WEBVTT - From the Vault: The Silurian Hypothesis

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday.

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Time to dig into the vault for an older episode

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of the show. This is our episode on the Silurian hypothesis,

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>originally published January. I hope you enjoy Welcome to Stuff

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind production of My Heart Radio. Hey,

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name is

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and today we're going

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to be talking about a subject that I've actually had

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>on the radar for a while. This is something that

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>was making the rounds on science blogs a few years back,

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and it has been suggested by a number of different listeners.

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm glad we're finally coming around to it. I

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>think I had some hesitation for a while that I

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>want to briefly explain right at the beginning here. But

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>today we're gonna be talking about an idea known as

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the Silurian hypothesis. Uh. And just to give you a

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit of background knowledge, we spent several minutes before

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>recording today trying to look up how they pronounced silurian

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>on Doctor Who because I was like, sure they might

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>use some kind of British English variation where they say Silurian,

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>but but a last we could not ever get the

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>doctor to say it right. I watched I think, an

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>entire scene where one of the more recent doctors was

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>chatting with a Silurian or Silurian out out of your Will,

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and they they it was like they were trying not

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to say it, like if they said it, one would

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>would pop up and and crawl out of the screen

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>or something. Uh they used they referred to another alien race.

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't even in the scene, and I don't even

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>think was part of that episode. And then in all

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>these other terms, but yeah, they were just trying to

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>mess with me. So this is a topic that I

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>have been interested in covering for quite a while. It's

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been a few years now, but Rob, when you

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>suggested it, I realized that I'd always been hesitating and

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>not wanting to quite go ahead with it. And I

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>think I realized the reason for that, which is that

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>when I saw people mentioning this paper on the internet,

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it was clear to me that a lot of them

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>were getting exactly the wrong takeaway from it, Like they

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>were latching onto a very shallow understanding of the concept

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>and and running off in a in a very different

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>direction than the authors intended. Not only a different direction

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>than they intend, but a direction they specifically say do

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>not go in, and specifically say that they are not

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to to make yeah. Uh So, to to clarify

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about here, the Silurian hypothesis paper begins

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>with a fascinating question, in the words of the author's quote,

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>if an industrial civilization had existed on Earth many millions

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of years prior to our own era, what traces would

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>it have left and would they be detectable today? That

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the question at the heart of this paper. And

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously this is a tantalizing premise. You know, it sets

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>your mind racing with images of impossibly weird organisms, you know,

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>like land dwelling octopi and stuff in the in their

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>own weird cities, and and what kind of technology would

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>they have? Things that are as alien as anything you

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>could imagine on another planet, except they would have all

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>been from here, native to planet Earth, dating back millions

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of years into prehistory. But while this is a really

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>attractive imaginative exercise, I think the first order of business

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>when talking about this subject is to be clear that

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the Silurian hypothesis paper is about coming up with a

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>framework for detecting physical traces of industrial civilizations and understanding

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>how long those traces last. So it's about trying to

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>say what are the right questions to ask when you're

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking at a planet and saying, how could

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>we tell if there had been a civilization on this

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>planet a long time ago. It is not a paper

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>arguing that there was in fact a lost civilization deep

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in Earth's past. So it's not evidence for lizardman, ancient aliens,

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Graham Hancock, Junk Atlantis, or any of that stuff. But

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I would say in its true form, it is a

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>really interesting question. Yeah, and at hard this episode is

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is not going to be about scientific evidence for lizardman

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>civilizations in the Hollow Earth. So if you're looking for that,

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this is this is not the episode for you. But yeah,

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>what I love about it is that it takes this

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of fantastic idea and then examines it reasonably, and

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that examination illuminates some very interesting geologic, climatic and astrophysical considerations. So,

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, setting aside pseudoscience and pseudo archaeology here. But

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, I think if you if you're

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>looking for some sci fi fund this topic in this episode,

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>well also still engage you. Um. But it is interesting

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>how from a certain perspective you can imagine people being

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>drawn into it by just sort of this sci fi idea,

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>this idea that does lean lend itself well to sort

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of conspiracy theorist mindsets, and then realizing actually, this paper

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is about geology and uh and uh and in the

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>last year of our planet and also uh, I guess

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, in many cases, kind of a

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>downbeat message about the lasting impact of human technology on

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 1>our planet. And on the other hand, too, how forgettable

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we may be from the standpoint of geological history. Yeah,

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>so if you're on board for all of that, you've

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>come to the right place. So real quick, I do

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>want to just discuss the Doctor Who reference here, since

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>since uh the author's Schmidt and Frank took the name

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>for the hypothesis from the Doctor Who species the Silurians

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>who first popped in the nineteen seventies series Doctor Who,

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and these Silarians, I think now you've got me saying Silarians. Oh,

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I'm probably well. It gets even worse because

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>so they take the name of the hypothesis from this

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Who series where these creatures show up. But then

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>they say explicitly in the paper, you know, the range

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 1>we would really be looking at would actually be after

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the Silurian geologic periods. Silurian period is something that's like

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a roughly twenty million year period. That's more than four

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred million years ago. I don't know, it's like four

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty something to four hundred and twenty something,

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I think roughly. But if you were seriously looking for

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>evidence of lost civilizations in Earth's ancient past, you'd probably

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>be looking for things like after about four hundred million

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>years ago, coming you know, forward in time from the

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Devonian period, when you could have the reasonable biological basis

0:06:54.680 --> 0:07:00.719
<v Speaker 1>for land dwelling animals that might have evolved complex technological intelligence. Yes, uh,

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but at any rate. In Doctor Who, especially in that

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>original nineteen seventy uh appearance, the Silurians are these kind

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of lizard men um. They factor into this plot with

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the Third Doctor played by John Perkway who lived nineteen

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>nine six, and then they subsequently pop up again with

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the fifth Doctor played by Peter Davison and the eleventh

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Doctor played by Matt Smith, and then more recently the

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>third teenth Doctor played by Jody Whittaker. So this is

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>just the TV show. I can't speak to the various

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>books and audio dramas that have come out, and their

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>look has changed throughout the film. Um. You know, they are,

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>in essence, this cold blooded, prehistoric reptile like species with

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>significant technological advancement that they I think they end up

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>entering various states of suspended animation to avoid uh you know,

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>major changes on Earth, changes to the climate, etcetera. Um,

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and then they re emerge and encounter the Doctor. Um.

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, they're They're one of the many interesting alien

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and otherworldly species that pop up. Uh. Though I guess

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>with the Silurians one of the key things is that

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>they're they're not pure aliens. They're they're sort of the originals.

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>There are their original terrans, original earthlings, uh, that are

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>then encountered by these evolved apes that come much later.

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean to to them, we are the aliens, yeah, right,

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>were like these weird future creatures. Uh the image you

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>would tell And I gotta be honest, I'm not a hoovoid,

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know the lore. But the picture you're

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>showing me of the Silurians, they look like they look

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 1>like if the world was all creature from the Black

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Lagoon and there was a leather face of the creature

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>from the Black Lagoon civilization. Yeah. I mean, they're definitely

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Who creatures of this era, which which I tend

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to love these costumes. I know they were working with

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>with with with budget limitations here, but yeah, the the

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>aliens and robot of this era really really called me. Now.

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>You said they look kind of fish like. Bear in mind,

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure some Doctor Who listeners Doctor Who viewers

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>will will will chime in here. But I believe they

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 1>are related to another species that pops up on the

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>show that live in the water. I think they're like

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the sea devils or something. Um, but these guys are

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.839
<v Speaker 1>not aquatic in nature. I think I got that right.

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>The seed of Oh wait, this is that like a

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>bunch of intelligent euryptorids or something something like that. Yeah, alright,

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>so this is two thousand eighteen paper, the Silurian hypothesis.

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Would it be possible to detect an industrial civilization in

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:41.079
<v Speaker 1>the Geological Record. This was published in the journal International

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Journal of Astrobiology. UH. It draws its name from that

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Who episode, and the authors here that they point

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>out that they may be the first to seriously consider

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>whether a technologically advanced civilization could have evolved prior to

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Homo sapiens on Earth, though the authors due stress that

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a to the best of the knowledge situation,

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's entirely possible somebody was batting around

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:07.079
<v Speaker 1>the idea of previously, but this may be the first,

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and certainly this was this one really made a splash

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>when it came out. Okay, So the two authors here

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>would be Adam Frank and Gavin A. Schmidt right and

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Frank is a is a physicist and astronomer, and Schmidt

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:23.479
<v Speaker 1>is a climate scientist right right. Schmidt is a climatologist,

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>climate model and director of the NASA Goddard Institute for

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Space Studies in New York and co founder of the

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>award winning climate science blog Real Climate. Frank is a physicist, astronomer,

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and writer whose work has appeared in such publications as

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times and NPR. And I believe we've

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>actually referenced his work on the podcast before. Uh. He

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>also has a book. He has a few books, including

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>The Constant Fire, The End of the Beginning, and Light

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:50.839
<v Speaker 1>of the Stars. Those are all nonfiction science books, of course.

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So to be clear, we're talking about two very legitimate

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>scientists and science communicators, not you know, not a couple

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of of quacks who were staring into the hollow Earth

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>or anything. So the authors here begin with a very

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>reasonable consideration of the search for intelligent life elsewhere in

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Uh. And then this is something we've we've

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>touched on the show plenty of times before. Ours is

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.959
<v Speaker 1>the only model of life, but we generally consider technological

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>advancement to be a hallmark of intelligent life. And more

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to the point, something we can search for signs of, uh,

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>concerning other worlds and other star systems. Uh. You know,

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and anytime you can you can figure out how to

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>look for signs of of advanced and expansive energy harvesting

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>or consumption. That might be a way for us to

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>tell if there's something else out there that is significantly advanced, right,

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and it also might be a simple prerequisite for contact

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>because uh, they're talking about so that They started off

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>by looking at this as an astrobiology question. You know,

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you're you're looking for signs of life elsewhere in the universe,

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and of course, the the search for intelligent life in

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.079
<v Speaker 1>the universe, in practical terms, what's accessible to us, really

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>boils down to the search for life capable of Harvard

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>harnessing radio technology within our galaxy. You know, you could

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>probably find maybe chemical biosignatures in in the atmospheres of

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>exoplanets that would give you an indication that there's some

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of life there, maybe bacterial in nature or whatever.

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>But if you're looking for intelligent life, you're you're probably

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 1>talking about radio of some kind, right, And so the

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>kinds of civilizations that develop radio communication technology would fall

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>under the classification of industrial civilizations. And these are what

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>author the authors define as civilizations that have the ability

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to harness energy on a global scale. And they bring

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>up how this actually feeds into one of the the

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 1>recurring characters in in the astrobiology literature, the Drake equation.

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Yeah, they bust out the Drake equation, and

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of course consider how how some of the takeaways relate

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to Earth, especially the notion that over the course of

0:12:56.120 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a planet's existence, multiple industrial civilizations can fear radically arise

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 1>over the span of time that life exists there, And

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>then we have to factor in questions over you know,

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>how many times life itself may have evolved or started

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>out on Earth before our last universal common ancestors got going,

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of a shadow biosphere, and the idea that

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 1>species like dolphins may suggest independent evolutions of intelligence on Earth. Um,

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, so we're left with this idea that, yeah, theoretically,

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>given the footprint of life on Earth, you could have

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>had multiple intelligences uh evolved and arise during that time period.

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Because that's certainly what the Drake equation UH seems to

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>allow for concerning other worlds. Well, yeah, and I you know,

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>so I kind of love the Drake equation. You know,

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a famous tool that I really enjoy thinking about

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>because because it does the job of taking a question

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that seems like we could not possibly answer it. The

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>question is how many active technological civilizations are there in

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the Milky Way galaxy? And you know, if you're being

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>honest with yourself, the correct answer to that is how

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the hell should I know? Like, there's no way to

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>answer that question at all. But what the Drake equation

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>does is break that unanswerable question down into a number

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of other questions that you then multiplied together to get

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>an estimated number. And many of those smaller questions themselves

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>could perhaps be answered, and in fact, some of them

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>have been answered since the Drake equation was first formulated.

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, So it decomposes an unsolvable problem of are

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>there aliens out there? And if so, how many, into

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a series of smaller problems, at least some of which

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>are solvable, maybe all of which are. You know, you

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>could come up with some kind of reasonable guess about.

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And so the classic formulation of the Drake equation is

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to get your number of civilizations in in the Milky way,

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you would multiply a bunch of different terms together. So

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>one is the rate of average the average rate of

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>star formation. You know, how much do you get stars

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>times the fraction of stars that have planets times the

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>average number of planets per star times the fraction of

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>planets that develop life times the portion of those life

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>systems that gain intelligence, times the portion of those intelligent

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>life systems that develop technological means to communicate times And

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>then here's a really interesting term, quote the length of

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>time l over which such civilizations released detectable signals. And

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it's this very last term that I think very often

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>gets overlooked by people who are thinking about, you know,

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>are there aliens out there, and how could we know?

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we often tend to assume that, well, once

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>there are aliens with technological means to communicate, that's just

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>like a you know, progress only extends from their civilizations

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>just continue to get bigger and their capabilities expand, and

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>they spread out from there. But I don't know that

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>there could be severe limitations on the length of a

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>radio receptive or radio broadcasting civilist nation. Maybe they only

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>exist for a few hundred years. Because one thing we

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>know is that our technological civilization is just a tiny

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>blip on the history of planet Earth, even a tiny

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>blip on the history of life on planet Earth. Earth

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is four point five billion years old. There's been life

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>on Earth for most of that time. Uh. The authors

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>here estimate that there has been complex life on Earth's

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>land surface for only about four hundred million years, So

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that's only a fraction of the entire history of Earth.

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>But that but four hundred million years is still a

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>gargantuan amount of time compared to the length of human civilization.

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>They say, industrial civilization, you know, by their metric, has

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>probably existed for only about three hundred years. This is

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>since roughly the beginning of mass production methods for for things.

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>And so if humans were wiped out by a global

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>mass extinction of some kind in the near future, our

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>industrial civilization would just be this tiny little splinter, this

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>blip of three hundred years on a history of a

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>currently four point five billion year old planet. Yeah, and

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>so from there we get into the question, Okay, if

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>if you have an industrial civilization like this it is

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>just a blip, would we be able to see it?

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And if we could see it, what would we look for?

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is you know, this is pretty much the

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>meat of the paper here analyzing this sort of question,

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>which which is great because it again it gets into

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of uh, you know, sci fi friendly concepts. It's

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a useful in considering the evolution of life and the

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 1>existence of intelligent life on other worlds. And it also

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>shines a light on what we're doing now and where

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>we are and and I think also, uh, you know,

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>illustrates nicely illustrates this idea that um that that the

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>technology is not just this um that this this this

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>ramp to Star Trek, you know, or this ramp to

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the culture or any of our more optimistic sci fi

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 1>dreams like there are there are severe challenges. Uh. And

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of course there's there's always the risk of extinction. That's

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. And one thing that's funny is we don't

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>know whether the rise of technological civilization should generally be

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>understood as, on average, a linear process where it just

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of goes in one direction and keeps going in

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>that direction, or whether it should be understood as, on

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>average a cyclical process where you get a rise in

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>technological civilization and then it disappears for some reason. You

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>can imagine what some of those reasons might be, um,

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and then maybe rises again out of the

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>out of the same biosphere. I mean. Either one I

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>think is is a perfectly plausible model to entertain is

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 1>like what usually happens in the universe. Uh. And we

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>just don't have the Uh, we don't have the evidence

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to really have an opinion on that. Yeah, I mean

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it just comes back to the fact

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that again we are the only model of intelligent life

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and certainly technologically advanced tech, um, intelligent life that we

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>have to look at. So we have nothing to compare

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>us to. Yeah, and we don't know what's going to

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>happen to us in the long run, right, So, uh, well,

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>let's get into the I guess the sort of the

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>first part of the paper. And I do want to

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>drive home that if you want to just go right

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to the paper yourself and dive in. Um, you just

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>do a search for the title and you can find

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it hosted on NASA. They have a NASA has a

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>has a PDF of this that's very easily accessible. Uh.

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>You can also read it in full on the Cambridge

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>University Press website, which I think is the press behind

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the journal, the International Journal Journal of Vester Biology. And yeah,

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>so it's all on their end with the references hyperlinked

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>and all that, which is nice. Yes, yeah, absolutely so

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>if you hit a paywall, don't don't give up. It's

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>out there. Um. And I believe Adam Frank also wrote

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 1>a piece for What the Atlantic where he nicely summarizes

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the ideas here. Oh yeah, and he also

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 1>tells a funny story about how they arrived at writing

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the paper because I think he says, uh, he showed

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>up in Gevin Schmidt's office to talk about UM, to

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>talk more about astrobiology, like Drake equation type questions, and

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>he's like, okay, so we we we know we've got

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>one industrial civilization on Earth. And then Schmidt responded by saying,

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>how do we know we're the only one? I think

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>just hitting that early like wall, They're like wow, And

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>then that turned into the paper, Yeah, and it's it's

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>it's quite a paper. Thank So let's see, let's get

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>into the first part of it, which I think you

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>can loosely think of it's just sort of a look

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>at the limits of our vision. So they point out

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>that for the last two point five million years, uh,

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>there's widespread physical evidence of things like climate change, soil horizons,

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>this is where one layer of soil differs from Belower above,

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>speaking to changes recorded in the soil, as well as

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>archaeological evidence of non Homo sapiens cultures such as the Neanderthals.

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And this two point five million year period is known

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>as the Quaternary. Now, going back before the Quaternary again

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>more than two point five million years ago, the land

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>evidence is harder to come by. You have to depend

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>on drilling, mining, and occasional exposed sections of the earth.

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Even in the ocean sentiment evidence apparently only goes back

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to around one seventy million years ago. Yeah, And I

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>think for me this was actually one of the most

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 1>interesting parts of the paper because I would say, if

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>you just go by standard intuition, a person might think, uh,

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, if there had been a civilization on Earth,

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a two million years ago or something like that. Uh,

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>would wouldn't that just be completely obvious, Like we'd see

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>evidence of it all around us. Would there be ruins

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and all that, you know, their their stone hinges, their

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 1>skyscrapers and everything like that. Actually it's not. It might

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>not be as obvious as you might think. In fact,

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the evidence of it could be rather scarce. And this

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>runs counter to our side five imaginings, right, because when

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you encounter elder civilizations and in other works like there's

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>usually some sort of a ruin or a vault or

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>some sort of mysterious monolith or something like the idea

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that the elders would just be gone entirely, like just erased,

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>not by some sort of a conspiracy or by some

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>sort of a you know, alien shenanigans. But just because

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 1>things don't last that long, that's a it's an alien

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>concept from too many of our again, too many of

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>our creative visions of of what the future in the past,

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe exactly so we think, well, you know, there are

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>ruins of civilizations from thousands of years ago, but that's

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>thousands of years ago. That's nothing in geological time. The

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>surface of the I mean, look a look at what

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a map of the land formations on Earth just you know,

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.239
<v Speaker 1>sixty million years ago looked like it's like, you know,

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the the surface of the Earth is not fixed and constant.

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>This is a geologically active planet. So would there be

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 1>ruins all around us with evidence of a civilization from

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions of years ago just be totally obvious?

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I probably by the answer that the authors

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>give here, which is that no, it would probably not

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>be totally obvious. In fact, it might be incredibly difficult

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to find evidence of at all. Uh. And so one

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of the the interesting points the authors make here is

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that the the exposed land surface of Earth, of course,

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is geologically very young on average. They cite evidence from

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a study by Mattman at All in two thousand nine

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>that the oldest large patch of land surface on Earth

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is probably in the Negev Desert, and that's only about

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>one point eight million years old. At one point eight

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>million years, I mean, compared to the history of civilization,

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is a long time. But that's again, it's like nothing

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in geological times, a tiny fraction of of Earth history.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So if we wanted to find remnants of a civilization

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>from say, hundreds of millions of years ago, you probably

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>would not find that on the surface of the Earth.

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>You'd have to look for it in in exposed geological

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>strata from from previous eras. And even then you can't

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.199
<v Speaker 1>just count on the fact that you would be finding

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>fossils of that civilization all over the place. Yeah, exactly.

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>That they that they had done something we you've discussed

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in the show before, which is of course that the

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>fossil record is inherently incomplete, because fossilization only occurs when

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>conditions are just right. Um. They point out that that

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of all the dinosaurs that ever lived, and there were

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a ton of you know, uh, you know, they're the

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.640
<v Speaker 1>era of the dinosaurs taken as as one gigantic, gigantic

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:36.119
<v Speaker 1>monolith just dwarfs anything that that that that humanity has

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>ever occupied. Uh. You know, it is a it is

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 1>a cathedral, and and we're we're not even like a

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>child's dollhouse, uh sort of situation here. Um. So, uh,

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, out of out of all of those dinosaurs

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that ever lived, there are only a few thousand near

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>complete specimens. And so the authors here contend that given

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the rarity of fossilization, a species is short lived, as

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Homo sapiens m not make it into the fossil record

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>at all. And of course, for fossilization to mean anything

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 1>to us or to you know, anybody who's doing and doing,

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, some sort of an investigation of a planet

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 1>or our planet, those fossilizations would have to survive and

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>then they would have to be found. Yeah, exactly. And

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>so again this might be pushing against your intuition. You

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>would say, like, wait a minute, there's there's there's there's

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>signs of human life all over the surface of Earth.

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>And and we have you know, at least a few thousand,

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>uh complete dinosaur fossils, enough to have museums of Natural

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>history with dinosaur fossils in places all over the world. Uh,

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.680
<v Speaker 1>surely you'd expect more. But dinosaurs existed for almost two

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred million years. Human civilization again is like it's a

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>few thousand years at this point. Yeah. So the problem

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>here is like we have trouble comparing the odds because

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not realizing how many millions of times more the

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>dinosaur bodies got to roll the dice than our cors would. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Another thing they touch on is that is the example

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of technology. Uh, and they point out how rarely complex

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>early examples of human technology are ever found. So if

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking, well, surely we would find one of these

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>factories or something that was made by one of these

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>factories that a previous civilization might have had, well not necessarily. Yeah, sure,

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>surely my rice cooker would be found hundreds of millions

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>of years in the future. But yeah, that that they

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:33.199
<v Speaker 1>mentioned several reasons why that's maybe not as clear as

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>you might assume. So they say urbanization that currently represents

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>less than one percent of the Earth's surface, So that's

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a limitation on the deposition side of creating a fossil

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>record of our current civilization. Only small parts of Earth's

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>surface are actually inhabited by humans. That that sounds counterintuitive,

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's true. And then they point out that quote,

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>exposed sections and drilling sites for pre quaternary surfaces are

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>order of magnitude less as fractions of the original surface.

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>So human civilization currently only feels a small portion of

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Earth's surface right now, and we only access tiny fractions

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of Earth's previous surface through through various kinds of drilling,

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know, access through exposure to rock strata. So

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>there's just like extreme selection filters on both sides, on

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the deposition and on the excavation side. Yeah, it would

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 1>be kind of like even if you knew somehow, with

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>some certainty that there was that there was a technological

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>civilization during this time and in the ancient ancient past,

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, you would. You would have to you have

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to really know exactly where to drill down to hit them.

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't just expect to randomly do it unless you

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>did a lot of drilling and digging and excavation. But

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>but but so what we've been talking about here is

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>challenging the the intuition that you would just be finding

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 1>physical fossil remnants and artifacts of this civilization from hundreds

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of millions of years ago all over the place, and

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they do a very good job of knocking

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that down. But of course it is not hopeless, because

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they say, while our chance of finding the physical remains

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of a hypothetical Silarian civilization might be very low, there

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>would be other traces of the existence of that civilization

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that would be preserved in the geologic record, and you

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you would have a very good chance of finding those traces. Yeah,

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's what most of the rest of the

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>paper deals with. I do want to point out one

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>other thing that they bring up in passing that I

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 1>thought was interesting. They point out that that you could

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly make an argument for or against the evolution of

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>intelligent life in a world based on the probable evolution

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of species that are in the fossil record, but that

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they would be focusing on physiochemical tracers for previous industrial civilization.

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So I hadn't really thought about this, but like the

0:28:55.880 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>idea of like looking at say, dinosaur um fall souls

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and saying, well, we don't have evidence that they evolved

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in it into an intelligent technological species, but if we

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>but we can make an argument based on this fossil

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and this fossil fossil that they were headed in that direction.

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel like even that's the kind of thing that

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't be quite as clear as your intuition might

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>lead you to assign them, because I mean, like intelligence

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in mammals arose very rapidly in geologic time. Yeah, so

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>again it reached this situation where the fossil record could

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>just be missing that snapshot entirely. So this all leads

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you next to the next major question. Given the limits

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of what we can detect in the geochemical record, what

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly could we look for on a planet to see

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>if an industrial society ever existed there? And yeah, that's

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>what the bulk of the paper focuses on. So in

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the case of Earth, if an organized, intelligent society evolved

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>during the pre Quaternary time but they didn't reach the

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>level of an industrial society, there simply would be no

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>heard off them as far as this paper is concerned.

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.959
<v Speaker 1>Right there, they're looking for the kinds of chemical material

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and climate type changes that would leave a trace in

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the geologic record, and that would primarily be a function

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of of industry, basically of energy production, of of material

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>working things like metals and plastics, and the UH and

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the methods of harnessing energy for industrial use. I was

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>reminded of our episodes on fire technology because if listeners

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>may remember, we discussed well, could something that evolved in

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the water or or on a water world, could they

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>ever really get any kind of advanced technology going if

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have access to the surface. And that seems

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a factor here as well, as they're only

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at the period during which something could have evolved

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>on land. Yeah, so you could maybe have advanced intelligence

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in the water. But it's maybe this is just a

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>lack of imagination on our party. You know, you always

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>need to be aware of the limitation of your vision.

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>But it does seem hard to imagine advanced technology under

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the water, because like, if you don't have fire, you

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>can't do metal working, or metal working is very difficult.

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know. It just seems harder to

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine how technology like we understand it could come about

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in the water. But again, you know, limits of our vision. Yeah,

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>so they say, quote, the focus is thus on the

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>period between the emergence of complex life on land in

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the Devonian four million years ago in the Paleozoic era

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and the mid apply a scene. Uh, and that's around

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>four million years ago. Yeah, because if it was much

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>more recent, you you'd probably get into the area where

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you'd start to expect to actually see those kinds of

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>remnants and artifacts that that we were talking about. Right,

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 1>So they get into the discussion of what we might

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>look for, and they have it nicely divided up. The

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:52.479
<v Speaker 1>first one is, uh, well, they basically have two broad

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>categories and then some some details on that category. The

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>first big one though, would be looking at the geological

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>footprint of the anthroposcene. So, as we've discussed in the

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>show before, there's an argument to be made that the

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>impact of human civilization on the environment and the geologic

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>record constitutes its own geologic era, the Anthropocene. So not

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>all the changes would be recognizable millions of years later,

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>but some would be. Right. So, human activity at this

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>point is is large scale enough that we are making

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>changes to the earth that that are that are widespread

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>or you could even say global, and I was gonna

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>say permanent, not permanent, but extremely long lived. You know,

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>going way into the future, you will be able to

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>find signs in the rocks and the ice and the settiment,

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the things on Earth that persists over long

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>periods of time that will leave records of what we

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>did to the Earth in just the past three years

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>or so. Right and uh, and as we've probably mentioned before,

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the anthroposcene is not a an official geological era, as

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>much as any of these things can be, you know, officials.

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>It seems like when you're talking about geologic terms, it's

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>even more ridiculous. We can consider such a small part

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of geologic history that we occupy, but there's a lot

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of compelling evidence for it, and you often see it discussed,

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>especially when we're talking about the changes that that humans

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>have made to the planet and arem still making to

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the planet, and how they may show up in the

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>geologic record. And just to be super clear, the majority

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>of the changes we're talking about of this kind would

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>not be changes like physical alterations of the Earth's surface.

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>We're not talking about like records of people digging holes

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and building stuff. We're talking about records of like changes

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to the to the level of different carbon isotopes in

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in geological strata and things like that. Right now, they

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>also hit upon something that that I thought was really

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting in in in a way almost almost encouraging, uh,

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the sustainability paradox. So the idea here is that, of

0:33:55.040 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>course the longer human civilization lasts, especially technological civilization, the

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>greater the geologic signal of its impact. Again, that that

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>lasting those lasting signs in the environment, not the faces

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>they carved into the mountains, but impacts again on their

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>their geochemical in nature. Um, so that signal increases. But

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:22.919
<v Speaker 1>the longer human civilization lasts, the more sustainable it must

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>become in order to survive. And this is of course

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the reality we're living in right now. If a civilization

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>survives this test and becomes more sustainable, then that signal

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>grows weaker. Right. So it's almost like the strength of

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the signal left for future people to discover is directly

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>proportional to how suicidal that civilization is, right Like, the

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>more it is just burning through fossil fuel resources and

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the rate of that, the stronger the signal will be.

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And so a civilization at some point, they say, well,

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>will naturally tend to attenuate for a couple of reasons.

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Either it really says it can't keep going at that rate,

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 1>or it's going to cause climate damage to itself, so

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it will naturally switch to more sustainable uh energy sources

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that are harder to detect in the future, or it

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of course does so much damage to itself that it's

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:18.439
<v Speaker 1>signal naturally is reduced, right right. So, so basically coming

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>back to what you said earlier, it's not just that

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 1>there there's gonna be a sign. There's gonna be the

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>signal uh, this footprint of a civilization uh in the

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.479
<v Speaker 1>in the you know, the geochemical record. It's it's also

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that it may just be very short, it may be

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a little it's not going to be this Uh. It's

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be a symphony. It's going to maybe be

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.399
<v Speaker 1>a note or two. So basically the idea being that

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that that the real strong, much stronger argument for aliens

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 1>existing and having some sort of role or some sort

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of advanced technology having some sort of role on Earth

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and they in the ancient history would not be look

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>at the pyramids, I think aliens did this, or I

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>think you know, ancient scientists did this. It would be

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 1>pointing at say a blip and uh or an increase

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>in global temperatures during a certain period of time and saying,

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the aliens did this? Or I think the

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>advanced technology and question did this? I mean, even then,

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be a very speculative and and

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>difficult to prove hypothesis. It would be kind of just

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>like unfalsifiable speculation, but that that would perhaps be the

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>more likely type of signal you would find if there

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:34.399
<v Speaker 1>had been alien intervention. Then you know, specific artifacts than

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>al right, well, let's get into some of the specifics

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:40.839
<v Speaker 1>of the footprint that the authors lay out here. The

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>first one is a stable isotope anomalies of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen,

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>and nitrogen. And this is one of the big ones.

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:51.839
<v Speaker 1>An estimated point five trillion tons of fossil carbon via

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the burning of fossil fuels and warming of the planet

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>um they quote, we we expect this temperature rise to

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>be detectable and so FA ocean uh carbonates notably forminifera.

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>This is a single celled organism with a with a

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>with a chalky shell. UM. Organic biomarkers cave records, stuches

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 1>such as stalactites, lake ostracods. These are minute aquatic crustaceans

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and high latitude ice cores, though only the first two

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of these will be retrievable in the time scales considered

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>here un Right, So this thing about the the isotope

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 1>anomalies of of carbon and these other elements is very interesting.

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 1>So they say, you know, there are natural distributions that

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you would find records of in the different isotopes of

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:42.279
<v Speaker 1>carbon that are that are moving around in Earth's atmosphere.

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 1>But when people suddenly start pulling huge amounts of fossil carbon,

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>carbon of a biological origin out of the ground and

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>burning it, you suddenly start throwing those isotopes out of whack,

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>and that will be something that will leave records for

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>millions of years to come. So you can look in

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the geological records, you know, the record of of strata

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>from previous eras, and say hunh. For some reason, in

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>this one period deep in history, suddenly the carbon isotopes

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 1>got way out of whack, as if suddenly a bunch

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:17.399
<v Speaker 1>of fossil carbon like coal or oil or whatever had

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>been burned at a at a hideous rate into the atmosphere. Right.

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:23.439
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, looking at our our time now

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>of of of modern human civilization, you know this that

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 1>we have this fossil fuel consumption and we have the

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>invention of the haber Bosch process and the large scale

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 1>use of of nitrogenous fertilizers and agriculture, which will also

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 1>heavily impact the planet's nitrogen cycling. Yeah, the haber Bosch process, Yeah,

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>as part of the changes in the nitrogen cycle that

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:48.839
<v Speaker 1>have come about as a result of of industrial civilization.

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 1>As well. They also touched on sediment to logical records.

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>The key causes here would be major soil erosion brought

0:38:56.640 --> 0:39:02.399
<v Speaker 1>on by agriculture, but also by agriculture lated deforestation. Um. Now,

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>this would be partially mitigated by dams, they point out,

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>but erosion is also heightened by climate changes and thawing

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>perma frost. Also sediment content changes due to just industrialization

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in general. Uh. Now here's a There's another big one

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that I think will be pretty obvious. Faunnel radiation and extinctions. Um. Basically,

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>humans have brought about many extinctions already, and we're living

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of an extinction event. Uh. This will

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>likely register in the fossil record. Yeah. Now, of course,

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:37.360
<v Speaker 1>previous major extinction events have usually been chalked up to

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:41.760
<v Speaker 1>two natural things like uh, oh, we can track massive

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>vulcanisms as the cause of this one, or say a

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>large space impact like the Katie extinction event. But there

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>are other extinction events in Earth's history where the cause

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is not totally clear. You know, there are some speculations,

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 1>but we don't know exactly why. Suddenly it seemed like

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>there was a great reduction in marine biodiversity at this

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:04.399
<v Speaker 1>point in history. All right. The next area is non

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 1>naturally occurring synthetics, So non naturally occurring chemicals generated by

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>industrial activity that persists in the environment. Things persistent organic pollutants,

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:18.359
<v Speaker 1>chlorofluoral carbons, in related compounds. And they also point out

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that steroids, leaf waxes, alkanones, and lipids can be preserved

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in sediment for many millions of years. Now, that one

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:29.439
<v Speaker 1>naturally makes me think of King plastic baby. Yeah, yeah,

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's the next thing that they mentioned. And

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>this one's you know, this one's disheartening but obvious. We've

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:39.840
<v Speaker 1>created tons of plastics, tons upon tons upon tons of plastics,

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and they sadly persist not only in heaps and floating masses,

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>but inside the bodies of organisms, including ourselves, uh so quote.

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 1>The potential for very long term persistence and detectability is high. Now.

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:55.279
<v Speaker 1>One of the things they point out about plastic that's

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting is that plastics may well proved to be a

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 1>very long term signature of human civilization and the geologic

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>record for you know, millions and millions of years to come.

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But the development of plastic is also something they would

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:10.359
<v Speaker 1>class under the I don't remember the umbrella term they

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>use for this, but sort of chemical contingencies. A technological

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 1>civilization does not have to use plastics. Plastics are just

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 1>something that humans happen to use. There are other things

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:26.879
<v Speaker 1>that seem probably more universal, like almost any industrial civilization

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you would expect to burn lots of fossil fuels, But plastics,

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that's more of a question mark. Is that unusual that

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we did it, or is that a very common thing

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that the civilizations would do all right. The next area

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that they highlight transuranic elements. These are elements having a

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:50.359
<v Speaker 1>higher atomic number than uranium, which is ninety two. Most

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 1>radioactive isotopes created via nuclear energy or weaponry have long

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.880
<v Speaker 1>half lives, but not long enough to be a factor

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>on the time scale that they're talking about here. But

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the exceptions are plutonium to forty four and um curium

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 1>two forty seven. So plutonium has a half life of

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:12.359
<v Speaker 1>eight point eight million years, and curium in this case

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a half life of fifteen million years.

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So in sufficient quantities of disposal, these would these would

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>pop up. And plutonium has no known natural causes outside

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of an actual supernova or something like that. This isotope

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 1>of plutonium. Yes, this particularly yea plutonium two forty four

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>so um. So, Yeah, if you found enough of this

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 1>uh in the geologic record, that would be a sign

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that's that's something was at work, there was some sort

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of technological atomic uh enterprise that was in place. Now,

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I guess we've already mentioned earlier that the authors are

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to claim that there was in fact a

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a long lost civilization hundreds of millions of years ago.

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:58.919
<v Speaker 1>But they do actually look at the geologic record to say,

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>are there anythings that that match these criteria we've been

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at, And they do find some interesting partial matches

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that have though of course nothing really comes close to

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 1>evidence that would be conclusive that there actually was a civilization,

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:16.399
<v Speaker 1>but some of these matches raise interesting questions of their own. Yeah,

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 1>they don't look at everything, and they point out that

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>things like the kt extinction event. We know that that

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 1>was not an industrial accident or anything. Um and uh

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and again they're not arguing that these are evidence of

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>past pre human industrial civilizations on Earth, but merely point

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to them as the source of events we might look at. Yeah.

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And I would say the biggest one that they focus

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>on in the paper is the event known as the

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Paleocene Eocene Thermal Maximum or p e t M. Yeah.

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>This is an abrupt spike in carbon and oxygen isotopes

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:53.279
<v Speaker 1>near the Paleocene Eocene transition fifty six million years ago,

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 1>resulting in a five to eight degree celsius global average

0:43:57.360 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>temperature rise. This is widely thought to be due to well,

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>I think they're there are different theories. One is that

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 1>it's volcanic activity. Um. But there have also been hypotheses

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 1>put forth that it could have been a common impact.

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 1>It could be due to burning pete, methane being released,

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and a few other candidates. Um. It's also used as

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:20.279
<v Speaker 1>a means of of understanding and kind of like kind

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:23.399
<v Speaker 1>of modeling out the effects of climate change during our

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 1>own era. Yeah. And and one of the reasons this

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 1>one gets singled out is, uh, so it really looks like, Okay,

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:33.440
<v Speaker 1>here we're seeing, for example, these carbon isotope signature changes

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that would signal that huge amounts of biogenic carbon carbon

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:40.279
<v Speaker 1>that originally came from life forms, like the stuff you

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:43.280
<v Speaker 1>would find in fossil fuels, is being burned and released

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:46.799
<v Speaker 1>into the atmosphere. Now, how would that happen if if

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:49.399
<v Speaker 1>if it wasn't creatures from the Black Lagoon with leather

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 1>face masks digging up a bunch of fossil fuels and

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>burning them for their civilization. Well, no, you probably don't

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:58.799
<v Speaker 1>need to jump to that conclusion because there are other

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>solutions on off for like, for example, there might have

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 1>somehow been lots of access of volcanic magma two beds

0:45:06.800 --> 0:45:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of fossil fuels. Maybe certain types of volcanic activity tended

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 1>to set a light to a lot of natural reserves

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:17.359
<v Speaker 1>of fossil fuels and shale beds and things like that.

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>And this almost acted as if the Earth itself, we're

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>we're setting off an industrial revolution, but it was just

0:45:23.560 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 1>volcanoes interacting with with these reservoirs of carbon in the ground. Yeah,

0:45:28.800 --> 0:45:31.840
<v Speaker 1>all you need is geologic upheaval and volcanic activity and

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:34.839
<v Speaker 1>again um our Our planet has A has A has

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a very active geological life, so there's plenty of opportunity

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:41.800
<v Speaker 1>for this sort of thing to potentially have taken place.

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So it kind of comes back to a problem with

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the signal here, the signal you would be looking for

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:49.799
<v Speaker 1>in the geochemical record. In many cases, the very sort

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of signal we're looking for, especially concerning carbon and warming,

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 1>could have also been caused by these naturally occurring causes,

0:45:55.640 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and so strong signals might be coming from something else,

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and more specific signals that we might look to just

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 1>might be too weak to to ever possibly observe or

0:46:05.120 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>to really make much out of. Oh yeah, this is

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:09.840
<v Speaker 1>an interesting paradox they talk about in their conclusion of

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:11.839
<v Speaker 1>all of the criteria they're able to come up with

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in this framework for for looking for past industrial civilizations,

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that you would expect any industrial civilization to

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 1>do also has other explanations, and so so it's not

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:28.719
<v Speaker 1>conclusive that it was an industrial civilization that this would

0:46:28.719 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 1>be things like you know, the carbon stuff. Meanwhile, the

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:36.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff that would be really strong evidence of an intelligent

0:46:36.080 --> 0:46:40.879
<v Speaker 1>civilization origin, that stuff that civilizations might not do. It's

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>more contingent things like plastics, and stuff. You know, you

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:47.200
<v Speaker 1>could have a civilization without plastics. That's not a necessary

0:46:47.520 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 1>milestone in the in the progress of energy harnessing. And

0:46:51.480 --> 0:46:53.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's even the sort of thing. Uh an advance

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:56.400
<v Speaker 1>civilization would move away from coming back to that the

0:46:56.440 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>sustainability paradox, when one could hope, I imagine. Now the

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 1>authors again, they're very clear about just how far you

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:08.919
<v Speaker 1>should take this hypothesis, stating that quote, the Silurian hypothesis

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 1>cannot be regarded as likely merely because no other valid

0:47:13.080 --> 0:47:17.279
<v Speaker 1>idea presents itself. Uh So they admit that this this

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:18.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing could easily get out of hand with

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 1>folks pointing to any sort of signal in the geochemical

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:25.759
<v Speaker 1>record as being possible proof of pre human technological societies.

0:47:26.239 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 1>If you're doing that, you're really taking it and running

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:31.799
<v Speaker 1>with it in the wrong direction. Yeah, I guess that's

0:47:31.800 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the frustrating things about about interesting work of

0:47:35.160 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 1>this kind is so you can point out a lot

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of the ways that it's difficult to rule out past civilizations.

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:44.800
<v Speaker 1>But then for a lot of people who just want

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to have a theory that changes everything, you know, for

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:50.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot it's just like it's fun to believe that.

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of people just want to believe it.

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to believe, you know, that there was an

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Atlantis mother civilization that birthed everything, or I want to

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:01.719
<v Speaker 1>believe that there were alien on Earth before humans or

0:48:01.760 --> 0:48:04.600
<v Speaker 1>anything like that, because that would change everything, and it

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 1>feels so cool to believe it. Therefore becomes your default belief.

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And so thus a paper that says, well, it's more

0:48:12.160 --> 0:48:14.799
<v Speaker 1>difficult to rule out that kind of thing than you

0:48:14.880 --> 0:48:19.400
<v Speaker 1>might think. Uh, some people can erroneously conclude that that

0:48:19.480 --> 0:48:21.799
<v Speaker 1>is in fact evidence for the thing they want to

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>believe because it feels cool. It's not positive evidence for it, yes, yeah, absolutely,

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 1>um yes, So so you know, they argue that that

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we need to to further research, you know, the likely

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:38.919
<v Speaker 1>signature left by our own um anthroposyne era, as well

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:43.399
<v Speaker 1>as a deeper exploration of the elemental and um compositional

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:48.160
<v Speaker 1>anomalies that we find in extant sediments. Basically, we look

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:51.280
<v Speaker 1>at past events mainly with stuff like impacts in mind,

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:55.440
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps the Silarian hypothesis needs to be at least

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on the table as well. Not because again we think

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it is, you know, actually a valid explanation for what

0:49:02.120 --> 0:49:05.719
<v Speaker 1>has happened. Um, you know, ultimately it's an outside possibility,

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:08.800
<v Speaker 1>not a conclusion we should jump to, but perhaps it

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:10.960
<v Speaker 1>should just be part of sort of the spectrum of

0:49:10.960 --> 0:49:14.840
<v Speaker 1>possibilities there. Again, not because we think it happened, but because,

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:17.279
<v Speaker 1>uh it gives us a little more of a sort

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of a robust spectrum and how to interpret these things.

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 1>And and then moving forward to you know, potentially considering

0:49:23.680 --> 0:49:26.839
<v Speaker 1>other worlds, looking at other planets like even Mars. Uh

0:49:26.880 --> 0:49:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it gives us one more tool, one more uh way

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to look at the evidence. Yeah, exactly, they're not arguing

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:37.239
<v Speaker 1>this because they think there was a civilization. It's that

0:49:37.360 --> 0:49:40.799
<v Speaker 1>we should consider these possibilities when looking at planets, even

0:49:40.800 --> 0:49:43.440
<v Speaker 1>including our own, and know what we would look for

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 1>if we wanted to consider that possibility, right, Yeah, because

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>ultimately this is not a supernatural explanation. This is ultimately,

0:49:51.400 --> 0:49:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, a natural hypothesis. But but it is admittedly

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:59.040
<v Speaker 1>an outside possibility. Now, of course we're here talking about

0:49:59.040 --> 0:50:02.040
<v Speaker 1>reasons why you shouldn't just jump to the conclusion of

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a Silurian civilization, but but there are also some arguments

0:50:06.120 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 1>against it in some of the specific events that they

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:11.880
<v Speaker 1>look at. For example, if you know, maybe the best

0:50:12.920 --> 0:50:16.520
<v Speaker 1>possibility is this interesting event in Earth history, the Paleocene

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Eocene thermal maximum. More suddenly there was there was rapid

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:23.640
<v Speaker 1>global warming and UH and these in these chemical changes

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:27.680
<v Speaker 1>like with carbon isotopes. They even put some arguments back

0:50:27.719 --> 0:50:33.000
<v Speaker 1>against considering UH civilization as a cause of this global

0:50:33.000 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 1>warming in Earth's history, because they say, look, the kind

0:50:37.200 --> 0:50:40.239
<v Speaker 1>of global warming caused by our civilization is happening in

0:50:40.280 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly rapid fashion over just a few hundred years.

0:50:45.040 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>This actually, though it's it's relatively rapid in geologic terms.

0:50:49.440 --> 0:50:53.520
<v Speaker 1>The the p et M actually happened probably over hundreds

0:50:53.520 --> 0:50:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of years, which which is incredibly slow if

0:50:58.080 --> 0:51:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you're imagining that civilization was the cause of it, right,

0:51:01.360 --> 0:51:03.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're comparing it to the model of

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:07.839
<v Speaker 1>of human industrial advancement, it's incredibly slow. So there's not

0:51:07.880 --> 0:51:09.600
<v Speaker 1>only the point that you shouldn't just jump to the

0:51:09.640 --> 0:51:13.400
<v Speaker 1>conclusion of there was a law civilization because it feels cool,

0:51:13.440 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 1>but like in the specific instances they look at, there

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:19.960
<v Speaker 1>are some reasons for thinking that's probably not true. I

0:51:19.960 --> 0:51:22.319
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I guess unless those civilizations were like just

0:51:22.440 --> 0:51:25.960
<v Speaker 1>really lazy, Yeah, I mean, you can sort of, you know,

0:51:26.000 --> 0:51:28.440
<v Speaker 1>pull out your sci fi hat and and put it

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 1>on and come up with various ideas of you know,

0:51:31.040 --> 0:51:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for why they might have been this way. Maybe they

0:51:32.719 --> 0:51:35.440
<v Speaker 1>were super long lived. Yeah, they weren't very ambitious, and

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:38.280
<v Speaker 1>they're like this, note, this is the right level of industrialization,

0:51:38.320 --> 0:51:40.479
<v Speaker 1>and we want to, uh, we need to keep going

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:44.040
<v Speaker 1>at this rate. I don't know. They didn't reproduce all

0:51:44.040 --> 0:51:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that much. I don't know. I mean that that's ultimately

0:51:47.440 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the problems with with imagining uh, you know,

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:55.239
<v Speaker 1>other life forms. It's like it's just you know, it's

0:51:55.600 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 1>you can you can make a case for any number

0:51:57.600 --> 0:52:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of things, um and and try and make it fit

0:52:01.840 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 1>your your hypothesis. And of course that's not really the

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:06.359
<v Speaker 1>way to go about it. I mean, not in from

0:52:06.360 --> 0:52:10.239
<v Speaker 1>a scientific perspective, from a sci fi dreaming creative perspective. Yeah,

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:14.920
<v Speaker 1>go for it, um though, though I guess it does

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of come down to the conundrum two at the

0:52:16.640 --> 0:52:19.239
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, like like when does when does

0:52:19.280 --> 0:52:23.440
<v Speaker 1>mere creativity and um and dream weaving become this kind

0:52:23.480 --> 0:52:26.319
<v Speaker 1>of corruption of our thought and uh and and a

0:52:26.360 --> 0:52:29.759
<v Speaker 1>pollution of our ability to understand our place in the

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:32.200
<v Speaker 1>world and are where we're going in the future and

0:52:32.200 --> 0:52:34.279
<v Speaker 1>where we were in the past. Well, you know, I

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>feel like a thread without maybe intending intending to do so.

0:52:37.760 --> 0:52:39.880
<v Speaker 1>That we've pursued A good bit on this podcast is

0:52:40.280 --> 0:52:45.280
<v Speaker 1>understanding the ideally, the difference between your sort of interest

0:52:45.360 --> 0:52:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and imagination and your epistemology. That like that an idea.

0:52:50.040 --> 0:52:53.160
<v Speaker 1>You can like an idea because it's interesting and cool,

0:52:53.719 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't necessarily mean it's true. You know that,

0:52:57.800 --> 0:53:00.920
<v Speaker 1>like that, your your epistemology is probably best to based

0:53:00.920 --> 0:53:03.880
<v Speaker 1>on evidence, and you should be skeptical of things that

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you want to believe because you like them and so forth.

0:53:07.360 --> 0:53:10.160
<v Speaker 1>But it's still totally valid to, like, say, be interested

0:53:10.200 --> 0:53:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in the bicameral mind or whatever because it's a fun idea,

0:53:13.719 --> 0:53:16.279
<v Speaker 1>even if you know, you probably accepted as you know,

0:53:16.320 --> 0:53:19.000
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of evidence for it, right right,

0:53:19.040 --> 0:53:20.680
<v Speaker 1>You can you can altomly engage in a number of

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>these ideas as as more as art than science, and

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:26.000
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly nothing wrong with that. Is when you start

0:53:26.080 --> 0:53:28.920
<v Speaker 1>arguing that your art is science, that's where you can

0:53:28.920 --> 0:53:31.920
<v Speaker 1>get into into some trouble. Um. I was reminded in

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:36.320
<v Speaker 1>all of this of Carl Sagan's approach to ancient aliens

0:53:36.440 --> 0:53:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and ancient astronauts, particularly in the book that he co

0:53:39.560 --> 0:53:44.520
<v Speaker 1>authored with Joseph Shklovsky, Intelligent Life in the Universe. Um.

0:53:45.160 --> 0:53:49.200
<v Speaker 1>In this particular book, you know, they they examine this idea.

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:51.399
<v Speaker 1>They said, Okay, here's the speculative idea, and we don't

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:53.799
<v Speaker 1>have evidence that had ever happened. But if it were

0:53:53.840 --> 0:53:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to have happened, what sorts of specific evidence might we

0:53:57.080 --> 0:54:00.000
<v Speaker 1>look for? And in this case, we're talking about science

0:54:00.040 --> 0:54:03.680
<v Speaker 1>ends that are evident in ancient religions and uh and

0:54:03.719 --> 0:54:06.399
<v Speaker 1>so forth. Uh. And I thought that was a great

0:54:06.400 --> 0:54:10.480
<v Speaker 1>treatment of that question. Uh. And against Sagan's treatment reminds

0:54:10.520 --> 0:54:13.640
<v Speaker 1>me of the treatment given in this paper by these authors.

0:54:13.880 --> 0:54:16.280
<v Speaker 1>But of course Segand had to come back and continue

0:54:16.320 --> 0:54:20.239
<v Speaker 1>to argue with the ancient alien people who were, you know,

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:22.919
<v Speaker 1>very much going off in their own director is true, ye, yeah,

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and pushing pushing art as science, and Sagan having to

0:54:26.120 --> 0:54:28.120
<v Speaker 1>remind them like, no, I love art as much as

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the next guy, but here's how we approach this from

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a scientific perspective. Well, I mean, I think the important

0:54:34.640 --> 0:54:37.239
<v Speaker 1>thing about this stuff, like Sagan's work on that or

0:54:37.440 --> 0:54:39.279
<v Speaker 1>or or the paper we're looking at here is it's

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:41.920
<v Speaker 1>good too when you're when you're exploring it like a

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:45.560
<v Speaker 1>tantalizing and juicy idea. It's a good idea to have

0:54:46.200 --> 0:54:49.920
<v Speaker 1>criteria for what would be good evidence of such a

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:54.000
<v Speaker 1>thing before you're actually looking at individual evidence in cases,

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:56.080
<v Speaker 1>because if you look at the evidence first and then

0:54:56.120 --> 0:54:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you try to come up with criteria, you're gonna have

0:54:58.520 --> 0:55:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a tendency to want to fit your criteria or whatever

0:55:01.239 --> 0:55:04.880
<v Speaker 1>evidence you've already got. The cherry picking model or what

0:55:05.000 --> 0:55:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is it the other name of the barn wall fallacy

0:55:08.680 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. Remember, the idea is like, you know,

0:55:11.560 --> 0:55:13.359
<v Speaker 1>somebody says, you know, I'm a great shot, and so

0:55:13.400 --> 0:55:15.399
<v Speaker 1>they shoot at the side of a barn, and then

0:55:15.719 --> 0:55:17.440
<v Speaker 1>they go up, they walk up to their bullet hole,

0:55:17.480 --> 0:55:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and then they draw a bulls eye perfectly around it.

0:55:20.040 --> 0:55:21.880
<v Speaker 1>That's that's a great point. That's that's a great way

0:55:21.920 --> 0:55:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of looking at it. All Right, Well, I guess we're

0:55:24.080 --> 0:55:26.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna go ahead and wrap this episode up. But we'd

0:55:26.160 --> 0:55:28.239
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from everyone out there. I love to

0:55:28.239 --> 0:55:31.960
<v Speaker 1>hear from any doctor who fans who have some additional

0:55:32.200 --> 0:55:36.520
<v Speaker 1>information they want to share about the Silurians. And various

0:55:36.520 --> 0:55:39.880
<v Speaker 1>related um species that have popped up in that show.

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:44.040
<v Speaker 1>And perhaps you have specific thoughts about about you know,

0:55:44.120 --> 0:55:47.400
<v Speaker 1>just this this basic you know view, uh, and what

0:55:47.440 --> 0:55:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it reveals about humanities uh place on Earth right now,

0:55:52.200 --> 0:55:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and what technological civilization is doing to the planet, and

0:55:57.480 --> 0:55:59.440
<v Speaker 1>just you know, ultimately, what kind of a you know,

0:55:59.480 --> 0:56:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a small lip a week signal we may be in

0:56:02.120 --> 0:56:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the future as opposed to this kind of lasting thing

0:56:05.520 --> 0:56:09.719
<v Speaker 1>that we sometimes imagine that human civilization is. I'm going

0:56:09.800 --> 0:56:13.239
<v Speaker 1>to say, I hope that I'll be optimistic, so I

0:56:13.239 --> 0:56:15.960
<v Speaker 1>hope we do stick around. I hope we attenuate the

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:19.480
<v Speaker 1>kinds of geologic signal we leave due to climate change,

0:56:19.480 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in chemical alteration of the atmosphere and all you know

0:56:22.239 --> 0:56:25.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, uh, you know, heavy metal pollutions and things,

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and that we the signal of our civilization can always

0:56:28.960 --> 0:56:32.000
<v Speaker 1>be charted against the geologic record because of the continuance

0:56:32.040 --> 0:56:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of Doctor Who Seasons. So when we're on the like,

0:56:35.320 --> 0:56:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, eventually we'll get into the exponential notation of

0:56:38.000 --> 0:56:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the Doctor who Seasons. Yeah yeah, yeah. Well, one day

0:56:42.280 --> 0:56:45.600
<v Speaker 1>some sort of ancient uh or rather some sort of

0:56:45.800 --> 0:56:48.839
<v Speaker 1>far flung future civilization will look back and say, look,

0:56:49.520 --> 0:56:52.040
<v Speaker 1>clearly they knew what they were doing. Uh, they were

0:56:52.080 --> 0:56:55.560
<v Speaker 1>able to do you know, some three million years of

0:56:55.640 --> 0:56:58.360
<v Speaker 1>doctor who though maybe at a certain point the doctor

0:56:58.440 --> 0:57:00.440
<v Speaker 1>will be a robot and the enemy, as will be

0:57:00.600 --> 0:57:04.440
<v Speaker 1>will be organics. And I don't know, Yeah, I wonder

0:57:04.800 --> 0:57:06.960
<v Speaker 1>at what point do we get a robot doctor. I mean,

0:57:07.000 --> 0:57:10.640
<v Speaker 1>they they're they've only recently really been been been mixing

0:57:10.719 --> 0:57:14.120
<v Speaker 1>up the casting on that role. All right, Well, let

0:57:14.200 --> 0:57:16.000
<v Speaker 1>us know in the meantime, if you want to listen

0:57:16.040 --> 0:57:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to other episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, we

0:57:17.760 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 1>have core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays and the Stuff

0:57:20.040 --> 0:57:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind podcast feed. On Monday's we do

0:57:23.360 --> 0:57:26.560
<v Speaker 1>listener mail, where we hear from from you, the listeners,

0:57:26.760 --> 0:57:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and we we read your various listener mails, always a

0:57:29.360 --> 0:57:32.200
<v Speaker 1>good time. On Wednesday's we do a short form artifact

0:57:32.320 --> 0:57:34.360
<v Speaker 1>or monster fact, and then on Fridays we do Weird

0:57:34.360 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 1>How Cinema. That's our time to set aside most serious

0:57:38.320 --> 0:57:41.800
<v Speaker 1>issues and just talk about a weird film. Huge thanks

0:57:41.880 --> 0:57:44.880
<v Speaker 1>as always to our excellent audio producer Seth Nipolis Johnson.

0:57:45.280 --> 0:57:46.880
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:57:46.880 --> 0:57:49.320
<v Speaker 1>with feedback on this episode or any other to suggest

0:57:49.440 --> 0:57:51.320
<v Speaker 1>topic for the future, or just to say hello. You

0:57:51.360 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 1>can email us at contact that Stuff to Blow Your

0:57:54.240 --> 0:58:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production

0:58:04.480 --> 0:58:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts for my heart Radio,

0:58:07.440 --> 0:58:10.120
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:58:10.160 --> 0:58:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.