WEBVTT - Surveillance: Bonds In Bubble, Says Cooperman

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz Jay Leye. We bring

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>you insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. Belisa

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>bramw it's Mr Cooperman. I believe as a caution on

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>the market out one year, state the case as you

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>see it. Well, the idea is where else are you

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>going to go? Are you going to go into bonds?

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>You're going to go into anything else. You're not going

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>to see a massive crash necessarily in stocks. At the

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>same time you're getting inflation, you're getting these cost pressures

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that we heard out from General Motors. I will just

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>say that he himself in a recent interview so that

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>he did get a new car among others, although he

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>treated it at two thousand and two Lexis for a Hyundai.

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>So Leonne Cooperman, I'm sure I can talk all of that.

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>The supplied to me. We's got a twelve car garage,

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>so we know that's I look at the debate here

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.119
<v Speaker 1>that we've got here on the equity markets right now,

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's what everybody's looking at. And I think we

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>forget John, it's expecting out six months, nine months, a

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>year out. What does twenty two look like? A deceleration?

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>How big is that deceleration? We're still working our way

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>through so many huge distortions. And the analogy that I've

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>used right now for the American economy, and others have

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>shared that view too, is that it's like holding a

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.479
<v Speaker 1>beach ball beneath the surface. This was a mandated recession.

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Now the policy has changed. The beach ball is searching

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to the surface again and going even higher. We've got

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to work out what it looks like in twenty three

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>is a return to trend growth? And what is normal

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>actually look like? You how many people come on the show,

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>on other shows on networks like this and talk about

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the return to normal? What is normal? Oh? That's true?

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>And that well, that's better said than when I said,

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>John about February pre pandemic. Was that normal? And we

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>really don't know in the hindsight of this natural disaster, John,

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with the oil. Seven many dollars a barrel.

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, Brent, flying year today and over the last

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>twelve months to create doing okay, right now, it's w

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:09.679
<v Speaker 1>T I sixty six handle Bongio tie by a couple

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of basis points. Tom want You're a dollar once Swenzi muted,

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 1>price action unchanged on the day, and futures bounced back

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>about full tents on the SMP up six tenths on

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the NASTAG one hundred. Very good. Now, just get right

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to it, because I know you're widely anticipate this. Leon

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Cooperman joins us with decades of experience on Wall Street

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>and the guys and his building of a certain wing

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of golden sex ages ago, someone that people hang on

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>every word. Leon Cooperman with Omega and their family office

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>chairman and CEO, Leah Cooperman, we want to talk about

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the markets front and center. But I've got to ask

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you once and for all, as we have seen time

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 1>after time after time, the hiding of leverage on Wall

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>Street to get to some form of point of greed,

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and it always ends ugly and shakes market confidence. His

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>arcer ghosts and all that that secret leverage that no

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 1>one knew was there. Is it harmed permanently our market confidence?

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's permanent. Everything is cyclical, you know. Uh,

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just the evidents of greed basically. I mean the

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that after long term capital the industry would get

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>into this kind of predicament again. I don't know what

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say so quickly, but get into the same

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>predicament again. It's kind of surprising. And I guess they

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to make a margin on what they lent this fellow.

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, I was saying that the more

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>things change and more than remain the same. Late John,

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey got to catch up as always going to see

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you again. What do you make of the increased demands

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>for transparency disclosures of the hedge fund community and maybe

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.119
<v Speaker 1>even family offices as well off the back of that incidents.

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't get the idea of the family office, you know.

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I can tell everybody. I'm like Hyman Roth and Godfather too.

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I've only seen a hundred times. I never get tired

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of it. Is a scene at the airport where right

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>before they shoot him in Ruth he said, I'm a

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>retired executive living on a pension, and I think of myself,

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a retired money manager living on investment income. The

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>bad news I no longer have this giant income I

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>used to have when I ran a hedge fund. The

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>good news, I have no pressure. I run my own money,

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>So why they have the right to regulate me, uh

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is beyond my wildest dreams. But look, we're in a

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>very strange environment. A lot of crazy things are going on.

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the market structure has been destroyed by a

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.359
<v Speaker 1>number of moves made by government, and we'll have to

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>just work our salves through it. In terms of the market,

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:38.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, I describe myself as a reasonably fully invested bear.

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>The fully invested part is all cyclical, you know, given

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>all those decades of experience that Tom attributed to me,

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I've said that, you know, bear markets don't come about

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>because of maculate conception. They come about because of certain

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>fundamental factors accelerating inflation. We don't have that hotstyle FED

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and we don't have that. In fact, I'd say the

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 1>FED is too accommodative. Um, you know, it comes about

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>because we are the market smells an oncoming recession. The

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>factors we're coming out of recession, corporate propers a terrific

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, and so uh, the normal conditions that cause

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 1>the bare market are not present, and I uh. The

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>other one I would mention is, you know, a significant

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.679
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical event which you can forecast, but we have plenty

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to worry about China, Ran Taiwan, etcetera. But and I

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>think the biggest plus out there is the fetest creative environment,

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>where is there's an absence of alternatives. You know, you've

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you reference this when you were chatting before, but essentially

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>there's an absence of alternatives. And what's happening is everybody's

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>being pushed out in the risk curve. The investor that

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>used to buy tea bills, he concluded or she concluded,

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I can't survive on zero, so I'm gonna take duration

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and inflation risk and I'll buy tea bonds. The team

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>bond buyers that I can't get by on one point

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>six percent, so I'm gonna buy industrial credits. The industrial

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>credit buyers says, I can't get buy in three percent.

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna buy high yield. The high yield buyer there's

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>no the thing as yield anymore, but the high yield

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>biases I can't get buying five or six percent. I'm

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna buy structure credit, cellos and stuff. Like that, which

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>tend to have a higher yield is their moort opaque

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and the and then the bond guy who buys cello

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 1>or a lady basically says, well, I'll tell you what

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the markets are hid my money and equities, and the

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>equity person is I'm gonna put two percent in bitcoin.

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>So everybody, everybody has been moving on the risk curve.

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>That will change. I have to say, well, I'm reasonably

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>heavily invested. I'm having a very good year that I

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I am more focused on the longer term issues. Since

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm running my own money, I don't compete against the

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred. I'm an absolute return guy. But it

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>seems to me if you step back and think about

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>what's going on, it's very very clear we are barring

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>from the future. We are barring from the future. If

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>you had a hundred economists on your show and you

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>asked him what is the potential real growth of the U.

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.679
<v Speaker 1>S economy over time? The answer would be centered around

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>two percent real and that you get there because one

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>percent productivity growth, half one percent a a force growth

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that determines real growth. That's two percent. You speak to

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a bear, they'll say one and a half percent. You

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>speak to a boat, they might say two and a percent,

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>but the response is sent around two percent. This year,

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the economy in real terms, are gonna grow three to

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>four times potential, Yet we're persistent in trying to hold

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>interest rates in zero. Makes no sense to me. I

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>understand that. I'll explain why in a second. Secondly, prior

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to the one point nine trillion package, prior to the

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>two trillion dollar package, prior to less ten days four

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars of infrastructure spending, we've already injected into the

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:38.679
<v Speaker 1>economy a trillion dollars more of transfer payments than income

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that was lost. So what's really going on is very simple.

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Prior to the virus hitting, we had about a five

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and a a half million people unemployed. That balloon to twenty

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>three million people. It's now down to about nine and

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a half million people, and monetary and fiscal policy to

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>be conducted the manner to get the unemployed back down

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to the five and a half million pre COVID, and

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>they're less concerned about the long term issues with damage

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>they might be created. So that's one thing I think

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>we're buying from the future. That's number one it's very clear.

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, the debt that we're racking up will have

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to be paid. And unless you're into m M T,

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>which I'm not, Uh, this is going to create a

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>long term issue. Second point I would make is there's

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a shift taking place to the left of government. The

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>people in charge now are going to go for higher taxes.

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have higher inflation, higher interest rates, which I

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>think will be a straining influence on multiples. Okay, I

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>think inflation is will be worse than Mr Powell. Secretary

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Powell is assuming every company I talked to in every

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>business I came back to New Jersey from Florida. I'm

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a Florida resident. I came back in New Jersey. Uh,

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And I had the lunch the other day at the

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>local place called the Milburne Dinner. I asked the owner,

0:08:55.800 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>how's businesses coming back? But I can't find labor. I can't. Finally,

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>we're saying that again and again. We sit in the earnings,

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you're hearing the reports, you're hearing the coals too. So

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you invested there. Let's take this conversation a little bit further.

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Why fully invested if you've just gone through all the

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>issues you've just gone through well, because you know, uh,

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the near term outlook, the conditions that would lead to

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a mid decline. Like I said, you know it's accelerating inflation.

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>We don't have that. You know, most importantly, we have

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a hostile FED. When you go into a beer market,

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>we have a fedness extremely friendly. They tell you they're

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.599
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep interest raised low, not only this year, but

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna keep below next year. I'm assuming, I'm assuming

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.599
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be surprised by inflation has been more intractable,

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and the market is canna be surprised if the Fed

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>will raise rates sometime in twenty two, will be forced

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>by inflation. So that's my view, the cyclical versus secular

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>outlook the long term ballot. Let me explain. I got

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>my NBA from Columbia Business School in January thirty one,

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven. I was broke at a loan, had a

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>six month old child is now approaching fifty five. Okay,

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I had no money in the bank and I couldn't

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>afford a vacation, so I went to work the next day.

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I started my career at Goldman on February first, sixty seven.

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>The dad was roughly a thousand. Fourteen years later it

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>was roughly a thousand, So I I think we borrowed

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>for the future. I expect very little action from the SMP.

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Everything I look at would suggests to me caution intermediate

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to longer term would be the rule of the day.

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>But leon, how do you remain cautious if it's not

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.839
<v Speaker 1>bonds right, if cash perhaps is losing value because of inflation,

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>if equities perhaps have borrowed from the future, Are you

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>going more into bitcoin? No? I don't know the only

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin I owned. Let me just say this on n

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>f T bitcoin stuff like that you talked to somebody else,

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>because I tell people that I turned seventy eight a

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>week ago, and basically I'm too old. I don't understand

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. It's crazy to me. It makes no sense.

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I own a little bit of goal, but compared to

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>my net worth, I owned very little. Basically, I'm basically

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 1>a stock you know, a meat and potatoes guy. I'm

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a stock guy. Stocks make more sense than anything else

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>because of FED policy. But when the FED policy changes,

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the market is going to have a response

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 1>to that. So when you say though that you've got

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>your eye on the exit. What is your eye? How

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>are you going to exit? What does that mean? Does

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.719
<v Speaker 1>it mean more cash? Yeah? I would say, Look in

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the bear market, the winner is he who loses least winds.

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So you know, when the market goes down, I'm gonna

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>lose money. I'll be worthless. I understand that every asset

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>has been inflated by monetary policy, every asset, whether it's

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 1>real estate, et cetera. You know, stocks, bonds, for sure.

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the bubble is not so much the stock market.

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>The bubble, I think is the bondom market. And I

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>would say this event it turns out to be wrong.

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've had a negative of bonds for for

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>quite a long time. If the view turns out to

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>be wrong and interest rates belong where they are, you

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>don't make double digit returns in the stock market. I

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>believe in the capital market line where you're earning a

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>bond has relevancy for what you should earn the stock market.

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>So bonds belong to one a half percent, you probably

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>earned four or five percent a year in the stock market.

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>But what I'm looking at for the exit or traditional things,

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for change and fed speak. I'm looking for

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:25.719
<v Speaker 1>change in the posture of the Fed. I'm looking for uh, inflation,

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at gold I'm looking at the overall economic activity.

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Let me say this, if I had to give you

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a list of positive and negatives, I'm more impressed by

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the negatives. Long ago at Golden Secs Asset Management, Leon

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Cooperman sat there and said, you've gotta be kidding me.

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>We don't own enough Apple. Leon Cooperman, I want you

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to talk about what Michael Mobison, one of the great

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>thinkers on Wall Street, a credit Sueez and leg Mason,

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>has always said, is we're gonna see this massive concentration

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:58.719
<v Speaker 1>of digital success stories. Can I be overweighted Apple or Amazon?

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>Are they so much the fabric of this nation that

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got to own them? Well? I own them. Uh.

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>They're not cheap stocks, but they're not expensive stocks. Nothing

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is expensive if interest rates that stay here. I went

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>back by the way and I look at the nifty

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty nineteen seventy two. In nineteen seventy two, when JP

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>morgan Us Trust was ruling the roost, they had the

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>philosophy only the right stock at any price. They don't

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>care what evaluation they've paid as long as they were

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>world class growth companies. Avon sixty five times earnings, Polaroid

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>ninety times earnings, SiZ Roebucks thirty five times earnings, so

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. The Tenua US government in nineteen seventy

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>two or six and a half percent, the Tenua governors

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>now one sixty Google thirty three times earnings is not

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>an expensive stock. This is but the card of the matter,

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Leon Cooperman, and you are what I would call intellectually

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>extremely constructive in your caution. You know that the financial

0:13:56.200 --> 0:14:00.040
<v Speaker 1>media is overwhelmed by the gloom crew every Friday to

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>come out the world's coming to an end. And to

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>their point, they're trying to avoid a polaroid or an

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Eastman Kodak. How do you sidestep the polaroids that won't

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>make it? Well, that's the function of your discipline and

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>your approach. I look at the stock market. I see

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>three stock market. I don't see one stock market. The

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>first stock market I see is the Fang market. And uh,

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the market has been extraordinarily disciplined, I might add.

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, for somebody that's cautious like I am, I

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>have to say I'm impressed by the market action. Who's

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the big correction has come in the so called fangs

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that have no earnings, very little in the way of revenues,

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and they have their long on promise things like Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft, Google.

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>They've held in very well. And then that expensive against

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. Okay, the secondary so they're nifty fifty today,

0:14:57.760 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>there'll be a high failure rate, Like there was a

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>high failure rate in nineteen seventy two. But what ended

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>in fifty fifty nineteen seventy two was a tenfold increase

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>in the price of oil led to a global recession.

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, we need a recession or we need to

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>change and FED policy to change the attitude. Until we

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>have that, the market will play. Well. That's not gonna

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>happen for a number of years. Maybe we're talking about

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>an interest I don't know. I don't know what's gonna happen. Uh,

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what the FED tells you. But I think that

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Mr Powell, I think he's doing a disservice frankly when

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>he says the market is not expensive because of your

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are If interest rates are, we belong where

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>they are. You don't make big returns in the stock market.

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>You basically, you know, the world's turned upside down. Okay,

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>So what I was saying before. The long term issues

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to me are number one, we're clearly barring from the

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>future the economy growing. Six, Real interest rates shouldn't be

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>where they are, and we should not be injecting so

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>much fiscal stimuluts into the economy. Whe the economy is

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>growing off the charts. Okay. Secondly, we have a government

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>charge and I voted for Mr Buy because I thought

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>we need to change. Uh, you know, I voted. My

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>value is not my pocket book. But the truth is,

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>if you look over the next twelve months, we have

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>more inflation, higher interest rates, you know, and higher taxes.

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Not particularly bullish. Third, poem makers do we have a

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>massive growth in debt. This nation was found in two

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>five years ago. We had no national debt. Three years

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>ago we had twenty trillion dollars and national debt and

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that's going up at the rate of like three trillion

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year, and that that has to be serviced,

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to reduce the long term growth potentially.

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly I hear all these concerns and you're going through

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>them point by point, and I think it resonates with

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our audience. But this falls into the

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>should shouldn't debate a lot of the time. This is

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>what they should do, it's what they shouldn't do. It's

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>what they've done. And we've got to accept that, nat Lee.

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>And you've gotta put money to work, as you always do.

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>So the question I've got for you, it's one, are

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the signposts you're looking for ultimately to get you to

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>d risk if you're fully invested now and here's a

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>whole long list of things you worried about. What are

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the signposts you're actually looking for to materialize that actually

0:16:57.560 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>leads you to d risk to take some money off

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the table. I I'm listening to FED speak. Uh you

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>know see how they when they change, you start to change.

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I look at the stock market, and the stock marks

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 1>a high quality, leading indicator. You know, there's no indication.

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the market has been very disciplined in its action.

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the price of gold, which has been

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>undermined by bitcoin. I'm looking at inflation. I'm looking at

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>economic growth. Lean you mentioned earlier, you're looking at the

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple is one of the stocks you own. Cast writes

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in he's listening down in Florida. Good morning, Mr Cass,

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and he wants to talk about the post pandemic softness

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that we will see an Apple in Amazon and the others.

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Are you adjusting for an Apple that stumbles after the

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>pandemics over, I have no credentials in Apple. I sold

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>Apple much lower. I had a nice profit. I got

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>out much too early. I do own uh you know, Microsoft.

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I do own Google. I do own some Facebook, I

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>do own some Amazon. But I would say this another

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>point on the cautious side for my days back as

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>a strategist at Goldman, I recall that the stock market

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>normally peaks in line with the peak rate of change

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>in corporate profits. That's the second quarter. In the June

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>profits this quarter will be up fifty. For the third

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>quarter and fourth quarre will be up much less. They'll

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>be up up much less. So I'm watching a lot

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of a host of indicators as to when they get out,

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm prepared to lose money because frankly, in bear markets,

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the winner is he will lose his lease. I'm not

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a big short seller. I believe in the long term

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:32.719
<v Speaker 1>outlook for what I own. I own a theene at

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>seven point six times earnings. I owned Signal twelve and

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a half times earnings. I owned Mr Cooper at five

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>times earnings. I own Google nine times earnings. So bad.

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I own Navigant four and a half times earnings. You know,

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm a great believe in the capitalistic system. You know,

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 1>when companies earn access returns, it attracts capacity and capital

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and kills returns. The energy industry is the best example.

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I came in to this year overweighted energy and everybody

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>hated it was three percent the SMP. You've crushed it,

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and you absolutely crushed it leon when it came to

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>energy stocks, just real quick here there. You're talking about

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals, and yet today we see that a downside

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>surprise was met with buying action. Has a dovish fed

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>become more important to stock valuations than fundamental growth in

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the economy. I think that the market structure has been destroyed.

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And I say that for a few reasons. When I

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>came to Wall Street fifty odd years ago, the commissions

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 1>with fifty cents of share and the vocal rule didn't exist.

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>So the Bob Monutions of the world, the Stanley Shop

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:37.959
<v Speaker 1>corns of the world made markets. They carried inventory, they

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>took risk. You can't do that in the more business

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>commissions any zero and there's no vigorous and there's no

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>there's no reward for risk taking. So the brokerage industry

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 1>don't stabilize anymore. Secondly, eight percent of the vibe used

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>to be done in the New York Stock Exchange of

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>the volume today has done off board and dock polls.

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>So the special as system doesn't stabilize. And Thirdly, for

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.239
<v Speaker 1>some unexplained reason, and I've written to the SEC, they

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>ignored me, and like my wife basically really I told them,

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, in ninety eight they enacted the uptick rule

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to deal with abuses of the twenty nine. It have

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>worked effectively for seventy years. Then in two thousand and

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>seven they elimited the uptick rule, and they gave rise

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of these quantitative trading systems which know

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 1>nothing about value. They know everything about price. So they

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>buy strength, they sell weakness. And when this market has

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>a reason to go down right now, it does not

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>have a good reason to go down. When this market

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>has a reason to go down, to go down so

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>fast your head's gonna spend and then you're gonna be

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>on the following daily so we can talk about it.

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I knew there was a reason that you and Sam

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>King got on, so wow, you have that incoming. Your

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>wifs ignore each other. Amazing. Why don't you have Cooperman's.

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know checkbook? I mean, that's what I'm something

0:20:51.080 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of Romega. It is the General Motors company. It has

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>been around since nineteen o eight through various and sundry

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>iterations and has been reinvigorated with Mary Barr. She's chairman

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>and chief executive officer of General Motors. Here's our David Weston.

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, so Mary Bar, it's a good

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>day for you, a good day for Will Durant to

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>start in General Motors all those many years ago. So

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at the numbers, one of the first things I

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>look at is the top line, the revenue, and then

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the profitability. The profitability. You did so much better than

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>anybody expected. You actually almost put a shame to analysts.

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, it wasn't because of increased revenue.

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>So my real question is how did you do that?

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>How did you get so much more money in profit

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>out of relatively flat revenue? Well, I think it's a

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a number of issues. First, um, strong demand for

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>our full size trucks and SUVs. I mean the Chevrolet Silverada,

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>the GMC Sierra on the Escalade, the Tahoe, et cetera.

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>There is exceptionally strong demand for those products, and so

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what's driving a very high average transaction prices.

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Because the demand is so high, we've been able to

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to be very disciplined on incentives. And then our

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>financing unit, GM Financial has done an excellent job of

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>taking advantage of higher use care prices and just a

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>very strong market. We're also seeing recovery UH and and

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, returned to strong sales in China, so across

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the board they contributed to the strong numbers. So you

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>surprise perhaps some people are saying, not only will we

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>stick with our guidance going forward for the rest of

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the year, but if anything, we think it's gonna towards

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the upper end of that guidance. At the same time,

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 1>you have the problem with chips. We talked about at

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>last quarter or something like one point five to two

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars being left on the table as it were.

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that number still holds good and yet you're

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.479
<v Speaker 1>doing much better than some people across the street at

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Ford for that matter, via christ or Peugeot. Why Well, again,

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of transparency between the different automakers

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening. We're focused on GM and I think

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>what's been incredible is the work that we're doing with

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>our purchasing group, our engineering group, are manufacturing group in

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>sales and marketing and working with suppliers. You know, we've

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>been working to build strong relationship with our suppliers for many,

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.199
<v Speaker 1>many years now, and there's just a team that is

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>looking understanding what chips are we going to have access to,

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>how do we allocate those to our highest demand and

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and products that we have limited or no ability to

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>recover because there's just such strong demand. We run those

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing operations around the clock and they're they're just being

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>creative and doing what engineers do of problem solving and

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 1>and in some cases re engineering to get the chips

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to the right products and to just um find every

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>opportunity we can to build a car, trucker crossover and

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>get it to the customer. So it's a mixed question,

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>not just of the vehicles you sell, but also where

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you direct your chips. It sounds like you want to

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>direct it to the ones that really are the most important.

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Are you getting more chips? Do you think than you

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>would have expected, because if you're purchasing department, well, again,

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of transparent to say more than

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, we were very clear last year of what

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.120
<v Speaker 1>we thought the demand was going to be this year

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and the chips that we had ordered, and so you know,

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we're continuing to work with the supply base on that

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and again, but it's I think it's looking for every

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>opportunity and managing it centrally and also working hand in

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.199
<v Speaker 1>hand with our j V and China, so across the

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>board we are just really being I think the team

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is being really scrappy and finding ways that we can

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>build the vehicles, not only full size trucks and SUVs,

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>but also our electric vehicle programs. And I think it's

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>important to note that even with the challenges of the

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>semiconductors UH shortage, there is no impact on our electric vehicles,

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>on our autonomous vehicles and the growth initiatives that we've

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>been talking about this first quarter. That was one of

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the questions I had both for the Hummer that's coming

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>out later this year and then the Lyric we're just

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>coming at and sometimes the first happen next year. Is

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>there going to be any delay because of the chip problem?

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely not, And I can tell you those vehicle programs

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>are on track, and uh, I'm really excited to have

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>customers get in those vehicles and drive them because I

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to be amazed. We understand the one

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>point five to two billion dollar number that was put

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>up before, but can you give us some sense those

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>those who donors the supply chain, If you had a

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent of the chips you needed, what percentage you

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>getting now? Are you running at? You know? Uh, It's

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a very dynamic situation, and so uh you know again,

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's every chip we have access to, we're

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>making sure it gets into the vehicles where we have

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>really strong customer demand. But it's something that changes every day, David,

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going to put a number on it.

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.719
<v Speaker 1>This problem isn't going away in the sense that as

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you go forward, you're gonna make more and more cars,

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna require more and more chips. What is the

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>longer term solution to this so we don't have this

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of problem you have this year. Well, I think

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we are going to see recovery. We think Q two

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>will be the weakest for the year. We'll see some recovery,

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>recovery in Q three, Q four UH, And we're working

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of long term strategies. I don't have

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>anything to share right now, but there's a you know,

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a whole um menu of things that we're working on,

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>processes that we're changing, um. So more to come later

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in the year of how we'll make sure we're never

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>in this situation again. But believe me, we have a

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>dedicated team working on that as well. When it comes

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to batteries, you've sort of vertically integrated, as it were,

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>where the joint venture where you're making your own batteries.

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Is there something like that perhaps that would make sense

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>for GM. You know, I'm not going to take anything

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>off the table. We're going to look at what what

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 1>we can do to make sure that we have the

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>right number of automotive grade chips UH and that we

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it it doesn't constrain our growth because we see huge

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunity not only with the product portfolio we have today,

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>but with the strong electric vehicle products that we have coming.

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 1>We hear some in Washington, both the Commerce Secretary and

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>also I talked to one of your Michigan representatives, yes

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Or Hailey Stevens, who suggested perhaps there needs to be

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>some co investment from the government as well as the

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>private sector in chip production. Does that make sense for

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 1>your point of view? I think making sure we have

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a secure supply chain um for the growth that I

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>think going to see it. I think it's something that

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>we all have to work together on, and we're having

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>regular conversations with the administration and members of Congress to

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>find the right solution, and we'll continue to do that.

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.679
<v Speaker 1>In your presentation today, General Motors really lays out a

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>fairly robust program to really go to electric vehicles and

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to really deal with greenhouse gases over the longer term.

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>You have very specific targets you're setting out there. How

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>do you hope to achieve those? Well, I think it's

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>making sure there's a whole ecosystem that when a customer

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>looks at can I buy an electric vehicle, they say,

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have a better experience when I buy

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 1>an electric vehicle. It's going to be a beautiful vehicle.

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be in this segment that I want

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to purchase because we can't. You know, person if they

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>want an suv or a crossover, they're not going to

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>buy a sedan. It's got to meet them in the

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 1>market where they want. But then it's also making sure

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a robust charging infrastructure, and we're working on that

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>as well, and that will be not only what we're doing.

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>For instance, we're putting charging in our workplaces, but also

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 1>working with communities and then working with all the startups

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that are in this business connecting those We just made

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.959
<v Speaker 1>an announcement that we have now we're going to provide

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>access to sixty chargers across across the country to really

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>give confidence to customers as they buy an e V

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and if even if it's their only vehicle, that they're

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>going to have a robust charging infrastructure. And I think

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 1>all those things combine, you know, beautiful vehicles, meets their needs,

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the right range and then charging available, customers are going

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to move to e v s And importantly, I think

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 1>for many investors people watch your company. I saw in

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>your presentation you expect to have the same profit margins

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>on e V s as you have on the so

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>called i c E. Internal combustion engine vehicles. So as

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>we move into the ultim platform and continue to take

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>costs out of the battery that that is, that is

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>our goal to to get there um and and have

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that break even and then move beyond. But you also

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>have to understand there's a different cost of ownership and

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>an electric vehicle versus versus an internal combustion engine vehicle

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>from a you know gas uh, gas savings that you

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have to you know, fuel up. So we've got

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to look at the whole equation. But we're on that

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>journey and I'm very pleased with the work that's going

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on with our battery technology to continue to take cost

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.959
<v Speaker 1>out and increase energy density. I'm sure you're looking at

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>supply chains that go beyond just microchips at this point

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>as you move into e v S. Where are there

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:19.959
<v Speaker 1>possible weak spots going forward and what are you doing

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to address those in terms of what you need the

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>supplies you need in order to manufacture the vast number

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of electric vehicles you're anticipating. Well, you know, as we

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>look at some of the key materials that need to

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>go into vehicles, especially those that are quite expensive. We're

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at how do we reduce the need you know,

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in in each each vehicle, but then also working with

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>trusted partners in the supply chain to make sure that

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we have a secure supply and that's going to allow

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>us to grow. And so that's the work that we're

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it's done and a lot of it's

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>underway right now. So Mary, as you look forward to

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I say, you've said you're maintaining your guidance. If anything,

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you'll be at the upper end. What are the vulnerabilities,

0:29:57.720 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>what's the sensitivity on it that might actually have you

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>all short? Well, uh, you know, with the insights that

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we have right now, we believe that that guidance is

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>correct with where we think we're going to be from

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a semiconductor perspective. But I think, you know, one of

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the things that gives us a lot of comments is

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>just the interest in our vehicles. The demand for our

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>vehicles across the board, you know, whether it's a Chevy

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Trailblazer or a Silverado or an Escalade, you know, across

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>our portfolio actually very strong midsized crossovers as well. So

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the strength of our product line UM, the services that

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>we're providing. We continue to see growth with on stars.

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of moving pieces that give me

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of confidence in our ability to hit that

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>um what we've said from a guidance perspective, and we're

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna work it every day. And finally, Mary, do you

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>have visibility to demand for your electric vehicles? I think

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the Lyric, the new electric suv you can order as

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of September. Do you have any sense whether people want

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the electric vehicles as oppose to your current vehicles. Well,

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen, um, you know, we can see growing excuse me,

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>growing demand for the for the bolt ev can't wait

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>for to get the eu V, the bolt Evy into

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the hands of customers. Um. You know, we've sold out

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the Hummer um e V truck and had extremely strong

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>demand um for quite some time for the Hummer Ev suv.

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.959
<v Speaker 1>So when we start selling the Lyric, which is one

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of the highest customer feedback vehicles we've had of the

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>just the beauty of that vehicle when they actually get

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in to see it, I expect we're going to have

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a strong reaction in September as well. So I'm very

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>um uh committed to the strength of our evs. Okay,

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much to Mary Barr. She is the

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>chairman and CEO of General Motors. Please brands in for

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Pulse whena I'm Tom Keane. What we're gonna do here?

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>This has been so anticipated and thank you folks for

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>your support of having Doug casson. He's a sea breeze.

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>We'd launch into a lot of baseball talk and all that,

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and we finally get to the equity markets today. I'm

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask one baseball question and that we're going to

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>get to the equity markets because I know you anticipate

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Mr Cass's views there, particularly at this historic time for

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the markets. Doug cass worst hitting since nineteen game after

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>game with two hits, three HiT's. Should they move the

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>mound back of foot? That doesn't apply to the Yankees

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 1>standing on the six and seven, six and seven in

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a row. I know, but you know there's a lot

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of minor league action going on here with real concern

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>over the lack of hitting in the game. Pitching domon

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>what was wrong When my cousin Sandy, I agree it's

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>against Marish Allen in the Games of War two to

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>one that it was beauty in that. The other thing

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>is that it will help those that are concerned about

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>long baseball games. You know. Yeah, So I'm with you.

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, but I'm just I think a lot

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of people want to know what you think about this. Uh,

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a great season. I'm watching apomy. It's going to

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>be a cold season for the Red Sox. Well there,

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, they dipped under six ball, but they're doing

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>better leading in April, and as you well know, Doug,

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>August is more important. Let's get to the equity markets.

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Douglas cast you've got some real caution out there. I

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>know you did an apple trade here, you got out

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of it. I want to start first with a trading

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>mentality out two weeks, three weeks. How do you apply

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>capital right now? Okay? Um? Paul Krueg. Krugman tweeted this

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>morning before seven o'clock, if it should happen to rain,

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>we have umbrellas, he quoted yelling, and he went on

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to say the panic pundits say she's predicting a hurricane.

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>The question I think a lot of investors are asking

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, as you just did with Lee Kuperman on

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>TV earlier this morning, is whether we're in a market

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 1>squall or market hurricane, or we at an important pivot

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>point for the markets. Um, the FED to me is

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>often wrong and ever in doubt. You just look at

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight as an example when the FED

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>was obsessed over inflation even as the financial crisis deepened,

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and there are many other examples. Misques me. I'm taking

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>out my Jerry for wind buttons ready to go on

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>my shirt. Um. My best proxy for inflation is the

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Mannheim used car indicts index. It's up fifty year over year.

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 1>There's no inventory, prices through the roof. We talked to

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>every single company as I do, and Lee Kuperman does,

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>their bottlenecks, supply issues, higher costs of broadcast, and the

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 1>prices being accepted by consumers. UM. In the fact that

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Steve Matthews featuring that reporter he said, it's a huge deal.

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>That's amazing. The question I think the question is, so

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>are we undergoing a squal or a hurricane. Obviously a

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>squall is less lethal, it's a sudden gust to win,

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it lasts only briefly. But the sustained winds of a hurricane,

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, are devastating, and if you look

0:34:55.560 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>at history, most market corrections are quick and squa as

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 1>an eighteen in February of last year being the exception.

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:05.720
<v Speaker 1>And that helps to explain why I think most short

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>sales of trades. Shorts may protect, but long generally generate well.

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Leon Cooperman's point was he was a fully invested bear

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>that he saw all of the signs of a potential

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>decline in markets. It might not happen now because just

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>markets don't go down for no reason. What do you

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>make of that? Are you also fully invested? The careful

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I listened very carefully to Pharaoh's interview of Lee. You

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>know I'm a big fan. I worked for Lee for

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 1>a number of years. Um Um. He said, there are

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 1>as signposts to do risk. I'll tell you mine. Number

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 1>one is the markets and difference to big beats TOI consensus.

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking Amazon, Zoom and even Apple. Here a m

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>D had multiple upgrades by the analytical community last week,

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>um a big earnings beef and beat in. The stock

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>is down twelve dollars and the fact that the market

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>has begun to vault in despite the ten year hanging

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>around one point six means that The market isn't newsy.

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not going lower because of higher rates. It just

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>begun to weaken as demand seems to be stated. Remember

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.439
<v Speaker 1>David Temper famously said about a month ago that race

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>would be contained and that in turn stocks would head higher.

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>The opposite is current rates are being contained, but stocks

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>are moving moving lower. The overall market is stalling, admittedly

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 1>at higher levels despite strong real economic data. Markets are

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>typically least are about rate of change. We are now

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>likely seeing the great of change in profits and economic growth.

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 1>It's something that Lee mentioned. Finally, this is really the

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>most important thing to me. We have basically been in

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a modern monetary theory position. It's been in place by

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the FEDS. It's shows by their indifference towards recovery and

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:57.399
<v Speaker 1>improving high frequency economic data. Now we are getting into

0:36:57.440 --> 0:37:01.439
<v Speaker 1>what I described as modern physical theory, and I think

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in the end, all violation of the fundamental laws of

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>economic and financial common sense a paid for. But every

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>both seems to think that he will unlow before the

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 1>break and Tom it's easy enough to burst the bubble,

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but to incize the bubble with the needles so that

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 1>it's subsides gradually is an operation of undebted Lisa, jump

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in here. You don't know who Jim Palmer is. No,

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I want to unpack a little bit of

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:30.280
<v Speaker 1>what you said. The idea of the logic of markets

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:33.399
<v Speaker 1>and modern fiscal theory is what you're saying, that you're

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 1>getting defensive, that you're going to cash or or please

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>insert what you're going to in order to be defensive

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>ahead of a surgeon inflation that forces offense hand and

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:48.760
<v Speaker 1>forces valuations that we see in equities. Lisa, I'm starting

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>up in about two weeks a new hedge fund, Sea

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Breeze Capital of Partners LP. I can't wait too short.

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:55.840
<v Speaker 1>You know. I don't know if you guys are a

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>fan of the movie Caddy Shack, but there's there's a

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>line when when Tye Webb is walking down with this

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:06.320
<v Speaker 1>caddy Danny Nowtan at Bushwood Country Club and he asked

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Danny whether he's in Russia. We're not in Russia, are

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 1>we We may not be in Russia, but we soon

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>might be in zimby way. Okay, there, come on, you mean, Doug,

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I get the idea of framing shorts and the you

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>know what makes us go here? The bullbear argument as well,

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 1>but when you mentioned above what you're talking about commodity

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>dynamics and you're talking about dollar dynamics, are you are

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you seeing a big figure fragility the US dollar here?

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>The dollar is going to get killed inflation? And give

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 1>me a number, Steve Roach, Steve Roaches, do we're gonna

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>get a return of the bond vigilantes? And I guess

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Tom one has to ask a fundamental question. If printing

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and spending money was so easy, Lisa, and without adverse

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>economic and market ramifications, why hasn't the FED and the

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>prior administration simply printed and spent through at the last century?

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Obvious there are adverse outcomes that come from undisciplined policy.

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Is there proof to right? And this is what I

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people are watching as they're saying, Look,

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight, we printed money and it

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 1>had no consequence. It frankly filled a hole that would

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>have otherwise been potentially deflationary. Why is this time different?

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 1>It's different because we have twenty eight point five trillion

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars in debt um. Twenty years ago we had four

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 1>point eight trillion. That means to me, Lisa um that

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 1>what was a hundred basis point increase in interest rates,

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and as a consequence, debt service is now only twenty

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>basis points. And the reality is that nobody knows when

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the twelve year bull market is going to end um.

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 1>But I think that climbing valuations, rising tax as, higher rates,

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and increased inflation are bona fide. I've never heard that

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you you're you're a great optimist of America and the

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Dodgers. I've never heard you this negative. But

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 1>what I want to say is, Doug, good luck with

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 1>your hedge fund. And I just you know, I remember

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that time, Doug, where you were out in the course

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 1>as you are done in Florida, and I heard you

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:25.760
<v Speaker 1>whisper a former greenskeeper about to become Yeah, dog gast,

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Sea Breeze Partners. He's starting a

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 1>new headshow on the Long Short Caddyshack fund as well,

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>more short than long. I think I've seen caddy Shack,

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll say fourteen times. Really, this is another side of you, Tom. Yeah.

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's art, It's crafted every sentence. This is going

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>to be an important conversation. David Rubinstein joins with Peer

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to Peer conversation conversations right now and with Carlo. What

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I love about Gina Romando David and just one of

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the great stories out there is her ability over years

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to just keep moving. Her father lost his job at Boulevard.

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I actually remember when Bovard Watch collapsed in Rhode Island,

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and she made good on it in venture capital and

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in politics. Yes, I mean, she has an incredible story.

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 1>She uh came from a blue collar family. As you

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:23.319
<v Speaker 1>point out, her father lost her job. Nonetheless, she went

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to Harvard, was near the top of her class, Rhodes scholar,

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Yale Law School, venture capitalists back in Rhode Island, she

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:31.240
<v Speaker 1>did chose not to go to New York or Washington

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>or l A. Went back to Rhode Island and really

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>built a good business before she got into politics. Well,

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:38.840
<v Speaker 1>she got into politics and and you know got what

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I would suggest high marks in a challenging Rhode Island,

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and it is a Rhode Island that all agree hasn't

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:49.879
<v Speaker 1>worn out infrastructure. She's focused on that right now. That's

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 1>correct infrastructure or something that Roode Island really needed. She

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 1>helped reform that and also did a lot in the

0:41:55.760 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>pension area. Elected governor twice and uh, interestingly, Um, she

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 1>chose to come to Washington. She could have stayed as

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a Rhode Island governor, maybe run for president down the

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>road herself, and she she could not. She could still

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:10.359
<v Speaker 1>do that, of course, down the road, but she wanted

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to come to Washington release help President Biden do the

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:15.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of things he's trying to do. So she is

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a point person on the infrastructure plan right now, appoint

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:21.359
<v Speaker 1>person with respect to infrastructure. Also a point person with

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>respect to our policies with China, especially considering the record

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 1>trade deficit that we just printed due to all of

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the imports from that nation. How does she talk about

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>free markets but also having a national focus? Can you

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>square these ideas well? The administration hasn't really changed a

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:42.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of the Trump trade policies yet, they haven't taken

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>down the the tariffs with China or the tariffs with Europe. Um.

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:50.280
<v Speaker 1>They suspect that some things may get negotiated with Europe.

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 1>She implied that, but she didn't say it would get

0:42:52.080 --> 0:42:53.919
<v Speaker 1>done for certain. And maybe the tariffs will come down

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to some extent. We don't know for certain. But right

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:59.359
<v Speaker 1>now the administration is focused domestically on the infrastructure bill,

0:42:59.760 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and don't really focus right now on new trade agreements.

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think they really want the kind of

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:08.360
<v Speaker 1>trade agreements that President Trump negotiated or are tried to negotiate.

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 1>But there's an idea here that perhaps it's behind Biden's

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:16.240
<v Speaker 1>proposals that the government can foster good spending that can

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 1>generate corporate growth. How does she talk about that in

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of the commerce of the United States versus federally

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:26.359
<v Speaker 1>funded programs that are one and done well they use.

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Usually the Commerce Department is often taking CEOs overseas for

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 1>trade missions to build plants and factories overseas. This administration

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is not as focused on that. They want to make

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:38.880
<v Speaker 1>certain that companies here are building more jobs here, and

0:43:38.920 --> 0:43:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that's their focus. So I don't think she's going to

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:42.799
<v Speaker 1>lead a lot of trade missions. So she didn't say

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:44.880
<v Speaker 1>she wouldn't do that right now, though she wants to

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 1>get the infrastructure build through and they recognize I'll have

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to compromise on some parts of it, for sure, David,

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you have a working number on your in your head

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>what that compromises. I don't mean that you know the

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Washington parlor game, but does it come in does it

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 1>ease act a little bit to get done or do

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you really see a much lesser statistic. Well, there are

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 1>two different issues on the compromise. What's the size of

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure bill going to be? And there're two different

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure bills, a traditional infrastructure and so called care infrastructure.

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the administration would like more than half of

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 1>what they propose, so it's unclear exactly what the number

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:23.399
<v Speaker 1>will be. The Republicans seem to be at a little

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:25.440
<v Speaker 1>bit less than half. And then the other issue is

0:44:25.480 --> 0:44:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the taxes, in corporate taxes and income personal income taxes.

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the administration made it clear they're prepared to

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>compromise on taxes for sure, but they don't want to

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 1>put a number out yet until they kind of know

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:38.240
<v Speaker 1>who they're negotiating with and what the other side really wants.

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:43.319
<v Speaker 1>I look, David at the compromise to come here an infrastructure,

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and it folds into capitalism in America. Should we have

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a more pure bill or is Gena Romando going to

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 1>say we can do a more complex bill. Well, I

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 1>think she's one of several players that are going to

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:57.839
<v Speaker 1>try to make a difference here. But I think right

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 1>now this is something that's likely to go forward over

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the remainder of this year. I think the it's not

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>going to get done that quickly. The infrastructure part is

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe easier. The harder part is the tax part. As

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, tax legislation usually takes a year or more

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to get through Congress, particularly when it's dealing with tax increases. UH.

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Senator Mansion has said that he could support a corporate

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 1>tax rate about the President's proposed um, you know, a

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:25.319
<v Speaker 1>much higher rate, but I suspect some corporate tax rate

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>between where it is now and will probably get done. Uh.

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>In terms of individual tax rates, it's unclear, but I'd

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:35.319
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if there is no individual tax increase at all.

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:38.879
<v Speaker 1>I suspect will be some. David, as an investor, as

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the co founder and co chair of Carlisle, how much

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are you relying on some of this infrastructure to get done?

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:47.399
<v Speaker 1>How much would it getting done or not getting done

0:45:47.840 --> 0:45:51.560
<v Speaker 1>change your outlook and the way that you invest. Of course,

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:54.359
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure is something that the country could benefit from, and

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure the President is talking about would be good

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:58.840
<v Speaker 1>for the economy. There's no doubt it. We create jobs

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's no doubt it would help in many different areas.

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:04.920
<v Speaker 1>For example, telecommunications are infrastructure on cell phone towers is

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 1>really um not exactly first world. It can be much better,

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:10.359
<v Speaker 1>as we all know when when trying to use cell

0:46:10.400 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 1>phones in the the ball's dropped. There are many different

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:14.879
<v Speaker 1>things I think would help the economy, but it's hard

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:17.320
<v Speaker 1>as an investor to say, well, if this bill passes,

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 1>the impact will be felt in two or three years,

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll make an investment right now take advantage of it.

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 1>It's too unclear right now. Although there's a question about

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the optimism the balance of risks that if there isn't

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>some sort of optimism about future growth, it's hard to

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 1>invest in assets at these valuations. Leon Cooperman just said

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 1>he was a fully invested bear and talking about how

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:39.480
<v Speaker 1>he can line up all of the arguments for why

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:41.759
<v Speaker 1>markets should go down, but they just aren't right now.

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:44.759
<v Speaker 1>What's your view on that. Are you a fully invested

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 1>bear or are you looking out to some of these

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 1>programs and saying it could change the trajectory of this recovery. Well,

0:46:51.719 --> 0:46:54.359
<v Speaker 1>of course, the economy has been pretty good uh last

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of months because of the stimulus. It's like they

0:46:56.600 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to do pretty well for some time. Uh, the

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of Rate sort of walk back our comments on

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 1>interest rate increases. So I suspect the markets will do

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 1>well today as well, because there was some concerned yesterday

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:10.680
<v Speaker 1>about interest rate increases possibly coming along. But I'd say

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for the next year or so, maybe two years, hint.

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:15.239
<v Speaker 1>The economy is like to do quite well down the

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:17.279
<v Speaker 1>road two or three or four years from now. It's

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:19.520
<v Speaker 1>hard to predict. At some point things will slow down,

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:22.120
<v Speaker 1>but the stimulus are still working its way through the economy.

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 1>But David, thank you so much. Really look forward to

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Mundo with David Rubinstein, of course peer to peer conversations.

0:47:35.000 --> 0:47:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Now joining us for a four hour conversation is Michael Faroli.

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 1>He's a JP Morrigan. He has a brilliant essay out

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 1>with Team Kasman on Friday on goods and services and

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:49.959
<v Speaker 1>on this odd John economy. But Michael Faroli, I gotta

0:47:50.040 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>rip up the script over what we saw you and

0:47:52.600 --> 0:47:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I adore Benjamin Friedman of Harvard Economics. He's one of

0:47:56.200 --> 0:47:59.320
<v Speaker 1>our most important thinkers. And I'm gonna go back to

0:47:59.400 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin Freedman The Moral Consequences of Growth, his classic book

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of twenty years ago, explain right now the moral consequences

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:12.399
<v Speaker 1>of debt is we wring our hands over something as

0:48:12.440 --> 0:48:16.600
<v Speaker 1>strange is the debt ceiling. So I agree with where

0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you were going in your previous conversation. It is kind

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of odd to be focusing on the debt ceiling at

0:48:21.000 --> 0:48:24.320
<v Speaker 1>this time. You know, certainly over the last few years,

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 1>we haven't worried that much about the deficit, and at

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 1>this point, as you say, Congress selects revenues, a select spending,

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the debt ceiling should be a residual of that, and

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it's a a concern is a bit

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit unique to the US. My understanding is that

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 1>this can be extended via reconciliation. So hopefully this shouldn't

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:47.400
<v Speaker 1>be too much of a headache for the market so

0:48:47.520 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 1>or for the economy this year. But that's something we'll

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:51.840
<v Speaker 1>have to just wait and see. As far as I understand,

0:48:51.840 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at this Treasury refunding announcement, the auction science is

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the longer end left unchanged. You know, it's just a

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:58.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit higher off the back of this announcement by

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of basis points or so. Michael, just going

0:49:01.000 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 1>into the payrolls report, this Friday. How big are you

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:06.759
<v Speaker 1>looking for that number? In America? How big are you

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:08.719
<v Speaker 1>looking north of a million? And what are the risks

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:10.839
<v Speaker 1>around some of these companies just not being able to

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 1>meet the demand by not being able to hide the people. Yeah,

0:49:14.040 --> 0:49:17.719
<v Speaker 1>so we're right near consensus looking for a million. We

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:21.240
<v Speaker 1>think the risks are fairly balanced. Obviously, this morning's ADP

0:49:21.400 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 1>numbers suggests there could be some downside, but as has

0:49:25.200 --> 0:49:28.960
<v Speaker 1>been the case over the past twelve thirteen months, the

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 1>range of uncertainty is obviously quite a bit larger than

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:35.200
<v Speaker 1>normal U There are some technical factors here in terms

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of how we seasonally adjust the numbers that could really

0:49:38.600 --> 0:49:41.719
<v Speaker 1>skew things one way or the other. But either way

0:49:41.760 --> 0:49:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it should be a pretty big number. But I would

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:45.920
<v Speaker 1>if we have a miss of a couple hundred thousand

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 1>on either side of that, I wouldn't really change my

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the overall course of the recovery. So expect noise,

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:55.080
<v Speaker 1>but expected to be a pretty big number. Might do

0:49:55.080 --> 0:49:57.799
<v Speaker 1>you think labor shortage translates into high wages in the

0:49:57.800 --> 0:49:59.440
<v Speaker 1>next couple of months? It's going to be this composition

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 1>where they should in the number of Friday. But beyond that,

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:04.319
<v Speaker 1>you think it does, yeah, and I think you're right

0:50:04.360 --> 0:50:06.359
<v Speaker 1>to say the next couple of months. Right. So, when

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:08.400
<v Speaker 1>we think about some of the issues that are weighing

0:50:08.400 --> 0:50:11.959
<v Speaker 1>on labor supply, one of them is working parents having

0:50:12.000 --> 0:50:14.239
<v Speaker 1>to be at you know, having to be but liking

0:50:14.280 --> 0:50:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to be at home in this kind of unusual schooling environment.

0:50:17.440 --> 0:50:20.960
<v Speaker 1>We've had another maybe, and this is a little more controversial,

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that the uh, the unemployment insurance bonuses may have raised

0:50:25.200 --> 0:50:28.080
<v Speaker 1>people's reservation wages and made them a little more picky

0:50:28.080 --> 0:50:31.239
<v Speaker 1>and what jobs uh they accept. You know, both of

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:33.840
<v Speaker 1>those are temporary, so school schedules should come back to

0:50:33.840 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 1>normal in September. That bonus payment ends in September. But

0:50:38.040 --> 0:50:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in the next few months, I do think it may

0:50:39.640 --> 0:50:41.719
<v Speaker 1>be uh, you know, a little bit tight and the

0:50:41.760 --> 0:50:44.600
<v Speaker 1>labor supply front, and perhaps we saw a little evidence

0:50:44.640 --> 0:50:47.279
<v Speaker 1>of that last Friday. We had a much fair bit

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:51.560
<v Speaker 1>strong and unexpected employment cost index, which was kind of ignored.

0:50:51.680 --> 0:50:54.400
<v Speaker 1>But but that could be one of the you know,

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:57.680
<v Speaker 1>signs that we are facing some labor supply shortages. But

0:50:57.719 --> 0:51:00.839
<v Speaker 1>I would think they're somewhat transitory nature and that they

0:51:00.880 --> 0:51:02.920
<v Speaker 1>should we should loosen things up. I think as we

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 1>get into the fall and winter. Won't make you think, Michael,

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're not transitory, that perhaps there is some credence

0:51:08.560 --> 0:51:12.319
<v Speaker 1>to that idea that the benefits made people a bit

0:51:12.360 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 1>more picky in terms of what they're willing to accept

0:51:14.880 --> 0:51:18.720
<v Speaker 1>with respect to wages in addition to rising input costs,

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in addition to some of the constraints supply chain issues

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that have caused prices to go up just generally, right,

0:51:24.480 --> 0:51:26.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think we want to distinguish wages and prices

0:51:26.680 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 1>for wages, We're just gonna have to you know, if

0:51:29.520 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 1>if those factors really do subside after September, then we

0:51:33.239 --> 0:51:37.479
<v Speaker 1>can take stock of how data developments after September start

0:51:37.520 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to play out, and we're just gonna have to wait

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:43.960
<v Speaker 1>until then. I think on prices it's a little trickier.

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So certainly some of these bottlenecks are going to be

0:51:46.680 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 1>putting off ward pressure on certain categories. Uh. You know,

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I think one area that might be useful. In the past,

0:51:53.320 --> 0:51:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the FED has kind of drawn attention to things like

0:51:56.239 --> 0:52:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Fed trim mean and what measures like do

0:52:00.360 --> 0:52:02.880
<v Speaker 1>was strip out extreme movements both to the upside and

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:05.920
<v Speaker 1>downside to get a better measure of the central tendency

0:52:05.960 --> 0:52:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of inflation. Things like that may be worth looking at.

0:52:08.840 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I think over the next few months, Michael. Just to

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:12.839
<v Speaker 1>wrap up here, we got those ADP numbers. They came

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:15.279
<v Speaker 1>in disappointing, and you've got all these people coming out

0:52:15.320 --> 0:52:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and saying, hey, they don't correlate with the monthly jobs

0:52:17.560 --> 0:52:20.280
<v Speaker 1>report out of the government and be they're really noisy

0:52:20.280 --> 0:52:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and messy, and their methodology doesn't capture people are getting

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 1>rehired by the same company. What would you say in

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:29.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of the ADPs predictive ability, even in the best

0:52:29.120 --> 0:52:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of times, it hasn't been great. Um. You know, over

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the past year you've had misses of over a million.

0:52:35.440 --> 0:52:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we've had pretty big big swings over the past year. Uh,

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think but given the range of missus,

0:52:43.400 --> 0:52:46.359
<v Speaker 1>what we saw this morning isn't that far from what

0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we and the consensus are expecting for private

0:52:49.400 --> 0:52:53.240
<v Speaker 1>perils on Friday. So I would say, you know, perhaps

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 1>this takes out a little bit of risk of a

0:52:55.840 --> 0:52:59.600
<v Speaker 1>really huge upside or downside surprise on Friday. Michael got

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to leave it. Mike, I've gotta say it's nice to

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:04.799
<v Speaker 1>see a full office. J I was just gonna say

0:53:04.800 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 1>he's whipping him into order. There. It's bustling with the

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:10.719
<v Speaker 1>half of Mr the Diamond as well, Michael Ferratti. That

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:17.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening.

0:53:17.920 --> 0:53:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Join us live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern

0:53:21.520 --> 0:53:25.560
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:30.880
<v Speaker 1>six to nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:53:31.040 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course on

0:53:40.080 --> 0:53:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the terminal. I'm Tom Keene, and this is Bloomberg