WEBVTT - "The Poisoner's Handbook" with Author Deborah Blum Pt. 1 

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Criminalia, a production of Shonda Land Audio in

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>partnership with I Heart Radio. Hello, and welcome to the

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>latest episode of Criminalia. For this season, we're exploring the

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>lives and motivations of some of the most notorious lady

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>poisoners throughout history. I'm Maria Try and I'm Holly Fry

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>and today we have a special guest with us, Deborah Blum.

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Deborah is amazing and you've probably heard of her if

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you follow Poison at All. She's a Pulitzer Prize winning

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>science journalist. She is the author of six books. She

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>is also now the director of the night Science Journalism

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>program at M I T. And we worship her. So

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>we have light resume there, nothing to check the box

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>at the watch. But we have her here with us

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>today because she is the author of the New York

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Times notable book Poison Squad and the New York Times

0:00:56.080 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>bestseller The Poisoner's Handbook. Deborah, welcome. Do you want to

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>add anything to let us know who you are? Our

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>poison expert extraordinaire here, Like, just overwhelmed by how nice

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you guys are. Really a pleasure to be here, and

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:21.199
<v Speaker 1>you know you're cover so many of my favorite subjects.

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>It's actually fun for me not to be talking about

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>how to run a remote fellowship program in the time

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of and I imagine so talking about how to kill

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>people and other things that are more interested about arsenic symptoms. Listen, Love,

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk to you about some arsenic You are,

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, very well known as a journalist, and your

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>love of science has driven so much of your work.

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Will you talk about how you ended up writing about science, science, history,

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and specifically poison, George, that's great territory for me to

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>cover and and you know, just stopped me. I grew

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>up in the South and Louisiana and Georgia, so I'm

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>perfectly capable of going on about this stuff, you know,

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>for the until the end of time. So if I

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>do this. So I'm a failed chemistry major. My dad

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>was an entomologist and chemical ecologist at the University of Georgia.

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>And I and I when I started college, I wanted

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to be a chemist. And I discovered the some of

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the things that make me a good journalist, you know,

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>having a short attentions man, uh, not working at all

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in the laboratory. And and I was actually a danger

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to myself and others. I set my hair on fire

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in one memorable afternoon, and also at one point generated

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>speaking of a poison, a toxic cloud that caused them

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to have to evacuate the freshman chemistry lab. Your very first,

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>very early age, right. So, but you know, so I

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>went into ournalism because for the same reason that I

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>like chemistry, I like to know how things work. And

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>then eventually realized, after several years of working for newspapers

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that I really wanted to combine both of those loves,

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>my interest knowing how things work scientifically my interest in

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>knowing how things work in society. Got a grad degree

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>in science journalism with a specialty and environmental toxicology, and

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>went off to be a science writer in California, which

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>was where I won the bullets er. Although that was

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>writing about primate research, right, um, but that launched me

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>into writing books, and I continued to write books. I

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>kept saying to my agent, I've had the same edge

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and ever since I started writing books, and she's wonderful.

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I kept saying, you know, I'd really like to write

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a book in which poisons are characters, because partly because

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I was grounded in chemistry, and partly because I like murder.

0:03:57.480 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I grew up with Agatha Christie and a lot of

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>early murder mystery writer is Agatha Christian in particular, who

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>really did a lot of work with poisons um because

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>she had worked in a hospital dispensary in World War One.

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>UM And and she kept saying, oh, no, Devra, I

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>have a better idea, no deveror you could do this,

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>and finally, or books, and She's like, I can't take

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it anymore. It's like the slow drip of torture. Let's

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>let you write the book that you wanted, right and

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>so and she said, um, just right, and and this

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I have had the same editor for the last three books.

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 1>She said, don't write a proposal, just write a delicious

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>little two page letter to your editor. And I thought

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that would be so interesting to sell a book writing

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>two pages. So I wrote a proposal on the idea

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that I was not going to kill my husband but

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I could, and a lot of stuff that I knew

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>about poisons at the time. And my editor at Penguin

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Press bought the book. And then this is my advice

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to everyone who listens to this focus. Don't be me

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and don't do this, because then I sold the book.

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I immediately spent the advance and and I'm like, well,

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>what's this book really about. I can't write a book

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>about how to poison my husband. That wouldn't be good.

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And so I then went into this frantic research that

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>led me to find the two scientists who are at

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the heart of Poisoner's Handbook, which does indeed do what

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I had originally thought about, which was both tell their

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>story but also look at poisons as the fascinating characters

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and the personalities that I think they have, which is

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>a very science journalist way of seeing things. I love

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 1>writing about science, and I love writing about chemistry, and

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I actually like writing about really dangerous substances because I

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 1>think and that we need the too us to navy

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>get a chemical world. We live in a chemical world.

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I am a collection of chemicals myself. I'm inhaling them

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>as we speak, as are all of us. Most of

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>them are not dangerous, but most people don't have the

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of toolkit to say what should it be I'd

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>be afraid of? And how do I protect myself? And

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>what should I not? And so a lot of what

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I think science journalists like myself do. All I hope

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we do is to provide people who are not, you know,

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>right at the science inner circle, or don't follow it regularly,

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>some of the tools that just let them navigate in

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>an intelligent way because they are smart, they just need

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:43.239
<v Speaker 1>the tools. And that's really underlies my love of science

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>journalism and is probably one of the reasons I'm here

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>at in I t So that's my long Southern answer.

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>I love it as I thought it would be. Um So,

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the hurdles that we often have when we're

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>preparing our episodes is sometimes the sparse sinus of historical

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>records just there's nothing out there, or if it is

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>out there, there might be two or three sources and

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they all conflict with each other. Um. I imagine that

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you have come across the same challenge. And um I

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>was wondering if you could talk a little bit over

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the years of writing about science history, how he worked

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>around that kind of challenge. Oh, I'm gonna love answering this.

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Um Uh, you know, well, real the inner nerd that

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I am, I guess um And and that reminds me.

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've done four books now that are narrative

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>histories of science too about toxicology. But I love writing

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>about history of science history in general. But because I

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think you really understand where you are unless you

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>know how you got there, and that would be and

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's another part of you know, how did I

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>get here? It's certainly true one of the lessons for me,

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>especially in the Poison Squad book, which is about the

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>invention of food safety in the United States, and that

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>history both explain how we came up with the idea that,

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we should regulate for food safety, but also

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>why we do it so badly on a number of

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>levels even today. So having said that, you know, it's

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>a real challenge depending on what you're writing about. When

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I did Poison Squad, the minor recent book, Harvey Washington Wiley,

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>who was the chemist at the heart of that story,

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>had been married to a suffragette librarian. I just love that,

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>and she had left all of his papers to the

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Library of Congress. So the in that case, because I

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>like to work from original documents, um, it was a

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>matter of did I have enough time to go through

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>four hundred linear feet of Harvey Washington wilt papers and

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>documents and newspaper clippings and memos and letters and trying

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to be smart that I mean,

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't always infect you must never get that right.

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>But in that particular, as I was a wash in

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a see of documents which was super helpful, um and

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>also daunting Poisoner's Handbook, I think better gets at that

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the some of the challenges that you mentioned. So as

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I said, I, UM, when I finally, after some fairly

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>hysterical months of research, discovered in the in the newsletters

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Society Forensic Toxicology that the toxicologists at the

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>heart of that book, Alexander Getler is considered the father

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of American forensic toxicology. UM, I thought, oh, this is great.

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll just go find a biography of him, and there

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>was none. And then I went and looked for a

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>biography of his boss, Charles Norris, who was the you know,

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>wonderful and pioneering first uh medical examiner in New York City,

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and there was none. Right, And so I'm like trolley

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>around trying to find information about these eyes, which was

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>the other challenge. And so after much going through and

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>then some of it you can be smart about. You

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 1>can go onto you know, and look at what were

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the contemporary toxicology books, the books about legal medicine published

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in the early twentieth century. And I bought a lot

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of those, um from used booksellers, and I have some

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of them to this day. UM. But and then you

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>can look at contemporary journals. I did that too, So

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I can go into the Journal of the American Medical

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Association or Science of the Journal of Toxicology and look

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>for papers published by Alexander Getler. And that was really

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>essential for me in trying to both understand or look

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>for papers about arsenic what did we know about arsenic

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and nine? Right, So all of that kind of helps

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>provide a foundation. But then you start kind of saying, well,

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 1>are there other archives that have some materials? So in

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>this case, and this is one of my favorite stories

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>about the challenges of working with archives and very different

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>from the Library of Congress, I discovered that the New

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>York City Municipal Archives had actually archived the letters of

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the Medical Examiner's Office from nineteen eighteen to nineteen thirty five,

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>just the period with Norris though. Oh, this is fantastic,

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 1>and I talked on the phone to an archive is

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>an extremely hostile and unfriendly archivist at the municipal archive. UM.

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>But and I and it was so I'm like, oh,

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm so excited about this and I can't wait. I'm

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna come to New York. Let me take you out

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to dinner when I get there to thank you for

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>your help. And he's like, we do not have to

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>meet in person, and so I know. But I go

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to this archive, which is in an old it's like

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the old city halls of New York and um,

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's you know, underfunded and unfriendly um as anyone

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>will tell you. And so I go up all shiny

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and like I have we already look at these papers

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and literally the guy the counter says to me, we

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have those and I go, yes, you do. It

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>was just like being in kindergarten. He goes, no, we don't.

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I go, yes, you do. He goes, no, we don't

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>come all the way to New York, right. UM. I said, yes,

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you do it. In fact, here's the name of the

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>archivist who won't speak to me, um, and here's his

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>phone number, and you're welcome to contact him. And so

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the guy goes off and he talks I never did

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>see the archives. UM to the archives, and then he

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>comes back and says, yes, we do actually have these, UM,

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and so here's the forms you have to fill out

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to get them. And I fell out the forms and

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>these box has come up. They've got like a dumb

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>waiter behind the counter and these it comes creaking up

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 1>in a very atmospheric way with these boxes of files

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that are covered with dust and apparently some mold. Because

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>both my I had my one of my grand students

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>helping me UM when I this was when I was

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>at Wisconsin UH, and both of us were sick. But

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the with the rest of it because we could have

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>out them in other ways UM. And those files were

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>amazing and really an unknown resource. So even when they

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>were working on the documentary failed a Porsoner's handbook, they

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>went back they said they had arm wrestle them out

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to write UM. So it wasn't like I had suddenly

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 1>opened the floodgates. So once I had those, I you know,

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>then looked at other you know, other archives, UM, and

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 1>I went over to the New York City Public Library.

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I was doing a lot of contemporary you know what

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>what what was being covered about Geller and Norris and

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Poisons at the time, and so I went to the

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>New York City Public Library because you can get through

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>ProQuest historical newspapers, the New York Times and a lot

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of the big major dailies. But I wanted like the

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn Eagle and on small papers, and they had those

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>on microphis. So a lot of that was going in

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 1>and finding the stories of micro phish, which I don't recommend,

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>but we're and you know, printing them out. I did that,

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and then the one other thing, and then you know,

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>we did interviews with um, you know, called people. There

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>were still a few people left too, had been students

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of Getler, the Getler boys and UM. One of the

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>things I did when I was doing research, and this

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>will tell you just how anal or researcher I am,

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is that I had discovered, uh been able to track

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>down Alexander Getler's kids and and their kids. And I

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>knew that his son Joseph had a number of grandid

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>kids or his grandkids who still lived in the New

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>York City area. UM, and I didn't have their exact

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>look and I did, I had their birth records, but

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>not their exact location. So I went to a friend

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of mine who worked for a newspaper who had some

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of those super search tools, and I said, if I

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>give you this person's name and their date of birth

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and where they were born, can you find out for

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>me where they're living now. And she did, and she said,

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, and don't tell anyone I did this. And

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>also I'm not giving you his social Security number. Please

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>don't give me his social Security number. Um. But basically

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I had the name. It was Paul Getler, who was

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>one of Alexander Getler's grandkids. So I used my pages

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and I called every single Paul Getler in that county

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and I just said, Hi, my name is Debord Woe.

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for the grandson of Alexander Getler for a

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>book I'm working on. And eventually got him, and he

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>was fantastic, and he put me in touch with some

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of his siblings, one of whom had had her daughter.

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>So Getler's great granddaughter had done a high school history

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>report on him, and they came to my hotel in

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>New York with her entire presentation and set up the

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>giant poster boards in the lobby of the hotel too,

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I think slightly the horror people at the front desk

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.359
<v Speaker 1>of the hotel. But they had like letters and journals

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and all kinds of stuff that they lent me. And

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>when I went on book tour and I went back

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to New York to talk about the book at a

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Barnes and Noble in New York City, Um, the whole

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Getler family was there, filling up the first two rows

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of that, you know. Um. And so that was wonderful,

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And that was another way that I was able to

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>get at resources that weren't obvious. I think people who

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>read these histories, you know, to me, they're a giant mosaic.

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>And because I'm a narrative writer, I'm also looking for

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the pieces that I can put people in the time.

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, what did the city look like? What did

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the city sound like? All of those things, Um, But

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you're building this kind of tapestry or mosaic, uh and

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>out all of these different pistes matter, and it is

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a ton of word. We have, as you know, talked

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot about women poisoners this season, and I know

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you have some thoughts on women and poison and why

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 1>poison is considered a women's weapon and why that's not

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>really an accurate characterization, Will you just share your thoughts

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>on that matter with us? Sure? And in fact, while

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I was a blogger at Wired after I did Poisonous

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Sound Book, it's been about a decade. I still do

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to some extent, you know, researching and writing about poisons things.

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I had a blog at Wired called Elemental and a

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>blog in the New York Times called poison pen Um,

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>And at Wired I actually did a whole blog on

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the myths of the female poisoner, right, which I really enjoyed.

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.880
<v Speaker 1>So you know, if you go back even to like

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, early crime fiction, when you actually looked at

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the modern xt FBI statistics, you see that that's not true.

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's kind of women use poison more preferentially

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>over other weapons like guns and knives. Right, But if

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you look at the whole panoradum of poisoners, there's more

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 1>male poisoners than female poisoners. But part of that, again

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>is that there's more homicidal males than homicidal females. Right,

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>there's just more men who killed people, is I dis

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the entire um, And so there's a lot. So when

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you actually look at the numbers, just the great numbers

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.959
<v Speaker 1>there's more male poisoners in the United States than female poisoners.

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>If you analyze the use of weapons, you do see

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it tilts a little more female. And it's actually interesting

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>because I did another book looking at biology and behavior,

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and one of the things that people talk about was

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that consistent imbalance on violence, right, and that there had

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 1>been this idea, for instance, that as you know, guns

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>became more available to women, there would be more shooting

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>deaths caused by women than men, or it would equalize out,

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>but in fact it never did. Right. Women in general,

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>when you look at crime statistics, um, just don't commit

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of crimes. And you could certainly make this

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>case I'm going on poison for a minute. If you

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>look at the history of mass shootings in the United States, right,

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>women have access to exactly the same women, but you

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>don't see that pattern of mass shootings, right if there's

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>just something socially, culturally, biologically, so something in the mix

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that So that's why you tend to see this sort

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of higher number of male poisoners, because you see a

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>higher number of male assaults and tempted deaths. But the

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 1>myth of the female poisoner probably dates back to the

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century UM in which poisons were highly accessible in

0:19:56.000 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a domestic way, right, and women actually more access to

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>them often than men if you looked at it in

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that sense, because they were the caretakers of the home

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and the distribution of UH jobs in the nineteenth century,

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and so um they had access for two pharmaceutical products. Right,

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Arsenic was quite common in UM different tonics and treatments

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:23.719
<v Speaker 1>to improve your complexion in Victorian times. Right. Fowler's solution

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is a famous example of that. You find these wonderful

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>advertisements targeting women, you know, in which they talk about,

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, how arsenic is going to make you more beautiful,

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and also how arsenic is entirely safe, which everyone knew

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't true, but you know, for some reason, they don't

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>always tell the truth in advertising. What I know him

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and have this incredible access to cosmetics right, containing one

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of the world's most famous and at that time handy

0:20:56.480 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>homicidal poisons. I mean, arsen was a fabulous poison or

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>poison in the nineteenth century because it's tasteless, it's odorless,

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it mimics the symptoms of a natural illness, and because

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>they were just figuring out how to detect it in

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a corpse. Right, so, um so, women have access to

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>this in a way, and not that a man couldn't

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>walk into a drug store and buy file Folwer solution,

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>but you know it's widely available to women. And a

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of the home products there were cyanide and some

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of the compounds that they used to like polish medal

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>in the house. You know, there was stryct nine and

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>pick me up tonics. Say mean, people had this incredible

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>access to these in a way that triggered no alarm

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>if you casually went and got something that contained arsenic

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>or straight nine. Um so it was super easy if

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you were annoyed with your husband or your boyfriend or

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>or was we're trying. Arsenic used to be known as

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the inheritance powder, you know, to work your way to

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>your inheritance to just you know, put it in coffee

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>or something, and people did. There were some quite notable

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>women mass poisoners in the nineteenth century like Maryanne Cotton

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>right who did exactly what I said us. You know,

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>handily available arsenic to work or to to get eliminate

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>relatives that stood in the way of money, to eliminate

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>partners so that you can inherit. I mean, I think

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:27.959
<v Speaker 1>two was in the neighborhood of close to twenty by

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the time they caught her, which will tell you. And

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 1>so that those kinds of you know, really stand out.

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Mass poisonings tended to shape the idea that women did

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>this um in a way that is both you know,

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>has a little bit of if I are in the smoke,

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:54.479
<v Speaker 1>but it's partly in largely smoke. We still have so

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>much more from our great chat with blond and that

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to be next week's episode, which time thrilled

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>about because this is easily one of my favorite conversations

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I have had all year. That's not even qualified as

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>in a podcast, etcetera, just in life, one of my

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 1>favorite conversations all year. And I am so glad that

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>she is very graciously helping us close out our season

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of Poison, and with that, we're gonna do a little

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:26.440
<v Speaker 1>what's your poison? Right? It actually references something that comes

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>up in episode two, but it also deals with stuff

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that Deborah talked about, which is a prohibition era and

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>so we're doing prohibition eric cocktails for this one. And

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>what I thought might be fun for these these ones

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 1>as we're nearing the end of the season, is to

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about kind of a classic cocktail and then how

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you can approach them to maybe customize them to be

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more attuned to your palette if they're

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>not for you as written. So, the first one is

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a side car. A sidecar, you'll see the amounts very slightly,

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>but your basic side car is is usually one and

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a half to two ounces of cognac. Anywhere from one

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.479
<v Speaker 1>half ounce to one ounce of orange liquor. So you're

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking like a triple sec or a quantreaux. You could

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>get crazy and lou use blue curasaw if you wanted.

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, um, and then anywhere from a half ounce

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to like three quarters of an ounce of lemon juice,

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>like freshly squeezed lemon juice. And some people like to

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>garnish with a sugar rim or they'll put an orange

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>twist or both of those. Um, so I made one.

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't love sidecars, They're just not my jam. I

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>like cognac more in a warm drink, you know, pour

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>it in a latte or a tea or something. Uh

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>perfection exactly. So what I decided to do as a

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>test to see if I can make this a little

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>bit more to my liking, is actually gonna harken back

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit to one of our earlier cocktails. Um

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>only because it's one of those one of those spirits

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you may have on hand if you were following along,

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's one that I bought for this, and I

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>was like, I should use that in more things, so

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>um in lieu of orange liqueur of any kind, but

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to keep the lemon juice. Otherwise you're getting

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>too far away from from what a sidecar is. I

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 1>just used ginger liqueur there. How was that way more

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>palatable for me, less bitey, and I enjoyed it a

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>lot more. I still would probably not select that over

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>other cocktails that we that we have done this year,

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>or just my usual very boring go to of vodka

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and diet coke um like clockwork every time. But but

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it is fun and that's kind of one of the

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>ways that I like to play with cocktail recipes. So

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>for anyone that's listening, if if you have not really

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>done that before and you look at it just it

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:51.719
<v Speaker 1>just becomes a matter of like puzzly problem solving of like, well,

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the one ingredient that is least palatable to me.

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what I could do to shift that out

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and subend something else that will also go with the

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.959
<v Speaker 1>other ingredients. These are the experiments that will lead you

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>to magical discoveries. You should I feel like, I mean

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:12.919
<v Speaker 1>your kitchen and you're cleaning to right. Absolutely. I have

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 1>a little lounge area in my kitchen. So you just

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>sit there and I'll just nix in different things to

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 1>see which one works. Taste that sounds great, and we

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>can train. You can sit and I'll make can taste

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>because it doesn't seem fair. Oh, I don't mind, I'll

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>prep all night. I love it. Uh So, anyway, that

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is that is this week's poison A sidecar or the

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>sidecar variation of your choice. I was thinking too that

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>it might be interesting to try other fruit liqueurs in there.

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think if you did like an apple

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>liquor in there, it could be really interesting if you did. Um.

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think because it is a little bit

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're limited what goes well with koa and

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 1>lemon juice. That won't create cacophony in terms of taste. Um,

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know the word thing that happens. The worst

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that happens, exactly if you make a terrible mistake,

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>is that you spit it out and dump it down

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the drink. And it's a small enough drink that you're

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>not wasting a lot of alcohol in that case. This

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is my wisdom. Don't sweat it. If you throw out

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>an ounce and a half of cod, it's fine. Thank

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us this week. Do not

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>forget to join us next week for the second part

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of Deborah's interview. We will see you then. Criminalia is

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>a production of Shonda land Audio in partnership with I

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. For more podcasts from Shonda land Audio, please

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.