WEBVTT - McDonalds E. Coli Outbreak, Boeing Earnings

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Affo card playing Android otto with the Bloomberg

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's go right to the man himself, Michael Halen. He's

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 2>a senior restaurant analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's been all

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 2>over busy, busy day today with the McDonald's news, with

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the Starbucks earnings. Hey, Mike, let's start with McDonald's here. Boy,

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>if I were a long term shareholder of McDonald's I

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 2>think I'd be buying stock here today because nothing's fundamentally

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 2>changed other than this short term, really unfortunate incident out

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>in the West.

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 4>I guess the question is going to be how short

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 4>term is it?

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:51.959
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 5>Obviously it was a tragedy. Somebody's passed away. You have

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 5>ten people in the hospital. That number could expand in

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 5>the coming weeks. So yeah, I guess it's going to

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 5>depend on when customers are going to feel comfortable going.

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 4>Back to McDonald's.

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 5>You know, we think, you know, we think that some

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 5>negative sentiment could linger. Obviously, this company has gotten ahead

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 5>of itself in terms of pricing, and customers, especially low

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 5>income consumers have pushed back by visiting less this year,

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 5>and so, you know, I think the timing of it

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 5>was kind of bad in terms of where the stock's at.

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the stock's been ripping higher over the last

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 4>couple of months.

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 5>It makes us think that they finally kind of hit

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 5>on value and we're able to track people back with

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 5>this five dollars meal in the last quarter, right, but

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.199
<v Speaker 5>with the stock near all time highs man, that's that's

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, I guess that's a decision consumers investors are

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 5>going to have to make today.

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 6>So for the next earnings report out of McDonald's, do

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 6>you expect any type of hit either to the sales

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 6>or any earnings metrics that has to do with this

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 6>equal y outbreak news?

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 5>So this is gonna be, uh, this is gonna impact

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 5>a fourth quarter. So we think this is gonna have

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 5>a meaningful impact on the fourth quarter and it'll probably

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 5>bleed into early twenty twenty five as well. We think

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 5>traffic and Samsar sales are going to get it a

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:17.679
<v Speaker 5>hit because you know, I've been on TV four times

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 5>already today. I'm sure all the major outlets are covering

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 5>this story. And so it's gonna turn a lot of

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 5>people off from McDonald's. And I think there's gonna be

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 5>a lot of people out there that just may not

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 5>feel safe eating in their local McDonalds. So I think

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 5>it's gonna it's gonna impact sales and traffic and earnings

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:37.959
<v Speaker 5>for at least a few quarters.

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 2>And Mike, aren't most I mean, like the vast majority

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 2>of McDonald's. Aren't they franchised versus company owned?

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 5>Yes, yeah, they're They're ninety six percent franchised. So yeah,

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 5>the largest impact is gonna be to the franchisees. That's

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 5>a great point, Paul. Franchisees are gonna suffer the most,

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, because McDonald's is so heavily franchised. You know

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 5>that they'll take a top line impact, but there's less

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 5>operating leverage in that model, right, and so because of that,

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:09.639
<v Speaker 5>their earnings aren't going to get hurt.

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 4>The last big example of.

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 2>This was Chapotle.

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 4>Chapotle owned all their stores.

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 5>So when their same star sales drop twenty percent twenty seventeen,

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 5>their margins got decimated, right, because there's just a lot

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 5>more operating leverage in the model. So you know, for

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 5>that reason, there's a lot less risk to the McDonald's

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 5>story in this case versus what we saw the Chipotle

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 5>back then.

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 6>So Michael Paul said that he's been ordering the same

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 6>thing from McDonald since high school. I imagine that when

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 6>he first lets going back ordered it, maybe the burger

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 6>was two dollars fifty cent. I want to talk about

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 6>pricing though, How is McDonald's doing right now with being

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 6>able to raise prices with a consumer that is kind

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 6>of constrained by higher interest rates and inflation right now?

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's not just them, it's it's it's all of

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 5>the restaurant, but especially quick service. Thirty percent of their

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 5>transactions are made by low income consumers. And there's this

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 5>ke shaped economy right where if you own assets, right,

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 5>if you have a lot of money in your four

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 5>oh one k and you own a house, and you

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 5>know you're doing pretty good, right, But inflation has squeezed

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 5>the hell out of low income consumers now for four years,

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 5>and they're they're just shopping at the grocery store more often.

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 4>They're cutting back on their visits.

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, they're they're cutting back on their checks when

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 5>they do go to the restaurants, right, and so McDonald's

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 5>franchise ease because they're the ones that set the pricing,

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, and everyone else in the restaurant industry is

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 5>struggling mightily to raise prices on their consumers this year.

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 5>And you know, and the rising you know, the seven

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 5>since of fifty basis points cut commodity prices have just

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 5>gone up since since September when we started pricing that in, right,

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 5>and so that's a big concern for restaurant tours.

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 4>I think in twenty twenty five.

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, Mike, let's switch gears. Look at Starbucks. Sbux

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.559
<v Speaker 2>is the ticker to put into your Bloomberg terminal stocks

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 2>off about a half of one percent today. It's pretty

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 2>much unchanged on the year, so badly, badly trailing the

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 2>S and P five hundred, which is up about twenty

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 2>two percent.

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 4>Here.

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 2>What's going on at Starbucks here, Michael?

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they they played catch up a bit once the

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 5>appointment of Brian Nickel was the hiring of Brian Nichol

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 5>was announced. You know, Brian Nickel started last month, and

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, he's moving quickly.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Man.

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 5>He's making a lot of management changes, and he's aggressively

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 5>making moves to simplify operations. You know, they're going to rationalize,

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 5>rationalized menu items, make it easier to execute, and try

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 5>to bring.

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 4>Hospitality back to the coffee shops.

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 5>They want to free up their employees, their partners as

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.239
<v Speaker 5>they like to call them, to get back to knowing

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 5>the names of their customers, right and being able to

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 5>greet them with a smile and friendly service.

0:05:58.680 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 5>And so that's that's going to be job one, and

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 5>then from there they're gonna expand on the marketing side.

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 5>You know, Starbucks has historically only marketed to its rewards members, right,

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 5>and Brian Nicol wants to expand that to everyone, right.

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 5>And we think that's a smart plan. We think they've

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 5>been under investing in marketing for a long time, and

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 5>we expected to pay dividends as early as fiscal twenty

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 5>twenty five.

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 6>What is the company said to explain the seven percent

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 6>decline in same store sales? Because before you came on,

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 6>we were talking about how you have to wait in

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 6>a really long line to get your Starbucks. There's less drive, right,

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 6>if you're doing it. There's I guess, well maybe some

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 6>teams in the store, but there's less people in the store.

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 6>What have they said about really what's driving that decline?

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 2>You know, part of what.

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 5>New CEO Brian Nichol has said this is like it's

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 5>largely about the experience. You know, it's become largely transactional. Right,

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 5>They've lost that customer service feel. They've had the trouble

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 5>executing the orders. You know, a big part of it is,

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, and then he also mentioned that, you know,

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 5>all of these new menu items that they added to

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 5>try to bring people in didn't work right. And then

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 5>you know, to your point, pricing has gotten ahead of

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 5>itself at Starbucks as well, and then China China, there's

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 5>a huge price gap between the prices that they're charging.

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 5>Sometimes they're charging three times as much as as some

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 5>of their smaller competitors like Luck and Coffee and k Coffee. So,

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, prices has also been a big part of

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 5>their issue, and it's something that they're they're going to

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 5>address right away.

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, I've seen some crazy graphics in various articles

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 2>showing the permutations of the different orders that one could have,

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 2>and if you're bar barbista. There's it's virtually impossible to

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 2>learn all these Is there a sense that they kind

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 2>of simplified just the menu a little bit?

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that was They issued a video yesterday after the close,

0:07:57.880 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 5>and that was a big point of emphasis. It was

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 5>like making the jobs of their barista is a lot

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 5>easier and their employees a lot easier, right, And so

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 5>you know when an.

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 4>Employee stressed, it's very hard for.

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 5>Them to provide the customer with a good experience, right.

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 5>So this all flows downhill.

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 4>So making the barista's jobs easier.

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 5>Making it more and more enjoyable environment for them is

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 5>going to flow down to the consumer, and then it's

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.679
<v Speaker 5>going to result in better traffic and same source sales.

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 6>We don't have a ton a ton of time left,

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 6>but I was curious to get your thoughts, you know,

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 6>Brian Nichols said. The company said that they're pulling back

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 6>this guidance because the CEO needs more time to kind

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 6>of think through all this. How unprecedented is that just

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 6>thirty seconds?

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Uh?

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 4>No, it would be This is very common.

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 5>Any any good CEO, we're worth his soul is gonna

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:49.719
<v Speaker 5>is going to suspend guidance. So they have more time

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 5>to get their initiatives in place. This is a huge company.

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 5>It's going to take a long time for momentum to

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 5>start building in the right direction.

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 4>And this is a wise move, all right.

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:02.599
<v Speaker 2>Michael Halen busy busy analysts today here with Starbucks McDonald's

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 2>in the news. Michael Halen, senior restaurant and food service

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 2>analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us from the BI office

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 2>in Princeton, New Jersey.

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard.

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Family Graffeo sitting in for Alex steel On Paul Swinging.

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 2>Were live here in our Boomberg Arrective Brokers studio and

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 2>we're streaming live on YouTube as well. Bowing back in

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 2>the news again today with some earnings not a good

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:44.839
<v Speaker 2>cash flow story, stocks down three and a quarter percent.

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 2>Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg provided an unvarnished view of his

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.839
<v Speaker 2>company at a crossolads absorbed by challenges ranging from huge

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 2>debt to serious performance lapses that it needs to address

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 2>before it can consider developing a new aircraft. Take it

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 2>Down Force. George Ferguson joins US Senior Aerospace, Airlines and

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Defense anels for Bloomberg Intelligence. So what did you see

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 2>in this earnings release, George? What did you hear from

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 2>new CEO Kelly Ortberg as you think about this Boeing

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 2>story right now?

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 8>So I think you touched on the most important thing

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 8>we heard on the call. I don't think it was

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 8>that cash burn continues into twenty twenty five, you know,

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 8>that worse than the front half of the year.

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 4>It's not like in the back half of the year cash.

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 8>There could be some generation, but it'll finish the year negative,

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 8>which really leads to me to believe, right, they just

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 8>got to raise They got to raise cash here shortly

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 8>because they don't want to dip underneath that ten billion dollars,

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 8>you know, amount they need to run the company. I

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:51.599
<v Speaker 8>think also I found it interesting away from his discussions

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 8>on you know, the culture Boeing and how it needs

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 8>to change. I think everybody understands that, we all agree.

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 8>I found it interesting too, you know, A couple of

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 8>analysts went out of him about selling divisions, didn't get

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 8>a lot out of them, I think on on selling

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 8>parts of Boeing to raise money. Look, I know he's busy,

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 8>he's been first couple of days. But my guess is

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 8>they've looked at ways to raise cash, and you know,

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 8>we didn't think there was much potential to sell big

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 8>chunks and raise cash. And it didn't sound like Kelly

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 8>had any of those on top of his list either,

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 8>So I thought.

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 4>It was the most interesting stuff.

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.959
<v Speaker 6>What did the CEO say about the serious performance lapses

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 6>that Boeing has had over the last year.

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean you know what I heard was, you know,

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 8>the serious lapses. You know, I guess he kind of

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 8>owned up to them as well. But again I think

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.719
<v Speaker 8>we all knew that and that and that, you know,

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.599
<v Speaker 8>he thought companies still had, you know, potential for a

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 8>very bright future. They're part of a duopoly, large backlog,

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 8>and I think he understands that they need to bring

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.199
<v Speaker 8>back the machinist as soon as they can in a

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 8>way where they're happy and ready to build product well,

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 8>and that's the path to success. And so but again

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 8>I think he kind of owned again the problems of

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 8>the company. But we've heard this before, right, I think

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 8>now that the question is how do you change it?

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 2>And you turn it around? All right? The most immediate

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess mile post for this company is settling the striking.

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Today is the day the rank and file out there

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 2>in the Pacific northwester they are going to vote today,

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>and he consents us how this might go.

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 8>I'm not seeing any I mean, I'm I'm in the

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 8>camp that it looks like he has a pretty good

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 8>shot of it, because again, I think, you know, I've

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 8>talked before that the union's been out now for about

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 8>a month, so I'm sure they're starting to feel the

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 8>pain of not having a paychecker at least a paycheck

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 8>as large as they're used to coming in. They're pretty

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 8>close to the terms that I think they're all looking for.

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.599
<v Speaker 8>The union might have been looking for forty percent. I

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 8>think they'll get. You know, thirty five sounds pretty darn close.

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 8>I don't know if you really want to hold out

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 8>for the extra five percent. And they sweetened up some

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 8>of the four oh one k matching and some bonuses,

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 8>so to me, it feels like they're pretty darn close

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.199
<v Speaker 8>and given the timeline, since they last all work, it

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 8>kind of feels like he might get it tonight.

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 2>All right. So the long term challenge I think for

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 2>this company, and I actually just happen to know a

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 2>couple of you know, long time really right out of

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 2>college engineers at Boeing, and it goes to that culture

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 2>issue of you know, the engineering first, maybe not necessarily

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 2>profitability metrics first, but engineering first, that there's a belief

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 2>in at least by some that the company needs to

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 2>get back there. A does a company believe that? And

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 2>B is there any sense that they can actually do it?

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 8>I mean I do think they can. I think it again,

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 8>it's going to take a wholesale I think change in

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.839
<v Speaker 8>attitude here. I do know people as well inside Boeing,

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:06.079
<v Speaker 8>and I hear a lot of stories about you know,

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 8>non engineers running around with clipboards trying to figure out

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.599
<v Speaker 8>how to manage programs that are very technical, you know,

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 8>in very technical programs. And so I think it will

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 8>be hard to change. And I think they can't lose

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 8>sight of profitability. And I think even Kelly, as he

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 8>tells you we got to get back to engineering and

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 8>a manufacturing culture, he's canceling the seven to sixty seven

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 8>because he thinks the prospects for the future aren't as good.

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 4>Right, he said, Look, this program was.

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 8>Coming to an end anyways, let's just get distractions away

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 8>from us so they can't lose sight of profitability. But

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 8>they yeah, they have to get back to engineering prowess

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 8>and manufacturing skills.

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 6>The stock is down almost forty percent or over forty

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 6>percent the year to date. Is there a sense in

0:14:56.360 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 6>the investor community that this is we're near the bottom bowing?

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 8>So look the other day, I think Monday, when you

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 8>saw the announcement of you know, the next proposal for

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 8>the union and a vote coming, you saw the stock move,

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 8>and so I think that that alone is an indicator

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 8>that you know, look on Wall Street and financial markets,

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 8>hope hope is eternal. And there are some folks out

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 8>there that saying think they see value in this.

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 2>When do you if they do come to market with

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 2>either debt or equity capital, George, when do you think

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 2>that'll be now that they've got the earnings behind them,

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Seemingly they have the green light.

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 8>I think that they want to see the vote tonight, right, Okay,

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 8>So my senses it's come in late this week, next week.

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 8>I think they want to see the vote tonight and

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 8>figure out what they think they need. Right if Kelly

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 8>doesn't get the vote, if the vote doesn't go his way,

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 8>it's going to be a larger chunk coming out of

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 8>the coming out of.

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 2>The high see you're saying, yep, makes sense, all right, George,

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much once again, and for give us a

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 2>few minutes of your time. George fur He's a senior aerospace,

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 2>defense and airlines animals for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's been our

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 2>go to voice here on really the last several years

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 2>on Boeing when they've had these you know, really serious

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 2>safety issues and doors you know, flying off airplanes and

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 2>things like that, cracks in the wings, and so they

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 2>really need to, obviously, as they've been saying for a

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 2>long time, get that focus back on quality. But now

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 2>they've got the I guess the shorter term issue of

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 2>managing this strike here, which again is well, I guess

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 2>into its fifth week right now. So they will have

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 2>a critical vote the machinists tonight. Will they support what

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 2>their union leadership has agreed to with the company and

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 2>end their strike. So again a key key vote today

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 2>for the striking workers and for the company, and for

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 2>the industry. And you think about all the supply chains

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 2>that fall back from Boeing, all the suppliers that supply Boeing,

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 2>they're pretty much on standby waiting for this thing. So

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 2>it just affects a lot more people and a lot

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 2>more companies than just Boeing. So keep an eye on that,

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and that'll be breaking news tonight in Bloomberg. Will certain

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 2>they cover that as well.

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar.

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Play and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the market. Chare Carol Pepper joined his

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 2>founder and CEO of Pepper International, Carol, A lot of

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 2>folks have been climbing this wall of worry about the stocks.

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Book get the S and p F twenty two percent

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 2>this year. What are you telling people who are concerned

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 2>that are saying, oh boy, this market's too far over

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 2>its skis.

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 9>What do you tell them?

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 10>I tell them relax, First of all, it's not too

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 10>far over as skis.

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 7>There's a lot of good news in the market.

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 10>And really, as you guys know, I manage money for

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.479
<v Speaker 10>people with over one hundred million dollars, and we're starting

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 10>to plan what should we be doing post election, post

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 10>the next rate cup, because that's really where you want

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 10>to look. Just like Wayne Gretzky said, don't skate to

0:17:57.760 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 10>where the puck is, skate to where it's going to be.

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 10>So we need to stop being focused on the election

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 10>and terrified whoever wins it will be a fareom free election.

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 7>There will not be another January sixth, I don't believe.

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 10>So that means we really should be focusing on what

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 10>is January twenty five going to look like and what's

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 10>going to happen after the next rate cut, And that's

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 10>all good news. The market is pricing in the fact

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 10>that we will have lower rates, the election will be

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 10>finally out of the way, so whoever's in will know

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 10>how to position ourselves and there will be a relief rally.

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 10>So you want to be looking during these fearful days,

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 10>these worried days, what can I buy that I don't

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 10>have that will do well in the good times, because

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 10>believe me, the good times are coming no matter who wins.

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 10>I think we'll have a really strong first quarter next year.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 10>And so let's position for that, which to me means growth.

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 10>Let's look at growth again because you know during fear days,

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 10>growth is what goes down. You see the nasdak drifting

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 10>lower when people get scared, and then when people are excited,

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 10>the nasdak shoots up. So when it's down, this is

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 10>the time to look at your portfolio and say what

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 10>am I under invested in? How do I get into

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 10>the strong names that will do well when we're past

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 10>the election?

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 6>So what does growth mean to you? Is that mag

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 6>seven or is that taking on a new I guess definition?

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Do you do?

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 6>You prescribe?

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 7>No, I think it's bag seven. I think it's in video.

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 10>I think it's things that are going to be working

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 10>as we go into the future. So that means artificial intelligence,

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 10>big tech, The big leaders are going to stay strong

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 10>and get stronger. Names like Starbucks will come back, McDonald's

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 10>will recover from this blip of you know, bad onions,

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 10>and so I always say be bet on the big

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 10>growth names because that's really where you're going to see

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 10>the turbo charging when things are going well. And don't

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 10>forget these big AI companies need to have a lot

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 10>of data centers. That's more manufacturing jobs. They need lower

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 10>interest rates.

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 7>Those are coming.

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 10>So that is only even though in video looks like

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 10>a crazy name with over five hundred percent return in

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 10>three years, it's just getting started. Look at the long

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 10>term turns of Microsoft and Amazon and some of the

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 10>big names, how they've done over twenty years.

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 7>And you'll be very glad if you put some of

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 7>these new big names in your portfolio and just close your.

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 10>Eyes, put the man on a fair day and leave

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 10>them there and say, you know what, ten years from now, I'll.

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 7>Thank myself that I did that.

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 2>You also, so you have been consistent on your Nvidia

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 2>call there for sure. Now you're talking to us a

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 2>little bit about energy names, and I've looked at you know,

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 2>we've seen WTA, cud oil just over the last several

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 2>weeks really be volatile with some of the escalation intentions

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 2>in the Middle East. What's your energy call here?

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I really think that energy is going to stay

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 10>below one hundred, but stay above fifty. I really think

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 10>we're going to be in that band for quite a

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 10>long time, and you know I do. I'm a great

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 10>believer in renewable energy. I'm a great believer in the

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 10>new carbon markets that are going to get started. That

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 10>will be a whole new asset class that we can

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 10>talk about next year and in twenty six where we

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 10>are offsetting the emissions from these fossil fuels. But I

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 10>do not believe fossil fuels are going away in any way,

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 10>shape or form. It's just a question of have will

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 10>all the various components of an energy market fit together.

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 10>And for that reason, I think energy should be a

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 10>core part of your portfolio. Will go up and we'll

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 10>go down, but it's going to stay in a band

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 10>certainly for the next ten years, and it's a great

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 10>dividend payer generally. So again, stick with the big names,

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 10>stick with the exxons and groups that are going to

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 10>do well. And frankly, a lot of those companies are

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 10>very committed to renewable energies, fossil fuels, offsetting their carbon footprint.

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 7>They really have massive departments now who are doing that.

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 7>That is not a conspiracy theory, that is a fact.

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 7>And so for this reason, I think even for any

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 7>ethical investors. It's an important part of your portfolio.

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 6>Carol. How dependent is your bull thesis that you've laid

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 6>out here on more rate cuts from the FED? Because

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 6>we've seen traders kind of pair back the level of

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 6>I I guess the number of rate cuts that we're

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 6>going to see this year potentially next year. How many

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 6>rate cuts does your bull thesis need.

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 10>I don't think the number actually important. I think it's

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 10>the trend and the trajectory. So is it four cuts

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 10>over the next year or two? Is it three cuts?

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 10>It will be fewer cuts if the market is strong,

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 10>it will be more cuts if the market is weak.

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 10>And where those numbers will turn out are up to

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 10>the FED. Frankly, nothing that we can really project. But

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 10>I don't see a situation where they're going to start

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 10>raising interest rates, certainly because I think they did a

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 10>great job of getting us a soft landing that we

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 10>need in I think we're getting that soft landing, and

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 10>again technology, we can't discount what technology is doing in

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 10>terms of increasing productivity without increasing costs, but at the

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 10>same time, frankly, allowing for higher wages for the workers.

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean, that's a nice sweet spot to be in.

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 10>Where you can raise your wages and have more productivity

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 10>at the same time.

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 7>And I think we're going to see that trend continuing.

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 10>So not really dependent on a particular number of rate cuts,

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 10>because of course, if the FED announced fewer rate cuts

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 10>in the beginning, the market will go down and be

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 10>upset for a week or two.

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 7>But the second there are good earnings coming out and

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 7>we see that the corporations are still drow on, the

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 7>market will come back.

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Carol, thanks so much for joining us. Always appreciate

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 2>getting a few minutes of your time. Carol Pepper, founder

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 2>and CEO of Pepper intern National.

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Playing and

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>broud Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Got Emily Graffeo sitting in for Alex Steel on Paul Sweeney.

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 2>You live here in our Bloomberg and Director Broker Studio

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 2>owners streaming live on YouTube as well, so check us

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 2>out there. We had a deal in the data security

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 2>business a couple of days ago, SOFOS. I think Tomo

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Bravo own Sofos acquiring secure Works in an all cash

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 2>deal values the company secure Works about eight hundred and

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 2>fifty nine million dollars. Secure Works as a publicly traded

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 2>company SCWX is as symbol. We have Wendy Thomas. She

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 2>is the CEO of secure Works. When you talk to

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 2>us about this transaction, why why sell to sofos and

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 2>what's the pro former company look like?

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 11>Yes, good morning, Paul. This is a strategic combination of

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 11>two longtime security market leaders. And so when you think

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 11>about combining are two agnostic, very open platforms, decades of

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 11>cybersecurity experience, and strong brands in the space. This is

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 11>a way to really scale up and defeat the adversary

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 11>at scale.

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 6>What does it say about the current market for cybersecurity

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 6>companies that this acquisition is going through.

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 11>The market is really looking for a single partner for cybersecurity,

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 11>sort of a consolidated platform play that a one organization

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 11>can increasingly address multiple use cases for their security needs,

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 11>from being proactive about vulnerability management to reactive to detection

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 11>and response capabilities, the way to AI powered platforms that

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 11>can predict the next cyber attack, and so the scale

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 11>of R and D required to make that a reality

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 11>for customers is one that requires scale in organizations. So

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 11>to take two cash low positive growing leaders in the

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 11>space and put them together means more scaled R and

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 11>D to be better, faster, stronger for customers.

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, So what are your customers doing with cybersecurity

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 2>these days? In terms of they're spending their investment.

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 11>They are increasingly moving from what I would call preventative

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 11>cybersecurity investments to proactive cybersecurity posture and risk management. This

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 11>is all about moving towards increasing prevention and the reason

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 11>is that dwell times of thread actors in an organization's

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 11>environment have gone from months to days to now hours.

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 11>So with the power of an AI powered platform, in

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 11>order to really be able to keep constant visibility about

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 11>potential holes in their attack surface, right, those unlocked doors,

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 11>as I like to talk about, it requires technology to

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 11>do that, technology to detect that someone's rattling that door

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 11>handle and the ability to immediately protect the organization from

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 11>someone getting in and taking those valuable data assets or

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 11>encrypting their systems with ransomware.

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 6>So you're using an AI powered you're an AI powered

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 6>security platform. I'm wondering how difficult it is right now

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 6>to be a company that's using AI when it seems

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 6>like demand is outpacing supply. Is that a challenge for

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 6>you guys.

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 11>Well, if you think about AI, that's a pretty broad category.

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 11>And while you know, natural language processing and generative AI

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 11>is the is the hot topic right now, and it

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 11>has its place in security in terms of things like

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 11>changing cybersecurity detections into readable language of what's going on

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 11>to a business person. We've been using AI for a

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 11>very long time in our platform. We started building it

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 11>in twenty seventeen for things like machine learning, deep learning,

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 11>statistical learning in order to sort through tremendous amounts of

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 11>data and find patterns of behavior that we can match

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 11>to thread actors, the way that they try to come

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 11>into an environment, the software that they use in those

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 11>tactics and techniques, and a platform like that that can

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 11>filter through a lot of data and find those patterns

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 11>is the key to being able to protect an organization.

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 11>So it's home built for both sofas and for secure works.

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 11>Their hub platform and our Tage's platform. It just makes

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 11>a ton of sense to be able to take the

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 11>best of both worlds. And put those together.

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.719
<v Speaker 2>All right, So you and I, Wendy, we first chatted

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 2>back in twenty twenty one. How is your company? How

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 2>has the industry changed over the last several years.

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 11>The industry is, I think, on a path for the

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 11>first and a long time to really consolidate, and that

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 11>is frankly as a result of customer demand to be

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 11>able to run a holistic security program, understand, frankly, quantify

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 11>their risk, demonstrate where they've protected against that risk, and

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:27.719
<v Speaker 11>then have the accountability around who is attacking their environment

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 11>and how they've protected against it for their boards and

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 11>c suite. It's become a boardroom topic for the last

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:37.360
<v Speaker 11>couple of years, and so the ability of a security

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 11>professional to elevate sort of a technical pursuit into the

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 11>language of business and risk. It's probably the biggest change

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 11>that I've seen over the last few years.

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 6>I want to zoom out and just talk about the

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 6>cyber industry more broadly and how different corporations should be

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 6>thinking about the current state of threat to their businesses

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 6>when it comes to cybersecurity. Is are we worse off

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 6>than we were maybe five years ago? As hackers get

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 6>more advanced.

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 11>I would say that the great things about AI that

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 11>have enabled us as businesses or security companies to leverage

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 11>the power of that AI has also represented a certain

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 11>amount of peril in terms of empowering those thread actors

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 11>as well, and whether it's nation states or cyber criminals

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 11>who are involved, their ability to use the same sort

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 11>of natural language processing technologies to make that phishing email

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 11>much more believable. It really does look like it's coming

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 11>from your bank or from a vendor that you use.

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 11>And so the last line of defense, always beyond technology,

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 11>is people and the need for all of us to

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 11>become more educated and just cyber aware is more important

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 11>than ever. So there's always is that human edge that

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 11>can make the difference on top of technology to keep

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 11>us all a little bit safer. When cyber criminals cannot

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 11>make money off of global citizens, then we start to

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 11>break that economic.

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Model, all right, Wendy, thank you so much for joining us.

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Wendy Thomas, she's the CEO of Secure Works. That's a

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 2>public traded company SCWX. Just recently, in the last couple

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 2>of days, agreed to be acquired by private company Sofos

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 2>and a deal for eight dollars and fifty cents per

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 2>sharing cash, which was a pre solid premium to the

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 2>pre deal talk there. And Sophos is owned by the

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 2>private equity firm Toma Bravo, so more consolidation than the

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 2>data security business. That seems like an area that is

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 2>just going to get significant investment for as far as

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 2>I can see, because I mean, you have to continue to,

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 2>I think invest in cybersecurity because as you mentioned, Emily,

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the you know, the state actors, the private actors are

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 2>just getting smarter and smarter and more and more aggressive.

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 6>Exactly you imagine the threat just gets worse.

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Yep, you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>androyd Otto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's get a sense of what's happening with these markets,

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 2>John just reporting we have a sell off in place

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 2>here today, but otherwise we are at or near all

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 2>time highs for these markets right smack in the middle

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 2>of earning. So it looks like people feel pretty decent

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 2>about the earnings that are coming about. Let's check in

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 2>with somebody who does this stuff for a living. Loreen Gilbert,

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 2>CEO of wealth Wise Financial, joins us via Dallas via

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 2>zoom from Dallas, Texas. Laurene, thanks so much for joining

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 2>us here. How do you What are the discussions you're

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 2>having with your clients these days? As they had a

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 2>pretty good twenty twenty four a year to date both

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 2>in stocks and even bonds are giving you some some

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 2>pretty solid returns. What's the conversation like these days.

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 12>Well, it has been a really good year, and what's

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 12>on everybody's mind is the upcoming election, and it's interesting

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 12>to see how many people are holding this weight and

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 12>see mentality on what to do with big life decisions,

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 12>whether it's buying a house or making a move with

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 12>a business. A lot of people are just playing wait

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.479
<v Speaker 12>and see. So the talk has been how will election

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 12>this election affect my portfolio? And to that question, we

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 12>say there shouldn't be a lot of allocation changes based

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 12>on the general election because we already know that this

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 12>year is a positive year for the market, so we

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 12>don't expect that to change. It's been a fantastic year

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 12>across the board, and so the real question is what

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 12>happens next year, and to that we look to Congress.

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 12>So more important for the markets would be what kind

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 12>of legislation could be enacted in Congress, So who controls

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 12>Congress could have an outcome as to what happens on

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 12>corporate tax rates, on individual tax rates, on regulations. So

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 12>all those things are of concern to people.

0:33:08.760 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 6>When you think about where we are right now in

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 6>the business and economic cycle and markets, is there still

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 6>room for this bull market to run? We just had

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 6>six straight weeks of S and P five hundred gains.

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 6>That was the best winning streak for the index all year.

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 6>Where are we are We still early? Are we mid cycle?

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 6>What do you think?

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 12>Well, we're in a light cycle, there's no doubt. But

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 12>this rally now is two years really in the making.

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 12>And the odds would say, or the history tells us

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 12>in the markets that there is still room for this

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 12>market to run. So where of the opinion that the

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 12>market continues to run that we'll see right now we're

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 12>seeing a pause in the market. A lot of that

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 12>is profit taking from stock So even you know, looking

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 12>this morning at next stare that report and beat on

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 12>earnings missed a little bit on revenue, but at the

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 12>end of the day is still flat on the price,

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:11.320
<v Speaker 12>and so there's been definite profit taking. Coca Cola is

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.399
<v Speaker 12>another example of reporting and then the stock going down.

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.760
<v Speaker 12>So I think what we're seeing is some profit taking

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 12>before your end a pause. And yet I will say,

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 12>we think there is definitely room to run. And fourth

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 12>quarter expectations for earnings are very robout. So while third

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 12>quarter is somewhat muted on your over year earnings, fourth

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 12>quarter we're expecting quite a bit.

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Lauren, I kind of grew up in the age of

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 2>the sixty forty portfolio, but I know that's kind of

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 2>a thing of the past that in fact, a lot

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 2>of not just institutional investors, but retail investors like they

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 2>have some alternatives in their portfolio, whether that's you know,

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 2>hedge funds, private equity, private credit. How does that conversation

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 2>go with you and your clients.

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.320
<v Speaker 12>Alternatives definitely have a place in a space, and it

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 12>all depends on the liquidity of the client and their

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 12>risk tolerance. Definitely, equities, you know, public equities, there's nothing

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 12>that can replace that because of liquidity and long term

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 12>growth as well as dividend income, So your equities have

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 12>a place right now. We were talking about bonds have

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 12>done very well, and the expectation is over the next

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 12>five years we see the bond market being very robust

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.320
<v Speaker 12>as rates come down, and that trend will be our friend,

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 12>so that we'll see long term you know what I

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 12>mean is three years to five years some robust returns

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 12>on fixed income, So we can't negate that or neglect it,

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 12>and so then you are left with alternatives as well.

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 12>And what alternatives can do is diversify a portfolio. There

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 12>are liquid alternatives and they're non liquid alternatives, so making

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 12>sure you're using probably a combination of both of those,

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 12>whether it's hedging a portfolio looking to commodities are considered

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:02.399
<v Speaker 12>in a sense an alternative looking at private equity as

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 12>a long term hold. So there's lots of different avenues

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 12>and ways to play at macro looking at macro elements too,

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 12>so lots of ways to play alternatives, and we believe

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 12>in that we've got double digit allocation in alternatives in

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 12>our portfolio.

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 6>I know you had mentioned that the election not really

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 6>kind of a longer term concern for investors, especially those

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 6>who have maybe a longer time horizon than traders. So

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 6>when you do think about maybe the next year ahead,

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:40.760
<v Speaker 6>what are the risks to the market and your outlook.

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so it really is there is a risk. The

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 12>risk is we go into recession, and looking at history

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 12>during a rate cut cycle, most of the time that's

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 12>very positive for equity markets. And the reason it's positive

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 12>is if you can go into a rate cut cycle

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:02.359
<v Speaker 12>and avoid a recession, then the markets do quite well

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 12>and have double digit returns. If the rate cut then

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 12>we go into a recession, then we're going to see

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 12>negatives on stock market prices, no doubt. Now, we believe

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 12>that we're going to still see continued growth in the economy.

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 12>We don't see this economy even though the leading economic

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 12>indicators we're seeing going down, we don't think that that

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 12>means we're huating right now into a recession. So if

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 12>we can avoid a recession, we see the stock market

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 12>doing quite well in twenty twenty five. So right now,

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 12>our base case is that there's not a recession, that

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 12>Pharaohserve continues low rates, and that the market will continue

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 12>to rally.

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, Lauren, thank you so much for joining us.

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Loreen Gilbert she's the CEO of wealth Wise Financial. Joining

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 2>us fro Dallas, Texas via that zoom thing.

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple card.

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Play and Android Otto with the Bloomberg.

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Business at You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 1>from our flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes a headline gets your attention, boy, this one does. Crackskull,

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 2>fractured bones, show danger at Rivian's factory. That draws you

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 2>right in. So I want to get right to the

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 2>reporter on this story. It's a big take story. We

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 2>love the big takes stories, really cool stories, deeply deeply reported,

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 2>resourced and sourced, I mean, and great graphics, all the

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:34.359
<v Speaker 2>kind of good stuff. So it makes sure good long

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 2>form journalism. Kyle Porter joins US Industrials reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Kyle talk to us about Rivian. I mean, I remember

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 2>talking to Bloomberg Intelligence analysts years ago and they say, Hey,

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the technology of evs, that's one thing, but at some

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 2>point they got to go start bending some metal. That's

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:55.919
<v Speaker 2>another whole thing, you know, entirely, and these companies don't

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 2>have any experience in it. What did you find at Rivian.

0:38:59.880 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 9>The kind of really struggling to build a safety culture

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 9>that they can be proud of. In short, there's been

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 9>numerous incidents, some of which you start that in the headline,

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 9>others which we didn't put into the story, or this

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 9>which I haven't been investigated by OSHA. If you talk

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 9>to people out.

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 4>There in normal Illinois, a lot of them.

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:19.439
<v Speaker 9>Go to work every day because it's the best paid

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:21.839
<v Speaker 9>employer in the region, but they don't feel safe.

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 2>So I mean, again, they only have one plant here.

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering how did Rivian, Like if I were starting

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 2>up a new hot Cup and I'd just go over

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 2>to Ford or GM or Stalantis, steal a bunch of

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 2>their factory people and say, hey, guys, start building my

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 2>car here. How did Rivian do it? How is Rivian

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 2>kind of I guess learning on the job if you will.

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 7>Well, Rivian got a deal.

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:48.520
<v Speaker 9>The original the plan that they have they purchased the

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:52.319
<v Speaker 9>sixteen million dollars have been abandoned by Mitsubishi when they

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 9>were trying to make an electric car in the US.

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 9>So it's sort of all fell into place. There were

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 9>still workers from the time that it was owned by

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 9>Mitsubishi that could come in work, so they felt that

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:03.279
<v Speaker 9>they could get some muscle memory. And then at the

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 9>start they you know, it was designed to be a

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:08.359
<v Speaker 9>very niche carmaker, and then they got the Amazon deal.

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 9>Things exploded and they had to ramp up.

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 2>So what's the company responding, like, how they've kind of

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 2>respond to this and do they have any policies in

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 2>place to try to address this, because I'm just looking

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 2>at another great graph you having a story that just

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 2>shows a number of serious violation sited, and Rube's at

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:26.439
<v Speaker 2>the top of that list.

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 9>Yes it is, and as you pointed out, it's only

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:32.720
<v Speaker 9>one factory with eight thousand staff. Most of the companies

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 9>on that list have multiple sites and tens of thousands

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 9>of workers the company, I'm sorry, continued no go.

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:40.320
<v Speaker 2>So I just want to know kind of how the

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:41.319
<v Speaker 2>companies responding here.

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 9>They're responded in great detail to us.

0:40:44.760 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 4>It's fair to say.

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 9>They pointed out that most of the serious citations that

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 9>they were issued were ultimately downgraded or in a couple

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 9>of cases, dismiss which is true of most people that

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 9>go through the citation process, and they pointed this to

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 9>things that they've done to improve their safety process. An indeed,

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 9>Osher itself has commended the company for being open and

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 9>looking to improve its health and safety.

0:41:06.920 --> 0:41:11.800
<v Speaker 2>So is Rivin any materially different than say a Tesla

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 2>factory or you know the other ev makers.

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 9>Well, it currently only builds two types of vehicle. You

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 9>have the Amazon truck and then you have the R one,

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:27.399
<v Speaker 9>which comes into several bottles. It's an SUV in a truck,

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:29.400
<v Speaker 9>and they're looking to ramp that up with an expansion

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 9>with the R two next year. So it's smaller. It's

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 9>I think it's aiming to produce now that you actually

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 9>cut their forecast this year about fifty thousand vehicles, so

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 9>the scale of it is much smaller.

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Does Rivian have the money to invest in their plants

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 2>into the safety because well, you look at the stocks

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:51.280
<v Speaker 2>of some of these companies that are just so volatile,

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 2>and I wonder if they even really have the money

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 2>to invest in safety protocols.

0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 9>It's a question to ask the company that they say

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 9>that they have a real commitment to safety and they

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 9>are investing in it.

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Is it is making an evy. I don't know, it

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 2>seems like they're not building an internal combustion engine, so

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 2>they're not actually building an engine, there is it? I

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 2>would think the process is a lot different. Is it

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 2>any more or less dangerous as the industry said versus

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 2>say a you know traditional guess assembly plant.

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 9>Oh, given that you're building this thing from scratch, you know,

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:29.719
<v Speaker 9>from the engine upwards, there's a lot of process that

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 9>has to be learned. There's a lot of things that

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 9>need to be learned. Indeed, one of the things that

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 9>the company was cited for was a movement vehicle that

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 9>the engineers are designed and you know, wasn't safe for

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:44.320
<v Speaker 9>employees to use. They were telling employees to be careful

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 9>until I she cited them and they figured out a

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:48.480
<v Speaker 9>way to do it differently. And you could replicate that

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 9>across a thousand examples, from how you attach the doors

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 9>to how you put.

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 4>The glass in.

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:54.800
<v Speaker 9>You could go on and on and on, and Ribbean's

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 9>had to work out new and different ways of doing

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 9>all these things for these new bespoke vehicles.

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 2>But the employees, I guess they are. Are they aware

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 2>of the hazards when they take these jobs.

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 9>That's a very good question. It's rapidly becoming a company town.

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 9>Most of the people that we spoke to for the

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 9>story are one of several family members who work at

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:20.759
<v Speaker 9>the plant. They all talk about how when the plant

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 9>first opened, it was very small, very welcoming. You saw

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 9>members of senior management. It felt like a family. And

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 9>as production as ramptup, that's gone away and there's been

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 9>a pressure just to produce interesting.

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, interesting story. Kyle Appreciate a Kyle Porter, industrials

0:43:35.840 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 2>reporter for Bloomberg News. It's got the Big Take story

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 2>about Rivian and working in their plant in Normal, Ohio,

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:45.759
<v Speaker 2>some of the safety concerns there. You can read more

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:48.839
<v Speaker 2>of this story on the Bloomberg and at bloomberg dot

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:52.360
<v Speaker 2>com slash Big Take. Looking at the stock of Rivian,

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 2>it's down about two percent today, it's down fifty six

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:58.880
<v Speaker 2>percent year to date. It's got a market cap of

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 2>ten point three billion, so again reflecting some of the

0:44:01.520 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 2>challenges of starting up some of these ev companies and

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:08.360
<v Speaker 2>the volatility around kind of the adoption of electric vehicles,

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 2>which is really still i think pretty uncertain as to

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 2>where the ultimate demand is for electric vehicles. We're seeing

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 2>that in some different demand numbers we see out of

0:44:17.040 --> 0:44:17.800
<v Speaker 2>some of these companies.

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:44:29.719 --> 0:44:33.080
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:36.320
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal