WEBVTT - US Retaliation Against Iran: Dr. Jeff McCausland Talks to A&G

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>It running back to Houti militants launching a new rave

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of missiles and drones that commercial ships their response after

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the US destroyed ten of their attack drones and a

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>ground control station in Yemen, but the string of US

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and Allied strikes so far failing to slow the Hooty attacks.

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Final preparations now under way at the Pentagon for multi

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>day multi target missilein bomb strikes. Militants and their weapons

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in a rock, Syria, and possibly Yemen all on the

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>list of likely targets for retaliation.

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>They have a lot of kabilly, I have a lot more.

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 3>I am frustrated as hell as how this story has

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 3>dropped out of the news media so much. Martha raddits

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 3>she seems to be frustrated herself on ABC News. I

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 3>like the angle She's been taken all week long. But

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 3>last yet, so Lloyd Austin does a press conferenceation today.

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 3>The only thing anybody seemed to be concerned about was

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 3>the you know why he didn't tell the president when

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 3>he told the president, and the whole prostate thing and

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 3>everything like that barely and he coverage whatsoever. Questions of

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 3>what do you think about three of your service people

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 3>dying last week. How are they not protected? How are

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 3>you going to keep them protected in the future. We've

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 3>seen no evidence of deterrence against any of these groups.

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 3>To who these are still firing at US? That was

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 3>like not even an important story for most of the newscasts.

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Really pissed me off.

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, we can delve into the media coverage of it

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 4>at some point, but let's welcome Jeff mccauslin's CBS News

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 4>military consultant to discuss the military aspects of this. Jeff,

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 4>there's so much When Jack was just describing the fact

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 4>that the Pentagon is still quote unquote making final preparations

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 4>and then announcing where the attacks would come. What do

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 4>you make of all this?

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, I make first of all, I'd share some of

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.199
<v Speaker 2>Jack's frustrations. Jean. For a long time, I've been saying

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 2>this is almost inevitable, this particular tragedy. US forces in

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Iraq and Syria have been subjected to over one hundred

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 2>and sixty attacks by these particular groups prior to the

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 2>one that hit the tower twenty two and Jordan. The

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 2>result in three USKI. So despite our efforts and we

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:03.639
<v Speaker 2>have not been able to shot shoot down and defend

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 2>ourselves think pretty dog going well, Inevitably one of these

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 2>things was going to get through. Inevitably you were going

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 2>to able to tragedy like this kind of this where

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 2>you're at. Clearly the Pentagon is preparing for some type

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 2>of a large scale response. I think it'll be a

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Mouldi day if you will, air campaign real questions of

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 2>why this is taken so long. But I think to

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 2>some degree, when you're doing something like this, you want

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 2>to be a bit deliberate. Clearly, what the Divide administration

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 2>has been trying to do in all its responses is

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 2>walk a tight rope between trying to send a very

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>clear and forceful messages these various groups to stop doing

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 2>what they're doing, whether there are Rocky groups, CHII groups

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 2>back by Iran or whether the huthis in Yemen. Well

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>at the same time not doing something so precipitous that

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the tips that particular conflict, all this being tied to

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 2>the war in Gaza into a regional conflict that could

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 2>literally stretch from the Mediterranean See all the way to Iran.

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 2>And then there are operational requirements that have to be considered. Apparently,

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 2>the weather and the target area has been particularly bad,

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 2>and they're interested that you go in VFR visual so

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 2>you can make sure you hit the right targets and

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 2>have the least collateral damage. Number Two, you've got to

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 2>make sure that you wouldn't look at force protection because

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 2>once this campaign begins, all the bases we have in

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 2>a Rock and in Syria, and we have a number

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 2>in some places relatively remotely, there may be a large

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 2>scale response, and as a consequence, we've got to be

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 2>ready to resupply, reinforce, defend, or in fact evacuate those

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 2>bases if things were to escalate very precipitously in the aftermath.

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 2>We've got to make sure we talk to some of

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 2>the allies in the region, make sure we understand they

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 2>their concerns, and then we decide where we're going to

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 2>go on that tight rope between trying to send a

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 2>very very forceful message that hopefully brings us to a

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 2>close without kicking this over into a major regional conflict.

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, everything you say is unquestionably true, but my counter

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 4>would simply be you would think those preparations would have

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 4>begun in earnest after say thirty or a sixty or

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and twenty seven attacks, and as we have

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 4>been saying similar to you, it seems an awful lot

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 4>like the administration endured attack after attack after attack and

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 4>needed some dead people to justify the sort of deterrence

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 4>that would prevent dead people. And it just I find

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 4>that morally and as a patriot unacceptable.

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 2>No, I think your point is very well taken. But

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 2>that being said to you, in this case, I learned

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 2>when I worked in the White House and I work

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 2>in the Pentagon. When you get into a crisis like this,

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 2>this immediate attack, you got to make sure you understand

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 2>one thing. Half of the initial reports you get is wrong,

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 2>and so as a consequence, one thing you want to

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 2>make sure as you identify which of the groups is

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 2>directly responsible for this attack, It's very likely this group

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 2>called katav hits Belah without a doubt, though there are

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 2>two or three other Scheite militia groups that are operating

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 2>in the area in both Syria and Rock. Second thing

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 2>you got to look for is the proverbial smoking gun. Yes,

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 2>as the President said, are these groups backed by iron,

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 2>no question about it. Is the drone that was using

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 2>this attack, largely manufactured in likely manufacturer probably and the

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 2>minissions on board, but backed by iron does not mean

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 2>directed by iron. Can you find the smoking guns from

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 2>intelligence where you have a direct connection between the IRGC

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Revolutionary Guards in Iran and this particular group. I mean, metaphorically,

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 2>we back Israel in the conflict there involved in, but

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 2>we don't direct the ongoing military operations. The fact, we've

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 2>complained about the level of violence that the Israelis have

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 2>used to kill twenty six thousand Palestinians. So there's that

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 2>differentiation of me and those I think will slow that response.

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.679
<v Speaker 2>Although you're quite right, many of these things in terms

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 2>of so called options, should have been prepared in advance

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 2>if in fact we saw the situation deteriorating in terms

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 2>of descending, resupplying, or evacuating our bases in the region. Yeah,

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 2>I got violence.

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm beyond an armchaired quarterback on this. I'm not even

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 3>as good is that. But I do not understand, since

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 3>you used the word inevitable over and over and over again,

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 3>how the Pentagon didn't have all of these plans ready

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 3>to go immediately when it finally happened. And then in

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 3>terms of you saying they're all backed by Iran but

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 3>not directed by Iran. What difference does it make if

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 3>you hit Iran hard enough, they'd have to call off

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 3>their dogs, wouldn't They wouldn't they have to say, hey,

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 3>you better not do that anymore. And we're trying to

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 3>deter the houthis also from interrupting the shipping lane. So

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 3>we got to send a message to all of those

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 3>at the same time, don't we.

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Well to sendergree these two they're connected, but they're separate.

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what will deter these Iraqi groups? I think

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 2>will be different than necessarily deter the HOUTHI But you're

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 2>quite right. We can go after Iran a big way

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 2>if we sort of choose. We certainly have the capabilities

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 2>beyond question. But we also have to consider what happens

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 2>in response. Okay, what happens in response? Uranians have already

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 2>demonstrated long range missile capability. They struck Pakistan because of

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 2>a terrorist attack in the last few weeks. They struck

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 2>a group in Syria a week or so ago against

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 2>the so called terror We know they have long rangeists.

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 2>They could respond using that. They could intensify their efforts

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 2>all across the region to include hitz Fe Lah in

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 2>soudn elebanon intensifying their attacks on Israel. They could for

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 2>a time at least close the Straits of Hormuz and

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 2>drive the price to oil one hundred fifty bucks of barrow.

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Those may be things that you're willing to accept without question,

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 2>but you've got to consider that particular possibility. In some ways,

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 2>I think deterring and getting these people to stop doing

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 2>what they're doing in Iraq and Syria is a lot

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 2>easier than trying to deter the hooties who have asclutely

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 2>nothing to lose and have their own agenda as do

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the Iraqis, which is to embellish their brand, attack more resources,

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.559
<v Speaker 2>encourage more volunteers, et cetera.

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 4>I find myself wishing we had almost unlimited time for

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 4>the Socratic class with doctor Jeff McCausland here CBS News

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 4>Military Consultant, because if I was sitting there in your class,

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 4>I would say, well, Professor mccauslan, it sounds like we're

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 4>What you and Jack are are are talking about is

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 4>the question of the US's meticulousness and deliberation that we

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 4>have to have a smoking gun. We need to figure

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 4>out if Iran was actually directing blah blah blah, as

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 4>opposed to not worrying about that sort of thing and

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 4>just protecting the sort of power that our advertaries would say.

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 4>We don't want to mess with them. We just can't

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 4>mess with them. Last time we did, they went nuts,

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 4>they blew up things, had nothing to do with it.

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 4>We're never going to mess with them again. And I

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 4>realized that the answer to that query would take a

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 4>very long time. But I think that's where we're at,

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 4>isn't it.

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 2>It is the degree. But that one thing I always

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 2>about concerned about when we make a response to things

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 2>like this is and I saw this in Washington. Nobody

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 2>seems to want to answer the following question. And then

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 2>what and then what? You know, a military force is

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 2>a means and not an answer. We can go and

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 2>just devastate it if you'd like. It, could nuke Oran

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 2>if you like, We could do all that. What does

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>that leave us on the other end of it? And

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 2>the concern is to lead us into a wider conference concern.

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Of course, it results in large scale civilian casualties on

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 2>the Iranian side. A lot of innocent people had nothing

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 2>to do with all this stuff, are going to die

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 2>or get killed in the process. Now, once again, one

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 2>might argue, and one could have a convincing argument that

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 2>that level of deterrence is required. Okay, but at least

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 2>I would I'd like to make sure there was some

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 2>consideration of what happens the day after as you go

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 2>through this process.

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Sure shouldn't. Ultimately, though, they be more worried about us

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 3>escalating than us worried about them escalating.

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, they are worried about us escalating. Quite frankly. The

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>first thing the Arrange do is jump up in all

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 2>the forms they could find and deny any connection to

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 2>this particular mission. At the same time, kadab hits Balah

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 2>jumped up in all their forms social media likes, and

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Ron was totally disconnected from all this. And oh, by

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 2>the way, after negotiation with the Iraqi government, we've decided

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.599
<v Speaker 2>we're going to suspend all these particular tacks so that

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 2>they're all kind of scurrying towards the exits. And that's why,

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 2>instead of a moment ago, it seems to me bringing this

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 2>particular sad chapter to a close may be easier than

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 2>dealing with the Houthis. Unfortunately, I don't think they've got

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 2>a great deal to lose. The problem the Iranians have

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 2>got is they basically, I think, in many ways, won

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 2>the game. The game for them was to get the

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 2>United States out of the reach out of Iraq. In particular,

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 2>even prior to this most recent attack, we had begun

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 2>negotiations with the Iraqi government on a timetable to withdraw

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 2>our forces because of strained relations following previous air strikes

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 2>that hit Iraqi soil. So the Iranians had really in

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 2>their hand gained what they wanted to accomplish, and I

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 2>think they have gone a step too far, or their proxies,

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 2>who they may have only limited control of, its going

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 2>a step too far. And so what they want to

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 2>do is take their winnings and leave the table.

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 4>So interesting. Jeff mccauslm CBS News military consultant, Always enjoy

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 4>the conversation, Jeff, thanks a million.

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 2>You guys are a pleasure to talk to.