WEBVTT - Tesla Under Pressure, Big Tech Bolsters S&P 500

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collide

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Live from New York.

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up. Trade tensions they ramp

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 3>higher as US and China accused one another of violating

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 3>recent agreements.

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 2>If we bring you the tech impact, that's.

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 3>As big tech stocks have actually been back in the

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 3>driver's seat, outperforming the S and P five hundred for.

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 2>Eight consecutive weeks.

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 3>But Tesla is under pressure with sales falling aggressively in

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 3>France to a three year low.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Can musks return from.

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Doge turning around for first, let's checking on these markets

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 3>which websaw on the day. We were in risk aversion

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 3>mode a little bit earlier, and now we tread backwater

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 3>to flat. Remember May was a stellar month and the

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Nazarck Cup nine percent for the S and P five hundred,

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 3>having one of its.

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Best Mays in years.

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:10.639
<v Speaker 3>But we are up just a tenth of a percent

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 3>as we try and shake off what is anxiety around

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 3>trade tensions and we get a dose of manufacturing reality.

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Is manufacturing numbers come in weak. Looking at the Golden

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Dragon Index. This is, of course the NASA Golden Dragon.

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Looking at some of the tech giants in China, that

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 3>too recovers up a tenth of a percent. Move on

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 3>to individual movers because there are some laggards out there,

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 3>and notably Tesla has been off today. More broadly, and

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 3>we are going to keep a keen eye on what's

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 3>happening with two point seven percent to the lower as

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 3>we worry about sales in France. We'll dig into that

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 3>later in the show. Byd this is the Wrong Taker.

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 3>We'll bring you what bid shares have been doing. Their

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 3>depository receiats have been basically trading flat, but here we

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 3>have it off by about two tenths of a percent.

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Was lower in Chinese trading.

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 3>That as the competition fierce competition is getting some criticism

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 3>from the government itself and government related entities. But focusing

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 3>more broadly on China, not just the EV sector, We're

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 3>going to look at what it has been happening with

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 3>the Golden Dragon index. Look, as we say, just recovering,

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 3>but after the last three days that has been having

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 3>let's call it a plummet following remarks. Now we know

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 3>of President Trump saying that Beijing is violated at trade talks.

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 3>More pain could be install course, as China issues its

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 3>own claims that the US has preached recent deal itself grimgs.

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 2>Mike Shepard joins US.

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Look, the tensative agreements of Switzerland are unwinding themselves somewhat.

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 4>Well, they really are, Cara. We are seeing this datent

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 4>that have been achieved in Geneva just a few weeks

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 4>ago rapidly fade away. On Friday, we saw President Donald

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Trump accuse Beijing of violating the spirit of that understanding

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 4>without offering too many specifics, but his trade advisor Jamison

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 4>Greer helped fill in the blanks, and the US concerns

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 4>seemed to center on what they see as Beijing's failure

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 4>to lift barriers on exports of rare earth minerals to

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 4>the US quickly enough whatever was discussed in Switzerland. On

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 4>the flip side, though, we are seeing China come back

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 4>very strong today accusing the US of violating its promises

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 4>under that agreement with some recent steps, and we saw

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 4>those with the American move to unveil new guidelines that

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 4>are coming on AI chip export controls, and that included

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 4>a warning to US allies against using Huawei's Ascend chip,

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 4>which is a challenge of course to Nvidia. The US

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 4>has also moved to restrict exports and sales of chip

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 4>design software to China, which is a big deal for

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 4>China's own AI and tech ambitions. And then finally the

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 4>icing on the cake of course, the revocation of Chinese

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 4>student visas. All of those things in China's bill of

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 4>goods against the US this morning, and this raises questions

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 4>about whether hjion Paying and Donald Trump will actually speak

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 4>by phone as Donald Trump has said he would like

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 4>to and mind.

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 3>What's so notable is that two of those moves of

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the three that you outline completely tech focused. Is it

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 3>going to be technology that remains the eye of the

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 3>storm when this attack.

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's either the eye of the storm, Caro, or

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 4>the thing that is driving the direction of the storm.

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 4>Because remember this comes on top of years of escalating

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 4>restrictions on exports to China imposed by the US and

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 4>really also twisting allies arms to take part in those

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 4>as well. Remember this is not just semiconductor exports, it's

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 4>also sales of chip making machinery to Beijing. All of

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 4>this is designed to curb China's ambitions in areas like

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 4>artificial intelligence, and this is really starting to take a

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 4>toll in a way politically between Washington and Beijing, and

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing tech emerge as this flashpoint and could be

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 4>what unravels whatever understanding may have emerged engine Even now,

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 4>there is a lot of time before the ninety day

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 4>pause expires, and the two sides still could find a

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 4>way back to the bargaining table and to maybe have

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 4>that call between the two leaders. But right now the

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 4>direction of travel is not heading in that way, at

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 4>least from what we are seeing.

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 3>Caro make Shepherd breaking it down, We thank you, and

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 3>let's stick with how markets are reacting, but more broadly,

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 3>how they should be thinking about this trade uncertainty. An

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 3>expert is Eliza Toovin, managing director at Gano Global. We

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 3>turn to your years of advising government, the CIA, and

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 3>of course, more broadly the field of enterprise. How bad

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 3>is this looking? How much we were turning to escalation now?

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 5>Hi, Caroline, great to be on with you, and I

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 5>agree with Michael Shepherd that the honeymoon.

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 2>We saw coming out of Geneva.

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 5>A few weeks ago is now shattered and we're back

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 5>in this cycle of escalation between the US and China,

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 5>and I agree with you that at the center of

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 5>this is technology. What's interesting about China's very strenuous reaction

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 5>to the US export controls on the Huawei assnship is

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 5>their propaganda apparatus has long been arguing that the US

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 5>export controls are ineffective and that China can work around them.

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 5>But I think the level of emphasis they're putting on this,

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, the volume at which they're really screaming for

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 5>these things to be removed, indicates just how effective and

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 5>how painful they are on China.

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 6>So we're going to be.

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 5>Seeing to see, watch to see how the US reacts

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 5>going forward. China is trying to press the US very

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 5>hard to make more concessions. After Geneva, the tariffs came

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 5>down significantly, but really at the heart of those tensions

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 5>were China's export control on rare earth and then the

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 5>US export controls on AI chips and related tooling.

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to.

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 3>AI chips first before we get to rares, because there's

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 3>not only the criticism coming from China but some US companies.

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 3>I just think of what Jensen Wong was telling our

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 3>own ed Ludlow last week how much basically we're forcing

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 3>China to innovate, and how he longs to be able

0:06:59.240 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 3>to access that much.

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Do you ever see that happening.

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 5>I think it's all about this scale of compute that's needed.

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 5>China can always find workarounds through smuggling, through making some

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 5>of their own chips, but it's really all about scaling,

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 5>and as you talk about on your show a lot,

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 5>really being able to make enough chips to supply the

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 5>rapidly escalating demands of compute in this age of AI

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 5>is at issue, and that's where the US still has

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 5>this very large.

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Lead just being able to scale up.

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 5>So if China is able to extract any additional concessions

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 5>from the US so that they can get more chips legally,

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 5>that's going to help them kind.

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Of shrink the gap faster.

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 5>However, if the US keeps these export controls in place

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 5>and enforces them strictly and gets allies and partners on

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 5>board on some of the tooling, some of the aspects

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 5>where countries like Japan and the Netherlands and Germany are strong,

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 5>then this gap between the US and China compute stance

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 5>to lengthen over the coming months and years.

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 3>But both sides have chips on the table here that

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 3>they can play, and play hard. I was just at

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the Reagan National Economic Forum on Friday where there was

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 3>a lot of anxiety just how confident Chinese leadership is

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 3>at the moment that they too can fight back. Liza,

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 3>what about the rare earth's signals? How much pain could

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 3>that levee on US industry itself as well?

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 5>We know that the auto manufacturers and the defense manufacturers

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 5>were they came crying to the US government before the

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 5>Geneva talks and said that these things are starting to

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 5>impose pain and in starting to impose work stoppages, and

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 5>that's something.

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 2>That it's a gray rhino.

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the US national security establishment has known about

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 5>this dependency on China for rare earth processing for years,

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 5>but they haven't come up.

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 2>With a solution at scale. But I think what was.

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 5>Interesting over the last month is that China has broken

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 5>the glass on actually using this coercive instrument. It's actually

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 5>now ratcheting up pressure it. Shei Jinping has an appetite

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 5>for leverage, and now that he knows he has this

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 5>leverage over the US you're going to see him pushing

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 5>again and again to kind of recycle this leverage and

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 5>try to extract more concessions from the US. But rather

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 5>than bending over and giving China more concessions, over the

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 5>last couple of weeks, you've seen them doubling down with

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 5>this empowered Commerce department, strengthening and broadening the export controls.

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 3>So you don't expect the US to blink in this moment.

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 3>What advice do you give to the private sect right

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 3>now as to how tough this could get for access

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 3>to RAS and indeed, in the flip side of you're

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 3>a Chinese company access to US chips.

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think that the private sector needs to remember

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 5>that this isn't just a competition about tech and trade,

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean tariffs and technolog The export controls, of course,

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 5>are incredibly important to markets, but perhaps even more important

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 5>is to watch the geopolitical tensions that are unfolding in

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 5>the Indo Pacific around Taiwan in the South China Sea.

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 5>Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, just on Saturday at the

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 5>Shangri Law Forum was warning that a Taiwan crisis could

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:25.239
<v Speaker 5>be imminent, and we know that China frequently has military

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 5>drills kind of these practice exercises around Taiwan and in

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 5>the South China Sea, and it's had the habit lately

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 5>of not announcing these in advance, so it's not giving

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 5>markets heads up that these are going to happen.

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Why does it do that.

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 5>It wants to preserve ambiguity if outside observers aren't sure

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 5>if this is just a drill or if it's something

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 5>more an actual rehearsal for something like a blockade. That's

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 5>very worrisome because it shrinks the window of warning. And

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 5>that's something that we're watching very closely at Garno Global

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 5>kind of the links between these technology export controls terrors

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 5>and the potential for some kind of supply chain disrupting

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 5>crisis around Taiwan that could prevent the chips from getting

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 5>out of Taiwan, perhaps for a couple of weeks or longer.

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's crucial to our audience, So thanks for making

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 3>that link. Visitobin of course, managing director at Garno Global.

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Great to have some time with you. Coming up, let's

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 3>talk about chips more. But Broadcomm's results this week, they're

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 3>likely to actually show ai demand is still booming. We

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 3>can talk about what's expected, how it could impact the

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 3>wider market. This is bloombag technology. Let's talk about how

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 3>the same tech giants that contributed to the S and

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 3>P five pounders decline in April, they are now driving

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 3>the recovery in US equities. Just taking video and put

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 3>a bow on a better than expected earning season for

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 3>big tech last week by delivering a strong outlook for

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 3>revenue despite US restrictions on sales of its to China.

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 2>This is as we expect.

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Earning some Braolcom this week, you see the shares are

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 3>also trading higher.

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:06.559
<v Speaker 2>Lue Meg's run.

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Bastantaker has been writing about how the Magnificent Seven in

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 3>particular have helped bounce back of our lows some phenomenal

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 3>recovery numbers.

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 7>Hey, thanks for having me. So this earning season was

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 7>a real test for big tech, especially given just how

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 7>uncertain the backdrop has become, given tariffs, given all sorts

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 7>of geopolitical tensions, given concerns about AI spending in the

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 7>ROI from AI, and I would say that broadly speaking,

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.959
<v Speaker 7>this group passed with flying colors. I'd say the notable

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 7>exception was Apple, which is dealing with a number of

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 7>its own sort of idiosyncratic issues. But the major companies

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 7>like Microsoft, Nvidia, Meta Alphabet quite strong across the board,

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 7>showing pretty positive trends.

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 6>And these are all companies.

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 7>That have allowed the market to really recover off the

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 7>low that we saw early in April.

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting that we're not back to our record highs.

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 3>We're actually inching in on them.

0:12:57.480 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 8>Ryan.

0:12:57.840 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, looking at the S and P five hundred, the

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 3>valuation story, that's starting to get a little dicey, right

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 3>when you're looking at magnificent seven names.

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so I'd say these names got pretty cheap by

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 7>a lot of metrics in the whole tear off cell

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 7>off in early April. They have come back quite dramatically,

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 7>I think in videos up something like forty five percent

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 7>or so since that low. So these are pretty remarkable

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 7>gains and it has come back in the valuation. But

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 7>I would say sort of the countering argument to this

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 7>is growth is expected to remain pretty strong for a

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 7>lot of these companies, and if you look at something

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 7>like the PEG ratio, they are all treating at fairly

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 7>modest ratios on that metric. So the valuations have come

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 7>back some but the growth that was just affirmed in

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 7>these most recent reports also pretty positive.

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 3>We're looking at the moment of how pricey perhaps they

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 3>are from a price to forward looking earnings perspective at

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 3>least Umeg's ran for Selca.

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 2>It's great to have you on as always.

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Let's get you even more of a take here and

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 3>particularly on AI demand what it means for certain companies

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 3>about to give us their numbers. Angelo Zeno's with us

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 3>VPN senior equity analyst over at CFRA Research. We think,

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 3>think about how in Nvidia helped the market recover. We

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 3>saw the numbers looking good. What about Broadcom as well?

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 3>We're still going to get AI optimism there.

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so thanks for having me, Caroline, and I think, yeah,

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 9>to your point, I think it's going to be very strong.

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 9>We're looking for top line growth of about twenty percent

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 9>here for the for the April quarter. And listen, I

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 9>think when you kind of look overall the trends that

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 9>we've seen here over the last couple couple of weeks

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 9>or you know, since Q one earning season really starting

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 9>with you know, Alphabet and Microsoft at the start of

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 9>earning season up until in video last week, the trend

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 9>on the compute side of things is I think much

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 9>stronger than anybody had anticipated, and really something that Gentsen

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 9>Wong last year, really last week really pounded the table on.

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 9>So when you kind of think about the drivers here

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 9>specifically for you know, the AI semi names here, over

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 9>the next couple of years, it really is going to

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 9>be tied to compute and the higher demand for computer

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 9>is going to drive higher capital spending plans, right, which

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 9>is what we saw Q one earning season. So we

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 9>think those trends remain intact here. For broadcams specifically, they've

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 9>got to buy a sixty forty split in semis versus software,

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 9>So the semi side will continue to drive that demand.

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 9>But software shouldn't be ignored because the profitability there and

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 9>growth continues to be very good.

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we're expecting strong things from broad Comm you too.

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Look your top semi conductive names are in Video and Broadcom, AMD, Marvell.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at how much some of those names have

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 3>already driven the S and P five hundred recovery. A

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 3>great chart from Ryan's story is that in Vidio makes

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 3>up twelve percent. Basically, the S and P five hundred

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 3>is rebound since April, but swiftly after them was Microsoft

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 3>that you named as being a winner of late broadcom

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 3>some five percent.

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 2>But is the valuation getting a little too.

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Rich now given the amount of geopolitical anxiety we're just

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 3>talking about with Eliza Tobin.

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, I think as far as the valuation

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 9>is concerned, you know, it's it's not as attractive as

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 9>it was four to six weeks ago. But I will

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 9>tell you that the valuations has just got you know,

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 9>just hit you know, basement level values. I mean, you

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 9>were talking about Nvidia at one point trading about seventeen

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 9>eighteen times on our twenty twenty six estimate.

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 10>They're now try closer.

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 9>To about twenty four to twenty five times on twenty

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 9>twenty six expectations. And I will tell you this, the

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 9>visibility again is improving here has improved of the last

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 9>couple of weeks, whether it be on the trade side

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 9>of things, improving commentary on trade, or whether it be

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 9>you know, just from the reiteration in terms of capex

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 9>spens plans for some of these hyperscalers. Now, I will say,

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 9>as far as you know what to look out for

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 9>here on the geopolitical side of things, A lot is

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 9>going There are a lot of moving parts here. Over

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 9>the next couple of weeks, obviously we want to hear

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 9>about the US China discussions. But as far as semis

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 9>are pincerned, there's a two thirty two semiconductor investigation that

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 9>is ongoing right now. We expect to get more clarity

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 9>in terms of what is what that's going to look

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 9>like as far as tariffs are concerned here over the

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 9>next two months or so. So it's waiting simo. But

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 9>our view you're going to see a permanent tariff on

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 9>the semiconductor industry when that gets unveiled. Our base case

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 9>right now is about a twenty five percent tariff.

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 3>What about the smartphone industry, because actually Apple has contributed

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 3>to the reprieve and the S and P five hundred,

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 3>it's one of your top names for hardware. But boy,

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 3>we're wondering whether it's going to get individual tariffs of

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty five percent landed on it, not to mention maybe

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Samsung gets the same though.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so you know, we're not looking for an individual

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 9>tariff on that side of things. But our view here

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 9>is they you know, they fall under the national security

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 9>umbre umbrella of the two thirty two semiconductor investigation, similar

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 9>to many other hardware names that are right now exempt from.

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 10>A lot of the tariffs.

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 9>But that said, if we're assuming something along the lines

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 9>of a twenty five percent, you know, based tariff or

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 9>two thirty two, that would imply that Apple probably has

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 9>to increase the price of its iPhone seventeen this fall.

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 9>Our view is probably along the lines of at least

0:17:56.400 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 9>fifty dollars or so. So again, we have to wait

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 9>see to see how all this stuff really plays itself

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 9>out on the geopolitical side of things, But our view

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:06.959
<v Speaker 9>is there's going to be some sort of permanent tariff

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 9>that goes into effect for the hardware companies and specifically Apple,

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 9>and Apple we think is best positioned to offset some

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 9>of those higher tariffs because of their brand recognition and

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 9>because of their pricing power.

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 3>So angelo, if an investor doesn't have the exposure they'd

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 3>like in these names, should they buy at this point?

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I think that's a good question. You know,

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:30.719
<v Speaker 9>we look at it right now in the sense that

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 9>we're looking more for a near term, you know, digestion period.

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 9>The dangerous thing with that is you just don't know

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 9>what you're going to get in a day in, day

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.199
<v Speaker 9>out basis because of the geopolitical environment right now. So

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 9>if you don't own any of these names right now,

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 9>our view is you do want to buy some of

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 9>these AI semi oriented names because they.

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 10>Are going to really drive the.

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 9>Earnings potential for the tech sector here over the next

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 9>two to three years, specifically Nvidia and Broadcom, as well

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 9>as some of the others smaller names, but Nvidia and

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 9>Broadcom would kind of be two of the top names

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 9>with the best visibility out there. And even if you

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 9>see some of these negative headwinds will whether it be

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 9>tied to the two thirty two semi conductor investigation or

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 9>something on the trade side of things. Ultimately we think

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 9>this stuff works itself out and the earnings potential is

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:18.880
<v Speaker 9>so great that you know, two to three years down

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 9>the road, these stocks should be significantly higher than where.

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 10>They are now.

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 2>We get those earnings for Broadcom.

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 3>On Thursday after the bell, Angelo Zino a busy week

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:27.479
<v Speaker 3>ahead cfr A Research.

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 2>We thank you.

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 3>Samsung well, it's nearing a wide ranging deal to invest

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 3>in Perplexity AI and put search technology from the AI

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 3>startup at the very forefront of the South Korean company's devices.

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 3>It's according to people familiar, the two companies are already

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 3>in talks to pre load Perplexities app and Assistant on

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 3>upcoming Samsung devices who like Seth Figeman joins us for

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 3>more on the story, and we knew that they struck

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 3>the still with Motorola Samsung ongoing conversation. How deeply into

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 3>twine will they become?

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think this is even more expensive than Mogo Motorola.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 11>It's about them being preloaded on devices, which matters a lot,

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.719
<v Speaker 11>But with Samsung, it's also integrating into its assystem, product,

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 11>into its browser, and of course just preloading on Samsung devices. Generally,

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 11>if you're Google right now, I think if they're setting

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 11>up a little bit straighter right now, there's a big

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 11>difference between being preloaded and the default service, which is

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 11>what Google has paid for for years and quite expensively.

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 11>But this is a step in that direction, and given

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 11>the anti trust scrutiny on Google, I would be a

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 11>little bit concerned.

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, of course that anti trust discussion of what

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 3>ultimately might be the policies they have to enact to

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 3>appease the judge.

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean that wrapped up on Friday.

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Analysts are deeply concerned about what all of this means

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 3>for alphabet How much does this also depend on Perplexity

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 3>getting some money from Samsung.

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think that's part of the broader tie up here.

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 11>So we have previously reported that Perplexity is close to

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 11>raising about five hundred million dollars like a fourteen billion

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 11>dollar valuation. Samsung could be one of the larger investors

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 11>in that deal, and that strikes as part of a

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 11>much larger tie up between these two companies.

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 3>How does that fourteen billion dollars stack up? Because like

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 3>we've become some numb to these.

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Figures because it's the enormous over to open hahard.

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 11>It's one of the largest AI players out there right now,

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 11>but it's still this is a really competitive environment. Not

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 11>only are they going up against Google, but going up

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 11>against open ai and others who are moving into real

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 11>time search but being more deeply intrigated into devices than

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 11>millions of people use. That is a really big leg

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 11>up in that race.

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 3>And people who loved Perplexity in many ways it is

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 3>one of the first that offered you where the information

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 3>was coming from but they've had their own copyright issues.

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 6>As well, Right, that's true.

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 11>I think Perplexity's main thing that was that they have

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 11>great design. You know, it's not so much that they

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 11>built a better model than Opennie are Google, but they

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 11>figure out how to package it in a really compelling way.

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 11>That seems to be drawing fans not just from consumers

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 11>but from the hardware companies.

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 2>How soon could this all be announced?

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 11>As soon as this year for devices?

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 6>Maybe into next year?

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we'll keep an eye out for the unfolding events.

0:21:50.080 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Seth Nigaman, We appreciate it. Welcome back to BlueBag Technology

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 3>and Karen Hydeer New York. A quick check on these markets,

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 3>because boy May was Estella month for the NASTAG.

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 2>Today we bounce off of our lows, but the anxiety remains.

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 2>What about the pulling back from.

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 3>China and the US in terms of those tentative agreements

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 3>made in Switzerland, The progress seems to be on the line.

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Many are worrying about that at the moment. Dig into

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 3>some of the names. I want to shine light on

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 3>one Chinese EV player. Of course, we've got to keep

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 3>an iron byd It's depository receipts doing better than they

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 3>did trade in Hong Kong at least, but under pressure

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.719
<v Speaker 3>is indeed, the Chinese government tries to hint at byd

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 3>that you're competing too hard in our country, you're racing

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 3>to the border in bottom in terms of price, or

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 3>to boost your numbers.

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Will they pull back a little bit from that?

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 3>But Tesla of by three percent, this is the numbers

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 3>are woeful for sales in May. In France they're done

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 3>sixty seven percent, just seven hundred and twenty.

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 2>One cars in the whole of France.

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.479
<v Speaker 3>All of this comes though, as Elon Musk officially departs

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 3>the White House after running those over there, at least

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 3>as many would say he was running it where Bush Securities,

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 3>managing direct to Dan I is writing this weekend that

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 3>this is quote music to the ears of Tesla shareholders.

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 3>With a crucial few months ahead, Dan Eyes joins us now,

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 3>and boy, those French numbers really show what the crucial

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 3>few months mean.

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Can Elon steer this the other way?

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 10>Okay?

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 8>I mean, obviously the leader's back, right, I mean, Musk

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 8>is Tesla Tesla's Musk. But I believe it's really about

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 8>autonomous and I think as we go into Austin in June,

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 8>you go into the robotics future, that's going to be

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 8>keep part of the value of Tesla's how we get

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 8>to a two.

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 10>Trillion dollar valuation. But and you'll quit Europe.

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 8>You look at us Juku at China and I think

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:41.719
<v Speaker 8>Musk is going to start to turn that around.

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 10>And I think that's where investors are starting to factor

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 10>in you.

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 8>And I'm gonna say, what's happened next month or two,

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 8>But a rebound second half of the year.

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so stomach for the near term. These probably remaining

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 3>poor numbers. The new refreshed model. Why isn't cutting it?

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 3>It seems it is more the political backlash. But you say,

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 3>ultimately the technology is going to outweigh a brand issue

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 3>that they've had.

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, look me, and you've talked about it before.

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 8>I believe ninety percent of the future value is autonomous

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:15.479
<v Speaker 8>and robotics. BI look in terms of margins delivery growth,

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 8>that's obviously very important to near turn numbers, but I

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 8>do believe streets factoring, and you start to see a

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 8>rebound second half of the year, you ever recommitted mass.

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 10>Queerly and I think when you look to the future, I.

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 8>Mean this long with Nvidio, I believe the most disruptive

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 8>technology companies in the world. And then who's driving the

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 8>software piece of course it's pound tier.

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 3>But why is Tesla clearly going to be such a

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 3>leadership in autonomous when Weimo is already busy doing it

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 3>And there is a different difference in the technology here

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 3>with Weimo going all in on lidar and a very

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 3>different tactic coming from elon Musk and Tesla.

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, look, Willim will clearly head start. I think Wimo

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 10>they're going to be at the.

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 8>Kids table relatively Cassela in the com years because of

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 8>the scale and scope.

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 10>Waymos in four cities, two hundred thirty thousand hour cars.

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 8>Like in other words, when I work out over the

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 8>coming years, I think you, look, this is going to

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 8>be dominated by Tesla in terms of cyber cabs.

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 10>It all starts.

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 8>Obviously in the next few weeks in Austin, but no

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 8>one will match the global scale and scope of Musk

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 8>and Tesla.

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 3>So what milestones in Austin, for example, do they need

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 3>to meet? Ed Ludlow with that great reporting out last

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 3>week that June twelfth is going to be the date

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:34.360
<v Speaker 3>we're anticipating for it to already make actionable what they've

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:37.239
<v Speaker 3>been trialing on the roads thus far. What do they

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 3>need to meet, how do they need to show off

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 3>in the technology to work?

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 8>Look the interventions, right, I mean, just showing that this

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 8>is something that is ready for prime time, because this

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 8>is just the beginning of ultimately going to be fifteen

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 8>to twenty twenty five cities over the next year. And

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 8>I think this is just really kind of way in

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 8>the ground from technology perspective, showing where a Tesla is

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 8>going to get to them when I believe, look, Weimo

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 8>is going to be successful and that's going to be

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 8>a key sort of player. But in terms of the

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 8>global vision, who's really going to dominate? I believe it's

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 8>Tesla and autonomous.

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 2>And is it a cybercab that dominates?

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Is it the fact that the Tesla's are already out

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.120
<v Speaker 3>on the road and they become the autonomous vehicles they

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 3>are the ones that we don't use ourselves but lend

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 3>out to the ecosystem.

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 10>Well, yeah, I mean it's first of all, it's data driven.

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 10>I mean, by next sure you have ten.

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 8>Million vehicles, you know, in terms of teslas that have

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 8>been sold data driven, and but I do believe cybercabs

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 8>when you think about the autonomous piece, that's going to

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 8>be so important.

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 10>But then also it's about FSD.

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 8>I mean FSD penetration could go from fifteen percent to

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 8>fifty percent. Think about the margin, the software, the uplift

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 8>that that's going to lead to test and that's why

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 8>I believe they are going into their biggest chapter of growth.

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 10>And that's why also it's just.

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 8>So important that must laser focus on Tesla on those

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 8>days in Trump White House hour rearview mirror.

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 3>And you think he will be laser focused on Tesla

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 3>because he's also saying I've got to be laser focused

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 3>on X. He's also remaining very committed and focused on

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX as well, and not to mention the XAI getting

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 3>woven into X at the moment.

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 8>Look, it's all part of it, obviously, the broader mask ecosystem,

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 8>but the hearts and lungs, the golden goose continues to

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 8>be Tesla, and I think must recognize is now is

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 8>the time, especially given autonomous and robiotics without actually with optimists.

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 3>Tell us the two trillion dollar valuation and how you

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 3>actually got there.

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 2>From a number's perspective.

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 8>Look when I look at when I look at autonomous

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 8>and you start to model out what could maybe twenty

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 8>percent of vehicles being autonomous, you're essentially looking three four

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 8>hours of earnings eventually is going to be thirteen to

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 8>fifteen hours earnings. So the whole math of the Tesla

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 8>valuation is going to drastically change.

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 10>And that's all about, like I believe, from an AI.

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 8>Perspective, one of probably the most undervalued pure players in

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 8>the market is Tesla.

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 10>Now, of course Nvidia, poun Teer.

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 8>You know how the hyperscalers, Microsoft and others continue to

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 8>front and center.

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 10>But you know, Tesla more and more is going to

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 10>prove that when you especially in.

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 8>The physical AI play in terms of our time as robotics,

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 8>they're gonna be front and center.

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:23.880
<v Speaker 3>At the moment, it's a one trillion dollar market capitalization,

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 3>How quickly does this two trillion become a reality?

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 10>I think next twelve to eighteen months, and I look

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 10>and I think.

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 2>That's going to double in that amount of time.

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 8>That's our view, and I think it could be conservative

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 8>relative to as is all plays out, because I think

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 8>again again, Musk and Tesla underestimated. Next week you're buying

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 8>you know called you know, wait next week and when

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 8>this actually the vision starts, it's going.

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 10>To kick off. I think it's the golden age at Tesla.

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 3>You are the highest price target five hundred, few bone

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 3>securities below you four seventy, but the price targets go

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 3>all all the way down to just I mean JP

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Morgan on one hundred and fifteen. So from what is

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 3>it that others aren't getting here? Is it just the

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 3>scale of the ambition, is it the execution? What is

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 3>it when you're sitting around the table with other analysts

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 3>and they're like no, Dan, and you're like no.

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 10>Yes, well yeah, I mean to that point.

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 8>I mean if you go back over the last five, seven,

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 8>eight years and the Neva underestimated tassa musk every time, right,

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 8>So I mean many thought that the chance of them

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 8>actually coming out with an EV was unrealistic, the chance

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 8>of them scaling to over a million vehicles, so we're

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 8>just again again. I think they continue to view this

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 8>as an automobile company. It's a disruptive technology player, one

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 8>of the best in the world along with Nvidian.

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 10>Of course, Pound.

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Tier Therefore we're looking forward to the global story here.

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Does this have to be executed in the US?

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 3>What about over in China at the moment where we're

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 3>just seeing the level of price competition and indeed the

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 3>commitment that we're starting see from BYD also into autonomous.

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 10>Look, China is a key market.

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 8>I mean, you're over forty percent of deliveries that come

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 8>out of trying to keep up from a supply perspective.

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 10>But it's also why too, It's it's.

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 8>Important more and more must that he distanced himself in

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 8>terms of from Trump White House. Now start to play

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 8>that ten percent politician ninety percent CEO.

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 10>You know what we see from Apple China is.

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 8>Key and I think we're going to continue to see

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 8>now rebound China and Autonomous Test is going to be

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 8>a major player in that market along with BYD and others.

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 3>And then let's talk robotics, because I'm hearing more and

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 3>more about how robotics is going to be the next

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 3>area of key growth. How quickly does the optimist become

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 3>the two trellion dollar driver.

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 8>And remember we're not even really factoring that in so

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:48.719
<v Speaker 8>it speaks to our view like when you look at

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 8>optimists and as that plays out, robotics potential could even be.

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 10>Bigger than autonomous And.

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 8>I think when it comes to physical AI, it's Tesla

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 8>and a Video that are leading that. And I think

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 8>is that all this is going to get in the

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 8>next twelve, eighteen, twenty four months.

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 10>It's the reality, right.

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 8>The scale and scope is something that tests has a

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 8>huge advantage of. And that's why I think optimist is

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 8>something that again I think investors Wall Street massively underestimating,

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 8>but they will be proven wrong.

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 10>I think as this all plays out, how much.

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 3>Is supply chain going to be a bottleneck kit because

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 3>we keep talking time and time again about the rare

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 3>earth control that China has. I mean, the fact that

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Tesla is so present in China from a supply side perspective,

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 3>is that a winning formula?

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 10>Oh?

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 8>With that, I mean used now that I think that's

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 8>the key, right, Like having such a big presence, and

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:42.719
<v Speaker 8>of course Musk has very good relationship in Beijing, you know,

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 8>in terms of their footprint, that is very important.

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 10>It gives them a huge advantage.

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 8>And also I think it speaks to the timing, especially

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 8>in this US China negotiations to further and further must

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 8>distance themselves from Trump in the White House. I think

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 8>is important, especially when it plays to what's happened China.

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to end on Apple because you were just

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 3>talking about other companies that have been owning the space

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Palanteer of course being one that you keep mentioning within software.

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 2>But what about the future of.

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Apple right now from a supply chain perspective, from a

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical perspective, because it seems as though, well Tim Cook

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 3>needs to be a little bit more politician right now too.

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think there's no better CEO in the world

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 8>that can navigate it.

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 2>He's not gone very well so far, I see.

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 8>I would disagree to the point that he's been able

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 8>to navigate to India, which is an actually huge.

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 10>Part of the pokem. We puts him in a lot

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 10>there and negotiating position.

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 8>And also like, look, the chances of iPhones coming to

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 8>the US, we continue to us unrealistic. In last you

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 8>want have thirty five hundred our iPhone and Cook's another one,

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 8>Like there's an understanding.

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 10>Okay, they might have been laid to the game, but.

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 8>The consumer AI revolution comes to Cooper Tino.

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 10>You'll start to see that next Week WWDC.

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 8>I view that as a very important event that starts

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 8>this next chapter.

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Dan, I've of webush some of the biggest price targets

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 3>out there, for Tesla and for Apple.

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 2>It's always great to have you on the show. Thank

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 2>you very much.

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, tech has become a major economic driver for

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 3>New York's economy, and a new campaign is.

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Celebrating just that.

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 3>We'll have more on the industry's impact and what's expected

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 3>from New York Tech Week as a bluembag Technology.

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Time Now for Talking Tech.

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 3>First up Byron Allen, while he's hired Molist to find

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 3>buyers for twenty eight local TV stations his company owns

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 3>now this comes as an effort to reduce debt is

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 3>coming on while taking advantage of potential deregulation in the

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 3>broadcast business. In a statement, Alan said, we have received

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 3>numerous inquiries. We are going to use this opportunity to

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 3>take a serious look at the office. Plus, Meta is

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 3>bending on automation for the future of ads. The social

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 3>media company aims to enable brands to fully create in

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 3>target ads using AI by the end of next year.

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Now that's calling to the Wall Street Journal, citing sources

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 3>meant as ad platform already offers some AI tools that

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 3>can generate variations of existing apps and a bridge AI.

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 3>A startup that uses artificial intelligence to transcribe medical conversations,

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 3>is raising three hundred million dollars in a new funding

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 3>round led by Andrews and Horowitz so All, according to

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:18.919
<v Speaker 3>sources who say that the round values of Pittsburgh based

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 3>company are five point three billion including the investments. But

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.399
<v Speaker 3>now let's bring it to New York. New York Tech

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 3>Week kicks off to day the city. It's meant the

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 3>fashion and finance and it's seen a tech boom though

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 3>over the past decade, the sector actually made forty one

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 3>percent of the city's net job growth since twenty nineteen.

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Judy Samuels is presidentcy of Tech NYC is a nonprofit.

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 3>You promote the sector in the city, and you have

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 3>got a rather coore new campaign we do.

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:45.439
<v Speaker 6>We're so excited about it.

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 12>We're launching today with support from New York City and

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 12>in partnership with Red Antler, a campaign called Obviously New

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 12>York And it's really just a moment to celebrate the

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 12>amazing growth of the tech industry here to really highlight

0:34:57.640 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 12>all the things that we think are just so going

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 12>so well in New York.

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Right now, give us the obvious statistics, give us the

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.399
<v Speaker 3>obvious statements of thought that make New York number two

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 3>tech sector in the world.

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 12>I mean, listen, I have so many, but just some

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 12>that i'd highlight. I think that really underscore what makes

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 12>New York so amazing. New York is the number one

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:17.840
<v Speaker 12>destination for college graduates.

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 6>The tech sector here.

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 12>In New York you talked about the forty one percent

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 12>figure is responsible for creates ten times the amount of

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 12>new jobs in our local economy than ten times.

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 6>More than other industries.

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 12>I find out that's right since the pandemic, since in

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 12>the past five years. But that speaks to the growth,

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 12>that speaks to the j curve that we're on here that.

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 6>I think is so important.

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.800
<v Speaker 12>You know, it's a seven hundred billion dollar industry, twenty

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 12>five thousand startups.

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 6>It's just booming here.

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 12>And it's because, of course, you know, the New York

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 12>City is home to every industry, and increasingly technology is

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 12>just powering every other industry. And the thing that we

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 12>think is happening here that is unique to New York

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 12>is that as the technology, especially in this moment where

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.879
<v Speaker 12>AI is just booming. You know, all the your entire

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 12>intros about all these companies just growing AI building AI.

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 12>As the new technology evolves, what happens uniquely here in

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 12>New York is companies figure out how to use it,

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 12>who's going to pay for it, what it's going to

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 12>actually do in practice.

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 6>And that is the New York story.

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 3>So give us some pin ups when you think all

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 3>the icons of the New York's stought up scene. I

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:30.240
<v Speaker 3>think cognition AI in many ways from the underlying really

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 3>leaps some vounds driving forward the technology when it comes

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:33.280
<v Speaker 3>to coding.

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 2>But where else do we seeing success stories in the.

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 6>AI space in particular?

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 12>Of course, we've got Runway, which is just an amazing

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 12>New York story because it marries the creativity that is

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 12>inherent to so much that happens in New York City

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:45.320
<v Speaker 12>and the AI side.

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 6>And it's beyond AI.

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.240
<v Speaker 12>Of course, you've got Ramp, which is probably the fastest

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 12>growing startup in New York. That's in the fintech space.

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 12>We have a ton happening in digital health companies like

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 12>Maven and Row. I mean, the list goes on and on.

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 12>But again I would underscore that all of those companies

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 12>are for the most part, building in uniquely New York industries.

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:03.919
<v Speaker 3>I love that you keep trying to do this tongue

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 3>twister again and again, and you're like nailing it.

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 6>I have a little bit of practice. I have a

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 6>little bit of practice.

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 3>But what about why the campaign around it, why this

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 3>moment a need to celebrate?

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:16.879
<v Speaker 12>I think that Listen, there's a couple of things happening here,

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:19.399
<v Speaker 12>and well, first of all, I just think people love

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 12>to have fun, people love.

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 6>To celebrate, and right now, New York.

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 12>Is just ascendant when it comes to tech, and we

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 12>wanted to kind of put a stamp on that. We

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:29.839
<v Speaker 12>wanted to call it out. We wanted people here to

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 12>feel excited. And then we want to go on the

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 12>road and remind people just how great the New York

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 12>tech ecosystem is.

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 6>Because here's the thing.

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 12>When you meet young people, people of all ages, but

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 12>especially young people, they always want to live in New York,

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 12>and we need to remind them that you can come

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 12>here and build a really dynamic tech career doing that.

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 3>But when I think of the resurgence in San Francisco,

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 3>basically generative aice rebral valley, we've covered it time and

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 3>time again. Do we need to be either or is

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:05.800
<v Speaker 3>it mutually beneficially seeing companies building talent systems in both places?

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 12>I think, listen, I think you want to see tech

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 12>building and growing the economy all over the country. I

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 12>think that's incredibly important. I like the way we do

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 12>it here in New York. That speaks to me, That's

0:38:15.040 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 12>why I'm here doing this job here. But I think

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 12>to your point, we want this to happen on both coasts.

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 12>We want this to happen in the middle of the

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:25.319
<v Speaker 12>country as well. I think that's really important. And you know,

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 12>we talked about a lot of homegrown New York tech companies,

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:31.359
<v Speaker 12>but open ai is also growing like crazy here and

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:34.359
<v Speaker 12>in really iconic New York building downtown. They're taking more

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 12>and more space. So it's going to take all of

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:37.399
<v Speaker 12>these pieces, all of this.

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Input you want, like the quintessential public private partnership, because

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 3>you as a normal profit in the middle of bringing

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 3>leaders within some of the iconic New York tech sector

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:49.320
<v Speaker 3>into help give advice to the public sector.

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:51.240
<v Speaker 2>And it goes both ways.

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:53.400
<v Speaker 3>What is it that the public sector is doing that

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 3>helps trikes a really good question.

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 12>So in this instance, The city is putting a significant

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 12>amount of money. It's I think four million dollars in

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:02.799
<v Speaker 12>total behind help to bolster the AI ecosystem. Part of

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 12>that is helping support our campaign, but that's just a

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 12>small part.

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 6>They're doing a lot more.

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 12>They have an AI Nexus program that the city is

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:11.399
<v Speaker 12>putting its money where its mouth is, and we think

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 12>that's really important. The state is also doing it's fair share.

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:16.879
<v Speaker 12>We've got a great program here called Empire AI where

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 12>we're really empowering academic institutions, giving them access to just

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:25.240
<v Speaker 12>the amazing quantity of compute that's incredibly hard for anyone

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:27.919
<v Speaker 12>outside of the private sector to get. So the state

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.919
<v Speaker 12>the city, especially in this instance, are really doubling down

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 12>to ensure that New York is a place where people

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 12>want to come to build and grow tech companies, but

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:37.240
<v Speaker 12>also where.

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 6>People want to live.

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm excited to see the statistics coming out for twenty

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 3>twenty five AI job posting surging twenty five thousand in

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four New York. J. D. Samuels THEDEO President

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 3>of Tech NYC. Go enjoy tech Week. Meanwhile, let's talk

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 3>about China because Tom Cruise is Film is back On

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 3>top of that Mission Impossible, The Final Reckoning posted the

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 3>biggest opening for a US film in the country this

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 3>year and twenty five point two million dollars during its

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 3>opening weekend, defining trade geopolitical tensions between Washington and Beijing.

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 2>IPO activity.

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 3>In the tech space, it is heating up digital bunking

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 3>startup Chime crypto firms Circle both targeting strong offerings. Anthony

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Hughes is there to break it all down, and the

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:26.720
<v Speaker 3>way in which we see that there's strength is Circle

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 3>being able to sell more shares at a higher price point.

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:31.879
<v Speaker 13>It seems yes, Circle seems to be going very well.

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 13>The IPO is pricing in the middle of this week,

0:40:35.080 --> 0:40:38.240
<v Speaker 13>so it actually launched last week. Since that happened, Bitcoin

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 13>did come off a bit, but there is certainly a

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 13>lot more enthusiasm towards cryptocurrency, of course, particularly in the

0:40:43.840 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 13>last month or so. We also saw coinbase come into

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:49.879
<v Speaker 13>the the S and P five hundred last month, so

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 13>that has contributed to a lot of enthusiasm for that

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 13>company in particular, which is which is behind stable coins,

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 13>and it's a business that some people wondering where it

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 13>fits into the scheme of things, whether it's more of

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 13>like a payments company, and maybe it might deserve a

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 13>bit of a discount to a company like Coinbase, which

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 13>has become sort of the premiere sort of stock in

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 13>the crypto space, one of the premier stocks anyway.

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, what's interesting is that Chime being very much sort

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 3>of a retail focused offering in the fintech space, is

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 3>it going to tap into retail demand. Is the institutional

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 3>demand that makes that also a success story when it

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 3>finally comes to the market.

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:31.360
<v Speaker 13>Well, I think Chime has a really interesting retail story

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 13>because it's obviously appealed very much. It's got eight million customers,

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Speaker 13>and it sells a debit card and a credit card,

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:38.800
<v Speaker 13>and it's been very popular with a certain sort of demographic,

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 13>a younger demographic. It actually reminds me a little bit

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 13>of the Robin Hood ipo from years ago, from a

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 13>few years back, where you know, there's this idea that

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 13>perhaps you have attracted a lot of customers, and maybe

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:52.360
<v Speaker 13>it might not necessarily be easy to attract millions and

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 13>millions more really quickly like you have in the past.

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 13>But you know, when you have these younger customers, you

0:41:57.080 --> 0:41:59.320
<v Speaker 13>can grow with them and add on products and stuff

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 13>like that, so that'll be one of the real sort

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 13>of selling points I guess with the chaime IPO. But

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 13>the company does come at a significant down round or

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 13>lower evaluation than it was able to attract in twenty

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:16.799
<v Speaker 13>twenty one, when we had very high valuations for all

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 13>sorts of tech companies, including fintech and this company, but

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 13>also software companies and the like. So we are in

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 13>a very different environment from twenty twenty one and we

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 13>have to take that into account.

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Hinge Health had that as well.

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:30.359
<v Speaker 3>Of course, I need to disclose that my husband does

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 3>indeed work over at coinbase as well. Anthony Hughes, thank

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:34.880
<v Speaker 3>you very much indeed for joining us. Now that does

0:42:34.920 --> 0:42:37.400
<v Speaker 3>it for this edition of Bloombag Technology. Do not forget

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 3>to check out our podcast. Find it on the terminal

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 3>as well as online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart This

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 3>is a blombag Technology