WEBVTT - BNY Mellon's Loh Sees Bond Yields Continuing to Fall  (Audio)

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Taking Stock with Kathleen Hay and Pim

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Box on Bloomberg Radio. The Bank of Japan, the European

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank, as well as several other European authorities have

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>ventured into uh I guess what you could call unchartered

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>territory of negative interest rates? How did this all happen

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and what does it mean? Well, that's why we have

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Lowe. He is the senior global market strategist for

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>b N Y Melon and he joins us now in

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the studio. Marvin, thank you very much for being with us.

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me. So when someone asks you,

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>how did we get here and what happens next? There's

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>no real playbook for this, is there? No? No, there

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>really isn't. I think that, um, we are in uncharted territory. UM.

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Up to now, it seems like the world and investors

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>have taken a certain degree of comfort that the central

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>bankers will get us out of this. I think we're

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>starting to see that fray a little bit. UM. Certainly

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>volatility over the course of the year and the fact

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that maybe some of these negative yields are not a

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>list sitting. The type of response that the central bankers

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>would have expected is starting to come out into the market,

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, kind of plays into whether or

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>not investors will continue to trust what our central bankers

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>are doing. Um in the worst case scenario, where would

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a steady drop in bond yields lead. We now have

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 1>more than eleven trillion dollars worth of bonds around the

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>world of negative territory. The e c B, of course

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>is buying more, that's focusing on corporates, but it all

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>seems to defeat And of course the Bank of Japan

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>officially went to negative rates in January. There were having

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>wrapping up their two day meeting. They're not expected to

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>buy more bonds yet, but if they don't do it now,

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they're supposed to do it in July. Where what does

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>this mean for the markets? Well, you know, you know,

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly clearly it's difficult. Um. By going into this negative

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>yield paradigm, Um, the central bankers are hoping to elicit

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>some sort of response both from the business world as

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>well as from consumers. And in fact, we've seen um

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that there's a certain part of the world that look

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>at negative yields not necessarily as a positive, as a negative.

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So it is ultimately very scary, and I think it

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.119
<v Speaker 1>um is playing into this commentary that's out there where

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have a global slow growth type of

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>environment that seems very difficult to break free of. Well,

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>if you can't break free of it, you've still got

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:21.359
<v Speaker 1>to live through it. What are you telling your clients,

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>your customers, how are you advising them about their money? Well,

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean we all have to reset expectations, right, you know,

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly we've gone through decades of some of the best

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>growth the world has seen, and there are certainly a

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>number of factors that went into that, whether it was technology,

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>whether it was um, a global decline in yields from

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a very very high perspective. Certainly inflation came down over

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the last several decades. If we are in this lower

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>inflation environment with these yields either low or negative, that

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.959
<v Speaker 1>are difficult to break out of this range, Um, you've

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>got to reset your expectations and plan accordingly, which you know,

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>in turn kind of promotes the concept of greater savings,

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>if you will, which is not what the central bankers want.

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>They want you to take that money and put it

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>into the economy rather than in the bank certainly plenty

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of stories, much of an anecdotal of large amounts of

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>safe sales in Japan, the you know, greater amount of

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand end notes that are in circulation now than

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they were in any period over the last couple of decades.

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So you know, there is that that degree of hoarding

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and concern out there. So let's take the other side

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>just for fun. Jenny Allen and said, I know it's

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a double negative. It's not impossible there could be a

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>rate increase in July at the next meeting, because if

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the economy perks up and jobs look better and I

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>would add for her, and if the Brexit vote is

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to remain, you can imagine how global sentiment would shift

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>at least some right, what are the odds of that

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and how do you how do you position for that?

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>If you're a bond investor or bond trader, well, um,

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>so you know investing in trading certainly potentially could be

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>two different things. Um. You know, traders are going to

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>take the short term view of that. If they're comfortable

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>one way or another with um a large rebound in

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the non farm report, if they're comfortable with the remain

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>versus a Brexit. You know, they can certainly take a bed,

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of easy to look at which asset

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>classes have been the most negatively affected with kind of

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>this recent type of of concern in the market. When

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes from an investment perspective, um basis points, it's

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>not really the biggest thing in the world. Quite frankly,

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean we as strategists, as traders, as animals, we

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of time um wringing our hands over

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is it going to be July? Is it going to

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>be September? But in the grand scheme of things, going

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>from this kind of basis points to basis points, is

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>not a deal breaker, all right, it's not a deal breaker.

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And once your thoughts on the European Central Bank and

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>its corporate bond buying program and what you believe that will,

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>what effect that will have so um, you know, it'll

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>probably um play out the way we've seen the sovereign

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>yield part of the world play out. Um. Those yields

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>are negative. You know, many of the headlines around the

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>bund getting into negative out to ten years. And like

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you said, Kathleen, we've got eleven billion, eleven trillion, remember

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the big figure here eleven trillion in sovereign bonds around

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the world that are negative, and that in effect has

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>kept rates somewhat captain the US, just because eventually the

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>spread gets so wide that people are going to look

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>at the U s D and at our rates as

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>a good alternative, particularly when um, you're looking at minus

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>one basis points in Germany and ten years if we

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>if we we, we've seen the e c B get

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>fairly aggressive in their at least what they've announced so

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>far in their corporate bond buying. They are running out

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of assets, they're still dealing with slow growth. One would

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>presume that they're going to remain aggressive on that front.

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, once again it promotes the concept of

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>lower yields making making their way out here despite the

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Fed is trying to put on a

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>brave face. Okay, you've been in the ball market for

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.119
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Does this Raley continue? Does a tenure

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>note in the US break below one for D does

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it hit it keep going? And for that to happen,

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what would you have to see? I mean, I think

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the risk is definitely to a lower yield continuing. Um,

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that there was certainly a note of caution

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that came out of the FLMC today, so we need

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to take that into effect. It was a note of

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>caution despite the fact that they didn't um change their

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>economic projections too much, so they're concerned there. And then

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>when we kind of get into the red friendum vote,

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, all bets are all well, uh, I'm betting

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be an interesting eight days. Marvel Low,

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you so very much for joining a senior global

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 1>market strategist at b n Y Melon. In the wake

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>of the Devash statement, the bond rallye may continue. He says,

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 1>this is taking stock on Bloomberg Radio.