1 00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:03,680 Speaker 1: I just can't disagree more with the idea that the 2 00:00:03,720 --> 00:00:05,800 Speaker 1: Cubs need to invest a lot of money or a 3 00:00:05,840 --> 00:00:14,920 Speaker 1: lot of years and believers it's a bad idea. Welcome 4 00:00:14,960 --> 00:00:19,400 Speaker 1: into Northside Territory, Foul Territory Networks Cubs Podcast. I'm Sahadev 5 00:00:19,440 --> 00:00:22,400 Speaker 1: Sharma with my partner Patrick Mooney, where your Cubs beat 6 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:25,759 Speaker 1: writers over at the Athletic Patrick, we are going to 7 00:00:25,840 --> 00:00:30,200 Speaker 1: do part two of a reader mail bag listener mail bag. Uh, 8 00:00:31,160 --> 00:00:34,120 Speaker 1: the listeners came in full force the other day when 9 00:00:34,159 --> 00:00:37,319 Speaker 1: we asked for questions. They have a lot of them, 10 00:00:38,200 --> 00:00:40,680 Speaker 1: and you know, it's a it's a common theme essentially 11 00:00:41,080 --> 00:00:44,960 Speaker 1: boils down to what's going wrong and how can this 12 00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:49,559 Speaker 1: team get better? Right? But thanks? Yeah, there there are 13 00:00:49,600 --> 00:00:54,880 Speaker 1: more specifics there, but uh, yeah, there's this team has 14 00:00:54,960 --> 00:00:57,160 Speaker 1: to get better and we need to We'll try and 15 00:00:57,240 --> 00:01:00,280 Speaker 1: answer how they're going to go about doing that. Patrick, 16 00:01:00,320 --> 00:01:02,920 Speaker 1: Why don't you kick it off with the first question here? 17 00:01:03,760 --> 00:01:07,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, let's go with a friend of the program, Michael 18 00:01:07,600 --> 00:01:13,480 Speaker 2: Sarami with our our guy at let Nation, friend of 19 00:01:13,520 --> 00:01:18,360 Speaker 2: Brett Given the collection of top one hundred prospects at 20 00:01:18,360 --> 00:01:23,280 Speaker 2: Triple A is a talent consolidating trade nearly a foregone 21 00:01:23,360 --> 00:01:24,800 Speaker 2: conclusion this offseason. 22 00:01:26,920 --> 00:01:29,880 Speaker 1: I mean, I think we've talked about this a lot, right, 23 00:01:29,920 --> 00:01:31,679 Speaker 1: and I think it is. But I also think it's 24 00:01:31,680 --> 00:01:33,840 Speaker 1: an important question, and I think it can't be brought 25 00:01:33,880 --> 00:01:37,160 Speaker 1: up enough because yes, I think the answer is yes. 26 00:01:37,280 --> 00:01:42,959 Speaker 1: I thought last year it made sense to trade some talent. 27 00:01:43,200 --> 00:01:49,760 Speaker 1: They did, and I keep seeing ziere Hope highlights on Twitter, 28 00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:55,040 Speaker 1: so Cubspans probably are a little stressed out about that. 29 00:01:55,080 --> 00:01:57,880 Speaker 1: But hey, Michael Bush had a great rookie season. Yeah, 30 00:01:58,560 --> 00:02:01,840 Speaker 1: so you can't freak out too much. Yes, you have 31 00:02:01,920 --> 00:02:05,600 Speaker 1: to give up talent to get talent. So even talking 32 00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:09,120 Speaker 1: about trading like zire Hope wasn't a top one hundred prospect. 33 00:02:09,160 --> 00:02:12,160 Speaker 1: He may end up being one, but he wasn't one. 34 00:02:12,639 --> 00:02:15,000 Speaker 1: There are positives from that. I think you can take 35 00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:17,560 Speaker 1: the Cubs were able to draft someone in the twelfth 36 00:02:17,639 --> 00:02:20,040 Speaker 1: round or eleventh round or whatever he was drafted and 37 00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:24,079 Speaker 1: use him to get you know, a highly prospect too 38 00:02:24,080 --> 00:02:28,040 Speaker 1: impact the team, and he's turning into a good prospect, 39 00:02:28,120 --> 00:02:31,240 Speaker 1: So who knows what that means for their talent. But 40 00:02:31,800 --> 00:02:34,480 Speaker 1: to answer that question, I don't know how you don't 41 00:02:34,639 --> 00:02:38,160 Speaker 1: make a trade. Kevin Olkountra is ready for the big leagues. 42 00:02:38,240 --> 00:02:40,519 Speaker 1: Own case, he's ready for the big league. Matt Shaw's 43 00:02:40,560 --> 00:02:43,200 Speaker 1: pretty much ready for the big leagues. Moys's Biasarius is 44 00:02:43,240 --> 00:02:46,680 Speaker 1: almost ready for the big leagues. Who am I missing? 45 00:02:46,880 --> 00:02:50,560 Speaker 1: I'm missing James. James Treantos is almost ready for the 46 00:02:50,560 --> 00:02:53,840 Speaker 1: big leagues. Kate Horton will probably be ready if he 47 00:02:53,880 --> 00:02:56,880 Speaker 1: stays healthy at some point in the middle of the season. Right, 48 00:02:57,200 --> 00:03:01,320 Speaker 1: And that's just guys, that's just as a triple A. Right, 49 00:03:01,680 --> 00:03:04,880 Speaker 1: you could Camp Smith, if Cam Smith is on the 50 00:03:04,960 --> 00:03:11,079 Speaker 1: Matt Shaw progression, he's gonna be ready there, yeah, year, yeah, yeah, 51 00:03:11,240 --> 00:03:16,000 Speaker 1: So he's he's not far off. Someone's gonna pop that 52 00:03:16,040 --> 00:03:18,760 Speaker 1: they've done a really good job of drafting. Who's a 53 00:03:19,240 --> 00:03:22,359 Speaker 1: I'm blanking on the pitchers that they have Connor Noland 54 00:03:22,480 --> 00:03:26,040 Speaker 1: and uh there's another one that's even better. Uh, both 55 00:03:26,040 --> 00:03:29,600 Speaker 1: of them got to triple A I believe. So, so 56 00:03:29,639 --> 00:03:33,840 Speaker 1: those are later round pitchers that that they that they've 57 00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:37,480 Speaker 1: developed at a certain point. I mean, and then you're 58 00:03:37,480 --> 00:03:40,240 Speaker 1: talking about guys that have reached the big leagues as well. Right, 59 00:03:41,160 --> 00:03:42,920 Speaker 1: you can talk about the pitching that they have at 60 00:03:42,920 --> 00:03:45,640 Speaker 1: the big leagues, like Wicks Ben Brown, Hayden wis Nesky, 61 00:03:46,040 --> 00:03:48,880 Speaker 1: uh and whoever else I'm not thinking of that that's 62 00:03:48,920 --> 00:03:52,760 Speaker 1: reached the big leagues, Javier assad like, Uh, those are 63 00:03:52,800 --> 00:03:57,560 Speaker 1: all young players, young under control, pre RB guys, And 64 00:03:57,760 --> 00:03:59,960 Speaker 1: I think at some point you have to look at 65 00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:02,760 Speaker 1: this team and say, where are all these guys going 66 00:04:02,800 --> 00:04:06,400 Speaker 1: to fit? Right? I don't always love that talking point, 67 00:04:06,560 --> 00:04:10,640 Speaker 1: right because like I hated that during the first rebuild 68 00:04:10,680 --> 00:04:13,360 Speaker 1: where it's like they have too many shortstops. No stop 69 00:04:13,400 --> 00:04:16,080 Speaker 1: saying stuff like that, Like you can never have too 70 00:04:16,080 --> 00:04:18,880 Speaker 1: many of those, like too much talent. It's how you 71 00:04:18,920 --> 00:04:22,560 Speaker 1: allocate it, right, Like how do you use this talent? 72 00:04:22,760 --> 00:04:25,279 Speaker 1: Is it? And the part of it is going to 73 00:04:25,320 --> 00:04:28,599 Speaker 1: be trades? And I think they have to figure out 74 00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:32,440 Speaker 1: who to target and who to move. You don't want 75 00:04:32,480 --> 00:04:34,960 Speaker 1: to give up on the guys that are going to 76 00:04:35,160 --> 00:04:40,400 Speaker 1: become stars, but you also need to move guys at 77 00:04:40,720 --> 00:04:44,880 Speaker 1: what may be perceived peak value. It's a really difficult 78 00:04:44,880 --> 00:04:49,160 Speaker 1: thing to do, I think, but it takes it takes 79 00:04:49,200 --> 00:04:54,240 Speaker 1: the right evaluation, internal evaluation. But I think I don't 80 00:04:54,279 --> 00:04:57,479 Speaker 1: know if it's a foregone conclusion, because I don't think 81 00:04:59,200 --> 00:05:01,320 Speaker 1: this front office will just make a move to make 82 00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:04,480 Speaker 1: a move type thing. But it almost feels like that, 83 00:05:05,320 --> 00:05:08,440 Speaker 1: like they're going to be aggressive right and looking for 84 00:05:08,480 --> 00:05:12,000 Speaker 1: this and and and they'll be creative in the sense 85 00:05:12,120 --> 00:05:14,720 Speaker 1: that there may be a move that we don't fully see, 86 00:05:14,800 --> 00:05:17,640 Speaker 1: like we discussed last podcast because we didn't see the 87 00:05:17,640 --> 00:05:21,920 Speaker 1: Michael Bush trade coming, But there there is. They they're 88 00:05:21,920 --> 00:05:24,880 Speaker 1: almost certainly going to move at least one of those 89 00:05:24,960 --> 00:05:26,000 Speaker 1: names that I mentioned. 90 00:05:27,680 --> 00:05:31,479 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think you're I think you're on the right 91 00:05:31,520 --> 00:05:32,159 Speaker 2: track there. 92 00:05:33,920 --> 00:05:35,960 Speaker 1: I can I can get the next question unless you 93 00:05:35,960 --> 00:05:37,720 Speaker 1: have more thoughts there, Patrick. 94 00:05:37,839 --> 00:05:39,760 Speaker 2: No, I think you just met something. It up And honestly, 95 00:05:39,880 --> 00:05:42,320 Speaker 2: I think we're going to be talking about this a 96 00:05:42,360 --> 00:05:45,640 Speaker 2: lot this winter. I think we're gonna they're gonna be oh, 97 00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:49,840 Speaker 2: James Treanto's rumor here or like three right here, and 98 00:05:50,040 --> 00:05:55,320 Speaker 2: putting together hypothetical trade scenarios. So I think I will 99 00:05:55,600 --> 00:05:58,560 Speaker 2: table that for the next round of trade rumors. 100 00:05:58,960 --> 00:05:59,200 Speaker 1: Right. 101 00:05:59,720 --> 00:05:59,840 Speaker 3: Uh. 102 00:06:00,200 --> 00:06:05,080 Speaker 1: We have a Twitter user RC seventy five Rocket wants 103 00:06:05,080 --> 00:06:10,279 Speaker 1: a crossdown trade. He's asking what trading for Garrett Crochet 104 00:06:10,360 --> 00:06:13,240 Speaker 1: makes sense. Then he's asking about the status of Ben 105 00:06:13,320 --> 00:06:17,200 Speaker 1: Brown and his help. You've got any updates there on 106 00:06:17,279 --> 00:06:22,520 Speaker 1: Ben Brown? Patrick and the possibility of Garrett Crochet coming 107 00:06:22,600 --> 00:06:24,680 Speaker 1: up north, Well, I. 108 00:06:24,600 --> 00:06:28,200 Speaker 2: Think it absolutely makes sense to trade for Garrett Crochet, 109 00:06:28,480 --> 00:06:31,279 Speaker 2: and I think there is almost a zero chance of 110 00:06:31,320 --> 00:06:35,520 Speaker 2: the White Sox trading Crochet to the north side of Chicago. 111 00:06:35,560 --> 00:06:39,839 Speaker 2: I think that is our understanding of the situation, right, 112 00:06:39,880 --> 00:06:42,120 Speaker 2: I mean, Jed and Chris gets our good friends are 113 00:06:42,200 --> 00:06:45,080 Speaker 2: essentially neighbors. You know, they may have seen each other 114 00:06:45,120 --> 00:06:48,120 Speaker 2: this morning at like school drop off or whatever. Our 115 00:06:48,200 --> 00:06:51,640 Speaker 2: buddy John Greenberg had that great ji leading it to crossdown. 116 00:06:51,720 --> 00:06:57,320 Speaker 2: So there is certainly a dialogue. But within that I 117 00:06:57,360 --> 00:07:01,440 Speaker 2: think there is like no expectation that that could actually. 118 00:07:01,120 --> 00:07:05,720 Speaker 1: Happen, right, Yeah, I would put it near zero, if 119 00:07:05,760 --> 00:07:12,000 Speaker 1: not confidently saying zero percent chance of that happening. I 120 00:07:12,040 --> 00:07:16,400 Speaker 1: also I think i'd monitor that trade though. If the 121 00:07:16,960 --> 00:07:21,240 Speaker 1: White Sox get a catching prospect, is that something? Now 122 00:07:21,320 --> 00:07:25,000 Speaker 1: they have two catching prospects, because because they have Edgar Carro, 123 00:07:25,160 --> 00:07:28,960 Speaker 1: I believe who they got in a trade with the Angels, 124 00:07:29,000 --> 00:07:31,240 Speaker 1: I want to say, is a catching prospect. And if 125 00:07:31,680 --> 00:07:34,320 Speaker 1: if they get another catching prospect, which is very possible, 126 00:07:36,360 --> 00:07:39,560 Speaker 1: would they move one of those catching prospects? And then 127 00:07:39,640 --> 00:07:42,560 Speaker 1: would that be something that they could because they need 128 00:07:42,600 --> 00:07:47,520 Speaker 1: position players, right, they need different position players. So does 129 00:07:47,560 --> 00:07:52,000 Speaker 1: a catcher like does a catcher for outfielder prospect? Catching 130 00:07:52,040 --> 00:07:57,480 Speaker 1: prospect for outfielder prospect makes sense. I'm just throwing out ideas, 131 00:07:58,120 --> 00:08:01,480 Speaker 1: and I think it's it's something that you know could 132 00:08:01,520 --> 00:08:03,840 Speaker 1: make sense. But that's that's you know, that's why you 133 00:08:03,920 --> 00:08:06,320 Speaker 1: monitor what the White Socks are doing. What like who 134 00:08:06,360 --> 00:08:08,360 Speaker 1: are they getting and what kind of talent are they getting? 135 00:08:09,000 --> 00:08:11,440 Speaker 1: And could there be a creative way for the Cubs 136 00:08:11,480 --> 00:08:15,720 Speaker 1: to kind of jump in on on that, but getting Crochet, 137 00:08:16,080 --> 00:08:19,360 Speaker 1: I don't. I don't see that. That's that's almost zero, 138 00:08:19,560 --> 00:08:20,360 Speaker 1: like I said. 139 00:08:20,680 --> 00:08:27,000 Speaker 2: And I think for me with Ben Brown, like we 140 00:08:27,080 --> 00:08:29,920 Speaker 2: got to see him throw in like a spring training game, 141 00:08:30,760 --> 00:08:33,360 Speaker 2: have him get through that. See is he going to 142 00:08:33,440 --> 00:08:38,240 Speaker 2: be like cleared to throw in real games next year? 143 00:08:38,320 --> 00:08:42,960 Speaker 2: Like this has been a weird Yeah, situation to. 144 00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:44,920 Speaker 1: Be reevaluated like right around now. 145 00:08:45,280 --> 00:08:48,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that would be a reevaluated Jet at 146 00:08:48,320 --> 00:08:51,160 Speaker 2: his end of season presser being re evaluated right now. 147 00:08:51,200 --> 00:08:55,600 Speaker 2: And obviously he hope for the news. He's super talented. 148 00:08:56,080 --> 00:08:58,480 Speaker 2: He's a really interesting guy. He's like a real student 149 00:08:59,559 --> 00:09:03,559 Speaker 2: of the game. But you know, I think you get 150 00:09:03,600 --> 00:09:08,680 Speaker 2: to a place with young pitchers where like the updates 151 00:09:08,800 --> 00:09:11,439 Speaker 2: just kind of get old, like un last year Harry 152 00:09:11,480 --> 00:09:15,840 Speaker 2: wood Mark Pryor, and like the team hasn't won the 153 00:09:15,880 --> 00:09:18,280 Speaker 2: World Series since nineteen oh eight, Like yeah, those young 154 00:09:18,280 --> 00:09:21,800 Speaker 2: pitchers at that moment, dated day, you know, regular updates. 155 00:09:21,880 --> 00:09:26,040 Speaker 2: I think with Brown, it's like, do your off season, 156 00:09:26,200 --> 00:09:28,600 Speaker 2: Let's see what happens in Masa. Let's see, like if 157 00:09:28,640 --> 00:09:33,760 Speaker 2: you're kind of ready to go again. I mean the 158 00:09:33,800 --> 00:09:36,439 Speaker 2: Cobs have already moved on from the idea of him 159 00:09:36,440 --> 00:09:39,200 Speaker 2: being part of their opening day rotation next year. I 160 00:09:39,240 --> 00:09:43,880 Speaker 2: think it's maybe you stretch him out in Iowa's depth, 161 00:09:44,080 --> 00:09:46,640 Speaker 2: maybe he comes out of the bullpen, maybe you focus 162 00:09:46,679 --> 00:09:49,880 Speaker 2: on him as a late inning reliever, but like until 163 00:09:50,760 --> 00:09:55,480 Speaker 2: like games start again. I wouldn't like put too much 164 00:09:55,520 --> 00:09:58,760 Speaker 2: weight on kind of any of these updates. And maybe 165 00:09:58,760 --> 00:10:06,040 Speaker 2: that's me just being cynical. Let me get you one 166 00:10:06,120 --> 00:10:11,200 Speaker 2: Saturday from Matt Sewell, what arm and what bat do 167 00:10:11,280 --> 00:10:15,160 Speaker 2: the Cubs absolutely need to add this off season? A 168 00:10:15,240 --> 00:10:18,400 Speaker 2: number one or two starter plon Soto would of course 169 00:10:18,440 --> 00:10:22,480 Speaker 2: be my dream, but once realistic, where can the Cubs 170 00:10:22,480 --> 00:10:25,120 Speaker 2: even add a bat? Catcher? And d H appear to 171 00:10:25,160 --> 00:10:27,040 Speaker 2: be the only current openings. 172 00:10:28,480 --> 00:10:31,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, and you're not wrong when you say where can 173 00:10:31,080 --> 00:10:33,760 Speaker 1: they add a bat? I think that is going to 174 00:10:33,760 --> 00:10:36,040 Speaker 1: be something like all of us kind of look at 175 00:10:36,080 --> 00:10:38,400 Speaker 1: and say, like where does this happen? How do they 176 00:10:39,000 --> 00:10:41,760 Speaker 1: how do they do this? So I think as far 177 00:10:41,800 --> 00:10:44,640 Speaker 1: as free agents go, like i'd look at you know, 178 00:10:44,760 --> 00:10:48,040 Speaker 1: I don't think one soda is happening. I think that's 179 00:10:48,240 --> 00:10:51,720 Speaker 1: that's no chance, Poppy, Yeah, that one's not I guess 180 00:10:51,720 --> 00:10:54,959 Speaker 1: that one's not zero percent, but it maybe a zero 181 00:10:55,040 --> 00:10:58,439 Speaker 1: point one percent. Yeah, just because we don't want to 182 00:10:58,520 --> 00:11:00,960 Speaker 1: rule out something happening and the next month or they're 183 00:11:01,000 --> 00:11:04,920 Speaker 1: just like screw it, or like ownership gets involved somehow 184 00:11:05,000 --> 00:11:07,200 Speaker 1: and says you have so much more money than we 185 00:11:07,240 --> 00:11:11,520 Speaker 1: ever expected. I mean, looking at free agents, I think 186 00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:17,400 Speaker 1: Santander from Baltimore makes sense, right, And also we have 187 00:11:17,480 --> 00:11:19,960 Speaker 1: to consider like we don't know what Cody Bellinger is 188 00:11:20,000 --> 00:11:22,640 Speaker 1: doing yet if he opts out, that just makes it 189 00:11:22,920 --> 00:11:25,320 Speaker 1: just changes a lot of things. And Santader makes a 190 00:11:25,360 --> 00:11:28,840 Speaker 1: ton of sense, right, Like then Santander is a guy 191 00:11:28,880 --> 00:11:32,000 Speaker 1: that you just say like, yes, he makes sense. Are 192 00:11:32,000 --> 00:11:34,160 Speaker 1: you willing to give up the pick? Are you willing 193 00:11:34,200 --> 00:11:37,840 Speaker 1: to pay the price that would be more. That would 194 00:11:37,840 --> 00:11:42,000 Speaker 1: be the bigger question to me than whether he's a fit. Right. 195 00:11:42,400 --> 00:11:45,079 Speaker 1: And then and then you're talking about guys like free 196 00:11:45,120 --> 00:11:49,080 Speaker 1: agent wise, it's like, Okay, what what are you trying 197 00:11:49,120 --> 00:11:52,440 Speaker 1: to do? And who are you? Like? What other trades 198 00:11:52,480 --> 00:11:55,400 Speaker 1: are you making? What what moves are you making? Is 199 00:11:55,480 --> 00:11:58,800 Speaker 1: Nico Horner still a part of this team? Right? Is 200 00:12:00,120 --> 00:12:04,240 Speaker 1: are you committed to Michael Bush playing only first base? 201 00:12:05,480 --> 00:12:07,280 Speaker 1: Those types of things? And then and then you have 202 00:12:07,320 --> 00:12:11,880 Speaker 1: to look at like, uh, is Pete Alazzo a fit 203 00:12:12,080 --> 00:12:14,840 Speaker 1: for this team? Right? Are you just going straight slug 204 00:12:15,040 --> 00:12:18,600 Speaker 1: and going going to get like this this power hitting 205 00:12:18,760 --> 00:12:22,000 Speaker 1: established guy that you know can can deliver home runs. 206 00:12:22,400 --> 00:12:25,800 Speaker 1: I don't know if those those things make perfect sense. 207 00:12:26,520 --> 00:12:29,760 Speaker 1: And and pre agent wise, I think pre agent wise 208 00:12:29,800 --> 00:12:32,480 Speaker 1: pitching makes more sense. I don't think carbon Burns is 209 00:12:32,480 --> 00:12:37,760 Speaker 1: happening again, like maybe, but it's like there's so many 210 00:12:37,800 --> 00:12:42,240 Speaker 1: reasons why I'll Scott Boris's client number one, right, going 211 00:12:42,280 --> 00:12:45,880 Speaker 1: to be looking for like maybe not a record deal, 212 00:12:46,120 --> 00:12:49,920 Speaker 1: but something just below the Garrett Cole uh and and. 213 00:12:50,240 --> 00:12:52,960 Speaker 2: Like strasburg Ish. 214 00:12:52,320 --> 00:12:58,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, he's thirty, he's his strikeout rate is going down. 215 00:12:59,000 --> 00:13:02,720 Speaker 1: These are just trends that this type of front office 216 00:13:02,840 --> 00:13:06,280 Speaker 1: I don't think looks at and says, yep, that's that's 217 00:13:06,440 --> 00:13:11,439 Speaker 1: worth that type of investment. But Max Freed may be 218 00:13:11,559 --> 00:13:15,960 Speaker 1: worth the risk. Uh, someone like Nathan Evaldi, an older 219 00:13:16,040 --> 00:13:18,920 Speaker 1: guy who you can get it a shorter deal, who 220 00:13:18,960 --> 00:13:23,040 Speaker 1: is consistent and uh you know like I and has 221 00:13:23,280 --> 00:13:26,080 Speaker 1: done it in the postseason. Like those are some those 222 00:13:26,080 --> 00:13:27,840 Speaker 1: are some names off the top of my head, like 223 00:13:27,920 --> 00:13:30,480 Speaker 1: Blake's Now, I don't see it. He's going to be 224 00:13:30,520 --> 00:13:31,640 Speaker 1: getting a pretty big deal. 225 00:13:32,280 --> 00:13:37,440 Speaker 4: Uh like maybe, but yeah, I do, I don't see that. 226 00:13:37,920 --> 00:13:40,840 Speaker 4: Sean and Iya just said is in the middle of 227 00:13:40,880 --> 00:13:46,240 Speaker 4: a pretty monster season and a pretty good postseason. Like 228 00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:50,400 Speaker 4: but like the so what did David Stearns do there? 229 00:13:50,480 --> 00:13:52,600 Speaker 4: He went and got someone that was under value, made 230 00:13:52,640 --> 00:14:00,079 Speaker 4: him a starter again and and and right right, So 231 00:14:00,360 --> 00:14:02,560 Speaker 4: I think they'll be looking for that type of thing 232 00:14:02,800 --> 00:14:05,199 Speaker 4: or just like it, like I said, like if all makes. 233 00:14:05,040 --> 00:14:08,280 Speaker 1: Sense to me, where it's like he's not gonna cost 234 00:14:08,280 --> 00:14:10,559 Speaker 1: a ton because he's thirty five ish. 235 00:14:11,080 --> 00:14:11,280 Speaker 2: Uh. 236 00:14:11,320 --> 00:14:13,240 Speaker 1: And then and then you look at trades for bats 237 00:14:13,280 --> 00:14:15,760 Speaker 1: when I when I think of bats, I like think 238 00:14:15,800 --> 00:14:21,760 Speaker 1: of like just yeah, Is Brent Rooker gonna cost a lot? Probably? Sure, 239 00:14:22,400 --> 00:14:26,040 Speaker 1: but he looks pretty good when he played at Wrigley 240 00:14:26,080 --> 00:14:29,840 Speaker 1: the last month, right, And uh, you've got to check in. 241 00:14:30,160 --> 00:14:33,440 Speaker 1: Just just ask about guys like are the Astors gonna 242 00:14:33,440 --> 00:14:35,960 Speaker 1: trade Kyle Tucker or are they gonna pay? Like are 243 00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:38,480 Speaker 1: they gonna pay Alex Bregman and trade Kyle Tucker? They're 244 00:14:38,480 --> 00:14:41,560 Speaker 1: gonna let Bregman walk and pay Kyle Tucker? Are they 245 00:14:41,560 --> 00:14:44,200 Speaker 1: gonna pay them both? I don't know, Uh, but you 246 00:14:44,240 --> 00:14:47,400 Speaker 1: gotta ask, You gotta check. You got to ask about 247 00:14:47,800 --> 00:14:52,320 Speaker 1: Vlad and likely get rebuffed very quickly. Right, and then 248 00:14:52,440 --> 00:14:55,120 Speaker 1: there's going there's probably gonna be some name that I'm 249 00:14:55,200 --> 00:14:57,880 Speaker 1: none of us are considering right now. That's a good 250 00:14:57,920 --> 00:15:01,480 Speaker 1: bat that hits the trade market. So I think all 251 00:15:01,520 --> 00:15:04,000 Speaker 1: those things you have to consider and just be open minded. 252 00:15:04,280 --> 00:15:06,400 Speaker 1: I think a bat may may have to come by 253 00:15:06,440 --> 00:15:09,520 Speaker 1: a trade, Like I just have a feeling like it 254 00:15:09,840 --> 00:15:11,760 Speaker 1: that that would be the route to get the bat. 255 00:15:11,880 --> 00:15:15,760 Speaker 1: I just don't know, Like I probably didn't name the 256 00:15:15,800 --> 00:15:18,240 Speaker 1: bat that they're going to go trades for, you know 257 00:15:18,280 --> 00:15:22,440 Speaker 1: what I mean? All Right, let's what's the next question here? 258 00:15:23,720 --> 00:15:29,480 Speaker 1: This Tiger's TS nine has two questions. Jed seems to 259 00:15:29,520 --> 00:15:33,920 Speaker 1: have organizational blind spots regarding bullpen assembly, signing five war 260 00:15:33,960 --> 00:15:38,880 Speaker 1: players are giving two year contracts to players Mancini and Barnhardt, 261 00:15:39,000 --> 00:15:42,000 Speaker 1: Will counsel challenge him to take more risks in free 262 00:15:42,080 --> 00:15:44,440 Speaker 1: agency as befitting a team with a two hundred and 263 00:15:44,440 --> 00:15:48,840 Speaker 1: forty million dollar payroll. It's admiral to be able to 264 00:15:48,920 --> 00:15:52,760 Speaker 1: fix a bullpen in season. However, undeniably there is a 265 00:15:52,760 --> 00:15:57,080 Speaker 1: connection between the offensive swoon and the bullpen struggles prior 266 00:15:57,200 --> 00:16:02,040 Speaker 1: to and during the same time. I'm losing track of 267 00:16:02,120 --> 00:16:05,160 Speaker 1: what the flow of that question. What does Jed need 268 00:16:05,200 --> 00:16:07,000 Speaker 1: to do to ensure this doesn't happen again for a 269 00:16:07,040 --> 00:16:09,360 Speaker 1: third season a row. I think he's saying, like, two 270 00:16:09,360 --> 00:16:12,440 Speaker 1: seasons in a row, oftense kind of disappeared and the 271 00:16:12,440 --> 00:16:15,360 Speaker 1: bullpen struggled. It did both times that did kind of 272 00:16:15,840 --> 00:16:18,880 Speaker 1: come together with the bullpen. The offense didn't really disappear 273 00:16:18,960 --> 00:16:23,360 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty three, in my opinion, it was pretty 274 00:16:23,400 --> 00:16:26,240 Speaker 1: solid all throughout the season in twenty twenty three, but 275 00:16:26,360 --> 00:16:31,640 Speaker 1: the bullpen certainly took a while to kind of coalesce there. 276 00:16:33,600 --> 00:16:37,160 Speaker 1: I have thoughts on bullpen. Patrick could go ahead and 277 00:16:38,240 --> 00:16:39,160 Speaker 1: share your thoughts. 278 00:16:39,520 --> 00:16:41,680 Speaker 2: Well, yeah, I'll leave some of the bullpens. I would 279 00:16:41,680 --> 00:16:46,000 Speaker 2: just say kind of picking apart this question, which had 280 00:16:46,000 --> 00:16:48,760 Speaker 2: a lot of good ideas within it, Like I don't 281 00:16:48,760 --> 00:16:50,880 Speaker 2: know if the bullpen is a blind spot for Jet 282 00:16:50,920 --> 00:16:53,800 Speaker 2: as much as he's fully aware of like kind of 283 00:16:53,840 --> 00:16:56,240 Speaker 2: how he's gone about this and doesn't really seem all 284 00:16:56,280 --> 00:17:02,280 Speaker 2: that inclined to change it. The man's any Barnhart types. 285 00:17:02,840 --> 00:17:06,280 Speaker 2: I will kind of quote you sa how to of like, look, 286 00:17:06,359 --> 00:17:10,120 Speaker 2: every team has stuff like that. You're kind of going 287 00:17:10,160 --> 00:17:13,480 Speaker 2: for role players, it has those did not work out. 288 00:17:14,520 --> 00:17:16,679 Speaker 2: I do think it'll be issering to see like, Okay, 289 00:17:16,680 --> 00:17:20,800 Speaker 2: now they have like triple A depth, like don't sign 290 00:17:20,880 --> 00:17:24,440 Speaker 2: those guys or be good at signing those guys. I mean, 291 00:17:25,240 --> 00:17:31,280 Speaker 2: you know, we probably shouldn't overthink the catching situation or 292 00:17:31,359 --> 00:17:34,679 Speaker 2: like place too much of an emphasis on that, Like 293 00:17:34,720 --> 00:17:37,560 Speaker 2: if you think biostereos can help and you don't want 294 00:17:37,600 --> 00:17:41,720 Speaker 2: to get stuck with kind of a bigger Barnhart deal 295 00:17:41,800 --> 00:17:44,239 Speaker 2: right where it's like a guy you know, that one 296 00:17:44,320 --> 00:17:46,960 Speaker 2: to one gold glove and you know, has this great 297 00:17:47,080 --> 00:17:49,920 Speaker 2: reputation but like does not hit and does not get 298 00:17:49,960 --> 00:17:53,639 Speaker 2: off to a good start. I think that's where some 299 00:17:53,680 --> 00:17:58,199 Speaker 2: of this stuff can spiral. I think Council has already 300 00:17:58,280 --> 00:18:03,600 Speaker 2: challenged the Cups to take more risks with that kind 301 00:18:03,600 --> 00:18:07,119 Speaker 2: of great moment in the Wrigley interview room of just 302 00:18:07,160 --> 00:18:10,040 Speaker 2: saying there's a big gap with Brewers. We should be 303 00:18:10,080 --> 00:18:12,320 Speaker 2: trying to build a ninety win teams around here. So 304 00:18:12,359 --> 00:18:17,760 Speaker 2: I would expect that to continue to happen throughout the 305 00:18:17,840 --> 00:18:21,239 Speaker 2: off season. And then yes, i'd leave it to you 306 00:18:21,280 --> 00:18:25,520 Speaker 2: to kind of explain the bullpen strategy that I don't 307 00:18:25,520 --> 00:18:29,520 Speaker 2: think is really evolving all that much, although watching like 308 00:18:30,320 --> 00:18:32,720 Speaker 2: play homes during the playoffs, I'm like, yeah, that's the 309 00:18:32,760 --> 00:18:36,320 Speaker 2: guy they should probably sign and get outside of their 310 00:18:36,840 --> 00:18:39,199 Speaker 2: whatever the IVY system tells them to do. Of like, 311 00:18:39,880 --> 00:18:42,919 Speaker 2: maybe he's not necessarily a closer in New York for 312 00:18:43,720 --> 00:18:45,560 Speaker 2: you know, from April first all the way to the 313 00:18:45,600 --> 00:18:48,679 Speaker 2: end of October, but he'd be a really nice piece 314 00:18:49,400 --> 00:18:52,280 Speaker 2: in that Wrigley bullpen for a long time. 315 00:18:52,760 --> 00:18:55,399 Speaker 1: Honestly, I'd like play Holmes was on my radar before 316 00:18:55,480 --> 00:18:57,919 Speaker 1: he looked good in the playoffs, because he's exactly the 317 00:18:57,960 --> 00:19:00,320 Speaker 1: type of guy that like it's like you want him 318 00:19:00,320 --> 00:19:03,119 Speaker 1: to It's almost bad that he's having a good playoffs 319 00:19:03,119 --> 00:19:04,159 Speaker 1: for the Cubs. 320 00:19:04,080 --> 00:19:09,280 Speaker 3: Because he yeah, yeah, it's like he's going to get 321 00:19:09,320 --> 00:19:13,680 Speaker 3: too expensive now, but he's He's exactly the type of 322 00:19:13,720 --> 00:19:15,840 Speaker 3: guy you should pursue someone that like had. 323 00:19:15,720 --> 00:19:20,000 Speaker 1: A quote unquote down season, but like his peripherals are great, 324 00:19:20,119 --> 00:19:23,080 Speaker 1: his stuff is great. Like that's exactly and and Tommy 325 00:19:23,160 --> 00:19:27,040 Speaker 1: probably has some idea like just slightly tweaked something about 326 00:19:27,400 --> 00:19:29,399 Speaker 1: where he stands on the mound or something about his 327 00:19:29,480 --> 00:19:32,720 Speaker 1: delivery or his pitch usage. And he has a great 328 00:19:32,760 --> 00:19:36,000 Speaker 1: track record with that. Like it, Like Tommy Outaby has 329 00:19:36,000 --> 00:19:38,919 Speaker 1: a really good track record with that. I just can't 330 00:19:39,040 --> 00:19:42,560 Speaker 1: disagree more with the idea that the Cubs need to 331 00:19:42,640 --> 00:19:44,600 Speaker 1: invest a lot of money or a lot of years 332 00:19:44,600 --> 00:19:47,679 Speaker 1: in relievers. It's a bad idea. I'm looking at the 333 00:19:47,720 --> 00:19:51,840 Speaker 1: top bullpens by e RA this season. None of them 334 00:19:51,880 --> 00:19:55,680 Speaker 1: spend big money outside of Atlanta on their relievers. Houston 335 00:19:55,760 --> 00:19:59,080 Speaker 1: spend big money on Josh Hater. They had a lot 336 00:19:59,080 --> 00:20:01,640 Speaker 1: of issues over course of the season with their bullpen 337 00:20:01,720 --> 00:20:07,399 Speaker 1: though Cleveland awesome bullpen, don't pay anybody, Milwaukee awesome bullpen, 338 00:20:07,520 --> 00:20:11,320 Speaker 1: don't pay anybody. La Dodgers big money team, spends a 339 00:20:11,359 --> 00:20:14,120 Speaker 1: lot of money. They don't pay their relievers a ton 340 00:20:14,160 --> 00:20:18,719 Speaker 1: of money. Detroit, they traded all their like anyone that 341 00:20:18,840 --> 00:20:22,640 Speaker 1: was like, they had an awesome bullpen. Yankees don't even 342 00:20:22,720 --> 00:20:25,840 Speaker 1: pay anybody in their bullpen. Saint Louis Ryan Helsley was 343 00:20:25,920 --> 00:20:29,840 Speaker 1: locked down. They developed him Seattle. They definitely don't pay 344 00:20:29,840 --> 00:20:33,560 Speaker 1: anybody in their bullpen. Tenpa Bay Like, it's just like, 345 00:20:33,600 --> 00:20:37,360 Speaker 1: those are the top ten bullpens in baseball. They don't 346 00:20:37,560 --> 00:20:41,200 Speaker 1: pay relievers. The White Sox when they were about to compete, 347 00:20:41,440 --> 00:20:45,119 Speaker 1: they decided to pay a bunch of relievers. Their bullpens stunk, Like, 348 00:20:45,400 --> 00:20:50,320 Speaker 1: do not pay big money to relievers. If it's the 349 00:20:50,359 --> 00:20:53,119 Speaker 1: final piece, maybe go trade for them at the deadline. 350 00:20:54,240 --> 00:20:56,760 Speaker 1: Do not do it. I mean always, if you're competing, 351 00:20:56,800 --> 00:20:59,560 Speaker 1: almost always trade for them at the deadline. Right. Just 352 00:20:59,880 --> 00:21:02,720 Speaker 1: not give three, four or five year deals to relievers. 353 00:21:02,760 --> 00:21:07,919 Speaker 1: It doesn't work. It very rarely works. And they're just like, 354 00:21:08,080 --> 00:21:11,800 Speaker 1: I just don't. I don't agree with any suggestion that 355 00:21:11,800 --> 00:21:13,960 Speaker 1: that's the way you build a bullpen, because no good 356 00:21:14,000 --> 00:21:16,960 Speaker 1: team does that. Good teams don't look at all these 357 00:21:16,960 --> 00:21:19,080 Speaker 1: bullpens and then I look at the bottom of the 358 00:21:19,119 --> 00:21:22,280 Speaker 1: list and like, these guys paid relievers. 359 00:21:22,680 --> 00:21:22,760 Speaker 2: Like. 360 00:21:23,760 --> 00:21:27,159 Speaker 1: The one thing, like I will say is you know 361 00:21:27,240 --> 00:21:32,520 Speaker 1: there's there is like bullpens just aren't year to year 362 00:21:32,720 --> 00:21:36,000 Speaker 1: guaranteed to be good. Yeah, Milwaukee seems to have figured 363 00:21:36,040 --> 00:21:39,520 Speaker 1: something out in Cleveland, clearly it has. Right, So so 364 00:21:39,640 --> 00:21:41,200 Speaker 1: like you need you just need to be a good 365 00:21:42,080 --> 00:21:45,560 Speaker 1: at talent evaluation and have some your your process needs 366 00:21:45,560 --> 00:21:48,679 Speaker 1: to be really good, right. I do not think this 367 00:21:48,800 --> 00:21:51,240 Speaker 1: is about money. There are other ways that I think 368 00:21:51,280 --> 00:21:53,760 Speaker 1: the clubs should allocate their money. I do think they 369 00:21:53,800 --> 00:21:56,000 Speaker 1: should spend money. I do think they should be aggressive 370 00:21:56,240 --> 00:21:59,880 Speaker 1: in free agency. I think doing so in the bullpen 371 00:22:00,119 --> 00:22:02,960 Speaker 1: is a big mistake. I just I just think that's 372 00:22:03,080 --> 00:22:07,080 Speaker 1: not a good allocation of especially when they're not spending 373 00:22:07,119 --> 00:22:09,680 Speaker 1: two hundred and eighty million like the Dodge, like the 374 00:22:09,800 --> 00:22:12,000 Speaker 1: Yankees or Dodgers who are spending more than that, right, 375 00:22:12,080 --> 00:22:14,399 Speaker 1: or the Padres. There are any abilies, right, they're not 376 00:22:14,440 --> 00:22:17,919 Speaker 1: spending as much as those teams do not do not 377 00:22:18,040 --> 00:22:22,680 Speaker 1: do it like they need to be better at figuring 378 00:22:22,720 --> 00:22:26,120 Speaker 1: out how to get the bullpen right in April and May. Sure, 379 00:22:26,440 --> 00:22:28,720 Speaker 1: but it's not the answer to that is not spending 380 00:22:28,720 --> 00:22:32,080 Speaker 1: big money. Not my opinion. I'm happy to listen to 381 00:22:32,359 --> 00:22:37,000 Speaker 1: arguments to counter that, but I mean just looking at 382 00:22:37,000 --> 00:22:38,280 Speaker 1: the facts and the data. 383 00:22:38,880 --> 00:22:43,160 Speaker 2: Otherwise, all right, we got I'm glad you're getting this 384 00:22:43,280 --> 00:22:46,600 Speaker 2: question sided because you wrote about it extensively after the 385 00:22:46,600 --> 00:22:51,000 Speaker 2: trade Deadlians from Cubs Bucks eighty four patchers seems like 386 00:22:51,040 --> 00:22:54,639 Speaker 2: one of the easiest positions to upgrade offensively, especially from 387 00:22:54,680 --> 00:22:58,359 Speaker 2: a power standpoint. What do you think a realistic trade 388 00:22:58,400 --> 00:23:02,399 Speaker 2: looks like for cal Raley orers. 389 00:23:02,440 --> 00:23:07,639 Speaker 1: Who Okay, cal Rally is going to cost a ton. 390 00:23:09,160 --> 00:23:13,760 Speaker 1: I believe Seattle has a catching prospect. His last name 391 00:23:13,840 --> 00:23:17,919 Speaker 1: is Ford. Don't know if he's guaranteed to catch. I 392 00:23:17,960 --> 00:23:22,439 Speaker 1: don't know if he's ready to be there. This is 393 00:23:22,440 --> 00:23:27,760 Speaker 1: a team that still needs offense. I mean, maybe they're 394 00:23:27,800 --> 00:23:30,600 Speaker 1: willing to move him because they have Ford and they 395 00:23:30,680 --> 00:23:35,360 Speaker 1: take bats in other areas. Okay, and then Shaye langliers 396 00:23:36,560 --> 00:23:42,639 Speaker 1: very solid catcher offensively, I don't know much about his defense. 397 00:23:43,000 --> 00:23:48,120 Speaker 1: Uh maybe average from what I understand, Uh, he's mostly 398 00:23:48,160 --> 00:23:50,320 Speaker 1: like that's going to be just like power added to 399 00:23:50,359 --> 00:23:55,479 Speaker 1: your not like not. I Like I remember looking up 400 00:23:55,520 --> 00:23:57,359 Speaker 1: at the board when when the A's were in town 401 00:23:57,400 --> 00:23:59,480 Speaker 1: and seeing his batting average, and I was like, wait 402 00:23:59,560 --> 00:24:01,640 Speaker 1: a minute, I thought Jay Langlers was having good season. 403 00:24:01,720 --> 00:24:03,320 Speaker 1: Then I looked at the rest of the stat line 404 00:24:03,359 --> 00:24:07,560 Speaker 1: and it was like, Oh, this guy's just all power and 405 00:24:07,560 --> 00:24:11,000 Speaker 1: and he's like I want to say, you had thirty 406 00:24:11,000 --> 00:24:12,320 Speaker 1: homers or it was close to it. 407 00:24:13,160 --> 00:24:17,800 Speaker 2: So he twenty nine eighty RBIs two twenty four batting average, 408 00:24:17,840 --> 00:24:19,879 Speaker 2: seven thirty nine ops. And this is kind of the 409 00:24:19,920 --> 00:24:24,800 Speaker 2: first I would say full you know, above average off 410 00:24:25,720 --> 00:24:29,359 Speaker 2: offensive season that he's had in his two plus years 411 00:24:29,359 --> 00:24:30,160 Speaker 2: of majors. 412 00:24:30,400 --> 00:24:33,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, neither of these guys are close to free agents. 413 00:24:34,920 --> 00:24:37,399 Speaker 1: It would cost a lot. That would be the big 414 00:24:37,440 --> 00:24:40,280 Speaker 1: deal of the their offseason. They're big trade of the 415 00:24:40,320 --> 00:24:43,480 Speaker 1: off season. It would cost like maybe it would be 416 00:24:43,520 --> 00:24:47,640 Speaker 1: something where you build it around miguel A Maaya and 417 00:24:48,119 --> 00:24:52,760 Speaker 1: Kevin Olcontra and then more right like yeah, and pitching, 418 00:24:53,280 --> 00:24:55,760 Speaker 1: Like I think it would like something like that because 419 00:24:56,680 --> 00:25:00,240 Speaker 1: you'd need like you'd need to replace their catcher with 420 00:25:00,400 --> 00:25:03,760 Speaker 1: like a you know, a decent catcher, uh, and you 421 00:25:03,960 --> 00:25:07,800 Speaker 1: need to uh and you need to add more. And 422 00:25:07,880 --> 00:25:10,880 Speaker 1: it wouldn't be just one top prospect in my opinion, 423 00:25:10,960 --> 00:25:13,760 Speaker 1: like you're giving up a catcher and like cal Rally 424 00:25:13,760 --> 00:25:15,920 Speaker 1: I believe is up for a goal glove this year, 425 00:25:16,440 --> 00:25:19,440 Speaker 1: like he's impactful like that, Like I think he would 426 00:25:19,440 --> 00:25:21,000 Speaker 1: cost more than Shaye langleiars. 427 00:25:21,400 --> 00:25:21,480 Speaker 2: Uh. 428 00:25:21,640 --> 00:25:24,800 Speaker 1: The one thing about Oakland is they their their evaluation 429 00:25:24,920 --> 00:25:27,439 Speaker 1: of talent is very different than a lot of organizations 430 00:25:27,480 --> 00:25:29,920 Speaker 1: around the game. So it may you may be able 431 00:25:29,960 --> 00:25:32,199 Speaker 1: to like swing a deal where it looks like you're like, 432 00:25:32,680 --> 00:25:36,639 Speaker 1: who are those? Like those aren't their top prospects. They 433 00:25:36,960 --> 00:25:39,239 Speaker 1: do that a lot, like they're they're unique with with 434 00:25:39,320 --> 00:25:43,160 Speaker 1: how they evaluate talent. So so maybe there's something there. 435 00:25:44,119 --> 00:25:46,800 Speaker 1: Either one would cost a lot that that's the bottom line. 436 00:25:47,280 --> 00:25:49,600 Speaker 1: There was a second What was the other part of that? 437 00:25:50,240 --> 00:25:54,280 Speaker 4: Uh oh no, yeah, yeah, that's that's kind of the. 438 00:25:54,200 --> 00:25:56,920 Speaker 2: Off season, right. I mean that question really something. 439 00:25:58,520 --> 00:26:02,040 Speaker 1: From and I look at yeah, like cal Rally. I 440 00:26:02,200 --> 00:26:04,920 Speaker 1: just don't like looking at his numbers again. I think 441 00:26:04,960 --> 00:26:07,000 Speaker 1: I may have mentioned his name last podcast A couple 442 00:26:07,119 --> 00:26:10,440 Speaker 1: podcasts ago. I was just throwing out names of teams 443 00:26:10,480 --> 00:26:14,119 Speaker 1: that may be willing to listen. The more I look 444 00:26:14,160 --> 00:26:16,840 Speaker 1: at his numbers, I just don't I don't see how 445 00:26:16,840 --> 00:26:19,159 Speaker 1: you could trade a guy that's what is he twenty 446 00:26:20,200 --> 00:26:23,399 Speaker 1: six or something like that? Like I don't know that 447 00:26:23,640 --> 00:26:27,000 Speaker 1: seems crazy to me. He's twenty seven. He'll be twenty 448 00:26:27,040 --> 00:26:30,359 Speaker 1: eight in a couple months in November. All right, Yeah, 449 00:26:30,600 --> 00:26:33,000 Speaker 1: I don't see cal rally being traded, but I could 450 00:26:33,000 --> 00:26:35,200 Speaker 1: be very wrong and it would cost a lot. It 451 00:26:35,240 --> 00:26:38,119 Speaker 1: would cost a ton. All right, here's one from I 452 00:26:38,119 --> 00:26:40,560 Speaker 1: don't know if it's Ramon or Ramon, but it's spelled 453 00:26:40,640 --> 00:26:44,879 Speaker 1: Ramon on Twitter. I don't know how to really phrase 454 00:26:44,920 --> 00:26:46,520 Speaker 1: this as a question, but what is up with the 455 00:26:46,520 --> 00:26:49,719 Speaker 1: way the Cubs diagnose injuries use the il It just 456 00:26:49,760 --> 00:26:52,320 Speaker 1: seems like they could really help themselves some if they 457 00:26:52,359 --> 00:26:54,480 Speaker 1: put guys on there and let them rest a bit 458 00:26:54,640 --> 00:26:58,439 Speaker 1: instead of them trying to play through injuries. You know, 459 00:26:58,520 --> 00:27:03,560 Speaker 1: I would. I think this question is is interesting in 460 00:27:03,560 --> 00:27:05,720 Speaker 1: a sense to like, do the Cubs is that any 461 00:27:05,760 --> 00:27:08,920 Speaker 1: different than any other teams? Patrick, I think the bigger 462 00:27:09,119 --> 00:27:15,520 Speaker 1: question is, Listen, they got rid of their again, some trainers, 463 00:27:15,800 --> 00:27:18,879 Speaker 1: their strength and conditioning guys. They're resetting strength and conditioning again. 464 00:27:19,920 --> 00:27:22,560 Speaker 1: So there's something. So it's I think it's for me, 465 00:27:23,200 --> 00:27:25,320 Speaker 1: and you can correct me. You can, maybe you have 466 00:27:25,320 --> 00:27:27,280 Speaker 1: a different opinion. I think it's less about how they 467 00:27:27,400 --> 00:27:31,399 Speaker 1: handle the injuries and more about like injury prevention. What 468 00:27:31,400 --> 00:27:34,320 Speaker 1: are they to get Yeah, yeah, I think that's a 469 00:27:34,320 --> 00:27:36,760 Speaker 1: big Like. I think this type of question for me 470 00:27:36,880 --> 00:27:39,879 Speaker 1: is the fans that watch the Cubs too much not 471 00:27:40,000 --> 00:27:42,600 Speaker 1: too much, sorry, that watch the Cubs and don't really 472 00:27:42,640 --> 00:27:44,879 Speaker 1: follow other teams, because I think this happens with a 473 00:27:44,920 --> 00:27:47,440 Speaker 1: lot of teams. And you also have to understand players 474 00:27:47,480 --> 00:27:49,680 Speaker 1: have a big say I'm going on the eye out 475 00:27:49,840 --> 00:27:52,520 Speaker 1: they do not like if you this could this becomes 476 00:27:52,560 --> 00:27:54,720 Speaker 1: a players association thing. If you're just putting guys on 477 00:27:54,760 --> 00:27:56,480 Speaker 1: the eye and they're like, no, I'm fine, I want 478 00:27:56,480 --> 00:27:57,119 Speaker 1: to push through this. 479 00:27:58,680 --> 00:28:01,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, no doubt. I think where you're you're trying to 480 00:28:01,200 --> 00:28:04,000 Speaker 2: stay there. Like how just local baseball is you watch 481 00:28:04,000 --> 00:28:06,479 Speaker 2: the same team every day and it just become like 482 00:28:07,000 --> 00:28:09,320 Speaker 2: numb to it, and I think. 483 00:28:09,520 --> 00:28:12,359 Speaker 1: And listen, it's frustrating when a guy's out for four 484 00:28:12,440 --> 00:28:14,040 Speaker 1: days with the same injury and you're like, why is 485 00:28:14,080 --> 00:28:15,879 Speaker 1: any on the il? I get it, I get it. 486 00:28:15,920 --> 00:28:19,120 Speaker 2: No, No, I think I think you're right in that. Look, 487 00:28:19,160 --> 00:28:24,040 Speaker 2: some of those changes are already being made. I think 488 00:28:24,080 --> 00:28:26,560 Speaker 2: I asked counsel maybe in April or May of like, look, 489 00:28:26,560 --> 00:28:30,960 Speaker 2: I know injuries happen all the time, but like, is 490 00:28:31,040 --> 00:28:34,639 Speaker 2: the volume of injuries all at once of being the 491 00:28:34,720 --> 00:28:38,520 Speaker 2: season like cause you to you know that set off 492 00:28:38,520 --> 00:28:41,000 Speaker 2: any alarm bells And he acknowledged, like, look, we don't 493 00:28:41,040 --> 00:28:44,240 Speaker 2: have any answers right now, but of course you can't 494 00:28:44,280 --> 00:28:47,600 Speaker 2: like ignore this happening and not question about could we 495 00:28:47,680 --> 00:28:52,720 Speaker 2: have done anything differently here? I mean, I will say, 496 00:28:53,120 --> 00:28:59,280 Speaker 2: like these strength coaches trainers have just like the most 497 00:28:59,320 --> 00:29:04,080 Speaker 2: brutal hours like maybe in the game, I mean just 498 00:29:04,280 --> 00:29:08,160 Speaker 2: the just the sheer amount of stuff they have to 499 00:29:08,520 --> 00:29:10,560 Speaker 2: deal with, and that's what they sign up for. But 500 00:29:10,640 --> 00:29:14,479 Speaker 2: I think it's you know, always important to kind of 501 00:29:14,560 --> 00:29:19,640 Speaker 2: just keep that in mind. And I also think too, 502 00:29:19,760 --> 00:29:22,880 Speaker 2: like the more I've covered the game, the more kind 503 00:29:22,880 --> 00:29:27,120 Speaker 2: of talking with you Sahadev of like there's kind of 504 00:29:28,360 --> 00:29:31,400 Speaker 2: an art to this, and that's what it was explained 505 00:29:31,400 --> 00:29:34,920 Speaker 2: to me, you know a while ago, of like just 506 00:29:34,960 --> 00:29:38,920 Speaker 2: the amount of technology and data they have in the 507 00:29:38,960 --> 00:29:41,560 Speaker 2: advancements they've made in that area. We think of like 508 00:29:41,680 --> 00:29:44,480 Speaker 2: kind of doctors and science, like oh, there should be 509 00:29:44,520 --> 00:29:47,080 Speaker 2: this like hard and fast answer every time, like oh, 510 00:29:47,920 --> 00:29:50,640 Speaker 2: if X injury happens and you're on the injury list 511 00:29:50,680 --> 00:29:53,880 Speaker 2: for why amount of days? And really there's a lot 512 00:29:53,880 --> 00:29:57,600 Speaker 2: of kind of triangulating here, and I mean we talked 513 00:29:57,600 --> 00:30:01,360 Speaker 2: about Ben Brown earlier, like how council I mean literally 514 00:30:01,400 --> 00:30:04,960 Speaker 2: use the phrase opinions, like you know, seeking opinions on 515 00:30:05,040 --> 00:30:09,120 Speaker 2: this and like different ways to go about really unusual 516 00:30:10,400 --> 00:30:14,160 Speaker 2: neck injury. So I think ultimately what we'll see is 517 00:30:14,200 --> 00:30:19,200 Speaker 2: like what becomes of this high performance staff under council 518 00:30:20,000 --> 00:30:25,960 Speaker 2: and also as the Hoyer Hawkins regime sort of evolves. 519 00:30:26,240 --> 00:30:31,920 Speaker 2: And speaking of the Hoyer Hawkins administration, we'll wrap it 520 00:30:32,040 --> 00:30:37,720 Speaker 2: up here. Side of with handle is low at why 521 00:30:37,760 --> 00:30:43,360 Speaker 2: don't you huh? Great episode with Derek Old on the 522 00:30:43,400 --> 00:30:48,240 Speaker 2: Cardinals air quotes reset Yes, editorial note thanks to Derek. 523 00:30:49,080 --> 00:30:52,160 Speaker 2: Great information on what's going on Saint Louis. Back to 524 00:30:52,200 --> 00:30:56,160 Speaker 2: the questions, but Cubs fans can tell Cards fans that 525 00:30:56,560 --> 00:30:59,400 Speaker 2: air quotes this is not a rebuilt language. Shouldn't necessarily 526 00:30:59,440 --> 00:31:03,360 Speaker 2: be trusted. Are rebuilds fundamentally for boating in the current era. 527 00:31:03,960 --> 00:31:05,600 Speaker 2: Is it all tied to TV money? 528 00:31:07,400 --> 00:31:10,840 Speaker 1: So I think that's I mean, it's it's tied to TV. 529 00:31:11,000 --> 00:31:13,560 Speaker 1: Is it tied to TV money? Listen? So I think 530 00:31:13,600 --> 00:31:18,640 Speaker 1: it's interesting that yeah, yeah, it's interesting that the Cubs 531 00:31:18,640 --> 00:31:22,720 Speaker 1: are starting a new network right around that that, like 532 00:31:22,800 --> 00:31:25,960 Speaker 1: it was in the middle of a pandemic. They start 533 00:31:26,040 --> 00:31:29,280 Speaker 1: a new network, right and then the rebuild it goes 534 00:31:29,320 --> 00:31:32,360 Speaker 1: into full force a year and a half later, right 535 00:31:32,640 --> 00:31:36,200 Speaker 1: and and and that's and they didn't call it a rebuild. 536 00:31:36,800 --> 00:31:39,040 Speaker 1: Does that have to do with the TV money? Does 537 00:31:39,080 --> 00:31:42,640 Speaker 1: that have to do with fans filling up the ballpark? 538 00:31:43,040 --> 00:31:46,840 Speaker 1: I think with the Cubs maybe, but like they're they're 539 00:31:46,840 --> 00:31:50,680 Speaker 1: going to fill that ballpark up for the most part anyways, Right. 540 00:31:51,200 --> 00:31:54,000 Speaker 1: I think in Saint Louis, it's really hard to sell 541 00:31:54,320 --> 00:31:58,240 Speaker 1: the word rebuild. The fans aren't stupid. Fans weren't stupid 542 00:31:58,280 --> 00:32:02,200 Speaker 1: in Chicago. They didn't think this was a reset. Fans 543 00:32:02,200 --> 00:32:05,480 Speaker 1: aren't stupid in Saint Louis. Uh, they know what that 544 00:32:05,880 --> 00:32:09,240 Speaker 1: what it is. I think there's another factor that that 545 00:32:10,880 --> 00:32:14,520 Speaker 1: is really simple, but we don't consider that much. What 546 00:32:14,760 --> 00:32:19,160 Speaker 1: player on that team wants to hear that. The players 547 00:32:19,160 --> 00:32:21,920 Speaker 1: that are currently on the team, you don't want to 548 00:32:21,920 --> 00:32:24,840 Speaker 1: hear you guys are going to lose six, you know, 549 00:32:24,880 --> 00:32:30,760 Speaker 1: win sixty five games, don't. Yeah, Like like they don't 550 00:32:30,800 --> 00:32:32,760 Speaker 1: want to hear it's a rebuild. They don't want to 551 00:32:32,800 --> 00:32:36,760 Speaker 1: hear like you guys are here to lose, like who 552 00:32:36,960 --> 00:32:41,640 Speaker 1: like imagine like that's I think I don't know like 553 00:32:41,800 --> 00:32:46,520 Speaker 1: how THEO phrased it, but like he he did massage 554 00:32:46,560 --> 00:32:48,840 Speaker 1: it a little bit, but he probably called it a rebuild. 555 00:32:48,840 --> 00:32:52,520 Speaker 1: He called like I think he said it in like 556 00:32:52,680 --> 00:32:56,760 Speaker 1: flatly like that. But he also didn't, uh say like 557 00:32:56,840 --> 00:32:58,719 Speaker 1: these guys need to lose a bunch of games and 558 00:32:58,760 --> 00:33:01,280 Speaker 1: things like that, that expectation is to lose right now. 559 00:33:01,320 --> 00:33:03,240 Speaker 1: But I think they kind of said, like we're building 560 00:33:03,280 --> 00:33:05,360 Speaker 1: towards something. We have to do this to get to 561 00:33:05,440 --> 00:33:07,479 Speaker 1: where we want to be. And that's a lot of 562 00:33:07,480 --> 00:33:10,520 Speaker 1: what like Jed has said, Jed said before, and I'm 563 00:33:10,560 --> 00:33:13,959 Speaker 1: sure the Cardinals say you similar language, I think saying 564 00:33:14,200 --> 00:33:17,240 Speaker 1: rebuild it. Yes, is it we're boting? I think so 565 00:33:17,920 --> 00:33:21,040 Speaker 1: to a certain extent for certain teams. I think it 566 00:33:21,080 --> 00:33:24,680 Speaker 1: is in certain in certain markets, it probably isn't. Right 567 00:33:24,840 --> 00:33:28,240 Speaker 1: Like the players there and the fan base they're just 568 00:33:28,320 --> 00:33:30,600 Speaker 1: kind of know like this is what you get every 569 00:33:31,160 --> 00:33:36,800 Speaker 1: whatever X amount of years. But it's like until they 570 00:33:36,800 --> 00:33:39,280 Speaker 1: can prove that it's an actual reset where there aren't 571 00:33:39,360 --> 00:33:42,720 Speaker 1: like four or five six years of bad baseball or 572 00:33:42,760 --> 00:33:45,480 Speaker 1: below average baseball people are going to just say this 573 00:33:45,560 --> 00:33:48,040 Speaker 1: is a rebuild, and look, it was a rebuild what 574 00:33:48,120 --> 00:33:50,239 Speaker 1: the Cubs are doing. I think they're out of the 575 00:33:50,280 --> 00:33:55,200 Speaker 1: rebuild phase. But I think I don't think you and 576 00:33:55,240 --> 00:33:57,560 Speaker 1: I ever denied that. Did we ever deny that? Like 577 00:33:57,760 --> 00:33:59,640 Speaker 1: I think we just kind of like said, like, jet's 578 00:33:59,640 --> 00:34:01,280 Speaker 1: not call it that, but this is what it is. 579 00:34:01,360 --> 00:34:01,960 Speaker 1: It is what it is. 580 00:34:02,040 --> 00:34:02,160 Speaker 2: Yea. 581 00:34:02,240 --> 00:34:06,120 Speaker 1: They refused to start yeah, yeah, and like how do 582 00:34:06,160 --> 00:34:08,279 Speaker 1: you do what you did did in twenty twenty one 583 00:34:08,440 --> 00:34:12,480 Speaker 1: and not say and like it's obvious, Like yes, I think. 584 00:34:12,320 --> 00:34:18,359 Speaker 2: That's a technical error, kind of a messaging mistake. I mean, 585 00:34:18,360 --> 00:34:20,640 Speaker 2: if we're going all the way back to that point, 586 00:34:20,640 --> 00:34:23,040 Speaker 2: I think they should have. I think it was a 587 00:34:23,080 --> 00:34:26,319 Speaker 2: genius that kind of articulating some of that stuff. And 588 00:34:26,400 --> 00:34:29,040 Speaker 2: I think in that moment when Jed was like fried 589 00:34:29,120 --> 00:34:33,759 Speaker 2: after that trade deadline on a zoom like saying like 590 00:34:33,800 --> 00:34:35,719 Speaker 2: I don't know what the definition of rebuild is, I 591 00:34:35,760 --> 00:34:38,319 Speaker 2: think it was a quote like that like that that 592 00:34:38,440 --> 00:34:41,320 Speaker 2: was unnecessary. 593 00:34:41,440 --> 00:34:45,279 Speaker 1: No, I don't disagree, Like I think fans like to 594 00:34:45,320 --> 00:34:49,200 Speaker 1: hear like a very clear vision and a very like 595 00:34:49,320 --> 00:34:52,440 Speaker 1: they just want words to like that that they associate 596 00:34:52,520 --> 00:34:55,400 Speaker 1: with what's going on, and I think rebuild is is 597 00:34:55,440 --> 00:34:59,320 Speaker 1: obviously what was happening. And I do think there's something 598 00:34:59,400 --> 00:35:01,319 Speaker 1: to what I was thing about the players, like does 599 00:35:01,360 --> 00:35:04,040 Speaker 1: Frank Schrundell, Did Frank Schundell need to hear that at 600 00:35:04,080 --> 00:35:06,879 Speaker 1: the time, you know, you're part of a rebuild, You're 601 00:35:06,880 --> 00:35:09,120 Speaker 1: not going to be here that long. I don't know. 602 00:35:09,520 --> 00:35:11,480 Speaker 1: Maybe it doesn't matter. Maybe they just need to suck 603 00:35:11,520 --> 00:35:15,040 Speaker 1: it up and play baseball. You're getting the play baseball. 604 00:35:15,160 --> 00:35:19,600 Speaker 1: There you go, rebuild or not, I don't know, but yeah, 605 00:35:19,880 --> 00:35:22,120 Speaker 1: it is, it is avoided. I haven't I guess I 606 00:35:22,160 --> 00:35:25,120 Speaker 1: don't hear it as much. And you know what, it 607 00:35:25,239 --> 00:35:28,240 Speaker 1: could be partly because the league doesn't want to hear it, 608 00:35:28,400 --> 00:35:31,520 Speaker 1: Like the league doesn't really love this right like that 609 00:35:31,560 --> 00:35:36,880 Speaker 1: they've probably like heard enough questions from Gordon over the 610 00:35:36,960 --> 00:35:40,680 Speaker 1: years about how he's going to stop rebuilds. Rob Vanfrid's like, 611 00:35:40,880 --> 00:35:43,240 Speaker 1: can you just get Gordon to stop asking me questions 612 00:35:43,239 --> 00:35:44,520 Speaker 1: about rebuilding and tanking? 613 00:35:45,640 --> 00:35:49,440 Speaker 2: Well, the third wild card now too, like you know, 614 00:35:49,640 --> 00:35:52,080 Speaker 2: the idea of building a team, you know, if you're 615 00:35:52,120 --> 00:35:54,680 Speaker 2: going back to when THEO first came here of like okay, 616 00:35:55,320 --> 00:35:58,120 Speaker 2: building a team that can win ninety plus games and 617 00:35:58,160 --> 00:36:01,560 Speaker 2: avoid us, you know, not that hard to build a 618 00:36:01,600 --> 00:36:04,080 Speaker 2: team that is in that gray area of buy or 619 00:36:04,120 --> 00:36:08,080 Speaker 2: sell the trade deadline and could win eighty four games 620 00:36:08,120 --> 00:36:10,520 Speaker 2: like the Marlins and Diamondbacks of last year. 621 00:36:10,680 --> 00:36:14,719 Speaker 1: So right, absolutely, Nope, that's I mean that the third 622 00:36:14,760 --> 00:36:17,360 Speaker 1: Wildcard changes a lot too. Yeah, Like it changes the 623 00:36:18,600 --> 00:36:20,680 Speaker 1: what teams are aiming for and that's a whole other 624 00:36:20,760 --> 00:36:26,640 Speaker 1: subject like episode Yeah, yeah, exactly. Thanks so much for 625 00:36:26,680 --> 00:36:29,880 Speaker 1: the questions everyone like. You guys make our jobs easier 626 00:36:29,920 --> 00:36:32,759 Speaker 1: by having so many questions for us and making sure 627 00:36:32,800 --> 00:36:34,720 Speaker 1: we have plenty to talk about. 628 00:36:35,280 --> 00:36:35,400 Speaker 3: Uh. 629 00:36:35,760 --> 00:36:37,640 Speaker 1: Keep I mean, We're going to keep doing this in 630 00:36:37,680 --> 00:36:40,719 Speaker 1: the off season. I'm sure we will have multiple episodes 631 00:36:40,760 --> 00:36:43,399 Speaker 1: like this over the next few months to get through 632 00:36:43,400 --> 00:36:46,319 Speaker 1: the off season and make sure we're on top of 633 00:36:46,400 --> 00:36:48,719 Speaker 1: everything you guys want to know about. Make sure in 634 00:36:48,760 --> 00:36:52,120 Speaker 1: a rate review and subscribe to north Side Territory, subscribe 635 00:36:52,160 --> 00:36:55,759 Speaker 1: to the YouTube channel, and subscribe to the Athletic, where 636 00:36:55,800 --> 00:36:57,720 Speaker 1: Patrick and I will be on top of all things 637 00:36:57,760 --> 00:37:01,120 Speaker 1: Cubs this off season. Thanks so much for listening. We 638 00:37:01,239 --> 00:37:03,840 Speaker 1: appreciate all of you. Take care