WEBVTT - The Big Brew & A: Part 1

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal hell that for me, I'm

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 2>I've heard so many players say, well, I want to

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 2>be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.399
<v Speaker 1>You want to be happy for day Ato steak is

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that woo whoo? And them and Tye, welcome back to

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>the solid rub of boys and girls. My name is

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Ty hilden Brandt. That fine gentleman over there, as always

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Dan Rubinstein, sir, sure, how are your brother?

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm always excited to speak with you, Ty, Nothing ever changes,

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 2>and perhaps it's because you are my one outlet to

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 2>humanity as I sit here in a basement all day.

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 2>But you're a good outlet. If you're going to be

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>that person for me, Uh, that's pretty great. So I'm

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 2>very good. We have an incredible treasure trove of quality

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 2>questions that are both going to get released in Q

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>and a form to the public, and then a much longer,

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 2>more detailed personal version that's will be released on verballers

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 2>dot com. So I'm excited for everybody to hopefully get

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 2>their questions weighed in on. And if you feel like

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 2>your question might have been weighed in on, but it's

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 2>on verballers dot com, I'm not saying you need to

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 2>sign up. That's a personal choice for you in your wallet,

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 2>but maybe poke around and see what's doing over there,

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 2>because we've got you pretty exciting. What it's our Our

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Winter Wonders are our bowl pick on pool, it's coming up,

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 2>the stars coming. We're not of one prize with the

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 2>run the Board which is coming on to it. We're

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 2>not very big in pivotal week here in week fourteen, however, yeah,

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Winter Wonders is getting awfully big in the window.

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, we're very excited. So going out to verbalers dot

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>com if you want to hear the full version of this,

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>but a lengthy part one. Nonetheless, we'll be posted on

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the public feed because we've got a bunch of questions.

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>As we typically do on these big long Q and

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>A episodes, we sourced questions not just from Patreon, but

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>also from Twitter, from Instagram, from email, really all of

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the channels that we have at our disposal. We put

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a call out and said, folks, give us your questions.

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So I've got the list in front of me, you've

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>got the list in front of you. This episode driven

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 1>by our good friends over at Geico. We thank them

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>for their tireless support all throughout this college football season.

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget to go on out again tibbawlers dot com

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>if you were ever so inclined, and again, many of

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you are going to be listening to this. I hope

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 1>before Friday. We've got a live show in Atlanta. Yes,

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>we did, got a live show in Atlanta. I've got

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>my gear right over here. You can't see it on

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the camera. I've got all my gear packed up nicely, neatly, youw.

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I need to do some tests to make sure that

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>we didn't break anything, because really New York got out

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.959
<v Speaker 1>of hand, as you know, right. But I've got it here.

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>We are psyched, we are ready. We're locked on content,

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>which maybe is the earliest we've ever been locked on

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>content for a live show. Yes, it is going to

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>be a banger. I am excited for this. Come on

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 1>out Terminal West six thirty pm Eastern time, I believe

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>is start time for the show.

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's basically a happy hour show. You can

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 2>still go out to dinner after, you could still have

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 2>yourself a needle. We're going to go watch the PAC

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 2>twelve championship together at a nearby bar. And by together,

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean let's all meet up and eat some tenders

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know, macaroni and cheeseballs, some potato skins.

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Whatever it is we have to do, I'll have my

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 2>beer and a half or whatever it takes. It's gonna

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 2>be great. Solid Rublelive dot Com. Only a handful of

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 2>tickets left. Go check out. Go check out the tickets.

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>If you're in or around, or can you get to Atlanta.

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a big one. Let's do it. Congratulations, Skippy,

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got mail, You've got mail on the Solid Ruble.

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>That is one of the few sound effects that we've

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>had on the Solid Rouble. Oh big, We've fat elbow

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>over there, our old sausage, fingers held and brown. It

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>happens sometimes. I was going to say that is one

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of the few sounds that we have from day one.

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>We never changed out the male sound. It's been with

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>us since twenty two thousand and eight. Yeah. I know

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>many of you listening are as well, so thank you

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for your tireless support. Our first question, our first questions

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>come to us Curtis EJ and Brad via Patreon over

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>averballers dot com. EJ wants to know what is Wisconsin's

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>ceiling with Luke Fikele and Brad wants to know what

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>made Luke Fickle the right choice at Wisconsin over Jim Leonard.

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>This felt like Leonard's to lose. I'm not convinced he

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>did anything during his interim time to lose it. So

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>two questions there bundled together with respect to Luke Fickle.

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Luke Fickle announced as the next head football

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>coach at Wisconsin. It's a big deal. It's a big hire.

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to say it's a shock higher. But

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we had been led to believe for a good long

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>time that there were only a handful of schools Luke

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Fickle might leave Cincinnati four, one being obviously Ohio State,

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>another maybe Notre Dame, but all within that big ten footprint, right,

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>That was sort of what we came away believing after

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the turmoil of last last season in the coach in

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>carousel world. So Luke Fickle has now decided to take

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>this job, Dan, what makes him the right choice? And

0:04:57.640 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>what's his ceiling?

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 2>It's a fascinating higher. And you know what, I thought

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 2>about it a little bit more after it happened, because

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 2>it didn't come out of nowhere, Because obviously the interest

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 2>in Luke Fickle has been pretty widespread these past few

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 2>years with his success at Cincinnati. I thought about Chris

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Peterson right waiting for the right place, you know, had

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 2>talked to usc that was interesting, Ucla, Stanford, all over

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 2>the place, the SEC, and he wanted something that fit him,

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>and so he ends up at Washington, and so I

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 2>think his recruiting ceiling probably isn't as high as Chris

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.679
<v Speaker 2>Peterson and what he was able to accomplish at Washington

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 2>because there's just a limited number of recruiting powers out west,

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 2>and so Washington was able to take advantage. What Luke

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Fickle brings to Wisconsin should be better recruiting than where

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 2>they were under Paul Christ. Probably similar defensive ceiling, which

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 2>is to say excellent, full on excellent. The difference being

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati seemed to be more of a transferred destination for

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Big Ten schools for guys who didn't work out for

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 2>whatever reason. Obviously we saw Jerome four coming from Alabama,

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 2>and the other difference is the best of Desmond Ritter

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 2>can be attributed to whatever extent to being developed to

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 2>a playoff caliber quarterback, something we haven't seen from Wisconsin.

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 2>So I think of it is my opinion that Luke

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Fickle is a more modern head coach than Paul Christ was,

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 2>for better or worse, because there were a lot of

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 2>old school things that you know, we can sort of

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 2>harangue about if that's the correct There's a lot of

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 2>very old school things in terms of keeping roster together,

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 2>in terms of you know, not playing players until they

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 2>were ready, and it really showed with success that Wisconsin

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 2>had under Paul Christ in the trenches for a long time.

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 2>What I think Luke Fickle will do and what I

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 2>think his ceiling is is sort of I think what

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 2>it was for Mark d Antonio at Michigan State right place,

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 2>right time, right defense, if I've Michigan or Penn State

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 2>or Ohio State is sort of floundering a bit. And

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 2>so that's where we were with Penn State when Mark

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Dantonio was there, and to a lesser extent, Michigan when

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Jim Harbaugh was relatively new, or when it was Brady

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Hope Michigan Right place, right time. Wisconsin can go from

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 2>a ceiling of Big Ten championship game, but we're now

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 2>going divisionless, which makes it a little trickier for a

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 2>school like Wisconsin. I think he can get Wisconsin right place,

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 2>right time, to a every so often lightning in a

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 2>bottle late season playoff conversation. If things break right, we're

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 2>talking about a playoff coach. We're talking about a coach

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 2>who has used lesser talent to beat Notre Dame on

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 2>the road, who has developed high level NFL talent, and

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 2>with the recruiting connections he has in the Midwest. I

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 2>do not think it's unfair for Wisconsin fans to expect

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 2>competing for the Big ten crown every so often and

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 2>being a double digit program, doubled win program right more

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 2>often than not.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>How about that, Well, you have to figure if he

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.679
<v Speaker 1>can take Cincinnati to the playoffs, he get one hundred

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>percent get Wisconsin there, especially friend schedule, different schedule, difference schedule,

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>but especially in an expanded universe. Remember we're going to

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve here in a matter of two to three years.

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>So with so many pieces already in place, the programs,

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I think at a relatively good spot, it helps to

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>have the bones of a good defense, which they do

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>have now as a starting point somewhat not as much,

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>but not as much as before, but still it's not

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>starting from scratch here. I think he makes them competitive

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>more competitive right away. It may take some time to

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>get the right skill guys in place, but I think

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a slam dunk higher over the long haul.

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And to the question that Brad was asking, why not

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Jim Leonard, I think that is the that is the

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>point there. Yeah, Luke Fickle's done this for a while.

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Luke Fickle has I've got his record here. Has been

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>very successful, to say the least, fifty seven in eighteen

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>as a head football coach. But eight of those losses

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>came in year one when he was starting over, right

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 1>when he was basically starting over. So this is a

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>guy who's proven that he can build a program, that

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>he can do it over the long haul. Jim Leonard

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>will probably could probably do that for somebody else, but

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Luke Fickle is much more of a known quantity at this.

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 2>He also, Yeah, you're You're totally right. And the Athletic

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 2>had a piece a couple of years ago. I believe

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 2>about Luke Fickel as a recruiter and how much he

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 2>blanketed the state of Ohio, And so we talked about this.

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati recruited on par with like a mid tier Power

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 2>five program, Yes, and so, which makes sense given the

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 2>success he had in the NFL players that were developed

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:45.599
<v Speaker 2>at Cincinnati. And so, what I expect for Wisconsin on

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 2>the recruiting trail is for Luke Fickele to be tireless

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 2>in the state of Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, wherever talent

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 2>is in the Midwestern footprint and continue to you know,

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, Wisconsin has had success. You know, Graham Mertz

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 2>is from Kansas. I believe they've gone outside of the

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 2>Midwestern footprint to recruits somewhat. But if there was a

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>criticism of Paul Christ near the end that didn't have

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 2>to do with the offense and lack of improvement and

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 2>development of receivers, et cetera, et cetera, It was that

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 2>recruiting was not taken as seriously as the teams Wisconsin

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 2>positions itself against in Madison. And so I think that

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 2>has already changed. That changed the second Luke Fickle and

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 2>that plane touchdown in Madison. Yeah, I mean, let's forget

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.439
<v Speaker 2>about the ceiling for a second. If I could, at

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 2>a minimum, I don't think you have to.

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Worry about lowering the floor, which was sort of the

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>conversation we started to get into. With the way things

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>headed now with Wisconsin over the last year year and

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a half, I think you'll see consistent results the way

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin fans are accustomed to seeing consistent results. I think

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you will see strong defense in the way that Wisconsin

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>fans are used to seeing a very strong defense. In course,

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe it needs a bit of repair, but it'll get there.

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 1>With Luke Fickley's that kind of coach. You will absolutely

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>see that improvement on offense as well, because Fickle has

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>shown in his time at Cincinnati that he can adapt

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to the personnel. We saw him do it this season

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>right immense turnover on offense. They it wasn't as good

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of an offense, but it was still very very reputable

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>and still very very solid, and still very much of

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the conversation for the best group of five team. I

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think it bears repeating, but part of the problem

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Paul Christ offense is that it was very

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>rigid and pretty stubborn. So just marginal improvements on that

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>front on offense make Wisconsin a much much better team,

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly within the Big Ten West. Now as it stands,

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I know that's going away, but Fickle will improve that

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball ever so gradually, and I think

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what will ultimately raise that floor, make the ceiling

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>more attainable for the Wisconsin Badgers. I also think, and

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>we didn't mention this, this strikes the perfect balance between

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>one needing new blood and two not sacrificing your identity

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to get it. I agree. Luke Fickle feels to me

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like he's that happy medium where it's more of a

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>firmware upgrade as opposed to a full on new operating system,

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:10.839
<v Speaker 1>which is really what you want when you're going after

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a new head coach, someone that feels like your program

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>but isn't going to go so drastically in a different

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>direction that it's going to be new and different and

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take a while to actually see the

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 1>results of it. So I love the hire. I think

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a slam dunk, as do I.

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 2>And we'll also mention though he is not a Wisconsin

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 2>guy and so measured against that. I know somebody asked,

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 2>why not Jim Leonard, you know, in comparing Luke Fickle

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 2>to Jim Leonard. Jim Leonard has coached I think at

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 2>precisely one school school at which he played.

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct? You can in fact check that for me.

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I believe that that is my understanding that he has

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 2>only coach at Wisconsin. He's a younger dude, late thirties,

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 2>round forty something like that. Not crazy young, not Charlie

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Weiss junior young at twenty eight or nine or whatever.

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 2>But why Luke Fickle. Luke Fickle has proven himself exactly

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 2>as an excellent head coach, and so I know there

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 2>has been this run of coaches. I guess Gary Anderson exempted,

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I forget, but I don't think he was at Wisconsin

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 2>on any level, meaningful level before, you know, jumping from

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 2>Utah State to Wisconsin. But obviously Brett Bielham as a

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 2>defensive coordinator at Wisconsin, Paul crist As an offensive coordinator

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 2>at Wisconsin that the romantic Wisconsin guy move would be

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 2>to elevate Jim Leonard, and I don't think Wisconsin was

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 2>against it, but I think they probably needed to be

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 2>told no by Luke Fickle and maybe somebody else before saying, okay,

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 2>let's roll the dice. This guy understands, you know, what works,

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 2>what doesn't work, the culture whatever at Wisconsin. But if

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 2>you are the Badgers. Not to say Jim Leonard would

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 2>have been settling because he got to audition for the role,

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 2>and I'm sure he ingratiated himself really well to those

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 2>in power there. But if you if you see yourself

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 2>as a team competing for Rose Bulls, which Wisconsin should

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 2>you owe it to go for the biggest names who

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 2>will listen and sit in a room with you. You

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 2>owe it to the fan base, you owe it to

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 2>the program. And I think it's going to work.

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Really really, I really like the higher and I think

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you hit the point that is very very important there

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>for Wisconsin fans. Though it would have been the romantic

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>thing to elevate Leonard, Luke Fickle is much more of

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a sure thing at this point. Like there's a very

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>very low degree of risk here associated with Luke Fickel

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>as compared to let me get into the next question

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>pro transition, Dan, we're podcasters after all. Kelsey Cardinal Hello

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey on Instagram says I'm an Auburn alum. How should

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel about Hugh Freeze? So this is a different

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>conversation altogether when we talk about Hugh Freeze, much like

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>this episode, there are football elements and non football elements

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that we need to consider here. On the football field,

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Freeze has gone eighty three and forty three and

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>ten seasons. It's pretty good. Notably, he's had one losing

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>season out of those ten. I believe his last season

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>when he was in Oxford before things fell apart at

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Old Miss. He's a pretty good football coach. I don't

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>view this as something that makes Auburn as a sudden

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>threat in the SEC SEC West because the West is

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot harder now than it was when he left.

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>But he's a good football coach. He's a good football coach.

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>The numbers would bear that out off the field. Off

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the field, Look, I can't tell you how to feel there. Right,

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>he was run out of Ole Miss for recruiting violation.

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 2>He does a pretty good job telling you how to

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 2>feel about Hugh Freese as a person. Continue exactly the

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 2>recruiting violations. There was also that, shall we say, scandalous

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 2>pattern of phone calls that came to light.

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>With his call logue. Well it wasn't just the calls,

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, right, I mean there are things with direct

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>messages to sexual assault victims in his time at Liberty,

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>so there's like a whole slew of off field stuff,

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we kind of have to consider that

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>as well when we're looking at whether or not this

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>is a higher worth making. I'd imagine the off field

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff is part of the reason why Auburn had it

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>written into his contract that he had to relinquish rights

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to his social media account before accepting the job. They

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>also needed to consult with a pr person before making

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the higher, So of course, again there's a duality there.

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>There's two things going on at once. There is the

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>on field stuff, which for sure has been successful. There's

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the off field stuff, which is definite baggage. Personally, if

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the low risk nature of the Luke

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Fickle higher, personally, I don't think the Hugh Freeze risk

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>is worth taking because Auburn has had two years of

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>relative instability now preceded by what three years of more

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>instability in a sense of uncertainty. Let's say when they

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>finally got rid of Gus Valson, they knew they wanted

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of them, but it's the will they

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>won't They think that took forever until it finally came

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to fruition. Now they're high and a guy who they're

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously banking on him cleaning up his act, but they

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:05.959
<v Speaker 1>did have to hire the PR person to tell them

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>how to feel first and what to do in light

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of the announcement. On some level, there is the Taylor

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Swift Jake Gillenhall knowing somebody is trouble before they walk in.

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying people don't deserve second chances, Dan,

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>but I'm just saying that Auburn does not feel like

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the program, given where it's been lately, that should take

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that risk at this moment. So, Kelsey, I can't tell

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you how to feel, but if it were me, I

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be pleased.

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Auburn does not feel he's a grown up, right Auburn,

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 2>And this isn't This is interesting because there are certain

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 2>radioactive coaches that you can say to yourself, sure, this

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 2>guy is a problem, but you know he gets results.

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Sure, if we hire urban Meyer, it's not a great look.

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 2>But there's nothing about urban Meyer on the sideline and

0:17:56.480 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 2>recruiting and running up program football wise that would lead

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 2>you to believe that that program would be anything less

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 2>than the absolute best it could be. If urban Meyer

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 2>took over Texas Tech. If he took over Washington State,

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 2>if he took over cal if he took over NC State, whatever,

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 2>they'd win ten or eleven games every year. Yeah, and

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 2>so that's the deal you make because you know, Urban

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Meyer is that good of a college football coach, or

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 2>at least we believe that to still be the case.

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Freeze.

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Hugh Freeze is where like he had a nice

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 2>little run. I don't care about the NCAA stuff. You know,

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 2>things have changed in terms of NIL and sure you

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 2>know the way money and recruiting, and even though it

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 2>isn't necessarily the spirit of NIL that bothers me to

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 2>a much lesser extent, I'm okay with with a lot

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 2>of those things. But off the field, and the fact

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 2>remains that Auburn I'll reiterate this with the social media stuff,

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 2>with whatever, It's clear that Hugh Freeze does not have

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 2>a command in a daily sense of being a grown up.

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 2>And this is already a place that has difficulties behind

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 2>the scenes with power struggles and with who's making decisions

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 2>and paying attention to perhaps the wrong boosters to make

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 2>big decisions or have sway. And now you're throwing this

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 2>little cherry bomb into the mix. Yeah, I know that

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Laane Kiffen was their first choice. And it's very clear

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 2>that Auburn is not a place a lot of good

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 2>coaches want to continue their career and continue to build.

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 2>That much is clear, and that much has come to

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 2>pass over these past few years where they have to

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 2>go so far outside of you know, the SEC universe

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 2>and hiring Brian Harson and Jean Chizy all these guys,

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Gus finally made sense for them.

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>But you freeze, Okay, I don't know what this does.

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 2>We talk about a ceiling with Wisconsin, what does this

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 2>mean for Auburn's ceiling? Like the offense will get better,

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 2>probably they'll recruit better, but like you know, it's going

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 2>to blow up, probably sooner rather than later. They already

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 2>don't trust them so great.

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think it's worth the risk. I think,

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>on some level, like everybody wants to win. You're in

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the SEC and it's gotten harder to win, so I

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>understand the value in taking a risk. I just don't

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>think this is the risk right that they should be

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>taking at this time, given where the program's been. You

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>want a sure thing, you want to slam dunk. I

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think you want to have to deal with that baggage.

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to worry about that. And again I

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>come back to what you said for Hugh Freeze. It's

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>one thing of it's Urban Meyer, right, Hugh Freeze. We're

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna We're gonna do this for Hugh Freeze.

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 2>By the way, the negative recruiting fodder that LSU Texas

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 2>A and m Alabama, Georgia, Florida, everybody Tennessee has with

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 2>Hugh Freeze and Auburn, with everything that happened with Brian Harson.

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Now everything that has already happened in the Hugh Freeze universe,

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 2>the free universe, the Hugh Freeze multiverse, multiverse, cinematic universe,

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 2>multiverse madness. It's it's a costco sized shopping cart of ammunition.

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>That's all Allan on Patreon wants to know who leaves

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>their current job first, Matt Rule or kirk Farence Dan

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>h kirk Ference leaves before Matt Rule. Yes, wow, why.

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 2>Matt Rule has an eight year deal and kirk Farence,

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the next year or two is liable

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 2>to retire. I think you think, I think Brian Farrence

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 2>was a clear succession plan with the ascension and the

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 2>the hiring and promotion to offensive coordinator and sort of

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 2>clearing the path that Kirk Farence has that kind of

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 2>cachet in Iowa City. I don't think Matt Rule is if,

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 2>like if Penn State opens up in a year or two,

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 2>because that's the thing that everybody's pointing to, that that's

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the dream job, that's the dream gig.

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm also of the mind that like things change, right,

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 2>that he's in the big ten at a major place

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 2>with major job security, that I don't think he would

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 2>jump after a year or two to Penn State. Maybe

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 2>four or five years, sure, But I think it's more

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 2>likely that Matt Rule has given such a long leash

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 2>and such an opportunity to rebuild the roster and rebuild

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 2>the culture that I'm a believer in that Nebraska is

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 2>such a believer given that deal, that I would say

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 2>it's likely or because I don't even Matt Rule is

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 2>getting any NFL attention anytime soon, No, that it's a

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 2>Kirk Farren's retirement before me believes Lincoln.

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>If James Franklin pulled a stunner and decided to go

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to Colorado, Matt Rule would rip up that contract and

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>go to State College tomorrow. Matt Rule has a well, well,

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that timing is different, but yes, I'm saying a year

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>or two. Yeah, he has a track record of not

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>being anywhere for that long, right, true, four seasons has

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>been his max. I'm telling you right now he will

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>be the next coach at Penn State whenever that comes

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>to fruition, and I don't think it's going to be

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>longer than five years. I think Matt Rule will have

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity if he wants to to leave for State College.

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>The Kirk Farens thing. You know, maybe I just live

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>too long through the Joe Paterno era, right, if we

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>separate out sort of the scandalous aspects of Paterno and

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>how he eventually departed Penn State, there was a good

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>long time even before that, when you had this this

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>fissure in a sense within the Penn State community. The

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>people who loved Joe Paterno and didn't want him to

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>ever leave, and then the people who were like enough

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of this already. We're running up the middle. Every play.

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>The offense is the same as it's been for the

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>last twenty years. Something's gotta change. Also, in that instance,

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>we had what, at least on the surface, for a

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>brief moment in a time, looked like a succession plan

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>handing it off to his son, which again went bust.

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>That did not work with Jay Paterno. So there's a

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of similarity again on a on one level, right

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>one very specific level, between Ference and the way things

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>went down at at Penn State with Paterno right in

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the late stages of his career. I just think that

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Farence is so much the honorary governor of the state

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that he's only going to leave on his terms whenever

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>he sees fit. It's going to be really hard to

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>push him out. And knowing that there is already this

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>track record with Matt rule not staying in one place

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>for too long, I think it's one hundred percent Matt

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>rule is the answer here, one hundred percent Matt rule.

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Howl is Kirk Farence. I don't know. He's not thirty,

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>he's not thirty.

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Ference age sixty seven years old. It's going to be seventy,

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 2>and I'm gonna do some quick math.

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Boo boo b boo boo boo bo boo boop three years. No,

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man. I think the answer is rule

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>by Let's ask another thing about Rule here that came

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to us from Keston on Twitter. Do you think Nebraska

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>can make a bowl game in rules first year or

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>are they cursed to lose forever? Nothing's forever, Keston. They're

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>not cursed. They've had a bad run here. It sucks.

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>As a Nebraska fan, I want Nebraska to do better.

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>But here's what I'd say about Matt Rule. If we're

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at track record, the track record for Rule has

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>been that he's been terrible in each of his previous

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>two college jobs. In the first season m h and

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>then he followed it up with a five hundred campaign,

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and then he followed it up with ten wins or more.

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's pretty quick turnaround. He's definitely got this track

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>record for doing a really good job within three years.

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>The difference, I think is that Nebraska's in a much

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>better place than both Temple and Baylor. Baylor was decimated

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>after Art Briles, and Temple sucked all the time, all

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the time. With the estion who did he take over for?

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Did he take over for? Al Goldie? Who did he

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>jump in for I don't recall the exact state of affairs,

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>but he was like one and eleven his first year

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>right at Temple. It was a really bad season. So

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>my only point here with this is that Nebraska is

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>not Temple, It's not Bailor. There is more talent here.

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I took a look at the schedule in twenty twenty three.

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 1>They could go six and six with that, they go

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>seven and five, but I think it's gettable and there's

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that needs to fill in and

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>improve in very short order. But he can absolutely go

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>five hundred with that schedule next year. So I think

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it's doable. I don't think they're going to go two

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>and ten. I think it's doable Keston. But you know,

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's it's very early days here in the rural

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>era at Nebraska, and you know, we need to see

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>who's playing quarterback. We need to see what he's what

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>he's going to bring to bear with respect to coordinators

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and so on and so forth. Well, okay, so first

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of all, it was Steve A. Dazio for two years.

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 2>He took over a four and seven Steve Adazzio Temple program.

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 2>When Nadazio I think got the best sea job. That's right,

0:26:54.960 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 2>that's from Temple. It is a in terms of Bowl

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 2>season one, I think it's tough. I think we'll know

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 2>pretty quickly in terms of how aggressive Nebraska wants to

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 2>be in the portal. This is shaping up to be

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 2>the biggest and most expansive transfer portal in the history

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 2>of three years of portals. But we're already seeing big names,

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 2>are already big name rumors, so I can only imagine

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 2>the medium names and the little names are going to

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 2>be vast as well. Nebraska needs to be a player

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 2>in the portal every year for a while, and so

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 2>depending on you know, we got to see who you

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 2>mentioned quarterback, but the staff looks like and how active

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:37.959
<v Speaker 2>they are and filling in gaps. You know a lot

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 2>of teams and I even know my team. I think

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 2>took two defensive linemen from Nebraska last year and their

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 2>defensive line coach. It's it's going to be different because,

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 2>as we're seeing everywhere, with so much coach movement comes

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 2>even more portal movement. And that doesn't always happen right away.

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes a lot of that roster will give the new

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 2>guy a year and say all right, this isn't the

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 2>place for me. This guy didn't recruit me whatever. So

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 2>I almost think year one might be better than the

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 2>year two, that there's going to be so much, so

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 2>much change. But no, I think if you can build

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 2>a defense and you can build a little bit of

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 2>depth through the portal, Nebraska should be bowling. If not,

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 2>you're one year two.

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>We got a question here from Nick on Instagram. Yeah,

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know you're talking about the portal, which is

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>why I thought of this question. He wants to know

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>if I'm prepared for Notre Dame quarterback Cade McNamara next season.

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Kate mc and where's he? He's from Nevada. He's from Novada.

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>He's from Nevada. But it brings up a really interesting

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>point and also a totally new perspective for me. Mm hm.

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>The portal era is relatively new. You know, at least

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>this much activity in the portal is only like two

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>years old, right. This has not been a thing that's

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>been with us all that long. I gotta say, as

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a fan of a program that we know going into

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>next season is going to need a quarterback, all of

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>these announcements about guys entering the portal are very, very exciting.

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I've never been more excited about the transfer portal than

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I am right now as a Notre Dame fan. And

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a change for me because for so long, you know,

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>it's been you kind of know who the next guy

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>up is going to be. And even the Jack Cone thing,

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd be moaned Jack Cone, but Jack Cone is pretty

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>good in retrospect. Hm, I gotta say, I'm very excited

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>about all of these possibilities. I hope they can shoot

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>higher than Kid McNamara.

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>However, even Kid McNamara is a huge upgrade over what

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame had this year with Drew Pine. So again,

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been making the joke. I'm only half joking, Nick.

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I hope Marcus Freeman's leaving his card on all of

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>these lockers of opposing quarterbacks, like, hey, we've got an

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>opening in twenty twenty three, stop on by, whether it's

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Kid McNamara or who else? Did you say is a

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Vaia Malie Hornsby? He's available? You know, there are all

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>these names that are going to be.

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Entering a bat from I think from Ohio, well not

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 2>from Ohio, excuse me, from Miami, of Ohio. I believe

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 2>I hope I didn't get that wrong. Okay, so you

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 2>can only be your authentic self. Yeah, you are a

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame fan. You're a Penn State fan. You are

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 2>a fan of the beneficiaries of the portal, the recipients.

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's you're getting the man of from Heaven

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 2>from the portal right now.

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>You're not at the Pittsburgh Pirates scenario that we well know.

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 2>It's more like you are not a Memphis fan, right

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 2>you are. You are not an FAU fan. You are

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 2>not a James Madison fan. You know that if anybody

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:40.479
<v Speaker 2>starts an Eastern Washington fan, I am. I had an

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 2>incredible twenty fifteen because of Vernon Adams, right, Probably wasn't

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 2>as fun that year to be an EWU fan. Although

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 2>I think you had Cooper cups, so that's not bad.

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 2>That's not a bad He had like two hundred and

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 2>sixty yards in Audston Stadium. It's exciting from a national

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 2>perspective when you don't root for a team who loses

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 2>or gains somebody important, right if you if you happen

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 2>to root for a team whose roster is consistently gutted

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 2>or at least the top of your roster is gutted

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 2>or is almost gutted. It kind of sucks.

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>That sucks. That really does.

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of the idea of and I'm sure it

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 2>sucks for those coaches too. I'm sure it like even

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 2>more so than like if you're Dan Lanning or Marcus

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Freeman or whatever. You know you're gonna lose guys, but

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 2>you know you're gonna gain guys as well. That there

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 2>is a transactional nature to Thanksgiving through MLK whatever in January.

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's fascinating and I think there will

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 2>be more to come in terms of how from an

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 2>administrative perspective things are dealt with with the portal. Everybody

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of rushed to be pro player and say, well,

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 2>of course they can play right away. They should have

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 2>the freedom to move, coaches move. That's all all reasonable,

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 2>that's all but and I don't want to say guard

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 2>rails because I just think it's difficult to institute a

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 2>one rule applies to all type thing. But I wonder

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 2>if we're going to see more and more conversations about, yes,

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 2>all of this is good, you can transfer, but here's

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 2>how that's going to work moving forward, right And be

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 2>more specific, and I know you know that that conversation

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 2>has come to nil and you know just how everything

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 2>how the gears and pulleys should operate in a way

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 2>that's beneficial to as many people as possible.

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Because I don't know, man, it's it.

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 2>It hurts college football on a certain level to see

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 2>this kind of movement movement because it it tamp It

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 2>dampens your excitement for your own team, knowing that you're

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 2>going to lose a bunch of people, and it it

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 2>I think it weakens your connection to the team. Knowing

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:54.239
<v Speaker 2>that that's possible for a lot of teams. Obviously if

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 2>you're Alabama, it just makes everything great. But also, I

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 2>don't know. Here's my zag. Here's my zag. With the portal,

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm very excited to see who enters the transfer portal

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 2>and where everything goes, where players go, where you know,

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 2>who's the new coach that recruits super well out of

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 2>the portal and or who's the guy that loses, you know,

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 2>and a fifth of their roster to the portal something

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 2>like that. What if this is maybe a third bake,

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 2>it's not even half baked, ty, What if we said yes,

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 2>you can transfer, and you can go and you can

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 2>play immediately, and you enter the portal and it's a

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 2>more organized structure. What if it were one and done.

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>What if you just get a year.

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 2>You're transferring from a school, you get to play right

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 2>away one year, you get hurt in the first four games.

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 2>In the same way you can apply for an injury waiver,

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 2>you get the full you get to you know, have

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity to get your degree, but you only get

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 2>to play. You get one year of eligibility and sort

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 2>of make it. You're not punishing anybody, very hall passy.

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a little bit haul passy. And so then you're

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 2>saying if you want to transfer after your freshman year,

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 2>good luck, because then you're just gonna have to train

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 2>for a year if you think your NFL quality, and

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe there's exceptions if your coach leaves or something like that.

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 2>I think, but that to me is interesting, not punishing

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 2>players for transferring on the front end, but just saying

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 2>here is what your eligibility window now looks like. Yeah,

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean I want to transfer with immediate, immediate eligibility.

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>What I was going to say is, I think we

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 1>are going to a universe in which every fan of

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>college football. It would be advisable to have a Group

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of five team that you like and a Power five

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>team that you like, so that you cover both your bases.

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Because I agree, it's very clearly going to a point where,

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the some of the players at

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a prominent group of five schools, there will be incentive

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>for them to look and see what's available in the

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Power five level. And it sucks, right, and you know,

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to have to bemoan that more than

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we have to. But that's just that's where things are headed.

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And so make sure you your bases if you like

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>the sport, is what I'm saying. Yeah, look, maybe it's

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>two years. Maybe you get two years, maybe you get

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>one year. I don't know though. Man, all right, let's

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>go over to Adam on Twitter. Did Dabo try and

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 1>fail to outdo Shane at Beamer Ball? A couple unusual

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>for Clemson special teams plays that backfired see a kickoff

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>return huddle fumble and the EJ. Pochkick touchback came off

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>as arrogant and helped South Carolina win the game. So

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:34.760
<v Speaker 1>was Dabo trying to be too cute in that thirty

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>one to thirty loss in the Palmetto Bowl against South Carolina. Dan,

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think part of it is you

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>save trick plays for big games. Yeah right.

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's him saying little old South Carolina,

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 2>let's just screw around and do a couple of unorthodox

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 2>things on kick returns or whatever, on pooch punts. I

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 2>think you save that for those big moments. You save

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 2>the double pas is, you save the you know, Michigan

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 2>handing the ball off to was he a backup linebacker

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:07.320
<v Speaker 2>in it full back? When he popped it over with

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 2>a jump pass, you save it. You save the unexpected

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 2>for those big moments against opponents you respect. So I

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 2>don't look at it as arrogant. I just look at

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 2>it as failed. Right that if that little huddle you

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 2>know who has the ball hot potato thing works on

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the kickoff return, we're looking at it as genius. And

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 2>so there are some plays that you can look at

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:29.959
<v Speaker 2>on the face like that does seem kind of silly,

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 2>even if it worked, And maybe that qualifies for that.

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 2>But also, and I've been consistent with this, I like aggression,

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 2>I like risks, I like thinking differently. You know, take

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 2>a swing if it ends up looking weird and not

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 2>working out, which that didn't. But it was because of

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 2>a fumble, not because of that actual I think formation

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 2>so be it, take swings, fail, be wrong, look foolish.

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 2>It's better than being an eyeway here him.

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 1>It's better than being eye with it. Here's the question

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I have though, Did he have to do that? They

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:02.800
<v Speaker 1>need to do that? I mean, it's always easier in

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.919
<v Speaker 1>retrospect to say, when a play blows up, he didn't

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>need to do that. He didn't need to go for

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it on fourth down from your own twenty nine Oregon.

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 1>You didn't need to go for two in that specific, weird,

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>mathematically curious instance Brian Kelly, which we've seen him do

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 1>in his time at Notre Dame, not so much else.

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:23.960
<v Speaker 1>You you didn't have to do that. You could have

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 1>done something else and still want That would be the

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>question I would ask, right, did he really have to

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 1>do that to beat South Carolina? You don't have to

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:32.360
<v Speaker 1>do anything. You don't have to do anything. I get that,

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:35.359
<v Speaker 1>But that I think is the spirit of the question,

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>did you really have to do that? I don't think

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it's arrogant. I think it's probably more along the lines

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of what you're describing, which is we've got these trick plays,

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 1>they've been in the quiver all year, we're saving them

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>for a big spot in a rival game. Now we're

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:49.760
<v Speaker 1>going to roll them out there. So I get that. Also,

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the hidden benefit, not just of what you see on

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the field, is if a trick play works, even if

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't go for a big play, those are the tens.

0:37:57.680 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Those are the types of things that tend to build

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:04.280
<v Speaker 1>within the ranks within your program. Sure players look forward

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to seeing those plays rolled out there in the wild

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>on game day, so there is added benefit to doing it.

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Just didn't work here, and I don't think they needed

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 1>do it when they did, but it certainly wasn't arrogant. Yeah,

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't think.

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Look, this is just it's a personal thing, right If

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 2>you think believe football should be played a certain way

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:27.760
<v Speaker 2>and to not get silly and fancy and whatever, that's.

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Your worldview, and you're free to have it.

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 2>Whether it's a fourth down call, whether it's a trick play,

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:36.400
<v Speaker 2>whether it's the moment for the trick play. We can

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 2>question a number of things, but in terms of fourth

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 2>down calls and aggression, and you know, I think Bill

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Connolly wrote about this. What Ryan Day is being criticized

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 2>for is the opposite but the same of what Dan

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Lanning is being criticized for. It right that you're like,

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, damned if you do, damned if you don't.

0:38:57.200 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 2>But also context matters, and Ohio State should have been

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 2>aggressive in that big moment, in those big moments against

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Michigan and Michigan team who was not going away, who

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 2>was giving Ohio State everything it could handle, And in

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the context of Dan Lanning going for it from his

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:14.960
<v Speaker 2>own twenty nine One, they've been very good on fourth

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 2>down this year. Two couldn't stop anybody for the last

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 2>four or five weeks other than Utah, I guess. And

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:24.399
<v Speaker 2>three their punter just dropped the ball on their own

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 2>goal line and so he went into the season as

0:39:27.360 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 2>backup or third string punter or something like that. So

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 2>they didn't have a lot of confidence in Oregon being

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 2>able to flip the field. So I don't look at

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 2>risky maneuvers in terms of the results. I was like,

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:43.839
<v Speaker 2>I look at risky maneuvers as like, Okay, you're going

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 2>for it on fourth down, what's the intention with this play?

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 2>What's the creativity involved? In this play, are you doing

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:52.759
<v Speaker 2>something that has never worked and it seems riskier than

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 2>you need to be in the way that you're doing things.

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 2>So maybe you say, Okay, that Clemson return huddle thing

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 2>was risky in that I love it. The return huddle

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 2>thing is risky in that, no, I don't think anybody

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 2>has really done it, at least recently successfully, and whatever.

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm just not going to criticize them for being aggressive

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:16.360
<v Speaker 2>and trying. Now you say, okay, let's do like the

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 2>fake handoff as a guy's swinging behind, you know, the

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 2>fake end around thing, kick return or laying down in

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 2>the end zone. There are any number of things you

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 2>can do. I always enjoy the like two punt returners

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 2>back and one guy gives like the fake one him

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 2>right and it's caught elsewhere on the field and totally

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 2>fools the the punt team. But I'm not results oriented

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 2>with this. Okay, I'm manner oriented, but I'm proaggression and

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm good with it.

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Next question, let's go to the next question here very quickly,

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:50.799
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about South Carolina Gary from Twitter. Please,

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>as a game Cocks fan, I'm super excited about the

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>last or the super excited about what I saw in

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the last two games. From your studies and observations, it

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 1>really makes us sound important. Thank you, Carol. How often

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>does a good end of season lead to continued cess

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>success versus momentum just dying off with the off season.

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>So look, I don't have the numbers here. I don't

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 1>have numbers. I'm sure Bill Connolly has numbers that would

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 1>back this up one way or the other. That said,

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>this is like my favorite thing to look at the

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 1>off season. Yeah, I go by this is what I

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:25.320
<v Speaker 1>go by. I'll go by this going into bowl season.

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very useful as a tool for picking

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>confidence pools, which we will be doing over after bowlers

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. But I really believe in momentum and I

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's a thing that you can use as an

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 1>effective tool to gauge how a program's going to do

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:45.359
<v Speaker 1>in the following season. South Carolina actually is a very

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>good example of it. This season. South Carolina finished eight

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and four this year. Great season. They closed out in

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:54.839
<v Speaker 1>dramatically impressive fashion, beating two top ten teams. What did

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 1>they do at the end of last season, Well, they

0:41:57.440 --> 0:41:59.359
<v Speaker 1>were lucky to get into a bowl game. They went

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to the Duke's Mayo Bowl. They won. Shane Biemer had

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:04.759
<v Speaker 1>the vat of you know, almost got a concussion getting

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the mayo dumped on his head, but nonetheless they were

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 1>able to hold up the Duke's Mayo Bowl trophy. They

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:13.440
<v Speaker 1>took that momentum into the off season. They were aggressive

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 1>in the portal, which of course helped. But it all

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>built to a point where now they're eight and four,

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:19.920
<v Speaker 1>they're going to go to a good bowl game. They

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:22.240
<v Speaker 1>had two really impressive wins here to close out the season,

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and it feels as if it is just building on itself.

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's important. You heard me talk about it

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:30.799
<v Speaker 1>at nauseum in the early days of Brian Kelly at

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame, some of those early teams, Right the momentum

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that they took with them into a bowl game throughout

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the latter half of a season, it built into the

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 1>beginning part of the next season. Eventually they got that

0:42:41.160 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 1>flywheel going. Not to sound too marketing, but you know,

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it helps. I think it all builds on itself.

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So I would much rather be South Carolina going into

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three than I would say Miami. It's a

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 1>state of Miami right now, right there was just a

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>thing you sent me. They couldn't even get stued to

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 1>hop on the bus to come to the stadium for

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Miami games. So that would be the opposite of positive momentum.

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It might take a while for Mario to build it up,

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:11.839
<v Speaker 1>and I believe still that he will, okay, but it'd

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 1>much rather be South Carolina with the just two different circumstances,

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 1>two different in terms of my second year coach. Yeah, yeah,

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:20.440
<v Speaker 1>much much different. But the trajectory of one does not

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 1>necessarily equal that of the other.

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 2>So I think maybe typically in years past, ten, fifteen

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:31.799
<v Speaker 2>years ago, what you're saying probably is true. But South

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 2>Carolina just had their offensive coordinator hired away by Matt Ruhle. Yes,

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Marcus Sadderfield, I believe so. As assistants are more mobile,

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:42.320
<v Speaker 2>as so much changes year to year because of the portal,

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:48.240
<v Speaker 2>because of early NFL declarations, because of uh just changes

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 2>to the sport in general, I think it's harder to

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 2>say this is how we finished, this is how we're

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 2>going to continue to be. Now, if there is relative

0:43:57.920 --> 0:44:00.839
<v Speaker 2>stability within your program and you bring a good chunk

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:03.840
<v Speaker 2>of players, you bring back a good chunk of coaches,

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 2>and you add guys who fit in well in the

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:11.319
<v Speaker 2>locker room and the culture. I think you're probably largely right.

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:17.880
<v Speaker 2>It's easier to win when you're happy than it is

0:44:17.960 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 2>to win when you're dysfunctional. And it seems like if

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 2>things are somewhat consistent within the program and you win

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:26.759
<v Speaker 2>near the end of a year, you at least go

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 2>into the next season in a good place. But also,

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 2>guys just get hurt, right, Guys just fumble the ball

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 2>at an opportune times, and so all of the pieces

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 2>can be there, and then the universe says like, well,

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:42.839
<v Speaker 2>you won that game twenty eight twenty seven last year,

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 2>you're losing it twenty eight twenty seven this year. And

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:48.680
<v Speaker 2>so there's too much with football that's up in the air,

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 2>and there's too small a sample size to me. Whereas,

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 2>like you look at the NBA with eighty two games,

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 2>if a team finishes really really well in their last

0:44:56.960 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 2>twenty even if they don't make the playoffs or something

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:01.120
<v Speaker 2>like that, and that team coming back the next year,

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:02.839
<v Speaker 2>and that coaching staff is coming back the next year,

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:05.800
<v Speaker 2>I would generally feel better about an NBA team finishing

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 2>strong than a college football team, just because there's so

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 2>many moving pieces that even if there's harmony in the

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 2>locker room, even if everybody's.

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Feeling good, I don't know.

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Schedules are so variable that I just sort of try

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and fail, but try to take each season as its own, living,

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:28.800
<v Speaker 2>breathing thing and then throw it out and move forward.

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:31.759
<v Speaker 2>Like what do we think about last year with Arkansas? Right,

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 2>kJ Jefferson emerges as this good point. Sam Pitman is

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 2>his revelation, finally gets this opportunity at a big place,

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, energizes things. They hit the portal hard, they

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:43.440
<v Speaker 2>beat who they beat Penn State right in the bowl game.

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:46.320
<v Speaker 2>They beat a top tier team in front of everybody

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:49.720
<v Speaker 2>in a medium to large size bowl game. I forget

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 2>which one it was exactly. You know, they send Traylon Burks,

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 2>He's one of the best three receivers in the country

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 2>to the NFL. I think he's good in the NFL.

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:01.319
<v Speaker 2>Like there's so much positive about Arkansas Moving into twenty

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:05.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty two, kJ Jefferson gets hurt. Defense falls apart. They

0:46:05.080 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 2>lose an all's sec caliber safety early on, and the

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:10.920
<v Speaker 2>season is just kind of a mess. They have the

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 2>text A and M opportunity and they don't get to

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:18.760
<v Speaker 2>lose like all of the good juju that was happening

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:24.320
<v Speaker 2>in Fayetteville, no kind of quickly evaporated through just football things.

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 2>And so that's why. And that's an example. That's not

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 2>an exception that proves anything, but that's what I would

0:46:29.600 --> 0:46:32.680
<v Speaker 2>go back to when I think about momentum heading into

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:33.320
<v Speaker 2>an off season.

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Fair Enough, we've got a few more questions here before

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:41.279
<v Speaker 1>we flip it over to the Patreon exclusive portion of this. Here,

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Q and A Dan. While I am reading this question,

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I want you to pull up on your computer, okay,

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>on your touchtne keypad. Would love to the standings for

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:54.719
<v Speaker 1>both the SEC and the Big Ten. Okay, I have

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 1>it already.

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:57.320
<v Speaker 2>I always have standings up when we'd record shows, just

0:46:57.360 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 2>because I'm stupid and I need to refer things.

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:04.879
<v Speaker 1>A terrific question from aj Morse four on Instagram. Let's

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>say SEC versus Big Ten challenge, mind them up one

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:15.320
<v Speaker 1>through fourteen and have them play. Ok what happens. So

0:47:15.880 --> 0:47:18.320
<v Speaker 1>here's what we're gonna do. We have not pre rehearsed

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 1>this obviously. I want you to list out as you've

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:25.840
<v Speaker 1>got the standings in front of you. I want you

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:29.919
<v Speaker 1>to list out number fourteen versus number fourteen. We're gonna

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 1>quick pick who wins. I will keep track of the

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:36.719
<v Speaker 1>tally here, whether it's SEC, whether it's Big Ten, and

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna give aj very quickly, rapid fire. We're not

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:43.279
<v Speaker 1>going to go into like deep seated analytical stuff on

0:47:43.400 --> 0:47:45.040
<v Speaker 1>any of these games, but we're gonna give him very

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:47.840
<v Speaker 1>quickly the results on who wins that challenge between the

0:47:47.960 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 1>SEC and the Big Ten.

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:52.959
<v Speaker 2>All right, So Vanderbilt is as promising as those last

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 2>late couple wins were. They gave up the most points

0:47:57.440 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 2>in the SEC on and five against rank teams, or

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:01.120
<v Speaker 2>at least to text A and M with the same

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:04.640
<v Speaker 2>record three and two against AP ranked teams RS. Weirdly enough,

0:48:05.760 --> 0:48:11.840
<v Speaker 2>So Vanderbilt against Northwestern, Yeah, Vandy Northwestern, Vanderbilt's beating Northwestern.

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:14.680
<v Speaker 2>I think I would take Vandy there, yep, Okay, what's next?

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I guess we'll go just in terms of what I'm

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:29.400
<v Speaker 2>seeing here, I guess Auburn, Okay, at thirteen sure against

0:48:29.480 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 2>home wreckers, I think so, I think it would have

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 2>to be. Yeah, I would take Auburn.

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I would definitely take Auburn, right, so that's two two

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:46.440
<v Speaker 1>for the SEC. Next up, the next worst team I

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 1>think in the Big Ten would probably be Indiana, Indiana

0:48:52.440 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 1>A and M probably go A and M. Right, yeah,

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 1>seventeen thirteen A and L. Sure, all right. Next next

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:09.760
<v Speaker 1>worst in the Big Ten is either well, it's probably Nebraska.

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say either Nebraska or Michigan State, but

0:49:12.880 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it's Nebraska. Who is next up for the SEC.

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Either Arkansas or Missoo who won that game at the

0:49:19.239 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 2>end of the year Missoo believe it was Missoo. So

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 2>we'll say Arkansas.

0:49:22.120 --> 0:49:24.840
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna say Arkansas. I take Arkansas.

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Arkansas v. Who Sorry I miss what you said. Over Nebraska,

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:32.480
<v Speaker 2>I think I would take Arkansas for Nebraska's well, nice

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:33.720
<v Speaker 2>finish for Nebraska.

0:49:33.360 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Though, Michigan State would be the next one up here

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 1>on the totem pole. Yeah, Michigan State. They would have Missoo.

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:43.759
<v Speaker 2>They would either have Missoo or Florida, who won the

0:49:43.760 --> 0:49:44.759
<v Speaker 2>Missoo Florida.

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Game this year. I think Florida won that. Florida won that,

0:49:46.840 --> 0:49:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So we'll say Missoo. Yeah, I mean Missoo plays defense,

0:49:53.200 --> 0:49:57.200
<v Speaker 1>they do, and Michigan State kind of a mess. Down

0:49:57.239 --> 0:49:59.479
<v Speaker 1>the stretch, so I think i'd probably take MISSOO again

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>another SEC team, I think I would take my Zoo

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:06.439
<v Speaker 1>SEC's five and oh here as we work from the bottom. Yeah,

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 1>let's keep going. All right, let's do this quickly. Mixed

0:50:09.280 --> 0:50:13.239
<v Speaker 1>up on the Big ten side, I would say is

0:50:13.520 --> 0:50:21.800
<v Speaker 1>probably Wisconsin. So now we're saying Florida or Wisconsin. Florida

0:50:21.840 --> 0:50:25.799
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin is what what I think we decided on. Yeah,

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:28.440
<v Speaker 1>so Florida, Florida Wisconsin. I think I.

0:50:34.120 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Florida finished the season basically demolishing South Carolina, throwing a lot,

0:50:41.080 --> 0:50:44.720
<v Speaker 2>but coming up short against Florida State, losing to Vandy.

0:50:44.960 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Whatever you want to say as a free class comfortably

0:50:47.160 --> 0:50:51.239
<v Speaker 2>beating A and M. I don't think if if you're

0:50:51.239 --> 0:50:52.399
<v Speaker 2>gonna look at Florida.

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Has as a weakness team, it's their defense. I don't

0:50:54.280 --> 0:50:56.759
<v Speaker 1>think Wisconsin's good enough. That's the thing I don't think.

0:50:56.880 --> 0:51:00.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't think right six and o SEC. Next up

0:51:01.200 --> 0:51:06.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Big ten is probably let's say Maryland.

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so above Florida, we'll say it's Kentucky.

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 1>It's seven and five Maryland against Kentucky. I'd probably pick Maryland.

0:51:16.160 --> 0:51:20.359
<v Speaker 1>I think Kentucky is one two three CanCon. Somebody asked,

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:22.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, the difference between pack it up pack

0:51:22.040 --> 0:51:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it in? Yeah, the same thing, the same thing. I think.

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I think one two three CanCon is you're already gone.

0:51:29.920 --> 0:51:31.640
<v Speaker 2>I think pack it up pack it in is in

0:51:31.760 --> 0:51:35.040
<v Speaker 2>the process of packing. Okay, that's what I take. Two

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:36.600
<v Speaker 2>different stages of yeah.

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:51:36.960 --> 0:51:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Giving Kentucky Maryland an incredible basketball matchup historically.

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I go, I go Maryland. Kentucky's out of it.

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:51.839
<v Speaker 2>So Maryland got shut out by Penn State. From where

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Will Ebs transferred, I mean nothing, nothing I'm gonna take.

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:59.960
<v Speaker 1>We're talking all neutral site games. Yeah, I might take

0:52:00.040 --> 0:52:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Maryland there. All right, we'll take Maryland there. We'll maybe

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:05.200
<v Speaker 1>six to one in favor of the SEC very quickly.

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's go. We're halfway, let's go. Let's keep going. But

0:52:08.160 --> 0:52:12.640
<v Speaker 1>next up Minnesota Minnesota.

0:52:12.640 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh, okay, and then my team, I guess Minnesota or

0:52:22.320 --> 0:52:26.680
<v Speaker 2>excuse me, Minnesota. So South Carolina are Ole Miss. We

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 2>will go ole Miss because South Carolina three and two

0:52:29.640 --> 0:52:31.000
<v Speaker 2>against ranked teams Ole Miss.

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 1>One and one, taking ole Miss there. Yeah, next up,

0:52:39.200 --> 0:52:45.759
<v Speaker 1>so next will be South Carolina, South Carolina against I

0:52:45.800 --> 0:52:46.440
<v Speaker 1>guess Iowa.

0:52:48.680 --> 0:52:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Mmmm.

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:56.680
<v Speaker 1>That's an interesting matchup. I might take Iowa there on

0:52:56.760 --> 0:52:58.719
<v Speaker 1>a neutral field, I'm gonna take Iowa. We'll give you

0:52:58.760 --> 0:53:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a big ten one. All right, movie on very quickly.

0:53:01.000 --> 0:53:03.759
<v Speaker 1>We've got seven and two for the sec. Let's go

0:53:04.040 --> 0:53:04.480
<v Speaker 1>over to.

0:53:06.520 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Actually, I don't even know South Carolina. With the way

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:11.799
<v Speaker 2>they finished, I'm seduced a little bit. Let's just give

0:53:11.880 --> 0:53:17.840
<v Speaker 2>one to the Okay, big charitable Okay, Illinois, So Illinois

0:53:18.200 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 2>or Mississippi State. Oh god, I'm inclined to go Illinois.

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:31.240
<v Speaker 2>What did Illinois finish against AP teams?

0:53:31.840 --> 0:53:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're November, They're November. It was terrible. There

0:53:34.480 --> 0:53:35.279
<v Speaker 1>were one in three.

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're they're pretty mistake run. I'm gonna Mississippi State.

0:53:37.840 --> 0:53:40.000
<v Speaker 1>There, all right? You talking in too, We'll go Mississippi State.

0:53:40.040 --> 0:53:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Eight and two in favor. Yep. Perdue is next Perdue

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 1>against I guess Alabama. Okay, so we go Alabama, yep.

0:53:52.360 --> 0:53:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Nine and two. Next up would be Penn State.

0:53:56.800 --> 0:54:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Penn State would be depending on who you would to

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:05.000
<v Speaker 2>start at quarterback, Tennessee I mean right now, would probably

0:54:05.000 --> 0:54:08.640
<v Speaker 2>be Penn State, although I guess we could flip flop

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Tennessee Alabama Tennessee's seventh Alabama sixth, which is weird considering

0:54:12.520 --> 0:54:14.840
<v Speaker 2>they played each other and both ten and two. So

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Tennessee against Penn State, you said, yeah, we'll go starting

0:54:18.800 --> 0:54:23.359
<v Speaker 2>at quarterback for Tennessee, Joe Milton. Joe Milton. So they

0:54:23.440 --> 0:54:26.560
<v Speaker 2>play this game tomorrow. Yeah, Penn State, I Michael Penn

0:54:26.600 --> 0:54:28.720
<v Speaker 2>State with the current state of the Tennessee defense.

0:54:29.239 --> 0:54:31.279
<v Speaker 1>And then we've got Ohio State and Michigan is our

0:54:31.320 --> 0:54:31.759
<v Speaker 1>final two.

0:54:33.840 --> 0:54:36.279
<v Speaker 2>So Ohio State Michigan, and so then you would have

0:54:36.680 --> 0:54:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Ohio State LSU.

0:54:38.560 --> 0:54:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I take Ohio State.

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:45.200
<v Speaker 2>LSU, by the way, ranked behind both, but they won

0:54:45.239 --> 0:54:47.640
<v Speaker 2>the division. So I guess we're going with LSU, Ohio

0:54:47.680 --> 0:54:48.200
<v Speaker 2>State LSU.

0:54:48.239 --> 0:54:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd go Ohio State, and then Georgia against Michigan. I

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 1>still take Georgia. I still go Georgia. So the long

0:54:55.200 --> 0:54:58.600
<v Speaker 1>winded answer to this was the final tally eleven and three,

0:54:58.719 --> 0:55:04.560
<v Speaker 1>ten and four four favorite the SEC. All right, let's

0:55:04.640 --> 0:55:09.200
<v Speaker 1>do one final non college football question here before we

0:55:09.360 --> 0:55:13.879
<v Speaker 1>cut over. In a in a complete capacity to our

0:55:15.000 --> 0:55:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Patreon world, Dan, let's go to your favorite Thanksgiving leftover recipe. Dan,

0:55:24.800 --> 0:55:28.240
<v Speaker 1>This is from the Thanksgiving leftover recipe. Your favorite Thanksgiving

0:55:28.320 --> 0:55:32.160
<v Speaker 1>leftover recipe, the example being turkey chili. Well, that's a good,

0:55:32.320 --> 0:55:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a good one favorite Thanksgiving. I don't know. Usually

0:55:39.360 --> 0:55:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I just stuff everything onto a sandwich and it's nothing

0:55:41.560 --> 0:55:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that glorious. How about a cold turkey sandwich.

0:55:45.280 --> 0:55:47.839
<v Speaker 2>Cold turkey sandwich, if you like the cranberry sauce, throw

0:55:47.920 --> 0:55:51.560
<v Speaker 2>that on there, stuffing on there. Honestly, I I'll throw

0:55:51.600 --> 0:55:54.360
<v Speaker 2>it in the toaster oven. I just there's nothing specific.

0:55:54.400 --> 0:55:56.840
<v Speaker 2>I just want another Thanksgiving me all some stuffing and

0:55:56.920 --> 0:56:00.719
<v Speaker 2>broccoli casserole and turkey if you've got it. Something I

0:56:00.880 --> 0:56:03.560
<v Speaker 2>do like to use, though, for leftovers in general, which

0:56:03.600 --> 0:56:07.440
<v Speaker 2>you could very easily use with Thanksgiving stuff is instead

0:56:07.480 --> 0:56:10.240
<v Speaker 2>of a sandwich, to make a hash, essentially a scramble

0:56:10.320 --> 0:56:11.440
<v Speaker 2>or something like that. If you got a bunch of

0:56:11.520 --> 0:56:14.800
<v Speaker 2>crispy potatoes, eggs, and if you want turkey, if you

0:56:14.840 --> 0:56:17.239
<v Speaker 2>don't want turkey, stuffing, all of that would be great

0:56:17.560 --> 0:56:20.640
<v Speaker 2>in a hash, like some sort of scrambly hash. I'm

0:56:20.680 --> 0:56:23.319
<v Speaker 2>just into because you just it's that old.

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Where do they do this?

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:25.880
<v Speaker 2>I think Rochester, New York, is known for it, but

0:56:25.920 --> 0:56:28.000
<v Speaker 2>they do it all over the Midwest and Northeast, like

0:56:28.080 --> 0:56:30.480
<v Speaker 2>the garbage plate right where you just like have a

0:56:30.600 --> 0:56:33.080
<v Speaker 2>plate full of stuff, mix it with eggs, throw a

0:56:33.080 --> 0:56:35.319
<v Speaker 2>bunch of hot sauce on top, and then just don't

0:56:35.440 --> 0:56:38.440
<v Speaker 2>move for the rest of the day. I think it's Rochester,

0:56:38.520 --> 0:56:40.560
<v Speaker 2>New York that's famous for their garbage plate, but maybe

0:56:40.560 --> 0:56:43.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm wrong about that. You can do it with a soup,

0:56:43.880 --> 0:56:45.000
<v Speaker 2>you can do it with a salad, you can do

0:56:45.040 --> 0:56:46.600
<v Speaker 2>it with whatever else. You can throw turkey out of

0:56:46.640 --> 0:56:47.480
<v Speaker 2>pizza of course.

0:56:49.280 --> 0:56:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The other way I would do it.

0:56:50.560 --> 0:56:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Is, you know, make a hash and then roll it

0:56:52.200 --> 0:56:54.040
<v Speaker 2>up in a tortilla and make like a breakfast burrito

0:56:54.200 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Thanksgiving leftover thing.

0:56:55.760 --> 0:56:58.840
<v Speaker 1>That would be delicious. But now sandwich or hash I

0:56:58.880 --> 0:57:00.799
<v Speaker 1>think is the way sandwich has all right, So here

0:57:00.920 --> 0:57:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is the deal. One in all going out to verballers

0:57:04.040 --> 0:57:05.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com. If you're going out to forballers dot com.

0:57:06.000 --> 0:57:09.960
<v Speaker 1>If you sign up, you will hear a continuous audio

0:57:10.080 --> 0:57:13.000
<v Speaker 1>file of part one and two. We're going to keep

0:57:13.080 --> 0:57:16.080
<v Speaker 1>going even after we hit stop here on the public feed.

0:57:16.680 --> 0:57:18.840
<v Speaker 1>We would encourage you again to go out to verballers

0:57:18.840 --> 0:57:22.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com and check that out. Soliverblelive dot com. If

0:57:22.000 --> 0:57:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be in the Atlanta area on Friday evening.

0:57:25.800 --> 0:57:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Terminal West is where the show will be at six

0:57:27.840 --> 0:57:30.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty pm Eastern time. As Dan said, more than enough

0:57:30.760 --> 0:57:33.040
<v Speaker 1>time to come out to the show, to watch the

0:57:33.120 --> 0:57:35.600
<v Speaker 1>games afterwards, maybe to come out and do tenders with tie.

0:57:36.040 --> 0:57:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Tender to tie coming out soliverablelive dot com, Smell ties

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:41.880
<v Speaker 1>hair dot com. If you're a weirdo either way, we

0:57:42.040 --> 0:57:44.320
<v Speaker 1>love you all the same here in the Verballer hood.

0:57:44.840 --> 0:57:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Go on out and make sure you support us live.

0:57:49.120 --> 0:57:51.080
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, we'd love to meet you,

0:57:51.160 --> 0:57:53.480
<v Speaker 1>love to shake your hand. Dan. That does it for

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:56.880
<v Speaker 1>part one of this here, Q and a bruine as

0:57:56.920 --> 0:57:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we call it. That's true in the verball You just

0:57:59.600 --> 0:58:03.160
<v Speaker 1>have some that was brewed this morning. Dan. Let's keep

0:58:03.160 --> 0:58:05.720
<v Speaker 1>this thing going. Okay, all right, thank you everybody.

0:58:05.800 --> 0:58:08.120
<v Speaker 2>If you are not on Verballers dot com and you're

0:58:08.160 --> 0:58:11.080
<v Speaker 2>not able to listen to the the real stuff.