1 00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:12,880 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene with 2 00:00:13,560 --> 00:00:16,520 Speaker 1: David Gura. Daily we bring you insight from the best 3 00:00:16,560 --> 00:00:22,239 Speaker 1: of economics, finance, investment, and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance 4 00:00:22,320 --> 00:00:27,000 Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course 5 00:00:27,320 --> 00:00:35,520 Speaker 1: on the Bloomberg Jim Glassman head economists for commercial Banking 6 00:00:35,560 --> 00:00:37,640 Speaker 1: at JP Morgan Chase, and we've reached him on our 7 00:00:37,680 --> 00:00:39,600 Speaker 1: phone line's gym. Great to speak with you. As always, 8 00:00:39,640 --> 00:00:41,840 Speaker 1: Let's start with the broad question here. What you're looking 9 00:00:41,840 --> 00:00:44,320 Speaker 1: for in in today's neber? Has this report different from 10 00:00:44,360 --> 00:00:47,600 Speaker 1: the last one? Probably not too different. And I think I, 11 00:00:47,760 --> 00:00:49,760 Speaker 1: like you guys have been saying, I don't think it's 12 00:00:49,800 --> 00:00:52,360 Speaker 1: the entreil of these reports anymore. That matter. It's the 13 00:00:52,400 --> 00:00:54,720 Speaker 1: message that is telling us about the economy. And I 14 00:00:54,720 --> 00:00:57,240 Speaker 1: think what is telling us is we're doing pretty good. 15 00:00:57,880 --> 00:01:00,120 Speaker 1: We still that the fact that we can have these 16 00:01:00,200 --> 00:01:02,520 Speaker 1: kind of this kind of job growth with an economy 17 00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:05,360 Speaker 1: that in theory is close to full employment tells you 18 00:01:05,520 --> 00:01:08,040 Speaker 1: where these people coming from. It must be that we're 19 00:01:08,040 --> 00:01:10,480 Speaker 1: still not really at our full capacity. So to me, 20 00:01:10,880 --> 00:01:13,160 Speaker 1: the most important message that we're getting from the job 21 00:01:13,240 --> 00:01:16,280 Speaker 1: market is that we still got a room to run here. 22 00:01:16,640 --> 00:01:18,919 Speaker 1: And that's a very positive story for the equity market 23 00:01:19,560 --> 00:01:21,679 Speaker 1: and even for the FED. I mean, it tells you, 24 00:01:21,760 --> 00:01:24,640 Speaker 1: it tells you the pet needs to slowly normalized interest rates. 25 00:01:24,680 --> 00:01:26,840 Speaker 1: But thanksly, there's no big rush. Where are we in 26 00:01:27,080 --> 00:01:29,160 Speaker 1: the business cycle as you see it when you when 27 00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:30,880 Speaker 1: you look at the economic data, when you look at 28 00:01:31,040 --> 00:01:33,720 Speaker 1: the markets, where do you think we are? I think 29 00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:36,360 Speaker 1: we're probably at the top of the ninth inning. But 30 00:01:37,240 --> 00:01:38,760 Speaker 1: and I say that because I think I think we 31 00:01:38,800 --> 00:01:41,680 Speaker 1: need another year or so this kind of growth to 32 00:01:41,720 --> 00:01:44,360 Speaker 1: pull everybody back into the job market. That has is 33 00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:46,960 Speaker 1: still a lot of young people, are still about a 34 00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:49,120 Speaker 1: million and a half people that dropped out that are 35 00:01:49,160 --> 00:01:52,160 Speaker 1: coming back, and all those part timers. But I think 36 00:01:52,200 --> 00:01:55,160 Speaker 1: the more important point is the game is not over 37 00:01:55,240 --> 00:01:57,280 Speaker 1: it at the ninth inning. I think this is going 38 00:01:57,320 --> 00:01:59,440 Speaker 1: to go extra innings. And the reason I say that 39 00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:02,520 Speaker 1: is we don't the inflation problems like we didn't normally 40 00:02:02,560 --> 00:02:04,800 Speaker 1: make you think about end the cycle, and we don't 41 00:02:04,800 --> 00:02:09,160 Speaker 1: see financial accesses that make you think about new problems brewing. 42 00:02:09,200 --> 00:02:11,560 Speaker 1: So I think we've got a very good chance of 43 00:02:11,639 --> 00:02:14,200 Speaker 1: going extra innings. I don't think there's anything many of 44 00:02:14,240 --> 00:02:16,440 Speaker 1: us could look at and say this is a problem, 45 00:02:16,480 --> 00:02:18,560 Speaker 1: and this is gonna throw us off course. Do let 46 00:02:18,600 --> 00:02:20,720 Speaker 1: me ask you about those young people you you mentioned here. 47 00:02:20,720 --> 00:02:23,560 Speaker 1: When you look at wage growth which is still lagging, 48 00:02:23,639 --> 00:02:26,160 Speaker 1: what's the role that those young people are playing. Do 49 00:02:26,200 --> 00:02:28,400 Speaker 1: you think that they're principally responsible here for dragging down 50 00:02:28,440 --> 00:02:31,120 Speaker 1: wage growth? You know, I don't, but I think the 51 00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:35,480 Speaker 1: I think the sense you get about what's true unemployment 52 00:02:35,520 --> 00:02:38,000 Speaker 1: is kind of an approximate idea about how far the 53 00:02:38,000 --> 00:02:40,680 Speaker 1: economy is from full capacity. I think maybe at the 54 00:02:40,680 --> 00:02:43,400 Speaker 1: part time the involuntary part time guys probably put more 55 00:02:43,440 --> 00:02:46,600 Speaker 1: pressure on wages. But I think the problem is everybody 56 00:02:46,639 --> 00:02:49,600 Speaker 1: has is we're taking the official unoplumber rate at face value, 57 00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:52,240 Speaker 1: and we're assuming four and a half percent, and we're 58 00:02:52,240 --> 00:02:54,359 Speaker 1: assuming full employment is four and a half to five. 59 00:02:54,840 --> 00:02:57,520 Speaker 1: I think that's maybe what's off course. I think personally, 60 00:02:57,560 --> 00:03:00,040 Speaker 1: when you look at a metric of unemployment that's on 61 00:03:00,120 --> 00:03:02,040 Speaker 1: an apple to apple similar to what we're used to 62 00:03:02,080 --> 00:03:04,200 Speaker 1: looking at, we made me more like five and a 63 00:03:04,240 --> 00:03:07,120 Speaker 1: half percent, and we're beginning to argue, we're beginning to 64 00:03:07,200 --> 00:03:10,799 Speaker 1: debate is the full employment level closer to four percent. Well, 65 00:03:10,800 --> 00:03:13,679 Speaker 1: if that were true, you you would say, Okay, the 66 00:03:13,800 --> 00:03:16,480 Speaker 1: labor market is doing fine, but I wouldn't describe it 67 00:03:16,520 --> 00:03:19,880 Speaker 1: as overly tight. So honestly, I think wages are doing 68 00:03:19,919 --> 00:03:23,000 Speaker 1: a little better. They're running a little above inflation. Uh, 69 00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:24,320 Speaker 1: that's a little bit of than the band. But I 70 00:03:24,360 --> 00:03:26,520 Speaker 1: wouldn't describe I doesn't, it doesn't. I don't find this 71 00:03:26,600 --> 00:03:31,440 Speaker 1: to be a mystery yet that despite the good sense 72 00:03:31,440 --> 00:03:33,679 Speaker 1: of tone of the job market, we're not seeing big 73 00:03:33,680 --> 00:03:36,480 Speaker 1: acceleration and wain wages because businesses have to manage things, 74 00:03:36,760 --> 00:03:38,400 Speaker 1: you know why, they keep them competitive. They're not going 75 00:03:38,440 --> 00:03:40,720 Speaker 1: to go crazy. Jim last one with us from JP 76 00:03:40,880 --> 00:03:43,360 Speaker 1: Morgan as we begin our job day coverage, David Gern, 77 00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:47,280 Speaker 1: Tom Keith thrilled your with us, uh nationwide, Jim blast 78 00:03:47,400 --> 00:03:49,480 Speaker 1: And why are there twenty thou people lined up to 79 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:52,120 Speaker 1: work at Amazon? I've gotten tons of mail on this. 80 00:03:52,280 --> 00:03:56,040 Speaker 1: I get the whole economist full employed idea. But then 81 00:03:56,080 --> 00:03:59,680 Speaker 1: why are twenty thou people lined up to pack cardboard 82 00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:03,840 Speaker 1: box is for Amazon? Yeah? I think it's I'm be 83 00:04:03,920 --> 00:04:06,600 Speaker 1: telling you we're not really as tight as people might think. 84 00:04:06,640 --> 00:04:10,040 Speaker 1: And uh, you know, part of the problem is there's 85 00:04:10,080 --> 00:04:13,040 Speaker 1: a lot of disruption going on because of the Amazon phenomenon. 86 00:04:13,480 --> 00:04:16,920 Speaker 1: So maybe people are saying this is the future. I'm 87 00:04:16,960 --> 00:04:18,760 Speaker 1: you know, they're they're trying to shift gears a little 88 00:04:18,800 --> 00:04:20,800 Speaker 1: bit and take advantage of what they think is coming. 89 00:04:21,200 --> 00:04:24,240 Speaker 1: But it probably is a testimony to the disruption that's 90 00:04:24,240 --> 00:04:27,240 Speaker 1: coming to the whole retail sector also from what you 91 00:04:27,279 --> 00:04:30,359 Speaker 1: see going on with Amazon. Let me ask you just 92 00:04:30,400 --> 00:04:32,640 Speaker 1: on a sector by sector basis what you're watching. Looking 93 00:04:32,680 --> 00:04:34,600 Speaker 1: at your note here about auto sales, what we saw 94 00:04:34,600 --> 00:04:36,520 Speaker 1: auto sales here, a little bit of disappointment over these 95 00:04:36,560 --> 00:04:38,800 Speaker 1: last couple of days. How's that playing out in terms 96 00:04:38,839 --> 00:04:42,400 Speaker 1: of what sectors are hiring at this point? Jim, You know, 97 00:04:42,440 --> 00:04:44,160 Speaker 1: I think the auto industry was the first one out 98 00:04:44,200 --> 00:04:48,240 Speaker 1: because credit tight credit really made it. It was a 99 00:04:48,320 --> 00:04:51,040 Speaker 1: nightmare for the auto industry. When the economy opened up 100 00:04:51,040 --> 00:04:53,479 Speaker 1: and credit began to flow, the auto industry was the 101 00:04:53,480 --> 00:04:56,600 Speaker 1: first one out. And so I think what we're what 102 00:04:56,600 --> 00:04:58,400 Speaker 1: we're seeing is that we're sort of the fact that 103 00:04:58,480 --> 00:05:00,880 Speaker 1: car sales are kind of stay mobilizing now and we 104 00:05:00,920 --> 00:05:03,520 Speaker 1: don't know how much of the uber phenomenon was driving 105 00:05:03,560 --> 00:05:06,600 Speaker 1: sales last year, but I think, uh, it's telling you 106 00:05:06,640 --> 00:05:09,400 Speaker 1: that the economy is becoming more mature. We're starting to 107 00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:12,120 Speaker 1: see It's it's really hard when you look around. We're saying, 108 00:05:12,120 --> 00:05:15,840 Speaker 1: a lot of every industry is picking up jobs. So 109 00:05:16,040 --> 00:05:18,520 Speaker 1: we're still looking at a picture of a tide that's 110 00:05:18,640 --> 00:05:21,920 Speaker 1: rising and it's helping everybody. Obviously the tech sector where 111 00:05:21,920 --> 00:05:26,160 Speaker 1: everybody wants to be young kids anyway. Uh, that's the hardest. 112 00:05:26,200 --> 00:05:33,000 Speaker 1: But the truth is healthcare, tech, financial services, information, business services, 113 00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:34,919 Speaker 1: those are all the areas. And it doesn't look to 114 00:05:34,920 --> 00:05:38,039 Speaker 1: me yet yet, like anyone who's dominating, just looks to 115 00:05:38,080 --> 00:05:40,160 Speaker 1: me like the kind of thing you normally see when 116 00:05:40,160 --> 00:05:44,039 Speaker 1: we're in a generally recovering economy. So it still looks 117 00:05:44,080 --> 00:05:47,960 Speaker 1: a lot like a recovery story. Is there consensus about 118 00:05:47,960 --> 00:05:49,839 Speaker 1: how many jobs we need to be adding month after 119 00:05:49,920 --> 00:05:52,320 Speaker 1: month to keep that unemployment rate from from rising. Is 120 00:05:52,320 --> 00:05:56,240 Speaker 1: that something that's a more art than science. Uh, it's 121 00:05:56,240 --> 00:05:59,480 Speaker 1: a little bit of both. The fact is, if you 122 00:05:59,560 --> 00:06:02,000 Speaker 1: look at the working age population, that's the easiest thing 123 00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:04,640 Speaker 1: you can do. Look at the population between sixteen years 124 00:06:04,640 --> 00:06:07,880 Speaker 1: of age and let's call it seventy or sixty or six, Well, 125 00:06:07,880 --> 00:06:11,120 Speaker 1: it's real clear. The growth of the working age population 126 00:06:11,160 --> 00:06:14,839 Speaker 1: has slowed down from about two per per per month 127 00:06:15,600 --> 00:06:19,680 Speaker 1: about a decade ago to about seventy five per months. 128 00:06:19,720 --> 00:06:22,480 Speaker 1: So that that's why all of us say we think 129 00:06:22,520 --> 00:06:25,239 Speaker 1: the steady state growth and jobs needs to be about. 130 00:06:26,000 --> 00:06:28,600 Speaker 1: Anything about that will tend to bring unemployment down. The 131 00:06:28,600 --> 00:06:30,960 Speaker 1: problem is there's still a lot of guys that dropped out, 132 00:06:31,520 --> 00:06:33,520 Speaker 1: so that there's a lot of guys who got pushed 133 00:06:33,520 --> 00:06:36,560 Speaker 1: out during the recession. So they're slowly coming back, and 134 00:06:36,600 --> 00:06:39,640 Speaker 1: so you can have a period here with a labor 135 00:06:39,640 --> 00:06:42,320 Speaker 1: force can grow faster than that seventy five tho just 136 00:06:42,360 --> 00:06:45,000 Speaker 1: because we're still recovery from the damage from the recession. 137 00:06:45,080 --> 00:06:47,440 Speaker 1: But in defense of a president job bowing in the 138 00:06:47,520 --> 00:06:50,320 Speaker 1: last hour about three g d P Carl Ricka Donna 139 00:06:50,400 --> 00:06:54,320 Speaker 1: covered with that with US surveillance, Jim Glass and seventy 140 00:06:54,360 --> 00:06:59,719 Speaker 1: five thousand per month non farm payrolls is totally unacceptable 141 00:07:00,279 --> 00:07:04,200 Speaker 1: to both Democrats, both Republicans are the governor of West 142 00:07:04,279 --> 00:07:08,599 Speaker 1: Virginia who's both because our benchmarks are coming from the 143 00:07:08,600 --> 00:07:10,960 Speaker 1: old days. Those those those benchmarks we used to have 144 00:07:11,000 --> 00:07:14,080 Speaker 1: are obsolete, and I think politicians haven't yet figured this 145 00:07:14,120 --> 00:07:16,840 Speaker 1: out because they keep talking about getting America back to work. 146 00:07:16,840 --> 00:07:19,360 Speaker 1: But the truth is most of US economists think America 147 00:07:19,440 --> 00:07:21,000 Speaker 1: is getting back to work, and we're pretty much back 148 00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:23,760 Speaker 1: to work. Here's the problem. There's like, in the last 149 00:07:23,800 --> 00:07:27,880 Speaker 1: ten years, twenty million people that the people who were 150 00:07:27,920 --> 00:07:30,440 Speaker 1: fifty five years of age and older, that population has 151 00:07:30,520 --> 00:07:34,680 Speaker 1: increased like twenty million. The young people millennials are up 152 00:07:34,840 --> 00:07:36,560 Speaker 1: two and a half a million, forty year olds down 153 00:07:36,600 --> 00:07:38,640 Speaker 1: about a million and a half. So really what's going 154 00:07:38,720 --> 00:07:41,920 Speaker 1: on here is the population because we're aging, We got 155 00:07:41,920 --> 00:07:44,360 Speaker 1: more and more people going into retirement. So we have 156 00:07:44,440 --> 00:07:47,040 Speaker 1: to change our idea. This is not the same labor 157 00:07:47,080 --> 00:07:49,760 Speaker 1: market that we've been living with for the last several decades. 158 00:07:50,480 --> 00:07:52,640 Speaker 1: Jim Lastman with us that Jim Glassman, the head economists 159 00:07:52,640 --> 00:07:54,920 Speaker 1: for commercial banking at JP Morgan Chase, on this job 160 00:07:54,960 --> 00:07:56,680 Speaker 1: to day here in the US. Just take you through 161 00:07:56,720 --> 00:07:58,240 Speaker 1: what we expect for the rest of the day. Of course, 162 00:07:58,240 --> 00:08:00,559 Speaker 1: those numbers come out from the Labor Department eight thirty 163 00:08:00,560 --> 00:08:02,960 Speaker 1: Wall Street time. Alan Krueger is going to join us 164 00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:05,400 Speaker 1: as well this morning of Princeton University. We're also going 165 00:08:05,440 --> 00:08:07,640 Speaker 1: to speak with Bill gross of course, if Janice Henderson 166 00:08:07,640 --> 00:08:09,520 Speaker 1: once those numbers come out, get his reaction to those, 167 00:08:09,520 --> 00:08:11,640 Speaker 1: and then we're gonna hear from Gary Khne, Gary Coon, 168 00:08:11,680 --> 00:08:14,240 Speaker 1: the head of the National Economic Council, so tremendous, a 169 00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:16,440 Speaker 1: great perspective throughout the morning on Jobs Day. And then 170 00:08:16,480 --> 00:08:18,680 Speaker 1: of course, as I mentioned, we're following this story out 171 00:08:18,680 --> 00:08:21,560 Speaker 1: of Washington as well, centering on Robert Mueller, the Special 172 00:08:21,600 --> 00:08:23,880 Speaker 1: Council going to a grand jury in Washington, d C. 173 00:08:24,040 --> 00:08:26,720 Speaker 1: For help with his investigation. Squarely though our focused on 174 00:08:26,840 --> 00:08:31,520 Speaker 1: the job's number, can we say, Sherman, let's see. We'll 175 00:08:31,560 --> 00:08:34,120 Speaker 1: see how our colleagues address up this boarding. But a 176 00:08:34,160 --> 00:08:36,160 Speaker 1: lot of speculation, as you allude to there, about who 177 00:08:36,240 --> 00:08:52,840 Speaker 1: might be the next chairman. Muhammad Hillarian is in Paris. 178 00:08:53,080 --> 00:08:57,120 Speaker 1: Dr Hillarian, good morning. In the back of your wonderful book, 179 00:08:57,160 --> 00:09:00,240 Speaker 1: the only game in town. You have the power of 180 00:09:00,400 --> 00:09:04,800 Speaker 1: scenario analysis. What are the scenarios cheer Yelling has to 181 00:09:04,840 --> 00:09:08,480 Speaker 1: come up with? Is she and Governor Kearney and others 182 00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:14,560 Speaker 1: battle the hard data of disinflation? What Connie and Yelling 183 00:09:14,640 --> 00:09:16,800 Speaker 1: have very different issues, and thank you Tom for having 184 00:09:16,800 --> 00:09:20,240 Speaker 1: me on for Yelling, is the flattening of the Phillips 185 00:09:20,280 --> 00:09:23,000 Speaker 1: curve in other In other words, why is it that 186 00:09:23,080 --> 00:09:26,920 Speaker 1: wages and inflation have not responded to what has been 187 00:09:27,120 --> 00:09:31,840 Speaker 1: very impressive job creation. Connie is in a different position. 188 00:09:32,640 --> 00:09:35,439 Speaker 1: He's worried about something else. He's worried about stag inflation. 189 00:09:36,240 --> 00:09:42,400 Speaker 1: That is a slow economy, but high inflation. So both 190 00:09:42,440 --> 00:09:48,760 Speaker 1: central banks are facing pretty unprecedented situations and their instruments 191 00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:51,680 Speaker 1: are simply not giving them enough information right now to 192 00:09:51,760 --> 00:09:54,920 Speaker 1: provide them with the confidence they need on the policy front. 193 00:09:55,920 --> 00:09:58,839 Speaker 1: What more could could policymakers be doing in Washington? Right? No, 194 00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:00,400 Speaker 1: I'm curious what you're gonna be looking for the day, 195 00:10:00,440 --> 00:10:03,000 Speaker 1: of course, But beyond that, what would you like to 196 00:10:03,000 --> 00:10:06,200 Speaker 1: see Washington doing more of? So what I'd like to see, 197 00:10:06,200 --> 00:10:09,040 Speaker 1: and I'm not the only one, is a handoff, handoff 198 00:10:09,080 --> 00:10:13,040 Speaker 1: from excessive reliance on central brank to a more comprehensive 199 00:10:13,080 --> 00:10:18,880 Speaker 1: policy response that acts on demand, supply, and debt. The 200 00:10:19,000 --> 00:10:22,720 Speaker 1: longer we wait for his handoff, the greater the risk 201 00:10:22,760 --> 00:10:25,640 Speaker 1: of collateral damage from relying just on moncrey policy. And 202 00:10:25,679 --> 00:10:28,360 Speaker 1: that's true not just for the US, is also true 203 00:10:28,400 --> 00:10:31,160 Speaker 1: for the ECB, the Bank of Japan. Both of them 204 00:10:31,240 --> 00:10:34,800 Speaker 1: also faced the same dilemma. What happens there? Did somebody 205 00:10:34,840 --> 00:10:37,680 Speaker 1: drop the baton halfway down Pennsylvania that was supposed to 206 00:10:37,679 --> 00:10:40,960 Speaker 1: have happened, wasn't it? So two thousand and ten happened 207 00:10:41,280 --> 00:10:44,959 Speaker 1: the tea party. Then you've got the polarization of Congress, 208 00:10:45,559 --> 00:10:47,680 Speaker 1: and then you've got a certain amount of all hazard 209 00:10:48,320 --> 00:10:52,680 Speaker 1: reliance on central banks. You saw that in Europe as well. 210 00:10:53,800 --> 00:10:56,480 Speaker 1: DJ Larian Richard Claire has sent me along a paper 211 00:10:56,559 --> 00:10:59,840 Speaker 1: Pedrodocostic Business Inside has written it up as well. Yasir 212 00:11:00,000 --> 00:11:02,400 Speaker 1: Abdi and Steven Deneger over at the i M F 213 00:11:02,480 --> 00:11:04,880 Speaker 1: you Health Court at the i MM for years, they 214 00:11:04,920 --> 00:11:09,200 Speaker 1: have a fabulous paper on technology and the effect of 215 00:11:09,360 --> 00:11:12,760 Speaker 1: labor and they go into routinization, they go into how 216 00:11:12,840 --> 00:11:17,280 Speaker 1: technology has changed everything we do and also offshoring is 217 00:11:17,360 --> 00:11:20,200 Speaker 1: Cherry Yell and Governor Karney is all of our angst 218 00:11:20,240 --> 00:11:25,880 Speaker 1: about jobs. Are we being overwhelmed by the new technology? Yes, 219 00:11:25,960 --> 00:11:29,200 Speaker 1: but partly so let me explain there certainly is a 220 00:11:29,360 --> 00:11:33,239 Speaker 1: structural and secular component to it, and that is understanding 221 00:11:33,280 --> 00:11:37,360 Speaker 1: that technology is changing the way we do things. How 222 00:11:37,559 --> 00:11:41,920 Speaker 1: is changing because of technology, and we don't yet fully 223 00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:47,079 Speaker 1: understand that. But that is a structural and seculation. That's 224 00:11:47,120 --> 00:11:50,520 Speaker 1: also a good or cyclical issue, which is we've had 225 00:11:50,800 --> 00:11:54,360 Speaker 1: deficient aggregate demand and we've let potential output come down 226 00:11:54,520 --> 00:11:58,680 Speaker 1: through policy in action. And it's important to make that 227 00:11:58,880 --> 00:12:02,360 Speaker 1: distinction because you can do a lot on the second one, 228 00:12:02,640 --> 00:12:06,679 Speaker 1: but it requires that other policy makers get into the 229 00:12:06,679 --> 00:12:09,400 Speaker 1: game and get off the sideline. The President has been 230 00:12:09,440 --> 00:12:12,880 Speaker 1: opinion a recently, but he's in West Virginia, his territory, 231 00:12:13,000 --> 00:12:18,880 Speaker 1: last night talking about infrastructure. With those kind of programs, 232 00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:23,000 Speaker 1: move the needle on potential g d P or do 233 00:12:23,040 --> 00:12:25,400 Speaker 1: we just give up and get used to two point 234 00:12:25,480 --> 00:12:28,840 Speaker 1: whatever percent run rate? There would be a tragedy if 235 00:12:28,880 --> 00:12:31,520 Speaker 1: we gave up. We can move the needle. We can 236 00:12:31,600 --> 00:12:36,480 Speaker 1: certainly move it towards three percent through the trifecta of infrastructure, 237 00:12:38,000 --> 00:12:40,959 Speaker 1: pro growth, tax reform, and the regulations. So these are 238 00:12:41,000 --> 00:12:44,520 Speaker 1: three things that the President has spoken about, and that 239 00:12:44,640 --> 00:12:48,560 Speaker 1: let's not forget. President Obama also had infrastructure program. President 240 00:12:48,679 --> 00:12:52,120 Speaker 1: Obama also was looking for tax reform. Um in a 241 00:12:52,200 --> 00:12:54,480 Speaker 1: in a perfect world, you'd go beyond that and you 242 00:12:54,640 --> 00:12:58,200 Speaker 1: deal with labor retooling and re training, you would deal 243 00:12:58,240 --> 00:13:00,840 Speaker 1: with the education system, you would deal elements that talk 244 00:13:00,920 --> 00:13:04,600 Speaker 1: to productivity. But no, Tom, we shouldn't just sit there 245 00:13:04,640 --> 00:13:07,640 Speaker 1: we we can get it back towards three percent, but 246 00:13:07,720 --> 00:13:11,400 Speaker 1: it requires Congress to step up to its economic governance. 247 00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:14,680 Speaker 1: We're talking to you from Paris. Let me ask you 248 00:13:14,720 --> 00:13:17,400 Speaker 1: just the degree to which excitement in the global economy 249 00:13:17,440 --> 00:13:19,480 Speaker 1: has shifted to Europe from from the U S. What 250 00:13:19,520 --> 00:13:21,800 Speaker 1: are we seeing in the context of the global economy 251 00:13:21,800 --> 00:13:26,040 Speaker 1: in Europe today? How has that changed? A lot? More optimism. 252 00:13:26,040 --> 00:13:30,360 Speaker 1: I'm very struck by the optimism that one hears here. Um, 253 00:13:30,440 --> 00:13:35,160 Speaker 1: euro gloom has given way to your optimism. It helped 254 00:13:35,280 --> 00:13:38,200 Speaker 1: by the latest GDP number. It's helped by the election 255 00:13:38,240 --> 00:13:41,720 Speaker 1: of Marcon So there's a sense here of optimism. Um. 256 00:13:41,760 --> 00:13:45,840 Speaker 1: I think that the economics tells you that it's not 257 00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:47,920 Speaker 1: enough to move the soft data. With sort of soft 258 00:13:48,000 --> 00:13:50,200 Speaker 1: data move in the US in a major way a 259 00:13:50,200 --> 00:13:52,560 Speaker 1: few months ago, but that didn't translate to the heart data. 260 00:13:53,040 --> 00:13:56,280 Speaker 1: So it's important that more be done. But the big difference, 261 00:13:56,360 --> 00:13:58,920 Speaker 1: David is there's a lot more optimism. Are you coming 262 00:13:58,960 --> 00:14:02,760 Speaker 1: to us from the cafe have la ground cafe? I know, 263 00:14:02,880 --> 00:14:04,440 Speaker 1: but I'm talking to you. I'm talking to you from 264 00:14:04,480 --> 00:14:08,079 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg offices, and as usual, they are beautiful offices 265 00:14:08,120 --> 00:14:10,600 Speaker 1: in a wonderful locations. My first time here, and I 266 00:14:10,679 --> 00:14:12,320 Speaker 1: think I'll try to visit more often. I know you 267 00:14:12,320 --> 00:14:14,600 Speaker 1: should visit moreover, In fact, we should visit with you. 268 00:14:14,720 --> 00:14:17,800 Speaker 1: I would suggest calling all the twins that we David 269 00:14:17,800 --> 00:14:19,920 Speaker 1: Goer and I do a road trip with Dr Hillary 270 00:14:19,960 --> 00:14:22,680 Speaker 1: into the Paris office. I'm thinking the last week of 271 00:14:22,720 --> 00:14:27,520 Speaker 1: a Nosspember because it's across the street from the opera 272 00:14:27,600 --> 00:14:30,280 Speaker 1: and the opera season stomps Um in September, so lets 273 00:14:30,280 --> 00:14:32,440 Speaker 1: it would in September. We'll get that. We'll do that 274 00:14:32,480 --> 00:14:35,120 Speaker 1: in September and you can pick the opera and well 275 00:14:35,200 --> 00:14:38,000 Speaker 1: I'll attend. Dr Larin, thank you so much from my 276 00:14:38,440 --> 00:14:42,960 Speaker 1: offices and studios in Paris. Friends greatly appreciated this morning. 277 00:14:43,000 --> 00:14:46,200 Speaker 1: Of course writing for bloom Review and Dr Larian affiliated 278 00:14:46,200 --> 00:14:49,320 Speaker 1: with Alan others. Really can't say enough about his book. 279 00:14:49,360 --> 00:14:51,480 Speaker 1: It was my book of the summer. I don't know 280 00:14:51,480 --> 00:14:54,280 Speaker 1: when it was the only game in town. Central Banks 281 00:14:54,920 --> 00:14:59,760 Speaker 1: instability as well, really really precious chapter on game theory 282 00:14:59,800 --> 00:15:15,640 Speaker 1: from Doctor Larium as well. For our cover to jobs. 283 00:15:15,640 --> 00:15:18,320 Speaker 1: Stay continues now with Alan Kruegers, Professor of Public Polace 284 00:15:18,360 --> 00:15:20,400 Speaker 1: and Economics at Princeton, former Chairman of the Council of 285 00:15:20,400 --> 00:15:23,000 Speaker 1: Economic Advisors under President Obama here with us in our 286 00:15:23,000 --> 00:15:25,360 Speaker 1: Bloomberg eleven three of studios in New York. Great to 287 00:15:25,360 --> 00:15:28,400 Speaker 1: see again. As always, let's start just by a going 288 00:15:28,440 --> 00:15:30,640 Speaker 1: macro if we could that we had the latest read 289 00:15:30,640 --> 00:15:32,480 Speaker 1: on GDP a few days ago. Can we draw a 290 00:15:32,520 --> 00:15:33,920 Speaker 1: line between that and what you think we're going to 291 00:15:34,000 --> 00:15:37,880 Speaker 1: see today. I think they are part of the same picture. 292 00:15:38,520 --> 00:15:40,520 Speaker 1: You know, it looks to me like the economy is 293 00:15:40,520 --> 00:15:42,400 Speaker 1: continuing at the same pace it has for the last 294 00:15:42,440 --> 00:15:46,560 Speaker 1: few years. Uh, there's been no change in policy, so 295 00:15:46,600 --> 00:15:48,480 Speaker 1: I'm not sure why we would expect to see much 296 00:15:48,560 --> 00:15:52,400 Speaker 1: change in economic performance. UM. So I think we're still 297 00:15:52,440 --> 00:15:56,600 Speaker 1: at about two underlying growth. Job growth is faster than 298 00:15:57,160 --> 00:16:01,080 Speaker 1: labor force growth. That should pull down the unemployment. UM. 299 00:16:01,120 --> 00:16:03,080 Speaker 1: I've been a little bit disappointed that we haven't seen 300 00:16:03,120 --> 00:16:06,760 Speaker 1: more wage growth. Uh. Inflation is but a little bit surprising, 301 00:16:07,000 --> 00:16:09,440 Speaker 1: but I suspect that those are sort of short term 302 00:16:09,440 --> 00:16:12,400 Speaker 1: phenomenon and we'll get back on track closer to percent inflation. 303 00:16:13,160 --> 00:16:15,280 Speaker 1: When when you look at all that this this administration 304 00:16:15,280 --> 00:16:17,360 Speaker 1: could be doing, that this Congress could be doing if 305 00:16:17,720 --> 00:16:20,600 Speaker 1: its prioritization is is the watchword in Washington. I think 306 00:16:20,680 --> 00:16:23,520 Speaker 1: is as we've seen the debate over healthcare unfold, and 307 00:16:23,560 --> 00:16:25,120 Speaker 1: now there's a question of what we're going to see 308 00:16:25,120 --> 00:16:26,920 Speaker 1: when it comes to tax from when it comes to 309 00:16:27,360 --> 00:16:29,600 Speaker 1: the labor economy, and what policies they could implement there, 310 00:16:29,640 --> 00:16:31,320 Speaker 1: what would be most effective. What if you were still 311 00:16:31,320 --> 00:16:33,400 Speaker 1: in the White House counseling the president, would you advise 312 00:16:33,480 --> 00:16:37,080 Speaker 1: him to do. My advice would be to tear up 313 00:16:37,120 --> 00:16:40,240 Speaker 1: the proposal that they endorsed on immigration reform a couple 314 00:16:40,240 --> 00:16:43,200 Speaker 1: of days earlier. Um that would be number one. And 315 00:16:43,280 --> 00:16:46,200 Speaker 1: if you just look at the Congressional Budget Office report 316 00:16:46,520 --> 00:16:48,960 Speaker 1: on the bipartisan bill that passed the Senate that would 317 00:16:48,960 --> 00:16:53,000 Speaker 1: have increased immigration to the US legal immigration, that concluded 318 00:16:53,240 --> 00:16:56,040 Speaker 1: GDP growth would be faster, income growth would be faster, 319 00:16:56,080 --> 00:16:58,600 Speaker 1: productivity growth would be higher, We'd have more innovation, we 320 00:16:58,720 --> 00:17:01,920 Speaker 1: create more companies if we reformed our immigration system in 321 00:17:01,960 --> 00:17:04,159 Speaker 1: that direction. So that would be point number one on 322 00:17:04,200 --> 00:17:07,720 Speaker 1: the labor market. Uh. I like their plans on infrastructure. 323 00:17:08,880 --> 00:17:10,760 Speaker 1: I'd like to see them spell them out more detail. 324 00:17:10,800 --> 00:17:12,720 Speaker 1: I'd like to see them have a strategy to congress 325 00:17:12,760 --> 00:17:15,400 Speaker 1: past them. But I think that's an area where there 326 00:17:15,480 --> 00:17:19,199 Speaker 1: is widespread agreement that the US needs more investment that 327 00:17:19,240 --> 00:17:21,920 Speaker 1: will help labor, that will help businesses, that will help 328 00:17:21,920 --> 00:17:25,120 Speaker 1: the economy down the road. Alan, you're cited in my 329 00:17:25,200 --> 00:17:28,040 Speaker 1: paper to jour, I've I've been quoted folks already saying 330 00:17:28,040 --> 00:17:31,359 Speaker 1: Olivia Blanchard's effort in Naples, Italy this summer was just 331 00:17:31,440 --> 00:17:33,360 Speaker 1: brilliant and out of the I m f we get 332 00:17:33,359 --> 00:17:35,760 Speaker 1: a working paper where you're sited. David Carter, I believe 333 00:17:35,840 --> 00:17:41,760 Speaker 1: cited is well, which basically says routinization and offshoring have 334 00:17:41,920 --> 00:17:46,560 Speaker 1: changed the American labor economy. Is technology the killer? Is 335 00:17:46,600 --> 00:17:50,520 Speaker 1: technology a job's killer? Or can we say it's still 336 00:17:50,560 --> 00:17:54,119 Speaker 1: adds vailue or is there just two America's Well, I 337 00:17:54,119 --> 00:17:56,560 Speaker 1: think it's more in the too America vein. It's not 338 00:17:56,640 --> 00:18:01,040 Speaker 1: a job's killer in the sense we've seen UH reasonable 339 00:18:01,119 --> 00:18:04,400 Speaker 1: job growth over the last twenty five years. The problem 340 00:18:04,480 --> 00:18:06,800 Speaker 1: is the nature of the jobs. The problem is that 341 00:18:07,520 --> 00:18:09,639 Speaker 1: jobs in the middle have been disappearing while they've been 342 00:18:09,640 --> 00:18:12,880 Speaker 1: growing at the top and the bottom. Uh. The problem 343 00:18:13,000 --> 00:18:16,320 Speaker 1: is that we're seeing fewer long term employment relationships for 344 00:18:16,400 --> 00:18:20,720 Speaker 1: seeing more workers move into self employment, more gig employment, 345 00:18:21,080 --> 00:18:23,960 Speaker 1: workers left without a safety net or labor laws are 346 00:18:24,080 --> 00:18:28,520 Speaker 1: not really set up for big independent workforce. UM. But 347 00:18:28,640 --> 00:18:31,280 Speaker 1: technology has brought lots of benefits to the US economy 348 00:18:31,320 --> 00:18:35,560 Speaker 1: and to consumers as well. UM. And ultimately we need 349 00:18:35,600 --> 00:18:40,520 Speaker 1: technology to raise productivity, growth, raised living standards, improve life expectancy, 350 00:18:40,560 --> 00:18:42,880 Speaker 1: and so on. So I think we need a better 351 00:18:42,960 --> 00:18:48,400 Speaker 1: strategy for adjusting in the face of the computer information 352 00:18:48,440 --> 00:18:51,800 Speaker 1: technology that's been developing. We'll come back here with you 353 00:18:51,840 --> 00:18:52,920 Speaker 1: in just just a minute, but let me ask you 354 00:18:52,960 --> 00:18:55,119 Speaker 1: a quick question about immigration. And you mentioned the speech 355 00:18:55,119 --> 00:18:57,640 Speaker 1: to the President gave, the legislation he embraced this week. 356 00:18:58,160 --> 00:19:00,200 Speaker 1: What does it seem like a conversation about him ration? 357 00:19:00,200 --> 00:19:03,440 Speaker 1: It's gotten harder and harder to have in this country. Well, 358 00:19:03,480 --> 00:19:08,400 Speaker 1: it's very polarizing, and UM. I was um disappointed by 359 00:19:08,600 --> 00:19:15,080 Speaker 1: the White House's position on um immigration this week because 360 00:19:15,560 --> 00:19:20,800 Speaker 1: to inject immigration reform in the middle of tax reform, 361 00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:24,200 Speaker 1: infrastructure and just doing the basics of government. In fact, 362 00:19:24,240 --> 00:19:26,480 Speaker 1: I think the Trump administration would be well served and 363 00:19:26,480 --> 00:19:29,240 Speaker 1: I think they'll discover pretty soon they should just focus 364 00:19:29,280 --> 00:19:32,160 Speaker 1: on getting Congress to do the basics, pass a budget, 365 00:19:32,359 --> 00:19:35,119 Speaker 1: raised a debt limit, do so without drama. That's in 366 00:19:35,119 --> 00:19:39,040 Speaker 1: the best interest of the American people and injecting um 367 00:19:39,080 --> 00:19:41,320 Speaker 1: an immigration bilt which is not going to pass, really 368 00:19:41,359 --> 00:19:44,480 Speaker 1: just done for political reasons. I think it's quite unfortunate 369 00:19:44,520 --> 00:19:46,280 Speaker 1: because all it does in the end is divided the 370 00:19:46,280 --> 00:19:50,480 Speaker 1: American people. David Greer right now, four minutes, thirty eight seconds, 371 00:19:50,520 --> 00:19:55,320 Speaker 1: precious time with Alan Hooder. Alan great, too great to 372 00:19:55,359 --> 00:19:57,440 Speaker 1: see once again we were chatting during the break here. 373 00:19:57,440 --> 00:19:59,199 Speaker 1: But work you're doing on on music now, I think 374 00:19:59,240 --> 00:20:01,480 Speaker 1: this is this is fascinating and your your interests are 375 00:20:01,560 --> 00:20:03,159 Speaker 1: very to as we know, what are you doing exactly 376 00:20:03,160 --> 00:20:04,720 Speaker 1: when it comes to the music industry, what are you 377 00:20:04,720 --> 00:20:07,800 Speaker 1: looking at? Well? A long time ago I was invited 378 00:20:07,840 --> 00:20:10,640 Speaker 1: to be the keynote speaker at the poll Star Concert 379 00:20:10,680 --> 00:20:14,840 Speaker 1: convention and that got me involved in studying the music industry. So, 380 00:20:15,240 --> 00:20:17,840 Speaker 1: together with a group of other economists, I've started the 381 00:20:17,920 --> 00:20:21,119 Speaker 1: Music Industry Research Association. We're holding a conference at u 382 00:20:21,119 --> 00:20:24,400 Speaker 1: c l A next week on Thursday and Friday, August 383 00:20:24,400 --> 00:20:28,000 Speaker 1: tenth and eleven, UH and we have a really interesting 384 00:20:28,040 --> 00:20:31,560 Speaker 1: program where people are presenting papers on copyright protection and 385 00:20:32,280 --> 00:20:35,399 Speaker 1: our our copyright laws appropriate given the change in technology 386 00:20:35,440 --> 00:20:38,080 Speaker 1: that we've seen on how streaming is changing the music 387 00:20:38,119 --> 00:20:42,200 Speaker 1: industry on live live events. UM, I'm giving a paper 388 00:20:42,240 --> 00:20:45,880 Speaker 1: on the backgrounds of musicians. We were talking before about inequality. 389 00:20:46,359 --> 00:20:48,960 Speaker 1: Music historically has been a route for people who came 390 00:20:49,040 --> 00:20:52,960 Speaker 1: from underprivileged backgrounds to be able to move up. Is 391 00:20:52,960 --> 00:20:56,320 Speaker 1: that still the case, um? And the short answers, yes, 392 00:20:56,359 --> 00:20:58,359 Speaker 1: it doesn't look like it's changed all that much. If 393 00:20:58,400 --> 00:21:02,200 Speaker 1: I compare the backgrounds of UH superstar musicians and c 394 00:21:02,320 --> 00:21:08,119 Speaker 1: e O s that musicians come from more disadvantaged backgrounds. Um. 395 00:21:08,160 --> 00:21:10,879 Speaker 1: But interestingly, if you look at who's successful over time 396 00:21:10,920 --> 00:21:13,760 Speaker 1: in the music industry, it tends to be those who 397 00:21:13,760 --> 00:21:16,879 Speaker 1: are more middle class or more upper middle class. Even so, 398 00:21:16,960 --> 00:21:19,640 Speaker 1: there's something about staying power which seems to be connected 399 00:21:19,640 --> 00:21:23,560 Speaker 1: to the background. Have the technologists figured out the people 400 00:21:23,680 --> 00:21:28,159 Speaker 1: have to get paid that. Granted, there's a revolution and 401 00:21:28,200 --> 00:21:31,560 Speaker 1: we all have to sort out contracts and both sides 402 00:21:31,600 --> 00:21:34,480 Speaker 1: of a contract, but have they figured out over ten 403 00:21:34,560 --> 00:21:38,399 Speaker 1: difficult years that just as an example, through as CAP B, 404 00:21:38,680 --> 00:21:42,439 Speaker 1: M I and c SEC, it's songwriters just possibly may 405 00:21:42,480 --> 00:21:46,520 Speaker 1: have to pay the rent um. Slowly they're figuring this out, 406 00:21:46,640 --> 00:21:48,720 Speaker 1: and I think this is an existential threat to the 407 00:21:48,800 --> 00:21:51,240 Speaker 1: music industry as we know it, and it's not just 408 00:21:51,359 --> 00:21:54,840 Speaker 1: the technologists, it's also our laws which were developed for 409 00:21:54,880 --> 00:22:00,840 Speaker 1: a time of Stephen Stephen Foster. So uh, we are seeing, uh, 410 00:22:01,040 --> 00:22:04,080 Speaker 1: for the first time in several years, revenue rise for 411 00:22:04,200 --> 00:22:07,399 Speaker 1: recorded music because of streaming. More and more people are 412 00:22:07,400 --> 00:22:10,320 Speaker 1: signing up for the subscription services, not only in the 413 00:22:10,440 --> 00:22:14,160 Speaker 1: US but around the world. China's rapidly seeing growth and 414 00:22:14,240 --> 00:22:17,080 Speaker 1: starting to protect intellectual property for music, which I think 415 00:22:17,160 --> 00:22:20,240 Speaker 1: is a very positive development. But we're a long way 416 00:22:20,280 --> 00:22:23,400 Speaker 1: from having a sustainable, stable business model in the music industry, 417 00:22:23,480 --> 00:22:25,800 Speaker 1: and that's part of the reason for forming this association. 418 00:22:26,200 --> 00:22:29,480 Speaker 1: What does does economic mobility and mobility generally within music 419 00:22:29,800 --> 00:22:34,080 Speaker 1: tell you more broadly about economic mobility in the US today, Well, 420 00:22:34,080 --> 00:22:37,439 Speaker 1: it's awfully hard to make it to um. Yeah, I'll 421 00:22:37,440 --> 00:22:38,960 Speaker 1: tell you something. David I gave a speech at the 422 00:22:39,040 --> 00:22:40,840 Speaker 1: Rock and Roll Hall of Fame about how the whole 423 00:22:40,840 --> 00:22:43,640 Speaker 1: economy is becoming like the music industry winner take all 424 00:22:43,720 --> 00:22:47,800 Speaker 1: superstar economy, and in music, the top one percent are 425 00:22:47,840 --> 00:22:52,320 Speaker 1: responsible for about half of the income. In the economy 426 00:22:52,320 --> 00:22:54,480 Speaker 1: as a whole, the top one percent makes of the 427 00:22:54,520 --> 00:22:58,040 Speaker 1: income um and the rest of the economy has kind 428 00:22:58,040 --> 00:23:02,160 Speaker 1: of been mirroring the music industry in terms of the UH, 429 00:23:02,200 --> 00:23:06,000 Speaker 1: the incomes UH and the rewards from the economy going 430 00:23:06,040 --> 00:23:08,400 Speaker 1: so much to the top. So I think that's that's 431 00:23:08,400 --> 00:23:09,720 Speaker 1: a danger, and I think we can learn from the 432 00:23:09,800 --> 00:23:12,000 Speaker 1: music industry about why that's been happening. And I think 433 00:23:12,000 --> 00:23:14,280 Speaker 1: it is related to the technology that there's been kind 434 00:23:14,280 --> 00:23:17,359 Speaker 1: of a flight to quality and you and that topper 435 00:23:17,480 --> 00:23:20,439 Speaker 1: are generating much more attention than everyone else. And Professor Kruge, 436 00:23:20,560 --> 00:23:23,000 Speaker 1: thank you so much. You've been I'm Professor of Economics 437 00:23:23,000 --> 00:23:27,000 Speaker 1: and Public Affairs, Priston University. Just a real pleasure, to 438 00:23:27,000 --> 00:23:40,240 Speaker 1: an honor to have them with us on this Job's Day. 439 00:23:41,359 --> 00:23:44,760 Speaker 1: We welcome on Bloomberg Radio, Bloomberg Television worldwide. We wait 440 00:23:44,800 --> 00:23:48,040 Speaker 1: for the Gary Khne interview. Certainly will get positive spin 441 00:23:48,320 --> 00:23:51,080 Speaker 1: from Mr Crone to David Weston and John Farrell. Will 442 00:23:51,080 --> 00:23:53,680 Speaker 1: look for that later, but right now joining us William 443 00:23:53,680 --> 00:23:56,640 Speaker 1: Gross of Janice Anderson, as we look at it better 444 00:23:56,680 --> 00:24:00,000 Speaker 1: than good job's report, Bill a little bit of enthusisa 445 00:24:00,119 --> 00:24:03,480 Speaker 1: as in wage growth, is it a wage growth that 446 00:24:03,680 --> 00:24:08,680 Speaker 1: is enough to change chair Yellings dialogue into the September meeting? 447 00:24:10,840 --> 00:24:13,000 Speaker 1: Well maybe not, Tom, I mean it's point three as 448 00:24:13,040 --> 00:24:16,000 Speaker 1: opposed to point to but the y O y as 449 00:24:16,040 --> 00:24:19,960 Speaker 1: we call it as two point five percent and didn't change. So, UM, 450 00:24:20,000 --> 00:24:22,800 Speaker 1: you know, obviously that's a positive, but not much. Jobs 451 00:24:22,840 --> 00:24:25,320 Speaker 1: about two hundred thousand, as you mentioned, is more than 452 00:24:26,080 --> 00:24:28,600 Speaker 1: expected during this point in time in the cycle. So 453 00:24:28,680 --> 00:24:32,159 Speaker 1: it's a you know, it's a rather strong economic report, 454 00:24:32,160 --> 00:24:35,280 Speaker 1: but I don't think it moves markets much. Um. You know, 455 00:24:35,359 --> 00:24:38,920 Speaker 1: job growth to me doesn't seem to be stimulating economic 456 00:24:38,960 --> 00:24:43,160 Speaker 1: growth and consumer spending like it has in prior cycles. Wages, 457 00:24:43,240 --> 00:24:45,679 Speaker 1: as we talked about, our sort of anemic and the 458 00:24:45,760 --> 00:24:49,240 Speaker 1: mystery surrounding the participation rate sort of places havoc with that, 459 00:24:49,440 --> 00:24:52,840 Speaker 1: and UH, I think what seems most important out of 460 00:24:53,040 --> 00:24:57,160 Speaker 1: policy rates in the US and globally are core inflation rates, 461 00:24:57,200 --> 00:25:00,520 Speaker 1: which as you know, i've declined for one point five 462 00:25:00,600 --> 00:25:04,920 Speaker 1: percent in the US UH from one point eight point 463 00:25:05,000 --> 00:25:08,760 Speaker 1: three percent over the last few months. Um. You know, 464 00:25:08,960 --> 00:25:10,760 Speaker 1: I think until we see a lift back to two 465 00:25:10,760 --> 00:25:13,640 Speaker 1: percent in terms of the core inflation rate to fit, 466 00:25:14,480 --> 00:25:18,160 Speaker 1: UH probably rgins quantitative tightening but won't raise short term 467 00:25:18,240 --> 00:25:20,639 Speaker 1: rates this year. And we saw that with Governor Carney 468 00:25:20,680 --> 00:25:23,280 Speaker 1: in a different calculus yesterday, Bill and the jobs reporting. 469 00:25:23,280 --> 00:25:25,280 Speaker 1: I know David Gura wants to jump in here with 470 00:25:25,400 --> 00:25:28,240 Speaker 1: questions on labor is well, I know that if Janice 471 00:25:28,280 --> 00:25:31,680 Speaker 1: Henderson held a job's fair today, two thousand people would 472 00:25:31,680 --> 00:25:35,040 Speaker 1: show up. How can you have a good labor economy 473 00:25:35,560 --> 00:25:39,119 Speaker 1: and have twenty thousand plus people show up to to 474 00:25:39,400 --> 00:25:43,240 Speaker 1: uh put stuff in boxes for Amazon? It's almost is 475 00:25:43,280 --> 00:25:48,080 Speaker 1: if we have two separate labor economies. Well, I think 476 00:25:48,119 --> 00:25:50,680 Speaker 1: we do. We talked about the participation rate, at least 477 00:25:50,680 --> 00:25:54,320 Speaker 1: we've mentioned it, and it's significantly lower than what it was. 478 00:25:54,400 --> 00:25:58,600 Speaker 1: And that's the mystery to all central bankers. Um To 479 00:25:58,760 --> 00:26:01,560 Speaker 1: my way of thinking, it's the demographically related, it's a 480 00:26:01,600 --> 00:26:06,679 Speaker 1: structural problem. It suggests that you know, boomers are getting 481 00:26:06,720 --> 00:26:10,280 Speaker 1: older and older, and that they're training for new tech 482 00:26:10,440 --> 00:26:16,679 Speaker 1: jobs is insignificant, and therefore they don't participate in the economy. 483 00:26:16,960 --> 00:26:20,320 Speaker 1: Doesn't mean they can't come back in, but to my 484 00:26:20,400 --> 00:26:24,120 Speaker 1: way of thinking, absent significant job training that they come 485 00:26:24,160 --> 00:26:27,840 Speaker 1: back into those, um, you know, lower pain jobs that 486 00:26:27,920 --> 00:26:32,120 Speaker 1: perhaps Amazon are providing. Bill, there's a groundhog day, ned 487 00:26:32,200 --> 00:26:35,200 Speaker 1: Ryerson asked Quality two jobs day. Over these last few months, 488 00:26:35,240 --> 00:26:38,199 Speaker 1: the economy seems fine, fairly normal. What's changed since the 489 00:26:38,240 --> 00:26:40,639 Speaker 1: last jobs report to you? When you look at the U. 490 00:26:40,720 --> 00:26:46,520 Speaker 1: S economy, UM, not much, you know. We we we've 491 00:26:46,520 --> 00:26:50,720 Speaker 1: seen inflation stay low and maybe take a little bit lower, 492 00:26:50,760 --> 00:26:54,480 Speaker 1: which I think is significant. We've seen strong earnings growths 493 00:26:54,520 --> 00:26:58,439 Speaker 1: in terms of corporations and that's propelled the stock market. 494 00:26:58,480 --> 00:27:02,600 Speaker 1: And we see continuing UH participation by central banks, not 495 00:27:02,720 --> 00:27:05,800 Speaker 1: by the Fed, but by central banks up to a 496 00:27:05,920 --> 00:27:08,399 Speaker 1: trillion dollars annually by the e c B and the 497 00:27:08,400 --> 00:27:11,960 Speaker 1: b O J. And so to my way of thinking, yes, 498 00:27:12,000 --> 00:27:15,720 Speaker 1: the U. S economy is important, but the Eurland economy 499 00:27:15,800 --> 00:27:18,360 Speaker 1: is more important in terms of their inflation rate, their 500 00:27:18,359 --> 00:27:20,679 Speaker 1: growth rate, and what the ECB plans to do in 501 00:27:20,760 --> 00:27:24,639 Speaker 1: terms of timing UH in terms of their quantitative easy procedures. 502 00:27:24,720 --> 00:27:27,560 Speaker 1: It's really the money at the checks that are being 503 00:27:27,600 --> 00:27:29,600 Speaker 1: written and had been written for the past five to 504 00:27:29,720 --> 00:27:32,840 Speaker 1: six years that are important in terms of financial markets. 505 00:27:32,880 --> 00:27:36,359 Speaker 1: And once that stops to move in at the same pace, 506 00:27:36,440 --> 00:27:38,560 Speaker 1: then I think we're going to begin to see some change. 507 00:27:38,600 --> 00:27:42,040 Speaker 1: But until then, onward and upward. We have seen the 508 00:27:42,119 --> 00:27:44,680 Speaker 1: US President here a touting the strength of the stock 509 00:27:44,720 --> 00:27:48,080 Speaker 1: market right and left, commenting on doubt little earlier this 510 00:27:48,119 --> 00:27:50,800 Speaker 1: week on Twitter and in speeches. How much credit can 511 00:27:50,840 --> 00:27:55,200 Speaker 1: he claim for how the market is doing today? Oh, 512 00:27:55,240 --> 00:27:57,840 Speaker 1: I don't think much. You know. Let's let's talk about 513 00:27:57,880 --> 00:28:00,919 Speaker 1: regulation and deregulation, and I think there is where he 514 00:28:00,960 --> 00:28:04,800 Speaker 1: can claim at least some minor progress. It's only been 515 00:28:04,880 --> 00:28:08,280 Speaker 1: six months, but to the extent that the regulations have 516 00:28:08,440 --> 00:28:11,439 Speaker 1: been cut, and they have been cut significantly. I'm not 517 00:28:11,480 --> 00:28:16,040 Speaker 1: sure exactly where and how they apply in each particular state, 518 00:28:16,119 --> 00:28:21,760 Speaker 1: but the regulations and deregulations, I think I've been the 519 00:28:21,840 --> 00:28:24,439 Speaker 1: main boost that hasn't certainly been from many of his 520 00:28:24,520 --> 00:28:27,480 Speaker 1: policies they have been enacted yet. Bill. I thought your 521 00:28:27,600 --> 00:28:32,919 Speaker 1: essay for Janice Henderson recently Curveball was absolutely superb. And 522 00:28:32,960 --> 00:28:36,840 Speaker 1: you brought up a concept that Stanley Fisher lad with 523 00:28:37,080 --> 00:28:40,080 Speaker 1: at the Economic Club of New York well over eighteen 524 00:28:40,120 --> 00:28:43,760 Speaker 1: months ago, and that is we miss proportional change and 525 00:28:43,840 --> 00:28:47,400 Speaker 1: that short term interest rates are set really, really low, 526 00:28:48,000 --> 00:28:51,600 Speaker 1: and even if they come up a bit, that's a 527 00:28:51,760 --> 00:28:56,200 Speaker 1: huge proportional or percentage change in the movement of short 528 00:28:56,320 --> 00:29:00,360 Speaker 1: rates is at a risk of instability for central bankers 529 00:29:00,640 --> 00:29:05,400 Speaker 1: in the coming months ahead. Yeah, I think it is Tom. 530 00:29:05,440 --> 00:29:08,480 Speaker 1: You know, it's a difficult concept to define, and typically 531 00:29:09,160 --> 00:29:13,560 Speaker 1: central bankers have looked at changes in FED interest rates 532 00:29:13,680 --> 00:29:17,959 Speaker 1: or short term interest rates in terms of their absolute magnitude. Um, 533 00:29:18,200 --> 00:29:21,200 Speaker 1: you know, prior cycles have raised the FED funds by 534 00:29:21,200 --> 00:29:24,200 Speaker 1: three four racist points in some cases more going back 535 00:29:24,240 --> 00:29:27,480 Speaker 1: to eighty one. But proportionately, you know, since you start 536 00:29:27,560 --> 00:29:30,680 Speaker 1: so low, you know, your double and maybe even quadruple 537 00:29:30,920 --> 00:29:33,600 Speaker 1: at you know, at a two percent level in terms 538 00:29:33,640 --> 00:29:36,400 Speaker 1: of FED funds, and that has a significant impact. Why 539 00:29:36,800 --> 00:29:39,720 Speaker 1: you know, common sense basically says that if you're paying 540 00:29:39,760 --> 00:29:44,880 Speaker 1: a certain interest rate cover or margin and that margin 541 00:29:45,120 --> 00:29:49,200 Speaker 1: quadruples over the next few years, then that's a significant 542 00:29:50,080 --> 00:29:54,040 Speaker 1: problem for interst rate coverage and for corporate profits or 543 00:29:54,040 --> 00:29:58,000 Speaker 1: even individual stability. Well, the Governor Karney faced yesterday, and 544 00:29:58,080 --> 00:30:01,360 Speaker 1: let's fold this right into the Bloomberg New conversation with 545 00:30:01,400 --> 00:30:06,440 Speaker 1: Alan Greenspan of a few days ago. It's almost not stagflation, 546 00:30:06,520 --> 00:30:09,680 Speaker 1: as Chairman Greenspan put it, but a new kind of 547 00:30:09,800 --> 00:30:14,160 Speaker 1: stag in a new kind of flation. What kind are 548 00:30:14,240 --> 00:30:19,840 Speaker 1: they bill? Gross? Well, I, um, you know, I've listened 549 00:30:19,880 --> 00:30:22,840 Speaker 1: to uh Chairman Greenspan over the last few days. My 550 00:30:22,920 --> 00:30:26,880 Speaker 1: interpretation you know, he's suggesting that there's a bubble, there's 551 00:30:26,920 --> 00:30:29,880 Speaker 1: a bubble in interest rates, and the bubble has to 552 00:30:29,920 --> 00:30:33,240 Speaker 1: do with real interest rates, which are exceedingly low as 553 00:30:33,240 --> 00:30:35,640 Speaker 1: our nominal rates. But it's real interest rates that are 554 00:30:35,640 --> 00:30:38,000 Speaker 1: a problem. I would agree with them, um, and I 555 00:30:38,040 --> 00:30:41,200 Speaker 1: would say that these real interest rates low as they are, 556 00:30:41,600 --> 00:30:46,120 Speaker 1: you know, ultimately, ultimately, which is the key create inflation, 557 00:30:46,920 --> 00:30:50,880 Speaker 1: which is the inflation part of it. Um. The stag 558 00:30:51,200 --> 00:30:55,840 Speaker 1: has to do with productivity and productivity as we've always 559 00:30:55,880 --> 00:30:58,960 Speaker 1: been flatlining for the last five years. And unless we 560 00:30:59,000 --> 00:31:03,280 Speaker 1: can have a higher productivity level and combination with perhaps 561 00:31:03,360 --> 00:31:06,200 Speaker 1: a higher inflation rate over the next six to twelve 562 00:31:06,200 --> 00:31:10,560 Speaker 1: months than we have, you know, the stagflation where productivity 563 00:31:10,680 --> 00:31:13,240 Speaker 1: is low. As a thanks to two or three percent Bill, 564 00:31:13,240 --> 00:31:15,040 Speaker 1: We're gonna come back with Bill Gross and countin you. 565 00:31:15,080 --> 00:31:17,800 Speaker 1: Thank you, Bloomberg Television for being with us. We wait 566 00:31:17,840 --> 00:31:20,760 Speaker 1: for the day where the President tweets about Bill Gross. 567 00:31:20,800 --> 00:31:24,400 Speaker 1: Here's the president, excellent jobs number just released, and I've 568 00:31:24,440 --> 00:31:28,479 Speaker 1: only just begun. I have only just begun. Many jobs 569 00:31:28,520 --> 00:31:34,200 Speaker 1: stifling that many jobs stifling regulations continue to fall. Movement 570 00:31:34,440 --> 00:31:39,280 Speaker 1: back to the USA exclamation point. Bill Gross can a 571 00:31:39,440 --> 00:31:47,000 Speaker 1: president affect the job's economy and the jobs report, well, 572 00:31:47,880 --> 00:31:51,160 Speaker 1: you know, perhaps long term. You know, we've talked Tom 573 00:31:51,200 --> 00:31:54,800 Speaker 1: in the past about what President Trump is trying to 574 00:31:54,840 --> 00:31:58,760 Speaker 1: do in terms of individual corporations, and we've talked about 575 00:31:58,880 --> 00:32:02,800 Speaker 1: individual states and trying to bring jobs to those particular states. 576 00:32:02,800 --> 00:32:06,600 Speaker 1: So you know, I think a president can affect, uh, 577 00:32:06,680 --> 00:32:10,280 Speaker 1: those areas to some extent, but really, uh, you know, 578 00:32:10,440 --> 00:32:12,640 Speaker 1: job growth, to my way of thinking, is a functional 579 00:32:12,640 --> 00:32:17,280 Speaker 1: longer term structural factors such as demographics and the expected 580 00:32:17,320 --> 00:32:20,920 Speaker 1: return on capital, and those are things that I don't 581 00:32:20,920 --> 00:32:25,720 Speaker 1: think Trump ever studied about in uh in his master's thesis. 582 00:32:26,800 --> 00:32:29,080 Speaker 1: I heard that you heard that you could get that 583 00:32:29,520 --> 00:32:34,080 Speaker 1: grossying sarcasm there on Bloomberg Radio Worldwide. Bill, we are 584 00:32:34,160 --> 00:32:37,040 Speaker 1: ten years on into this financial crisis. It's an honor 585 00:32:37,120 --> 00:32:40,360 Speaker 1: to have you with us every job's day, and here 586 00:32:40,360 --> 00:32:43,000 Speaker 1: we are ten years on. You have been the clarion 587 00:32:43,120 --> 00:32:48,560 Speaker 1: voice on financial repression. Let's revisit that right now. Do 588 00:32:48,680 --> 00:32:53,760 Speaker 1: you assume that our enjoyment of low yield after any 589 00:32:53,840 --> 00:32:57,760 Speaker 1: kind of inflation will be called financial repression for years? 590 00:33:00,200 --> 00:33:02,800 Speaker 1: I think? So, you know, that's we've forgotten about Rogoff 591 00:33:02,880 --> 00:33:05,480 Speaker 1: and Reinhardt, right, that's about seven or eight years ago 592 00:33:05,520 --> 00:33:10,480 Speaker 1: when they sort of reinvented the thesis. But this has 593 00:33:10,520 --> 00:33:15,280 Speaker 1: been occurring for centuries. That financial repression for a long time, occurred, 594 00:33:15,480 --> 00:33:19,360 Speaker 1: you know, between the nineteen forties and actually up until 595 00:33:19,440 --> 00:33:22,760 Speaker 1: Vulgar in nineteen seventy nine, where central banks and the 596 00:33:22,800 --> 00:33:26,880 Speaker 1: FED repressed short term interest rates relative to inflation. So 597 00:33:27,280 --> 00:33:29,840 Speaker 1: financial repression has been with us. I think it will 598 00:33:29,840 --> 00:33:31,960 Speaker 1: continue to be with us. It has to do with 599 00:33:32,080 --> 00:33:36,960 Speaker 1: the neutral rate of interest, which is an amazing topic 600 00:33:37,400 --> 00:33:40,800 Speaker 1: of interest by central bankers everywhere, and to the extent 601 00:33:40,920 --> 00:33:43,880 Speaker 1: that the neutral rate of interest is far far lower 602 00:33:43,920 --> 00:33:46,600 Speaker 1: than what it was, and and FED officials think it's 603 00:33:46,600 --> 00:33:49,960 Speaker 1: below zero percent in real terms by the way, Um, 604 00:33:50,200 --> 00:33:54,280 Speaker 1: then financial repression will continue to exist. It basically means 605 00:33:54,280 --> 00:33:59,120 Speaker 1: that savers can't earn anything close to the rate of inflation, 606 00:33:59,240 --> 00:34:04,760 Speaker 1: let alone something for productivity growth and real growth. So um, yes, 607 00:34:04,840 --> 00:34:07,520 Speaker 1: And I think it's a negative. You've mentioned how I 608 00:34:07,680 --> 00:34:11,800 Speaker 1: talked about how it's a negative for financial institutions, business 609 00:34:11,840 --> 00:34:15,080 Speaker 1: models like consurance companies, pension funds, and even banks. And 610 00:34:15,719 --> 00:34:18,839 Speaker 1: one of these days, one of these years, perhaps, uh, 611 00:34:18,960 --> 00:34:21,400 Speaker 1: the economy is going to pay the price for financial 612 00:34:21,400 --> 00:34:24,600 Speaker 1: repression as opposed to reaping the rewards. Bill, tell us 613 00:34:24,640 --> 00:34:26,640 Speaker 1: what you see when you look at the yield curve? Now, 614 00:34:26,640 --> 00:34:29,600 Speaker 1: we were speculating yesterday as Governor Carney spoke in London 615 00:34:29,920 --> 00:34:32,000 Speaker 1: about the degree to which he's paying attention to to 616 00:34:32,040 --> 00:34:33,640 Speaker 1: the yield curve. There, what do you see when you 617 00:34:33,640 --> 00:34:37,600 Speaker 1: look at him? Well, I see it, Uh, you know, 618 00:34:37,640 --> 00:34:42,960 Speaker 1: a fairly normal yield curve. It has been flattening obviously 619 00:34:43,000 --> 00:34:46,080 Speaker 1: over the past three or four years, depending upon how 620 00:34:46,120 --> 00:34:48,960 Speaker 1: you measure it, whether it's two tens or two thirties 621 00:34:49,080 --> 00:34:53,279 Speaker 1: or even bills to UH to ten year treasures, there's 622 00:34:53,320 --> 00:34:57,400 Speaker 1: been a significant flattening. Um. The question becomes as a 623 00:34:57,520 --> 00:35:01,239 Speaker 1: rosen uh, as I wrote in my Investment Outlook of 624 00:35:01,239 --> 00:35:03,239 Speaker 1: a month ago, as to how flat it can go 625 00:35:03,440 --> 00:35:08,200 Speaker 1: before recession is threatened. And again, I think because of 626 00:35:08,239 --> 00:35:12,120 Speaker 1: the leverage inherent in the US economy and globally, that 627 00:35:12,239 --> 00:35:16,040 Speaker 1: you can't really flatten occurred much more or else the 628 00:35:16,239 --> 00:35:20,640 Speaker 1: danger for recession increases. Bill, I want to rip up 629 00:35:20,640 --> 00:35:22,960 Speaker 1: the script. A lot of people don't know, Bill, that 630 00:35:23,000 --> 00:35:26,240 Speaker 1: you've written very thoughtful, very matthew articles for the cf 631 00:35:26,320 --> 00:35:31,000 Speaker 1: A Institute we see another hedge fund today go down 632 00:35:31,000 --> 00:35:34,080 Speaker 1: in flames. This is the esteemed Andy Hall, with a 633 00:35:34,120 --> 00:35:38,800 Speaker 1: great track record in oil, oil strategy, oil trading of course, 634 00:35:39,280 --> 00:35:42,560 Speaker 1: iconic at City Group years ago. And Bill, this goes 635 00:35:42,680 --> 00:35:47,120 Speaker 1: into again making big bets and getting something wrong. You've 636 00:35:47,120 --> 00:35:50,320 Speaker 1: had the humility any number of times of being humbled 637 00:35:50,360 --> 00:35:53,480 Speaker 1: by the markets. What is it about hedge funds and 638 00:35:53,640 --> 00:35:57,560 Speaker 1: concentrated bets? When are we going to learn the value 639 00:35:57,719 --> 00:36:02,399 Speaker 1: of a good level of diversification versus betty knowing at 640 00:36:02,480 --> 00:36:07,960 Speaker 1: some point you're gonna be wrong, wrong, wrong, big. Well. 641 00:36:08,000 --> 00:36:11,000 Speaker 1: I think in many cases markets do and individuals do 642 00:36:11,120 --> 00:36:14,200 Speaker 1: know the value of diversification, and certainly even pension funds 643 00:36:14,239 --> 00:36:19,200 Speaker 1: in terms of that mix. But hedge funds, almost by 644 00:36:19,239 --> 00:36:23,080 Speaker 1: their nature, are leveraged players. And to the extent that 645 00:36:23,200 --> 00:36:25,640 Speaker 1: leverage is injected into a market, whether it's a bet 646 00:36:25,640 --> 00:36:27,960 Speaker 1: on gold or whether it's a bet on oil one 647 00:36:28,000 --> 00:36:32,000 Speaker 1: way or the other, then there's a significant potential I 648 00:36:32,040 --> 00:36:35,719 Speaker 1: guess for damage and destruction. I used to when I 649 00:36:35,719 --> 00:36:37,759 Speaker 1: play blackjack, Tom, I used to play black jack, and 650 00:36:37,760 --> 00:36:40,040 Speaker 1: I used to be a lot called Gambler's Ruin. And yes, 651 00:36:40,120 --> 00:36:45,279 Speaker 1: you couldn't bet you couldn't bet more than one fiftieth 652 00:36:45,400 --> 00:36:48,400 Speaker 1: of the stake of the chips on your table. You know, 653 00:36:48,520 --> 00:36:52,960 Speaker 1: before you're being threatened by what they call gamblers ruin, 654 00:36:53,040 --> 00:36:55,560 Speaker 1: which is a restraint of bad luck. Well, this is 655 00:36:55,600 --> 00:36:57,600 Speaker 1: so important, folks, that we have the honor of Ed 656 00:36:57,680 --> 00:37:00,600 Speaker 1: Thorpe of Massachusetts Institute of Technology. You in with Barry 657 00:37:01,000 --> 00:37:03,719 Speaker 1: Les recently, and I've interviewed at Thorpe and Bill you 658 00:37:03,760 --> 00:37:06,560 Speaker 1: and I've read at Thorpe cover to cover almost as 659 00:37:06,760 --> 00:37:10,799 Speaker 1: religion to our listeners who don't have the sophistication of 660 00:37:10,840 --> 00:37:14,480 Speaker 1: Andy Hall or Bill Grocer, John Tucker. The basic idea 661 00:37:14,640 --> 00:37:20,160 Speaker 1: here of diversification, How do you do that ten years 662 00:37:20,160 --> 00:37:23,560 Speaker 1: on from this financial crisis, with the odd fixed income 663 00:37:23,600 --> 00:37:29,120 Speaker 1: market that we have, How does Bill Gross diversify? Well, 664 00:37:29,480 --> 00:37:34,520 Speaker 1: you diversified carefully, and you diversified Tom with a sense 665 00:37:34,600 --> 00:37:40,759 Speaker 1: of trades. Carried trades, trades that supposedly yield um. You know, 666 00:37:40,800 --> 00:37:43,520 Speaker 1: a positive number, whether it be a spread, or whether 667 00:37:43,560 --> 00:37:46,839 Speaker 1: it be an interest rate tenure treasury at two point 668 00:37:46,880 --> 00:37:50,520 Speaker 1: two five or whatever. You do it very carefully because 669 00:37:50,640 --> 00:37:55,360 Speaker 1: all carried trades, all interest rates, spreads and risk premiums 670 00:37:55,360 --> 00:37:59,520 Speaker 1: are compressed and so you have to take that into consideration, 671 00:37:59,560 --> 00:38:02,279 Speaker 1: and too, pality. You can't just talk about stocks and 672 00:38:02,480 --> 00:38:06,600 Speaker 1: bonds because stocks and bonds are both artificially elevated. And 673 00:38:06,640 --> 00:38:09,600 Speaker 1: so what you do the the essence of the short 674 00:38:09,600 --> 00:38:12,960 Speaker 1: answer to your question, Thomas, you you begin to raise 675 00:38:13,320 --> 00:38:17,480 Speaker 1: much more cash because gat cash is the ultimate cushion. 676 00:38:17,960 --> 00:38:20,520 Speaker 1: I guess in terms of the risk of market. Is 677 00:38:20,520 --> 00:38:24,359 Speaker 1: your Mexican trade tired? You've been arbitraging Mexican yields here 678 00:38:24,400 --> 00:38:27,640 Speaker 1: and there and everywhere. Have we've seen enough of an 679 00:38:27,680 --> 00:38:30,239 Speaker 1: e m in a Mexico move where you've got to 680 00:38:30,239 --> 00:38:34,640 Speaker 1: go find something else to do with your marginal cash? Yeah? 681 00:38:34,680 --> 00:38:37,680 Speaker 1: I think so. I was in uh, you know, Mexican 682 00:38:38,320 --> 00:38:41,719 Speaker 1: linkers so to speak, tips, Mexican tips, and you know 683 00:38:41,760 --> 00:38:44,680 Speaker 1: they yield three and a half percent real. Um, you know, 684 00:38:44,680 --> 00:38:47,759 Speaker 1: I got out of those about a month ago. But um, 685 00:38:48,000 --> 00:38:51,160 Speaker 1: you know, Mexico still is a very undervalued pay so 686 00:38:51,800 --> 00:38:55,480 Speaker 1: especially in real terms, and especially when you compare to 687 00:38:55,560 --> 00:38:59,560 Speaker 1: the you know, the Big MAC index which the economist runs. Um, 688 00:38:59,719 --> 00:39:02,080 Speaker 1: you know, their big max are very very cheap, like 689 00:39:02,160 --> 00:39:07,000 Speaker 1: two and a half bucks versus states, and so ultimately 690 00:39:07,040 --> 00:39:09,200 Speaker 1: the pace at the pace, so the Mexican Paso has 691 00:39:09,200 --> 00:39:11,840 Speaker 1: a way to go in terms of strengthening relative to 692 00:39:11,880 --> 00:39:15,480 Speaker 1: the dollar. And that's the biggest bet I've met in Mexico. 693 00:39:15,640 --> 00:39:19,160 Speaker 1: What would be your counsel for Republicans in Washington to 694 00:39:19,320 --> 00:39:22,600 Speaker 1: jump start after what they've been through. What's your advice 695 00:39:22,680 --> 00:39:26,319 Speaker 1: to senators to representatives up for re election in two 696 00:39:26,360 --> 00:39:29,680 Speaker 1: thousand eighteen. They got a rebuild, they got a restructure. 697 00:39:29,719 --> 00:39:37,319 Speaker 1: What's the bill grows prescription to get Washington to assist America. Well, 698 00:39:37,360 --> 00:39:41,680 Speaker 1: my prescription is more of a populist as opposed to 699 00:39:41,880 --> 00:39:47,360 Speaker 1: corporate type of prescription. That's not the Republican mantra, unfortunately. 700 00:39:47,480 --> 00:39:50,520 Speaker 1: But my wave of the future Tom and that's five 701 00:39:50,600 --> 00:39:52,880 Speaker 1: or ten years out, and it depends on the next president, 702 00:39:52,880 --> 00:39:55,680 Speaker 1: of course, But my wave of the future continues to 703 00:39:55,719 --> 00:40:01,520 Speaker 1: believe that populism and that universal income, uh, universal benefits 704 00:40:01,560 --> 00:40:04,920 Speaker 1: are really the wave of the future because, uh, you know, 705 00:40:05,040 --> 00:40:09,560 Speaker 1: people are being replaced by technology and by robotization, and 706 00:40:09,600 --> 00:40:12,719 Speaker 1: to the extent that they can't find jobs, they need help. 707 00:40:12,760 --> 00:40:15,320 Speaker 1: And I think one of the biggest problems with government 708 00:40:15,400 --> 00:40:19,600 Speaker 1: is that, yes they've embraced technology, and yes corporations have 709 00:40:19,680 --> 00:40:23,680 Speaker 1: run that way, but but governments have failed to take 710 00:40:23,719 --> 00:40:26,480 Speaker 1: care of people that have been displaced by them. And 711 00:40:26,600 --> 00:40:28,600 Speaker 1: so that's what I would say to Republicans, get a 712 00:40:28,600 --> 00:40:31,560 Speaker 1: little more democratic. Bill Gross, thank you so much, and 713 00:40:31,640 --> 00:40:33,799 Speaker 1: may you speak to David Gura for a lengthy time. 714 00:40:33,920 --> 00:40:38,320 Speaker 1: It's times. It's a conversation, ly, Bill Gross. He's an 715 00:40:38,360 --> 00:40:40,440 Speaker 1: agent for Colin Kaepernick because he tries to find the 716 00:40:40,560 --> 00:40:56,040 Speaker 1: job in the NFL as well. Right now to our 717 00:40:56,160 --> 00:40:59,319 Speaker 1: David Weston and John Ferry. Here's David. No one in 718 00:40:59,360 --> 00:41:02,160 Speaker 1: the country were focused on than Gary Khane, director of 719 00:41:02,200 --> 00:41:05,160 Speaker 1: the President's National Economic Council. Gary joins us now from 720 00:41:05,160 --> 00:41:08,440 Speaker 1: the White House. Welcome back to the program. Thanks David, 721 00:41:08,440 --> 00:41:10,239 Speaker 1: thanks for having me. Okay, So Gary gives us as 722 00:41:10,239 --> 00:41:12,279 Speaker 1: we've already heard from the President in a tweet. He 723 00:41:12,280 --> 00:41:14,560 Speaker 1: thinks there's are really good numbers, although there's more to come. 724 00:41:14,800 --> 00:41:17,000 Speaker 1: Give us your sense and the presidents for that matter, 725 00:41:17,040 --> 00:41:19,160 Speaker 1: about how you look at these numbers, and specifically the 726 00:41:19,239 --> 00:41:22,680 Speaker 1: number of jobs added, the participation rate, and the wage growth. 727 00:41:23,560 --> 00:41:27,720 Speaker 1: So look, David, the President's completely right. These are good numbers. 728 00:41:28,320 --> 00:41:32,840 Speaker 1: Two nine thousand non farm payroll jobs, unemployment rate down 729 00:41:32,880 --> 00:41:35,879 Speaker 1: to four point three percent, down to a sixteen year low. 730 00:41:36,480 --> 00:41:40,319 Speaker 1: We're bringing Americans back into the workforce, and that's what 731 00:41:40,400 --> 00:41:42,440 Speaker 1: the presidents set out to do, and that's what the 732 00:41:42,440 --> 00:41:45,879 Speaker 1: President is doing. That is our objective, and we've done 733 00:41:45,920 --> 00:41:49,920 Speaker 1: that without our major policy initiatives being able to take place. 734 00:41:50,120 --> 00:41:54,440 Speaker 1: Number one policy initiative to deregulate the US environment. We 735 00:41:54,600 --> 00:41:59,720 Speaker 1: still haven't gotten most of our nominees through the regulatory process. 736 00:41:59,840 --> 00:42:02,240 Speaker 1: We out a couple through yesterday in a big package 737 00:42:02,239 --> 00:42:04,440 Speaker 1: of nominees that went through. We got some of our 738 00:42:04,520 --> 00:42:07,040 Speaker 1: CFTC members through. We didn't get our firm members through. 739 00:42:07,120 --> 00:42:09,400 Speaker 1: We didn't get other members through. When we get those 740 00:42:09,440 --> 00:42:13,240 Speaker 1: members through, we're gonna be able to continue deregulating markets 741 00:42:13,280 --> 00:42:16,680 Speaker 1: and the environment so we can can continue to invest 742 00:42:16,760 --> 00:42:20,200 Speaker 1: capital in the United States and can continue to create great, 743 00:42:20,320 --> 00:42:23,359 Speaker 1: high paying jobs in America. This is all about not 744 00:42:23,440 --> 00:42:26,200 Speaker 1: only growing the economy, but growing the economy so we 745 00:42:26,239 --> 00:42:29,000 Speaker 1: can create great, high paying jobs for Americans and bring 746 00:42:29,040 --> 00:42:31,520 Speaker 1: more and more people back to the workforce. That's what 747 00:42:31,560 --> 00:42:33,920 Speaker 1: the President's committed to do. That's what I'm committed to do. 748 00:42:34,000 --> 00:42:36,240 Speaker 1: So let's talk about those high paying jobs. Because wage 749 00:42:36,239 --> 00:42:38,080 Speaker 1: growth is up about two and a half percent year 750 00:42:38,160 --> 00:42:41,520 Speaker 1: over year. A lot of commons still find that rather tepid, 751 00:42:41,800 --> 00:42:44,359 Speaker 1: and it's good, but it's not good enough. How do 752 00:42:44,400 --> 00:42:48,640 Speaker 1: you explain this phenomenon where we have really a robust employment, 753 00:42:48,719 --> 00:42:51,320 Speaker 1: some people think full employment, and yet we're not seeing 754 00:42:51,360 --> 00:42:54,879 Speaker 1: the wage growth. So it is on the twelve month 755 00:42:55,000 --> 00:42:56,839 Speaker 1: or two and a half, the one month was three 756 00:42:56,880 --> 00:42:59,680 Speaker 1: tents of a percent, So the one month is annualizing 757 00:42:59,760 --> 00:43:01,759 Speaker 1: high higer than the twelve months, which is which is 758 00:43:01,800 --> 00:43:05,120 Speaker 1: interesting news to us. We spend time this morning discussing 759 00:43:05,239 --> 00:43:08,000 Speaker 1: what that means. If that's a new trend, we would 760 00:43:08,000 --> 00:43:10,840 Speaker 1: obviously like to see some wage inflation in the system. 761 00:43:11,120 --> 00:43:14,880 Speaker 1: Wage inflation means that we're putting more income in consumers pockets. 762 00:43:15,080 --> 00:43:17,440 Speaker 1: When consumers have more income, and then we lower their 763 00:43:17,480 --> 00:43:19,840 Speaker 1: tax rates on top of that, they'll have more money 764 00:43:19,880 --> 00:43:23,120 Speaker 1: to spend, driving more and more economic growth. So that's 765 00:43:23,160 --> 00:43:25,920 Speaker 1: really what we want to see. We need to create 766 00:43:26,120 --> 00:43:28,560 Speaker 1: the jobs. We need to create the jobs by getting 767 00:43:28,680 --> 00:43:32,200 Speaker 1: rid of the regulation that's bogging down industry. We need 768 00:43:32,239 --> 00:43:35,360 Speaker 1: to reform the tax code so we can incentivize companies 769 00:43:35,400 --> 00:43:37,879 Speaker 1: to invest in America. That's what we're trying to do. 770 00:43:38,040 --> 00:43:40,840 Speaker 1: We're totally committed to doing it, and we're we feel 771 00:43:40,880 --> 00:43:42,840 Speaker 1: confident that we can get that done between now and 772 00:43:42,920 --> 00:43:45,480 Speaker 1: the end of the year. Gary, you've inherited an economy 773 00:43:45,480 --> 00:43:48,879 Speaker 1: where the headline numbers for the labor market look really 774 00:43:48,960 --> 00:43:51,320 Speaker 1: quite solid, and they point towards a tight labor market, 775 00:43:51,360 --> 00:43:53,120 Speaker 1: and we haven't seen the wage growth we thought we 776 00:43:53,160 --> 00:43:55,280 Speaker 1: would get over the previous few years, and it's starting 777 00:43:55,320 --> 00:43:57,680 Speaker 1: to creep in. But I just wonder whether you think 778 00:43:57,719 --> 00:43:59,719 Speaker 1: there's a lot more specapacity, a lot more slack in 779 00:43:59,760 --> 00:44:02,240 Speaker 1: the lay up a market than the headline numbers suggest. 780 00:44:03,800 --> 00:44:05,880 Speaker 1: I think there is some slack in the labor market. 781 00:44:05,920 --> 00:44:08,360 Speaker 1: I think we can get the participation rate higher. I 782 00:44:08,400 --> 00:44:11,479 Speaker 1: think we can bring more Americans back to work by 783 00:44:11,640 --> 00:44:14,840 Speaker 1: creating the jobs and creating incentives and make it easier 784 00:44:14,880 --> 00:44:17,440 Speaker 1: for small and medium sized businesses to grow, make it 785 00:44:17,440 --> 00:44:21,080 Speaker 1: easier for businesses to start by making credit available, by 786 00:44:21,080 --> 00:44:23,680 Speaker 1: getting rid of regulation. We do think that there is 787 00:44:23,840 --> 00:44:26,560 Speaker 1: much more potential to bring people back into the labor force. 788 00:44:26,600 --> 00:44:28,520 Speaker 1: And Gared, do you think those issues You've pointed out 789 00:44:28,560 --> 00:44:31,040 Speaker 1: some structural issues, but you think really predominantly the issues 790 00:44:31,040 --> 00:44:35,719 Speaker 1: are quite cyclical. Uh, you know, we argue that that 791 00:44:35,840 --> 00:44:38,799 Speaker 1: all the time, what we're committed on right now is 792 00:44:38,840 --> 00:44:42,360 Speaker 1: to create the best possible jobs environment that we can create. 793 00:44:42,719 --> 00:44:45,880 Speaker 1: And we know, we really do know that when people 794 00:44:45,960 --> 00:44:48,840 Speaker 1: think about investing capital, and investing capital is what you 795 00:44:48,880 --> 00:44:51,360 Speaker 1: need to grow in economy, people look at a couple 796 00:44:51,360 --> 00:44:55,200 Speaker 1: of fundamental factors. Regulation and taxes are two of the 797 00:44:55,280 --> 00:44:58,200 Speaker 1: main driving factors they look at, and those are two 798 00:44:58,239 --> 00:45:00,839 Speaker 1: factors that we are spending an forrmous amount of time 799 00:45:00,840 --> 00:45:03,880 Speaker 1: and making better for anyone that wants to invest capital 800 00:45:03,920 --> 00:45:06,799 Speaker 1: in the United States. Garrett, you raised the taxes. We've 801 00:45:06,800 --> 00:45:09,239 Speaker 1: talked to you before about the plan. You came out 802 00:45:09,400 --> 00:45:11,719 Speaker 1: with the Group of Six as it's called, with an 803 00:45:11,719 --> 00:45:13,719 Speaker 1: outline of a plan. Where are you on that plan? 804 00:45:13,760 --> 00:45:16,480 Speaker 1: When are we going to see the specific legislative language? 805 00:45:17,480 --> 00:45:19,799 Speaker 1: So as you're right, the Group of Six continues to meet. 806 00:45:19,880 --> 00:45:23,919 Speaker 1: We put out a notice last week that shows how 807 00:45:23,960 --> 00:45:26,919 Speaker 1: well coordinated the six of us are, how we all 808 00:45:26,960 --> 00:45:30,279 Speaker 1: agree on the skeleton of the tax plan. We're now 809 00:45:30,440 --> 00:45:33,880 Speaker 1: working quite actively with the House Ways and Means Committee 810 00:45:33,880 --> 00:45:36,919 Speaker 1: and the Finance Committee in the Senate to actually get 811 00:45:36,960 --> 00:45:40,680 Speaker 1: some muscle structure on the skeleton to really drive tax 812 00:45:40,719 --> 00:45:42,719 Speaker 1: reform to where where we have to drive it. We're 813 00:45:42,719 --> 00:45:46,200 Speaker 1: gonna continuously meet over August and hopefully be able to 814 00:45:46,280 --> 00:45:49,600 Speaker 1: deliver a comprehensive tax bill early in the fall. Is 815 00:45:49,640 --> 00:45:53,120 Speaker 1: that September it's early, and that's early in the fall, 816 00:45:53,120 --> 00:45:54,799 Speaker 1: but there's a lot of other dates that are early 817 00:45:54,800 --> 00:45:57,040 Speaker 1: in the fall as well. And how confident you are 818 00:45:57,080 --> 00:45:59,279 Speaker 1: you at this point, given all the difficulties that have 819 00:45:59,360 --> 00:46:01,600 Speaker 1: been occurred ring up in Congress, that you've abibly get 820 00:46:01,640 --> 00:46:03,719 Speaker 1: this through this year, as you said before, is really 821 00:46:03,760 --> 00:46:07,880 Speaker 1: your goal. Look, I think the members of Congress understand 822 00:46:07,920 --> 00:46:11,480 Speaker 1: how important tax reform is. And if we're really going 823 00:46:11,560 --> 00:46:14,839 Speaker 1: to drive the economy and drive economic growth and get 824 00:46:14,880 --> 00:46:18,239 Speaker 1: from the muddling two percent to three percent, then we 825 00:46:18,320 --> 00:46:21,719 Speaker 1: have to do something structural to the US economy. The 826 00:46:21,760 --> 00:46:23,479 Speaker 1: structural things we have to do, and I've talked about 827 00:46:23,480 --> 00:46:26,000 Speaker 1: red reform, so I'll talk about taxes. We really have 828 00:46:26,160 --> 00:46:30,640 Speaker 1: to change our tax rate. We cannot be substantially higher 829 00:46:30,640 --> 00:46:32,719 Speaker 1: than the O E c D average tax rate out 830 00:46:32,719 --> 00:46:35,040 Speaker 1: there at a thirty five percent tax rate against a 831 00:46:35,080 --> 00:46:38,320 Speaker 1: tree O E c D average tax rate, you know, 832 00:46:39,000 --> 00:46:41,560 Speaker 1: percent higher taxes than the O E c D average 833 00:46:41,680 --> 00:46:44,839 Speaker 1: just does not make us competitive. We've got to get 834 00:46:44,880 --> 00:46:47,000 Speaker 1: in line with the rest of the world. We've got 835 00:46:47,040 --> 00:46:50,560 Speaker 1: to entice capital to be invested in the United States. Gary, 836 00:46:50,600 --> 00:46:52,320 Speaker 1: we caught up with Muhammeddalarian, a man of course that 837 00:46:52,400 --> 00:46:54,320 Speaker 1: you know well, and he talked about the much needed 838 00:46:54,320 --> 00:46:56,880 Speaker 1: handoff from monetary policy to to fiscal Do you think 839 00:46:56,920 --> 00:46:59,000 Speaker 1: we've relied too much on monetery policy in a country 840 00:46:59,000 --> 00:47:01,719 Speaker 1: a lot of the United States too long? Look, I 841 00:47:01,719 --> 00:47:03,759 Speaker 1: don't think this is a US issue. I think the 842 00:47:03,760 --> 00:47:06,840 Speaker 1: globe has been dealing with the whole monetary fiscal policy 843 00:47:06,880 --> 00:47:10,360 Speaker 1: issue since the two thousand and eight financial crisis. Central 844 00:47:10,360 --> 00:47:12,560 Speaker 1: banks did what they were supposed to do. But we 845 00:47:12,640 --> 00:47:15,480 Speaker 1: do have to transition the economy and in the system 846 00:47:15,560 --> 00:47:18,120 Speaker 1: to a more normalized system. And does that require a 847 00:47:18,160 --> 00:47:20,680 Speaker 1: handoff from monetary policy to fiscal Gary, is that way 848 00:47:20,719 --> 00:47:23,960 Speaker 1: you guys can help? Yeah, we can help. We can 849 00:47:24,000 --> 00:47:26,960 Speaker 1: help by removing barriers. We can help by making it 850 00:47:27,000 --> 00:47:30,319 Speaker 1: easier for capital flow into the United States. We can 851 00:47:30,360 --> 00:47:33,600 Speaker 1: get a more competitive tax system here, we can remove 852 00:47:33,760 --> 00:47:36,520 Speaker 1: regulation that stops capital from coming into the United States. 853 00:47:36,680 --> 00:47:39,040 Speaker 1: That's exactly what we're trying to do. Gary. As you 854 00:47:39,080 --> 00:47:40,600 Speaker 1: go back to your office there in the White House, 855 00:47:40,640 --> 00:47:42,960 Speaker 1: behind that behind you right now? What is will be 856 00:47:43,000 --> 00:47:46,719 Speaker 1: your number one priority? And today are you more confident 857 00:47:46,760 --> 00:47:50,240 Speaker 1: in achieving that or less than the day you walked in. David, 858 00:47:50,280 --> 00:47:52,440 Speaker 1: my number one priority for him now to the end 859 00:47:52,480 --> 00:47:55,360 Speaker 1: of the year is taxes. My second priority is taxes, 860 00:47:55,400 --> 00:47:59,040 Speaker 1: and if you're confused, my third priority is taxes. Gary 861 00:47:59,400 --> 00:48:03,560 Speaker 1: the U s National Economic Council with Director John Pharaoh 862 00:48:03,600 --> 00:48:06,640 Speaker 1: and David Weston in conversation from the White House Lawn 863 00:48:06,680 --> 00:48:11,120 Speaker 1: with Mr Kohn of the National Economic Council as well. 864 00:48:11,239 --> 00:48:14,040 Speaker 1: To summarize here, a great week. Thanks to all of 865 00:48:14,040 --> 00:48:19,080 Speaker 1: our team for their sport, particularly an exhaustive, exhausted team, 866 00:48:19,080 --> 00:48:21,560 Speaker 1: I should say in Washington, which has just really done 867 00:48:21,560 --> 00:48:25,920 Speaker 1: a a great job. For special thanks to Kevin Surreally, 868 00:48:26,000 --> 00:48:38,880 Speaker 1: our our chief Washington correspondent. Thanks for listening to the 869 00:48:38,920 --> 00:48:45,759 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 870 00:48:46,160 --> 00:48:49,920 Speaker 1: or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at 871 00:48:50,000 --> 00:48:54,640 Speaker 1: Tom Keene. David Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast, 872 00:48:55,000 --> 00:49:01,800 Speaker 1: you can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio s