, so,

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>for those who don't know, Xerox Park was a research

0:43:09.520 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 1>lab that did a lot of the foundational research that

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:16.880
<v Speaker 1>led to the creation of what we think of as

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the modern PC, the sort of graphical interfaces, the mouse,

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and they had this, They had a lot of this stuff.

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>It was being shown in demos some people who came

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to look at it. Steve Jobs, Microsoft and those two companies,

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:39.400
<v Speaker 1>which are each now worth a trillion dollars, really built

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>something out of that in Xerox Park, which less to say,

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 1>is not worth a trillion dollars, did not commercialize and

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, Google does have something of a reputation of

0:43:50.680 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 1>being better at the early stages of tech developments than

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the final polished products, and I think it's something that

0:43:57.360 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>people at Google are somewhat self conscious about and aware of,

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:02.479
<v Speaker 1>and they really don't want to be the Xerox Park

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of AI chatbots. Well, you know what I find fascinating

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is we keep calling this company Google when, as we

0:44:08.719 --> 0:44:11.400
<v Speaker 1>all know, they changed their name several years ago to Alphabet,

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 1>which was meant to reflect all those other investments they

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 1>were making besides the search engine. So Chilia, that seemed

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 1>like a very sort of unfocused, scattershot strategy to sort

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:26.359
<v Speaker 1>of invest in a million different projects in a lot

0:44:26.400 --> 0:44:30.239
<v Speaker 1>of different areas. Does this feel like that they're getting

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 1>away from that and kind of focusing now more strictly

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 1>on AI. Yes, you know, I think that AI is

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 1>something that is present across the Alphabet portfolio. Certainly Waymo

0:44:43.400 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the self driving car unit as a different expression of

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:51.319
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence. But nevertheless, the two adds still make up

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 1>something like eighty percent of alphabets revenue. And so I think,

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:01.719
<v Speaker 1>especially in these past financial times, there is a recognition

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in the company that this is our bread and butter,

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:07.239
<v Speaker 1>and we need to make sure that we don't know

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>squander any momentum in this race. You know the self

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of the lifeblood of the company. Our thanks to Julia Love,

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News Tech reporter, Bloomberg BusinessWeek Technology editor Joshua Breustein,

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and the editor of Bloomberg BusinessWeek Magazine Joel Webber. Bloomberg's

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:24.360
<v Speaker 1>might reek in with us as well. You're listening to

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Up next, well Spring is near right.

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>You can feel that at travelers they are definitely looking

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to hit the road. Families are really prioritizing travel this year,

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>more so than last year, and most of them are

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 1>heading to beaches and resort destinations. So if you want

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to go to one of those destinations, you can expect

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to find a lot of people traveling. Priceline CEO Brett

0:45:46.719 --> 0:46:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Keller is up next. This is Bloomberg. Please see is

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Tim Stenovic from

0:46:04.760 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio shares The booking holdings are up more than

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:12.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent so far this year. The company recently

0:46:12.239 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 1>gave an earnings update that was last week, beating both

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:18.240
<v Speaker 1>on the top and bottom lines among the online travel

0:46:18.280 --> 0:46:21.920
<v Speaker 1>companies brands price Line. Priceline CEO Brett Keller has been

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:24.399
<v Speaker 1>with the company for more than twenty years. He joined

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:26.800
<v Speaker 1>me and Bloomberg's just met and with a positive outlook

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:30.280
<v Speaker 1>for a Priceline and the broader industry. Things are actually

0:46:30.400 --> 0:46:33.880
<v Speaker 1>very good if you're in travel right now. Obviously a

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 1>very tough you know, twenty twenty and twenty twenty one,

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two started to show some really nice signs,

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and for the last couple of quarters, the consumer has

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:46.440
<v Speaker 1>really demonstrated that they're prioritizing travel right now. And if

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earlier, you know, we recently came out with

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:53.360
<v Speaker 1>our fourth quarter results and it's showing real strength across

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 1>especially across the US, but really across all markets around

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the world. And I'm really excited with Spring coming up,

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Carol and Brett, I was curious about what does the

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 1>travel demand look like as we head into spring. Should

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:08.640
<v Speaker 1>we expect this strength to continue? I mean, when I

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:10.879
<v Speaker 1>think back to the holiday travel, there was a little

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:12.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of chaos when you thought about the airlines and

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 1>some of that in the bookings. But what are you

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:19.000
<v Speaker 1>expecting for spring travel right now? Sure? Well, consumers have

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially kind of fallen back into their typical booking patterns,

0:47:23.200 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 1>meaning they're traveling on the busiest days of the year,

0:47:25.960 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 1>so they're going to pack those spring break weeks, especially

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:33.399
<v Speaker 1>families when children have time off from school. Families are

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>really prioritizing travel this year more so than last year,

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and most of them are heading to beaches and resort destinations.

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:43.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to go to one of those destinations,

0:47:43.400 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you can expect to find a lot of people traveling.

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the airlines have largely recovered and are operating

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:53.759
<v Speaker 1>at a pretty good scale now, but they still have

0:47:53.960 --> 0:47:56.759
<v Speaker 1>limited capacity, which means planes will be very, very full.

0:47:56.800 --> 0:48:00.839
<v Speaker 1>There's not really any slack in thatstry at this time.

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Gotta say, bright, you know, I get that. You know,

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:04.680
<v Speaker 1>if you try to book a flight right now for

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:07.919
<v Speaker 1>business or otherwise, Man, those flights are expensive. We're still

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, blown away by how expensive it is.

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Does that continue? Because I'm thinking about the inflationary side

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of this story. What do you see in terms of

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:21.439
<v Speaker 1>costs for flights for lodging, How is it playing out? Sure?

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:23.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we look at forward bookings at the

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:26.839
<v Speaker 1>spring break time frame, which is really you know, most

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of March in April. What we're seeing as flight prices

0:48:30.440 --> 0:48:33.440
<v Speaker 1>are up about twenty five percent over last year, so

0:48:33.880 --> 0:48:36.080
<v Speaker 1>very expensive. If you're trying to travel overseas, which a

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are now heading out to Europe, you're

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:41.480
<v Speaker 1>going to see prices up to forty percent over what

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you would be what you were paying last year. On

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the hotel side, not so challenging. Hotel prices are about

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:51.840
<v Speaker 1>four or five percent, so a little easier to consume those.

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:54.359
<v Speaker 1>But on the if you try to fly, you're going

0:48:54.400 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 1>to pay a lot of money. So I think you'll

0:48:55.719 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 1>see quite a few consumers in the US choosing to

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:04.160
<v Speaker 1>drive fly and they'll get to their hotel destination that way.

0:49:04.560 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>But it's a lot to consume right now, and consumers

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>so far are inhaling those prices. We haven't seen either

0:49:11.160 --> 0:49:14.799
<v Speaker 1>the hotel industry or the airlines really pull back on

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:16.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of their price increases, and so as long

0:49:16.920 --> 0:49:19.759
<v Speaker 1>as demand is there, we can expect those prices to

0:49:19.760 --> 0:49:23.400
<v Speaker 1>stay rather high. Right any sign that capacity increased capacity

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:25.520
<v Speaker 1>comes into the airline industry, I mean, they've gotten so

0:49:25.600 --> 0:49:29.120
<v Speaker 1>smart at taking out excess capacity that was pre pandemic.

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:30.759
<v Speaker 1>We saw that in a big way. They're great about

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:33.279
<v Speaker 1>charging for everything once you get on a flight, or

0:49:33.320 --> 0:49:35.719
<v Speaker 1>even on your way to that flight. Is there any

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:37.920
<v Speaker 1>signs or any indications that you're hearing that we get

0:49:37.920 --> 0:49:41.239
<v Speaker 1>an increase in airline capacity. Well, I think there's some

0:49:41.320 --> 0:49:43.239
<v Speaker 1>early signs. I know all of the airlines would love

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to build up capacity. What they've been challenged with, of course,

0:49:47.600 --> 0:49:50.759
<v Speaker 1>is hiring enough pilots and staff and ground crew to

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:56.279
<v Speaker 1>support the oncoming flow of equipment. There've been a number

0:49:56.280 --> 0:49:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of new orders put in for planes, and so I

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:00.719
<v Speaker 1>think over the next couple of ye years we'll see

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that start to ease. But you know, getting us through

0:50:03.440 --> 0:50:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the summer, I think what we have today on the

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:08.920
<v Speaker 1>market is pretty much what we're living with, which means

0:50:09.320 --> 0:50:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a very stressed environment when it comes to uh, you know,

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:16.880
<v Speaker 1>finding an airline ticket that is reasonably priced to a

0:50:16.920 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 1>great destination. There are still deals to be found. You

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:24.560
<v Speaker 1>can still find reasonable locations to travel to, but you

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:27.440
<v Speaker 1>might have to be flexible if money is a really

0:50:27.480 --> 0:50:30.600
<v Speaker 1>tight concern for you right now, Britt, Where exactly are

0:50:30.640 --> 0:50:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the most affordable deals for spring break, whether it's to

0:50:34.320 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the US or maybe even internationally. Sure, you know, if

0:50:38.000 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're looking for a nice, warm beach destination

0:50:42.160 --> 0:50:46.200
<v Speaker 1>for Lauderdale, always a good option Myrtle Beach, you know,

0:50:46.280 --> 0:50:49.760
<v Speaker 1>not not the Miami Beach, but provide the same type

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:53.879
<v Speaker 1>of experience in some ways, especially for families. Puerto Rico

0:50:54.120 --> 0:50:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is very popular right now. Obviously Dominican REPUBLICANMAKA. So the

0:50:57.239 --> 0:51:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Caribbean continues to be a reasonably affordable place to go overseas.

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:04.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you're trying to travel to the big

0:51:04.719 --> 0:51:07.799
<v Speaker 1>cities like London and Paris, you're going to pay. If

0:51:07.840 --> 0:51:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you are a little bit flexible and I want to

0:51:09.640 --> 0:51:13.760
<v Speaker 1>try something new, you can try something like Lisbon, Athens, Munich,

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:18.719
<v Speaker 1>even Naples. You know, those destinations. You'll pay maybe a

0:51:18.840 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 1>touch less on the flight, but you're really going to

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 1>say when it comes to your hotel and the average

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:24.520
<v Speaker 1>price you're going to pay there as well as it's

0:51:24.520 --> 0:51:26.360
<v Speaker 1>just a little cheaper to travel in some of those markets,

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:30.680
<v Speaker 1>especially in Greece. A beautiful destination and much more reasonable

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:33.480
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the daily expenses for a consumer.

0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Sign me up, We're ready. Hey listen, Brett. What I

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:38.720
<v Speaker 1>do wonder too, is the window that you guys see globally.

0:51:38.880 --> 0:51:41.239
<v Speaker 1>What are you seeing globally in terms of where there's

0:51:41.280 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 1>lots of activity travel wise? Is it mostly Is it

0:51:44.080 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 1>largely the US? I know here in New York City,

0:51:46.360 --> 0:51:47.960
<v Speaker 1>as I walk the streets of New York, I'm seeing

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot more international travelers back on the streets. Yeah.

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:56.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, the US recovered first, and that was mostly

0:51:56.360 --> 0:52:00.640
<v Speaker 1>due to domestic travel. The US borders opened up a

0:52:00.640 --> 0:52:02.840
<v Speaker 1>little sooner than some of the European boards, and especially

0:52:02.880 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the Asian borders, and so we saw a number of

0:52:05.080 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 1>international travelers begin to pour into the US. But Europe

0:52:09.719 --> 0:52:12.680
<v Speaker 1>came back very strong in twenty twenty two and is

0:52:12.719 --> 0:52:15.319
<v Speaker 1>now moving at a very fast pace and catching up

0:52:15.360 --> 0:52:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to the US. Asia was the longest, they took the

0:52:18.680 --> 0:52:21.600
<v Speaker 1>longest coming out of COVID to really start to recover,

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:25.160
<v Speaker 1>But they are now ramping up very very quickly, and

0:52:25.200 --> 0:52:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think in some countries we're seeing demand outpacing two nineteen.

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Because the travel was so constrained for so long, people

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:37.239
<v Speaker 1>are just desperate to go out and take vacations, visit

0:52:37.280 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 1>friends and family, and just see the world. Something else

0:52:41.160 --> 0:52:43.239
<v Speaker 1>I thought was interesting in a survey that y'all had

0:52:43.400 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 1>was looking at how spring breakers are basically split between

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:50.440
<v Speaker 1>going someplace new versus returning to a favorite destination. Why

0:52:50.480 --> 0:52:55.040
<v Speaker 1>do you think that is? Well, you know, travel is

0:52:55.080 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that if you've had a great experience,

0:52:58.080 --> 0:53:00.759
<v Speaker 1>you want to repeat it. And a lot of consumers,

0:53:00.760 --> 0:53:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, when they find a favorite hotel or a

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:04.879
<v Speaker 1>favorite location, they know they can bank on that head

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:06.239
<v Speaker 1>and count on that and if they can get the

0:53:06.280 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 1>price that they want, they're going to return to that destination.

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 1>We see that a lot with Priceline customers, right they

0:53:11.520 --> 0:53:13.920
<v Speaker 1>come back and repeat and stay many times at the

0:53:13.960 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 1>same hotel. And I think that's just you know, when

0:53:17.120 --> 0:53:20.239
<v Speaker 1>you've had a poor travel experience, it just reminds you

0:53:20.480 --> 0:53:22.279
<v Speaker 1>how much you love the good ones. And so I

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:23.680
<v Speaker 1>think people are just a little bit of a creature

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:25.239
<v Speaker 1>of habit there you're going to return to where you

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:27.919
<v Speaker 1>where you feel most comfortable, you know the area, etc.

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:30.320
<v Speaker 1>But there's always a mix of people who want to

0:53:30.320 --> 0:53:33.239
<v Speaker 1>try something new every time they head out. And with

0:53:33.280 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the world now really opening up, I think it's much

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:38.759
<v Speaker 1>more possible to do that now, you know. The UN

0:53:38.840 --> 0:53:41.640
<v Speaker 1>World Tourism Organization came out with a stat that said

0:53:42.000 --> 0:53:45.040
<v Speaker 1>over nine hundred million tourists traveled in twenty twenty two.

0:53:45.280 --> 0:53:47.600
<v Speaker 1>That's still only sixty three percent of where we were

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen. But this year that number could get

0:53:50.960 --> 0:53:53.400
<v Speaker 1>as high as ninety five percent, so almost back to

0:53:53.480 --> 0:53:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a fully worldwide travel recovery. I gotta tell you, I'm

0:53:56.600 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>one of those people. There's a few places I know,

0:53:59.160 --> 0:54:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I know, I'm gonna love it, and I go back. Hey, listen,

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Brett just got about twenty five seconds here. Lots of

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:08.880
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical concerns. Doctor's remindus were still not over COVID completely.

0:54:08.920 --> 0:54:11.120
<v Speaker 1>What is it that you worry about most when you

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:14.320
<v Speaker 1>look at the outlook? You know, I think our primary

0:54:14.320 --> 0:54:19.320
<v Speaker 1>concern obviously is the longstanding impact of inflation on consumer's wallet.

0:54:19.360 --> 0:54:21.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that really is the primary concern now. I

0:54:21.840 --> 0:54:25.680
<v Speaker 1>think consumers are largely over concerns about health as they travel,

0:54:25.719 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's now really more about the pocketbook. And you know,

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what we do here at Priceline. We try to

0:54:29.560 --> 0:54:30.919
<v Speaker 1>help you get a great deal and get you where

0:54:30.960 --> 0:54:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to go. That was Priceline CEO Brett Keller,

0:54:33.239 --> 0:54:36.759
<v Speaker 1>along with Bloomberg's jessmenton still to come on. Bloomberg Business Week,

0:54:37.000 --> 0:54:39.520
<v Speaker 1>we speak with someone who's always on the move. We're

0:54:39.560 --> 0:54:43.279
<v Speaker 1>talking about Bloomberg Pursuits autocolumnist Hannah Elliott. She's back from

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the snowy mountains of Italy to share her drive with

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a Ferrari first an suv. It really did drive like

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:53.239
<v Speaker 1>a Ferrari. It has the signature V twelve engine, It

0:54:53.400 --> 0:54:56.640
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a Ferrari, and they were very proud to

0:54:56.719 --> 0:54:59.919
<v Speaker 1>have me drive it across snow and ice and off

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:03.160
<v Speaker 1>rote terrain. So it is an suv. Even if we

0:55:03.200 --> 0:55:06.920
<v Speaker 1>don't use that word for it, it certainly remains true

0:55:07.000 --> 0:55:15.759
<v Speaker 1>to the brand. This is Bloomberg Broadcasting from the financial

0:55:15.800 --> 0:55:19.279
<v Speaker 1>capital of the World Bloomberg eleven Rio in New York

0:55:19.400 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to Washington, d C. Bloomberg ninety nine one to Boston,

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg one O six one to San Francisco, Bloomberg nine

0:55:26.239 --> 0:55:29.440
<v Speaker 1>sixty to the country Sirius XM Chado one nineteen and

0:55:29.520 --> 0:55:32.879
<v Speaker 1>around the globe the Bloomberg Business app and Bloomberg Radio

0:55:33.000 --> 0:55:37.320
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Massier

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and Tim Stenovec from Bloomberg Radio in the Pursuit section

0:55:43.200 --> 0:55:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of the magazine. This week, our Globe trotting auto columnist

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Hannah Elliott explains that Ferrari has pretty much everything, sold out,

0:55:50.040 --> 0:55:53.600
<v Speaker 1>order books and records, sales last year, margins the key

0:55:53.680 --> 0:55:57.360
<v Speaker 1>rivals such as Porsche and Mercedes Benz can't touch, and

0:55:57.560 --> 0:56:02.239
<v Speaker 1>even a line of what she calls quote rioting hybrid supercars.

0:56:02.239 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 1>The one thing the Italian automaker never had done, Da

0:56:04.719 --> 0:56:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Da da an suv. That is until now. Ferrari's preparing

0:56:09.280 --> 0:56:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to release a four hundred thousand dollars model that it

0:56:11.640 --> 0:56:14.560
<v Speaker 1>previously swore it would never never make. Let's bring in

0:56:14.560 --> 0:56:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Hannah and Bloomberg Pursuits editor Chris Rouser to tell us

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:19.759
<v Speaker 1>about it. Chris, Ferrari and an suv. They said it

0:56:19.760 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 1>would never happen, never, never, never, and yet we have it. Yes,

0:56:23.320 --> 0:56:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Hannah and I have been doing this a

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:28.520
<v Speaker 1>long time, and they have told Bloomberg that they're not

0:56:28.520 --> 0:56:31.240
<v Speaker 1>going to make an suv. And then you know, Aston

0:56:31.320 --> 0:56:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Martin made one, Lamborghini most importantly made one, Rolls Royce

0:56:36.440 --> 0:56:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Bentley and the pressure was just on and the margins

0:56:39.239 --> 0:56:42.239
<v Speaker 1>were just the profits were just possibly too high, so

0:56:42.280 --> 0:56:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that they finally caved. And of course, when it came

0:56:44.920 --> 0:56:46.840
<v Speaker 1>time to test drive it. We wanted to send Hannah.

0:56:47.040 --> 0:56:48.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, so Hannah tell us about it? Were you

0:56:48.719 --> 0:56:52.239
<v Speaker 1>crazy about it? I really liked it. I have to

0:56:52.320 --> 0:56:55.880
<v Speaker 1>say I didn't really know what to expect. This is

0:56:55.880 --> 0:56:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the first. Not only is this the first SUV Ferrari's

0:56:59.080 --> 0:57:02.120
<v Speaker 1>ever made, it's the first four door vehicle period it's

0:57:02.120 --> 0:57:05.480
<v Speaker 1>ever made. So I wasn't quite sure what to expect,

0:57:05.480 --> 0:57:08.440
<v Speaker 1>but I have to say I was pleasantly surprised. Ferrari

0:57:08.560 --> 0:57:11.880
<v Speaker 1>has done a couple other four seat vehicles before, the

0:57:11.960 --> 0:57:16.400
<v Speaker 1>GTCS Forloso and the FF, and this kind of looks

0:57:16.520 --> 0:57:18.960
<v Speaker 1>like those, maybe blown up a bit. I think I

0:57:19.040 --> 0:57:21.520
<v Speaker 1>was happy with the looks. And of course it really

0:57:21.560 --> 0:57:24.360
<v Speaker 1>did drive like a Ferrari. It has the signature V

0:57:24.520 --> 0:57:29.720
<v Speaker 1>twelve engine, It sounds like a Ferrari. It certainly remains

0:57:29.760 --> 0:57:33.480
<v Speaker 1>true to the brand. We should note Ferrari does not

0:57:33.680 --> 0:57:37.000
<v Speaker 1>like to use the word suv to describe this vehicle.

0:57:37.080 --> 0:57:39.959
<v Speaker 1>They want to say it's like a sporty, agile car

0:57:40.080 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 1>with larger volumes. Sounds like an SUV to me. Yeah,

0:57:46.480 --> 0:57:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and let's not forget it does have multiple driving mode.

0:57:49.920 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 1>It's got all wheel drive, it's got a clearance that

0:57:52.800 --> 0:57:57.439
<v Speaker 1>can lift to allow for uneven terrain, and they were

0:57:57.560 --> 0:58:00.560
<v Speaker 1>very proud to have me drive it across snow and

0:58:00.640 --> 0:58:05.240
<v Speaker 1>ice and off road terrain. So it is of an suv,

0:58:05.440 --> 0:58:09.560
<v Speaker 1>even if we don't use that word for it, and

0:58:09.560 --> 0:58:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and I have to say, you're right, it's smaller than like, um,

0:58:14.280 --> 0:58:16.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the subs you might see moms driving to

0:58:17.080 --> 0:58:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the soccer game. It does have a lower roofline certainly,

0:58:22.560 --> 0:58:27.120
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, it's an suv. So okay, take us through

0:58:27.280 --> 0:58:29.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the dynamics of it and the different modes

0:58:29.960 --> 0:58:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of driving. You got wet mode, slip control, ice mode,

0:58:32.800 --> 0:58:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got comfort mode. I'm all in Orte doesn't so

0:58:37.960 --> 0:58:41.720
<v Speaker 1>tell us about this trip, you tech exactly. So one

0:58:41.760 --> 0:58:44.680
<v Speaker 1>surprise of the trip that we didn't actually anticipate because

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of weather conditions, we weren't sure if we'd be able

0:58:47.120 --> 0:58:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to do it, but we did take this. We rode

0:58:50.360 --> 0:58:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a ski lift through this high alpine snow track that

0:58:56.160 --> 0:58:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Ferrari had cut into the mountains and the alt and

0:58:59.040 --> 0:59:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the Italian album and um, we drove it on snow

0:59:02.760 --> 0:59:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was fantastic. I started out in what's called

0:59:06.640 --> 0:59:11.080
<v Speaker 1>wet mode, which is sort of a softer mode that

0:59:11.480 --> 0:59:14.720
<v Speaker 1>makes UM the suspension softer and the steering softer to

0:59:14.720 --> 0:59:18.479
<v Speaker 1>try to smooth out everything UM when you're driving, which

0:59:18.600 --> 0:59:20.919
<v Speaker 1>was great. That's something that you might use, like if

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you're driving to your ski chalet, for instance, or the

0:59:24.240 --> 0:59:26.320
<v Speaker 1>hotel where you're going to stay where you're skiing. Yeah,

0:59:26.360 --> 0:59:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Chris and I were doing that last week. Yeah, exactly,

0:59:31.800 --> 0:59:34.320
<v Speaker 1>this is this is what we all really need. UM.

0:59:34.400 --> 0:59:36.720
<v Speaker 1>And then you can switch, for instance, I switched into

0:59:36.800 --> 0:59:39.360
<v Speaker 1>ice mode, which sort of tightens everything up. It's a

0:59:39.360 --> 0:59:43.080
<v Speaker 1>lot stiffer. Um, you're going to feel the bumps and

0:59:43.120 --> 0:59:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the jolts in the road more, but it's also quicker

0:59:46.160 --> 0:59:49.120
<v Speaker 1>or make it can be potentially quicker if you're really

0:59:49.240 --> 0:59:51.880
<v Speaker 1>on it. UM and Ferrari was it great. They had

0:59:51.920 --> 0:59:55.240
<v Speaker 1>actually a professional rally driver with me in the passenger

0:59:55.320 --> 0:59:57.760
<v Speaker 1>seat who was really coaching me through the drive modes

0:59:57.800 --> 0:59:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and how to get the most out of the car.

0:59:59.640 --> 1:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's pretty incredible. It was really surreal to

1:00:03.600 --> 1:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>hear this roaring Ferrari engine that you're used to hearing,

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, on a track or or on the on

1:00:10.920 --> 1:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the freeway in California, to hear that in these alps

1:00:14.720 --> 1:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>um it was pretty it was very cool. I mean

1:00:18.600 --> 1:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>this one, this was one of the ones where I

1:00:20.040 --> 1:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>was very jealous of you have. I got to say, well,

1:00:21.960 --> 1:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>can I ask you anna? Can I just ask you?

1:00:23.800 --> 1:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Though it sounds like it was incredible, Um, but tell

1:00:27.720 --> 1:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>us about the door handle. So yeah, you know, there

1:00:31.840 --> 1:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>are a few things that we should say about the person. Yeah,

1:00:36.960 --> 1:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the door. The rear doors open and reverse. It's considered

1:00:43.000 --> 1:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a carriage style, so they open um in reverse and

1:00:46.760 --> 1:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to open them you pull a little lever thing. It's

1:00:52.840 --> 1:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a little smaller than a credit card, and it's

1:00:56.080 --> 1:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>positioned um on the pillar of the door, on the door,

1:01:02.360 --> 1:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's sort of hidden with the door pillars. It's

1:01:04.880 --> 1:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>really hard to explain. You don't even really see it, though.

1:01:07.440 --> 1:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>The intent is that when you look at the car

1:01:09.760 --> 1:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the sides, you don't you can't see any door handles.

1:01:12.120 --> 1:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>They're totally hidden. When you get close to the door,

1:01:14.880 --> 1:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>then you see this little handle that you pull and

1:01:17.920 --> 1:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it opens and closes the door. Now, the thing about

1:01:20.720 --> 1:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>those is they are sort of partially automated, which is

1:01:24.160 --> 1:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>meant to be more convenient because then it makes the

1:01:26.960 --> 1:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>door lighter to open. It'll slowly close itself, but The

1:01:30.560 --> 1:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>thing is, we're so used to just opening and closing

1:01:33.280 --> 1:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and slamming doors really quickly. It takes a little bit

1:01:36.880 --> 1:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of time to get used to this sort of partially

1:01:40.640 --> 1:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>automated door. And you can, of course override it and

1:01:44.000 --> 1:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>just push the door closed. But which is what you did, right? Yes? Yes,

1:01:49.720 --> 1:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>because I'm so impatient. You know, you just get out

1:01:51.960 --> 1:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and you just want to slam the door close it

1:01:54.280 --> 1:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>once you're sitting inside. There's a button inside that you

1:01:56.600 --> 1:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>could push that will automatically close the door. But again,

1:01:59.360 --> 1:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it takes a lot longer to sort of

1:02:01.480 --> 1:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>slowly close the door by a button rather than just

1:02:04.680 --> 1:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>yanking it shut. In comparison to the other high hand

1:02:08.920 --> 1:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>supercar SUVs that are out there, this one holds its own.

1:02:13.240 --> 1:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>This one certainly holds its own. I would say that

1:02:16.720 --> 1:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>really the key that everyone's asking about and wondering about

1:02:21.120 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is does it beat the Lamborghini Urus that was such

1:02:24.400 --> 1:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic vehicle when it first debuted, And I have

1:02:28.760 --> 1:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to say it doesn't. It's very very good, but it's

1:02:33.240 --> 1:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>also one hundred thousand dollars more than the Lamborghini suv

1:02:37.560 --> 1:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's really not any better. It's it's very good.

1:02:42.520 --> 1:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>But the Eurus it just is so striking. It's really

1:02:46.640 --> 1:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>really true to Lamborghini design heritage. It drives possibly even

1:02:52.080 --> 1:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>better than the Lamborghini. I you know, some people might

1:02:55.960 --> 1:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>hate me for saying that it's just a better value proposition.

1:03:00.000 --> 1:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>The Lamborghini is great too, but I don't think it. Sorry,

1:03:02.680 --> 1:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the Ferrari's great too, but I don't think it beats

1:03:05.000 --> 1:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the Lamborghini. All right, Well, there's no chance I'm buying

1:03:08.080 --> 1:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>either of those SUVs. Just FYI, we just have about

1:03:13.040 --> 1:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a minute lap, Chris. I just want to get to

1:03:15.080 --> 1:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>one other thing that's in pursuits. It's a fun section

1:03:18.600 --> 1:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>because I'm more likely to go to Sweden's Arctic retreat

1:03:21.280 --> 1:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>than buy one of these high end SUVs. Just quickly,

1:03:25.080 --> 1:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>just tell us about this. I mean, you may remember

1:03:27.040 --> 1:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>recently that a pilot made headlines for doing a three

1:03:29.400 --> 1:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty three turn on his flight so that

1:03:31.720 --> 1:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>his passengers could see the northern lights. And suddenly everybody

1:03:34.520 --> 1:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh my god, I gotta go see the

1:03:35.720 --> 1:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>northern lights. And you kind of think of the northern

1:03:37.880 --> 1:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>lights as like standing in a field, which I have seen,

1:03:40.320 --> 1:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>like standing in a field, having your toes freeze. Like

1:03:42.600 --> 1:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>then you're like, okay, I saw the northern lights and

1:03:44.280 --> 1:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>then you're like, all right, now I'm in Swedish Lapland,

1:03:46.840 --> 1:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>do I do? And we wanted to do a story

1:03:48.720 --> 1:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>about how much how much other stuff there is to do,

1:03:51.360 --> 1:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>what other things to see in nature, what other zany

1:03:54.480 --> 1:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>activities to do. You can go mushing, you can go

1:03:57.240 --> 1:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>ice fishing, you can do lots of different things. And

1:03:59.400 --> 1:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the Arctic tweet is this really great, really small place

1:04:03.600 --> 1:04:05.919
<v Speaker 1>in Swedish Lapland where you can go and just see

1:04:05.920 --> 1:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>amazing things and do amazing things. I have to say,

1:04:08.320 --> 1:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it just looks like so much fun. It looks like

1:04:10.000 --> 1:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you were so out in nature. And I feel like,

1:04:12.360 --> 1:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I can't afford the Ferraria suv, but

1:04:15.000 --> 1:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I can afford this. Read more, folks. It's

1:04:17.880 --> 1:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in the pursuit section, along with another also along with

1:04:22.760 --> 1:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a really fun story about a reality show. When it

1:04:25.280 --> 1:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>comes to artists, there is actually an art reality show.

1:04:29.560 --> 1:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Who knew, right, Yes, there's a reality show competition show

1:04:33.200 --> 1:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>for artists. And as you'll be shocked to know that,

1:04:35.760 --> 1:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>our famous arts writer James Army was not a fan.

1:04:39.600 --> 1:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>He no, he didn't like it. He was nutshy about that. Chris,

1:04:43.680 --> 1:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you as always, and our thanks to Hannah Elliott.

1:04:46.760 --> 1:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Always so much fun when we get to check in

1:04:48.440 --> 1:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>with you guys. The editor of Pursuits of course, Chris

1:04:50.720 --> 1:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Rouser and our unrivaled auto columnist Hannah Elliott, thank you

1:04:54.200 --> 1:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>again both for joining us. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

1:04:57.080 --> 1:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Coming up. From elite driving to elite dwellings. We look

1:04:59.440 --> 1:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>at the market seven, eight and even nine figure homes.

1:05:02.920 --> 1:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>That's next. This is Bloomberg. You're listening to Bloomberg Business

1:05:15.920 --> 1:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Tim Stenovic from Bloomberg Radio.

1:05:22.280 --> 1:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Underway a broader shift among America's ultra rich and powerful

1:05:25.400 --> 1:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in the wake of the COVID nineteen pandemic. There moves

1:05:28.440 --> 1:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>away from places such as New York's Upper East Side

1:05:30.880 --> 1:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and San Francisco's nob Hill to warmer, less dense regions

1:05:34.160 --> 1:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of Florida and Texas have lifted real estate prices in

1:05:37.120 --> 1:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>some locales while leaving other neighborhoods behind. Now, among the

1:05:41.360 --> 1:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg analysis findings, New York City falls as Florida gains

1:05:45.560 --> 1:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>in a shift of the most expensive areas to live

1:05:47.920 --> 1:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Our next guest is seeing this

1:05:50.600 --> 1:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>trend as well. Bonnie Stone Cellars is co founder and

1:05:53.360 --> 1:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>chair of Forbes Global Properties. It's a consortium of global

1:05:56.440 --> 1:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>firms and brokers that deal in luxury properties around the world.

1:06:00.000 --> 1:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Bunny stop, I'd explain what's hot, what's not, and why

1:06:03.440 --> 1:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>prices have remained high despite the fact that there's a

1:06:07.080 --> 1:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>slowdown in the volume of sales. We're seeing a shortage

1:06:11.640 --> 1:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of supply and that's bolts forring the prices. And it's

1:06:15.400 --> 1:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>true that there are new places where the top sales

1:06:19.160 --> 1:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>are arising. In fact, pomp Beach had the highest price

1:06:22.560 --> 1:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>sale in twenty twenty two at one hundred and seventy

1:06:25.840 --> 1:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>three million, so the price is still high. Slow down

1:06:28.080 --> 1:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in sales it makes sense, right, if there are not

1:06:30.400 --> 1:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>enough properties coming out of the market basic supply and demand,

1:06:33.240 --> 1:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see those prices stay high. But it's

1:06:35.160 --> 1:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>also ultimately because the supplies in there, it's going to

1:06:38.280 --> 1:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>bring down the volume. Do you see any of that

1:06:40.600 --> 1:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>changing anytime soon? Well, I mean if you just kind

1:06:43.600 --> 1:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of look at the trophy sales in twenty twenty two,

1:06:47.120 --> 1:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you would say that we wouldn't see that

1:06:51.040 --> 1:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>changing soon. The top twenty the top twenty five sales

1:06:55.120 --> 1:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and twenty twenty two range from seventy three million to

1:06:58.840 --> 1:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>one hundred seven d three million. These were higher prices

1:07:02.720 --> 1:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in many locations than we've ever seen before, and many

1:07:06.640 --> 1:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of these are purchased by people where a softer economy

1:07:09.840 --> 1:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a higher interest rate will have no effect the billionaires

1:07:14.240 --> 1:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>around the world. By all of the homes this year,

1:07:18.400 --> 1:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the more than fifty percent were in the United States.

1:07:22.560 --> 1:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I think partially that's because the international buyers are weren't

1:07:27.600 --> 1:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>as fluid during COVID as we hope they will be

1:07:30.640 --> 1:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty three. And just to put a fine

1:07:33.560 --> 1:07:37.439
<v Speaker 1>point on it, kind of interesting, but South Florida had

1:07:37.520 --> 1:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the most top trophy sales in the United States and

1:07:42.520 --> 1:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that was followed by Los Angeles, And then it didn't

1:07:46.080 --> 1:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>happen until we got to Hong Kong that we had

1:07:48.320 --> 1:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>an international city in the top three of the top

1:07:52.360 --> 1:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>sales trophy sales. What is it that's going on in Florida?

1:07:56.040 --> 1:07:57.959
<v Speaker 1>Is it like, what are you seeing in the time

1:07:57.960 --> 1:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that you've done this how many years? Is there something

1:08:00.960 --> 1:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>really distinct going on in Florida right now? Well, I

1:08:03.520 --> 1:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't think I think there's anything in particular about Florida

1:08:08.360 --> 1:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>other than the fact that there were no taxes here. Yeah,

1:08:10.800 --> 1:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>but that's not new, right, right, that's not new. But

1:08:14.480 --> 1:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I would suggest that a lot of the amenities that

1:08:18.160 --> 1:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the top buyers are looking for happen to be found

1:08:21.920 --> 1:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in homes here, and those amenities number one for twenty

1:08:26.240 --> 1:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, based on our research, or outdoor space. It

1:08:30.200 --> 1:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>turns out that people are now investing in entertaining again

1:08:34.360 --> 1:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and being with other people, and they want that outdoor

1:08:38.200 --> 1:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>space and a lot of it with which to interact.

1:08:42.680 --> 1:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>The second item is being close to amenities that they

1:08:48.000 --> 1:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>like to spend time with. Vacation where you live and

1:08:51.640 --> 1:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the beach in Florida is a strong factor as well.

1:08:55.360 --> 1:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>That was Bonnie stone Seller's co founder and chair of

1:08:57.600 --> 1:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Forbes Global Properties. Check out that full interview. You can

1:09:00.439 --> 1:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>find it on our podcast feed, and that raps up

1:09:02.960 --> 1:09:05.479
<v Speaker 1>the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio.

1:09:05.680 --> 1:09:07.599
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us, and a big thank

1:09:07.640 --> 1:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you to Bloomberg colleagues Jes Metten and Mike Regan for

1:09:10.439 --> 1:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>sharing some co hosting duties while Tim is on leave.

1:09:13.920 --> 1:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to tune into Bloomberg Business Week Monday through Friday,

1:09:16.920 --> 1:09:19.479
<v Speaker 1>starting at three pm Wall Street Time on Bloomberg Radio.

1:09:19.720 --> 1:09:22.439
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch our daily broadcast on YouTube. Just

1:09:22.520 --> 1:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg Global News and check out our Bloomberg Business

1:09:25.880 --> 1:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Week podcasts. Find that at Bloomberg dot com, Apple, or

1:09:28.720 --> 1:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. Bloomberg Business Week is available

1:09:32.080 --> 1:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on newstands now at Bloomberg dot com, Slash BusinessWeek, and

1:09:35.320 --> 1:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal, and you can also see

1:09:37.800 --> 1:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>us on Bloomberg Originals, available on Bloomberg dot com, Slash Originals,

1:09:41.680 --> 1:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and streaming platforms including Roku, Amazon, Fire TV, Samsung TV

1:09:46.200 --> 1:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Plus and more. Have a good and safe weekend, everybody.

1:09:49.320 --> 1:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Carol Masser. Stay with us. Today's top stories and

1:09:52.439 --> 1:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>global business headlines are coming up right now