WEBVTT - Why Gen Z Loves 2016 Nostalgia - The Story

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff. I'm Cara Price. This is the story.

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 2>As I've mentioned many many, many, many, many many many

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 2>times on this show, I am extremely online, and that

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 2>means that I am exposed to a lot of things

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:35.279
<v Speaker 2>that I find interesting, but I don't really understand because

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 2>these trends change really quickly, and the people propelling culture

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>forward are arguably a little bit younger than me. They're

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.279
<v Speaker 2>gen Z and Jen Alpha. I need some help. So

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.319
<v Speaker 2>our guest today is what I guess we would call

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 2>a trend analyst and a youth whisperer. Her name is

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Casey Lewis, and she writes a substact that I've read

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 2>for as.

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Long as it's been in existence.

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 2>It's actually like the only one that I read with

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 2>any regular cadence.

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It's called After School.

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 2>And I rarely do this, but if you're listening right now,

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 2>you should subscribe to it if you care about youth

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 2>culture or the Internet at all. Every installment of After

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 2>School is this curated grab bag of current trends, cultural moments,

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 2>and analysis. So as we look ahead to what twenty

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 2>twenty six has in store, I thought it would be

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 2>helpful to reflect on the ethos of youth culture at

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 2>this very very weird moment. Casey and I started our

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 2>conversation with a trend that overtook many Instagram feeds this

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 2>past weekend that unfortunately, even parents were doing young parents

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 2>and old parents, which was posting pictures of yourself back

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 2>in twenty sixteen. And while this felt incredibly random, Casey

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 2>told me that it actually didn't come out of nowhere.

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Here's Casey.

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 3>It's been fascinating because months ago, maybe not nine months ago,

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 3>it was all about millennial cringe, the stomp clap hay

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 3>music coming back. So it went from millennial cringe to

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 3>just the end of the year, the millennial cringe had

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 3>morphed into a millennial optimism, young people obsessed with, you know,

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 3>the sort of twenty tens of New York I want

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 3>to be a hipster.

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 4>But now the twenty sixteen thing.

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Has built on all of that, and it's it's crazy

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 3>having twenty sixteen.

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 4>You two, like, do you think it was a special year?

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean other than like the first worst news

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 2>cycle that ever existed.

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, it was a weird time in culture. The Cut

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 3>published this piece that was like, you know, we do

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 3>not want to live through this again, and they mentioned

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 3>things that happened in twenty sixteen that I'd completely forgotten,

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, happened then the Pulse nightclub massacre, Brexit, there

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 3>were like multiple horrible police killings.

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 4>Politically, it was.

0:02:55.600 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 3>A horrible time, but most of the you know, the

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 3>trends around it are just an excuse I think to

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 3>dig back in your photos and show how like cutesy

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 3>you looked. People are romanticizing the flower crowns at Coachella,

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 3>the chokers, the snapchat filters. I think that young people

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 3>associate twenty sixteen with peak whimsy aesthetically, even though having

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 3>lived the twenty sixteen it did not feel particularly whimsical.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 2>It was the antithesis of whimsy. So what got me

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 2>interested in talking to you for this particular interview was

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 2>your end of the year review, which was titled Nostalgia,

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Economy and Analog Awakening. You sent out two hundred and

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 2>sixty newsletters in twenty twenty five. What was the cultural

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 2>shift that you felt was most overlooked and what was

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 2>the kind of thing that surprised you the most.

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the analog trend is overlooked by any means,

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 3>but I think it's hard to over emphasize, like how

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 3>big of a thing this tension between analog and AI is,

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 3>especially for young people. It feels like every single day

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 3>there's headlines around, you know, young people have discovered these

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:22.719
<v Speaker 3>old school hobbies. I've seen multiple headlines this week around

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 3>like Grandma core and at the same time the rise

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 3>of AI, especially in more like tech adjacent corners of

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 3>the Internet. I mean, it's totally taken over the conversation

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 3>in the last year. So I think that the tension

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 3>between these two stories is very interesting to me.

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 2>There is like an interesting juxtaposition because it feels like

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 2>the AI headlines things coming out of cees are like

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 2>industry checkpoints, whereas you're really reporting on things that people

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 2>are doing. And I think that what's more interesting to

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 2>me is like what are people doing to combat the

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 2>fatigue of like an influx of like this is how

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 2>you should be using your phone, this is how you

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 2>should be using your computer. And to me, based on

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 2>what you report, it seems like people are like, I

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 2>don't want to do any of this stuff.

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, young people in particular, it seems like they're pushing

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 3>back against this. Even with my end of year Christmas

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Hall analysis, a lot of people got iPads specifically to

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 3>many of them didn't have any social media on their iPads.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 3>They just had it for games and Pinterest. So this

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 3>is like, it's like an interesting tech I know, it's

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 3>like almost like catalog behavior or magazine. But you know,

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 3>as adults who have been in the workplace for a while,

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 3>I think we're seeing this narrative around using AI to optimize,

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 3>to you know, just be the best like corporate machine

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 3>that we can possibly be. And then young people a

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 3>aren't exposed to those headlines and when they are exposed

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 3>to them or trying to push back against them, but

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 3>they are using AI for homework, yes, exactly.

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 2>So I've noticed that some brands have taken to the

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 2>analog awakening. And I've thought for a long time that

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 2>unplugging or taking time away from your phone would become

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 2>the ultimate luxury. But is gen z buying into this?

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 2>And how about gen Alpha?

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 3>So gen Alpha is interesting because in my research, a

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of these kids have very limited tech access, and

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 3>in interviews I've done with you know, different kids, some

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 3>of them you know, maybe only have an hour a

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 3>day and they spend that watching YouTube videos or YouTube shorts.

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Others have you know, kind of as much screen time

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 3>as they want, but they can't be on TikTok. Very

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 3>few of the Gen Alphas I've talked to, and I've

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 3>probably talked to fifty in the last year, very few

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 3>of them are allowed on TikTok, but they still are

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 3>able to consume that kind of content via reels or

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 3>other platforms. I think that Gen Alpha is generally too

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 3>young to really have a sense of being unplugged equals

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 3>luxury or you know, freedom, because they've grown up in

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 3>a time of you know, being in front of screens,

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 3>but also their parents moderating the screens one way or

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 3>the other. So it'll be fascinating to see as they're

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 3>able to make decisions for themselves.

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 4>Another thing is the phone bands.

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, so many schools in the last year have

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 3>band phones pretty widely, and so their screen time has

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 3>always been so you know, they're sort of like babysat

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 3>So will they think that being able to be unplugged

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 3>equals luxury Not at first, I don't think, But for

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Gen Z and also millennials, the twenty twenty six ins

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 3>and outs tiktoks that I watched being offline was a

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 3>huge in brain rot, a huge out all of these

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 3>words around, like being super online and you know, knowing

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 3>these sort of like week to week, day to day

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 3>trends isn't cool anymore. It's much better, according to the

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 3>ins and outs, to be unplugged, to read books, to

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 3>limit your screen time in the morning. Like they were

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 3>imposing all of these rules around screen time, which you know,

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 3>it's fascinating because I think at the end of the day,

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 3>having an awareness of what's happening online and being ahead

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 3>of the trend cycle is never not going to be

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 3>a flex but they do want to be nice to

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 3>their brains a little bit and limit the doom scrolling.

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 2>What do you know about school phone bands? Like how

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 2>has this affected.

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Things across the country. So many public schools have banned phones.

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 3>Private schools are a little more you know, they kind

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 3>of create the rules and yeah, but there were so

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 3>many articles around like, you know, kids are socializing again,

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 3>the lunch room is loud again, and a lot of

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 3>these articles interviewed both teachers and students, and it seems

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 3>like it's very much net positive. Of course, some kids

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 3>are figuring out how to get around it. But if

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 3>everyone is sort of like not supposed to be on

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 3>their phone. Then being the one kid that gets arounded

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 3>by like having an extra device in your pocket, like

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 3>who are you going to talk to? Like, you know,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 3>there's there's really no reason to do that if everyone

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 3>else doesn't have their phone. So I do think that

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 3>it is good for education, but I think that that

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 3>being limited during the day to check what's happening just

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 3>will make people sort of binge a bit more before

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 3>and after. But I do like the you know, the

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 3>discovery of analog at the lunch room. I will say

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 3>earlier this week, Peugh published a study around phone band

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 3>sentiment and they talk to adults and teens and something

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 3>like half of the teens were okay with like phone bands,

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 3>but they did not believe that it should be banned

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 3>during free periods in lunch room.

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 4>So there is pushback like.

0:09:58.480 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>This, what are we gonna do?

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, exactly. It's not like kids are generally like

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 3>phone ban good. You know, like you're never going to

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 3>want to be limited to things like that, Like you

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 3>don't want to be patrolled.

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wouldn't want to be patrolled either.

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 2>As a complete pivot, you mentioned the decline of the

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 2>dating app.

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Can you fill me.

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 2>In on what sex and romance looks like for gen

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 2>z because they're certainly, I mean they're certainly reading a

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of romance.

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, And you know they're reading a lot of romance,

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 3>and I think some of them are coming into their

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 3>own sexually from the romance to see. You know, they're

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 3>realizing what they want and they're realizing like how to

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of put it into words. So I, you know,

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 3>haven't consumed a lot of romance to see myself, But

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 3>I do think it's net positive in many reasons. You know,

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 3>people are reading more, but people are also realizing what,

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 3>especially like women's passion can look like.

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 4>I this last.

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Year, maybe last two years, in terms of gender and

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 3>sex and dating, it's been so complicated, I think, and

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 3>made me just so grateful that I'm a millennial and

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 3>not like in it because I believe I was on

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 3>dating apps. Twenty sixteen a really good time for dating apps, yes,

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 3>peak and years around it, yeah.

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 4>Peak dating app.

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Like one thing you can say about twenty sixteen is

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 3>that Hinder was great, But I think that dating apps

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 3>haven't evolved, and so young people feel as though they're

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 3>just endlessly swiping to no end, and then when they

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 3>are going on a date with someone that they meet

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 3>on a dating app, it's not a good match, and

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 3>so they feel like they've wasted their time. It feels

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 3>like part of that is the apps have to monetize,

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 3>and so the experience is worse. But in the last

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 3>year two years, there have been a million headlines around

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 3>all of the other ways young people are meeting in person.

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 3>So obviously the cliched run club, but there's a million

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 3>other speed dating, having a matchmaker, having your friends do creative.

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Google doc for you.

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's just so many different ways that people

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.119
<v Speaker 3>are trying to meet that aren't.

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 4>The dating apps.

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.080
<v Speaker 3>I think we'll see a dating app comeback. I think

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 3>that that isn't really inevitable.

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 4>I do think so.

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that the dating apps will realize they're ruining

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 3>the experience by monetization, and maybe the largest ones won't.

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, they have to answer to shareholders, the ones

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 3>that are public, But that gives a great opportunity for

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 3>challengers to enter the space and make an actually good experience.

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.359
<v Speaker 3>But at the same time, I think what happened politically

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 3>the election last year just created so much beyond the

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 3>dating apps, beyond the it's hard to meet people. It

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 3>created so much friction between men and women, and you know,

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 3>I felt like you couldn't trust men who didn't feel

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 3>like my husband's great but I was so angry at

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 3>men for you know, And so I think that does

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 3>add like some complications to the gender dynamic for people

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 3>who are seeking out ooh identify a straight and are

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 3>seeking out an opposis ex partner.

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 2>After the break out dating apps in AI Lovers stay

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 2>with Us. You actually mentioned that gen Z are eighty

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 2>three percent more open to developing relationships with AI chatbots.

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that a trend that you see continuing?

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Like, because as we talk about sort of nostalgic core analog,

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 2>where does the relationship with a chatbot really fit into things?

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>For gen Z?

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 3>One sort of asterisk with that stat. It was cited

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 3>in a New Yorker piece, But it is a survey

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 3>that has been commissioned by a some sort of like

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 3>AI company, and so it's always hard to know with those.

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I still find it interesting and like worth considering,

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 3>but at the same time, it's it gives me pause

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 3>often and that one especially, But I do.

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 4>Think you know.

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 3>The cut wrote a piece about AI as my boyfriend.

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I think is the reddit the subreddit that has seventy

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 3>five thousand members, like people like, even if we don't

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 3>have any friends who are in relationships, they HI or.

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 2>I have friends that are in pretty serious like parasocial

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 2>relationships with chat thoughts.

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, and I think that it's not something that

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 3>we're really like talking about. And one thing that kind

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 3>of made me realize, like, oh, this is a little

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 3>bit deeper than I realized. At the end of the year,

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 3>there was a TikTok trend where girls were asking chatchept

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 3>the craziest questions that they had asked chatchip. It's sort

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 3>of like a chatchepte.

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 4>Wrapped yeah yeah.

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 3>And so they would post screenshots of the response and

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 3>the way that that chat cheepe deep talk to these

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 3>girls like oh girl, Like it was crazy. It was

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 3>so crazy, and it made me realize like, oh, they

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 3>are talking to them like if not boyfriends, like their

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 3>best friend. Like there is some real parasocial relationships happening,

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 3>and I think for a lot of people, they're not

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 3>like I'm going to seek out a relationship with an

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 3>AI chatbot, but they just find themselves suddenly emotionally attached

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 3>and then it's like, oh shit, I'm in it with

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 3>this chatbot.

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's also I mean, I don't know,

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that there is even I have friends that

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 2>are married who are still like very attached to what

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 2>a chatbot thinks. I think we have since the kind

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 2>of dawn of the personal computer. I think this predates

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 2>the phone. Like we have learned to outsource our emotions

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 2>onto devices, you.

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Know what I mean? Like, yeah, am I sad? Am?

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I happy? Am I excited? Am I confused? Like let

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 2>me use a device? You know?

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And it used to be that we like picked up

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a book or read a.

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, and like And I don't mean to sound

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 2>old fashioned, but I think that this idea that like

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 2>we can sort of outsource our emotional need to something

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 2>digital is like the most indicative human evolutionary change of

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 2>our time. And it's why there's so much rage online,

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 2>why there's so much joy online. But like, I think

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 2>the chatbot has like become an extension of this need

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 2>that we have to be in constant contact. And the

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 2>irony is that, like I think we are in less

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 2>contact with people, but we are in more contact than

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 2>ever with something. And I think every time a new

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 2>digital tool gets introduced, like human attention is co opted.

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 4>I think that is so true.

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.880
<v Speaker 3>So I could not agree more like young people are

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 3>more lonelier than ever, like of course they're going to

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 3>turn to AI. And also, you know, we've seen such

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 3>a rise in therapy speak, and you know, everyone knows

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 3>that they should go to therapy. You know, everyone needs therapy,

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 3>but so a few people can afford therapy. And you know,

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 3>even if you sort of scoff at that and then

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 3>you find yourself in a hard moment and you're like,

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how to process this. I'm going to

0:17:56.359 --> 0:18:00.360
<v Speaker 3>ask the all knowing chat GPT, well know, And it's

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 3>very easy to see how someone could turn to that.

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 4>And I also believe that at least I don't know.

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 4>Do you spend time on the.

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Substack notes, I don't know, Okay, so it's it's substack

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 3>sort of Twitter competitor, But among the writers on that

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 3>are very very vocally anti AI, and I do see

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 3>that kind of poke up here and there on TikTok too.

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 3>For instance, when a rumor that Pinterest was going to

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 3>be acquired by open Ai through all of these like

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 3>never Ai people. But I have this feeling that like

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 3>no one is being honest about how much they're actually

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 3>using AI in the day to day. And I could

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 3>be wrong. This is just my theory, but you know

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 3>the theory the people who are the loudest against something

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 3>are either secretly like fascinated by it or like actively

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 3>using it. But it's just it's so easy. It's it's

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 3>readily available to you. And I just think that, you know,

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 3>everyone is using it more than they're kind of letting on.

0:18:58.160 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that's absolutely I think that's apout right. And

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it's like even if you don't think you're

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 2>using it, you're using it right, you know.

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Like if you're searching something on Google, you're using it

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 3>at the pop is.

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 2>So I want to talk a little bit about maxing,

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 2>because this was a trend that we saw this year.

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Everything was about maxing, and there's looks maxing, social maxing,

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 2>productivity maxing. Now there's friction maxing, which might be the

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 2>trend of twenty twenty six. Is maxing the evolution of

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 2>a word or a behavior that has already existed, or

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 2>is maxing an entirely new phenomenon.

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 4>I think we've always maxed.

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 3>I think, to use another trending sort of phrase, I

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 3>think it is optimization core adjacent. I think it's I

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 3>think about as a teenager, young teenager reading seventeen and

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 3>teen Vogue, you know, the health advice, the fitness advice,

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 3>like I tried probably when I was like twelve, I

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 3>tried to do every single like that was my bible.

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 4>It's kind of sad to talk, well, but.

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 3>If I could follow the advice of these editors, like

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 3>I could be a perfect specimen, like I was obsessed.

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 3>I think many young women are obsessed with this idea

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 3>of perfection, and I think that that's very much Maxine

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 3>the teen boy, you know, association with Maxine. I think

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 3>that the Andrew Huberman's, the Joe Rogan's, the manisphere that

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 3>has sort of taken it to another level.

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 4>But I think to your point, we've always maxed.

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think fitness culture has always been a

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>thing for men. I do think that the Internet in general.

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Has like called to the four a brighter spotlight on

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 2>the sort of vulnerabilities of men and their looks in

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 2>a way that when I was growing up boys just

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:43.479
<v Speaker 2>didn't talk about it.

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 4>Definitely, it does seem like there's more visible pressure on

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 4>young men to look a certain way.

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Though.

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 3>My brother is a year older than me, and when

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 3>we were in high school, I remember he was like

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 3>at one point, this is going to embarrass him if

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 3>he listens to this, but he was like obsessed with

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 3>like getting his cap to be like like, I mean,

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 3>this is a tale as old as time. Teen boys,

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 3>young boys, they've always had pressures on them to look

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 3>a certain way. Yeah, the resources of the you know,

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 3>all of these YouTube guys who are dispensing advice like

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 3>that didn't exist as much. Like if my brother wanted

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 3>to really truly like learn about what we now call

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 3>looks maxine, he could maybe read a book about like

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 3>the like exercise, you know, like the physiology.

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I totally total.

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 3>But now, but now the resources are packaged very differently,

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's how so many of these boys

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 3>who discover looks maxine then become you know, slightly red pilled,

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 3>and then it's like a whole different thing.

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, before I let you go, I just want to

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 2>play a quick game with you. You very kindly included

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 2>a buzzword section for people like me and I want

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 2>to read through a few of these and you can

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 2>give me a don Would you be comfortable if I

0:21:57.840 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 2>did that?

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? Yeah, I hope, I I hope. I can't I

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 4>have them down?

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, first one, am A me a livecore?

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Am I a live core?

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:15.959
<v Speaker 1>So?

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 4>This was a pretty wild.

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad we got that on microphone.

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:24.399
<v Speaker 3>Actually, this was a weird micro trend. This was not

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 3>like something that kids nationwide were doing, like you know,

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 3>but kids were filming themselves dropping heavy objects on their

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 3>feet to get the reaction as a sort of like

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 3>rejection against AI and and honestly a rejection against algorithmic

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 3>blandness and a sort of proof of life.

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Wow, am I a live core?

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Club? Club?

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 3>This was very much a micro trend. But a group

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 3>of gen Zers created a club for going to the club. Okay,

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 3>it was this push pool between like we want to

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 3>be going out more, we don't have that many friends,

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 3>people are afraid to go places by themselves for many reasons, safety,

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 3>et cetera.

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 4>And so they created a club club.

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Very Cool Life. Three sixty kids.

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 3>So these are Genalfa and to some extent to gen

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Z they have been surveilled by their parents and teachers

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 3>and you know, for much of their life. And so

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Life three sixty is an app that I honestly didn't

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 3>know existed until a year or two ago. And it's

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 3>very it's like find my and So's. It's basically parents

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 3>just keeping constant tabs on there. It's like helicopter parents

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 3>two point zero in bold and by tech. But it

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 3>would be very interesting to see what happens with this

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 3>generation or you know, the subgroup who has been constantly

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, kept tabs on by their parents. That is,

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:00.959
<v Speaker 3>when they have freedom.

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 4>Will they ever have freedom? Do they even want freedom?

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 2>That's a good question. Lemonee Miso gochu Jane.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 3>So this is kind of making fun of you know,

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 3>not just the New York Times food but so many

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 3>of these food bloggers food TikTokers just cramming as many

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 3>buzzwords into their recipe names as possible.

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 4>Got and you know, it's like.

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Fusion, fusion to the max. This phrase took hold then

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 3>the New York I believe it was Eric Kim, one

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 3>of the New York Times food guys, then created a

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 3>lemony miso gochu jan recipe as a sort of wing

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 3>but you know what was interesting is in the ins

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 3>and Outs for twenty twenty six lists this kind of sentiment,

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 3>either specifically saying lemony miso go chu jing or saying

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 3>just overly complicated recipes very much out people want like

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 3>very simple quality recipes for twenty twenty six.

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:03.159
<v Speaker 1>So like pasta with tomato.

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Sauce exactly, exactly, like going back to basics.

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, this is one that I'm very curious about.

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Monkey barring.

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:18.239
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so there's like a constant sort of cycle of

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 3>dating app adjacent terms or dating really dating terms. Yeah,

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 3>so sharking is another one. So sharking is when you're

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 3>just you're circling around, you're pursuing hookups monkey barring. I mean,

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 3>think about it. You're on the playground, your arm you're

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 3>still visualized there, you're still holding onto this monkey bar

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 3>you but your other hand is on this So you're

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 3>like you are effectively cheating on your partner who you're

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 3>planning to break up with while starting a new relationship

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 3>with someone else.

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Yes, well, being alone is very hard.

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 4>It's hard.

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>It's very hard. What's a good boy?

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm so glad you asked. So the gene alphas

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 3>have like their own sort of phrases, many of which

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I probably don't even know about because

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 3>I really only learn about the ones that make it,

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:14.120
<v Speaker 3>make it to TikTok. But good boy was when it's

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 3>like sort of demeaning to say, like, oh, aren't you

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 3>a good boy? So it's like, you know, kids can

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 3>like make anything, yes, yes, yes, yes yes, And so

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 3>then it took hold to where teachers were banning the

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 3>phrase good boy, much like six' seven and it was

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 3>a new.

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 4>One, now, yeah for one is another.

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 3>One it's actually interesting, though because six seven took off

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 3>and then for one was like deemed the new six,

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 3>seven but then six' seven like took off with a

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 3>vengeance like for one never really got the legs that

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 3>it maybe, could have, because yeah six seven then became

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 3>like such a.

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 4>Mainstream thing, yeah, yeah yeah what's a?

0:26:57.440 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Yearner girl so THIS was.

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 3>I leave this popped up around The Time taylor swift

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 3>released her. Latest album it's when you you're kind of

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:11.479
<v Speaker 3>a hopeless romantic but you're like very like proud, of

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 3>it and so you're not chill about what about your

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 3>crush or what? You?

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 4>Want?

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, Interesting yeah i'm definitely a year, inner girl Which

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 2>is fine's anything wrong?

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 4>WITH it i think it's, better ACTUALLY so.

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I get my last rapid fire is not a term

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 2>what's gonna pop in twenty six or?

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Not pop.

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 3>YOU know i identify as a, trend researcher not a

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 3>trend what's The word i'm looking for that people?

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Fore cast.

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Trend FORECASTER but, i think, you know the brick popped

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 3>off so much at the end of the year with

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 3>all these headlines. AROUND landlines i think all of those

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 3>things are, very CUTE and i think that they're nice

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 3>ways To signal i'm a balanced person who isn't. Terminally

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 3>ONLINE but i do wonder how much of that is

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 3>just performative or, even worse like just for, the CONTENT

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 3>and i could see like a hobby backlash or.

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Like everyone ebaying. Their.

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 3>NEEDLE interesting i don't know the. Analog trend it seems

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 3>to me that it is still, gaining steam that it has.

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Not PLATEAUED but i do wonder how many hobbies can

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 3>one do and realize that that doesn't actually fill.

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>The, void katie thank you so much for. Joining me

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you.

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 4>So much this is so. Much fun.

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 2>That's it for this week For, Tech Stuff I'm. Kara

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 2>price this episode was Produced By eliza Dennis And. Melissa

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 2>slaughter it was executive produced by Me, Oswa Oshan, julia

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Nutter And kate Osborne for Kaleidoscope And katrina Norvell For.

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 2>iHeart Podcasts jack insley mixed this Episode And kyle murdoch

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:17.959
<v Speaker 2>wrote our.

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Theme song join Us on friday For the.

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Week, in tech where we'll run through the headlines you

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 2>need to follow and, please, rate review and reach out

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 2>to us At tech stuff podcast at gmail.

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Dot com we want to hear. From you