WEBVTT - Markets Whipsaw on Tariff Uncertainty, Apple Might Hike Prices

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from the heart of

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>where innovation, money and power collide in Silicon Valley and beyond.

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde.

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 2>And Ed Ludlow live from New York. I'm Caroline Hyde

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 2>and I'm.

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Ed Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 2>And it's another day ed of US stocks whip soaring

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 2>following President Trump's tariffs. This is nervy investors respond to

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 2>the speculation on tariff delays since refuted by the White

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 2>House and reports of a legal challenge to those libbes.

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Well in the context of tariffs in this market and

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 3>the technology sector, it is the mag seven Names that

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 3>the focus think about Nvidia and Gain, a name that

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 3>was significantly lower swung to a gain. It's held that

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 3>game and list downgrades and cuts is part of the

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 3>story in Apple and Tesla, but at one point in

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 3>the session, Apple was on track for its biggest three

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 3>day drop since October of two thousand. I want to

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 3>show you some data that was brought up by Apollo

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Global in their newsletter this morning, and it is the

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 3>mag seven Names, and then North America are US revenues

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 3>and Amazon's case sixty one percent majority in North America

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 3>excluding AWS, but for most of them, most of those

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 3>sales come from outside the US and jurisdictions where taris

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 3>will be held hardest. And that's why there's concern in

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 3>part that it will be a hit to earnings going forward.

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>And boy, hasn't that been a story for Apple. Now,

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 2>let's just return to the keystock that renowned tech bull

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Dan ives and Webbush has cut his price target for

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 2>the iPhone maker. He's gone way down to two hundred

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>and fifty dollars from three hundred and twenty five while

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 2>maintaining though an outperform rating. Johnny us now Bloomberg's ran Vlastellaca.

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Apple has been in the io of the storm, and

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Dan I's singling that out over the course of the weekend.

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, good morning, thanks for having me. Apple is really

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 4>sort of a poster child for terrif related risk right now.

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 4>It does so much manufacturing overseas, especially in countries like

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 4>China and Vietnam, which are some of the countries that

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 4>have been hit with some of the highest tariff rates.

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 4>So there is so much uncertainty surrounding the company, surrounding

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 4>its earnings potential in this kind of environment. What are

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 4>they going to do? What are tariffs going to look like?

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Are they going to have to raise prices? If they do,

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 4>what is that going to mean for demand? Are they

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 4>going to have or are they going to absorb these

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 4>higher costs? If so, what does that mean for margins

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 4>and earnings? There are so much uncertainty here Because we're

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 4>talking about Apple, which is still the biggest company in

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 4>the world, It's obviously has a lot of implications for

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 4>the market overall.

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 3>We were talking before the show about is this a

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 3>historic Monday or not? Biggest three day drop for Apple

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:54.839
<v Speaker 3>going back to two thousand. That gives me a sort

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 3>of sense of scale, but talks to me about the

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 3>stock Ryan, I mean, our colleagues at Bloombag Intelligence don't

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 3>think Apple raises prices. It has used mechanisms around the

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 3>world to stay competitive on the services side, in particular.

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 5>How's the stock viewed?

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 6>Well?

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 4>I think so much of this really depends on what

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 4>happens with tariffs. There's so much uncertainty on that point.

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 4>And if they stay in place as they currently are,

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, the outlook is very grim. But if they

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 4>come off tomorrow, which you know doesn't seem like it's honestly,

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 4>you see who knows. You know, people are still pretty

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 4>positive about the company's longer term potential, maybe eventually with AI,

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 4>with services, growth, with earnings. It still has a bunch

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 4>of cash, a very strong balance sheet. There's certainly reasons

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 4>to be optimistic, but a lot of people I talk

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 4>to are just very skeptical about it.

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 4>I will say that if you look at its RSI,

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 4>it's trading at some of the most oversold levels in years.

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 4>So there is certainly an argument to be made here

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 4>that some people feel like it's gotten oversold, Like you said,

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 4>biggest three day drop at least at one point since

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 4>before the iPod. So that tells you the kind of

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 4>buying opportunity if you like the stock that you could

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 4>be looking at here.

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to this Monday Bloom those rights Plaseelica, Thank you

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 3>very much. Let's get more on the wider market tat

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 3>term Or. Angela Zeo, CFRA Research VP, Senior ecuty analyst

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 3>joins us.

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 5>Now and I want.

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 3>To go back to the point that we raise at

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 3>the top of the show that if you put the

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 3>mag seven side by side, Angelo, and look at the

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 3>revenues they derive from outside of the United States. Apple

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 3>catches the eye right, there's a lot of it coming

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 3>x USA or x North America. How are you modeling

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 3>that this morning?

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, now, thanks for having me. So as far as

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 7>that's concerned, yeah, I mean, look, listen, listen, I mean,

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 7>Apple is it's really tough to be a technology hardware

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 7>a company right now, and to us, Apple is probably

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 7>facing its toughest tests in about two decades, it's called

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 7>since the financial crisis, where it actually prospered because of

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 7>the iPhone launch at that point in time. But when

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 7>you kind of look at Apple specifically here to your point,

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 7>forty three percent of sales here in the US the

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 7>rest internationally. So it is a true global company. And

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 7>the fact that they do have you know that most

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 7>of their iPhone production in the in China is the

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 7>issue out here. We do think as far as the

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.799
<v Speaker 7>tariff concerns are concerned. Right now, there's essentially this twenty

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 7>billion dollar or so deficit that they're going to have

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 7>to make up in terms of you know, if you

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 7>were a look at over the last twelve months and

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 7>kind of extract the type of tariff hit that they

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 7>would have gotten from importing all those goods the in

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 7>terms in the US. So when you think about that

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 7>and you look at the potential of what they could

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 7>do here in terms of offsetting that twenty billion dollar increase,

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 7>I think there are a number of things that they

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 7>can do, but I don't think personally it's something along

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 7>the lines of them increasing iPhone prices by about thirty

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 7>percent or so across the line here in the US,

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 7>because that's just going to cause way too much demand destruction.

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 2>So they swallow a marginhead But right now the investor

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 2>base is having to swallow serious headline pressure. We're being

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 2>whip swored by the latest. We don't know whether this

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 2>could suddenly on a dime spin into the green. We're

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 2>off by two and a half percent. How do you,

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 2>as a long term investor hold the trade? Angelou?

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean you look at where the stock is

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 8>at now.

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 7>I mean we've seen essentially a thirty percent plus correction

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 7>in the shares, So in our view, it's at this

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 7>point it's too late to sell the shares if you're

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 7>an Apple investor. We've told investors we think there's downside

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 7>to about one hundred and fifty five to one hundred

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 7>and sixty five dollars a share. That would essentially apply

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 7>a peak to trough of about forty percent.

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 8>And those are declines that we've seen in the.

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 7>Past from Apple stock, and they've recovered and hit new

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 7>highs back then. We think this is a point in

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 7>time where Apple is going to be able to adjust

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 7>to whatever new scenario that we see. If these fifty

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 7>percent plus tariffs from China are here to stay, we

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 7>think they're going to adjust their business model for that,

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 7>whether it be increasing their iPhone prices by one hundred

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 7>dollars across the board with the iPhone seventeen cycle, and

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 7>then you know, potentially kind of you know, when you

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 7>look at it from an installment cost perspective, that's fairly

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 7>limited to the consumer out there. But nonetheless, there are

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 7>a number of things we think Apple can do here

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 7>to kind of right size their model.

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to the other areas that you focus. You

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 2>will focus on a lot of chip names, and many

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 2>are worried about the exposure of semiconductors to supply chain

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 2>in Asia, even though there was a carve out of

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 2>semi conductors coming from Asia from a tariff perspective, they're

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 2>in the green today, Angelou. Is that the right way

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 2>to be analyzing the sell off of Lake?

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's interesting.

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 7>So you kind of when we were looking at the

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 7>shares this morning for a lot of these names, specifically

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 7>a namelike Nvidia, we thought it was essentially overdone. But

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 7>you kind of look at the decline we've seen from

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 7>peak to trough on the semiconductor side of things, it's

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 7>been about a forty percent of climb, which is actually

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 7>similar to the decline that we saw from peak to

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 7>trough back in twenty twenty twenty two. And again it's

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 7>one of those situations you never know where the bottom

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 7>is on the chip side of things, but there is

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:51.679
<v Speaker 7>clearly some very strong secular opportunities tied to the chip sector,

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 7>specifically on the AI side of things.

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 8>We think that infrastructure build out continues.

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 7>Clearly, it's going to be somewhat ratcheted down because those.

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 8>Of the tariff situation we're in right now.

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 7>But nonetheless, I mean, it is an opportunity that you know, persists,

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 7>we think over the next decade or so, and you

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 7>know in video clearly at that top of the list.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 7>But when you look at the profitability of these companies

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 7>on that AI trade that is going to remain in tact,

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 7>of course, with some downside to the estimates. But again,

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 7>the forty in production we've seen in the share prices reflective.

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 5>Let me jump in here.

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 3>The bigger question to me is is not just where

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 3>the infrastructure build out continues, it's whether the hyper scalea

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 3>capex moderates, because profit estimates for many of these companies

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 3>in the semi space are predicated on that.

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 5>What's your call on that investment cycle?

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so, I mean we do think that it's going

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 8>to be challenged.

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 7>So you kind of look at a year ago and

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 7>essentially the capex numbers just continue to go higher and

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 7>hire and our view it actually we've probably seen, you know,

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 7>somewhat of a peak type capex number here in the

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 7>near term.

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 8>We don't think you're talking peak levels at all. Long term.

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 7>We actually think as you go into twenty twenty six,

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 7>we're looking at a capex increase of about four percent

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 7>for the high purpose scalers. On a combined basis, it's

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 7>going to be north of thirty percent this year. It

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 7>starts to level out though, absolutely, but nonetheless I mean

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 7>you kind of look at the secular themes that drive

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 7>infrastructure spending. It is the cloud, it is digital ad spend,

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 7>and long term, those are going to be trends that

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 7>continue to see higher revenue.

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 3>World Angela, How does this technology market compare to ninety eight,

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and two thousand and eight and every day

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 3>of your working life that's gone before it.

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that's a great question.

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 7>I think, you know, specifically from a valuation perspective, I

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 7>think the good news is we don't have a valuation

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 7>problem in tech, and I think historically that has been

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 7>an issue. These are historically very high growth oriented type names,

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 7>and you always have to worry about how much can

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 7>these names really kind of decline. I think the great

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 7>thing is when you look at tech here specifically, if

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 7>it's driving it, it is big tech, and big tech

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 7>has massive cash flow generation.

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 8>Even if we kind.

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 7>Of discount some of the tariff issues at hand, right now,

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 7>you're still talking about an Apple, if they don't offset

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 7>that twenty billion or so, it's still going to generate

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 7>potentially ninety billion or so on an annualized basis. That

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 7>would be your worst case scenario. So when we start

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.959
<v Speaker 7>thinking about the drivers here of tech. The discount now

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 7>that you've seen here over the last nine to ten

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 7>months on the valuation side of things now trading less

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 7>than twenty times on a calendar twenty six pass Again,

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:34.719
<v Speaker 7>those estimates have to go down. But when we kind

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 7>of look at things here, you got to look at

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 7>it from a long term perspective. You look at that

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 7>twenty percent or so discount on broader tech and I

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 7>think you know, overall, if you're a long term investor,

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 7>I think there's an opportunity here over.

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 8>The next couple of days weeks. You just got to

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 8>be willing to lose some money in the near term.

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Rite that volatility. Angelo Zino of CFIRA, Great to have

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 2>you on the show. Thank you. Coming up, we're going

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 2>to check in on Teslas stock price following a dramatic

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 2>price target cut from Wedbush. We're on that next, and

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 2>what are you drilling into?

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's fair to say a lot of

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 3>people work this Sunday, and one of the only markets

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 3>open to look at was crypto and bitcoin in particular.

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 3>We went from like eighty eight thousand US dollars per

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 3>token Friday night down now to around seventy eighty five hundred.

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 3>It's moderated, but there's divergence with gold. There is the

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 3>tariff story hitting crypto assets, and we'll continue to track

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 3>it because that was a lot of the focus over

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 3>the weekend. Just in case you missed it, stick with us,

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 3>we'll be right back. This is Bloomberg Technology tesler trading

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 3>at one point in this session below two hundred and

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 3>eighteen dollars a share, a price at which COMMAS secretary

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Howard Lutnik predicted they'd never fall to again. That decline

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 3>followed a forty three percent price target cut by Webbush

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Securities analyst Daniel Iive, citing Trump's trade policies and a

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 3>brand crisis created by Elon Musk, Bloomberg's Global Auto's Edisi

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Crazydales here for more from London. When I was reading

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 3>the Ives, note there were some very specific points, which

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 3>is that, for example, in China, it's not just the

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 3>tariffs themselves, it's the reputation and association of Musk with

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 3>the policy that might drive Chinese consumer is to buy

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 3>domestic models.

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, that's right, and I mean I think what we've

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 9>seen from the Trump administration is that they've really sort

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 9>of you know, stoked this nationalistic sentiment in other countries already.

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 9>You think about Canada being a great example of this,

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 9>maybe not great, but an example of this, where you know,

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 9>at hockey games suddenly you know there's a booing of

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 9>the national anthem, and you know, we don't have to

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 9>go that far back in history to think of other

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 9>companies that you know, have felt the brunt of sort

0:12:56.160 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 9>of nationalistic sentiment in China and and you know, felt

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 9>blowback from that. And so I think that's what I

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.719
<v Speaker 9>was maybe was alluding to here, And it's maybe a

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 9>risk that we haven't seen necessarily in China, where you know,

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 9>whereas we've seen these Tesla takedown protests in other countries,

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 9>it's not something that we're seeing on the streets of say,

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 9>you know, Shanghai or Beijing.

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 2>He calls for Elo Musk to step up Craig and

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 2>to show leadership. Now, last time I check. I don't

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 2>think el must particularly cares what Wall Street analysts think

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 2>or ask of him, But are we anticipating a return

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:34.719
<v Speaker 2>to leading this business rather than his role at the

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 2>White House.

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 9>I think there was a lot of sort of hope

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 9>and optimism last week right when Politico reported that Musk

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 9>you know, was on the cusp of stepping back officially

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 9>from his roles. But I think, you know, not only

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.839
<v Speaker 9>did we hear Musk dispute that and say it's you know,

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 9>fake news, we also heard you know, from jd Vance,

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 9>the Vice President, talk about this idea that you know,

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 9>Doje is nowhere near done, and allude to the idea

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 9>that Musk is going to continue to advise this administration

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 9>you know, for you know, long into the future, and

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 9>so even if officially he is no longer a special

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 9>government employee. I think this, this notion that he would

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 9>fully step back from politics seems you know, seems like

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 9>a stretch, given given how sort of assertive and hands

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 9>on he's been to this point. Maybe he does go

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 9>back to spending more time, you know, say in Austin

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 9>or at facilities like in California. But I think the

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 9>bigger problem here is the sort of daily drumbeat of

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 9>his posts on X that could be really divisive.

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Crater Dal, thanks so much for joining us as always. Meanwhile,

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 2>coming up, we're going to take a closer look at

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 2>how the US China trade tensions could also be playing

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 2>into the negotiations for TikTok. Sam Sak, senior fellow at

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 2>New America joining US ed, what are you keeping an eye.

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 5>On market's over in Asia overnight?

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 3>And also a piece of news, this is the mc

0:14:56.240 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 3>i AC Asia Pacific Information Tech in debt. Clearly heavy clients,

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 3>but this as President Trump said that he has spoken

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 3>to the Japanese Prime minister. Also getting some headlines crossing

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg terminal. Relating to Asia, Trump says China must

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 3>back off thirty four percent tariff increases by April eighth.

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Trump says that talk to China on possible meetings will

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 3>be terminated, and he threatens a fifty percent additional tariff

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 3>on China starting April ninth if they don't meet an

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Eightril eight deadline. He's talking about to back off of

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 3>the thirty thirty four percent. I think we call them

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 3>reciprocal tariffs right Carrow that were put in place by

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese.

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 8>The reporters.

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 7>We had a deal pretty much with Jake jack nadded

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 7>deal but pretty close, and then China changed the deal

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 7>because of tariffs.

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 8>If I gave a little of jarriffs, A proven a

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 8>deal at fifteen Brothers which shows you the power of derives.

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 3>There was President Trump speaking last night of allD Air

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Force one, saying China's objections to US tariffs stored a

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 3>deal to sell.

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 5>Off TikTok and keep it operating in the US.

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 3>In the last two minutes, the President has posted on

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 3>truth social threatening a fifty percent additional tariff on China

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 3>if they don't remove the thirty four percent reciprocal tariffs

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 3>that China had put in place by April eighth. You

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 3>said a deadline that post. I think Carry was seeing

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 3>all kinds of assets react. Some that I'm seeing, for

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 3>example God and Dragon index and as that modern edgines is, we.

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Have more boers, go for it.

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 5>Carry pick it up.

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 2>President Trump saying that all talks with China have been

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 2>terminated unless tariffs are pulled. So thus far, unless there

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 2>is a change of sentiment coming from China and they

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 2>withdraw as you were just articulating that extra thirty four

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 2>percent that they put on on Friday, then all China

0:16:56.200 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 2>talks are terminated unless those tariffs are pulled.

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm going to look at some of the assets,

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 3>just really quick shares like Ali Barba's US listed ADRs

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 3>clearly getting hit, but the Nazet Golden Dragon China Index

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:10.919
<v Speaker 3>down almost four percent.

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 5>So it's important.

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Let's get back to the story we're talking about, and

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 3>that is the future of TikTok in the United States.

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 3>Bloombos Kirk Wagner joins us, and essentially, Kurt, what the

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 3>President said last night on Air Force One confirmed what

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 3>you had reported a couple of days earlier that the

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 3>tariff policy of this White House derailed a deal that

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 3>was being negotiated with China to have US investor ownership

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 3>of TikTok in the US.

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 10>Take it from there, Well, that's exactly right. This deal,

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 10>as Trump said, was close to being done. They had

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 10>the framework in place, and you know, the tariffs hit.

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 10>The tariffs are announced, and China said, you know, we're

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 10>going to pause on this thing. And the news you

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 10>just shared Ed and Caroline makes me think that we're

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 10>we're definitely nowhere close to a deal now.

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 10>Things are getting more intense, not less intense on this

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 10>traf war. And so you know, as Trump said, the

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 10>tariffs work, I would say tariffs have consequences. Right in

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 10>this case, the deal for TikTok is sort of in

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 10>the crosshairs of this thing.

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 6>We knew that would be the case.

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 10>I think I'm not sure if we knew it would

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:15.679
<v Speaker 10>be quite this much in the middle of all this,

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 10>but you know, part of the geopolitical fight here, Kit.

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Wagner, we thank you. We have now got the perfect

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 2>voice to discuss the implications of US and China on

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 2>technology and more broadly, Sam Sas is with US senior

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 2>fellow at New America. You have worked for tech giants

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 2>like Zeemans setting up their businesses over in Asia, who

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 2>speak the language, interpret what is going on at the

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 2>moment and how China is going to fight the US

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 2>on this.

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 11>China anticipated the tariffs, but they were shocked by the scale.

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 11>And what we're seeing now is the leadership in Beijing

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 11>is trying to both signal resolves. They say we've got

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 11>this under control, We've diversified our economy, but they're also

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 11>still hoping for some space for a deal. And let's

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 11>watch how they navigate doing both at the same time.

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 11>In you know, TikTok, the deal was ready to come,

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 11>but tariffs derailed it. And now China's saying we still

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 11>can maintain leverage at this key moment.

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Sam I'm just going to remind our audience of the

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 3>breaking news of literally the last thirty seconds, which is

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 3>that President Trump is saying that all talks of China

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 3>have been terminated. He had threatened an additional fifty percent

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 3>tariff if China had not removed the thirty four percent reciprocal.

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 5>Tariff by April eighth.

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 3>The question who's in the stronger position here, the United

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 3>States or China.

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 11>Well, first of all, there were no talks actually planned

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 11>with China, so I'm not sure where that's coming from.

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.679
<v Speaker 2>You know, China has already moved forward.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 11>We heard news that they're building a rail line linking

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 11>to Europe. They want to secure their exports to Europe.

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 11>It's going around Russia. They're trying to accommodate European sanctions.

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 11>They're looking towards emerging economies. They've signaled that they've already

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 11>significan reduced their trade and investment with the United States.

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 2>So they've priced this in.

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 11>But their economy is weak and they want to try

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 11>to offset the domestic pressure on the economy in the

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 11>hopes that maybe Trump will come around. But look, we're

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 11>quickly moving toward a downward escalatory spile. If Trump moves

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 11>forward with these compounding tariffs.

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 2>If you are Apple, if you are Tesla that has

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 2>significant revenue in China and you're implicated by the brand

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 2>destruction of a domestic consumer going for China right now,

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 2>how do you respond? You wait this out and trying

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 2>to make changes to your business model at this moment.

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 11>The problem is these companies attempted to change their business

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 11>model with the China plus one diversifying to India, to Vietnam.

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 11>But now those transshipment companies have also been hit by tariffs,

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 11>and I think multinationals are reeling from that. Same In

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 11>the fashion industry, they were double producing lines to countries

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 11>that are now impacted by the tariffs. The prices are

0:20:57.960 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 11>just going to be passed to the consumer and multi

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 11>nationals are going to be hiding in the process.

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 3>So Sam, I go very quickly back to my same question.

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 3>But who's got more leeway here to put their economy

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 3>through pain?

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 5>China or the United States?

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 11>You know, what do you do when both countries are

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 11>under pressure domestically? I think the United States came out

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 11>as from a very strong position in their own economy. Well,

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 11>China was weak, and now that may Flip.

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Sam Sachs, New America Senior Fellow, just the perfect guest.

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to bluemog Technology. I'm Caroline Hide in.

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 3>New York and I'm Medladlow in San Francisco. Let's talk

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 3>about the markets and whipsaw, volatility, girations. Call it what

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 3>you will. The breaking headlines of the last thirty minutes.

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Our President Trump talking on truth social about ending tariff

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.479
<v Speaker 3>negotiations with China. Then as that one hundred is swung

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 3>from a four percent decline or more early in the

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 3>session to again now it is down one point nine percent.

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 3>It's probably better exemplified in some of the single mover

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 3>names in the context of tariffs. There is a big

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 3>focus in the research notes and the activity on social

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 3>media around the mag seven names because of their exposure

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 3>in terms of revenue outside of the United States. In

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.719
<v Speaker 3>Nvidia is a name that has swung between a significant

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 3>loss with significant gain. It is now slightly softer. Tesla

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 3>continues to be under pressure. Apple down six percent, and

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 3>we will get to more about Apple with Bloombo's Mark

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 3>German in a moment. Amazon now flat but had actually

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 3>had a big reversal of fortunes.

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 5>Earlier in the day.

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 3>Caro, It's very hard to piece where you win and

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 3>lose in this market. But I think mag seven is

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 3>interesting if you just think about where their businesses are

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 3>around the.

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 2>World, and the threat of ongoing headline risk is one

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 2>that investors are having to navigate. Case in point, the

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 2>last thirty minutes trade. Let's discuss it with Isabelle Lee

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 2>who joins us on the impact of those that have

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 2>controlled the stock market, ultimately the big owners wool Street.

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 2>They've been pushing back over the course of the weekend.

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I think of Bilackman's been speaking out, I've Haas, Weinstein,

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 2>a whole long list, Jaban Diamond. How have they basically

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 2>seen the move shift away from them of late with

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Trump's commitment to tariffing, certainly China. In the last tenty minutes.

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 12>Exactly, it's really been hard to your point headline risk,

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 12>and I want to point out that this intra day

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 12>gap of seven percent, more than seven percent, is the

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 12>largest since twenty twenty. And of course the whole of

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 12>the country and the whole of the world are affected,

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 12>but especially the investing class. We have around ten percent

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 12>of Americans or at least the richest ten percent invested

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 12>in a huge chunk of this, and they really don't

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 12>want to look at their four oh one case. There

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 12>was a meme that says four to one K is

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 12>now two to one K, and it's really astonishing. We

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 12>have strategists cutting down their price targets, vis jump to fifty.

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 12>We have one after the other downgrading their us US

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 12>and even FED cuts are shifting by the hours. So

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 12>it's really an exciting market. We spent the whole weekend

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 12>this big tick I did with Bildana Hirich and Denizza Takova.

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 12>We were just calling people and everyone was really just worried.

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 12>That was a common threat.

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:03.239
<v Speaker 5>Team in the control room.

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring up those pictures from last Wednesday where President

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 3>Trump walked out with the chart of death. There it is,

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 3>there is the president countries listed by tariffs and I

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:17.959
<v Speaker 3>think reciprocals as well. Just anecdotally, some of the responses

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 3>you got to that specific board in his hands were

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 3>some of the most astonishing things I've seen in print journalism.

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 12>Recap some we have Rich Seinberg, he's a senior wealth

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 12>advisor and he was saying he's used to all the

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 12>stress but then this is one of the most frustrating

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 12>he's seen. In fact, he's very, very frustrated. We have

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 12>that quote in the story. Jay Hatfield of Infrastructure Capital

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 12>was saying that this is quote unambiguously stupid and there's

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 12>no reason to cause a quote trade war like this.

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.160
<v Speaker 12>And to Caroline's point, on top of all of this

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 12>is the reverse wealth effect. We had wealth effect for

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 12>the good of two years. Everyone was feeling flushed, everyone

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 12>was feeling happy taking vacations. But now it's the exact opposite,

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 12>and that can have real implications in the economy. If

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:57.719
<v Speaker 12>you look at your four O and K, or your

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 12>retirement or just your investments in general, you may not

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 12>I want to take that vacation, You may not want

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 12>to buy that big appliances. And yes, maybe the richest

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 12>Americans whld majority of the docks, but if you're an

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 12>average American, if you have fifty thousand inner bank account

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 12>at twenty percent, wipe down is still significant. In fact,

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 12>if that's your wholeness egg, it's a lot scarier than

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 12>for those who are wealthy.

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Bloombergs is a la brilliant reporting. Good to catch up,

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much. Let's get back to Apple, and

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 3>after years of avoiding iPhone price hikes in the United States,

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 3>Apple may need to finally concede to raise it's nine

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 3>hundred and nine nine dollars flagship model pricing as tariff's

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 3>hit production. Let's got to bloombergs Mark German. This was

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 3>the subject of this weekend's Power On. You explained the

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 3>historic strategy very well, which is Apple's not raised prices.

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 3>It has removed the bottom tier of handset and only

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:49.360
<v Speaker 3>offered a premium. So what happens nextly?

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 13>There is precedent for Apple raising prices outside of the US.

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:56.400
<v Speaker 13>We've seen it post Spruxit in the UK. You've seen

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 13>price adjustments in the European Union. We saw twenty five

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 13>percent iPhone price sits in twenty twenty two in Japan,

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 13>seen some adjustments in Canada and Australia. But you're right

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 13>in the US it's been pretty stagnant. It's actually been

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 13>one of the only things in the technology world over

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 13>the last decade that's been pretty consistent.

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 6>But given these tariffs.

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 13>Something's got to give, and there's going to be adjustments

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 13>with suppliers. They're going to push suppliers to give them

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 13>better pricing. They're going to eat some of the costs themselves,

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 13>They're going to make supply chain changes, but ultimately I

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 13>do strongly believe they will have to make some price adjustments,

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 13>probably with the iPhone seventeen launch later in the year,

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.479
<v Speaker 13>and this is going to be a big sea change trap. Well,

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 13>obviously it's a big shift, but they do have some

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 13>ways to help the consumer here. They've got a trade

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 13>in program, they have installment plans through all the carriers now,

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 13>so I think from a consumer standpoint, it's not going

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 13>to be a massive negative.

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 13>We've seen some analyst reports and commentary over the last

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 13>few days. I saw one website claim that a maid

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 13>in USA iPhone would cost thirty thousand dollars per unit.

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 13>I've seen analysts notes saying a made in USA iPhone

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:08.239
<v Speaker 13>could cost three thousand to thirty five hundred dollars. The

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 13>good news is that these are completely misguided. Apple's not

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 13>moving production to the US, certainly not for the iPhone.

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 13>What you're going to see is them moving to more

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 13>of these safe havens outside of China that are pushing

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 13>tear that are going to get hit with tariffs, but

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 13>less so India, for instance, You know, prior to Trump's

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 13>post earlier today about a fifty percent tariff, India was

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 13>at fifty percent of the size of the tariff on China,

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 13>coming in around twenty six percent versus the prior fifty

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 13>four percent, right, and so.

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 6>That is a big improvement.

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 13>Vietnam is in the high forties, but that's still an

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 13>improvement over the fifty four percent, and they've been stuffing

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 13>the US channel over the last several months with more

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 13>units in order to avoid those tariffs.

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 2>Can I quickly get your expertise on what Tim Cook

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 2>is thinking about right now as well? We all thought

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 2>he was a marvelous politician in and of himself the

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 2>way and which had managed to navigate the previous administration.

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 2>How much do you think he's desperately trying to get

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 2>some sort of carve out.

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 6>Extremely desperately.

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 13>But it seems like Trump, as we expected, is even

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 13>more emboldened than his second tour or his second term,

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 13>and he is doing ever he wants at this point.

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 13>It doesn't seem like he's working with companies on exemptions.

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 13>It doesn't seem like he cares about who showed up

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 13>to his inauguration doesn't seem to care that Apple said

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 13>they're going to invest half a trillion dollars in the

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 13>US basically because of him. He's just doing whatever he wants,

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 13>and it doesn't seem like he's taking the impact into

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 13>a gap.

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 3>There's how this is playing out in markets, in the

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 3>stock analysis, and then there's how it's playing out in

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 3>the culture, how everyday people talk about MAGA and tariffs

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 3>and Apple. This is a video from a post that

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 3>overheard on Wall Street made and I'm not sharing it

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 3>with you, Mark Flippant Lee, but they're suggesting that in

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 3>the future Wall Street analysts will quit and start assembling

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 3>iPhones in the Middle West. As far as I can tell,

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 3>you said that won't happen. Just explain in thirty seconds why.

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 13>I mean there's I mean, they're certainly you know, they

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 13>have the right to quit their jobs and become manufacturing workers.

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 13>But I don't anticipate Apple moving outside of Asia in

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 13>any considerable way. The one thing I do see them

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 13>doing is decentralizing their supply chain, right, but I don't

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 13>see that coming to the US. I think you'll see

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 13>more production in parts of South America, right, maybe parts

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 13>of Europe, maybe parts of in more parts of India

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 13>and China, but I don't think Midwest manufacturing facilities to

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 13>create iPhones are coming anytime soon. I certainly don't think

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 13>they're on the table right now.

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Makes for a good meme for Mark German is nothing

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 2>but straight talk. We thank you so much.

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 5>Nice.

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's take a quick look at what's happening in semi

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 2>conductors right now, though ed because throughout the trading day

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 2>we have basically been in the green websodes somewhat on

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 2>this headline risk. But the socks up more than a

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 2>percentage point in video now about one and a half percent,

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 2>taking off that anxiety around the yet further tariffs coming

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 2>China's way, if Trump is to be believed, onto social

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 2>broadcom up three percent. Let's dig into what all of

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 2>this means to the industry. Peter Elstrom and Pisa say

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 2>is doing a tour of the US at the moment

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.719
<v Speaker 2>you're here with me in New York, and people basically

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 2>had seen the chips sector wade because of again it's

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 2>exposure from a supply chain to Asia. Why are they

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 2>managing to shake it off a little bit today?

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 14>Well, the volatility here is really surprising. I thought I

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 14>knew what the tariffs were as I was walking over

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 14>here to the set, and they changed even on my

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 14>way over. So we know that Taiwan is going to

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:34.960
<v Speaker 14>get hit with tariffs around thirty two percent. China also

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 14>is looking at some tariffs at this point, so there

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 14>are concerns about what exactly those costs are going to be.

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 14>As products move into the US. There'll be an exception

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 14>for the chips themselves, at least so far, we've seen

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 14>the White House carve out this exception for the actual chips,

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 14>but there's not an exception for the products in TSMC

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 14>of course makes products for Apple as German was referring

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 14>to earlier, and also Nvidia in particular, and it's not

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 14>exactly clear what those products are to do when it

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 14>comes to these tariffs. You may see some exceptions there,

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 14>and the analysts are trying to figure this out right now.

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 14>They do believe that invidious servers coming into the US

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 14>are going to be exempted from the tariffs, but it's

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 14>not clear and the White House hasn't been able to

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 14>give clarity on that point so far.

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 3>It's an amazing point that that actually many don't understand

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 3>specific policies relates to tariffs.

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 5>The other part of it.

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.479
<v Speaker 3>Is that everything your team's reported for the last two years,

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 3>which is the United States wants to have more semiconduct

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 3>and manufacturing that fabs take time and billions of dollars

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 3>to implement and build.

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 5>Where are we at in that process?

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 14>Right You talked about these companies that are trying to

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 14>sidestep the tariffs from the Trump administration right now, Apple,

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 14>of course has been very good at this. Look at TSMC,

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 14>though certainly not as high profile. But TSMC came forward,

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 14>they were already spending sixty five billion dollars on chip

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 14>capacity in the US. They promised to spend another one

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 14>hundred billion dollars on capacity in the US. You think

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 14>that they would be one of the companies that will

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 14>get some exemptions here, But so far the Trump administration

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 14>has been holding pretty firm and it's not clear exactly

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 14>how they're going to be affected. As they make chips

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 14>in Taiwan and send them over to the US. Still

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 14>they have their the bulk of their manufacturing in Taiwan.

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 14>They need to be able to send those chips someplace

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 14>else and then they come into the United States. So

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 14>TSMC is making progress in building this geographic diversification, but

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 14>they haven't made that much progress so far.

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 2>What's so interesting is tomorrow we get samsung preliminary revenue.

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be down and they're in the line

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 2>of fire when it comes to US CUBS. And at

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 2>the same time, we're all worried about AI infrastructure bubbles

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 2>that we were talking about even before this, right, So

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 2>how much were dialing up into what already is a

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 2>feeling that we're over allocated to the chip sector.

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 14>Well, that's the big question with all of these huge

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 14>investments into AI and into data centers in particular. We

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 14>know that the hyperscalers are spending tens of billions of

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 14>dollars at this point on that capacity, but we don't

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 14>know what kind of revenue is sitting on the other

0:32:57.600 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 14>side of it. So we're trying to get some insight

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 14>into that. Samsung is certainly going to talk about their

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 14>progress in making memory chips for AI. They've been behind

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 14>s k Heinex in particular in terms of building that

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.959
<v Speaker 14>kind of capability pairing up with Nvidia at this point,

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 14>but we're going to get some sign of their progress

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 14>tomorrow and we'll see whether they give us any indication

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 14>about what that AI demand is in the.

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 5>End, Bloomberg's piter Eil stream over in New York. Thank

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 5>you so much.

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's turn to another side of the markets right now,

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 2>because twenty twenty five was supposed to see a rebound

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 2>in IPO demand, but look, this market route following Trump's

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 2>tariff announcements has led several companies Klana stub Hub, for example,

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 2>to pause their plans here to talk about this. Or

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Greg Martin, co founder of Rainmaker Securities. Rainmaking was meant

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 2>to be on and now we understand there's a pullback

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 2>because these markets are treacherous. Greg, are all IPOs on ice?

0:33:57.600 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, thank you for having me on.

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 15>I was hoping to be able to talk about the

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 15>excitement we were going to have coming into Clarna and

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 15>subub hitting the road and hopefully a re emergence of

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 15>the IPO market. But the worst thing for the IPO

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 15>market is uncertainty and instability, and that's what we have

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 15>in stage right now. I mean the vix at forty

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 15>five and approaching fifty. It's crazy how instable we are

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 15>right now, and it's a huge web blanket on the

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 15>IPO market.

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Stub Hub Clana. We see Chime, for example, delaying the

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 2>brands that we know have already paused, but there's others

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 2>waiting in the wings. We're already discussing, Well, maybe they'd

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 2>be She and Bolt discord many had been articulated in

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 2>the markets, varying amounts of reports is say whether or

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:42.879
<v Speaker 2>not they'd actually tap. But Greg, do we think there

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 2>has to be a step away for the entirety of

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five as it stands.

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 15>I think that's strong. I think it's a little bit

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 15>wait and see. We're definitely in pause mode. I think

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 15>people want to see what materializes. I remain an optimist.

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 15>I'm hopeful that trade deals will get done. This uncertainty,

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 15>this instability persists for a long time, and if we

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 15>start to have years of a global recession and you know,

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:11.279
<v Speaker 15>trade wars, it could push this thing considerably to the

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 15>end or next year.

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 6>I think right now it's really up in the air.

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 15>As we pointed out, Slarner and StubHub of delayed Hinge

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 15>Health was supposed to go public, Chime.

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 6>Circle just filed last week.

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 15>It's just a lot of uncertainty, and I think right

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 15>now it's wait and see mode.

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 6>So I think it's probably at least a quarter of pause.

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting, let's bring those names back up, is a

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of people work at those companies. A lot of

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 3>them have a broad base of investors. Many of them

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:42.320
<v Speaker 3>the employees and investors watch this program. Does this pause

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:45.799
<v Speaker 3>in the IPO window open up the secondaries market or

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 3>put pressure on the companies to give employees liquidity in

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 3>other ways?

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 15>Absolutely, we've had a huge dearth of liquidity, you know,

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 15>since twenty twenty one, frankly, and people have been waiting

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 15>for the IPO market to open up. We've started to

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 15>see companies doing tender offers in order to alleviate some

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 15>of the liquidity pressure, but there's still a ton of

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 15>liquidity for pressure that persists. And Frankly, in this period

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 15>of there's a lot of fear in the market, and

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 15>employees and workers in all of these companies are starting

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:15.959
<v Speaker 15>to think, you know, I'd like to have a little

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 15>bit more of my net worth and cash, and so

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:19.760
<v Speaker 15>I think there's going to be a lot of pressure

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 15>for companies to enable secondaries trading. So I do expect

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 15>some secondaries trading will happen the flip side of that, though,

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:29.319
<v Speaker 15>is it investors when they buy secondaries, when they buy

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 15>into these private companies before they go public, they want

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 15>to see a public market in the future because they

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 15>start to think about liquidity. So there's there's there's a

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 15>there's a trade off there, and so we are going

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 15>to see more liquidity pressure, but we also will see

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 15>a little bit of a pause on demand.

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:45.439
<v Speaker 6>So it'll be interesting to see how the market plays out.

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Greg, is this an America problem or it's a global

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:50.280
<v Speaker 3>market problem?

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 6>Five pos, It's a global problem. I mean this is

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:55.240
<v Speaker 6>this is something that hits.

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 15>Everybody everywhere, in every part of the world, and it

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 15>needs to be sorted out. We're seeing every market affected

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 15>by this, and you know, the United States is the

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:06.800
<v Speaker 15>center of it all of course, but everyone is affected

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 15>by this and it needs to get sorted out or

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:10.800
<v Speaker 15>else we could have some long term issues.

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 2>India was really active, for example, Greg, though, I want

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 2>to just see where the blame lies, because briefly, core

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 2>weave wasn't exactly accepted with welcome arms when it came

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 2>to the market. It since rallied a bit, but was

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 2>this already in the making.

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 6>I don't think it was necessarily in the making. I mean,

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 6>it was a unique story.

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 15>It had major customer concentration issues, it had a huge

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 15>amount of debt, and frankly, it's actually traded up quite

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:38.320
<v Speaker 15>well since the IPO and actually is still up about

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 15>twenty percent since an IPO to forty, despite the major

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:43.399
<v Speaker 15>market pullback last week.

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 6>So I don't think this has anything.

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 15>I don't think this was necessarily in play before Core

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 15>or We was a different story. I think this is

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 15>something that hit from left field, and I think it's

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 15>something that we're all having to deal with and right

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:57.799
<v Speaker 15>now we're just not certain which direction we'll go, and

0:37:57.800 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 15>that's why the market.

0:37:58.640 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 6>Is in pause.

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Crade Martin, co founder of Remaker Securities, thank you very much.

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, the EU remains open to and strongly prefers negotiations.

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:19.760
<v Speaker 6>We will not weigh end up endlessly.

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 3>That was EU Trade Minister Maraschefkevich. Now, trade ministers from

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 3>the Block have been meeting in Luxembourg and discussing how

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 3>the Block should respond to Trump's tariffs. For more, let's

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 3>bring in Bloomberg's Michael Sheppard. That's the thing about tariff's,

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.319
<v Speaker 3>they can go both ways. There's a response. What do

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 3>we know about the EU's position as it stands well, as.

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:43.359
<v Speaker 16>We heard from the Trade Minister, they are willing to

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:46.320
<v Speaker 16>sit tight for a minute, but not for too long.

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 16>They want to see how the effects of the latest

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 16>down dreft in markets play out here in Washington and

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 16>whether it might cause the Trump administration to start rethinking

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 16>the levees that they have imposed on the block. That

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 16>is not just the twenty percent across the board tariffs

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:05.800
<v Speaker 16>that Trump unveiled last week, but also the measures targeting

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 16>autos that took effect on Thursday, and then the levies

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 16>that took effect previously against steel and aluminum. Taken together,

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 16>they have really angered officials in the European Union and

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 16>prompting calls for a strong response and a potential retaliation

0:39:20.840 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 16>that could take aaim at America's biggest tech companies. And

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 16>this would be through a measure known as the Anti

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 16>Coercion Instrument, and that could result in higher taxes, including

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 16>through the Digital Service Tax, against American tech giants, the

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 16>ones that we know so well like Meta, Google and others.

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Chev what's interesting is the EU is going to be

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 2>watching closely what's just been posted on true social Trump

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:47.240
<v Speaker 2>threatening yet more tariffs on China because of their tough response.

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 2>So how does the EU navigate not having yet further

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:51.800
<v Speaker 2>tariff are their direction?

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 16>Well, Caro, they are really having to walk a type

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 16>rope here. And even before his tariff's announcement last week,

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 16>President Donald Trump warned both China and the European Union

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 16>in social media posts that he would retaliate against them

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 16>over any reprisals that they unveiled, and China responded very

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 16>quickly last week to Trump's across the board tariffs, hitting

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:18.359
<v Speaker 16>all Chinese goods with heavy tariffs of their own. And

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 16>because the European Union has waited a moment, they have

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 16>a chance now to see how that possibility of a

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 16>reprisal to a reprisal from the US could play out.

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:30.240
<v Speaker 3>I just want to think of materially how this impacts

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:33.760
<v Speaker 3>technology companies, right, So, for example, Apple makes some iMac

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 3>products in Ireland, part of the EU, subject to a

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:39.919
<v Speaker 3>twenty percent tariff. Intel has a fab in Ireland, other

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 3>facilities in Germany under consideration. Just that sort of physical component.

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 16>Mike, Well, it's the physical components, but it's also the

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 16>whole demand side question too. If there's a chill in

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 16>the global economy. If there's an overall bump in inflation,

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 16>that will also weigh on on global commerce and even

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 16>anything happening on these shores. If it's important to the US,

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 16>even if it's just consumed in the US, tech companies,

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 16>like every other business across the US, will start to

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 16>feel it. A lot of the tariffs are paid here

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 16>by consumers in this country. It's not just as the

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:20.440
<v Speaker 16>President is like to say, those countries paying the cost.

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 5>As he sees it, all.

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.439
<v Speaker 2>Stock markets currently down shepiy, thank you, Mike Shephard. There, Look,

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 2>let's quickly look at how the markets have fared. It's

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 2>been ugly in Europe and the stocks six hundred is

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 2>sold off in particular ASML is still off. But we

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 2>think more broadly about the US just in gyration mode.

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 2>At the moment, we're off by three quarters percent on

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 2>the na's that one hundred. We're in a bear market.

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 2>We're likely going to enter a bear market on the

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 2>S and P five hundred. But that does it for

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 2>this edition of Bloemberg Technology. And we really are speaking

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:48.880
<v Speaker 2>once again with Ed Ludlow back in the fold in

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:50.879
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco. It's a joy to have you back on