WEBVTT - 4/7/25: World Panic As Trump Doubles Down, Billionaire Warns 'Economic Nuclear Fallout', Poll Shows Americans Reject Tariffs

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.599
<v Speaker 1>Hey, guys, Saga and Crystal here.

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 2>and we are so excited about what that means for

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 2>the future of this show.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 3>This is the only place where you can find honest

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 3>perspectives from the left and the right that simply does

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 3>not exist anywhere else.

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 2>So if that is something that's important to you, please

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 2>go to Breakingpoints dot com. Become a member today and

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 2>you'll get access to our full shows, unedited, ad free,

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 2>and all put together for you every morning in your inbox.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 3>We need your help to build the future of independent

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 3>news media and we hope to see you at Breakingpoints

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 3>dot com.

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, everybody.

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 3>It is a gloomy day here in Washington, gloomy fitting

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 3>the mood of the global economy in Crystal.

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>So what do we have today?

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes, indeed, Trump is doubling down on his tariffs, no

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 2>sign of some big negotiation or walk back insight, and

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 2>global markets already in freefall this morning. This is before

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 2>the US market's officially open. So we decided to spend

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 2>the whole show basically talking about tariffs because this is

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>such monumental news with such massive cascading effects for everyone here.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 4>And globally. So we're going to start with just the

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 4>details of where we are, what we know. Jeff Stein

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 4>is going to join.

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 2>He's going to weigh in on his latest reporting of

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 2>how this tariff scheme was developed. And also big fight

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 2>developing between two Trump supporters, Bill Ackman, who has now

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 2>come out against the tariffs, and Howard Lutnik, who of

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>course is the Commerce Secretary. We also have the very

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 2>latest polling about how Americans are feeling about all of this,

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 2>with the caveat being all of this polling really occurred

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:32.759
<v Speaker 2>before the massive market movements, before these massive announcements, so

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 2>getting early indications though about how nervous Americans are about

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 2>this direction. Elon appears to be breaking with Trump over

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 2>tariffs and specifically getting into a bit of a battle

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 2>with Peter Navarro. Protests have also broken out nationwide. These

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 2>are not just about tariffs, but about overwhelming sort of

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 2>resistance among the Democratic base to Trump and Elon and

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 2>everything that's going on. So we wanted to take a

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 2>look at that as well. Was the first really big

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 2>nationwide organized resistance to Trump two point zero, and we're

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 2>going to have a nice discussion debate between Rocanna and

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 2>orn Cass should be interesting to get both of their perspectives.

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Grow us not some neoliberal like Free Trader. He has

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 2>a nuanced view on tariffs. I'm interested to hear or

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 2>and explain exactly how he feels about everything that is

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 2>going on and how this plan is being implemented right

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 2>now as well.

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 3>That's right, or the more serious person that we could

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 3>find that will actually defend some of at least what

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 3>is going on here, So we wanted to make sure

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 3>we did that. Yeah, as Crystal said, though, it's going

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 3>to be a tariff special here. Thank you very much

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 3>to all our premium subscribers out there. By the way,

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 3>the best way that everybody could help with our show

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 3>right now is really just like subscribe and to share it,

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 3>especially if you're listening on the podcast is texted to

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 3>a friend. Especially, I know tariff's very sensitive subject and

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:49.679
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people are trying to wrap their heads

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 3>around what's going on. So that's why we wanted to

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 3>really dedicate this to everybody, and it is I think

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 3>best listened to as a whole. All right, let's go

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 3>ahead and start with the tariffs, is Crystal said, Let's

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 3>go put this up there on the screen, major movement

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 3>in the Asian and the European markets, basically a massive

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 3>implosion of all of the stock value across the globe

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 3>since the announcement of the tariffs. For those who are watching,

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 3>you can see various stock indices across the world that

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 3>are down. The minimum is in China down five percent,

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 3>although things changed actually just since we made this graphic.

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 3>The Hong Kong Stock Exchange having its worst days since

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>nineteen ninety seven in some fifteen percent drop overnight. Germany

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 3>down almost ten percent, Canada down, the UK down, the

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 3>United States down over fifteen percent in the Japanese Nicky Index,

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 3>I believe, with one of the worst days in the

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 3>history of that they even I think had to flip

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 3>their circuit breaker to set yeah trading over in Japan.

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 3>So you can just see what is occurring globally. No

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 3>sign from Donald Trump yet that he is backing down.

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 3>He spent the weekend in Florida golfing. We'll return to

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 3>that in a little bit on Air Force One, though

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 3>he did take a few questions.

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Here's what he had to say, the pain in the market.

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 5>At some point, you're unwilling to tolerate this idea of

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 5>you're a threshold.

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 6>I think your question is so stupid.

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 5>I admit I think it's a I don't want anything

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 5>to go down, but sometimes you have to take meticine

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 5>to fix something. And we have such a horrible We

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 5>have been treated so badly by other countries because we

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 5>had stupid leadership that allowed this to happen. They didn't

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 5>get it spoken when.

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 7>They look at the fact that we have.

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 5>A billion dollar trade deficit. When you look at the

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 5>trade deficit that we have with certain countries, way over

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 5>a billion per country. With China, it's a trillion dollars,

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 5>and we have to solve our trade deficit with China.

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 6>We have a trillion dollar trade.

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 5>Deficit with China, hundreds of billions of dollars a year

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 5>with us with China, and unless we solve that problem,

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm not going to make a deal.

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Those comments would make sense, Crystal. I thought there were

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 3>just tariffs on China. Maybe some of us could get

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 3>behind that, but that's not really what's going on here.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 3>We got to basically it's average some thirty percent tariff

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 3>across the world, including fifty percent or whatever on Vietnam.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Multiple countries calling the White House over the weekend might

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 3>be a bit difficult because the President is down golfing

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 3>in mar A Lago. He did win his golf championship though.

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations. Well some good too, That's great, that's right. Let's

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>put this up there on the screen.

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 3>This is his latest from truth social We have massive

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 3>financial deficits with China, the European Union, and many others.

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 3>The only way this problem can be cured is with tariffs,

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 3>which are numbering tens of billions into the USA.

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>They are already in effect and a beautiful thing to behold.

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 3>The surplus with these countries has grown during the presidency

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 3>of Sleepy Joe Biden.

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>We are going to reverse it, and reverse it quickly.

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Someday people will realize the tariffs for the United States

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 3>of America are a very beautiful thing. So there is

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 3>still yet no major movement there by the White House.

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 3>In terms of where we are here in the United States,

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 3>things are a bit all over the place. As we said,

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 3>the Japanese Index and the Hong Kong Index just absolutely

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 3>got destroyed overnight the United States markets. It's roughly like

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 3>two point five percent as of US right recording. Right now,

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 3>we can put that on the screen just in terms

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 3>of where everything is. The Nasdaq was down by about

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 3>two point eight percent. It honestly could extend much much worse.

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 3>It was even worse whenever the futures did open this morning.

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Nobody really quite knows.

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 3>If, though, that the S and P does fall today

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 3>more than four percent for a third day in a row,

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 3>it will be the first time since the Great Depression.

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's one of those.

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Where it's always difficult to contextualize history, you know, when

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 3>it's actually happening. But the truth is is that we

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 3>are in one of the five great market crashes in

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.919
<v Speaker 3>modern American history from the Great Depression, not just me

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 3>saying that the data indicates this is the worst crash,

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 3>not a listens March of twenty twenty. And then finally,

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, to get to the inevitable retort, they're like, well,

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 3>why doesn't matter, and it's like, well, even if you

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 3>don't own any stocks, and that's fine, I think fifty

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 3>eight percent of Americans do. But for the rest of

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 3>the country and the bottom of the income scale, the

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 3>market and the liquidity in that market and the decision

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 3>making being driven by those companies that will affect one

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 3>hundred percent of us. You know, you could have owned

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 3>zero stocks in two thousand and nine and you still

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 3>would have suffered the consequences because you would not have

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 3>any access to the company wants to hire you, doesn't

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 3>have any access to cash, they have no market, they

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 3>have no liquidity, they have no ability to borrow. They're

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 3>going bus. You know, these capital markets, for better or

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 3>for worse, and I think for worse now do absolutely

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:27.239
<v Speaker 3>rule our entire lives.

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And we'll talk about that.

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 3>I think more in terms of tariff strategy, and what

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I think the biggest flaw in the overall roll out

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 3>in the strategy was is that fact is is that

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 3>we're basically asking private markets to you know, act in

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 3>a way that we believe is beneficial to the state,

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 3>but with no real incentive, you know, both to the

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 3>company for the employer to minimize any sort of short

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 3>term not even short term, long term economic pain.

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Now at this point that's another thing.

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Everyone's like, oh, well, he could cut a deal, and

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 3>he could cut a deal and things could sert, just like, yeah,

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 3>they could. But you know, in the interim, there are

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 3>a lot of companies, even in this week that will

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 3>pay literally millions of dollars in tariffs. You can't just

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 3>take millions of dollars off of somebody's bottom line and

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 3>expect nothing to happen.

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it just doesn't really work that way. Yeah,

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's where I continue to fall.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Even if this is a short term strategy, there's a

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of pain in that short term strategy for millions

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 3>of people, not to mention them. Level of uncertainty in

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 3>the markets, in the overall pocketbooks, the amount of consumer

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 3>spending that's going to shrink as a result of this

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 3>genuinely cannot be overstated.

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's I don't think anyone really knows how massive

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the fallout is going to be. Like, there is no

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 2>limit to how bad it could be. And yeah, Trump

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 2>could walk back from it at any time. I mean

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 2>he walked back from the you know, the height of

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 2>the Canada and Mexico tariffs. This man, he's a mad man.

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 2>He's all over the place. But there's a big debate

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 2>on econ Twitter at this point of like we may

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 2>already be past the point of no return in a

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 2>certain respect because let's say today he comes out and says,

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 2>you know what, I've deals with fifty countries good enough,

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 2>We're rolling this back to you know, a lower level,

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.599
<v Speaker 2>and we'll revisit it a month from now, which is

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of the playbook that he's been running. Do you

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 2>think if you are someone making decisions for a major business,

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 2>a major manufacturing concern, like, is this going to give

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 2>you confidence to want to invest more in the United

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 2>States of America?

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 4>Of course not, of course not.

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean if you're running any company, including our own,

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 2>by the way, thinking about how things are going to go,

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 2>and you know how people are feeling with a potential

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 2>recession coming and how their premium membership budget is looking

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 2>at this point like you are going to freeze in

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 2>place at best, and at worst you're going to start saying,

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 2>you know what, these people, this project that we had going,

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 2>that we were hopeful for for the future, this is

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 2>just not the environment to do it in. So in

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 2>some ways, even if at this point Trump were to

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 2>come out and say, just getting guys, you know, late

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 2>April Fool's joke, Liberation Day is over. Who is going

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 2>to want to invest in this climate? And you know,

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I used to get really irritated with all the like

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 2>uncertainty talk because this was used against you know, any

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 2>sort of like progressive economic policy that would benefit working

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 2>class people or whatever. But at certain point, you really

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 2>do as a business owner, as an investor, as someone

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 2>who is an executive in a company, you need some

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:20.359
<v Speaker 2>sort of stable policy climate in which to make decisions.

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 2>And you will not have that with this present period.

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 2>You will not have that with this president. And I

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 2>think given the you know, seesaw nature of American politics,

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I think there are a lot of countries and a

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 2>lot of companies here and around the world that are saying,

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if we'll ever have that with the

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 2>US again.

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 4>Period.

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 2>You know, a couple things that I just wanted to

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 2>emphasize from Trump's comments and why they sent the markets

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 2>into such a free fall. You know, last week, of

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 2>course there were significant market losses, but I think we

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 2>both had the feel of like it actually.

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 4>Could have been worse.

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it could have been much.

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Worth And the reason for that is because there was

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 2>still a hope on Wall Street of like Trump's going

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 2>to come on on Sunday before the future's market opens

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 2>and he's going to announce a bunch of deals and

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 2>he's going to step away from this and instead he

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 2>makes this comment sometimes you have to take the medicine

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 2>number one and seems to not care at all about

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the nuclear bomb that he's dropped on the global economy,

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 2>which just on like a personal level, thinking about this

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 2>person's psychology, I cannot wrap my head around someone who

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:26.839
<v Speaker 2>would drop this level bomb and then just go I'm

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 2>gonna go play golf, I'm gonna go host a fundraiser

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 2>at mar A Lago like insanity. But so he says

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>that in no indication of making these deals, and the

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 2>in fact, he told his surrogates, I don't want you

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 2>to say these are a starting point for negotiations. No,

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 2>these are in place, and that's that. And then the

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 2>other thing he said that was so disconcerting is he's

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 2>holding onto this idea that if you have a trade

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 2>deficit with any country, no matter what the dynamics are,

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Like we talked about Lesotho last week, right, this poor

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 2>African nation that we buy diamonds for and they're too

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 2>poor to afford our products, and in his mind, that

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 2>means that Lesotho is ripping us off. Okay, idiotic, stupid,

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 2>like the most Kindergarten level of understanding of trade you

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 2>could possibly imagine, but he reiterates that. And it matters

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 2>not only for understanding how stupid the policy is, which

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 2>most people I think already understand, but it also matters

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 2>because what deal can Lesotho make with us that's going

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 2>to fix that problem?

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 4>There isn't one.

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, countries that had, in anticipation of Trump

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 2>loving tariffs had rolled back their terrri straight trying to

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 2>get ahead of it, say like Israel is one example

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 2>of that, like, look, we don't even charge you any tarffs.

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 4>They still got hit with tariffs.

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 2>There is no deal that you can make with virtually

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 2>any of these countries that's just going to close the

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 2>trade deficit overnight.

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 4>That is not how this works.

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 2>And so that was the other thing that made a

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 2>lot of investors go what the fuck because that indicates

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 2>there are no grand bargains or deals. This is not

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 2>just a negotiating tactic. May really be serious about moving

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 2>forward with this, and it is just as nonsensical as

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 2>it appears on its face when you're looking at you know,

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the Penguin islands and this stupid formula that we're going

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 2>to talk more about that they may not even be

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 2>applying correctly. It really doesn't matter to him what the

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 2>carnage is, what the fallout is. You know, he has

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 2>this idea and has had about Terris number one and

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 2>number two.

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 4>He likes that.

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 2>He likes that the whole world is jumping at his moves.

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 2>He loves that all these countries are having to call

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 2>and scramble, that all these companies are going to come

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 2>on bended knee to try to get their car ount

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 2>to try to get their exemption. And he loves that

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 2>he can do all of this apparently without having a

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 2>consult a single person.

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.119
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the power to raise.

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.559
<v Speaker 2>Revenue and institute tariffs is supposed to be with Congress.

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 2>He's using eyepen in a very similar way to how

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 2>he's you know, using these sort of like national security

0:13:56.000 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 2>or national emergency car bounds to claim extraordinary powers from SOLFF.

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 2>That's what he's doing here with tariffs. There will be

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 2>court challenges. I don't know how that will go. I

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 2>don't think anyone knows really how that will go. But

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 2>he also likes. What he loves about this is that

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 2>it all comes down to him, and he can be

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 2>the dictator and he doesn't have to ask anyone for anything.

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 2>And all the chaos around him doesn't bother him one bit.

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, why would it bother him?

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 3>As you said, it's very you know, it's something that

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 3>feeds his own conception of what's going on. But what

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 3>I just simply cannot move away from is there's genuine,

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 3>like massive pain not even being done necessarily to billionaires

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 3>or companies or anything. That's like real folks who have

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 3>retirement accounts who are watching these just evaporate. I mean, look,

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 3>let's also contextualize it correctly. You know, one year of

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 3>gains in the S and P five hundred are erased.

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 3>That means basically, if you had money over the last

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 3>year and you were chunking it away into your four

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 3>oh one k, and you were doing everything that you're

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 3>supposed to do, that money's gone or it's you know,

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 3>it's now it's actually down. And if you look at

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 3>over at the five year period, who was a common

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 3>talking point, oh my gosh, the SP five is up

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 3>over one hundred percent. Well now it's down to eighty two.

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 3>So now we're already back to twenty twenty four, you know,

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 3>style valuation. Let's wait another week. What are we going

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 3>to go back to twenty twenty three. You know the

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 3>backward clock that's ticking here for a lot of people,

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 3>layers of what preciseable percentage of the country which is

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 3>over sixty five, and size of percentage even more that

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 3>are over seventy. I was telling you this morning there

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 3>are a lot of people who are on retirement to

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 3>have mandatory withdrawals, you know, from their IRA accounts. So

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 3>what if you're literally forced to sell at the bottom.

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's a that's a horrible thing to be

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 3>inflicting on people. Finally, as you and I just want

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 3>to really stick on this point with the capital markets,

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 3>the way that this is being basically rolled is we're

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 3>implementing this massive tariff and so if you want to

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 3>build here, you have to move here. We will not

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 3>compensate you at all in the interim. We are not

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 3>giving you a tax break. In fact, Steve Manution, the

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 3>former Secretary of the Treasury, was onto CNBC on Friday,

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 3>and I actually thought he gave a great answer.

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>He was like, look, of course we can have tariffs.

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I'm pro tariff.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 3>I know you are in some cases yeah as well, Yeah,

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 3>you know what that needs to be paired with a

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 3>dollar for dollar manufacturing credit and or infusion from capital

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 3>of Congress, which would mean what for Apple. Let's say

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 3>we want Apple to build an iPhone here in America

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 3>or build more of it. Okay, let's say five to

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent of it something like that here in the

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 3>United States.

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's going to cost X, Y, and z.

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 3>We will then acknowledge that we can have Apple pony

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 3>up some of that cash. Congress and then others the

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 3>administration will say we will also kick a tax credit

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 3>or a break to make sure that you don't fire

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 3>people in the interim and you don't rehab it on

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 3>our overall equities markets, which is what we're currently having.

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>There's none of that.

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Actually, the Congress wants to remove manufacturing tax credits right

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 3>now so that they can pay for a permanent extension

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 3>or whatever.

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Some of these corporates. That's that's why I want people

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to understand.

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 3>So the problem is that not only do we have

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 3>a massive teriff regime in place, we are actually currently

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 3>have a gop led Congress which wants to reduce the

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 3>amount of social spending that there is while extending corporate

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 3>tax rusts and not increasing manufacturing tax credits, which would

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 3>actually benefit all of the stated goal of bring things over.

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I'm just like, this is so it's

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>not even stupid.

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.439
<v Speaker 3>Stupid is something that doesn't necessarily bear consequences.

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>This has massive consequences.

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 3>And you know that's another thing too, where you know

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 3>the administration is really banking on like, oh well he

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 3>said he was going to do just like, well, okay,

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 3>hold on a second. Nobody nobody, And this is why

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 3>the markets crashed as they were ever floated a thirty

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 3>five for forty percent tariff.

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Nobody floated.

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 3>When you say reciprocal tariffs, that's a word, it has

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 3>a meaning, it has a definitional term, right, And that

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Bess Crystal. With the actual calculation from what I can

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 3>tell of whate reciprocal tariff would mean, even with currency

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 3>market manipulation and all, that is maybe five to ten percent.

0:17:57.880 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Whenever it comes to China, on Japan, it would be five.

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 3>Actually it might even be zero if you factor in

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 3>a few other things. Do you know why he decided

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 3>not to do that because the number was not big enough.

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 3>So that's where this is ten times out of step.

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Even with allegedly many of the things that he sold

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 3>on the campaign trail, and that is why you are

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 3>seeing the level of freak out. And look, very soon,

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 3>real voters, you're all going to start you were going

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 3>to feel this in a very real way. Screw retirement.

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 3>We're talking layout. We've already seen it. We've already seen

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Stilantus layoffs nine hundred people in Michigan.

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>We've already seen people freeze investment.

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Just wait, start asking around for people who are like, yeah,

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:36.959
<v Speaker 3>we had a project and it got pulled. You're going

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 3>to see consultants go down if the pharma tariffs eventually

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 3>do go into place.

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, just good luck.

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, to the entire US consulting industry, a centure

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 3>and those of people. Do I love those industries, No,

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 3>but there's a lot of people who work there and

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 3>they propel a lot of people there as well. If

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 3>we want to change things, we need tax credits, we

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 3>need capital infusion. Currently is a four to five hundred

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars raised on people. If you take that out

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 3>of money out of the economy, you've got to put

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 3>it back in at the same time.

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>But they don't, they don't want to do any of that.

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's right.

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 3>So we're looking at some you know, an eight level

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 3>liquidity crunch and also this final you know word here there.

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>This our economy is leveraged to the hilt. We learned

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>nothing from two thousand and eight.

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 3>When you start to drop fifteen to twenty we're talking

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 3>margin calls at the top of Wall Street, We're talking

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, these major fortune five hundred. They are levered

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 3>up to the hilt, maybe not one hundred times like

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 3>they were during two thousand and eight. But we've really

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 3>learned very little about debt crises and all this because

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 3>there's been you know, a deck fifteen years of cheat

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 3>money that is all going to end. And when you

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 3>pull all that back out of the economy, I can't

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 3>even begin to describe, like what the layoffs and the

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 3>unemployment situation and all that's going to look.

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Like, isn't it Warren Buffett who says when the stock

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 2>market goes down, you find out who's women without Yeah.

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>That's right, it's true. Yeah, it's scirically true.

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 4>Everybody is.

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I was reading an article about how everybody's making calls

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 2>around to try to figure out what the equivalent and

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 2>of like the Lehman brothers this time is some entity

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 2>that's really at the center that's overleveraged at this or that,

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 2>or you know, it could also be some gigantic manufacturing

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 2>concern that had, you know, move forward with all these

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 2>investments potentially related to the the Inflation Reduction Act and

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the Chips Act, which by the way, like they weren't enough,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 2>those things were working to increase significantly. You can look

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 2>at the Joe, We're going to show the chart when

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 2>we talked to rowan Orn manufacturing infrastructure investment in this country.

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 2>And not only are they not doing the analogous thing

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 2>for whatever industries that they want to build up, but

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Chips Act is being de facto rolled back because Doge

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 2>went in and like cut half the staff that was

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 2>implementing this.

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 4>And again it has been.

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 2>Very, very successful the IRA because it focuses on things

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 2>like you know, EV batteries and green energy. Like Trump

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 2>doesn't like that, so that's being hacked hacked at as well.

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 2>So like the things that were actually working to increase

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing investment in this country are being killed. There are

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 2>no corresponding to tax crist and by the way, with

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 2>this level of across the board tariff even that, like

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 2>what you're going to subsidize everything in the entire You're

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 2>going to subsidize banana production and coffee being production and

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 2>diamond mind product, like it still would be insanity given

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 2>the way that they're moving forward. But there's none of

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 2>that either. In fact, there's an austerity push on the

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 2>other side. And then you know, even if you think

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 2>about the advanced manufacturing that we have here, are so

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 2>many of they're either raw materials or the parts that

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 2>they're sourcing come from overseas, so they're being hit with

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 2>those arrafs when they're trying to import things to you know,

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 2>assemble a complicated final product.

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 4>And so no, I mean.

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 2>There, I think this is much more likely to it

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 2>to negatively impact, to damage significantly the manufacturing, investment production

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 2>that we do have, than it is to spur any

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 2>sort of a renaissance.

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:02.199
<v Speaker 4>Last thing.

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 2>And I'll say, I mean, I'm sure I'll have many

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 2>other comments that I can make today and I will

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 2>make in the future, et cetera. But you really do

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 2>have to look at this as class warfare. And I

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 2>know that this is being framed it's like, oh, this

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 2>is going to be great for the working class, nonsense.

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Trump has said he wants to get rid of the

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 2>income tax, and certainly, even if he doesn't achieve that

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 2>maximalist goal, he's going to extend the Tax Cut and

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Jobs Act, which is a gigantic tax cut for the

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 2>richest people in the country, and he wants to move

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 2>towards funding the government through tarifs. Terrafts are a regressive tax.

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.479
<v Speaker 2>They hit the working class way harder than they hit

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 2>rich people because the working class, of course, spends much more,

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 2>as a larger percent of their income on goods. So

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 2>when prices are going up for groceries and toilet paper

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 2>and clothes and medicine and everything else in that you

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 2>could think of in the fresh fruits and vegetables, like

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 2>so much of what is consumed to your comes from overseas,

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 2>that is incredibly, incredibly regressive and it is going to

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 2>hurt working class people. It's going to devastate them now obviously,

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 2>like the rich people are getting hurt right now in

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 2>the market as well. But the impetus here and why

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 2>he always talks about McKinley, because what was the state

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 2>of taxation under McKinley. It was all effectively teriffs. There

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 2>was no income tax in place, and that is the

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 2>direction that he wants to move things in. So you know,

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 2>it's I always want. I think it's really important to

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 2>talk about the specifics of what the formula is and

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 2>how it's being implemented and how it doesn't make sense.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 2>But I also think we have to keep in mind

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 2>the bigger picture of what he is actually trying to accomplish,

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 2>and I think among those things are again consolidating power

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 2>and power grab and I also think it is shifting

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 2>the burden of taxation on to working class people, shifting

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 2>the burden of funding the government on to working class people.

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 2>And you know, if he sticks with this plan is

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 2>going to be devastating for so many.

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 4>And the market, the market matters.

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to say that it's like, oh, who

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 2>cares that if the market is crashing, real there is

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 2>real pain there as sober as indicating. But the market

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 2>is also just the first indicator of how catastrophic this

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 2>is going to be. Look At how regular people fared

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 2>in coming out of the housing crisis. Look at how

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 2>regular people would have fared in the COVID crash had

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 2>there not been a massive government infusion to support people

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 2>you know, look at how regular people fail fair in

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 2>any recession, any massive market crash, and there is no

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 2>indication that there is some major government program coming to

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 2>help support people through these times. In Trump's words, we

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 2>just got to take the medicine. I think that's a

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 2>good place to transition to Jeff and talk with him

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 2>about his reporting.

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 4>He's been so.

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Good on this issue, even going back to the camp

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 2>and you know, he was one who was saying, like, listen, guys,

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.120
<v Speaker 2>he talks about tariffs a lot, and you're right that

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 2>you never laid out this particular scheme, but he did

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 2>lay out pretty maximalu's tariff ideas. I don't think Wall

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Street ever took them seriously. They thought they were getting

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 2>their tax cuts and that this was just like a

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 2>negotiating tactic. And you know that would be something like

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 2>the level of tariff imposition from his first term maybe

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 2>amped up a little bit, but I don't think they

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 2>ever took that particularly seriously. And Jeff has also done

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 2>a fantastic job digging into the behind the scenes and

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 2>surprising no one. It really was Trump who said this

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.439
<v Speaker 2>is the way that I want to do it. Some

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 2>of his advisors had been working on some more sophisticated

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 2>level of tariff plan, and he said no, no, no,

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 2>And the decision making went up to the hours before

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 2>he made the announcement there at the White House. So

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:49.959
<v Speaker 2>with that being said, let's go ahead and get to economics.

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:51.959
<v Speaker 2>Chief Economics report is at his name now, I want

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 2>to give him his fancy name. He's got a fancy

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 2>title at the Washington Post now chief economics reporter. Jeff's

0:25:58.040 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 2>time from the Washington Post.

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now the chief economics reporter for the Washington Post.

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Jeff Stein, great friend of the show. Good to see you, Jeff.

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 3>You've been number one to be reading this week as

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 3>we enter and post liberation.

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 4>That's in every week.

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that's right, all the reporting skills I learned. We're

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 8>here on breaking points.

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 3>Ah, that is absolutely not true. All right, let's go

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 3>and let's go ahead. Jeff's reaction. He's gonna break down

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.199
<v Speaker 3>not only Donald Trump's role behind all of this. He

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 3>will reveal the truth behind the fake formula. None of us,

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 3>many of us, have paid notice to the fact that

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:30.959
<v Speaker 3>many of the tariffs were being put into place on

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 3>some unpopulated islands. The USCA secretary was actually asked about

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 3>this or sorry, The Secretary of Agriculture was asked about

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 3>this over the weekend.

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a listen. We'll get reaction.

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 4>Why are you putting import tariffs on islands that are

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 4>entirely populated by penguins?

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean that, Come on, Jake, Obviously, here's the

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 9>bottom line. We live under a tariff regime from other countries.

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>We have too long is the.

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 9>Idea that America goes first? I mean, come on, whatever, listen,

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 9>the people that are leading this are serious, intentional, patriotic,

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 9>the smartest people I've ever worked with. I did not

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 9>come up with the formulas.

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 3>So Jeff, who came up with this formula? Where where

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.640
<v Speaker 3>do this thing come from? You've got the story. We'll

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 3>put it up there, but you can talk well while

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 3>we show off your work.

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 8>The weird thing about that answer, with all these respect

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 8>to the Agriculture secretary, is like, if I was a

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 8>Trump Cabinet official, I feel like I could have given

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 8>a somewhat cojent response. Like the reason that these tiny

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 8>little islands were hit by the tariffs is in.

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 6>Part because there's some.

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:50.239
<v Speaker 8>Concerns that they could be vehicles for transhipment, right, like,

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 8>if you're a foreign country and you're trying to just

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 8>send something to a country that you know, the tiny

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 8>middle island, then you reincorporate, say that that that good

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 8>is now from that island and then send it onward.

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 8>That's what I would have said if I was the

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 8>Agriculture secretary, even though the idea that a substantial proportion

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 8>of trade could be rerouted through an island with like

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 8>fall penguins and no people on it is probably overblown,

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 8>Like that's what you could have said in response, even

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 8>I mean, according to the trade expers I've spoken to,

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 8>even more kind of shocking about this formula that they

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 8>use to determine country specific terrors, which are different than

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 8>the universal one that they applied on all countries, which

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 8>we can talk about sort of the criticisms of and

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 8>the very strong criticisms of the country specific tariffs hit

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 8>countries based on essentially their trading deficit with the US.

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 8>And so you have countries like Lesotto, which is a

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 8>big minner of diamond exporter to the US, which is

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 8>an incredibly poor country. Of course we buy more from

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 8>Lesoto than they do from US. That has nothing to

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 8>do with the thing that the White House and Trump

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 8>are talking about as being the impetus of this global

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 8>trade war, right because they're saying, look, which there is

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 8>some truth to this part that the US has, you know,

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 8>is a global purchaser of stuff across the world, that

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 8>we have a global trade imbalance, which is all true,

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 8>that it is you know, particularly bad with some countries

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 8>like China, and that they want to do something about it.

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 8>But Lesoto is not a net center of exports to

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 8>the US because they have nefarious currency arrangement or high

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 8>terror farriers our exports because it's an incredibly poor country,

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 8>Like it would make no sense for Lesoto to be

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 8>buying more stuff from US than we do from from them.

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 6>So that's like the I think the.

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 8>Overarching frame and the question to your question, Stager, like

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 8>why do they do this? We had reporting last week

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 8>about how the Trump administration's sort of top economic minds

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 8>had weeks been working on a formula that was narrowly

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 8>about sort of the thing the problem that they're ostensibly

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 8>trying to solve, which you can debate whether it's worth solving,

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 8>but this issue of US buying more than we sell

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 8>to the rest of the world, and they had a

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 8>plan that took into account. They had several plans that

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 8>took into account all kinds of currency manipulation factors and tariffs,

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 8>and they were coming up with sophisticated measures to deal

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 8>with that. I cannot prove who wrote the more crude

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 8>formula that was widely mocked that Trump, as we reported,

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 8>personally selected, but I do know that it bears striking

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 8>resemblance to a number of public state public formulas previously

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 8>endorsed by Peter Navarro, who is sort of the most

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 8>ultra maximalist trade hawk in Trump's orbit. And so I'll

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 8>just leave that observation there.

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, to get from you the reaction from Bill Ackman,

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 2>who is now very unhappy with these tarifs, and of

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 2>course he's been a big Trump supporter. He's also accusing

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Howard Lutnick of profiting off of the crash of the

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 2>stock market. If we could put before up on the screen, guys,

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 2>this is what part of what acca He's famous for

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 2>these freaking way too long posts on Twitter. But in

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 2>any case, this is a portion of what he had

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 2>to say. He said, business is a confidence game. The

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 2>president is losing the confidence of business leaders around the globe.

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 2>The consequences for our country and millions of our citizens

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 2>who have supported the president, in particular low income consumers

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 2>who are already under a huge amount of economic stress,

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 2>are going to be severely negative.

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 4>This is not what we voted for.

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 2>The president has an opportunity on Monday to call a

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 2>time out, have the time to execute on fixing an

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 2>unfair tariff system. Alternatively, we are heading for a self

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 2>induced economic nuclear winter, and we should start hunkering down.

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 2>May cooler heads prevail before I get into the the attack.

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:01.719
<v Speaker 2>Then on Howard at Nick Commerce Secretary, just would love

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 2>to get your reaction to Ackman, you know, and his

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 2>position here and saying, hey, you got to call a

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 2>time out here or else we're headed for this economic

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 2>nuclear winter, because you've been pointing out for a long time. Listen, guys,

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>he's serious about these tarts.

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Did he float this particular formula on the campaign trail? No,

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 2>but he was floating some pretty maximus positions. And it

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 2>certainly seems like people like Bill Ackman and a lot

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 2>of the other Wall Street types who were excited about

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 2>a Trump administration they thought they were getting.

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 4>Their tax cut.

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 2>They did not think that they were getting self induced

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 2>global economic meltdown.

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, just from a writerly perspective, I think

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 8>the technical term here is burying the lead.

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 6>If you're saying we might be headed.

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 8>For economic nuclear winner, normally you don't put it at

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:50.479
<v Speaker 8>the bottom of six hundred words of text and after,

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 8>you know, seven paragraphs of expository throat clearing.

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 4>It was very New York Times of him.

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, no comment a post report.

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 8>I'm I think you know exactly as you're saying, It's

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 8>been really remarkable to see.

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 6>Like, I don't think anything Trump.

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 8>Has done is really that surprising based on his campaign rhetoric,

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 8>based on the reporting. I mean, I wrote a story

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 8>in August twenty twenty three.

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 6>You can go look it up. I promise it's real.

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 8>It says in detail that that President Trump is seriously

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 8>considering or plans to, if re elected, launch a global

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 8>trade war that includes tariff barriers as high as sixty

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 8>percent on China, which is pretty.

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 6>Close to what they ended up with.

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 8>That is, would include a universal tariff of up to

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 8>ten or twenty percent, which is almost double what he

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 8>in fact actually proposed in terms of universal tariffs. That

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 8>includes these sectoral tariffs on entire industries now we haven't

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 8>even seeing yet, right, So like for all the all

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 8>the sort of financial carnage we've seen in markets, like

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 8>some of the biggest measures that they're considering are not

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 8>even yet announced. So that's that's tear ups on all

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 8>kinds of the same good that come in wherever they're from.

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 8>And autos we've seen, but farm the Lumbard copper, et cetera.

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 8>You know, as I've been pointing on Twitter, it's just

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 8>it's hard for me to understand how some of the

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 8>richest people in the world couldn't afford one hundred and

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 8>fifty dollars subscription to The Washington Post. And it makes

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 8>me wonder, like why I didn't just start in investment

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 8>service for these guys in charge like ten times my

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 8>current salary, Because there were people who, you know, I

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 8>have sources who are lobbyists who are paid four or

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 8>five six times when I'm to give Wall Street advice

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 8>on how to invest in, how to navigate Washington, and

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 8>a lot of times our reporting was much closer to

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 8>what actually happened, So I could ramble on about this

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:57.919
<v Speaker 8>for days.

0:34:57.960 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I've been I think it's a good point to

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 3>be fair. So also, and despite you writing it, there

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 3>were also a lot of people who worked for him

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:07.359
<v Speaker 3>telling a lot of those people just don't worry about

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 3>it's not going to happen. So you know, it's not

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 3>like he wasn't also feeding them a lot of what

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 3>they wanted to hear during the campaign.

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 1>I guess that might be.

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 8>True, but like I definitely take it as a possibility

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 8>that I'm just like not talking the right people.

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 6>But I don't know. I'm not like the best source

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 6>reporter in America.

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 8>But you know, there are people who are like in

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 8>the Trump circle who talked to me, and they have

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 8>they have been like very clear, like for a year

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 8>and a half or two years to me now that

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.320
<v Speaker 8>like you talked to Trump one on one about this stuff,

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 8>like there is no or very little sort of like yeah,

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 8>this is a bluff. Yeah, like this is a design

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 8>to get people to move. It's like I talked to

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 8>a senator a couple of months ago and he said

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 8>that he was like begging Trump to like not do

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 8>the tariffs, and Trump was like.

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 6>Basically just said, we need to get back.

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 8>To where McKinley was over and over to this senator

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 8>and the Center's like, what are you talking about? So,

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think there is an element that are

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 8>there are people goes to Trump who are saying to

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:14.800
<v Speaker 8>Wall Street, this isn't serious. But I also think people

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 8>were just kind of seeing what I'm hearing things that

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 8>weren't really even being said.

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:19.839
<v Speaker 6>If that makes sense.

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they were hearing what they want to do. Let's

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and get the attack on Letning. Now he

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 2>has since walked this back and apologized for it. But

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 2>I think this is before b that we can put

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 2>up on the screen here. So Ackman says, I just

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 2>figured out why Howard lutnink Co, of course, is the

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Commerce Secretary and adamant Trump tariff defender on cable news,

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 2>is indifferent to the stock market and the economy crashing.

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 2>He and Canter that's his firm, are long on bonds.

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 2>He profits when our economy implodes. It's a bad idea

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 2>to pick a Secretary of Commerce whose firm is levered

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 2>long fixed income. It's an irreconcilable conflict of interests. Of course,

0:36:56.880 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 2>this administration is rife with conflicts of interest. If you

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 2>aren't cashing it in, you're in this administration. I don't

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 2>know what you're doing. But you know, what did you

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 2>make of this from Ackman? As I said, he did

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 2>walk this back and apologize. I think Letnik he must

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 2>be doing his best in a very difficult position.

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Whatever.

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:15.320
<v Speaker 2>But you know, do you think there's is this fair

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 2>critique of Lutnik at all? And also bigger picture, what

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 2>do you make of these two you know, previously very

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 2>solid Trump supporters. Lutink I don't think has weighed in,

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 2>but Ackman attacking him directly.

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I don't know much about the internal, you know,

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 8>positions of Canter Fitzgerald.

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 6>I do think it doesn't make a ton.

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 8>Of sense that that that this strategy on crashing the

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 8>market would lead to an uptick.

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 6>In bond sales.

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 8>I mean that mostly affect the issuance, which is a

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:54.800
<v Speaker 8>US government function.

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 6>So it's it's hard for me to see like that really.

0:37:58.000 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I guess you could see the price of

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 8>existing thing outstanding bonds go up, but I don't know

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 8>at a very minimum, Like I just would like to

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 8>see a lot more any evidence at all of this.

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:10.839
<v Speaker 6>Before even suggesting there's anything there.

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 8>I think on the political dynamic, I think it is

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 8>really interesting that we're seeing an increasing number of people

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:22.919
<v Speaker 8>in the Trump orbit attack not the president but sort

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 8>of people around him, like Elon Musk over the weekend

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 8>went after Peter Navarro, who, as I mentioned, this sort

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:33.879
<v Speaker 8>of court to this whole strategy.

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 6>Bill Lackman.

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:38.880
<v Speaker 8>They're going after not the president himself but the Commerce secretary.

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 8>And there seems to be another element of like, this

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 8>can't have been the president's fault.

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 6>Personally, so we need to find a stand in.

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 8>It's like the King, it could never be wrong. It's

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 8>his advisor. So I think there is an elements of

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 8>that going on, where people are trying to find maybe

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:57.280
<v Speaker 8>a fall guy that Trump can then be like, oh,

0:38:57.320 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 8>this whole lapse was like this guy's fault.

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 6>It's all Trump guys.

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 8>This is like all being done by the President, like

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:05.879
<v Speaker 8>you see those clips of him in nineteen eighty being

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 8>like Japan is ripping us off, it's him, you know.

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:12.240
<v Speaker 8>But if that's what they need to do to feel

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 8>like they can sort of make clear to Trump that.

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 6>This has to change without hitting him directly, I think

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 6>we're going.

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 2>To see more of that gives him a way to

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.879
<v Speaker 2>save face potentially of like oh what this guy gave

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 2>me some terrible advice. Allry, Howard Lutnik, You're own right.

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Last question for you then, Jeff, where do you think

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 3>things are going to go for the next week? So

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 3>the administration's cope is fifty different countries have called us

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 3>and we're negotiating.

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean?

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 8>I mean we reported last week that the Trump White

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 8>House sent out internal talking points to their people saying,

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 8>do not characterize this as a negotiation. And Lutnik has

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:53.319
<v Speaker 8>a desine. They've all been saying, like, this is not

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:56.839
<v Speaker 8>going to be resolved in days or weeks. Is there

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:59.320
<v Speaker 8>a chance that in the back of his head Donald

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 8>Trump is still thinking, like, tell everyone in my inner

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 8>circle that this is not a negotiation so that we

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 8>have higher leverage with the rest of the world as

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 8>the economy implodes. Like it's possible, But I don't really

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 8>think so. And so far I've continually taken the like

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:19.919
<v Speaker 8>the under on the like Trump is bluffing by a lot,

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 8>and I think people would be wise to continue to

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 8>do so.

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 2>I do have one more for you, Jeff, just on

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 2>the political temperature from Republicans. There is starting to be

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 2>an effort for Congress to reclaim what should be its

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 2>powers over leving tariffs.

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 4>Many Republicans have.

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 2>First of all, I mean they're terrified to go against

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:42.919
<v Speaker 2>Trump to start with, he has really consolidated control over

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:46.280
<v Speaker 2>that party. And second of all, they were comforting themselves

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:48.319
<v Speaker 2>with the idea of like, oh, some of them are

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 2>even saying like, oh, he's going to use this as

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 2>a negotiating tool to take teriffs down to zero, so

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 2>this is actually free trade, Like this is you know,

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:58.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm totally in line with my Chamber of Commerce orientation here.

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Increasingly that position is untenable. So do you think that

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 2>there could be some significant breakage within the own part

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:11.720
<v Speaker 2>his own party, you know, among senate Senate Republicans in particular,

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 2>from Trump and this tariff insanity.

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:18.319
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think it's it's common, especially like if we

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 8>get to Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and we're in a bear

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:22.319
<v Speaker 8>market and the recession is.

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 6>Hitting, their need to be loyal to Trump will start

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 6>to crack.

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 8>And I think you're seeing some signs that already, with

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:35.439
<v Speaker 8>this still somewhat tepid Commressional Review of Terror Policy bill

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 8>moving forward forward to you're seeing more Republicans than would

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 8>have been conceivable a few weeks ago sign up for that,

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 8>but that's not really going to be enough to brain

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 8>Trump in at all, just based on the text of legislation.

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 8>Will more aggressive legislation be proposed if this gets worse,

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 8>I definitely think so. I mean, it's incredible to think about.

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 8>You know, Commssional Republicans were furious about President Biden's unilateral

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 8>four hundred billion dollars so student loan bailout, and Trump,

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.080
<v Speaker 8>by the White House's own accounting, is moving forward with

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 8>a unilateral six trillion dollar tax fike, you know, more

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 8>than ten times the size of the student loan bailout.

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 8>The legal questions there are certainly different, but you know,

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 8>I think a lot of Republicans in their bones are

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 8>not okay with this, and you're going to hear from

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 8>them pretty soon.

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 6>I agree.

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, then, thank you for joining us. We appreciate it.

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Thanks Jeff, I know you're super busy. We really appreciate it.

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:29.439
<v Speaker 4>Thanks you too.

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:34.359
<v Speaker 2>So you're just talking to Jeff stin there about how

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Republicans may react to all of this, and they will

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 2>likely be watching very closely the public reaction to what

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:43.800
<v Speaker 2>is going on in the markets and with Trump's tariff policy.

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Harry Enton took a look last week at the polling

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 2>that we do have at this point about how Americans

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 2>feel about this direction.

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:51.319
<v Speaker 4>Let's go ahead and take a listen to that.

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 7>The Press secretary criticize the people she calls the naysayers

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 7>when it comes to these tariffs.

0:42:57.680 --> 0:42:58.799
<v Speaker 1>Who are the naysayers?

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:01.760
<v Speaker 10>The nay sayers are the majority of the American public.

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 10>It's the American people who are the naysayers. Oppose new

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 10>tariffs on other countries all goods. Look at this, fifty

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:12.760
<v Speaker 10>six percent of Americans opposed new tariffs on all goods.

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:16.879
<v Speaker 10>How about cars in particular, fifty six percent of Americans

0:43:17.080 --> 0:43:21.359
<v Speaker 10>oppose new tariffs on imported cars in park car parts. Look,

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 10>the bottom line is the American people oppose, oppose, opposed, No, no, no,

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 10>they do not want new tariffs. I looked at a

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 10>ton of polling. You It's really hard to find any

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 10>in which you find folks supporting new tariffs. Maybe against China,

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 10>but against all other countries, especially our allies. No no,

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 10>noose a pose a posts.

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 7>So Caroline love It again told Kate in that discussion

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 7>that the president is is laser focused on reducing prices.

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:51.879
<v Speaker 7>What do voters say that they believe the tariffs will

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 7>do to prices.

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 10>What do voters believe the tariffs will do to prices?

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:58.440
<v Speaker 10>At least in the short term? Tariffs will raise prices? Again,

0:43:58.480 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 10>what did we get here? Ey two percent of Americans

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:04.319
<v Speaker 10>overall say that the prices will go up in the

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 10>short term. How about among Republicans through Republican base. This

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 10>was a shocker to me. Sixty four percent of Republicans

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 10>believe that tariffs will in fact cause prices to go

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 10>up in the near term. And get this, just five percent,

0:44:18.400 --> 0:44:21.399
<v Speaker 10>five percent of Americans overall believe that tarifs, at least

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 10>in the short term, will bring down prices. You don't

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 10>have to be a mathematical genius to know, mister Berman,

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 10>that seventy two beats five.

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of a lot of warnings there for

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 2>this direction from the president and for his party. Put

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 2>this up on the screen from you gov. This was

0:44:38.040 --> 0:44:43.000
<v Speaker 2>a poll taken on April third, and they say that

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:48.440
<v Speaker 2>among US adults, only thirteen percent on March ninth through eleventh,

0:44:48.480 --> 0:44:51.360
<v Speaker 2>and then nineteen percent on April third say that raising

0:44:51.400 --> 0:44:55.720
<v Speaker 2>tariffs will help the average American. And there's a big

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:59.879
<v Speaker 2>partisan divide here where you know, there's a significant number

0:44:59.880 --> 0:45:02.479
<v Speaker 2>of Republicans who say it will help, but even there

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:04.919
<v Speaker 2>it's not a majory. It is a plurality at thirty

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 2>nine percent. Among Democrats, it's only six percent think they

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 2>will help independence, it's only fourteen percent. So there is

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.799
<v Speaker 2>next two zero confidence among the American public that this

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 2>is actually going to be, you know, taking the medicine

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and on the other side, some grand utopio weight crber.

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right.

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 3>If you look at it overall, and we still have

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 3>not yet seen the impact. That's actually the probably the

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:30.560
<v Speaker 3>most important point to underscore. This is where you start at.

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:33.760
<v Speaker 3>This is the market is the leading indicator. The price

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 3>at Walmart hasn't gone up yet, right, you haven't actually

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 3>been seen the layoffs. We just know that that it's

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 3>likely coming unless there's some major impact. But in the interim,

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 3>this is the baseline from which you're beginning with. So

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 3>that's really not where you want to be. Let's go

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 3>and put the next one up there on the screen, though,

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:51.880
<v Speaker 3>and this is the word of caution for everybody who's

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:55.279
<v Speaker 3>out there who is hoping and praying for some big

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 3>shift in the Republican base. I'm not so sure it

0:45:58.160 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 3>says quote Republican skepticism of free trade service. When voters

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 3>were asked whether tariff's help or hurt the economy, seventy

0:46:04.160 --> 0:46:07.400
<v Speaker 3>seven percent said tariff's help create jobs and our beneficial.

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Ninety three percent of Democrats that they raise prices in

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 3>our negative force. The survey was taken before this market

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 3>down on Thursday and Friday, but it is still, you know,

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:19.840
<v Speaker 3>an indicator of where things were beforehand. Trump successfully completely

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:23.760
<v Speaker 3>flipped that in terms of the Republican and the Democratic basis,

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:26.359
<v Speaker 3>how they thought broadly about tariffs, probably the.

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Best idea of negative polarization.

0:46:28.719 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 3>But it does just show us that even with everything

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 3>that there is right now, you and I all need

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 3>to remember the level of trust that a lot of

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:40.360
<v Speaker 3>these Republican voters have in Donald Trump. They don't trust

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 3>the media. They don't trust you know, the New York Times,

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 3>the Wall Street Journal or CNBC.

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>If anything.

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 3>They liked seeing Jim Kramer and these other people panicking.

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Right there's a lot of negative polarization. In fact, the

0:46:50.880 --> 0:46:55.399
<v Speaker 3>best argument I've heard that's pro tariff is everybody who

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:57.840
<v Speaker 3>was wrong about this, this, this, and this are the

0:46:57.840 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 3>people who are upset about tariffs.

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:00.719
<v Speaker 1>I sympathize with that.

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, whenever you see yourself as I do, find

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 3>somehow in agreement with people posting Milton Friedman memes.

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Makes me cringe. I'm like, maybe I'm entirely wrong about

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 1>this entire thing. I don't think so.

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 3>But obviously anybody who thinks they're right, you know, broadly does.

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 1>But that is the broader thinking.

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 3>You have an entire part of the American electorate which

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 3>is negatively polarized against every institution.

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Trying to tell them that this is wrong.

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 3>It's only going to harden their beliefs almost certainly at

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 3>an emotional level. And really, I don't think that there

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 3>will be any grand flip for them unless there is

0:47:32.520 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 3>some serious economic fallout. And you know, as we just said,

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:38.640
<v Speaker 3>it's just not there yet. Yes, the stock market and

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:40.719
<v Speaker 3>all of that is there, but that's just you know,

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 3>a prelude. If you think about h nine, what was

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 3>the absolute bottom and the worst part of it, It's

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 3>not when the market drop by fifty percent. It's when

0:47:48.040 --> 0:47:50.680
<v Speaker 3>people were fire sailing their houses and you know, people

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:53.799
<v Speaker 3>were showing up to occupy Wall Street. It takes some

0:47:53.840 --> 0:47:56.680
<v Speaker 3>eighteen months for this stuff to really bleed into the

0:47:56.719 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 3>overall economy, somebody goes to the bank, you know, or

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:02.319
<v Speaker 3>somebody goes to that bank there. People are not lending,

0:48:02.360 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 3>there's a liquidity crunch this you know, rate crises and

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:07.719
<v Speaker 3>all this. So get fired from my job six months

0:48:07.800 --> 0:48:11.120
<v Speaker 3>later because cash reserves have fallen down. That's when the

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:14.279
<v Speaker 3>stuff really starts to roll. So we're still not there yet.

0:48:14.400 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 3>I think people should buckle up.

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Republicans are very much in trust the plan mode. Yeah,

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:20.840
<v Speaker 2>no doubt about it. Like you said, they don't believe

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:22.879
<v Speaker 2>anybody but Trump. And so if Trump is like this

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:24.560
<v Speaker 2>is going to be great, they're like, all right, well

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 2>we'll see. Maybe it's going to be great.

0:48:26.160 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:48:27.239 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 2>And the question is, and if we could put the

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 2>last element actually up on the screen here, guys, see five.

0:48:33.680 --> 0:48:37.840
<v Speaker 2>The question is, once it gets from quote unquote just

0:48:38.520 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 2>a market drop and you start to see even more

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:48.359
<v Speaker 2>companies laying off workers and prices are going up, and

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:52.319
<v Speaker 2>you you know, likely are in a situation of stagflation

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:57.560
<v Speaker 2>and the economic disaster in ordinary people's lives. If we

0:48:57.640 --> 0:49:01.520
<v Speaker 2>get to a place, god forbid where that becomes undeniable,

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:05.200
<v Speaker 2>does that change anything, and you know, the lowest approval ratings.

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:07.040
<v Speaker 2>This is a Nate Cone rite up. He says, Republican's

0:49:07.040 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 2>tariffs suppose a risk like no other. Trump's political strength

0:49:09.640 --> 0:49:11.239
<v Speaker 2>is built on the economy. If it thinks he could

0:49:11.320 --> 0:49:15.400
<v Speaker 2>drag his party down with him, he has a whole

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:17.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, look at the way that recessions have normally

0:49:18.040 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 2>worked out for presidents, and this one, if we do

0:49:21.360 --> 0:49:25.239
<v Speaker 2>end up in recession, will be completely self inflicted and

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 2>there will be no ability like Obama in ten twenty

0:49:29.120 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 2>twelve is like, Hey, I'm still trying to pull a

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:33.920
<v Speaker 2>down of this mess that these last guys left, you know, Biden.

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Same thing with Trump coming out of the COVID crash,

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:39.080
<v Speaker 2>like I'm just trying to get things back together after

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:41.759
<v Speaker 2>these people screwed things up. Trump is not going to

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:45.320
<v Speaker 2>have that luck to like he owns this one hundred percent.

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:48.040
<v Speaker 2>There is no ability to be like, oh but Joe Biden, No,

0:49:48.280 --> 0:49:50.400
<v Speaker 2>you are the one who did this and architect of this,

0:49:50.600 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 2>so it lands in your lap. So if there is

0:49:53.120 --> 0:49:57.120
<v Speaker 2>a recession, it will undeniably be because of the singular

0:49:57.160 --> 0:50:01.399
<v Speaker 2>person of Donald J. Trump, and Nate writes in this piece,

0:50:01.440 --> 0:50:04.400
<v Speaker 2>he says the tariff announced Wednesday, how introduce a political

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:07.160
<v Speaker 2>problem of an entirely different magnitude for Trump and his party.

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:11.680
<v Speaker 2>No party or politician of recession proof. Historically, even truly

0:50:11.800 --> 0:50:15.359
<v Speaker 2>dominant political parties have suffered enormous political defeats during major

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:18.480
<v Speaker 2>economic downturns. In none of those cases, not even with

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 2>the infamous Smoot Holly tariff, could the president be held

0:50:21.640 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 2>responsible for the downturn as self evidently as today and

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:28.200
<v Speaker 2>whatever it may have felt like after the election, the

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Republican Party is not even close to politically dominant. Keep

0:50:32.640 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 2>in mind, and this is part of why Trump is,

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:40.240
<v Speaker 2>I think, in such complete giving no fox about anything mode.

0:50:40.440 --> 0:50:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Is like he doesn't care about the Republican Party. He

0:50:42.840 --> 0:50:45.200
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really care if it's a complete bloodbath in the midterms.

0:50:45.200 --> 0:50:49.160
<v Speaker 2>He's doing whatever he wants anyway. And so you also

0:50:49.200 --> 0:50:51.279
<v Speaker 2>have to keep in mind, as popular as he is

0:50:51.320 --> 0:50:52.719
<v Speaker 2>with the base, he's not going to be on the

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:57.040
<v Speaker 2>ballot in the midterm elections. And we have seen consistently

0:50:57.360 --> 0:51:00.399
<v Speaker 2>that his popularity with the Republican base does not sleep

0:51:00.480 --> 0:51:04.839
<v Speaker 2>over to the broader Republican Party. So yeah, they have

0:51:04.920 --> 0:51:07.440
<v Speaker 2>to be looking at the results in Wisconsin have to

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:10.560
<v Speaker 2>be looking at the leader of their the undisplayed leader

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:14.280
<v Speaker 2>of their party intentionally. It appears crashing the entire economy

0:51:14.560 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 2>and go oh shit, Like if we're in if I'm

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:20.920
<v Speaker 2>in a district that's less than Trump plus fifteen, I'm

0:51:20.960 --> 0:51:23.959
<v Speaker 2>starting to get real nervous looking what is going on here.

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 3>I hate to say it, but you know who I

0:51:25.880 --> 0:51:27.880
<v Speaker 3>see making big bets that I think are going to

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:30.400
<v Speaker 3>pay off, Ted Cruz. And I hate to say it,

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:33.840
<v Speaker 3>but I see him out there. He's counter signaling on tariffs.

0:51:34.000 --> 0:51:37.000
<v Speaker 3>He's talking about tax hikes, he's trying to loop it

0:51:37.040 --> 0:51:41.000
<v Speaker 3>into some of his old school conservatism. And Ted Cruz

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:44.360
<v Speaker 3>is a guy is hardline on immigration but anti tariff,

0:51:44.600 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 3>one of those people who could credibly say I ran

0:51:47.040 --> 0:51:50.440
<v Speaker 3>against Donald Trump in two thousand and sixteen. And I'm

0:51:50.440 --> 0:51:52.480
<v Speaker 3>not just one calling this. Other people are saying. They're like,

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:55.400
<v Speaker 3>I think he's going to challenge Shadey Vance for the nomination,

0:51:55.480 --> 0:51:57.680
<v Speaker 3>and if you think about what the future of that

0:51:57.760 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 3>might look like. Trump has already said he doesn't want

0:51:59.600 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 3>to endorse an Actually he wants to run for a

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 3>third term. But let's assume that he's just going to

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:05.520
<v Speaker 3>slip this one out and let people.

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Dangle in the wind.

0:52:06.640 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, you would rather be on the record against it.

0:52:10.200 --> 0:52:12.960
<v Speaker 3>And I again, I hate to say it, because I

0:52:12.960 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 3>think Ted Cruz is totally wrong. Ted Cruz is an

0:52:15.040 --> 0:52:18.040
<v Speaker 3>actual on iroonic free trader, doesn't believe in tariff's at all.

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Who believes in you know, this Tea party libertarian vision.

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:23.560
<v Speaker 3>But let's be honest. I mean, the bad way that

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 3>this is all being handled and rolled out, it's going

0:52:26.480 --> 0:52:30.719
<v Speaker 3>to poison the well of tariff discussion for a generation.

0:52:30.440 --> 0:52:30.919
<v Speaker 4>Really sucks.

0:52:31.160 --> 0:52:31.840
<v Speaker 1>It's horrible.

0:52:32.000 --> 0:52:33.640
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking about it, you know, in terms of

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:36.560
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and eight, for people like us who really

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:40.520
<v Speaker 3>became politically aware at that time. Anytime I hear about

0:52:40.600 --> 0:52:43.480
<v Speaker 3>leverage or credit default, I'm just like, no, you know,

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:46.440
<v Speaker 3>it's it's baked in for all of us who lived

0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:49.279
<v Speaker 3>through all of that. Well, think about if you're you know, me,

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:52.920
<v Speaker 3>twelve years younger, what are you living through right man?

0:52:52.960 --> 0:52:55.920
<v Speaker 3>If you're a college senior right now, Holy shit, can

0:52:56.000 --> 0:52:59.399
<v Speaker 3>you imagine having to graduate into this economy? I mean

0:52:59.440 --> 0:53:01.760
<v Speaker 3>it'd be one of the those where if you especially

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.279
<v Speaker 3>you know, with the overall lee times for where we are,

0:53:04.480 --> 0:53:08.279
<v Speaker 3>what we're only a month or so away from college graduation.

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I think, what are they going to do? Yeah, I

0:53:09.760 --> 0:53:11.239
<v Speaker 1>mean what are you going to do?

0:53:11.640 --> 0:53:13.920
<v Speaker 3>And there are a lot of signs, just like, oh

0:53:14.080 --> 0:53:17.840
<v Speaker 3>nine law school applications are double what they were just

0:53:17.920 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 3>from last year. That's a terrible sign. It means people

0:53:21.120 --> 0:53:23.680
<v Speaker 3>are willing to leverage up to two hundred k in

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:25.920
<v Speaker 3>the hopes that things are better three years from now.

0:53:25.920 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 3>By the way, news flash, it's not going to be.

0:53:27.760 --> 0:53:30.279
<v Speaker 3>But as those people found out at that time, I

0:53:30.320 --> 0:53:31.759
<v Speaker 3>know a lot of those folks that didn't end up

0:53:31.760 --> 0:53:33.920
<v Speaker 3>working out so well for them. But all of the

0:53:33.960 --> 0:53:37.120
<v Speaker 3>signs are there. So you're graduating in a month. Okay, No,

0:53:37.280 --> 0:53:40.400
<v Speaker 3>we're looking at occupy again. That's what happened last time

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:43.480
<v Speaker 3>eighteen months or so. And so the polling and the

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:45.000
<v Speaker 3>way that the base and all of that will be

0:53:45.080 --> 0:53:49.440
<v Speaker 3>negatively impacted could genuinely poison the well on tariffs, not

0:53:49.520 --> 0:53:51.920
<v Speaker 3>just for them, but for the entire country writ large.

0:53:52.000 --> 0:53:55.279
<v Speaker 3>And it's again I hate this because politically we are

0:53:55.320 --> 0:53:56.680
<v Speaker 3>such a yo yo nation.

0:53:56.880 --> 0:53:57.480
<v Speaker 1>We're just going to.

0:53:57.520 --> 0:54:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Flip back to some sort of Obama as you know argument,

0:54:01.280 --> 0:54:03.040
<v Speaker 3>which is gonna make a lot of sense to a

0:54:03.080 --> 0:54:04.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of people and who were willing to listen.

0:54:05.280 --> 0:54:08.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, and it's unfortunate because there actually was a

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:14.160
<v Speaker 2>new bipartisan consensus around some level of intelligent trade protectionism.

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:17.960
<v Speaker 4>You know, Trump and Trump could have claimed credit for that. Absolutely.

0:54:18.040 --> 0:54:20.960
<v Speaker 2>He started that interaction with the taries he put on China,

0:54:21.040 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 2>which I supported, you supported. They didn't actually accomplish that

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:28.080
<v Speaker 2>much because they weren't paired with industrial policy, but they

0:54:28.080 --> 0:54:30.239
<v Speaker 2>did open the door. And then Biden is able with

0:54:30.280 --> 0:54:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Inflation Reduction Act in the Chips Act, which again no

0:54:32.560 --> 0:54:34.840
<v Speaker 2>one is saying that this is like remade the economy

0:54:34.880 --> 0:54:36.839
<v Speaker 2>and it was the end all be all, but these

0:54:36.840 --> 0:54:40.759
<v Speaker 2>were significant investments that were paying off. They genuinely were

0:54:40.800 --> 0:54:45.239
<v Speaker 2>working for critical investments for industries that are going to

0:54:45.280 --> 0:54:47.759
<v Speaker 2>be important in the future and important for national security.

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:51.000
<v Speaker 2>And Trump is blowing that up. And now you know

0:54:51.120 --> 0:54:55.840
<v Speaker 2>that consensus about Arris. There's this western Pennsylvania Democratic representatives

0:54:55.920 --> 0:55:00.680
<v Speaker 2>like represents an area around Pittsburgh, Representative Luzio, and we're

0:55:00.680 --> 0:55:02.000
<v Speaker 2>trying to get him on the show. Actually I think

0:55:02.000 --> 0:55:03.759
<v Speaker 2>we haven't booked for this week. I want to speak

0:55:03.760 --> 0:55:05.440
<v Speaker 2>with him, but you know, he comes from this like

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:08.239
<v Speaker 2>blue collar part of Pennsylvania and very like union heavy,

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:10.759
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. And he put out this video that was like, listen, guys,

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:14.920
<v Speaker 2>tariffs in certain certain circumstances, yes, but what Trump is

0:55:14.960 --> 0:55:15.720
<v Speaker 2>doing is crazy.

0:55:15.760 --> 0:55:18.080
<v Speaker 4>Like he's very clear, I oppose this thing that is

0:55:18.120 --> 0:55:18.960
<v Speaker 4>being done.

0:55:19.160 --> 0:55:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Democrats will ript Liberals got living him to shreds for

0:55:23.120 --> 0:55:27.040
<v Speaker 2>daring to say that in some instances tariffs are good

0:55:27.280 --> 0:55:30.440
<v Speaker 2>and that's where that's where the Democratic Party is going

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:33.200
<v Speaker 2>to be, unfortunately, and that is where so much of

0:55:33.239 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 2>the country is going to be because it's difficult to

0:55:36.000 --> 0:55:38.719
<v Speaker 2>have this nuance like think, tariffs are a tool, right,

0:55:38.719 --> 0:55:40.560
<v Speaker 2>they can be used in a good way, and they

0:55:40.560 --> 0:55:42.719
<v Speaker 2>can be used in a very bad way. But it's

0:55:42.719 --> 0:55:45.359
<v Speaker 2>hard to have that nuanced conversation when they're being used

0:55:45.400 --> 0:55:47.320
<v Speaker 2>to just intentionally crash the markets and blow up the

0:55:47.360 --> 0:55:47.960
<v Speaker 2>whole economy.

0:55:48.000 --> 0:55:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Totally, I totally agree.

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:50.960
<v Speaker 3>I can see it coming from a mile away, is

0:55:51.000 --> 0:55:55.160
<v Speaker 3>that this negative polarization and increasing the way already the

0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:57.240
<v Speaker 3>way that it is. The Democrats are done with tariffs,

0:55:57.239 --> 0:55:59.160
<v Speaker 3>probably for an entire generation.

0:55:59.280 --> 0:55:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Keep going.

0:55:59.760 --> 0:56:02.719
<v Speaker 3>The dependents will join you there, and eventually the non

0:56:02.760 --> 0:56:05.240
<v Speaker 3>MAGA part or whatever is left of the Republican party,

0:56:05.360 --> 0:56:08.840
<v Speaker 3>and you'll find yourself at a supermajority who supports things.

0:56:08.680 --> 0:56:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Like TPP or whatever, you know, and we're.

0:56:11.239 --> 0:56:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Going to be right back from where we started twenty

0:56:13.520 --> 0:56:16.040
<v Speaker 3>five years from now. And so this is where, look,

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:18.920
<v Speaker 3>you do need to blame the practitioners, where if you're

0:56:18.920 --> 0:56:22.160
<v Speaker 3>gonna do something which is genuinely extraordinary, you have to

0:56:22.200 --> 0:56:24.560
<v Speaker 3>do it right now. Nobody is saying Donald J. Trump

0:56:24.600 --> 0:56:27.120
<v Speaker 3>is mister detail or any of that, but I mean,

0:56:27.200 --> 0:56:29.839
<v Speaker 3>at a basic level, what people I think voted for

0:56:30.160 --> 0:56:32.600
<v Speaker 3>is there's this idea that there's a senile old man

0:56:32.640 --> 0:56:33.280
<v Speaker 3>in the White House.

0:56:33.400 --> 0:56:35.160
<v Speaker 1>We're going to restore things to normalcy.

0:56:35.400 --> 0:56:38.200
<v Speaker 3>And yes, we'll have our chaos in terms of Trump,

0:56:38.440 --> 0:56:42.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, drum thing about Mika Brazinski's facelift. But but

0:56:43.480 --> 0:56:46.200
<v Speaker 3>and p goes up, the gospel gas price goes down,

0:56:46.480 --> 0:56:49.480
<v Speaker 3>the people around him seem to generally ish more competent

0:56:49.520 --> 0:56:53.160
<v Speaker 3>compared to these Jake Sullivan type idiots or Anthony Blincoln.

0:56:53.280 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 3>So fine, but that's not what you're getting now. Like

0:56:55.719 --> 0:56:58.520
<v Speaker 3>you said, now you own this thing one hundred percent.

0:56:58.840 --> 0:56:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:56:59.520 --> 0:57:02.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, people say, like, oh, he's a world historic figure.

0:57:03.000 --> 0:57:05.000
<v Speaker 3>He's making a huge bet and it is true. Trump

0:57:05.040 --> 0:57:07.600
<v Speaker 3>is actually fundamentally a gambler. He believes that he can

0:57:07.760 --> 0:57:10.120
<v Speaker 3>do this and he can get away with it. Obviously,

0:57:10.120 --> 0:57:12.280
<v Speaker 3>he's ten times more successful than I am in politics,

0:57:12.320 --> 0:57:14.800
<v Speaker 3>so maybe he's right. But it's one of those where

0:57:15.000 --> 0:57:18.640
<v Speaker 3>you can see all of the building blocks for a crisis.

0:57:18.760 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 3>I was talking thinking about this with Doge as well.

0:57:21.560 --> 0:57:23.600
<v Speaker 3>At a certain point, it's no longer up to you.

0:57:23.760 --> 0:57:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Like I said before about that whole airline disaster, imagine

0:57:27.280 --> 0:57:28.920
<v Speaker 3>if they had fired air traffic controllers and you had

0:57:28.960 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 3>a crash. Even if you're not responsible that crash, you're

0:57:31.120 --> 0:57:32.640
<v Speaker 3>getting blamed for that crash.

0:57:32.720 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with what's.

0:57:33.760 --> 0:57:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Happening right now with the economic you know, with these

0:57:36.720 --> 0:57:40.360
<v Speaker 3>economic the tariffs and a potential recession. Let's say that

0:57:40.560 --> 0:57:44.920
<v Speaker 3>something totally out of the norm happens. Remember previous recessions

0:57:45.040 --> 0:57:47.720
<v Speaker 3>that have sparked actual sell offs like this nine to

0:57:47.760 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 3>eleven and the pandemic.

0:57:49.360 --> 0:57:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Who knows shit happens. That's one of the rules of

0:57:53.040 --> 0:57:54.480
<v Speaker 1>running the world. Do you have no idea?

0:57:54.640 --> 0:57:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Russia invades Ukraine, boom gas market entirely implode. Same October seventh,

0:57:59.640 --> 0:58:02.760
<v Speaker 3>changed the entire route of every shipping container in the

0:58:02.840 --> 0:58:05.919
<v Speaker 3>entire world. You never you can't plan for such an event.

0:58:05.960 --> 0:58:08.840
<v Speaker 3>So let's say he's got this grand plan and then boom,

0:58:08.960 --> 0:58:09.920
<v Speaker 3>something happens.

0:58:09.960 --> 0:58:11.120
<v Speaker 1>You know in the world.

0:58:11.160 --> 0:58:13.760
<v Speaker 3>Now you're in that fortieth order consequence. But you are

0:58:13.800 --> 0:58:16.240
<v Speaker 3>going to bear one hundred percent of the responsibility for that.

0:58:16.280 --> 0:58:18.240
<v Speaker 3>And people don't forgive and you know, honestly, they shouldn't

0:58:18.240 --> 0:58:18.560
<v Speaker 3>forgive you.

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:19.480
<v Speaker 1>They shouldn't forgive you.

0:58:19.480 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 3>He screwed people's lives and if you get laid off

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:23.120
<v Speaker 3>as a result of them, well, I don't know what

0:58:23.160 --> 0:58:23.480
<v Speaker 3>to tell you.

0:58:23.520 --> 0:58:25.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the number one thing you're not supposed to do.

0:58:25.360 --> 0:58:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he said some really wild things too, Like he

0:58:28.760 --> 0:58:30.440
<v Speaker 2>said there should be no supply chains.

0:58:30.440 --> 0:58:31.680
<v Speaker 4>They should all be in the US.

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:35.080
<v Speaker 2>This is like, it's like the philosophy of North Korea,

0:58:35.200 --> 0:58:37.680
<v Speaker 2>like unironically the philosophy.

0:58:37.120 --> 0:58:40.440
<v Speaker 3>As I've heard, my heart is in my heart, I

0:58:40.480 --> 0:58:43.360
<v Speaker 3>am autarchist, which is what you're talking about. That's what

0:58:43.400 --> 0:58:45.440
<v Speaker 3>the North Korean model is, And just why do we

0:58:45.480 --> 0:58:47.960
<v Speaker 3>really need all of these other countries. That's where my

0:58:48.000 --> 0:58:50.120
<v Speaker 3>heart is. That is not where my head and my

0:58:50.600 --> 0:58:53.760
<v Speaker 3>stock portfolio. It's more the reality of all of the

0:58:53.800 --> 0:58:56.120
<v Speaker 3>global supply chain. It would be great to get you know,

0:58:56.200 --> 0:58:58.640
<v Speaker 3>twenty percent more autarchic, you know, be a nice little

0:58:58.680 --> 0:59:00.959
<v Speaker 3>goal for us. But you know, look, let's be real.

0:59:01.000 --> 0:59:02.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, if we want to do that, it's going

0:59:02.160 --> 0:59:03.720
<v Speaker 3>to take a billion dollars in investment. We're going to

0:59:03.800 --> 0:59:06.720
<v Speaker 3>need actually not a billion, many many more than the

0:59:07.040 --> 0:59:09.640
<v Speaker 3>hundreds and hundreds. Yeah, it's probably be a trillion dollars.

0:59:09.640 --> 0:59:12.440
<v Speaker 3>And even that, maybe we'll get five ten percent. It's

0:59:12.440 --> 0:59:15.880
<v Speaker 3>a start at the very least. It's a philosophy. If anything,

0:59:15.920 --> 0:59:19.200
<v Speaker 3>I think Trump is negatively polarizing US, and I think

0:59:19.240 --> 0:59:21.520
<v Speaker 3>ten years from now, what you're going to watch is

0:59:21.600 --> 0:59:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Trump is a lot like FDR in that, you know,

0:59:24.320 --> 0:59:26.919
<v Speaker 3>he showed people what was possible in such a way

0:59:26.920 --> 0:59:28.760
<v Speaker 3>that people are like, I'm not so sure about this.

0:59:29.000 --> 0:59:30.800
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump will be the very last president to have

0:59:30.800 --> 0:59:33.720
<v Speaker 3>IEBA authority. I'm one hundred percent confident of that. Donald

0:59:33.720 --> 0:59:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Trump will be the very last president to be able

0:59:35.480 --> 0:59:38.240
<v Speaker 3>to you know, alien enemies. That's getting some sort of

0:59:38.800 --> 0:59:40.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, when the House takes credit just like they

0:59:40.840 --> 0:59:43.000
<v Speaker 3>passed the twenty second Amendment, they're going to say and

0:59:43.120 --> 0:59:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Congress has to approve by fifty or two votes or whatever,

0:59:46.760 --> 0:59:49.280
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of the things that he's pushing right now.

0:59:49.400 --> 0:59:52.000
<v Speaker 3>The legacy of that will actually likely be one of

0:59:52.200 --> 0:59:55.400
<v Speaker 3>reaction and reassertion I think by Congress obviously could be

0:59:55.480 --> 0:59:55.960
<v Speaker 3>totally wrong.

0:59:56.000 --> 0:59:59.160
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, well, last thought on this on the sort

0:59:59.160 --> 1:00:01.840
<v Speaker 2>of broad historical sweep, I mean, in part because of

1:00:01.880 --> 1:00:04.360
<v Speaker 2>the disaster of the Smoot Holly terraces and how they

1:00:04.400 --> 1:00:07.960
<v Speaker 2>exacerbated the Great Depression. You know, progressives, FDR was a

1:00:08.000 --> 1:00:10.840
<v Speaker 2>free trade guy. I mean, you know, moved very much

1:00:10.840 --> 1:00:12.640
<v Speaker 2>in the direction of thing.

1:00:12.680 --> 1:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not a hundred like that's a very free freedman

1:00:15.240 --> 1:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and monitorist.

1:00:16.040 --> 1:00:18.240
<v Speaker 2>But it did make the during depression worse. Like at

1:00:18.280 --> 1:00:20.320
<v Speaker 2>that time it was terrible economic policy.

1:00:20.560 --> 1:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm still not ready to say it was. Well, okay, the.

1:00:23.560 --> 1:00:26.840
<v Speaker 4>Monsters it was the only thing, yes.

1:00:26.640 --> 1:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>For and I do not think that is accurate. But

1:00:28.800 --> 1:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>this that's a much more nuance.

1:00:30.800 --> 1:00:34.480
<v Speaker 2>But you know, back to my point, it is widely

1:00:34.520 --> 1:00:37.440
<v Speaker 2>believed and was widely believed at the time that Smoot

1:00:37.480 --> 1:00:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Holly exacerbated the Great Depression, and FDR's whole you know

1:00:42.720 --> 1:00:45.880
<v Speaker 2>push was to roll back trade barriers, and that helps,

1:00:46.080 --> 1:00:50.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, begins an era in which the progressive position

1:00:50.160 --> 1:00:53.640
<v Speaker 2>on trade was for a long time lowering trade barriers

1:00:53.720 --> 1:00:57.840
<v Speaker 2>and lowering tariffs. And during McKinley's time also there was

1:00:57.840 --> 1:01:01.080
<v Speaker 2>actually pushback. It was somewhat divided depending on the industry

1:01:01.080 --> 1:01:03.840
<v Speaker 2>and where you would doing, whether you're a farmer, a manufacturer, whatever.

1:01:03.920 --> 1:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>But you know, there was a long period in which

1:01:06.920 --> 1:01:12.040
<v Speaker 2>the progressive position was a free trade position, and that changed,

1:01:12.320 --> 1:01:14.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, over time. And this that's why, you know,

1:01:14.960 --> 1:01:18.200
<v Speaker 2>I do think there is so there are so many

1:01:18.240 --> 1:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>facets to what is being done right now. It just

1:01:20.440 --> 1:01:23.560
<v Speaker 2>is impossible to wrap your heat around. And I can't

1:01:23.600 --> 1:01:27.640
<v Speaker 2>think of another single policy move that has been made

1:01:27.680 --> 1:01:30.960
<v Speaker 2>by a leader here or around the world. Maybe like

1:01:31.040 --> 1:01:32.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, our decision to enter World War two, but

1:01:32.880 --> 1:01:34.280
<v Speaker 2>that was sort of like made for us when we

1:01:34.280 --> 1:01:37.320
<v Speaker 2>were attacked at Pearl Harbord, but that could have this

1:01:37.480 --> 1:01:44.960
<v Speaker 2>level of both domestic and global radical fallout. And the

1:01:45.040 --> 1:01:47.080
<v Speaker 2>other thing that we haven't even touched on here is

1:01:47.320 --> 1:01:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the world also is going to get

1:01:49.520 --> 1:01:51.800
<v Speaker 2>a say, you know, the Europeans are getting ready to

1:01:51.800 --> 1:01:54.600
<v Speaker 2>announce what their retaliatory tariffs are going to be, or

1:01:54.600 --> 1:01:57.200
<v Speaker 2>what their response is going to be. China's already announced

1:01:57.480 --> 1:02:01.360
<v Speaker 2>quite a significant response You already have had a shift

1:02:01.440 --> 1:02:03.919
<v Speaker 2>in the global power balance. You already had to move

1:02:04.080 --> 1:02:08.480
<v Speaker 2>away somewhat from the dollar as well, and that too

1:02:08.640 --> 1:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>will have a massive global reordering effect, with consequences that

1:02:13.640 --> 1:02:14.640
<v Speaker 2>are hard to comprehend.